scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

A Three-Stage Nonparametric Kernel-Based Time Series Model Based on Fuzzy Data

Abstract

In this paper, a nonlinear time series model is developed for the case when the underlying time series data are reported by 𝐿𝑅 fuzzy numbers. To this end, we present a three-stage nonparametric kernel-based estimation procedure for the center as well as the left and right spreads of the unknown nonlinear fuzzy smooth function. In each stage, the nonparametric Nadaraya–Watson estimator is used to evaluate the center and the spreads of the fuzzy smooth function. A hybrid algorithm is proposed to estimate the unknown optimal bandwidths and autoregressive order simultaneously. Various goodness-of-fit measures are utilized for performance assessment of the fuzzy nonlinear kernel-based time series model and for comparative analysis. The practical applicability and superiority of the novel approach in comparison with further fuzzy time series models are demonstrated via a simulation study and some real-life applications.

Read accessible full text

A Three-Stage Nonparametric Kernel-Based Time Series Model Based on Fuzzy Data

Author: Hesamian, Gholamreza,Johannssen, Arne,Chukhrova, Nataliya
Publisher: MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/math11132800
Source: https://repos.hcu-hamburg.de/bitstream/hcu/906/1/mathematics-11-02800.pdf
Ci a ion: Hesamian, G.; Johannssen,
A.; Chukh o a, N. A Th ee-S age
Nonpa ame ic Ke nel-Based Time
Se ies Model Based on Fuzzy Da a.
Ma hema ics 2023,11, 2800. h ps://
doi.o g/10.3390/ma h11132800
Academic Edi o : Sal a o e Sessa
Recei ed: 27 May 2023
Re ised: 13 June 2023
Accep ed: 19 June 2023
Published: 21 June 2023
Copy igh : © 2023 by he au ho s.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Swi ze land.
This a icle is an open access a icle
dis ibu ed unde he e ms and
condi ions o he C ea i e Commons
A ibu ion (CC BY) license (h ps://
c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/
4.0/).
ma hema ics
A icle
A Th ee-S age Nonpa ame ic Ke nel-Based Time Se ies Model
Based on Fuzzy Da a
Gholam eza Hesamian 1, A ne Johannssen 2,* and Na aliya Chukh o a 3
1Depa men o S a is ics, Payame Noo Uni e si y, Teh an 19395-3697, I an; [email p o ec ed]
2Facul y o Business Adminis a ion, Uni e si y o Hambu g, 20146 Hambu g, Ge many
3Ha enCi y Uni e si y o Hambu g, 20457 Hambu g, Ge many; na aliya.chukh [email p o ec ed]
*Co espondence: a ne.johannssen@uni-hambu g.de
Abs ac :
In his pape , a nonlinea ime se ies model is de eloped o he case when he unde lying
ime se ies da a a e epo ed by
LR
uzzy numbe s. To his end, we p esen a h ee-s age nonpa a-
me ic ke nel-based es ima ion p ocedu e o he cen e as well as he le and igh sp eads o he
unknown nonlinea uzzy smoo h unc ion. In each s age, he nonpa ame ic Nada aya–Wa son
es ima o is used o e alua e he cen e and he sp eads o he uzzy smoo h unc ion. A hyb id
algo i hm is p oposed o es ima e he unknown op imal bandwid hs and au o eg essi e o de simul-
aneously. Va ious goodness-o - i measu es a e u ilized o pe o mance assessmen o he uzzy
nonlinea ke nel-based ime se ies model and o compa a i e analysis. The p ac ical applicabili y
and supe io i y o he no el app oach in compa ison wi h u he uzzy ime se ies models a e
demons a ed ia a simula ion s udy and some eal-li e applica ions.
Keywo ds:
uzzy eg ession; uzzy ime se ies model; nonpa ame ic ime se ies analysis; ime
se ies analysis
MSC: 03E72; 37M10; 62A86
1. In oduc ion
The ield o ime se ies analysis comp ises me hods used o analyze he cha ac e is ics
o a esponse a iable wi h espec o ime. I akes in o conside a ion he ac ha obse -
a ions made o e ime may ha e an in e nal s uc u e (such as au oco ela ions, ends,
seasonal and/o cyclic a ia ions) ha should be accoun ed o . The main aims o ime
se ies analysis a e as ollows:
•
T end analysis: o iden i y he unde lying pa e n o end in he da a o e ime, such
as an upwa d o downwa d end.
•
Seasonali y analysis: o iden i y i he da a exhibi a epea ing pa e n o e a se pe iod,
such as daily, weekly, o yea ly.
•Fo ecas ing: o o ecas u u e alues using his o ical da a.
•
Anomaly de ec ion: o iden i y any unusual o unexpec ed obse a ions in he da a ha
de ia e om he no mal pa e n.
•
Model selec ion: o choose an app op ia e model o ep esen he unde lying ela ion-
ships be ween a iables in he da a.
•
Noise educ ion: o emo e any unwan ed a iabili y o andom luc ua ions om he da a
o imp o e he accu acy o p edic ions and make he unde lying pa e ns mo e clea .
These aims can in o m decision make s, p o ide insigh in o he unde lying pa e ns
and ela ionships in he da a, and suppo he de elopmen o da a-d i en s a egies in
a ious ields such as economics, enginee ing, inance, and mo e (see, e.g., [1–8]).
Common ime se ies models ely on exac obse a ions and ensu e c isp p edic ions.
Howe e , due o a ious unce ain y ac o s, i is some imes p e e able o make p edic ions
Ma hema ics 2023,11, 2800. h ps://doi.o g/10.3390/ma h11132800 h ps://www.mdpi.com/jou nal/ma hema ics
Ma hema ics 2023,11, 2800 2 o 17
using imp ecise alues. Fo ins ance, we usually obse e imp ecise obse a ions in ca bon
emissions, social bene i s and oil ese es, among o he s [
9
]. T adi ional s a is ical ime
se ies models ail o add ess p edic ion p oblems based on ambiguous o ague in o ma ion
ep esen ed by uzzy da a. This sho coming can be o e come by ime se ies models ha
use echniques o uzzy s a is ics. In gene al, uzzy s a is ics is a b anch o s a is ics
ha deals wi h unce ain y and imp ecision, e.g., in he da a. I includes, o ins ance,
he ields o uzzy es ima ion, uzzy eg ession, uzzy clus e ing, and uzzy hypo hesis
es ing [10–12].
Fuzzy ime se ies models we e o iginally in oduced in 1993 [
13
], and since hen hey
ha e eplaced con en ional (c isp) ime se ies app oaches when obse a ions a e unce ain.
When conside ing uzzy ime se ies models, he p edic ion o u u e alues equi es h ee
p incipal s eps. In s ep 1, he exac da a a e epo ed. In s ep 2, h ough he iden i ica ion o
uzzy logical ela ions [
14
,
15
], he p edic ions a e ans o med in o uzzy quan i ies. Finally,
s ep 3 p o ides a de uzzi ica ion app oach [
16
–
22
] o ans o m he uzzy alues in o c isp
ones. The echniques used o iden i y uzzy logical ela ions in s ep 2 p ima ily in ol e
uzzy logical ela ion g oups and ma ices [
13
,
23
–
34
], so compu ing me hods [
35
–
44
],
and s a is ical app oaches in in e ac ion wi h uzzy logic [
21
,
24
,
45
–
47
]. S ep 2 is an essen ial
pa o he p edic i e powe o he p esen ed model. Fuzzy ime se ies models ha ely on
imp ecise obse a ions ha e a ac ed subs an ial a en ion in ecen yea s, mainly due o
hei high applicabili y o eal-li e p oblems.
In ac , a lo o esea che s ha e ocused on ime se ies models using imp ecise obse a-
ions. The so compu ing echniques employed in his amewo k a e mos ly combina ions
o a i icial neu al ne wo ks, e olu iona y algo i hms, uzzy and ough se s. These ap-
p oaches a e widely used o c isp o uzzy o ecas s based on c isp pas obse a ions such
as elec ici y load, s ock index p ices and empe a u e ( o a e iew o hese echniques, we
e e o [
48
–
56
]). In addi ion, a ious me hods combine echniques o ime se ies and uzzy
eg ession analysis [
57
]. Fo some ecen ad ances in uzzy eg ession analysis, see [
58
–
63
].
The eliabili y o o ecas ing me hods gene ally equi es exac obse a ions in he
sample. Bu he e is o en only ague in o ma ion ha is gi en in e ms o imp ecise
quan i ies. Mo eo e , he e a e a ious eal-wo ld p oblems ela ed o biological, economic,
en i onmen al, medical and sociological da a whe e we ace inaccu a e ins ead o accu-
a e da a. In many eal-li e applica ions, e.g., mon hly Co
2
emission, annual sea su ace
empe a u e o he wa e le el o a lake, con en ional obse a ions a e o en epo ed as
mean alues. In such cases, he da a ob ained a e no su icien in o ma i e since some
in o ma ion con ained in he ange o he da a is neglec ed. To o e come his sho coming,
one al e na i e would be o epo such kind o da a as in e al alued (compa able o
con en ional con idence in e als). Howe e , a po en ial sho coming o in e al- alued
da a is he ac ha all alues wi hin he in e al ha e he same impo ance. To a oid his
issue o in e al- alued da a, he epo ed da a can al e na i ely be ep esen ed wi h help
o uzzy numbe s [
64
]. These uzzy quan i ies can be modeled ia expe s opinion, o as
simple al e na i e, hey can be cons uc ed ia a me hod p oposed by Buckley [
65
]. In his
app oach, con en ional con idence in e als a e employed o cons uc uzzy numbe s
a ound he con en ional mean alues.
In addi ion o he abo emen ioned me hods, he e a e also uzzy ime se ies models
ha ely on uzzy da a, bu compa a i ely ew o e all. In his ega d, Hesamian and
Akba i [
66
] i s sugges ed a uzzy semi-pa ame ic ime se ies model (
FSPTSM
) based on
uzzy da a, non- uzzy coe icien s, and uzzy smoo h unc ions. Secondly, Za ei e al. [
67
]
used a speci ic a ian o he
FSPTSM
[
66
] o iangula uzzy da a and di e en dis ance
measu es o uzzy da a. And hi dly, Hesamian e al. [
68
] in oduced a o wa d addi i e
ime se ies model (FATSM) o uzzy obse a ions.
In his pape we de elop a uzzy nonpa ame ic ime se ies model (
FNPTSM
) o
uzzy obse a ions ha is inspi ed by nonpa ame ic eg ession models and ke nel smoo h-
ing me hods [
57
]. As an ini ial idea, no e ha in nonpa ame ic eg ession analysis, he
Nada aya-Wa son es ima o [
69
,
70
] is ai ly common. Now, le us conside he issue o pa-
Ma hema ics 2023,11, 2800 3 o 17
ame e es ima ion in he nonlinea eg ession model
x = (x −1
,
x −2
,
. . .
,
x −p) + e
wi h
:Rp→R
. Based on his gene al model, a simple nonpa ame ic way o es ima ing he
unc ion is o employ he ke nel-based Nada aya–Wa son es ima o
b
(x ) =
T∗
∑
j=p+1
wh( ,j)xj(1)
wi h
wh( ,j) =
∑p
i=1Kx −i−xj−i
h
∑T∗
j=p+1∑p
i=1Kx −i−xj−i
h,
whe e
K
is a ke nel unc ion and
h>
0 he bandwid h pa ame e . No e ha he es ima o
(1)
is
a weigh ed a e age o
x1
,
x2
,
. . .
,
xT
using he weigh s
wh(
,
j)
. As o de e mining he op imal
bandwid h h, he Gene alized C oss Valida ion (GCV) c i e ion
bh=a g min
h>0GCV(h) = a g min
h>0
1
T∗−p
T∗
∑
=p+1
x −∑T∗
j=p+1wh( ,j)xj
1− (Wh)
T∗−p

2
can be u ilized, whe e
(Wh)
is he ace o he ma ix
Wh= [wh(
,
j)]
. I is a ma e o
ac ha he es ima ed alues o
a e ensu ed o be wi hin he ange o he esponse
a iable. This bene icial p ope y is one o he easons why we apply he Nada aya–Wa son
ke nel-based es ima o o ou uzzy ime se ies model. By u ilizing his idea, he p oposed
FNPTSM
p o ides an es ima ion p ocedu e o he unknown (nonlinea ) ela ionship be-
ween he uzzy obse a ions in h ee s ages. The ad an age o his me hodology is ha i
conside ably dec eases he complexi y in he es ima ion p ocedu e. While he o he uzzy
ime se ies models [
66
–
68
] a e based on es ima ing he unknown componen s o he model
by uni ying he cen e s and sp eads o uzzy da a and hei co esponding p edic ed alues,
ou p oposed me hod p o ides a smoo h es ima ion p ocedu e acco ding o h ee sepa a e
s ages. In he amewo k o a simula ion s udy and wo eal-da a examples, he e iciency
and app op ia eness o he
FNPTSM
is assessed in compa ison wi h p e ious ime se ies
models o uzzy da a by u ilizing ou app o ed goodness-o - i c i e ia.
The pape is o ganized as ollows. Fi s , we ecall some necessa y concep s ela ed o
uzzy numbe s in Sec ion 2. In Sec ion 3, he h ee-s age nonpa ame ic ke nel-based ime
se ies model using uzzy da a is p esen ed. In Sec ion 4, a ious applica ion examples a e
gi en. Concluding ema ks a e p o ided in Sec ion 5.
2. Fuzzy Numbe s
In his sec ion, we in oduce basic de ini ions o uzzy numbe s ha a e needed o
de elop ou p oposed me hod.
A uzzy se
e
A
is a mapping on
X
ha assigns a speci ic deg ee o membe ship
0
≤µe
A(x)≤
1 o each
x∈X
. In addi ion, a uzzy numbe (
FN
)
e
A
is a con ex no -
malized uzzy se on he eal line
R
wi h an uppe semi-con inuous membe ship unc ion
o bounded suppo [
71
]. In many eal applica ions, ague da a
a
can be epo ed as
e
A
:
“abou
a
”. Such uzzy da a can o en be ep esen ed ia a special case o
FN
s, so called
LR
-
FN
s, which spli
µe
A
in o wo cu es: a pa on he le and a pa on he igh o he
modal alue. So, when conside ing eal-li e applica ions in uzzy en i onmen s,
LR
-
FN
s
play an impo an ole. The membe ship unc ion o an
LR
-
FN µe
A(x) = (a
;
la
,
a)LR
can be
de ined by:
Ma hema ics 2023,11, 2800 4 o 17
µe
A(x) = 






La−x
lai x≤a
Rx−a
ai x>a
(2)
In
(2)
,
L
and
R
a e con inuous and s ic ly dec easing unc ions om
[
0, 1
]
o
[
0, 1
]
sa is ying
L(
0
) = R(
0
) =
1 and
L(
1
) = R(
1
) =
0. In addi ion,
a∈R
ep esen s he
modal alue, while
la>
0 and
a>
0 a e he le sp eads and igh sp eads o
e
A
, espec i ely.
The se o all
LR
-
FN
s is ep esen ed by
FLR(R)
. A special case o an
LR
-
FN
is he so-called
iangula uzzy numbe (TFN), whose membe ship unc ion has he ollowing o m:
µe
A(x) = 






x−(a−la)
laa−la≤x≤a
a+ a−x
aa<x≤a+ a
0 o he wise
The e a e a ious ope a ions ha can be de ined be ween wo
LR
-
FN
s, i.e., be ween
e
A= (a
;
la
,
a)LR
and
e
B= (b
;
lb
,
b)LR
. Fo ins ance, as we need bo h ope a ions in his
pape , we de ine Addi ion and Scala mul iplica ion o e
Aand e
Bin he ollowing [72]:
• Addi ion: e
A⊕e
B= (a+b;la+lb, a+ b)LR
• Scala mul iplica ion:
λ⊗e
A=(λa;λla,λ a)LR i λ>0
(λa;−λ a,−λla)RL i λ<0
Mo eo e , he e a e nume ous concep s used o de ine dis ances be ween wo
LR
-
FN
s
e
A= (a
;
la
,
a)LR
and
e
B= (b
;
lb
,
b)LR
[
71
]. He e, we u ilize he squa ed e o dis ance measu e
D
o pe o mance e alua ion o he
FNPTSM
in compa ison wi h o he models. I is
de ined as
D(e
A,e
B) = (((a−b)2+c1(la−lb)2+c2( a− b)2)/3)0.5
wi h c1=R1
0L−1(α)dαand c2=R1
0R−1(α)dα[73].
3. Nonpa ame ic Ke nel-Based Time Se ies Model o Fuzzy Da a
In his sec ion, he
FNPTSM
is de eloped along wi h he sugges ed pa ame e es ima-
ion me hod.
3.1. The Model
Fi s , we ecall he de ini ion o uzzy ime se ies da a.
De ini ion 1.
Le
exT={ex1
,
ex2
,
. . .
,
exT
be a se o
FN
s o size
T
. Then,
exT
is called uzzy ime se ies
da a i {ex1,ex2, . . . , exTis he ague concep o o dina y ime se ies da a {x1,x2, . . . , xT}[68,74].
As discussed in he In oduc ion, he e a e many si ua ions whe e i is p e e able o
epo exac da a xby an FN e
xas “abou x”. Then, e
xis he espec i e ague concep o x.
De ini ion 2.
Le
exT={e
x1
,
e
x2
,
. . .
,
e
xT
be uzzy ime se ies da a. The
FNPTSM
o uzzy ime
se ies da a exTis hen de ined by
e
x =e
(e
x −1,e
x −2, . . . , e
x −p)⊕ee , (3)
whe e
1. e
x = (x ;lx , x )LR,
2. e
(e
x −1,e
x −2, . . . , e
x −p) = ( (x −1,x −2, . . . , x −p);
l (lx −1,lx −2,...,lx −p), ( x −1, x −2,..., x −p))LR,
Ma hema ics 2023,11, 2800 5 o 17
3. ee = (e ;le , e )LR’s a e uzzy e o s, whe e e ∈Rand le , e ∈R+.
Rema k 1.
No e ha
(3)
p o ides an
FN
in he o m
e
x∗
= (x∗
;
lx∗
,
x∗
)LR
wi h
x∗
= (x −1
,
x −2
,
. . .
,
x −p) + e
,
lx∗
=l (lx −1,...,lx −p)+le
and
x∗
= ( x −1,..., x −p)+ e
wi h
=
1, 2,
. . .
,
T
.
Acco ding o De ini ion 1, as
{x1
,
x2
,
. . .
,
xT}
is o dina y ime se ies da a,
ex∗
T={e
x∗
1
,
e
x∗
2
,
. . .
,
e
x∗
T
is also a ague concep o o dina y ime se ies da a
{x∗
1
,
x∗
2
,
. . .
,
x∗
T
. Thus, he p oposed uzzy ime
se ies model (3)gene a es new uzzy ime se ies da a.
3.2. Th ee-S age Es ima ion Me hod o he Nonlinea Fuzzy Smoo h Func ion
Below, we sugges a h ee-s age me hod o es ima e he unknown uzzy smoo h unc-
ion
e
in
(3)
. Fo his pu pose, he uzzy p edic ions a e ob ained based on a wi hin-sample
o ecas
xT∗=x1
,
x2
,
. . .
,
xT∗>
wi h
T∗<T
. F om
(3)
, one can ge h ee o dina y non-
linea ime se ies models as (1)
x = (x −1
,
x −2
,
. . .
,
x −p) + e
, (2)
lx =l (lx −1,...,lx −p)+le
,
and (3)
x = ( x −1,..., x −p)+ e
o
=
1, 2,
. . .
,
T∗
. The e o e, o es ima e he uzzy smoo h
unc ion a
ex= (x
;
lx
,
x)T
wi h
x= (x1
,
x2
,
. . .
,
xp)>
,
lx= (lx1
,
lx2
,
. . .
,
lxp)>
and
x= ( x1
,
x2, . . . , xp)>, we ollow he h ee-s age p ocedu e below:
•S age
(1): Conside he nonlinea eg ession model
lx =l (x −1,x −2,...,x −p)+le
.
Based on he ime se ies da a
lx = (lx −1
,
. . .
,
lx −p)>
, we employ he weigh ed
Nada aya–Wa son es ima o o es ima e
l
o a wi hin-sample o ecas
T∗≤T
a
lx= (lx1, . . . , lxp)>)as
lb
(lx )=
T∗
∑
j=p+1
whl( ,j)lxj,
whe e
whl( ,j) =
∑p
i=1Klx −i−lxj−i
hl
∑T∗
j=p+1∑p
i=1Klx −i−lxj−i
hl(4)
wi h ke nel unc ion
K(
.
)
and bandwid h pa ame e
hl>
0. The op imal alue o
hl
can be es ima ed by implemen ing he GCV c i e ion,
bhl=a g min
hl>0GCV(h) = a g min
hl>0
1
T∗−p
T∗
∑
=p+1

lx −∑T∗
j=p+1whl( ,j)lxj
1− (Whl)
T∗−p



2
, (5)
whe e
(Whl)
is he ace o he ma ix
Whl= [whl(
,
j)]
wi h
whl(
,
j)
as de ined in
(4)
.
•S age
(2): Conside he nonlinea eg ession model
x = (x −1,x −2,...,x −p)+ e
. Based
on he wi hin-sample ime se ies o ecas da a
x = ( x −1
,
. . .
,
x −p)>
,
=
1, 2,
. . .
,
T∗
,
he weigh ed Nada aya–Wa son es ima ion o
a
x= ( x1
,
. . .
,
xp)>)
can be es ab-
lished ia
b
( x )=
T∗
∑
j=p+1
wh ( ,j) xj,
whe e
wh ( ,j) =
∑p
i=1K x −i− xj−i
h 
∑T∗
j=p+1∑p
i=1K x −i− xj−i
h (6)

Ma hema ics 2023,11, 2800 6 o 17
and
h >
0 is a bandwid h pa ame e . The op imal alue o
h
can be es ima ed using
he GCV c i e ion,
bh =a g min
h >0GCV(h) = a g min
h >0
1
T∗−p
T∗
∑
=p+1
 x −∑T∗
j=p+1wh ( ,j) xj
1− (Wh )
T∗−p

2
, (7)
whe e (Wh )is he ace o he ma ix Wh = [wh ( ,j)] wi h wh ( ,j)as de ined in (6).
•S age
(3): Conside he nonlinea eg ession model
x = (x −1
,
x −2
,
. . .
,
x −p) + e
.
Based on he wi hin-sample ime se ies o ecas da a
(x = (x −1
,
x −2
,
. . .
,
x −p)>)
,
=1, 2, . . . , T∗, a nonpa ame ic es ima o can be achie ed as
b
(x ) =
T∗
∑
j=p+1
wh( ,j)xj,
whe e
wh( ,j) =
∑p
i=1Kx −i−xj−i
h
∑T∗
j=p+1∑p
i=1Kx −i−xj−i
h(8)
and bandwid h pa ame e
h>
0. Simila o he p e ious s ages, he op imal alue o
his es ima ed wi h he help o he GCV c i e ion,
bh=a g min
h>0GCV(h) = a g min
h>0
1
T∗−p
T∗
∑
=p+1
x −∑T∗
j=p+1wh( ,j)xj
1− (Wh)
T∗−p

2
, (9)
whe e (Wh)is he ace o he ma ix Wh= [wh( ,j)] wi h wh( ,j), as de ined in (8).
The e o e, he o ecas
e
xT∗+k
wi h ime lag
k∈N
can be achie ed by an
LR
-
FN
ia
eb
xT∗+k= (b
xT∗+k;lb
xT∗+k, b
xT∗+k)LR wi h
b
xT∗+k=
T∗+k−1
∑
j=p+1
∑p
i=1Kx −i−xj−i
bh
∑T∗+k−1
j=p+1∑p
i=1Kx −i−xj−i
bh·xj,
lb
xT∗+k=
T∗+k−1
∑
j=p+1
∑p
i=1Klx −i−lxj−i
bhl
∑T∗+k−1
j=p+1∑p
i=1Klx −i−lxj−i
bhl·lxj,
b
xT∗+k=
T∗+k−1
∑
j=p+1
∑p
i=1K x −i− xj−i
bh 
∑T∗+k
j=p+1∑p
i=1K x −i− xj−i
bh · xj.
Acco ding o S ages (2) and (3), i can be seen ha he sp eads o he uzzy p edic ion
e
xT∗+ka e always non-nega i e.
Rema k 2.
Since he p oposed ime se ies model elies on uzzy da a, le us ecall he p e ious
ime se ies models based on uzzy da a [
66
–
68
]. Fi s , Hesamian and Akba i [
66
] p oposed a uzzy
semi-pa ame ic au o eg essi e in eg a ed mo ing a e age (ARIMA) model as ollows:
e
xi=
p
M
l=1
(θl⊗e
xi−l⊕e
( i)⊕eei),i=p+1, . . . , T.
Ma hema ics 2023,11, 2800 7 o 17
The pa ame e s o he model a e es ima ed by employing a hyb id me hod including a non-
pa ame ic ke nel-based me hod and leas absolu e de ia ions. Fo a second ime se ies model based
on uzzy da a, Za ei e al. [
67
] applied he me hod [
66
] o es ima e he model pa ame e s and he
uzzy smoo h unc ion based on a speci ic dis ance, ke nel and iangula uzzy numbe s. Finally,
Hesamian e al. [68] p oposed he uzzy nonlinea ime se ies model
e
x =e
(e
x −1,e
x −2, . . . , e
x −p)⊕ee , =1, 2, . . . , T,
whe e
e
(e
x −1,e
x −2, . . . , e
x −p) =
p
M
l=1
l(e
x −l).
As o he es ima ion o he unknown uzzy smoo h unc ions
e
l
, hey applied a o wa d addi i e
nonpa ame ic echnique.
Rema k 3.
We ha e ex ended some common pe o mance measu es used o compa e he p edic i e
accu acy o di e en ime se ies models ha we implemen in Sec ion 4. Fo his pu pose, a ime se ies
model is i s es ima ed based on a wi hin-sample uzzy ime se ies da ase o size
T∗<T
and hen he
pe o mance o he model is e alua ed ia he emaining uzzy ime se ies da ase o size T −T∗.
1. Mean Fo ecas E o :
MFE =∑T
=T∗+1D2(eb
x ,e
x )
T−T∗
2. Mean Absolu e Scaled E o :
MASE =∑T
=T∗+1q
T−T∗
wi h
q =D(eb
x ,e
x )
1
T−T∗∑T
=T∗+1D2(e
x ,e
x −1)
3. Basis o he Index o Ag eemen :
BIA =1−∑T
=T∗+1D2(e
x ,eb
x )
∑T
=T∗+1(D(e
x ,ex) + D(ex,eb
x ))2
wi h
ex=∑T
=T∗+1e
x
T−T∗
4. Mean Simila i y Measu e:
MSM =1
T−T∗
T
∑
=T∗+1Rmin{eb
x (x),e
x (x)}dx
Rmax{eb
x (x),e
x (x)}dx
Le
A
and
B
be wo uzzy ime se ies models. As
MSM :FLR(R)×FLR(R)→[
0, 1
]
is a
simila i y measu e, alues o
MSM
abo e 0.5 show a good deg ee o simila i y be ween he uzzy
esponses and hei uzzy p edic ions. I we obse e
MSMB<MSMA
, hen model
A
ou pe o ms
model
B
. Fu he , i
MFEA<MFEB
,
MASEA<MASEB
o
BIAA<BIAB
, hen model
A
ac s
be e in e ms o p edic ion accu acy compa ed o model B.
Rema k 4.
While he p oposed es ima ion p ocedu e does no depend on he shape unc ions
L
and
R
co esponding o uzzy da a, he pe o mance measu es
MFE
,
MASE
and
MSM
depend on
hese shape unc ions. The e o e, he selec ed ype o he shape unc ions
L
and
R
may a ec he
p edic ion c i e ia. Fo ins ance, assume ha he da a ha e epo ed by
e
x = (x
,
lx
,
x )LR
wi h
L(x) =
1
−x
and
R(x) = √1−x
. Tha is,
c1=1
2
and
c2=2
3
. The e o e, he dis ance be ween
Ma hema ics 2023,11, 2800 8 o 17
e
x
and i s p edic ion is
D2(e
x
,
eb
x ) = (x −b
x )2+1
2(lx −lb
x )2+2
3( x − b
x )2
. This implies ha
he
MFE
c i e ion is mo e sensi i e o igh sp eads han o le sp eads in his case. Conside ing
L(x) = R(x) =
1
−x
, i can be seen ha
D2(e
x
,
eb
x )
would be equally dependen om he le
and igh sp eads. Howe e , when we compa e he pe o mance o uzzy ime se ies models, i is
easonable ha he shape unc ions
L
and
R
a e assumed o be he same o all he conside ed models.
Thus, ollowing his app oach, he pe o mance c i e ia a e no sensi i e o he selec ion o
L
and
R
since c1and c2 emain ixed o each model.
3.3. Selec ion o Au o eg essi e O de and Op imal Bandwid hs
When implemen ing he
FNPTSM (3)
, i is necessa y o selec he op imal bandwid hs
h
,
hl
and
h
, o choose he ke nel unc ion and o de e mine he au o eg essi e o de
p
.
The p ocedu e used o selec he au o eg essi e o de and he op imal bandwid hs is
p oposed as ollows:
(1)
Le p=1.
(2)
(2.1) Compu e bhp
lbased on (5).
(2.2) Compu e bhp
based on (7).
(2.3) Compu e bhpbased on (9).
(3)
Le p=p+1 and e u n o (2) un il
b
p=a g min
pRMSEp,
whe e
RMSEp=
u
u
∑T∗
i=p+1D2(eb
xi,e
xi)
T∗−p.
Then, b
p,bhp,bhp
land bhp
a e he op imal alues.
4. Nume ical Examples
In his sec ion, he e ec i eness o he
FNPTSM
is in es iga ed conside ing a simula-
ion s udy and applica ion examples ha ely on uzzy da a. Recall ha he e a e h ee o he
ime se ies models ha a e based on uzzy da a (see Rema k 2), i.e., he models in oduced
by Hesamian and Akba i [
66
], Za ei e al. [
67
] and Hesamian e al. [
68
]. Howe e , as he
me hod o Za ei e al. [
67
] is based on Hesamian and Akba i’s me hod [
66
] (wi h a di e en
dis ance measu e), we omi his echnique in he compa isons below. Thus, we compa e ou
p oposed me hod wi h he models sugges ed by Hesamian and Akba i (
FSPTSM
) [
66
] and
Hesamian e al. (
FATSM
) [
68
] ia h ee di e en ke nel unc ions (Gaussian, Epanechniko ,
and iweigh ).
Example 1.
In his example, 10 uzzy da ase s, each o size 300, a e gene a ed by he ollowing
FNPTSM:
e
x = (e
x −1,e
x −2,e
x −3)⊕ee , =4, 5, . . . , 300,
whe e
1.
(e
x1,e
x2,e
x3) = x1−cos(x2)−expx3
1+|x3|; cos2 0.9
3
∏
j=1
lxj!, exp 0.002
3
∏
j=1
xj!!LR
2. e
xj= (xj
;
lxj
,
xj)LR
,
j=
1, 2, 3 a e he ini ial alues wi h
xj∼N(
0, 1
)
, and
lxj
and
xj
a e
andom a iables ollowing U(0, 0.2)and U(0, 0.9), espec i ely,
3. ee = (e
;
le
,
e )LR
wi h
e ∼N(
0, 4
)
,
le
and
e
a e andom a iables ollowing
U(
0, 0.4
)
and U(0, 0.5), espec i ely, and
4. L(x) = 1−x2and R(x) = 1−x.
Ma hema ics 2023,11, 2800 9 o 17
The ke nels Gaussian, Epanechniko , and iweigh a e applied o p edic
e
x
. Based on he
10 sample uzzy da ase s (each o size 300), he mean alues o he goodness-o - i measu es and hei
co esponding bandwid h mean alues a e summa ized in Table 1. Consul ing he esul s o he
FNPTSM
, i is e iden ha he bes esul s among a ious ke nels a e ob ained ia he Gaussian
ke nel (lowes alues o
MFE
,
MASE
and la ges alues o
BIA
,
MSM
). In addi ion, he esul s o
he
FSPTSM
and
FATSM
can also be ound in Table 1. Compa ing hese esul s wi h he esul s o
he
FNPTSM
, i is ob ious ha he
FNPTSM
p o ides mo e accu a e p edic ions compa ed o bo h
o he me hods o all h ee ke nels, as all he conside ed goodness-o - i measu es show be e esul s
o he
FNPTSM
. Tha is, we obse e he lowes alues o
MFE
,
MASE
and he la ges alues o
BIA, MSM o he FNPTSM.
Table 1.
The mean pe o mance measu es o he
FNPTSM
,
FSPTSM
and
FATSM
co esponding o
some speci ic ke nels in Example 1.
Me hod Ke nel Resul s Goodness-o -Fi
C i e ia
FNPTSM
Gaussian
MFE =1.0452
bh=0.45 MASE =1.6089
b
hl=0.04 BIA =0.9996
b
h =0.22 MSM =0.4167
Epanechniko
MFE =1.1728
bh=0.66 MASE =1.6478
b
hl=0.05 BIA =0.9992
b
h =0.39 MSM =0.3953
iweigh
MFE =1.2482
bh=1.89 MASE =1.6339
b
hl=0.08 BIA =0.9991
b
h =0.54 MSM =0.3721
FSPTSM
Gaussian
hop =0.07 MFE =8.9728
b
θ1=0.5575 MASE =4.2652
b
θ2=−0.0956 BIA =0.9536
b
θ3=−0.1247 MSM =0.2207
Epanechniko
hop =0.02 MFE =5.2530
b
θ1=−0.6424 MASE =4.5383
b
θ2=−0.5168 BIA =0.9603
b
θ3=−0.4258 MSM =0.2920
iweigh
hop =0.13 MFE =11.5231
b
θ1=0.3757 MASE =3.8643
b
θ2=−0.1576 BIA =0.9738
b
θ3=−0.2568 MSM =0.2133
Ma hema ics 2023,11, 2800 16 o 17
28.
Cheng, S.H.; Chen, S.M.; Jian, W.S. Fuzzy ime se ies o ecas ing based on uzzy logical ela ionships and simila i y measu es. In .
Sci. 2016,327, 272–287. [C ossRe ]
29.
Sadaei, H.J.; Enaya i a , R.; Abdullah, A.H.; Gani, A. Sho - e m load o ecas ing using a hyb id model wi h a e ined exponen ially
weigh ed uzzy ime se ies and an imp o ed ha mony sea ch. In . J. Elec . Powe Ene gy Sys . 2014,62, 118–129. [C ossRe ]
30.
Ye, F.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, D.; Fuji a, H.; Gong, Z. A no el o ecas ing me hod based on mul i-o de uzzy ime se ies and echnical
analysis. In . Sci. 2016,367–368, 41–57. [C ossRe ]
31.
E endi, R.; Ismail, Z.; De is, M.M. A new linguis ic ou -sample app oach o uzzy ime se ies o daily o ecas ing o Malaysian
elec ici y load demand. Appl. So Compu . 2015,28, 422–430. [C ossRe ]
32.
Tala posh ia, F.M.; Hossein, J.S.; Rasul, E.; Guima aesc, F.G.; Mahmud, M.; Eslami, T. S ock ma ke o ecas ing by using a hyb id
model o exponen ial uzzy ime se ies. In . J. App ox. Reason. 2016,70, 79–98.
33.
Wang, W.; Liu, X. Fuzzy o ecas ing based on au oma ic clus e ing and axioma ic uzzy se classi ica ion. In . Sci.
2015
,294, 78–94.
[C ossRe ]
34.
Sadaei, H.J.; Enaya i a , R.; Lee, M.H.; Mahmud, M. A hyb id model based on di e en ial uzzy logic ela ionships and impe ialis
compe i i e algo i hm o s ock ma ke o ecas ing. Appl. So Compu . 2016,40, 132–149. [C ossRe ]
35.
Aladag, C.H.; Yolcu, U.; Eg ioglu, E. A high o de uzzy ime se ies o ecas ing model based on adap i e expec a ion and a i icial
neu al ne wo k. Ma h. Compu . Simul. 2010,81, 875–882. [C ossRe ]
36.
Chen, M.Y. A high-o de uzzy ime se ies o ecas ing model o in e ne s ock ading. Fu u e Gene . Compu . Sys .
2014
,37, 461–467.
[C ossRe ]
37.
Eg ioglu, E.; Aladag, C.H.; Yolcu, U. Fuzzy ime se ies o ecas ing wi h a no el hyb id app oach combining uzzy c-means and
neu al ne wo ks. Expe Sys . Appl. 2013,40, 854–857. [C ossRe ]
38.
Yolcu, O.C.; Yolcu, U.; Eg ioglu, E.; Aladag, C.H. High o de uzzy imese ies o ecas ing me hod based on an in e sec ion
ope a ion. Appl. Ma h. Model. 2016,40, 8750–8765. [C ossRe ]
39.
Singh, P.; Bo ah, B. High-o de uzzy-neu o expe sys em o daily empe a u e o ecas ing. Knowl. Based Sys .
2013
,46, 12–21.
[C ossRe ]
40.
Yolcu, O.C.; Lam, H.K. A combined obus uzzy ime se ies me hod o p edic ion o ime se ies. Neu ocompu ing
2017
,247, 87–101.
[C ossRe ]
41.
Yolcu, O.C.; Alpaslan, F. P edic ion o TAIEX based on hyb id uzzy ime se ies model wi h single op imiza ion p ocess. Appl.
So Compu . 2018,66, 18–33. [C ossRe ]
42.
Aladag, C.H. Using mul iplica i e neu on model o es ablish uzzy logic ela ionships. Expe Sys . Appl.
2013
,40, 850–853.
[C ossRe ]
43.
Gaxiola, F.; Melin, P.; Valdez, F.; Cas illo, O. In e al ype-2 uzzy weigh adjus men o back p opaga ion neu al ne wo ks wi h
applica ion in ime se ies p edic ion. In . Sci. 2014,260, 1–14. [C ossRe ]
44.
Wei, L.Y. A hyb id ANFIS model based on empi ical mode decomposi ion o s ock ime se ies o ecas ing. Appl. So Compu .
2016,42, 368–376. [C ossRe ]
45.
Sadaei, H.J.; Enaya i a , R.; Guima aes, F.G.; Mahmud, M.; Alzamil, Z.A. Combining ARFIMA models and uzzy ime se ies o
he o ecas o long memo y ime se ies. Neu ocompu ing 2016,175, 782–796. [C ossRe ]
46.
To ba , S.; Khashei, M.; Bija i, M. A hyb id p obabilis ic uzzy ARIMA model o consump ion o ecas ing in commodi y ma ke s.
Econ. Anal. Policy 2018,58, 22–31. [C ossRe ]
47.
Kocak, C. ARMA(
p
,
q
)- ype high o de uzzy ime se ies o ecas me hod based on uzzy logic ela ions. Appl. So Compu .
2017
,
58, 92–103. [C ossRe ]
48.
Abhishekh, S.S.G.; Singh, S.R. A sco e unc ion-based me hod o o ecas ing using in ui ionis ic uzzy ime se ies. New Ma h. Na .
Compu . 2018,14, 91–111. [C ossRe ]
49.
Cheng, C.H.; Chen, C.H. Fuzzy ime se ies model based on weigh ed associa ion ule o inancial ma ke o ecas ing. Expe Sys .
2018,35, 23–30. [C ossRe ]
50.
Guan, H.; Dai, Z.; Zhao, A.; He, J. A no el s ock o ecas ing model based on High-o de - uzzy- luc ua ion ends and back
p opaga ion neu al ne wo k. PLoS ONE 2018,13, e0192366. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
51.
Gup a, C.; Jain, G.; Tayal, D.K.; Cas illo, O. ClusFuDE: Fo ecas ing low dimensional nume ical da a using an imp o ed me hod
based on au oma ic clus e ing, uzzy ela ionships and di e en ial e olu ion. Eng. Appl. A i . In ell.
2018
,71, 175–189. [C ossRe ]
52.
Gau am, S.S.; Singh, S. A e ined me hod o o ecas ing based on high-o de in ui ionis ic uzzy ime se ies da a. P og. A i .
In ell. 2018,7, 339–350.
53.
Li, R. Wa e quali y o ecas ing o Haihe Ri e based on imp o ed uzzy ime se ies model. Desal. Wa e T ea .
2018
,106, 285–291.
[C ossRe ]
54.
No ak, V. De ec ion o s uc u al b eaks in ime se ies using uzzy echniques. In . J. Fuzzy Logic In ell. Sys .
2018
,18, 1–12.
[C ossRe ]
55.
Phan, T.T.H.; Big, A.; Caillaul , E.P. A new uzzy logic-based simila i y measu e applied o la ge gap impu a ion o unco ela ed
mul i a ia e ime se ies. Appl. Compu . In el. So Compu . 2018,2018, 1–15. [C ossRe ]
56.
Rahim, N.F.; O hman, M.; Sokkalingam, R.; Kadi , E.A. Fo ecas ing c ude palm oil p ices using uzzy ule-based ime se ies
me hod. IEEE Access 2018,6, 32216–32224. [C ossRe ]

Ma hema ics 2023,11, 2800 17 o 17
57.
Chukh o a, N.; Johannssen, A. Fuzzy eg ession analysis: Sys ema ic e iew and bibliog aphy. Appl. So Compu .
2019
,84, 105708.
[C ossRe ]
58.
Akba i, M.G.; Hesamian, G. Linea model wi h exac inpu s and in e al- alued uzzy ou pu s. IEEE T ans. Fuzzy Sys .
2017
,26, 518–530.
[C ossRe ]
59.
Hesamian, G.; Akba i, M.G. Semi-pa ame ic pa ially logis ic eg ession model wi h exac inpu s and in ui ionis ic uzzy ou pu s.
Appl. So Compu . 2017,58, 517–526. [C ossRe ]
60.
Hesamian, G.; Akba i, M.G.; Asadollahi, M. Fuzzy semi-pa ame ic pa ially linea model wi h uzzy inpu s and uzzy ou pu s.
Expe Sys . Appl. 2017,71, 230–239. [C ossRe ]
61.
Akba i, M.G.; Hesamian, G. Elas ic ne o ien ed o uzzy semipa ame ic eg ession model wi h uzzy explana o y a iables and
uzzy esponses. IEEE T ans. Fuzzy Sys . 2019,27, 2433–2442. [C ossRe ]
62.
Hesamian, G.; Akba i, M.G. A uzzy addi i e eg ession model wi h exac p edic o s and uzzy esponses. Appl. So Compu .
2020,95, 106507. [C ossRe ]
63.
Hesamian, G.; To kian, F.; Johannssen, A.; Chukh o a, N. A uzzy nonpa ame ic eg ession model based on an ex ended cen e
and ange me hod. J. Compu . Appl. Ma h. 2023,2023, 115377. [C ossRe ]
64. Vie l, R. S a is ical Me hods o Fuzzy Da a; Wiley: New Yo k, NY, USA, 2011.
65. Buckley, J.J. Fuzzy S a is ics, S udies in Fuzziness and So Compu ing; Sp inge : Be lin, Ge many, 2006.
66.
Hesamian, G.; Akba i, M.G. A semi-pa ame ic model o ime se ies based on uzzy da a. IEEE T ans. Fuzzy Sys .
2018
,26, 2953–2966.
[C ossRe ]
67.
Za ei, R.; Akba i, M.G.; Chachi, J. Modeling au o eg essi e uzzy ime se ies da a based on semi-pa ame ic me hods. So
Compu . 2020,24, 7295–7304. [C ossRe ]
68.
Hesamian, G.; To kian, F.; Ya mohammadi, M. A uzzy nonpa ame ic ime se ies model based on uzzy da a. I an. J. Fuzzy Sys .
2022,19, 61–72.
69.
Golub, G.H.; Hea h, M.; Wahba, G. Gene alized c oss- alida ion as a me hod o choosing a good idge pa ame e . Technome ics
1979,21, 215–223. [C ossRe ]
70.
C a en, P.; Wahba, G. Smoo hing noisy da a wi h spline unc ions: Es ima ing he co ec deg ee o smoo hing by he me hod o
gene alized c oss- alida ion. Nume . Ma h. 1979,31, 377–403. [C ossRe ]
71.
Chukh o a, N.; Johannssen, A. Fuzzy hypo hesis es ing: Sys ema ic e iew and bibliog aphy. Appl. So Compu .
2021
,106, 107331.
[C ossRe ]
72. Lee, K.H. Fi s Cou se on Fuzzy Theo y and Applica ions; Sp inge : Be lin, Ge many, 2005.
73.
Coppi, R.; D’U so, P.; Gio dani, P.; San o o, A. Leas squa es es ima ion o a linea eg ession model wi h
LR
- uzzy esponse.
Compu . S a . Da a Anal. 2006,51, 267–286. [C ossRe ]
74. G zego zewski, P. Tes ing s a is ical hypo heses wi h ague da a. Fuzzy Se s Sys . 2000,11, 501–510. [C ossRe ]
75. Mills, T.C. Applied Time Se ies Analysis: A P ac ical Guide o Modelling and Fo ecas ing; Academic P ess: London, UK, 2019.
Disclaime /Publishe ’s No e:
The s a emen s, opinions and da a con ained in all publica ions a e solely hose o he indi idual
au ho (s) and con ibu o (s) and no o MDPI and/o he edi o (s). MDPI and/o he edi o (s) disclaim esponsibili y o any inju y o
people o p ope y esul ing om any ideas, me hods, ins uc ions o p oduc s e e ed o in he con en .