scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Purely Catalytic P Systems over Integers and Their Generative Power

Abstract

We further investigate the computing power of the recently introduced P systems with Z-multisets (also known as hybrid sets) as generative devices. These systems apply catalytic rules in the maximally parallel way, even consuming absent non-catalysts, e ectively generating vectors of arbitrary (not just non-negative) integers. The rules may be made inapplicable only by dissolution rules. However, this releases the catalysts into the immediately outer region, where new rules might become applicable to them. We discuss the generative power of this model. Finally, we consider the variant with mobile catalysts.

Read accessible full text

Purely Catalytic P Systems over Integers and Their Generative Power

Author: Alhazov, Artiom; Belingheri, Omar; Freund, Rudolf; Ivanov, Sergiu; Porreca, Antonio E.; Zandron, Claudio
Publisher: Fénix
Year: 2016
Source: https://idus.us.es/bitstreams/72224cb6-94eb-4521-a2c4-37aa03b5cb65/download
Pu ely Ca aly ic P Sys ems o e In ege s
and Thei Gene a i e Powe
A iom Alhazo 1, Oma Belinghe i2, Rudol F eund3,
Se giu I ano 4, An onio E. Po eca2, and Claudio Zand on2
1Ins i u e o Ma hema ics and Compu e Science
Academy o Sciences o Moldo a
S . Academiei 5, Chi¸sin˘au, MD 2028, Moldo a
E-mail: [email p o ec ed]
2Dipa imen o di In o ma ica, Sis emis ica e Comunicazione
Uni e si `a degli S udi di Milano-Bicocca
Viale Sa ca 336/14, 20126 Milano, I aly
E-mail: {o.belinghe i@campus,po eca@disco,zand on@disco}.unimib.i
3Facul y o In o ma ics, TU Wien
Fa o i ens aße 9-11, 1040 Vienna, Aus ia
E-mail: [email p o ec ed]
4Uni e si ´e Pa is Es , F ance
E-mail: [email p o ec ed]
Summa y. We u he in es iga e he compu ing powe o he ecen ly in oduced P
sys ems wi h Z-mul ise s (also known as hyb id se s) as gene a i e de ices. These sys ems
apply ca aly ic ules in he maximally pa allel way, e en consuming absen non-ca alys s,
e ec i ely gene a ing ec o s o a bi a y (no jus non-nega i e) in ege s. The ules may
be made inapplicable only by dissolu ion ules. Howe e , his eleases he ca alys s in o
he immedia ely ou e egion, whe e new ules migh become applicable o hem. We
discuss he gene a i e powe o his model. Finally, we conside he a ian wi h mobile
ca alys s.
1 In oduc ion
Memb ane sys ems (cell-like, wi h symbol-objec s) ha e adi ionally been iewed
as collec ions o hie a chically a anged mul ise p ocesso s [12]. In he lis o
open p oblems dissemina ed in 2015 [11], Gheo ghe P˘aun sugges ed going beyond
he adi ional se ing whe e symbol mul iplici ies in mul ise s a e es ic ed o
non-nega i e in ege s. One sugges ed app oach [6] de ines gene alized mul ise s as
aking mul iplici ies om a bi a y ini ely gene a ed, o ally o de ed commu a i e
g oups.
In wo k [3], a di e en app oach is aken: only ca aly ic ules a e allowed, and
he applicabili y o a ule only depends on p esence o he co esponding ca alys
16 A. Alhazo , O. Belinghe i, R. F eund, S. I ano , A.E. Po eca, C. Zand on
in he gi en egion. Consuming an absen non-ca alys makes i s mul iplici y neg-
a i e. While in [3] i was al eady es ablished ha such model is no uni e sal, we
ound i in e es ing o in es iga e i s gene a i e powe mo e p ecisely.
Since he numbe o ca alys s emains ini e and does no change h oughou
he compu a ion, his induces a ini e se o “ ule eams” which can be applied
in pa allel in one s ep. The i ual absence o applicabili y condi ions and he
ini eness o he “ eams” hin s a he possibili y o seeing hem as in ege ec o s;
in his case he P sys em i sel can be seen as e ol ing by sequen ially adding such
ec o s (possibly ha ing nega i e componen s) o he con en s o i s memb anes.
Pape [2] compa es his gene al model o ec o addi ion sys ems [5, 9] (adap ed
o allow nega i e ec o componen s [8]) and blind egis e machines [7].
He e we e u n o he pa icula model om [3], discussing he lowe bound o
i s gene a i e powe and gi ing some esul s on he a ian wi h a ge indica ions.
2 P elimina ies
The eade is assumed o be amilia wi h he basic no ions o o mal languages
and memb ane compu ing; see [13] o a comp ehensi e in oduc ion o bo h. We
only ema k ha , as common in memb ane compu ing, mul ise s in O◦=NOa e
ep esen ed by s ings in O∗, keeping in mind ha he o de o symbols is no
ele an .
2.1 Ex ending Mul ise s
To ep esen also nega i e mul iplici ies, mul ise s mus be ex ended. A Z-mul ise ,
allowing in ege mul iplici ies (called a hyb id se in [4]) would be om ZO; i
can be ep esen ed by a s ing in (O∪O−)∗, whe e O−={a−|a∈O}is a
se o symbols ha ep esen s objec s in mul iplici y “nega i e one”. No e ha ,
as opposed o P sys ems wi h ma e -an ima e [1], symbol a−he e is no an
ac ual objec , bu simply a con enien way o ep esen a de ici o a, and he
ac ual mul iplici y o a ep esen ed by a s ing wis |w|a− |w|a−. We also do no
dis inguish be ween no a ions a−kand (a−)k. The supe sc ip −can be used as a
mo phism, p oducing a mul ise wi h opposi e mul iplici ies, e.g., (ak)− ep esen s
he same Z-mul ise as he one in he p e ious sen ence. As he s ings he e a e
only used o ep esen [Z-] mul ise s, we may w i e an equali y sign be ween he
s ings ep esen ing he same [Z-] mul ise . Fo conciseness, le us use he no a ion
O•= (O∪O−)∗. Finally, since i will be always clea om he con ex , we may
call an elemen o O•“mul ise ”, omi ing he wo d “ ep esen ing”. Assuming an
o de is ixed on O, o u∈O•, ec o (|u|a− |u|a−)a∈Ois deno ed by ψO(u); he
subsc ip Omay be omi ed when i is clea om he con ex . This ec o is called
he Pa ihkh image o u.
Pu ely Ca aly ic P Sys ems o e In ege s and Thei Gene a i e Powe 17
2.2 Linea Se s
The linea se gene a ed by a se o ec o s A={ai|1≤i≤d} ⊂ Znand an
o se a0∈Znis de ined as ollows:
hA, a0iN=a0+Xd
i=1 kiai|ki∈N,1≤i≤d.
I he o se a0is he ze o ec o , we will call he co esponding linea se homo-
geneous; we also will use a sho no a ion hAiN=hA, 0iN.
We use he no a ion ZnLINN=hA, a0iN|A∈(Zn)d,a0∈Z, m ∈N, o
e e o he class o all linea se s. Semilinea se s a e de ined as ini e unions o
linea se s. We use he no a ions ZnSLINN o e e o he classes o semilinea
se s o n-dimensional ec o s. In case no es ic ion is imposed on he dimension,
nis eplaced by ∗. We may omi ni n= 1. A ini e union o linea se s which
only di e in he s a ing ec o s is called uni o m semilinea :
ZnSLINU
N=Sb∈BhA, biN|A∈(Zn)d, B ∈(Zn)k, d, k ∈N
=nnb+Pd
i=1 kiai|ki∈N,1≤i≤do|A∈(Zn)d, B ∈(Zn)k, d, k ∈No.
Le us deno e hese se s by hA, BiN.
3 Pu ely Ca aly ic P Sys ems o e In ege s
In pu ely ca aly ic P sys ems o e in ege s he se o objec s is a disjoin union
o ca alys s Cand he egula objec s O. The egula objec s a e allowed o ha e
any in ege mul iplici y, while he ca alys s a e only allowed o appea in a non-
nega i e numbe o copies.
The ules can be o he wo ollowing ypes:
•ca aly ic ules: cu →c , whe e c∈Cand u, ∈O∗;
•ca aly ic ules wi h dissolu ion:cu →c δ, whe e c∈C,u, ∈O∗, and δ6∈
C∪Ois he symbol indica ing memb ane dissolu ion.
The ules applied in pa allel canno in ol e mo e ca alys s han a ailable in he
sys em; he mul iplici ies o egula objec s, on he o he hand, do no in luence
he applicabili y o ules. An applica ion o a ule cu →c in a egion con aining
cw (c∈C,u, ∈O∗,w∈O•p oduces cw(cu)−c =cw (u−), o , in e ms o
ec o s, igno ing he ca alys , ec o ψ(w) + ψ( )−ψ(u) is ep esen ed by he
con en s o ha egion a e he ule has been applied. An applica ion o a ule
cu →c δ p oduces he same e ec , and hen dissol es he enclosing memb ane,
mo ing he con en s o he dissol ed memb ane in o he pa en memb ane.
Pu ely ca aly ic P sys ems o e in ege s e ol e unde he maximally pa -
allel seman ics, so each ca alys en e s exac ly one ule (non-de e minis ically
chosen), unless he gi en egion has no ules associa ed wi h his ca alys . By
18 A. Alhazo , O. Belinghe i, R. F eund, S. I ano , A.E. Po eca, C. Zand on
ZdOZPm(pca k, δ) we deno e he amily o se s o d-dimensional ec o s o in e-
ge s gene a ed by pu ely ca aly ic P sys ems o e in ege s wi h dissolu ion, a mos
mmemb anes and a mos kca alys s. I any o pa ame e s d, m, k is unbounded,
i is eplaced by ∗in he no a ion.
We also use no a ions o ex ended ea u es (lis ed in pa en heses in he no a-
ion o he se s o Z- ec o s gene a ed by he co esponding amilies o P sys ems).
Ta ge indica ions, deno ed by a , allow he non-ca alys s o be sen o a di e en
memb ane. In he igh side o he ules, sending objec ais w i en by (a, a ),
whe e a ∈ {ou }∪{inj|1≤j≤m};jhe e is a label o immedia ely inne
memb ane. In his pape , we may w i e a nin he no a ion o a se o Z- ec o s
gene a ed by a amily o P sys ems; his gene aliza ion e lec s he possibili y o
assign a ge s e en o nega i e mul iplici es o objec s.
Ano he ea u e is mobile ca alys s [10], i.e., a ge s may also be associa ed o
he ca alys s, and hus he ca alys s mo e ac oss he memb ane s uc u e; we de-
no e his ea u e by mpca ksince he sys ems we conside a e pu ely ca aly ic. We
use he plus sign be ween he ea u es o ca aly ic mobili y and dissolu ion when
i is allowed o he same ule o mo e a ca alys and o dissol e he memb ane
cu en ly con aining i .
4 Resul s
4.1 Simpli ica ions and Obse a ions
Fi s , we would like o explici ly allow ules o he o m c→cx, (c∈C,x∈O•),
i.e., he mul ise o egula objec s in he le side being emp y. This does no
change he model, since any Z-mul ise xcan be w i en as u( −), u, ∈O∗, and,
ixing some a∈O,c→cx is equi alen o cau →a . Mo eo e , any ule cu →c
is equi alen o c→cu( −), so i su ices o only conside ules o ypes c→cx
and c→cxδ (c∈C,x∈O•).
Second, no ice ha i is enough o s a wi h a single ca alys in any egion,
because i can pe o m he ole o any numbe o ca alys s, and i mul iple ca -
alys s a e ini ially in he same egion, hey will always s ay in he same egion
(possibly, me ged wi h o he s). Indeed, ake an a bi a y egion o an a bi a y
pu ely ca aly ic P sys em o e in ege s, say, i has ca alys s ci, 1 ≤i≤d, and each
ca alys cihas associa ed ules ci→cixi,j, 1 ≤j≤ni, whe e xi,j ∈O•∪O•δ.
No e ha i none o he ca alys s has associa ed ules, hen hey a e equi alen o
a single ca alys wi h no associa ed ules, so in he ollowing we assume he con-
a y. I some ca alys cihas no associa ed ules, i is hen equi alen o i ha ing
associa ed a single ule ci→ci, i.e., xi,1=λand ni= 1, so in he ollowing we
assume ni≥1 o 1 ≤i≤d. We can now eplace all hese ca alys s by a single
ca alys cha ing associa ed he ollowing se o ules:
{c→cx1,j1· · · xd,jd|1≤ji≤ni,1≤i≤d}.
Pu ely Ca aly ic P Sys ems o e In ege s and Thei Gene a i e Powe 19
On he o he side, no ca alys in some egion is equi alen o one ca alys wi h no
associa ed ules. The e o e, wi hou es ic ing he gene ali y, in he ollowing we
assume ha in he ini ial con igu a ion o an a bi a y pu ely ca aly ic P sys em
o e in ege s, each memb ane egion i, 1 ≤i≤m, con ains p ecisely one ca alys ,
and we can call i ci.
Thi d, no ice ha no in o ma ion en e s memb anes, so he ou e egions can-
no a ec he inne egions in any way. Hence, i he ou pu egion i0is no he
skin, hen only he memb ane subs uc u e inside i0, including i0is ele an o he
esul , and o he memb anes a e i ele an and may be emo ed wi hou a ec ing
he esul , making i0 he skin (unless some ule in some emo ed memb ane had
applicable ules, bu could ne e be dissol ed, in which case he gene a ed se o
ec o s is emp y, which is a degene a e case). So in he ollowing, we assume ha
he ou pu egion is always he skin.
Fou h, e e y elemen a y memb ane ha ing no ules associa ed o he ca alys s
a ailable he e may be emo ed om he sys em wi hou a ec ing he esul (unless
i is he ou pu memb ane, in which case a single on is gene a ed, which is a
degene a e case), so in he ollowing we assume ha each elemen a y memb ane
has some applicable ules. Clea ly, he P sys em will no each he hal ing un il
his memb ane is dissol ed.
Conside his easoning s a ing om he elemen a y memb anes ou side, by
induc ion. Take any non-elemen a y memb ane iwhich becomes elemen a y du ing
a compu a ion. Assume iis no dissol ed (i.e., i has no ules associa ed o any o
he ca alys s ha we e placed wi hin he memb ane subs uc u e inside i, including
i), bu i is no he ou pu memb ane. Then all he compu a ion in he memb ane
subs uc u e inside i, including i, does no con ibu e o he esul , and can be
emo ed om he sys em wi hou a ec ing he esul .
As a summa y o he ou h obse a ion, wi hou es ic ing he gene ali y
(excep , possibly he degene a e cases gene a ing he emp y se o some single on),
we may assume ha any pu ely ca aly ic P sys em o e in ege s has applicable
ules associa ed o all elemen a y memb anes, and all memb anes excep he skin
mus be dissol ed a some momen du ing he compu a ion.
Finally, o e e y egion excep he skin, a ca alys ciwi hou associa ed ules
is equi alen o a ca alys wi h a ule ci→ci. Hence, wi hou es ic ing he
gene ali y, we may assume ha he ca alys s a e ne e idle be o e he hal ing is
eached. Clea ly, (excluding he degene a e case gene a ing he emp y se ), he
skin should ha e no ules associa ed o any ca alys o he sys em.
We would like o no e ha e en wi hou p uning he memb ane s uc u e by
emo ing memb ane subs uc u es no con ibu ing o he esul , he memb ane
s uc u e ob ained a hal ing (i a all eachable) is unique.
We ecall ha in [2], he ollowing gene aliza ion app oach is aken: The e is
a ini e numbe o eachable memb ane s uc u es. These could be used as s a es
o a sequen ial P sys em, which may be ob ained, sepa a ely o each memb ane
s uc u e, by combining he beha io o all ca alys s in all egions o he P sys em.
Indeed, ha ing ixed a eachable memb ane s uc u e, we know which memb anes

20 A. Alhazo , O. Belinghe i, R. F eund, S. I ano , A.E. Po eca, C. Zand on
ha e been dissol ed, and hus he esul ing loca ion o each ca alys . Then, o each
ca alys , associa ed ules in i s cu en loca ion a e conside ed and combined, sim-
ila ly o he second obse a ion abo e, bu globally. Ha ing ob ained a sequen ial
sys em, he ca alys is no longe needed. Then, in [2] i was shown ha such a
gene aliza ion is no hing else bu a sequen ial blind ec o addi ion sys em wi h
s a es, and i was claimed ha i cha ac e izes p ecisely he amily o all semilinea
ec o s o in ege s.
Indeed, in his way any pu ely ca aly ic P sys em o e in ege s can be subs i-
u ed by a sequen ial blind ec o addi ion sys em wi h s a es, so he uppe bound
o he amily o all semilinea se s o ec o s o in ege s, o , equi alen ly, he amily
o all in ege ec o se s, gene a ed by blind egis e machines, holds. Howe e , he
e e se is no necessa ily ue, i.e., i does no ollow ha o any sequen ial blind
ec o addi ion sys em wi h s a es he e would exis an equi alen pu ely ca aly ic
P sys em o e in ege s.
Ano he esul in [2] has been ob ained o in ege ec o addi ion P sys ems,
namely Theo em 5. Tha model has been shown o cha ac e ize exac ly he uni o m
semilinea se s. Howe e , since in he model o in ege ec o addi ion P sys ems,
as opposed o pu ely ca aly ic P sys ems o e in ege s, he e is no concep o a
ca alys , dissol ing a memb ane only disables ules o ha egion, wi hou enabling
ules ha , in pu ely ca aly ic P sys ems o e in ege s, a e con ained in he pa en
egion and associa ed o he ca alys s ha we e in he dissol ed egion. Hence,
he cha ac e iza ion om Theo em 5 o [2] has no di ec implica ion on he powe
o pu ely ca aly ic P sys ems o e in ege s.
The e o e, a his poin in he p esen pape we would like o de ini ely de ia e
in o he pa icula i ies o how dissolu ion a ec s he compu a ion, and he lowe
bounds.
4.2 Gene a i e Powe
We ecall ha we discuss he amily o in ege ec o se s gene a ed by pu ely
ca aly ic P sys ems o e in ege s, wi h he usual hal ing condi ion.
Since he ou pu egion canno be dissol ed by de ini ion and any o he appli-
cable ule can ne e be s opped, single-memb ane pu ely ca aly ic P sys ems o e
in ege s a e degene a e:
ZdOZP1(pca ∗, δ) = {∅} ∪ {{ } | ∈Zd}.
Fo simplici y, we will no men ion hese degene a e cases while conside ing mul-
iple memb anes.
Wi h wo memb anes, a cha ac e iza ion is s ill s aigh o wa d:
ZdOZP2(pca ∗, δ) = ZdSLINU
N.
Indeed, le Abe he ini e se o ec o s co esponding o he non-dissol ing ules
in he elemen a y memb anes, and le Bbe he ini e se o sums o wo ec o s:
Pu ely Ca aly ic P Sys ems o e In ege s and Thei Gene a i e Powe 21
he one co esponding o he ini ial con igu a ion and ec o s co esponding o he
dissol ing ules in he elemen a y memb ane; he skin should ha e no ules. I he
ca alys in he elemen a y memb ane is c2, hen he co espondence men ioned
abo e is c2→c2x↔ψ(x), and simila ly wi h dissolu ion. An a bi a y compu a-
ion o a P sys em consis s o an a bi a y numbe o applica ions o non-dissol ing
ules and one applica ion o a dissol ing ule. Hence, he esul ing ec o sums up
om he “ini ial” ec o , one a bi a y “dissol ing” ec o , and an a bi a y linea
combina ion o “non-dissol ing” ec o s.
I is wo h no ing ha , by a simila easoning, o a P sys em wi h mul iple
memb anes, i he ch onological o de o dissol ing memb anes is ixed, he esul is
s ill ZdSLINU
N. Indeed, each combina ion o ules (one o each ca alys ) yields one
ec o , so all such possible combina ions o non-dissol ing ules yield a ini e se
o ec o s, and mul iple non-dissol ing s eps yield a linea se gene a ed by hese
ec o s. Thus, o e he whole compu a ion he esul sums up om he ini ial
con igu a ion, a ini e numbe o dissolu ion ec o s, and a ini e numbe o linea
se s co esponding o he memb ane s uc u es eached du ing ha compu a ion.
Since he o al numbe o ch onological o de s o dissol ing memb anes is bounded,
he known esul al eady ollows:
ZdOZP∗(pca ∗, δ)⊆ZdSLINN.
E en wi h h ee memb anes, in case wo o hem a e elemen a y, he powe o
such pu ely ca aly ic P sys ems o e in ege s is s ill ZdSLINU
N, bu o a di e en
eason: each elemen a y memb ane con ibu es wi h i s uni o m semilinea se ,
and a sum o wo uni o m semilinea se s is s ill uni o m semilinea .
Le us now examine a P sys em wi h h ee nes ed memb anes – he minimal
numbe o ob ain a se which is no in ZdSLINU
N. Le he ec o ob ained by
joining he ini ial con en s o all memb anes be a, he se o non-dissol ing ec o s
o he elemen a y memb ane be A3, he se o dissol ing ec o s o he elemen a y
memb ane be B3, he se s o non-dissol ing and dissol ing ec o s in he middle
memb ane associa ed o ca alys c2a e A2and B2, and he simila se s associa ed
o ca alys c3(which will a i e om he elemen a y memb ane) a e Aand B. Le
us see wha he esul ing ec o se is buil om, besides a.
A non-dissol ing compu a ion in h ee memb anes adds a each s ep (an ele-
men o ) A3 o he elemen a y memb ane and (an elemen o ) A2 o he middle
memb ane. E en ually all objec s will a i e o he skin, so he h ee-memb ane
phase o he compu a ion will con ibu e by (an a bi a y elemen o ) hA2+A3iN.
Then he e a e wo possibili ies. I memb ane 2 is dissol ed i s , hen he
sys em con inues compu ing by only applying he ules in memb ane 3, and e en-
ually dissol ing memb ane 3, yielding B2+hA3iN+B3. Howe e , i memb ane
3 is dissol ed i s , hen bo h ca alys s a e ac i e in memb ane 2, e en ually dis-
sol ing i , yielding B3+hA2+AiN+ (B2+A∪A2+B∪A+B). The exp ession
in pa en heses co esponds o applying a leas one dissol ing ule. The e o e, he
se o in ege ec o s gene a ed by such a pu ely ca aly ic P sys em o e in ege s
wi h h ee nes ed memb anes is
22 A. Alhazo , O. Belinghe i, R. F eund, S. I ano , A.E. Po eca, C. Zand on
M=a+B3+hA2+A3iN+B2+hA3iN∪ hA2+AiN+B2+A∪A2+B∪B2+B,
and he powe o all h ee-memb ane pu ely ca aly ic P sys ems o e in ege s,
no ing ha he powe o he nes ed case subsumes he powe o he case wi h wo
elemen a y memb anes, is
ZdOZP1(pca ∗, δ) = {M|a∈Zd, A2, A3, B2, B3, A, B ∈F IN(Zd)},
whe e Mis he exp ession abo e. Un o una ely, i is no ob ious wha can be
simpli ied in i , excep B3can subsume a. So we y o analyze i in de ails,
possibly going in o pa icula cases.
All e ms in he exp ession Ma e bounded excep h ee: hA3+A2iN,hA3iN
and hA+A2iN. These e ms a e no independen , e en hough A2,A3and Aa e
h ee independen ini e se s o ec o s. I is, howe e , possible o sepa a e hem
in a pa icula case when |A3|= 1, choosing A2=−A3and A=C−A2. Since
A3is a single on, he iden i y A3−A3={0}holds, so he h ee unbounded e ms
become h{0}iN,hA3iNand hCiN, so we a e ge ing close o ob aining a union o
wo pa icula linea (o e en uni o m semilinea ) se s wi h di e en base ec o s.
Indeed, i we choose a=0,B3={0},B2={0},B={0}and A3={e},
exp ession Msimpli ies o h{e}iN∪hCiN+(C+{e}∪{0}), which can be ew i en
as h{e}iN∪ hCiN∪ {e} hCiN.
Al e na i ely, o a oid dealing wi h he union o h ee cases when memb ane
2 is di ided las , i we choose B2=A2and B=A, hen he las pa en hesis in
he gene al exp ession o se Mbecomes simply A2+A=C. Choosing a=0,
B3={0}, and A3={e}, exp ession Msimpli ies o h{e}iN− {e}∪hCiN+C.
Since 0∈ h{e}iN− {e}and hCiN+C∪ {0}=hCiN, in his case we can ew i e
M o
−{e} ∪ h{e}iN∪ hCiN,
which is a union o any wo homogeneous linea se s, such ha he i s one has
only one gene a o , uni ed wi h he opposi e ec o o ha gene a o . Hence,
ZdOZPn(ca , δ))ZdSLINU
N, n ≥3.
Wha i B=∅, i.e., ca alys c3has no associa ed dissolu ion ules in egion 2?
Then he gene al exp ession o se Mis immedia ely simpli ied o
M=a+B2+B3+hA2+A3iN+ (hA3iN∪ hA2+AiN+A),
and in ou case o A3={e},A2=−{e}and A=C+{e},Mbecomes
a+B2+B3+ (h{e}iN∪ hCiN+C+{e}),
and choosing a+B2+B3={−e}, and no icing ha C0 imes is co e ed by e0
imes and hCiN+C∪{0}=hCiN, we simpli y M o {−e} ∪h{e}iN∪ hCiN, i.e., an
“almos clean union” we al eady ob ained be o e. Finally, we no ice ha we can
equi alen ly w i e i as
h{e},−eiN∪ hCiN.
Con inuing he cu en app oach wi h mo e memb anes would only esul in mo e
cases.
Pu ely Ca aly ic P Sys ems o e In ege s and Thei Gene a i e Powe 23
4.3 Communica ion
We would like o ema k ha adding a ge indica ions o he egula objec s
should no inc ease he powe o pu ely ca aly ic P sys ems o e in ege s. Indeed,
looking a a pu ely ca aly ic P sys em o e in ege s, i is easily decidable which
memb anes will e en ually be dissol ed. Hence, he only ques ion is whe he he
con en s o a egion speci ied by a ge , a e possible dissolu ions, will be in he
ou pu . The e is no need o examine he u u e o a mo ed egula objec , since
he esou ces in pu ely ca aly ic P sys ems o e in ege s a e unbounded, and we
can iew his copy o a mo ed objec as s aying in ha egion un il he end o he
compu a ion.
Howe e , i also he ca alys s a e allowed o ha e a ge indica ions associa ed,
i does make a di e ence. We claim he ollowing cha ac e iza ions.
ZdOZP∗(mpca k, a n) = ZdSLINN, k ≥1,
ZdOZP∗(mpca k+δ) = ZdSLINN, k ≥1,
ZdOZP∗(mpca ∗, δ) = ZdSLINN,
The uppe bound in ei he case is easy o see because he numbe o possible
a angemen s o ca alys s ac oss he gi en memb ane s uc u e (and any possible
s uc u es ob ained om i by memb ane dissolu ions) is bounded. Hence, pu ely
ca aly ic P sys ems o e in ege s wi h mobile ca alys s a e s ill no mo e powe ul
han blind ec o -addi ion sys ems wi h s a es, which cha ac e ize Z∗SLINN, see
[2]. We now p oceed o ⊇inclusions.
Conside an a bi a y semilinea se S1≤i≤mhAi, biiN, whe e o each i, 1 ≤i≤
m,Aiis a ini e se , Ai∪ {bi} ⊆ Zd. We cons uc he ollowing pu ely ca aly ic
P sys em o e in ege s
Π1= (O, C, µ, w1,· · · , w2m+1, R1,· · · , R2m+1, i0= 1) whe e
O={ai|1≤i≤d}, C ={c},
µ= [ [ [ ]m+2 ]2· · · [ [ ]2m+1 ]m+1 ]1,
w1=c, wi+1 =λ, 1≥i≥2m,
R1={c→(c, ini+1) i|1≤i≤m, ψ( i) = bi},
Ri+1 ={c→c( , ou )|ψ( )∈Ai}∪{c→(c, inm+i+1)},1≤i≤m,
Rm+i+1 =∅,1≤i≤m.
The wo k o Π1consis s o a non-de e minis ic choice o i- h linea se o gene a e,
by mo ing ca alys cin o memb ane i+ 1 and p oducing bi. A e sending o he
skin an a bi a y combina ion o ec o s om Ai, he ca alys en e s memb ane
m+i+ 1 and he sys em hal s.
The sys em Π2is ob ained om Π1by eplacing he se s Ri+1 o ules, 1 ≤
i≤m, by
{c→c |ψ( )∈Ai}∪{c→(c, inm+i+1)δ}.