scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Hydroboration of carbon dioxide with catechol- and pinacolborane using an Ir–CNP* pincer complex. Water influence on the catalytic activity

Abstract

Iridium complexes based on deprotonated lutidine-derived CNP* pincers 2a/2b selectively catalyzed the hydroboration of CO2 under mild conditions (1–2 bar CO2, 30 °C) to methoxyborane using HBcat (TOF up to 56 h−1 ) and to the formate level with HBpin (TOF up to 1245 h−1 ). Interestingly, an intriguing, positive water effect on the reaction rates has been observed. NMR spectroscopy and ESI-MS analysis of the hydroboration reactions have shown the formation of ligand-protonated [Ir(CNP)(CO)(BR2)H][B(R2)2] (R2 = catecholate, pinacolate) derivatives under catalytic conditions. Control experiments, however, have demonstrated that these derivatives are not catalytically competent species in the hydroboration of CO2.

Read accessible full text

Hydroboration of carbon dioxide with catechol- and pinacolborane using an Ir–CNP* pincer complex. Water influence on the catalytic activity

Author: Sánchez Mellado, Práxedes; Hernández Juárez, Martín; Rendón Márquez, Nuria; López Serrano, Joaquín; Álvarez González, Eleuterio; Paneque Sosa, Margarita; Suárez Escobar, Andrés Luis
Publisher: Royal Society of Chemistry
Year: 2018
DOI: 10.1039/C8DT03951H
Source: https://idus.us.es/bitstreams/a8c9458c-766b-42a6-b73f-a5692d909d53/download
Jou nal Name
ARTICLE
This jou nal is © The Royal Socie y o Chemis y 20xx J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 1
Please do no adjus ma gins
Please do no adjus ma gins
a.
Ins i u o de In es igaciones Químicas (IIQ), Depa amen o de Química Ino gánica
and Cen o de Inno ación en Química A anzada (ORFEO-CINQA).
CSIC and
Uni e sidad de Se illa. A da. Amé ico Vespucio 49, 41092, Se illa (Spain). E-mails
:
nu [email protected]; and es.sua [email protected]
† Dedica ed o P o . E nes o Ca mona on occasion o his 70
h
anni e sa y.
Elec onic Supplemen a y In o ma ion (ESI) a ailable: [NMR and ESI-MS
spec a o
selec ed de i a i es and ca aly ic eac ions, and X- ay c ys allog aphy da a o
CCDC
1856145]. See DOI: 10.1039/x0xx00000x
Recei ed 00 h Janua y 20xx,
Accep ed 00 h Janua y 20xx
DOI: 10.1039/x0xx00000x
www. sc.o g/
Hyd obo a ion o ca bon dioxide wi h ca echol- and
pinacolbo ane using an I -CNP* pince complex. Wa e in luence
on he ca aly ic ac i i y
P áxedes Sánchez, Ma ín He nández-Juá ez, Nu ia Rendón,* Joaquín López-Se ano, Eleu e io
Ál a ez, Ma ga i a Paneque, and And és Suá ez*
I idium complexes based on dep o ona ed lu idine-de i ed CNP* pince s 2a/2b selec i ely ca alyze he hyd obo a ion o
CO2 unde mild condi ions (1-2 ba CO2, 30 oC) o me hoxybo ane using HBca (TOF up o 56 h-1) and o he o ma e le el
wi h HBpin (TOF up o 1245 h-1). In e es ingly, an in iguing, posi i e wa e e ec on he eac ion a es has been obse ed.
NMR spec oscopy and ESI-MS analysis o he hyd obo a ion eac ions ha e shown he o ma ion o ligand-p o ona ed
[I (CNP)(CO)(BR2)H][B(R2)2] (R2 = ca echola e, pinacola e) de i a i es unde ca aly ic condi ions. Con ol expe imen s,
howe e , ha e demons a ed ha hese de i a i es a e no ca aly ically compe en species in he hyd obo a ion o CO2.
In oduc ion
Ca bon dioxide is he C1 ca bon sou ce pa excellence o
chemicals and uels p oduc ion due o i s abundan , enewable
and non- oxic na u e.
1
Howe e , he chemical ans o ma ion
o CO
2
is signi ican ly hampe ed by i s high he modynamic and
kine ic s abili y. While con e sion o CO
2
by non- edox
p ocesses such as he p oduc ion o ca bona es, ca bama es
and u e hanes a e ela i ely well-es ablished p ocesses,
1
he
educ ion o CO
2
o syn he ically and ene ge ically ele an
p oduc s such as o mic acid de i a i es and me hanol s ill
ep esen s an impo an challenge.
2
Among po en ial
educ an s, dihyd ogen p o ides he mos a om-economical
al e na i e, and consequen ly i is no su p ising ha
hyd ogena ion o CO
2
o o ma es
and, o a lesse ex en , o
MeOH
has been p o usely s udied.
2
Since hyd ogena ion o
CO
2
usually in ol es he use o high empe a u es and
p essu es, o he educing agen s such as hyd osilanes
3
o
hyd obo anes
4
ha e also ecei ed a signi ican a en ion due
o he milde eac ion condi ions ha can be employed wi h
hese species. Fu he mo e, hei eac i i y can be adjus ed by
a ying he silane o bo ane subs i uen s acili a ing access o
di e en C1 p oduc s including CO, CH
2
O, MeOH and CH
4
.
3,4
In
his ein, pa icula ly appealing o syn he ic pu poses is he
educ ion o CO
2
o o ma e and ace al de i a i es ha se e
o he de elopmen o educ i e unc ionaliza ions o CO
2
.
5
Reduc ion o ca bon dioxide can be accomplished in he
absence o a ca alys wi h
me al bo ohyd ides.
6
On he
con a y, he hyd obo a ion o CO
2
wi h e en e y eac i e BH
3
adduc s should be ca ied ou in he p esence o a ca alys .
7,8
Since he seminal wo k o Guan e al. epo ing he educ ion
o CO
2
wi h HBca (ca echolbo ane) o me hanol media ed by
pince nickel complexes,
9
he e has been an in ense impe us
o he de elopmen o non-me al,
8,10
main g oup me al,
11
and
ansi ion me al ca alys s o CO
2
hyd obo a ion.
12-21
Among
hese ca aly ic sys ems, hiola e nickel
12
and palladium
13
pince complexes ha e p o ided he highes TOFs, in he ange
o 1780 o 2400 h
-1
, o he educ ion o CO
2
o
me hoxybo ane using HBca as educ an . Also, while
hyd obo a ion o CO
2
wi h BH
3
and HBca p oceeds o he
me hoxide le el, he educ ion p ocess can be con olled o
some ex en by he use o less eac i e bo anes such as HBpin
(pinacolbo ane).
Thus, selec i e educ ion o CO
2
o
o moxybo ane, which has been p o en o se e as a o ma e
sou ce o syn he ic pu poses,
14
has been achie ed wi h HBpin
and a me al ca alys .
11c,14-17
I is also wo h men ioning
a emp s o gene a e ace al de i a i es ha can be employed
as me hylene ans e eagen s.
18-20
I is in e es ing o no e ha al hough ca alys s o he
hyd obo a ion o CO
2
based on di e en me als, including
mos o g oups 8-11 elemen s, ha e been epo ed, i is
su p ising ha i idium complexes, which ha e been equen ly
employed in hyd obo a ion eac ions,
22-24
ha e no been
in es iga ed in he educ ion o CO
2
by hyd obo anes. While
being less a ac i e in e ms o cos and en i onmen al
aspec s, noble me al ca alys s should no be igno ed since
highe ca aly ic e iciencies and s abili ies may compensa e o
ARTICLE Jou nal Name
2 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3 This jou nal is © The Royal Socie y o Chemis y 20xx
Please do no adjus ma gins
Please do no adjus ma gins
hei inc ease p ice and be use ul o small scale applica ions.
He ein, we epo an I ca alys p ecu so based on a
dep o ona ed lu idine-de i ed N-he e ocyclic
ca bene/phosphine CNP* pince ha selec i ely ca alyzes he
hyd obo a ion o CO
2
o me hoxy- o o moxybo ane
depending on he employed hyd obo ane (HBca o HBpin).
In e es ingly, an unexpec ed posi i e in luence o he p esence
o small amoun s o wa e in he eac ion a es has been
obse ed. Finally, i idium species o med unde ca aly ic
condi ions ha e been in es iga ed and hei pa icipa ion in
he ca aly ic cycle has been e alua ed.
Resul s and discussion
Syn hesis o he ca alys p ecu so
Reac ion o he ca bonyl i idium complex
1(Cl)
25
wi h KO
Bu in
THF yielded he o ma ion o a mix u e o he dep o ona ed
“ au ome ic” species
2a
and
2b
(Scheme 1).
The a io, as
de e mined by
1
H NMR spec oscopy, be ween hese species
depends on he sol en . In he
1
H NMR spec um egis e ed in
THF-d
8
,
2a
and
2b
appea in a 9:1 a io, whe eas a
2a
/
2b
a io
o 4 was obse ed in C
6
D
6
. In he o me sol en , he CH
2
N
b idge o he pince o
2a
p oduces in he
1
H NMR spec um a
single signal a 4.72 ppm (2H) and he me hyne CHP a m gi es
ise o a double esonance a 3.84 ppm (
2
J
HP
= 1.9 Hz, 1H),
meanwhile
2b
exhibi s a single peak a 6.17 ppm (1H) o he
CHN pince a m and a double signal a 3.51 ppm (
2
J
HP
= 11.4
Hz, 2H) o he hyd ogens o he me hylene CH
2
P moie y. Fo
bo h complexes, he esonances co esponding o he py idine
de i ed agmen s appea signi ican ly shi ed up ield (6.30-
5.37 ppm) in compa ison o
1(Cl)
, in ag eemen wi h he
p esence o dea oma ized cen al ings. In he
13
C{
1
H} NMR
spec um, de i a i e
2a
exhibi s he esonance p oduced by
he ca benic ca bon a om as a double a 182.8 ppm (J
CP
= 92
Hz) and ha o he CO ligand a 182.0 ppm (d, J
CP
= 10 Hz).
Fu he suppo o he in e ed s uc u e o
2a
was ob ained
by a X- ay di ac ion s udy o a single c ys al o he complex
(Fig. 1).
26
Dep o ona ion o he me hylene P-a m is e lec ed
in sho C(19)-P(1) and C(19)-C(18) bond leng hs o 1.743 and
1.370 Å, espec i ely. Fu he mo e, al e na ing C-C dis ances in
he py idine moie y e idence ing dea oma iza ion as shown
by he elonga ed C(18)-C(17) and C(16)-C(15) dis ances o
1.460 and 1.396 Å, and sho en C(17)-C(16) and C(15)-C(14)
bond leng hs o 1.343 and 1.378 Å, espec i ely (a e age C-C
bond in he py idine molecule: 1.38 Å).
As in e ed om he di e en
2a
/
2b
a ios obse ed in
dis inc sol en s, complexes
2a
and
2b
a e in equilib ium in
solu ion. This obse a ion is u he mani es ed in he
1
H,
1
H-
exchange spec oscopy (EXSY) spec um (mixing ime = 0.8 s)
o he
2a
/
2b
mix u e in we THF-d
8
egis e ed a 25
o
C, whe e
in ense exchange c oss-peaks a e obse ed be ween: i) signals
co esponding o he me hyne and me hylene b idges o
2a
, ii)
esonances caused by he CHP and CH
2
N moie ies o
2a
wi h
hose o he CH
2
P and CHN b idges o
2b
, espec i ely, and iii)
he signals o he me hyne and me hylene agmen s o
2a
and
2b
wi h hose o wa e (Fig. S1). These obse a ions suppo
ha he iden a e ligand b idges can ge in ol ed in e e sible
p o ona ion/dep o ona ion media ed by wa e molecules
ac ing as p o on ans e assis an s.
27
Scheme 1
Syn hesis o complexes
2a
and
2b
.
Fig. 1 ORTEP d awing a 30% ellipsoid p obabili y o complex 2a. Mos hyd ogen a oms
and sol en molecule (THF) ha e been omi ed o cla i y. Selec ed bond leng hs [Å]
and angles [o]: I (1)-C(1) 2.034(8), I (1)-N(3) 2.127(5), I (1)-P(1) 2.285(2), I (1)-C(32)
1.818(8), C(1)-I (1)-P(1) 168.3(2), C(1)-I (1)-C(32) 97.2(3), C(32)-I (1)-N(3) 172.9(3), C(1)-
I (1)-N(3) 89.7(2), P(1)-I (1)-N(3) 82.64(16).
Ca aly ic hyd obo a ion o CO2
Hyd obo a ion o CO
2
ca alyzed by he mix u e o complexes
2a
/
2b
was in es iga ed. Ini ial eac ions we e ca ied ou wi h
HBca in THF-d
8
(2 ba CO
2
, 30
o
C) using 1.0 mol% o
2a
/
2b
.
Selec i e CO
2
educ ion o he co esponding me hoxybo ane
(CH
3
OBca ) was es ablished by
1
H NMR spec oscopy a e he
obse a ion o a single esonance a 3.81 ppm, and he
appea ance o a b oad signal in he
11
B NMR spec um a 22.5
ppm. Also, he expec ed concomi an o ma ion o dibo oxane
(ca BOBca ) was con i med by he appea ance o a whi e
p ecipi a e a e emo al o THF-d
8
unde acuum and addi ion
o C
6
H
6
(

H
(THF-d
8
) = 6.83, 6.93 ppm;

B
(THF-d
8
) = 16.5
ppm).
28
Al hough signi ican ca e was exe cised in he se -up o
he ca aly ic expe imen s, hese eac ions we e ini ially ound
di icul o ep oduce. Howe e , a e sc upulous con ol o he
eac ion pa ame e s, a ma ked in luence o he p esence o
wa e in he hyd obo a ion eac ion was no iced.
29
The e o e,
ca aly ic eac ions we e pe o med in he p esence o a iable
amoun s o wa e (Table 1). Reac ions we e ollowed up by
1
H{
11
B} NMR spec oscopy, and o a meaning ul compa ison o
he ca aly ic ac i i y, TON alues we e de e mined a e 1.5 h
Jou nal Name ARTICLE
This jou nal is © The Royal Socie y o Chemis y 20xx J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 3
Please do no adjus ma gins
Please do no adjus ma gins
al hough upon ex ended eac ion imes all he eac ions
p oceeded o comple ion. Thus, when he ca aly ic eac ion
was pe o med in he p esence o 1 mol% o wa e , o ma ion
o 18% o me hoxybo ane was obse ed (TON = 54; TOF = 36 h
-
1
) (en y 1). By inc easing he wa e con en , as e
ans o ma ion o CO
2
o me hoxybo ane was e idenced,
p o iding up o 28% con e sion o me hoxybo ane in he
p esence o 5 mol% o wa e (TON = 84; TOF = 56 h
-1
) (en ies
2 and 3). I should be no ed ha o he la e eac ion he
maximum yield is 30% a e conside ing he amoun o bo ane
ha is hyd olyzed o ca BOBca . Fu he inc ease in he wa e
con en o he eac ion o 6 mol% somewha dec eased he
ca aly ic ac i i y (TOF = 50 h
-1
) (en y 4). In e es ingly, complex
1(Cl)
was ound a poo e ca alys han
2a
/
2b
p o iding 78
u no e s a e 16 h (TOF = 4.9 h
-1
) (en y 5). Con ol
expe imen s showed ha
2a
/
2b
ca alyzes he hyd olysis o
HBca o yield ca BOBca as he sole p oduc .
Table 1 Ca aly ic hyd obo a ion o CO2 wi h HBca
En y Ca alys H
2
O (mol%) Yield (%) TON
1 2a/2b 1 18 54
2 3 24 72
3 5 28 84
4 6 25 75
5a 1(Cl) 3 26 78
Reac ion condi ions: 1.0 mol% [I ], 2 ba CO2, 30 oC, THF-d8, [HBca ] = 0.5 M.
Reac ion ime: 1.5 h, unless o he wise no ed. Yields we e de e mined by 1H{11B}
NMR spec oscopy using hexame hylbenzene as in e nal s anda d. TON alues
based on moles o B-H bonds eac ed pe mole ca alys : (mmol me hoxybo ane x
3)/(mmol ca ). a Reac ion ime: 16 h.
Nex , he ca aly ic pe o mance o
2a
/
2b
in he
hyd obo a ion o CO
2
wi h HBpin was examined unde 1 ba o
CO
2
a 30
o
C (Table 2). These eac ions we e ca ied ou wi h
low ca alys loadings o 0.2 mol%. While p e ious epo s ha e
shown ha educ ion o CO
2
wi h pinacolbo ane may yield
o ma e (HCO
2
Bpin), ace al (H
2
C(OBpin)
2
) and me hoxy
(CH
3
OBpin) de i a i es, o mix u es he eo , eac ions wi h
2a
/
2b
ga e solely o moxybo ane. Mo eo e , as in he case o
he eac ions wi h HBca , he p esence o small amoun s o
wa e signi ican ly inc eases he eac ion a e. All eac ions
p oceeded o con e sions o HBpin highe han 90%, al hough
TON alues we e compa ed a e a eac ion ime o 20 min.
Fo example, eac ion in he p esence o 1 mol% o wa e
p o ided he o moxybo ane de i a i e in 30% yield (TOF =
450 h
-1
, en y 1), whe eas upon addi ion o inc easing amoun s
o wa e up o 7 mol% a ca. h ee- old ise o he ca aly ic
ac i i y (TOF = 1245 h
-1
)
was obse ed (en ies 2-5). Mo eo e ,
when he ca alys loading was u he educed o 0.1 mol%,
o moxybo ane was ob ained in 74% yield a e 1 h, wha
ep esen s a no able TOF o 740 h
-1
. Among he ew ca alys s
ha selec i ely p oduces o moxybo ane,
11c,14-17
only he
palladium pince complex epo ed by Haza i e al. p o ides
as e eac ion a es wi h low ca alys loadings (TOF = 8500 h
-1
,
0.01 mol% ca alys ).
15
Table 2 Ca aly ic hyd obo a ion o CO2 wi h HBpin
En y H2O (mol%) Yield (%) TON
1 1 30 150
2 2 72 360
3 3 79 395
4 6 80 400
5 7 83 415
6a 3 74 740
Reac ion condi ions, unless o he wise no ed: 0.2 mol% 2a/2b, 1 ba CO2, 30 oC,
THF-d8, [HBpin] = 0.4 M. Reac ion ime: 20 min. Yields we e de e mined by
1H{11B} NMR spec oscopy using hexame hylbenzene as in e nal s anda d. TON
alues as de e mined by (mmol o moxybo ane)/(mmol ca ). a 0.1 mol% 2a/2b.
Reac ion ime: 1.0 h.
S udy o me al species o med unde ca aly ic condi ions
To shed ligh on he me al species o med unde ca aly ic
condi ions, he hyd obo a ion o CO
2
(2 ba ) wi h HBca was
ca ied ou using 20 mol% o
2a
/
2b
in THF-d
8
. Upon eac ion
comple ion only a single signal is obse ed in he
31
P{
1
H} NMR
spec um a 16.9 ppm ha co esponds o a dihyd ide species,
as deduced by he appea ance o wo double s o double s
signals appea ing a 17.5 (
2
J
HP
= 12 Hz,
2
J
HH
= 2 Hz) and 8.3
ppm (
2
J
HP
= 22 Hz,
2
J
HH
= 2 Hz) in he
1
H NMR spec oscopy
expe imen . The e o e, we hypo hesized whe he he species
obse ed a e eac ion comple ion was a dihyd ide I complex
based on a p o ona ed CNP (
3
+
, Scheme 2) o dep o ona ed
CNP* (
4
, Scheme 3) ligand, and consequen ly an independen
syn hesis o bo h complexes was pu sued. Fo he s udy o
complex
3(Cl)
, a CD
2
Cl
2
solu ion o
1(Cl)
was exposed o 1 ba
o H
2
(Scheme 2). The
1
H NMR spec um o he newly o med
species showed a double o double s a 17.45 ppm (
2
J
HP
=
11.7 Hz,
2
J
HH
= 1.6 Hz) a ibu able o he I H ans o he
py idine moie y, and a double o double s o double s
appea ing a 8.32 ppm (
2
J
HP
= 22.2 Hz,
2
J
HH
= 1.6 Hz,
4
J
HH
= 1.6
Hz) caused by he hyd ide ligand placed cis o he N-dono
agmen ha couples wi h he o he I H hyd ogen and one o
he hyd ogens o he CH
2
P b idge.
30
Meanwhile, he
31
P{
1
H}
NMR spec um displays a single signal a 16.9 ppm. These
da a ag ee well wi h he obse ed signals a he end o he
ca aly ic eac ion and demons a es ha ligand p o ona ion
occu s unde ca alysis. Complex
3(Cl)
could no be isola ed
since i s a emp ed pu i ica ion yielded mix u es o
3(Cl)
and
1(Cl)
, indica ing ha he dihyd ido complex loses H
2
unde
acuum.
ARTICLE Jou nal Name
4 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3 This jou nal is © The Royal Socie y o Chemis y 20xx
Please do no adjus ma gins
Please do no adjus ma gins
Scheme 2 Reac ion wi h H2 o complex 1(Cl).
Scheme 3 Reac ion wi h H2
o complexes
2a
/
2b
.
Addi ionally, o ma ion o a dep o ona ed dihyd ide
complex
4
was uled ou since exposu e o he
2a
/
2b
mix u e
o H
2
(5 ba ) in THF-d
8
p oduced in he
31
P{
1
H} NMR spec um a
single a 8.8 ppm. Fu he mo e, in he
1
H NMR spec um
de i a i e
4
showed wo double o double s appea ing a
8.64 (
2
J
HP
= 20.8 Hz,
2
J
HH
= 1.5 Hz) and 16.59 (
2
J
HP
= 11.3 Hz,
2
J
HH
= 1.5 Hz),
30
whe eas he signals o he dea oma ized
py idine ing a e signi ican ly shi ed o high ield appea ing in
he ange be ween 6.56 and 5.71 ppm. Complex
4
also
eadily
loses H
2
unde acuum leading o he egene a ion o he
2a
/
2b
mix u e.
Fu he mo e, analysis by ESI-MS (posi i e mode) o he
ca aly ic eac ion be ween CO
2
and HBca in he p esence o
20 mol% o
2a
/
2b
p o ided a peak a m/z 698 a ibu able o
he ca ionic agmen [I H
2
(CNP)(CO)]
+
(
3
+
), while in he
nega i e mode a peak a m/z 227 was obse ed ha has been
assigned o he a ylspi obo ona e es e [Bca
2
] .
Deg ada ion
o HBca p omo ed by nucleophiles, including complexes
con aining anionic ligands, ha e been shown o p o ide he
abo e anion along wi h o he bo on species such as B
2
ca
3
and
BH
3
.
23,24,31
Howe e , o ma ion o hese, o o he , bo on
de i a i es could no be unequi ocally de ec ed by MS o NMR
spec oscopy. Mo eo e , al hough HBpin has been shown o
be less p one o deg ada ion han HBca ,
22d,32
ESI-MS analysis
o a ca aly ic eac ion wi h HBpin using 20 mol% o
2a
/
2b
allowed o he de ec ion o he ca ionic agmen
1
+
and he
anion [Bpin
2
]
(m/z 243).
33
We specula e ha o ma ion o
[Bca
2
] and [Bpin
2
]
anions migh ini ially in ol e nucleophilic
a ack o he hyd obo ane by he me hyne ca bon o he
dep o ona ed CNP* ligand,
27
and ligand-assis ed B-H
ac i a ion, as shown by Mils ein e al. o ela ed Ru
complexes.
34
Howe e , di ec e idence o hese p ocesses has
emained elusi e in ou sys em.
Since he hyd obo a ion eac ion is signi ican ly as e
using HBpin han wi h HBca , he la e p ocess was chosen o
ge insigh in o he o ma ion o o he me al species du ing he
ca aly ic eac ion. Hyd obo a ion o CO
2
(2 ba ) wi h HBca
using 10 mol% o
2a
/
2b
in THF-d
8
was moni o ed by
1
H NMR
spec oscopy, showing he o ma ion o a hyd ide complex
ha p oduces a double esonance a 6.9 ppm (
2
J
HP
= 21 Hz),
and which could be he esul o he oxida i e addi ion o
HBca o
1
+
. In o de o unequi ocally de e mine he s uc u e
o his de i a i e, complex
1(Bca
2
)
was eadily isola ed a e
anion exchange o
1(Cl)
wi h Li[Bca
2
]
35
and made eac wi h
HBca (Scheme 4). Addi ion o a sligh excess o HBca (1.5
equi ) o a THF-d
8
solu ion o
1(Bca
2
)
p oduced he decolo ing
o he ini ially yellow solu ion o yield he bo yli idium hyd ide
complex
5(Bca
2
)
.
24,36
This de i a i e was spec oscopically
cha ac e ized since a emp s o isola e
5(Bca
2
)
yielded
mix u es o
1(Bca
2
)
and
3(Bca
2
)
. Diagnos ic signals o
complex
5(Bca
2
)
in he
1
H NMR and
13
C{
1
H} NMR spec a
egis e ed in THF-d
8
include he p esence o a double
esonance a 6.90 ppm (
2
J
HP
= 21.1 Hz) a ibu able o he
hyd ido ligand, and a double a 154.3 ppm (J
CP
= 96 Hz) due o
he ca benic ca bon, espec i ely. The p esence o he
ca bonyl ligand is mani es ed in he
13
C{
1
H} NMR spec um by
a b oad esonance a 176.8 ppm, and in he IR spec um by an
abso p ion a 2005 cm
-1
. Mo eo e , in addi ion o he HBca
and bisca echolbo a e esonances appea ing in he
11
B NMR
spec um a 22.5 (d, J
BH
= 189 Hz) and 15.1 ppm espec i ely, a
b oad signal a 12.9 ppm is also obse ed, which ha e been
assigned o he bo yl ligand. Also, while hese spec oscopic
da a do no allow o a s aigh o wa d di e en ia ion
be ween he wo possible isome s esul ing om he oxida i e
addi ion o HBca o
1(Bca
2
)
, i.e. ans (
5-I
) o cis (
5-II
)
coo dina ion o he bo yl ligand o he py idine agmen (Fig.
2), compa ison o he chemical shi o he esonance o he
hyd ido ligand wi h hose o complex
3(Cl)
sugges s a cis
coo dina ion o he Bca moie y o he ca bonyl ligand. This
ligand disposi ion p e en s he ans coo dina ion o he wo
po en ially

-accep ing bo yl and ca bonyl ligands.
36b,37
Mo eo e , DFT calcula ions (B3LYP-D3, 6-31g(d,p)/SDD) o
5-I
and
5-II
indica e ha he o me ca ionic species is mo e s able
by 3.2 kcal/mol (Fig. 2). Also o no e, in he
1
H,
1
H-exchange
spec oscopy (EXSY) spec um o he eac ion mix u e o
1(Bca
2
)
and HBca
in THF-d
8
egis e ed a 25
o
C, exchange
c oss peaks a e obse ed be ween he signal o he a oma ic
hyd ogens co esponding o HBca and hose o he [Bca
2
]
anion indica i e o he exis ence o a bo on subs i uen
sc ambling p ocess. Upon egis e ing he same expe imen a
50
o
C, a c oss-peak signal caused by he exchange be ween
ee HBca and he hyd ido ligand is also obse ed poin ing ou
o he e e sibili y o he B-H oxida i e addi ion.
Cl
N
PPh2
NNMes
I CO H2, CD2Cl2
Cl
N
PPh2
NNMes
I H
CO
H
1(Cl) 3(Cl)
acuum
Jou nal Name ARTICLE
This jou nal is © The Royal Socie y o Chemis y 20xx J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 5
Please do no adjus ma gins
Please do no adjus ma gins
Scheme 4 Syn hesis o 1(Bca 2) and 1(BA F), and eac ions wi h bo anes.
Fig. 2 Rela i e he modynamic s abili y o ca ionic agmen s 5-I and 5-II, and 6-I and 6-
II. Da a in pa en hesis a e G in THF (kcal mol-1).
To es he o ma ion o analogous species o
5(Bca
2
)
wi h
HBpin, complex
1(BA
F
)
, p e iously p epa ed by anion
exchange o
1(Cl)
wi h NaBA
F
, was eac ed wi h an excess o
HBpin (2.4 equi ) (Scheme 4). The newly o med species
6(BA
F
)
p o ided compa able NMR spec a o hose o
5(Bca
2
)
, wi h he logical di e ences o he signals due o he
[BA
F
]
-
anion and he bo yl ligand, e incing he cis a angemen
o he bo yl and CO ligands. Howe e , DFT calcula ions (B3LYP-
D3, 6-31g(d,p)/SDD) shows ha he isome
6-I
is 3.5 kcal/mol
less s able han
6-II
, wha can be asc ibed o he p esence o
non-s abilizing in e ac ions in
6-I
be ween he mo e s e ically
demanding pinacol moie y wi h he subs i uen s o he NHC
and phosphino agmen s (Fig. 2). Also o in e es , exchange
c oss-peaks be ween he esonances o he ee bo ane and
he hyd ido ligand o
6(BA
F
)
a e obse ed in he
1
H,
1
H-EXSY
spec um.
NMR spec a o he eac ion o complexes
5(Bca
2
)
and
6(BA
F
)
wi h CO
2
did no show any no iceable changes, i.e.
inse ion o CO
2
in o he I -H bond o yield a o ma o complex
was no obse ed. The e o e, in o de o de e mine whe he
species
5(Bca
2
)
and
6(BA
F
)
pa icipa e in he educ ion o CO
2
wi h bo anes, complexes
1(Bca
2
)
and
1(BA
F
)
we e employed
as p e-ca alys in lieu o
2a
/
2b
in he hyd obo a ion o CO
2
wi h HBca and HBpin, espec i ely. Unde he eac ion
condi ions o Table 1, en y 5,
1(Bca
2
)
p o ided a signi ican ly
lowe TOF o 6.8 h
-1
(89% con . a e 13 h). Simila ly, complex
1(BA
F
)
was also ound a poo e ca alys p ecu so han
2a
/
2b
in he educ ion o CO
2
since negligible o ma ion o
o moxypinacolbo ane was obse ed (<5% con . a e 21 h).
O e all, hese esul s suppo ha
5(Bca
2
)
and
6(BA
F
)
a e no
signi ican ly in ol ed in he hyd obo a ion o CO
2
using
2a
/
2b
as ca aly ic p ecu so s. Ma de , Bake e al. ha e simila ly
obse ed ha while [I (Cl)(COE)
2
]
2
/PPh
3
mix u es p omo e
HBca deg ada ion and a e ac i e in alkene hyd obo a ions,
isola ed i idium bo yl compounds gene a ed om he eac ion
o his ca aly ic sys em and hyd obo anes p oduce inne ec i e
ca alys s.
24
Simila ly, o hiola e Ni and Pd pince complexes,
which a e e y ac i e ca aly ic p ecu so s in he hyd obo a ion
o CO
2
o CH
3
OBca , i has been shown ha he co esponding
hyd ide species a e p obably no in ol ed in he ca aly ic
p ocess.
12,13
As p e iously epo ed, ca aly ic hyd obo a ion o CO
2
wi h
HBpin can p oceed o he me hoxide le el (CH
3
OBpin),
4
al hough wi h a p ope choice o he ca alys pa ially educed
p oduc s including he co esponding o moxybo ane
de i a i e can be ob ained.
14-20
Guan e al. ha e
compu a ionally s udied he educ ion o CO
2
wi h HBca o
CH
3
OBca media ed by a pince nickel hyd ide complex.
9b
The
delinea ed mechanism is composed o h ee successi e cycles.
The i s cycle in ol es CO
2
inse ion in o he Ni-H bond o
yield a Ni- o ma e in e media e ha upon in e ac ion wi h
HBpin yields HCO
2
Bca . The subsequen educ ion o
o moxybo ane implies he inse ion in o a Ni-H bond o
p oduce o maldehyde, which is inally educed o CH
3
OBca
by a hi d molecule o HBca . Analogous s eps ha e also been
p oposed o he hyd obo a ion o CO
2
wi h HBpin ca alyzed
by a Ru complex.
38
Based on he mechanism p oposed by he
Guan g oup, Haza i e al. ha e assumed ha he high
selec i i y p o ided by a pince Pd complex in he
hyd obo a ion o CO
2
wi h HBpin o he o ma e le el is
de e mined by he la ge size o he pinacol agmen ha
p e en s u he educ ion o HCO
2
Bpin.
15
Fu he mo e,
selec i e educ ion o CO
2
o o moxybo ane wi h HBpin has
only been achie ed wi h me al based ca alys s.
14-17
The e o e,
since a highly selec i e CO
2
hyd obo a ion wi h HBpin o
o moxybo ane akes place using
2a
/
2b
, i can be expec ed
ha me al species should be in ol ed in he ca aly ic
eac ions. Fu he mo e, conside ing he deg ada ion o he
hyd obo anes as well as he obse ed in luence o wa e , i
can be p oposed ha he ca aly ically ac i e species a e
i idium de i a i es o med by eac ion o
2a
/
2b
wi h he
hyd obo anes and wa e . Howe e , since in addi ion o
us a ed Lewis pai s con aining bo on-based moie ies
capable o ca alyzing he hyd obo a ion o CO
2
,
8a,8b,8g
o he
bo on species ha e been shown o ca alyze hyd obo a ion
eac ions, as epo ed o he ca aly ic addi ion o
hyd obo anes o alkenes and alkynes,
39
educ ion o CO
2
media ed by bo on species de i ed om hyd obo ane
deg ada ion p omo ed by
2a
/
2b
, o hei pa icipa ion in
accele a ing an I -ca alyzed eac ion,
40
canno be ully uled
ou .
Conclusions
The i idium complexes suppo ed by dep o ona ed lu idine-
de i ed CNP* pince s
2a
/
2b
ca alyze he hyd obo a ion o CO
2
.
A ma ked in luence o he hyd obo ane is obse ed in he
selec i i y and a e o he eac ions. Mo e in e es ingly,

ARTICLE Jou nal Name
6 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3 This jou nal is © The Royal Socie y o Chemis y 20xx
Please do no adjus ma gins
Please do no adjus ma gins
signi ican eac ion a e accele a ions ha e been obse ed
a e op imiza ion o he wa e con en o he eac ions,
sugges ing ha wa e is in ol ed in he o ma ion o he
ca aly ically ac i e species. Thus, upon using HBca selec i e
educ ion o CO
2
o he me hanol equi alen is obse ed (TOF
up o 58 h
-1
), whe eas he mos s e ically demanding HBpin
yields he co esponding o moxybo ane as he sole p oduc
wi h no able ca aly ic ac i i ies (TOF up o 1245 h
-1
).
Unde ca aly ic condi ions, i idium species esul ing om
he oxida i e addi ion o he hyd obo ane o ligand-
p o ona ed [I (CNP)(CO)][B(R
2
)
2
] (R
2
= ca echol, pinacol)
complexes has been obse ed. Howe e , con ol expe imen s
indica e ha hese species a e ine icien ca alys s in he
hyd obo a ion o CO
2
. Taking in o accoun he obse ed wa e
e ec , he hyd obo ane deg ada ion leading o he o ma ion
o [B(R
2
)
2
]
-
anions, and he di e en selec i i y obse ed in he
educ ion o CO
2
wi h HBca and HBpin, we eel inclined o
conside ha he hyd obo a ion eac ions a e ca alyzed by I -
con aining species o med a e eac ion o
2a
/
2b
wi h he
hyd obo ane in he p esence o wa e . Un o una ely, we ha e
been unable o de ec such as species by NMR spec oscopy o
MS, sugges ing ha hey a e o med in low concen a ions.
Expe imen al
Gene al p ocedu es
All eac ions and manipula ions we e pe o med unde ni ogen o
a gon, ei he in a B aun Labmas e 100 glo ebox o using s anda d
Schlenk- ype echniques. All sol en s we e dis illed unde ni ogen
wi h he ollowing desiccan s: sodium-benzophenone-ke yl o
die hyl e he (E 2O) and e ahyd o u an (THF); sodium o pen ane
and oluene; CaH2 o dichlo ome hane and ace oni ile (CH2Cl2,
CH3CN); and NaOMe o me hanol (MeOH). Fo he p epa a ion o
we THF-d8 solu ions, comme cial THF-d8 (Eu iso op, <0.05% wa e )
was d ied wi h sodium-benzophenone-ke yl and dis illed unde
a gon, and known amoun s o wa e we e added. Wa e con en in
he hus p epa ed solu ions was con i med by 1H NMR spec oscopy
using hexame hylbenzene as in e nal s anda d. Complex 1(Cl),25
Li[Bca 2]35 and Na[BA F]41 we e syn he ized ollowing p e iously
epo ed me hods. All o he eagen s we e pu chased om
comme cial supplie s and used as ecei ed. NMR spec a we e
ob ained on B uke DPX-300, DRX-400, AVANCEIII/ASCEND 400R o
DRX-500 spec ome e s. 31P{1H} and 11B NMR shi s we e
e e enced o ex e nal 85% H3PO4 and BF3E 2O espec i ely, while
13C{1H} and 1H shi s we e e e enced o he esidual signals o
deu e a ed sol en s. All da a a e epo ed in ppm down ield om
Me4Si. All NMR measu emen s we e ca ied ou a 25 °C, unless
o he wise s a ed. NMR signal assigna ions we e con i med by 2D
NMR spec oscopy (1H-1H COSY, 1H-1H NOESY, 1H-13C HSQC and 1H-
13C HMBC) and 1H{31P} and 1H{11B} NMR expe imen s. HRMS da a
we e ob ained on a JEOL JMS-SX 102A mass spec ome e a he
Ins umen al Se ices o Uni e sidad de Se illa (CITIUS). ESI-MS
expe imen s we e ca ied ou in a B uke 6000 appa a us by he
Mass Spec ome y Se ice o he Ins i u o de In es igaciones
Químicas. Elemen al analyses we e un by he Analy ical Se ice o
he Ins i u o de In es igaciones Químicas in a Leco T ueSpec CHN
elemen al analyze . IR spec a we e acqui ed on a B uke Tenso 27
ins umen .
Syn hesis o complexes
Complexes 2a/2b. To a solu ion o 1(Cl) (0.075 g, 0.10 mmol) in
THF (5 mL) was added a solu ion o KO Bu (0.013 g, 0.11 mmol) in
THF (5 mL) gi ing ise o a ed solu ion. The esul ing solu ion was
s i ed o 2 h, and sol en was e apo a ed unde educed p essu e.
The esidue was ex ac ed wi h oluene (2  10 mL), and ola iles
we e emo ed unde acuum. The solid ob ained was washed wi h
pen ane (2  10 mL) and d ied unde acuum o gi e he mix u e o
complexes 2a and 2b as a ed solid (0.050 g, 70%). C ys als o 2a
sui able o X- ay di ac ion analysis we e g own om a sa u a ed
solu ion o he complexes 2a/2b in THF. Anal. calcd (%) o
C32H29I N3OP: C 55.32, H 4.21, N 6.05; ound: C 55.10, H 4.56, N
6.09. IR (nujol): 1938 (CO) cm-1.
NMR spec oscopy da a o 2a: 1H NMR (500 MHz, THF-d8):

7.57
(m, 4H, 4 H a om PPh), 7.41 (s, 1H, H a om NHC), 7.20 (m, 6H, 6 H
a om PPh), 7.09 (s, 1H, H a om NHC), 6.92 (s, 2H, 2 H a om Mes),
6.30 (m, 2H, Hb + Hc), 5.37 (dd, 3JHH = 3.7 Hz, 3JHH = 3.7 Hz, 1H, Hd),
4.72 (s, 2H, CH2N), 3.84 (d, 2JHP = 1.9 Hz, 1H, Ha), 2.28 (s, 3H, CH3),
2.09 (s, 6H, 2 CH3). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, THF-d8):

28.3. 13C{1H}
NMR (125 MHz, THF-d8):

182.8 (d, JCP = 92 Hz, C-2 NHC), 182.0 (d,
JCP = 10 Hz, CO), 156.3 (d, JCP = 24 Hz, Cq a om), 150.8 (d, JCP = 1 Hz,
Cq a om), 140.6 (d, JCP = 58 Hz, 2 Cq a om), 139.6 (Cq a om), 137.5
(Cq a om), 136.9 (2 Cq a om), 132.9 (d, JCP = 11 Hz, 4 CH a om),
131.9 (d, JCP = 2 Hz, Cc), 129.4 (2 CH a om), 129.3 (d, JCP = 2 Hz, 2 CH
a om), 128.3 (d, JCP = 10 Hz, 4 CH a om), 121.8 (d, JCP = 3 Hz, CH
a om), 121.1 (d, JCP = 3 Hz, CH a om), 117.8 (d, JCP = 19 Hz, Cb), 101.7
(Cd), 69.1 (d, JCP = 69 Hz, Ca), 57.3 (CH2N), 21.2 (CH3), 18.6 (2 CH3).
NMR spec oscopy da a o 2b: 1H NMR (500 MHz, THF-d8):

7.64
(m, 4H, 4 H a om PPh), 7.49 (s, 1H, H a om NHC), 7.32 (m, 6H, 6 H
a om PPh), 7.06 (s, 1H, H a om NHC), 6.91 (s, 2H, 2 H a om Mes),
6.17 (s, 1H, He), 6.17 (d, 3JHH = 8.7 Hz, 3JHH = 6.3 Hz, 1H, Hc), 6.05 (d,
3JHH = 8.9 Hz, 1H, Hd), 5.53 (d, 3JHH = 6.1 Hz, 1H, Hb), 3.51 (d, 2JHP =
11.4 Hz, 1H, CH2P), 2.25 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.12 (s, 6H, 2 CH3). 31P{1H}
NMR (202 MHz, THF-d8):

33.3.
Complex 1(Bca 2). A solu ion o 1(Cl) (0.100 g, 0.14 mmol) and
Li[Bca 2] (0.035 g, 0.15 mmol) in MeCN (8 mL) was s i ed o 1 h.
The esul ing suspension was il e ed, and sol en was emo ed
unde educed p essu e. The esidue was ex ac ed wi h CH2Cl2 (2 
10 mL), and he solu ion was b ough o d yness. The esul ing solid
was washed wi h pen ane (2  8 mL) and d ied unde acuum.
Complex 1(Bca 2) was ob ained as an o ange solid (0.073 g, 58%). IR
(nujol): 1973 cm-1 (CO). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD2Cl2):

7.79 (dd, 3JHH
= 7.7 Hz, 3JHH = 7.7 Hz, 1H, H a om Py), 7.65 (d, 3JHH = 7.7 Hz, 1H, H
a om Py), 7.59 (m, 6H, 6 H a om), 7.52 (m, 2H, 2 H a om), 7.44 (m,
4H, 4 H a om), 7.04 (s, 2H, 2 H a om Mes), 7.01 (s, 1H, H a om NHC),
6.55 (m, 8H, Bca 2), 5.42 (s, 2H, CH2N), 4.09 (d, 2JHP = 10.1 Hz, 2H,
Jou nal Name ARTICLE
This jou nal is © The Royal Socie y o Chemis y 20xx J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 7
Please do no adjus ma gins
Please do no adjus ma gins
CH2P), 2.36 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.13 (s, 6H, 2 CH3). 31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz,
CD2Cl2):

45.4. 11B{1H} NMR (96 MHz, CD2Cl2):

14.4. 13C{1H} NMR
(125 MHz, CD2Cl2):

178.6 (d, JCP = 98 Hz, C-2 NHC), 177.1 (d, JCP = 9
Hz, CO), 165.0 (d, JCP = 7 Hz, Cq a om), 155.3 (Cq a om), 152.3 (4 Cq
a om Bca 2), 141.5 (CH a om), 140.3 (Cq a om), 136.3 (2 Cq a om),
135.6 (Cq a om), 133.2 (d, JCP = 12 Hz, 4 CH a om), 132.0 (2 CH
a om), 130.2 (d, JCP = 54 Hz, 2 Cq a om), 129.5 (d, JCP = 11 Hz, 4 CH
a om), 129.3 (2 CH a om), 124.7 (d, JCP = 10 Hz, CH a om), 124.6
(CH a om), 122.8 (CH a om), 122.5 (CH a om), 118.2 (4 CH a om
Bca 2), 108.7 (4 CH a om Bca 2), 55.5 (CH2N), 42.6 (d, JCP = 31 Hz,
CH2P), 21.3 (CH3), 18.5 (2 CH3). HRMS (ESI): m/z 696.1743
[(MBca 2)+] (exac mass calcula ed o C32H30I N3OP: 696.1750).
Complex 1(BA F). A solu ion o 1(Cl) (0.096 g, 0.13 mmol) and
Na[BA F] (0.116 g, 0.13 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (7 mL) was s i ed o 2 h.
The esul ing suspension was il e ed, and sol en was emo ed
unde educed p essu e. The esul ing solid was washed wi h
pen ane (2  10 mL) and d ied unde acuum. Complex 1(BA F) was
isola ed as an o ange solid (0.186 g, 91%). Anal. calcd (%) o
C64H42BF24I N3OP: C 49.31; H 2.72; N 2.70; ound: C 49.20; H 2.92; N
2.78. IR (nujol): 1979 (CO) cm-1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD2Cl2):

7.95
(dd, 3JHH = 7.7 Hz, 3JHH = 7.7 Hz, 1H, H a om Py), 7.76 (s, 8H, 8 H a om
BA F), 7.72 (d, 3JHH = 7.8 Hz, 1H, H a om Py), 7.63 (m, 4H, 4 H a om),
7.59 (s, 4H, 4 H a om BA F), 7.51 (m, 7H, 7 H a om), 7.44 (dd, 3JHH =
1.8 Hz, 5JHP = 0.8 Hz, 1H, H a om NHC), 7.17 (d, 3JHH = 1.8 Hz, 1H, H
a om NHC), 7.09 (s, 2H, 2 H a om Mes), 5.39 (s, 2H, CH2N), 4.14 (d,
2JHP = 10.1 Hz, 2H, CH2P), 2.40 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.16 (s, 6H, 2 CH3).
31P{1H} NMR (202 MHz, CD2Cl2):

45.6. 11B{1H} NMR (96 MHz,
CD2Cl2):

6.6. 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CD2Cl2):

179.3 (d, JCP = 99
Hz, C-2 NHC), 176.4 (d, JCP = 10 Hz, CO), 165.9 (d, JCP = 7 Hz, Cq
a om), 162.2 (q, JCB = 50 Hz, 4 BCq a om BA F), 154.9 (Cq a om),
141.5 (CH a om), 140.8 (Cq a om), 136.1 (2 Cq a om), 135.2 (m, 8 CH
a om BA F), 133.2 (d, JCP = 12 Hz, 4 CH a om), 132.3 (2 CH a om),
129.6 (o e lapped, 2 Cq a om), 129.6 (d, JCP = 11 Hz, 4 CH a om),
129.5 (2 CH a om), 129.3 (q, JCF = 32 Hz, 8 Cq a om BA F), 125.0 (q,
JCF = 272 Hz, 8 CF3), 124.9 (d, JCP = 10 Hz, CH a om), 123.9 (CH
a om), 123.3 (CH a om), 121.8 (CH a om), 117.9 (m, 4 CH a om
BA F), 56.3 (CH2N), 43.1 (d, JCP = 31 Hz, CH2P), 21.3 (CH3), 18.5 (2
CH3); signal o one qua e na y a oma ic ca bon could no be
iden i ied.
Complex 3(Cl). In a J.Young- al ed NMR ube, a solu ion o 1(Cl)
(0.050 g, 0.07 mmol) in CD2Cl2 (0.5 mL) was cha ged wi h 1 ba o
H2. The esul ing solu ion was immedia ely analyzed by NMR
spec oscopy indica ing comple e o ma ion o 3(Cl). Complex 3(Cl)
loses hyd ogen upon exposu e o acuum. IR (CD2Cl2): 2338 (I H),
2085 (I H), 1987 (CO) cm-1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD2Cl2):

8.45 (s,
1H, H a om NHC), 8.29 (d, 3JHH = 6.4 Hz, 1H, H a om Py), 7.99 (dd,
3JHH = 7.3 Hz, 3JHH = 6.6 Hz, 1H, H a om Py), 7.82 (d, 3JHH = 6.4 Hz, 1H,
H a om Py), 7.60 (dd, 3JHP = 12.8 Hz, 3JHH = 7.7 Hz, 2H, 2 H a om PPh),
7.51 (dd, 3JHH = 7.6 Hz, JHP = 6.3 Hz, 1H, H a om PPh), 7.40 (m, 5H, 5
H a om PPh), 7.27 (m, 2H, 2 H a om PPh), 7.12 (d, 2JHH = 15.4 Hz, 1H,
CHHN), 7.07 (s, 1H, H a om NHC), 7.05 (s, 2H, 2 H a om Xyl), 4.89 (d,
2JHH = 15.3 Hz, 1H, CHHN), 4.82 (dd, 2JHH = 17.1 Hz, 2JHP = 12.5 Hz,
1H, CHHP), 3.63 (dd, 2JHH = 17.1 Hz, 2JHP = 10.2 Hz, 1H, CHHP), 2.42
(s, 3H, CH3), 2.01 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.86 (s, 3H, CH3), 8.32 (ddd, 2JHP =
22.2 Hz, 2JHH = 1.6 Hz, 4JHH = 1.6 Hz, 1H, I H cis o Py), 17.45 (dd,
2JHP = 11.7 Hz, 2JHH = 1.6 Hz, 1H, I H ans o Py). 31P{1H} NMR (202
MHz, CD2Cl2):

16.9. 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CD2Cl2):

175.0 (CO),
163.4 (d, JCP = 3 Hz, Cq a om), 156.9 (d, JCP = 100 Hz, C-2 NHC), 155.8
(Cq a om), 140.3 (CH a om), 139.6 (Cq a om), 136.8 (Cq a om), 135.7
(Cq a om), 135.5 (Cq a om), 134.9 (d, JCP = 12 Hz, 2 CH a om), 134.4
(d, JCP = 49 Hz, Cq a om), 132.3 (d, JCP = 2 Hz, CH a om), 131.3 (d, JCP
= 2 Hz, CH a om), 130.4 (d, JCP = 11 Hz, 2 CH a om), 130.1 (d, JCP = 63
Hz, Cq a om), 129.5 (d, JCP = 10 Hz, 2 CH a om), 129.4 (CH a om),
129.2 (CH a om), 129.1 (d, JCP = 12 Hz, 2 CH a om), 125.7 (CH a om),
124.1 (d, JCP = 3 Hz, CH a om), 123.4 (d, JCP = 10 Hz, CH a om), 121.8
(d, JCP = 3 Hz, CH a om), 58.1 (CH2N), 46.1 (d, JCP = 37 Hz, CH2P), 21.3
(CH3), 18.4 (CH3), 18.2 (CH3). MS (ESI, CH2Cl2/MeCN): m/z (%): 698
(100) [(MCl)+].
Complex 4. In a J.Young- al ed NMR ube, a solu ion o 2a/2b
(0.010 g, 0.014 mmol) in THF-d8 (0.5 mL) was cha ged wi h 5 ba o
H2. The esul ing solu ion was immedia ely analyzed by NMR
spec oscopy showing comple e o ma ion o 4. Complex 4 eadily
loses hyd ogen upon emo al o he H2 a mosphe e.
1
H NMR (500 MHz, THF-d
8
):

7.58 (m, 3H, 3 H a om), 7.41 (dd,
J
HP
= 10.1 Hz,
3
J
HH
= 7.6 Hz, 2H, 2 H a om), 7.19 (m, 7H, 7 H
a om), 7.06 (m, 2H, 2 H a om), 6.56 (dd,
3
J
HH
= 8.8 Hz,
3
J
HH
= 6.2
Hz, 1H, H
c
), 6.43 (d,
3
J
HH
= 8.8 Hz, 1H, H
b
), 5.71 (d,
3
J
HH
= 6.2 Hz,
1H, H
d
), 5.01 (d,
2
J
HH
= 14.1 Hz, 1H, CHHN), 4.70 (d,
2
J
HH
= 14.3
Hz, 1H, CHHN), 3.93 (d,
2
J
HP
= 2.7 Hz, 1H, H
a
), 2.43 (s, 3H, CH
3
),
2.03 (s, 3H, CH
3
), 1.95 (s, 3H, CH
3
), 8.64 (dd,
2
J
HP
= 20.8 Hz,
2
J
HH
= 1.5 Hz, 1H, I H), 16.59 (dd,
2
J
HP
= 11.3 Hz,
2
J
HH
= 1.6 Hz,
1H, I H).
31
P{
1
H} NMR (202 MHz, THF-d
8
):

8.8.
13
C{
1
H} NMR
(125 MHz, THF-d
8
):

176.5 (b m, CO), 174.7 (d, J
CP
= 19 Hz, C
q
a om), 162.7 (d, J
CP
= 92 Hz, C-2 NHC), 150.3 (C
q
a om), 145.0
(d, J
CP
= 50 Hz, C
q
a om), 140.7 (d, J
CP
= 71 Hz, C
q
a om), 139.2
(C
q
a om), 138.4 (C
q
a om), 136.7 (C
q
a om), 136.0 (C
q
a om),
134.7 (d, J
CP
= 11 Hz, 2 CH a om), 132.0 (d, J
CP
= 2 Hz, C
c
), 131.4
(d, J
CP
= 12 Hz, 2 CH a om), 129.5 (CH a om), 129.3 (CH a om),
129.0 (CH a om), 128.6 (CH a om), 128.0 (d, J
CP
= 10 Hz, 2 CH
a om), 127.8 (d, J
CP
= 11 Hz, 2 CH a om), 122.0 (CH a om),
121.8 (d, J
CP
= 3 Hz, CH a om), 115.3 (d, J
CP
= 18 Hz, C
b
), 102.0
(C
d
), 66.6 (d, J
CP
= 78 Hz, C
a
), 60.3 (CH
2
N), 21.2 (CH
3
), 18.7
(CH
3
), 18.4 (CH
3
).
Complex 5(Bca
2
).
In a J.Young- al ed NMR ube, a
solu ion o
1(Bca
2
)
(0.035 g, 0.04 mmol) in THF-d
8
(0.5 mL)
was ea ed wi h HBca (5.0

L, 0.05 mmol). Comple e
con e sion o
1(Bca
2
)
o
5(Bca
2
)
was de e mined by NMR
spec oscopy. IR (CH
2
Cl
2
): 2101 (

I H
), 2005 (

CO
) cm
-1
.
1
H NMR
(500 MHz, THF-d
8
):

7.91 (d,
3
J
HH
= 1.1 Hz, 1H, H
a om NHC),
7.86 (d,
3
J
HH
= 7.9 Hz, 1H, H
a om Py), 7.82 (dd,
3
J
HH
= 7.8 Hz,
3
J
HH
= 7.8 Hz, 1H, H
a om Py), 7.74 (d,
3
J
HH
= 7.4 Hz, 1H, H
a om
Py), 7.48 (m, 4H, 4 H a om), 7.36 (m, 4H, 4 H a om), 7.24 (m,
2H, 2 H
a om), 7.11 (b , H a om HBca ), 7.05 (d,
3
J
HH
= 1.1 Hz,
1H, H
a om NHC), 6.97 (b , H a om HBca ), 6.82 (s, 1H, H a om
Mes), 6.76 (m, 2H, 2 H a om I Bca ), 6.70 (m, 2H, 2 H a om
ARTICLE Jou nal Name
8 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3 This jou nal is © The Royal Socie y o Chemis y 20xx
Please do no adjus ma gins
Please do no adjus ma gins
I Bca ), 6.39 (b m, 8H, 8 H a om Bca
2
), 6.00 (d,
2
J
HH
= 15.7 Hz,
1H, NCHH), 5.97 (s, 1H, H a om Mes), 5.01 (dd,
2
J
HH
= 17.3 Hz,
2
J
HP
= 12.5 Hz, 1H, PCHH), 5.00 (d,
2
J
HH
= 15.7 Hz, 1H, NCHH),
4.37 (q,
1
J
HB
= 190 Hz, HBca ), 3.98 (dd,
2
J
HH
= 17.1 Hz,
2
J
HP
=
10.2 Hz, 1H, PCHH), 2.01 (s, 3H, CH
3
), 1.86 (s, 3H, CH
3
), 1.81 (s,
3H, CH
3
), 6.90 (d,
2
J
HP
= 21.1 Hz, 1H, I H).
31
P{
1
H} NMR (202
MHz, THF-d
8
):

15.7.
11
B NMR (96 MHz, THF-d
8
):

22.5 (d, J
BH
= 189 Hz, HBca ), 15.1 (b , Bca
2
), 12.9 (I Bca ).
13
C{
1
H} NMR
(101 MHz, THF-d
8
):

176.8 (b , CO), 162.0 (C
q
a om), 155.1 (C
q
a om), 154.3 (d, J
CP
= 96 Hz, C-2 NHC), 153.3 (4 C
q
a om Bca
2
),
151.0 (2 C
q
a om I Bca ), 149.5 (2 C
q
a om HBca ), 141.3 (CH
a om), 140.1 (C
q
a om), 136.2 (C
q
a om), 135.8 (C
q
a om),
135.2 (C
q
a om), 133.7 (d, J
CP
= 11 Hz, 2 CH a om), 132.4 (d, J
CP
= 11 Hz, 2 CH a om), 132.2 (CH a om), 131.9 (CH a om), 131.8
(d, J
CP
= 50 Hz, C
q
a om), 130.0 (d, J
CP
= 11 Hz, 2 CH a om),
129.9 (CH a om), 129.4 (CH a om), 129.2 (d, J
CP
= 62 Hz, C
q
a om), 129.1 (d, J
CP
= 12 Hz, 2 CH a om), 125.0 (CH a om),
124.9 (CH a om), 124.7 (d, J
CP
= 10 Hz, CH a om), 123.9 (CH
a om), 122.6 (b , 2 CH a om HBca ), 121.4 (2 CH a om I Bca ),
118.0 (4 CH a om Bca
2
), 112.4 (b , 2 CH a om HBca ), 111.3 (2
CH a om I Bca ), 108.7 (4 CH a om Bca
2
), 59.1 (CH
2
N), 46.1 (d,
J
CP
= 39 Hz, CH
2
P), 21.3 (CH
3
), 18.6 (CH
3
), 17.6 (CH
3
).
Complex 6(BA
F
).
In a J.Young- al ed NMR ube, a solu ion
o
1(BA
F
)
(0.023 g, 0.015 mmol) in THF-d
8
(0.5 mL) was
ea ed wi h pinBH (5.3

L, 0.036 mmol). Comple e con e sion
o
1(BA
F
)
o
6(BA
F
)
was de e mined by NMR spec oscopy. IR
(CH
2
Cl
2
): 2089 (

I H
), 1993 (

CO
) cm
-1
.
1
H NMR (400 MHz, THF-
d
8
):

8.03 (dd,
3
J
HH
= 7.7 Hz,
3
J
HH
= 7.7 Hz, 1H, H
a om Py), 7.79
(s, 8H, 8 H a om BA
F
), 7.73 (m, 2H, 2 H a om), 7.68 (d,
3
J
HH
=
7.7 Hz, 1H, H
a om Py), 7.61 (m, 2H, 2 H a om), 7.57 (s, 4H, 4 H
a om BA
F
), 7.45 (m, 8H, 8 H
a om), 7.25 (s, 1H, H a om), 7.06
(s, 1H, H a om), 7.01 (s, 1H, H a om), 5.79 (d,
2
J
HH
= 15.8 Hz,
1H, NCHH), 5.19 (d,
2
J
HH
= 15.8 Hz, 1H, NCHH), 4.86 (dd,
2
J
HH
=
16.9 Hz,
2
J
HP
= 12.5 Hz, 1H, PCHH), 3.83 (dd,
2
J
HH
= 17.1 Hz,
2
J
HP
= 10.4 Hz, 1H, PCHH), 3.75 (q,
1
J
HB
= 172 Hz, HBpin), 2.33 (s, 3H,
CH
3
), 2.12 (s, 3H, CH
3
), 2.05 (s, 3H, CH
3
), 1.22 (s, 4 CH
3
HBpin),
0.74 (s, 6H, 2 CH
3
I Bpin), 0.71 (s, 6H, 2 CH
3
I Bpin), 6.81 (d,
2
J
HP
= 22.1 Hz, 1H, I H).
31
P{
1
H} NMR (162 MHz, THF-d
8
):

18.1.
11
B NMR (128 MHz, THF-d
8
):

30.1 (d, J
BH
= 173 Hz, HBpin),
23.2 (b , I Bpin), 4.6 ppm (BA
F
).
13
C{
1
H} NMR (101 MHz, THF-
d
8
):

178.0 (b , CO), 162.6 (q, J
CB
= 50 Hz, 4 BC
q
a om BA
F
),
162.4 (C
q
a om), 156.8 (d, J
CP
= 102 Hz, C-2 NHC), 155.6 (C
q
a om), 140.8 (CH a om), 139.8 (C
q
a om), 137.2 (C
q
a om),
135.9 (C
q
a om), 135.4 (m, 8 CH a om BA
F
), 133.8 (d, J
CP
= 11
Hz, 2 CH a om), 132.1 (m, 2 CH a om), 132.0 (CH a om), 131.8
(CH a om), 129.8 (m, 4 CH a om + 8 C
q
a om BA
F
), 128.8 (d, J
CP
= 11 Hz, 2 CH a om), 125.2 (q, J
CF
= 272 Hz, 8 CF
3
), 125.0 (CH
a om), 123.6 (CH a om), 123.4 (CH a om), 123.3 (CH a om),
118.0 (m, 4 CH a om BA
F
), 83.6 (2 C
q
HBpin), 82.8 (2 C
q
I Bpin),
59.7 (CH
2
N), 47.3 (d, J
CP
= 37 Hz, CH
2
P), 25.0 (4 CH
3
HBpin),
24.9 (o e lapped wi h sol en signal, 2 CH
3
I Bpin), 24.2 (2 CH
3
I Bpin), 20.9 (CH
3
), 18.9 (CH
3
), 18.8 (CH
3
); signals o h ee
qua e na y a oma ic ca bons could no be de ec ed due o
signi ican spec um complexi y.
Rep esen a i e p ocedu e o CO
2
hyd obo a ion wi h HBca
In a glo ebox, a J.Young- al ed NMR ube was cha ged wi h a
solu ion o
2a
/
2b
(1.6 mg, 2.3

mol) and hexame hylbenzene
(3.8 mg, 0.023 mmol) in THF-d
8
con aining 0.2% o wa e (0.5
mL) ( o al wa e con en : 5 mol%), and ca echolbo ane (25

L,
0.23 mmol) was added. The NMR ube was submi ed o
acuum o emo e he N
2
a mosphe e, cha ged wi h CO
2
(2
ba ) and hea ed o 30
o
C. Reac ion p og ess was moni o ed by
1
H{
11
B} and
11
B NMR spec oscopies.
Rep esen a i e p ocedu e o CO
2
hyd obo a ion wi h HBpin
In a glo ebox, a J.Young- al ed NMR ube was cha ged wi h
300

L o a eshly p epa ed 1.3 mM s ock solu ion o
2a
/
2b
(0.4

mol) in THF-d
8
con aining 0.2% o wa e ,
hexame hylbenzene (3.8 mg, 0.023 mmol) and THF-d
8
(0.2 mL)
con aining 0.2% o wa e ( o al wa e con en : 5 mol%).
Pinacolbo ane (32

L, 0.22 mmol) was added, and he NMR
ube was submi ed o acuum o emo e he N
2
a mosphe e,
cha ged wi h CO
2
(1 ba ) and hea ed o 30
o
C. Reac ion
p og ess was moni o ed by
1
H{
11
B} and
11
B NMR
spec oscopies.
DFT calcula ions
DFT calcula ions we e ca ied ou wi h he Gaussian 09
p og am.
42
The hyb id unc ional B3LYP
43
was used, wi h
dispe sion e ec s aken in o accoun by adding he D3 e sion
o G imme’s empi ical dispe sion.
44
C, H, N, B, O and P a oms
we e ep esen ed by he 6-31g(d,p) basis se ,
45
whe eas I was
desc ibed using he S u ga /D esden E ec i e Co e Po en ial
and i s associa ed basis se SDD.
46
All geome y op imiza ions
we e pe o med wi hou es ic ions in THF (bulk sol en
e ec s modelled wi h he SMD con inuum model).
47
Con lic s o in e es
The e a e no con lic s o decla e.
Acknowledgemen s
Financial suppo (FEDER con ibu ion) om he Spanish
MINECO (CTQ2016-80814-R and CTQ2016-81797-REDC) is
g a e ully acknowledged. M.H.J. hanks SECITI-DF o a
pos doc o al ellowship and CONACyT Mexico o pos doc o al
unding (263719). The use o compu a ional acili ies o he
Supe compu ing Cen e o Galicia (CESGA) is g a e ully
acknowledged.
Re e ences
1
a) M. A es a, Ca bon Dioxide as Chemical Feeds ock,
Wiley VCH, Weinheim, 2010; b) Q. Liu, L. P. Wu, R. Jacks ell
and M. Belle , Na . Commun., 2015,
6
, 5933; c) A. M. Appel,
J. E. Be caw, A. B. Boca sly, H. Dobbek, D. L. DuBois, M.
Dupuis, J. G. Fe y, E. Fuji a, R. Hille, P. J. A. Kenis, C. A.
Ke eld, R. H. Mo is, C. H. F. Peden, A. R. Po is, S. W.
Ragsdale, T. B. Rauch uss, J. N. H. Reek, L. C. See eld , R. K.
Thaue and G. L. Wald op, Chem. Re ., 2013,
113
,
Jou nal Name ARTICLE
This jou nal is © The Royal Socie y o Chemis y 20xx J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 9
Please do no adjus ma gins
Please do no adjus ma gins
6621 6658; d) Y. Li, X. Cui, K. Dong, K. Junge and M. Belle ,
ACS Ca al., 2017,
7
, 1077 1086; e) J. Klanke maye , S.
Wesselbaum, K. Beydoun and W. Lei ne , Angew. Chem. In .
Ed., 2016,
55
, 7296 7343; ) M. A es a, A. Dibenede o and
A. Angelini, Chem. Re ., 2014,
114
, 1709 1742.
2
a) Y.-N. Li, R. Ma, L.-N. He and Z.-F. Diao, Ca al. Sci. Technol.,
2014,
4
, 1498 1512; b) W.-H. Wang, Y. Himeda, J. T.
Mucke man, G. F. Manbeck and
E. Fuji a, Chem. Re ., 2015,
115
, 12936 12973; c) W. Wang, S. Wang, X. Ma and J. Gong,
Chem. Soc. Re ., 2011,
40
, 3703 3727.
3
F. J. Fe nández-Ál a ez, A. M. Ai ani and L. A. O o, Ca al. Sci.
Technol., 2014,
4
, 611 624.
4
a) C. C. Chong and R. Kinjo, ACS Ca al., 2015,
5
, 3238 3259;
b) S. Bon emps, Coo d. Chem. Re ., 2016,
308
, 117 130.
5
A. Tlili, E. Blondiaux, X. F ogneux and T. Can a , G een Chem.,
2015,
17
, 157 168.
6
a) J. G. Bu , W. G. B own and H. E. Helle , J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1950,
72
, 2560 2562; b) T. Wa k and R. K. Pea son, J. Ino g.
Nucl. Chem., 1958,
7
, 404 411; c) K. Fujiwa a, S. Yasuda and
T. Mizu a, O ganome allics, 2014,
33
, 6692 6695; d) I. Knop
and C. C. Cummins, O ganome allics, 2015,
34
, 1601 1603.
7
a) M.-A. Léga é, M.-A. Cou emanche and F.-G. Fon aine,
Chem. Commun., 2014,
50
, 11362 11365; b) M. La age, A.
Pujol, N. Sa on-Me ce on and N. Mézailles, ACS Ca al., 2016,
6
, 3030 3035; c) S. Y.-F. Ho, C.-W. So, N. Sa on-Me ce on
and N. Mézailles, Chem. Commun., 2015,
51
, 2107 2110.
8
a) M.-A. Cou emanche, M.-A. Léga é, L. Ma on and F.-G.
Fon aine, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013,
135
, 9326 9329; b) T.
Wang and D. W. S ephan, Chem. Eu . J., 2014,
20
,
3036 3039; c) Y. Yang, M. Xu and D. Song, Chem. Commun.,
2015,
51
, 11293 11296; d) A. Ramos, A. Anñolo, F. Ca illo-
He mosilla, R. Fe nández-Galán, A. Rod íguez-Diéguez and D.
Ga cía-Vi ó, Chem. Commun., 2018,
54
, 4700 4703; e) Y.
Yang, L. Yan, Q. Xie, Q. Liang and D. Song, O g. Biomol.
Chem., 2017,
15
, 2240 2245; ) S. C. Sau, R. Bhaacha jee, P.
K. Va dhanapu, G. Vijaykuma , A. Da a and S. K. Mandal,
Angew. Chem. In . Ed., 2016,
55
, 15147 15151; g) R.
Decle cq, G. Bouhadi , D. Bou issou, M.-A. Léga é, M.-A.
Cou emanche, K. S. Nahi, N. Boucha d, F.-G. Fon aine and L.
Ma on, ACS Ca al., 2015,
5
, 2513 2520.
9
a) S. Chak abo y, J. Zhang, J. A. K ause and H. Guan, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2010,
132
, 8872 8873; b) F. Huang, C. Zhang, J.
Jiang, Z.-X. Wang and H. Guan, Ino g. Chem., 2011,
50
,
3816 3825; c) S. Chak abo y, J. Zhang, Y. J. Pa el, J. A.
K ause and H. Guan, Ino g. Chem., 2013,
52
, 37 47; d) S.
Chak abo y, Y. J. Pa el, J. A. K ause and H. Guan,
Polyhed on, 2012,
32
, 30 34.
10
a) M.-A. Cou emanche, J. La ouche, M.-A. Léga é, W. Bi, L.
Ma on and F.-G. Fon aine, O ganome allics, 2013,
32
,
6804 6811; b) M.-A. Cou emanche, M.-A. Léga é, L. Ma on
and F.-G. Fon aine, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014,
136
,
10708 10717; c) C. Das Ne es Gomes, E. Blondiaux, P.
Thué y and T. Can a , Chem. Eu . J., 2014,
20
, 7098 7106; d)
T. Wang and D. W. S ephan, Chem. Commun., 2014,
50
,
7007 7010; e) A. Tlili, A. Voi u iez, A. Ma ine, P. Thué y
and T. Can a , Chem. Commun., 2016,
52
, 7553 7555; ) N.
on Wol , G. Le è e, J.-C. Be he , P. Thué y and T. Can a ,
ACS Ca al., 2016,
6
, 4526 4535; g) G. Tuci, A. Rossin, L.
Luconi, C. Pham-Huu, S. Cicchi, H. Ba and G. Giambas iani,
Ca al. Sci. Technol., 2017,
7
, 5833 5837.
11
a) M. D. Anke , M. A owsmi h, P. Bellham, M. S. Hill, G.
Kociok-Köhn, D. J. Lip o , M. F. Mahon and C. Wee man,
Chem. Sci., 2014,
5
, 2826 2830; b) D. Mukhe jee, S. Shi ase,
T. P. Spaniol, K. Mashima and J. Okuda, Chem. Commun.,
2016,
52
, 13155 13158; c) D. Mukhe jee, H. Osseili, T. P.
Spaniol and J. Okuda, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016,
138
,
10790 10793; d) D. Mukhe jee, A.-K. Wiegand, T. P. Spaniol
and J. Okuda, Dal on T ans., 2017,
46
, 6183 6186; e) T. J.
Hadling on, C. E. Ke alidis, L. Ma on and C. Jones, ACS Ca al.,
2017,
7
, 1853 1859; ) J. A. B. Abdalla, I. M. Riddles one, R.
Ti oin and S. Ald idge, Angew. Chem. In . Ed., 2015,
54
,
5098 5102.
12
T. Liu, W. Meng, Q.-Q. Ma, J. Zhang, H. Li, S. Li, Q. Zhao and
X. Chen, Dal on T ans., 2017,
46
, 4504 4509.
13
Q.-Q. Ma, T. Liu, S. Li, J. Zhang, X. Chen and H. Guan, Chem.
Commun., 2016,
52
, 14262 14265.
14
R. Shin ani and K. Nozaki, O ganome allics, 2013,
32
,
2459 2462.
15
H.-W. Suh, L. M. Gua d and N. Haza i, Chem. Sci., 2014,
5
,
3859 3872.
16
C. K. Ng, J. Wu, T. S. A. Ho and H.-K. Luo, Chem. Commun.,
2016,
52
, 11842 11845.
17
A. Bu gun, R. S. C ees, M. L. Cole, C. J. Doonan and C. J.
Sumby, Chem. Commun., 2014,
50
, 11760 11763.
18
L. J. Mu phy, H. Hollenho s , R. McDonald, M. Fe guson, M.
D. Lumsden and L. Tu cule , O ganome allics, 2017,
36
,
3709 3720.
19
S. Bon emps, L. Vendie and S. Sabo-E ienne, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2014,
136
, 4419 4425.
20
G. Jin, C. G. We ncke, Y. Escudié, S. Sabo-E ienne and S.
Bon emps, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015,
137
, 9563 9566.
21
a) M. J. Sg o and D. W. S ephan, Angew. Chem. In . Ed., 2012,
51
, 11343 11345; b) S. Bon emps, L. Vendie and S. Sabo-
E ienne, Angew. Chem. In . Ed., 2012,
51
, 1671 1674; c) A.
Aloisi, J.-C. Be he , C. Gen e, P. Thué y and T. Can a , Dal on
T ans., 2016,
45
, 14774 14788; d) S. Baghe zadeh and N. P.
Mankad, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015,
137
, 10898 10901; e) R.
Pal, T. L. G oy and R. J. T o i ch, Ino g. Chem., 2015,
54
,
7506 7515; ) S. R. Tamang and M. Findla e , Dal on T ans.
2018,
47
, 8199 8203.
22
Fo selec ed examples o hyd obo a ion I ca alys s: a) D. A.
E ans, G. C. Fu and A. H. Ho eyda, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992,
114
, 6671 6679; b) J. A. B inkman, T. T. Nguyen and J. R.
Sowa J ., O g. Le ., 2000,
2
, 981 983; c) A. Pé ez Luna, M.
Bonin, L. Micouin and H.-P. Husson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002,
124
, 12098 12099; d) C. M. C udden, Y. B. Hleba and A. C.
Chen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004,
126
, 9200 9201; e) Y.
Yamamo o, R. Fujikawa, T. Umemo o and N. Miyau a,
Te ahed on, 2004,
60
, 10695 10700; ) N. Iwada e and M.
Suginome, O g. Le ., 2009,
11
, 1899 1902; g) C. Maze and
D. Gé a d, Chem. Commun., 2011,
47
, 298 300; h) K. Y.
Gheb eyessus and R. J. Angelici, O ganome allics, 2006,
25
,
3040 3044; i) M. G. L. Mi abelli and L. G. Sneddon, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1988,
110
, 449 453.
23
a) J. A. Melanson, C. M. Vogels, A. Decken and S. A.
Wes co , Ino g. Chem. Commun., 2010,
13
, 1396 1398; b)
G. M. Lee, C. M. Vogels, A. Decken and S. A. Wes co , Eu . J.
Ino g. Chem., 2011, 2433 2438.
24
S. A. Wes co , T. B. Ma de , R. T. Bake and J. C. Calab ese,
Can. J. Chem., 1993,
71
, 930 936.
25
P. Sánchez, M. He nández-Juá ez, E. Ál a ez, M. Paneque, N.
Rendón and A. Suá ez, Dal on T ans., 2016,
45
,
16997 17009.
26
Fo he solid s a e s uc u e o an analogous I (PNP*)(CO)
complex: L. Schwa sbu d, M. A. I on, L. Kons an ino ski, Y.
Diskin-Posne , G. Lei us, L. J. W. Shimon and D. Mils ein,
O ganome allics, 2010,
29
, 3817 3827.
27
T. Cheisson and A. Au an , Dal on T ans., 2016,
45
,
2069 2078.
28
A. Lang, J. Knizek, H. Nö h, S. Schu and M. Thomann, Z.
Ano g. Allg. Chem., 1997,
623
, 901 907.
29
Fo examples o wa e in luence in o he I pince
ans o ma ions: a) E. Ben-A i, G. Lei us, L. J. W. Shimon and
D. Mils ein, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006,
128
, 15390 15391; b)
M. A. I on, E. Ben-A i, R. Cohen and D. Mils ein, Dal on