scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Oral manifestations of Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome: genotype-phenotype correlation analysis

Abstract

Background: Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome (WHS) is a rare disease caused by deletion in the distal moiety of the short arm of chromosome 4. The objectives of this study were to report the most representative oral findings of WHS, relate them with other clinical characteristics of the disease, and establish possible phenotype-genotype correlation. Methods: The study was conducted at 6 reference centers distributed throughout Spain during 2018–2019. The study group consisted of 31 patients with WHS who underwent a standardized oral examination. Due to behavioral reasons, imaging studies were performed on only 11 of the children 6 years of age or older. All participants had previously undergone a specific medical examination for WHS, during which anatomical, functional, epilepsy-related, and genetic variables were recorded. Results: The most prevalent oral manifestations were delayed tooth eruption (74.1%), bruxism (64.5%), dental agenesis (63.6%), micrognathia (60.0%), oligodontia (45.5%), and downturned corners of the mouth (32.3%). We detected strong correlation between psychomotor delay and oligodontia (p = 0.008; Cramér’s V coefficient, 0.75). The size of the deletion was correlated in a statistically significant manner with the presence of oligodontia (p = 0.009 ; point-biserial correlation coefficient, 0.75). Conclusion: Certain oral manifestations prevalent in WHS can form part of the syndrome’s phenotypic variability. A number of the characteristics of WHS, such as psychomotor delay and epilepsy, are correlated with oral findings such as oligodontia and bruxism. Although most genotype-phenotype correlations are currently unknown, most of them seem to be associated with larger deletions, suggesting that some oral-facial candidate genes might be outside the critical WHS region, indicating that WHS is a contiguous gene syndrome.

Read accessible full text

Oral manifestations of Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome: genotype-phenotype correlation analysis

Author: Limeres, Jacobo; Serrano, Candela; Nova, Joaquin Manuel de; Silvestre-Rangil, J; Machuca-Portillo, Guillermo; Maura, I.; Diniz-Freitas, M.
Publisher: MDPI
Year: 2020
DOI: 10.3390/jcm9113556
Source: https://idus.us.es/bitstreams/56e54bce-26f9-4803-bcb3-cbfad3f84f8b/download
Jou nal o
Clinical Medicine
A icle
O al Mani es a ions o Wol -Hi schho n Synd ome:
Geno ype-Pheno ype Co ela ion Analysis
Jacobo Lime es 1, Candela Se ano 1, Joaquin Manuel De No a 2, Ja ie Sil es e-Rangil 3,
Guille mo Machuca 4, Isabel Mau a 5, Jose C uz Ruiz-Villandiego 6, Ped o Diz 1,*,
Raquel Blanco-Lago 7, Julian Ne ado 8,9,10 and Ma cio Diniz-F ei as 1
1Medical-Su gical Den is y Resea ch G oup (OMEQUI), Heal h Resea ch Ins i u e o San iago
de Compos ela (IDIS), Uni e si y o San iago de Compos ela (USC), 15782 San iago de Compos ela, Spain;
[email p o ec ed] (J.L.); [email p o ec ed] (C.S.); ma [email p o ec ed] (M.D.-F.)
2Depa men o S oma ology IV, School o Den is y, Uni e si y Complu ense de Mad id, 28040 Mad id,
Spain; [email p o ec ed]
3
Depa men o S oma ology, Uni e si y Hospi al Doc o Pese -FISABIO, 46017 Valencia, Spain; sil anja@u .es
4Depa men o Special Ca e in Den is y, School o Den is y, Uni e si y o Se ille, 41009 Se illa, Spain;
[email p o ec ed]
5Se ice o Pedia ic Den is y, Ba celona Uni e si y Child en’s Hospi al HM Nens, 08009 Ba celona, Spain;
[email p o ec ed]
6Se ice o Special Ca e in Den is y, Qui ón Hospi al, 200012 San Sebas ián, Spain; [email p o ec ed]
7Se ice o Neu opedia ics, Uni e si y Hospi al Cen al de As u ias, 33011 O iedo, Spain;
[email p o ec ed]
8Medical and Molecula Gene ics Ins i u e (INGEMM), La Paz Uni e si y Hospi al, IdiPAZ, 28046 Mad id,
Spain; [email p o ec ed]
9Ins i u e o Ra e Diseases Resea ch (IIER) & Cen e o Biomedical Ne wo k Resea ch on Ra e
Diseases (CIBERER), Ins i u o de Salud Ca los III, 28029 Mad id, Spain
10 ERN (Eu opean Re e ence Ne wo k)-ITHACA, La Paz Uni e si y Hospi al, 28046 Mad id, Spain
*Co espondence: Ped [email p o ec ed]
Recei ed: 24 Sep embe 2020; Accep ed: 31 Oc obe 2020; Published: 4 No embe 2020


Abs ac :
Backg ound: Wol -Hi schho n synd ome (WHS) is a a e disease caused by dele ion in
he dis al moie y o he sho a m o ch omosome 4. The objec i es o his s udy we e o epo
he mos ep esen a i e o al indings o WHS, ela e hem wi h o he clinical cha ac e is ics o
he disease, and es ablish possible pheno ype-geno ype co ela ion. Me hods: The s udy was
conduc ed a 6 e e ence cen e s dis ibu ed h oughou Spain du ing 2018–2019. The s udy
g oup consis ed o 31 pa ien s wi h WHS who unde wen a s anda dized o al examina ion.
Due o beha io al easons, imaging s udies we e pe o med on only 11 o he child en 6 yea s
o age o olde . All pa icipan s had p e iously unde gone a speci ic medical examina ion
o WHS, du ing which ana omical, unc ional, epilepsy- ela ed, and gene ic a iables we e
eco ded. Resul s: The mos p e alen o al mani es a ions we e delayed oo h e up ion (74.1%),
b uxism (64.5%), den al agenesis (63.6%), mic ogna hia (60.0%), oligodon ia (45.5%), and
down u ned co ne s o he mou h (32.3%). We de ec ed s ong co ela ion be ween psychomo o
delay and oligodon ia (p=0.008; C am
é
’s V coe icien , 0.75). The size o he dele ion was
co ela ed in a s a is ically signi ican manne wi h he p esence o oligodon ia (
p=0.009
;
poin -bise ial co ela ion coe icien , 0.75). Conclusion: Ce ain o al mani es a ions p e alen in
WHS can o m pa o he synd ome’s pheno ypic a iabili y. A numbe o he cha ac e is ics
o WHS, such as psychomo o delay and epilepsy, a e co ela ed wi h o al indings such
as oligodon ia and b uxism. Al hough mos geno ype-pheno ype co ela ions a e cu en ly
unknown, mos o hem seem o be associa ed wi h la ge dele ions, sugges ing ha some
o al- acial candida e genes migh be ou side he c i ical WHS egion, indica ing ha WHS is a
con iguous gene synd ome.
J. Clin. Med. 2020,9, 3556; doi:10.3390/jcm9113556 www.mdpi.com/jou nal/jcm
J. Clin. Med. 2020,9, 3556 2 o 14
Keywo ds:
Wol -Hi schho n synd ome; 4p-; s oma ogna hic diseases; o al mani es a ions; geno ype
1. In oduc ion
Wol -Hi schho n synd ome (WHS) is a de elopmen al diso de caused by sub elome ic dele ion
in he dis al egion o he sho a m o ch omosome 4 (4p16.3) [
1
]. Ch omosomal mic oa ay
echniques showed ha a conside able pe cen age o pa ien s ha e o he cy ogene ic abe a ions in
addi ion o dele ion, such as unbalanced de no o ansloca ions, in e ed duplica ions, and pe icen ic
in e sions [2–5].
The disease is conside ed a e and has an es ima ed p e alence o 1/50.000 bi hs, wi h a
p edominance among he emale sex o 2:1 [
6
]. Al hough pa ien s wi h WHS ha e agile heal h o he
i s yea s o hei li e, hei mean li e expec ancy is mo e han 30 yea s [
7
]. To da e, mo e han 300 cases
o WHS ha e been documen ed in he medical li e a u e, which helped cha ac e ize i s pheno ypic
spec um [
7
]. An almos pa hognomonic inding in hese pa ien s is he cha ac e is ic “G eek wa io
helme ” acies, which consis s o a p ominen glabella, wide o ehead, a ched eyeb ows, hype elo ism,
exoph halmos, epican hal olds, wide nasal b idge, la ge nose, sho phil um, mic ogna hia, and a
la ge mou h wi h down u ned co ne s (Figu e 1) [
8
]. In addi ion o his unique acial pheno ype, he
undamen al mani es a ions o his polymal o ma i e synd ome in i s “classical” p esen a ion include
de elopmen al delay, in ellec ual disabili y, and epilepsy [9].
Figu e 1. Wol -Hi schho n synd ome wi h cha ac e is ic “G eek wa io helme ” acial pheno ype.
The co e WHS pheno ype is due o he haploinsu iciency o se e al in ima ely ela ed genes, which
include WHSC1, WHSC2, SLBP, and LETM1 [
2
,
3
]. Subsequen ly, addi ional genes we e iden i ied o
which he dele ion is necessa y o he pheno ypic exp ession o be comple e, which include FGFRL1,
CPLX1, CTBP1 and PIGG [
5
,
10
]. A numbe o hese genes, such as WHSC1 and FGFRL1, a e conside ed
candida es o de e mining he c anio acial pheno ype [
11
,
12
]. Recen s udies based on exome-sequence
analysis con i med ha poin mu a ions in he c i ical NSD2 egion (WHSC1) a e ela ed o he o o acial
pheno ype [
13
] and wi h nume ous o he cha ac e is ics o he synd ome [
14
]. Howe e , pa ien s we e
iden i ied wi h dele ions in he c i ical WHS egion (including WHSC1 and LETM1) who showed none
o he cha ac e is ic acial ea u es [
15
]. Co ela ion be ween gene ic abno mali ies and he c anio acial
pheno ype has, he e o e, s ill no been de ini i ely cla i ied.
J. Clin. Med. 2020,9, 3556 3 o 14
Up o now, he o al mani es a ions o his synd ome ha e a oused li le in e es in he
scien i ic li e a u e. Howe e , and pa adoxically, an ea ly and ini ial suspec ed diagnosis can
be es ablished on he basis o acial ai s [
16
], which equi es a ho ough examina ion o he o al
ca i y. The mos nume ous se ies published o da e on he gene al clinical mani es a ions o WHS (87
pa ien s) indica ed ha app oxima ely 50% o indi iduals wi h his disease ha e some ype o den al
abno mali y [
17
]. Ne e heless, mos o he a ailable in o ma ion in he den al li e a u e comes om
indi idual case s udies ha , in u n, we e included in na a i e e iews [
16
,
18
], excep o a se ies o 7
Finnish pa ien s wi h WHS in whom he gene ic bases o den al agenesis we e in es iga ed [19].
The aims o his c oss-sec ional s udy we e o assess he o al mani es a ions o WHS in a
con enience sample o Spanish pa ien s, and de e mine whe he he o al indings we e co ela ed wi h
o he clinical cha ac e is ics o WHS, including geno ype-pheno ype co ela ions.
2. Ma e ials and Me hods
2.1. Pa ien Selec ion
Th ough he Spanish Wol -Hi schho n Synd ome Associa ion (AESWH), we con ac ed he amilies
o 45 pa ien s wi h WHS du ing 2018–2019. The amilies we e in o med in w i ing abou he
s udy objec i es, and hei in o med consen was ob ained o using he clinical and pho og aphic
in o ma ion. The s udy was conduc ed in acco dance wi h he Decla a ion o Helsinki o he Wo ld
Medical Associa ion (2008) and app o ed by he Resea ch E hics Commi ee o La Paz Uni e si y
Hospi al, Mad id, Spain (PI-2734).
All pa icipan s had p e iously unde gone a speci ic and egula ed medical examina ion o
WHS, du ing which ana omic diso de s, clinical indings/como bidi ies, de elopmen al abno mali ies,
and epilepsy- ela ed da a we e eco ded (Table S1). These a iables had al eady been epo ed
and employed o analyzing he Spanish-based coho o WHS o which he pa ien s in his s udy
belong [4,5,20].
2.2. Single Nucleo ide Polymo phism (SNP) A ay Analysis
DNA was quan i ied using PicoG een (In i ogen Co po a ion, Ca lsbad, CA, USA).
A genomewide scan o 850,000 ag SNPs was conduc ed a he Medical and Molecula Gene ics Ins i u e
(INGEMM) using Illumina Cy oSNP-850k BeadChip acco ding o he manu ac u e ’s speci ica ions
(Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). GenCall sco es <0.15 a any locus we e conside ed “no-calls”.
Image da a we e analyzed using he Ch omosome Viewe ool con ained in Genome S udio (Illumina,
San Diego CA, USA). The me ic ha we employed was he logR a io, which is he log (base 2) a io
o he obse ed no malized R alue o an SNP di ided by he expec ed no malized R alue (unde
he manu ac u e ’s speci ica ions). In addi ion, allele- equency analysis was applied o all SNPs,
and genomic posi ions we e based on GRCh37. We de e mined he size o he dele ion and, in cases in
which dele ion was associa ed wi h duplica ion, he size o he duplica ion.
2.3. Mul iplex Liga ion-Dependen P obe Ampli ica ion
We employed mul iplex liga ion-dependen p obe ampli ica ion (MLPA) ki p096 o de e mine
dele ions/duplica ions in he 4p16.3 egion. Reac ions we e pe o med acco ding o he manu ac u e ’s
ecommenda ions (MRC Holland, Ams e dam, The Ne he lands). P oduc s we e analyzed using a
agmen analyze sequence (ABI 3730XL; Applied Biosys ems, Fos e Ci y, CA, USA) and 500Liz
as he in e nal size s anda d. Da a analysis was pe o med using Co alyse (MRC, Ams e dam,
The Ne he lans).
2.4. Clinical and Radiological O al Examina ion
To acili a e hei pa icipa ion, we es ablished a ne wo k o 6 e e ence den al cen e s dis ibu ed
s a egically h oughou Spain (Se ille, Mad id, Valencia, Ba celona, San Sebas i
á
n, and San iago
J. Clin. Med. 2020,9, 3556 4 o 14
de Compos ela). A calib a ion mee ing was held wi h each cen e ’s ep esen a i es o eco d, in a
s anda dized manne , he pa ien s’ den al his o y, and he esul s o clinical and adiological o al
examina ion. All pa ien s 6 yea s and olde unde wen o hopan omog aphy; cone-beam compu ed
omog aphy was eques ed o hose pa ien s who p esen ed mal o ma ions o he maxillo acial bones
o suspec ed cle pala e.
We collec ed he ollowing in o ma ion om each pa ien : deg ee o coope a ion (based on he
numbe o den al eam membe s necessa y o pe o m he o al examina ion); examina ion o he o al
ca i y wi h special emphasis on he p esence o down u ned co ne s o he mou h, abno mal enula,
cle lip/pala e, ogi al pala e (high and na ow pala e), oo h-e up ion ch onology, mo phological
(e.g., peg-shaped ee h, mic odon ia), nume ical (e.g., den al agenesis, oligodon ia), and s uc u al
(e.g., enamel hypoplasia) oo h abno mali ies, and gingi al s a us (basic pe iodon al examina ion);
in e maxilla y ela ionships and oo h malocclusions in he sagi al, ans e se, and e ical planes;
and he p esence o ha m ul habi s (e.g., b uxism).
2.5. S a is ical Analysis
We employed he chi-squa ed es o s udy he associa ion be ween 2 nominal ca ego ical a iables,
and Fishe ’s exac es o s udy he associa ion be ween 2 dicho omous a iables. To de e mine he
magni ude o associa ion be ween 2 ca ego ical a iables, we applied C am
é
’s V coe icien (CVC),
which is applied o he chi-squa ed coe icien . We conside ed ha he associa ion be ween he a iables
was weak when V was
≤
0.25, mode a e when 0.25 <V<0.70, and s ong when V
≥
0.70. To quan i y
he co ela ion be ween a dicho omous and a con inuous a iable, we employed he poin -bise ial
co ela ion coe icien (CC), a de i a i e o Pea son’s co ela ion coe icien . We conside ed ha he
associa ion be ween a iables was weak when <0.30, mode a e when 0.30
≥
≤
0.70, and s ong when
>0.70. We conside ed s a is ically signi ican only hose co ela ions in which he null hypo hesis
was ejec ed in he independence es (p alue <0.05) and wi h a s ong deg ee o associa ion (CVC o
CC >0.70).
3. Resul s
The s udy g oup consis ed o 31 pa ien s (68.8% o all AESWH membe s), wi h a mean age o
9.5 ±3.6
yea s, wi h a p edominance o he emale sex (67.7%). Table 1lis s he pa icipan s’ ana omical
cha ac e is ics and hei clinical peculia i ies/como bidi ies, Table 2desc ibes he de elopmen al
abno mali ies and epilepsy cha ac e is ics, and Table 3, Figu e 2, and Table S2 show he esul s o he
gene ic s udy.
Table 1.
Ana omical cha ac e is ics and clinical indings/como bidi ies in s udy-g oup pa ien s wi h
Wol -Hi schho n synd ome (n=31).
Ana omical Va iables Como bidi ies
Sex Female n=21
(67.7%) Ca diopa hy n=13
(41.9%)
Male n=10
(23.2%) Neph ologic–u ologic abno mali ies n=18
(58.1%)
Mean age, yea s 9.5 ±3.6
(2.2–20.7) Oph halmologic mani es a ions n=19
(61.3%)
Weeks o ges a ion 30.8 ±3.3
( ange 23–39) O o hinola yngologic mani es a ions n=15
(48.4%)
Mean weigh , g * 1865.0 ±527.8
( ange 800–3440) Recu en espi a o y in ec ions n=14
(45.2%)
Mean heigh , cm * 43.3 ±3.9
( ange 34–52) Cen al ne ous sys em mal o ma ions n=15
(48.4%)
Mean c anial ci cum e ence, cm * 36.7 ±2.5
( ange 30–41) Gas os omy ca ie n=3
(9.7%)
G ow h delay n=22
71.0% O he su gical his o y n=21
(67.7%)
* A bi h.
J. Clin. Med. 2020,9, 3556 5 o 14
Table 2.
De elopmen al abno mali ies and epilepsy cha ac e is ics o s udy-g oup pa ien s wi h
Wol -Hi schho n synd ome (n=31).
De elopmen al Abno mali ies Epilepsy Cha ac e is ics
Head con ol n=30
(96.8%) Diagnosis o epilepsy n=31
(100%)
Ac i e si ing n=21
(67.7%) Age a onse , mon hs 9.9 ±5.0
( ange 0–24)
Walking wi h suppo n=20
(64.5%) Seizu es igge ed by e e n=12
(38.7.0%)
Independen walking n=11
(35.5%) Seizu es no igge ed by e e n=7
(22.5%)
Seizu es igge ed by e e and
o he condi ions
n=12
(38.7%)
Au onomous eeding n=6
(19.4%) S a us epilep icus
n=14
(45.2%)
episodes, 3.8 ±11.0
( ange 0–55)
Sphinc e con ol n=25
(80.6%)
Admission o in ensi e ca e due o
s a us epilep icus
n=11
(35.5%)
In e ac ion wi h en i onmen n=28
(90.3%) Tonic-clonic seizu es n=21
(67.7%)
Communica ion by ges u es/pic og ams
n=19
(61.3%) A ypical absences n=17
(54.8%)
Emi s single wo ds n=10
(32.3%) Seizu e- ee pe iod ≥2 yea s n=12
(38.7%)
Emi s simple ph ases n=4
(12.9%) AED use n=26
(83.9%)
Psychomo o de elopmen le el * 139.1 ±47.8
( ange 36–230) Uses AEDs in mono he apy n=17
(54.8%)
Psychomo o delay * 18.4 ±10.1
( ange 1–33) Valp oic acid use n=16
(51.6%)
Numbe o como bidi ies ha
a ec de elopmen
6.8 ±3.1
( ange 1–13) Le e i ace am use n=14
(45.1%)
AEDs, an iepilep ic d ugs; * uni s lis ed in Table S1.
Table 3. Gene ic analysis o s udy-g oup pa ien s wi h Wol -Hi schho n synd ome (n=31).
Gene ic-Al e a ion Type Numbe o Cases
Te minal dele ions
Simple 4p- e minal dele ions 16 (51.60%)
4p- e minal dele ions and
addi ional e minal duplica ions in
o he ch omosomes *
13 (41.95%)
4p- e minal dele ions and
addi ional genomic
in e s i ial duplica ions
2 (6.45%)
In e s i ial dele ions 0 (0%)
* O igina ed by unbalanced ansloca ions ei he de no o o inhe i ed. Mean size o 4p- e minal dele ions was
8.6 ±6.1 Mb ( ange, 1.9–23.5 Mb), and he mean size o addi ional duplica ions was 2.3 ±3.6 Mb ( ange, 0–15.0).

J. Clin. Med. 2020,9, 3556 6 o 14
Figu e 2.
Dele ions (black ba s) obse ed in un ela ed indi iduals wi h Wol -Hi schho n synd ome.
*, cases wi h addi ional ea angemen s. Loca ion o 4p cy ogene ic bands and known genes o hei
c i ical egion (#) p oduced using UCSC genome b owse e sion GRCh37/hg19 (In e na ional Human
Genome Sequencing Conso ium 2004).
3.1. Clinical and Radiological O al Examina ion
Fo 15 pa ien s (48.3%), he o al examina ion was pe o med wi hou o ce ul es ain , 10 (32.2%)
equi ed mode a e es ain , and 6 (19.3%) equi ed hea y es ain . O he 23 pa ien s who we e
6 yea s o age o olde , imaging s udies we e pe o med in only 11 due o beha io al easons.
Upon examining he o al ca i y, we obse ed ha 10 pa ien s (32.3%) had down u ned co ne s
o he mou h, and 4 (12.9%) had abno mal enula. We de ec ed cle lip/pala e in 5 pa ien s (16.1%),
and ogi al pala e in 5 mo e (16.1%).
Wi h ega d o den al abno mali ies, 23 pa ien s (74.1%) had delayed oo h e up ion, 8 (25.8%) had
mic odon ia, 8 (25.8%) had a leas 1 peg-shaped oo h, and 2 (6.4%) had used ee h. O he 11 pa ien s
whose age and le el o coope a ion allowed o adiological es s, 7 (63.6%) showed den al agenesis
and 5 (45.5%) showed oligodon ia (Figu e 3). The mos a ec ed ee h we e he second mola s in he
empo a y ee h and he second p emola in he pe manen ee h (Table 4). Radiological indings also
included 2 cases (18.1%) o au odon ism. We obse ed den al a i ion in 26 pa ien s (83.8%), ca ies in
7 (22.5%), and enamel hypoplasia in 3 (9.6%).
Figu e 3. Oligodon ia in a pa ien wi h Wol -Hi schho n synd ome.
J. Clin. Med. 2020,9, 3556 7 o 14
Table 4. Den al agenesis in pa ien s wi h Wol -Hi schho n synd ome.
Uppe Tee h
n(%)
Lowe Tee h
n(%)
Tempo a y ee h
n=18
La e al inciso 2 (11.1) La e al inciso -
Second mola 8 (44.4) Second mola 8 (44.4)
De ini i e ee h
n=47
Cen al inciso - Cen al inciso 2 (4.2)
La e al inciso 8 (17.0) La e al inciso 4 (8.5)
Canine - Canine 1 (2.1)
Fi s p emola 5 (10.6) Fi s p emola -
Second p emola 12 (25.5) Second p emola 7 (14.9)
Fi s mola 1 (2.1) Fi s mola -
Second mola 2 (4.2) Second mola 5 (10.6)
n, numbe o cases o den al agenesis.
O he 19 pa ien s who we e 6 yea s o age o olde and o whom he basic pe iodon al examina ion
was comple ed, 4 (21.0%) had heal hy gums, 10 (52.6%) had bleeding upon p obing, and 5 (26.3%) had
bleeding and calculi.
The examina ion o he in e maxilla y ela ionship could be comple ed in only 15 pa ien s
due o beha io al issues. We diagnosed Angle’s Class II due o mic ogna hia o e ogna hia
in 9 (60.0%) pa ien s, c ossbi e in 5 (33.3%), and o e bi e in 7 (31.8%) (Table 5). We eco ded
pe sis en b uxism in 20 pa ien s (64.5%), 7 (22.5%) had a non-nu i i e sucking habi , and 5 (16.1%)
p esen ed nibbling.
Table 5.
In e maxilla y ela ionships and oo h malocclusions in pa ien s wi h Wol -Hi schho n synd ome.
Sagi al Plane
n=15
T ans e se Plane
n=15
Ve ical Plane
n=15
n(%) n(%) n(%)
Class I 4 (26.6) No mal
occlusion 5 (33.3) No mal
occlusion 6 (40.0)
Class II 9 (60.0) C ossbi e 5 (33.3) O e bi e 7 (46.6)
Class III 2 (13.3) Scisso bi e 3 (20.0) Open bi e 2 (13.3)
O e je 4 (26.6)
An e io
c ossbi e 3 (20.0)
n, numbe o examined pa ien s; n, numbe o pa ien s who sa is ied a speci ic condi ion.
O al indings we e no co ela ed wi h each o he excep o he down u ned co ne s o he
mou h, which was mode a ely co ela ed wi h he p esence o a high-a ched (ogi al) pala e (p=0.031;
CVC, 0.37).
3.2. Co ela ions be ween Sys emic Findings, Gene ic Va iables, and O al Mani es a ions
We ound no s a is ically signi ican co ela ions be ween ana omical a iables and o al indings;
howe e , he e was mode a e posi i e co ela ion be ween weigh and mic ogna hia/Class II (p=0.040;
CC =0.57), and be ween heigh and mic ogna hia/Class II (p=0.036; CC =0.58). The e was mode a e
nega i e co ela ion be ween c anial ci cum e ence and he p esence o abno mal enula (p=0.003;
CC =
−
0.51; Table S3). We also obse ed mode a e co ela ion be ween b uxism and he pa ien ’s sex,
which sugges s a p edominance o he male sex (p=0.042; CVC =0.37; Table S3).
A e analyzing he ela ionship be ween clinical indings/como bidi ies and o al mani es a ions,
we ound no s a is ically signi ican co ela ions; howe e , we de ec ed a endency owa d co ela ion
be ween ca diac de ec s and mic ogna hia/Angle’s Class II (p=0.035; CVC =0.69; Table S4).
J. Clin. Med. 2020,9, 3556 8 o 14
In e ms o de elopmen al abno mali ies, we de ec ed s ong co ela ion be ween psychomo o
delay and oligodon ia (p=0.008; CVC =0.75; Table S5).
We ound no s a is ically signi ican co ela ions be ween epilepsy- ela ed da a and o al indings,
bu he e was mode a e co ela ion be ween spasms and abno mal enula (p=0.013; CVC =0.68) and
be ween he onse o eb ile seizu es and c ossbi e (p=0.035; CVC =0.69; Table S6). We also ound
a endency owa ds co ela ion be ween o al numbe o assayed an iepilep ic d ugs and b uxism
(
p=0.065
; CVC =0.45), and a endency owa ds posi i e co ela ion be ween deg ee o seizu e con ol
and b uxism (p=0.065; CVC =0.54).
A e analyzing he gene ic a iables, we ound ha he size o he dele ion was co ela ed in a
s a is ically signi ican manne wi h he p esence o oligodon ia (p=0.009; CC =0.75); mean dele ion
size in indi iduals wi h oligodon ia was 8.1
±
3.9 Mb s. 2.6
±
0.6 Mb in hose wi hou oligodon ia.
A e dis ibu ing he dele ion sizes in o clus e s on he basis o clinical mani es a ions o WHS and a
p e ious classi ica ion [
3
] (<2.5 >,<5>,<8.5 >,<10 >,<12.5 >, and <13 >Mb), we ound s a is ically
signi ican co ela ion only when compa ing dele ions <5 Mb s. >5 Mb in ela ion o he p esence o
oligodon ia (p=0.001; Figu e 4).
Figu e 4.
p-a m o ch omosome-4 sc eening in Wol -Hi schho n synd ome pa ien s wi h oligodon ia.
Open squa e ed a ea is minimal egion associa ed wi h oligodon ia in ou coho (2.3–5.5 Mb).
Rema kably, MSX1 gene is placed a 4.85 Mb om elome e.
The e was also mode a e co ela ion be ween he size o he duplica ion and c ossbi e (p=0.047;
CC =0.56), and be ween size o duplica ion and b uxism (p=0.014; CC =0.44; Table S7).
4. Discussion
To ou knowledge, his is he i s s udy o da e o a case se ies o WHS ocused on o al indings and
i s co ela ion wi h he synd ome’s o he clinical and geno ypic cha ac e is ics. The esul s o ana omical
abno mali ies, clinical indings/como bidi ies, de elopmen abno mali ies, and epilepsy- ela ed and
gene ic-s udy da a p ima ily ag ee wi h hose ob ained in he Spanish-based WHS coho and we e
al eady discussed in p e ious publica ions [4,5,20].
In his s udy, he p e alence o down u ned co ne s o he mou h (1 o e e y 3 pa ien s) was
lowe han ha epo ed in p e ious publica ions, gi en ha a numbe o au ho s i a inding ha
o ms pa o he acial-pheno ype cha ac e is ic o WHS [
8
,
17
]. This disc epancy can be a ec ed by
a ious ac o s such as pheno ype se e i y, obse e subjec i i y, and he de ini ion o he inding,
which in some cases was iden i ied as “dis inc mou h” [
7
,
21
]. Down u ned co ne s o he mou h a e
also a equen inding among pa ien s wi h ch omosome 9q sub elome e dele ion synd ome (9qSTDS),
one o he mos common clinically ecognizable synd omes o sub elome e dele ions. Indi iduals wi h
J. Clin. Med. 2020,9, 3556 9 o 14
his synd ome also ha e o he cha ac e is ics simila o hose o pa ien s wi h WHS, such as g oss
mo o delay, congeni al hea de ec s, and epilepsy [22].
In he li e a u e, s udies indica ed ha abno mal enula a e an uncommon o al mani es a ion in
pa ien s wi h WHS [
18
], which has been epo ed in only an isola ed case [
6
,
23
]. Howe e , enulum
abno mali ies can be an ex emely use ul indica o in diagnosing a numbe o synd omic condi ions [
24
].
Fo example, enum hype plasia de ec ed in a numbe o he pa ien s o he p esen se ies was
conside ed an impo an diagnos ic inding in Ellis- an C e eld synd ome (caused by mu a ions in he
EVC1 and EVC2 genes loca ed on ch omosome 4p16), which also sha e o he o al mani es a ions wi h
WHS such as peg-shaped ee h, agenesis, oligodon ia, e up ion delay, and mic odon ia [25].
Mic ogna hia is conside ed one o he componen s o he cha ac e is ic acial pheno ype o
WHS [
7
,
17
], and ou esul s ag ee wi h hose in he li e a u e, which es ima e a p e alence o >50% [
18
].
Mic ogna hia is a common inding in some o he mos common ch omosome abno mali ies, such
as 18p dele ion [
26
]. In mic ogna hia, he ongue is posi ioned owa ds he back and p ojec ed in a
e og ade di ec ion owa ds he ha d pala e, causing a high-a ched pala e [
18
]. Cle lip/pala e appea s
in app oxima ely 25–50% o cases [
7
], a a e subs an ially highe han ha de ec ed in his se ies.
Conside ing ha isola ed cle pala e and high-a ched pala e migh ep esen he same en i y, hei
join p e alence would exceed 60% [
18
]; e en assuming his p oposal, his a e is su p isingly double
ha eco ded in he p esen se ies. Mic ogna hia, glossop osis, and espi a o y p oblems cons i u e
he Pie e Robin sequence o which isola ed cle pala e was subsequen ly added. Robin anomalad is
ela ed o a ious gene ic synd omes, especially S ickle synd ome [
27
], ollowed by T eache Collins
synd ome [
28
]. MSX1 mu a ions a e obse ed in he Pie e Robin sequence, and dele ion o an MSX1
agmen (4p16.3) loca ed in he WHS c i ical egion can cause a numbe o he synd ome’s acial
cha ac e is ics [29].
In 3 o e e y 4 pa ien s, den al e up ion was delayed. The i s published epo s o WHS
sugges ed ha delay in oo h de elopmen was a common inding in hese pa ien s [
30
]. Subsequen ly,
he p e alence o delayed den al e up ion in WHS was es ima ed o be 50% [
17
] and could be clinically
iden i ied by he pe sis ence o deciduous ee h [
16
,
17
]. Delayed oo h e up ion, oo h anomalies,
and den al agenesis a e also ypical indings in pa ien s wi h 22q11 dele ion synd ome who also
equen ly ha e congeni al hea mal o ma ions [
31
]. We ound peg-shaped ee h in 1 o e e y 4 pa ien s,
wi h he same p opo ion o mic odon ia, and almos 1 o e e y 5 pa ien s who had unde gone
adiog aphy was diagnosed wi h au odon ism. Al hough hese abno mali ies in oo h size and
shape we e men ioned in he li e a u e ega ding WHS, hei p e alence has no been speci ied [
7
,
17
],
and mos a ailable in o ma ion co esponds o indi idual case s udies [32–34].
In line wi h ou esul s, o he s udies sugges ed ha den al agenesis and oligodon ia a e common
indings in WHS [
2
,
19
]. Pos e io ee h a e mos o en a ec ed [
16
], especially pe manen second
p emola s [
19
]. Oligodon ia is a inding ha also a ec s app oxima ely hal o he pa ien s wi h
Williams synd ome (7q11.23 dele ion) [35].
Almos 80% o he pa ien s o he p esen se ies had gingi al in lamma ion (bleeding on p obing
o spon aneous). Al hough i was sugges ed ha pa ien s wi h WHS can exp ess some ype o
immunode iciency [
36
,
37
] ha migh po en ially comp omise gingi al heal h, i seems mo e plausible
o a ibu e his inding o de icien o al hygiene [
16
], which could also be exace ba ed in pa ien s
who ake hydan oins o con ol hei epilepsy. In a pa ien g oup wi h WHS who had unde gone an
o al-hygiene egimen unde hei gua dian’s con ol, he e was signi ican educ ion in he a e o
gingi al in lamma ion [34].
Re e ences ega ding malocclusions in WHS a e sca ce, and a <10% p e alence was es ima ed [
38
].
Howe e , mo e han hal o ou pa ien s we e Angle’s Class II, p esumably due o he mic ogna hia
(mandibula hypoplasia), mandibula e ogna hia (abno mal pos e io posi ioning o he mandible),
and o he p edisposing ac o s such as inge sucking. Mandibula e ogna hia is a common inding
in pa ien s wi h 1p36 dele ion synd ome— he mos common dele ion a e 22q11.2 dele ion [
39
]—and
in pa ien s wi h 5p dele ion synd ome (C i du cha synd ome) [
40
]. Malocclusion and c owding