scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Molecular dynamics simulations of homogeneous solids using multi-layered structures

Abstract

The main goal of this work is to model a homogeneous computer material with well-defined mechanical properties. To carry out the model material, an internal structure arranged in layers with different atom sizes is implemented using a simple interatomic law of Lennard-Jones type (LJ). We show that imposing an appropriate scaling law between the interatomic potentials from different layers, we obtain the same mechanical properties as if the material was homogeneous. Employing this scheme, given a fixed space volume to be occupied by the solid, this structural arrangement allows to decrease drastically (∼30-80%) the required number of atoms as compared with the case of a homogeneous solid, decreasing the computational effort and speeding up calculations. In that respect, this procedure is an analogous to mesh refinements methodologies usually applied in the continuum approaches.

Read accessible full text

Molecular dynamics simulations of homogeneous solids using multi-layered structures

Author: Gilabert Villegas, Francisco Antonio; Castellanos Mata, Antonio
Publisher: IOP Publishing Ltd.
Year: 2008
DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/83/10003
Source: https://idus.us.es/bitstreams/5aad28ce-ca53-457f-9646-cf00b1589ad2/download
July 2008
EPL, 83 (2008) 10003 www.epljou nal.o g
doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/83/10003
Molecula dynamics simula ions o homogeneous solids
using mul i-laye ed s uc u es
F. A. Gilabe (a) and A. Cas ellanos
Depa men o Elec onics and Elec omagne ism, Facul y o Physics, Uni e si y o Se ille
A da. Reina Me cedes s/n, 41012, Se ille, Spain, EU
ecei ed 19 Feb ua y 2008; accep ed in final o m 16 May 2008
published online 11 June 2008
PACS 02.70.Ns – Molecula dynamics and pa icle me hods
PACS 34.20.C – In e a omic po en ials and o ces
PACS 62.20.-x – Mechanical p ope ies o solids
Abs ac – The main goal o his wo k is o model a homogeneous compu e ma e ial wi h well-
defined mechanical p ope ies. To ca y ou he model ma e ial, an in e nal s uc u e a anged
in laye s wi h diffe en a om sizes is implemen ed using a simple in e a omic law o Lenna d-
Jones ype (LJ). We show ha imposing an app op ia e scaling law be ween he in e a omic
po en ials om diffe en laye s, we ob ain he same mechanical p ope ies as i he ma e ial was
homogeneous. Employing his scheme, gi en a fixed space olume o be occupied by he solid, his
s uc u al a angemen allows o dec ease d as ically (∼30–80%) he equi ed numbe o a oms as
compa ed wi h he case o a homogeneous solid, dec easing he compu a ional effo and speeding
up calcula ions. In ha espec , his p ocedu e is an analogous o mesh e inemen s me hodologies
usually applied in he con inuum app oaches.
Copy igh c
EPLA, 2008
In oduc ion. – Compu a ional designs o solids and
so ma e buil om simplified mic oscopic laws o in e -
ac ion ha e become an ex emely use ul ool o model
ma e ials wi h p esc ibed mac oscopic p ope ies. Many
o hem a e de o ed o unde s and phenomena such as
plas ici y, phase ansi ions, c eeps, la ge de o ma ions,
ac u e p opaga ion and so on. Among he ex ensi e
li e a u e on his a ea, he esea ch made in [1,2] is
wo h men ioning. O e he las yea s, all hese nume -
ical designs a e commonly used wi hin he amewo k o
s a is ical mechanics, since a di ec compa ison wi h he
heo e ical models o liquids and solids is possible [3,4].
Ne e heless, o ge a eliable s a is ical ep esen a ion,
all hese ealiza ions s ill demand high-pe o mance calcu-
la ions in iew o he la ge numbe o pa icles equi ed.
Fo such eason, hyb id models a e now e y popula in
ma e ial sciences hanks o he eno mous quan i y o sa ed
calcula ions. This enables esea che s o in oduce much
mo e de ailed physical aspec s in he model, and he e o e
i is no longe necessa y o sac ifice he physical desc ip-
ion by i ue o ge ing compu a ional imp o emen s. In
a hyb id nume ical design, a con inuum desc ip ion o he
ma e ial coexis s oge he wi h an a omis ic scale le el o
ep esen he in e es zone o he p oblem [5]. In ew wo ds,
we may say ha when he zone desc ibed by MD finishes,
(a)E-mail: [email p o ec ed]
i is immedia ely con inued by a FEM mesh coupled in
he in e ace. This mixed s a egy is now commonly used
in compu a ional es s o nano-inden a ion pe o med on
models o me allic ma e ials (among many o he s, see o
example [6]), whe e he egion suffe ing la ge de o ma ions
is desc ibed by he a omic ep esen a ion, and his is in
u n sus ained by he con inuum egion whe e he de o -
ma ions a e small and p edominan ly elas ic.
In his s udy, we p esen an al e na i e scena io,
wi hou abandoning he disc e e na u e o he in e nal
ep esen a ion o a solid, whose o igins, as a as we
know, s a ed back wi h he bidimensional esea ch made
in [7,8]. In ou de e minis ic desc ip ion, co espond-
ing o he mesoscopic le el, we assume ha pa icles
can be conside ed as “supe -a oms”, which a e ully
cha ac e ized by hei posi ions, eloci ies, in e pa icle
dis ances and o ces. Using his desc ip ion, we design
a mac oscopic solid in e nally s uc u ed in laye s. Each
laye is an amo phous assembly o supe -a oms ha
possess a con enien ly selec ed “size” o in e ac ion ange
obeying a simple scaling law. This gene a es a solid
bulk locally ea anged by amo phous a omic laye s wi h
diffe en hicknesses. The in e ac ion be ween a oms has
been modeled by means o LJ po en ial, which has been
used o model fluids (see pionee esea ch in e s. [9,10])
and solids such as me allic glasses, alloys and an de
Waals solids [11–13]. This po en ial is simple, well known
10003-p1
F. A. Gilabe and A. Cas ellanos
and widely used o s udy he mic oscopic o mac oscopic
c osso e in condensed ma e physics.
This pape is o ganized as ollows: Fi s ly, we p esen
some basic p elimina y defini ions, nomencla u e and he
undamen al physical meaning o he a iables employed
in his s udy. Subsequen ly, he mo i a ion o his al e na-
i e desc ip ion is commen ed, oge he wi h ou p oposal
o he in e ac ion and scaling laws. La e on, we shall
desc ibe he cen al aspec s o ou compu a ional imple-
men a ion, ha is, a de ailed desc ip ion o he laye ing
p ocedu e as well as he ad an ages ob ained om i .
Finally, he esul s ob ained om he mechanical es s by
means o uniaxial and iso opic comp essions a e exposed,
and compa ed wi h hose esul s ob ained om he
“classical” o homogenous solid bulk.
P elimina y issues. – Le us conside a pai o a oms
sepa a ed by a sepa a ion dis ance and subjec ed o
he ac ion o a cen al po en ial u( ) and in e ac ion
o ce ( )=u( ). No e ha he ollowing defini ions
a e independen om he po en ial o m excep o he
non-di ec ional and pai s-addi i i y ea u es. Le us use
designa ions σ, 0,and 1 o he dis ances a which
he po en ial and i s fi s and second de i a i es become
ze o, i.e.:u(σ)=0,u( 0)=0andu ( 1) = 0. Fo all usual
po en ials, σ<
0<
1. The physical meaning o hese
dis ances a e: σ—ha d sphe e adius, 0—equilib ium
dis ance and 1—b eak dis ance. We shall no use
he quan i y σ. The h ee mos impo an dimensional
cha ac e is ics o he in e ac ion a e ene gy, s eng h
and s iffness o he bond, gi en by D=−u( 0), max =
u( 1)andC=u( 0), espec i ely. All hese quan i ies
a e posi i e. In his s udy we use Dand max as he
uni s o ene gy and o ce, espec i ely. Fo he p essu e
we define he magni ude σ0= max/ 2
0, whose meaning
is he s ess needed o b eak a single in e a omic bond
(changing he sign o nega i e). The uni o ime is he
pe iod o oscilla ion o a single a om o mass mgi en by
T0=2πm/C. Finally, he c i ical dissipa ion coefficien
gi en by γc=√mC ep esen s he quan i y o mass ha
can be slowed down pe uni ime. The c i ical alue
co esponds o he iscosi y o an effec i e medium whe e a
pa icle is imme sed and whose alue p e en s he pa icle
o comple e an oscilla ion due o he ac ion o he po en ial
field. In ha espec , we ha e conside ed an a he mal
p oblem. The e o e he simples way o ep esen a global
dissipa i e mechanism is o fix a cons an dissipa ion
coefficien , in ou case γ=0.03γc. We a e awa e o his
delibe a e simplifica ion, since his choice does no allow
us o con ol he he mal p ope ies o he sys em. To
con ol he empe a u e o he ma e ial an addi ional
equa ion o γshould be included, e ol ing in ime and
eadjus ing he ene gy o he sys em [14]. Ne e heless, in
his wo k we a e in e es ed in calcula ing he mechanical
p ope ies unde e y low empe a u es.
To pe o m he mechanical es s, he ba os a ic p oce-
du e de ised by [15] has been implemen ed. I consis s o a
ma hema ical p ocedu e ha enables us o apply any kind
o ex e nal s essed/comp essed s a e on he solid, so ha
he in e nal s ess o he sys em, gi en by he exp ession
o he Cauchy s ess enso ,
σαβ =1
V
i<j
∂u( ij)
∂ α
ij
β
ij,(1)
can ma ch he ex e nally applied p essu e. In (1), he
cen al cha ac e o he po en ial has been assumed,
α
ij deno es he α-componen o he in e a omic dis ance
be ween a oms iand j,andVis he olume occupied by
he solid. P essu e changes a e accomplished by changing
he coo dina es o he pa icles and he size o he
compu a ional cell unde pe iodic bounda y condi ions.
Using his p ocedu e, we ha e ca ied ou uniaxial and
iso opic es s. F om hese es s, he elas ic moduli can be
accu a ely calcula ed using he in e nal s a e o s esses
(wi h eq. (1)) and de o ma ions ( ela i e changes o he
pe iodic cell gi en by αβ ), i.e.
E=2σ2
xx +σxx(σyy +σzz)−(σyy +σzz)2
xx(2σxx +σyy +σzz)−(yy +zz)(σyy +σzz),(2)
ν=σxx(yy +zz)−xx(σyy +σzz)
(yy +zz)(σyy +σzz)−xx(2σxx +σyy +σzz),(3)
B=1
3
σxx +σyy +σzz
xx +yy +zz
,(4)
whe e E,νand Ba e he Young modulus, he Poisson
coefficien and he bulk modulus, espec i ely. Fo mulae
(2)–(4) can be ob ained assuming an iso opic and homo-
geneous ma e ial (o a ma e ial wi h cubic symme y)
oge he wi h he cons i u i e equa ions o elas ici y [16].
Mo i a ion, in e ac ion and scaling laws. – The
mo i a ion is o c ea e a compu e solid bulk ma e ial
wi hou comp omising nei he a good knowledge o hei
mechanical p ope ies no he compu a ional effo associ-
a ed o an ele a ed numbe o pa icles. This imp o emen
is aimed a designing a compu e bulk ma e ial: i) wi h
well-defined mechanical beha io , ii) wi h simple bu
well-de e mined physics, iii) wi h an affo dable numbe o
pa icles and, i ) using an efficien and simple algo i hm.
We combine wo ideas: fi s , an inhomogeneous in e nal
s uc u e and secondly, an app op ia e scaling law o he
in e a omic po en ials.
We chose o build he e ogeneous a angemen s o a oms
wi h o de ing by laye s and wi h diffe en a om sizes.
This s uc u al ep esen a ion o he ma e ial is specially
sui able o pe o m uniaxial es s. Compu a ional effi-
ciency is no o iously imp o ed, since his o de ing allows
us o classi y a oms using echniques inspi ed by pa allel
compu ing using pa icle sys ems [17]. The simple idea
behind ou p oposal is ha using diffe en a om sizes
in a gi en olume, he numbe o a oms pe olume
dec eases, and he e o e he numbe o pai in e ac ions
dec eases as well. The esul is an ob ious speed-up
o he compu a ions: he final pu pose o his esea ch
is o ob ain he same mechanical beha io as in he
10003-p2
MD simula ions using mul i-laye ed s uc u es
Fig. 1: (Colou on-line) Le : de ail o he building ma e ial
in laye s. Black boxes a e i ually bounding he egion o
he sample co esponding wi h a laye , and he ed ones a e
enclosing he in e aces be ween a couple o laye s. Righ :
snapsho o he in e ace be ween wo laye s wi h diffe en
a om sizes. An app op ia e cu -off dis ance mus be se . Fo
an efficien calcula ion (see ex ), his cu -off will depend on
he scaling ac o used in he in e a omic po en ial o bo h
adjacen laye s.
homogeneous case bu educing he compu ing ime
significa i ely. A p oblem o which his me hodology
will be pa icula y sui able is he con ac be ween a
de o mable sphe e and a igid plane. As desc ibed in [18],
he sphe e can be ob ained om he cu o a block made
o his he e ogeneous ma e ial. Since he mos impo an
e en s will occu in he con ac zone, his con ac is mo e
p ecisely desc ibed by he laye ha con ains he smalles
a oms, whils he es o he egions a om he con ac
zone a e ep esen ed by la ge a om sizes.
The idea is o c ea e a block o he bulk ma e ial
a anged by laye s, as i is shown in fig. 1, whe e he
laye ing p ocess is indica ed by i ual boxes. Each laye
has a diffe en a om size. When we say “a om sizes” we
a e e e eing o equilib ium dis ances inside he amo phous
la ice. In ou simple elec ion, he ela ion be ween a om
sizes belonging o a couple o adjacen laye s scales as
l+1 =k
l(l⩾0), whe e lis he a om size o he laye l.
The fi s laye o a oms con ains he smalles a oms wi h
size 0defined p e iously. Thus, he a om size in he
n- h laye is n=kn 0. Taking in o accoun his scaling,
he po en ial ene gy be ween a oms om wo con iguous
laye s land mis
ulm( ij)=Dlm  lm
ij 12
−2 lm
ij 6
,(5)
whe e ij is he dis ance be ween a oms and lm is he
equilib ium dis ance equal o (kl 0+km 0)/2. This is a
long- ange po en ial bu in p ac ice one usually defines a
cu -off dis ance om which he po en ial ac ion becomes
negligible. In he case o a homogeneous s uc u e, we se
his cu -off dis ance o cu -off =2.1 0, ha co esponds o
a ypical dis ance beyond which o ces be ween pai s a e
essen ially ze o. Fo he scaled po en ial w i en in eq. (5),
we ha e es ablished an analogous cu -off dis ance gi en by
cu -off,lm =2.1 lm.
The elas ic moduli o a solid composed by wo laye s
indexed by le e s land m, espec i ely should be
in a iable i he po en ial pa ame e s sa is y he ollowing
scaling o mulae
lm =γlm 0,D
lm =γ3
lmD, γlm =1
2(kl+km).(6)
To ob ain hese ela ions, we ha e easoned as ollows.
Le us suppose a hypo he ic elas ic modulus o ou
homogeneous ma e ial deno ed by M. This modulus has
a dependency o he po en ial pa ame e s Dand 0gi en
by M=λD/ 3
0. The quan i y λis a numbe depending
i) on he spa ial dis ibu ion o he la ice nodes (i.e., he
in e nal s uc u e: amo phous, FCC, BCC, o wha e e )
and ii) on he in e ac ion ange be ween a oms (i.e.,
fi s , second o a he neighbo shells). Fo a wo-laye ed
compu e ma e ial, he same elas ic modulus should ha e a
dependency gi en by M=λDlm/ 3
lm. Then, we admi he
ollowing assump ion: bo h ypes o solids, homogeneous
and wo-laye ed, will ha e he same effec i e in e nal
s uc u e, i.e.,λ=λ. A e a s aigh o wa d ope a ion,
we ob ain he ela ions w i en in (6). The e o e, i his
assump ion is ue, a he e ogeneous ma e ial composed by
mo e han 2 laye s will keep hei elas ic moduli equal o
he homogenous ones i he scaling gi en by (6) is ulfilled
be ween each in e ace o med by wo con iguous laye s.
Gene al aspec s o he implemen a ion. – An
efficien MD ealiza ion equi es, a leas , he ollowing
ea u es: i) o admi a sui able cu -off dis ance o a oid he
unnecessa y coun ing o pa icles ha do no con ibu e,
ii) an efficien algo i hm o sea ching and so ing he
nea es neighbo s and iii) a con enien di ision o he
p oblem using echniques based on he domain decom-
posi ion p ocedu e [17]. In a polydispe si e size sys em, as
he one we a e dealing wi h he e, one can ackle he in e -
pa icle in e ac ion in wo ways: 1) o conside a mean
cu -off dis ance o all laye s using i o any pai wi h
non-equal a om sizes (see he igh pic u e in fig. 1), o 2)
o ake ad an age o he laye ed s uc u e o classi y a oms
acco ding o hei sizes and ecalcula ing he app op ia e
cu -off dis ance as a unc ion o he scaling ac o .
The fi s s a egy is e y easy o implemen bu
p oduces an inefficien handling o in e ac ing pai s and
an inaccu a e calcula ion o o ces and in e nal s esses.
In ou si ua ion, o compu e he o al o ce ac ing on one
a om we need o conside he adjacen a oms possessing
diffe en sizes. To conside an a e age cu -off dis ance
may lead o miss a oms beyond his ange and whose
con ibu ions o he in e ac ion o ce a e no negligible.
On he o he hand and a he same ime, since each
a om has a lis o po en ial neighbo s o in e ac wi h, o
assume his a e age cu -off dis ance may lead o include
a oms in he lis whose con ibu ions a e negligible. This
implies addi ional and expensi e ope a ions o inse ion,
calcula ion and ex ac ion o memo y alloca ions.
In ha espec , he second s a egy, al hough i is a bi
mo e elabo a ed o implemen , leads o a mo e efficien
10003-p3
F. A. Gilabe and A. Cas ellanos
Fig. 2: (Colou on-line) Snapsho showing how a con inuum
bulk ma e ial is ob ained once a laye ed sample wi h nl=5,
N= 21311, k=4/3 eaches he equilib ium. In his case,
he pe iodic bounda y condi ions a e only imposed in he
di ec ions o he plane pe pendicula o he column axis o he
sample.
handling o he in e ac ing pai s. This educes he uly
necessa y in e ac ing numbe o a oms compa ed wi h he
p e ious s a egy and wi h he homogeneous case. Also,
he in e a omic o ces and he s ess enso componen s
a e p ope ly calcula ed, since any in e ac ing pai is no
missed. The p oblem is s aigh o wa dly di ided in o
wo s ages: fi s , we pe o m he in e ac ions be ween
a oms wi h he same size, i.e. inside a laye , which is
compu a ionally enclosed wi hin a i ual bounding box,
as he black ones depic ed in he le pic u e o fig. 1, and
secondly, we pe o m he in e ac ions in he zone c ea ed
by he in e ace be ween wo adjacen laye s, as he
ed i ual box shown in he same pic u e. This simple
classifica ion o in e ac ions sa es many unnecessa y
memo y accesses (a oms inside i ual boxes a e loca ed
in con iguous blocks o memo y) and helps o con ol all
o ces calcula ed on each pa o he ma e ial.
Laye ing de ails. – This p ocedu e has been imple-
men ed in a C++ code as ollows. An amo phous and
mechanically equilib a ed block o monosized a oms
is c ea ed a low empe a u e (<0.1 K). This block is
eplica ed nl−1 imes, whe e nlis he numbe o laye s.
Each copy is placed on he p e ious block, bu scaling he
a om size acco ding o l+1 =k
l,i.e., he copied block
is “infla ed”. Due o he expansion o he scaled block,
he bounda y box has o be eadjus ed o keep he same
c oss-sec ion as he o iginal block. Thus, he a oms alling
ou side he eadjus ed box mus be emo ed. In each new
laye he mass densi y emains app oxima ely cons an
Fig. 3: A om numbe as a unc ion o he numbe o laye s in
a he e ogeneous-laye ed sys em in compa ison wi h a homoge-
neous sys em (solid line).
while he nume ical densi y dec eases d as ically. Using
his p ocedu e, i is easy o calcula e he numbe o a oms
in he laye l, gi en by Nl=N0/k2l, whe e N0is he a om
numbe in he o iginal block. Nex , he p og am de ec s
nlbounding boxes co esponding o he laye s con aining
monosized a oms and nl−1 bounding boxes co e-
sponding o in e aces con aining wo-sized a oms (wi h a
negligible nume ical cos ). Then, he key leading o an effi-
cien pe o mance is ha he in e ac ion ea men in each
laye becomes iden ical as in a homogeneous case, i.e.,
Dlm, lm wi h l=m, excep o he in e ace whe e l=m.
The esul is a complexi y linea wi h he o al pa icle
numbe , he e o e he compu a ion ime o his scheme is
educed acco ding o his numbe . Once a configu a ion
is ob ained, he las s ep consis s o ge ing a con inuum
bulk. Laye s mus s ick o each o he , as fig. 2 shows,
whils o ces, s esses and ene gy a e moni o ed. A e he
equilib ium, he new mul i-laye sys em is achie ed wi h
ze o s esses and low empe a u e. In fig. 3 we show he
ad an age o using his me hodology o wo g ow h a es
k. These esul s can be easily checked, since he o al
numbe o a oms in a configu a ion, as fig. 2 shows, can
be accu a ely calcula ed jus making he ollowing sum:
N=
nl−1

l=0
N0
k2l=N0
1−k−2nl
1−k−2.(7)
This exp ession is no hing mo e han he p edic ed a om
numbe in a mul ilaye ed specimen, co esponding o a
simple geome ical se ies wi h a e kand nl e ms. In
fig. 3 we ha e ep esen ed wi h dashed lines hose alues
acco ding o eq. (7), while symbols a e he esul s ob ained
a e he cons uc ion o he solid o diffe en laye
numbe s. The solid line ma ks he limi es ablished by
homogeneous-like cons uc ions. Figu e 4 shows he huge
ad an ages ob ained om he laye ing in e ms o he
sa ed numbe o a oms in a gi en olume: he numbe o
a oms needed o pe o m he model is d as ically educed,
be ween 30%–80%, depending on nland k.
Elas ic coefficien s and mechanical esponse. – A
a ie y o specimens has been c ea ed, a ying he a om
numbe (n), he laye numbe (nl) and he scaling size
10003-p4
MD simula ions using mul i-laye ed s uc u es
Table 1: Young modulus E, Poisson coefficien νand bulk modulus Bcalcula ed o diffe en configu a ions o he compu e
bulk laye ed ma e ial. Thei exp essions a e gi en by o mulae (2)–(4).
nlkn E/σ
0νB/σ
0
1 1.0 1000 24.5±0.80.370 ±0.131.5±0.2
1 1.0 8000 22.5±0.80.377 ±0.004 31.05 ±0.07
1 1.0 10648 22.1±0.40.379 ±0.002 31.2±0.02
2 1.40 1626 22.55 ±0.07 0.379 ±0.001 31.8±0.3
2 1.50 4375 22.45 ±0.07 0.3849 ±0.001 32.5±0.3
2 1.33 4737 22.48 ±0.02 0.380 ±0.002 32.4±0.4
2 1.50 5113 23.105 ±0.014 0.3765 ±0.0002 31.32 ±0.06
3 1.40 1432 24.4±0.70.372 ±0.008 32.2±0.5
3 1.33 2079 24.3±0.40.371 ±0.005 31.8±0.3
3 1.33 7924 23.5±0.10.375 ±0.001 31.78 ±0.12
4 1.33 8728 23.0±0.40.379 ±0.003 31.9±0.2
5 1.33 21311 24.0±0.50.373 ±0.005 31.4±0.3
Fig. 4: Imp o emen s ob ained using he laye ed model. The
educ ion in he numbe o pa icles is plo ed as a unc ion o
henumbe o laye s,nl.
ac o (k). Table 1 shows he esul s o mechanical es s
o hese laye ed ma e ials. Young modulus and Poisson
coefficien a e ob ained om uniaxial es s, while he
bulk modulus was calcula ed om iso opic comp essions.
No e ha he case nl= 1 co esponds o he homogeneous
ma e ial.
The esul s om able 1 sugges ha he elas ic moduli
seem o be cons an , despi e small diffe ences p obably
caused by a sligh size effec o he sample. These alues
we e ob ained applying s esses below 10−3σ0, p oducing
de o ma ions much smalle han 0.2%: we made su e
ha he samples ne e abandoned he elas ic egime.
Uniaxial s ess was applied in he di ec ion pe pendicula
o he laye ing, and he iso opic es in he h ee spa ial
di ec ions. In bo h cases pe iodic bounda y condi ions
we e conside ed. When an uniaxial comp ession imposing
a e y slow s ain a e is pe o med (˙T
0=10
−5), he
mechanical esponse o he compu e ma e ial is clea ly
linea , as fig. 5 shows. This diag am illus a es he s ess-
s ain cu e whe e he p essu e and s ain a e calcula ed
acco ding o he o iginal dimensions o he sample and
no he ins an aneous alues. We also checked ha he
same samples beha ed in a simila way i a es o uniaxial
ension was ca ied ou . In fig. 5, he con inuous line was
ob ained om a e aging o e fi e diffe en specimens. The
Fig. 5: S ess-s ain diag am o homogeneous and he e oge-
neous ma e ial. The ma e ial is de o med imposing a quasi-
s a ic–like bu con inuous cell sh inking on he pe iodic cell
ha con ains he ma e ial. The laye ed specimen has 3 laye s
wi h a g ow h a e k=4/3.
ba s ep esen he s anda d de ia ion om he a e age o
he he e ogeneous ma e ial (simila ones a e ob ained o
he homogeneous case). These he e ogeneous specimens
we e c ea ed using an iden ical p ocedu e bu changing
he ini ial dis ibu ions o posi ions and eloci ies o he
a oms du ing he s age o amo phous p epa a ion. Each
specimen consis ed o h ee laye s wi h k=4/3. In o de o
compa e wi h he homogeneous case, we ha e also plo ed
wi h dashed line he s ess-s ain cu e ob ained om
comp essing a homogeneous compu e ma e ial occupying
an equi alen olume. Bo h ypes o s uc u es esponded
wi h he same mechanical beha io . E en in he domain
o la ge de o ma ions, a e age alues we e always wi hin
he nume ical e o ba s. This si ua ion is also p esen in
expe imen al esul s o physical ma e ials.
Fo he sake o comple eness, we pe o med (on he
he e ogeneous ma e ial used in fig. 5) uniaxial es s
imposing he ex e nal p essu e by means o a s epwise
mechanism using he ba os a ic p ocedu e desc ibed in
e . [15] The leaps o p essu e we e se o 0.05σ0. Figu e 6
shows he esul an beha io . Two cycles consis ing o
loading and unloading we e ca ied ou . In he fi s cycle
he specimen was comp essed om 0 up o 0.25σ0(black
10003-p5

F. A. Gilabe and A. Cas ellanos
Fig. 6: (Colou on-line) S ess-s ain diag am o he he e oge-
neous ma e ial imposing small leaps o p essu e. Each symbol
ep esen s a mechanical equilib a ed s a e a low empe a u e.
The ma e ial defini ely b eaks once he p essu e exceeds he
alue 0.5σ0. Compa ison wi h he alues ob ained om homo-
geneous s uc u es ga e an excellen ag eemen , p o ing ha
effec s o he scaling law a e exac ly he expec ed ones.
ci cles). Once he equilib ium was eached, he specimen
was immedia ely unloaded up o ze o p essu e ( ed
ci cles). The second cycle s a ed eloading he p e ious
final s a e a ze o s ess, inc emen ing s ep by s ep up
o 0.5σ0(black c osses). Decomp ession p ocess was om
0.5σ0 e u ning o 0 ( ed c osses). To finish his es , he
las s a e o he second eload was newly comp essed up
o 0.65σ0(black squa es). In his case we obse ed ha
he ma e ial b oke once he alue 0.5σ0was exceeded
(de o ma ion jumped om 4% up o 12%).
Conce ning his b eakage, he e a e wo specific quan i-
ies ha comple e he cha ac e iza ion o he mechanical
beha io oge he wi h he elas ic moduli: he onse o
plas ici y σY, o yield s eng h (beyond which he ma e ial
flows plas ically) and he maximum s ess ha he ma e -
ial can sus ain σU, o ul ima e s eng h. F om calcula ions
a e aged om o e 20 diffe en samples o homogeneous
bulk ma e ials consis ing o 104a oms each, we ha e
ob ained ha hese quan i ies a e σY/σ0=0.29 ±0.12
and σu/σ0=0.51 ±0.08. In figs. 5 and 6 i can be seen ha
he he e ogenous ma e ial beha es iden ically wi hin his
ange o alues. In ac we ob ained simila alues o hese
wo quan i ies: σY/σ0=0.3±0.1andσu/σ0=0.50 ±0.1.
Conclusion. – Wi hin he amewo k o he MD
app oach, a simple compu a ional p ocedu e based on
he scaling o he in e a omic po en ial was used o
model he e ogenous amo phous solids ha possess he
same mechanical p ope ies as i hey had an in e nal
homogeneous s uc u e. The laye ed model was subjec ed
o a ious mechanical es s. F om he es s, Young and
bulk moduli, he Poisson coefficien and he s ess-s ain
diag ams (con olling he s ain a e o he applied p es-
su e) we e ob ained. The mechanical esponse showed by
laye ed s uc u es exhibi ed he same beha io as i hey
we e homogeneous. The combina ion be ween simple scal-
ing laws on he in e a omic po en ial and an app op ia e
laye ing makes i possible o educe up o 80% he nume i-
cal densi y o equi ed a oms o desc ibe he solid. This se
o ideas p esen ed in his pape a e sugges ed as he begin-
ning o a me hodology simila o he mesh efinemen s
app oach in FEM, al hough applied o disc e e simula ion
using pa icles. In ha sense, an immedia e applica ion
ha we ha e al eady s a ed is a de ailed s udy o he
elas ic-plas ic and ully plas ic egime in adhesi e nano-
con ac s [18]. This me hod will allow us o build a much
la ge sphe ical body o ca y ou he con ac wi h a igid
plane. We shall be in a posi ion o ob ain he JKR solu-
ion, commonly used o desc ibe he con ac be ween a
sphe ical mac oscopic so body and a igid fla su ace,
in he elas ic egime [19].
∗∗∗
The au ho s wish o hank P o . A. M. K i so o
his e y use ul con ac s and discussions. This wo k has
been suppo ed by he Minis e io de Educaci´on y Ciencia
o he Spanish Go e nmen unde p ojec FIS2006-03645
and by he Jun a de Andaluc´ıa unde p ojec FQM-421.
REFERENCES
[1] Ab aham F. F. and Gao H.,Phys. Re . Le .,84 (2000)
3113.
[2] Gao H., Huang Y. and Ab aham F. F.,J. Mech. Phys.
Solids,49 (2001) 2113.
[3] Allen M. P. and Tildesley D. J.,Compu e Simula ion
o Liquids (Ox o d Uni e si y P ess, Ox o d) 2002.
[4] Hoo e Wm. G.,Compu a ional S a is ical Mechanics
(Else ie , Ams e dam) 1991.
[5] Ra ii-Taba H., Hua L. and C oss M.,J. Phys.:
Condens. Ma e ,10 (1998) 2375.
[6] Shia i B., Mille R. E. and Cu in W. A.,J. Eng.
Ma e . Technol.,127 (2005) 358.
[7] Falk M. L. and Lange J. S.,Phys. Re . E,57 (1998)
7192.
[8] Falk M. L.,Phys. Re . B,10 (1999) 7062.
[9] Rahman A.,Phys. Re .,136 (1964) A405.
[10] Ve le V.,Phys. Re .,117 (1967) 98.
[11] Kobayashi S., Maeda K. and Takeuchi S.,Ac a
Me all.,28 (1980) 1641.
[12] S olo i z D., Vi ek V. and Egami T.,Ac a Me all.,
31 (1983) 335.
[13] Quesnel D. J., Rimai D. S. and DeMejo L. P.,Phys.
Re . B,48 (1993) 6795.
[14] Nose S.,J. Chem. Phys.,81 (1984) 511.
[15] Pa inello M. and Rahman A.,J. Appl. Phys.,52
(1981) 7182.
[16] Landau L. D. and Li shi z E. M.,Theo y o Elas ici y
(Pe gamon P ess, Heading on Hill Hall, Ox o d) 1986.
[17] Plimp on S.,J. Compu . Phys.,117 (1995) 1.
[18] Gilabe F. A., Quin anilla M. A. S., Cas ellanos
A. and Val e de J. M.,Z. Angew. Ma h. Mech.,87
(2007) 128.
[19] Johnson K. L., Kendall K. and Robe s A. D.,P oc.
R. Soc. London, Se . A,324 (1971) 301.
10003-p6