scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Sequential reduction and alkyl exchange reactions of bis(imino)pyridine dialkyliron(II) with trimethylaluminum

Abstract

The sequence of reactions ensuing when the 2,6-bis(imino)pyridine Fe(II) dialkyl complexes [Fe(CH2SiMe3)2(BIP)] react with trimethylaluminum is described in detail. The first step is the reduction of the dialkyl to the corresponding monoalkyl complex [Fe(CH 2SiMe3)(BIP)]. In the presence of an excess of trimethylaluminum, these undergo exchange of the remaining CH 2SiMe3 group for methyl, and ultimately the methyliron fragment is displaced from the complex, leading to previously known paramagnetic aluminum compounds. The diethylaluminum complex [AlEt2( iPrBIP)] was obtained when triethylaluminum was used instead of trimethylaluminum.

Read accessible full text

Sequential reduction and alkyl exchange reactions of bis(imino)pyridine dialkyliron(II) with trimethylaluminum

Author: Cartes Domínguez, María Ángeles; Rodríguez Delgado, Antonio; Palma Ramírez, María del Pilar; Álvarez González, Eleuterio
Publisher: American Chemical Society
Year: 2014
DOI: 10.1021/om500167r
Source: https://idus.us.es/bitstreams/36ba25f6-0437-4aa2-afbe-d21be33f07e2/download
1
Sequen ial Reduc ion And Alkyl Exchange Reac ions O Bisiminopy idine Dialkyli on(II) Wi h
T ime hylaluminum.
M. Ángeles Ca es, An onio Rod íguez-Delgado, Pila Palma, Eleu e io Ál a ez and Juan Cámpo a.*
Ins i u o de In es igaciones Químicas, CSIC – Uni e sidad de Se illa. c/ Amé ico Vespucio, 49, 41092, Se illa,
Spain.
Summa y: The sequence o eac ions ensuing when 2,6-bisiminopy idine Fe(II) dialkyl complexes
[Fe(CH2SiMe3)2(BIP)] eac wi h ime hylaluminum is desc ibed in de ail. The i s s ep is he educ ion o he
dialkyl o he co esponding monoalkyl complex [Fe(CH2SiMe3)(BIP)]. In he p esence o an excess o
ime hylaluminum, hese unde go exchange o he emaining CH2SiMe3 g oup o me hyl, and ul ima ely he
me hyli on agmen is displaced om he complex, leading o p e iously known pa amagne ic aluminum
compounds. The die hyl aluminum complex [AlE 2(iP BIP)] was ob ained when ie hylaluminum was used ins ead o
ime hylaluminum.
In oduc ion
The s udy o i on and cobal complexes wi h 2,6-bis(imino)py idine (BIP) ligands as ca alys s o ole in
polyme iza ion has a ac ed much in e es since hei disco e y in 1998.1 As a esul , he main ac o s con olling
hei pe o mance and selec i i y a e now easonably well unde s ood.2 Howe e , he in es iga ion o he
mechanis ic aspec s o hese ca alys s p o ed e y challenging, and he ue na u e o he ac i e species in ol ed
in hese ca aly ic sys ems is s ill being deba ed.3
By analogy wi h o he homogeneous ole in polyme iza ion ca alys s, ea ly mechanis ic p oposals
pos ula ed ha ac i a ion o [MX2(BIP)] wi h o ganoaluminum co-ca alys s leads o coo dina i ely unsa u a ed
ca ionic Fe(II) o Co(II) alkyl species.4 This p oposal ecei ed a s ong expe imen al suppo om Chi ik, who
syn hesized i on5 and cobal 6 complexes o ype [M(R)(S)(iP BIP)]+ (S is a sol en molecule o no ligand; he
supe sc ip on he BIP ligand e e s o he a yl subs i uen s on he imine g oups, see Scheme 1) and con i med ha
hese complexes do in ac beha e as single-componen ca alys s o e hylene polyme iza ion. Howe e , one o he
di icul ies o his classic ac i a ion scheme is ha , while he eac ion o pa amagne ic dihalide complexes
[MX2(BIP)] wi h o ganoaluminum compounds is complex and di icul o s udy, he be e -beha ed o ganoli hium o
-magnesium eagen s seldom lead o s aigh o wa d alkyla ion.7 F equen ly, he ou come o such eac ions is
simul aneous alkyla ion and educ ion, he main p oduc s being unusual neu al o anionic monoalkyl species
[M(R)(BIP)]0/-.8-10 This dis inc eac i i y o BIP complexes sugges ed ha ac i a ion o i on o cobal dihalide
p ecu so s by o ganoaluminum compounds could also in ol e edox changes.8,9 Al hough he in e mediacy o
neu al o e en anionic in e media es in he polyme iza ion eac ion seems a he i s sigh unusual, combined
s uc u al, spec oscopic and heo e ical s udies ha e shown ha he abo e-men ioned educed species
[M(R)(BIP)]0/- a e p ope ly desc ibed as M(II) complexes con aining singly o doubly educed BIP adical-anion
ligands,5b,9,11 he e o e he edox changes a e ligand- a he han me al-cen e ed p ocesses. Since he elec onic
2
s a e and he s e ic en i onmen o he me al cen e in isoelec onic ca ionic, neu al and anionic monoalkyl species
is e y simila , i is concei able ha di e en ly cha ged species could play some ole in he polyme iza ion p ocess.
So a , no s able alkyli on o alkylcobal complexes ha e been isola ed om he eac ions o i on o cobal
p ecu so s wi h o ganoaluminum eagen s. Fo example, Gamba o a s udied he eac ion o he i on complexes
[FeCl2(iP BIP)] o [Fe(CH2SiMe3)2(iP BIP)] wi h ime hyl- o ie hylaluminum (hence o h TMA and TEA,
espec i ely), bu his led o he isola ion o [AlMe2(iP BIP)] and o he pa amagne ic, NMR-silen aluminum
compounds ha a e ca aly ically inac i e, a he han o i on alkyl species.12 In consequence, s udies on ac i a ion
p ocesses ha e elied on in si u spec oscopic s udies.13-16 These led o di e en and some imes con adic o y
esul s. Thus, using ESI mass spec ome y, Leskelä and co-wo ke s iden i ied he o ma ion o he ca ionic alkyl
species [FeMe(THF)(iP BIP)]+ when he co esponding halide p ecu so complex was ea ed wi h MAO in THF,13
bu a combined Mossbaue and UV-VIS analysis o he MAO ac i a ion p oduc s in mo e usual non-pola sol en s
led Gibson o p opose ha his p ocess in ol es oxida ion a he han educ ion, p oducing Fe(III) species.14 This
conclusion has ound suppo in heo e ical con ibu ions.17 Using NMR, B yliako and Talsi showed ha in e ac ion
o i on15 and cobal 16 [MX2(BIP)] complexes wi h MAO o aluminum ialkyls leads o di e en ypes o p oduc s
depending on he M / Al a io and he na u e o he o ganoaluminum compounds. Whils MAO gi es ise o ca ionic
bime allic species [M(µ-X)(µ-Me)AlMe2(BIP)]+ (whe e X = Cl o Me), TMA and o he aluminum ialkyls cause he
educ ion o he complexes, a o ding neu al compounds [M(µ-X)(µ-R)AlR2(BIP)] ha a e signi ican ly less s able
han he ca ionic species gene a ed wi h MAO and decompose a oom empe a u e o ul ima ely yield i on- ee
aluminum complexes, consis en ly wi h Gamba o a’s esul s.12,15c Bo h neu al and ca ionic bime allic species can
be seen as adduc s o he co esponding complexes [M(X)(BIP)]+/0 wi h a ialkylaluminum uni . Conside ing ha
bo h MAO and aluminum ialkyls a e e icien ac i a o s, and he p e iously-men ioned simila i y o he me al
cen e in ca ionic and neu al monoalkyl complexes, i was sugges ed ha di e en coca alys s could lead o
di e en (ca ionic o neu al) ac i e species, a leas in he case o i on complexes.5b,15c This could help explain he
s ong in luence o co-ca alys s in he molecula weigh dis ibu ion o polye hylenes ob ained wi h he la e
ca alys s.
Wi h he aim o con ibu ing o cla i y he ole o aluminum alkyls as educing agen s, we ha e in es iga ed
he in e ac ion o he mally s able dialkyls [Fe(CH2SiMe3)2(BIP)] wi h TMA a oom empe a u e as a well-de ined
model o he in e ac ion o i on BIP complexes wi h aluminum alkyls, a highly ele an p ocess o ole in
polyme iza ion. In his con ibu ion, we show ha hese eac ions ake place h ough a sequence o consecu i e
educ ion and alkyl exchange s eps in ol ing neu al i on monoalkyls [Fe(R)(BIP)] (R = CH2SiMe3 o Me), which
could be isola ed o de ec ed unde he app op ia e expe imen al condi ions.
Resul s and Discussion
Some ime ago, we s udied he in e ac ion o he i on dialkyl complex [Fe(CH2SiMe3)2(MesBIP)] (1a) wi h
ime hylaluminum (TMA).18 Using 1H NMR, we obse ed ha he eac ion o 1a wi h one equi alen o TMA (i. e.,
0.5 Al2Me6) in C6D6, leads o a single p oduc , 2a, mode a ely s able in solu ion a oom empe a u e. This esul
was conside ed ele an because e hylene was apidly polyme ized when bubbled h ough he esul ing solu ion. In
ha epo , we sugges ed ha complex 2a could be a bime allic Fe/Al complex on he basis o he simila i y o
some o i s main 1H signals wi h hose o he species epo ed by B yliako and Talsi.15b Howe e , we la e ound
3
close simila i y wi h he spec a o he monoalkyl complexes [Fe(CH2SiMe3)(E BIP)]10a and [Fe(CH2SiMe3)(
iP BIP)],19 epo ed by Chi ik, and his led us o conclude ha 2a could be a membe o he same amily o
monoalkyl compounds, as shown in Scheme 1. Ou e o s o isola e 2a om he eac ion o 1a and TMA we e
ini ially hwa ed by he acile decomposi ion o he p oduc du ing he wo kup. Howe e , a e a numbe o
a emp s, we ound ha 2a is ob ained in high yield (up o 90 %) when s oichiome ic amoun s o 1a and TMA a e
combined in oluene a oom empe a u e and he esul ing mix u e is e apo a ed unde acuum in o de o
minimize he exposu e o he p oduc o he aluminum byp oduc s du ing he wo kup. As shown in Figu e 1, he
NMR spec um o he c ys alline sample o 2a con i ms ha his is he same obse ed in he NMR expe imen .
Scheme 1
Figu e 1. 1H NMR spec um o 1a (bo om) and e ec o adding one equi alen o TMA (middle). The spec um o a pu e sample o 2a is shown
in he op. The esidual signal o he sol en (C6D6) is ma ked wi h an as e isk.
The essen ially quan i a i e eac ion o 1a wi h TMA sugges ed ha his eac ion could be ex ended o
ela ed complexes. As men ioned be o e, Gamba o a s udied he eac ion o he bulkie dialkyl complex
[Fe(CH2SiMe3)2(iP BIP)] ( 1b) wi h a la ge excess (10 equi ) o TMA, showing i leads o he compound
[AlMe2(iP BIP)].14 Howe e , we ound ha i his eac ion is ca ied ou using he p ocedu e de ised o he syn hesis
o 2a, he p e iously desc ibed mono ime hylsilyl de i a i e [Fe(CH2SiMe3)(iP BIP)] (2b)19 is ob ained in good yield.
Since he c ys al s uc u e o 2b had no been p e iously epo ed, he iden i ies o bo h monoalkyl
de i a i es 2 we e con i med wi h X- ay di ac ion s udies (Figu es 2 and 3). The molecule o 2a has no symme y
elemen s bu 2b has a c ys allog aphically imposed symme y mi o . Apa om ha , he main bond leng hs and
N
Fe
N N A
A
SiMe3
Me3Si
N
Fe
N N A
A
Me3Si
N
Fe
N N
Me
A
A
TMA
"Me2AlCH2SiMe3" "Me2AlCH2SiMe3"
1a , 1b
N
Fe
N N
Me
A
A
Me3Si
2a , 2b
a, A = 2,4,6-Me3C6H2
b, A = 2,6-iP 2C6H3
Me·
3b
TMA
TMA = 1/2 Al2Me6
(•)
II II
(•)
4
angles a e e y simila in bo h molecules, and close o hose in he ela ed monoalkyl [Fe(CH2SiMe3)(E BIP)].19
Thus, hey bo h exhibi leng hened imino C=N and con ac ed 2,5-py idyl C-CN bonds wi h ega d o he ee BIP
ligand, ha can be conside ed as diagnos ic o monoelec onic educ ion o [BIP]•-.5b,11b The 4-coo dina ed Fe
cen e can be desc ibed as app oxima ely squa e plana , se e ely dis o ed by he depa u e o he Fe-C bond om
he mean coo dina ion plane. In e es ingly, he a ying deg ee o s e ic hind ance exe ed by he MesBIP, E BIP19 o
iP BIP ligands has li le e ec on his dis o ion, as he angle o med by he cen al py idine ing, he i on cen e and
he me al-bound ca bon a om is almos he same in he h ee compounds (ca. 149º).
Figu e 2. X ay c ys al s uc u e o compound 2a. Selec ed bond leng hs (Å) and angles (deg): Fe(1)-N(1), 2.007(5); Fe(1)-C(28), 2.050(5);
Fe(1)-N(2), 2.103(5); Fe(1)-N(3), 2.110(6); C(1)-C(6), 1.440(9); C(6)-N(2), 1.323(8); C(5)-C(8), 1.436(10), C(8)-N(3), 1.325(7); N(1)-Fe(1)-C(28),
148.5(2); N(2)-Fe(1)-N(3), 136.68(19).
Figu e 3. X ay c ys al s uc u e o compound 2b. Selec ed bond leng hs (Å) and angles (deg): Fe(1)-N(1), 1.992(3); Fe(1)-C(18), 2.025(4);
Fe(1)-N(2), 2.190(2); N(2)-C(4), 1.316(3); C(4)-C(1), 1.443(4); N(1)-Fe(1)-C(18), 149.06(14); N(2)-Fe(1)-N(2)’, 142.04(11). Symme y ope a ion
o gene a e equi alen a oms: x, -y+1, z.
Moni o ing he eac ion o 1b wi h TMA in C6D6 by 1H NMR imp o ed ou unde s anding o he eac ion o
he i on and aluminum alkyls (Scheme 1 and Figu e 4). The eac ion o 1b wi h an equi alen amoun o TMA
p oceeds mo e sluggishly han in he case o 1a, as he con e sion in o 2b is ca. 50 % 10 min a e mixing he
eagen s and eaches 60 % a e 30 min (no e ha NMR expe imen s a e signi ican ly mo e dilu ed han
p epa a i e eac ions, which explains why he la e become nea ly comple e in a sho ime). A signi ican decay o
he in ensi y o he 2b signals was obse ed a longe eac ion imes. Inc easing he TMA / 1b a io o 2:1 led o he
appea ance o a new pa amagne ic species, iden i ied as he monome hyl complex [Fe(Me)(iP BIP)], 3b, by
5
compa ison wi h he spec um o an au hen ic sample o his compound independen ly p epa ed as desc ibed in he
li e a u e.10a Mos likely, his p oduc a ises om he alkyl exchange be ween 2b and TMA. Howe e , signals o 2b
a e almos inapp eciable in his expe imen whils signi ican amoun s o 1b (ca. 15 %) emained un eac ed. This
indica es ha he alkyl exchange be ween 2b and TMA p oceeds as e han he ini ial educ ion o 1b o 2b. In an
independen expe imen , we eac ed a pu e sample o 2b wi h 1 equi . o TMA in C6D6. The spec um o he
eac ion mix u e showed he o ma ion o 3b, con i ming ha , as ep esen ed in Scheme 1, his complex can be
o med om 1b in a s epwise manne , i. e., ia 2b. In con as , ea ing he mesi yl de i a i e 1a wi h wo
equi alen s o TMA does no a o d he co esponding me hyl de i a i e, 3a. Moni o ing his eac ion by NMR
showed ha he signals o 2a lose in ensi y and ade away wi hin minu es. Ve y likely 3a is ini ially o med, bu i
apidly decomposes in he p esence o ee TMA. We con i med ha also 3b has a simila beha io , as i s 1H
spec um becomes b oade and decays in he p esence o TMA, a la ge excess (Al/Fe = 50) causing i s immedia e
disappea ance. The ins abili y o bo h monome hyl complexes in he p esence o TMA is consis en wi h he
p e iously men ioned esul s by Gamba o a.12
Figu e 4. 1H NMR moni o ing o he eac ion o 1b wi h 1 and 2 Eq o TMA. F om bo om o op: 1) Spec um o 1b wi h signal assigna ions; 2)
Reac ion wi h 1 equi o TMA, 30 min a e mixing, showing signal assignmen s o 2b; 3) Reac ion wi h 2 Eq o TMA, 5 min a e mixing; 4)
Spec um o 3b wi h signal assigmen s. Shadowed ba s highligh he signals o 1b and 3b in he eac ion mix u es. The esidual signal o he
sol en (C6D6) is ma ked wi h an as e isk.
The diamagne ic egion close o 0 ppm in he 1H NMR spec a o solu ions o 2a, 2b o 3b di ec ly
gene a ed om 1a, 1b o 2b and TMA is complex and consis en ly show se e al signals ha can be easonably
assigned o he AlCH2SiMe3 moie y o silyl-con aining aluminum species. Fo example, he spec um o
Al(CH2SiMe3)3 consis s o wo signals a δ 0.0 and -0.55 ppm.20 The complexi y o his egion can be explained
assuming ha he hypo he ical compound [Al(Me)2CH2SiMe3] disp opo iona es in o a mix u e o silyl-con aining
alkyls. The ac ha simila Al-con aining p oduc s a e obse ed in he eac ions o TMA wi h compounds 1 and 2
sugges s ha bo h p ocesses in ol e Fe/Al alkyl exchange, bu in he o me case he esul ing mixed i on alkyls
[Fe(Me)(CH2SiMe3(BIP)] unde go Fe-Me homolysis, as depic ed in Scheme 1. This ou come is no su p ising, as
mos complexes o he ype [MR2(BIP)] a e uns able and decompose wi h ei he M-C bond homolysis o alkyl
mig a ion o he BIP ligand.19,21,22 The successi e o ma ion o complexes 2 and 3 can he e o e be seen as a

6
se ies o alkyl exchange eac ions, p obably in ol ing bime allic in e media es simila o hose obse ed by
B yliako and Talsi.15 This aises he ques ion o why we did no de ec such in e media es in ou expe imen s.
These au ho s showed ha 3b eac s wi h TMA a 253 K a o ding he bime allic de i a i e [Fe(µ-
Me)2AlMe2(iP BIP)], 4b,15c bu we did no obse e his no any new p oduc s when 3b was ea ed wi h excess o
TMA a oom empe a u e. In o de o add ess his poin , we e isi ed he eac ion o 3b wi h TMA a low
empe a u e. We con i med ha , as epo ed by B yliako and Talsi, 3b is cleanly ans o med in o 4b by eac ion
wi h 10 Equi o TMA a 253 K. Howe e , only pa ial con e sion was obse ed wi h a TMA / 3b a io 5:1, which
indica es ha ei he he o ma ion o 4b is slow, o i is a e e sible p ocess equi ing excess o TMA o shi he
equilib ium. Inc easing he empe a u e should accele a e he eac ion o 3b and TMA, he e o e a apid exchange
be ween i on monoalkyls and bime allic adduc s and a low associa ion cons an (because dissocia ion is en opy-
d i en) could be he causes ha p e en de ec ion o he la e a oom empe a u e. Howe e , he in e mediacy o
adduc s o ype 4 can eadily explain he ins abili y o he me hyl complexes in he p esence o TMA (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2
To conclude ou s udy, we b ie ly in es iga ed he in e ac ion o 1b wi h wo equi alen s o TEA, as a
possible ou e o he co esponding monoe hyl de i a i e, [FeE (iP BIP)]. This compound was no ob ained, bu
ins ead he g een, NMR-silen aluminum complex 5 was isola ed in 45 % yield (Eq. 1). The c ys al s uc u e o 5 is
shown in Figu e 4. This compound is analogous o he me hyl de i a i e isola ed by Gamba o a om he eac ion
wi h excess o TMA, which is bes desc ibed as an Al(III) complex con aining a educed BIP•- adical anion. In
ag eemen wi h his p oposal, he leng hs o he imino C=N bonds and he C-C bonds connec ing hese o he
cen al Py ing (C1-C6 and C5-C8) a e elonga ed and con ac ed, espec i ely, in compa ison wi h hose in he ee
iP BIP ligand. The main di e ence be ween he s uc u es o he dime hyl complex and 5 is in he geome y o he Al
cen e , which is bipy amidal igonal in he o me and squa e py amidal in he la e wi h one o he e hyl g oups
occupying he apical posi ion. The acile o ma ion o compound 5 con i ms ha displacemen o he i on cen e
om BIP complexes by aluminum alkyls is a qui e gene al p ocess and plays an impo an ole in he deac i a ion
o i on-based ole in polyme iza ion ca alys s.
3
N
Fe
N N
Me
A
A
Me
Al
Me2
4
"FeMe2"
N
Al
N N
Me
A
A
Me
TMA
N
Fe
N N
Me
A
A
N
Fe
N N
Me3Si
Me3Si
1b
N
Al
N N
E E
2 TEA
5
TEA = "AlE 3"
- " FeR2"
(1)
7
Figu e 5. X ay c ys al s uc u e o compound 5. Selec ed bond leng hs (Å) and angles (deg): Al(1)-N(1), 1.9582(16); Al(1)-N(2), 1.972(2); Al(1)-
N(3), 2.1345(18); Al(1)-C(34), 1.972(2); Al(1)-C(36), 1.984(3); C(6)-N(2), 1.311(2); C(8)-N(3), 1.327(2); C(1)-C(6), 1.456(3); C(5)-C(8), 1.450(3);
N(1)-Al(1)-C(34), 142.72(10); N(1)-Al(1)-C(36), 103.36(9); N(2)-Al(1)-N(3), 145.36(7); C(34)-Al(1)-C(36), 113.47(11).
Conclusions
We ha e shown ha he in e ac ion o he mally s able i on(II) bis( ime hylsilylme hyl) complexes 1a,b wi h
TMA in ol es h ee dis inc s ages. The dialkyl complexes a e i s educed o he mono( ime hylsily)me hyl
de i a i es 2a,b. These a e obus enough, and can be isola ed in good yields when 1a o 1b and TMA a e eac ed
in 1:1 a io. P esumably, he ini ial educ ion o he Fe cen e is no di ec ly induced by he o ganoaluminum
compound bu is due o he in insic ins abili y o mixed alkyl in e media es a ising om CH2SiMe3/Me exchange,
which apidly decomposes unde going Fe-Me bond homolysis. The CH2SiMe3 g oup ha emains in 2a and 2b is
eadily exchanged wi h a second equi alen o TMA, a p ocess ha leads o me hyl complexes (3). An excess o
TMA causes he displacemen o i on om he BIP ligand, a o ding NMR-silen dialkylaluminum-BIP complexes.
The la e p ocess p obably cons i u es a main deac i a ion ou e o he i on polyme iza ion ca alys s. Complexes 3
eac u he wi h o ganoaluminum compounds such as TMA o he p oduc s esul ing om he alkyl exchange,
a o ding NMR-silen aluminum species. This p e en ed hei isola ion om he eac ion mix u es, al hough he
o ma ion mo e s able de i a i e 3b (bu no 3a) was obse ed using NMR spec oscopy. A simila p ocess akes
place when TMA is eplaced wi h highe aluminum alkyls, and complex 5, he e hyl analogue o he p e iously
known compound [AlMe2(iP BIP)], was isola ed om he eac ion o 1b wi h wo equi alen s o TEA. The sequence
o eac ions o he dialkyls 1 wi h TMA can be ega ded as a se ies o alkyl exchanges be ween he BIP-con aining
species and he aluminum alkyls, and p obably in ol e he o ma ion o Fe/Al bime allic species as in e media es.
As epo ed p e iously by B yliako , Talsi e al., he educed, elec ically neu al Fe/Al bime allics a e he mally
uns able and can only be de ec ed a low empe a u e. The e o e, educed monoalkyl species [Fe(R)(BIP)] a e he
mos ele an p oduc s a ising om he in e ac ion be ween Fe(II) BIP complexes and aluminum alkyls a he oom
empe a u e and, in consequence, hey a e likely o play some ole in ca alys sys ems gene a ed om Fe(II)
p ecu so s and TMA o o he ialkylaluminum compounds. In an ensuing pape we will be analyzing he ole o
hese educed species in he mechanism o e hylene polyme iza ion ca alyzed by i on complexes.
8
Expe imen al
All manipula ions we e ca ied ou unde oxygen- ee a gon a mosphe e using con en ional Schlenck
echniques, o a ni ogen illed glo e box. Sol en s we e igo ously d ied and degassed be o e using. TMA and
TEA we e pu chased om Ald ich and used as ecei ed. Compounds 1a and 1b we e p epa ed acco ding o
li e a u e p ocedu es.18-19 Mic oanalyses we e pe o med by he Mic oanaly ical Se ice o he Ins i u o de
In es igaciones Químicas (Se illa, Spain). In a ed and UV-Vis spec a we e eco ded, espec i ely, on a B uke
Vec o 22 and Pe kin-Elme Lambda 12 o Lambda 750 spec opho ome e s and NMR spec a on B uke DRX 300,
400 o 500 MHz spec ome e s. The esonances o he sol en we e used as he in e nal s anda d bu chemical
shi s we e epo ed wi h espec o TMS. Magne ic suscep ibili ies we e measu ed a 298 K using a She wood
magne ic balance model MSB-Au o, and we e co ec ed o he diamagne ic con ibu ions es ima ed om Pascal’s
cons an s.23
[Fe(CH2SiMe3)(MesBIP)], 2a. To a solu ion o complex 1a (627 mg, 1 mmol) in oluene (30 mL), s i ed a oom
empe a u e, 1.1 mL o a 1 M solu ion o TMA in oluene (1 mmol “AlMe3” / mL, 1.1 Eq) was added d opwise.
Du ing he addi ion, he colo o he mix u e changed om pu ple o g een. The s i ing was con inued o 5 min and
hen he solu ion was e apo a ed o d yness. The esidue was ex ac ed in pen ane (2 x 30 mL) and he solu ion
was il e ed h ough a pad o celi e. The esul ing g een solu ion was concen a ed o 1/3 o he o iginal olume
(app ox. 20 mL) and s o ed a -20 ºC. The p oduc was isola ed as a g een solid by il a ion, washed wi h cold
pen ane and d ied unde acuum. Yield, 500 mg, 90 %. X- ay quali y c ys als we e ob ained by ec ys alliza ion
om hexane. Anal. Calcd o C31H42N3FeSi: C, 68.87; H, 7.83; N, 7.77. Found: C, 68.80; H, 8.17; N, 7.85. µe (298
K)= 4.3 µB . UV-VIS (E 2O): λmax 360 nm (ε = 4994), λmax 479 nm (ε = 2825), λsh 640 nm (ε = 1285), λsh 687 nm (ε =
1202). 1H NMR (300 MHz, C6D6, 298 K): δ -187.3 (Δν1/2 = 178 Hz, 6H, MeCN), -50.0 (Δν1/2 = 172 Hz, 12H, o-Memes),
-11.3 (Δν1/2 = 42 Hz, 4H, m-CHmes), 14.8 (Δν1/2 = 24 Hz, 6H, p-Memes), 33.7 (Δν1/2 = 214 Hz, 9H, SiMe3), 66.0 (Δν1/2 =
96 Hz, 2H, 3,3’-HPy), 331.8 (Δν1/2 = 234 Hz, 1H, 4-HPy).
[Fe(CH2SiMe3)(iP BIP)], 2b. To a solu ion o complex 1b (1.56 g, 2.5 mmol) in 30 mL o oluene, s i ed a oom
empe a u e, 2.5 mL o a 1 M solu ion o TMA in he same sol en (2.5 Eq “AlMe3”) we e added a oom
empe a u e. The colo o he mix u e changed om pu ple o g een. A e 5 min, he ola iles we e emo ed unde
acuum, he esidue was ex ac ed in pen ane (3 x 20 mL) and he solu ion was il e ed h ough a pad o celi e. The
g een solu ion was concen a ed o ca. 1/3 o i s o iginal olume and s o ed a -20 ºC o se e al days. The p oduc
o ms a g een mic oc ys alline ma e ial ha was il e ed, washed wi h cold pen ane and d ied unde acuum. Yield,
1.15 g, 77%. X- ay quali y c ys als we e ob ained by ec ys alliza ion om oluene/pen ane. Anal. Calcd o
C37H54N3FeSi·0.5C7H7: C, 72.51; H, 8.71; N, 6.26. Found: C, 72.04; H, 8.17; N, 6.35. µe (298 K)= 4.0 µB. IR (Nujol
mull), 1581 (νC=N). UV-VIS (E 2O) : λmax 353 nm (ε = 4919), λmax 465 nm (ε = 2538), λsh 589 nm (ε = 478). 1H NMR
(300 MHz, C6D6, 298 K): δ -203.6 (Δν1/2 = 178 Hz, 6H, MeCN), -105.6 (Δν1/2 = 421 Hz, 2H, CHMe2), -31.7 (Δν1/2 = 102
Hz, 6H, CHMeMe), -18.4 (Δν1/2 = 41 Hz, 6H, CHMeMe), -17.4 (Δν1/2 = 28 Hz, 2H, p-CHA ), -10.8 (Δν1/2 = 31 Hz, 4H,
m-CHA ), 65.8 (Δν1/2 = 79 Hz, 2H, 3,3’-HPy), 364.2 (Δν1/2 = 211 Hz, 1H, 4-HPy).
9
[AlE 2(iP BIP)], 5. A solu ion o complex 1b (1.60 g, 2.25 mmol) in oluene (30 mL), s i ed a oom empe a u e,
was ea ed wi h 4.5 mL o a 1 M solu ion o TEA in he same sol en (4.5 Eq “AlE 3”). The colo o he mix u e
changed om pu ple o g een. A e s i ing o 5 min, he solu ion was aken o d yness, and he esidue was
ex ac ed in pen ane. The solu ion was il e ed h ough a pad o celi e, concen a ed o ca. 1/3 o he o iginal
olume and s o ed a -20 ºC. The p oduc o med c ys als ha we e app op ia e o X- ay di ac ion. Yield, 570 mg,
45 %. Anal. Calcd o C37H53N3Al: C, 78.40; H, 9.48; N, 7.41. Found: C, 78.41; H, 9.92; N, 7.22. IR (Nujol mull):
1581 (νC=N).
NMR Moni o ing he eac ions o i on alkyl complexes wi h TMA. Gene al p ocedu e.
Gene al p ocedu e: Samples o he i on complexes we e weighed in he glo e box, dissol ed in he equi ed
amoun o C6D6 and placed in NMR ubes capped wi h sep a. A 0.1 M s ock solu ion o TMA (con aining 1 Eq
“AlMe3” pe mL) was p epa ed in he same sol en , and a sample was placed in a sep um-capped ial. The 1H
NMR spec um o he pu e samples was eco ded. The equi ed amoun o he TMA solu ion was aken wi h a gas-
igh sy inge om i s ial, and injec ed in o he ube o he co esponding complex. The NMR ube was sealed wi h
a small amoun o silicone g ease and pa a ilm and gen ly shaken be o e placing in o he NMR p obe.
Moni o ing he eac ion o complexes 1 - 3 wi h TMA a oom empe a u e: Samples con aining 10 µmol o he
complexes in C6D6 we e p epa ed as desc ibed and ea ed wi h 100 o 200 µL o he TMA solu ion (Al/Fe = 1 o 2,
espec i ely). Fo he eac ion o 3b wi h 50 Eq o TMA, a 1 N solu ion o his eagen was used.
Moni o ing he eac ion o 3b wi h TMA a low empe a u e: Two samples con aining 4.5 mg o 3b (8 µmol) in
oluene-d8 we e p epa ed in he glo e box and placed in sep um–capped NMR ubes. A 0.2 N solu ion o TMA in
he same sol en was simila ly p epa ed. The 3b samples we e cooled o 193 K (-80 ºC) in an ace one – d y ice
ba h, and he p esc ibed amoun o he TMA solu ion (200 o 400 µL, Al/Fe = 5 o 10, espec i ely) was added. The
sep a we e sealed wi h silicone g ease and pa a ilm and he ubes we e ans e ed o he p e-cooled NMR p obe.
Associa ed Con en
Expe imen al o he X- ay c ys al s uc u e analyses and c ys allog aphic in o ma ion iles o 2a, 2b and 5. These
da a a e a ailable ee o cha ge ia he In e ne a h p://pubs.acs.o g.
Acknowledgemen s
This wo k was suppo ed by he Go e nmen o Spain (p ojec numbe CTQ2012-30962), he Jun a de Andalucía
(p ojec numbe FQM5074) and he Eu opean Union (EU) (FEDER unds). MAC hanks CSIC o a p edoc o al
esea ch ellowship (I3P p og am).
Re e ences