scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Morse decomposition of global attractors with infinite components

Abstract

In this paper we describe some dynamical properties of a Morse decomposition with a countable number of sets. In particular, we are able to prove that the gradient dynamics on Morse sets together with a separation assumption is equivalent to the existence of an ordered Lyapunov function associated to the Morse sets and also to the existence of a Morse decomposition -that is, the global attractor can be described as an increasing family of local attractors and their associated repellers.

Read accessible full text

Morse decomposition of global attractors with infinite components

Author: Caraballo Garrido, Tomás; Jara Pérez, Juan Carlos; Langa Rosado, José Antonio; Valero Cuadra, José
Year: 2015
DOI: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.2845
Source: https://idus.us.es/bitstreams/1e77a431-56a3-421b-bc4e-cc2ec62d7a7a/download
Manusc ip submi ed o Websi e: h p://AIMsciences.o g
AIMS’ Jou nals
Volume xx, Numbe 0x, xxxxx xxxx pp. 1–xx
MORSE DECOMPOSITION OF GLOBAL ATTRACTORS WITH
INFINITE COMPONENTS
Tom´
as Ca aballo, Juan C. Ja a, Jos´
e A. Langa
Dp o. Ecuaciones Di e enciales y An´alisis Num´e ico,
Uni e sidad de Se illa, Apdo. de Co eos 1160, 41080-Se illa, Spain
Jos´
e Vale o
Cen o de In es igaci´on Ope a i a, Uni e sidad Miguel He n´andez,
A da. de la Uni e sidad, s/n, 03202-Elche, Spain
(Communica ed by Associa e Edi o )
Abs ac . In his pape we desc ibe some dynamical p ope ies o a Mo se
decomposi ion wi h a coun able numbe o se s. In pa icula , we a e able o
p o e ha he g adien dynamics on Mo se se s oge he wi h a sepa a ion
assump ion is equi alen o he exis ence o an o de ed Lyapuno unc ion
associa ed o he Mo se se s and also o he exis ence o a Mo se decomposi ion
- ha is, he global a ac o can be desc ibed as an inc easing amily o local
a ac o s and hei associa ed epelle s.
1. In oduc ion. The asymp o ic beha iou o a sys em o (o dina y o pa ial)
di e en ial equa ions modeling eal phenomena om di e en a eas o Science is
usually desc ibed by he analysis o hei global a ac o s, a compac in a ian
se o he associa ed semig oups a ac ing (uni o mly) bounded se s o wa ds in
ime. This subjec has ecei ed much a en ion h oughou he las decades (see,
o ins ance, [4], [9], [12], [16], [19], [18] o [20]). We ecall now he de ini ion o
global a ac o associa ed o a semig oup.
Fi s , le Xbe a me ic space wi h me ic d:X×X→R+, whe e R+= [0,∞),
and deno e by C(X) he se o con inuous maps om Xin o X. Gi en a subse A⊂
X, he -neighbo hood o Ais he se O(A) := {x∈X:d(x, a)<  o some a∈
A}.
De ini ion 1.1. A amily {T( ) : ≥0} ⊂ C(X)is a semig oup in a comple e
me ic space Xi :
•T(0) = IX, wi h IXbeing he iden i y map in X,
•T( +s) = T( )T(s), o all , s ∈R+,
•R+×X3( , x)7→ T( )x∈Xis con inuous.
2000 Ma hema ics Subjec Classi ica ion. 37B25, 37L99, 35B40, 35B41.
Key wo ds and ph ases. Mo se decomposi ion; in ini e componen s; g adien dynamics; Lya-
puno unc ion; g adien -like semig oup.
Pa ially suppo ed by FEDER and Minis e io de Econom´ıa y Compe i i idad (Spain) unde
g an s MTM2011-22411 and MTM2012-31698, and by Jun a de Andaluc´ıa unde P oyec o de
Excelencia P12-FQM-1492.
1
2 T. CARABALLO, J.C. JARA, J.A. LANGA, J. VALERO
The no ion o in a iance plays a undamen al ole in he s udy o he asymp o ic
beha io o semig oups.
De ini ion 1.2. A subse Ao Xis said in a ian unde he semig oup {T( ) : ≥
0}i T( )A=A o all ≥0.
Gi en A, B ⊂X, he Hausdo semidis ance om A o Bis gi en by
d(A, B) := sup
a∈A
in
b∈Bd(a, b).
De ini ion 1.3. Gi en wo subse s A, B o Xwe say ha Aa ac s Bunde he
ac ion o he semig oup {T( ) : ≥0}i d(T( )B, A) →∞
−→ 0.
We a e now in a posi ion o de ine global a ac o s.
De ini ion 1.4. A subse Ao Xis a global a ac o o a semig oup {T( ) :
≥0}i i is compac , in a ian unde he ac ion o {T( ) : ≥0}and o e e y
bounded subse Bo Xwe ha e ha Aa ac s Bunde he ac ion o {T( ) : ≥0}.
De ini ion 1.5. The semig oup {T( ) : ≥0}is e en ually dissipa i e i o any
bounded se B he e exis s ∗= ∗(B)≥0such ha ∪ ≥ ∗T( )Bis bounded.
Rema k 1.6. I is ob ious ha i T( )possesses a global a ac o , hen i is e en-
ually dissipa i e.
One o he main p ope ies in he s udy o a ac o s is e e ed o he desc ip ion
o hei geome ical in e nal s uc u e. Gene ically, a global a ac o is cha ac e -
ized by a ( ini e o in ini e) numbe o isola ed in a ian se s and he connec ing
o bi s among hem. This ac leads o a Mo se decomposi ion o he global a ac o
in e ms o a amily o a ac ing- epelle pai s (see [8,17,11,14,15]). We now
in oduce his concep .
De ini ion 1.7. Le {T( ) : ≥0}be a semig oup on X. We say ha an in a ian
se E⊂X o he semig oup {T( ) : ≥0}is an isola ed in a ian se i he e is
an  > 0such ha Eis he maximal in a ian subse o O(E).
De ini ion 1.8. A disjoin amily o isola ed in a ian se s is a amily {M1,· · · , Mn}
o isola ed in a ian se s wi h he p ope y ha
O(Mi)∩ O(Mj) = ∅,1≤i<j≤n,
o some  > 0.
De ini ion 1.9. A global solu ion o a semig oup {T( ) : ≥0}is a con inuous
unc ion ξ:R→Xwi h he p ope y ha T( )ξ(s) = ξ( +s) o all s∈Rand o
all ∈R+. We say ha ξ:R→Xis a global solu ion h ough x∈Xi i is a
global solu ion wi h ξ(0) = x.
I is also well known ha he global a ac o is he union o all bounded comple e
global solu ions o he semig oup T.
De ini ion 1.10. Le {T( ) : ≥0}be a semig oup which possesses a disjoin
amily o isola ed in a ian se s M={M1,· · · , Mn}. A homoclinic s uc u e asso-
cia ed o Mis a subse {Mk1,· · · , Mkp}o M(p≤n) oge he wi h a se o global
solu ions {ξ1,· · · , ξp}such ha
Mkj
→−∞
←− ξj( ) →∞
−→ Mkj+1 ,1≤j≤p,
whe e Mkp+1 := Mk1.
MORSE DECOMPOSITION WITH INFINITE COMPONENTS 3
Rema k 1.11. He e, ξ( ) →±∞
−→ Mmeans ha d(ξ( ), M)→0as → ±∞.
We will s udy he dynamics o he semig oup inside he global a ac o A. We
now de ine gene alized dynamically g adien semig oups (see [6,5]).
De ini ion 1.12. Le {T( ) : ≥0}be a semig oup wi h a global a ac o Aand
a disjoin amily o isola ed in a ian se s M={M1,· · · , Mn}in A. We say ha
{T( ) : ≥0}is a gene alized dynamically g adien semig oup ela i e o Mi :
a) Fo any global solu ion ξ:R→ A he e a e 1≤i, j ≤nsuch ha
Mi
→−∞
←− ξ( ) →∞
−→ Mj.
b) The e is no homoclinic s uc u e associa ed o M.
Rema k 1.13. The concep o gene alized dynamically g adien semig oup is he
same as he concep o g adien -like semig oup as gi en in [1],[5].
To in oduce he no ion o a Mo se decomposi ion o he a ac o Ao a semi-
g oup {T( ) : ≥0}(see [8], [17] o [18]) we p e iously need he no ion o a ac o -
epelle pai . We ecall ha he omega-limi se o B⊂Xis de ined by
ω(B) = ∩ ≥0∪s≥ T(s)B.
De ini ion 1.14. Le {T( ) : ≥0}be a semig oup wi h a global a ac o A. We
say ha a non-emp y subse Ao Ais a local a ac o i he e is an  > 0such ha
ω(O(A)) = A. The epelle A∗associa ed o a local a ac o Ais he se de ined
by
A∗:= {x∈ A :ω(x)∩A=∅}.
The pai (A, A∗)is called an a ac o - epelle pai o {T( ) : ≥0}.
No e ha i Ais a local a ac o , hen A∗is closed and in a ian .
De ini ion 1.15. Gi en an inc easing amily ∅=A0⊂A1⊂ · · · ⊂ An=A, o
n+1 local a ac o s, o j= 1,· · · , n, de ine Mj:= Aj∩A∗
j−1.The o de ed n- uple
M:= {M1, M2,· · · , Mn}is called a Mo se decomposi ion o A.
De ini ion 1.16. We will say ha a semig oup {T( ) : ≥0}wi h a global a ac o
Aand a disjoin amily o isola ed in a ian se s M={M1,· · · , Mn}in Ais a
g adien semig oup wi h espec o M, i he e exis s a con inuous unc ion V:
X→Rsuch ha [0,∞)3 7→ V(T( )x)∈Ris non-inc easing o each x∈X M,
Vis cons an in Mi o each 1≤i≤n, and V(T( )x) = V(x) o all ≥0i and
only i x∈
n
S
i=1
Mi.
Vis called a Lyapuno unc ion ela ed o M.
I has been p o ed in [1] ha gi en a disjoin amily o isola ed in a ian se s
on he global a ac o M={M1,· · · , Mn} o a semig oup T( ), he dynamical
p ope y o being gene alized dynamically g adien , he exis ence o an associa ed
o de ed amily o local a ac o - epelle s, and he exis ence o a Lyapuno unc-
ional ela ed o M, a e equi alen p ope ies. Many o he a gumen s in [1] make
a p ecise use o he ac ha he numbe o Mo se se s is ini e. The aim o his
pape is o gene alize his esul o he case o a coun able numbe o Mo se se s.
Indeed, he gene al heo y o Mo se decomposi ion o in a ian se s is gene ically
adap ed o he exis ence o a ini e numbe o isola ed Mo se se s. Howe e , i is no
4 T. CARABALLO, J.C. JARA, J.A. LANGA, J. VALERO
unusual o ha e an in ini e numbe o in a ian s in a global a ac o . Fo ins ance,
conside he scala di e en ial equa ion
dy
d = (y)
wi h
(y) = 




−y, i y≤0,
(1 −e−y)sin π
y,i 0 < y ≤1,
1−y, i y≥1.
No e ha he equa ion possesses he ollowing ixed poin s:
y1= 1, y2=1
2, y3=1
3, ..., yk=1
k, ..., y∞= 0,
wi h hei espec i e associa ed uns able mani olds (see De ini ion 4.2)
Wu(1) = 1, Wu1
2= [1
2,1), ..., Wu1
k= [1
k,1
k−1), ..., Wu(0) = 0,
and as global a ac o A= [0,1].In [3] he au ho s s udy a mul i alued e sion o
he well-known Cha ee-In an e equa ion, also leading o a global a ac o wi h an
in ini e numbe o equilib ia, which ac ually has mo i a ed he necessi y o de el-
oping he heo y in his pape . We will conside his applica ion in a subsequen
wo k.
In Sec ion 2we ecall some esul s on he dynamics ela ed o an a ac o - epelle
pai . In Sec ion 3we will gene alize De ini ions 1.12,1.15 and 1.16 o he case o
an in ini e numbe o disjoin isola ed in a ian se s M∞={Mi}∞
i=1 ∪M∞inside
he global a ac o . In Sec ions 4,5and 6we p o e he main esul o his pape ,
he equi alence be ween a gene alized dynamically g adien semig oup e e ed o
M∞wi h a sui able sepa a ion assump ion, he exis ence o an o de ed Lyapuno
unc ion associa ed o M∞, and he exis ence o a Mo se decomposi ion on he
global a ac o . This is done in se e al s eps: i s , we p o e ha he p ope y o
he semig oup o being gene alized dynamically g adien oge he wi h a sepa a ion
assump ion implies ha a Mo se decomposi ion can be cons uc ed; hen we p o e
ha om a Mo se decomposi ion ela ed o M∞an o de ed Lyapuno unc ion
can be de ined; inally, we check ha he exis ence o an o de ed Lyapuno unc ion
implies ha he semig oup is gene alized dynamically g adien semig oup e e ed
o M∞and ha he sepa a ion assump ion holds.
2. P elimina y esul s on a ac o - epelle pai s. The ollowing esul s on
he dynamics on a ac o - epelle pai s a e aken om [1].
We ecall ha local a ac ion o Ain Ais equi alen o local a ac ion in X,
o which we i s ly need he ollowing esul .
Lemma 2.1. Le {T( ) : ≥0}be a semig oup in Xwi h a global a ac o A. I
A⊂ A is a compac in a ian se o {T( ) : ≥0}and he e is an  > 0such
ha Aa ac s O(A)∩ A, hen gi en δ∈(0, ε) he e is a δ0∈(0, δ)such ha
γ+(Oδ0(A)) ⊂ Oδ(A), whe e γ+(Oδ0(A)) = S
x∈Oδ0(A)S
≥0
{T( )x}.
The nex esul gene alizes o semig oups a known esul o g oups gi en in [8]
and shows ha ou de ini ion o local a ac o is equi alen o ha one in [8,17].
MORSE DECOMPOSITION WITH INFINITE COMPONENTS 5
Lemma 2.2. I {T( ) : ≥0}is a semig oup in Xwi h a global a ac o Aand
S( ) := T( )|A, clea ly {S( ) : ≥0}is a semig oup in he me ic space A. I Ais
a local a ac o o {S( ) : ≥0}in he me ic space A( ha is, he e exis s ε > 0
wi h ω(O(A)∩ A) = A), and Kis a compac subse o Asuch ha K∩A∗=∅,
hen Aa ac s K. Fu he mo e Ais a local a ac o o {T( ) : ≥0}in X.
We now desc ibe he dynamics on an a ac o - epelle pai .
Lemma 2.3. Le {T( ) : ≥0}be a semig oup in Xwi h a global a ac o Aand
(A, A∗)an a ac o - epelle o {T( ) : ≥0}. Then:
(i)I ξ:R→Xis a global bounded solu ion o {T( ) : ≥0} h ough x /∈A∪A∗,
hen ξ( ) →∞
−→ Aand ξ( ) →−∞
−→ A∗.
(ii)A global solu ion ξ:R→Xo {T( ) : ≥0}wi h he p ope y ha
ξ( )∈ Oδ(A∗) o all ≤0 o some δ > 0such ha Oδ(A∗)∩A=∅mus sa is y
d(ξ( ), A∗) →−∞
−→ 0.
(iii)I x∈X A, hen T( )x →∞
−→ A∪A∗.
Pa (i) o he p e ious lemma is p o ed in Theo em 1.4 in [17]. Pa s (ii) and
(iii) can be ound in [1].
3. Gene alized dynamically g adien semig oups. In his sec ion we will in-
oduce he concep s o gene alized dynamically g adien semig oups and Mo se
decomposi ion o a coun able se o isola ed in a ian se s.
De ini ion 3.1. A disjoin (coun able) amily o in a ian se s is a amily M∞=
{Mi}∞
i=1 ∪M∞o in a ian se s wi h he p ope y ha , gi en j∈N, he e exis s δj
such ha
Oδj(Mj)∩ Oδj(Mi) = ∅, o all i6=j,i∈N∪ {∞}.(3.1)
De ini ion 3.2. Le {T( ) : ≥0}be a semig oup which possesses a disjoin
amily o in a ian se s M∞={Mi}∞
i=1 ∪M∞wi h Mjisola ed o each j∈N. A
homoclinic s uc u e associa ed o M∞is a ini e subse {Mk1,· · · , Mkp}o M∞
oge he wi h a se o global solu ions {ξ1,· · · , ξp}such ha
Mkj
→−∞
←− ξj( ) →∞
−→ Mkj+1 ,1≤j≤p,
whe e Mkp+1 := Mk1.
Rema k 3.3. The se M∞is no assumed o be isola ed. The eason is ha ypically
in applica ions M∞is an accumula ion se o he sequence Mnas n→ ∞. Hence,
i is no isola ed. This is he case in he example gi en in he in oduc ion, and
also, o ins ance, in he applica ion o mul i alued semi lows in [3].
De ini ion 3.4. Le {T( ) : ≥0}be a semig oup wi h a global a ac o Aand
a disjoin amily o in a ian se s M∞={Mi}∞
i=1 ∪M∞in Awi h Mjisola ed
o each j∈N. We say ha {T( ) : ≥0}is a gene alized dynamically g adien
semig oup ela i e o M∞i o any global solu ion ξ:R→ A such ha ξ( 0)6∈ Mk,
o some 0∈Rand any k∈N∪ ∞, i holds ha
Mj
→−∞
←− ξ( ) →∞
−→ Mi, o 1≤i<j≤ ∞.(3.2)
Rema k 3.5. I is ob ious ha condi ion (3.2) implies he ollowing p ope ies:
•Fo any global solu ion ξ:R→ A he e a e 1≤i, j ≤ ∞ such ha
Mj
→−∞
←− ξ( ) →∞
−→ Mi.

6 T. CARABALLO, J.C. JARA, J.A. LANGA, J. VALERO
•The e is no homoclinic s uc u e associa ed o M∞.
When he numbe o se s Miis ini e, hen i is p o ed in [2] ha hese las wo
p ope ies imply (3.2) o a sui able ea angemen o he se s. In ac , De ini ion
3.4 is he way in which i is de ined a Mo se decomposi ion o a global a ac o in
[18].
No e ha , in pa icula , (3.2) implies ha he e is no global solu ion ξ( ) : R→ A
wi h ξ( 0)6∈ M1 o some 0∈Rsuch ha
lim
→−∞ d(ξ( ), M1)=0.
The ollowing lemma implies ha an isola ed in a ian se inside a global a ac-
o is compac .
Lemma 3.6. Le Mbe an isola ed in a ian se which is ela i ely compac . Then
Mis compac .
P oo . We need o p o e ha Mis closed. Le yn→y, whe e yn∈M. By he
con inui y o Twe ha e ha T( )yn→T( )y o any > 0. Hence, T( )y∈M.
Thus, T( )M⊂M o all ≥0. On he o he hand, as Mis in a ian , o any
> 0 he e exis s zn∈Msuch ha T( )zn=yn. Since Mis ela i ely compac ,
passing o a subsequence we ha e zn→z∈M, and hen T( )z=y. The e o e,
M⊂T( )M o all > 0. I ollows ha Mis in a ian . As Mis an isola ed
in a ian se , we ge M=M.
As a consequence o he i s s a emen in Lemma 2.3 we ob ain he ollowing.
Co olla y 3.7. I {T( ) : ≥0}is a semig oup in Xwi h a global a ac o A
and (A, A∗)is an a ac o - epelle pai o {T( ) : ≥0}, hen {T( ) : ≥0}
is a gene alized dynamically g adien semig oup associa ed o he disjoin amily o
isola ed in a ian se s {A, A∗}.
No e ha (3.1) implies
Mi∩M∞=∅, o each i∈N.(3.3)
Lemma 3.8. Condi ion (3.2) implies ha he e is no global solu ion ξ:R→ A
wi h ξ( 0)∈ A M∞ o some 0∈Rsuch ha
lim
→+∞d(ξ( ), M∞)=0.(3.4)
P oo . I is ob ious, as in (3.2), ha he index icanno be ∞.
Lemma 3.9. Le M∞={Mi}∞
i=1 ∪M∞be compac in a ian se s such ha Mj∩
Mi=∅ o i6=j,i, j ∈N∪ ∞, and also suppose ha he in a ian compac se
M∞⊂ A is such ha
lim
i→∞ d(Mi, M∞)=0.(3.5)
Then M∞is a disjoin amily o in a ian se s.
P oo . Take j∈Na bi a y. We ha e o check (3.1). The e exis s δ1>0 such ha
Oδ1(Mj)∩ Oδ1(M∞) = ∅.
In iew o (3.5) he e is N > j such ha
Mi⊂ Oδ1
2
(M∞) i i > N.
MORSE DECOMPOSITION WITH INFINITE COMPONENTS 7
Hence,
Oδ1(Mj)∩ Oδ1
2
(Mi) = ∅i i > N.
Ob iously, he e exis s δ2>0 o which
Oδ2(Mj)∩ Oδ2(Mi) = ∅ o 1 ≤i≤N,i6=j.
Then he esul ollows o δj= min{δ1/2, δ2}.
We can now in oduce he concep o a Mo se decomposi ion e e ed o M∞.
De ini ion 3.10. Gi en an inc easing amily ∅=A0⊂A1⊂ · · · ⊂ An⊂ · · · A∞=
Ao local a ac o s, o j∈Nde ine Mj:= Aj∩A∗
j−1,M∞=∩∞
j=0A∗
j.The o de ed
coun able se M∞:= {Mi}∞
i=1 ∪M∞is called a Mo se decomposi ion o A.
The ollowing p ope ies o he se s Mj ollow.
Lemma 3.11. M∞∩Aj=∅ o any j∈N.Hence, M∞⊂A∞ ∪∞
j=1 Ajand
M∞∩Mj=∅ o all j∈N.
P oo . Le y∈M∞. Then y∈A∗
j, o any j∈N, implies y6∈ Aj o all j∈N.
Lemma 3.12. The se s Mj,j∈N∪ ∞, a e compac .
P oo . Since Mj⊂ A, hey a e ela i ely compac . Also, as Mja e he in e sec ion
o closed se s, hey a e closed.
We can also gi e he ollowing cha ac e iza ion.
P oposi ion 3.13. Le {T( ) : ≥0}be a semig oup wi h he global a ac o A
and M∞={Mi}∞
i=1 ∪M∞a Mo se decomposi ion o Awi h he amily ∅=A0⊂
A1⊂ · · · ⊂ A∞=Ao local a ac o s. Then,
∞
j=0
(Aj∪A∗
j)=(
∞
[
j=1
Mj)∪M∞.
P oo . I z∈
∞
S
j=1
Mj, le k∈Nbe such ha z∈Mk=Ak∩A∗
k−1. Hence
z∈Ak⊂Ak+1 ⊂ · · · ⊂ A∞and z∈A∗
k−1⊂A∗
k−2⊂ · · · ⊂ A∗
0. Thus
z∈(
∞
j=k
Aj)∩(
k−1
j=0
A∗
j)⊂

∞
j=k
(Aj∪A∗
j)
∩

k−1
j=0
(Aj∪A∗
j)
=
∞
j=0
(Aj∪A∗
j),
p o ing ha
∞
S
j=1
Mj⊂
∞
T
j=0
(Aj∪A∗
j).I z∈M∞, hen z∈
∞
T
j=0
A∗
j⊂
∞
T
j=0
(Aj∪A∗
j).
Con e sely, we ake z∈
∞
T
j=0
(Aj∪A∗
j).I z∈
∞
T
j=0
A∗
j, hen z∈M∞. O he wise,
z∈Aj o some j∈N. Deno e I:= {i1, i2,· · · , ik, . . . }and J:= {j1, j2,· · · , jl, .. . }
such ha I∪J=Z+wi h I∩J=∅and z∈Ai o all i∈Iand z∈A∗
j o all j∈J.
Clea ly, i i:= min I, necessa ily I={j≥i}and J={0,1,· · · , i−1}, consequen ly
z∈Aiand z∈A∗
i−1. So, z∈Ai∩A∗
i−1=Mi, om which
∞
T
j=0
(Aj∪A∗
j)⊂
∞
S
j=1
Mj.
8 T. CARABALLO, J.C. JARA, J.A. LANGA, J. VALERO
4. Cons uc ion o a Mo se decomposi ion om he dynamics on M∞.
In his sec ion we desc ibe he cons uc ion o a Mo se decomposi ion o he global
a ac o A ela i e o he disjoin amily o in a ian se s M∞={Mi}∞
i=1 ∪M∞
in Asuch ha Mjis isola ed i j∈Nand sa is ying (3.2). By Lemma 3.8 we ha e
ha (3.4) does no hold.
The ollowing lemma will play an impo an ole in wha ollows.
Lemma 4.1. Le {T( ) : ≥0}be a semig oup wi h a global a ac o Aand he
disjoin amily o in a ian se s M∞={Mi}∞
i=1 ∪M∞={M1, . . . , Mn, . . . ;M∞}in
Abe such ha Mja e isola ed o j∈N. Assume ha Tis gene alized dynamically
g adien ela i e o M∞. Then, M1is a local a ac o o {T( ) : ≥0}.
P oo . We i s ly p o e ha o all δ∈(0, δ1) he e exis s δ0∈(0, δ) such ha
γ+(Oδ0(M1)) ⊂ Oδ(M1),
whe e δ1sa is ies Oδ1(M1)∩ Oδ1(Mi) = ∅ o i > 1 o i=∞.
I no , he e exis 0 < δ < δ1and sequences { k}k∈No posi i e imes and {xk}k∈N
o poin s in Xsuch ha o all k
d(xk, M1)<1
k,
d(T( k)xk, M1) = δ
and
d(T( )xk, M1)< δ o ∈[0, k).
Thus, i we de ine, o each k, ξk( ) := T( + k)xk o ∈[− k,∞),as k→
k→∞ ∞,
we conclude ha he e exis s a global solu ion ξ:R→X o T(·) such ha ξk→
k→∞ ξ
uni o mly in compac se s o imes (see [7, Lemma 3.1]). Then, d(ξk( ), M1)≤δ o
∈[− k,0] implies
d(ξ( ), M1)≤δ < δ1 o ≤0.
Bu by (3.2) we ha e ξ( )→Mj,wi h j > 1, as → −∞, a con adic ion.
M1is he maximal in a ian se in Oε(M1) o some ε > 0. Thus, o δ <
min{ε, δ1} ake δ0∈(0, δ) such ha
γ+(Oδ0(M1)) ⊂ Oδ(M1),
so ha
ω(Oδ0(M1)) ⊂ Oδ(M1)⊂ Oε(M1),
and hen, as ω(Oδ0(M1)) is in a ian ,
ω(Oδ0(M1)) ⊂M1.
The o he inclusion is i ial, so ha M1is a local a ac o .
Fo M1a local a ac o , le M∗
1={x∈ A :ω(x)∩M1=∅}be i s associa ed
epelle , so each Mi, wi h i≥2,is con ained in M∗
1and mo e gene ally he o bi
ξ(R) o any global solu ion ξ:R→ A ha con e ges o Mi,i≥2, when →+∞,is
con ained in M∗
1. Conside ing he es ic ion {T1( ) : ≥0}o {T( ) : ≥0} o M∗
1
we ha e ha {T1( ) : ≥0}sa is ies (3.2) in he space M∗
1wi h he in a ian se s
{Mi}∞
i=2 ∪M∞and we may assume, by he las lemma, ha M2is a local a ac o
o he semig oup {T1( ) : ≥0}in M∗
1. I M∗
2,1is he epelle associa ed o he local
a ac o M2 o {T1( ) : ≥0}in M∗
1we may p oceed and conside he es ic ion
MORSE DECOMPOSITION WITH INFINITE COMPONENTS 9
{T2( ) : ≥0}o he semig oup {T1( ) : ≥0} o M∗
2,1and hen {T2( ) : ≥0}
sa is ies (3.2) in M∗
2,1wi h he associa ed in a ian se s {Mi}∞
i=3 ∪M∞.
Se ing A=: M∗
0,−1and M∗
1,0:= M∗
1, o j≥1 we ha e ha Mjis a local
a ac o o he es ic ion o {T( ) : ≥0} o M∗
j−1,j−2whose epelle will be
indica ed by M∗
j,j−1.
De ini ion 4.2. Le {T( ) : ≥0}be a semig oup. The uns able se o an in a ian
se Mis de ined by
Wu(M) := {z∈X: he e is a global solu ion ξ:R→X
such ha ξ(0) = zand lim
→−∞ d(ξ( ), M)=0}.
De ine A0:= ∅,A1:= M1and o j= 2,3,· · · ,
Aj:= Aj−1∪Wu(Mj) =
j
[
i=1
Wu(Mi).(4.1)
Also, A∞=A.
I is clea ha A=∪∞
i=1Wu(Mi)∪Wu(M∞).
Lemma 4.3. Assume he condi ions o Lemma 4.1. Then M∞=∩∞
j=0A∗
j.
P oo . Le z∈M∞. Then as M∞is in a ian , ω(z)⊂M∞. Then zcanno be in
Wu(Mj) o j∈N, as in such a case by (3.2) we would ha e ω(z)∩Mi6=∅ o
some i≤j, a con adic ion. Thus, by (4.1) we ha e ha z6∈ Aj o j∈N. Hence,
ω(z)∩Aj=∅, so ha z∈ ∩∞
j=0A∗
j.
Con e sely, le z∈ ∩∞
j=0A∗
j. Then ω(z)∩Aj=∅ o all j∈N. I z6∈ M∞, we
ake a global solu ion ξ(·) such ha ξ(0) = z. Then by condi ion (3.2) we ha e ha
ξ( )→Mias →+∞ o some i∈N. Bu hen ω(z)∩Ai6=∅, a con adic ion.
Lemma 4.4. Assume he condi ions o Lemma 4.1. Then he se s Mj,j∈N∪ ∞,
a e compac .
P oo . We no e ha Mj⊂ A implies by Lemma 3.6 ha he se s Mja e compac
i j∈N. Also, Lemma 4.3 implies ha M∞is closed, and hen M∞⊂ A implies
ha i is compac .
Lemma 4.5. Assume he condi ions o Lemma 4.1. Suppose ha , gi en j∈N,
he e exis s δjsuch ha
Wu(Mj)∩ Oδj(
∞
[
i=j+1
Mi∪M∞)) = ∅.(4.2)
Then,
Aj∩ Oδj((
∞
[
i=j+1
Mi)∪M∞) = ∅.(4.3)
P oo . Fo j= 1 he esul ollows since A1=M1=Wu(M1). Suppose (4.3) is
ue o j−1 and we will show i o j. I no , he e exis s a sequence {xk}k∈Nin
Ajsuch ha o all k
d(xk,(
∞
[
i=j+1
Mi)∪M∞)<1
k.
As Aj:= Aj−1∪Wu(Mj) and we ha e (4.3) o j−1, hen xk∈Wu(Mj), om
which, by hypo hesis, we ge a con adic ion.
16 T. CARABALLO, J.C. JARA, J.A. LANGA, J. VALERO
We can now conclude ou main heo em.
Theo em 6.7. Le {T( ) : ≥0}be a semig oup wi h global a ac o Aand
conside a disjoin amily o in a ian se s M∞={Mi}∞
i=1 ∪M∞in Asuch ha
Mja e isola ed o j∈N. Then, he ollowing condi ions a e equi alen :
1. {T( ) : ≥0}is a gene alized g adien semig oup wi h espec o M∞in he
sense o he De ini ion 5.1 and M∞is o de ed wi h espec o he espec i e
Lyapuno unc ion.
2. {T( ) : ≥0}is a gene alized dynamically g adien semig oup wi h espec o
M∞(as in De ini ion 3.4) sa is ying (4.2).
3. M∞is a Mo se decomposi ion o A.
P oo . I is a s aigh o wa d consequence o Theo em 4.8 and P oposi ions 5.3,6.3
and 6.6.
Co olla y 6.8. Le {T( ) : ≥0}be a semig oup wi h global a ac o Aand
conside a disjoin amily o in a ian se s M∞={Mi}∞
i=1 ∪M∞in Asuch ha
Mja e isola ed o j∈N. Assume ha M∞is a Mo se decomposi ion o A. Then
A=∪∞
j=1Wu(Mj)∪Wu(M∞).
P oo . In iew o Theo em 6.7,{T( ) : ≥0}is a gene alized g adien semig oup
wi h espec o M∞in he sense o he De ini ion 5.1 and M∞is o de ed wi h
espec o he Lyapuno unc ion. Hence, he esul ollows om P oposi ion 6.5.
Acknowledgemen . We would like o hank he e e ees o hei help ul com-
men s and sugges ions which allowed us o imp o e he p esen a ion o he pape .
REFERENCES
[1] A ag˜ao-Cos a, E.R., Ca aballo, T., Ca alho, A.N., & Langa, J.A., S abili y o g adien
semig oups unde pe u ba ion, Nonlinea i y, 24 (2011), 2099–2117 .
[2] A ag˜ao-Cos a, E.R., Ca aballo, T., Ca alho, A.N., & Langa, J.A., Con inui y o Lyapuno
unc ions and o ene gy le el o a gene alized g adien sys em, Topological Me hods Nonl.
Anal.,39 (2012), 57–82.
[3] J. M. A ie a, A. Rod ´ıguez-Be nal, J. Vale o, Dynamics o a eac ion-di usion equa ion wi h
a discon inuous nonlinea i y, In e na . J. Bi u . Chaos Appl. Sci. Eng g.,16 (10) (2006),
2695-2984.
[4] A. V. Babin and M. I. Vishik, A ac o s in E olu iona y Equa ions S udies in Ma hema ics
and i s Applica ions 25, No h-Holland Publishing Co., Ams e dam (1992).
[5] A. N. Ca alho and J. A. Langa, An ex ension o he concep o g adien semig oups which
is s able unde pe u ba ion, J. Di e en ial Equa ions, 246 (2009), 2646–2668.
[6] Ca alho, A.N., Langa, J.A., & Robinson, J.C., A ac o s o in ini e-dimensional non-
au onomous dynamical sys ems, Applied Ma hema ical Se ies 182, Sp inge , New Yo k (2013).
[7] A.N. Ca alho, J.A. Langa, J.C. Robinson, A. Su´a ez, Cha ac e iza ion o non-au onomous
a ac o s o a pe u bed in ini e-dimensional g adien sys em, J. Di e en ial Equa ions,236
(2007), 570–603.
[8] C. Conley, Isola ed in a ian se s and he Mo se index, CBMS Regional Con e ence Se ies in
Ma hema ics, 38. Ame ican Ma hema ical Socie y, P o idence, R.I. (1978).
[9] J. K. Hale, Asymp o ic Beha io o Dissipa i e Sys ems, Ma hema ical Su eys and Mono-
g aphs Numbe 25 (Ame ican Ma hema ical Socie y, P o idence, RI) (1988).
[10] D. Hen y, Geome ic Theo y o Semilinea Pa abolic Equa ions, Lec u e No es in Ma hema -
ics 840, Sp inge -Ve lag, Be lin, (1981).
[11] M. Hu ley, Chain ecu ence, semi lows and g adien s, J. Dyn. Di . Equa ions, 7(1995),
437–456.

MORSE DECOMPOSITION WITH INFINITE COMPONENTS 17
[12] O. A. Ladyzhenskaya, A ac o s o Semig oups and E olu ion Equa ions, Camb idge Uni-
e si y P ess, Camb idge (1991).
[13] D.E. No on, The undamen al heo em o dynamical sys ems, Commen . Ma h., Uni . Ca -
olinae, 36 (3) (1995), 585–597.
[14] M. Pa ao, Mo se decomposi ion o semi lows on opological spaces, J. Dyn. Di . Equa ions,
19 (1) (2007), 181–198.
[15] M. Pa ao and Luiz A.B. San Ma in, Semi lows on opological spaces: chain ansi i i y and
semig oups, J. Dyn. Di . Equa ions, 19 (1) (2007), 155–180.
[16] Robinson, J.C., In ini e-Dimensional Dynamical Sys ems. Camb idge Uni e si y P ess, Cam-
b idge, England (2001).
[17] K. P. Rybakowski, The homo opy index and pa ial di e en ial equa ions, Uni e si ex ,
Sp inge -Ve lag (1987).
[18] Sell, G.R. & You, Y., Dynamics o e olu iona y equa ions. Applied Ma hema ical Sciences
Vol. 143, Sp inge -Ve lag, New Yo k (2002).
[19] R. Temam, In ini e-Dimensional Dynamical Sys ems in Mechanics and Physics, Sp inge -
Ve lag, Be lin (1988; second edi ion 1996).
[20] Vishik, M.I., Asymp o ic beha iou o solu ions o e olu iona y equa ions, Camb idge Uni-
e si y P ess, Camb idge, England (1992).
E-mail add ess, T. Ca aballo: [email p o ec ed]
E-mail add ess, J.C. Ja a: [email p o ec ed]
E-mail add ess, J.A. Langa: [email p o ec ed]
E-mail add ess, J. Vale o: [email p o ec ed]