scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Retail Services Survival in an Economic Crisis Context

Abstract

Travel agencies face a generalized economic crisis. To establish and nourish a permanent relationship with clients can become the key to their survival. Structural equation modeling is used to analyze the effects of the actions of customer relationship management (CRM) on the perception of the quality of the relationship (RQ), and its consequences on loyalty and purchasing intention. The results confirm that RQ can be improved through CRM actions of travel agencies. The RQ set up with the travel agency has a positive effect on loyalty and buying intention, and there is a strong impact of loyalty on purchasing intention.

Read accessible full text

Retail Services Survival in an Economic Crisis Context

Author: Vega Vázquez, Manuela; Oviedo García, María de los Ángeles; Castellanos Verdugo, Mario
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Year: 2014
DOI: 10.1080/15332969.2014.946880
Source: https://idus.us.es/bitstreams/22717d83-d12f-4db4-ac61-c173bce950b5/download
Depósi o de in es igación de la Uni e sidad de Se illa
h ps://idus.us.es/
“This is an Accep ed Manusc ip o an a icle published by Taylo & F ancis in
Se ices Ma ke ing Qua e ly on 2014, a ailable a :
h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/15332969.2014.946880.”
1
Running head: RETAIL SERVICES SURVIVAL IN AN ECONOMIC CRISIS CONTEXT
Re ail Se ices Su i al in an Economic C isis Con ex
The ou is ic indus y g ew 3% in 2012, globally c ea ing 101.2 million jobs and he
g ow h o ecas s o 2013 con inue being posi i e in e ms o he indus y’s con ibu ion o
he GDP (3.1%) and e en mo e so in he long e m (in 2023 he o ecas is ha ou ism will
be 10% o GDP) (WTTC, 2013). Tou ism is, hen, an indus y wi h a capaci y o gene a ing
employmen and incomes all o e he wo ld, as well as os e ing he dis ibu ion o weal h.
T a el agencies, which play a undamen al ole wi hin he ou is ic dis ibu ion sec o ,
a ange he anspo , accommoda ion and ood and be e ages se ices o a elle s
(Eu os a , 2012) in a e ail business which sells a mix u e o a el and leisu e p oduc s o
consume s - bo h indi iduals and businesses.
T a el agencies - whose dis inc i e cha ac e is ic is he se ice o assessmen which
hey o e he cus ome - a e acing a apidly-changing en i onmen wi h an inc ease o
compe i i eness due o he appea ance and expansion o online a el agencies, in eg a ion
p ocesses– bo h e ical and ho izon al – as well as Eu ope’s economic c isis. In a si ua ion
like his, gi en he economic ad an ages o e aining exis ing cus ome s as opposed o
sea ching o po en ial cus ome s, o es ablish and nou ish a pe manen ela ionship wi h
clien s can become he key ha ma ks he di e ence be ween he su i al o he
disappea ance o hese companies. The e o e, he e is an inc easingly g ea e need o a el
agencies o analyse he ma ke om he pe spec i e o cus ome s o design a se ice which is
capable o sa is ying hese cus ome s’ expec a ions and needs.
Loyal y is he mos demanded ou come om an app op ia e managemen o
ela ionships wi h cus ome s. I s p eceden s in consume ma ke s ha e been sca cely analysed
by he scien i ic li e a u e (Vesel and Zabka , 2010) because mos esea ch in cus ome
ela ionships has been ca ied ou in he business- o-business sphe e (A hanasopoulu, 2009).
2
Running head: RETAIL SERVICES SURVIVAL IN AN ECONOMIC CRISIS CONTEXT
This has le he consume ma ke s la gely unexplo ed. Fu he mo e, ano he ou come o he
ela ionship quali y (RQ) is also wo hy o a en ion: pu chase in en ion, a s ong p oxy o
making an ac ual pu chase (Hong and Cho, 2011).
Wha s ands ou in con as o he impo ance o he ou is ic indus y is he scan
esea ch published abou his indus y and he ole ha a el agencies play in he
comme cialisa ion o i s p oduc s and se ices. In he Cus ome Rela ionship Managemen
(CRM) a ea he e a e s ill sphe es in which i is necessa y o ca y ou a g ea e esea ch
e o o unmis akably es ablish, in all he domains, he co espondence be ween he
ela ionship which i ms se up wi h hei cus ome s and he esul s expec ed. Rela i ely li le
esea ch has been done on he CRM ou comes om he cus ome ’s poin o iew and mos o
his esea ch has been conduc ed using a quali a i e app oach (Si a aks, K ai i and Tang,
2011). So, he e is a lack o esea ch abou CRM, RQ: wo c ucial ou comes in he ou is ic
sec o in gene al and in he e ail sec o in pa icula .
On he o he hand, i is in e es ing o conside he quali y o he ela ionship in he
ou is ic con ex due o i s po en ial capaci y o ein o ce he cus ome s’ loyal y- an e ec ha
has al eady been e i ied o angible goods in di e en indus ies (Chiu, 2009). Bu in he
case o ou is ic p oduc s his could play a di e en ole. I is necessa y o ackle his, gi en
ha i s in angibili y makes i di icul o e alua e he quali y be o e, du ing and a e
consump ion.
This esea ch analyses, om he cus ome s’ pe spec i e, he ela ionship be ween he
CRM, RQ and wo impo an esul s (loyal y and pu chase in en ion) in e ail a el agencies.
The aim is a be e unde s anding o he ac o s which lead o he long- e m success o he
ela ionships be ween cus ome s and se ice i ms. The esul s o his s udy will be use ul o
academicians and p ac i ione s. F om he heo e ical poin o iew a sphe e in he li e a u e
3
Running head: RETAIL SERVICES SURVIVAL IN AN ECONOMIC CRISIS CONTEXT
which has been sca cely analysed is ackled: e aile s in he ou ism sec o . This is impo an
i we ake in o accoun ha wi hin a e ail con ex , i migh seem less ob ious ha e ail
cus ome s can ac ually o m a genuine o quali y ela ionship wi h hei e aile . F om a
p ac ical poin o iew, he esul s o his esea ch will allow e aile s o iden i y ma ke ing
s a egies on how o os e posi i e ela ionships wi hin which hei cus ome s emain in he
ansac ions willingly because hey pe cei e some ob ious bene i .
Cus ome Rela ionship Managemen and Rela ionship Quali y
Cus ome Rela ionship Managemen (CRM) can be de ined as a s a egic ision o he
i m owa d he managemen o he ela ionships wi h he cus ome s ia a se o ma ke ing
plans, ac i i ies and ac ions, along wi h sophis ica ed applica ions wi h p o essional suppo
o a ac , mo i a e and imp o e he ela ionships wi h cu en and po en ial cus ome s,
gene a ing bene i s bo h o he i m and o he cus ome s (Alsmadi and Alnawas, 2011).
CRM is a undamen al condi ion o main ain a en ion cen ed on cus ome s’ needs as
an elemen which can allow a compe i i e s a egy o success o be achie ed (Wu and Li,
2011). I also e ains cus ome s and ein o ces con inuous epu chasing pa e ns (Cas ellanos-
Ve dugo, O iedo-Ga cía, Roldán and Vee ape mal, 2009). CRM is use ul because i a ou s
he educ ion o he cos s o achie ing cus ome s, lowe s he cos s o selling/p omo ing he
se ice and he se ice ime, imp o es he cus ome ’s sa is ac ion , c ea es a sus ainable
compe i i e ad an age, inc eases he numbe o consume s and he e en ion a e, helps he
ga he ing o da a which con ibu e o measu ing he cus ome alue and inc eases he
cus ome loyal y due o a mo e pe sonal and e icien se ice.
The posi i e expe iences in he buye -selle ela ionship induce he main aining o a
cons i u ed ela ionship. The posi i e e ec s o CRM come om an imp o emen o he
ela ionship quali y (RQ) wi h he cus ome s wi h whom he long- e m ela ionships o
4
Running head: RETAIL SERVICES SURVIVAL IN AN ECONOMIC CRISIS CONTEXT
loyal y es ablished allow he imp o emen o p o i s. Thus, he ela ionship wi h cus ome s
becomes an impo an in angible asse (Wu and Li, 2011).
RQ is a gene al e alua ion o he s eng h o he ela ionship and he deg ee o which
his ul ills he needs and expec a ions o he pa ies in ol ed, based on a his o y o
encoun e s which ha e been a success o a ailu e (Chiu, 2009). RQ is de ined as he deg ee
o sui abili y o a ela ionship o sa is y he cus ome ’s needs associa ed wi h his ela ionship
(Hennig-Thu au and Klee, 1997). When he e is a s ong RQ, his indica es ha he pas
beha iou o he supplie has sa is ied he cus ome , ha he la e us s u u e pe o mance
and wishes o main ain he ela ionship.
In se ices con ex s, cus ome s a e aced wi h high deg ees o unce ain y, pe cei ed
as a consequence o ac o s such as he in angibili y, complexi y o he lack o amilia i y
wi h he se ice. This can be educed ia RQ. In consume ma ke s i is accep ed ha RQ is a
cons uc made up o cus ome sa is ac ion wi h he se ice p o ided, hei us in he se ice
supplie and he commi men o he cus ome s o he ela ionship es ablished wi h he
se ices i m (A hanasopoulou, 2009; Si a aks e al., 2011; Vesel and Zabka , 2010; Walsh
Hennig-Thu au, Sassenbe g and Bo nemann e al., 2010).
Sa is ac ion is a global e alua ion based on he buying and global consump ion
expe ience wi h a speci ic supplie (De Canniè e, De Pelsmacke , and Geuens, 2010), an
a ec i e esponse o he consume s who ind he in e ac ions o be sa is ac o y and
s imula ing. This condi ions he cus ome ’s decision o main ain he ela ionship wi h he
se ice supplie o no because wi hou cus ome sa is ac ion he ela ionship will no
con inue. Cus ome sa is ac ion is an essen ial componen o RQ, a key de e minan (Wu and
Li, 2011), which is loca ed a he hea o he exchange ela ionship (Vesel and Zabka ,

5
Running head: RETAIL SERVICES SURVIVAL IN AN ECONOMIC CRISIS CONTEXT
2010). This b oad eeling is in luenced by he se ice quali y, he p oduc quali y, he p ice
and bo h pe sonal and con ex ual ac o s (Liu, Guo, and Lee, 2011).
T us in he eliabili y and in eg i y o he se ice supplie is also conside ed o be a
undamen al componen o achie e success in he ela ionship. I s impo ance s ems om i s
capaci y o in luence in he o ganisa ions’ e iciency and e ec i eness, hanks o he us
be ween he pa ies educing he ansac ion isks and cos s. When a cus ome us s an
o ganisa ion - ha is, us s his o ganisa ion’s p oduc /se ice quali y - a long- e m loyal y is
achie ed and he ela ionships be ween bo h pa ies a e s eng hened. As us p oceeds om
p e ious posi i e expe iences wi h he se ice supplie , he consume will end o main ain
he ela ionship. T us plays an impo an ole in people’s pu chasing beha iou be o e and
a e he pu chase (Liu e al., 2011).
Commi men is ela ed o he cus ome ’s wish o con inue and ein o ce he
ela ionship and i is he di e en ia ing elemen o a success ul ela ionship (Wu and Li,
2011). Commi men is de ined as a long-las ing wish o main ain a aluable ela ionship (De
Canniè e e al., 2010) and ep esen s he highes le el o ela ional bonding, shown by s ong
eelings o union and obliga ion wi h he se ices o ganisa ion (Lin and Wu, 2011).
Commi men can lead o sho - e m sac i ices in o de o enjoy long- e m bene i s (Au ie
and N’Goala, 2009). Commi men by bo h pa ies is a po en indica o o he ela ionship’s
quali y (Ou, Shih, Chen, and Wang, 2011; Si a aks e al., 2011). This is e y use ul o
de e mine he p obabili y o he cus ome ’s loyal y.
The esul s o Wu and Li (2011) in he hospi ali y sec o , in line wi h hose o Chang
and Ku (2009) in di e en sec o s, indica e ha when cus ome s show a high le el o
awa eness o he ho el’s CRM ac ions, he RQ ecognised will be be e and he RQ e ec
can be imp o ed by implemen ing CRM. All his leads us o p opose ha he CRM ac ions
6
Running head: RETAIL SERVICES SURVIVAL IN AN ECONOMIC CRISIS CONTEXT
pe cei ed by he cus ome s con ibu e o imp o ing he quali y o he ela ionship which hey
es ablish wi h he i m. We hus o mula e he ollowing hypo hesis:
H1. When cus ome s ecognise CRM ac ions ca ied ou by he i m, hey will ha e a mo e
posi i e pe cep ion o RQ.
Loyal y and Pu chase In en ion as Rela ionship Quali y Ou comes
The RQ model o e s a heo e ical amewo k ha ela es se ice ela ionships o
o ganisa ion ou comes in which he cus ome ’s aluing o he in e pe sonal ela ionships wi h
he con ac pe sonnel has an impo an impac on he con inued use o he se ice by his
cus ome . The quali y o he ela ionship plays an ou s anding ole in he success o
ela ionships ma ke ing (Hennig-Thu au, 2000; Hennig-Thu au e al., 2002) and in he
cus ome ’s loyal y (Walsh e al., 2010), as well as ha ing an in luence on he cus ome s’
u u e beha iou in en ions (Ga ba ino and Johnson, 1999).
Two o he mo e impo an consequences o he ela ionship es ablished wi h he
se ice supplie a e pu chase in en ion and cus ome loyal y (Kim, Lee, and Yoo, 2006). As
his wo k analyses RQ om he cus ome ’s pe spec i e, i is app op ia e o use in he esea ch
how he RQ a ec s bo h a iables.
The cus ome s’ loyal y is hei in en ion o emain wi h an o ganisa ion, “a deeply
held commi men o ebuy o epa onise a p e e ed p oduc o se ice consis en ly in he
u u e, he eby causing epe i i e same b and o same b and-se pu chasing, despi e
si ua ional ac o s ha may cause swi ching beha io ” (Oli e , 1999, p. 34). I he e o e
ep esen s he cus ome ’s commi men o buy mo e and in a mo e a ied way om he
o ganisa ion and help i o, whene e possible, achie e success ( h ough, o example, wo d
o mou h). The g owing compe i i eness in he se ices indus y has made i ms become e y
7
Running head: RETAIL SERVICES SURVIVAL IN AN ECONOMIC CRISIS CONTEXT
conce ned in main aining long- e m ela ionships wi h hei cu en cus ome s (Jamil and
A ya y, 2010).
Resea ch in di e en a eas has empi ically es ablished he ela ion be ween RQ and
i s componen s and cus ome loyal y (Si a aks e al., 2011), al hough di e ences ha e been
iden i ied based on he ype o ho el es ablishmen (Wu and Li, 2011) o ype o se ice
conside ed (Walsh e al., 2010). As a whole, he esul s o p e ious esea ch (Si a aks e al.,
2011; Walsh e al., 2010) indica e ha high le els o RQ (o i s componen s) gene a e loyal y.
This leads us o o mula e he second hypo hesis.
H2. When cus ome s pe cei e ha hey ha e a posi i e RQ wi h he se ice supplie ,
hey will es ablish a ela ionship o loyal y wi h hem.
Pu chase in en ion e e s o he deg ee o pe cep ual con ic ion o a cus ome o
epu chase a pa icula p oduc /se ice o o epu chase any p oduc /se ice om a pa icula
o ganisa ion (Rajaobelina and Be ge on, 2009). I is a ques ion, hen, o a possibili y o a
u u e pu chase. This is a use ul indica o o es ima e he consume ’s beha iou . When
consume s ha e a posi i e pu chase in en ion hey a e d i en o inally ca y ou a pu chase
h ough he o ming o a commi men wi h he b and. In inancial se ices, Wong e al.
(2007) s a e ha he bes p edic o o he likelihood o a cus ome seeking u u e con ac wi h
a inancial se ices p o ide is he quali y o he ela ionship o da e. Rajaobelina and
Be ge on (2009) ound a posi i e ela ion be ween RQ and pu chase in en ion.
In ecen esea ch, De Canniè e e al. (2010) s a ed ha a be e RQ led o a s onge
pu chase in en ion o cus ome s wi h a weake ela ion wi h he e aile , whe eas a s onge
in en ion led o a i me pu chase beha iou o cus ome s wi h a s onge ela ion wi h he
e aile . We p opose as a hypo hesis:
8
Running head: RETAIL SERVICES SURVIVAL IN AN ECONOMIC CRISIS CONTEXT
H3. When cus ome s pe cei e ha hey ha e a posi i e RQ wi h he se ice supplie ,
hey will main ain a pu chase in en ion wi h his supplie .
Some p e ious s udies ha e analysed he impac o consume s’ a i udes on hei
buying beha iou (Allen e al., 1992; Wes b ook and Oli e , 1991). I seems plausible ha
cus ome loyal y o a e aile - a posi i e long e m a i ude (Espejel, Fandos, and Fla ián ,
2007) - would ha e a posi i e in luence on he consume ’s p edisposi ion o epea he
pu chase wi h ha speci ic e aile . Espejel e al. (2007; 2008) and Fandos and Fla ián (2006)
ha e es ablished a posi i e and signi ican e ec o loyal y on pu chase in en ion in ood
p oduc s wi h a p o ec ed designa ion o o igin (PDO). In a di e en a ea, e-ma ke places,
he e is also e idence o a posi i e ela ionship be ween loyal y and pu chase in en ion (Hong
and Cho, 2011). In he banking sec o i has been ound ha cus ome loyal y has a posi i e
in luence on c oss-buying in en ion (Tung and Ca lson, 2013). Souiden and Pons (2009)
showed a di ec posi i e impac o loyal y on pu chase in en ion in he case o ehicle use s
and Kim e al. (2011) in he online shopping o ou ism p oduc s and se ices. Ne e heless,
o he bes o ou knowledge, his ela ionship has no been checked ou in e ail a el
agencies.
H4. Cus ome loyal y has a posi i e impac on pu chase in en ion.
The ela ionship be ween he hypo heses o his esea ch is shown in Figu e 1.
--Inse igu e 1 abou he e—
Me hodology
To measu e he ela ionship be ween he cons uc s p oposed in he hypo heses
(CRM, RQ, loyal y and pu chase in en ion), a se o i ems alida ed in p e ious esea ch was
gene a ed ( Liu e al., 2011; Walsh e al., 2010; Wu and Li, 2011). F om his ini ial se o
i ems, a e ining p ocess o he sales ook place in wo phases. Face alidi y was e i ied
15
Running head: RETAIL SERVICES SURVIVAL IN AN ECONOMIC CRISIS CONTEXT
pe cei ed by he a el agencies’ cus ome s is in luenced by he CRM ac ions, a el agencies
mus make an e o o ein o ce hei ac ions in his a ea as hey will ha e an impac on an
imp o emen o he RQ. Al hough i is ue ha , o be ca ied ou , CRM ac ions mus be
suppo ed by a s ong echnological ounda ion - which means ha selec ing he echnology is
an impo an ac o -, o he elemen s, such as a igo ous analysis o he CRM ac ions, an
in e nal eo ganisa ion and lea ning a e he mos impo an de e minan s o success in he
implemen a ion o a CRM s a egy.
The ole ha con ac pe sonnel play in he cus ome ’s e alua ion o RQ is c ucial, as
is he main aining o he ela ionship in he long- e m once he ansac ion has been
concluded. The con ac pe sonnel a e he ehicle o undamen al communica ion wi h he
cus ome s and a e, indeed, he way in which he o ganisa ion shows i s business o ien a ion
owa d he cus ome s. I he a el agencies seek he loyal y o hei cus ome s h ough he
RQ hey es ablish wi h hem, his will hen become a decisi e ac o p o iding he con ac
pe sonnel wi h he lea ning and he ools necessa y o achie e sa is ac ion, us and
commi men , as well as de eloping a CRM s a egy.
F om he poin o iew o he RQ be ween he a el agencies and hei cus ome s, he
esul s ha e con i med ha i is made up o sa is ac ion, us and commi men . P e ious
esea ch has shown he impo ance o us in employees o us in he a el agency, as he
in e ac ion wi h he employees allows he e alua ing o hei compe i i eness and good
in en ions (Vázquez-Casielles e al., 2005).
In he e ail con ex , i could seem less e iden ha cus ome s gene a e an RQ wi h he
supplie , hus p oposing he challenge o how o c ea e ci cums ances which lead o
es ablishing posi i e ela ionships ha b ing abou he cus ome s emaining wi h his e aile
because hey pe cei e some bene i . In he case o a el agencies, i can be di icul o se up

16
Running head: RETAIL SERVICES SURVIVAL IN AN ECONOMIC CRISIS CONTEXT
commi ed ela ionships wi h hei cus ome s, con a y o se ices in he sphe e o indus ial
ma ke ing. This is because he se ices o a el agencies a e e y dependen on c edibili y
and cus ome s canno easily e alua e he esul o he se ice p o ision un il some ime a e
he da e o he ansac ion. The asymme y o he in o ma ion (Howden and P essey, 2008)
hinde s he cus ome ’s objec i e aluing o he se ice’s quali y (Johnson and G ayson,
2005). In gene al, ou is ic se ices a e suppo ed o a g ea ex en by c edibili y (Spielmann
e al., 2012) and, speci ically, by he a el agency-cus ome ela ionship. Hence, he se ice
p o ide mus be awa e o he impo ance o pe sonal in e ac ion in he cus ome ’s
pe cep ion.
To se up s ong communica ion lines wi h cus ome s (Al-Hawa i, 2011; Walsh e al.,
2010) abou aspec s such as hei sa is ac ion wi h he se ice, he punc uali y o he se ice,
a en ion o incon eniences du ing he enjoymen o he aca ions, e c., will con ibu e o
inc easing he commi men o he ela ionship es ablished wi h he a el agency. Moline e
al. (2007a, 2007b) ecommend ha ca e be aken wi h bo h emo ional aspec s - ela ed o he
enjoymen o he p oduc and he ime cus ome s spend in he agency du ing he pu chase
decision p ocess - and cogni i e aspec s, such as he p ice o he pe sonnel’s p o essionalism.
Howe e , online a el agencies canno o e con ac pe sonnel able o de elop RQ wi h he
cus ome s. I s impac on desi able ou comes o he agencies (loyal y and pu chase in en ion)
ha e been co obo a ed in his esea ch. Due o a el sales equi ing in ense collabo a i e
in e ac ion be ween he a el agen and he cus ome , many cus ome s a ach high
impo ance o he agen ’s ecommenda ions when booking hei a el plans. I e aile a el
agencies wish o achie e RQ ou comes, hey should concen a e hei e o s on selec ing,
mo i a ing and aining hei con ac pe sonnel. An impo an elemen in he social
in e ac ion be ween employee and cus ome is empa hy. This plays wo simul aneous oles: i
17
Running head: RETAIL SERVICES SURVIVAL IN AN ECONOMIC CRISIS CONTEXT
os e s success ul in e ac ions (symbiosis) and mi iga es he e ec s o nega i e expe iences in
se ice in e ac ion ( o gi eness) (Wieseke, Geigenmüle , and K aus, 2012).
The esea ch esul s make clea he possibili y o a el agencies ca ying ou CRM
wi h hei cus ome s. This imp o es he RQ ha hey es ablish wi h hem and esul s in,
inally, loyal y, and pu chase in en ion. Howe e , his is no an obs acle o using he
possibili ies ha In e ne o e s. Fo example, a co po a i e web page which se es as a
complemen o he a el agency’s ac i i y o assessing, in o de o imp o e sa is ac ion, o
ein o ce he commi men wi h he cus ome s and o inc ease hei us in he a el agency,
using he ne o p o ide alue o he cus ome in all he a el cycle - be o e, du ing and a e
i and no only when booking and pu chasing. In his way a esponse would be gi en o a pa
o he inc easingly mo e digi al, echni ied demand which chooses he pu chasing channel
based on he des ina ion o expe ience desi ed. To compe e wi h pu ely online agencies –
which base hei s a egy on low p ices – is no possible o o line e ail agencies, bu o
combine bo h o ms o ac ion is. This could gi e hem a compe i i e ad an age compa ed o
pu ely online a el agencies. New media p o ide ample oppo uni ies o g ow h h ough
new adap a i e s a egies (Hennig-Thu au e al., 2010).
Al hough his esea ch ills a esea ch gap – as empi ical esea ch abou he
pe cep ions cus ome s ha e o hei a el agency and how hey espond o he ac ions
unde aken by he a el agency is scan – i has some limi a ions, such as i s ans e sali y. I
would he e o e be e y in e es ing o ackle he analysis o he ela ionships p oposed om a
longi udinal pe spec i e as well as in o he esea ch con ex s. Mo eo e , ad ancing a s ep
u he , new esea ch mus es ablish he ela ionship be ween RQ ou comes and a eal epea
pu chase beha iou in e ail en i onmen s (De Canniè e e al., 2010). This has no been done
in he case o ou is ic p oduc s/se ices.
18
Running head: RETAIL SERVICES SURVIVAL IN AN ECONOMIC CRISIS CONTEXT
Las ly, he esea ch has aken place in a e ail se ing. This is a speci ic con ex , and
di e en ela ionships migh eme ge in o he con ex s, such as he ole ha RQ has o loses in
online a el agencies. This is because i he cus ome o his ype o a el agencies is
exclusi ely mo i a ed by a aining he lowes p ice, he ole pe o med by he RQ in his ype
o a el agencies could e en disappea .
19
Running head: RETAIL SERVICES SURVIVAL IN AN ECONOMIC CRISIS CONTEXT
Re e ences
Al-Hawa i, M.A. (2011). Au oma ed se ice quali y as a p edic o o cus ome s'
commi men . Asia Paci ic Jou nal o Ma ke ing and Logis ics, 23(3), 346-366.
Allen, C.T., Macheli , K.A., & Kleine, S.S. (1992). A compa ison o a i udes and emo ions
as p edic o s o beha io a di e se le els o beha io al expe ience. Jou nal o
Consume Resea ch, 18(4), 493-504.
Alsmadi, S., & Alnawas, I. (2011). Empi ical in es iga ion o he CRM concep in he
Jo danian con ex : he case o banks and inancial ins i u ions. In e na ional Jou nal
o Business and Managemen , 6(2), 182-195.
Ande son, J.C., & Ge bing, D.W. (1988). S uc u al equa ion modeling in p ac ice: a e iew
and ecommended wo-s ep app oach. Psychological Bulle in, 103(3), 411-423.
A hanasopoulou, P. (2009). Rela ionship quali y: a c i ical li e a u e e iew and esea ch
agenda. Eu opean Jou nal o Ma ke ing, 43(5-6), 583-610.
Au ie , P., & N’Goala, G. (2010). The di e ing and media ing oles o us and ela ionship
commi men in se ice ela ionship main enance and de elopmen . Jou nal o he
Academy o Ma ke ing Science, 38(3), 303-325.
Cas ellanos-Ve dugo, M., O iedo-Ga cía, M.A., Roldán, J.L., & Vee ape mal, N. (2009).
The employee-cus ome ela ionship quali y: an eceden s and consequences in he
ho el indus y. In e na ional Jou nal o Con empo a y Hospi ali y Managemen ,
21(3), 251-274.
Chiu, C. (2009). Unde s anding ela ionship quali y and online pu chase in en ion in e-
ou ism: a quali a i e applica ion. Quali y & Quan i y, 43(4), 669-675.
De Canniè e, M.H., De Pelsmacke , P., & Geuens, M. (2010). Rela ionship quali y and
pu chase in en ion and beha io : he mode a ing impac o ela ionship s eng h.
Jou nal o Business and Psychology, 25(1), 87-98.
20
Running head: RETAIL SERVICES SURVIVAL IN AN ECONOMIC CRISIS CONTEXT
Espejel, J., Fandos, C., & Fla ián, C. (2007). The ole o in insic and ex insic quali y
a ibu es on consume beha io o adi ional ood p oduc s. Managing Se ice
Quali y, 17(6), 681-701.
Espejel, J., Fandos, C., & Fla ián, C. (2008). Consume sa is ac ion. A key ac o o
consume loyal y and buying in en ion o a POD ood p oduc . B i ish Food Jou nal,
110(9), 865-881.
Eu os a (2012). T a el agencies s a is ics - NACE Re . 1.1. Re ie ed July 24, 2012, om
h p://epp.eu os a .ec.eu opa.eu/s a is ics_explained/index.php/T a el_agencies_s a is
ics_-_NACE_Re ._1.1.
Fandos, C., & Fla ián, C. (2006). In insic and ex insic quali y a ibu es, loyal y and buying
in en ion: an analysis o PDO p oduc . B i ish Food Jou nal, 108(8), 646-662.
Fo nell, C., & La cke , D.F. (1981). E alua ing s uc u al equa ion models wi h unobse able
a iables and measu emen e o . Jou nal o Ma ke ing Resea ch, 18(Feb ua y), 39-
50.
Ga ba ino, E., & Johnson, M.S. (1999). The di e en oles o sa is ac ion, us , and
commi men in cus ome ela ionships. Jou nal o Ma ke ing, 63(Ap il), 70-87.
Hai , J.F., Ande son, R.E., Ta ham, R.L., & Black , W.C. (1999). Mul i a ia e da a analyisis.
Englewood Cli s, NJ: P en ice-Hall.
Hennig-Thu au, T. (2000). Rela ionship quali y and cus ome e en ion h ough s a egic
communica ion o cus ome skills. Jou nal o Ma ke ing Managemen , 16(1-3), 55-
79.
Hennig-Thu au, T., & Klee, A. (1997). The impac o cus ome sa is ac ion and ela ionship
quali y on cus ome e en ion: a c i ical eassessmen and model
de elopmen .·Psychology & Ma ke ing, 14(8), 737-764.

21
Running head: RETAIL SERVICES SURVIVAL IN AN ECONOMIC CRISIS CONTEXT
Hennig-Thu au, T., Mal house, E., F iege, C., Gensle , S., Lobscha , L., Rangaswamy, A., &
Skie a, B. (2010). The impac o new media on cus ome ela ionships. Jou nal o
Se ice Resea ch, 13(3), 311-330.
Hong, I.B., & Cho, H. (2011). The impac o consume us on a i udinal loyal y and
pu chase in en ion in B2C e-ma ke places: In e media y us s. selle us .
In e na ional Jou nal o In o ma ion Managemen , 31(5), 469-479.
Howden, C., & P essey, A.D. (2008). Cus ome alue c ea ion in p o essional se ice
ela ionships: he case o c edence goods. The Se ice Indus ies Jou nal, 28(6), 789–
812.
INE (2012). INE. Anua io Es adís ico de España 2012. INE, Mad id.
Jamil, B., & A ya y, A. (2010). The in luence o ela ionship quali y on loyal y in se ice
sec o . In e na ional Jou nal o Economics and Managemen , 4(1), 81-100.
Johnson, D., & G ayson, K. (2005). Cogni i e and a ec i e us in se ice ela ionships.
Jou nal o Business Resea ch, 58(4), 500– 507.
Kim, W., Lee, Y., & Yoo, Y. (2006). P edic o s o ela ionship quali y and ela ionship
ou comes in luxu y es au an s. Jou nal o Hospi ali y & Tou ism Resea ch, 30(2),
143-169.
Lin, J., & Wu, C. (2011). The ole o expec ed u u e use in ela ionship-based se ice
e en ion. Managing Se ice Quali y, 21(5), 535-551.
Liu, C., Guo, Y.M., & Lee, C. (2011). The e ec s o ela ionship quali y and swi ching
ba ie s on cus ome loyal y. In e na ional Jou nal o In o ma ion Managemen ,
31(1), 71-79.
McGo y, S. (2000). Measu emen in a c oss-cul u al en i onmen : su ey ansla ion issues.
Quali a i e Ma ke Resea ch: An In e na ional Jou nal, 3(2), 74-81.
22
Running head: RETAIL SERVICES SURVIVAL IN AN ECONOMIC CRISIS CONTEXT
Moline , M., Sánchez, J., Rod íguez, R., & Calla isa, L. (2007a). Pe cei ed ela ionship
quali y and pos -pu chase pe cei ed alue. an in eg a i e amewo k. Eu opean
Jou nal o Ma ke ing, 41(11/12), 1392-1422.
Moline , M., Sánchez, J., Rod íguez, R., & Calla isa, L. (2007b). Rela ionship quali y wi h a
a el agency: The in luence o he pos pu chase pe cei ed alue o a ou ism
package. Tou ism and Hospi ali y Resea ch, 7(3-4), 194-211.
Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychome ic heo y (2nd ed.). New Yo k: McG aw-Hill.
Oli e , R.L. (1999). Whence consume loyal y? Jou nal o Ma ke ing, 63(special issue), 33–
44.
Ou, W., Shih, C., Chen, C., & Wang, K. (2011). Rela ionships among cus ome loyal y
p og ams, se ice quali y, ela ionship quali y and loyal y: an empi ical s udy.
Chinese Managemen S udies, 5(2), 194-206.
Rajaobelina, L., & Be ge on, J. (2009). An eceden s and consequences o buye -selle
ela ionship quali y in he inancial se ices indus y. In e na ional Jou nal o Bank
Ma ke ing, 27(5), 359-380.
Si a aks, P, K ai i , D., & Tang; J. (2011). E ec s o e-CRM on cus ome -bank ela ionship
quali y and ou comes: he case o Thailand. Jou nal o High Technology Managemen
Resea ch, 22(2), 141-157.
Souiden, N., & Pons, F. (2009). P oduc ecall c isis managemen : he impac on
manu ac u e ’s image, consume loyal y and pu chase in en ion. Jou nal o P oduc &
B and Managemen , 18(2), 106-114.
Spielmann, N., La oche, M., & Bo ges, A. (2012). How se ice seasons he expe ience:
measu ing hospi ali y se icescapes. In e na ional Jou nal o Hospi ali y
Managemen , 31(2), 360–368.
23
Running head: RETAIL SERVICES SURVIVAL IN AN ECONOMIC CRISIS CONTEXT
Tung, B., & Ca lson, J. (2013). Modeling a o ma i e measu e o ela ionship quali y and i s
e ec s: e idence om he Hong Kong e ail banking indus y. Se ice Ma ke ing
Qua e ly, 34(2), 139-158.
Vázquez-Casielles, R., Suá ez-Ál a ez, L., & Díaz-Ma ín, A.M. (2005). T us as a key ac o
in success ul ela ionships be ween consume s and e ail se ice p o ide s. The
Se ices Indus ies Jou nal, 25(1), 83-101.
Vesel, P., Zabka , V. (2010). Comp ehension o ela ionship quali y in he e ail en i onmen .
Managing Se ice Quali y, 20(3), 213-235.
Walsh, G., Hennig-Thu au, T., Sassenbe g, K., & Bo nemann, D. (2010). Does ela ionship
quali y ma e in e-se ices? A compa ison o online and o line e ailing. Jou nal o
Re ailing and Consume Se ices, 17(2), 130-142.
Wes b ook, R.A., & Oli e , R.L. (1991). The dimensionali y o consump ion emo ion
pa e ns and consume sa is ac ion. Jou nal o Consume Resea ch, 18(June), 84-91.
Wieseke, J., Geigenmüle , A., & K aus, F. (2012). On he ole o empa hy in cus ome -
employee in e ac ions. Jou nal o Se ice Resea ch, 15(3), 316-331.
Wo ld T a el & Tou ism Council (2013). T a el & ou ism. Economic impac 2013.
Re ie ed Ma ch20, 2013, om h p://www.w c.o g/ esea ch/economic-impac -
esea ch/.
Wu, S., & Li, P. (2011). The ela ionships be ween CRM, RQ, and CLV based on di e en
ho el p e e ences. In e na ional Jou nal o Hospi ali y Managemen , 30(2), 262-271.
24
Running head: RETAIL SERVICES SURVIVAL IN AN ECONOMIC CRISIS CONTEXT
Table 1. Analysis and i ems o he e ined measu emen scales / A e age/ S anda d
de ia ion (SD)/s anda dised loads
Sacles/i ems
A e age
SD
Es . loadings
CRM – adap ed om Wu and Li (2011). C onbach’s α = 0.872
The agency’s opening hou s sa is y my demands as a cus ome
4.04
0.874
0.757
The agency p o ides an app op ia e in o ma ion and booking
se ice
4.02
0.981
0.753
The agency is conce ned abou i s cus ome s’ needs
3.76
1.070
0.812
The agency esponds o he opinions o i s cus ome s
2.84
1.355
0.822
Rela ionship Quali y (RQ)
Sa is ac ion – adap ed om Moline e al. (2007), Walsh e al.
(2010) and Wu and Li (2011). C onbach’s α = 0.881
The su oundings o he agency sa is ies me
3.76
0.947
0.784
The se ice a i ude o he agency’s employees sa is ies me
3.79
0.976
0.795
The p o essional knowledge o he i m’s employees sa is ies me
3.71
0.984
0.828
The agency has ne e annoyed me
3.68
0.955
0.820
My expe iences wi h he agency a e excellen
3.71
0.994
0.777
My expec a ions ha e always been sa is ied
3.77
0.963
0.787
T us – adap ed om Moline e al. (2007), Liu e al. (2011),
Walsh e al. (2010) and Wu and Li (2011). C onbach’s α = 0.879
The se ice supplied by he agency is us wo hy
3.85
0.886
0.814
The in o ma ion supplied by he agency is accu a e
3.80
0.921
0.746
The agency ea s i s cus ome s hones ly
3.86
0.896
0.780
You can us in he a el agency ul illing i s p omises
3.79
0.923
0.783
I ha e always had posi i e expe iences
3.77
0.945
0.738
The agency is able o supply i s cus ome s wi h wha hey a e
looking o
3.83
0.907
0.722
I ha e always been able o coun on hei suppo and help
3.60
1.007
0.784
They ha e been conce ned abou my wellbeing a all imes
3.39
1.004
0.711
I ully us his a el agency
3.58
1.013
0.818
Commi men – adap ed om Moline e al. (2007), Walsh e al.
(2010) and Wu and Li (2011). C onbach’s α = 0.801
I am e y commi ed o agency X
2.52
1.204
0.900
Agency X means a lo o me
2.36
1.154
0.896
I he agency we e o disappea , i would mean a g ea loss o me
2.29
1.150
0.799
Pu chasing in en ion- adap ed om Wu and Li (2011), Walsh e
al. (2010) C onbach’s α = 0.853
In he u u e, I will epea my pu chase o p oduc s/se ices in
his a el agency
3.38
0.982
0.785
I would consume a new p oduc o he agency i he agency
sugges ed his o me
3.04
0.969
0.771
I main ain a posi i e a i ude owa d he agency
3.49
0.951
0.779
My nex pu chase o a el/ icke s will be in his agency
3.15
1.022
0.737
Loyal y – adap ed om Liu e al. (2011). C onbach’s α = 0.871
I mean o emain wi h his a el agency
3.27
1.019
0.900
I mean o ecommend his agency o o he s
3.45
1.015
0.776
I am a loyal cus ome o his a el agency *
3.02
1.153
0.765
Sou ce: Own elabo a ion. *New i em