scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Abnormal accumulation of autophagic vesicles correlates with axonal and synaptic pathology in young Alzheimer’s mice hippocampus

Abstract

Dystrophic neurites associated with amyloid plaques precede neuronal death and manifest early in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). In this work we have characterized the plaque-associated neuritic pathology in the hippocampus of young (4- to 6-month-old) PS1M146L/ APP751SL mice model, as the initial degenerative process underlying functional disturbance prior to neuronal loss. Neuritic plaques accounted for almost all fibrillar deposits and an axonal origin of the dystrophies was demonstrated. The early induction of autophagy pathology was evidenced by increased protein levels of the autophagosome marker LC3 that was localized in the axonal dystrophies, and by electron microscopic identification of numerous autophagic vesicles filling and causing the axonal swellings. Early neuritic cytoskeletal defects determined by the presence of phosphorylated tau (AT8-positive) and actin–cofilin rods along with decreased levels of kinesin-1 and dynein motor proteins could be responsible for this extensive vesicle accumulation within dystrophic neurites. Although microsomal Ab oligomers were identified, the presence of A11-immunopositive Ab plaques also suggested a direct role of plaque-associated Ab oligomers in defective axonal transport and disease progression. Most importantly, presynaptic terminals morphologically disrupted by abnormal autophagic vesicle buildup were identified ultrastructurally and further supported by synaptosome isolation. Finally, these early abnormalities in axonal and presynaptic structures might represent the morphological substrate of hippocampal dysfunction preceding synaptic and neuronal loss and could significantly contribute to AD pathology in the preclinical stages.

Read accessible full text

Abnormal accumulation of autophagic vesicles correlates with axonal and synaptic pathology in young Alzheimer’s mice hippocampus

Author: Sánchez Varo, Raquel María; Trujillo Estrada, Laura Isabel; Sánchez Mejías, Elisabeth; Torres Canalejo, Manuel; Baglietto Vargas, David; Moreno González, Inés; Jiménez Muñoz, Sebastián; Ruano Caballero, Diego; Vizuete Chacón, María Luisa; Vitorica Ferrán
Publisher: Springer
Year: 2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00401-011-0896-x
Source: https://idus.us.es/bitstreams/2ff14429-1fe6-4e67-94de-e42325e325a8/download
ORIGINAL PAPER
Abno mal accumula ion o au ophagic esicles co ela es
wi h axonal and synap ic pa hology in young Alzheime ’s mice
hippocampus
Raquel Sanchez-Va o •Lau a T ujillo-Es ada •Elisabe h Sanchez-Mejias •Manuel To es •
Da id Baglie o-Va gas •Ines Mo eno-Gonzalez •Vanessa De Cas o •Sebas ian Jimenez •
Diego Ruano •Ma isa Vizue e •Jose Ca los Da ila •Jose Manuel Ga cia-Ve dugo •
An onio Jesus Jimenez •Ja ie Vi o ica •An onia Gu ie ez
Recei ed: 22 July 2011 / Re ised: 27 Sep embe 2011 / Accep ed: 13 Oc obe 2011 / Published online: 22 Oc obe 2011
ÓThe Au ho (s) 2011. This a icle is published wi h open access a Sp inge link.com
Abs ac Dys ophic neu i es associa ed wi h amyloid
plaques p ecede neu onal dea h and mani es ea ly in
Alzheime ’s disease (AD). In his wo k we ha e cha ac-
e ized he plaque-associa ed neu i ic pa hology in he
hippocampus o young (4- o 6-mon h-old) PS1
M146L
/
APP
751SL
mice model, as he ini ial degene a i e p ocess
unde lying unc ional dis u bance p io o neu onal loss.
Neu i ic plaques accoun ed o almos all ib illa deposi s
and an axonal o igin o he dys ophies was demons a ed.
The ea ly induc ion o au ophagy pa hology was e idenced
by inc eased p o ein le els o he au ophagosome ma ke
LC3 ha was localized in he axonal dys ophies, and by
elec on mic oscopic iden i ica ion o nume ous au ophagic
esicles illing and causing he axonal swellings. Ea ly
neu i ic cy oskele al de ec s de e mined by he p esence o
phospho yla ed au (AT8-posi i e) and ac in–co ilin ods
along wi h dec eased le els o kinesin-1 and dynein mo o
p o eins could be esponsible o his ex ensi e esicle
accumula ion wi hin dys ophic neu i es. Al hough mic o-
somal Aboligome s we e iden i ied, he p esence o
A11-immunoposi i e Abplaques also sugges ed a di ec ole
o plaque-associa ed Aboligome s in de ec i e axonal
anspo and disease p og ession. Mos impo an ly, p e-
synap ic e minals mo phologically dis up ed by abno mal
au ophagic esicle buildup we e iden i ied ul as uc u ally
and u he suppo ed by synap osome isola ion. Finally,
hese ea ly abno mali ies in axonal and p esynap ic s uc-
u es migh ep esen he mo phological subs a e o
hippocampal dys unc ion p eceding synap ic and neu onal
loss and could signi ican ly con ibu e o AD pa hology in he
p eclinical s ages.
Keywo ds PS1/APP ansgenic mice 
Dys ophic neu i es Elec on mic oscopy LC3 
Amyloid plaques P esynap ic e minals
In oduc ion
Alzheime ’s disease (AD) g adually damages he unc ion
and s uc u e o pa icula ly ulne able b ain a eas, as hose
used o memo y and cogni ion. Accumula ion o agg e-
ga ed p o eins a he ex acellula (amyloid-be a, Ab) and
in acellula (hype phospho yla ed au) le els is one o he
majo abno mali ies ound in he b ain o AD pa ien s
( e ised in [13,26,50]). Ano he key pa hological ea u e,
ha de ines his disease, is he ea ly appea ance o amyloid
R. Sanchez-Va o L. T ujillo-Es ada E. Sanchez-Mejias 
D. Baglie o-Va gas I. Mo eno-Gonzalez V. De Cas o 
J. C. Da ila A. J. Jimenez A. Gu ie ez (&)
Dp o. Biologı
´a Celula , Gene
´ ica y Fisiologı
´a, Facul ad de
Ciencias, Uni e sidad de Ma
´laga, Campus de Tea inos,
29071 Ma
´laga, Spain
e-mail: [email p o ec ed]
M. To es S. Jimenez D. Ruano M. Vizue e J. Vi o ica
Dp o. Bioquı
´mica y Biologı
´a Molecula , Facul ad de Fa macia,
Uni e sidad de Se illa, Se ille, Spain
J. M. Ga cia-Ve dugo
Labo a o io de Mo ologı
´a Celula , Unidad Mix a Cen o de
In es igacio
´n P ı
´ncipe Felipe-UVEG, Valencia, Spain
R. Sanchez-Va o L. T ujillo-Es ada E. Sanchez-Mejias 
M. To es D. Baglie o-Va gas I. Mo eno-Gonzalez 
V. De Cas o S. Jimenez D. Ruano M. Vizue e 
J. C. Da ila J. M. Ga cia-Ve dugo J. Vi o ica A. Gu ie ez
Cen o de In es igacio
´n Biome
´dica en Red sob e En e medades
Neu odegene a i as (CIBERNED), Mad id, Spain
M. To es S. Jimenez D. Ruano M. Vizue e J. Vi o ica
Ins i u o de Biomedicina de Se illa (IBiS)-Hospi al Uni e si a io
Vi gen del Rocı
´o/CSIC/Uni e sidad de Se illa, Se ille, Spain
123
Ac a Neu opa hol (2012) 123:53–70
DOI 10.1007/s00401-011-0896-x
plaque-associa ed neu i ic changes in he o m o dys o-
phic neu i es, oge he wi h a selec i e loss o connec ions
and neu onal g oups. Dys ophic neu i es, de ined as
hickened o i egula neu onal p ocesses, a e conside ed o
be an exp ession o a widesp ead al e a ion o he neu onal
cy oskele on. In AD, dys ophic axons a e pa icula ly
abundan in he hippocampal ibe sys ems o igina ing
om he subiculum, CA1, and he en o hinal co ex [57].
Synap ic loss in bo h he neoco ex and he hippocampus is,
so a , he bes pa hological co ela e o ea ly cogni i e
decline [19,41,52–54,59,61]. The ini ial neu i ic
degene a i e changes may ep esen an ea ly mani es a ion
o axonal damage ha p ecede he appea ance o synap ic
loss and, he e o e, a p omising disease-modi ying mo -
phological a ge o ea ly in e en ion s a egies o e e se
he damage and escue he de e io a ing neu ons. Sup-
po ing he idea ha hese changes could be po en ially
e e sible, a ecen s udy has epo ed ha dys ophic
axons su ounding amyloid plaques emain connec ed
o iable neu onal bodies o e a ela i ely long pe iod o
ime [1].
The exp ession o he human amyloid p ecu so p o ein
(APP) wi h single o double mu a ions in ansgenic mouse
lines leads o he o ma ion o neu i ic plaques wi h clus e s
o dys ophic neu i es and glial ec ui men ha esembles
he amyloid pa hology seen in AD b ains [4,28]. A e
plaque o ma ion, neu i ic abno mali ies p og essi ely
de elop as shown by in i o mul ipho on imaging in an
AD model [42]; howe e , he cellula dys unc ion unde -
lying he neu i ic pa hology is no well unde s ood.
Nume ous au ophagic acuoles accumula e wi hin dys o-
phic neu i es in he b ains o humans wi h AD and AD
models [46,47,66] and se e al lines o in es iga ion
suppo he no ion ha de ec s in he au ophagy p ocess, a
cellula ca abolic mechanism essen ial o he deg ada ion
o agg ega ed p o eins and o ganelles, signi ican ly con-
ibu es o AD pa hogenesis [11,37,46,48]. In e es ingly,
i has been epo ed ha au ophagic compa men s pa ic-
ipa e in APP p ocessing and Abpep ides p oduc ion [65,
66] sugges ing a possible causal ela ionship be ween pla-
que o ma ion and neu i ic dys ophy. Rema kably,
es o ing he in acellula au ophagy pa hway amelio a es
disease p og ession and cogni ion de ici s in a ansgenic
model [65] p o ing he po en ial he apeu ic alue o
au ophagy induc ion in ea ly s ages o he disease o
neu onal unc ion eco e y.
He e, in his wo k, we ha e cha ac e ized he mo pho-
logical and subcellula abno mali ies associa ed wi h
dys ophic neu i es a ound plaques in he hippocampus o
ou PS1/APP model a 4–6 mon hs o age. Such neu i ic
abno mali ies may esul in de ec s in main aining axonal
and synap ic e minals s uc u e and unc ion. As we ha e
epo ed p e iously, his bigenic model ep oduces majo
amyloid-induced pa hogenic s eps seen in humans. The mos
ele an ea u e o ou model is ha , unlike many o he
ansgenic mice in which neu onal loss is no obse ed, he
selec i e neu odegene a i e pheno ype wi h speci ic subse s
o in e neu ons and py amidal neu ons is a ec ed in hippo-
campus and en o hinal co ex, ollowing a egional and
empo al pa e n [5,29,44,51]. This neu onal loss was ound
o be associa ed wi h a neu o oxic in lamma o y esponse
induced by soluble oligome ic Abpep ides [29]. A be e
unde s anding o he pa hological basis o he neu i ic
changes, p io o neu onal loss in his model, will p o ide
aluable insigh s in o he po en ial causes o ea ly axonal
damage and synap ic dys unc ion and will u he imp o e
he accu acy o p eclinical e alua ion o no el he apeu ic
agen s in ended o e e se axonal damage.
Ma e ials and me hods
T ansgenic mice
The gene a ion and cha ac e iza ion o PS1/APP ansgenic
( g) mice has been epo ed p e iously [5,10,12,29,30,
44,51]. These double ansgenic mice (C57BL/6 back-
g ound) we e ob ained by c ossing homozygo ic
PS1M146L ansgenic mice wi h he e ozygo ic Thy1-
APP751SL (Swedish: K670N, M671L and London: V717I
FAD mu a ions) mice (Cha les Ri e , F ance). Mice ep-
esen ed F6–F10 o sp ing o he e ozygous ansgenic
mice. Non- ansgenic mice o he same gene ic backg ound
and ages we e used as con ols. All animal expe imen s
we e ca ied ou in acco dance wi h he Eu opean Union
egula ions and app o ed by he commi ee o animal use
o esea ch a Malaga Uni e si y.
An ibodies
The ollowing p ima y an ibodies we e used in his s udy:
an i-human amyloid p ecu so p o ein (hAPP) abbi
polyclonal (1:20,000, Sigma A8717); an i-Ab(clone 6E10)
mouse monoclonal (1:5,000, Sigma A1474); an i-oligome
A11 ( ecognizes Ab42 oligome s bu no monome s o
ib ils) abbi polyclonal (1:500; Millipo e AB9234); an i-
Ab
42
abbi polyclonal (1:40; Biosou ce 44-344); an i-
phospho-PHF- au pSe 202/Th 205 mouse monoclonal
(clone AT8) (1:500; Pie ce MN1020); an i-co ilin abbi
polyclonal (1:2,000, Cy oskele on ACFLO2); an i-mic o-
ubule-associa ed p o ein 1 ligh chain 3 (LC3) goa
polyclonal (1:1,000; San a C uz Bio echnology Sc16755);
an i-neu o ilamen 150 kDa abbi polyclonal (1:5,000;
Millipo e AB1981); an i-mic o ubule-associa ed p o ein 2
(MAP-2); abbi polyclonal (1:5,000; Chemicon Ab5622);
an i-synap ophysin abbi polyclonal (1:1,000; Abcam
54 Ac a Neu opa hol (2012) 123:53–70
123
ab14692); an i- esicula GABA anspo e (VGAT) gui-
nea pig polyclonal (1:5,000; Calbiochem 676780); an i-
esicula glu ama e anspo e (VGLUT1) guinea pig
polyclonal (1:10,000; Millipo e AB5905); an i-human Ab,
N e minus (clone 82E1) mouse monoclonal (1:1,000, IBL
10323); an i-kinesin hea y chain (clone KN-01) mouse
monoclonal (1:1,000, Abcam AB9097); an i-dynein,
74 kDa (clone 74.1) mouse monoclonal (1:1,000, Millipo e
MAB1618).
Tissue p epa a ion
A e deep anes hesia wi h sodium pen oba bi al (60 mg/
kg), 2-, 4- and 6-mon h-old con ol (WT), PS1 and PS1/
APP g mice we e pe used ansca dially wi h 0.1 M
phospha e bu e ed saline (PBS), pH 7.4 ollowed by 4%
pa a o maldehyde, 75 mM lysine, 10 mM sodium me-
ape ioda e in 0.1 M phospha e bu e (PB), pH 7.4. B ains
we e hen emo ed, pos - ixed o e nigh in he same ixa-
i e a 4°C, c yop o ec ed in 30% suc ose, sec ioned a
40 lm hickness in he co onal plane on a eezing
mic o ome and se ially collec ed in wells con aining cold
PBS and 0.02% sodium azide.
Fo elec onic mic oscopy, 4.5-mon h-old PS1/APP g
mice we e pe used ansca dially wi h 0.1 M phospha e
bu e ed saline (PBS)/1% hepa in, pH 7.4 ollowed by 2.5%
glu a aldehyde–2% pa a o maldehyde in 0.1 M phospha e
bu e (PB), pH 7.4. A e being emo ed, he b ains we e
pos - ixed in he same ixa i e o e nigh a 4°C, washed
se e al imes wi h PB, sec ioned a 50 o 100 lm hickness in
he co onal plane on a ib a ome (Leica VT1000M) and
se ially collec ed in wells con aining cold PB and 0.02%
sodium azide. Then, he 100-lm sec ions we e ixed in 2%
osmium e oxide in 0.1 M PB and dehyd a ed, o be inally
embedded in A aldi e (EMS, USA). Tissue blocks we e cu
se ially in o semi hin (1.5 lm) wi h a diamond kni e in a
Leica ul amic o ome (EM UC6), placed on slides, s ained
wi h 1% oluidine blue and explo ed wi h he ligh mic o-
scope o amyloid plaques. Then, selec ed a eas om
semi hins we e cu in ul a hin sec ions. Ul a hin sec ions
we e placed on Fo m a -coa ed g ids and s ained wi h u anyl
ace a e and lead ci a e be o e being examined wi h an
elec on mic oscope (FEI Tecnai Spi i , OR, USA).
Ligh mic oscopy immunohis ochemis y
Se ial sec ions om con ol (WT) and bo h g mice (PS1 and
PS1/APP) we e p ocessed in pa allel o ligh mic oscopy
immunos aining using he same ba ches o solu ions o
minimize a iabili y in immunohis ochemical labeling
condi ions. F ee- loa ing sec ions we e i s ea ed wi h 3%
H
2
O
2
/10% me hanol in PBS, pH 7.4 o 20 min o inhibi
endogenous pe oxidases, and wi h a idin–bio in Blocking
Ki (Vec o Labs, Bu lingame, CA, USA) o 30 min o
block endogenous a idin, bio in and bio in-binding p o eins.
Sec ions we e immuno eac ed wi h one o wo o he p ima y
an ibodies o e 24 o 48 h a oom empe a u e. The issue-
bound p ima y an ibody was hen de ec ed by incuba ing o
1 h wi h he co esponding bio inyla ed seconda y an ibody
(1:500 dilu ion, Vec o Labo a o ies), and hen ollowed by
incuba ing o 90 min wi h s ep a idin-conjuga ed ho se-
adish pe oxidase (Sigma–Ald ich) dilu ed 1:2,000. The
pe oxidase eac ion was isualized wi h 0.05% 3-3-diam-
inobenzidine e ahyd ochlo ide (DAB, Sigma–Ald ich),
0.03% nickel ammonium sulpha e and 0.01% hyd ogen
pe oxide in PBS. A e DAB, sec ions immunolabeled o
APP, MAP-2, neu o ilamen o synap ophysin we e incu-
ba ed 3 min in a solu ion o 20% o Congo ed. Sec ions we e
hen moun ed on gela ine-coa ed slides, ai d ied, dehyd a ed
in g aded e hanol, clea ed in xylene and co e slipped wi h
DPX (BDH) moun ing medium. Speci ici y o he immune
eac ions was con olled by omi ing he p ima y an ise a.
Fo double immuno luo escence labelings, sec ions we e
i s sequen ially incuba ed wi h he indica ed p ima ies
an ibodies ollowed by he co esponding Alexa488/568
seconda y an ibodies (1:1,000; In i ogen). APP-immuno-
labeled sec ions we e s ained wi h 0.02% hio la ine-S in
50°e hanol o 5 min. Sec ions p ocessed o immuno lu-
o escence we e moun ed on o gela in-coa ed slides,
co e slipped wi h 0.01 M PBS con aining 50% glyce in
and 3% ie hylenediamine and hen examined unde a
con ocal lase mic oscope (Leica SP5 II).
Immunoelec on mic oscopy
Sec ions o 50 lm om 4.5-mon h-old PS1/APP mice we e
i s washed wi h PBS and incuba ed in a 50 mM glycine
solu ion 10 min in o de o inc ease he an ibody-binding
e iciency. Following he s anda d immunohis ochemical
p o ocol, he issue was incuba ed o e nigh in p ima y
abbi polyclonal an ibodies an i-hAPP o an i-Ab
42
in a
PBS 0.1 M/0.01% Tx-100/1% BSA solu ion a oom em-
pe a u e. Then, hey we e washed in PBS, and incuba ed
wi h 1.4 nm gold-conjuga ed seconda y an ibody goa an i-
abbi IgG (1:100; Nanop obes) o one nigh a oom
empe a u e. A e pos ixing wi h 1% glu a aldehyde and
washing wi h 50 mM sodium ci a e, he labeling was
enhanced wi h he HQ Sil e
TM
Ki (Nanop obes). In neg-
a i e con ol expe imen s, p ima y an ibody was omi ed.
Then, he slices we e p ocessed by he s anda d ixa ion,
dehyd a ion and embedding s eps.
S e eological analysis
Densi y and size o 6E10-posi i e amyloid plaques we e
ob ained by s e eology-based quan i ica ion in he
Ac a Neu opa hol (2012) 123:53–70 55
123
hippocampal o ma ion o PS1/APP a 6 and 18 mon hs o
age (n=4/age; 5 sec ions pe animal) acco ding o he
op ical ac iona o me hod as p e iously desc ibed [44].
B ie ly, an Olympus BX61 mic oscope and he NewCAST
so wa e package (Olympus, Glos up, Denma k) we e
used. In o de o ob ain he plaque densi y, he numbe o
plaques was quan i ied in i e sec ions h ough he an e o-
pos e io ex en o he hippocampus and hen di ided
be ween he sampled a eas. CA1 sub ields we e de ined
using a 109objec i e and he numbe o plaques was
coun ed using a 409objec i e. The numbe o coun ing
ames a ied wi h he hippocampal egion o sub ield
laye analyzed. We used a coun ing ame o 7,154.7 lm
2
wi h s ep leng hs o 84.58 984.58 lm. Neu i e and plaque
sizes we e es ima ed by he nuclea o applica ion wi h
iso ophic p obes (n=5 adii). The numbe o APP-posi-
i e dys ophic neu i es pe plaque was quan i ied o e
Congo ed s ained Abdeposi s. Each analysis was done by
a single examine blinded o sample iden i ies.
To al p o ein ex ac ion and Wes e n blo s
The p o ein pelle s, ob ained using he T ipu e
TM
Isola ion
Reagen , we e esuspended in 4% SDS and 8 M u ea in
40 mM T is–HCl, pH 7.4 and o a ed o e nigh a oom
empe a u e. The p o ein con en was e alua ed using
Low y.
Wes e n blo s we e pe o med as desc ibed p e iously
[12,29,51]. B ie ly, 10–20 lg o p o ein om he di e en
samples we e loaded on 16% SDS-T is-T icine-PAGE and
ans e ed o ni ocellulose (Hybond-C Ex a, Ame sham,
Sweden). A e blocking, he memb anes we e incuba ed
o e nigh , a 4°C, wi h he app op ia e an ibody. The
memb anes we e hen incuba ed wi h an i-mouse ho se-
adish-pe oxidase-conjuga ed seconda y an ibody (Dako,
Denma k) a a dilu ion o 1/8,000. The blo s we e de el-
oped using he ECL-plus de ec ion me hod (Ame sham,
Sweden). Fo quan i ica ion, he scanned (Epson 3200)
images we e analyzed using PCBAS p og am. In each
expe imen , he in ensi y o bands om WT mice and/o
expe imen al condi ion we e a e aged and conside ed as 1
ela i e uni . Da a we e always no malized by he speci ic
signal obse ed in 6-mon h-old WT g oup.
Synap osomes and mic osomes p epa a ion, soluble
ac ions isola ion and immunop ecipi a ion
The synap osomal ac ions we e ob ained basically as
desc ibed p e iously [62]. B ie ly, he issue was homog-
enized (using a Dounce homogenize ) in 0.32 M Suc ose,
10 mM T is–HCl (pH 7.4) bu e (bu e A) con aining
comple e p o ease and phospha ase inhibi o cock ails
(Sigma). A e homogeniza ion, he c ude synap osomal
ac ion (synap osomes plus mi ochond ia) was isola ed by
wo sequen ial cen i uga ions (1,5009g, 10 min ollowed
by 12,5009g, 20 min; a 4°C). The c ude synap osomes
we e esuspended in 13% ( inal concen a ion) Ficoll 400
(in bu e A) and laye ed on he bo om o a discon inuous
g adien , composed by bu e A and 7% Ficoll (in bu e
A). The g adien s we e cen i uged a 100,0009g(45 min
a 4°C) and he synap osomes we e isola ed a he 7.5–13%
in e ace. A e washing ( wice wi h bu e A), he p o ein
con en o he synap osomal ac ions was quan i ied by
Low y.
The soluble and mic osomal ac ions (supe na an and
pelle , espec i ely) om PS1/APP and WT mice we e
ob ained a e cen i uga ion a 100,0009g(1 h, 4°C) as
desc ibed p e iously [29,30].
The A11 o 6E10 immunop ecipi a ion expe imen s
we e also pe o med as desc ibed in de ail p e iously [29,
30]. Since he epi ope ecognized by A11 was sensi i e o
de e gen s, synap osomes and mic osomes we e dis u bed
by sonica ion (4 pulses a 100 W, 30 s a 4°C). A e
sonica ion, he synap osomes and mic osomes we e cen-
i uged (30,0009g, 30 min a 4°C) and soluble p o eins
we e used o immunop ecipi a ion. A11 and 6E10
immunop ecipi a ion was done using 50 lg o soluble
p o ein.
S a is ical analysis
Da a was exp essed as mean ±SD. The compa ison
be ween wo mice g oups (WT and PS1/APP mice o PS1
and PS1/APP g mice) was done by wo- ailed es , and
o compa ing se e al g oups (WT, PS1 and PS1/APP
mice) and ages we used one-way ANOVA, ollowed by
Bon e oni pos hoc mul iple compa ison es (SigmaS a
Ò
2.03, SPSS Inc). Fo bo h es s, he signi icance was se a
95% o con idence.
Resul s
Amyloid plaque-associa ed dys ophic neu i es display
a massi e accumula ion o au ophagic esicles
om ea ly ages
This PS1/APP ansgenic model exhibi ed ex acellula Ab
deposi s h oughou he hippocampus om a e y ea ly age
as illus a ed in Fig. 1a wi h Congo ed s aining a 4 mon hs.
The numbe and size o he amyloid deposi s p og essi ely
inc eased wi h age (Fig. 1b). In young mice (4- o 6-mon h
old), he mos abundan plaques we e hose less han
500 lm
2
(70.53 ±9.74%), whe eas in olde mice
(18 mon hs) he as majo i y o plaques (69.41 ±11.73%)
we e medium o la ge ([500 lm
2
).
56 Ac a Neu opa hol (2012) 123:53–70
123
Double labeling APP/Congo ed (Fig. 1a–c) and APP/
hio la in-S (Fig. 1d) expe imen s demons a ed ha , a
e e y age examined, almos all (91.61 ±0.14%, he pe -
cen age was p ac ically iden ical a 4, 6 and 18 mon hs o
age) ib illa amyloid deposi s we e deco a ed wi h clus e s
o APP-posi i e dys ophic neu i es (APP is a well- epo -
ed ma ke o dys ophies) om he ime o he appea ance
o amyloid plaques. The numbe o dys ophic neu i es pe
plaque inc eased wi h age in pa allel wi h he size o he
plaque (Fig. 1e). Resul s showed ha , in ac , he numbe
o hese dys ophic neu i es co ela ed wi h he size o he
plaque and was independen o he age o he mice. Thus,
neu onal pa hology in he o m o dys ophic neu i es
occu ed e y ea ly in his ansgenic model. These pa h-
ological s uc u es we e no ound in wild- ype (WT) o
PS1 ansgenic mice o he same age (da a no shown).
The e o e, plaque-associa ed abno mal swelling o neu o-
nal p ocesses ep esen ed an ea ly indica o o disease
de elopmen and migh comp omise neu onal in eg i y and
hippocampal unc ion in young PS1/APP mice. No dys-
ophic neu i es we e ound in a eas emo e om Ab
plaques o in 2-mon h-old PS1/APP mice (be o e he Ab
deposi ion).
T ansmission elec on mic oscopy analysis o he hip-
pocampus o 4.5-mon h-old PS1/APP mice e ealed a
close spa ial associa ion be ween amyloid plaques and
neu onal dys ophies (Fig. 2a, b). No dys ophic neu i es
we e ound in a eas emo e om plaques. These abno mal
swollen neu i es had a ound/o al p o ile and we e gian -
sized, compa ed o no mal neu onal p ocesses in he
a
b
c
d
APP/Thio-S
CA1
CA3
DG
CA1
CA3
DG
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Neu i es/ plaque
< 200
Plaque size (
μ
m2)
200-500 500-1000 >1000
e
*
*
*
Fig. 1 Ea ly plaque-associa ed
neu i ic dys ophy pa hology in
PS1/APP hippocampus. aand
bAPP-immunolabeled sec ions
coun e s ained wi h Congo ed
o ib illa amyloid deposi s a
4(a) and 6 (b) mon hs o age
showing he ea ly occu ence o
he neu i ic pa hology. The
numbe o neu i ic plaques
p og essi ely inc eases wi h
age. APP-posi i e dys ophic
neu i es a ise om
glu ama e gic neu ons since he
human APP ansgene is
exclusi ely exp essed by
p incipal neu ons as shown in
he inse .cA ep esen a i e
neu i ic plaque o med by a co e
o congophilic ib illa amyloid
su ounded by nume ous APP-
posi i e dys ophic neu i es.
dCon ocal image showing
APP-posi i e dys ophic
neu i es ( ed) a ound a plaque
s ained wi h hio la in-S
(g een). eS e eological
quan i ica ion o he dys ophic
neu i es a ound plaques. The
numbe o dys ophies/plaque
inc eased wi h he size o plaque
(lm
2
). Da a a e exp essed as
mean ±SD, *p 0.05. Scale
ba s aand b500 lm, inse
25 lm, cand d10 lm.
CA1–CA3 sub ields o he
hippocampus p ope ,
DG den a e gy us
Ac a Neu opa hol (2012) 123:53–70 57
123

adjacen neu opil. Ul as uc u al mo phome ic analysis
(100 abe an neu i es; n=3) e ealed ha he p edomi-
nan size o hese dys ophic s uc u es was be ween 10 and
50 lm
2
(63.74%), ollowed by hose anging om 50 o
100 lm
2
(20.43%). No ably, 5% o he dys ophic neu i es
measu ed o e 100 lm
2
, only 9.68% o neu i es we e in he
ange 5–10 lm
2
and jus 1% unde 5 lm
2
. In con as ,
no mal non-dys ophic neu i es had an a e age size o
1.42 ±0.77 lm
2
.
Dys ophic neu i es we e massi ely illed wi h collec-
ions o acuola s uc u es o pu a i e au ophagic na u e
wi h di e en mo phologies and he e ogeneous in alumi-
nal con en s (Fig. 2c, e). The mos common mo phology
co esponded o au ophagic esicles (AVs) consis ing o
double memb ane-bound esicles wi h densely compac ed
amo phous o mul ilamella con en s named as au o-
phagosomes (Fig. 2c, d). These AVs ep esen he ini ial
s ages o au ophagy which con ain undiges ed compac ed
o ganella ma e ial. In addi ion, he e we e also single o
double memb ane esicles wi h anslucen o amo phous
elec on-dense ma e ial in some dys ophic neu i es
(Fig. 2e, ), and hese migh p esumably ep esen au o-
phagosomes wi h pa ially diges ed ma e ial and/o he
ma u e deg ada i e o ms o AVs (au ophagolysosomes).
O e all, a subs an ial accumula ion o ea ly and, o a less
ex en , la e AVs wi hin hippocampal abe an neu i es,
su ounding amyloid plaques, occu ed a e y ea ly ages
in hese PS1/APP mice.
LC3-posi i e au ophagic esicles wi hin dys ophic
neu i es a e implica ed in he amyloidogenic pa hway
To co obo a e he au ophagic na u e o he he e ogeneous
esicles accumula ed wi hin he dys ophic neu i es, we
immunos ained PS1/APP hippocampal sec ions wi h he
an i-LC3 an ibody, a ma ke o au ophagy (Fig. 3a, b). A
4 mon hs (Fig. 3a), LC3 immuno eac i i y was mainly
ound in py amidal soma a and hei apical dend i es, as
well as in punc a e s uc u es esembling dys ophic neu-
i es a ound plaques (see inse s in Fig. 3a). A 6 mon hs
(Fig. 3b), he immuno eac i i y o LC3 a ound plaques
was ma kedly inc eased while, in pa allel, he s aining o
soma a and apical dend i es dec eased.
To mo e speci ically de e mine he p opo ion o LC3
ha was in he LC3-II o m, which mig a es as e han
LC3-I on SDS-PAGE and is he o m associa ed (by lipi-
da ion) wi h he au ophagosomal s uc u es, we pe o med
quan i a i e immunoblo analysis o LC3-I and LC3-II
o ms in he hippocampus o 6-mon h-old PS1/APP and
WT mice (Fig. 3c). Signi ican ly highe le els o LC3-II
we e obse ed in PS1/APP mice han in age-ma ched WT
mice (2.15 ±0.35 old, n=6, p 0.05).
Con ocal imaging o double APP/LC3 immunolabeling
(Fig. 3d1–d3) e ealed he punc a e na u e o he LC3
labeling (see inse in Fig. 3d2) and he colocaliza ion o
LC3 in bo h APP-posi i e (glu ama e gic) and non-APP
(likely GABAe gic o choline gic) dys ophic neu i es
(Fig. 3d3). Conside ing he colocaliza ion o APP and LC3
wi hin dys ophic neu i es in ou AD model, we nex
wan ed o assess he ea ly implica ion o AVs in APP
p ocessing, and in u n likely in ol emen in Abp oduc-
ion. To ha end, we pe o med immunoelec on
*
*
ab
cd
e
Fig. 2 Ex ensi e accumula ion o au ophagic esicles wi hin dys o-
phic neu i es a ound amyloid plaques. T ansmission elec on
mic oscopy images o plaque-associa ed abe an neu i es in young
PS1/APP hippocampus. aLow magni ica ion image o an amyloid
plaque (as e isk) su ounded by dys ophic neu i es (discon inuous
whi e ci cles). bA di e si y o dys ophic neu i es based on hei
subcellula con en can be iden i ied. cand dDys ophic neu i e illed
wi h he e ogeneous elec odense double-memb ane esicles (whi e
squa e magni ied in d) belonging o he ea ly deg ading au ophagy-
lysosomal pa hway (au ophagosomes); hese AVs had a dense
compac ed amo phous ( illed whi e a ows) o mul ilamella con en
(emp y whi e a ows). eand Dys ophic neu i e illed wi h
au ophagic esicles (whi e squa e magni ied in ) o dis inc
mo phologies showing anslucen ( illed whi e a ows) o amo phous
elec odense ma e ial (emp y whi e a ows) which migh ep esen
la e au ophagic esicles (au ophagolysosomes). Scale ba s a10 lm,
b2lm, cand e1lm, dand 500 nm
58 Ac a Neu opa hol (2012) 123:53–70
123
mic oscopy o APP and Ab
42
in 4.5-mon h-old PS1/APP
hippocampus. Sil e -enhanced immunogold labeling
e ealed ha APP localized p e e en ially o he AVs
wi hin plaque-associa ed dys ophic neu i es (Fig. 3e–g),
as well as o he Golgi and endoplasmic e iculum (ER)
memb anes in he neu onal cell soma a (Fig. 3h). No APP-
labeling was ound in o he o ganelles o plasma mem-
b ane. Immunoelec on mic oscopy de ec ion o Abwas
much less s onge han o APP, since op imal in acellula
labeling wi h he an ibodies o Ab o ms in ou model
equi es p e- ea men wi h o mic acid which is no
compa ible wi h EM p ocessing. Ne e heless, as expec ed
and in con as o APP immunolabeling, Ab
42
label was
mainly associa ed wi h plaques (as e isk in Fig. 3i). In e -
es ingly, some au ophagic esicles wi hin dys ophic
neu i es we e also posi i e o he Ab
42
an ibody (inse in
Fig. 3i).
Dys ophic neu i es ep esen axonal s uc u es
wi h cy oskele al abno mali ies
To de e mine he dend i ic and/o axonal na u e o he
plaque-associa ed dys ophic neu i es in ou PS1/APP
model, we ha e pe o med ligh and elec on mic oscopy
s udies in 4- o 6-mon h-old mice. Immunolabeling o he
MAP-2 p o ein (a ma ke o dend i ic p ocesses) (Fig. 4a,
b) and o he pos synap ic ma ke a1GABA
A
R (no
shown) e ealed no posi i e dys ophic neu i es a ound
plaques a he ea ly ages in es iga ed. Mo eo e , con ocal
double MAP-2/APP immuno luo escence labeling con-
i med he lack o colocaliza ion o he dend i ic ma ke in
APP-posi i e dys ophic neu i es (Fig. 4c1–c3). On he
o he hand, he close spa ial ela ionship be ween amyloid
plaques and axonal ibe s ac s in he hippocampus, as
e ealed by neu o ilamen (NF) immunolabeling and
Congo ed s aining (Fig. 4d), along wi h he p esence o
swollen NF-posi i e neu i es (inse s in Fig. 4d) indica ed a
possible axonal/synap ic o igin o hese dys ophic
s uc u es.
In ac , he labeling o he dys ophic neu i es was e y
pa en wi h he p esynap ic ma ke synap ophysin
(Fig. 4e). Nume ous synap ophysin-posi i e punc a ed
s uc u es we e obse ed a ound amyloid plaques. To
de e mine he neu ochemical na u e o hese synap o-
physin-posi i e dys ophic neu i es, we pe o med double
immuno luo escence labeling o APP and he wo majo
neu o ansmi e esicula anspo e s, VGLUT1 o glu-
ama e (Fig. 4 1– 3) and VGAT o GABA (Fig. 4g1–g3).
As shown in Fig. 4 3 mos APP-posi i e dys ophic neu-
i es con ained VGLUT1 indica ing he glu ama e gic
na u e o he abno mal axons su ounding amyloid plaques.
Consis en wi h he exclusi e exp ession o he human
mu a ed ansgene o APP by p incipal cells, many
enla ged inhibi o y GABAe gic dys ophic neu i es, im-
munonega i e o APP, we e also iden i ied a ound he
plaques (Fig. 4g3).
In addi ion, elec on mic oscopy in he hippocampus o
4.5-mon h-old PS1/APP mice con i med he p esence o
some dys ophic myelina ed axons a ound/nea plaques
(Fig. 4h–j). These axonal dys ophies had a se e e
(Fig. 4h, i) o mode a ely (no shown) pa hological numbe
o au ophagic esicles. The enla ged size o an abe an
axon (110.22 lm
2
) compa ed o adjacen no mal ones
(1.57 ±0.63 lm
2
) is shown in Fig. 4j.
In o de o iden i y possible ea ly mic o ubule-associa ed
axonal anspo de ici s in he PS1/APP hippocampus,
which migh lead o esicle accumula ion (au ophagic,
synap ic, e c.) along axons and he consequen de elopmen
o dys ophy, we i s assessed au abno mali ies by quan i-
a i e Wes e n blo s expe imen s wi h he AT8 an ibody
(which de ec s au phospho yla ed a bo h se ine 202 and
h eonine 205 esidues, one o he i s o be phospho yla ed)
(Fig. 5a). Immunoblo ing e ealed a signi ican ly highe
le el o exp ession in young PS1/APP mice (1.75 ±0.15
old) compa ed o age-ma ched con ols. We ha e also
con i med by AT8 immunohis ochemis y he p esence o
phospho- au posi i e neu i es su ounding amyloid plaques
in 4- o 6-mon h-old ansgenic animals (Fig. 5b). To
de e mine whe he phospho- au was p esen wi hin APP-
posi i e dys ophic neu i es, we pe o med double APP/AT8
immuno luo escence labeling (Fig. 5c1–c4 and d1–d4). The
p esence o AT8 was ound in some, bu no all, APP-posi-
i e dys ophic neu i es (Fig. 5c3 and de ail in c4; Fig. 5d3
and de ail in d4).
Tau could also induce changes in he o ganiza ion and
s abili y o neu onal ac in ilamen s, and i is known ha
he o ma ion o co ilin/ac in pa hological bundles occludes
neu i es and esicle anspo . To assess possible ea ly
al e a ions o he ac in cys oskele on in ou AD model we
analyzed ac in and co ilin immunolabeling in he hippo-
campus o young PS1/APP mice. Resul s showed
nume ous od-like inclusions a ound amyloid plaques as
shown o co ilin in Fig. 5e. Mo eo e , double APP/co ilin
labeling (Fig. 5 1– 3) showed colocaliza ion o bo h
ma ke s in some, pa icula ly small, APP-posi i e neu i es.
Finally, o u he explo e whe he mic o ubule esicu-
la anspo was comp omised in young PS1/APP mice we
measu ed he le els o kinesin-1 and dynein, wo mic o-
ubule-associa ed mo o p o eins, in hippocampal p o ein
ex ac s p epa ed om 6-mon h-old PS1/APP and WT
mice (Fig. 5g). We ound signi ican ly lowe le els o bo h
kinesin-1 hea y chain (-24.71 ±11.80%, n=8) and
dynein (-38.06 ±14.40%, n=8) in PS1/APP han age-
ma ched WT animals.
These mic o ubule, ac in cy oskele al and molecula
mo o de ec s a e ea ly pa hogenic e en s in ou AD model
Ac a Neu opa hol (2012) 123:53–70 59
123
LC3-I
LC3-II
β-ac in
WT PS1/APP
WT PS1/APP
Rela i euni s
3
2
1
0
LC3-II
p<0.05
c
4 mon hs
6 mon hs
so
so
a
b
sp
sp
s
s
g
APP LC3 Me ge
d1 d2 d3
**
*
e*
*
i
h
A
β
42
**
*
*
60 Ac a Neu opa hol (2012) 123:53–70
123
and migh lead o anspo abno mali ies and he accu-
mula ion o o ganelles (synap ic esicles, au ophagosomes,
mi ochond ia, lysosomes) wi hin axonal neu i es p omo -
ing he dys ophic p ocess.
The ea ly axonal pa hology includes mo phologically
dis up ed p esynap ic e minals
The axonal de ec s in ou AD model could also a ec
p esynap ic e minals. The e o e, in o de o in es iga e
he possible ea ly synap ic pa hology we examined he
hippocampus o 4.5-mon h-old PS1/APP mice using
elec on mic oscopy (Fig. 6a–e). Ou ul as uc u al s udy
showed ha , nea o amyloid plaques, he e we e p e-
synap ic elemen s ha displayed pa hological changes
including la ge diame e wi h a conside a e numbe o
AVs and, in con as , ewe synap ic esicles (Fig. 6a, b;
p esynap ic e minals ou lined wi h a whi e line). The
p esence o p esynap ic e minals, a he beginning o he
dys ophy p ocess, wi h ew and ea ly s age AVs o -
ma ion, as well as wi h synap ic-like esicles we e also
de ec ed (Fig. 6c–e; see also he p esynap ic e minal
ou lined wi h a black line in Fig. 6b). Howe e , hese
al e ed p esynap ic elemen s we e making synap ic
con ac s wi h mo phologically no mal dend i es o den-
d i ic spines wi h pos synap ic densi y (see Fig. 6a–d).
These mo phologically al e ed p esynap ic e minals may
ep esen he ini ial s ages o synap ic dis up ion and
loss.
Mo eo e , we compa ed he LC3-II accumula ion in
synap osomal and mic osomal ac ions isola ed om
6-mon h-old WT and PS1/APP animals (Fig. 6 ). As
expec ed, a low pe cen age o LC3-II was obse ed in
isola ed synap osomes om WT mice (15.42 ±2.25%,
n=4, o mic osomal ac ions in WT mice). Fu he , in
ag eemen wi h ou elec on mic oscopy s udies, he
amoun o LC3-II in PS1/APP mice was highe in bo h
synap osomal and mic osomal ac ions. Al hough he
ela i e abundance o LC3-II p esen ed in PS1/APP-
de i ed synap osomes was s ill low (22.22 ±3.84% o
PS1/APP mic osomal LC3-II), he le el was consis en ly
highe (2.54 ±0.54, n=5) han in WT synap osomes.
These da a demons a ed he exis ence o an ea ly
au ophagy-associa ed axonal/synap ic pa hology in he
hippocampus o his AD mouse model.
Ex acellula pe iplaque oligome ic Abspa ially
co ela es wi h axonal/synap ic dys ophy
Taking in o accoun he close spa ial ela ionship
be ween axonal dys ophies and Abplaques, we nex
examined he possible in acellula and/o ex acellula
o igin o he pa hogenic Abagen . We i s in es iga ed
he possible in acellula accumula ion o oligome ic Ab
in isola ed synap osomes and mic osomes by immuno-
p ecipi a ion expe imen s using he monoclonal an ibody
6E10 (Fig. 7a). Resul s demons a ed he p esence o a
ela i ely la ge accumula ion o monome ic Abin syn-
ap osomes, whe eas lowe le els we e de ec ed in
mic osomes (Fig. 7a1). Fu he mo e, wi hin he di e en
Abpep ides, he Ab
42
was he majo o m obse ed in
hese synap osomal ac ions (Fig. 7a2). On he o he
hand, no Aboligome s we e obse ed wi h his
app oach.
We ha e also used he an i-oligome ic Aban ibody A11
in immunohis ochemis y and immunop ecipi a ion expe -
imen s. Ou esul s demons a ed ha mos Abplaques we e
immunoposi i e o he A11 an ibody (Fig. 7b), wi h a
p e e en ial immunolabeling a he plaque pe iphe y (see
inse ). Fu he mo e, A11-immunop ecipi a ion using he
soluble (S1) ac ions demons a ed he p esence o minu e
amoun o ex acellula oligome ic Ab(Fig. 7c) in he
hippocampus o he PS1/APP mice a his ea ly age
(6 mon hs). These da a we e consis en wi h p e ious
expe imen s (see also [29,30]). Howe e , in spi e o he
ela i e abundance o monome ic Abin synap osomes,
unde he p esen expe imen al condi ions, no Aboligome s
Fig. 3 Au ophagic compa men s wi hin dys ophic neu i es a e si es
o APP p ocessing. aand bImmunohis ochemis y o he au o-
phagosome ma ke LC3 in CA1 sub ield o PS1/APP mice
hippocampus. A 4 mon hs (a), immuno eac i i y was concen a ed
in py amidal cell soma a (s a um py amidale) and hei apical
dend i es (s a um adia um). LC3-posi i e dys ophic neu i es we e
su ounded amyloid plaques (uppe inse in a) and we e punc a e in
na u e ( he lowe inse shows a high magni ica ion image o he LC3-
posi i e dys ophy ci cled in he uppe inse ). A 6 mon hs (b), he
immuno eac ion was mainly associa ed wi h dys ophic neu i es
a ound plaques (a ows) as shown he e o s a um o iens (SO).
cQuan i a i e immunoblo analysis o LC3-II o m in he hippocam-
pus o 6-mon h-old PS1/APP and WT mice. PS1/APP mice had
signi ican ly highe LC3-II le els han age-ma ched WT mice (n=6,
p 0.05). d1–d3 Con ocal images o double immuno luo escence
labeling o APP (g een) and LC3 ( ed); APP-posi i e dys ophic
neu i es a ound an amyloid plaque (as e isk) displayed he LC3
ma ke (long a ows); some LC3-posi i e dys ophic neu i es we e
nega i e o APP (sho a ows) indica ing he non-glu ama e gic
o igin o hese abe an neu i es. eDys ophic neu i es (enci cled)
a ound amyloid plaques (as e isk) we e APP immunoposi i e as
e ealed by elec on mic oscopy using sil e -enhanced immunogold
labeling. Highe magni ica ion o a dys ophic neu i e immunopos-
i i e o APP; small open squa es indica e mi ochond ia; inse shows
wo au ophagosomes immunogold-labeled o APP. gHighe mag-
ni ica ion image o wo au ophagic esicles immunogold-labeled o
APP. hIn addi ion o au ophagic esicles, APP immunogold labeling
was associa ed wi h he endoplasmic e iculum (ER) and Golgi
cis e nae in neu onal soma a. iImmunogold labeling e ealed ha
Ab42 pep ides localize o amyloid plaques (as e isk) and au ophagic
esicles (inse ). so s a um o iens, sp s a um py amidale, s s a um
adia um. Scale ba s aand b100 lm(uppe inse in a50 lm, lowe
inse in a10 lm); d1–d3 100 lm(inse in d2 2.5 lm), e–h500 nm,
inse in 200 nm, i2lm and inse 400 nm
b
Ac a Neu opa hol (2012) 123:53–70 61
123
dys ophies. In any case, u he expe imen s a e needed
o cla i y his poin .
A u he signi ican esul was he iden i ica ion by
elec on mic oscopy o dys ophic axon e minals ha we e
making con ac wi h mo phologically no mal pos synap ic
elemen s. These abno mal p esynap ic bou ons con ained
nume ous AVs and we e obse ed o ha e a low con en in
synap ic esicles. These esul s we e con i med by LC3-II
Wes e n blo s using synap osomes isola ed om he hippo-
campus o 6-mon h-old PS1/APP mice. Al hough we canno
ule ou a di ec e ec o soluble Abon hese p esynap ic
e minals, hei ela i e dis ance om Abplaques (be ween
10 and 30 lm) oge he wi h he low soluble Abcon en a
his age, sugges ed ha AV accumula ion migh e lec he
axonal anspo de ec s a dys ophies. These al e ed syn-
ap ic e minals may ep esen one o he ini ial pa hogenic
s eps o synap ic loss leading o ea ly de ici s in synap ic
ansmission and plas ici y.
As ea ly memo y loss in AD is inc easingly a ibu ed o
synap ic ailu e, we can conclude ha his PS1/APP
ansgenic model shows, a young ages and in absence o
py amidal degene a ion, a p esynap ic pa hology p og es-
sion ha may closely esemble he p e-clinical o ea ly
s ages o human AD.
Acknowledgmen s This wo k was suppo ed by g an s PS09/00099
( o A.G.), PS09/00151 ( o J.V.), PS09/00848 ( o D.R.) and PS09/
00376 ( o A.J.J.) om Fondo de In es igacio
´n Sani a ia (FIS)-Ins i-
u o de Salud Ca los III, Spain. Financial suppo was also ecei ed
om Jun a de Andalucı
´a g an s SAS P09/496 ( o A.G.) and CTS-4795
( o J.V.). R.S.V., V.D.C. and S.J. we e he ecipien s o a con ac
om CIBERNED. E.S.M. and L.T.E. held a PhD ellowship om
Spain FPU p og am. We hank Me cedes Anei os o he excellen
echnical assis ance and Ma io So iano o his help wi h he ans-
mission elec on mic oscope.
Open Access This a icle is dis ibu ed unde he e ms o he
C ea i e Commons A ibu ion Noncomme cial License which pe -
mi s any noncomme cial use, dis ibu ion, and ep oduc ion in any
medium, p o ided he o iginal au ho (s) and sou ce a e c edi ed.
Re e ences
1. Adalbe R, Nog adi A, Babe o E e al (2009) Se e ely dys o-
phic axons a amyloid plaques emain con inuous and connec ed
o iable cell bodies. B ain 132:402–416
2. A end T (2005) Alzheime ’s disease as a diso de o dynamic
b ain sel -o ganiza ion. P og B ain Res 147:355–378
3. A end T (2009) Synap ic degene a ion in Alzheime ’s disease.
Ac a Neu opa hol 118:167–179
4. Ashe KH, Zahs KR (2010) P obing he biology o Alzheime ’s
disease in mice. Neu on 66:631–645
5. Baglie o-Va gas D, Mo eno-Gonzalez I, Sanchez-Va o R e al
(2010) Cal e inin in e neu ons a e ea ly a ge s o ex acellula
amyloid-be a pa hology in PS1/Abe aPP Alzheime mice hippo-
campus. J Alzheime s Dis 21:119–132
6. Bambu g JR, Bloom GS (2009) Cy oskele al pa hologies o
Alzheime disease. Cell Mo il Cy oskele 66:635–649
7. Bell KF, Claudio CA (2006) Al e ed synap ic unc ion in Alz-
heime ’s disease. Eu J Pha macol 545:11–21
8. Bell KF, de Ko GJ, S egge da S e al (2003) S uc u al
in ol emen o he glu ama e gic p esynap ic bou ons in a
ansgenic mouse model exp essing ea ly onse amyloid pa hol-
ogy. Neu osci Le 353:143–147
9. Be oni-F edda i C, Fa o e i P, Solazzi M e al (2003) Neu onal
dea h e sus synap ic pa hology in Alzheime ’s disease. Ann NY
Acad Sci 1010:635–638
10. Blancha d V, Moussaoui S, Czech C e al (2003) Time sequence
o ma u a ion o dys ophic neu i es associa ed wi h Abe a
deposi s in APP/PS1 ansgenic mice. Exp Neu ol 184:247–
263
11. Boland B, Kuma A, Lee S e al (2008) Au ophagy induc ion and
au ophagosome clea ance in neu ons: ela ionship o au ophagic
pa hology in Alzheime ’s disease. J Neu osci 28:6926–6937
12. Caballe o C, Jimenez S, Mo eno-Gonzalez I e al (2007) In e -
indi idual a iabili y in he exp ession o he mu a ed o m o
hPS1M146L de e mined he p oduc ion o Abe a pep ides in he
PS1xAPP ansgenic mice. J Neu osci Res 85:787–797
13. Cas ellani RJ, Rols on RK, Smi h MA (2010) Alzheime disease.
Dis Mon 56:484–546
14. Chish i MA, Yang DS, Janus C e al (2001) Ea ly-onse amyloid
deposi ion and cogni i e de ici s in ansgenic mice exp essing a
double mu an o m o amyloid p ecu so p o ein 695. J Biol
Chem 276:21562–21570
15. Ci i o JR, Kang JE, Lee J e al (2008) Endocy osis is equi ed o
synap ic ac i i y-dependen elease o amyloid-be a in i o.
Neu on 58:42–51
16. Ci i o JR, Yamada KA, Finn MB e al (2005) Synap ic ac i i y
egula es in e s i ial luid amyloid-be a le els in i o. Neu on
48:913–922
17. De Felice FG, Wu D, Lambe MP e al (2008) Alzheime ’s
disease- ype neu onal au hype phospho yla ion induced by Ab-
e a oligome s. Neu obiol Aging 29:1334–1347
18. Decke H, Lo KY, Unge SM, Fe ei a ST, Sil e man MA (2010)
Amyloid-be a pep ide oligome s dis up axonal anspo h ough
an NMDA ecep o -dependen mechanism ha is media ed by
glycogen syn hase kinase 3be a in p ima y cul u ed hippocampal
neu ons. J Neu osci 30:9166–9171
19. DeKosky ST, Sche SW (1990) Synapse loss in on al co ex
biopsies in Alzheime ’s disease: co ela ion wi h cogni i e
se e i y. Ann Neu ol 27:457–464
20. Dela ou B, Blancha d V, P adie L, Duyckae s C (2004) Alz-
heime pa hology diso ganizes co ico-co ical ci cui y: di ec
e idence om a ansgenic animal model. Neu obiol Dis
16:41–47
21. Dickson TC, King CE, McCo mack GH, Vicke s JC (1999)
Neu ochemical di e si y o dys ophic neu i es in he ea ly and
la e s ages o Alzheime ’s disease. Exp Neu ol 156:100–110
22. Dickson TC, Vicke s JC (2001) The mo phological pheno ype o
be a-amyloid plaques and associa ed neu i ic changes in Alzhei-
me ’s disease. Neu oscience 105:99–107
23. Fiala JC (2007) Mechanisms o amyloid plaque pa hogenesis.
Ac a Neu opa hol 114:551–571
24. Geddes JW, Ande son KJ, Co man CW (1986) Senile plaques as
abe an sp ou -s imula ing s uc u es. Exp Neu ol 94:767–776
25. Geddes JW, Monaghan DT, Co man CW e al (1985) Plas ici y o
hippocampal ci cui y in Alzheime ’s disease. Science
230:1179–1181
26. Gomez-Isla T, Spi es T, de Calignon A, Hyman BT (2008)
Neu opa hology o Alzheime ’s disease. Handb Clin Neu ol
89:233–243
68 Ac a Neu opa hol (2012) 123:53–70
123

27. Gou as GK, Almeida CG, Takahashi RH (2005) In aneu onal
Abe a accumula ion and o igin o plaques in Alzheime ’s disease.
Neu obiol Aging 26:1235–1244
28. Hussain I (2010) APP ansgenic mouse models and hei use in
d ug disco e y o e alua e amyloid-lowe ing he apeu ics. CNS
Neu ol Diso d D ug Ta ge s 9:395–402
29. Jimenez S, Baglie o-Va gas D, Caballe o C e al (2008)
In lamma o y esponse in he hippocampus o PS1M146L/
APP751SL mouse model o Alzheime ’s disease: age-dependen
swi ch in he mic oglial pheno ype om al e na i e o classic.
J Neu osci 28:11650–11661
30. Jimenez S, To es M, Vizue e M e al (2011) Age-dependen
accumula ion o soluble Abe a oligome s e e ses he neu op o-
ec i e e ec o sAPPalpha by modula ing PI3K/Ak -GSK-3be a
pa hway in Alzheime mice model. J Biol Chem
286:18414–18425
31. Jin M, Shepa dson N, Yang T e al (2011) Soluble amyloid
{be a}-p o ein dime s isola ed om Alzheime co ex di ec ly
induce Tau hype phospho yla ion and neu i ic degene a ion. P oc
Na l Acad Sci USA 108:5819–5824
32. Kanaan NM, Mo ini GA, Lapoin e NE e al (2011) Pa hogenic
o ms o au inhibi kinesin-dependen axonal anspo h ough a
mechanism in ol ing ac i a ion o axonal phospho ans e ases.
J Neu osci 31:9858–9868
33. Kochl R, Hu XW, Chan EY, Tooze SA (2006) Mic o ubules
acili a e au ophagosome o ma ion and usion o au ophago-
somes wi h endosomes. T a ic 7:129–145
34. Koenigsknech -Talboo J, Meye -Luehmann M, Pa sadanian M
e al (2008) Rapid mic oglial esponse a ound amyloid pa hology
a e sys emic an i-Abe a an ibody adminis a ion in PDAPP
mice. J Neu osci 28:14156–14164
35. Ko ie RM, Meye -Luehmann M, Hashimo o T e al (2009)
Oligome ic amyloid be a associa es wi h pos synap ic densi ies
and co ela es wi h exci a o y synapse loss nea senile plaques.
P oc Na l Acad Sci USA 106:4012–4017
36. Ko acs AL, Rei h A, Seglen PO (1982) Accumula ion o au o-
phagosomes a e inhibi ion o hepa ocy ic p o ein deg ada ion by
inblas ine, leupep in o a lysosomo opic amine. Exp Cell Res
137:191–201
37. Lee JH, Yu WH, Kuma A e al (2010) Lysosomal p o eolysis
and au ophagy equi e p esenilin 1 and a e dis up ed by Alzhei-
me - ela ed PS1 mu a ions. Cell 141:1146–1158
38. Ma ins IC, Kupe s ein I, Wilkinson H e al (2008) Lipids e e
ine Abe a amyloid ib ils o neu o oxic p o o ib ils ha a ec
lea ning in mice. EMBO J 27:224–233
39. Masliah E, Al o d M, Adame A e al (2003) Abe a1–42 p omo es
choline gic sp ou ing in pa ien s wi h AD and Lewy body a ian
o AD. Neu ology 61:206–211
40. Masliah E, Hansen L, Alb igh T, Mallo y M, Te y RD (1991)
Immunoelec on mic oscopic s udy o synap ic pa hology in
Alzheime ’s disease. Ac a Neu opa hol 81:428–433
41. Masliah E, Mallo y M, Al o d M e al (2001) Al e ed exp ession
o synap ic p o eins occu s ea ly du ing p og ession o Alzhei-
me ’s disease. Neu ology 56:127–129
42. Meye -Luehmann M, Spi es-Jones TL, P ada C e al (2008)
Rapid appea ance and local oxici y o amyloid-be a plaques in a
mouse model o Alzheime ’s disease. Na u e 451:720–
724
43. Mi a SS, Heyman A, McKeel D e al (1991) The Conso ium o
Es ablish a Regis y o Alzheime ’s Disease (CERAD). Pa II.
S anda diza ion o he neu opa hologic assessmen o Alzhei-
me ’s disease. Neu ology 41:479–486
44. Mo eno-Gonzalez I, Baglie o-Va gas D, Sanchez-Va o R e al
(2009) Ex acellula amyloid-be a and cy o oxic glial ac i a ion
induce signi ican en o hinal neu on loss in young PS1(M146L)/
APP(751SL) mice. J Alzheime s Dis 18:755–776
45. Nimm ich V, Ebe U (2009) Is Alzheime ’s disease a esul o
p esynap ic ailu e? Synap ic dys unc ions induced by oligome ic
be a-amyloid. Re Neu osci 20:1–12
46. Nixon RA (2007) Au ophagy, amyloidogenesis and Alzheime
disease. J Cell Sci 120:4081–4091
47. Nixon RA, Wegiel J, Kuma A e al (2005) Ex ensi e in ol e-
men o au ophagy in Alzheime disease: an immuno-elec on
mic oscopy s udy. J Neu opa hol Exp Neu ol 64:113–122
48. Nixon RA, Yang DS (2011) Au ophagy ailu e in Alzheime ’s
disease-loca ing he p ima y de ec . Neu obiol Dis 43:38–45
49. Noda-Sai a K, Te ai K, Iwai A e al (2004) Exclusi e associa ion
and simul aneous appea ance o congophilic plaques and AT8-
posi i e dys ophic neu i es in Tg2576 mice sugges a mechanism
o senile plaque o ma ion and p og ession o neu i ic dys ophy
in Alzheime ’s disease. Ac a Neu opa hol 108:435–442
50. Pe l DP (2010) Neu opa hology o Alzheime ’s disease. M Sinai
J Med 77:32–42
51. Ramos B, Baglie o-Va gas D, Del Rio JC e al (2006) Ea ly
neu opa hology o soma os a in/NPY GABAe gic cells in he
hippocampus o a PS1xAPP ansgenic model o Alzheime ’s
disease. Neu obiol Aging 27:1658–1672
52. Sche SW, P ice DA, Schmi FA, DeKosky ST, Mu son EJ
(2007) Synap ic al e a ions in CA1 in mild Alzheime disease and
mild cogni i e impai men . Neu ology 68:1501–1508
53. Sche SW, P ice DA, Schmi FA, Mu son EJ (2006) Hippo-
campal synap ic loss in ea ly Alzheime ’s disease and mild
cogni i e impai men . Neu obiol Aging 27:1372–1384
54. Selkoe DJ (2002) Alzheime ’s disease is a synap ic ailu e. Sci-
ence 298:789–791
55. Sokolow S, Henkins KM, Bilouso a T e al (2011) AD synapses
con ain abundan Abe a monome and mul iple soluble oligo-
me s, including a 56-kDa assembly. Neu obiol Aging. doi:
10.1016/j.neu obiolaging.2011.05.011
56. S okin GB, Lillo C, Falzone TL e al (2005) Axonopa hy and
anspo de ici s ea ly in he pa hogenesis o Alzheime ’s dis-
ease. Science 307:1282–1288
57. Su JH, Cummings BJ, Co man CW (1993) Iden i ica ion and
dis ibu ion o axonal dys ophic neu i es in Alzheime ’s disease.
B ain Res 625:228–237
58. Su JH, Cummings BJ, Co man CW (1998) Plaque biogenesis in
b ain aging and Alzheime ’s disease. II. P og essi e ans o -
ma ion and de elopmen al sequence o dys ophic neu i es. Ac a
Neu opa hol 96:463–471
59. Sze CI, T oncoso JC, Kawas C e al (1997) Loss o he p esyn-
ap ic esicle p o ein synap ophysin in hippocampus co ela es
wi h cogni i e decline in Alzheime disease. J Neu opa hol Exp
Neu ol 56:933–944
60. Tampellini D, Gou as GK (2010) Synapses, synap ic ac i i y and
in aneu onal abe a in Alzheime ’s disease. F on Aging Neu osci
2:13
61. Te y RD, Masliah E, Salmon DP e al (1991) Physical basis o
cogni i e al e a ions in Alzheime ’s disease: synapse loss is he
majo co ela e o cogni i e impai men . Ann Neu ol 30:572–580
62. Vi o ica J, Sa us egui J (1986) In ol emen o mi ochond ia in
he age-dependen dec ease in calcium up ake o a b ain syn-
ap osomes. B ain Res 378:36–48
63. Vossel KA, Zhang K, B odbeck J e al (2010) Tau educ ion
p e en s Abe a-induced de ec s in axonal anspo . Science
330:198
64. Woodhouse A, Vicke s JC, Adla d PA, Dickson TC (2009)
Dys ophic neu i es in TgCRND8 and Tg2576 mice mimic
human pa hological b ain aging. Neu obiol Aging 30:864–874
65. Yang DS, S a ides P, Mohan PS e al (2011) Re e sal o
au ophagy dys unc ion in he TgCRND8 mouse model o Alz-
heime ’s disease amelio a es amyloid pa hologies and memo y
de ici s. B ain 134:258–277
Ac a Neu opa hol (2012) 123:53–70 69
123
66. Yu WH, Kuma A, Pe e ho C e al (2004) Au ophagic acuoles
a e en iched in amyloid p ecu so p o ein-sec e ase ac i i ies:
implica ions o be a-amyloid pep ide o e -p oduc ion and
localiza ion in Alzheime ’s disease. In J Biochem Cell Biol
36:2531–2540
67. Zempel H, Thies E, Mandelkow E, Mandelkow EM (2010) Abe a
oligome s cause localized Ca(2?) ele a ion, misso ing o
endogenous Tau in o dend i es, Tau phospho yla ion, and
des uc ion o mic o ubules and spines. J Neu osci
30:11938–11950
68. Zhang XM, Cai Y, Xiong K e al (2009) Be a-sec e ase-1 ele-
a ion in ansgenic mouse models o Alzheime ’s disease is
associa ed wi h synap ic/axonal pa hology and amyloidogenesis:
implica ions o neu i ic plaque de elopmen . Eu J Neu osci
30:2271–2283
70 Ac a Neu opa hol (2012) 123:53–70
123