scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Sums and Products of Indirect Utility Functions (NIRSA) Working Paper Series No. 6

Abstract

There are relatively few known demand systems that are theoretically satisfactory and practically implementable. This paper investigates building more complex demand systems from simpler known ones by considering sums and products of basic utility functions, an approach that does not seem to have been exploited previously in the literature. Some of the systems that result are interesting and usefully extend the range of available functions. Even the simpler systems that are not sufficiently flexible for the analysis of real world consumption data may still be useful for applied general equilibrium studies and for theoretical explication. Although some systems, instead of being new, turn out to be rediscoveries of already known ones, the way in which they arise as combinations of simple components is of interest in itself in showing them as sub sets of wider classes

Read accessible full text

Sums and Products of Indirect Utility Functions (NIRSA) Working Paper Series No. 6

Author: Conniffe, Denis
Publisher: NIRSA - National Institute for Regional and Spatial Analysis
Year: 2002
Source: https://mural.maynoothuniversity.ie/id/eprint/79/1/NIRSA1150402.pdf
1
NIRSA is a esea ch ins i u e dedica ed o he in e -disciplina y and compa a i e s udy o he
impac o global p ocesses on egional and spa ial de elopmen . I in ol es se e al hi d-
le el ins i u ions in I eland: NUI Maynoo h, Galway-Mayo Ins i u e o Technology, Ins i u e
o Technology, Sligo, Ma y Immacula e College - Uni e si y o Lime ick, Wa e o d Ins i u e
o Technology.
© 2002 by Denis Conni e. All igh s ese ed. Sho sec ions o he ex , no o exceed wo
pa ag aphs, may be quo ed wi hou he explici pe mission o he au ho p o ided ull c edi ,
including he © no ice, is gi en o he sou ce.
DISCLAIMER
While NIRSA is happy o acili a e he dissemina ion o wo king pape s p oduced by
associa es o he Ins i u e, he esponsibili y o con en es s solely wi h he au ho s.
ABSTRACT
The e a e ela i ely ew known demand sys ems ha a e heo e ically sa is ac o y and
p ac ically implemen able. This pape in es iga es building mo e complex demand sys ems
om simple known ones by conside ing sums and p oduc s o basic u ili y unc ions, an
app oach ha does no seem o ha e been exploi ed p e iously in he li e a u e. Some o he
sys ems ha esul a e in e es ing and use ully ex end he ange o a ailable unc ions. E en
he simple sys ems ha a e no su icien ly lexible o he analysis o eal wo ld
consump ion da a may s ill be use ul o applied gene al equilib ium s udies and o
heo e ical explica ion. Al hough some sys ems, ins ead o being new, u n ou o be
edisco e ies o al eady known ones, he way in which hey a ise as combina ions o simple
componen s is o in e es in i sel in showing hem as sub se s o wide classes.
2
I INTRODUCTION
An indi ec u ili y unc ion , whe e p is a ec o o p ices and y is income, and he
demand equa ions de i ed om i h ough Roy's iden i y
),( yU p
y
U
p
U
q
i
i∂
∂
∂
∂
−= /, (1)
sa is y demand heo y, o u ili y maximisa ion, p o ided mee s s ingen c i e ia.
These a e ha U be homogeneous o deg ee ze o in income and p ices (p), non-dec easing in
y, non-inc easing in p, and con ex o quasi-con ex in p. Then he demand equa ions sa is y
he equi ed cons ain s o agg ega ion, homogenei y, Slu sky symme y and nega i i y
u ili ies. These c i e ia o he alidi y o indi ec u ili y unc ions a e e y es ic i e on he
choice o unc ional o ms, e en wi h es ic ions placed on he pa ame e s occu ing in he
o ms. The e a e ela i ely ew known unc ions U ha sa is y alidi y condi ions o all, o
e en o all plausible alues o p ices and income and some o hem a e e y basic. This
pape in es iga es building mo e complex demand sys ems om simple known ones by
conside ing sums and p oduc s o basic u ili y unc ions.
),( yU p
The basic combina ion de ices, which will be desc ibed in sec ion II, a e qui e simple, bu a
leas as a as his au ho knows, hey ha e no been exploi ed p e iously in he li e a u e in
o de o expand he ange o alid demand sys ems. Some o he simple sys ems ha esul
and ha will be desc ibed in sec ion III, may no be as lexible as migh be desi ed o he
analysis o eal wo ld su ey o ime se ies da a on consume expendi u es on commodi ies.
Howe e , hey may s ill be use ul o applied gene al equilib ium s udies and o heo e ical
explica ion. Some mo e complex sys ems, o be de i ed in sec ion IV, a e mo e lexible and
pe haps use ully ex end he ange o a ailable unc ions. As migh be expec ed, some
sys ems, ins ead o being new, u n ou o be edisco e ies o al eady known ones. Howe e ,
e en he way in which hey a ise as combina ions o simple componen s is o in e es in i sel
in showing hem as sub se s o wide classes.
3
II DEMAND EQUATIONS FROM SUMS AND PRODUCTS OF UTILITIES
Suppose we ha e wo (indi ec ) u ili y unc ions and sa is ying all alidi y c i e ia.
Then he c i e ia ob iously apply o
1
U2
U
21 UU
+
( he sum o wo quasi-con ex unc ions is
quasi-con ex o con ex) and indeed o 21
)1( UU
λ
λ
+
−
, whe e
λ
is a posi i e cons an , and
co esponding demand sys ems can be de i ed. Le ),(
11 yww ii p
=
and be
he se s o demand equa ions, in budge sha e o m, esul ing om applica ion o Roy's
iden i y o and espec i ely. Then by applying (1) o
),(
22 yww ii p=
1
U2
U21
)1( UU
λ
λ
+
−
and
simpli ying, he demand equa ions co esponding o his sum o u ili ies u n ou o be
y
U
y
U
y
U
w
y
U
y
U
y
U
ww iisi
∂
∂
+
∂
∂
−
∂
∂
+
∂
∂
+
∂
∂
−
∂
∂
−
=
21
2
2
21
1
1)1()1(
)1(
λλ
λ
λλ
λ
, (2)
o he o iginal indi idual demand o mulae weigh ed by (apa om cons an s) he de i a i es
o u ili ies wi h espec o income. The sub-sc ip s deno es he u ili ies we e summed.
Fo he special case o u ili y unc ions o he o m
1
1P
y
U= and
2
2P
y
U=, (3)
whe e and a e p ice indices, he alidi y o u ili y unc ions educes o he alidi y o
he p ice indices and i is hen e iden ha he u ili y unc ion
1
P2
P
21
)1( PP
y
U
λλ
+−
=
is also alid. So we will be in e es ed in he p ope ies o he weigh ed sum o u ili y
unc ions
2
21
2
1
21
1
)1()1(
)1( U
PP
P
U
PP
P
U
λλ
λ
λλ
λ
+−
+
+−
−
=.
Applying Roy's iden i y o his gi es
21
2
2
21
1
1)1()1(
)1(
PP
P
w
PP
P
ww iiwsi
λλ
λ
λλ
λ
+−
+
+−
−
=, (4)
he indi idual demand o mulae weigh ed (apa om cons an s) by he p ice indices, o he
ecip ocals o he de i a i es o u ili ies wi h espec o income.
4
Fo unc ions o he o m (3), he p oduc o u ili ies is a alid u ili y unc ion
λλ
2
1
1UU −1.
Applying (1) o his gi es
y
U
y
U
y
U
w
y
U
y
U
y
U
ww iimi
log
log
log
log
)1(
log
log
log
log
log
log
)1(
log
log
)1(
21
2
2
21
1
1
∂
∂
+
∂
∂
−
∂
∂
+
∂
∂
+
∂
∂
−
∂
∂
−
=
λλ
λ
λλ
λ
, (5)
he indi idual demand o mulae weigh ed by he elas ici ies o u ili ies wi h espec o
income. The sub-sc ip m deno es he u ili ies we e mul iplied.
1 I he logs o u ili y unc ions we e u ili y unc ions, hen he ac ha he sum o u ili ies gi es a alid
u ili y would su ice o he p oduc o u ili ies. Con exi y is he c ucial p ope y. Fo unc ions o he
o m (3), . Since P is a alid p ice index, i is conca e in p ices. The log
unc ion is conca e and inc easing, so is conca e and he e o e is con ex.
PyU logloglog −=
Plog Ulog
5
III SIMPLE HOMOTHETIC COMPONENT UTILITY FUNCTIONS
Th ee simple u ili y unc ions can be gene a ed by di iding income by p ice indices
co esponding o (weigh ed) a i hme ic, geome ic and ha monic means. They a e
∑
=
jj
ap
y
U
γ
, (6)
∏
=j
j
gp
y
U
α
(7)
and
∑
=
j
j
hp
yU
δ
(8)
espec i ely. All sa is y alidi y condi ions p o ided he ss ','
α
γ
and s'
δ
a e posi i e wi h
.1=Σ j
α
The co esponding demand equa ion sys ems a e ob ained by applying (1) and o
(6) his gi es
jj
ii
ai p
p
w
γ
γ
Σ
= o
jj
i
ai p
y
q
γ
γ
Σ
=, (9)
whe e q deno es quan i y. These a e Leon ie demands in ha he a ios o quan i ies o
commodi ies a e always in ixed p opo ions, i espec i e o p ices o income. Fo he i h
commodi y he own-p ice elas ici y is ai
w
−
and he c oss-p ice elas ici y wi h espec o
p ice k is . No e he e is o e -pa ame e isa ion in (9) as any one
ak
w−
γ
could be elimina ed
by di iding i in o nume a o and denomina o . Bu he con en ion 1=Σ j
γ
is mo e
compa ible wi h he a e age p ice in e p e a ion. As is well known, applica ion o (1) o (7)
leads o he Be gson, o cons an budge sha e, demands, igi
w
α
=
, wi h own-p ice elas ici y
equalling minus one and c oss-p ice elas ici y ze o. Applying (1) o (8) gi es
∑
=
j
j
i
i
hi
p
p
w
δ
δ
o
∑
=
j
j
i
i
hi
p
p
y
q
δ
δ
2, (10)
wi h own-p ice elas ici y –2 + and c oss-p ice elas ici y . As o (9), he e is pa ame e
edundancy in (10) and a
hi
whk
w
1=Σ j
δ
con en ion ma ches wi h a ha monic mean p ice index.
O he simple u ili y unc ions a e easily w i en down, o example,

6
∑
=2
jj
p
y
U
φ
, (11)
which is alid i he s'
φ
a e posi i e and which gi es he demand equa ions
2
2
jj
ii
i p
p
w
φ
φ
Σ
= o 2
jj
ii
i p
yp
q
φ
φ
Σ
=, (12)
wi h own-p ice elas ici y 1-2 and c oss-p ice elas ici y
i
w k
w
−
. Again a edundan
pa ame e can be accoun ed o by imposing 1
=
Σ
j
φ
, which also pe mi s in e p e a ion o
he denomina o o (12) as a p ice index.
E en wi h he ou u ili y unc ions (6), (7), (8) and (11), he e a e qui e a ew po en ial
demand sys ems. Taking he u ili y unc ions wo a a ime, he e a e six possibili ies and he
h ee combina ion me hods ia (2), (4) and (5) makes eigh een demand sys ems. Bu how
much mo e lexibili y do hey gi e? Wi h income appea ing as simply as i does in he ou
s a ing poin u ili y unc ions, i is e iden ha no only ha e hei demand sys ems uni a y
income elas ici ies2, bu so will he combina ion sys ems because he weigh s in (2), (4) and
(5) a e unc ions o p ices and no income. So we a e only conside ing g ea e lexibili y in
esponse o p ice changes. Taking as a i s example he combina ion o (6) and (7) by (4),
gi es he demand sys em
∏
∏
Σ+−
+−
=
jjj
iiji
wsi pp
pp
wj
j
γλλ
λγαλ
α
α
)1(
)1( , (13)
which can be w i en as
ag
iigi
wsi pp
pp
w
λλ
λ
γ
α
λ
+−
+
−
=)1(
)1( (14)
whe e he sp'deno e means o p ices (which a e unc ions o pa ame e s) wi h he subsc ip
deno ing he ype o mean. By di iding nume a o and denomina o o (13) by
λ
−1and
w i ing
ii
γγ
λ
λ
=
−1
i is possible o w i e (13) as
∏
∏
Σ+
+
=
jjj
iiji
wsi pp
pp
wj
j
γ
γα
α
α
. (15)
7
This ge s id o
λ
and emo es he need o any cons ain on he s'
γ
, bu al hough nea e , i
des oys he in e p e a ion o jj p
γ
Σ as an a i hme ic mean p ice index. Howe e , he de ice
will be used in sec ion IV.
Fo he demand sys em (9), co esponding o (6), all goods had o be p ice inelas ic and o
he cons an budge sha e model he elas ici y had o be –1. I is easily e i ied ha o (14)
he p ice elas ici y is
])1[(
)1(
)1(
agwsi
g
iiwsi ppw
p
w
λλ
λ
αα
+−
−
−−− ,
so ha p ice elas ic goods a e possible. The c oss-p ice elas ici y wi h espec o p ice k is
])1[(
)1(
agwsi
g
kiwsk ppw
p
w
λλ
λ
αα
+−
−
−− ,
so ha c oss-p ice elas ici ies wi h espec o k a e no cons an o e commodi ies, unlike he
si ua ion o (9) whe e hey all equalled minus he budge sha e o good k. So he weigh ed
sum o (6) and (7) does gi e a sys em wi h scope o ep esen a g ea e ange o economic
beha iou . Simila ema ks apply o he sum and p oduc combina ions ia (2) and (5), which
a e
ag
a
g
iiai
si pp
p
p
pp
w)1(
)1(
λλ
λγαλ
−+
+−
= and
a
ii
imi p
p
w
γ
λαλ
+−= )1(
espec i ely. Fo hese wo sys ems o become he same and also equal o (14) would equi e
ag pp =. Bu as is well known, a geome ic mean is always less han an a i hme ic mean
unless all commodi ies ha e he same p ice. Al hough he sys ems a e dis inc , hey ha e an
e iden similia i y – own p ice appea s explici ly and linea ly in all, while he o he p ices
(and own p ice) occu implici ly h ough he p ice indices.
The co esponding demand sys ems o combina ions o (7) and (8) a e
hg
h
i
i
gi
wsi pp
p
p
p
w
λλ
δ
λαλ
+−
+−
=)1(
)1( 2
,
jj qlog
2 A well known ela ed cha ac e is ic o hese basic demand sys ems is ha hey could ha e been
de i ed om addi i e di ec u ili y unc ions, o example,
α
Σ
in he case o cons an budge
sha e demands, o Σ in he case o (12).
jj
q
φ
/
2
8
hg
gh
i
i
hi
si pp
pp
p
p
w)1(
)1(
λλ
δ
λαλ
−+
+−
=
and
i
hi
imi p
p
w
δ
λαλ
+−= )1(
espec i ely, whe e he ha monic mean is
∑
=
j
j
h
p
p
δ
1.
Again, equali y o he sys ems equi es hg pp
=
, bu a ha monic mean is always less han a
geome ic mean unless p ices a e equal. So again he sys ems a e dis inc , wi h he simila i y
ha he ecip ocal o own p ice appea s explici ly and linea ly in all h ee, while he o he
p ices ea u e only h ough he p ice indices. As migh be expec ed, he combina ions display
mo e lexibili y in p ice elas ici ies han hei componen s did. Fo example, o he demand
sys em (10), co esponding o (8), all goods had o be p ice elas ic, bu he combina ions elax
his. The demand sys ems o combina ions o (7) and (8) can be ob ained oo and simila
commen s apply. The equa ions o a commodi y a e ound o explici ly ea u e bo h own
p ice and i s ecip ocal, which has bene i s o own-p ice lexibili y, bu o he p ices again
ea u e only h ough p ice indices.
Now conside he combina ion o u ili y unc ions (6) and (11), o demand sys ems (9) and
(12), ia (4). This leads o
qa
q
ii
ii
wsi pp
p
p
p
w
λλ
φ
λγλ
+−
+−
=)1(
)1( 2
, (16)
whe e q
p deno es he oo quad a ic p ice index
.
2
∑jj p
φ
As al eady men ioned, all he demand sys ems de i ed in his sec ion, ha e uni a y income
elas ici y and his could be seen as a se ious in lexibili y. So i is i we a e ying o model
obse ed consume demand. Howe e , i is o en conside ed a desi able p ope y in applied
gene al equilib ium s udies, some imes along wi h ex eme pa simony in pa ame e s. Fo
9
example, i (16) is u he simpli ied by aking n
iii /1
=
=
φ
γ
, whe e n is he numbe o
commodi ies, we ge (in quan i y a he han budge sha e o m) he single pa ame e sys em
])1[(
)1(
qa
q
i
wsi ppn
p
p
y
q
λλ
λλ
+−
+−
=, (17)
wi h a
p and q
p now he simples p ice mean and he squa e oo o he simple mean o
squa ed p ices. Bu (17) is he new class o demand equa ions p oposed by Da a and Dixon
(2000)3 o gene al equilib ium models, which hey belie e will also be use ul in a a ie y o
o he applica ions. F om he de elopmen he e i is e iden hei s is a sub-class o a much
wide one. They see he 'linea i y' in explici own p ice4 in (17) as a pa icula i ue, bu ha
is no unique o hei case. The sys ems esul ing om combina ions o (6) and (11) ia (2)
and (5), wi h he same imposi ion o n
iii /1
=
=
φ
γ
,
])1[(
])1[( 2
a q
i
g
a
a
q
si ppn
p
p
p
p
p
y
q
λλ
λλ
+−
+−
= and
a
i
g
a
mi pn
p
p
p
y
q
])1[( 2
λλ
+−
=
sha e he p ope y. No a e hese he only ones. The o mulae gi en ea lie o he demand
sys ems om combina ions o (7) and (8), i w i en as equa ions o quan i ies a he han
budge sha es, show ha all h ee ha e he p ope y. P esumably oo, he e will be occasions
when mo e han a single pa ame e is desi ed, so ha he mo e gene al o mulae a e
applicable. Pe haps he e may e en be be si ua ions whe e 'linea i y' in he ecip ocal o own
p ice may be desi able ins ead o , o as well as, 'linea i y' in own p ice. I is no implausible
o suspec he e a e o he use ul sys ems o use in gene al equilib ium modelling besides (17)
o be ob ained om combina ions o simple componen s sys ems.
3 They use
λ
−ins ead o
λ
, de ining i o be nega i e. O cou se, hey p o e he alidi y condi ions
di ec ly o hei sys em a he han deducing hem om he p ope ies o componen s.
4 They a gue, ci ing Dixi and S igli z (1977) ha some imes he non-linea i y due o implici in
p ice indices is unimpo an .
i
p