scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

The challenge of the last few years: planning against poverty, microfinance

Abstract

The last ten years have witnessed a heightened interest in infrastructure in both developed and developing countries, with emphasis on the financial crisis in developed countries, and the recurring attention on growth and poverty reduction. An edition of the UN Report underlines the choices available to policymakers across the range of economic, social, cultural and political challenges that are needed to bridge the urban divide. The term “inequality” has many different meanings. Shortly we describe how an indicator of economic well-being is distributed over a particular population. The coefficient or index is commonly used for measuring the grade of difference in size, income, wealth, costs, etc. Gini’s Coefficient (1921). Obviously the index only considers one aspect of difference, that of the distribution of income. The effect of social services which are administered directly, as for example, the Health Service and Education, even though they are extremely important for a substantial equality of rights and opportunities, is not taken into account. As a group of eminent planning experts recognized in the Global Report on Human Settlements 2009: “Among the most significant challenges that urban planning has to address in the next few decades are increasing poverty and inequality, as well as the rapidly expanding urban sector.” Urbanization, therefore, does indeed play a positive role in overall poverty reduction, particularly where supported by well-adapted policies.

Read accessible full text

The challenge of the last few years: planning against poverty, microfinance

Author: Carta, Giuseppe
Publisher: Centre de Política de Sòl i Valoracions
Year: 2016
DOI: 10.5821/ctv.8152
Source: https://upcommons.upc.edu/bitstream/2117/91249/1/CH%2005%20Carta%20Giuseppe.pdf
1165
THE CHALLENGE OF THE LAST FEW YEARS: PLANNING AGAINST
POVERTY, MICROFINANCE
Giuseppe Ca a
P o a Uni e si y o Pale mo
Facul y o A chi ec u e
Viale Campania, 14 – PA Pale mo 90144 I aly
gca a1939@libe o.i
+39 091521553
Key wo ds: Soul, Cohesion, U ban, Policies.
Abs ac
“Nisi es in in ellec u quod p ius non ue i in sensu”, John Locke, 1690.
The las en yea s ha e wi nessed a heigh ened in e es in in as uc u e in bo h de eloped and
de eloping coun ies, wi h emphasis on he inancial c isis in de eloped coun ies, and he
ecu ing a en ion on g ow h and po e y educ ion. An edi ion o he UN Repo unde lines he
choices a ailable o policymake s ac oss he ange o economic, social, cul u al and poli ical
challenges ha a e needed o b idge he u ban di ide.
The e m “inequali y” has many di e en meanings. Sho ly we desc ibe how an indica o o
economic well-being is dis ibu ed o e a pa icula popula ion. The coe icien o index is
commonly used o measu ing he g ade o di e ence in size, income, weal h, cos s, e c. Gini’s
Coe icien (1921). Ob iously he index only conside s one aspec o di e ence, ha o he
dis ibu ion o income. The e ec o social se ices which a e adminis e ed di ec ly, as o
example, he Heal h Se ice and Educa ion, e en hough hey a e ex emely impo an o a
subs an ial equali y o igh s and oppo uni ies, is no aken in o accoun .
As a g oup o eminen planning expe s ecognized in he Global Repo on Human Se lemen s
2009: “Among he mos signi ican challenges ha u ban planning has o add ess in he nex
ew decades a e inc easing po e y and inequali y, as well as he apidly expanding u ban
sec o .” U baniza ion, he e o e, does indeed play a posi i e ole in o e all po e y educ ion,
pa icula ly whe e suppo ed by well-adap ed policies.
The challenge o he las ew yea s: planning agains po e y,
mic o inance
“Nisi es in in ellec u quod p ius non ue i in sensu”, John Locke, 1690.
The las en yea s ha e wi nessed a heigh ened in e es in in as uc u e in bo h de eloped and
de eloping coun ies, wi h emphasis on he inancial c isis in de eloped coun ies, and he
ecu ing a en ion on g ow h and po e y educ ion in de eloping coun ies. O he
1166
cha ac e is ics desc ibe in as uc u e as essen ially public goods. Inc easingly, he meaning o
in as uc u e has been shi ing om one ocusing on physical ixed asse s such as oads,
ai po s, sea po s, elecommunica ions sys ems, wa e dis ibu ion sys ems and sani a ion. I
now o en embodies no ions such as knowledge bases (Bu on, 2002).
In gene al in as uc u e can be ca ego ized in o ‘ha d’ in as uc u e and ‘so ’ in as uc u e.
The o me e e s o physical s uc u es o acili ies ha suppo he socie y and economy, such
as anspo (po s, oads and ailways); ene gy (elec ici y, elec ical g ids, gas and oil
pipelines); elecommunica ions ( elephone and in e ne ); and, basic u ili ies (wa e supply,
hospi als and heal h clinics, schools, i iga ion, e c.). The la e suppo s he de elopmen and
ope a ion o ha d in as uc u e, such as policy and ins i u ional amewo ks; go e nance
mechanisms; sys ems and p ocedu es; and anspa ency o inancing and p ocu emen
sys ems. B oadly de ined, he e o e, in as uc u e e e s o all basic inpu s o he p ope
unc ioning o he economy. In spi e o his, he e a e wo ca ego ies economic and social
in as uc u e, adop ed in he ‘Millennium Decla a ion, 1990- 2015, whe e 48 quan i iable
indica o s a e se ou .
The mos ele an in e ac ions on cu en u ban issues ake place wi h Repo s o he Uni ed
Na ions. I is he enue o na ional go e nmen agencies, local au ho i ies, he academe, ci il
socie y and p i a e sec o ac o s om all o e he wo ld o ind syne gies and explo e
collabo a ion. The UN add essed he u ban di ide, no ing ha much o he wo ld is
simul aneously ending owa d inc eased u baniza ion, leading o he c ea ion o hype -
seg ega ed ci ies due o poo u ban managemen p ac ices. An edi ion o he UN Repo
unde lines he choices a ailable o policymake s ac oss he ange o economic, social, cul u al
and poli ical challenges ha a e needed o b idge he u ban di ide. I cha s a new cou se o
ac ion, wi h he s eps and le e s needed o achie e a mo e inclusi e ci y, emphasizing he need
o comp ehensi e and in eg a ed esponses ha go beyond sho - e m pe spec i e. Indeed
o e he las 20 yea s, many u ban a eas ha e expe ienced d ama ic g ow h, as a esul o he
apid popula ion g ow h, and he wo ld’s economy has been ans o med by a combina ion o
apid echnological and poli ical change. An es ima ed h ee billion people – i ually hal o he
wo ld’s o al popula ion now li e in u ban se lemen s 1. And, while ci ies and owns command
an inc easingly dominan ole in he global economy as cen es o bo h p oduc ion and
consump ion, an uncon olled and apid u ban g ow h in pa icula in he de eloping wo ld is
hampe ing he capaci y o mos ci ies o p o ide adequa e se ices o hei ci izens. Gene ally,
i has been unde s ood ha he g ow h in mos pa s o he de eloping wo ld has been d i en
mainly by u al mig a ion.
1 In Oc obe 2012, he Wo ld U ban Fo um in Napoli (UN-Habi a and Commission on Human
Se lemen s) he Commission eques ed “ o p omo e a me ge o he U ban En i onmen Fo um
and he In e na ional Fo um on U ban Po e y”. The Wo ld U ban Fo um was he p emie
con e ence on ci ies, as well as he majo global ga he ing o ac o s conce ned wi h he
planning, go e nance and managemen o u ban a eas.
1167
Howe e , in his p ocess, he u al-u ban mig a ion can no longe espond o all he ecen
changes and ans o ma ions which ha e aken place in he wo ld’s ci ies. Beyond he u al -
u ban mig a ion wa es, an eme ging end shows ha in a-u ban mig a ions, and he
p ocesses o “ eclassi ica ion”, which consis s o a g adual ans o ma ion o se e al u al a eas
in o new u ban cen es con ibu e o he agg a a ion o he u ban li ing s anda ds o he mos
ulne able po ions o he popula ion in se e al wo ld’s ci ies. Indeed, he eme gence o new
global issues and o ces, including high le els o in e nal and ans na ional mig a ion,
globaliza ion, clima e change, ising u ban insecu i y and c ime, human-caused disas e s and
con lic s, and ising in o mali y wi hin ci ies a e in e ela ed wi h he in e nal dynamic o g ow h o
ci ies hemsel es.
Economic in as uc u e is also pa o an economy’s capi al s ock used o acili a e economic
p oduc ion, o se e as inpu s o p oduc ion (e.g. elec ici y, oads, and po s). This helps o
p oduce i ems ha a e consumed by households (e.g. wa e , sani a ion and elec ici y). Social
in as uc u e, on he o he hand, encompasses se ices such as heal h, educa ion and
ec ea ion. I has a di ec impac on he quali y o li e wi h he a endan posi i e e ec s on
e icien use o na ional esou ces and on po e y alle ia ion2.
The “ igh o he ci y” has e ol ed o e he pas wo cen u ies as a challenge o he exclusiona y
de elopmen and ma ginaliza ion ha a e ampan in ci ies oday. Mo e han a new legalis ic
de ice, he igh o he ci y is he exp ession o he deep yea nings o dwelle s o e ec i e
ecogni ion o hei a ious igh s. The concep has been deployed in a ious ways ac oss
egions, coun ies and ci ies o he wo ld. In some places i has been used as a heo e ical and
poli ical amewo k ocusing on en o cemen , empowe men , pa icipa ion, sel -de e mina ion
and a ious o ms o human igh s p o ec ion a he ci y le el. Some de eloping coun ies ha e
made signi ican e o s o close he u ban di ide as pa o a less speci ic “ igh s-based”
app oach, o only ecognizing some pa icula aspec s o he igh o he ci y.
UN policy analysis shows ha mo e o en han no p ocesses do no ma ch because hey ail o
acknowledge he linkages among he dimensions o he inclusi e ci y – economic, social,
poli ical, and cul u al. Admi edly, ci ies will, ime and again, adop new ules in a bid o add ess
some exclusion ela ed issues; bu hese ail o spell ou speci ic goal and sus ained p ocesses.
The mos impo an ac o s ha p e en ci ies om b idging he u ban di ide, include:
1) poo coo dina ion among a ious ie s o go e nmen . Today, mo e and mo e au ho i ies
sha e he same basic philosophy: b inging go e nmen wi hin he each o o dina y people
h ough enhanced mu ual engagemen . The physical space is becoming a poli ical space in
e ms o sys ems o ep esen a ion and pa icipa ion and in his sense is a undamen al aspec
o local democ acy.
2) absence o scien i ic da a o in o med policy choices. Only hose ci ies able o emb ace
di e en pa e ns o add ess inequali ies and ine iciencies will be able o p o ide be e li es o
hei esiden s, while limi ing ecological damage. The u u e o ci ies will depend on which
models can be de ised and implemen ed o build a new ype o ci y.
2 M. Ca a, Piani ica e la complessi à, Pale mo 1990.
1168
3) Exclusion o ma ginalized g oups and disc imina ion o mino i ies; he U ban Di ide can be
cha ac e ized by a ious o ms o inclusion/exclusion, in eg a ion/ma ginaliza ion, weal h/
po e y, equali y/inequali y. Those on he w ong side o he di ide a e excluded om he
bene i s o u ban expansion and p ospe i y.
I is no su p ising ha a policy analysis su ey pe cei ed u ban e o ms as se ing p ima ily he
in e es s o he ich, wi h poli icians and ci il se an s coming nex . The u ban poo s and o
sha e only a minimal ex en , i a all, in any bene i s acc uing om u baniza ion and ela ed
e o ms.
This imbalance is e y much in luenced by man 's a i udes and alues, and pa icula ly by he
inadequacies o adi ional me hods o o mula ing a ge s. The e a e also ex e nal in luences
a ising om p essu e g oups – he p i a e p ope y - p opaganda and media. When hese
unc ions a e conside ed in a balanced and in e connec ed way, op imum solu ions should
eme ge, which no only make he bes use o a ailable esou ces a he p ope ime, bu should
encou age a 'con iden ' esponse om he communi y.
Social di isions can pe mea e in e ac ions amongs indi iduals e en in he absence o
signi ican e hnic, acial o o he ac o s o seg ega ion.
The Millennium De elopmen Goal was widely adop ed, namely in 2015 o educe by hal he
p opo ion o people li ing in ex eme po e y. Bu qui e wha his a ge migh mean is obscu ed
by he bewilde ing ambigui y wi h which he e m ‘po e y’ is used, and by he pecunia y
indica o s p oposed o moni o i . Po e y o en appea s as an elusi e concep , especially om
he pe spec i es o policy make s in de eloping coun ies. The bes de ini ion o po e y
emains a di e en a gumen . Pe haps he only poin o gene al ag eemen is ha people who
li e in po e y mus be in a s a e o dep i a ion; ha is, a s a e in which hei s anda d o li ing
alls below minimum accep able s anda ds.
In gene al, po e y is a condi ion ha is expe ienced o e ime and is he ou come o a p ocess.
While many a e bo n in o po e y and emain in i , o he s expe ience he condi ion a one o
mo e s ages o hei li e ha dep i e people o hei human igh s and esul in inequi able and
agmen ed socie ies. The Human De elopmen Repo (2001) no es ha 70 pe cen o he
wo ld’s poo a e emale. The 2000/2001 Wo ld De elopmen Repo (Wo ld Bank, 2001)
iden i ies h ee b oad dimensions o po e y ela ing o lack o income, insecu i y and lack o
poli ical oice. The Ox o d Po e y and Human De elopmen Ini ia i e ecen ly un eiled an
inno a i e new “mul idimensional” measu e o people li ing in po e y, known as he
Mul idimensional Po e y Index o MPI.
The s udies e iewed all look a in as uc u e’s con ibu ion o economic g ow h a he han
speci ically po e y and inequali y. Some e idence sugges s ha ce ain ypes o in as uc u e
se ice p o ision, such as oads and anspo , ha e a po en ial con ibu ion o ag icul u al
ou pu , and ha in as uc u e imp o emen s (in elec ici y supply, anspo and
elecommunica ions) in small owns con ibu e signi ican ly o indus ial g ow h and employmen .
1169
On he whole, he e idence shows ha public in es men on in as uc u e, especially on u al
oads, imp o es local communi y and ma ke de elopmen 3.
This s udy sugges s ha , while in as uc u e in es men needs o be e y subs an ial and mus
be suppo ed by ac o s such as imp o emen in social in as uc u e so as o p omo e apid
educ ions in po e y, high le els o pe sonal and poli ical co up ion, acili a ed by weak
sys ems, ha e hinde ed a demand-led app oach, in es men choices and encou aged neglec
o main enance. Too o en, he e ha e been nega i e a he han posi i e consequences o
poo people, including en i onmen al damage.
We li e in a new u ban e a wi h mos o humani y now li ing in owns and ci ies. Global po e y
is mo ing in o ci ies, mos ly in de eloping coun ies, in a p ocess we call he u banisa ion o
po e y. The wo ld’s slums a e g owing as a e he global u ban popula ions. Indeed, his is one
o he g ea es challenges we ace in he new millennium. The links be ween mic o inance and
he Millennium De elopmen Goals mus be emphasised because bo h sphe es o e lap in he
c ucial domain o wo ldwide po e y educ ion. The o e lap is such ha mic o inance can open
up o he poo .
I mic o inance is o accele a e Millennium Goal achie emen , he deg ee and na u e o dono
and public sec o suppo o mic o inance mus change. Mic o inance p o ide s do need o
ecoup ope a ional cos s, bu his does no p e en hem om using subsidies o he mo e
ulne able poo and ma ke . The Millennium De elopmen Goals has enabled he Uni ed
Na ions o claim a cen al ole in in e na ional app oaches. As a measu e o po e y, he
Millennium Goals a e a comp omise, bu hey se e o highligh he many dimensions ha
po e y can ake. One can a gue ha he Goals do no do jus ice o he di e ences be ween
u al and u ban po e y o o he dep i a ions ha bese millions o e ugees and homeless
people in he wo ld. While he ul ima e goal is o e adica e all ex eme po e y, he immedia e
a ge is o hal e he numbe o people in ex eme po e y by 2015 compa ed wi h 1990. Fo
example, while he wo ld oday p oduces mo e han enough o eed e e yone. Social secu i y
has a ole he e, especially wi h ega d o unde weigh p e-school and school age child en.
Fo una ely, mo e han one gene a ion o expe ience wi h mic o inance is now a ailable ac oss
he globe on which ins i u ions can call o ensu e ha mic o inance loans a e no only p o-poo ,
bu accessible and sui ed o hei needs. This is especially so among he u ban poo who ha e
ew oppo uni ies o g ow hei own ood. Howe e , among he u al poo highe a m-ga e
p ices a e a boon.
Mic o inance has enabled e en he poo es ag icul u al households o eap he bene i s o
highe a m ga e p ices, inancing he alue chains ha connec poo u al households wi h new
ma ke s. This kind o end is consis en wi h educed unemploymen and mo e oppo uni ies o
he ex eme poo o ind be e -paid jobs in less isky a eas o p oduc ion. The li e a u e on
ex eme po e y is no as abundan o ex ensi e as ha on po e y in gene al. The needs o
3 Fo example, ehabili a ion o u al oads aises male ag icul u al wages and agg ega e c op
indices in poo illages o Bangladesh. Likewise, in Vie nam public in es men in in as uc u e
has esul ed in an inc ease in he a ailabili y o ood, he comple ion a es o p ima y school and
he wages o ag icul u al wo ke s.

1170
hose a he bo om o he po e y py amid a e no ma e ially di e en om hose o he poo in
gene al. In eali y, hose needs and ci cums ances a e di e en in impo an ways, pa icula ly
he way hey manage money and deal wi h isk.
The concep o "adequa e housing" is slowly bu su ely becoming in e na ionally accep ed as a
basis o policies and p og ammes aimed a add essing he needs o low-income communi ies.
The sec ion p esen s concep s essen ial o unde s anding low-income housing, and explo es
he easons behind he se ious lack o decen , a o dable housing in ci ies –and hence he
p oblem o u ban slums by examining al e na i e s a egies abou wha o do abou exis ing
slum condi ions and in o mal se lemen s, and how o a oid u u e slums h ough he p oduc ion
o new housing. Finally, he guide examines he main conside a ions needed o add ess he
imp o emen o in o mal se lemen s and he p oduc ion o adequa e and a o dable low-income
housing on a ci y-wide scale.
Go e nmen and policy make s need o quickly enhance hei unde s anding o low-income
housing issues in ci ies in pa icula , because he housing si ua ions and needs o u al
communi ies a e o en qui e di e en om hose o ci y dwelle s.
P oduc i e dynamic demands unde s anding o wha is going on in ci ies and hough ul policy
esponses o hese de elopmen s. Ou key messages in ol ed in u ban planning and
de elopmen a e :
1. U baniza ion is bo h unde s andable and manageable.
2. Sus ainable u ban de elopmen solu ions exis , bu hey equi e us , dialogue and new
ins i u ions.
3. Success can only come om pu suing he i e a i e cycle o ac ing-lea ning ha d i es
inno a i e go e nmen s. Examples o such p ac ices can be seen in a eas such as land,
housing and li elihoods.
Pa e ns o u baniza ion
Be ween 2000 and 2030, A ica's u ban popula ion – as example - will inc ease om 294 million
o 742 million. This is a daun ing p ospec , gi en ha mos A ican s a es a e cu en ly ailing o
deal wi h he needs o hei u ban popula ions. G ow h and mig a ion - u al- o-u ban mig a ion
accoun s a only one-qua e . In o he wo ds, he bulk o u ban g ow h comes om na u al
popula ion g ow h wi hin ci ies, a eali y which unde mines he policy mig a ion. A common
misconcep ion is ha u baniza ion implies an explosion o mega-ci ies (ci ies wi h mo e han
se en million people).
We ha e seen ha he u ban poo a e he mos impo an ac o s in ol ed in p o iding shel e in
A ican ci ies and owns, despi e he absence o go e nmen suppo and in es men . O
cou se, because hei houses a e cons uc ed wi hou he suppo ing in a- s uc u es such as
access o wa e , sani a ion and ene gy, hey a e insu icien and inadequa e o ep esen
any hing esembling he kind o housing ha is implied by he uni e sal igh , as se ou in
A icle 25 o he Uni e sal Decla a ion o Human Righ s.
The cen al challenge acing go e nmen s and manage s is o ecognize and app ecia e he
e o s o he u ban poo , and build on hei in es men s o p og essi ely sol e he shel e c isis.
1171
In o mal se lemen s con ain en i e ib an local economies, wi h hei own in o mal housing and
land ma ke s and hei own di e se social and cul u al g oupings, while condi ions in some
se lemen s may indeed be squalid, unheal hy, impo e ished and socially excluding.
Go e nmen s, and in pa icula na ional se ices, need o d aw on his knowledge o es ablish
he numbe s o people li ing in he se lemen , hei li ing condi ions, hei needs and
aspi a ions -all i al in o ma ion which mus shape plans ha will a ec he se lemen . Once his
unde s anding has been eached, i mus be ela ed o ou key aspec s o de elopmen :
- I is o e c owded o cha ac e ized by ex emely high densi y o dwellings and popula ion.
- I s esiden s ha e insecu e land enu e and may be e ic ed.
- I s esiden s expe ience high le els o po e y and social exclusion.
A slum household is de ined as a g oup o indi iduals li ing unde he same oo lacking one o
mo e o he ollowing condi ion: access o imp o ed wa e ; access o imp o ed sani a ion
acili ies; su icien li ing a ea (no mo e han h ee people sha ing he same oom); s uc u al
quali y and du abili y o dwellings; and secu i y o enu e. De ining slums by household-le el,
howe e , does no ully cap u e he deg ee o dep i a ion expe ienced by a gi en household o
slum communi y, o hei speci ic needs -a dimension ha is impo an .
Gen i ica ion
A he same ime, he es ic ions pu in place o ensu e he p ese a ion o he his o ic
cha ac e limi he deg ee o which p ope ies can be al e ed and hus impose a cos o hei
owne s. We a gue ha wi h posi i e he i age e ec s, he policy bene i s he owne s by emo ing
unce ain y ega ding he u u e o he neighbou hood. A he ma gin, cos s and bene i s o
designa ion will o se each o he , esul ing in a ze o impac on p ope y alue. A all o he
loca ions in neighbou hood he e ec would be posi i e.
Empi ical analysis o he de e minan s allowing owne s’ in e es s play in he designa ion
p ocess agains al e na i e mo i a ions o designa ion, e.g. p e en ing decline o
ede elopmen . This analysis goes u he in connec ing he spa ial ou come o a poli ical
ba gaining p ocess o one o he mos s iking con empo a y u ban phenomena: gen i ica ion,
ha in oduces ou heo e ical model o he i age designa ions and he ins i u ional se ing.
In he long- un he e is a p obabili y ha a any loca ion owne s ( e)de elop hei p ope y
causing a de e io a ion in in e nal he i age om he ini ial endowmen . Such de e io a ion
implies a all in he ex e nal quan i y o he i age e e ywhe e in he ci y. While a any loca ion x
he in e nal he i age is unde he ull con ol o he owne , he ex e nal he i age a all loca ions
can be exp essed as an expec ed alue de e mined by he p obabili y o he i age de e io a ion
ac oss he neighbou hood.
We p o ide an explana ion o he s uc u e o an u ban agglome a ion, desc ibing whe e i ms in
di e en sec o s ha e decided o loca e hei ac i i ies, anging om se ice supply o
manu ac u ing p oduc s. Second, we conside a model o mula ion ha implies ha
agglome a ion economies a e associa ed wi h a disp opo iona e expansion o jobs in
knowledge-in ensi e p oduce se ices and household se ices. Mo eo e , as he di e si y o
household se ices in an agglome a ion inc eases, new households a e a ac ed o he
1172
agglome a ion, which implies ha u ban agglome a ion s imula es expansion o bo h labou
supply and job demand.
In summa y, sec o s a e a ac ed o loca e and expand in u ban a eas wi h highe han a e age
supply po en ial, and when such sec o s g ow hey s imula e addi ional se ice-p oducing i ms
o ope a e in he same u ban a ea. When densi y ge s highe he g ow h in ce ain a eas may
come o a hal . One may ema k ha he supply capaci y o business se ices is measu ed
empi ically by obse ing he numbe o jobs which may conside ed as a c ude measu e. An
al e na i e would be o weigh jobs by using in o ma ion abou wage le els o di e en jobs.
Mic o inance
Go e nmen s should be encou aged o adop policies ha enable he housing sec o o wo k.
Go e nmen s ha e a hei disposal majo ins umen s ha add ess demand-side and supply-
side cons ain s, and imp o e he ins i u ional amewo k o he housing sec o as a whole as a
i al ool in disclosing hese cons ain s and p o iding go e nmen s wi h he necessa y
in o ma ion o ake policy decisions.
Demand-side ins umen s a e:
1) de eloping p ope y igh s: ensu ing ha igh s o own and exchange housing a e es ablished
and en o ced, ensu ing land igh s and egula iza ion o insecu e enu e;
2) de eloping mo gage inance: c ea ing he es ablishmen o compe i i e mo gage lending
ins i u ions, and os e ing inno a i e a angemen s o p o ide g ea e access o inance by he
poo , which includes mic o-c edi and mic o- inancing o housing and land acquisi ion;
3) a ionalizing subsidies: ensu ing ha subsidy p og ams a e o an app op ia e scale,
measu able, and anspa en , p e e ably ocusing on he demand side and a oid dis o ing
housing ma ke s.
Supply-side ins umen s a e:
1) p o iding in as uc u e o esiden ial land de elopmen : coo dina ing he agencies
esponsible o p o ision o esiden ial in as uc u e ( oads, d ainage, wa e , sewe age, and
elec ici y) o e icien de elopmen o u ban planning ins umen s.
2) o ganizing he building indus y: c ea ing g ea e compe i ion in he building indus y, emo al
and use o local building ma e ials, p omo ing he es ablishmen o lab es ing and quali y
con ol, suppo ing g een echnologies and low-ca bon p ac ices.
These ins umen s a e o be suppo ed and guided by de eloping he ins i u ional amewo k:
s eng hening ins i u ions which can o e see and manage he pe o mance o he sec o as a
whole; b inging oge he all he majo public agencies, p i a e sec o , and ep esen a i es o
nongo e nmen al o ganiza ions, policies and p og ams which bene i he poo and elici hei
pa icipa ion. Such ins i u ional amewo k should en o ce anspa ency in housing ma ke s,
es ablish moni o ing and indica o s and egula upda es on he pe o mance o he housing
sec o and he p ope y ma ke .
P io i ies o use o hese ins umen s, howe e , a y ac oss coun ies; p io i ies a e o de elop
ma ke o ien ed sys ems o p ope y igh s, acili a e he housing supply and enhance indus ial
compe i ion.
1173
One o m o change is o local go e nmen s o coo dina e e ec i ely wi h cen al and s a e o
p o incial le el au ho i ies and ice e sa. Inclusi e policies o ci ies should ocus mo e on
aspec s ha could be in eg a ed in o o mal municipal p ac ices; such as he in o mal economy,
social capi al and in o mal ins i u ional a angemen s, including a o dable land deli e y and
housing sys ems. The cos indices will always e eal he implica ion o de eloping any gi en
land uni in ela ion o he land which appea s o be he cheapes wi hin he su eyed a ea.
These indices, howe e , should no alone de e mine a planning solu ion di ec ly, bu a he
p o ide a 'basis o choice' in he o mula ion i sel . When such a basis is o mula ed, i becomes
ela i ely a simple exe cise o modi y some o he pa ame e s and o calcula e how his would
a ec he cos o de elopmen . The e is also a di e ence in he cha ac e o he cos s in ol ed
be ween he second g oup o ac o s and he o he h ee g oups, whe e he cos s end o be
ixed and o ha e a 'passi e' cha ac e e lec ing exis ing ea u es o he analysed a ea. The
planne can exe cise no in luence upon hem; hey a e dependen a iables.
Housing inance includes mo gage and cons uc ion loans. These a e ypically o e ed by
comme cial banks and building socie ies, which demand a lien on land (i.e., he igh o keep
possession un il he deb is discha ged. The as majo i y o u ban poo (in A ica o in Asia)
ha e no access o any inancial ins umen s, and no al e na i e bu o inance hei houses
h ough in o mal mechanisms. These include mainly pe sonal sa ings, small loans om
ela i es, iends o mic o inance ins i u ions.
The poo a e denied access o o mal housing inance due o lack o colla e al esul ing om he
quali y and/o legal s a us o hei housing, limi ed incomes o unce ain
employmen s a us. Po en ial imp o emen s o cu en housing inance sys ems include he
ollowing:
1- Re o m o land egula ions, p ope y igh s and land ma ke s mus allow p i a e owne ship,
leasehold and
ansac ions on open land ma ke s;
2- S onge ax bases o municipali ies, pu ing hem in a be e posi ion and access o capi al
ma ke s;
3- Encou aging g ea e p i a e in es men and inance in u ban in as uc u e and se ices,
whe he h ough
gua an ee schemes including public-p i a e pa ne ships wi h in e na ional inancial ins i u ions
and p i a e ope a o s and/o in es o s;
4- P omo ion o housing inance h ough mic o inance ins i u ions and housing coope a i es
who know how o each ou o low-income u ban communi ies and whose epaymen can a ac
p i a e and dono unding;
5- U ban po e y can ha e implica ions o o he na ions, apa om emig a ion lows. Deep
dep i a ion weakens na ional capaci ies o comba o ganized c ime, human a icking, a med
con lic , e o ism, social un es and he sp ead o diseases.
As a g oup o eminen planning expe s ecognized in he Global Repo on Human Se lemen s
2009: “Among he mos signi ican challenges ha u ban planning has o add ess in he nex
ew decades a e inc easing po e y and inequali y, as well as he apidly expanding u ban
sec o .” E idence also indica es an in e se ela ionship be ween he deg ee o u baniza ion