scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

New infiltration technique in the treatment of the Plantar Fascia Syndrome based on Platelet-Rich Plasma

Abstract

Pain in the attachment of the plantar fascia in the calcaneus represents 10% of all sports injuries, affects 10% of foot runners, and will affect around 20% of the world population. There is no effective conservative treatment for it. This paper justifies a new definition and name for this pathology, Plantar Fascia Syndrome (PFS), presents a methodology for its diagnosis, and presents the clinical and functional effectiveness of a new conservative treatment based on platelet-rich plasma (PRP). In total, 25 patients (from an initial sample of 260) diagnosed with recalcitrant PFS lasting for more than 12 months were treated with a single infiltration of 2 mL of PRP, according to a new technic proposed. The study was approved by the ethical committee for clinical research of the reference hospital. The patients were controlled after 15, 30, 90, and 180 days, reviewing on each occasion pain, thickness of the plantar fascia, and active extension of the ankle joint. A total of 15 days after infiltration, 85% of patients had no clinical signs requiring treatment. After 90 days of infiltration, no patients showed clinical signs. This improvement in the patients’ condition lasted for 180 days. All patients after treatment can fully resume normal activity with no pain.

Read accessible full text

New infiltration technique in the treatment of the Plantar Fascia Syndrome based on Platelet-Rich Plasma

Author: Pardo-Camps, Francesc,Pardo Bosch, Francesc
Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
Year: 2024
DOI: 10.3390/jcm13010170
Source: https://upcommons.upc.edu/bitstream/2117/400070/1/Pardo-Camps%20%26%20Pardo-Bosch%202024.pdf
Ci a ion: Pa do-Camps, F.;
Pa do-Bosch, F. New In il a ion
Technique in he T ea men o he
Plan a Fascia Synd ome Based on
Pla ele -Rich Plasma. J. Clin. Med.
2024,13, 170. h ps://doi.o g/
10.3390/jcm13010170
Academic Edi o s: Ca lo Biz and
Pie o Ruggie i
Recei ed: 30 No embe 2023
Re ised: 24 Decembe 2023
Accep ed: 26 Decembe 2023
Published: 28 Decembe 2023
Copy igh : © 2023 by he au ho s.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Swi ze land.
This a icle is an open access a icle
dis ibu ed unde he e ms and
condi ions o he C ea i e Commons
A ibu ion (CC BY) license (h ps://
c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/
4.0/).
Jou nal o
Clinical Medicine
A icle
New In il a ion Technique in he T ea men o he Plan a Fascia
Synd ome Based on Pla ele -Rich Plasma
F ancesc Pa do-Camps 1,2 and F ancesc Pa do-Bosch 3,*
1Uni e si y Clinic, Complu ense Uni e si y o Mad id, Plaza Ramón y Cajal, s/n, 28040 Mad id, Spain;
d pa docamps@d pa docamps.com
2Depa amen o O hopedic Su ge y and T auma ology, Ca alan Ins i u e o Heal h, A . Josep Lapo e 2,
43204 Reus, Spain
3
Depa amen o P ojec and Cons uc ion Enginee ing, Uni e si a Poli ècnica de Ca alunya (Ba celonaTech),
C. Jo di Gi ona 1-3, 08034 Ba celona, Spain
*Co espondence: ancesc.pa [email p o ec ed]
Abs ac : Pain in he a achmen o he plan a ascia in he calcaneus ep esen s 10% o all spo s
inju ies, a ec s 10% o oo unne s, and will a ec a ound 20% o he wo ld popula ion. The e is
no e ec i e conse a i e ea men o i . This pape jus i ies a new de ini ion and name o his
pa hology, Plan a Fascia Synd ome (PFS), p esen s a me hodology o i s diagnosis, and p esen s he
clinical and unc ional e ec i eness o a new conse a i e ea men based on pla ele - ich plasma
(PRP). In o al, 25 pa ien s ( om an ini ial sample o 260) diagnosed wi h ecalci an PFS las ing o
mo e han 12 mon hs we e ea ed wi h a single in il a ion o 2 mL o PRP, acco ding o a new echnic
p oposed. The s udy was app o ed by he e hical commi ee o clinical esea ch o he e e ence
hospi al. The pa ien s we e con olled a e 15, 30, 90, and 180 days, e iewing on each occasion
pain, hickness o he plan a ascia, and ac i e ex ension o he ankle join . A o al o 15 days a e
in il a ion, 85% o pa ien s had no clinical signs equi ing ea men . A e 90 days o in il a ion, no
pa ien s showed clinical signs. This imp o emen in he pa ien s’ condi ion las ed o 180 days. All
pa ien s a e ea men can ully esume no mal ac i i y wi h no pain.
Keywo ds: pla ele - ich plasma; PRP; in il a ion; plan a ascia synd ome; conse a i e ea men
1. In oduc ion
Fee a e he mos dis al unc ional uni s in he lowe pa o he human body. They a e
he basic mechanism ha main ains he balance in he bipedal posi ion. Fee ’s mo emen s
a e combined and sequen ial. Desynch oniza ion in hese mo emen s leads o a degen-
e a ion o he s uc u es, which in u n esul s in pain. Foo pain can be disabling, which
explains why he e a e so many pa ien s seeking medical and su gical help.
One equen ly pain ul ana omical s uc u e o he oo is he en hesis o he si e o
a achmen o he plan a ascia (aponeu osis) in he calcaneus. This pain occu s due o
s i ness a e p olonged es . The pain o igina es in di e en pa hologies ha a ec bo h
he ascia and he calcaneus, as well as o he adjacen s uc u es. This inju y ha ms 7%
o he popula ion o e 65 yea s old who expe ience pain in his a ea o he oo [
1
]. In
oo - acing a hle es, his inju y accoun s o 25% o all oo inju ies [
2
] and app oxima ely 8
o 10% o all inju ies. Despi e he impo ance o his inju y, he elie o he symp oms akes
abou 1 yea [3], and he ou come is no always p omising.
The pa hology o he en hesis be ween he plan a ascia and he calcaneus (ci cled
a ea in Figu e 1) a ising om opposing ensions o he a ious o ces ha con e ge a
his poin has been in es iga ed o mo e han 100 yea s wi hou a clea desc ip ion o i s
ae iology, a well-de ined diagnos ic me hodology, o a p ecise ea men p o ocol. To da e,
his pa hology has been e e ed o as plan a ascii is [4,5] o plan a asciosis [6,7].
J. Clin. Med. 2024,13, 170. h ps://doi.o g/10.3390/jcm13010170 h ps://www.mdpi.com/jou nal/jcm
J. Clin. Med. 2024,13, 170 2 o 14
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 o 14
Figu e 1. Loca ion o he Plan a Fascia Synd ome in he hind oo .
A e ha ing s udied he pa hological signs o his synd ome and conside ed i s de -
ini ions, he au ho s ha e named his pa hology Plan a Fascia Synd ome (PFS) wi h he
ollowing de ini ion: “Sha p and s abbing pain a e es ing he oo on he loo , loca ed in he
an e io lowe ace o he heel, and i adia ing and/o p ojec ing o he middle o he sole o he oo ”
[8]. Pain is he p ima y symp om in pa ien s wi h PFS and is associa ed on many occasions
wi h igh ness o s i ness o he plan a a ea, a educ ion in mobili y o he a ch o he
ankle [9], and a ce ain deg ee o p og essi e unc ional impai men . This de ini ion is
suppo ed by Nuclea Magne ic Resonance (MRI) s udies, whe e i is possible o de ec
he p esence o bone oedema, subchond al lesions, and a ious o he bone pa hologies
ha coexis wi h he in lamma o y pa hology, some imes ch onic, o he plan a ascia
i sel .
The connec i e issue and he muscle- endinous ib es o he plan a ascia ha e good
egene a i e capaci y, howe e , depending on he ex en o he pa hology, assis ance may
be needed o a oid incomple e egene a ion [10]. On he o he hand, he calcaneus p e-
sen s chond al inju ies o di icul egene a ion due o ascula de ici , which would ben-
e i om he angiogenic g ow h ac o s (GFs) [11]. In he las decade, con ibu ions om
molecula biology ha e enabled he de elopmen o new echniques. These echniques
include he applica ion in he inju ed a ea o pla ele - ich plasma (PRP) p epa a ions. I s
u ili y has been demons a ed in di e en ields such as bone egene a ion [12,13], oph-
halmologic su ge y o he limbus and co nea [14,15], ca diopulmona y su ge y [16], max-
illo acial su ge y [17,18], den is y [19], auma ology, accele a ing he healing o bo h
muscle and endon inju ies, and in os eo-degene a i e join inju ies [20–23].
Nowadays, PRP is seen as a non-indus ial pla ele concen a e wi h a pla ele con-
cen a ion g ea e han he basal coun . When ac i a ed, i eleases GFs wi h an i-in lam-
ma o y, analgesic, and egene a i e p ope ies. In daily p ac ice, i is ecognised ha hese
e ec s can, in gene al, s imula e he issue epai p ocesses in bo h bone and so issues,
dec ease he in ec ion a es in ollowing ea men s [24], educe pain and in lamma ion,
and, inally, educe blood loss [25,26].
Conside ing he clea egene a i e powe o PRP, he good esul s ob ained wi h
PRP, which is conside ed a conse a i e ea men [27,28], in o he musculoskele al pa-
hologies, and he ac ha PFS is a pa hology cha ac e ised by de e io a ion o so issue
( ascia) and ha d issue (calcaneus), his pape aims o demons a e he e ec i eness om
a clinical and unc ional poin o iew o a conse a i e ea men based on only one in-
il a ion o 2 mL o pla ele - ich plasma (PRP) in pa ien s diagnosed wi h Plan a Fascia
Synd ome (PFS) wi h a new injec ion p ocedu e.
The en hesis be ween he plan a ascia and he calcaneus is a biomechanical si e sub-
jec o di e en ac ions, cu ing, and wis ing o ces. I s dynamic balance is main ained
due o i s elas ic p ope ies. The biomechanical ac ion o he en hesis equi es signi ican
ene gy consump ion, which in u n esul s in wea and ea o he de e io a ion o he
inse ional ib es. Many au ho s belie e ha hese ib es may be epai ed and/o eco -
e ed h ough he ex e nal applica ion o PRP. This applica ion o PRP also aims o imp o e
Figu e 1. Loca ion o he Plan a Fascia Synd ome in he hind oo .
A e ha ing s udied he pa hological signs o his synd ome and conside ed i s
de ini ions, he au ho s ha e named his pa hology Plan a Fascia Synd ome (PFS) wi h he
ollowing de ini ion: “Sha p and s abbing pain a e es ing he oo on he loo , loca ed in he
an e io lowe ace o he heel, and i adia ing and/o p ojec ing o he middle o he sole o he
oo ” [
8
]. Pain is he p ima y symp om in pa ien s wi h PFS and is associa ed on many
occasions wi h igh ness o s i ness o he plan a a ea, a educ ion in mobili y o he a ch
o he ankle [
9
], and a ce ain deg ee o p og essi e unc ional impai men . This de ini ion
is suppo ed by Nuclea Magne ic Resonance (MRI) s udies, whe e i is possible o de ec
he p esence o bone oedema, subchond al lesions, and a ious o he bone pa hologies ha
coexis wi h he in lamma o y pa hology, some imes ch onic, o he plan a ascia i sel .
The connec i e issue and he muscle- endinous ib es o he plan a ascia ha e good
egene a i e capaci y, howe e , depending on he ex en o he pa hology, assis ance may
be needed o a oid incomple e egene a ion [
10
]. On he o he hand, he calcaneus p esen s
chond al inju ies o di icul egene a ion due o ascula de ici , which would bene i om
he angiogenic g ow h ac o s (GFs) [
11
]. In he las decade, con ibu ions om molecula
biology ha e enabled he de elopmen o new echniques. These echniques include he
applica ion in he inju ed a ea o pla ele - ich plasma (PRP) p epa a ions. I s u ili y has
been demons a ed in di e en ields such as bone egene a ion [
12
,
13
], oph halmologic
su ge y o he limbus and co nea [
14
,
15
], ca diopulmona y su ge y [
16
], maxillo acial
su ge y [
17
,
18
], den is y [
19
], auma ology, accele a ing he healing o bo h muscle and
endon inju ies, and in os eo-degene a i e join inju ies [20–23].
Nowadays, PRP is seen as a non-indus ial pla ele concen a e wi h a pla ele concen-
a ion g ea e han he basal coun . When ac i a ed, i eleases GFs wi h an i-in lamma o y,
analgesic, and egene a i e p ope ies. In daily p ac ice, i is ecognised ha hese e ec s
can, in gene al, s imula e he issue epai p ocesses in bo h bone and so issues, dec ease
he in ec ion a es in ollowing ea men s [
24
], educe pain and in lamma ion, and, inally,
educe blood loss [25,26].
Conside ing he clea egene a i e powe o PRP, he good esul s ob ained wi h PRP,
which is conside ed a conse a i e ea men [
27
,
28
], in o he musculoskele al pa hologies,
and he ac ha PFS is a pa hology cha ac e ised by de e io a ion o so issue ( ascia) and
ha d issue (calcaneus), his pape aims o demons a e he e ec i eness om a clinical and
unc ional poin o iew o a conse a i e ea men based on only one in il a ion o 2 mL
o pla ele - ich plasma (PRP) in pa ien s diagnosed wi h Plan a Fascia Synd ome (PFS)
wi h a new injec ion p ocedu e.
The en hesis be ween he plan a ascia and he calcaneus is a biomechanical si e
subjec o di e en ac ions, cu ing, and wis ing o ces. I s dynamic balance is main ained
due o i s elas ic p ope ies. The biomechanical ac ion o he en hesis equi es signi ican
ene gy consump ion, which in u n esul s in wea and ea o he de e io a ion o he
inse ional ib es. Many au ho s belie e ha hese ib es may be epai ed and/o eco e ed
h ough he ex e nal applica ion o PRP. This applica ion o PRP also aims o imp o e
he os eoca ilaginous issue whe e he plan a ascia is inse ed o pe o m i s physio-
logical ac ion o ac ion-dis ac ion and whe e o he o ces, such as cu ing and wis ing
o ces, con e ge.
J. Clin. Med. 2024,13, 170 3 o 14
2. Ma e ials and Me hods
2.1. Type o S udy
The au ho s conduc ed a mul icen e in e en ional clinical s udy wi h olun ee
pa ien s diagnosed wi h G ade III Plan a Fascia Synd ome (see Sec ion 2.2) and subjec ed
hem o ea men based on a single in il a ion o 2 mL o pla ele - ich plasma (PRP), clas-
si ied as pu e pla ele - ich plasma acco ding o he pla ele concen a es’ classi ica ion [
29
].
The de ice used was P o eal
®
(Ga à, Spain), homologa ion e e ence CE 0318. All pa ien s
me he inclusion c i e ia: pain e alua ion using he VAS
global
equal o o g ea e han 15
poin s; ul asound e alua ion showing a p oximal hickening o he plan a ascia g ea e
han o equal o 4 mm, measu ed 5 mm away om he medial ube osi y o he calca-
neus in he longi udinal sec ion; pa hology du a ion o equal o o g ea e han 6 mon hs;
men and women o e 18 yea s old; willing o pa icipa e in he s udy a e signing he
in o med consen . They did no mee any exclusion c i e ion: p esence o sys emic, degen-
e a i e, neu ological, and senso y diseases impac ing o mani es ing he ankle and oo ;
mo pho- unc ional al e a ions impac ing he ankle and oo leading o signi ican clinical
disc epancies in he lowe limbs, dysme ies, o ob ious clinical scoliosis; ha ing ecei ed
any medical, o hopaedic and/o nonsu gical in asi e ea men o he en hesis condi ion
be ween he plan a ascia and he calcaneus in he las h ee mon hs; p esen ing any ype
o pla ele o coagula ion diso de ; o ha ing di icul ies in unde s anding he ea men
ins uc ions. The s udy, ca ied ou be ween May 2013 and Decembe 2014, was app o ed
by he e hical commi ee o clinical esea ch o he ‘Hospi al Clínico San Ca los’ in Mad id
(in e nal code: 13/179-e). The s udy s a ed wi h 260 pa ien s wi h po en ial diagnosis o
PFS, acco ding o he p ima y heal h ca e doc o s in he ins i u ions whe e he s udy was
conduc ed. A e he ele an echnical checks, de eloped by he esea che s (see Figu e 2),
we e conduc ed, 25 pa ien s we e selec ed o being ea ed wi h PRP.
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 o 14
he os eoca ilaginous issue whe e he plan a ascia is inse ed o pe o m i s physiolog-
ical ac ion o ac ion-dis ac ion and whe e o he o ces, such as cu ing and wis ing
o ces, con e ge.
2. Ma e ials and Me hods
2.1. Type o S udy
The au ho s conduc ed a mul icen e in e en ional clinical s udy wi h olun ee pa-
ien s diagnosed wi h G ade III Plan a Fascia Synd ome (see Sec ion 2.2) and subjec ed
hem o ea men based on a single in il a ion o 2 mL o pla ele - ich plasma (PRP),
classi ied as pu e pla ele - ich plasma acco ding o he pla ele concen a es’ classi ica ion
[29]. The de ice used was P o eal
®
(Ga à, Spain), homologa ion e e ence CE 0318. All
pa ien s me he inclusion c i e ia: pain e alua ion using he VAS
global
equal o o g ea e
han 15 poin s; ul asound e alua ion showing a p oximal hickening o he plan a ascia
g ea e han o equal o 4 mm, measu ed 5 mm away om he medial ube osi y o he
calcaneus in he longi udinal sec ion; pa hology du a ion o equal o o g ea e han 6
mon hs; men and women o e 18 yea s old; willing o pa icipa e in he s udy a e signing
he in o med consen . They did no mee any exclusion c i e ion: p esence o sys emic,
degene a i e, neu ological, and senso y diseases impac ing o mani es ing he ankle and
oo ; mo pho- unc ional al e a ions impac ing he ankle and oo leading o signi ican
clinical disc epancies in he lowe limbs, dysme ies, o ob ious clinical scoliosis; ha ing
ecei ed any medical, o hopaedic and/o nonsu gical in asi e ea men o he en hesis
condi ion be ween he plan a ascia and he calcaneus in he las h ee mon hs; p esen ing
any ype o pla ele o coagula ion diso de ; o ha ing di icul ies in unde s anding he
ea men ins uc ions. The s udy, ca ied ou be ween May 2013 and Decembe 2014, was
app o ed by he e hical commi ee o clinical esea ch o he ‘Hospi al Clínico San Ca los’
in Mad id (in e nal code: 13/179-e). The s udy s a ed wi h 260 pa ien s wi h po en ial
diagnosis o PFS, acco ding o he p ima y heal h ca e doc o s in he ins i u ions whe e
he s udy was conduc ed. A e he ele an echnical checks, de eloped by he esea ch-
e s (see Figu e 2), we e conduc ed, 25 pa ien s we e selec ed o being ea ed wi h PRP.
Figu e 2. Selec ion scheme o he 25 pa ien s.
Ou o he ini ial 260 pa ien s, 152 we e excluded as hei pain assessmen using
VAS
global
did no each he equi ed minimum o 15 poin s (see Sec ion 2.2). Addi ionally,
35 pa ien s we e disca ded as hei plan a ascia hickness measu ed less han 4 mm. An-
o he 21 pa ien s we e excluded due o medica ion ( ecei ed co icos e oid in il a ion o
ook nons e oidal an i-in lamma o y d ugs). Fu he mo e, 9 pa ien s we e excluded o
Figu e 2. Selec ion scheme o he 25 pa ien s.
Ou o he ini ial 260 pa ien s, 152 we e excluded as hei pain assessmen using
VAS
global
did no each he equi ed minimum o 15 poin s (see Sec ion 2.2). Addi ionally,
35 pa ien s we e disca ded as hei plan a ascia hickness measu ed less han 4 mm.
Ano he 21 pa ien s we e excluded due o medica ion ( ecei ed co icos e oid in il a ion
o ook nons e oidal an i-in lamma o y d ugs). Fu he mo e, 9 pa ien s we e excluded o
ongoing o hopaedic ea men , 3 o p esen ing pla ele o coagula ion diso de s, 9 due o
lack o willingness o pa icipa e in he s udy, and 6 o di icul ies in comp ehension.
J. Clin. Med. 2024,13, 170 4 o 14
2.2. Plan a Fascia Synd ome: Diagnosis and Classi ica ion
The p ima y diagnosis o PFS is basically clinical, bu nowadays con i ma ion by
means o he so-called complemen a y diagnosis es s is equi ed.
Pain in he medial calcaneal ube osi y can be e alua ed wi h he 10-poin Visual
Analogue Scale (VAS), whe e he pa ien is asked o sco e his/he le el o pain, wi h 0
meaning ‘no pain’ and 10 meaning ‘se e e pain’. The global assessmen o pain (VAS
Global
)
akes place in h ee s ages o occasions, as shown in Equa ion 1. The i s pain assessmen
(VAS
1
) is conduc ed when he pa ien ge s ou o bed, pu s he a ec ed oo on he loo , and
akes his/he i s s eps; he second pain assessmen (VAS
2
) is conduc ed when he pa ien
pu s he a ec ed oo on he loo a e a p olonged es (minimum du a ion o 30 min);
and he hi d pain assessmen (VAS
3
) is conduc ed when he pa ien ’s medial calcaneal
ube osi y is ouched o p essed du ing he clinical examina ion. This clinical-explo a o y
p o ocol has been designed acco ding o di e en wo ks [3,30,31].
VASGlobal =
3
∑
i=1
VASi(1)
Based on he esul o his iple assessmen , each pa ien can be classi ied in o h ee
g oups: G oup A (VAS
Global ≤
15 poin s), G oup B (15 poin s < VAS
Global ≤
20 poin s), and
G oup C (VASGlobal > 20 poin s).
The second elemen ha allows he doc o o make a clea diagnosis o PFS is he
hickness, in millime es, o he a e age s ip o he plan a ascia measu ed using ul a-
sonog aphy (US) in he longi udinal plane a a dis ance o 5 mm om he medial calcaneal
ube osi y. The US examina ion was de eloped by specialis doc o s om he adiodiagno-
sis se ice o he medical cen es in which he s udy was ca ied ou . They ollowed he
p o ocol ou lined in he Eu opean echnical guide o musculoskele al ul asound o he
ankle and oo . The de ices used we e he Esao e MyLab gold 25 model and he Esao e
Tecohnus MPX (San Jus Des e n, Spain). This is an objec i e elemen ha when in he
hands o an expe , can be conside ed as pa hognomonic in con i ming a diagnosis o
PFS. A hickness lowe han 3 mm can be conside ed no mal [
32
]. O he s udies [
33
,
34
]
conside a posi i e diagnosis o PFS when he hickness is highe han 4 mm. Based on
hese assessmen s, PFS can be classi ied in o 3 g oups acco ding o plan a ascia hickness
(PFT): G oup 1 (PFT
≤
3 mm), G oup 2 (3 mm < PFT
≤
4 mm), and G oup 3 (PFT > 4 mm).
The combina ion o bo h classi ica ions de ines h ee g ades o PFS, as shown in
Figu e 3, which a e: G ade I (mild), G ade II (mode a e), and G ade III (se e e).
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 o 14
ongoing o hopaedic ea men , 3 o p esen ing pla ele o coagula ion diso de s, 9 due
o lack o willingness o pa icipa e in he s udy, and 6 o di icul ies in comp ehension.
2.2. Plan a Fascia Synd ome: Diagnosis and Classi ica ion
The p ima y diagnosis o PFS is basically clinical, bu nowadays con i ma ion by
means o he so-called complemen a y diagnosis es s is equi ed.
Pain in he medial calcaneal ube osi y can be e alua ed wi h he 10-poin Visual An-
alogue Scale (VAS), whe e he pa ien is asked o sco e his/he le el o pain, wi h 0 mean-
ing ‘no pain’ and 10 meaning ‘se e e pain’. The global assessmen o pain (VASGlobal) akes
place in h ee s ages o occasions, as shown in Equa ion 1. The i s pain assessmen (VAS1)
is conduc ed when he pa ien ge s ou o bed, pu s he a ec ed oo on he loo , and akes
his/he i s s eps; he second pain assessmen (VAS2) is conduc ed when he pa ien pu s
he a ec ed oo on he loo a e a p olonged es (minimum du a ion o 30 min); and
he hi d pain assessmen (VAS3) is conduc ed when he pa ien ’s medial calcaneal ube -
osi y is ouched o p essed du ing he clinical examina ion. This clinical-explo a o y p o-
ocol has been designed acco ding o di e en wo ks [3,30,31].
VAS =VAS

 (1)
Based on he esul o his iple assessmen , each pa ien can be classi ied in o h ee
g oups: G oup A (VASGlobal ≤ 15 poin s), G oup B (15 poin s < VASGlobal ≤ 20 poin s), and
G oup C (VASGlobal > 20 poin s).
The second elemen ha allows he doc o o make a clea diagnosis o PFS is he
hickness, in millime es, o he a e age s ip o he plan a ascia measu ed using ul a-
sonog aphy (US) in he longi udinal plane a a dis ance o 5 mm om he medial calcaneal
ube osi y. The US examina ion was de eloped by specialis doc o s om he adiodiag-
nosis se ice o he medical cen es in which he s udy was ca ied ou . They ollowed he
p o ocol ou lined in he Eu opean echnical guide o musculoskele al ul asound o he
ankle and oo . The de ices used we e he Esao e MyLab gold 25 model and he Esao e
Tecohnus MPX (San Jus Des e n, Spain). This is an objec i e elemen ha when in he
hands o an expe , can be conside ed as pa hognomonic in con i ming a diagnosis o PFS.
A hickness lowe han 3 mm can be conside ed no mal [32]. O he s udies [33,34] conside
a posi i e diagnosis o PFS when he hickness is highe han 4 mm. Based on hese as-
sessmen s, PFS can be classi ied in o 3 g oups acco ding o plan a ascia hickness (PFT):
G oup 1 (PFT ≤ 3 mm), G oup 2 (3 mm < PFT ≤ 4 mm), and G oup 3 (PFT > 4 mm).
The combina ion o bo h classi ica ions de ines h ee g ades o PFS, as shown in
Figu e 3, which a e: G ade I (mild), G ade II (mode a e), and G ade III (se e e).
Figu e 3. Classi ica ion o he Plan a Fascia Synd ome.
2.3. P ocedu e—In il a ion Technique
This pape p esen s a new he apeu ic echnique o he ea men o PFS based on
knowledge o he pa hogenesis and o he ana omy o he sole o he oo and is in ended
Figu e 3. Classi ica ion o he Plan a Fascia Synd ome.
2.3. P ocedu e—In il a ion Technique
This pape p esen s a new he apeu ic echnique o he ea men o PFS based on
knowledge o he pa hogenesis and o he ana omy o he sole o he oo and is in ended o
add ess he causes o he disease h ough bio- egene a i e he apy using PRP in il a ion.
Al hough PRP in il a ion has been ese ed o G ade III pa ien s, he e is no eason why
i canno be used in pa ien s in ea lie s ages o less se e e o ms o PFS.
J. Clin. Med. 2024,13, 170 5 o 14
2.3.1. P epa a ion o he Pa ien
The pa ien lies on a s e che in a supine decubi us posi ion wi h he a ec ed membe
in ex e nal o a ion and he knee lexed abou 70
◦
. Wi h his mo emen , he oo will be in a
side suppo posi ion wi h he in e nal ace looking upwa ds ( he punc u e o PRP injec ion
will be pe o med in his in e nal a ea). The su gical ield o he oo o be ea ed will be
p epa ed acco ding o he same p o ocol used in any o he mino ou pa ien su ge y. A e
he pa ien has been adequa ely p epa ed and wi h he medial ace o he calcaneus ully
exposed, he loca ion o he an e io -in e nal calcaneal ube osi y ( he poin o maximum
pain) will be de e mined by palpa ion o by ul asonog aphy. This is he e e ence poin
o he PRP in il a ion. Jus be o e he in il a ion, local supe icial anaes hesia will be
pe o med by sp aying he skin wi h chlo oe hyl Chemi osa
®
(Labo a o ios ERN, Ba celona,
Spain), whe e e hyl chlo ide is applied un il he skin begins o whi en [
35
]. The pa ien will
no expe ience any pain when he needle is in oduced.
2.3.2. PRP Adminis a ion
PRP ac i a ion. PRP is ac i a ed wi h calcium chlo ide 5% and acco ding o he
es ablished p o ocol. The in il a ion mus be pe o med be ween 6 and 10 min a e he
PRP has been ac i a ed.
In il a ion poin . The in il a ion should be pe o med a he an e io -inne edge o
he calcaneus aking speci ic incision and/o pene a ion lines ollowing he skin olds
as a e e ence. Plan a load a eas should be a oided in o de o minimise he isk o
inju y o any asculo-ne ous s uc u e and o educe he isk o in ec ion. Ano he eason
o ecommending his ana omical a ea is he ac ha plan a skin is connec ed o he
unde lying ascia by means o many s ong ib ous ascicles called e inacula cu is ha ac
as pa i ions di iding he subcu aneous a in o small i egula chambe s o compa men s
con aining iny essels o he de mis. They also p e en mo emen be ween he skin and
ascia. These chambe s a e la ge in he ea pa o he oo , below he calcaneus, whe e
hey ac as minia u e shock abso be s. So, i he in il a ion is gi en in he en al ace o
he calcaneus, he shock-abso bing unc ion can be comp omised and lead o heel pain
synd ome [36].
Technique o execu ion. The needle is inse ed pe pendicula ly o he skin (a an angle o
90
◦
), wo cen ime es om he plan a plane (lowe edge o he calcaneus), in he ansi ion
a ea be ween he skin o he medial ace o he heel and he skin o he plan a a ea and
acco ding o a linea plane be ween 1 and 3 mm om he medial ube osi y (see Figu e 4).
An expe auma ologis should no need o use ul asonog aphy (US) o ensu e he co ec
posi ioning o he needle; howe e , US could help new p ac i ione s.
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 o 14
o add ess he causes o he disease h ough bio- egene a i e he apy using PRP in il a-
ion. Al hough PRP in il a ion has been ese ed o G ade III pa ien s, he e is no eason
why i canno be used in pa ien s in ea lie s ages o less se e e o ms o PFS.
2.3.1. P epa a ion o he Pa ien
The pa ien lies on a s e che in a supine decubi us posi ion wi h he a ec ed mem-
be in ex e nal o a ion and he knee lexed abou 70°. Wi h his mo emen , he oo will
be in a side suppo posi ion wi h he in e nal ace looking upwa ds ( he punc u e o PRP
injec ion will be pe o med in his in e nal a ea). The su gical ield o he oo o be ea ed
will be p epa ed acco ding o he same p o ocol used in any o he mino ou pa ien su -
ge y. A e he pa ien has been adequa ely p epa ed and wi h he medial ace o he cal-
caneus ully exposed, he loca ion o he an e io -in e nal calcaneal ube osi y ( he poin
o maximum pain) will be de e mined by palpa ion o by ul asonog aphy. This is he
e e ence poin o he PRP in il a ion. Jus be o e he in il a ion, local supe icial anaes-
hesia will be pe o med by sp aying he skin wi h chlo oe hyl Chemi osa
®
(Labo a o ios
ERN, Ba celona, Spain), whe e e hyl chlo ide is applied un il he skin begins o whi en
[35]. The pa ien will no expe ience any pain when he needle is in oduced.
2.3.2. PRP Adminis a ion
PRP ac i a ion. PRP is ac i a ed wi h calcium chlo ide 5% and acco ding o he es ab-
lished p o ocol. The in il a ion mus be pe o med be ween 6 and 10 min a e he PRP
has been ac i a ed.
In il a ion poin . The in il a ion should be pe o med a he an e io -inne edge o
he calcaneus aking speci ic incision and/o pene a ion lines ollowing he skin olds as
a e e ence. Plan a load a eas should be a oided in o de o minimise he isk o inju y
o any asculo-ne ous s uc u e and o educe he isk o in ec ion. Ano he eason o
ecommending his ana omical a ea is he ac ha plan a skin is connec ed o he unde -
lying ascia by means o many s ong ib ous ascicles called e inacula cu is ha ac as
pa i ions di iding he subcu aneous a in o small i egula chambe s o compa men s
con aining iny essels o he de mis. They also p e en mo emen be ween he skin and
ascia. These chambe s a e la ge in he ea pa o he oo , below he calcaneus, whe e
hey ac as minia u e shock abso be s. So, i he in il a ion is gi en in he en al ace o
he calcaneus, he shock-abso bing unc ion can be comp omised and lead o heel pain
synd ome [36].
Technique o execu ion. The needle is inse ed pe pendicula ly o he skin (a an angle
o 90°), wo cen ime es om he plan a plane (lowe edge o he calcaneus), in he an-
si ion a ea be ween he skin o he medial ace o he heel and he skin o he plan a a ea
and acco ding o a linea plane be ween 1 and 3 mm om he medial ube osi y (see Fig-
u e 4). An expe auma ologis should no need o use ul asonog aphy (US) o ensu e
he co ec posi ioning o he needle; howe e , US could help new p ac i ione s.
Figu e 4. Theo e ical needle inse ion poin o he injec ion o PRP.
Figu e 4. Theo e ical needle inse ion poin o he injec ion o PRP.
When he punc u e is pe o med a an angle o 90
◦
, he needle eaches he plan a ascia
so ha when he he apis ies o p ess he plunge o he sy inge he e is conside able
esis ance (Figu e 5a) and is unable o injec he PRP. Fo his eason, he needle mus be
wi hd awn abou 5 mm and immedia ely einse ed a an angle o 5
◦
in he caudal di ec ion
so ha he plasma can be injec ed wi hou esis ance. The i s millili e o he PRP is

J. Clin. Med. 2024,13, 170 6 o 14
injec ed wi h he needle in his posi ion (Figu e 5b). Then, he needle mus be wi hd awn
abou 5 mm un il i e u ns o a plane pe pendicula o he skin and einse ed a an angle
o 5
◦
in he en al di ec ion so ha he emaining millili e o PRP can also be injec ed
wi hou esis ance (Figu e 5c).
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 o 14
When he punc u e is pe o med a an angle o 90°, he needle eaches he plan a
ascia so ha when he he apis ies o p ess he plunge o he sy inge he e is consid-
e able esis ance (Figu e 5a) and is unable o injec he PRP. Fo his eason, he needle
mus be wi hd awn abou 5 mm and immedia ely einse ed a an angle o 5° in he caudal
di ec ion so ha he plasma can be injec ed wi hou esis ance. The i s millili e o he
PRP is injec ed wi h he needle in his posi ion (Figu e 5b). Then, he needle mus be wi h-
d awn abou 5 mm un il i e u ns o a plane pe pendicula o he skin and einse ed a
an angle o 5° in he en al di ec ion so ha he emaining millili e o PRP can also be
injec ed wi hou esis ance (Figu e 5c).
Figu e 5. PRP adminis a ion: (a) plan a ascia palpa ion; (b) caudal injec ion; and (c) en al injec-
ion.
The in il a ion is gi en a an angle o 5° bo h in he caudal and en al di ec ions
because ha allows he PRP o be injec ed in o wo ana omical ca i ies big enough o e-
cei e he 2 mL. Fo his eason, he e is no need o p ess ha d on he plunge o he sy inge
(which con i ms ha he PRP has been injec ed in he igh place). Wi h his echnique,
PRP is applied o he whole plan a ascia inse ed in he calcaneus, as well as in all he
medial ube osi y, which a e p ecisely he ana omical elemen s a ec ed by he degene a-
i e pa hology equi ing ea men .
2.4. Da a Collec ion
The 25 pa ien s (see Table 1 o he demog aphic ea u es o he popula ion) selec ed
o pa icipa e in he obse a ional s udy ecei ed in il a ions in acco dance wi h he
abo e-desc ibed echnique.
Table 1. Demog aphic ea u es.
Age (Yea s) Weigh (kg) Heigh (m) BMI (kg/m
2
) Symp. Du a.
(Mon hs)
Mean ± σ 48.9 ± 9.74 76.44 ± 15.10 1.64 ± 0.09 28.24 ± 4.65 15.76 ± 11.91
BMI: Body Mass Index; Symp. Du a.: Du a ion o symp oms.
The e olu ion o he mos signi ican clinical a iables was s udied o a pe iod o 6
mon hs om Day 0 a 4 con ol isi s (Day 15, 30, 90, and 180). The a iables we e pain as
measu ed by he VAS (global assessmen o pain, desc ibed a he s a o his sec ion), he
plan a ascia hickness (PFT) in millime es measu ed by ul asonog aphy in he longi u-
dinal plane, and he ac i e ex ension o he ankle bo h in passi e soleus (AES) and passi e
gas ocnemius (AEG) as e alua ed wi h he help o a goniome e . The esul s o his e al-
ua ion a e p esen ed in Table 2 unde he o m o x ± σ, whe e x is he mean and σ is he
s anda d de ia ion.
Figu e 5. PRP adminis a ion: (a) plan a ascia palpa ion; (b) caudal injec ion; and (c) en al injec ion.
The in il a ion is gi en a an angle o 5
◦
bo h in he caudal and en al di ec ions
because ha allows he PRP o be injec ed in o wo ana omical ca i ies big enough o ecei e
he 2 mL. Fo his eason, he e is no need o p ess ha d on he plunge o he sy inge
(which con i ms ha he PRP has been injec ed in he igh place). Wi h his echnique,
PRP is applied o he whole plan a ascia inse ed in he calcaneus, as well as in all he
medial ube osi y, which a e p ecisely he ana omical elemen s a ec ed by he degene a i e
pa hology equi ing ea men .
2.4. Da a Collec ion
The 25 pa ien s (see Table 1 o he demog aphic ea u es o he popula ion) selec ed
o pa icipa e in he obse a ional s udy ecei ed in il a ions in acco dance wi h he
abo e-desc ibed echnique.
Table 1. Demog aphic ea u es.
Age (Yea s) Weigh (kg) Heigh (m) BMI (kg/m2)Symp. Du a.
(Mon hs)
Mean ±σ48.9 ±9.74 76.44 ±15.10 1.64 ±0.09 28.24 ±4.65 15.76 ±11.91
BMI: Body Mass Index; Symp. Du a.: Du a ion o symp oms.
The e olu ion o he mos signi ican clinical a iables was s udied o a pe iod o
6 mon hs om Day 0 a 4 con ol isi s (Day 15, 30, 90, and 180). The a iables we e
pain as measu ed by he VAS (global assessmen o pain, desc ibed a he s a o his
sec ion), he plan a ascia hickness (PFT) in millime es measu ed by ul asonog aphy in
he longi udinal plane, and he ac i e ex ension o he ankle bo h in passi e soleus (AES)
and passi e gas ocnemius (AEG) as e alua ed wi h he help o a goniome e . The esul s
o his e alua ion a e p esen ed in Table 2unde he o m o
x±σ
, whe e
x
is he mean
and σis he s anda d de ia ion.
2.5. S a is ical Analysis
The desc ip i e s a is ical analysis o he a iables eco ded du ing he s udy was
made using IBM SPSS 22.0 so wa e. The a iables we e exp essed as mean (
x
) and
s anda d de ia ion (
σ
). As i was a small sample (n< 30), he no mali y o he a iables was
checked wi h he Shapi o–Wilk es . When he a iables p esen ed a no mal dis ibu ion,
he S uden ’s - es was used o compa e he measu emen s; when he dis ibu ion was
J. Clin. Med. 2024,13, 170 7 o 14
no no mal, he compa ison was made wi h he Wilcoxon es . Whene e he esul s we e
s a is ically signi ican , all necessa y es s we e made o con i m ha he a iables we e
pa ame ic. In all hese es s, p- alues < 0.05 we e assumed o be s a is ically signi ican
wi h a con idence in e al o 95%.
Table 2. Da a was collec ed du ing he con ol isi s.
D0 D15 D30 D90 D180
VAS17.86 ±1.59 4.38 ±2.08 2.14 ±2.10 0.9 ±1.44 0.44 ±0.82
VAS26.98 ±1.49 3.54 ±2.37 2.1 ±2.08 0.86 ±1.32 0.52 ±0.82
VAS38.36 ±1.38 4.62 ±2.59 2.84 ±2.09 1.74 ±1.76 1.04 ±1.39
VASglobal 23.18 ±3.58 12.54 ±6.33 7.08 ±5.71 3.5 ±3.52 2 ±2.58
PFT 5.87 ±1.04 4.60 ±1.47 4.27 ±1.42 3.96 ±1.30 3.91 ±1.24
AES 12.16 ±4.97 15.36 ±4.5 17.44 ±4.23 18.4 ±4.25 18.84 ±3.99
AEG 6.36 ±5.84 9.76 ±4.98 11.8 ±3.98 12.36 ±3.91 13.36 ±3.55
3. Resul s
This sec ion desc ibes he e olu ion o each o he clinical a iables conside ed in he
sec ion ‘Da a collec ion’ du ing he en i e pe iod o he s udy (6 mon hs). Jus as in he
p e ious sec ion, he esul s a e exp essed as mean (x) and s anda d de ia ion (σ).
3.1. E olu ion o he Clinical Va iables be ween Consecu i e Visi s
Table 3shows he e olu ion (nega i e alues ep esen a dec ease and posi i e alues
ep esen an inc ease) o he s udy a iables (
x±σ
) be ween con ol isi s, as well as he
p- alue ha e lec s he s a is ical signi icance o he e olu ion. O he 28 p- alues p esen ed,
22 a e below 0.05, meaning ha he e olu ion o he a iables is s a is ically signi ican ,
which suppo s he e ec i eness o he ea men . Non-signi ican p- alues in he able
ha e been ma ked wi h an as e isk. All hese alues can be seen om Visi 3 (D30) onwa ds
and a e mos ly concen a ed be ween Visi s 4 (D90) and 5 (D180). This means ha while
he pa ien s’ condi ion con inues o imp o e un il he 6 mon h pe iod is o e , he mos
signi ican imp o emen akes place in he i s weeks.
Table 3. E olu ion o he alues in ela ion o he p e ious isi .
D0–D15 p-Value D15–D30 p-Value D30–D90 p-Value D90–D180 p-Value
VAS1−5.72 ±2.24 0.000 −2.24 ±1.73 0.000 −1.24 ±1.76 0.003 −0.46 ±1.49 0.138 *
VAS2−4.86 ±1.74 0.000 −1.44 ±1.85 0.000 −1.24 ±2.34 0.017 −0.34 ±1.04 0.117 *
VAS3−5.52 ±2.31 0.000 −1.78 ±2.58 0.008 −1.10 ±2.25 0.030 −0.7 ±1.19 0.007
VAS
global −16.10 ±5.42 0.000 −5.46 ±4.89 0.000 −3.58 ±5.47 0.007 −1.5 ±2.90 0.016
PFT −1.60 ±1.13 0.000 −0.33 ±0.61 0.000 −0.30 ±0.41 0.002 −0.05 ±0.320 0.424 *
AES 5.28 ±3.51 0.000 2.08 ±3.93 0.017 0.96 ±4.39 0.245 * 0.44 ±4.33 0.530 *
AEG 5.44 ±4.95 0.000 2.04 ±3.67 0.019 0.56 ±4.16 0.384 * 1.56 ±3.41 0.034
*p- alue no s a is ically signi ican wi h a con idence in e al o 95%.
A se ies o g aphs a e p esen ed o gi e a clea e image o he e olu ion o he esul s
o each a iable. The way he a e age o he ou VAS pain ypologies con inues o
dec ease (Figu e 6a) clea ly e lec s a g adual imp o emen . The e olu ion o hese a iables
be ween isi s (Figu e 6b) shows ha he imp o emen became p og essi ely less ma ked
bu con inued un il he las isi . The same ype o e olu ion (g adual imp o emen ) occu s
in he case o plan a ascia hickness (PFT), which is p esen ed in Figu e 7. Figu e 7a
p esen s he e olu ion o he dec ease in he PFT om D0 o D180, and Figu e 7b displays
he di e ence expe ienced in PFT be ween isi s.
J. Clin. Med. 2024,13, 170 8 o 14
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 o 14
bu con inued un il he las isi . The same ype o e olu ion (g adual imp o emen ) oc-
cu s in he case o plan a ascia hickness (PFT), which is p esen ed in Figu e 7. Figu e 7a
p esen s he e olu ion o he dec ease in he PFT om D0 o D180, and igu e 7b displays
he di e ence expe ienced in PFT be ween isi s.
Figu e 6. E olu ion o he ou VAS pain ypologies h oughou he s udy.
Figu e 7. E olu ion o he plan a ascia hickness h oughou he s udy.
Finally, Figu e 8a shows he e olu ion o he mobili y o he ankle (ac i e ex ension),
measu ed in bo h passi e soleus and passi e gas ocnemius. Bo h a iables show ha he
mobili y o he oo a ec ed by PFS inc eased in each con ol isi ollowing he in il a ion
wi h PRP. The e olu ion o his a iable be ween isi s (Figu e 8b) shows ha he im-
p o emen became p og essi ely less ma ked bu con inued un il he las isi .
Figu e 8. E olu ion o ankle mobili y h oughou he s udy
Figu e 6. E olu ion o he ou VAS pain ypologies h oughou he s udy.
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 o 14
bu con inued un il he las isi . The same ype o e olu ion (g adual imp o emen ) oc-
cu s in he case o plan a ascia hickness (PFT), which is p esen ed in Figu e 7. Figu e 7a
p esen s he e olu ion o he dec ease in he PFT om D0 o D180, and igu e 7b displays
he di e ence expe ienced in PFT be ween isi s.
Figu e 6. E olu ion o he ou VAS pain ypologies h oughou he s udy.
Figu e 7. E olu ion o he plan a ascia hickness h oughou he s udy.
Finally, Figu e 8a shows he e olu ion o he mobili y o he ankle (ac i e ex ension),
measu ed in bo h passi e soleus and passi e gas ocnemius. Bo h a iables show ha he
mobili y o he oo a ec ed by PFS inc eased in each con ol isi ollowing he in il a ion
wi h PRP. The e olu ion o his a iable be ween isi s (Figu e 8b) shows ha he im-
p o emen became p og essi ely less ma ked bu con inued un il he las isi .
Figu e 8. E olu ion o ankle mobili y h oughou he s udy
Figu e 7. E olu ion o he plan a ascia hickness h oughou he s udy.
Finally, Figu e 8a shows he e olu ion o he mobili y o he ankle (ac i e ex ension),
measu ed in bo h passi e soleus and passi e gas ocnemius. Bo h a iables show ha
he mobili y o he oo a ec ed by PFS inc eased in each con ol isi ollowing he in il-
a ion wi h PRP. The e olu ion o his a iable be ween isi s (Figu e 8b) shows ha he
imp o emen became p og essi ely less ma ked bu con inued un il he las isi .
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 o 14
bu con inued un il he las isi . The same ype o e olu ion (g adual imp o emen ) oc-
cu s in he case o plan a ascia hickness (PFT), which is p esen ed in Figu e 7. Figu e 7a
p esen s he e olu ion o he dec ease in he PFT om D0 o D180, and igu e 7b displays
he di e ence expe ienced in PFT be ween isi s.
Figu e 6. E olu ion o he ou VAS pain ypologies h oughou he s udy.
Figu e 7. E olu ion o he plan a ascia hickness h oughou he s udy.
Finally, Figu e 8a shows he e olu ion o he mobili y o he ankle (ac i e ex ension),
measu ed in bo h passi e soleus and passi e gas ocnemius. Bo h a iables show ha he
mobili y o he oo a ec ed by PFS inc eased in each con ol isi ollowing he in il a ion
wi h PRP. The e olu ion o his a iable be ween isi s (Figu e 8b) shows ha he im-
p o emen became p og essi ely less ma ked bu con inued un il he las isi .
Figu e 8. E olu ion o ankle mobili y h oughou he s udy
Figu e 8. E olu ion o ankle mobili y h oughou he s udy.
3.2. E olu ion o Clinical Va iables in Rela ion o he Day o T ea men
Wha e e he pa hology, i is pa icula ly impo an o measu e he e olu ion o he
pa ien s’ condi ion compa ed o he baseline. This pe iod is assumed o co espond o
hei wo s clinical s a us. Table 4shows he e olu ion o all he a iables a each o
J. Clin. Med. 2024,13, 170 9 o 14
he con ol isi s in ela ion o he beginning o he ea men (D0) and hei espec i e
s a is ical signi icance. In his case, all alues a e s a is ically signi ican (p- alue < 0.05).
This con i ms he a ou able e olu ion h oughou he s udy o he pa ien s unde going
he ea men desc ibed he ein.
Table 4. E olu ion o he a iables in ela ion o he s a o he ea men (D0).
D0–D15 p-Value D0–D30 p-Value D0–D90 p-Value D0–D180 p-Value
VAS1−3.48 ±1.94 0.000 −5.72 ±2.24 0.000 −6.96 ±1.91 0.000 −7.42 ±1.93 0.000
VAS2−3.42 ±2.20 0.000 −4.86 ±1.74 0.000 −6.10 ±2.06 0.000 −6.44 ±1.68 0.000
VAS3−3.74 ±2.70 0.000 −5.52 ±2.31 0.000 −6.62 ±2.22 0.000 −7.32 ±1.82 0.000
VAS
global −10.64 ±6.35 0.000 −16.10 ±5.42 0.000 −19.68 ±5.18 0.000 −21.18 ±4.65 0.000
PFT −1.27 ±1.01 0.000 −1.60 ±1.13 0.000 −1.91 ±1.07 0.000 −1.96 ±1.09 0.000
AES 3.20 ±4.42 0.000 5.28 ±3.51 0.000 4.97 ±4.25 0.000 6.68 ±5.28 0.000
AEG 3.40 ±4.95 0.000 5.44 ±4.95 0.000 5.85 ±3.91 0.000 7.00 ±5.22 0.000
The mean alue o all simple VASx dec eased by mo e han 6 poin s, while he mean
alue o VAS
global
dec eased by mo e han 21 poin s. The mean alue o PFT dec eases
by 1.96 mm. This educ ion is almos wice he size as he one gene a ed by low- ol age
elec ical impulses [
31
] (1.05 mm), un il now conside ed one o he mos signi ican in he
echnical li e a u e. Finally, in wha conce ns he ac i e ex ension o he ankle, he mean
mobili y inc eases by 6
◦
in he passi e soleus and 7
◦
in he passi e gas ocnemius. As a
inal obse a ion o esul s, i should be men ioned ha since he ou h isi (D90), none o
he pa ien s ha e had any clinical symp oms equi ing ea men .
4. Discussion
The diagnosis o Plan a Fascia Synd ome (PFS) is he esul o g ouping di e en
symp oms and signs o a mul i ac o ial pa hology loca ed in he en hesis be ween he
plan a ascia and he medial calcaneal ube osi y.
Any biomechanical al e na ion o one elemen o he ankle’s ex enso appa a us
( he plan a lexo ), which comp ises he iceps su ae, he calcaneus, and he plan a
ascia, could cause PFS. Fo ins ance, a con ac u e o he iceps su ae (composed o he
gas ocnemius, soleus, and plan a is muscles, con e ging wi h he Achilles endon) due
o excessi e ac i i y could dis up he posi ioning o he calcaneus du ing he walking
mo emen . This al e a ion could po en ially modi y he con ac ion–dis ension mechanisms
o he ascia, leading o he de elopmen o he pa hology. Howe e , as he e is no eal
knowledge o he pa hogenesis o PFS, no e en o he pa hology ha occu s in his
ana omical a ea, no consensus has been eached ei he in e ms o de ini ion o in e ms
o he name o apply o he inju ies ound in he plan a ascia and in he calcaneus. This
makes i easy o hink ha he e is no e ec i e conse a i e ea men capable o sol ing
his e y pain ul pa hology. In addi ion, due o he lack o igo ous s udies wo ldwide
based on scien i ic e idence, i has no been possible o make ca ego ical s a emen s abou
he ue use ulness o PRP in he ea men o di e en endon and aponeu osis diseases,
and, mo e speci ically, o he pa hology a ec ing he en hesis be ween he plan a ascia
and he calcaneus.
The i ues o he echnique p esen ed in his pape a e based, i s ly, on knowing
how o de ine he s uc u es damaged in he PFS, ha is he plan a ascia o aponeu osis
and he calcaneus; secondly, on he knowledge o he PRP he apeu ic capaci y bo h in
so issue ( he ascia) and in ha d issue ( he bone); and hi dly, and las ly, on ha ing
de e mined he adequa e dosage o PRP. The decision o adminis e no mo e han 2 mL o
PRP was suppo ed by he ana omical space exis en in he hind oo and by he his o y o
he angiogenic e ec o PRP.
The ea men o PFS wi h one in il a ion o 2 mL o PRP has led o clinical im-
p o emen s ha can be labelled as success ul when e alua ed acco ding o he published
c i e ia [
37
] because i has been objec i ely shown ha he imp o emen s achie ed a