scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

A finite deformation membrane based on inter-atomic potentials for the transverse mechanics of nanotubes

Abstract

A finite deformation hyper-elastic membrane theory based on inter-atomic potentials for crystalline films composed of a single atomic layer is developed. For this purpose, an extension of the standard Born rule that exploits the differential geometry concept of the exponential map is proposed to deal with the curvature of surfaces. The exponential map is approximated locally and strain measures based on the stretch and the curvature of the membrane arise. The methodology is first particularized to atomic chains in two dimensions, and then to graphene sheets. A reduced model for the transverse mechanics of carbon nanotubes is developed in detail. This model is a hyper-elastic constrained membrane which fully exploits the symmetry of the transverse deformation. Additionally, a continuum version of the non-bonded interactions is provided. The continuum model is discretized using finite elements and very good agreement with molecular mechanics simulations is obtained. Finally, several simulations illustrate the strong effect of the van der Waals interactions in the transverse deformation of carbon nanotubes.

Read accessible full text

A finite deformation membrane based on inter-atomic potentials for the transverse mechanics of nanotubes

Author: Arroyo Balaguer, Marino,Belytschko, T.
Year: 2003
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-6636(02)00270-3
Source: https://upcommons.upc.edu/bitstream/2117/8551/3/2003-MM-AB-blanc.pdf
ec o s. In addi ion o he ex ac ion o elas ic
ma e ial enso s, hese models ha e been used wi h
he fini e elemen me hod o sol e bounda y alue
p oblems, such as he nano-inden a ion o silicon
(Tadmo e al., 1999). I he de o ma ion is no
uni o m enough o he local heo y o hold, mixed
con inuum a omis ic app oaches ha e been p o-
posed o deal wi h inhomogenei ies o de ec s
(Tadmo e al., 1996; Shenoy e al., 1999).
The appeal o he app oach based on he Bo n
ule s ems om he ac ha i gi es ise o fini e
de o ma ion cons i u i e models based on he
nano-scale physics a he han phenomenologi-
cal ma e ial models. The in e -a omic po en ials,
based on expe imen al da a and quan um me-
chanical conside a ions o calcula ions, a e hus a
he co e o he esul ing s ain ene gy densi y. A
local quasicon inuum has also been de eloped
based on he igh -binding me hod (Tadmo e al.,
1999).
This pape deals wi h he applica ion o such a
heo y o he mechanics o ca bon nano ubes.
Since he disco e y o hese c ys alline ubes in
1991, many s udies ha e ocused on hei unique
mechanical p ope ies, h ough expe imen s (Yu
e al., 2000; Chop a e al., 1995; Yu e al., 2001b),
molecula dynamics (MD) and molecula me-
chanics (MM) simula ions (Be nholc e al., 1998;
Gao e al., 1998) and fi s -p inciples calcula ions
(Zhou e al., 2001; Mai i, 2000). Al hough molec-
ula simula ions seem well sui ed o s udy hese
sys ems, hey a e no comple ely sa is ac o y. In-
deed, hey a e e y demanding om he compu-
a ional poin o iew. The leng h scales (
AA) and
ime scales (ps) ha mus be esol ed a e o en well
below he scales o p ac ical in e es o a pa ic-
ula p oblem. In addi ion, al hough sys ems o
o e one million nuclei a e cu en ly being ana-
lyzed, one can always en ision la ge p oblems o
which he compu ing capabili ies do no suffice.
An app oach ha can alle ia e some o he
d awbacks o molecula simula ions is he use o
con inuum mechanics. The abili y o con inuum
models o desc ibe he mechanics o nano ubes has
been no ed by se e al au ho s. C oss-sec ion con-
inuum models ha e been used o explain expe i-
men al obse a ions on he ans e se s abili y o
nano ubes (Chop a e al., 1995; Yu e al., 2001a).
These ex emely simplified models b ing insigh s as
well as quan i a i e in o ma ion on he physical
phenomena ha go e n he s abili y o he ci cula
and he collapsed configu a ions obse ed in na-
no ubes. The ib a ional p ope ies o ca bon na-
no ubes ha e been in es iga ed h ough linea
elas ici y by Sohlbe g e al. (1998). The elas ic
p ope ies o ca bon nano ubes as a con inuum,
neglec ing all cu a u e effec s, ha e in es iga ed
by Lu (1997). Zhong-Can e al. (1997) conside ed
he nano ube o be an inex ensible memb ane, and
ob ained an exp ession o he elas ic ene gy in
e ms o he cu a u e o a amily o simple de-
o ma ions. Yakobson e al. (1996) used he heo y
o elas ic shells and linea ized bi u ca ion analysis
o s udy he buckling pa e ns o comp essed ca -
bon nano ubes obse ed in MD simula ions. Qian
e al. (2001) used a 3D con inuum heo y com-
bined wi h a mesh- ee app oxima ion o s udy C60
molecules inside nano ubes.
Ne e heless, he p oposed models so a a e
ei he o e -simplified, es ic ed o he linea e-
gime, o o e y pa icula si ua ions, and do no
cons i u e a sys ema ic con inuum app oach o he
mechanics o nano ubes. This is pa icula ly ue
wi h ega ds o he la ge de o ma ions. Indeed,
expe imen s (Chop a e al., 1995; Fal o e al.,
1997), MD/MM simula ions (Be nholc e al.,
1998) and fi s -p inciples calcula ions (Mai i,
2000) show ha ca bon nano ubes unde go e y
la ge de o ma ions, wi h highly non-linea beha -
io and s ill emain elas ic in he sense ha he
de o ma ions a e e e sible, wi h s able bonds and
in ac bond opology.
F om hese conside a ions, de eloping a fini e
de o ma ion model based on he Bo n ule and on
nano-scale physics applicable o nano ubes would
be o g ea in e es and would fill in a gap in he
p esen use o con inuum models o model c ys-
alline films one a om hick. Apa om he
physical insigh s ha a con inuum model b ings,
such a desc ip ion could be he basis o an effi-
cien nume ical simula ion me hodology, in con-
as wi h he some imes oo de ailed molecula
simula ions. Efficiency becomes an issue when
nano- opes bundles o ens o hund eds o na-
no ubes o mul i-walled nano ubes se e al mi-
c ons long (Ruoff e al., 1993; Yu e al., 2000) a e
2
o be analyzed. Fu he mo e, a con inuum me-
chanics heo y allows us o exploi he symme y
o ce ain si ua ions explici ly, analogously o he
plane s ain and plane s ess si ua ions in 3D
elas ici y. Such educed models o he ans e se
beha io o nano ubes a e one o he opics p e-
sen ed in his pape .
Un o una ely, he adi ional app oach based
on he Bo n ule wo ks o bulk ma e ials bu ails
o ex end di ec ly o he case o c ys alline films
and opes one a om hick de o ming in highe di-
mensional spaces, i.e. 3D in he case o films, and
2D o 3D in he case o opes. The p esen pape
desc ibes some mechanical effec s ha a ise om a
ecen ex ension o he Bo n ule o memb anes
(A oyo and Bely schko, 2002). The ex ension is
based on he diffe en ial geome y concep o he
exponen ial map, and is he e called he exponen ial
Bo n ule. An al e na i e app oach has been e-
po ed by F iesecke and James (2000).
The ou line o his pape is as ollows: we fi s
p esen he Bo n ule o bulk ma e ials, in es i-
ga e i s s uc u e and explain why i b eaks down
o films (Sec ion 2). Then, a e some geome ic
p elimina ies, Sec ion 3 in oduces he p oposed
exponen ial Bo n ule in an abs ac and gene al
way. This abs ac p esen a ion o he heo y is
complemen ed by i s ealiza ion in he simples , ye
comple e, si ua ion, i.e. an a omic chain de o ming
in wo dimensions. The o mula ion o he equi -
alen con inuum ope-like objec is de ailed in
Sec ion 4, and a simple example illus a ing he
effec i eness o his model in mimicking he a omic
chain is p o ided. P e ious o he applica ion o
he heo y o ca bon nano ubes, hei c ys alline
s uc u e, as well as he ins ance o in e -a omic
po en ial conside ed, a e desc ibed in Sec ion 5.
Sec ion 6 desc ibes in de ail he model o he
ans e se mechanics o ca bon nano ubes. The
implemen a ion o he new heo y o he a bi a y
de o ma ion o he con inuum memb ane in 3D is
p esen ed in A oyo and Bely schko (2002). The
B a ais mul i-la ice na u e o g aphene equi es
he ea men o addi ional in e nal a iables, he
so-called inne displacemen s. Addi ionally, he
an de Waals in e ac ions a e also accoun ed o
in he con inuum heo y, and he con inuum
a ia ional s a emen o he p oblem as well as he
Lag angian s ess measu es ha na u ally a ise a e
desc ibed. Finally, a alida ion es compa ing he
p oposed con inuum model disc e ized wi h fini e
elemen s o molecula calcula ions is p o ided in
Sec ion 7. Se e al simula ions highligh ing he
ele ance o he an de Waals o ces in he
ans e se configu a ions o ca bon nano ubes and
nano- opes a e also included in his sec ion.
2. B eakdown o he Bo n ule o films
The o mula ion o a fini e de o ma ion con-
inuum model o space-filling de ec less c ys als
based on he Bo n ule is ela i ely s aigh o -
wa d. The Bo n ule links he a omis ic de o ma-
ion o ha o he con inuum medium. Then, a
ep esen a i e c ys alli e is conside ed, and, o a
gi en con inuum de o ma ion, he con inuum
s ain ene gy densi y is defined o be he ene gy o
he c ys alli e subjec o he de o ma ion di ided
by i s olume. The de ails o he p ocedu e a e
p esen ed in se e al o he a icles e e enced in
Sec ion 1, and will also be b iefly desc ibed la e in
he p esen pape . The ocus o his sec ion is
on he undamen al kinema ic assump ion ha
links he con inuum and he a omic de o ma ions,
i.e. he Bo n ule. The de ails o he a omic model
a e delibe a ely omi ed. La e , an ins ance o an
a omic model is adop ed.
2.1. The s anda d Bo n ule
Assume o he momen ha we a e dealing
wi h space-filling con inuum bodies, i.e. open
subse s o he ambien Euclidean space. Le Ube
he de o ma ion ha maps he unde o med body
X0Rn, in o Rn,nbeing ei he 1, 2 o 3. I X
deno es a poin in he unde o med body, i s image
a e de o ma ion is x¼UðXÞ. The de o med
body is deno ed as X¼UðX0Þand is an open se o
Rn. The de o ma ion g adien is he de i a i e o
he ec o - alued ec o ial unc ion U,F¼
DU¼oU=oX2Rnn. A each poin X, he de o -
ma ion g adien is a linea ans o ma ion om Rn
in o Rn, which maps ‘‘infini esimal’’ ma e ial ec-
o s, dx¼FdX(see Mal e n, 1969, p. 156).
3
F om a diffe en ial geome y poin o iew, he
de o ma ion g adien is called he angen map o
U, and is deno ed as F¼TU. Le us call he in-
fini esimal neighbo hoods o Xand x he angen
spaces o he unde o med body and he de o med
one, espec i ely deno ed as TXX0and TxX(see
Fig. 1 o an illus a ion). Then, using his lan-
guage, he de o ma ion map Umaps he unde-
o med body in o he de o med one, and he
angen map F¼TUmaps he angen space o
he unde o med body in o he angen space o he
de o med body.
In he absence o slips, phase ansi ions and
o he special c ys allog aphic phenomena, he
Cauchy and Bo n hypo hesis o c ys als a e
equi alen o homogeneous de o ma ions (E -
icksen, 1984). Wha is e e ed o as he Bo n ule
in some wo ks is simply called he me hod o ho-
mogeneous de o ma ions in o he s (Ma in, 1975;
Cousins, 1978). The Bo n hypo hesis consis s o
assuming ha he la ice ec o s de o m as would
ma e ial line elemen s in a homogeneous de o -
ma ion:
a¼FA;ð1Þ
whe e Adeno es an unde o med la ice ec o and
a he same ec o in he de o med c ys al. The
geome y o he la ice ec o s, ha is hei leng h
and he angles hey o m wi h o he la ice ec o s
in he de o med c ys al, can he e o e be ex ac ed
om he con inuum de o ma ion h ough he
G een de o ma ion enso C¼FTFusing s anda d
con inuum mechanics ela ions:
kak¼ ACA
pand cos h¼ACB
kakkbk;ð2Þ
whe e Band b ep esen ano he unde o med
and de o med la ice ec o and his he angle a
and b o m in he de o med c ys al. Once he
geome y o he de o med la ice ec o s is linked
o he con inuum de o ma ion, a cons i u i e
model based on he a omic in e ac ions can be
cons uc ed by iden i ying he con inuum s ain
ene gy densi y wi h he po en ial ene gy o he
a omic sys em o a ep esen a i e cell di ided by
i s olume.
One could a gue ha he ule exp essed by Eq.
(1) is o mally inconsis en , because he la ice
ec o s Aand a, each connec ing wo a omic po-
si ions, a e physical en i ies ha lie in he unde-
o med and de o med body espec i ely, while he
angen map F¼TUmaps elemen s o he angen
o he unde o med body in o elemen s o he an-
gen o he de o med body. This inconsis ency can
also be iewed om a mo e classic s andpoin : he
la ice ec o s ha e fini e leng h while he de o -
ma ion g adien maps ‘‘infini esimal’’ ma e ial
ec o s, dx¼FdX. These objec ions a e ci cum-
en ed by no ing ha o homogeneous de o ma-
ions, Eq. (1) holds exac ly, e en o ma e ial
ec o s o fini e leng h. The Bo n ule assumes
ha , a leas ‘‘locally’’, i.e. in he scale o he la ice
ec o s, he de o ma ion is homogeneous.
2.2. Why he case o films is mo e difficul
Conside now he case in which we ha e a single
a om hick c ys alline film (such as a g aphene
shee ) de o ming a bi a ily in 3D. I is na u al in
his case o ea he con inuum solid as a mem-
b ane wi hou hickness. The shee is hen a wo-
mani old embedded in R3(a su ace). I is assumed
ha he a oms lie on he su ace (CauchyÕs hy-
po hesis), and he e o e he la ice ec o s a e
cho ds o he su ace. We would like o use he
Bo n ule in o de o exp ess he geome y o he
de o med la ice ec o s in e ms o he some
con inuum a iable cha ac e izing he de o ma-
ion o he su ace, such as he G een de o ma ion
enso .
Suppose ha he unde o med body is plana ,
like a plana g aphene shee . In his case, X0an
open se in R2. The de o ma ion map ans o ms
his o iginally plana body in o a cu ed mem-
Fig. 1. De o ma ion map and i s angen map o space filling
bodies.
4

F¼g1I1þg2I2;ð7Þ
whe e I1;I2gis he dual basis o I1;I2g. Thus, a
ec o W¼WIII2TXX0is ans o med by he
de o ma ion g adien in o w¼FW ¼WIgI2
TUðXÞX. The e o e, he ma ix ep esen a ion o F
in he Ca esian/con ec ed basis gIIJgis he
22 iden i y ma ix, he in o ma ion abou he
de o ma ion being con ained in he con ec ed
basis ec o s. We can also define he G een de-
o ma ion enso C¼FTF. I s componen s in he
Ca esian basis o X0coincide wi h hese o he
me ic enso in he con ec ed basis p esen ed in
Eq. (6).
The enso Ccan be used o measu e leng h,
angle and a ea changes due o he de o ma ion in
e ms o unde o med body quan i ies, i.e. Cop-
e a es in TX0. In pa icula he elemen o a ea o
Xcan be w i en in e ms o he elemen o a ea o
X0as dX¼JdX0whe e he Jacobian is J¼
de gIJ
p. Also, he s e ch in he di ec ion o a uni
ec o E2TXX0is K¼ECðXÞE
p.
3.1.2. The second undamen al o m: he cu a u e
The uni no mal o he su ace Xcan be defined
as
n¼g1g2
kg1g2k;ð8Þ
whe e kkdeno es he Euclidean no m. The sec-
ond undamen al o m o he de o med body kcan
be exp essed in he basis gIgJgin e ms o i s
componen s:
kIJ ¼ngI;J;ð9Þ
whe e gI;Jdeno es he de i a i e o gIwi h espec
o XJ. The no mal cu a u e kna a poin xo he
su ace Xand in a gi en di ec ion defined by he
uni ec o ¼ IgI2TxX, is he minimum o
he cu a u es o all he cu es o Xpassing
h ough x angen o . I can be ob ained as:
knðxÞ¼kIJ I J:ð10Þ
Suppose he no mal cu a u e o he de o med
body is o be compu ed a a poin x¼UðXÞ2Xin
a gi en di ec ion V¼VIII2TXX0o he unde-
o med body. This di ec ion co esponds in he
de o med body o ¼FV ¼VIgI, whe e Eq. (7)
has been used. The e o e, a e no malizing , he
esul ing exp ession o he no mal cu a u e is:
knðxÞ¼ kIJ VIVJ
gMN VMVN
p;ð11Þ
whe e he denomina o co esponds o he Eu-
clidean no m o .
3.1.3. The exponen ial map
A simple defini ion o he exponen ial map is
gi en in Mo gan (1993) o a mani old M:
The exponen ial map exppa a poin pin M
maps he angen space TpMin o Mby send-
ing a ec o in TpM o he poin in Ma dis-
ance j jalong he geodesic om pin he
di ec ion .
The exponen ial map is in e ible and diffe en-
iable in a neighbo hood o each egula poin po
he mani old. I can be defined because o he ex-
is ence and uniqueness o geodesics a any poin
gi en a di ec ion in he angen space. The expo-
nen ial map is defined he e in abs ac e ms be-
cause i s e alua ion equi es he knowledge o he
geodesics. In gene al, ob aining he geodesics in-
ol es sol ing he geodesic diffe en ial equa ions.
These equa ions a e a sys em o non-linea o di-
na y diffe en ial equa ions whose unknowns a e
he pa ame ic coo dina es o he geodesic, and
whose coefficien s a e he Ch is offel symbols o
he su ace. Finding he geodesics, and hus he
exponen ial map, is much simple in some pa ic-
ula cases, as will be shown o he cylinde . Mo e
de ails abou he exponen ial map o su aces can
be ound in do Ca mo (1976). Fig. 3 p o ides an
illus a ion o how he exponen ial map b ings a
angen ec o o he su ace.
Fig. 3. Illus a ion o he exponen ial Bo n ule; he geodesic a
xin he di ec ion o wis ep esen ed by a dashed line.
6
3.2. Exponen ial Bo n ule
In he p esen heo y, he con inuum solid
equi alen o he o iginal single laye c ys alline
film is a memb ane wi hou hickness. The nuclei
o he a omis ic sys em lie on his su ace and
consequen ly he la ice ec o s a e cho ds o he
su ace. Le Adeno e an unde o med la ice ec-
o . In he p esen se ing, since he unde o med
body is plana , X0and TX0can be iden ified, and
consequen ly Acan be ans o med h ough he
de o ma ion g adien . The esul o he ans o -
ma ion w¼FA is simply he de o med la ice
ec o we would ob ain h ough he s anda d Bo n
ule. Howe e he ec o wis angen o he de-
o med su ace X, no a cho d. Conside he ol-
lowing gene alized kinema ic ule, called he
exponen ial Bo n ule in he ollowing:
a:¼expUðXÞFA:ð12Þ
Desc ibed in wo ds, his map akes a la ice ec o
in he unde o med body Aemana ing om Xand
ans o ms i in o a ec o win he angen o he
de o med body Xa x¼UðXÞ. Then, his ec o is
mapped om he angen space o he de o med
su ace h ough he exponen ial map, which
‘‘b ings’’ he esul o he s anda d Bo n ule back
o he su ace, hence defining a cho d (see Fig. 3
o an illus a ion o his p ocedu e). Thus, he
exponen ial Bo n ule links he de o ma ion o he
la ice ec o s o he de o ma ion o he con in-
uum objec , since bo h he de o ma ion g adien
and he exponen ial map a e defined in e ms o
he de o ma ion map U.
This ex ended kinema ic ule p o ides a heo-
e ical amewo k o he applica ion o c ys al
elas ici y o cu ed c ys als, by ec i ying he
sho comings o he s anda d Bo n ule. No e
howe e ha i s p ac ical implemen a ion is no
s aigh o wa d, since he e alua ion o he expo-
nen ial map equi es he de e mina ion o he
geodesics, which in gene al en ails he in eg a ion
o a sys em o wo non-linea diffe en ial equa-
ions. This esul s in a compu a ionally e y
complex me hod ha is necessa ily non-local. He e
we p esen app oxima ions o he exponen ial map
ha ende he model local and compu a ionally
easible.
4. A omic chain in 2D
In his sec ion, we illus a e he exponen ial
Bo n ule o he simples case, an a omic chain
de o ming in 2D. The esul ing con inuum model
is a hype -elas ic ope whose s ain ene gy densi y
depends on he s e ch and he cu a u e o he
con inuum objec . This cons i u i e model is based
exclusi ely on he a omis ic desc ip ion o he
chain. In his case he exponen ial map is ap-
p oxima ed a each poin by he exponen ial map
o he ci cle, o which a closed- o m exp ession is
s aigh o wa d.
4.1. A omic model
The s ain ene gy o he a omic sys em is de-
sc ibed by means o bond s e ch Vsand bond
angle Vhpo en ials. The s ain po en ial ene gy o
he a omic chain can be w i en as a unc ion o
he nuclea posi ions xi:
Pchainðx1;...;xnÞ¼X
nB
k1
VsðakÞþX
mB
l1
VhðhlÞ;
ð13Þ
whe e akdeno es he bond leng hs, hldeno es he
angle ha adjacen bonds o m, and nBand mBa e
he numbe o bonds and adjacen bonds, espec-
i ely. This pa icula a omis ic model is chosen
o simplici y, bu he app oach is no es ic ed o
his s uc u e o he in e -a omic po en ial by any
means. The exponen ial Bo n ule p o ides a link
be ween he a omis ic and he con inuum de o -
ma ions, and can be combined wi h any a omis ic
model o choice, no es ic ed o closes -neighbo
models.
4.2. Con inuum model
As illus a ed in Fig. 4, he unde o med body is
conside ed o be a 1D line segmen ha is allowed
o de o m in 2D. The e o e, he de o ma ion map
can be desc ibed as x¼UðXÞ¼U1ðXÞi1þU2ðXÞi2
wi h X2X0Rand i1;i2g he basis o R2. In his
case, he componen s o he de o ma ion g adien
a e ½F¼½U1
;X;U2
;XT, and he G een de o ma ion
enso Cis a scala , whose squa e oo is he
s e ch Ko he de o med ope:
7
K¼C
p¼ ðU1
;XÞ2þðU2
;XÞ2
q:ð14Þ
The no mal cu a u e kno he de o med ope can
be w i en as:
kn¼1
K3ðU2
;XU1
;XX U1
;XU2
;XX Þ;ð15Þ
and can be in e p e ed geome ically as he in e se
o he adius o cu a u e o he cu e.
As we men ioned in Sec ion 3.2, in o de o
ob ain a p ac ical me hod he exponen ial Bo n
ule needs o be app oxima ed. I is desi able ha
he app oxima ion o he exponen ial Bo n ule
leads o a local model, i.e. one in which he s ain
ene gy depends on he local de o ma ion o he
ope. The s a egy ollowed o ob ain such an ap-
p oxima ion is o pe o m he exponen ial map a
each poin , no o he o iginal cu e, bu o a ci cle
o adius ¼1=knwi h he same no mal as he
o iginal cu e (see Fig. 4). Thus, locally, his ci cle
eplaces he o iginal cu e. The exponen ial map o
he ci cle is eadily a ailable in closed o m.
The fi s pa o he exponen ial Bo n ule maps
he la ice ec o Ao leng h Ain o a ec o an-
gen o he cu e whose componen s a e
½w¼A½F. The e o e, i s leng h is
w¼C
pA:ð16Þ
The exponen ial map o he ci cle is illus a ed in
Fig. 5. The leng h o he angen ec o wis
‘‘walked’’ on he geodesic o ob ain expUðXÞw, and
he e o e he cho d a. Since he geodesic o he
ci cle is i ially he ci cle i sel , he leng h o he
a c defined by he ends o ais w.
Le hdeno e he angle o med by wo adjacen
de o med la ice ec o s. Conside he iangle
o med by he ends o aand he cen e o he
ci cle. This iangle is isosceles, and i s equal angles
a e h=2. The e o e i s hi d angle, he angle sub-
ended by he a c o leng h w,isc¼ph. Con-
sequen ly, we can ela e he leng h o he a c, w, o
he adius o he ci cle ¼1=knand he angle c:
w¼c ¼ðphÞ=kn:ð17Þ
Since he leng h o he unequal side o he iangle
can be easily compu ed as
a¼kak¼2 sin c
2;ð18Þ
i ollows ha
a¼2
kn
sin knw
2and h¼pknw:ð19Þ
No e om Eqs. (16) and (19) ha he quan i ies a
and h, which a e he a gumen s o he a omis ic
ene gy (see Eq. (13)), a e exp essed in e ms o he
con inuum de o ma ion.
The nex s ep is o conside a ep esen a i e
c ys alli e o he a omis ic sys em, which in his
case is a cell o leng h Aincluding a single nucleus
in he unde o med c ys al. In a homogeniza ion
p ocess, he ene gy o his de o med cell con ain-
ing one bond and one angle be ween adjacen
bonds is iden ified o he s ain ene gy densi y o
he con inuum mul iplied by he unde o med ol-
ume o he cell: AWðUÞ¼VsðaÞþVhðhÞ. Since
ou aim is o o mula e a hype -elas ic con inuum
model, he elas ic po en ial WðUÞis a s ain ene gy
pe unde o med olume, in his case unde o med
Fig. 5. The exponen ial map o he ci cle defined a each poin
o he cu e by he uni no mal and he no mal cu a u e.
Fig. 4. Illus a ion o he con inuum ope like model o an
a omic chain de o ming in 2D.
8
leng h. The con inuum s ain ene gy densi y de-
pends on he de o ma ion map U h ough he local
s ain measu es Cand kn. The e o e, he hype -
elas ic po en ial o he con inuum ope can be
w i en as:
WðC;knÞ¼1
AVs2=knsinðknC
pA=2Þ
hinþVhp
hknC
pAio:ð20Þ
The o al s ain ene gy o he con inuum sys em
app oxima ing he a omis ic ene gy o Eq. (13) can
hen be w i en as:
P opeðUÞ¼ZX0
WðC;knÞdX0:ð21Þ
By aking de i a i es o he hype -elas ic po en ial
Wwi h espec o he s ain measu es, Lag angian
s ess measu es a ise: he wo k conjuga e o Cis an
axial s ess analogous o he second Piola Ki ch-
hoff s ess enso , and he conjuga e o knis a
bending momen -like s ess. Second de i a i es
lead o he axial, bending and coupled axial-
bending elas ic angen moduli.
4.3. Example and discussion
Suppose an ini ially ec ilinea unde o med
ope o leng h nA is ben in o a ci cle o adius
wi h uni o m s e ch. The con inuum s e ch is
K¼2p =ðnAÞ, and he cu a u e is kn¼1= .
Since he a oms a e pos ula ed o lie on he
con inuum su ace, he co esponding equispaced
a omic chain con aining nbonds is de o med in o
a egula polygon o nsides whose ci cumci cle
has a adius . The bond leng h and angle p e-
dic ed by he con inuum model (see Eqs. (16) and
(19)) a e:
a¼2 sin p
nand h¼p2p=n:ð22Þ
I is easy o see ha hese p edic ions coincide
exac ly wi h he ac ual bond leng hs and angles o
he a omic chain de o med in o a egula polygon.
The e o e, he p edic ed ene ge ics o his fini e
de o ma ion a e also exac . O cou se, o a gen-
e al de o ma ion wi h non-cons an s e ch and
cu a u e, he local app oxima ion o he expo-
nen ial Bo n ule will lead o app oxima e ene -
ge ics. The examples p esen ed la e demons a e,
howe e , ha his app oxima ion is e y accu a e.
The inadequacy o he s anda d Bo n ule can
be illus a ed easily in he p esen example. The
s anda d Bo n ule co esponds o aking a¼
w¼FA. Suppose ha ou ec ilinea 1D unde-
o med body is de o med in o a ci cle wi hou
s e ch, i.e. K¼C¼1. The applica ion o he
s anda d Bo n ule leads o de o med la ice ec-
o s ha a e angen o he ope. Consequen ly,
wo la ice ec o s emana ing om he same nu-
cleus emain collinea a e de o ma ion, so he
angle hey o m is unchanged i espec i e o he
bending o he ope. Fu he mo e, since he ope is
ben wi hou s e ch, he leng h o he de o med
la ice ec o s also emains unchanged (see Eq.
(16)). The e o e, he ene gy o such a model will
emain unchanged, and he esul ing ope has ze o
bending s iffness.
Howe e , he eal la ice ec o s do no emain
coplana and hei leng h changes due o he cu -
a u e e en i K¼C¼1, since om Eq. (22) i
ollows ha o his isome ic de o ma ion
a¼nA=psin p
nand h¼p2p=n:ð23Þ
The e o e, he ene gy o he a omic sys em will
change when de o med in his ashion. Thus, a
con inuum model based on he s anda d Bo n ule
is blind o he ac ha he ope is being ben , and
assigns ze o ene gy change o he de o ma ion, in
sha p con as wi h he exponen ial Bo n ule,
which p edic s he co ec ene ge ics.
Al hough an in ui i e app oach would associa e
he con inuum s e ch o he s e ch o he bonds,
and he con inuum cu a u e o changes in bond
angles, he p oposed model couples hese de o -
ma ion modes. Indeed, he con inuum bond leng h
a, which is he a gumen o he in e -a omic
s e ch po en ial, depends bo h on Cand knin a
non-linea ashion. The same applies o he con-
inuum bond angle h. This ea u e is essen ial and
makes he con inuum model exac o de o ma-
ions ha map an ini ially s aigh chain in o a
ci cula a c wi h cons an s e ch. Thus, as in he
case o he s anda d Bo n ule o bulk c ys alline
ma e ials, he esul ing con inuum model o he
ope is exac o homogeneous de o ma ions.
9
The con inuum s a emen o he p oblem o
finding s able equilib ium solu ions is hen gi en
by:
U¼a g in
W2CPðWÞ

;ð59Þ
whe e Cis he app op ia e space o de o ma ions
o ial unc ions accoun ing o essen ial bound-
a y condi ions. Acco ding o he p inciple o s a-
iona y ene gy, he equilib ium solu ions o he
sys em a e s a iona y poin s o he po en ial en-
e gy unc ional, and hey e i y he p inciple o
i ual wo k:
0¼dPðUÞ
¼ZX0
ob
WW
oC:dCþob
WW
okn
dkn!dX0
ZX0
BdUdX0þdPnb;ð60Þ
whe e dUdeno es he i ual de o ma ion. The
a ia ions o he non-bonded con inuum po en ial
can be w i en as:
dPnb ¼1
2
4
S2
0ZX0ZX0BX
V0
nb
kUðXÞUðYÞk
½UðXÞUðYÞ
½dUðXÞdUðYÞdX0YdX0X:ð61Þ
Le us also define he s ess measu es, always
e alua ed a he elaxed inne displacemen s ^
gg.
Recalling he exp ession o he s ain ene gy den-
si y in Eq. (48) and ollowing a simila a ionale o
ha used o ob ain Eq. (52), we ob ain:
S¼2ob
WW
oC¼2oW
oC
¼2
S0X
3
l1
V0
s
okalk
oC
"þ2X
3
k1
oVh
oh
ohk
oC

þoVh
o 1
okaik
oCþoVh
o 2
okajk
oC#;ð62Þ
and
m¼ob
WW
okn¼oW
okn
¼1
S0X
3
l1
V0
s
okalk
okn
"þ2X
3
k1
oVh
oh
ohk
okn

þoVh
o 1
okaik
oknþoVh
o 2
okajk
okn#:ð63Þ
The in-plane s ess Sco esponds p ecisely o he
Second Piola Ki chhoff s ess, while mis a mo-
men -like s ess. No e ha , because o he special
o m o C(see Eq. (33)), Shas only wo non-ze o
componen s, which a e ela ed o he ac ions in
he axial and he ci cum e en ial di ec ions. On he
o he hand, mis he e a scala . The gene al heo y
o a bi a y de o ma ions is gi en in A oyo and
Bely schko (2002). No e ha , since he memb ane
has no hickness, he uni s o Sa e o ce di ided
by leng h, while mis exp essed in uni s o o ce
(bending momen di ided by leng h).
Using he G een s ain enso E¼1=2ðCIÞ,
we can ew i e he p inciple o i ual wo k as:
0¼ZX0ðS:dEþmdknÞdX0
ZX0
BdUdX0þdPnb:ð64Þ
Depending on he ea men o he axial s e ch K1
(see Eq. (30)) diffe en si ua ions can be s udied:
Plane s ain: We can conside he si ua ion in
which he alue o K1is p esc ibed. In his case,
he unknowns o he a ia ional p oblem (64) a e
U2and U3(see Eq. (30)). I K1¼1, a de o ma ion
analogous o plane s ain condi ions is achie ed.
This applies o e y long o axially cons ained
nano ubes. K1can also be p esc ibed an a bi a y
alue o s udy he ans e se beha io o s e ched
o comp essed nano ubes; he beha io will change
due o he non-linea i y o he model. In his si -
ua ion, dK1¼0 and he axial componen o he
memb ane s ess does no appea in he a ia ional
p inciple. This means ha he axial s ess can be
compu ed a pos e io i, bu does no play a ole in
he solu ion o he p oblem.
Plane s ess: Al e na i ely, he axial componen
o he memb ane s ess can be p esc ibed, o in-
16

s ance, o be ze o. This would be he case o axially
uncons ained nano ubes. In his case, in addi ion
o U2and U3, he axial s e ch K1becomes an
unknown o he p oblem.
7. Valida ion and ep esen a i e simula ions
In his sec ion, nume ical simula ions o s able
configu a ions o ca bon nano ubes in diffe en
si ua ions a e epo ed. The educed con inuum
model desc ibed in he p e ious sec ion is used and
he a ia ional p inciple desc ibed in Eq. (64) is
disc e ized by Gale kin fini e elemen s (FE).
Thus, he o iginal disc e e molecula sys em is e-
placed by a con inuum model which is subse-
quen ly ans o med by he FE me hod in o
ano he disc e e sys em. Howe e , in p inciple we
a e ee o design he FE disc e iza ion so ha
he FE model has ewe deg ees o eedom han
he o iginal sys em. Fu he mo e, since he con-
inuum model is 2D, while he ull a omis ic
model is 3D, he compu a ional cos is u he
educed.
Fi s , he exponen ial Bo n ule-based con in-
uum model is alida ed by compa ing FE simula-
ions based on i wi h ull a omis ic calcula ions.
In hese compa isons he in e -a omic po en ials
used in he MM simula ions a e used o cons uc
he con inuum cons i u i e equa ion, and analo-
gous bounda y condi ions a e conside ed in bo h
calcula ions. Since he con inuum model is in-
ended o mimic he a omis ic sys em, which is
iewed as ‘‘ ue’’, he e m e o should be un-
de s ood as de ia ion o m he a omis ic model.
Simula ions show ha he ag eemen is excellen
wi h ega d o he ene ge ics as well as o he s able
configu a ions. Simula ions o a model based on
he s anda d Bo n ule a e also p o ided, illus-
a ing he deficiencies o such a model. The ex-
ponen ial Bo n ule simula ions also show ha , o
he es ed si ua ions, he elaxa ion o he inne
displacemen s g ea ly affec s he ene ge ics bu has
e y li le impac on he minimum ene gy config-
u a ions. The con inuum model is hen applied o
simula e se e al si ua ions whe e he ans e se
beha io o ca bon nano ubes and he effec o an
de Waals in e ac ions a e impo an . A final ex-
ample o he gene aliza ion o he model o h ee
dimensions is p esen ed, wi h a wis ing es o a
[10,10] nano ube beyond he poin o s uc u al
ins abili ies.
The in e -a omic po en ials all in o he gene al
o m desc ibed in Eq. (28). The wo-body po en ial
Vsis a Mo se po en ial while he h ee-body po-
en ial depends only on he angle Vhand is ha -
monic wi h a sex ic co ec ion. The pa ame e s a e
aken om he MM2 model. The non-bonded in-
e ac ions a e based on he classical Lenna d-
Jones (6 12) po en ial.
The a ia ional p inciple in Eq. (64) imposes
es ic ions on he fini e elemen in e pola ion
spaces. The i ual in e nal wo k e m in ol es
a ia ions on he cu a u e o he es unc ions,
and he e o e he fini e elemen space needs o be
H2, i.e. ha e up o second squa e in eg able de-
i a i es. This is why C1He mi e fini e elemen s
a e chosen. No e ha he disc e iza ion o he
configu a ion desc ibed in Eq. (30) equi es he
app oxima ion o he scala unc ions U2ðÞ and
U3ðÞ, i.e. he cu e in R2desc ibed by hese
unc ions needs o be pa ame ized wi h espec o
he fini e elemen deg ees o eedom. Each o
hese unc ions is app oxima ed by piecewise C1
cubic polynomials, and he e o e, each node I
ca ies ou deg ees o eedom: U2
I,U3
I,ðU2Þ0
Iand
ðU3Þ0
I. The in e nal and ex e nal wo k e ms o he
a ia ional p inciple a e in eg a ed using 3 Gauss
poin s pe elemen , while he in eg a ion o he
non-bonded in e ac ions e m may equi e mo e
in eg a ion poin s depending on he size o he fi-
ni e elemen s ela i e o he an de Waals equi-
lib ium dis ance. Fou in eg a ion poin s a e
equi ed o his e m in some o he simula ions.
The BFGS quasi-New on echnique is used
bo h in he elaxa ion o he inne displacemen s
and in he global ene gy minimiza ion. This i e -
a i e me hod only equi es g adien s o he ob-
jec i e unc ion and app oxima es he in e se o i s
Hessian using in o ma ion om he p e ious i e -
a ions. Fo some o he la ge examples in ol ing
mo e han one nano ube, and when he ini ial
configu a ion is e y a om equilib ium, dy-
namical elaxa ion is used o ob ain a good fi s
guess which is u he efined wi h he BFGS
minimiza ion algo i hm.
17
7.1. Valida ion es
To alida e he p oposed educed con inuum
model, a FE disc e ized e sion is compa ed o a
MM model. A [32,0] zigzag ca bon nano ube ( he
s anda d desc ip ion o ca bon nano ubes in e ms
o wo in ege s is desc ibed by Sai o e al. (1992)) is
conside ed (see Fig. 9(a)). The molecula model
used in he compa ison has 384 nuclea posi ions,
ha is 1152 deg ees o eedom, while he FE
model has 20 nodes and consequen ly 80 deg ees
o eedom. No e ha he disc e e FE model e-
duces he compu a ional cos , no only because
la ge elemen s ela i e o he c ys al cell size can be
used, bu also because o i s educed dimensio-
nali y.
The fi s configu a ion s udied consis s o sim-
ply olling a g aphene shee in o a ube in an iso-
me ic ans o ma ion, wi hou any kind o
elaxa ion. This configu a ion is called O iginal
ube in Table 1. The able shows he excellen
ag eemen be ween he ene gy ob ained wi h he
molecula model and ha ob ained ia he con-
inuum model and FE. Acco ding o he las e-
ma k o Sec ion 6.2, he ene gy o he con inuum
model should be exac in his si ua ion. No e
howe e ha he con inuum memb ane is disc e -
ized using an app oxima ion space ha does no
ep oduce exac ly a ci cle, and hus in oduces
disc e iza ion e o s.
Then se e al ‘‘plane s ain’’ si ua ions a e con-
side ed. This condi ion is en o ced in he molecu-
la model by p esc ibing o ze o he nuclea
displacemen s in he di ec ion o he axis o he
ube a he nuclei loca ed a bo h ends o he ube.
In he con inuum model, we simply en o ce
K1¼1.
Also, wo kinds o ene gy minimiza ion a e
conside ed. The fi s one eezes he inne dis-
placemen s o hose o he g aphene shee in
equilib ium, i.e. in he con inuum model by p e-
sc ibing g¼0. In his pa icula example, in oking
symme y conside a ions, his cons ained mini-
miza ion can be easily implemen ed in he molec-
Fig. 9. (a) Ac ual molecula model used in compa ison, (b) compa ison o 20 elemen exponen ial Bo n ule con inuum model wi h
MM and (c) esul s ob ained wi h a model cons uc ed om he s anda d Bo n ule.
Table 1
Compa ison o 20 elemen model (CþFE) wi h MM: ene gy in J/mol
g0 Relaxed g
MM CþFE E o (%) MM CþFE E o (%)
O iginal ube 14.58 14.69 0.81
Relaxed ube 10.26 10.28 0.22 6.338 6.324 0.22
Squeezed A 20.85 21.22 1.8 12.95 13.11 1.2
Squeezed B 48.56 49.17 1.3 30.68 30.46 0.75
18
ula model by p esc ibing o ze o he displace-
men s o all he nuclei in he di ec ion o he ube
axis. This incomple e analysis is pe o med o
highligh he effec o he inne elaxa ion. The
o he analysis is an uncons ained s uc u al op-
imiza ion o all he nuclea posi ions. In he
con inuum, he inne displacemen s a e elaxed in
o de o calcula e b
WW a each Gauss poin .
The si ua ions conside ed a e:
Relaxed ube: The O iginal ube is elaxed
wi hou any cons ain o he han he plane s ain
condi ions.
Squeezed A: Displacemen s a he ends o one
diame e o he ube a e p esc ibed so ha his
diame e o is squeezed o 3=4 o i s o iginal size.
Squeezed B: Displacemen s a he ends o one
diame e o he ube a e p esc ibed so ha his
diame e o is squeezed o 1=2 o i s o iginal size.
Table 1 p esen s he equilib ium ene gies o
bo h he MM and he Con inuum FE simula ions,
as well as he ela i e e o o he FE calcula ion
wi h espec o MM. A posi i e alue o e o
means ha he MM ene gy is lowe han he FE
ene gy. No e ha his e o includes con ibu ions
no only om he modelling o he disc e e a omic
sys em as a memb ane, bu also om he FE dis-
c e iza ion.
Fig. 9(b) compa es he equilib ium configu a-
ions o he con inuum/FE model and he MM
model in he Squeezed B si ua ion. Despi e he
la ge de o ma ions o which he ube is subjec ed,
he ag eemen is excellen . Table 1 shows ha he
equilib ium ene gies ob ained wi h he con inuum
model a e in all he cases e y accu a e app oxi-
ma ions o he MM ene gies. The disc epancies a e
in all he cases below 2%. The effec o he inne
elaxa ion in he magni ude o he ene gies is e y
impo an . In his able 20 fini e elemen s ha e
been used, while 32 hexagonal cells span he same
pe ime e in he MM model. The e o e, we expec
he FE model o be mo e cons ained and he e-
o e yield highe equilib ium ene gies. This can be
no iced in he columns co esponding o ozen
inne displacemen s. Howe e , when hose a e e-
laxed, he FE model eaches lowe ene gies han
he molecula model, s ill emaining e y accu a e.
P obably he con inuum ea men o he inne
displacemen s allows o his ex a elaxa ion.
Al hough he effec o he inne elaxa ion in he
equilib ium ene gies is e y impo an , in hese
simula ions i s effec on he s able configu a ions is
negligible. This can be explained by no ing ha he
in-plane beha io o he model is e y s iff, while
he flexu al beha io is e y complian . The e o e,
a sligh pe u ba ion o in-plane de o ma ion ( he
inne ea angemen s a e an in-plane effec ) has
d ama ic influence on ene gy, bu no in hese
flexu al-domina ed op imal de o ma ions. This
sugges s ha in hese examples, he inne elax-
a ion is nea ly uncoupled om he bending de-
o ma ion. This is no he case o o he ypes o
de o ma ion (A oyo and Bely schko, 2002).
Table 2 shows he esul s ob ained wi h 36 fini e
elemen s. The e o s ob ained a e smalle in all he
cases excep in he Squeezed B si ua ion wi h inne
elaxa ion. This indica es ha in gene al he iche
disc e iza ion dec eases he o e all e o , bu also
ha he fine mesh allows o he modeling e o s o
mani es hemsel es. Indeed, he e o p obably
inc eases in he las case because he con inuum
model is mo e complian han he molecula one
wi h ega d o he inne displacemen s. Howe e ,
simula ions ca ied ou wi h e en fine meshes in-
dica e ha he esul s ‘‘con e ge’’ o a e y accu-
a e esul . Thus, e en i he FE model is efined
beyond he uni cell size, he con inuum model
Table 2
Compa ison o 36 elemen model (CþFE) wi h MM: ene gy in J/mol
g0 Relaxed g
MM CþFE E o (%) MM CþFE E o (%)
O iginal ube 14.58 14.60 0.14
Relaxed ube 10.26 10.28 0.21 6.338 6.324 0.22
Squeezed A 20.85 21.05 0.96 12.95 12.99 0.31
Squeezed B 48.56 49.01 0.93 30.68 30.34 1.1
19
appa en ly does no exhibi fine ea u es ha
canno be p esen in he molecula model.
This excellen beha io con as s wi h he si u-
a ion encoun e ed when a con inuum model o
he memb ane is di ec ly cons uc ed om he
Bo n ule wi hou he p oposed exponen ial ex-
ension. In his case he esul ing hype -elas ic
po en ial is non-con ex. Indeed, as discussed in
Sec ion 4.3, he ene gy o such a model is in a ian
unde isome ic de o ma ions (bending wi hou
s e ch), i.e. he model has ze o bending s iffness.
This eflec s in a pa hological mesh dependency in
he nume ical implemen a ion o such a model:
since he disc e e FE space canno ep esen all
isome ic de o ma ions, he disc e e p oblem can
s ill be sol ed, bu as he mesh is efined, he nu-
me ical me hod picks solu ions wi h inc easingly
fine ea u es. Fig. 9(c) illus a es his ac , and
sha pe kinks in he nume ical solu ion a e ob-
se ed as he mesh is efined. The equilib ium en-
e gy o he FE solu ions is almos ze o, which is
no ealis ic. This is eminiscen o he si ua ion
encoun e ed in o he ma e ials, o which he
Fig. 13. Equilib ium configu a ion o a bundle o se en closely
packed [22,0] nano ubes.
Fig. 10. Which is mo e s able, ci cula o collapsed? (Answe :
o he [20,0] and [26,0] ubes, ci cula , and o he [32,0] and
[40,0] ubes, collapsed.)
Fig. 12. Equilib ium configu a ions o pai s o nano ubes in
an de Waals con ac .
Fig. 11. T ans e se s abili y o a mul i walled nano ube.
20
s ain ene gy densi y is physically con-con ex,
leading o non-unique solu ions wi h inc easingly
fine ea u es, as epo ed by Daco ogna (1989, p.
276) and e e ences he ein.
7.2. T ans e se de o ma ion simula ions
The nex simula ions illus a e he applica ion
o he con inuum/FE model o he ans e se me-
chanics o nano ubes in diffe en si ua ions. In
hese applica ions, he compu a ional cos o
analogous MM simula ions would be much highe
han he cos o he p esen ed calcula ions. This is
especially ue wi h ega ds o he non-bonded
in e ac ions.
The fi s example s udies he s abili y o he
ci cula and he collapsed configu a ions o ca bon
nano ubes. Because o he an de Waals a ac-
ion po en ial, he ene gy o he sys em is educed
when wo walls adhe e. On he o he hand, o he
wall o a nano ube o come in con ac wi h i sel ,
significan elas ic ene gy is equi ed. This adeoff
is p obably esponsible o he obse a ion by Gao
e al. (1998) ha below a ce ain adius, only he
ci cula configu a ion is s able. Fo g ea e adii,
he collapsed configu a ion is a leas me a-s able.
Subsequen ly, ano he h eshold adius sepa a es
he nano ubes o which he ci cula configu a ion
is ene ge ically a o able om hose in which he
collapsed configu a ion is. Fig. 10 shows he sim-
ula ions pe o med o se e al nano ubes. In his
and subsequen figu es, he nodes shown a e nodes
o he fini e elemen mesh; hey a e no a oms. In
hese calcula ions, he ully elaxed ci cula con-
figu a ion is de o med so ha he wall o he
nano ube is b ough in con ac wi h i sel a he
an de Waals equilib ium dis ance, and hen
he ene gy is minimized. The sign o he diffe ence
in ene gy be ween he ci cula configu a ion and
he elaxed configu a ion is also epo ed, i.e. a
posi i e diffe ence means ha he ene gy o he
configu a ion p esen ed on he igh is lowe . In
some cases, he nano ube goes back o he o iginal
configu a ion ( his is he case o he [20,0] nano-
ube). This implies ha he collapsed configu a ion
is no s able. The collapsed configu a ion is s able
o he [26,0] nano ube, bu his only cons i u es a
local minimum o he ene gy since he ci cula
configu a ion has lowe ene gy. Fo he [32,0] and
[40,0] nano ubes, he collapsed configu a ion is he
ene ge ically a o able s uc u e. This is expec ed
because la ge nano ubes a e mo e flexible and
ha e mo e wall a ea o gain adhesion ene gy. Fig.
11 displays a simila analysis o a mul i-walled
nano ube o which he collapsed configu a ion
yields lowe ene gy .
A simila compe i ion o elas ic and adhesion
ene gy occu s when wo nano ubes a e b ough o
he an de Waals equilib ium dis ance. Fig. 12
shows he equilib ium configu a ions ob ained
when his nume ical expe imen is pe o med wi h
nano ubes o diffe en sizes. Again, he la ge na-
no ubes ha e la ge po ions o fla ened walls.
We also epo a simula ion o a bundle o na-
no ubes unde plane s ain. Fig. 13 shows he
equilib ium configu a ion o he sys em. A TEM
image o such a nano ope has been epo ed by
Sal e a e al. (1999). Ca bon nano ubes end o be
closely packed in hexagonal la ices in he nano-
opes and c ys als o nano ubes (Thess e al., 1996;
Schli le e al., 2001). As can be seen om Fig. 13,
he equilib ium configu a ion displays a fla ening
o he nano ube walls, o pa ial polygonaliza ion.
7.3. Th ee dimensional simula ion
The heo y p esen ed has been used o con-
s uc a memb ane applicable in he gene al 3D
Fig. 14. Twis ing o a [10,10] nano ube: de o med geome y o
wis ing angles o 38,210and 360, and c oss sec ion o he
de o med memb ane a he cen e o he ube o he abo e
h ee configu a ions.
21

de o ma ion o ca bon nano ubes (A oyo and
Bely schko, 2002). This mo e gene al memb ane
can be disc e ized wi h subdi ision fini e elemen s,
and he s uc u al ins abili ies epo ed in expe i-
men s and a omis ic simula ions can be analyzed
a e y low compu a ional cos . The analysis o
wis ing a [10,10] nano ube is p o ided in Fig. 14,
o a Te soff-B enne po en ial. No e ha , he
de o med geome ies ha e been pos -p ocessed,
and he compu a ional mesh has abou 18 ele-
men s a ound he pe ime e . Each end o he
nano ube is inc emen ally o a ed 360in opposi e
o ien a ions.
The fi s snapsho o he de o ma ion shows he
configu a ion when he fi s ins abili y om a
uni o m wis ing occu s, and he co esponding
c oss-sec ion is shown a he bo om o he figu e.
Fu he wis ing causes he wall o he nano ube o
come in an de Waals con ac wi h i sel , as
clea ly shown in he c oss-sec ion in he bo om o
Fig. 14. Beyond 210, a seconda y ins abili y de-
elops, and he ube olds on o i sel . F om he
c oss-sec ion i is appa en ha he an de Waals
in e ac ions a e esponsible o his buckled mo -
phology. In he absence o hese long- ange o ces,
he memb ane in e -pene a es and he seconda y
s uc u e is no obse ed. This 3D memb ane has
been shown o p o ide e y accu a e ene ge ics
and de o med geome ies e en o e y la ge de-
o ma ions (A oyo and Bely schko, 2002).
8. Conclusions
We ha e u he explo ed a me hodology o
cons uc con inuum models o one-a om hick
c ys alline films. The p oposed model is a hype -
elas ic memb ane whose elas ic po en ial ene gy is
w i en in closed- o m exclusi ely in e ms o he
in e -a omic po en ials ha cons i u e he molec-
ula desc ip ion o he sys em. The analysis o he
p esen wo k is based on he exponen ial he
Bo n ule (A oyo and Bely schko, 2002), a ki-
nema ic assump ion linking he a omic and he
con inuum de o ma ions when he c ys al is a
cu ed film. This ex ension is based on he ex-
ponen ial map. An illus a i e example o an
a omic chain de o ming in wo dimensions has
been p esen ed. The esul ing simple ope-like
con inuum model encompasses all o he unda-
men al ideas.
The gene al me hodology hen is pa icula ized
o analyze he ans e se mechanics o ca bon
nano ubes. This model explici ly exploi s he
symme y o such a de o ma ion, and leads o a
model o educed dimensionali y. The hype -elas-
ic po en ial, as well as s ain and s ess measu es
a e p o ided, and a con inuum o mula ion o he
non-bonded in e ac ions is de i ed. The p oposed
model is disc e ized using fini e elemen s, yielding
an al e na i e simula ion me hod ha is as e
han a omis ic calcula ions.
Se e al simula ions highligh ing he ele ance
o an de Waals in e ac ions in he ans e se
mechanics o nano ubes a e epo ed. The esul s
show ha he con inuum model based on he ex-
ponen ial Bo n ule e y well app oxima es he
s able configu a ions and ene gies o he co e-
sponding MM model. Resul s ag ee wi h MM
calcula ions wi hin 2% in he equilib ium ene gies.
This sha ply con as s wi h he non-physical e-
sul s ob ained om a model based on he s anda d
Bo n ule. We also show he impo an effec o he
inne ea angemen s o he c ys al s uc u e on
he equilib ium ene gies. A ull 3D simula ion il-
lus a es he applica ion o he p esen heo y o
analyze he s uc u al ins abili ies o nano ubes
obse ed in expe imen s and a omis ic calcula-
ions.
Acknowledgemen s
The suppo o he ‘‘la Caixa’’ G adua e P o-
g am o M. A oyo, and he Na ional Science
Founda ion and he U.S. A my Resea ch Office is
g a e ully acknowledged.
Re e ences
A oyo, M., Bely schko, T., 2002. An a omis ic based fini e
de o ma ion memb ane o single laye c ys alline films.
Jou nal o he Mechanics and Physics o Solids 50, 1941
1977.
Be nholc, J., B abec, C.J., Na delli, M.B., Mai i, A., Roland,
C., Yakobson, B.I., 1998. Theo y o g ow h and mechanical
p ope ies o nano ubes. Applied Physics A 67, 39 46.
22
B enne , D.W., 1990. Empi ical po en ial o hyd oca bons o
use in simula ing chemical apo deposi ion o diamond
films. Physical Re iew B 42 (15), 9458 9471.
Chop a, N.G., Benedic , L.X., C espi, V.H., Cohen, M.L.,
Louie, S.G., Ze l, A., 1995. Fully collapsed ca bon
nano ubes. Na u e 377, 135 138.
Cousins, C.S.G., 1978. Inne elas ici y. Jou nal o Physics C,
4867 4879.
Daco ogna, B., 1989. Di ec me hods in he calculus o
a ia ions. In: Applied Ma hema ical Sciences, ol. 78.
Sp inge Ve lag, Be lin.
do Ca mo, M.P., 1976. Diffe en ial geome y o cu es and
su aces. P en ice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
E icksen, J.L., 1984. Phase ans o ma ions and ma e ial
ins abili ies in solids. In: Gu in, M.E. (Ed.), The Cauchy
and Bo n Hypo heses o C ys als. Academic P ess, Lon
don, pp. 61 77.
Fal o, M.R., Cla y, G.J., Taylo , R.M., Chi, V., B ooks, F.P.,
Washbu n, S., Supe fine, R., 1997. Bending and buckling o
ca bon nano ubes unde la ge s ain. Na u e 389, 582 584.
F iesecke, G., James, R.D., 2000. A scheme o he passage
om a omic o con inuum heo y o hin films, nano ubes
and nano ods. Jou nal o he Mechanics and Physics o
Solids 48, 1519 1540.
Gao, G., C
ßa
ggin, T., Godda d III, W., 1998. Ene ge ics,
s uc u e, mechanical and ib a ional p ope ies o single
walled ca bon nano ubes. Nano echnology 9, 184 191.
Lu, J.P., 1997. Elas ic p ope ies o ca bon nano ubes and
nano opes. Physical Re iew Le e s 79 (7), 1297 1300.
Mai i, A., 2000. Mechanical de o ma ion in ca bon nano ubes
ben ubes s ubes pushed by a omically sha p ips.
Chemical Physical Le e s 331, 21 25.
Mal e n, L.E., 1969. In oduc ion o he mechanics o a
con inuous medium. P en ice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Ma sden, J.E., Hughes, T.J., 1983. Ma hema ical ounda ions
o elas ici y. P en ice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Ma in, J.W., 1975. Many body o ces in me als and he b ug
ge elas ic cons an s. Jou nal o Physics C 8, 2837 2857.
Mo gan, F., 1993. Riemannian geome y, a beginne Õs guide.
Jones and Ba le Publishe s.
Ne ins, N., Chen, K., Allinge , N.L., 1996. Moleculas mechan
ics (MM4) calcula ions on alkenes. Jou nal o Compu a
ional Chemis y 17 (5 6), 669 694.
Qian, D., Liu, W.K., Ruoff, R.S., 2001. Mechanics o C60 in
nano ubes. Jou nal o Physical Chemis y B 105, 10753
10758.
Ruoff, R.S., Te soff, J., Lo en s, D.C., Sub amoney, S., Chan,
B., 1993. Radial de o ma ion o ca bon nano ubes by an
de Waals o ces. Na u e 364, 514 516.
Sai o, R., Fuji a, M., D esselhaus, G., D esselhaus, M.S., 1992.
Elec onic s uc u e o chi al g aphene ubules. Applied
Physics Le e s 60 (18), 2204 2206.
Sal e a , J.P., B iggs, G.A.D., Bona d, J.M., Bacsa, R.R.,
Kulik, A.J., S oockli, T., Bu nham, N.A., Fo 
oo, L., 1999.
Elas ic and shea moduli o single walled ca bon nano ube
opes. Physical Re iew Le e s 82 (5), 944 947.
Schli le , R.R., Seo, J.W., Gimzewski, J.K., Du kan, C.,
Sai ullah, M.S.M., Welland, M.E., 2001. Single c ys als o
single walled ca bon nano ubes o med by sel assembly.
Science 292, 1136 1139.
Shenoy, V.B., Mille , R., Tadmo , E.B., Rodney, D., Phillips,
R., O iz, M., 1999. An adap i e fini e elemen app oach o
a omic scale mechanics he quasicon inuum me hod.
Jou nal o he Mechanics and Physics o Solids 47, 611
642.
Sohlbe g, K., Sump e , B.G., Tuzun, R.E., Noid, D.W., 1998.
Con inuum me hods o mechanics as a simplified app oach
o s uc u al enginee ing o nanos uc u es. Nano echnol
ogy 9, 30 36.
Tadmo , E.B., O iz, M., Phillips, R., 1996. Quasicon inuum
analysis o de ec s in solids. Philosophical Magazine A 73
(6), 1529 1563.
Tadmo , E.B., Smi h, G.S., Be ns ein, N., Kaxi as, E., 1999.
Mixed fini e elemen and a omis ic o mula ion o complex
c ys als. Physical Re iew B 59 (1), 235 245.
Thess, A., Lee, R., Nikolae , P., Dia, H., Pe i , P., Robe , J.,
Xu, C., Lee, Y.H., Kim, S.G., Rinzle , A.G., Colbe , D.T.,
Scuse ia, G.E., Tom
aanek, D., Fische , J.E., Smalley, R.E.,
1996. C ys alline opes o me allic ca bon nano ubes.
Science 273, 483 487.
Weine , J.H., 1983. S a is ical mechanics o elas ici y. Wiley,
New Yo k.
Yakobson, B.I., B abec, C.J., Be nholc, J., 1996. Nanome
chanics o ca bon ubes: Ins abili ies beyond he linea
esponse. Physical Re iew Le e s 76 (14), 2511 2514.
Yu, M., Dye , M.J., Ruoff, R.S., 2001a. S uc u e and
mechanical flexibili y o ca bon nano ube ibbons: An
a omic o ce mic oscopy s udy. Jou nal o Applied Physics
89 (8), 4554 4557.
Yu, M., Kowalewski, T., Ruoff, R.S., 2001b. S uc u al analysis
o collapsed, and wis ed and collapsed, mul iwalled ca bon
nano ubes by a omic o ce mic oscopy. Physical Re iew
Le e s 86 (1), 87 90.
Yu, M., Lou ie, O., Dye , M.J., Moloni, K., Kelly, T.F., Ruoff,
R.S., 2000. S eng h and b eaking mechanism o mul i
walled ca bon nano ubes unde ensile load. Science 287,
637 640.
Zanzo o, G., 1996. The Cauchy Bo n hypo hesis, nonlinea
elas ici y and mechanical winning in c ys als. Ac a C ys
allog aphica A 52, 839 849.
Zhong Can, O. Y., Su, Z. B., Wang, C. L., 1997. Coil o ma
ion in mul ishell ca bon nano ubes: compe i ion be ween
cu a u e elas ici y and in e laye adhesion. Physical Re
iew Le e s 78 (21), 4055 4058.
Zhou, G., Duan, W., Gu, B., 2001. Fi s p inciples s udy on
mo phology and mechanical p ope ies o single walled
ca bon nano ube. Chemical Physical Le e s 333, 344
349.
23