scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Radiometric sensitivity computation in aperture synthesis interferometric radiometry

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the radiometric sensitivity computation of an aperture synthesis interferometric radiometer devoted to Earth observation. The impact of system parameters and the use of simultaneous redundant measurements are analyzed. The interferometric radiometer uncertainty principle is presented; it quantifies the relationship between radiometric sensitivity and angular resolution.

Read accessible full text

Radiometric sensitivity computation in aperture synthesis interferometric radiometry

Author: Camps Carmona, Adriano José,Corbella Sanahuja, Ignasi,Bará Temes, Francisco Javier,Torres Torres, Francisco
Publisher: IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
Year: 1998
Source: https://upcommons.upc.edu/bitstream/2117/1930/4/radiometric%20sensitivity%20computation00662749.pdf
680 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, VOL. 36, NO. 2, MARCH 1998
(a)
(b)
Fig. 3. (a) Obse a ion o
"
00
change o ice slab on du aluminum mold a
13.5 GHz. Poin s (1–3) co espond o he ice ime exis ence in one day; (4)
wo days; (5) 32 days; (9–10) 47 days; (11) 66 days; and (12) 85 days. (b)
The measu emen s analogous o (a) a 37.5 GHz.
he o he hand, quick eezing may p oduce a speci ic dis ibu ion o
sal concen a ion in ice olume.
Howe e , he main esul o he measu emen s, as i ollows
om Figs. 2 and 3, is he hys e esis o
"
00
in he case o slow-
cycle empe a u e change o many days. Ou o he expe imen s wi h
di e en empe a u e condi ions and wi h long- ime measu emen s
also indica ed he e ec o ambigui y o elec omagne ic losses.
The discussion on hys e esis o he eal pa o ice dielec ic
pe mi i i y a 1 kHz was published ea lie in [7]. I was obse ed
o he ice ha o med he 2% NaCl solu ion. This expe imen las ed
o abou an hou . Howe e , his obse a ion was in e p e ed as he
in luence o he hea o phase ansi ion. In ou expe imen s, he
analogous explana ion is no ue because he e was a small amoun
o sal and a long pe iod o keeping ice a a low-ambien empe a u e.
We conclude ha he hys e esis e ec in ou expe imen s may
be connec ed wi h he exis ence o supe cooling sal mic oscopic
inclusions a empe a u es lowe han eu ec ic poin , whe e hey
a e in a liquid s a e. The possible supe cooling empe a u e is
de e mined by he shape and he size o liquid inclusions. I seems
ha hei me amo phism de e mine he olume-liquid concen a ion
and, consequen ly, he imagina y pa o dielec ic pe mi i i y. The
de e mina ion o he exac o igin o elec omagne ic-loss ambigui y
equi es a mo e de ailed in es iga ion o eshwa e ice s uc u e and
physical and chemical peculia i ies o inclusions.
V. CONCLUSIONS
The e a e signi ican ime changes o he imagina y pa o dielec-
ic pe mi i i y e en o cons an - alue sal -impu i y concen a ion
in eshwa e ice. Di e en alues o elec omagne ic loss we e
expe imen ally obse ed a he iden ical empe a u e. Thus, o he
de e mina ion o ice dielec ic loss, we mus ake in o accoun he
ice- ime exis ence a e wa e is ozen, he ice- empe a u e his o y,
and he inclusions cha ac e is ics. Dis ega ding hese condi ions in
p e ious pape s led no so much o measu emen e o s, bu o he
desc ip ion o ice wi h di e en s uc u es. The e o e, he c yosphe e
emo e sensing equi es aking in o accoun he ime changeabili y o
ice elec omagne ic p ope ies.
REFERENCES
[1] A. S og yn, “A s udy o he mic owa e b igh ness empe a u e o snow
om he poin o s ong luc ua ion heo y,” IEEE T ans. Geosci. Remo e
Sensing, ol. GE-24, pp. 220–231, Ma . 1986.
[2] S. C. Wa en, “Op ical cons an s o ice om he ul a iole o he
mic owa e,” Appl. Op ., ol. 23, no. 8, pp. 1206–1225, 1984.
[3] C. Ma zle and U. Wegmulle , “Dielec ic p ope ies o eshwa e ice a
mic owa e equencies,” J. Phys. D, Appl. Phys., ol. 20, pp. 1623–1630,
1987; E a a in J. Phys. D, Appl. Phys., ol. 21, p. 1660, 1988.
[4] L. Le i and L. Luba , “On he elec ic p ope ies o ice doped wi h
NH
4
F,” Phys. Kondens. Ma e ie, ol. 7, pp. 368–371, 1968.
[5] I. G. Young and R. E. Salomon, “Dielec ic beha io o ice wi h HCl
impu i y,” J. Chem. Phys., ol. 48, no. 4, pp. 1635–1644, 1968.
[6] G. S. Bo donski and S. D. K ylo , “Radio b igh ness a ia ion o
eshwa e ice co e in win e pe iod,” Iz es ya Academii Nauk Rossii
Se ia Fiziki A mos e y i Okeana, ol. 29, no. 6, pp. 842–847, 1993.
[7] V. V. Bogo odsky and G. P. Hohlo , “In luence o some sal componen s
and i s composi ion on ice elec ical p ope ies,” P oc. A c . An a c .
Ins ., in Russian, ol. 295, pp. 89–95, 1970.
Radiome ic Sensi i i y Compu a ion in
Ape u e Syn hesis In e e ome ic Radiome y
Ad iano Camps, Ignasi Co bella, Ja ie Ba ´
a, and F ancesc To es
Abs ac — This pape is conce ned wi h he adiome ic sensi i i y
compu a ion o an ape u e syn hesis in e e ome ic adiome e de o ed
o ea h obse a ion. The impac o sys em pa ame e s and he use
o simul aneous edundan measu emen s a e analyzed. The In e e o-
me ic Radiome e Unce ain y P inciple is p esen ed; i quan i ies he
ela ionship be ween adiome ic sensi i i y and angula esolu ion.
Index Te ms—In e e ome y, adiome y, emo e sensing, sensi i i y.
I. INTRODUCTION
An in e e ome ic adiome e measu es he co ela ion be ween he
analy ic signals collec ed by di e en an ennas [
S
1
(
)
and
S
2
(
)
].
These co ela ions p o ide he samples o he so-called isibili y
Manusc ip ecei ed Decembe 27, 1995; e ised July 2, 1997. This wo k
was suppo ed by he Eu opean Space Agency. wi hin he amewo k o ESA
MIRAS CCN 2, Wo k O de 10, ESTEC Con ac 9777/92/NL/PB ac i i ies,
wi h MATRA MARCONI SPACE as main con ac o .
The au ho s a e wi h he Depa men o Signal Theo y and Communica-
ions, Uni e si a Poli `
ecnica de Ca alunya, 08034 Ba celona, Spain (e-mail:
[email p o ec ed]).
Publishe I em Iden i ie S 0196-2892(98)00737-2.
0196–2892/98$10.00 1998 IEEE
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, VOL. 36, NO. 2, MARCH 1998 681
unc ion, which has dimensions o Kel in.
V
1
;
2
(
u;
)=
1
2
E
[
S
1
(
)
S
3
2
(
)]
=

+


1
T
(
; 
)~
12
0
u
+

c
1
e
0
j
2

(
u
+

)
d d
(1)
whe e
(
u;
)
is he baseline and is equal o he di e ence be ween he
an enna posi ions o e he
XY
plane no malized o he wa eleng h;
T
(
; 
)
K is he so-called modi ied b igh ness empe a u e [1].
T
(
; 
)=
T
B
(
; 
)
1
0

2
0

2
F
n
1
(
; 
)
F
3
n
2
(
; 
)
(2)
whe e
T
B
(
; 
)
, dimensions o Kel in, is he b igh ness empe a u e;
(
;
)
a e he di ec o cosines, wi h espec he
(
X; Y
)
axes, equal
(sin

cos
;
sin

sin

)
;
F
n
1
;
2
(
; 
)
a e he no malized an enna
ol age pa e n; and
~
12
(

)
, he inge-wash unc ion, (wi hou uni s)
akes in o accoun spa ial deco ela ion e ec s [2].
In he ideal case, no deco ela ion e ec s
~
12
(

)

1
and iden ical
an enna pa e ns
F
n
1
=
F
n
2
=
F
n
, he modi ied b igh ness empe -
a u e can be eco e ed by means o a disc e e Fou ie T ans o m o
he isibili y samples
T
(
; 
)=
F
0
1
[
V
(
u;
)]
:
(3)
In la ge in e e ome e s, in o de o simpli y he signal dis ibu ion
ne wo k, he c oss-co ela ions a e usually pe o med a baseband by
means o eal co ela o s a e in-phase and quad a u e demodula ion
V
1
;
2
/
E
[
i
1
(
)
i
2
(
)] +
jE
[
q
1
(
)
i
2
(
)]
:
(4)
II. RADIOMETRIC SENSITIVITY COMPUTATION
Radiome ic sensi i i y is de ined as he minimum inpu change ha
can be de ec ed a he ou pu [2]–[4]. In a in e e ome ic adiome e ,
i is limi ed by he disc e iza ion and he ini e co e age o he spa ial
equencies plane
(
u;
)
and he SNR, which can be imp o ed by
inc easing he in eg a ion ime and/o he p ede ec ion bandwid h
[3]. The ini e
(
u;
)
co e age and he disc e iza ion e o s se he
sa u a ion limi ha is eached o high SNR’s.
A. Disc e iza ion and Fini e
(
u;
)
Co e age
In a o al-powe o Dicke adiome e , he measu ed an enna em-
pe a u e is gi en by equa ions 4.55–4.60 o [4]. The e o commi ed
depends on he pa icula b igh ness empe a u e dis ibu ion being
obse ed and can be minimized by maximizing he an enna main-
beam e iciency (MBE), which equi es he use o an ennas wi h
a ape ed illumina ion ha , in u n, educe he achie able spa ial
esolu ion.
On he o he hand, an in e e ome ic adiome e o ms he b igh -
ness empe a u e map by a disc e e-in e se Fou ie ans o m o he
isibili ies measu ed by he a ay (3). I has been shown [1], [5], [6]
ha , as p oposed in [7], he op imum shape o a wo-dimensional
(2-D) in e e ome ic a ay is a
Y
.
Y
-a ays gene a e he la ges
egula
(
u;
)
co e age o e an hexagonal g id o a gi en numbe
o an ennas, hus maximizing he angula esolu ion o , con e sely,
minimizing he ha dwa e equi emen s [1].
The impulse esponse o he in e e ome e in he di ec ion
(

0
;
0
)
can be in e p e ed as he beam syn hesized by he a ay, and i is
called he equi alen a ay ac o (
AF
eq
) [3] because o i s simila i ies
wi h phased a ays
AF
eq
(
; ; 
0
;
0
)=
A
n
W
(
u
n
;
n
)~
n
u
+

o
1
e
+
j
2

(
u
(

0

)+
(

0

))
(5)
whe e
A
is he pixel’s a ea in he
(
u;
)
plane;
A
=
d
2
o
T
-a ays;
A
=
p
3
d
2
=
2
o
Y
-a ays;
A
=
d
o one-dimensional (1-D) a ays;
and
d
is he spacing be ween adjacen an ennas no malized o he
wa eleng h o he minimum baseline. The unc ion
W
(
u;
)
is a
window used o weigh he isibili y samples.
In a simila way, he MBE can be de ined as
MBE
=
main lobe
j
AF
eq
(
; 
)
j
d

4

j
AF
eq
(
; 
)
j
d

(6)
whe e he
AF
eq
is no squa ed because i e e s o b igh ness
empe a u es, a powe measu emen , howe e , om (5), he
AF
eq
may ha e nega i e lobes. The MBE can be op imized by a p ope
selec ion o he window unc ion. Table I shows he sidelobe le el
(SLL) and he MBE a he SLL o i e di e en windows o
an
Y
-a ay wi h
N
EL
=43
an ennas pe a m spaced
d
=0
:
89
wa eleng hs, as p oposed o MIRAS [7]. Deco ela ion e ec s ha e
been neglec ed since
B=
0

2%. The sa u a ion o he adiome ic
sensi i i y shown in Fig. 1 is due o he disc e iza ion o MBE e o
compu ed a he cen e o he ins an aneous ield o iew (FOV) [1].
The e o dec eases wi h he a ay size and he window smoo hness.
B. SNR
I he eal and imagina y pa s o he isibili y unc ion a e
ob ained by c oss-co ela ing he in-phase and quad a u e componen s
o he signals collec ed by he an ennas once digi alized [7], sligh ly
di e en esul s a e ob ained om hose p esen ed in [2], [3], and
[8] o he 1-D in e e ome e ESTAR, o adioas onomy. Th ee
e ec s ha now ha e been aken in o accoun a e p ede ec ion il e s’
shape ( ec angula o Gaussian), single sideband (SSB) o double
sideband (DSB) ecei e s wi h he same p ede ec ion bandwid h, and
co ela o ’s ype.
The MIRAS inge-wash unc ion was compu ed in [5] and [6],
aking in o accoun he o e all equency esponse o he ecei ing
chain [7]. I was ound ha he inge-wash unc ion is be e
app oxima ed by a Gaussian il e (7a) han by a ec angula il e
(7b) wi h he same noise bandwid h
B
(7c).
j
H
(
)
j
=
e
0
((
0
)
=B
)
(7a)
j
H
(
)
j
=5
0
o
B
(7b)
B
1
=
+
1
01
j
H
(
)
j
2
d
(7c)
whe e
5(
x
)=1
o
j
x
j
1
=
2
and
0
elsewhe e. Consequen ly, i is
expec ed ha mo e accu a e esul s a e ob ained wi h he Gaussian
model.
Following he p ocedu e used in [3], he s anda d de ia ion o he
eal and imagina y pa s o he isibili y unc ion can be compu ed,
aking in o accoun ha I/Q demodula ion is pe o med p io o he
co ela ion [6, App. 1]. The main esul s a e lis ed below o Gaussian
(8a) and o ec angula p ede ec ion il e s (8b)

2
; i
=1
2
p
2
B
e
(
T
A
+
T
R
)
2
1+
e
0

(21
=
p
2
B
)
+
V
2
; i
(
u;
)1+
e
0

(21
=
p
2
B
)
0
V
2
i;
(
u;
) 1
0
e
0

(21
=
p
2
B
)
(8a)
682 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, VOL. 36, NO. 2, MARCH 1998
TABLE I
SLL [dB] AND MBE FOR THE MIRAS SPACEBORNE-INSTRUMENT EQUIVALENT-ARRAY FACTOR (

2
mn
=
u
2
mn
+
2
mn
,

max
=
p
3
N
EL
d
)
Fig. 1. Radiome ic sensi i i y dBK (10 log
1
T
) e sus SNR [10 log (
T
A
=
V
)].
T
A
=
200 K, MIRAS ins umen . Radiome ic sensi i i y sa u a ion
is due o he disc e iza ion and ini e (
u;
) co e age e o s.

2
; i
=1
2
B
e
(
T
A
+
T
R
)
2
1+3 21
B
+
V
2
; i
(
u;
)1+3 21
B
0
V
2
i;
(
u;
) 1
0
321
B
(8b)
whe e
3(
x
)=1
0
j
x
j
o
j
x
j
1
and
0
elsewhe e;
V
and
V
i
a e he
eal and imagina y pa s o he isibili y unc ion;
T
A
is he an enna
empe a u e;
T
R
=
T
R
1
=
T
R
2
is he ecei e s’ noise empe a u e;
1
=
o
0
lo is he di e ence be ween he il e ’s cen al equency
o
and he local oscilla o ’s equency
lo; and

e is he e ec i e
in eg a ion ime ha depends on co ela o ’s ype, i.e.,

e
=

o an
analog co ela o , and

e
=

/2.46 o 1-bi
2
1-bi co ela o wi h
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, VOL. 36, NO. 2, MARCH 1998 683
sampling equencies
s
=2
B
[9]. A his poin , i is in e es ing o
no e he ollowing.
1) The a iance

2
V
=

2
+

2
i
, compu ed wi h ec angula
p ede ec ion il e s, is
p
2
imes la ge han wi h Gaussian il e s
because noise is mo e compac ed in equency and su e s less
om deco ela ion e ec s.
2) Fo any kind o il e , an imp o emen by a ac o o wo is
achie ed in SSB ecei e s (
j
1
j
>B=
2
), as compa ed o
DSB ecei e s (
1
=0
), a he expense o highe speed
co ela o s and highe powe consump ion. In p ac ice, he
use o SSB demodula ion simpli ies ecei e ’s design when
e adia ion om local oscilla o o he an enna mus be kep
below he h eshold o he signals ecei ed in he p o ec ed
band, i.e., 1.400–1.427 MHz [7]. I also educes local oscilla o
AM noise and o se s can be easily emo ed by high-pass
il e ing he signals p io o co ela ion.
3) The use o digi al co ela o s educes he in eg a ion ime

by a ac o ha depends on quan iza ion le els and sampling
equency [9].
Since he b igh ness empe a u e map is ob ained by means
o a disc e e Fou ie ans o m o he isibili y samples, he
isibili y e o s a e ansla ed in o he empe a u e map
^
T
(
; 
)=
A
m n
W
mn
1
[
V
(
u
mn
;
mn
)+
e
V
(
u
mn
;
mn
)
+
je
V
(
u
mn
;
mn
)]
1
e
j
2

(
u 
+

)
(9)
whe e (
e
V
,
e
Vi
) a e he e o s in he eal and imagina y
pa s o he isibili y unc ion. P io o compu a ion o he
adiome ic sensi i i y some conside a ions abou edundancy
and he mi ici y mus be poin ed ou .
1) He mi ici y o he Visibili y Samples: Only hal o he base-
lines mus be measu ed (
u
≥0,
≥0 and
u
<0,
> 0). The o he
hal is ob ained by conjuga ing he measu ed baselines. In doing so,
he noise is He mi ian oo.
V
3
(
u;
)=
1
2
E
[
S
1
(
)
S
3
2
(
)]
3
=
1
2
E
[
S
2
(
)
S
3
1
(
)] =
V
(
0
u;
0
)
:
(10)
2) Redundancy and Co ela ion Be ween E o s: In [5], [6], [10]
and [11], i is shown ha he c oss-co ela ion o he e o s o wo
iden ical baselines 1–2 and 3–4 (excep o he an enna posi ions)
wi h he same in eg a ion ime

, one o hem delayed

d
, is gi en
by ( ec angula p ede ec ion il e s)
E
[1
V
12
(
+

d
)1
V
3
34
(
)] =
R
^
V
^
V
(

d
)
0
V
12
V
3
34
=
V
13
V
3
24
B
e sinc

d
:
(11)
being
R
^
V
^
V
(

d
)
, he c oss-co ela ion be ween he measu ed is-
ibili ies
V
12
and
V
34
a
=

d
. No e ha , in an ac ual onboa d
in e e ome e like MIRAS [7], all baselines a e measu ed in he same
ime in e al and

d
=0
. Gi en i s impo ance, we explici ly show
ha he noise o a isibili y sample (8b) can be ob ained om (11).

2
V
=

2
V
+

2
V
=
E
[
j
1
V
12
j
2
]=
R
1
V
1
V
(0)
=
V
11
V
3
22
B
e
=
j
V
(0
;
0)
j
2
B
e
=(
T
A
+
T
R
)
2
B
e (12)
F om (11), i can be seen ha , wi h ideal noise- ee ecei e s, e o s
be ween simul aneous measu emen s (

d
=
0) o di e en isibili y
samples a e s ongly co ela ed i he spacing be ween he an enna
pai s 1–2 and 3–4 is much smalle han he down all o he ampli ude
o he isibili y unc ion. This si ua ion holds o scenes consis ing
on poin sou ces [2], [10], and a e aging simul aneous measu emen s
does no imp o e SNR signi ican ly. On he con a y, o a smoo h
empe a u e dis ibu ion, as in he case o ea h obse a ion, he
isibili y unc ion decays apidly, e o s a e only pa ially co ela ed,
and a e aging educes noise powe .
On he o he hand, i he ecei e ’s noise empe a u e is much
highe han he b igh ness empe a u e o be measu ed, he a e -
aging o simul aneous measu emen s imp o es he SNR, due o
he educ ion o ecei e ’s noise. This is no he case wi h ea h
obse a ion a low mic owa e equencies, in which ecei e ’s noise
empe a u e (
T
R

80 K) is usually lowe han he a e age b igh ness
empe a u e (
T
A

250 K). In any case, he imp o emen shown by
(13), ep oduced om [3], will always be lowe han he uppe bound
ound o a linea a ay, which akes in o accoun unco ela ed e o s
1
T
no edundancy
=
T
B
+
T
R
p
B
p
N
V
!
1
T
edundancy
unco e o s
=
T
B
+
T
R
p
B
p
c
+ln
N
V
(13)
whe e
N
V
s ands o he o al numbe o isibili ies and
c
is he
Eule ’s cons an .
A de ailed analysis o edundancy and i s imp o emen on adio-
me ic sensi i i y equi es a speci ic a ay con igu a ion and scene
unde obse a ion. Howe e , o
Y
-a ays, which p o ide a e y
low deg ee o edundancy [5], [7], [10], [11], his imp o emen can
be app oxima ely ound i we ealize ha only baselines ela ing
an ennas on he same a m can be edundan . By he ze o baseline
i is unde s ood ha he one co esponding o
u
=
=0
, which
in MIRAS is non edundan , since i is measu ed by a dedica ed
Dicke adiome e . Recall also ha when he He mi ian p ope y is
conside ed e e y
(
u;
)
-poin is ac ually duplica ed. Fo he
Y
-a ay
wi h h ee a ms, each wi h
N
EL
=43
elemen s, plus a cen al
elemen , he e a e
3
N
EL
(3
N
EL
+1)
/
2 + 1 = 8386
baselines
[ he ex a one co esponding o
V
(0
;
0)
],
3
N
2
EL
+3
N
EL
+1=
5551
non edundan baselines o non edundan
(
u;
)
poin s, and
3(
N
EL
0
1) = 126
edundan
(
u;
)
poin s wi h di e en deg ees o
edundancy. I means ha
8386
0
5551 = 2709
edundan complex
co ela ions ( isibili ies) lead o only 126 edundan
(
u;
)
poin s.
This leads o an imp o emen o a 1% o a 43 an ennas pe a m
Y
-a ay [10], [11], e en in he case in which e o s be ween hese
isibili y samples a e assumed o be comple ely unco ela ed.
3) Snapsho Radiome ic Sensi i i y: As shown in he p e ious
sec ion, isibili y e o s a e He mi ian and, o compu a ional pu -
poses, unco ela ed om sample o sample. Wi h hese conside a ions,
he snapsho adiome ic sensi i i y, ha is, he a e age e o in each
b igh ness empe a u e map ob ained a e an in eg a ion ime o

seconds, is
T
(
; 
)=
A
m n
W
mn
1
[
e
V
(
u
mn
;
mn
)+
je
V
(
u
mn
;
mn
)]
1
e
j
2

(
u 
+

)
1
T
(
; 
)=
E
[
T
(
; 
)
T
(
; 
)
3
]
=
A
2
m n
W
2
mn
(

2
mn
+

2
imn
)
+
u >
0
;

0
u

0
; >
0
W
2
mn
(

2
mn
+

2
imn
)
1
cos[4

(
u
mn

+
mn

)]
(14)
684 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, VOL. 36, NO. 2, MARCH 1998
TABLE II
BASIC PARAMETERS OF MIRAS INSTRUMENT
which can be app oxima ed by
1
T
(
; 
)
'
AT
A
+
T
R
B
e

w

ol

p
N
V
(15)
whe e
A
=
p
3
d
2
=
2
, he local oscilla o ac o is gi en by

ol
=
p
2=1
:
41
o DSB ecei e s and

ol
=1
o SSB ecei e s;
he il e ac o is gi en

=
4
p
2=1
:
19
o Gaussian il e s
and

=1
o ec angula il e s; and he windowing ac o

w
is de ined as

w
=
m n
W
2
mn
=N
V
(16)
whe e he numbe o isibili y samples, including he He mi ian
ones, is
N
V
=6
N
2
EL
+6
N
EL
+1
o
Y
-a ays. In he
MIRAS case,
N
EL
=43
and he windowing ac o

w
=
1
;
0
:
5212
;
0
:
5717
;
0
:
5446
;
and
0
:
4517
o he ec angula , iangula ,
Hamming, Hanning, and Blackmann windows, espec i ely (Table I).
No e ha he weighing unc ion a enua es isibili y samples be ween
dis an an ennas, whe e SNR is wo se; hus, he adiome ic sensi i i y
is imp o ed a he expense o a loss in he angula esolu ion. MIRAS
spacebo ne snapsho adiome ic sensi i i y can be compu ed om
(15) and (16) wi h he pa ame e s lis ed in Table II [7]. Fig. 1 shows
he snapsho adiome ic sensibili y in decibels
10 log (
1
T
) [dBK]
g
e sus he SNR. Fo an SNR in he MIRAS ange 31.6–33.2 dB, he
adiome ic sensi i i y is bounded by 7.1–15.0 K and 3.2–6.8 K o
he ec angula and Blackmann windows, espec i ely.
4) Radiome ic Sensi i i y Imp o emen by Pixel A e aging:
Radiome ic sensi i i y can be imp o ed in a 2-D in e e ome ic
adiome e by means o “pixel a e aging.” Tha is, since a pixel
emains in he FOV o a long ime, he eco e ed alues can be
a e aged a e p ope co ec ion o he dependence wi h he angle
o incidence. In he MIRAS case, a pixel emains in he FOV o
abou 22 s (

FOV
=
FOV wid h/pla o m eloci y
= 165
Km/7
Km/s
=22
s), om which 11 s co espond o each pola iza ion.
The imp o emen on he adiome ic sensi i i y in each pola iza ion
is hen
1
T
pixel a g.
=
1
T
snap-sho
= (11
s=
0
:
3
s
)=6
o
6
p
2
in a single pola iza ion ins umen . This imp o emen is achie ed
because unsimul aneous measu emen s a e independen and he e o
is educed by he squa e oo o he numbe o measu emen s,
o equi alen ly, he in eg a ion ime is inc eased o he o al ime
he pixel emains in he FOV

FOV. A e pixel a e aging, o
he MIRAS ins umen (dual pola iza ion ins umen ), he expec ed
adiome ic sensi i i y alues a e hen
1
T
MIRAS

2
:
5
and
1
:
1
K o he ec angula and Blackmann windows, espec i ely, and
T
A

200
K.
III. RADIOMETRIC SENSITIVITY IN INTERFEROMETRIC
RADIOMETERS AND TOTAL POWER RADIOMETERS:
THE INTERFEROMETRIC RADIOMETER UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLE
In o de o compa e in a homogeneous way he adiome ic
sensi i i ies o in e e ome ic adiome e s and ideal o al-powe
adiome e s, we mus ake in o accoun all he a ailable in eg a ion
ime. No e ha a 2-D in e e ome ic adiome e images all he
space simul aneously, while a o al-powe adiome e images only he
pixel poin ed by he an enna beam. Tha is, he MIRAS spacebo ne
ins umen will image (
3
N
EL
+1)
2
= 130
2
=16
:
900
pixels
simul aneously [1] e e y

=
0.3 s, om which he e a e 8.689
in he alias- ee FOV. An ideal o al-powe adiome e imaging
only he alias- ee FOV pixels wi h he same angula esolu ion
would ha e a maximum in eg a ion ime o

pixel
=
=
8
:
689 =
0
:
3
s
=
8
:
689 = 34
:
5

s, leading o a wo s -case adiome ic sensi i i y
o
1
T
TPRad
pixel
=
T
sys
=
(
B
pixel
)

14
:
5
K, which is e y close o
he snapsho adiome ic sensi i i y o he in e e ome e adiome e
when he ec angula window is used (Sec ion II-B3).
The adiome ic sensi i i y imp o emen achie ed by windowing
can be now unde s ood as he spa ial a e aging o he pixel’s alue
wi h i s neighbo s. In ac , he sensi i i y imp o emen by windowing
is app oxima ely ela ed o he hal -powe syn hesized beamwid hs
gi en in [6] and [12] by
1
T
In Rad
ec angula
1
T
In Rad
W
=1

W
'
1

0
3dB
W
1

0
3dB
ec angula
:
(17)

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, VOL. 36, NO. 2, MARCH 1998 685
In [6] and [12], he angula esolu ion o
Y
-a ays is analyzed,
and o he ec angula window
1

0
3dB
ec .

=
(4
p
3
N
EL
d
)
. Fo an
a bi a y window
W
, he p oduc
1
T
W
1

0
3dB
;W
is ound o be
1
T
W
1

2
0
3dB
;W
'
p
3
2
d
2
T
A
+
T
R
B
e

w

ol

F
p
N
V


w
4
p
3
N
EL
d
'
p
3

24
T
A
+
T
R
B
e

ol

F
;
(
N
EL
>
1)
(18)
which can be app oxima ed by
1
T
1

2
0
3dB
;W
'
T
A
+
T
R
B
e

ol

F
d:
(19)
Equa ion (19) is he new In e e ome ic Radiome e Unce ain y
P inciple. I s a es ha he p oduc o he adiome ic sensi i i y
1
T
by he 2-D angula esolu ion
1

2
0
3dB
is a cons an ha depends only
on ecei e s and co ela o s pa ame e s, and i is independen on he
window used o p ocess he isibili y samples. I can be iewed as
he in e e ome ic adiome e e sion o he o al-powe adiome e
unce ain y equa ion gi en in (6.149) o [4].
IV. CONCLUSIONS
The adiome ic sensi i i y o a gene al 2-D in e e ome ic a-
diome e has been compu ed in his pape . The impac o he il e s’
shape has been analyzed and quan i ied as well as he ype o demod-
ula ion (SSB o DSB) and he kind o co ela o . The imp o emen
achie ed by means o pixel a e aging has been discussed and esul s
ha e been pa icula ized o he MIRAS ins umen , a
Y
-shaped
in e e ome ic adiome e wi h 43 an ennas pe a m, cu en ly unde
s udy a he Eu opean Space Agency. I has been shown ha a e
pixel a e aging, adiome ic sensi i i ies a e expec ed o be abou
2.5 o 1.1 K, depending on he weighing unc ion used o ape
he isibili y samples. Finally, The new in e e ome ic adiome e
unce ain y p inciple has been s a ed: i es ablishes ha he p oduc
o he adiome ic sensi i i y by he angula esolu ion is a cons an
ha depends only on he kind o ecei e s, co ela o s, and minimum
baselines.
REFERENCES
[1] A. Camps, J. Ba ´a, I. Co bella, and F. To es, “The p ocessing o hexago-
nally sampled signals wi h s anda d ec angula echniques: Applica ion
o ape u e syn hesis in e e ome e adiome e s,” IEEE T ans. Geosci.
Remo e Sensing, ol. 35, pp. 183–190, Jan. 1997.
[2] R. Thompson, J. Mo an, and G. Swenson, In e e ome y and Syn hesis
in Radio As onomy. New Yo k: Wiley, 1986.
[3] C. S. Ru , C. T. Swi , A. B. Tanne , and D. M. LeVine, “In e e ome ic
syn he ic ape u e adiome y o he emo e sensing o he Ea h,” IEEE
T ans. Geosci. Remo e Sensing, ol. 26, pp. 597–611, Sep . 1988.
[4] F. T. Ulaby, R. K. Moo e, and A. K. Fung, Mic owa e Remo e Sensing,
ol. I. No wood, MA: A ech House, 1981.
[5] J. Ba ´a, I. Co bella, F. To es, and A. Camps, “Two-dimensional disc e e
o mula ion o ape u e syn hesis adiome e s,” ESA-ESTEC, Final
Rep., CNN 2 o Wo k O de 10 o ESTEC Con ac 9777/92/NL/PB,
Jan. 1996.
[6] A. Camps, “Applica ion o in e e ome ic adiome y o Ea h ob-
se a ion,” Ph.D. disse a ion, Uni e si a Poli `
ecnica de Ca alunya,
Ba celona, Spain, No . 1996.
[7] Ma a Ma coni Space, “MIRAS: Mic owa e imaging adiome e wi h
ape u e syn hesis. Mic owa e adiome y c i ical echnical de elop-
men ,” ESA-ESTEC, Final Rep., ESTEC Con ac 9777/92/NL/PB, Jan.
1995.
[8] M. E. Tiu i, “Radio as onomy ecei e s,” IEEE T ans. An ennas P op-
aga ., ol. AP-11, pp. 930–938, Dec. 1964.
[9] J. B. Hagen and D. T. Fa ley, “Digi al co ela ion echniques in adio
science,” Radio Sci. ol. 8, pp. 775–784, Aug./Sep . 1973.
[10] J. Ba ´a, A. Camps, F. To es, and I. Co bella, “Baseline edundancy and
adiome ic sensi i i y: A c i ical e iew,” in Soil Mois u e and Ocean
Salini y Measu emen s and Radiome e Techniques Consul a i e Mee -
ing. Noo dwijk, The Ne he lands: ESA-ESTEC, Ap . 20–22, 1995.
[11] , “The co ela ion o isibili y e o s and i s impac on he
adiome ic esolu ion o an ape u e syn hesis adiome e ,” submi ed
o publica ion.
[12] , “Angula esolu ion o wo-dimensional hexagonally sampled
in e e ome ic adiome e s,” Radio Sci., o be published.
Recip oci y o he Bidi ec ional Re lec ance
Dis ibu ion Func ion (BRDF) in Measu emen s
and Models o S uc u ed Su aces
William C. Snyde
Abs ac —The bidi ec ional e lec ance dis ibu ion unc ion (BRDF)
is one o he mos impo an su ace p ope ies o e es ial emo e
sensing, bu i s de ini ion o s uc u ed su aces is no ully unde s ood.
The BRDF o la su aces has a s aigh o wa d de ini ion and is usually
conside ed o be ecip ocal, which means he alue is he same when
he sou ce and de ec o angles a e swi ched. S uc u ed su aces, such
as o es canopies and g asslands, equi e an ex ension o he de ini ion
o BRDF and some addi ional measu emen condi ions. In his pape ,
a de ini ion o he BRDF o s uc u ed su aces is p oposed, and i
is shown ha wi h his de ini ion, he BRDF is ecip ocal. In addi ion,
some o he ela ed geome ical measu emen equi emen s a e discussed.
I is concluded ha ecip oci y should apply o bo h measu emen s
and models o s uc u ed su aces and ha ield measu emen s iola e
ecip oci y no because he BRDF i sel is non ecip ocal, bu because o
unco ec ed geome ic and adiome ic ac o s.
Index Te ms—Elec omagne ic sca e ing by ough su aces, adia i e
ans e , adiome y, emo e sensing.
I. INTRODUCTION
Land-co e bidi ec ional e lec ance is o p ime impo ance in e -
es ial emo e sensing. In he sola - e lec i e egion o he spec um,
he bidi ec ional p ope ies a e applied o no malize he e ec s o
di e en sun-senso geome ies o p o ide consis en su ace ea u es
o classi ica ion and change de ec ion [1]. In he he mal in a ed
egion, he bidi ec ional cha ac e is ics a e applied o accoun o he
e lec ed downwelling i adiance and o compu e he angula emis-
si i y [2]. The bidi ec ional e lec ance dis ibu ion unc ion (BRDF)
cha ac e izes su ace bidi ec ional e lec ance o all combina ions
o inciden and e lec ed zeni h and azimu h angles. BRDF is an
op ical p ope y o a ma e ial ha does no depend on ex e nal
ac o s, such as illumina ion o a mosphe ic ansmission. In p ac ice,
BRDF can be modeled, bu canno be measu ed o applied di ec ly
Manusc ip ecei ed Feb ua y 19, 1997; e ised June 4, 1997. This wo k
was pe o med a he Ins i u e o Compu a ional Ea h Sys em Science,
Uni e si y o Cali o nia, San a Ba ba a, and suppo ed by Ea h Obse ing
Sys em P og am Con ac NAS5-31370 o he Na ional Ae onau ics and Space
Adminis a ion.
The au ho is wi h GDE Sys ems Inc., San Diego, CA 92150-9008 USA
(e-mail: [email p o ec ed]).
Publishe I em Iden i ie S 0196-2892(98)00547-6.
0196–2892/98$10.00 1998 IEEE