scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Insect Body Defence Reactions against Bee Venom: Do Adipokinetic Hormones Play a Role?

Abstract

Bees originally developed their stinging apparatus and venom against members of their own species from other hives or against predatory insects. Nevertheless, the biological and biochemical response of arthropods to bee venom is not well studied. Thus, in this study, the physiological responses of a model insect species (American cockroach, Periplaneta americana) to honeybee venom were investigated. Bee venom toxins elicited severe stress (LD50 = 1.063 uL venom) resulting in a significant increase in adipokinetic hormones (AKHs) in the cockroach central nervous system and haemolymph. Venom treatment induced a large destruction of muscle cell ultrastructure, especially myofibrils and sarcomeres. Interestingly, co-application of venom with cockroach Peram-CAH-II AKH eliminated this effect. Envenomation modulated the levels of carbohydrates, lipids, and proteins in the haemolymph and the activity of digestive amylases, lipases, and proteases in the midgut. Bee venom significantly reduced vitellogenin levels in females. Dopamine and glutathione (GSH and GSSG) insignificantly increased after venom treatment. However, dopamine levels significantly increased after Peram-CAH-II application and after co-application with bee venom, while GSH and GSSG levels immediately increased after co-application. The results suggest a general reaction of the cockroach body to bee venom and at least a partial involvement of AKHs.

Read accessible full text

Insect Body Defence Reactions against Bee Venom: Do Adipokinetic Hormones Play a Role?

Author: Bodláková, Karolína; Černý, Jan; Štěrbová, Helena; Guráň, Roman; Zítka, Ondřej; Kodrík, Dalibor
Publisher: MDPI
Year: 2022
DOI: 10.3390/toxins14010011
Source: https://dspace.vut.cz/bitstreams/d53d0080-3c15-46ea-9245-325a547fcb75/download


Ci a ion: Bodláko á, K.; ˇ
Ce ný, J.;
Š ˇe bo á, H.; Gu áˇn, R.; Zí ka, O.;
Kod ík, D. Insec Body De ence
Reac ions agains Bee Venom: Do
Adipokine ic Ho mones Play a Role?.
Toxins 2022,14, 11. h ps://doi.o g/
10.3390/ oxins14010011
Recei ed: 23 No embe 2021
Accep ed: 20 Decembe 2021
Published: 23 Decembe 2021
Publishe ’s No e: MDPI s ays neu al
wi h ega d o ju isdic ional claims in
published maps and ins i u ional a il-
ia ions.
Copy igh : © 2021 by he au ho s.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Swi ze land.
This a icle is an open access a icle
dis ibu ed unde he e ms and
condi ions o he C ea i e Commons
A ibu ion (CC BY) license (h ps://
c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/
4.0/).
oxins
A icle
Insec Body De ence Reac ions agains Bee Venom: Do
Adipokine ic Ho mones Play a Role?
Ka olina Bodláko á1,2,†, Jan ˇ
Ce ný1,2,† , Helena Š ˇe bo á1, Roman Gu áˇn 3,4 , Ondˇ ej Zí ka 3,4
and Dalibo Kod ík1,2,*
1Biology Cen e, Ins i u e o En omology, CAS, B anišo ská31, 370 05 Ceske Budejo ice, Czech Republic;
[email p o ec ed] (K.B.); [email p o ec ed] (J. ˇ
C.); [email p o ec ed] (H.Š.)
2Facul y o Science, Uni e si y o Sou h Bohemia, B anišo ská31a, 370 05 Ceske Budejo ice, Czech Republic
3Depa men o Chemis y and Biochemis y, Facul y o Ag iSciences, Mendel Uni e si y in B no,
Zemˇedˇelská1665/1, 613 00 B no, Czech Republic; [email p o ec ed] (R.G.); [email p o ec ed] (O.Z.)
4Cen al Eu opean Ins i u e o Technology, B no Uni e si y o Technology, Pu kyˇno a 656/123,
612 00 B no, Czech Republic
*Co espondence: [email p o ec ed]
† The au ho s con ibu ed equally o he wo k.
Abs ac :
Bees o iginally de eloped hei s inging appa a us and enom agains membe s o hei
own species om o he hi es o agains p eda o y insec s. Ne e heless, he biological and biochemi-
cal esponse o a h opods o bee enom is no well s udied. Thus, in his s udy, he physiological
esponses o a model insec species (Ame ican cock oach, Pe iplane a ame icana) o honeybee enom
we e in es iga ed. Bee enom oxins elici ed se e e s ess (LD
50
= 1.063 uL enom) esul ing in a
signi ican inc ease in adipokine ic ho mones (AKHs) in he cock oach cen al ne ous sys em and
haemolymph. Venom ea men induced a la ge des uc ion o muscle cell ul as uc u e, especially
myo ib ils and sa come es. In e es ingly, co-applica ion o enom wi h cock oach Pe am-CAH-II
AKH elimina ed his e ec . En enoma ion modula ed he le els o ca bohyd a es, lipids, and p o eins
in he haemolymph and he ac i i y o diges i e amylases, lipases, and p o eases in he midgu .
Bee enom signi ican ly educed i ellogenin le els in emales. Dopamine and glu a hione (GSH
and GSSG) insigni ican ly inc eased a e enom ea men . Howe e , dopamine le els signi ican ly
inc eased a e Pe am-CAH-II applica ion and a e co-applica ion wi h bee enom, while GSH and
GSSG le els immedia ely inc eased a e co-applica ion. The esul s sugges a gene al eac ion o he
cock oach body o bee enom and a leas a pa ial in ol emen o AKHs.
Keywo ds:
adipokine ic ho mone; Ame ican cock oach; dopamine; honey bee; meli in; me abolism;
muscle ul as uc u e; i ellogenin
Key Con ibu ion:
This s udy desc ibes he e ec o bee enom on he le els o adipokine ic ho -
mones, haemolymph nu ien s, i ellogenins, dopamine, and oxida i e s ess ma ke s; he ac i i y o
diges i e enzymes; and he muscle ul as uc u e in he body o he model species, he cock oach
(Pe iplane a ame icana). The ole o adipokine ic ho mones in physiological p ocesses a e enom
ea men is emphasised.
1. In oduc ion
Honeybee enom is a cock ail o a ious biologically ac i e subs ances including
pep ides, p o eins, amines, and amino acids dissol ed in an aqueous solu ion [
1
]. Toxins
ei he igge biochemical cascades o become biologically ac i e ollowing he e ec s o
ano he oxin h ough posi i e eedback loops. Bee enom mainly con ains meli in (ap-
p oxima ely 50% o d y ma e ), phospholipases, hyalu onidase, o he enzymes, and small,
biologically ac i e subs ances wi h ee amine g oups (dopamine, his amine, se o onin,
and no epineph ine) [
1
,
2
]. Meli in is a 26-amino acid pep ide wi h nume ous biological,
oxicological, and pha macological ac i i ies [
3
,
4
]. Toxici y is based on an abili y o bind
Toxins 2022,14, 11. h ps://doi.o g/10.3390/ oxins14010011 h ps://www.mdpi.com/jou nal/ oxins
Toxins 2022,14, 11 2 o 18
o he phospholipid bilaye o cell memb anes and o m po es. Meli in also ac i a es
o he enzymes, including phospholipases, which b eak down phospholipids and inc ease
cell des uc ion [
1
,
4
], which is he likely cause o mi ochond ial damage and collapse [
5
].
Biogenic amines also play impo an oles as majo s imula o s o in lamma ion and o he
immune esponses [
2
,
6
]. The de ence eac ion agains bee enom in he ic im’s body is
gene ally well unde s ood; howe e , no all he de ails a e known. The ecen iden i ica ion
o i ellogenin in bee enom [
7
] sugges s ha i inc eases he alle genic p ope ies o he
enom; howe e , his has no been s udied in de ail. Vi ellogenins a e mos ly known as
yolk p ecu so s in ol ed in ep oduc ion, bu hey also play impo an oles in p o ec ion
agains oxida i e s ess, wound healing, and insec immuni y, wi h s ong ac i i y agains
bac e ia and o he pa hogens [8,9].
Bee enom in oxica ion ce ainly elici s se e e s ess on he a ec ed body, wi h he an i-
s ess esponse gene ally con olled by he ne ous and endoc ine sys ems [
10
]. In insec s,
an i-s ess eac ions a e p edominan ly egula ed by adipokine ic ho mones (AKHs), which
a e esponsible o main aining homeos asis. AKHs a e small pep ides (8–10 amino acids
in leng h) ha a e eleased om he co po a ca diaca, a small neu oendoc ine gland
connec ed o he b ain [
11
,
12
]. They in e ac wi h a ious body sys ems in ol ed in
he ac i a ion o me abolism and ela ed p ocesses ( e iewed in [
11
–
13
]), which include
ac i a ion o diges i e enzymes [
14
–
16
], mobilisa ion o an i-oxida i e s ess esponse
( e iewed in [
13
]), and/o in e ac ions o AKHs wi h biogenic amines [
17
,
18
], among
o he s. I is also known ha some biogenic amines can con ol AKH p oduc ion [
17
].
None heless, i emains unclea whe he hese mechanisms a e in ol ed in AKH esponses
induced by na u al enoms.
In his s udy, he model Ame ican cock oach, Pe iplane a ame icana, was u ilised o mea-
su e he physiological e ec s o bee oxins. This is a e y popula model o physiological
and biochemical s udies and is p edominan ly used by Ame ican insec scien is s. The ho -
monal sys em o his species is well known and possesses wo AKHs called Pe am-CAH-I
(P. ame icana ca dioaccele a ing ho mone I (pGlu-Leu-Th -Phe-Th - P o-Asn-T p-NH
2
);
and Pe am-CAH-II (pGlu-Val-Asn-Phe-Se -P o-Asn-T p-NH
2
) [
19
]. Cock oaches a e no
he p ima y a ge s o bee a acks; howe e , he main oxic ac i i ies o bee enom by
molecules such as meli in o phospholipases a e no species-speci ic. Bee enom should
be e ec i e agains cock oaches since bees o en ace a acks by o he insec species. The
main goals o his s udy we e o desc ibe he e ec o bee oxins on se e al me abolic
cha ac e is ics and on muscle ul as uc u e. Fu he mo e, he possible ole o AKHs and
se e al o he biologically ac i e subs ances ( i ellogenins, dopamine, and glu a hione) in
de ence eac ions agains he enom was e alua ed.
2. Resul s
2.1. Gene al In e ac ions be ween Venom and AKH
Ini ial expe imen s in ol ed measu ing cock oach mo ali y 24 h a e applying in-
c easing doses o bee enom o de e mine he app op ia e dose (Figu e 1). A dose o 0.5 uL
enom pe cock oach was deemed he mos app op ia e since i elici ed app oxima ely 20%
mo ali y (LD50 = 1.063 uL) and p o ided a su icien physiological e ec whils lea ing a
sa is ac o y numbe o li ing insec s o he ollowing expe imen s. The es ima ed hal -li e
o 3.82 min o meli in was used o assess he a e a which bee enom is deg aded by he
cock oach de ence sys em in he haemolymph (Figu e 2).
Venom ea men elici ed se e e s ess in he cock oach body, since AKH le els in he
cen al ne ous sys em (CNS) signi ican ly ose by 3.8- old and 3.3- old a 6 h and 12 h,
espec i ely (Figu e 3). The le els e u ned o he con ol le el a e 24 h. Co esponding
AKH le els in he haemolymph signi ican ly inc eased by 3.6- old and 1.4- old a e 1 h
and 2 h, espec i ely (Figu e 4), indica ing ha AKH u no e in he haemolymph was
much as e han ha in he CNS. In e es ingly, he le el o AKHs in he CNS was in he
o de o pmols, while in haemolymph in he o de o mols.
Toxins 2022,14, 11 3 o 18
Toxins 2022, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 o 20
Figu e 1. The e ec o inc easing doses o honeybee enom on mo ali y o P. ame icana adul s 24 h
a e he ea men . Each poin ep esen s he mean ± SD; n = 3 g oups wi h 15–20 indi iduals in
each.
Venom ea men elici ed se e e s ess in he cock oach body, since AKH le els in
he cen al ne ous sys em (CNS) signi ican ly ose by 3.8- old and 3.3- old a 6 h and 12
h, espec i ely (Figu e 3). The le els e u ned o he con ol le el a e 24 h. Co esponding
AKH le els in he haemolymph signi ican ly inc eased by 3.6- old and 1.4- old a e 1 h
and 2 h, espec i ely (Figu e 4), indica ing ha AKH u no e in he haemolymph was
much as e han ha in he CNS. In e es ingly, he le el o AKHs in he CNS was in he
o de o pmols, while in haemolymph in he o de o mols.
2.2. E ec o Venom and AKH on Muscle Ul as uc u e
En enoma ion changed he muscle ul as uc u e in he cock oach ho ax (Figu e 5) by
inducing myo ib il des uc ion and gene al diso ganisa ion o o ganelles in muscle cells
(Figu e 5C). In e es ingly, co-applica ion wi h Pe am-CAH-II p e en ed his damage (Fig-
u e 5D). Meanwhile, ho mone adminis a ion alone (Figu e 5B) did no a ec he common
ul as uc u e o muscle cells compa ed wi h he Ringe saline con ol (Figu e 5A).
2.3. E ec o Venom and AKH on Selec ed Me aboli es
The le els o he main haemolymph nu ien s in he cock oach (ca bohyd a es, lipids,
and p o eins) we e modula ed by he enom ea men a e 6 h (Figu e 6), while he
changes we e less signi ican wi h inc easing ime (da a no shown). Ca bohyd a e le els
signi ican ly dec eased a e en enoma ion (1.8- old) and signi ican ly inc eased a e
Pe am-CAH-II ea men (1.8- old; Figu e 6A) as expec ed, since his ho mone p ima ily
mobilises ca bohyd a es in he cock oach body [20]. Co- ea men wi h bo h agen s elim-
ina ed hese luc ua ions and main ained ca bohyd a e le els a ha o he con ol. The
lipid le els signi ican ly inc eased in all expe imen al g oups a e he ea men s (Figu e
6B); howe e , hese changes we e sligh ly smalle han hose eco ded o ca bohyd a es
(1.3–1.7- old), wi h he o al lipid le el in he haemolymph app oxima ely wo imes lowe
han he o al ca bohyd a e le el. P o ein le els signi ican ly inc eased by 1.2–1.3- old ol-
lowing Pe am-CAH-II ea men alone o in combina ion wi h bee enom (Figu e 6C).
Figu e 1.
The e ec o inc easing doses o honeybee enom on mo ali y o P. ame icana adul s 24 h
a e he ea men . Each poin ep esen s he mean
±
SD; n= 3 g oups wi h 15–20 indi iduals in each.
Toxins 2022, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 o 20
Figu e 2. Tempo al changes in he amoun o meli in in he haemolymph o P. ame icana adul s
injec ed wi h 2 μL he honeybee enom. (A) Illus a i e HPLC eco d o meli in s anda d (1 μg).
(B) Illus a i e HPLC eco d o haemolymph ex ac (5 μL) 5 min a e enom ea men ; no peak
was obse ed in con ol haemolymph a RT = 10.3 min (da a no shown). (C) Le el o meli in in P.
ame icana adul haemolymph a di e en imes a e he ea men . The hal li e o 3.82 min was
es ima ed om plo s o log meli in i e. Each poin ep esen s he mean ± SD (n = 3–4).
Figu e 2.
Tempo al changes in he amoun o meli in in he haemolymph o P. ame icana adul s
injec ed wi h 2
µ
L he honeybee enom. (
A
) Illus a i e HPLC eco d o meli in s anda d (1
µ
g).
(
B
) Illus a i e HPLC eco d o haemolymph ex ac (5
µ
L) 5 min a e enom ea men ; no peak
was obse ed in con ol haemolymph a RT = 10.3 min (da a no shown). (
C
) Le el o meli in in
P. ame icana adul haemolymph a di e en imes a e he ea men . The hal li e o 3.82 min was
es ima ed om plo s o log meli in i e. Each poin ep esen s he mean ±SD (n= 3–4).
Toxins 2022,14, 11 4 o 18
Toxins 2022, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 o 20
Figu e 3. ELISA quan i ica ion o he Pe am-CAH-I and Pe am-CAH-II ( oge he —AKH) in CNS o
P. ame icana adul s a e he honeybee (0.5 μL) ea men ; esul s a e exp essed in pmol o Pe am-
CAH-II ( o explana ion see Sec ion 5.4). S a is ically signi ican di e ences be ween he enom
g oup and co esponding con ol (mean ± SD, n = 8) a each ime-poin e alua ed by S uden ’s - es
on 5% le el a e indica ed by * s a is ically signi ican di e ences among he ime-poin s a e he
enom ea men e alua ed by one-way ANOVA wi h Tukey’s pos - es a he 5% le el a e indi-
ca ed by di e en le e s abo e he columns (a,b.c) (no di e ences we e eco ded among he con-
ols). The numbe s abo e he columns ep esen old-di e ence o AKH le el as compa ed wi h
co esponding con ol.
Figu e 3.
ELISA quan i ica ion o he Pe am-CAH-I and Pe am-CAH-II ( oge he —AKH) in CNS o P.
ame icana adul s a e he honeybee (0.5
µ
L) ea men ; esul s a e exp essed in pmol o Pe am-CAH-II
( o explana ion see Sec ion 5.4). S a is ically signi ican di e ences be ween he enom g oup and
co esponding con ol (mean
±
SD, n= 8) a each ime-poin e alua ed by S uden ’s - es on 5% le el
a e indica ed by * s a is ically signi ican di e ences among he ime-poin s a e he enom ea men
e alua ed by one-way ANOVA wi h Tukey’s pos - es a he 5% le el a e indica ed by di e en le e s
abo e he columns (a,b.c) (no di e ences we e eco ded among he con ols). The numbe s abo e he
columns ep esen old-di e ence o AKH le el as compa ed wi h co esponding con ol.
2.2. E ec o Venom and AKH on Muscle Ul as uc u e
En enoma ion changed he muscle ul as uc u e in he cock oach ho ax (Figu e 5)
by inducing myo ib il des uc ion and gene al diso ganisa ion o o ganelles in muscle
cells (Figu e 5C). In e es ingly, co-applica ion wi h Pe am-CAH-II p e en ed his damage
(Figu e 5D). Meanwhile, ho mone adminis a ion alone (Figu e 5B) did no a ec he
common ul as uc u e o muscle cells compa ed wi h he Ringe saline con ol (Figu e 5A).
2.3. E ec o Venom and AKH on Selec ed Me aboli es
The le els o he main haemolymph nu ien s in he cock oach (ca bohyd a es, lipids,
and p o eins) we e modula ed by he enom ea men a e 6 h (Figu e 6), while he
changes we e less signi ican wi h inc easing ime (da a no shown). Ca bohyd a e le -
els signi ican ly dec eased a e en enoma ion (1.8- old) and signi ican ly inc eased a e
Pe am-CAH-II ea men (1.8- old; Figu e 6A) as expec ed, since his ho mone p ima -
ily mobilises ca bohyd a es in he cock oach body [
20
]. Co- ea men wi h bo h agen s
elimina ed hese luc ua ions and main ained ca bohyd a e le els a ha o he con ol.
The lipid le els signi ican ly inc eased in all expe imen al g oups a e he ea men s
(Figu e 6B); howe e , hese changes we e sligh ly smalle han hose eco ded o ca bo-
hyd a es
(1.3–1.7- old
), wi h he o al lipid le el in he haemolymph app oxima ely wo
imes lowe han he o al ca bohyd a e le el. P o ein le els signi ican ly inc eased by
1.2–1.3- old ollowing Pe am-CAH-II ea men alone o in combina ion wi h bee enom
(Figu e 6C).
Toxins 2022,14, 11 5 o 18
Toxins 2022, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 o 20
Figu e 4. HPLC quan i ica ion o he Pe am-CAH-I and Pe am-CAH-II ( oge he —AKHs) in hae-
molymph o P. ame icana adul s a e he honeybee (0.5 μL) ea men . (A) Illus a i e HPLC eco d
o AKH s anda ds Pe am-CAH-I and Pe am–CAH-II (10 and 10 pmol, espec i ely). (B) Illus a i e
HPLC eco d o an ex ac om 100 uL o haemolymph ( o de ails see Sec ion 5.4). (C) Le el o
AKHs in P. ame icana adul haemolymph a di e en imes a e he ea men . S a is ically signi i-
can di e ences be ween he enom g oup and co esponding con ol (mean ± SD, n = 3) a each
ime-poin e alua ed by S uden ’s - es on 5% le el a e indica ed by *; s a is ically signi ican di -
e ences among he ime-poin s a e he enom ea men e alua ed by one-way ANOVA wi h
Tukey’s pos - es a he 5% le el a e indica ed by di e en le e s abo e he columns (a,b,c) (no di -
e ences we e eco ded among he con ols). The numbe s abo e he columns ep esen old-di e -
ence o AKH le el as compa ed wi h co esponding con ol.
Figu e 4.
HPLC quan i ica ion o he Pe am-CAH-I and Pe am-CAH-II ( oge he —AKHs) in
haemolymph o P. ame icana adul s a e he honeybee (0.5
µ
L) ea men . (
A
) Illus a i e HPLC eco d
o AKH s anda ds Pe am-CAH-I and Pe am–CAH-II (10 and 10 pmol, espec i ely). (
B
) Illus a i e
HPLC eco d o an ex ac om 100 uL o haemolymph ( o de ails see Sec ion 5.4). (
C
) Le el o AKHs
in P. ame icana adul haemolymph a di e en imes a e he ea men . S a is ically signi ican di e -
ences be ween he enom g oup and co esponding con ol (mean
±
SD, n= 3) a each ime-poin
e alua ed by S uden ’s - es on 5% le el a e indica ed by *; s a is ically signi ican di e ences among
he ime-poin s a e he enom ea men e alua ed by one-way ANOVA wi h Tukey’s pos - es a
he 5% le el a e indica ed by di e en le e s abo e he columns (a,b,c) (no di e ences we e eco ded
among he con ols). The numbe s abo e he columns ep esen old-di e ence o AKH le el as
compa ed wi h co esponding con ol.

Toxins 2022,14, 11 6 o 18
Toxins 2022, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 o 20
Figu e 5. TEM pho os o he ho acic muscles om P. ame icana adul s 24 h a e ea men wi h (A)
Ringe saline (con ol), (B) 40 pmol Pe am-CAH-II, (C) 0.5 uL bee enom, and (D) 0.5 uL bee enom
+40 pmol Pe am-CAH-II oge he . Scale ba s in he Figs = 2 μm.
The ac i i y o he main diges i e enzymes in he cock oach midgu a e bee enom
applica ion showed some signi ican changes, bu hese we e gene ally small and ambig-
uous. The e o e, only he empo al e ec s o he enom, Pe am-CAH-II, and hei co-ad-
di ion a e shown (Figu e 7). Bee enom sligh ly s imula ed amylase ac i i y a e 6–24 h,
which was no modula ed by Pe am-CAH-II. The 2- old s imula ion using Pe am-CAH-II
alone was no obse ed un il 24 h a e ea men (Figu e 7A). Lipase ac i i y signi ican ly
inc eased by 2- old 24 h a e Pe am-CAH-II ea men , while o he ea men s had insig-
ni ican e ec s (Figu e 7B). P o ease ac i i y was signi ican ly s imula ed 12 h and 24 h
a e enom adminis a ion, while Pe am-CAH-II alone only s imula ed p o ease ac i i y
by 2.2- old a e 24 h. In e es ingly, Pe am-CAH-II s imula ion o all enzymes (24 h a e
ea men ) was signi ican ly elimina ed by he enom du ing co-applica ion o bo h agen s
(one-way ANOVA wi h Tukey’s pos - es : amylase, p = 0.0004; lipase, p = 0.0015; p o ease,
p = 0.002; da a no shown o cla i y).
Vi ellogenins a e ac i ely in ol ed in de ence eac ions agains a ious pa hogens
[9]. The e was a signi ican educ ion in bo h ~100 kDa i ellogenin p o eins by 8.2- old
and 2.9- old in he emale haemolymph 6 h a e enom adminis a ion (Figu e 8A,B).
Meanwhile, he esponse in he male haemolymph was less p onounced, wi h he hea ie
p o ein signi ican ly educed by 1.3- old and he ligh e p o ein una ec ed (Figu e 8A,C).
Figu e 5.
TEM pho os o he ho acic muscles om P. ame icana adul s 24 h a e ea men wi h
(
A
) Ringe saline (con ol), (
B
) 40 pmol Pe am-CAH-II, (
C
) 0.5 uL bee enom, and (
D
) 0.5 uL bee
enom +40 pmol Pe am-CAH-II oge he . Scale ba s in he Figs = 2 µm.
The ac i i y o he main diges i e enzymes in he cock oach midgu a e bee enom
applica ion showed some signi ican changes, bu hese we e gene ally small and am-
biguous. The e o e, only he empo al e ec s o he enom, Pe am-CAH-II, and hei
co-addi ion a e shown (Figu e 7). Bee enom sligh ly s imula ed amylase ac i i y a e
6–24 h,
which was no modula ed by Pe am-CAH-II. The 2- old s imula ion using Pe am-
CAH-II alone was no obse ed un il 24 h a e ea men (Figu e 7A). Lipase ac i i y
signi ican ly inc eased by 2- old 24 h a e Pe am-CAH-II ea men , while o he ea men s
had insigni ican e ec s (Figu e 7B). P o ease ac i i y was signi ican ly s imula ed 12 h
and 24 h a e enom adminis a ion, while Pe am-CAH-II alone only s imula ed p o ease
ac i i y by 2.2- old a e 24 h. In e es ingly, Pe am-CAH-II s imula ion o all enzymes (24 h
a e ea men ) was signi ican ly elimina ed by he enom du ing co-applica ion o bo h
agen s (one-way ANOVA wi h Tukey’s pos - es : amylase, p= 0.0004; lipase, p= 0.0015;
p o ease, p= 0.002; da a no shown o cla i y).
Vi ellogenins a e ac i ely in ol ed in de ence eac ions agains a ious pa hogens [
9
].
The e was a signi ican educ ion in bo h ~100 kDa i ellogenin p o eins by 8.2- old and
2.9- old
in he emale haemolymph 6 h a e enom adminis a ion (Figu e 8A,B). Mean-
while, he esponse in he male haemolymph was less p onounced, wi h he hea ie p o ein
signi ican ly educed by 1.3- old and he ligh e p o ein una ec ed (Figu e 8A,C).
Toxins 2022,14, 11 7 o 18
Toxins 2022, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 o 20
Figu e 6. The e ec o 0.5 μL honeybee enom and/o 40 pmol Pe am-CAH-II on (A) ca bohyd a e,
(B) lipid and (C) p o ein le els in he haemolymph o P. ame icana adul s 6 h a e he ea men .
S a is ically signi ican di e ences among he g oups (mean ± SD) e alua ed by one-way ANOVA
wi h Tukey’s pos - es a he 5% le el a e indica ed by di e en le e s abo e he columns (a,b,c) (n
= 6–8). The numbe s abo e he columns ep esen old-di e ence o he pa icula nu ien le el in
ea ed cock oaches compa ed wi h ha in con ols.
Bee enom applica ion insigni ican ly s imula ed dopamine le els in he cock oach
CNS 6 h a e ea men (Figu e 9). Ne e heless, a signi ican inc ease in his amine was
eco ded a e ea men wi h Pe am-CAH-II alone o oge he wi h enom by 2.3- old
and 2.4- old, espec i ely. Meanwhile, he le els o glu a hione oxida i e s ess ma ke s
( educed and oxidised glu a hione: GSH and GSSG, espec i ely) sligh ly inc eased ol-
lowing ea men wi h enom alone o ho mone alone (Figu e 10). Howe e , hei co-ad-
minis a ion led o a signi ican inc ease in GSH and GSSG le els by 5.3- old and 2.8- old,
espec i ely.
Figu e 6.
The e ec o 0.5
µ
L honeybee enom and/o 40 pmol Pe am-CAH-II on (
A
) ca bohyd a e,
(
B
) lipid and (
C
) p o ein le els in he haemolymph o P. ame icana adul s 6 h a e he ea men .
S a is ically signi ican di e ences among he g oups (mean
±
SD) e alua ed by one-way ANOVA
wi h Tukey’s pos - es a he 5% le el a e indica ed by di e en le e s abo e he columns (a,b,c)
(n= 6–8)
. The numbe s abo e he columns ep esen old-di e ence o he pa icula nu ien le el in
ea ed cock oaches compa ed wi h ha in con ols.
Toxins 2022,14, 11 8 o 18
Toxins 2022, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 o 20
Figu e 7. The empo al e ec o 0.5 uL honeybee enom and/o 40 pmol Pe am-CAH-II on (A) am-
ylase, (B) lipase and (C) p o ease ac i i ies in he midgu o P. ame icana adul s 6, 12 and 24 h a e
he ea men . S a is ically signi ican di e ences be ween he con ol and enom g oups, be ween
he con ol and Pe am-CAH-II g oups, and be ween he con ol and bo h agen s g oups (all mean ±
SD) e alua ed by one-way ANOVA wi h Dunne ’s pos - es a he 5% le el a e indica ed by *, @
and #, espec i ely (n = 6–8). The numbe s abo e he columns ep esen old-di e ence o he pa -
icula enzyme ac i i y in ea ed cock oaches compa ed wi h ha in con ols. Fo u he s a is ics
see he co esponding ex .
Figu e 7.
The empo al e ec o 0.5 uL honeybee enom and/o 40 pmol Pe am-CAH-II on (
A
)
amylase, (
B
) lipase and (
C
) p o ease ac i i ies in he midgu o P. ame icana adul s 6, 12 and 24 h a e
he ea men . S a is ically signi ican di e ences be ween he con ol and enom g oups, be ween he
con ol and Pe am-CAH-II g oups, and be ween he con ol and bo h agen s g oups (all mean
±
SD)
e alua ed by one-way ANOVA wi h Dunne ’s pos - es a he 5% le el a e indica ed by *, @ and #,
espec i ely (n= 6–8). The numbe s abo e he columns ep esen old-di e ence o he pa icula
enzyme ac i i y in ea ed cock oaches compa ed wi h ha in con ols. Fo u he s a is ics see he
co esponding ex .
Bee enom applica ion insigni ican ly s imula ed dopamine le els in he cock oach
CNS 6 h a e ea men (Figu e 9). Ne e heless, a signi ican inc ease in his amine was
eco ded a e ea men wi h Pe am-CAH-II alone o oge he wi h enom by 2.3- old
and 2.4- old, espec i ely. Meanwhile, he le els o glu a hione oxida i e s ess ma k-
e s ( educed and oxidised glu a hione: GSH and GSSG, espec i ely) sligh ly inc eased
ollowing ea men wi h enom alone o ho mone alone (Figu e 10). Howe e , hei
co-adminis a ion led o a signi ican inc ease in GSH and GSSG le els by 5.3- old and
2.8- old, espec i ely.
Toxins 2022,14, 11 9 o 18
Toxins 2022, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 o 20
Figu e 8. The e ec o 0.5 uL honeybee enom on i ellogenin le el in P. ame icana adul haemo-
lymph 6 h a e he ea men . (A)—illus a i e 4–20% SDS polyac ylamide gel ( emales 0.4 uL and
males 1 uL haemolymph/well: 1— emale con ol, 2— emale en enomed, 3—male con ol, 4—male
en enomed; 5—molecula s anda ds); (B)— i ellogenin quan i ica ion in emales; (C)— i ellogenin
quan i ica ion in males. S a is ically signi ican di e ences be ween he enom g oups and co e-
sponding con ols e alua ed by S uden ’s - es on 5% le el a e indica ed by * (n = 6–8). The numbe s
abo e he columns ep esen old-di e ence o he pa icula i ellogenin le el in ea ed cock-
oaches compa ed wi h ha in con ols.
Figu e 9. The e ec o 0.5 uL honeybee enom and/o 40 pmol Pe am-CAH-II on dopamine le els
in he b ain o P. ame icana adul s 6 h a e he ea men . S a is ically signi ican di e ences among
he g oups (mean ± SD) e alua ed by one-way ANOVA wi h Tukey’s pos - es a he 5% le el a e
Figu e 8.
The e ec o 0.5 uL honeybee enom on i ellogenin le el in P. ame icana adul haemolymph
6 h a e he ea men . (
A
)—illus a i e 4–20% SDS polyac ylamide gel ( emales 0.4 uL and males 1 uL
haemolymph/well: 1— emale con ol, 2— emale en enomed, 3—male con ol, 4—male en enomed;
5—molecula s anda ds); (
B
)— i ellogenin quan i ica ion in emales; (
C
)— i ellogenin quan i ica ion
in males. S a is ically signi ican di e ences be ween he enom g oups and co esponding con ols
e alua ed by S uden ’s - es on 5% le el a e indica ed by * (n= 6–8). The numbe s abo e he columns
ep esen old-di e ence o he pa icula i ellogenin le el in ea ed cock oaches compa ed wi h
ha in con ols.
Toxins 2022, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 o 20
Figu e 8. The e ec o 0.5 uL honeybee enom on i ellogenin le el in P. ame icana adul haemo-
lymph 6 h a e he ea men . (A)—illus a i e 4–20% SDS polyac ylamide gel ( emales 0.4 uL and
males 1 uL haemolymph/well: 1— emale con ol, 2— emale en enomed, 3—male con ol, 4—male
en enomed; 5—molecula s anda ds); (B)— i ellogenin quan i ica ion in emales; (C)— i ellogenin
quan i ica ion in males. S a is ically signi ican di e ences be ween he enom g oups and co e-
sponding con ols e alua ed by S uden ’s - es on 5% le el a e indica ed by * (n = 6–8). The numbe s
abo e he columns ep esen old-di e ence o he pa icula i ellogenin le el in ea ed cock-
oaches compa ed wi h ha in con ols.
Figu e 9. The e ec o 0.5 uL honeybee enom and/o 40 pmol Pe am-CAH-II on dopamine le els
in he b ain o P. ame icana adul s 6 h a e he ea men . S a is ically signi ican di e ences among
he g oups (mean ± SD) e alua ed by one-way ANOVA wi h Tukey’s pos - es a he 5% le el a e
Figu e 9.
The e ec o 0.5 uL honeybee enom and/o 40 pmol Pe am-CAH-II on dopamine le els
in he b ain o P. ame icana adul s 6 h a e he ea men . S a is ically signi ican di e ences among
he g oups (mean
±
SD) e alua ed by one-way ANOVA wi h Tukey’s pos - es a he 5% le el a e
indica ed by di e en le e s abo e he columns (a,b) (n= 6–8). The numbe s abo e he columns ep esen
old-di e ence o he pa icula dopamine le el in ea ed cock oaches compa ed wi h ha in con ols.
Toxins 2022,14, 11 16 o 18
ans e ime: 100.0
µ
s, and p e-pulse s o age: 10.0
µ
s. Fo MS/MS a mul iple eac ion
moni o ing mode was used wi h he ollowing pa ame e s: o all p ecu so ions: m/z
154.091, 308.089, and 613.160 Da, he isCID ene gy: 20.0 eV, and collision ene gy: 35 eV.
5.10. Da a P esen a ion and S a is ical Analyses
Da a was analysed using P ism e sion 6.0 (G aphPad So wa e, San Diego, CA,
USA). Ba g aphs ep esen mean
±
s anda d de ia ion (SD) and he numbe s o epli-
ca es (n) is depic ed in he igu e legends. S a is ical di e ences we e e alua ed by S u-
den ’s - es (Figu es 3,4and 8), and by one-way ANOVA wi h he Tukey’s pos - es
(Figu es 3,4,6,7,9and 10) and wi h Dunne ’s pos - es (Figu e 7).
Supplemen a y Ma e ials:
The ollowing a e a ailable online a h ps://www.mdpi.com/a icle/
10.3390/ oxins14010011/s1, Table S1: Lis o plan s blooming in he icini y o he apia y in ˇ
Ceské
Budˇejo ice (CZ; 48◦58031.92400 N, 14◦26044.67100 E; al i ude 390 m) in June 2020.
Au ho Con ibu ions:
Concep ualiza ion, D.K.; Me hodology, K.B., J. ˇ
C., H.Š. and R.G.; Valida ion,
D.K. and O.Z.; Fo mal Analysis, D.K. and O.Z.; In es iga ion, D.K.; Resou ces, D.K., R.G. and O.Z.;
Da a Cu a ion, D.K. and O.Z.; W i ing—D.K.; W i ing—Re iew & Edi ing, all au ho s. All au ho s
ha e ead and ag eed o he published e sion o he manusc ip .
Funding:
This s udy was suppo ed by p ojec RVO 60077344 o he Ins i u e o En omology, and he
p ojec CEITEC 2020 (LQ1601).
Ins i u ional Re iew Boa d S a emen : No applicable.
In o med Consen S a emen : No applicable.
Da a A ailabili y S a emen : No applicable.
Acknowledgmen s:
This s udy was suppo ed by he p ojec s RVO 60077344 o he Ins i u e o
En omology (K.B., J. ˇ
C., H.Š. and D.K.). R.G. and O.Z. we e suppo ed by he p ojec CEITEC 2020
(LQ1601). The pho os o insec s in he G aphical Abs ac we e aken by M. Hejníko á.
Con lic s o In e es :
The au ho s decla e no con lic o in e es . The sponso s had no ole in he
design, execu ion, in e p e a ion, o w i ing o he s udy.
Re e ences
1.
Lubawy, J.; U banski, A.; M ówczynska, L.; Ma uszewska, E.; Swia ły-Błaszkiewicz, A.; Ma ysiak, J.; Rosinski, R. The in luence o
bee enom meli in on he unc ioning o he immune sys em and he con ac ile ac i i y o he insec hea —A p elimina y s udy.
Toxins 2019,11, 494. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
2.
Mo eno, M.; Gi ald, E. Th ee aluable pep ides om bee and wasp enoms o he apeu ic and bio echnological use: Meli in,
apamin and mas opa an. Toxins 2015,7, 1126–1150. [C ossRe ]
3.
Son, D.J.; Lee, J.W.; Lee, Y.H.; Song, H.S.; Lee, C.K.; Hong, J.T. The apeu ic applica ion o an i-a h i is, pain- eleasing, and
an i-cance e ec s o bee enom and i s cons i uen compounds. Pha macol. The . 2007,115, 246–270. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
4.
Chen, J.; La i ie e, W.R. The nocicep i e and an i-nocicep i e e ec s o bee enom injec ion and he apy: A double-edged swo d.
P og. Neu obiol. 2010,92, 151–183. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
5.
Flo ea, A.; Va ga, A.P.; Ma ei, H.V. Ul as uc u al a iabili y o mi ochond ial c is ae induced
in i o
by bee (Apis melli e a)
enom and i s de i a i es, meli in and phospholipase A2, in isola ed a ad enoco ical mi ochond ia. Mic on
2018
,112, 42–54.
[C ossRe ] [PubMed]
6.
Ho an, K.L.; Adamski, S.W.; Ayele, W.; Langone, J.J.; G ega, G.J. E idence ha p olonged his amine su usions p oduce
ansien inc eases in ascula pe meabili y subsequen o he o ma ion o enula mac o-molecula leakage si es. P oo o he
Majno-Palade hypo hesis. Am. J. Pa hol. 1986,123, 570–576.
7.
Pa k, H.G.; Lee, S.K.; Kim, B.Y.; Yoon, H.J.; Choi, Y.S.; Lee, K.Y.; Wan, H.; Li, J.; Jin, B.R. Honeybee (Apis ce ana) i ellogenin ac s as
an imic obial and an ioxidan agen in he body and enom. De . Comp. Immunol. 2018,85, 51–60. [C ossRe ]
8.
Salmela, H.; Amdam, G.V.; F ei ak, D. T ans e o immuni y om mo he o o sp ing is media ed ia egg-yolk p o ein i ellogenin.
PLoS Pa hog. 2015,11, e1005015. [C ossRe ]
9.
Kod ík, D.; Ib ahim, E.; Gau am, U.K.; ˇ
Capko á-F yd ycho á, R.; Bednᡠo á, A.; K iš ˚u ek, V.; Jedliˇcka, P. Changes in i ellogenin
exp ession caused by nema odal and ungal in ec ions in insec s. J. Exp. Biol. 2019,222, jeb202853. [C ossRe ]
10. S o ey, K.B. Ad en u es in oxygen me abolism. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C 2004,139, 359–369. [C ossRe ]
11.
Gäde, G.; Ho mann, K.H.; Sp ing, J.H. Ho monal egula ion in insec s: Fac s, gaps, and u u e di ec ions. Physiol. Re .
1997
,77,
963–1032. [C ossRe ]

Toxins 2022,14, 11 17 o 18
12.
Kod ík, D. Adipokine ic ho mone unc ions ha a e no associa ed wi h insec ligh . Physiol. En omol.
2008
,33, 171–180.
[C ossRe ]
13.
Kod ík, D.; Bednᡠo á, A.; Zemano á, M.; K ishnan, N. Ho monal egula ion o esponse o oxida i e s ess in insec s—An
upda e. In . J. Mol. Sci. 2015,16, 25788–25816. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
14.
Kod ík, D.; Vinoku o , K.; Tomˇcala, A.; Socha, R. The e ec o adipokine ic ho mone on midgu cha ac e is ics in Py hoco is
ap e us L. (He e op e a). J. Insec Physiol. 2012,58, 194–204. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
15.
Bil, M.; B oeckx, V.; Landuy , B.; Huyb ech s, R. Di e en ial pep idomics highligh s adipokine ic ho mone as key playe in
egula ing diges ion in anau ogenous lesh ly, Sa cophaga c assipalpis.Gen. Comp. Endoc inol. 2014,208, 49–56. [C ossRe ]
16.
Bodláko á, K.; Jedliˇcka, P.; Kod ík, D. Adipokine ic ho mones con ol amylase ac i i y in he cock oach (Pe iplane a ame icana)
gu . Insec Sci. 2017,24, 259–269. [C ossRe ]
17.
Van de Ho s , D.J.; Van Ma ewijk, W.J.A.; Diede en, H.B. Adipokine ic ho mones o insec : Release, signal ansduc ion, and
esponses. In . Re . Cy ol. 2001,211, 179–240.
18.
Socha, R.; Kod ík, D.; Zemek, R. S imula o y e ec s o bioamines no epineph ine and dopamine on locomo ion o Py hoco is
ap e us (L.): Is he adipokine ic ho mone in ol ed? Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B 2008,151, 305–310. [C ossRe ]
19.
Sca bo ough, R.M.; Jamieson, G.C.; Kalish, F.; K ame , J.S.; McEn oe, G.A.; Mille , C.A.; Schooley, D. Isola ion and p ima y
s uc u e o wo pep ides wi h ca dioaccele a o y and hype glycemic ac i i y om he co po a ca diaca o Pe iplane a ame icana.
P oc. Na l. Acad. Sci. USA 1984,81, 5575–5579. [C ossRe ]
20.
Michi sch, J.; S eel, J.E. Ca bohyd a e and lipid me abolism in cock oach (Pe iplane a ame icana) a body a e bo h ac i a ed by low
and simila concen a ions o Pe am-AKH II. Pep ides 2008,29, 226–234. [C ossRe ]
21. Culliney, T.W. Geological his o y and e olu ion o he honey bee. Am. Bee J. 1983,123, 580–585.
22.
Engel, M.S. Fossil honey bees and e olu ion in he genus Apis (Hymenop e a: Apidae). Apidologie
1998
,29, 265–281. [C ossRe ]
23.
Oudejans, R.C.H.M.; V oemen, S.F.; Jansen, R.F.R.; Van de Ho s , D.J. Locus adipokine ic ho mones: Ca ie -independen
anspo and di e en ial inac i a ion a physiological concen a ions du ing es and ligh . P oc. Na l. Acad. Sci. USA
1996
,93,
8654–8659. [C ossRe ]
24.
Van de Ho s , D.J.; Van Ma ewijk, W.J.A.; Vullings, H.G.B.; Diede en, J.H.B. Me abolic neu oho mones: Release, signal
ansduc ion and physiological esponses o adipokine ic ho mones in insec s. Eu . J. En omol. 1999,96, 299–308.
25.
Goldswo hy, G.J.; Kod ík, D.; Comley, R.; Ligh oo , M. A quan i a i e s udy o he adipokine ic ho mone o he i ebug,
Py hoco is ap e us.J. Insec Physiol. 2002,48, 1103–1108. [C ossRe ]
26.
Kod ík, D.; Socha, R. The e ec o insec icide on adipokine ic ho mone i e in insec body. Pes Manag. Sci.
2005
,61, 1077–1082.
[C ossRe ] [PubMed]
27.
Velki, M.; Kod ík, D.; Veˇceˇ a, J.; Hackenbe ge , B.K.; Socha, R. Oxida i e s ess elici ed by insec icides: A ole o he adipokine ic
ho mone. Gen. Comp. Endoc inol. 2011,172, 77–84. [C ossRe ]
28.
Kod ík, D.; Pla šin, I.; Velki, M.; S aško á, T. Enhancemen o insec icide e icacy by adipokine ic ho mones. In Insec icides:
Occu ence, Global Th ea s and Ecological Impac ; Mon gome y, J., Ed.; No a Science Publishe s, Inc.: New Yo k, NY, USA, 2015;
pp. 77–91.
29.
Ib ahim, E.; Hejníko á, M.; Shaik, H.A.; Doležel, D.; Kod ík, D. Adipokine ic ho mone ac i i ies in insec body in ec ed by
en omopa hogenic nema ode. J. Insec Physiol. 2017,98, 347–355. [C ossRe ]
30.
Gau am, U.K.; Boha á, A.; Shaik, H.A.; Zemek, R.; Kod ík, D. Adipokine ic ho mone p omo es in ec ion wi h en omopa hogenic
ungus Isa ia umoso osea in he cock oach Pe iplane a ame icana.Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C 2020,229, 108677. [C ossRe ]
31.
Gau am, U.K.; Hlá ko á, D.; Shaik, H.A.; Ka aca, I.; Ka aca, G.; Sezen, K.; Kod ík, D. Adipokine ic ho mones enhance he e icacy
o he en omopa hogenic ungus Isa ia umoso osea in model and pes insec s. Pa hogens 2020,9, 801. [C ossRe ]
32.
Kod ík, D.; Bá ˚u, I.; Socha, R. Adipokine ic ho mone (Py ap-AKH) enhances he e ec o a py e h oid insec icide agains he
i ebug Py hoco is ap e us.Pes Manag. Sci. 2010,66, 425–431. [C ossRe ]
33.
Be en, D.P.; Richa dson, W.H.; Tong, T.C.; Cla k, R.F. Massi e honey bee en enoma ion-induced habdomyolysis in an adolescen .
Pedia ics 2006,117, 231–235. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
34.
Flo ea, A.; C aciun, C. Bee (Apis melli e a) enom p oduced oxic e ec s o highe ampli ude in a ho acic ao a han in skele al
muscle—An ul as uc u al s udy. Mic osc. Mic oanal. 2012,18, 304–316. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
35.
Malencik, D.A.; Ande son, S.R. Associa ion o meli in wi h isola ed myosin ligh -chain. Biochemis y
1988
,27, 1941–1949.
[C ossRe ]
36.
Ownby, C.L.; Powell, J.R.; Jiang, M.S.; Fle che , J.E. Meli in and phospholipase A(2) om bee (Apis melli e a) enom cause nec osis
o mu ine skele al muscle in i o. Toxicon 1997,35, 67–80. [C ossRe ]
37.
Fle che , J.E.; Hube , M.; Wieland, S.J.; Gong, O.H.; Jiang, M.S. Simila i ies and di e ences in mechanisms o ca dio oxins,
meli in and o he myo oxins. Toxicon 1996,34, 1301–13011. [C ossRe ]
38.
Goldswo hy, G.J.; Opoku-Wa e, K.; Mullen, L.M. Adipokine ic ho mone enhances lamina in and bac e ial lipopolysaccha ide-
induced ac i a ion o he p ophenoloxidase cascade in he A ican mig a o y locus , Locus a mig a o ia.J. Insec Physiol.
2020
,48,
601–608. [C ossRe ]
39.
Goldswo hy, G.J.; Opoku-Wa e, K.; Mullen, L.M. Adipokine ic ho mone and he immune esponses o locus s o in ec ion. Ann.
N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2005,1040, 106–113. [C ossRe ]
40.
A ese, E.L.; Soulages, J.L. Insec a body: Ene gy, me abolism, and egula ion. Ann. Re . En omol.
2010
,55, 207–225. [C ossRe ]
Toxins 2022,14, 11 18 o 18
41.
Bodláko á, K.; Beˇno á, M.; Kod ík, D. The e ec o adipokine ic ho mones on he ac i i y o diges i e enzymes. Physiol. En omol.
2018,43, 140–148. [C ossRe ]
42.
Ha ukainen, H.; Münch, D.; Baumann, A.; Zhong, S.; Halskau, Ø.; K ogsgaa d, M.; Amdam, G.V. Vi ellogenin ecognizes cell
damage h ough memb ane binding and shields li ing cells om eac i e oxygen species. J. Biol. Chem.
2013
,288, 28369–28381.
[C ossRe ]
43.
Singh, N.K.; Pakkiana han, B.C.; Kuma , M.; P asad, T.; Kannan, M.; Konig, S.; K ishnan, M. Vi ellogenin om he silkwo m,
Bombyx mo i: An e ec i e an i-bac e ial agen . PLoS ONE 2013,8, e73005. [C ossRe ]
44. Salmela, H.; Sunds om, L. Vi ellogenin in in lamma ion and immuni y in social insec s. In lamm. Cell Signal. 2017,4, e1506.
45.
Tu ail, M.; Ha akeyama, M.; Takeda, M. Molecula e idence o wo i ellogenin genes and p ocessing o i ellogenins in he
Ame ican cock oach, Pe iplane a ame icana.A ch. Insec Biochem. Physiol. 2001,48, 72–80. [C ossRe ]
46.
Ca lisle, J.; Lough on, B.G. The inhibi ion o p o ein syn hesis in Locus a mig a o ia by adipokine ic ho mone. J. Insec Physiol.
1986,32, 573–578. [C ossRe ]
47.
Lo enz, M.W. Adipokine ic ho mone inhibi s he o ma ion o ene gy s o es and egg p oduc ion in he c icke G yllus bimacula us.
Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B 2003,136, 197–206. [C ossRe ]
48.
Pichon, Y.; Mana anche, R. Biochemis y o he ne ous sys em. In Comp ehensi e Insec Physiology, Biochemis y and Pha macology;
Ke ku , G.A., Gilbe , L.I., Eds.; Pe gamon P ess: Ox o d, UK, 1985; Volume 10, pp. 417–450.
49.
Janne , D.E.; Gomes, N.S.; Poe ini, M.R.; Pole o, K.H.; Musachio, E.A.S.; de Almeida, F.P.; Amado , E.C.D.; Reginaldo, J.C.;
Rambo ge , B.P.; Roeh s, R.; e al. Oxida i e s ess and dec eased dopamine le els induced by imidaclop id exposu e cause
beha io al changes in a neu ode elopmen al diso de model in D osophila melanogas e .Neu o oxicology
2021
,85, 79–89. [C ossRe ]
[PubMed]
50.
Weisel-Eichle , A.; Haspel, G.; Libe sa , F. Venom o a pa asi oid wasp induces p olonged g ooming in he cock oach. J. Exp. Biol.
1999,202, 957–964. [C ossRe ]
51.
Veˇceˇ a, J.; K ishnan, N.; Alquice , G.; Kod ík, D.; Socha, R. Adipokine ic ho mone-induced enhancemen o an ioxidan capaci y
o Py hoco is ap e us hemolymph in esponse o oxida i e s ess. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C 2007,146, 336–342. [C ossRe ]
52.
Kod ík, D.; K ishnan, N.; Habuš o á, O. Is he i e o adipokine ic pep ides in Lep ino a sa decemlinea a ed on gene ically modi ied
po a oes inc eased by oxida i e s ess? Pep ides 2007,28, 974–980. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
53.
Koubo á, J.; Sábo á, M.; B ejcha, M.; Kod ík, D.; ˇ
Capko áF yd ycho á, R. Seasonal changes in elome ase ac i i y in ela ion o
cell size, DNA eplica ion, and nu ien con en s in he a body o Apis melli e a.Sci. Rep. 2021,11, 592. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
54.
Kod ík, D.; K iš ˚u ek, V.; S obodo á, Z. Bee yea : Basic physiological s a egies o cope wi h seasonali y. Comp. Biochem. Physiol.
A2022,264, 111115. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
55.
Smi h, J.J.B. De e mining he hemolymph olume o he cock oach. In Tes ed S udies o Labo a o y Teaching, P oceedings o he
15 h Wo kshop/Con e ence o he Associa ion o Biology Labo a o y Educa ion, A lan a, GA, USA, 7–11 June 1994; Goldman, C.A., Ed.;
Associa ion o Biology Labo a o y Educa ion (ABLE): To on o, ON, Canada, 1994; pp. 119–139.
56.
Ka buso á, N.; Gau am, U.K.; Kod ík, D. E ec o na u al oxins and adipokine ic ho mones on he ac i i y o diges i e enzymes
in he midgu o he cock oach Pe iplane a ame icana.A ch. Insec Biochem. Physiol. 2019,101, e21586. [C ossRe ]
57.
S oscheck, C.M. Quan i a ion o p o ein. In Me hods in Enzymology; Deu sche , M.P., Ed.; Academic P ess: San Diego, CA, USA,
1990; Volume 182, pp. 50–68.
58.
Zöllne , N.; Ki sch, K. Übe die quan i a i e Bes immung on Lipoide (Mik ome hode) mi els de ielen na ü lichen Lipoiden
(allen bekann en Plasmalipoiden) gemeinsamen Sul o-phospho- anillin-Reak ion. Z. Ges. Exp. Medizin.
1962
,135, 545–561.
[C ossRe ]
59.
Kod ík, D.; Socha, R.; Šimek, P.; Zemek, R.; Goldswo hy, G.J. A new membe o he AKH/RPCH amily ha s imula es
locomo o y ac i i y in he i ebug, Py hoco is ap e us (He e op e a). Insec Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2000,30, 489–498. [C ossRe ]
60.
Ca oll, N.V.; Longley, R.W.; Roe, J.H. The de e mina ion o glycogen in li e and muscle by use o an h one eagen . J. Biol. Chem.
1956,220, 583–593. [C ossRe ]
61.
Socha, R.; Kod ík, D.; Šimek, P.; Pa oˇcko á, M. The kind o AKH-mobilized ene gy subs a es in insec s can be p edic ed wi hou
a knowledge o he ho mone s uc u e. Eu . J. En omol. 2004,101, 29–35. [C ossRe ]
62.
Be n eld, P. Amylases,
α
and
β
. In Me hods in Enzymology; Colowick, S.P., Kaplan, N.O., Eds.; Academic P ess: New Yo k, NY,
USA, 1955; Volume 1, pp. 149–158.
63.
Robe s, I.M. Hyd olysis o 4-me hylumbelli e yl bu y a e: A con enien and sensi i e luo escen assay o lipase ac i i y. Lipids
1985,20, 243–247. [C ossRe ]
64.
Elpidina, E.N.; Vinoku o , K.S.; G omenko, V.A.; Rudenskaya, Y.A.; Dunae sky, Y.E.; Zhuzhiko , D.P. Compa men aliza ion o
p o einases and amylases in Nauphoe a cine ea midgu . A ch. Insec Biochem. Physiol. 2001,48, 206–216. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
65.
Laemmli, U.K. Clea age o s uc u al p o eins du ing he assembly o he head o bac e iophage T4. Na u e
1970
,227, 680–685.
[C ossRe ] [PubMed]
66.
Socha, R.; Šula, J.; Kod ík, D.; Gelbiˇc, I. Ho monal con ol o i ellogenin syn hesis in Py hoco is ap e us.J. Insec Physiol.
1991
,37,
805–816. [C ossRe ]