scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Representation of a solution of the Cauchy problem for an oscillating system with multiple delays and pairwise permutable matrices

Abstract

Nonhomogeneous system of linear differential equations of second order with multiple different delays and pairwise permutable matrices defining the linear parts is considered. Solution of corresponding initial value problem is represented using matrix polynomials.

Read accessible full text

Representation of a solution of the Cauchy problem for an oscillating system with multiple delays and pairwise permutable matrices

Author: Diblík, Josef; Fečkan, Michal; Pospíšil, Michal
Publisher: Hindawi
Year: 2013
DOI: 10.1155/2013/931493
Source: https://dspace.vut.cz/bitstreams/063f6608-1d36-43bf-a649-00ec3ca0a3e7/download
Hindawi Publishing Co po a ion
Abs ac and Applied Analysis
Volume 2013, A icle ID 931493, 10 pages
h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1155/2013/931493
Resea ch A icle
Rep esen a ion o a Solu ion o he Cauchy P oblem o
an Oscilla ing Sys em wi h Mul iple Delays and Pai wise
Pe mu able Ma ices
Jose Diblík,1Michal FeIkan,2,3 and Michal Pospíšil4
1Depa men o Ma hema ics, Facul y o Elec ical Enginee ing and Communica ion, B no Uni e si y o Technology,
Technick´
a 3058/10, 616 00 B no, Czech Republic
2Depa men o Ma hema ical Analysis and Nume ical Ma hema ics, Comenius Uni e si y, Mlynsk´
adolina,
842 48 B a isla a, Slo akia
3Ma hema ical Ins i u e o Slo ak Academy o Sciences, ˇ
S e ´
aniko a 49, 814 73 B a isla a, Slo akia
4Cen e o Resea ch and U iliza ion o Renewable Ene gy, Facul y o Elec ical Enginee ing and Communica ion,
B no Uni e si y o Technology, Technick´
a 3058/10, 616 00 B no, Czech Republic
Co espondence should be add essed o Michal Posp´
ıˇ
sil; [email p o ec ed] .cz
Recei ed 13 Janua y 2013; Accep ed 19 Ap il 2013
Academic Edi o : Jaan Janno
Copy igh © 2013 Jose Dibl´
ık e al. This is an open access a icle dis ibu ed unde he C ea i e Commons A ibu ion License,
which pe mi s un es ic ed use, dis ibu ion, and ep oduc ion in any medium, p o ided he o iginal wo k is p ope ly ci ed.
Nonhomogeneous sys em o linea di e en ial equa ions o second o de wi h mul iple di e en delays and pai wise pe mu able
ma ices de ining he linea pa s is conside ed. Solu ion o co esponding ini ial alue p oblem is ep esen ed using ma ix
polynomials.
1. In oduc ion
Mo i a ed by delayed exponen ial ep esen ing a solu ion
o a sys em o di e en ial o di e ence equa ions wi h
oneo mul iple ixedo a iabledelays[1–6], which has
many applica ions in heo y o con ollabili y, asymp o ic
p ope ies, bounda y- alue p oblems, and so o h [3–5,7–
15], we ex ended ep esen a ion o a solu ion o a sys em o
di e en ial equa ions o second o de wi h delay [1]
𝑥(𝑡)=−𝐵2𝑥(𝑡−𝜏)(1)
o he case o wo delays
𝑥(𝑡)=−𝐵2
1𝑥(𝑡−𝜏1)−𝐵2
2𝑥(𝑡−𝜏2), (2)
whe e he linea pa s we e gi en by pe mu able ma ices [16].
Equa ions (1), (2), and he below-s a ed (11)wi h𝑓≡0a e
gene aliza ions o he scala equa ion
𝑥(𝑡)=−𝑏2𝑥(𝑡)(3)
ep esen ing linea oscilla o , o 𝑁-dimensional space wi h
oneo mul iple ixeddelays.Clea ly,eachsolu iono hela e
equa ion is oscilla ing whene e 0 =𝑏∈R. Analogically,
(1)wi h𝑥∈R𝑁can ha e a leas one oscilla ing solu ion
whene e 𝑁is odd. Indeed, i 𝐵is 𝑁×𝑁ma ix, 𝑁≥3is
odd, and 𝐵has a simple eal nonze o eigen alue 𝜆, hen he e
exis s a egula ma ix 𝑆such ha 𝑆−1𝐵𝑆=𝐽=(𝜆0
0
𝐽)whe e
𝐽is (𝑁−1)×(𝑁−1)ma ix. On le ing 𝑥=𝑆𝑦,onege s
𝑦=−𝐽2𝑦(𝑡−𝜏)(4)
o ew i es as he sys em
𝑦1=−𝜆2𝑦1(𝑡−𝜏),
𝑦2=−𝐽2𝑦2(𝑡−𝜏),(5)
whe e 𝑦=(𝑦
1,𝑦2)∈R×R𝑁−1.No e ha he i s
column Vo 𝑆is he eigen ec o o 𝐵co esponding o 𝜆.
Clea ly, i solu ion 𝑦1o (5)isoscilla ing, hensolu ion𝑦o
(4) is oscilla ing in he i s coo dina e whene e i s ini ial
2Abs ac and Applied Analysis
condi ion sa is ies {𝑦(𝑡)|𝑡∈[−𝜏,0]}⊂R×{0}𝑁−1.
Consequen ly, solu ion 𝑥o (1)isoscilla inginspan{V}
whene e {𝑥(𝑡)|𝑡∈[−𝜏,0]}⊂span{V}.Taking𝑦1(𝑡)=𝑒𝜇𝑡,
one ob ains cha ac e is ic equa ion 𝜇2=−𝜆
2𝑒−𝜇𝜏 o (5),
which has solu ions 𝜇1,2 =𝛼±𝚤𝛽∈Cwi h 𝛽 =0.Thus,𝑦1
is oscilla ing.
On he o he hand, he e can exis a nonoscilla ing
solu ion o he sys em (1)whene e 𝑥∈R𝑁and 𝑁is e en.
Fo ins ance, i 𝑁=2and 𝐵=(01
−1 0 ), hen(1)has he o m
𝑥(𝑡)=𝑥(𝑡−𝜏)(6)
wi h 𝑥∈R2,which,ob iously,doesno ha eanoscilla ing
solu ion sa is ying nonoscilla ing ini ial condi ion. Simila ly,
i can be shown ha sys em wi h odd dimension can possess
a nonoscilla ing solu ion sa is ying an app op ia e ini ial
condi ion.
Fo simplici y, we call he gene aliza ions (1), (2), and (11)
wi h 𝑓≡0,o scala equa ion(3), oscilla ing al hough hei
solu ions do no always ha e o be oscilla ing. Ne e heless, a
he end o his pape , in Co olla y 8 we s a e he ep esen a-
ion o a solu ion o mo e gene al sys em (86)wi hou squa es
o ma ices.
We no e ha he delayed ma ix exponen ial om [1–5]
as well as he ep esen a ion o a solu ion o second-o de
di e en ial equa ions de i ed in [1,16]andin hispape can
lead o new esul s in nonlinea bounda y alue p oblems o
impulsi e unc ional di e en ial equa ions conside ed in [17]
o s ochas ic delayed di e en ial equa ions om [18].
So, in he p esen pape , we ex end ou esul om
[16] o h ee and mo e delays by he assump ion o pai -
wise pe mu able ma ices de ining linea pa s. By such an
assump ion, we a e able o cons uc ma ix unc ions sol ing
homogeneous sys em o di e en ial equa ions o second
o de wi hanynumbe o ixeddelays,and,consequen ly,
we use hese unc ions o ep esen a solu ion o he co -
esponding nonhomogeneous ini ial alue p oblem. As will
be shown in he nex sec ions, ex ending om wo o mo e
delays b ings many echnical di icul ies, o example, he
use o mul inomial coe icien s. Na u ally, he esul s o he
p esen pape hold wi h one o wo di e en delays as well.
Howe e , hese cases can by s udied in a simple way, which
was al eady done in [1,16]. Thus, we ocus ou a en ion on
hecaseo h eeandmo edi e en delays.
Fi s , we ecall ou esul om [16].
Theo em 1. Le 𝜏1,𝜏2>0,𝜏:=max{𝜏1,𝜏2},and𝜑∈
𝐶1([−𝜏,0],R𝑁).Le 𝐵1,𝐵2be 𝑁×𝑁pe mu able ma ices; ha
is, 𝐵1𝐵2=𝐵2𝐵1,andle 𝑓:[0,∞)→R𝑁be a gi en unc ion.
Solu ion 𝑥(𝑡)o
𝑥(𝑡)=−𝐵2
1𝑥(𝑡−𝜏1)−𝐵2
2𝑥(𝑡−𝜏2)+𝑓(𝑡)(7)
sa is ying ini ial condi ion
𝑥(𝑡)=𝜑(𝑡),
𝑥(𝑡)=𝜑(𝑡),−𝜏≤𝑡≤0 (8)
has he o m
𝑥(𝑡)={
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
𝜑(𝑡),−𝜏≤𝑡<0,
X(𝑡)𝜑(0)+Y(𝑡)𝜑(0)
−𝐵2
1∫0
−𝜏1
Y(𝑡−𝜏1−𝑠)𝜑(𝑠)𝑑𝑠
−𝐵2
2∫0
−𝜏2
Y(𝑡−𝜏2−𝑠)𝜑(𝑠)𝑑𝑠
+∫𝑡
0Y(𝑡−𝑠)𝑓(𝑠)𝑑𝑠, 0≤𝑡, (9)
whe e
X(𝑡)=X𝐵2
1,𝐵2
2
𝜏1,𝜏2(𝑡)
:= ∑
𝑖,𝑗≥0
𝑖𝜏1+𝑗𝜏2≤𝑡(−1)𝑖+𝑗
×(𝑖+𝑗
𝑖)𝐵2𝑖
1𝐵2𝑗
2(𝑡−𝑖𝜏1−𝑗𝜏2)2(𝑖+𝑗)
(2(𝑖+𝑗))! ,
Y(𝑡)=Y𝐵2
1,𝐵2
2
𝜏1,𝜏2(𝑡)
:= ∑
𝑖,𝑗≥0
𝑖𝜏1+𝑗𝜏2≤𝑡(−1)𝑖+𝑗
×(𝑖+𝑗
𝑖)𝐵2𝑖
1𝐵2𝑗
2(𝑡−𝑖𝜏1−𝑗𝜏2)2(𝑖+𝑗)+1
(2(𝑖+𝑗)+1)! .
(10)
We will deno e Θand 𝐸 he 𝑁×𝑁ze o and iden i y
ma ix, espec i ely.
2. Sys ems wi h Mul iple Delays
In his sec ion, we de i e he ep esen a ion o a solu ion o
𝑥(𝑡)=−𝐵2
1𝑥(𝑡−𝜏1)−⋅⋅⋅−𝐵2
𝑛𝑥(𝑡−𝜏𝑛)+𝑓(𝑡)(11)
sa is ying he ini ial condi ion (8), whe e 𝑛≥3,𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛>0,
𝜏:=max𝑖=1,...,𝑛𝜏𝑖,𝐵1,...,𝐵𝑛a e 𝑁×𝑁pai wise pe mu able
ma ices; ha is, 𝐵𝑖𝐵𝑗=𝐵𝑗𝐵𝑖 o each 𝑖,𝑗∈{1,...,𝑛},𝜑∈
𝐶1([−𝜏,0],R𝑁),and𝑓:[0,∞)→R𝑁a e gi en unc ions.
The solu ion 𝑥(𝑡)will be ep esen ed using ma ix unc ions
analogical o (10)andwillbes a edinSec ion 3.Weno e ha
hesamep oblemswi h𝑛=1,2we e s udied in [1,16].
F om now on, we assume he p ope y o emp y sum and
emp y p oduc ; ha is,
∑
𝑖∈0𝑓(𝑖)=0, ∑
𝑖∈0𝐹(𝑖)=Θ,
∏
𝑖∈0𝑓(𝑖)=1, ∏
𝑖∈0𝐹(𝑖)=𝐸 (12)
o any unc ion 𝑓and ma ix unc ion 𝐹, whe he hey a e
de ined o no o indica ed a gumen .
Abs ac and Applied Analysis 3
We ecall ha (𝑗1,...,𝑗𝑛)!is a mul inomial coe icien [19]
gi en by
(𝑗1,...,𝑗𝑛)!=(𝑗1+⋅⋅⋅+𝑗𝑛)!
𝑗1!⋅⋅⋅𝑗𝑛!.(13)
No e ha i 𝑛=2, hen(𝑗1,𝑗2)=(𝑗1+𝑗2
𝑗1)and (20) coincides
wi h (10).
We will need a p ope y o mul inomial coe icien s
desc ibed in he nex lemma.
Lemma 2. Le 𝑛≥2be ixed. Then
(𝑖1,𝑖2,...,𝑖𝑛)!=(𝑖1−1,𝑖2,...,𝑖𝑛)!
+(𝑖1,𝑖2−1,𝑖3,...,𝑖𝑛)!+(𝑖1,...,𝑖𝑛−1,𝑖𝑛−1)!
(14)
o any 𝑖1,...,𝑖𝑛≥1.
P oo . I 𝑛=2, hen he s a emen ollows om he p ope y
o binomial coe icien s:
(𝑖1,𝑖2)!=(𝑖1+𝑖2
𝑖1)=(𝑖1+𝑖2−1
𝑖1−1)+(𝑖1+𝑖2−1
𝑖1)
=(𝑖1−1,𝑖2)!+(𝑖1,𝑖2−1)!. (15)
Le he s a emen be ue o 𝑛−1. Nex , we use he p ope y
o mul inomial coe icien
(𝑖1,𝑖2,𝑖3,...,𝑖𝑛)!=(𝑖1+𝑖2,𝑖3,...,𝑖𝑛)!(𝑖1,𝑖2)! (16)
wi h induc i e hypo hesis o de i e
(𝑖1,𝑖2,𝑖3,...,𝑖𝑛)!
=[(𝑖1+𝑖2−1,𝑖3,...,𝑖𝑛)!+(𝑖1+𝑖2,𝑖3−1,...,𝑖𝑛)!
+⋅⋅⋅+(𝑖1+𝑖2,𝑖3,...,𝑖𝑛−1)!](𝑖1,𝑖2)!. (17)
Clea ly, om (16), we ge
(𝑖1+𝑖2,𝑖3−1,...,𝑖𝑛)!(𝑖1,𝑖2)!=(𝑖1,𝑖2,𝑖3−1,...,𝑖𝑛)!,
.
.
.
(𝑖1+𝑖2,𝑖3,...,𝑖𝑛−1)!(𝑖1,𝑖2)!=(𝑖1,𝑖2,𝑖3,...,𝑖𝑛−1)!.(18)
Applying he case 𝑛=2(p ope yo binomialcoe icien )
and (16), we ge
(𝑖1+𝑖2−1,𝑖3,...,𝑖𝑛)!(𝑖1,𝑖2)!
=(𝑖1+𝑖2−1,𝑖3,...,𝑖𝑛)![(𝑖1−1,𝑖2)!+(𝑖1,𝑖2−1)!]
=(𝑖1−1,𝑖2,𝑖3,...,𝑖𝑛)!+(𝑖1,𝑖2−1,𝑖3,...,𝑖𝑛)!. (19)
Pu ing (18)and(19)in(17), we ob ain ha he s a emen
holds o 𝑛and he p oo is comple e.
In u he wo k, we w i e ({𝑗 | 𝑗 ∈ 𝑀})! o he
mul inomial coe icien o elemen s o he ini e se 𝑀,and
(𝑖,{𝑗|𝑗∈𝑀})! o he mul inomial coe icien o 𝑖and
elemen s o he ini e se 𝑀; o example, i 𝑀={1,2}, hen
(𝑎,{𝑗|𝑗∈𝑀})!=(𝑎,1,2)!. Fo he comple eness, we de ine
({𝑗|𝑗∈0})!:=1.
De ine he unc ions X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛,Y𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛:R→𝐿(R𝑁)as
X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡)
:= ∑
𝑗1,...,𝑗𝑛≥0
𝑗1𝜏1+⋅⋅⋅+𝑗𝑛𝜏𝑛≤𝑡(−1)𝑗1+⋅⋅⋅+𝑗𝑛(𝑗1,...,𝑗𝑛)!
×𝑛
∏
𝑖=1𝐵2𝑗𝑖
𝑖(𝑡−𝑗1𝜏1−⋅⋅⋅−𝑗𝑛𝜏𝑛)2(𝑗1+⋅⋅⋅+𝑗𝑛)
(2(𝑗1+⋅⋅⋅+𝑗𝑛))! ,
Y𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡)
:= ∑
𝑗1,...,𝑗𝑛≥0
𝑗1𝜏1+⋅⋅⋅+𝑗𝑛𝜏𝑛≤𝑡(−1)𝑗1+⋅⋅⋅+𝑗𝑛(𝑗1,...,𝑗𝑛)!
×𝑛
∏
𝑖=1𝐵2𝑗𝑖
𝑖(𝑡−𝑗1𝜏1−⋅⋅⋅−𝑗𝑛𝜏𝑛)2(𝑗1+⋅⋅⋅+𝑗𝑛)+1
(2(𝑗1+⋅⋅⋅+𝑗𝑛)+1)!
(20)
o any 𝑡∈R.
We will need unc ions X𝐵2
𝜏,Y𝐵2
𝜏:R→𝐿(R𝑁) o 𝜏>0
and 𝑁×𝑁complex ma ix 𝐵(c . [16]) de ined as
X𝐵2
𝜏(𝑡):=∑
𝑖≥0
𝑖𝜏≤𝑡(−1)𝑖𝐵2𝑖 (𝑡−𝑖𝜏)2𝑖
(2𝑖)!,
Y𝐵2
𝜏(𝑡):=∑
𝑖≥0
𝑖𝜏≤𝑡(−1)𝑖𝐵2𝑖 (𝑡−𝑖𝜏)2𝑖+1
(2𝑖+1)!(21)
wi h he p ope ies
X𝐵2
𝜏(𝑡)=−𝐵2Y𝐵2
𝜏(𝑡−𝜏),X𝐵2
𝜏(𝑡)=−𝐵2X𝐵2
𝜏(𝑡−𝜏),
Y𝐵2
𝜏(𝑡)=X𝐵2
𝜏(𝑡),Y𝐵2
𝜏(𝑡)=−𝐵2Y𝐵2
𝜏(𝑡−𝜏)(22)
o any 𝑡∈R, conside ing he one-sided de i a i es a −𝜏,0.
Some o p ope ies o unc ions X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛and Y𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛a e
concluded in Lemma 4,bu op o ei wewillneed henex
lemma.
Lemma 3. Le 𝑛≥1and 𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛>0.Le 𝐵1,...,𝐵𝑛be
𝑁×𝑁pai wise pe mu able ma ices, ha is, 𝐵𝑖𝐵𝑗=𝐵𝑗𝐵𝑖 o
each 𝑖,𝑗∈{1,...,𝑛}.Then o any𝑡∈R,
X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡)=∑
𝑀⊂{1,...,𝑛}𝑆𝑀(𝑡),
Y𝐵2
1,...𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡)=∑
𝑀⊂{1,...,𝑛}𝑆𝑀(𝑡),(23)
4Abs ac and Applied Analysis
whe e he sums a e aken o e all subse s o {1,...,𝑛}including
he i ial ones, and
𝑆𝑀(𝑡):= ∑
𝑗𝑖≥1,𝑖∈𝑀
∑𝑖∈𝑀 𝑗𝑖𝜏𝑖≤𝑡(−1)∑𝑖∈𝑀 𝑗𝑖({𝑗𝑖|𝑖∈𝑀})!
×∏
𝑖∈𝑀𝐵2𝑗𝑖
𝑖(𝑡−∑𝑖∈𝑀 𝑗𝑖𝜏𝑖)2∑𝑖∈𝑀 𝑗𝑖
(2∑𝑖∈𝑀 𝑗𝑖)! ,(24)
𝑆𝑀(𝑡):= ∑
𝑗𝑖≥1,𝑖∈𝑀
∑𝑖∈𝑀 𝑗𝑖𝜏𝑖≤𝑡(−1)∑𝑖∈𝑀 𝑗𝑖({𝑗𝑖|𝑖∈𝑀})!
×∏
𝑖∈𝑀𝐵2𝑗𝑖
𝑖(𝑡−∑𝑖∈𝑀 𝑗𝑖𝜏𝑖)2∑𝑖∈𝑀 𝑗𝑖+1
(2∑𝑖∈𝑀 𝑗𝑖+1)! .(25)
P oo . Deno e N0,N he se o all nonnega i e, posi i e
in ege s, espec i ely; ha is, N0={0}∪N.Thus,weha e
he i ial iden i y
N0×⋅⋅⋅×N0
⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟
𝑛
=({0}×N0×⋅⋅⋅×N0
⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟
𝑛−1 )∪(N×N0×⋅⋅⋅×N0
⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟⏟
𝑛−1 )
=⋅⋅⋅= ⋃
𝑀1,...,𝑀𝑛∈{{0},N}𝑀1×⋅⋅⋅×𝑀𝑛.(26)
Analogically, o any 𝑡∈Reach 𝑛- uple 𝑗1,...,𝑗𝑛≥0
such ha ∑𝑛
𝑖=1 𝑗𝑖𝜏𝑖≤𝑡canbedi idedin wodis inc se so
𝑖-s so ha 𝑗𝑖≥1i 𝑖∈𝑀⊂{1,...,𝑛}and 𝑗𝑖=0i 𝑖∈
{1,...,𝑛} 𝑀.Tha is,𝑀deno es he se o all indices 𝑖such
ha 𝑗𝑖=0.Mo eo e ,∑𝑛
𝑖=1 𝑗𝑖𝜏𝑖=∑𝑖∈𝑀 𝑗𝑖𝜏𝑖. Acco dingly, we
can w i e
{(𝑗1,...,𝑗𝑛)∈N𝑛
0|𝑛
∑
𝑖=1𝑗𝑖𝜏𝑖≤𝑡}
=⋃
𝑀⊂{1,...,𝑛}{(𝑗1,...,𝑗𝑛)∈N𝑛
0|
𝑗𝑖=0∀𝑖∉𝑀,∑
𝑖∈𝑀 𝑗𝑖𝜏𝑖≤𝑡},
(27)
whe e he union is aken o e all subse s o {1,...,𝑛}
including he i ial ones. So, in he iew o de ini ion (20),
he s a emen o X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛 ollows.
S a emen o Y𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛canbep o edinasimila way.
Lemma 4. Le 𝑛≥3and 𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛>0.Le 𝐵1,...,𝐵𝑛be
𝑁×𝑁pai wise pe mu able ma ices; ha is, 𝐵𝑖𝐵𝑗=𝐵𝑗𝐵𝑖 o
each 𝑖,𝑗∈{1,...,𝑛}. Then he ollowing holds o any 𝑡∈R:
(1) i 𝐵𝑖=Θ o some 𝑖∈{1,...,𝑛}, hen
X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑖−1,𝐵2
𝑖,𝐵2
𝑖+1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑖−1,𝜏𝑖,𝜏𝑖+1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡)=X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑖−1,𝐵2
𝑖+1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑖−1,𝜏𝑖+1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡),(28)
(2) i 𝜏𝑖=𝜏𝑘 o 𝑖<𝑘,𝑖,𝑘∈{1,...,𝑛}, hen
X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑖−1,𝐵2
𝑖,𝐵2
𝑖+1,...,𝐵2
𝑘−1,𝐵2
𝑘,𝐵2
𝑘+1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑖−1,𝜏𝑖,𝜏𝑖+1,...,𝜏𝑘−1,𝜏𝑘,𝜏𝑘+1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡)
=X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑖−1,𝐵2
𝑖+𝐵2
𝑘,𝐵2
𝑖+1,...,𝐵2
𝑘−1,𝐵2
𝑘+1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑖−1,𝜏𝑖,𝜏𝑖+1,...,𝜏𝑘−1,𝜏𝑘+1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡),(29)
(3) o any bijec i e mapping 𝜎:{1,...,𝑛}→{1,...,𝑛}
we ge
X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡)=X𝐵2
𝜎(1),...,𝐵2
𝜎(𝑛)
𝜏𝜎(1),...,𝜏𝜎(𝑛) (𝑡),(30)
(4) aking he one-sided de i a i es a 0,𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛, hen
X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡)=−𝐵2
1X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡−𝜏1)
−⋅⋅⋅−𝐵2
𝑛X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡−𝜏𝑛), (31)
(5) conside ing he one-sided de i a i es a 0 ( hey bo h
equal Θ), hen
Y𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡)=X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡).(32)
S a emen s (1)–(4) hold wi h Yins ead o X.
P oo . S a emen (1) ollows easily om de ini ion o X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛,
because Θ2𝑖 =𝐸i 𝑖=0and Θ2𝑖 =Θwhene e 𝑖>0. Nex , i
𝜏𝑖=𝜏𝑘, hen
∑
𝑗1,...,𝑗𝑛≥0
𝑗1𝜏1+⋅⋅⋅+𝑗𝑛𝜏𝑛≤𝑡𝐹(𝑗1,...,𝑗𝑛)
=∑
𝑗1,...,𝑗𝑖−1,𝑙,𝑗𝑖+1,...,𝑗𝑘−1,𝑗𝑘+1,...,𝑗𝑛≥0
𝑗1𝜏1+⋅⋅⋅+𝑗𝑖−1𝜏𝑖−1+𝑙𝜏𝑖+𝑗𝑖+1𝜏𝑖+1
+⋅⋅⋅+𝑗𝑘−1𝜏𝑘−1+𝑗𝑘+1𝜏𝑘+1+⋅⋅⋅+𝑗𝑛𝜏𝑛≤𝑡 ∑
𝑗𝑖,𝑗𝑘≥0
𝑗𝑖+𝑗𝑘=𝑙𝐹(𝑗1,...,𝑗𝑛)(33)
o any ma ix unc ion 𝐹.Thus,using hep ope yo
mul inomial coe icien (see (16))
(𝑗1,...,𝑗𝑛)!
=(𝑗1,...,𝑗𝑖−1,𝑗𝑖+𝑗𝑘,𝑗𝑖+1,...,𝑗𝑘−1,𝑗𝑘+1,...,𝑗𝑛)!(𝑗𝑖,𝑗𝑘)!,
(34)
Abs ac and Applied Analysis 5
o (2), we ob ain
X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡)
=∑
𝑗1,...,𝑗𝑖−1,𝑙,𝑗𝑖+1,...,𝑗𝑘−1,𝑗𝑘+1,...,𝑗𝑛≥0
𝑗1𝜏1+⋅⋅⋅+𝑗𝑖−1𝜏𝑖−1+𝑙𝜏𝑖+𝑗𝑖+1𝜏𝑖+1
+⋅⋅⋅+𝑗𝑘−1𝜏𝑘−1+𝑗𝑘+1𝜏𝑘+1+⋅⋅⋅+𝑗𝑛𝜏𝑛≤𝑡(−1)∑𝑠∈{1,...,𝑛}
𝑠 =𝑖,𝑘 𝑗𝑠+𝑙
×(𝑗1,...,𝑗𝑖−1,𝑙,𝑗𝑖+1,...,𝑗𝑘−1,𝑗𝑘+1,...,𝑗𝑛)!
×(∑
𝑗𝑖,𝑗𝑘≥0
𝑗𝑖+𝑗𝑘=𝑙 (𝑗𝑖,𝑗𝑘)!𝐵2𝑗𝑖
𝑖𝐵2𝑗𝑘
𝑘)
×∏
𝑠∈{1,...,𝑛}
𝑠 =𝑖,𝑘 𝐵2𝑗𝑠
𝑠(𝑡−∑𝑠∈{1,...,𝑛}
𝑠 =𝑖,𝑘 ∑𝑗𝑠𝜏𝑠−𝑙𝜏𝑖)2(∑𝑠∈{1,...,𝑛}
𝑠 =𝑖,𝑘 𝑗𝑠+𝑙)
(2(∑𝑠∈{1,...,𝑛}
𝑠 =𝑖,𝑘 ∑𝑗𝑠+𝑙))!
=∑
𝑗1,...,𝑗𝑖−1,𝑙,𝑗𝑖+1,...,𝑗𝑘−1,𝑗𝑘+1,...,𝑗𝑛≥0
𝑗1𝜏1+⋅⋅⋅+𝑗𝑖−1𝜏𝑖−1+𝑙𝜏𝑖+𝑗𝑖+1𝜏𝑖+1
+⋅⋅⋅+𝑗𝑘−1𝜏𝑘−1+𝑗𝑘+1𝜏𝑘+1+⋅⋅⋅+𝑗𝑛𝜏𝑛≤𝑡(−1)∑𝑠∈{1,...,𝑛}
𝑠 =𝑖,𝑘 𝑗𝑠+𝑙
×(𝑗1,...,𝑗𝑖−1,𝑙,𝑗𝑖+1,...,𝑗𝑘−1,𝑗𝑘+1,...,𝑗𝑛)!(𝐵2
𝑖+𝐵2
𝑘)𝑙
×∏
𝑠∈{1,...,𝑛}
𝑠 =𝑖,𝑘 𝐵2𝑗𝑠
𝑠(𝑡−∑𝑠∈{1,...,𝑛}
𝑠 =𝑖,𝑘 ∑𝑗𝑠𝜏𝑠−𝑙𝜏𝑖)2(∑𝑠∈{1,...,𝑛}
𝑠 =𝑖,𝑘 𝑗𝑠+𝑙)
(2(∑𝑠∈{1,...,𝑛}
𝑠 =𝑖,𝑘 ∑𝑗𝑠+𝑙))!
=X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑖−1,𝐵2
𝑖+𝐵2
𝑘,𝐵2
𝑖+1,...,𝐵2
𝑘−1,𝐵2
𝑘+1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑖−1,𝜏𝑖,𝜏𝑖+1,...,𝜏𝑘−1,𝜏𝑘+1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡).(35)
P ope y (3) is i ial.
Now, we p o e he s a emen (4). I 𝜏:=𝜏1=⋅⋅⋅=𝜏𝑛,
hen X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡)=X𝐵2
1+⋅⋅⋅+𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏(𝑡)
=−(𝐵2
1+⋅⋅⋅+𝐵2
𝑛)X𝐵2
1+⋅⋅⋅+𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏(𝑡−𝜏)
=−𝐵2
1X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡−𝜏1)
−⋅⋅⋅−𝐵2
𝑛X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡−𝜏𝑛)
(36)
by (2) and om he p ope y o X𝐵2
1+⋅⋅⋅+𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏(𝑡)(see (22)).
Hence, wi hou any loss o gene ali y, we assume ha
𝜏𝑖=𝜏𝑗 o each 𝑖 =𝑗,𝑖,𝑗∈{1,...,𝑛}(in he o he case, we
collec ma ices as s a ed in (2)). No e he case 𝑛=2was
p o ed in [16, Lemma 2.3.] Now, assume ha X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛−1
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛−1 (𝑡)
sol es 𝑥(𝑡)=−𝐵2
1𝑥(𝑡−𝜏1)−⋅⋅⋅−𝐵2
𝑛−1𝑥(𝑡−𝜏𝑛−1), (37)
ha is, ha he s a emen is ul illed o 𝑛−1di e en delays.
Le 𝜏𝑘:=max𝑖=1,...,𝑛𝜏𝑖.I 𝑡<𝜏𝑘, hen𝑡−𝜏𝑘<0, ha is,
X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡−𝜏𝑘)=Θ, (38)
and om de ini ion (20)i holds
X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡)=X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑘−1,𝐵2
𝑘+1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑘−1,𝜏𝑘+1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡)(39)
o such 𝑡.Consequen ly,
X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡)=X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑘−1,𝐵2
𝑘+1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑘−1,𝜏𝑘+1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡)
=−∑
𝑖=1,...,𝑛
𝑖 =𝑘 𝐵2
𝑖X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑘−1,𝐵2
𝑘+1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑘−1,𝜏𝑘+1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡−𝜏𝑖)
=−𝑛
∑
𝑖=1𝐵2
𝑖X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡−𝜏𝑖)
(40)
by he induc i e hypo hesis.
Now, le 𝑡≥max𝑖=1,...,𝑛𝜏𝑖. Applying Lemma 3,wege
X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡)=∑
𝑀⊂{1,...,𝑛}𝑆𝑀(𝑡)(41)
wi h 𝑆𝑀(𝑡)gi en by (24) and he sum aken o e all subse s
o {1,...,𝑛}including he i ial ones. No e ha
𝑆0(𝑡)=∑
𝑗𝑖≥1,𝑖∈0
0≤𝑡 (−1)0({𝑗𝑖|𝑖∈0})!𝐸(𝑡−0)0
0!
=∑
0≤𝑡𝐸=𝐸𝜒[0,∞) (𝑡)(42)
wi h a cha ac e is ic unc ion 𝜒
𝑀o a se 
𝑀gi en by
𝜒
𝑀(𝑡)={1, 𝑡∈
𝑀,
0, 𝑡∉
𝑀. (43)
Since each 𝑀⊂{1,...,𝑛}is a ini e se , Lemma 2 yields
({𝑗𝑖|𝑖∈𝑀})!=∑
𝑖∈𝑀(𝑗𝑖−1,{𝑗𝑘|𝑘∈𝑀 {𝑖}})!. (44)
We apply his iden i y o de i e a o mula o he second
de i a i e o 𝑆𝑀 o any 0 =𝑀⊂{1,...,𝑛}:
𝑆󸀠󸀠
𝑀(𝑡)
=∑
𝑗𝑖≥1,𝑖∈𝑀
∑𝑖∈𝑀 𝑗𝑖𝜏𝑖≤𝑡(−1)∑𝑖∈𝑀 𝑗𝑖({𝑗𝑖|𝑖∈𝑀})!
×∏
𝑖∈𝑀𝐵2𝑗𝑖
𝑖(𝑡−∑𝑖∈𝑀 𝑗𝑖𝜏𝑖)2(∑𝑖∈𝑀 𝑗𝑖−1)
(2(∑𝑖∈𝑀 𝑗𝑖−1))!
=∑
𝑖∈𝑀 ∑
𝑗𝑘≥1,𝑘∈𝑀
∑𝑘∈𝑀 𝑗𝑘𝜏𝑘≤𝑡(−1)∑𝑘∈𝑀 𝑗𝑘(𝑗𝑖−1,{𝑗𝑘|𝑘∈𝑀 {𝑖}})!
×∏
𝑘∈𝑀𝐵2𝑗𝑘
𝑘(𝑡−𝜏𝑖−∑𝑘∈𝑀 {𝑖}𝑗𝑘𝜏𝑘−(𝑗𝑖−1)𝜏𝑖)2(∑𝑘∈𝑀 𝑗𝑘−1)
(2(∑𝑘∈𝑀 𝑗𝑘−1))! .
(45)

6Abs ac and Applied Analysis
Nex , o any ixed 𝑖∈{1,...,𝑛}we spli he second sum o
𝑗𝑖=1and 𝑗𝑖≥2, ha is,
∑
𝑗𝑘≥1,𝑘∈𝑀
∑𝑘∈𝑀 𝑗𝑘𝜏𝑘≤𝑡𝐹(𝑗1,...,𝑗𝑖−1,𝑗𝑖,𝑗𝑖+1,...,𝑗𝑛)
=∑
𝑗𝑘≥1,𝑘∈𝑀 {𝑖}
∑𝑘∈𝑀 {𝑖} 𝑗𝑘𝜏𝑘≤𝑡−𝜏𝑖𝐹(𝑗1,...,𝑗𝑖−1,1,𝑗𝑖+1,...,𝑗𝑛)
+∑
𝑗𝑘≥1,𝑘∈𝑀 {𝑖}
𝑗𝑖≥2
∑𝑘∈𝑀 𝑗𝑘𝜏𝑘≤𝑡 𝐹(𝑗1,...,𝑗𝑖−1,𝑗𝑖,𝑗𝑖+1,...,𝑗𝑛), (46)
anduse heequali y
∑
𝑗𝑘≥1,𝑘∈𝑀 {𝑖}
𝑗𝑖≥2
∑𝑘∈𝑀 𝑗𝑘𝜏𝑘≤𝑡 𝐹(𝑗1,...,𝑗𝑖−1,𝑗𝑖,𝑗𝑖+1,...,𝑗𝑛)
=∑
𝑗𝑘≥1,𝑘∈𝑀
∑𝑘∈𝑀 𝑗𝑘𝜏𝑘≤𝑡−𝜏𝑖𝐹(𝑗1,...,𝑗𝑖−1,𝑗𝑖+1,𝑗𝑖+1,...,𝑗𝑛)(47)
since∑
𝑘∈𝑀𝑗𝑘𝜏𝑘≤𝑡⇐⇒ ∑
𝑘∈𝑀 {𝑖}𝑗𝑘𝜏𝑘+(𝑗𝑖−1)𝜏𝑖≤𝑡−𝜏𝑖.(48)
So we ob ain
𝑆󸀠󸀠
𝑀(𝑡)=−∑
𝑖∈𝑀𝐵2
𝑖(𝑆𝑀 {𝑖} (𝑡−𝜏𝑖)+𝑆𝑀(𝑡−𝜏𝑖)) (49)
o each 0 =𝑀 ⊂ {1,...,𝑛}.Ob iously,𝑆󸀠󸀠
0(𝑡) = Θ.
Consequen ly,
X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡)
=− ∑
0 =𝑀⊂{1,...,𝑛}∑
𝑖∈𝑀𝐵2
𝑖(𝑆𝑀 {𝑖} (𝑡−𝜏𝑖)+𝑆𝑀(𝑡−𝜏𝑖))
=− ∑
0 =𝑀⊂{1,...,𝑛}∑
𝑖∈𝑀𝐵2
𝑖𝑆𝑀 {𝑖} (𝑡−𝜏𝑖)
−∑
0 =𝑀⊂{1,...,𝑛}∑
𝑖∈𝑀𝐵2
𝑖𝑆𝑀(𝑡−𝜏𝑖). (50)
Now, we add and sub ac
∑
0 =𝑀⊂{1,...,𝑛}∑
𝑖∉𝑀𝐵2
𝑖𝑆𝑀(𝑡−𝜏𝑖)(51)
o he igh -hand side o (50) oge
X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡)
=− ∑
0 =𝑀⊂{1,...,𝑛}
𝑛
∑
𝑖=1𝐵2
𝑖𝑆𝑀(𝑡−𝜏𝑖)
+∑
0 =𝑀⊂{1,...,𝑛}∑
𝑖∉𝑀𝐵2
𝑖𝑆𝑀(𝑡−𝜏𝑖)
−∑
0 =𝑀⊂{1,...,𝑛}∑
𝑖∈𝑀𝐵2
𝑖𝑆𝑀 {𝑖} (𝑡−𝜏𝑖)
(52)
and apply 𝑀=𝑀 {𝑖}whene e 𝑖∉𝑀:
X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡)
=− ∑
0 =𝑀⊂{1,...,𝑛}
𝑛
∑
𝑖=1𝐵2
𝑖𝑆𝑀(𝑡−𝜏𝑖)
+∑
0 =𝑀⊂{1,...,𝑛}∑
𝑖∉𝑀𝐵2
𝑖𝑆𝑀 {𝑖} (𝑡−𝜏𝑖)
−∑
0 =𝑀⊂{1,...,𝑛}∑
𝑖∈𝑀𝐵2
𝑖𝑆𝑀 {𝑖} (𝑡−𝜏𝑖).
(53)
Deno ing #𝑀 henumbe o elemen so hese 𝑀,wespli
he las wo e ms o he igh -hand side o he la e equali y
wi h espec o ∑
0 =𝑀⊂{1,...,𝑛}=∑
𝑀⊂{1,...,𝑛}
1≤#𝑀≤𝑛−1 +∑
𝑀⊂{1,...,𝑛}
#𝑀=𝑛
=∑
𝑀⊂{1,...,𝑛}
#𝑀=1 +∑
𝑀⊂{1,...,𝑛}
2≤#𝑀≤𝑛 .(54)
Hence, we ha e
∑
0 =𝑀⊂{1,...,𝑛}∑
𝑖∉𝑀𝐵2
𝑖𝑆𝑀 {𝑖} (𝑡−𝜏𝑖)
−∑
0 =𝑀⊂{1,...,𝑛}∑
𝑖∈𝑀𝐵2
𝑖𝑆𝑀 {𝑖} (𝑡−𝜏𝑖)
=∑
𝑀⊂{1,...,𝑛}
1≤#𝑀≤𝑛−1 ∑
𝑖∉𝑀𝐵2
𝑖𝑆𝑀 {𝑖} (𝑡−𝜏𝑖)
+∑
𝑀={1,...,𝑛}∑
𝑖∉𝑀𝐵2
𝑖𝑆𝑀 {𝑖} (𝑡−𝜏𝑖)
−∑
𝑀∈{{1},...,{𝑛}} ∑
𝑖∈𝑀𝐵2
𝑖𝑆𝑀 {𝑖} (𝑡−𝜏𝑖)
−∑
𝑀⊂{1,...,𝑛}
2≤#𝑀≤𝑛 ∑
𝑖∈𝑀𝐵2
𝑖𝑆𝑀 {𝑖} (𝑡−𝜏𝑖).
(55)
Now, we show ha
∑
𝑀⊂{1,...,𝑛}
1≤#𝑀≤𝑛−1 ∑
𝑖∉𝑀𝐵2
𝑖𝑆𝑀 {𝑖} (𝑡−𝜏𝑖)
=∑
𝑀⊂{1,...,𝑛}
2≤#𝑀≤𝑛 ∑
𝑖∈𝑀𝐵2
𝑖𝑆𝑀 {𝑖} (𝑡−𝜏𝑖). (56)
Le 𝑀⊂{1,...,𝑛}, and le 𝑖∉𝑀be a bi a y and ixed such
ha 1≤#𝑀≤𝑛−1. Then, clea ly,
𝐵𝑖𝑆𝑀 {𝑖} (𝑡−𝜏𝑖)=𝐵𝑖𝑆(𝑀∪{𝑖}) {𝑖} (𝑡−𝜏𝑖)(57)
and 2≤#(𝑀∪{𝑖})≤𝑛,𝑖∈𝑀∪{𝑖}.Mo eo e ,i 𝑀1,𝑀2⊂
{1,...,𝑛},𝑖∉𝑀1,2 a e such ha 𝑀1=𝑀2,1≤#𝑀1,2 ≤𝑛−1,
hen 𝑀1∪{𝑖}=𝑀2∪{𝑖}.
Abs ac and Applied Analysis 7
On he o he side, i 𝑀⊂{1,...,𝑛},𝑖∈𝑀a e a bi a y
and ixed such ha 2≤#𝑀≤𝑛, hen
𝐵𝑖𝑆𝑀 {𝑖} (𝑡−𝜏𝑖)=𝐵𝑖𝑆(𝑀 {𝑖}) {𝑖} (𝑡−𝜏𝑖)(58)
and 1≤#(𝑀 {𝑖})≤𝑛−1,𝑖∉𝑀 {𝑖}.Fu he mo e,i
𝑀1,𝑀2⊂{1,...,𝑛},𝑖∈𝑀1,2 a e such ha 𝑀1=𝑀2,2≤
#𝑀1,2 ≤𝑛, hen,𝑀1 {𝑖}=𝑀2 {𝑖}.Inconclusion, he eis
1−1co espondence be ween he e ms on he le -hand side
o (56) and he e ms on he igh -hand side. So (56)is alid.
Pu ing (56)in(55)weob ain
∑
0 =𝑀⊂{1,...,𝑛}∑
𝑖∉𝑀𝐵2
𝑖𝑆𝑀 {𝑖} (𝑡−𝜏𝑖)
−∑
0 =𝑀⊂{1,...,𝑛}∑
𝑖∈𝑀𝐵2
𝑖𝑆𝑀 {𝑖} (𝑡−𝜏𝑖)
=∑
𝑀={1,...,𝑛}∑
𝑖∉𝑀𝐵2
𝑖𝑆𝑀 {𝑖} (𝑡−𝜏𝑖)
−∑
𝑀∈{{1},...,{𝑛}} ∑
𝑖∈𝑀𝐵2
𝑖𝑆𝑀{𝑖} (𝑡−𝜏𝑖).
(59)
Nex , by he p ope y o emp y sum, we ge
∑
𝑀={1,...,𝑛}∑
𝑖∉𝑀𝐵2
𝑖𝑆𝑀 {𝑖} (𝑡−𝜏𝑖)= ∑
𝑀={1,...,𝑛}Θ=Θ. (60)
Mo eo e , i holds
∑
𝑀∈{{1},...,{𝑛}} ∑
𝑖∈𝑀𝐵2
𝑖𝑆𝑀 {𝑖} (𝑡−𝜏𝑖)
=𝑛
∑
𝑖=1𝐵2
𝑖𝑆0(𝑡−𝜏𝑖)=∑
𝑀=0
𝑛
∑
𝑖=1𝐵2
𝑖𝑆𝑀(𝑡−𝜏𝑖). (61)
The e o e, pu ing (60)and(61)in(59)and he esul in(53),
we ob ain
X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡)=− ∑
0 =𝑀⊂{1,...,𝑛}
𝑛
∑
𝑖=1𝐵2
𝑖𝑆𝑀(𝑡−𝜏𝑖)
−∑
𝑀=0
𝑛
∑
𝑖=1𝐵2
𝑖𝑆𝑀(𝑡−𝜏𝑖)
=−𝑛
∑
𝑖=1𝐵2
𝑖∑
𝑀⊂{1,...,𝑛}𝑆𝑀(𝑡−𝜏𝑖)
=−𝑛
∑
𝑖=1𝐵2
𝑖X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡−𝜏𝑖).
(62)
Hence, X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡)sol es (31) o all𝑡≥0.Clea ly, hesame
is ue o 𝑡<0.
Fo Y𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡),s a emen s(1)–(3)canbep o edas o
X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡). Nex , i 𝜏:=𝜏1=⋅⋅⋅=𝜏𝑛,weapply hepoin (2)
o his lemma and p ope y (22) o Y𝐵2
1+⋅⋅⋅+𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏(𝑡) o see ha
Y𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡)=Y𝐵2
1+⋅⋅⋅+𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏(𝑡)
=−(𝐵2
1+⋅⋅⋅+𝐵2
𝑛)Y𝐵2
1+⋅⋅⋅+𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏(𝑡−𝜏)
=−𝐵2
1Y𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡−𝜏1)
−⋅⋅⋅−𝐵2
𝑛Y𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡−𝜏𝑛).
(63)
So, Y𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡)is a solu ion o (31) when all delays a e he
same.
Again, he case 𝑛=2wi h di e en delays was p o ed
in [16]; hus, we assume ha he s a emen is ul illed o 𝑛−
1,𝑛≥3and ha 𝜏𝑖=𝜏𝑗 o each 𝑖 =𝑗,𝑖,𝑗∈{1,...,𝑛}.As
be o e, i 𝑡<𝜏𝑘and 𝜏𝑘:=max𝑖=1,...,𝑛𝜏𝑖, hen
Y𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡)=Y𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑘−1,𝐵2
𝑘+1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑘−1,𝜏𝑘+1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡)(64)
by de ini ion (20), and he s a emen ollows om he
induc i e hypo hesis. Fo 𝑡≥max𝑖=1,...,𝑛𝜏𝑖, we apply Lemma 3
o see ha
Y𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡)=∑
𝑀⊂{1,...,𝑛}𝑆𝑀(𝑡)(65)
wi h 𝑆𝑀(𝑡)gi en by (25). This ime
𝑆0(𝑡)=∑
𝑗𝑖≥1,𝑖∈0
0≤𝑡 (−1)0({𝑗𝑖|𝑖∈0})!𝐸(𝑡−0)1
0!
=∑
0≤𝑡𝐸𝑡=𝑡𝐸𝜒[0,∞) (𝑡)(66)
and 𝑆󸀠󸀠
0(𝑡)=Θ. The es p oceeds analogically o X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡).
The inal s a emen ollows di ec ly om de ini ion (20).
Rema k 5. Ano he p oo o s a emen s (1)–(3) o he p e-
iouslemmacanbemadewi h heaido s a emen (4)
o he same lemma and uses he uniqueness o a solu ion
o he co esponding ini ial alue p oblem. Fo ins ance in
s a emen (1) o he lemma, bo h
X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡),X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑖−1,𝐵2
𝑖+1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑖−1,𝜏𝑖+1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡)(67)
sol e 𝑥(𝑡)=−𝐵2
1𝑥(𝑡−𝜏1)−⋅⋅⋅−𝐵2
𝑖−1𝑥(𝑡−𝜏𝑖−1)
−𝐵2
𝑖+1𝑥(𝑡−𝜏𝑖+1)−⋅⋅⋅−𝐵2
𝑛𝑥(𝑡−𝜏𝑛)(68)
wi h ini ial condi ion
𝑥(𝑡)={Θ, −𝜏≤𝑡<0,
𝐸, 𝑡=0, 𝑥(𝑡)=Θ,−𝜏≤𝑡≤0 (69)
and 𝜏=max𝑖=1,...,𝑛𝜏𝑖.
We a e eady o s a e and p o e ou main esul .
8Abs ac and Applied Analysis
3. Main Resul
He ewe indasolu iono heini ial aluep oblem(11), (8)
in he sense o he nex de ini ion.
De ini ion 6. Le 𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛>0,𝜏:=max𝑖=1,...,𝑛𝜏𝑖,and𝜑∈
𝐶1([−𝜏,0],R𝑁),andle 𝐵1,...,𝐵𝑛be 𝑁×𝑁ma ices, and
le 𝑓:[0,∞)→R𝑁be a gi en unc ion. Func ion 𝑥:
[−𝜏,∞) → R𝑁is a solu ion o (11) and ini ial condi ion
(8), i 𝑥∈𝐶
1([−𝜏,∞),R𝑁)∩𝐶2([0,∞),R𝑁)( aken he
second igh -hand de i a i e a 0) sa is ies (11)on[0,∞)and
condi ion (8)on[−𝜏,0].
Theo em 7. Le 𝑛≥3,𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛>0,𝜏:=max𝑖=1,...,𝑛𝜏𝑖,and
𝜑∈𝐶1([−𝜏,0],R𝑁),andle 𝐵1,...,𝐵𝑛be 𝑁×𝑁pai wise
pe mu able ma ices; ha is, 𝐵𝑖𝐵𝑗=𝐵
𝑗𝐵𝑖 o each 𝑖,𝑗 ∈
{1,...,𝑛},andle 𝑓:[0,∞)→R𝑁be a gi en unc ion.
Solu ion 𝑥(𝑡)o (11)sa is ying ini ial condi ion (8)has he o m
𝑥(𝑡)={
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
𝜑(𝑡),−𝜏≤𝑡<0,
X(𝑡)𝜑(0)+Y(𝑡)𝜑(0)
−𝑛
∑
𝑖=1𝐵2
𝑖∫0
−𝜏𝑖
Y(𝑡−𝜏𝑖−𝑠)𝜑(𝑠)𝑑𝑠
+∫𝑡
0Y(𝑡−𝑠)𝑓(𝑠)𝑑𝑠, 0≤𝑡, (70)
whe e X(𝑡)=X𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡)and Y(𝑡)=Y𝐵2
1,...,𝐵2
𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡).
P oo . Ob iously, 𝑥(𝑡)sa is ies he ini ial condi ion on [−𝜏,0),
and, om de ini ion (20), 𝑥(0)=𝜑(0). Fo he de i a i e, i
holds lim𝑡→0−𝑥(𝑡)= 𝜑(0).Mo eo e ,i 0≤𝑡<min𝑖=1,...,𝑛𝜏𝑖,
hen 𝑥(𝑡)=𝜑(0)+𝑡𝜑(0)
−𝑛
∑
𝑖=1𝐵2
𝑖∫𝑡−𝜏𝑖
−𝜏𝑖(𝑡−𝜏𝑖−𝑠)𝜑(𝑠)𝑑𝑠
+∫𝑡
0(𝑡−𝑠)𝑓(𝑠)𝑑𝑠
(71)
since
Y(𝑡−𝜏𝑖−𝑠)={(𝑡−𝜏𝑖−𝑠)𝐸, 𝑠∈[−𝜏𝑖,𝑡−𝜏𝑖],
Θ, 𝑠∈(𝑡−𝜏𝑖,0] (72)
o each 𝑖=1,...,𝑛.Thus
𝑥(𝑡)=𝜑(0)−𝑛
∑
𝑖=1𝐵2
𝑖∫𝑡−𝜏𝑖
−𝜏𝑖𝜑(𝑠)𝑑𝑠+∫𝑡
0𝑓(𝑠)𝑑𝑠 (73)
and lim𝑡→0+𝑥(𝑡)= 𝜑(0).Clea ly,
𝑥∈𝐶1((−𝜏,∞),R𝑁)∩𝐶2((0,∞) {𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛},R𝑁).
(74)
We show ha , al hough X(𝑡)is no 𝐶2a 𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛,
unc ion 𝑥(𝑡)is 𝐶2a hese poin s and, he e o e, in (0,∞).
A once, we p o e ha 𝑥(𝑡)is a solu ion o (11).
Assume ha 0≤𝑡<min𝑖=1,...,𝑛𝜏𝑖. Then iden i ies (71)and
(73) a e alid, and by di e en ia ing (73) o such𝑡we ge
𝑥(𝑡)=−𝑛
∑
𝑖=1𝐵2
𝑖𝜑(𝑡−𝜏𝑖)+𝑓(𝑡)=−𝑛
∑
𝑖=1𝐵2
𝑖𝑥(𝑡−𝜏𝑖)+𝑓(𝑡)(75)
since 𝑥(𝑡−𝜏𝑖)=𝜑(𝑡−𝜏𝑖) o each 𝑖=1,...,𝑛.
Now, le 0 =𝑀1,2 ⊂{1,...,𝑛}be such ha 𝜏𝑖≤𝑡<𝜏𝑗 o
each 𝑖∈𝑀1,𝑗∈𝑀2.Then
Y(𝑡−𝜏𝑗−𝑠)={Y(𝑡−𝜏𝑗−𝑠), 𝑠∈[−𝜏𝑗,𝑡−𝜏𝑗],
Θ, 𝑠∈(𝑡−𝜏𝑗,0] (76)
whene e 𝑗∈𝑀2,and(70)becomes
𝑥(𝑡)=X(𝑡)𝜑(0)+Y(𝑡)𝜑(0)
−∑
𝑖∈𝑀1𝐵2
𝑖∫0
−𝜏𝑖
Y(𝑡−𝜏𝑖−𝑠)𝜑(𝑠)𝑑𝑠
−∑
𝑗∈𝑀2𝐵2
𝑗∫𝑡−𝜏𝑗
−𝜏𝑗
Y(𝑡−𝜏𝑗−𝑠)𝜑(𝑠)𝑑𝑠
+∫𝑡
0Y(𝑡−𝑠)𝑓(𝑠)𝑑𝑠.
(77)
By he poin (5) o Lemma 4,wege
𝑥(𝑡)=X(𝑡)𝜑(0)+Y(𝑡)𝜑(0)
−∑
𝑖∈𝑀1𝐵2
𝑖∫0
−𝜏𝑖Y(𝑡−𝜏𝑖−𝑠)𝜑(𝑠)𝑑𝑠
−∑
𝑗∈𝑀2𝐵2
𝑗∫𝑡−𝜏𝑗
−𝜏𝑗
X(𝑡−𝜏𝑗−𝑠)𝜑(𝑠)𝑑𝑠
+∫𝑡
0X(𝑡−𝑠)𝑓(𝑠)𝑑𝑠,
(78)
and o hesecondde i a i ei holds
𝑥(𝑡)=X(𝑡)𝜑(0)+Y(𝑡)𝜑(0)
−∑
𝑖∈𝑀1𝐵2
𝑖∫0
−𝜏𝑖Y(𝑡−𝜏𝑖−𝑠)𝜑(𝑠)𝑑𝑠
−∑
𝑗∈𝑀2𝐵2
𝑗(𝜑(𝑡−𝜏𝑗)+∫𝑡−𝜏𝑗
−𝜏𝑗Y(𝑡−𝜏𝑗−𝑠)𝜑(𝑠)𝑑𝑠)
+𝑓(𝑡)+∫𝑡
0Y(𝑡−𝑠)𝑓(𝑠)𝑑𝑠 (79)
since X(0)=𝐸. Now, we apply he p ope y (4) o Lemma 4
oge he wi h
X(𝑡−𝜏𝑗)=Y(𝑡−𝜏𝑗)=Θ, ∀𝑗∈𝑀2(80)
Abs ac and Applied Analysis 9
o see ha bo h Xand Ya e solu ions o
𝑦(𝑡)=−∑
𝑖∈𝑀1𝐵2
𝑖𝑦(𝑡−𝜏𝑖). (81)
The e o e,
𝑥(𝑡)=−∑
𝑘∈𝑀1𝐵2
𝑘(X(𝑡−𝜏𝑘)𝜑(0)+Y(𝑡−𝜏𝑘)𝜑(0)
−∑
𝑖∈𝑀1𝐵2
𝑖∫0
−𝜏𝑖
Y(𝑡−𝜏𝑖−𝜏𝑘−𝑠)𝜑(𝑠)𝑑𝑠
−∑
𝑗∈𝑀2𝐵2
𝑗∫𝑡−𝜏𝑗
−𝜏𝑗
Y(𝑡−𝜏𝑗−𝜏𝑘−𝑠)𝜑(𝑠)𝑑𝑠
+∫𝑡
0Y(𝑡−𝜏𝑘−𝑠)𝑓(𝑠)𝑑𝑠)
−∑
𝑗∈𝑀2𝐵2
𝑗𝜑(𝑡−𝜏𝑗)+𝑓(𝑡)
=−∑
𝑖∈𝑀1𝐵2
𝑖𝑥(𝑡−𝜏𝑖)−∑
𝑗∈𝑀2𝐵2
𝑗𝜑(𝑡−𝜏𝑗)+𝑓(𝑡).(82)
In ac , his is exac ly o mula (11)since𝑥(𝑡−𝜏𝑗)=𝜑(𝑡−𝜏𝑗)
o each 𝑗∈𝑀2.
Finally, i max𝑖=1,...,𝑛𝜏𝑖≤𝑡,weha e
𝑥(𝑡)=X(𝑡)𝜑(0)+Y(𝑡)𝜑(0)
−𝑛
∑
𝑖=1𝐵2
𝑖∫0
−𝜏𝑖
Y(𝑡−𝜏𝑖−𝑠)𝜑(𝑠)𝑑𝑠
+∫𝑡
0Y(𝑡−𝑠)𝑓(𝑠)𝑑𝑠.
(83)
So, di e en ia ing his o mula wice and applying (4) o
Lemma 4 esul in (11). Hence, one can see ha unc ion 𝑥(𝑡)
gi en by (70) eallysol es(11) and sa is ies ini ial condi ion
(8)and,mo eo e , ha 𝑥∈𝐶2((0,∞),R𝑁).Tosee helas
one, one has o pu 𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛in o he compu ed de i a i es,
o example, i 𝜏𝑘:=min𝑖=1,...,𝑛𝜏𝑖<𝜏𝑖 o each 𝑖=1,...,𝑘−
1,𝑘+1,...,𝑛, henby(75)and(82)wege
lim
𝑡→𝜏−
𝑘𝑥(𝑡)=−𝑛
∑
𝑖=1
𝑖 =𝑘𝐵2
𝑖𝜑(𝜏𝑘−𝜏𝑖)−𝐵2
𝑘𝜑(0)+𝑓(𝜏𝑘)
=−∑
𝑗∈𝑀2𝐵2
𝑗𝜑(𝜏𝑘−𝜏𝑗)
−𝐵2
𝑘𝑥(0)+𝑓(𝜏𝑘)=lim
𝑡→𝜏+
𝑘𝑥(𝑡),
(84)
whe e 𝑀2={1,...,𝑛} {𝑘}.
I is easy o see ha de ining unc ions

X𝐵1,...,𝐵𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡):=X−𝐵1,...,−𝐵𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡),

Y𝐵1,...,𝐵𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡):=Y−𝐵1,...,−𝐵𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡)(85)
leads o he solu ion o
𝑥(𝑡)=𝐵1𝑥(𝑡−𝜏1)+⋅⋅⋅+𝐵𝑛𝑥(𝑡−𝜏𝑛)+𝑓(𝑡)(86)
wi h pai wise pe mu able ma ices 𝐵1,...,𝐵𝑛and ini ial
condi ion (8). Mo e p ecisely, we ha e he ollowing co olla y
o Theo em 7.
Co olla y 8. Le 𝑛≥3,𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛>0,𝜏:=max𝑖=1,...,𝑛𝜏𝑖,
𝜑∈𝐶1([−𝜏,0],R𝑁),andle 𝐵1,...,𝐵𝑛be 𝑁×𝑁pai wise
pe mu able ma ices; ha is, 𝐵𝑖𝐵𝑗=𝐵
𝑗𝐵𝑖 o each 𝑖,𝑗 ∈
{1,...,𝑛},andle 𝑓:[0,∞)→R𝑁be a gi en unc ion.
Solu ion 𝑥(𝑡)o (86)sa is ying ini ial condi ion (8)has he
o m
𝑥(𝑡)={
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
{
𝜑(𝑡),−𝜏≤𝑡<0,
X(𝑡)𝜑(0)+Y(𝑡)𝜑(0)
+𝑛
∑
𝑖=1𝐵𝑖∫0
−𝜏𝑖
Y(𝑡−𝜏𝑖−𝑠)𝜑(𝑠)𝑑𝑠
+∫𝑡
0Y(𝑡−𝑠)𝑓(𝑠)𝑑𝑠, 0≤𝑡, (87)
whe e X(𝑡)=
X𝐵1,...,𝐵𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡)and Y(𝑡)=
Y𝐵1,...,𝐵𝑛
𝜏1,...,𝜏𝑛(𝑡).
P oo . The co olla y can be p o ed exac ly in he same way as
Theo em 7.
Acknowledgmen s
J. Dibl´
ık was suppo ed by he G an GAˇ
CR P201/11/0768.
M. Feˇ
ckan was suppo ed in pa by he G an s VEGA-
MS 1/0507/11, VEGA-SAV 2/0029/13, and APVV-0134-10. M.
Posp´
ıˇ
sil was suppo ed by he P ojec no. CZ.1.07/2.3.00/
30.0005 unded by Eu opean Regional De elopmen Fund.
Re e ences
[1] D. Y. Khusaino , J. Dibl´
ık, M. R˚
uˇ
ziˇ
cko ´
a, and J. Luk´
aˇ
co ´
a,
“Rep esen a ion o a solu ion o he Cauchy p oblem o an
oscilla ing sys em wi h pu e delay,” Nonlinea Oscilla ions, ol.
11, no. 2, pp. 276–285, 2008.
[2] D. Y. Khusaino and G. V. Shuklin, “Linea au onomous ime-
delay sys em wi h pe mu a ion ma ices sol ing,” S udies o he
Uni e si y o ˇ
Zilina, ol.17,no.1,pp.101–108,2003.
[3]M.Med ed’andM.Posp
´
ıˇ
sil, “Su icien condi ions o he
asymp o ic s abili y o nonlinea mul idelay di e en ial equa-
ions wi h linea pa s de ined by pai wise pe mu able ma i-
ces,” Nonlinea Analysis. Theo y, Me hods & Applica ions, ol.75,
no.7,pp.3348–3363,2012.
[4]M.Med ed’andM.Posp
´
ıˇ
sil, “Rep esen a ion and s abili y o
solu ions o sys ems o di e ence equa ions wi h mul iple delays
and linea pa s de ined by pai wise pe mu able ma ices,”