scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Mechanical characterisation of natural reinforced plastics

Abstract

The work described in this paper refers to the mechanical characterisation offibre reinforced composite materials with an epoxy matrix. Sisal and Hemp fibresare used with different surface treatments. The comparison between a reference glass fibre reinforced composite andthe other natural fibres composites is made. It is also presented the influence ofthe surface treatment in the mechanical characterizations of the natural fibres A brief description of the production of the natural fibres compositematerials is made.

Read accessible full text

Mechanical characterisation of natural reinforced plastics

Author: P. Vieira,C. Romão,A. T. Marques,J. L. Esteves
Year: 2003
Source: https://repositorio-aberto.up.pt/bitstream/10216/69672/2/64100.pdf
Mechanical Cha ac e isa ion o Na u al Fib e Rein o ced Plas ics
P. Viei a
1
, C. Romão
2
, A.T. Ma ques
3
J.L. Es e es
3
1
INEGI – Ins i u e o Mechanical Enginee ing and Indus ial Managemen , Leça do Balio, Po ugal
2
IPV - Ins i u e Poly echnic o Viseu, Viseu, Po ugal
3
FEUP – Facul y o Enginee ing o Uni e si y o Po o, Po o, Po ugal
Keywo ds: Na u al Fib es, Sisal, Hemp, Composi e.
Abs ac
The wo k desc ibed in his pape e e s o he mechanical cha ac e isa ion o
ib e ein o ced composi e ma e ials wi h an epoxy ma ix. Sisal and Hemp ib es
a e used wi h di e en su ace ea men s.
The compa ison be ween a e e ence glass ib e ein o ced composi e and
he o he na u al ib es composi es is made. I is also p esen ed he in luence o
he su ace ea men in he mechanical cha ac e iza ions o he na u al ib es
A b ie desc ip ion o he p oduc ion o he na u al ib es composi e
ma e ials is made.
In oduc ion
Today he sea ch o new, ecyclable and enewable ma e ials is leading he
esea che s in new ways. Na u al p oduc s a e eme ging and some esea ch is
s a ing in his ma e . The wo k p esen ed he e shows he compa ison be ween
Glass, Sisal and Hemp [1-2]. Some pla es we e made using hose ma e ials as
ein o cemen and an epoxy esin as ma ix. The na u al ib es we e cleaned in
o de o emo e s aw and o he con amina ing agen s. A e hese compa isons,
we made a su ace ea men in he hemp ib es o see i i imp o es he adhesion
ib e - ma ix. The ea men used is called me ce iza ion, and is desc ibed below.
The ib e - ma ix adhesion is o he mos impo ance, and he inal esul o he
composi e is depending immensely on his ac o . The cleaning o he na u al
ib es is also e y impo an . Con amina ing agen s can also des oy he composi e
o educe i s mechanical p ope ies d as ically.
Fib e p epa a ion
Glass Ma ib e - he glass ib e is deli e ed in oles. To p epa e he ma o
in oduce in he mould, we ha e o cu i in pieces o 150x100 mm
2
. The numbe o
laye s is e y impo an , o main ain he ib e olume ac ion (30% in olume).
Na u al Sisal ib e - he i s s ep o any na u al ib e is he cleaning. When hey
we e deli e ed, hey we e ull o g ass and o he con amina ing agen s. A e he
cleaning p ocess, i was necessa y o cu he ib es in app oxima ely 30 mm leng h
pieces, o be able o agglome a e hem in he mould and make a ma . Making he
ma is he nex s ep. A e calcula ing he olume ac ion we in oduced he ib e
alea o y in he mould, close i and pu i in he p ess. A e 10 minu es we can
emo e he ma .
Na u al Hemp ib e - exac ly he same p ocess as wi h he Sisal ib es.
The nex igu es show all he p ocess.
Figu e 1: The mould Figu e 2: The na u al ib e ma
Su ace T ea men
Wi h he hemp ib es a su ace ea men has been done o inc ease he
ib e/ma ix adhesion. This ea men (me ce izing) is made in some s eps. Fi s
s ep is o pe o m an imme sion a ba h. Two hou s in a solu ion o 8% in olume
o Sodium Hyd oxide (NaOH) wi h dis illed wa e . Du ing his p ocess he ba h
was s i ed con inuously using a mechanical agi a o ( igu e 3). A he end he
solu ion p esen ed a yellow colou because o he subs ances emo ed om he
ib e. The nex s ep is cleaning he ib es se e al imes in a dis illed wa e ba h,
un il he wa e is clean. A e se e al ba hs, a neu alizing solu ion o 25% in
olume o ace ic acid is used. Again, mo e wo o h ee ba hs wi h dis illed wa e
and he ea men is inished. To d y he ib es we le hem 5 days a ambien
empe a u e, and hen six hou s a 60º C in an o en ( igu e 4). [3-5]
The su ace o na u al ib es is hyd ophilic, no gi ing good adhesion o he
hyd ophobic epoxy ma ix, so he me ce isa ion ea men y o imp o e he
adhesion ib e/ma ix by he dec ease o hyd ophilic cha ac e o he ib es.
Figu e 3: Sodium Hyd oxide ba h Figu e 4: Fib es in he o en
Manu ac u ing a pla e
To manu ac u e a pla e we used he comp ession moulding echnique. The mould
ha we can see in igu e 1 has a ca i y o 150x100x4 mm
3
and is made o
aluminium. The i s s ep is o clean he su ace and hen apply he mould elease
agen QZ13 om Ciba. A e he p epa a ion o he esin, we in oduce i in he
mould ( igu e 6). The ma is hen placed in he mould ( igu e 7) and he mould
closed. A las e e y hing is placed in he ho pla e p ess, whe e he combina ion
o p essu e and empe a u e make he pla e.
Figu e 5: Mixing he esin
Figu e 6: In oducing he esin Figu e 7: Placing he ma
A e 1 hou in he p ess, he mould has been open ( igu e 8) and he imming o
he pla e was made. Th ee examples o he pla es a e shown in igu e 9, one om
each ma e ial. In all p ocess he e we e some p oblems ha had o be sol ed. The
i s was making a homogeneous ma using he cu ed ib es. Fo 30% olume
ac ion o hemp ib e we calcula ed he need o 25 g ams. Tha amoun o ib e
be o e comp essed is in olume 5 imes bigge han he ma we need. The p oblem
wasn’ comp essing, he p oblem was main aining he olume ac ion in all he
pla e. To sol e ha p oblem, laye s we e made wi h 8 g ams each. Wi h h ee
laye s we could make a ma , and ha educes he p obabili y o ha ing a e y
di e en olume ac ion in all he pla e. Void con en is ano he p oblem.
Because o he limi a ion o his p ocess, we es ima e by measu ing he pla e and
weighing i ha he oid con en is a ound 10 %.
Figu e 8: Open mould Figu e 9: The h ee pla es
To p oduce he pla es used o he compa ison, we used he epoxy esin Reapox
520/D526 om REA Indus ies wi h he ollowing cha ac e is ics:
Tensile S eng h (MPa) = 71; Modulus (GPa) = 3.5; Densi y (g/cm
3
) = 1.12.
To p oduce he hemp pla es used o es ing he su ace ea men , we used he
epoxy esin Reapox WOOD RX8 om REA Indus ies wi h he ollowing
cha ac e is ics:
Figu e 10: Tes se up
Tensile S eng h (MPa) = 50; Modulus (GPa) = 3.0; Densi y (g/cm
3
) = 1.13.
We used a di e en esin because his new esin has wice he up u e de o ma ion
ha he i s one. We made one o wo es s wi h he 520 and he de o ma ion
wasn’ enough o he agmen a ion es s planed o make wi h his ibe s.
Mechanical Tes s and Resul s
Fo he mechanical es s we used an INSTRON 4208. We made
he es s acco ding o he ISO 527-4 s anda d. We used a 100
kN load cell and a 2 mm/min ac ion speed. Figu e 10 shows
he se up.
In ou wo k, we made he compa ison be ween glass, sisal and
hemp. In he hemp ib es we ha e also done a compa ison wi h
na u al hemp ib es and ib es subjec ed o a me ce iza ion
ea men ha is desc ibed abo e.
The esul s ( able 1) show ha he na u al ib es a e s ill e y
a om he glass ib e. I we look o he ensile s eng h, he
alue ob ained by he na u al ib es is e en in e io han he
ma ix and mo e o less ou imes smalle han he glass ib e. I we look o he
modulus, he sisal ib e composi e alue is hal o he glass ib e composi e, bu
he hemp ib e composi e is only 20 % in e io .
Composi Tensile S engh
[MPa] Modulus
[GPa] De o ma ion
[%]
REAPOX 520/D526
+
30% glass ib e
192.4 ± 20.5
10.0 ± 0.9
2.5 ± 0.3
REAPOX 520/D526
+
30% sisal ib e
50.9 ± 5.5
5.5 ± 0.5
1.3 ± 0.3
REAPOX 520/D526
+
30% hemp ib e
51.1 ± 6.8
7.8 ± 0.5
0.8 ± 0.1
REAPOX 520/D56
70
3.5
4
Table 1: Compa ison be ween he mechanical esul s o he h ee ib es
A bad ib e-ma ix adhesion could be esponsible o hese esul s. Table 2 shows
he esul s o he es s made wi h he hemp ib es. The su ace ea men made o
he ib es didn’ imp o e he adhesion be ween ib e and ma ix. In he esul s we
can see a loss o 15 % in he Tensile S eng h and a los o 30 % in he Modulus
using his ea men . In bo h cases he Tensile S eng h is in e io o he one o he
esin, bu he Modulus is highe .
When analysing he c ack, we could obse e ha he adhesion was eally bad. In
some c acks, we could see small bi es o ib e comple ely emo ed om he
ma ix. Tha shows ha he adhesion is inexis en , and ha he ib e is weakening
he ma ix ins ead o ein o cing i .
Composi e % Fib e
[%] Tensile S eng h
[MPa] Modulus
[GPa] De o ma ion
[%]
REAPOX WOOD RX8
+
Hemp wi hou ea men
25
30
35
45.6 ± 0.9
45.1 ± 6.3
47.1 ± 3.6
5.4 ± 0.4
6.2 ± 0.8
6.7 ± 0.5
0.98 ± 0.03
0.90 ± 0.22
0.81 ± 0.15
REAPOX WOOD RX8
+
Hemp wih ea men
25
30
35
37.9 ± 1.9
38.3 ± 3.9
40.7 ± 3.5
3.8 ± 0.3
4.4 ± 0.6
4.6 ± 0.3
0.69 ± 0.02
0.64 ± 0.16
0.56 ± 0.10
REAPOX WOOD RX8
50
3.0
7
Table 2: Compa ison be ween he mechanical esul s o he ea ed and he na u al ib es
Conclusions
In his s udy, in which we compa e he composi es made wi h glass, sisal and hemp
ib es, we ealize ha we can’ pick a na u al ib e, mix i wi h esin and ob ain a
composi e ma e ial. Na u al ib es a e in eali y di icul o p ocess. The esul s
ob ained a e a om good, in some cases he esul o he mechanical p ope ies
o he composi e we e in e io o he one o he ma ix.
I is necessa y o poin he esea ch in he cleaning and in he su ace ea men o
he ib e. Only wi h good su ace ea men we can ob ain a good adhesion ib e-
ma ix, and ha is one key-poin o ob ain a good composi e. In ou pape we made
he s udy using he me ce izing ea men o he ib e su ace. Tha ea men
p o ed o be inapp op ia e, because i didn’ imp o e he mechanical p ope ies,
bu ins ead i wo sened hose p ope ies. Fu u e wo ks should be made o sol e
his p oblem.
Re e ences
[1] C. Romão, “S udy o he Mechanical Beha iou o Composi e Polyme ic Ma e ials
Rein o ced wi h Na u al Fibe s", Disse a ion p esen ed o ob aining a Mas e 's
deg ee in Mechanical Enginee ing, om he Enginee ing Facul y in he Uni e si y o
Po o, Ap il, 2003.
[2] P ojec SAPIENS POCTI/40201/EME/2001, “Mechanical beha iou o Composi es o
Polyme ic Ma ix Rein o ced wi h Na u al Fibe s”, Repo o Annual P og ess, 1º
yea o ac i i y, 2002.
[3] Pe e s R.H. “Tex ile Chemis y I: The Chemis y o Fib es”, Else ie Publishing
Company, 1963.
[4] Pe e s R.H. “Tex ile Chemis y II: Impu i ies in Fib es, Pu i ica ion o Fib es”,
Else ie Publishing Company, 1967.
[5] Rowell R.M. “Chemical Modi ica ion o Ag icul u al Fibe s o P ope y enhanced
Composi es”, Cap. V, P ojec : Modi ica ion o Lignocellulosics o Ad anced
Ma e ials and New Uses, h p://www. ppl. s. ed.us, 1995.
[6] Rowell R.M., Han J.S. and Rowell J.S. “Cha ac e iza ion and Fac o s E ec ing Fibe
P ope ies”, Na u al polyme s and Ag o ibe s Composi es, pp. 115-134, 2000
[7] Eicho n S.J., Baillie C.A., Za ei opoulos N., Mwaikambo L.Y., Ansell M.P.,
Du esne A., En wis le K.M., He e a-F anco P.J., Escamilla G.C., G oom L.,
Hughes M., Hill C., Rials T.G. and Wild P.M., “Cu en In e na ional Resea ch in o
Cellulosic Fib es and Composi es”, Jou nal o Ma e ials Science, 36, pp.2107-2131,
2001.