scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Major challenges in Rheumatology: will we ever treat smarter, instead of just harder?

Abstract

The field of rheumatology has witnessed astonishing progress in the understanding and management of rheumatic diseases since the second half of the twentieth century. The discovery and introduction of glucocorticoids and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) into the therapeutic armamentarium of rheumatologists enabled, for the first time, to effectively change the natural course of disease and improve most clinical outcomes. The new millennium pushed the revolution further at an exponential level with the advent of sophisticated, biologically-engineered drugs—the so-called biologicals or bDMARDs—that targeted specific molecules in key pathogenic pathways and dramatically modified the prognosis of most patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases.

Read accessible full text

Major challenges in Rheumatology: will we ever treat smarter, instead of just harder?

Author: Romão, Vasco C.,Fonseca, João Eurico
Publisher: Frontiers
Year: 2019
Source: https://repositorio.ulisboa.pt/bitstream/10451/49115/1/Major_rheumatology.pdf
SPECIALTY GRAND CHALLENGE
published: 26 June 2019
doi: 10.3389/ med.2019.00144
F on ie s in Medicine | www. on ie sin.o g 1June 2019 | Volume 6 | A icle 144
Edi ed by:
Michel Goldman,
F ee Uni e si y o B ussels, Belgium
Re iewed by:
Pa ick Du ez,
Cliniques Uni e si ai es Sain -Luc,
Belgium
*Co espondence:
João Eu ico Fonseca
[email p o ec ed]
Special y sec ion:
This a icle was submi ed o
Rheuma ology,
a sec ion o he jou nal
F on ie s in Medicine
Recei ed: 10 May 2019
Accep ed: 10 June 2019
Published: 26 June 2019
Ci a ion:
Romão VC and Fonseca JE (2019)
Majo Challenges in Rheuma ology:
Will We E e T ea Sma e , Ins ead o
Jus Ha de ? F on . Med. 6:144.
doi: 10.3389/ med.2019.00144
Majo Challenges in Rheuma ology:
Will We E e T ea Sma e , Ins ead o
Jus Ha de ?
Vasco C. Romão1,2 and João Eu ico Fonseca 1,2
*
1Depa men o Rheuma ology, Cen o Hospi ala Uni e si á io Lisboa No e, Hospi al de San a Ma ia, Lisbon Academic
Medical Cen e, Lisbon, Po ugal, 2Rheuma ology Resea ch Uni , Ins i u o de Medicina Molecula , Faculdade de Medicina,
Uni e sidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Po ugal
Keywo ds: heuma ology, pe sonalized medicine, s a i ica ion, heuma oid a h i is, bioma ke s
“[A eply o le e s ecommending emedies]: Dea Si (o Madam): I y e e y emedy sen o me. I am
now on No. 67. You s is 2,653. I am looking o wa d o i s bene icial esul s.”
Ma k Twain, quo ed in My Fa he Ma k Twain, by Cla a Clemens
THE TREATMENT REVOLUTION IN RHEUMATOLOGY
The ield o heuma ology has wi nessed as onishing p og ess in he unde s anding and
managemen o heuma ic diseases since he second hal o he wen ie h cen u y. The disco e y
and in oduc ion o glucoco icoids and con en ional syn he ic disease-modi ying an i heuma ic
d ugs (csDMARDs) in o he he apeu ic a mamen a ium o heuma ologis s enabled, o he i s
ime, o e ec i ely change he na u al cou se o disease and imp o e mos clinical ou comes
(1). The new millennium pushed he e olu ion u he a an exponen ial le el wi h he ad en
o sophis ica ed, biologically-enginee ed d ugs— he so-called biologicals o bDMARDs— ha
a ge ed speci ic molecules in key pa hogenic pa hways and d ama ically modi ied he p ognosis
o mos pa ien s wi h immune-media ed heuma ic diseases (2).
This p og ess, which was d i en by emendous esea ch e o s o be e unde s and he
complex mechanisms behind each disease, has been pa icula ly ema kable in in lamma o y
join diseases such as heuma oid a h i is (RA) and spondyloa h i is (including ankylosing
spondyli is and pso ia ic a h i is), and slowe in he a ea o connec i e issue diseases (e.g.,
sys emic lupus e y hema osus, Sjög en’s synd ome) and asculi is. Indeed, as o Ma ch 2019,
10 o iginal bDMARDs wi h 5 di e en mechanisms o ac ion a e app o ed in Eu ope o he
ea men o RA, 9 o pso ia ic a h i is (4 mechanisms o ac ion), 6 o ankylosing spondyli is
(2 mechanisms o ac ion), only 1 o sys emic lupus e y hema osus and small- essel asculi is and
none o Sjög en’s synd ome (3).
Ye , despi e hese signi ican ad ances, majo unme needs endu e. The case o RA is
pa adigma ic o he cu en challenges aced by heuma ologis s and pa ien s alike in daily clinical
p ac ice. While a i s , and especially when pa alleled o o he heuma ic diseases, RA seems o
be he lucky ela i e o he heuma ology amily wi h a a ie y o inno a i e bDMARDs a ailable
o ea ing and modi ying he disease and imp o ing pa ien s’ li es and ou comes, in p ac ice he
eali y is mo e complex (4,5).
“ME-TOO” DRUGS AND THE TRIAL AND ERROR APPROACH
Fi s ly, a e he majo b eak h oughs shown a ound he u n o he millennium by he pionee
bDMARDs app o ed o RA (in liximab and e ane cep ) in compa ison o he s anda d o ca e
Romão and Fonseca Majo Challenges in Rheuma ology
a ailable a he ime (csDMARDs), he ollowing decade obse ed
a su ge o o he d ugs ha demons a ed a compa able e ec
in simila popula ions o pa ien s (6). Wi h a ew excep ions
(e.g., ocilizumab and sa ilumab exhibi ing supe io i y o e
me ho exa e in mono he apy), new coming he apies usually
con eyed a “me- oo” e ec ha hough impo an o inc ease
ea men op ions in he e en o ine icacy o in ole ance, did
no gene a e as emendous an impac as i s p edecesso s (7).
Secondly, he wide di e si y o bDMARDs and modes o
ac ion con as s wi h he p o ound lack o eliable, ep oducible
clinical and biological ma ke s o in o m ea men selec ion.
Indeed, in spi e o all he no able p og ess seen so a , we a e
somewha su p isingly unable o ecognize be o ehand which
indi idual pa ien s will bene i mo e om a gi en d ug, which
will no espond a all and which a e a a highe isk o
oxici y o in ole ance (8). Taking he speci ic example o RA,
i should be acknowledged ha he e a e a ew well-es ablished
p ognos ic indica o s ha a e associa ed a a g oup le el wi h
ea men - esis an disease, including emale gende , olde age,
long las ing disease, ailu e o p e ious biologics, smoking, and
high baseline disabili y (8,9). Bu hese ea u es seem o be
gene ically associa ed wi h wo se ea men ou comes as a whole,
a he han cons i u ing speci ic p edic o s o esponse o a gi en
d ug. A couple o excep ions exis , such as he ole o heuma oid
ac o / an i-ci ullina ed p o ein an ibodies se oposi i i y in
de e mining a be e esponse o i uximab (10) and aba acep
(11) bu also he e his is a g oup e ec and some se onega i e
pa ien s will s ill show imp o emen wi h hese ea men s,
while o he se oposi i e pa ien s will no expe ience any bene i .
O he a iables such as ele an como bidi ies (e.g., lymphoma
o monoclonal gammopa hy) o in ec ious isk may u he
concede sligh p e e ence o one bDMARD o e ano he and hus
aid in he ea men decision p ocess (12,13), al hough again
his is no d i en by a pa icula ly s ong ac o ha iden i ies
he bes ea men o a gi en pa ien . This cu en landscape
has ine i ably led o he so-called ial and e o app oach
ha is he hallma k o p esen ea men s a egies in RA and
o he in lamma o y join diseases and which has signi ican
implica ions in e ms o cos , isk and, ul ima ely, ou come.
LIMITATIONS OF PRESENT TREATMENT
MODALITIES
Undeniably, coupled wi h he majo bene i s b ough by hese
he apies, a ew sho comings ha e eme ged. These a e powe ed
by he a o emen ioned unp ecise ea men pa adigm, wi h
implica ions bo h a he pa ien and socie al le el. The i s ac o
is ela ed o he signi ican di ec cos s associa ed wi h hese
d ugs, which has pu addi ional inancial p essu e in al eady
s uggling heal hca e sys ems (14). Howe e , i has been shown
ha he o e all cos associa ed wi h RA managemen has no
inc eased signi ican ly o e he las decades, due o a majo
d op in indi ec cos s and p oduc i i y losses ha compensa ed
o he highe d ug- ela ed expendi u e (14,15). In ac , he
main conce n is ha lacking obus pe sonalized ea men
s a egies, pa ien s may be ea ed wi h cos ly bDMARDs o
an ex ended pe iod o ime wi hou expe iencing any ele an
bene i bu s ill be exposed o i s isks and po en ial ad e se
e en s. I is ema kable ha in such a case, he isk-bene i a io
is clea ly il ed in he w ong di ec ion, and ye , heal h au ho i ies,
physicians and pa ien s, all seem o igno e o accep his ac
as ine i able.
Cu en ly, bDMARDs ha e a well-es ablished sa e y p o ile
(16), ha needs o be balanced agains he co esponding
bene i s p o ided by he ea men i sel . A numbe o se ious
condi ions—such as ube culosis and o he se ious in ec ions
o li e and medulla y oxici y, o name jus a ew (17)—a e
associa ed wi h bDMARDs and a e accep ed only in e u n o
subs an ial e icacy and imp o emen o sho - and long- e m
ou comes. I his second pa o he equa ion is missing, as
is he case o he conside able p opo ion o pa ien s ha ail
o see any bene i a all, i may be e hically (and inancially,
as explained abo e) unaccep able o p esc ibe and adminis e
hese d ugs. Hence, he p oblem elies in he ac ha we
a e unable o iden i y hese pa ien s be o ehand, emphasizing
he limi a ions o his ea men model and he need o an
indi idualized app oach. The scena io is agg a a ed when we also
ake in o accoun he sho - e m, highly-in ensi e, emission-
inducing egimens ha a e applied in se e al heuma ic diseases,
usually wi h subs an ial oxici y, in an indisc imina e manne
(18–20). These ea men modali ies ep esen he s anda d o
ca e, bu pe sonalized ea men could e olu ionize he cu en
pa adigm o an all-o -no hing app oach simply based on he
exis ence o a ce ain diagnosis.
Ano he aspec ha should be conside ed when analyzing
he issue o undisce ning d ug selec ion is e ec i e ea men
delay. T ea - o- a ge (T2T) app oaches ha e shown ha , in
e ms o p ognosis, mo e impo an han he d ug adminis e ed
is he he apeu ic a ge de ined and he quickness o a ain
i (21,22). Subjec ing pa ien s o ea men s ha will no be
e ec i e o long pe iods—a leas 3 o 6 mon hs as pe s anda d
ecommenda ions (23)—will cos p ecious ime du ing which
disease ac i i y is high and s uc u al damage eadily occu s.
This leads o poo long- e m ou comes and is ye ano he eason
o why a gene alized same-d ug- o -all s a egy is lawed. The
disco e y o p ecise bioma ke s o esponse o in o m ea men
selec ion could sa e up his los ime and, hus, syne gis ically
ein o ce he T2T s a egy. In spi e o his, T2T ad oca es
ha e, somewha su p isingly, dis ega ded he impo ance o
pe sonalized medicine s. he main goal o aba ing disease
ac i i y ega dless o he mechanism implied and d ug chosen
(24). Howe e , as hey poin ou , his only e lec s he cu en
s anding, whe e p ecise bioma ke s ha ha e a majo impac on
ea men selec ion and can modi y and guide clinical p ac ice a e
s ill missing (8,25).
Impo an ly, one should no o ge o he addi ional
ac o s con ibu ing o ea men limi a ions. Despi e majo
imp o emen s in he a ea o ea ly diagnosis, i has ecen ly been
epo ed ha in daily clinical p ac ice he eali y is s ill a om
op imal (26–28). Mo eo e , he e has also been a con inuous
global e o o he de elopmen and upda e o classi ica ion
c i e ia o heuma ic diseases, bu hese a e aimed a pa ien
ec ui men in esea ch s udies, in mos cases pe o m poo ly
F on ie s in Medicine | www. on ie sin.o g 2June 2019 | Volume 6 | A icle 144
Romão and Fonseca Majo Challenges in Rheuma ology
in a eal-wo ld se ing, and he e o e should no be applied
o clinical diagnosis (29). Finally, wi h he inco po a ion in o
ou ine ca e o highly sensi i e diagnos ic echniques such as
ul asonog aphy o magne ic esonance imaging, he conce n
o o e diagnosis and o e ea men o heuma ic diseases is
al eady a eali y, ha should be add essed (30). These aspec s
allow o be e unde s and he delica e landscape in which
d ugs a e p esc ibed and unde sco e he need o imp o e
ea men app oaches.
NEW PLAYERS: THE ROLE OF
BIOSIMILARS AND NOVEL TARGETED
SYNTHETIC MOLECULES
As we ha e exposed, cu en ly a ailable bDMARDs compose
an he e ogeneous g oup o d ugs, wi h se e al modes o
ac ion, dis inc dosages, schedules, and ou es o adminis a ion
and some pa icula i ies in e ms o concomi an medica ion,
moni o ing, o ad e se e en s. Howe e , he o e all e icacy and
sa e y be ween bDMARDs is conside ed o be oughly simila
and long- e m ou comes o pa ien s ea ed wi h hese d ugs
a e no subs an ially di e en (2,7). Fo his ma e , we should
highligh he impo ance o disease egis e s, bo h na ional and
in e na ional, which ha e g ea ly con ibu ed o demons a e he
bene i s and pi alls o ea men s in a eal-li e se ing (31).
I is in his se ing ha in he las 5–10 yea s wo new ea men
classes ha e appea ed o add o he complexi y o heuma ic
pa ien s managemen : biosimila DMARDs (bsDMARDs o
biosimila s) and a ge ed syn he ic DMARDs ( sDMARDs). Bo h
ha e con ibu ed o widen he op ions a ailable o ea ing RA
pa ien s, bu also b ough along addi ional challenges o he able.
Biosimila s eme ged ollowing he pa en expi y o bDMARDs
and p omised o inc ease pa ien access by signi ican ly
dec easing ea men cos s while, simul aneously, showing
compa able e icacy and sa e y (32,33). Following igo ous
clinical ial p og ams demons a ing equi alence o he o iginal
bDMARDs, he e a e cu en ly 16 bsDMARDs app o ed in
Eu ope o he ea men o RA (4 in liximab, 3 e ane cep ,
6 adalimumab, 3 i uximab), wi h o he s awai ing app o al (2
adalimumab), al eady wi hd awn (2 adalimumab) o no ha ing
applied o RA indica ion (3 i uximab) (3). These imp essi e
numbe s speak well o he po en ial impac o bsDMARDs in he
ield. Indeed, i s main added alue elies in he educed cos -−20
o 40% below e e ence bDMARDs, depending on coun y—and,
consequen ly, he la ge numbe o pa ien s ha can be ea ed
wi h hese d ugs (33,34). While his pa ially esol es one o he
issues men ioned abo e (cos ), he o he wo (sa e y and ime
los ) emain unchanged. Ul ima ely, he inc ease in o e could
e en ampli y he p oblem, wi h pa ien s swi ching o en be ween
di e en bDMARDs and bsDMARDs in he pu sui o he igh
d ug, wi h he associa ed implica ions in ea men delay and
pha maco igilance issues. This u he ein o ces he need o
pa ien s a i ica ion and a ional ea men selec ion.
None heless, bsDMARDs ha e undoub edly opened a new e a
in he ea men o heuma ic diseases. Ra es o i s bsDMARD
a e ising in Eu ope (34), and a e he main pi o al ials,
good quali y obse a ional da a ha e con i med he sa e y o
swi ching pa ien s om he o iginal d ug o i s biosimila (35–
37). Concu en ly, o he challenges a ise, such as selec ion and
swi ching be ween biosimila s o he same bDMARD, di e en
immunogenici y pa e ns and, po en ially, lack o e idence o
es ablished p ognosis ma ke s ha may di e om hose known
o he o iginal d ug (35,36). This la e aspec may be ueled by
a low willingness o bsDMARD d ug de elope s o be e explo e
disease he e ogenei y, as his could po en ially be comme cially
una ac i e and limi he p omo ion o hese d ugs. Addi ionally,
he nocebo e ec — he nega i e e ec o a ea men ha is
a ibu able o poo pa ien expec a ions—is a well-de ined
phenomenon ha is pa icula ly oublesome when swi ching
eal-wo ld pa ien s om o iginal bDMARDs o bsDMARDs,
due o he impo ance played by subjec i e measu es (e.g., pain
and global assessmen , ende join coun s) in he e alua ion o
disease ac i i y and ea men esponse (38).
A no el class o o al highly speci ic small molecules inhibi ing
in acellula signaling pa hways, he sDMARDs, has also become
a ailable (39). To aci inib, a Janus kinase inhibi o app o ed
in he Uni ed S a es (2012) and Eu ope (2017), was ecen ly
ollowed by ba ici inib (2018 and 2017, espec i ely) as he i s
wo o al d ugs ha ha e an e icacy and sa e y p o ile compa able
o bDMARDs (40). This is a majo ad ance, gi en he p e e ence
o many pa ien s o o al s. pa en e al adminis a ion. O he
po en ial ad an ages include apid clinical e icacy, e en in
mono he apy, absence o immunogenici y and a sho e hal -
li e, acili a ing he managemen o ad e se d ug eac ions (39,
40). Howe e , i s place in ea men algo i hms (be o e o
a e cs/b/bsDMARDs) is s ill o be ully unde s ood. Mos
impo an ly, while sDMARDs will de ini ely be bene icial o
a la ge numbe o pa ien s, he lack o p edic i e bioma ke s
p ecludes i s a ional applica ion a he indi idual pa ien le el
and i s in oduc ion in he clinical a mamen a ium ollows he
same ial and e o app oach.
THE LAG OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE
IN RHEUMATOLOGY
A numbe o easons can be pu o wa d as o why pe sonalized
medicine is aking a long ime o ma e ialize in heuma ology.
Fi s , he he e ogeneous and mul i ac o ial na u e o immune-
media ed heuma ic diseases, wi h complex pa hogeneses,
makes i unlikely ha a single ma ke o a gi en pa hway
will disc imina e esponse o se e al di e en DMARDs wi h
con as ing modes o ac ion (41). Second, a conside able amoun
o e o is dedica ed o iden i ying bioma ke s in he blood, a
om he key immunopa hologic e en s happening a he syno ial
issue, which may p o e mo e in o ma i e (42). Thi d, one aspec
ha is no so commonly ci ed ela es o he subjec i e na u e o
a signi ican pa o he ools used o assess ea men esponse,
emission s a us o disabili y. This applies bo h o he pa ien
(e.g., isual analog scale) and he physician (e.g., join coun s)
and is, by de ini ion, in luenced by many o he indi idual- ela ed
ac o s, such as pe sonali y, p e ious expe ience wi h a gi en
d ug, expec a ions, pa ien -doc o ela ionship, cul u al con ex ,
F on ie s in Medicine | www. on ie sin.o g 3June 2019 | Volume 6 | A icle 144
Romão and Fonseca Majo Challenges in Rheuma ology
como bidi ies, e c. (43,44). Indeed, his sca ci y o ha d ou comes
con as s o ha seen, o ins ance, in he a ea o oncology
(e.g., dea h, umo - ee su i al), whe e pe sonalized ea men
has long been a eali y. To wha ex en is he cu en si ua ion
explained by his ac is unclea , bu subjec i e measu es a e
likely o play an impo an ole in con ounding s udy esul s,
po en ially leading o he loss o a weak, albei unique signal.
CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE
PERSPECTIVES
In summa y, he p esen momen in heuma ology is an exci ing
one, a e wo as -paced decades ha ans o med he p ognosis
o pa ien s wi h in lamma o y heuma ic diseases. This was
mainly due o a deep expansion o a ailable, e ec i e he apies
ha ha e come, none heless, coupled wi h majo challenges
ha need o be ackled. We a gue ha his is he ime
o do so, whe e esea ch e o s should be bes di ec ed a
es ablishing obus bioma ke -based ea men models ha will
allow indi idualized ca e. I success ul, he ou come o his
app oach is likely o ansla e in o mo e subs an ial bene i s,
compa ed o he meek pu sui o new d ugs—o en wi h he
same o close mechanisms o ac ion— ha will p o ide a simila
o e all e ec o cu en ly a ailable op ions. Syno ial issue
should be a he cen e o hese in es iga ions, as a ge ing he
disease p ocess a i s co e will a guably p o e mos aluable.
This is de ini ely a sinuous pa h, no wi hou many expec able
se backs, bu one wo h acking as i s comple ion may inally
lead o a new longed- o e a o pe sonalized medicine in
heuma ology. No ably, despi e all he cu ing-edge science
behind hese inno a ions, clinical expe ise o heuma ologis s
will be o s a egic impo ance in guiding he p ocess along
he way.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
VR and JF con ibu ed o manusc ip concep ion and design,
li e a u e e iew, manusc ip p epa a ion, and c i ical e iew.
Bo h au ho s ha e ead and app o ed he inal e sion o
he manusc ip .
FUNDING
VR’s wo k was pa ially suppo ed by Fundação pa a a
Ciência e Tecnologia (In e no Dou o ando Bu sa y e e ence
SFRH/SINTD/95030/2013).
REFERENCES
1. Agga wal D, Ab aham S. Rheuma oid a h i is ea men s: a his o ical
pe spec i e. JSM A h i is. (2016) 1:1011.
2. Con i F, Cecca elli F, Massa o L, Cip iano E, F anco M Di, Alessand i C, e
al. Biological he apies in heuma ic diseases. Clin Te . (2013) 164:e413–28.
doi: 10.7417/CT.2013.1622
3. Eu opean Medicines Agency. A ailable O: h ps://www.ema.eu opa.eu/en/
sea ch/sea ch (ci ed Ma 31, 2019).
4. Win h op KL, Weinbla ME, C ow MK, Bu mes e GR, Mease PJ, So AK, e
al. Unme need in heuma ology: epo s om he Ta ge ed The apies mee ing
2018. Ann Rheum Dis. (2019) 20:1–7. doi: 10.1136/ann heumdis-2018-
214280
5. an Vollenho en RF. Un esol ed issues in biologic he apy o heuma oid
a h i is. Na Re Rheuma ol. (2011) 7:205–15. doi: 10.1038/n heum.2011.22
6. A ci AB, Feis E, Bu mes e G-R. Biologicals in heuma oid
a h i is: cu en and u u e. RMD Open. (2015) 1:e000127.
doi: 10.1136/ mdopen-2015-000127
7. Bu mes e GR, Pope JE. No el ea men s a egies in heuma oid
a h i is. Lance . (2017) 389:2338–48. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)
31491-5
8. Romão VC, Vi al EM, Fonseca JE, Buch MH. Righ d ug, igh pa ien ,
igh ime: aspi a ion o u u e p omise o biologics in heuma oid a h i is?
A h i is Res The . (2017) 19:239. doi: 10.1186/s13075-017-1445-3
9. Wijb and s CA, Tak PP. P edic ion o esponse o a ge ed ea men . Mayo
Clin P oc. (2017) 92:1129–43. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.05.009
10. Isaacs JD, Cohen SB, Eme y P, Tak PP, Wang J, Lei G, e al. E ec o
baseline heuma oid ac o and an ici ullina ed pep ide an ibody se o ype
on i uximab clinical esponse: a me a-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis. (2012)
72:329–36. doi: 10.1136/ann heumdis-2011-201117
11. Go enbe g JE, Cou oisie DS, He nandez M V, Iannone F, Lie E, Canhão
H, e al. Associa ion o heuma oid ac o and an i-ci ullina ed p o ein
an ibody posi i i y wi h be e e ec i eness o aba acep : esul s om he
pan-Eu opean Regis y Analysis. A h i is Rheuma ol. (2016) 68:1346–52.
doi: 10.1002/a .39595
12. Mon i S, Kle sy C, Go la R, Sa zi-pu ini P, A zeni F, Pelle i o R, e al.
Fac o s in luencing he choice o i s - and second-line biologic he apy o
he ea men o heuma oid a h i is : eal-li e da a om he I alian LORHEN
Regis y. Clin Rheuma ol. (2017) 36:753–61. doi: 10.1007/s10067-016-3528-y
13. Humph eys J, Hy ich K, Symmons D. Wha is he impac o biologic he apies
on common co-mo bidi ies in pa ien s wi h heuma oid a h i is? A h i is
Res The . (2016) 18:282. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-1176-x
14. Husche D, Mi endo T, on Hinübe U, Kö e I, Hoese G, P ä lin A, e al.
E olu ion o cos s uc u es in heuma oid a h i is o e he pas decade. Ann
Rheum Dis. (2015) 74:738–45. doi: 10.1136/ann heumdis-2013-204311
15. Kalkan A, Halle E, Be n o L, Husbe g M, Ca lsson P. Cos s o heuma oid
a h i is du ing he pe iod 1990–2010: a egis e -based cos -o -illness s udy in
Sweden. Rheuma ol. (2014) 53:153–60. doi: 10.1093/ heuma ology/ke 290
16. Wood ick RS, Rude man EM. Sa e y o biologic he apy in
heuma oid a h i is. Na Re Rheuma ol. (2011) 7:639–52.
doi: 10.1038/n heum.2011.145
17. Rami o S, Sep iano A, Cha zidionysiou K, Nam JL, Smolen JS, an de
Heijde D, e al. Sa e y o syn he ic and biological DMARDs: a sys ema ic
li e a u e e iew in o ming he 2016 upda e o he EULAR ecommenda ions
o managemen o heuma oid a h i is. Ann Rheum Dis. (2017) 76:1101–36.
doi: 10.1136/ann heumdis-2016-210708
18. Mok CC. Con: cyclophosphamide o he ea men o lupus neph i is.
Neph ol Dial T ansplan . (2016) 31:1053–7. doi: 10.1093/nd /g w068
19. King C, Ha pe L. A oidance o ha m om ea men o ANCA-
associa ed asculi is. Cu T ea Op ions Rheuma ol. (2017) 3:230–43.
doi: 10.1007/s40674-017-0082-y
20. Espinoza F, Fab e S, Pe s YM. Remission-induc ion he apies o ea ly
heuma oid a h i is: e idence o da e and clinical implica ions. The Ad
Musculoskele Dis. (2016) 8:107–18. doi: 10.1177/1759720X16654476
21. Smolen JS, B eed eld FC, Bu mes e GR, Byke k V, Dougados M, Eme y
P, e al. T ea ing heuma oid a h i is o a ge : 2014 upda e o he
ecommenda ions o an in e na ional ask o ce. Ann Rheum Dis. (2016)
75:3–15. doi: 10.1136/ann heumdis-2015-207524
22. S o e MA, Schoels MM, Smolen JS, Ale aha D, B eed eld FC, Bu mes e
G, e al. E idence o ea ing heuma oid a h i is o a ge : esul s o
a sys ema ic li e a u e sea ch upda e. Ann Rheum Dis. (2016) 75:16–22.
doi: 10.1136/ann heumdis-2015-207526
23. Smolen JS, Landewé R, Bijlsma J, Bu mes e G, Cha zidionysiou K,
Dougados M, e al. EULAR ecommenda ions o he managemen
F on ie s in Medicine | www. on ie sin.o g 4June 2019 | Volume 6 | A icle 144
Romão and Fonseca Majo Challenges in Rheuma ology
o heuma oid a h i is wi h syn he ic and biological disease-modi ying
an i heuma ic d ugs: 2016 upda e. Ann Rheum Dis. (2017) 76:960–77.
doi: 10.1136/ann heumdis-2016-210715
24. Smolen JS, Ale aha D. Fo ge pe sonalised medicine and ocus
on aba ing disease ac i i y. Ann Rheum Dis. (2013) 72:3–6.
doi: 10.1136/ann heumdis-2012-202361
25. Cuppen BVJ, Welsing PMJ, Sp enge s JJ, Bijlsma JWJ, Ma ijnissen ACA, an
Laa JM, e al. Pe sonalized biological ea men o heuma oid a h i is: a
sys ema ic e iew wi h a ocus on clinical applicabili y. Rheuma ol. (2016)
55:826–39. doi: 10.1093/ heuma ology/ke 421
26. Dis le O, Allano e Y, Den on CP, Ma ucci-Ce inic M, Pope JE, Hinzmann
B, e al. Fac o s in luencing ea ly e e al, ea ly diagnosis and managemen in
pa ien s wi h di use cu aneous sys emic scle osis. Rheuma ol. (2018) 57:813–
7. doi: 10.1093/ heuma ology/kex504
27. Sø ensen J, He land ML. Diagnos ic delay in pa ien s wi h heuma oid
a h i is, pso ia ic a h i is and ankylosing spondyli is: esul s om he
Danish na ionwide DANBIO egis y. Ann Rheum Dis. (2015) 74:1–7.
doi: 10.1136/ann heumdis-2013-204867
28. S ack RJ, Nigh ingale P, Jinks C, Shaw K, He on-Ma x S, Ho ne R, e al.
Delays be ween he onse o symp oms and i s heuma ology consul a ion
in pa ien s wi h heuma oid a h i is in he UK: an obse a ional s udy. BMJ
Open. (2019) 9:1–8. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018–024361
29. Agga wal R, Ringold S, Khanna D, Neogi T, Johnson SR, Mille A, e al.
Dis inc ions be ween diagnos ic and classi ica ion c i e ia? A h i is Ca e Res.
(2015) 67:891–7. doi: 10.1002/ac .22583
30. Landewé RBM. O e diagnosis and o e ea men in heuma ology:
a li le cau ion is in o de . Ann Rheum Dis. (2018) 77:1394–6.
doi: 10.1136/ann heumdis-2018-213700
31. Nikipho ou E, Buch MH, Hy ich KL. Biologics egis e s in RA:
Me hodological aspec s, cu en ole and u u e applica ions. Na Re
Rheuma ol. (2017) 13:503–10. doi: 10.1038/n heum.2017.81
32. Dö ne T, S and V, Co nes P, Gonçal es J, Gulácsi L, Kay J, e al. The changing
landscape o biosimila s in heuma ology. Ann Rheum Dis. (2016) 75:974–82.
doi: 10.1136/ann heumdis-2016-209166
33. A aújo FC, Gonçal es J, Fonseca JE. Pha macoeconomics o biosimila s:
wha is he e o gain om hem? Cu Rheuma ol Rep. (2016) 18:50.
doi: 10.1007/s11926-016-0601-0
34. IQVIA. The Impac o Biosimila Compe i ion in Eu ope. (2018) A ailable
online a : h ps://ec.eu opa.eu/docs oom/documen s/31642/a achmen s/1/
ansla ions/en/ endi ions/na i e
35. Edwa ds CJ, He cogo á J, Alb and H, Amio A. Swi ching o biosimila s:
cu en pe spec i es in immune-media ed in lamma o y diseases. Expe Opin
Biol The . (2019). doi: 10.1080/14712598.2019.1610381. [Epub ahead o p in ].
36. Toussi o E, Ma o e H. Swi ching om o igina o biological agen s o
biosimila s: wha is he e idence and wha a e he issues? RMD Open. (2017)
3:e000492. doi: 10.1136/ mdopen-2017-000492
37. Kay J, Schoels MM, Dö ne T, Eme y P, K ien TK, Smolen JS, e
al. Consensus-based ecommenda ions o he use o biosimila s o
ea heuma ological diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. (2018) 77:165–74.
doi: 10.1136/ann heumdis-2017-211937
38. Glin bo g B, Lo AG, Ome o ic E, Hend icks O, Linauskas A, Espesen
J, e al. To swi ch o no o swi ch: esul s o a na ionwide guideline
o manda o y swi ching om o igina o o biosimila e ane cep . One-
yea ea men ou comes in 2061 pa ien s wi h in lamma o y a h i is
om he DANBIO egis y. Ann Rheum Dis. (2019) 78:192–200.
doi: 10.1136/ann heumdis-2018-213474
39. Jega heeswa an J, Tu k M, Pope JE. Compa ison o Janus kinase inhibi o s
in he ea men o heuma oid a h i is: a sys emic li e a u e e iew.
Immuno he apy. (2019) 11:737–54. doi: 10.2217/im -2018-0178
40. Taylo PC. Clinical e icacy o launched JAK inhibi o s in heuma oid a h i is.
Rheuma ol. (2019) 58(Suppl. 1):i17–26. doi: 10.1093/ heuma ology/key225
41. McInnes IB, Sche G. Pa hogene ic insigh s om he ea men o heuma oid
a h i is. Lance . (2017) 389:2328–37. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31472-1
42. As o i E, Ne iani A, Bomba die i M, Pi zalis C. Towa ds a S a i ied
Ta ge ed App oach wi h biologic ea men s in heuma oid a h i is:
ole o syno ial pa hobiology. Cu Pha m Des. (2015) 21:2216–24.
doi: 10.2174/1381612821666150310145758
43. Hamme HB, Uhlig T, K ien TK, Lampa J. Pain Ca as ophizing, subjec i e
ou comes, and in lamma o y assessmen s including ul asound: esul s om
a longi udinal s udy o heuma oid a h i is pa ien s. A h i is Ca e Res. (2018)
70:703–12. doi: 10.1002/ac .23339
44. Dougados M, Na a H, S einbe g G, Rouane S, Falissa d B. Rela i e
impo ance o doc o - epo ed ou comes s pa ien - epo ed ou comes in
DMARD in ensi ica ion o heuma oid a h i is: he DUO s udy. Rheuma ol.
(2013) 52:391–9. doi: 10.1093/ heuma ology/kes285
Con lic o In e es S a emen : The au ho s decla e ha he esea ch was
conduc ed in he absence o any comme cial o inancial ela ionships ha could
be cons ued as a po en ial con lic o in e es .
Copy igh © 2019 Romão and Fonseca. This is an open-access a icle dis ibu ed
unde he e ms o he C ea i e Commons A ibu ion License (CC BY). The use,
dis ibu ion o ep oduc ion in o he o ums is pe mi ed, p o ided he o iginal
au ho (s) and he copy igh owne (s) a e c edi ed and ha he o iginal publica ion
in his jou nal is ci ed, in acco dance wi h accep ed academic p ac ice. No use,
dis ibu ion o ep oduc ion is pe mi ed which does no comply wi h hese e ms.
F on ie s in Medicine | www. on ie sin.o g 5June 2019 | Volume 6 | A icle 144