scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Value Conflict, Lack of Rewards, and Sense of Community as Psychosocial Risk Factors of Burnout in Communication Professionals (Press, Radio, and Television)

Abstract

Journalists are at particular risk of work-related stress and burnout. The objective of this study is to describe and analyze the principal factors involved in the appearance of burnout in communication professionals, as well as the possible interactions between them and with self-reported health, and to observe whether the variables involved are the same in different types of environments. To achieve this objective, 292 participants answered the following measurement instruments: Demographic and labor datasheet; Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI General survey); Areas of Worklife Scale (AWS); and General Health Questionnaire (GHQ -12). The results were the following: Emotional Exhaustion (EE) shows direct correlation and statistical significance with the other two burnout dimensions, Depersonalization (DP) and Personal Accomplishment (PA), also with health perception variables and inverse and statistical significance with the workload, control, rewards, community, fairness, and values. A multiple linear regression model shows workload and values as inverse EE predictors, which confirms a burnout process in which EE contributes as the main dimension in DP and is shown to be a precursor of PA, itself. When comparing different types of media, journalists who work in institutional press offices presented significantly lower scores in PA and higher in control, rewards, community, justice, and values. Therefore, further research should be carried out in order to analyze the protective role of these variables regarding PA and burnout. Gascón, Santiago; Fueyo-Díaz, Ricardo; Borao, Luis; Leiter, Michael P.; Fanlo-Zarazaga, Álvaro; Oliván-Blázquez, Bárbara; Aguilar-Latorre, Alejandra

Read accessible full text

Value Conflict, Lack of Rewards, and Sense of Community as Psychosocial Risk Factors of Burnout in Communication Professionals (Press, Radio, and Television)

Author: Gascón, Santiago; Fueyo-Díaz, Ricardo; Aguilar-Latorre, Alejandra; Leiter, Michael P.; Borao, Luis; Fanlo-Zarazaga, Álvaro; Oliván-Blázquez, Bárbara
Year: 2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18020365
Source: https://zaguan.unizar.es/record/99139/files/texto_completo.pdf
In e na ional Jou nal o
En i onmen al Resea ch
and Public Heal h
A icle
Value Con lic , Lack o Rewa ds, and Sense o Communi y
as Psychosocial Risk Fac o s o Bu nou in Communica ion
P o essionals (P ess, Radio, and Tele ision)
San iago Gascón1, Rica do Fueyo-Díaz 1, Luis Bo ao 1, Michael P. Lei e 2,Ál a o Fanlo-Za azaga 3,4,
Bá ba a Oli án-Blázquez 1,4,* and Alejand a Aguila -La o e 4


Ci a ion: Gascón, S.; Fueyo-Díaz, R.;
Bo ao, L.; Lei e , M.P.;
Fanlo-Za azaga, Á.; Oli án-Blázquez,
B.; Aguila -La o e, A. Value Con lic ,
Lack o Rewa ds, and Sense o
Communi y as Psychosocial Risk
Fac o s o Bu nou in Communica ion
P o essionals (P ess, Radio, and
Tele ision). In . J. En i on. Res. Public
Heal h 2021,18, 365. h ps://doi.o g/
10.3390/ije ph18020365
Recei ed: 1 Decembe 2020
Accep ed: 30 Decembe 2020
Published: 6 Janua y 2021
Publishe ’s No e: MDPI s ays neu-
al wi h ega d o ju isdic ional clai-
ms in published maps and ins i u io-
nal a ilia ions.
Copy igh : © 2021 by he au ho s. Li-
censee MDPI, Basel, Swi ze land.
This a icle is an open access a icle
dis ibu ed unde he e ms and con-
di ions o he C ea i e Commons A -
ibu ion (CC BY) license (h ps://
c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/
4.0/).
1Depa men o Psychology and Sociology, Uni e si y o Za agoza, 50009 Za agoza, Spain;
sgascon@uniza .es (S.G.); ueyo@uniza .es (R.F.-D.); lbo ao@uniza .es (L.B.)
2Depa men o Psychology, Acadia Uni e si y, Wol ille, NS B4P 2R6, Canada; [email p o ec ed]
3Heal h Science Ins i u e A agón (IACS), 50009 Za agoza, Spain; [email p o ec ed]
4Ins i u e o Heal h Resea ch A agón (IIS A agón), 50009 Za agoza, Spain; [email p o ec ed]
*Co espondence: boli an@uniza .es
Abs ac :
Jou nalis s a e a pa icula isk o wo k- ela ed s ess and bu nou . The objec i e o
his s udy is o desc ibe and analyze he p incipal ac o s in ol ed in he appea ance o bu nou
in communica ion p o essionals, as well as he possible in e ac ions be ween hem and wi h sel -
epo ed heal h, and o obse e whe he he a iables in ol ed a e he same in di e en ypes o
en i onmen s. To achie e his objec i e, 292 pa icipan s answe ed he ollowing measu emen
ins umen s: Demog aphic and labo da ashee ; Maslach Bu nou In en o y (MBI Gene al su ey);
A eas o Wo kli e Scale (AWS); and Gene al Heal h Ques ionnai e (GHQ -12). The esul s we e he
ollowing: Emo ional Exhaus ion (EE) shows di ec co ela ion and s a is ical signi icance wi h he
o he wo bu nou dimensions, Depe sonaliza ion (DP) and Pe sonal Accomplishmen (PA), also
wi h heal h pe cep ion a iables and in e se and s a is ical signi icance wi h he wo kload, con ol,
ewa ds, communi y, ai ness, and alues. A mul iple linea eg ession model shows wo kload and
alues as in e se EE p edic o s, which con i ms a bu nou p ocess in which EE con ibu es as he
main dimension in DP and is shown o be a p ecu so o PA, i sel . When compa ing di e en ypes
o media, jou nalis s who wo k in ins i u ional p ess o ices p esen ed signi ican ly lowe sco es in
PA and highe in con ol, ewa ds, communi y, jus ice, and alues. The e o e, u he esea ch should
be ca ied ou in o de o analyze he p o ec i e ole o hese a iables ega ding PA and bu nou .
Keywo ds: communica ion p o essionals; bu nou ; alues; psychosocial isks
1. In oduc ion
In o ma ion p o essionals ha e been iden i ied as a high- isk sec o o heal h p ob-
lems de i ed om wo k s ess and bu nou [
1
]. To a g ea ex en , some dis inc i e aspec s
ha e been conside ed wi h espec o o he p o essions as he main cause o his: he p o es-
sion has su e ed dizzying changes in he las decades. Consequen ly, hese ha e p oduced
d as ic cu s in he wo k o ce, as well as an o e load in he quan i y and a ie y o asks
which equi e cons an upda ing wi h new echnologies by he emaining pe sonnel [1,2].
1.1. S ess in Jou nalis s
Ini ial esea ch in his ield was ocused on he pos auma ic s ess symp oma ology
su e ed by wa co esponden s, o ca as ophe wi nesses/in o man s [
3
]; howe e , hese
d ama ic si ua ions a e no longe ep esen a i e o he ypical ac i i y o such p o essionals.
Psychosocial ac o s should be unde s ood as hose ha a e p esen in a ce ain
wo k en i onmen , in e ac ing be ween he pe son and he wo king condi ions, and ha
co espond o he con en and he compliance o he ask and he o ganiza ion i sel [
4
].
In . J. En i on. Res. Public Heal h 2021,18, 365. h ps://doi.o g/10.3390/ije ph18020365 h ps://www.mdpi.com/jou nal/ije ph
In . J. En i on. Res. Public Heal h 2021,18, 365 2 o 12
These ac o s may become isks when hey igge maladjus men o psychophysiological
s ess esponses [
5
,
6
]. The lis o ac o s ha may become isks is qui e ex ensi e and
a ious aspec s ha e been highligh ed: o ganiza ional (hie a chy, esou ce managemen ,
supe ision, leade ship, wo king en i onmen ) [
7
]; employmen condi ions (s abili y,
o a ion, use o skills); ask (men al and physical load, con ol possibili y) [
8
]; ela ions
(wi h manage s, colleagues o clien s).
In o ma ion p o essionals, due o many causes (con inuous changes in o ma s, ech-
nology, demands, ins abili y a wo k, o li ing hei ca ee in a oca ional way), can ake on
a wide a ie y o esponsibili ies. All he while, he imes a e ma ked by he cu en clima e
o accep ing long and changeable schedules wi h li le s abili y [
4
]. O e load doesn’
seem o be he only a iable ha explains he wea in his and o he p o essions [
9
], he
psychosocial ac o s can a y acco ding o he ype o media (newspape , adio, ele ision,
news agency, e c.) and depending on he o ma (di ec , daily p ess, e c.). In an en i on-
men whe e changing eali y and immediacy p edomina e, i was o be expec ed ha he
a iable “possibili y o con ol o e he ask” had a bigge p edic ed powe o s ess le els,
especially, in audio isual en i onmen s [2,6,8].
To a g ea e o lesse deg ee, in hese kinds o en i onmen s i is usual o wo k in
di ec con ac wi h people: in e iewees, collabo a o s, lis ene s ha in e ac and demand.
On he o he hand, he need o eamwo k be ween epo e s, edi o s, documen a y make s,
p oduce s, manage s, e c., is common, c ea ing a ela ionship o dependency in an ac i i y
whe e e e y membe is essen ial and on which each should wo k o he bes o hei abili ies
wi hin a sho ime ame. The in e pe sonal ela ions be ween wo ke s, pa ne s, and
manage s, o be ween p o essionals in he ou side en i onmen , a e he mos impo an
and could become bo h a p o ec i e ac o bu a cause o s ess oo and gain special
impo ance in c i ical si ua ions o ha assmen when psychological agg essions a e used as
a me hod o o ce people in o abandoning he ield [10,11].
A cen al aspec in di e en p o essions is ecogni ion, eedback ha is necessa y, bu
di icul o ob ain in any wo k en i onmen , and e en mo e so in an en i onmen uled
by immediacy. In addi ion o ecogni ion and he sense pe cei ed o jus ice, a wo k-li e
a ea ha gains impo ance is he ela i e cong uence o incong uence be ween pe sonal
p inciples and hose o he o ganiza ion [
10
,
12
]. I is common ha an employee s a s hei
ca ee wi h a s ong commi men o hei pe sonal aims and hose o he company and, o
di e en easons, dis ances hemsel es o e ime [
9
]. We mus add o all hese ac o s ha
jou nalis s need o be up o da e wi h news and echnology upg ades which quickly each
obsole ion [
5
,
6
]. Beyond his, hey also mus show o sp ead con en , independen ly o
hei opinion, some imes a om hei belie s o ideologies, and ha could a ouse c i icism
o ejec ion in an audience ha is in cons an in e ac ion [10].
1.2. Ch onic S ess o Bu nou
The concep o bu nou has gene a ed con o e sy o decades, including when he
WHO ypi ied i as a wo k- ela ed pa hology [
4
]. Some au ho s, such as Pines and A onson,
ha e conside ed i a one-dimensional cons uc , cha ac e ized by exhaus ion [
13
], and
o he esea che s [
14
] ha e conside ed i a complex synd ome composed o he dimensions
o Emo ional Exhaus ion (EE), Depe sonaliza ion –o Cynicism (DP)–, and a diminished
sense o Pe sonal Accomplishmen (PA). In any case, his ch onic condi ion has d ama ic
consequences o employees’ heal h: dep ession, anxie y, immunological, ca dio ascula ,
diges i e p oblems, e c., as well as ad e se e ec s o he companies: absen eeism, job
abandonmen , e o s, e c. [15].
Since Maslach and Jackson (1981) gene a ed he “Maslach Bu nou In en o y” (MBI) [
14
]
o measu e he h ee subscales o EE, DP, and PA, coun less s udies ha e been ca ied ou
in di e en p o essions and mul iple coun ies [
10
,
16
]. La e , Lei e and Maslach o e ed a
model based on he a iables o “A eas o Wo k Li e” (AWL) [
17
], which could con ibu e
o bu nou expe ience. The p oposed a eas a e wo kload, con ol, ewa ds, communi y,
ai ness, and alues, and a e based on he esul s o se e al su eys on labo - ela ed s ess.
In . J. En i on. Res. Public Heal h 2021,18, 365 3 o 12
“Wo kload” has shown, in mul iple in es iga ions, i s di ec ela ionship wi h EE [
18
].
Closely ela ed o his, he ac ha he wo ke has “con ol” o e he ask can educe
EE
[9,10]
. O he a iables can be p o ec i e o dele e ious i espec i e o high o e load
si ua ions. In his way, “ ewa ds”— ecogni ion, o in insic sa is ac ion de i ed om
wo k–, a e a mode a ing a iable in he p ocess o bu nou a wo k [
19
]. “Communi y”
e e s o bo h in e pe sonal suppo ela ionships, in a posi i e sense, and con lic s wi h
manage s o colleagues, on he nega i e side [
11
,
17
]. The “ ai ness” a ea desc ibes he
pe cep ion o equi y el by employees wi hin hei o ganiza ion [
17
]. Finally, he a ea o
“ alues” e lec s he compa ibili y o con lic be ween he alues o he indi idual and
hose o he o ganiza ion, as well as he g ea mo i a ional po en ial ha he aims and
hopes o employees ha e when hey coincide wi h he goals o hei company [20].
Su eys om he “A eas o Wo kli e (AWL)” model show ha i explains a sig-
ni ican pe cen age o he bu nou a iance in di e ing p oduc i e sec o s a ound he
wo ld
[9,10,21]
, and is conside ed an op imal ins umen o e alua e psychosocial isk
ac o s be o e designing u u e in e en ions.
Al hough some in e en ion me hods aimed a he indi idual ha e ob ained empi ical
suppo in managing wo k s ess, hey a e no ully e ec i e on hei own and hei bene i s
end o decline o e ime [
22
]. The e o e, i is usually p e e able o implemen in e en ion
me hods a he o ganiza ional le el based on he s eng hs ound in an ini ial e alua ion,
ocusing on he elimina ion o modi ica ion o as many causes as possible o educe s ess
and p e en i s eappea ance in he u u e [23].
The objec i e o his esea ch was o desc ibe and analyze he main ac o s in ol ed
in he appea ance o bu nou in communica ion p o essionals in ela ion o a eas o wo k-
li e, sociodemog aphic, occupa ional, and heal h a iables, as well as obse ing possible
di e ences in hese a iables acco ding o di e en ypes o media, in o de o design
in e en ion p og ams in he media o es ablish a pe manen p e en i e cul u e. The
hypo hesis was ha he wo kload would be, as in many o he p o essions, he a ea ha
would mainly p edic he EE a es. Simila ly, i was expec ed ha he a iable “con ol”,
o lack o con ol o e he ask, would help explain he h ee dimensions o bu nou since
i was assumed ha jou nalis s mus deal wi h mul iple and di e en asks and ha he
la es news is no some hing ha can be con olled by hem.
2. Ma e ials and Me hods
A ans e sal desc ip i e s udy de eloped h oughou he mon hs o Sep embe o
Decembe o 2019. This i s analysis o psychosocial ac o s in he media is pa o a wide
s udy. The da a we e used o design and implemen a model o pe manen p e en ion
based on he cla i ica ion o he company’s alues, he implemen a ion o a anspa en
jus ice sys em, and he dis ibu ion o ewa ds. The e alua ion o possible imp o emen s
and hei main enance, h ough he model applica ion in a newspape , a adio s a ion, and
a ele ision s udio, has no ye been analyzed.
2.1. Pa icipan s
App oxima ely 1200 communica ion p o essionals wo k in A agon. A sample size
was eached, es ima ed acco ding o he e alua ion c i e ion o he 10:2 ecommended
a io o he numbe o subjec s and he numbe o es i ems included in he con i ma o y
ac o analysis. The e o e, psychome ic adequacy was p o ided o he analysis [
24
]. A
o al o 830 people we e in i ed o pa icipa e in conduc hei wo k in he communica ion
media in his Spanish egion. In o ma ion sessions we e held in he wo kplaces, con ac ing
hose in e es ed in pa icipa ing and dis ibu ing in o ma ion b ochu es. E-mails we e
sen om he Human Resou ces o ices. Addi ionally, con ac was made wi h he A agon
Jou nalis s Associa ion o sp ead he in o ma ion h ough hei usual channels amongs
hei membe s.
The inclusion c i e ia we e (a) subjec s o e 18; (b) hey unde s and spoken and
w i en Spanish; (c) hey gi e hei in o med consen ; (d) and hey a e wo king ac i ely in
In . J. En i on. Res. Public Heal h 2021,18, 365 4 o 12
any media in he au onomous communi y o A agon (Spain). Exclusion c i e ia we e he
ailu e o gi e consen and incomple e ques ionnai es.
A o al o 323 p o essionals showed hei a ailabili y o pa icipa e in he su ey.
Finally, a e applying he inclusion c i e ia, 292 p o essionals we e conside ed. Th ee
wo king g oups (wi h a o al o 13 p o essionals) we e c ea ed o discuss and in e p e he
inal esul s, in ligh o hei expe ience, and o make p oposals on he p e en i e design o
be implemen ed in hei wo king en i onmen s.
2.2. Ins umen s
Demog aphic and labo da ashee . The ollowing a iables we e collec ed: sociodemo-
g aphic a iables (gende , age, and cohabi a ion) and wo k a iables (wo king ime in he
ield o in o ma ion, wo k con ac ype, media ype (newspape , adio, ele ision, o he s)
and p o ession (manage , d a ing/sc eenw i e , epo e , ins i u ional communica ion,
came a pho og aphy, layou a is , publicis , adminis a o , and o he s).
Maslach Bu nou In en o y (MBI Gene al su ey, Maslach, Jackson and Lei e , 1996) [
14
].
I p o ides in o ma ion abou he h ee dimensions ha cons i u e hei heo e ical model
o bu nou : Emo ional Exhaus ion (EE), Depe sonaliza ion (DP), and Pe sonal Accom-
plishmen (PA). The ques ionnai e was alida ed in Spanish by Gil Mon e (2002) [
25
], who
ound he eliabili y o
α
: 0.89 o he EE, 0.67 o DP, and 0.74 o PA. The 16 i ems a e a ed
using a Like scale on which he equency wi h which he desc ibed si ua ion has been
expe ienced, om 0 o 6, is indica ed. Thus, o example, o he ques ion “I eel emo ionally
exhaus ed a wo k”, he answe should in o m o he equency wi h which i happens,
anging om 0, ne e , o 6, daily. Low sco es on p o essional e iciency and high sco es in
exhaus ion and cynicism mean pe cep ions o being “mo e bu ned by wo k”.
A eas o Wo kli e Scale (AWS, Lei e and Maslach, 1999) [
17
]. I consis s o 29 i ems
ha e alua e he deg ee o i o misma ch ha he p o essional pe cei es abou he main
a iables o hei wo k a ea en i onmen . Those a eas a e manageable wo kload, he
possibili y o con ol o e he asks, exis ence o non-exis ence o in insic ewa ds a wo k,
sense o communi y, pe cei ed jus ice o ai ness, and alues (conco dance be ween own
alues and hose o he o ganiza ion). The ques ionnai e eques s an answe o he i ems
wi h which he subjec ag ees, o some ex en , in each o he s a emen s. Fo example: in
he s a emen “I don’ ha e ime o do he wo k ha mus be done”, he subjec could
answe wi h 1 (s ongly disag ee) o 5 (s ongly ag ee). The e sion alida ed o Spanish
language was used [
26
], which gained a C onbach’s Alpha anging om 0.75 o 0.88:
Wo kload = 0.80
;
Con ol = 0.87
;
Rewa d = 0.84
;
Communi y = 0.75
;
Fai ness = 0.88
; and
Values = 0.85.
Gene al Heal h Ques ionnai e (GHQ -12, Goldbe g and Williams, 1988) [
27
]. I alues
gene al aspec s o cogni i e unc ion and psychological symp oms and is used in psychia ic
popula ions o ob ain he gene al assessmen o cogni i e unc ioning in ecen weeks. In
hei sho e sion, he 12 i ems epo ou subscales: soma ic symp oms, anxie y and
insomnia, social dys unc ion, and dep ession. Using he Like scale be ween 0 and 3, 0
indica ing always and 3 ne e . The alida ed Spanish e sion [
28
] e ealed a C onbach’s
alpha o 0.76 on he global scale.
2.3. S a is ical Analysis
The sample p esen ed a non-no mal dis ibu ion on he quan i a i e a iables; gi en
ha he Kolmogo o -Smi no s a is ic was used, he p- alues o all hese a iables we e
lowe han 0.05. Fo his eason, non-pa ame ic s a is ics we e chosen o he co ela ion
analysis—Spea man’s Rho—and compa ison o means be ween g oups—U Mann-Whi ney
and K uskal-Wallis. The co ela ion be ween he h ee bu nou dimensions (EE, DP, PA) and
o he a iables: age, expe ience, heal h pe cep ion, and wo k en i onmen we e analyzed.
The compa isons we e g ouped by gende , by ype o con ac (pe mean , empo a y,
sel -employed), and by he en i onmen in which he pa icipan was wo king.
In . J. En i on. Res. Public Heal h 2021,18, 365 5 o 12
A i s mul i a ia e model was de eloped o each o he h ee bu nou dimen-
sions. The independen a iables we e added in o he eg ession model wi h a s epwise
me hod [
29
] wi h which a inal model was ob ained o each ace o bu nou . Rega ding
he eg ession on EE, he wo kload was added in S ep 1 and he o he a eas in S ep 2.
This is because he wo kload is always closely co ela ed wi h EE and mus always be
included [
30
]. As o he eg ession on DP, EE was added a S ep 1, and subsequen ly he
a eas o wo k-li e; and o he eg ession on PA, DP was inse ed a S ep 1 and a e ha ,
he a eas o wo k-li e. This is because he h ee aspec s o bu nou de ine a synd ome. They
a e ela ed o one ano he and hose ela ionships among he h ee pa s o bu nou need
o be included in he analysis. Subsequen ly, a mul i a ia e scales model was de eloped o
iden i y he s eng h o he associa ions among he a iables. The independen a iables
we e pu in o he eg ession model wi h a s epwise me hod. Linea eg ession was ca ied
ou since he ollowing condi ions we e me : he esiduals o he model had a no mal
dis ibu ion (abo e all, because he sample size is e y high and, wi h he cen al limi he-
o em, any dis ibu ion wi h cons an mean and a iance—i i has a la ge enough sample
size—has a no mally dis ibu ed mean); and had a ini e mean and cons an a iance.
In e ac ions in a mul iple eg ession analysis we e also explo ed, in o de o in es iga e
whe he wo kload has a di e en e ec on he ou come (EE, DP, and PA) depending on he
alues o o he independen a iables (A eas o Wo kli e, AWS).
2.4. E hical Ques ions
The esea ch was conduc ed in acco dance wi h he Helsinki Decla a ion o 1975, as
e ised in 2008. E e y pa icipan subjec p e iously p o ided in o med consen o access
o he ques ionnai e and he da a was anonymized. The p ojec ecei ed he app o al
o he A agon Occupa ional Sa e y and Heal h Ins i u e (ISSLA, Go e nmen o A agon)
(Code 2018/0507).
3. Resul s
3.1. Desc ip ion o Sample
The sample consis ed o 292 subjec s: 145 males (49.7%) and 147 emales (50.3%). The
mean age was 43.45 yea s (SD: 9.56), age ange (22–67). O hem, 76.6% we e li ing wi h
a s able pa ne . In e ms o he wo k a iables, wo- hi ds o he sample had mo e han
12 yea s’
expe ience in he sec o , mo e han hal had a pe manen con ac , and p esen ed
mean low le els o exhaus ion, cynicism, and lack o pe sonal accomplishmen (Table 1).
Table 1.
Desc ip ion o he cha ac e is ics o he sample. Sociodemog aphic, labo , bu nou , and
wo k en i onmen a iables.
Pe cen ages/
Median (IQ Range) Ranks
P o ession
Execu i e 10.0%
W i ing, sc eenw i e 39.5%
Repo e 14.4%
Edi o /p esen e 16.7%
Pho og aphe , came aman 4.9%
Layou designe 0.8%
Publicis 1.9%
Adminis a ion 2.7%
Documen alis 3.3%
Media
Newspape s 26.4%
Radio 17.4%
Tele ision 32.1%
Ins i u ional P ess 24.2%

In . J. En i on. Res. Public Heal h 2021,18, 365 6 o 12
Table 1. Con .
Pe cen ages/
Median (IQ Range) Ranks
Heal h pe cep ion 2 (0) 1–4
GHQ (Gene al Heal h Ques ionnai e) 24 (7) 0–36
EE (Emo ional Exhaus ion) 17 (15) 0–54
DP (Depe sonaliza ion) 6 (5) 0–18
PA (Pe sonal Accomplismen ) 7 (5) 0–24
Wo kload 16 (8) 6–30
Con ol 9 (5) 3–15
Rewa ds 14 (5) 4–20
Communi y 17 (5) 5–25
Fai ness 17 (9) 6–30
Values 16 (7) 5–25
IQ Range: in e qua ile ange.
3.2. Bu nou ’s Dimensions, A eas o Wo k-Li e, and Heal h
In e ms o he co ela ions ob ained be ween he bu nou dimensions and he main
a iables o in es iga ion (Table 2), EE shows di ec co ela ion and s a is ical signi icance
wi h he o he wo bu nou dimensions (DP and PA), as well as wi h heal h pe cep ion
a iables and an in e se co ela ion and s a is ical signi icance wi h he wo kload, con ol,
ewa ds, communi y, ai ness, and alues. DP shows di ec signi ican co ela ions wi h
he heal h pe cep ion a iable, wi h he o he bu nou dimensions (EE and PA), and
an in e se signi ican co ela ion wi h con ol, heal h pe cep ion, ewa ds, communi y,
ai ness, and alues.
Table 2.
Co ela ions (Spea man’s Rho) be ween he dimensions o Emo ional Exhaus ion (EE),
Depe sonaliza ion (DP), and Pe sonal Accomplishmen (PA)(bu nou ), Six A eas o Wo kli e, and
pe sonal and heal h a iables.
EE DP PA
Age −0.068 −0.037 −0.065
Time wo ked (yea s) 0.020 0.112 0.075
Heal h pe cep ion 0.215 ** 0.174 ** 0.130 *
GHQ 0.645 ** 0.418 ** 0.528 **
DP 0.468 ** 0.688 **
PA 0.688 ** 0.490 **
Wo kload −0.588 ** −0.080 −0.364 **
Con ol −0.516 ** −0.356 ** −0.487 **
Rewa ds −0.552 ** −0.458 ** −0.529 **
Communi y −0.504 ** −0.399 ** −0.495 **
Fai ness −0.513 ** −0.324 ** −0.512 **
Values −0.567 ** −0.354 ** −0.576 **
*p< 0.05, ** p< 0.01; N = 292.
A sequen ial model o bu nou was analyzed, using mul iple linea eg ession, e i y-
ing ha he wo kload a iable was he main p edic o o EE (
−
1.297), oge he wi h alues
(
−
1.072). EE u ned ou o be he a iable ha con ibu ed he mos o DP (0.132), while
he dimensions o DP and EE we e s a is ically signi ican p edic o s o PA (0.355 and 0.287,
espec i ely) [17].
The esul s o he linea eg ession model, aking in o accoun each dimension o
bu nou sepa a ely as dependen a iables showed ha , wi h espec o he dimension
o EE, wo kload, ewa ds, alues, and communi y we e shown as in e se coe icien s
In . J. En i on. Res. Public Heal h 2021,18, 365 7 o 12
p edic o s, and ha o each poin o he wo kload a iable i dec eases by almos a
poin (
−
0.941) EE. Fu he mo e, o each poin o ewa ds, alues, and communi y, EE
dec eased by app oxima ely hal a poin (0.648, 0.538, and 0.491, espec i ely). The model
accoun s o 57.1% o he global a iance (Table 3). Taking DP as a dependen a iable,
ewa d and communi y a e in e se coe icien s o he depe sonaliza ion p edic o s, so
ha wi h each poin he communi y and ewa d a iables, depe sonaliza ion dec eased
0.30 and 0.19 poin s. The model accoun s o 23.3% o he a iance. Finally, when aking
PA as a dependen a iable, he ollowing a iables we e shown o be in e se p edic ing
coe icien s: cong uence alues, ewa ds, communi y, and manageable load. Wi h each
poin on he a iables— alues, ewa ds, communi y, and load, 0.398, 0.334, 0.260, and
0.155 poin s, espec i ely—, a dec ease in lack o pe sonal accomplishmen was ound. The
model accoun s o 46.3% o he a iance.
Table 3.
Linea eg ession model, aking as dependen a iables: EE, DP, and PA and as independen
a iables he Six A eas o Wo k Li e.
EE Coe icien p-Value Con idence In e al 95%
Lowe Uppe
Cons an 59.588 <0.001 54.74 64.42
Wo kload −0.945 <0.001 −1.14 −0.74
Rewa ds −0.655 <0.001 −0.99 −0.31
Values −0.556 <0.001 −0.82 −0.28
Communi y −0.465 0.002 −0.76 −0.16
R2 0.580
R2adj 0.573
DP Coe icien p-Value Con idence In e al 95%
Lowe Uppe
Cons an 13.822 <0.001 12.03 15.60
Rewa ds −0.307 <0.001 −0.43 −0.17
Communi y −0.193 0.001 −0.31 −0.07
R2 0.240
R2adj 0.234
PA Coe icien p-Value Con idence In e al 95%
Lowe Uppe
Cons an 25.853 <0.001 23.15 28.54
Values −0.399 <0.001 −0.54 −0.25
Rewa ds −0.330 0.001 −0.51 −0.14
Communi y −0.265 0.002 −0.42 −1.00
Wo kload −0.163 0.005 −0.27 −0.05
R2 0.475
R2adj 0.466
Rega ding he in e ac ions in a mul iple eg ession analysis, he wo kload is ela ed
o DP in a di e en way when employees ha e a high o low sco e in con ol (
−
0.476,
p= 0.030
). Addi ionally, he wo kload is ela ed o PA in a di e en way when he em-
ployees ha e a high o low sco e in ewa ds (
−
0.763, p= 0.005). Finally, he wo kload is
associa ed wi h PA in a di e en way when he employees ha e a high o low sco e in he
communi y (
−
0.593, p= 0.028). We c ea ed Figu e 1 o show hose signi ican in e ac ions.
The es o he in e ac ions we e no meaning ul.
In . J. En i on. Res. Public Heal h 2021,18, 365 8 o 12
In . J. En i on. Res. Public Heal h 2021, 18, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 o 12
Figu e 1. Signi ican in e ac ions.
In e ms o he di e en ypes o media (newspape s, adio, TV, ins i u ional p ess)
in he s udy (as is shown in Table 4), signi ican di e ences we e ound ela ing o he
ollowing a iables: PA, con ol, ewa ds, communi y, ai ness, and alues. The ins i u-
ional p ess wo ke s showed signi ican ly highe sco es in con ol, ewa ds, communi y,
jus ice, and alues, and lowe sco es in PA compa ed o newspape s, adio, o TV wo k-
e s, al hough he e we e no signi ican di e ences compa ing wo kload among he di e -
en ypes o media.
Table 4. Compa ison o medians acco ding o he wo k en i onmen o he a iables o pe cep ion o heal h, bu nou , and
Six A eas o Wo k Li e.
P ess Radio TV Ins i u ional P ess p-Value
Median (IQ) Median (IQ) Median (IQ) Median (IQ)
Heal h pe cep ion 2 (0) 2 (0) 2 (0) 2 (0) 0.655
GHQ12 24 (8) 25 (8.5) 24 (6) 23 (6.25) 0.151
EE 16 (16) 20 (17.75) 17 (13.75) 13.5 (13) 0.127
DP 6 (5) 7 (5.5) 6.5 (5) 5.5 (6) 0.160
PA 8 (7.25) 9 (6.75) 7 (4) 5 (8) 0.010 *
Wo kload 16 (8.25) 16 (9) 15 (7.5) 17 (9) 0.506
Con ol 9 (6) 9.5 (3.75) 9 (5) 11 (4) 0.020 *
Rewa ds 13 (6) 13 (5) 13 (6) 16 (5) 0.011 *
Comnuni y 16.5 (5.25) 18 (6) 16 (4.5) 18 (4.5) 0.016 *
Fai ness 16 (7.5) 17.5 (8.5) 15 (8.5) 19 (9) 0.006 **
Values 15 (7) 16 (6) 14 (6) 19 (5) <0.001 **
IQ: in e qua ile ange. S a is ic used: K uskal-Wallis. * p < 0,05, ** p < 0,01
4. Discussion
As e idenced by se e al in es iga ions conduc ed in di e en wo k en i onmen s,
ou s udy wi h jou nalis s showed ha he highe he manageable load index, he lowe
he le el o EE [9,31]. Howe e , he possibili y o exe cising “con ol” o e he ask i sel
was no shown o be an explana o y a iable o any o he bu nou dimensions, as we
hypo hesized be o e his s udy began. This hypo hesis was plausible, since communica-
ion p o essionals wo k wi h an uncon ollable subjec — he la es news—and, equen ly,
hey a e o ced o change hei schedules and calenda s because o i . O he a eas con ib-
u ed o deple ion le els, namely, as he “cong uence o alues” inc eases, exhaus ion le -
els dec ease in a s a is ically signi ican ela ionship.
The incong uence be ween own alues and hose o he company can e ode he
wo ke on a psychological le el, no h ough physical o e -exe ion, bu emo ionally and
on a daily basis. This phenomenon is common among p o essions wi h a s ong oca ional
Figu e 1. Signi ican in e ac ions.
In e ms o he di e en ypes o media (newspape s, adio, TV, ins i u ional p ess)
in he s udy (as is shown in Table 4), signi ican di e ences we e ound ela ing o he
ollowing a iables: PA, con ol, ewa ds, communi y, ai ness, and alues. The ins i u-
ional p ess wo ke s showed signi ican ly highe sco es in con ol, ewa ds, communi y,
jus ice, and alues, and lowe sco es in PA compa ed o newspape s, adio, o TV wo ke s,
al hough he e we e no signi ican di e ences compa ing wo kload among he di e en
ypes o media.
Table 4.
Compa ison o medians acco ding o he wo k en i onmen o he a iables o pe cep ion o heal h, bu nou , and
Six A eas o Wo k Li e.
P ess Radio TV Ins i u ional P ess p-Value
Median (IQ) Median (IQ) Median (IQ) Median (IQ)
Heal h pe cep ion 2 (0) 2 (0) 2 (0) 2 (0) 0.655
GHQ12 24 (8) 25 (8.5) 24 (6) 23 (6.25) 0.151
EE 16 (16) 20 (17.75) 17 (13.75) 13.5 (13) 0.127
DP 6 (5) 7 (5.5) 6.5 (5) 5.5 (6) 0.160
PA 8 (7.25) 9 (6.75) 7 (4) 5 (8) 0.010 *
Wo kload 16 (8.25) 16 (9) 15 (7.5) 17 (9) 0.506
Con ol 9 (6) 9.5 (3.75) 9 (5) 11 (4) 0.020 *
Rewa ds 13 (6) 13 (5) 13 (6) 16 (5) 0.011 *
Comnuni y 16.5 (5.25) 18 (6) 16 (4.5) 18 (4.5) 0.016 *
Fai ness 16 (7.5) 17.5 (8.5) 15 (8.5) 19 (9) 0.006 **
Values 15 (7) 16 (6) 14 (6) 19 (5) <0.001 **
IQ: in e qua ile ange. S a is ic used: K uskal-Wallis. * p< 0.05, ** p< 0.01.
4. Discussion
As e idenced by se e al in es iga ions conduc ed in di e en wo k en i onmen s,
ou s udy wi h jou nalis s showed ha he highe he manageable load index, he lowe
he le el o EE [
9
,
31
]. Howe e , he possibili y o exe cising “con ol” o e he ask i sel
was no shown o be an explana o y a iable o any o he bu nou dimensions, as we
hypo hesized be o e his s udy began. This hypo hesis was plausible, since communica ion
p o essionals wo k wi h an uncon ollable subjec — he la es news—and, equen ly, hey
a e o ced o change hei schedules and calenda s because o i . O he a eas con ibu ed
o deple ion le els, namely, as he “cong uence o alues” inc eases, exhaus ion le els
dec ease in a s a is ically signi ican ela ionship.
The incong uence be ween own alues and hose o he company can e ode he wo ke
on a psychological le el, no h ough physical o e -exe ion, bu emo ionally and on a
daily basis. This phenomenon is common among p o essions wi h a s ong oca ional
cha ac e (heal h o educa ion) [
31
], whe e he e may be a con inuous clash be ween he
In . J. En i on. Res. Public Heal h 2021,18, 365 9 o 12
ideals ha ini ially guided he pe son owa ds ha ac i i y and he obliga ion o ca y ou
di e en ac i i ies, pa icula ly hose con a y o his o he pe sonal ideals.
An inc ease in o e load a es and a dec ease in he cong uence o alues seem o
lead communica ion p o essionals in his s udy owa ds physical, men al, and emo ional
bu nou , which, acco ding o hese esul s, co ela es wi h he o he wo dimensions o
bu nou , DP and PA, and o which he six a eas poin ed ou by Lei e and Maslach also
con ibu ed in di e en ways (depending on he media): wo kload, con ol, ewa ds, com-
muni y, ai ness, and alues [17]. These dimensions also showed a s a is ically signi ican
ela ionship wi h heal h pe cep ions.
The esul s poin o con i ma ion o he sequen ial model o bu nou sugges ed by
Lei e , in which wo kload indices con ibu e o he EE and his, in u n, o he DP and PA.
Howe e , as i has been shown in se e al s udies [
10
], o he wo king li e a eas can inc ease
o also mode a e hese bu nou le els, cynicism o lack o pe sonal accomplishmen ,
leading o wha has been called “a double p ocess model o bu nou ”.
Thus, a high wo kload can be obse ed in a wo k en i onmen and ye , high a es o
EE may no occu , as would be expec ed, since o he a iables such as con ol o e he ask,
good pe sonal ela ions, o an adequa e adjus men be ween own alues and hose o he
company, may p o ec employees. In such a case, and in o de o p e en his, hese alues
mus be obse ed and s eng hened because i hey we e o be weakened, he exhaus ion
p ocess due o o e load could be as and d ama ic [9,21].
In he case o p o essionals in his s udy, and aking in o accoun he di e en media in
gene al, i was ound ha , in addi ion o wo kload, as bo h he index o in insic “ ewa ds”
o wo k and he le els in communi y (a p oblema ic pe cep ion in labo ela ions) dec ease,
he le els o EE inc ease. This inc ease in in e pe sonal con lic and dec ease in ewa ds
also con ibu ed o an inc ease in he sense o DP, and hese same a iables, oge he wi h
low le els o alue cong uence, gene ally con ibu e o a signi ican dec ease in lack o PA.
The ewa ds do no ha e much o do wi h he sala y ecei ed, bu a he wi h he posi i e
eedback o doing a good job, he ecogni ion o bosses, colleagues, and he public. In
sho , i e e s o he eeling ha hei e o s a e wo hwhile.
Howe e , hese esul s a e no he same o all p o essionals, no o all ypes o media.
I was ound ha o e load ac ed e y di e en ly, depending on whe he he indi idual
pe cei ed con ol o e hei ask o no , o whe he hey el g a i ied o com o ed by hei
bosses and colleagues. The o e load a iable also had di e en consequences depending
on he wo k en i onmen , o he employees’ pe cei ed sense o communi y.
The di e ences ound among di e en ypes o media (newspape s, adio, TV, in-
s i u ional p ess), bo h in he dimensions o bu nou and in he a eas ha con ibu e o
hose alues, we e s a is ically signi ican in he pe sonal accomplishmen dimension (PA).
Al hough all o hem endu ed simila wo kload le els, his did no occu in he a eas o
con ol, ewa ds, communi y, ai ness, and alues be ween he ins i u ional p ess and
he es o he media (w i en and audio- isual p ess), esul ing in di e ences in bu nou ,
especially in pe sonal accomplishmen a wo k.
In subsequen discussions, wi h p o essionals om di e en media o which he
esul s we e shown, explana ions we e gi en o he ac ha jou nalis s, in gene al, begin
hei ca ee s wi h ambi ions ha a e no o an economic na u e, bu wi h ideals o elling
he u h, con ibu ing o in o ma ion, change, and pe cei ing ha hei wo k has meaning.
O e he yea s, many ha e he eeling o “ illing in he pages”, o “ elling i ele an
s o ies”, o hey e en w i e o b oadcas con en con a y o hei con ic ions o ision
o eali y. On he o he hand, hose who wo k o he ins i u ional p ess ha e i ed hei
oca ion in o a poli ical, social, o economic p ojec . They ha e accep ed his posi ion
because he e is an a ini y in alues and goals and, he e o e, i is no a p oblem o hem
o in es mo e ime o e o in he ac i i ies, as hey wo k owa ds a common goal wi h
hei supe io s.
Enough scien i ic suppo has no been ound on his ma e ega ding communica ion
p o essionals [
32
,
33
], al hough we conside ha i could be ex apola ed o o he p o essions.