Different woods in cooperage for oenology: A review
Abstract
Producción Científica
Full text
beverages Review Different Woods in Cooperage for Oenology: A Review Ana Martínez-Gil 1, Maria del Alamo-Sanza 1, Rosario Sánchez-Gómez 1 and Ignacio Nevares 2,* 1Department of Analytical Chemistry, UVaMOX-Higher Tech. Col. of Agricultural Engineering, Universidad de Valladolid, 34001 Palencia, Spain; [email protected] (A.M.-G.); [email protected] (M.d.A.-S.); [email protected] (R.S.-G.) 2Department of Agroforestry Engineering, UVaMOX-Higher Tech. Col. of Agricultural Engineering, Universidad de Valladolid, 34001 Palencia, Spain *Correspondence: ignacio.nevar[email protected] Received: 31 October 2018; Accepted: 19 November 2018; Published: 23 November 2018 Abstract: Contact of wine with wood during fermentation and ageing produces significant changes in its chemical composition and organoleptic properties, modifying its final quality. Wines acquire complex aromas from the wood, improve their colour stability, flavour, and clarification, and extend their storage period. New trends in the use of barrels, replaced after a few years of use, have led to an increased demand for oak wood in cooperage. In addition, the fact that the wine market is becoming increasingly saturated and more competitive means that oenologists are increasingly interested in tasting different types of wood to obtain wines that differ from those already on the market. This growing demand and the search for new opportunities to give wines a special personality has led to the use of woods within the Quercus genus that are different from those used traditionally (Quercus alba,Quercus petraea, and Quercus robur) and even woods of different genera. Thus, species of the genus Quercus, such as Quercus pyrenaica Willd., Quercus faginea Lam., Quercus humboldtti Bonpl., Quercus oocarpa Liebm., Quercus frainetto Ten, and other genera, such as Robinia pseudoacacia L. (false acacia), Castanea sativa Mill. (chestnut), Prunus avium L. and Prunus cereaus L. (cherry), Fraxinus excelsior L. (European ash), Fraxinus americana L. (American ash), Morus nigra L, and Morus alba L. have been the subject of several studies as possible sources of wood apt for cooperage. The chemical characterization of these woods is essential in order to be able to adapt the cooperage treatment and, thus, obtain wood with oenological qualities suitable for the treatment of wines. This review aims to summarize the different species that have been studied as possible new sources of wood for oenology, defining the extractable composition of each one and their use in wine. Keywords: traditional oaks; different oaks; other woods; ellagitannins; low molecular phenols; volatile compounds 1. Introduction The wine trade controlled mainly by Greeks and Romans (2000 BCE) used earthenware jars and amphora, although these containers were fragile, heavy, and difficult to handle. Faced with this problem of transporting wines from the production to the consumption areas, wooden containers were created. The study of archaeological findings and written testimonies allows us to establish how wooden barrels displaced clay amphorae for wine transport and storage: a revolution. There are many references to the use of wooden containers for wine. The best-known reference is possibly that of Julius Caesar in “The Gallic Wars” (51 BCE) [ 1 , 2 ]. From the 5th century onwards, the term ‘barrel’ was used to designate these wooden containers. Since then, oak has been one of the main woods for this Beverages 2018,4, 94; doi:10.3390/beverages4040094 www.mdpi.com/journal/beverages
Beverages 2018,4, 94 2 of 25 purpose, being a resistant, flexible, easy to handle, and not very permeable material. Specifically, the European species, mainly Quercus petraea and Quercus robur, were used as they were abundant near the areas where wine was made. In the mid-twentieth century, the use of wood was notably abandoned due to the proliferation of other materials (cement and stainless steel). However, from the 1990s onwards, the use of wooden barrels re-emerged rather significantly and became a world fashion [ 2 – 4 ]. In addition, this resurgence also led to a change in their use. Nowadays, wine ageing has changed with the use of newer oak barrels because with their use the extractability of the oak compounds decreases. For this reason, in recent years, an imbalance between the amount of oak available and the number of barrels produced has been detected in France [ 5 ]. Moreover, the price of cooperage logs is increasing steadily with a concomitant decrease in the quality/price ratio. Given the growing demand for French oak barrels (Quercus petraea and Quercus robur) and the increase in price, some cooperages also work with oak from Eastern Europe (Romania, Hungary, Russia), as it is the same species with characteristics similar to those of French oak. Many oenologists have used barrels of this type of oak, as the results obtained are comparable to those of ageing wine in French oak. For these reasons, over the last few years, there has been a proliferation of studies on European oaks of the same species but of different origins. In recent years, the literature has offered studies about Slovenian oak [ 6 ], Spanish oaks [ 7 – 11 ], Hungarian oaks [12,13] , Russian oaks [13,14] , Romanian, Ukrainian, and Moldavian oaks [ 15 ], Romanian oak [16,17] , among others. These studies of the same species but different origin showed similar characteristics to American and French oaks, suggesting that they are suitable for barrel production for quality wines. Some authors even state that these origins have intermediate characteristics between French and American oaks [7,9,15]. Singleton mentions different woods within cooperage, from both the United States (white oak, red oak, chestnut oak, red or sweet gum, sugar maple, yellow or sweet birch, white ash, Douglas fir, beech, black cherry, sycamore, redwood, spruce, bald cypress, elm, and basswood) and Europe (white oak, chestnut, fir, spruce, pine, larch, ash, mulberry), and a number of additional species imported from Africa, South America, and Australia (acacia, karri: Eucalyptus diversicolor; jarrah: Eucalyptus marginata; stringybark: Eucalyptus obliqua and Eucalyptus gigantea; and she oak: Casuarina fraseriana). However, this long list of woods rapidly diminishes when considering only those that are suitable for ageing different alcoholic beverages [ 18 ]. As the number of wood species declined, oak and chestnut became the most widely used varieties in barrel-making and so were already those most used from the 16th century onwards [ 19 – 21 ]. They were chosen because they modified the gustatory and olfactory characteristics of the different wines and spirits favourably [ 21 ]. These two woods (Quercus and Chestnut) are the only ones approved today by the Organzation of Vine and Wine (OIV) (Resolution OENO 4/2005). The typical anatomy of oak offers greater resistance, flexibility, easy handling, and low permeability in relation to those provided by other woods [ 22 ]. At present, oak (Quercus) is the preferred material for the manufacture of barrels for ageing alcoholic beverages, especially wines. Oak belongs to the genus Quercus, which is made up of more than 250 species, although this figure is controversial as some authors cite up to 600 [ 21 , 23 ]. Most of these are to be found in the temperate zones of the northern hemisphere as far as south to Central America and Ecuador. The number of species increases from East to West, from Europe and Africa to the North American Pacific coast, Mexico being the country with the greatest diversity of species. The Quercus genus is subdivided into two subgenera, Cyclobalanopsis and Euquercus: the first includes tropical species and some from Asia and Malaysia not used in the manufacture of barrels for oenological use, while those within the subgenera Euquercus are used in cooperage [ 21 ]. Within these species, few meet all of the requirements, and those most used belong to the group of white oaks [ 5 ]. According to Vivas [ 21 ], some of the species used in cooperage in the USA and Europe are Quercus alba,Quercus garryana, Quercus macrocarpa, and Quercus stellata, and only in Europe Quercus cerris,Quercus suber,Quercus coccifera,Quercus lanuginosa,Quercus petraea, and Quercus robur. The main species used for wine ageing
Beverages 2018,4, 94 3 of 25 belong to the genus Oersted (formerly Lepidobalanus): Quercus petraea L. (Quercus sessilis) and Quercus robur (Quercus pedunculata) growing in Europe and Quercus alba growing in different areas of the United States. In America, white oak has only been associated with Q. Alba for years; however, strictly speaking, the classification of “white oak” includes many other species, such as: Q. alba,Q. garryana,Q. macrocarpa M., Q. stellata Wan., Quercus lyrata Walt., Quercus prinus,Quercus muehlenbergii E., Quercus michauxi Nutt, Quercus bicolor Willd., Quercus lobata Née,Quercus montana Willd, and Quercus virginiana L. [ 24 , 25 ]. Thus, in cooperage, Q. alba, a majority species in the eastern United States, has been associated with numerous species resulting in confusion, as is the case for: Q. prinus,Q. muehlenbergii,Q. bicolor, Q. stellata,Q. macrocarpa,Q. lyrrata, and Quercus durandii [18,26]. In Europe, the largest forests producing high-quality oaks are found in France. Forests cover 27% of the total area of France, and approximately 9% of these are oak forests. The regions of Le Fôret du Centre, Nevers, Tronçais, Allier, and Limousin in the Massif Central and Vosges in the northeast of the country are particularly important producers. Although French oak is the most highly valued in Europe, other producer regions include Hungary, Poland, Russia, Italy, and, in the Iberian Peninsula, the Basque Country. In fact, until the 1930s, the oak that was most widely used in the châteaux of Bordeaux came from Russia rather than France. However, Q. petraea and Q. robur are associated with France and not the rest of Europe. In general, American oaks differ from European species because they have higher density and resistance and lower porosity and permeability than European species [ 25 ]. In addition, American woods have larger tylosis, which allows this wood to be cut by sawing without compromising the watertightness, which leads to a better use of wood. Heartwood of Quercus is composed of macromolecules that are polymers of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, representing 90% of dry wood. In addition, there is an extractable fraction that are soluble compounds released to wine during aging; this part represents approximately 10% of dry wood and is variable depending on species. The extractable fraction (ellagitannins, low molecular weight compounds and volatile compounds) in wood depends not only on variety but also on many other factors, such as sylvocultural factors, geographic origin, and individual tree and cooperage processing, with high variability in content (Tables 1and 2). In general, Q. robur has the highest content of ellagitannins followed by Q. petraea and finally Q. alba. In addition, Q. alba also tends to have lower content of low molecular weight compounds (Table 1) and Q. robur lower aromatic compounds (Table 2).
Beverages 2018,4, 94 4 of 25 Table 1. The range of ellagitannins and low molecular weight phenolic (LMWP) compounds found in green, seasoned, and toasted wood. * sum of castalagin, vescalagin, granidin, and A, B, C, D, and E roburins; ** sum of acids (ellagic, gallic, syringic, vanillic, and ferulic), aldehydes (coniferaldehyde, sinapaldehyde, syringaldehyde, and vanillin) and cumarins (scopoletin and aesculetin); *** sum of gallic acid and elagic acids. Treatment Species Concentration Range Ellagitannins (mg/g) * References Concentration Range LMWP (µg/g) * References Untreated (green wood) Quercus pyrenaica Willd. 28.12–32.72 [27–29] 265–1061 [23,27,28,30] Quercus faginea Lam. 32.51 [28,29] 407 [28,30] Quercus frainetto Ten. - - - - Quercus oocarpa Liebm. - - - - Quercus humboldtti Bonpl. 1.94 [16] 365 [16] Castanea sativa Mill. - - - - Robinia pseudoacacia L. - - - - Prunus avium L. - - - - Prunus cereaus L. - - - - Fraxinus americana L - - - - Fraxinus excelsior L. - - - - Quercus petraea 8.65–32.10 [16,28,29] 225–752 [16,28,30] Quercus robur 28.41–44.01 [28,29] 310–647 [28,30] Quercus alba 3.48–5.96 [16,29] 237–486 [5,16] Seasoned Quercus pyrenaica Willd. 2.81–77.9 [8,31–33] 475–4304 [7,28,31,33–35] Quercus faginea Lam. 24.11–26.97 [8,28] 760–1422 [7,28] Quercus frainetto Ten. 108 [36] 3800 *** [36] Quercus oocarpa Liebm. 33.9 [36] 5500 *** [36] Quercus humboldtti Bonpl. 1.61 [17] 832 [17] Castanea sativa Mill. 4.74–76.3 [31,33,36–38] 1155–14,430 [31–34,36–41] Robinia pseudoacacia L. nd [42,43] 41–408 [40,42] Prunus avium L. nd–0.04 [31,43,44] 6–620 [31,44] Prunus cereaus L. - - 228 [40] Fraxinus americana L. nd [43,45] 98 [45] Fraxinus excelsior L. nd [43,45] 53 [45] Quercus petraea 1.98–80.62 [8,17,28,31,32,36,38] 368–3400 [7,17,28,31,34,38] Quercus robur 3.93–87.4 [8,31,32,36] 647–4166 [7,28,31,34,45] Quercus alba 0.88–35.64 [8,17,31,32,36] 469–1064 [7,17,31]
Beverages 2018,4, 94 5 of 25 Table 1. Cont. Treatment Species Concentration Range Ellagitannins (mg/g) * References Concentration Range LMWP (µg/g) * References Toasted Quercus pyrenaica Willd. 4.32–47.05 [8,32,33,46] 607–20,500 [7,33,35] Quercus faginea Lam. 9.34 [8] 2132 [7] Quercus frainetto Ten. - - - - Quercus oocarpa Liebm. - - - - Quercus humboldtti Bonpl. 0.12 [17] 2464 [17] Castanea sativa Mill. 0.66–10.51 [33,37] 1353–35,282 [7,33,35,37,40,47,48] Robinia pseudoacacia L. nd [42,49] 6–2496 [40,42,44,46] Prunus avium L. nd [43,46] 90–3378 [44,46,48] Prunus cereaus L. - - 445–1578 [40] Fraxinus americana L. nd [43,45] 1915–3062 [45] Fraxinus excelsior L. nd [43,45] 1922–3585 [45] Quercus petraea 3.53–56.76 [8,17,32,46] 856–4420 [7,17,32,46] Quercus robur 7.72–11 [8] 2067–8225 [7,40,47,48] Quercus alba nd–5.89 [8,17,32,46] 460–3620 [7,17,32,46,47] nd: not detected.
Beverages 2018,4, 94 6 of 25 Table 2. The range of volatile compounds expressed as µg/g wood found in green, seasoned, and toasted wood. Treatment Species Guaiacol Eugenol Furfural Trans-β-Methyl-γ-Octalactone Cis-β-Methyl-γ-Octalactone Vanillin References Untreated (green wood) Q. pyrenaica Willd. 0.16–0.24 1.47–5.71 1.35–2.56 0.84–29.37 14.35–59 3.42 [27,50] Q. petraea 0.09 2.05 1.19 18.4 36.9 2.19 [50] Seasoned Q. pyrenaica Willd. nd–1.25 nd–7.28 1.94–19.7 nd–33.8 5.3–68.2 1.6–25.24 [27,51–55] Q. faginea Lam. 0.29 1.98 17.6 1.74 15.5 10.6 [51] Q. humboldtti Bonpl. 0.1 2.65 nd nd 0.02 1.97 [17] Castanea sativa Mill. nd–0.38 0.71–4.47 2.27–6.72 nd–0.23 nd–0.34 2.90–24.40 [53,55–57] Robinia pseudoacacia L. nd–0.86 nd–0.21 0.45–0.92 nd nd 1.65–3.48 [55–57] Prunus L. nd–0.53 nd–0.11 0.49–0.66 nd nd 0.13–2.42 [55–57] Fraxinus americana L. 0.08–0.13 0.19–0.57 0.54–0.8 nd nd 7.25–10.3 [55,57] Fraxinus excelsior L. 0.11–0.22 0.44–0.94 1.21–1.31 nd nd 1.39–14.7 [55,57] Q. petraea nd–1.3 0.57–6.5 3.4–19.9 0.09–14.7 0.42–55.9 2.0–18.8 [50,51,53–55] Q. robur 0.08–0.11 1.01–1.58 4.51–10.8 2.87–3.98 2.83–22.9 1.21–15.9 [51,53] Q. alba 0.04–3.3 1.38–5.9 1.2–4.68 2.52–5.0 22.3–32.5 6.8–7.9 [51,54,55] Toasted Q. pyrenaica Willd. 0.11–8.91 nd–14.6 19.6–4082 nd–58.6 0.10–212 8.69–235 [51,54,55,58–60] Q. faginea Lam. 0.36 2.35 96 1.08 3.25 258 [51] Q. humboldtti Bonpl. 3.74 3.34 533.53 0.06 0.3 22.36 [17] Castanea sativa Mill. 0.46–5.30 2.13–3.23 431–1675 nd nd 7.15–143 [55,57] Robinia pseudoacacia L. 0.52–6.05 0.40–2.36 20.7–840 nd nd 19.2–106 [55,57] Prunus L. 0.91–1.71 0.74–1.50 23–175 nd nd 45–91.7 [55,57] Fraxinus americana L. 5.97–11.9 1.58–3.00 26.5–63.6 nd nd 76.1–160 [55,57] Fraxinus excelsior L. 6.47–14.07 1.59–3.21 26.5–82 nd nd 76.3–187 [55,57] Q. petraea 0.17–3.4 0.83–4.0 10.3–963 0.01–14.6 0.05–22.8 3.0–370 [51,54,55,60] Q. robur 0.17–0.53 1.01–1.37 8.90–10.8 3.41–3.98 2.83–22.9 130–172 [51] Q. alba 1.22–7.3 1.29–11.6 4.04–1539 3.29–7.4 16.1–45.5 7.5–102 [51,54,55,60]
Beverages 2018,4, 94 7 of 25 Furthermore, the use of oak barrels in the production of quality wines implies long periods and a high economic cost for wineries. For this reason, alternative techniques to ageing in oak barrels have been used for over 15 years and these were developed to give wood characteristics to the wine in a faster, cheaper, and simpler way. They are based on the addition to the wine of pieces of wood of very different sizes and shapes (splinters, cubes, staves). These alternative products have been widely used for a long time in the producing countries of the New World, but their use has spread, above all, since the main wine producer, Europe, changed its legislation to admit their use. This maturation practice was approved by the International Oenological Codex of the International Organization of Vine and Wine (OIV) (OENO 9/2001) and by the Official Journal of the European Union (CE 1507/2006). 2. Oak Species Not Traditionally Used in Cooperage The use and/or study of alternative oaks (other species of the genus Quercus) is proposed as a solution to the search for new sources of quality wood for cooperage that provide wines with differentiated notes appreciated by the consumer. For this reason, a market opportunity has arisen for oak species not traditionally used in cooperage, such as Quercus pyrenaica,Quercus faginea, Quercus frainetto,Quercus oocarpa, and Quercus humboldtii and others that are less well-known, such as Quercus serrata,Quercus mongolica or Quercus denta (Figure 1). Beverages 2018, 4, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 24 Furthermore, the use of oak barrels in the production of quality wines implies long periods and a high economic cost for wineries. For this reason, alternative techniques to ageing in oak barrels have been used for over 15 years and these were developed to give wood characteristics to the wine in a faster, cheaper, and simpler way. They are based on the addition to the wine of pieces of wood of very different sizes and shapes (splinters, cubes, staves). These alternative products have been widely used for a long time in the producing countries of the New World, but their use has spread, above all, since the main wine producer, Europe, changed its legislation to admit their use. This maturation practice was approved by the International Oenological Codex of the International Organization of Vine and Wine (OIV) (OENO 9/2001) and by the Official Journal of the European Union (CE 1507/2006). 2. Oak Species Not Traditionally Used in Cooperage The use and/or study of alternative oaks (other species of the genus Quercus) is proposed as a solution to the search for new sources of quality wood for cooperage that provide wines with differentiated notes appreciated by the consumer. For this reason, a market opportunity has arisen for oak species not traditionally used in cooperage, such as Quercus pyrenaica, Quercus faginea, Quercus frainetto, Quercus oocarpa, and Quercus humboldtii and others that are less well-known, such as Quercus serrata, Quercus mongolica or Quercus denta (Figure 1). Figure 1. Cross-sections of some of the non-standard species in cooperage in comparison with Q. sessilis. Figure 1. Cross-sections of some of the non-standard species in cooperage in comparison with Q. sessilis.
Beverages 2018,4, 94 8 of 25 2.1. Pyrenaica Oak (Quercus Pyrenaica Willd) It is distributed throughout the western Atlantic–Mediterranean regions (West France, Portugal, Spain, and North Morocco) through a wide range of altitudes, from sea level to over 2000 m. This wood is known as “rebollo” or “melojo”, and is mostly located in Spain (Allué, 1995) with a forest mass of 1,090,716 ha, the majority of which is found in the region of Castilla y León [ 61 ] (Figure 2). Traditionally, this wood has been used in Spain for railway sleepers and ships and, in recent years, especially as firewood from low forest cover, an arboreal mass composed of feet coming from buds or roots. This has resulted in a progressive degradation of the characteristics of some of these forest areas, such as a high percentage of trees with a diameter of <40 cm and knotty, twisted, or short-boled trees. Therefore, their use for manufacturing barrels is very limited due to the high number of poor quality trees for cooperage. However, its structural properties (mesh, grain, density, and permeability) are also appropriate for oenological use [27]. Beverages 2018, 4, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 24 . 2.1. Pyrenaica Oak (Quercus Pyrenaica Willd) It is distributed throughout the western Atlantic–Mediterranean regions (West France, Portugal, Spain, and North Morocco) through a wide range of altitudes, from sea level to over 2000 m. This wood is known as “rebollo” or “melojo”, and is mostly located in Spain (Allué, 1995) with a forest mass of 1,090,716 ha, the majority of which is found in the region of Castilla y León [61] (Figure 2). Traditionally, this wood has been used in Spain for railway sleepers and ships and, in recent years, especially as firewood from low forest cover, an arboreal mass composed of feet coming from buds or roots. This has resulted in a progressive degradation of the characteristics of some of these forest areas, such as a high percentage of trees with a diameter of <40 cm and knotty, twisted, or short-boled trees. Therefore, their use for manufacturing barrels is very limited due to the high number of poor quality trees for cooperage. However, its structural properties (mesh, grain, density, and permeability) are also appropriate for oenological use [27]. Figure 2. Quercus pyrenaica Willd distribution map [62]. https://commons.wikimedia.org/ wiki/File:Quercus_pyrenaica_range.svg. Various studies from 1996 to the present place value on this wood’s content of ellagitannins, low weight, and aromas [7,8,27–32,34,35,46,50–53,55,58,59,63–65], as well as its use for containers of alcoholic drinks, such as brandy and other spirits [66–70] and wines [9,10,58,60,71–79]. However, the supply of quality wood for the manufacture of barrels is insufficient, so this wood can be used for the manufacture of alternative products in the short and medium term. With proper management, these forests could supply wood for the manufacture of barrels in the future. Consequently, most studies on the behaviour of this wood during wine ageing have been carried out with alternative products (in particular chips or staves) [58,60,71–77,79], observing that wines aged with this wood present good final characteristics. The resulting wines are closer to those aged with French oak than those aged with American oak, thus meaning this wood is suitable for producing quality wines [9,10,74]. In addition, peculiarities have been reported, such as that wines aged with barrels of this oak species had high levels of eugenol, guaiacol, and other volatile phenols, while the contents of cis-β-methyl- γ-octalactone or maltol are similar to those of wines aged with Q. alba [76]. However, Fernandez de Simón et al. [60] observed that the Tinta del País variety, in addition to having a higher concentration of eugenol, also had a higher content of cis-β-methyl-γ-octalactone than the same wine treated with Figure 2. Quercus pyrenaica Willd distribution map [ 62 ]. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File: Quercus_pyrenaica_range.svg. Various studies from 1996 to the present place value on this wood’s content of ellagitannins, low weight, and aromas [ 7 , 8 , 27 – 32 , 34 , 35 , 46 , 50 – 53 , 55 , 58 , 59 , 63 – 65 ], as well as its use for containers of alcoholic drinks, such as brandy and other spirits [ 66 – 70 ] and wines [ 9 , 10 , 58 , 60 , 71 – 79 ]. However, the supply of quality wood for the manufacture of barrels is insufficient, so this wood can be used for the manufacture of alternative products in the short and medium term. With proper management, these forests could supply wood for the manufacture of barrels in the future. Consequently, most studies on the behaviour of this wood during wine ageing have been carried out with alternative products (in particular chips or staves) [ 58 , 60 , 71 – 77 , 79 ], observing that wines aged with this wood present good final characteristics. The resulting wines are closer to those aged with French oak than those aged with American oak, thus meaning this wood is suitable for producing quality wines [9,10,74] . In addition, peculiarities have been reported, such as that wines aged with barrels of this oak species had high levels of eugenol, guaiacol, and other volatile phenols, while the contents of cisβ -methyl- γ -octalactone or maltol are similar to those of wines aged with Q. alba [ 76 ]. However, Fernandez de Simón et al. [ 60 ] observed that the Tinta del País variety, in addition to having a higher concentration of eugenol, also had a higher content of cisβ -methyl- γ -octalactone than the same wine treated with French and
Beverages 2018,4, 94 9 of 25 American oak, especially when staves were used. In tasting, wines aged in Q. pyrenaica wood barrels are more appreciated than the same ones aged in American or French oak barrels [ 76 ]. Gallego et al. 2012 [ 79 ] also observed that the wines aged with chips and staves from Q. pyrenaica oak were better considered than American or French ones, showing higher aromatic intensity and complexity, and woody, balsamic, and cocoa notes. Connick et al. [ 77 ] carried out a sensorial analysis and found that wine aged in contact with Q. pyrenaica chips only differed to wine aged with Q. petraea for woody character and attained a higher score. However, a wine from two Portuguese red grape varieties (Tinta Roriz, 80% and Touriga Nacional, 20%), aged with chips of Q. petraea versus Q. pyrenaica, reported that, from a sensory point of view, the wine with French oak chips showed a tendency for higher aroma scores than those aged in contact with Q. pyrenaica oak [ 71 ]. As regards oxygen, a very important factor in the ageing of wines, Del Álamo et al. [ 73 ] reported that the same red Tempranillo variety aged with Q. pyrenaica required less oxygen than the same one aged with traditional oak species (Q. petraea and Q. alba). Similarly, Gonalves and Jordão 2009 [ 75 ] recorded that Syrah wines aged in contact with Q. pyrenaica oak species had higher antioxidant activity values than those aged in contact with the American oak species. 2.2. Quercus Faginea Lam A wood studied from 1996 [ 30 ] to the present [ 80 ] for oenological purposes. This species is endemic to the Iberian Peninsula and North Africa. Its common name is Quejigo, with about 269,000 ha distributed mainly in Castilla-La Mancha, Castilla y León, Aragón, and Cataluña on the peninsula [61,81] (the protected surface area is under 4%, due to its dispersion and abundance in Spain [ 81 ]). It is a medium-sized deciduous or semi-evergreen tree growing to a height of 20 m and a diameter of 80 cm. This species once covered (during the 15th and 16th centuries) much of the Iberian Peninsula, and the wood was valued and intensively exploited for naval construction [ 82 ]. It was traditionally used for the production of charcoal, and it has also been used in the manufacture of beams for construction due to its strength and resistance. Q. faginea wood has a white yellowish sapwood and brown yellowish heartwood, high density, and considerable mechanical strength [ 80 ]. Its composition in ellagitannins, low molecular weight compounds, and volatile compounds in wood has been studied [ 7 , 8 , 10 , 28 – 30 , 51 , 63 , 80 ], as well as its interaction with wine [ 9 , 10 , 78 ]. The antioxidant activity is very high, with an IC50 of 3.3 µ g/mL for heartwood, as compared to standard antioxidants (an IC50 of 3.8 µ g/mL for Trolox) [ 80 ]. Miranda et al. [ 80 ] reported that Q. faginea is a very good candidate for cooperage due to it being a source of compounds with antioxidant properties. However, after studying the volatile composition of different species of Spanish oak, both in traditional species (Q. robur and Q. petraea) and new species (Q. faginea and Q. pyrenaica), Cadahía et al. [ 51 ] propose that, while Q. pyrenaica may be considered suitable for wine ageing, Q. faginea is not. In addition, a wine was in contact with this oak for 21 months and then compared with other species, especially traditional ones, and it was observed that wine aged with Q. faginea was the least preferred by the tasting panel and always the one that obtained the lowest scores in almost all descriptors [ 10 ]. Fernández de Simón et al. 2003 [ 9 ] studied the low molecular weight phenolic compounds in red Rioja wine aged during 21 months in barrels made of Q. Faginea oak and other woods (Q. pyrenaica, Q. robur,Q. petraea, and Q. alba), showing by means of a discriminant analysis that wines aged with Q. faginea could be discriminated from the rest by function 2, which was related to trans-resveratrol, p-hydroxybenzaldehyde, syringic acid, ellagic acid, and 5–HMF. 2.3. Quercus Frainetto Ten This species is native to the Balkan Peninsula and also present in South Italy and Northwest Turkey (Figure 3). Despite also being known as Hungarian oak, its presence in Hungary is sporadic [ 83 ]. In Greece, it is a vital timber tree and frequently managed as coppice forest for both firewood and timber in combination with grazing. In the other countries in which it grows, it is most often used for firewood, although the quality of the wood is similar to Q. petraea. Because of the rather high durability
Beverages 2018,4, 94 16 of 25 the concentration of resveratrol and catechin in all of the wines studied was much higher when aged with M. alba chips than when aged with Q. alba. The sensory test showed that, after 20 days’ ageing with M. alba, Syrah wines presented better scores than the same ones aged with Q. alba; however, the scores of the Cabernet wines after ageing with these two woods were similar [ 90 ]. Mulberry extract (M. nigra heartwood) (2 g/L of wood in 40% water-ethanol) had higher a polyphenol content and antioxidant activity than the extracts from the Quercus robur,Robinia pseudoacacia L., and Cotinus coggygria Scop wood species [ 116 ]. Rosso et al. [ 113 ] observed that a red wine (Raboso Piave var.) aged during 9 months in blackberry (M. alba) 225-L barrels presented a significant decrease in fruity-note ethyl esters and ethylguaiacol and the high cession of ethylphenol (a horsey-odour defect). Therefore, these authors concluded that this wood is hardly suitable for wine ageing. 4. Chemical Composition of the Extractable Fraction of the Different Woods The chemical composition, especially the extractable fraction, of oak wood can decisively condition its oenological quality, as it contributes to characteristics such as the colour, smell, flavour, and body of the final wine. Ellagitannins, low molecular weight compounds, and volatile compounds are the main constituents of this fraction in oak. Table 1shows the total concentration of ellagitannins and the total content of low molecular weight phenolic compounds in green, dried, and toasted wood of Quercus specimens but of different species than the traditional ones (Quercus:pyrenaica,faginea,frainetto,oocarpa, and humboldtti) and woods other than oak (castanea sativa,robina pseudoacacia,prunus avium,prunus cereaus fraxinus americana, and fraxinus excelsior). In general, the ranges found for total ellagitannins and low molecular weight phenolic compounds in the same species are broad due to factors such as the type of treatment and the intensity and variability within the species, and are shown in Table 1. As can be seen in Table 1, the species Robinia pseudoacacia (acacia), fraxinus americana (ash), and fraxinus excelsior (ash) do not contain ellagitannins in their composition. With regard to cherry, no studies have been found on the species Prunus cereaus. The ellagitannins in Prunus avium were not detected in the studies by Sanz et al. [ 43 , 44 ], with only very small quantities of castalagina (0.04 mg/g) and vescalagina (4.19 µ g/g) being detected in the work of Alañon et al. [ 31 ], insignificant quantities with respect to the habitual contents that exist in the woods used in cooperage. As regards woods other than oak, the eight ellagitannins have only been found in the species Castanea sativa Mill (chestnut). The ranges of ellagitannins in dried chestnut are between 4.74 and 76.3 mg/g and in toasted vary from 0.66 to 10.51 mg/g (Table 1). As with oak [ 17 , 32 , 135 ], toasting decreases the concentration of these ellagitannins. In general, the total concentration in ellagitannins is similar to that found in traditional oaks. In addition to ellagitannins, other hydrolysable tannins not present in oak have been found in chestnut. In addition, cherry and acacia have condensed tannins, never found in oak, in their composition. All this means that there is an important qualitative difference between these different woods and Quercus with respect to the composition of the traditional oak used in wine ageing. The main phenolic components analyzed specially in the green and seasoned wood of these new species of Quercus were ellagitannins (Table 1), with similar results to those found in other oaks traditionally used in oenology. Drying and toasting degrade these compounds as well as traditional Quercus woods. The eight ellagitannins identified in the traditional oaks were found in all the new species of Quercus, except in the case of the Q. oocarpa, which did not present dimer ellagitannins (A, B, C, and D Roburins) in its composition. Q. pyrenaica,Q. faginea, and Q. oocarpa had a similar range of total ellagitannin concentration among them; moreover, ellagitannins of these species were between Q. robur and Q. alba, and more similar to Q. petraea. However, Q. humboldtii showed a lower concentration than the other new species and more similar to Q. alba. On the other hand, Q. frainetto is distinguished especially from the other species by its higher content of pentosylated dimers, and a monomer concentration that is similar to the rest of Quercus, which makes it the species with the highest content in ellagitannins (108 mg/g). Unlike ellagitannins, low molecular weight compounds during drying and toasting increase their concentration in both Quercus and other woods, just like traditional oaks. Castanea sativa Mill. wood has the highest low molecular weight phenolic
Beverages 2018,4, 94 17 of 25 (LMWP) content (Table 1). In general, the total LMWP contents found in the acacia (Robinia pseudoacacia L.), cherry (Prunus), and ash (Fraxinus) woods are lower than in the others, especially after drying. Ellagic and gallic acids are the main LMWPs in Q. pyrenaica,Q. faginea,Q. humboldtii, and Castanea sativa as in traditional oaks. Only in the toasted wood of Q. humboldtii does this not occur, as the majority were coniferaldehyde and sinapaldehyde. This behaviour has also been observed in traditional woods, especially in the species Q. alba and/or Q. robur [ 7 , 17 , 47 , 48 ], although the most common profile is that mentioned above. In Q. oocarpa and Q. frainetto, only the ellagic and gallic acids were studied [ 36 ], probably because they are the majority in this species. Furthermore, there is more ellagic acid than gallic acid in Q. pyrenaica,Q. faginea,Q. humbolditti, and Q. oocarpa, as usually occurs in traditional oaks; however, in Q. frainetto and Castanea sativa, this relationship was reversed. Compared to traditional oak, the most different woods were acacia, cherry, and ash, as in none of the three were these acids the majority. With the exception of the dry wood of P. cereaus, the majority component of which was ellagic acid, gallic acid was not detected [ 40 ]. Similarly, neither gallic acid nor ellagic acid were detected in the wood of the considered Fraxinus species [43]. Table 2represents the concentration of some of the most representative volatile compounds of traditional oak for their aromatic contribution to wine during the ageing process analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) in green wood and dried and toasted specimens of the genus Quercus, but of different species to the traditional ones (Quercus:pyrenaica,faginea, and humboldtti) and woods other than oak (castanea sativa,robina pseudoacacia,prunus, and fraxinus excelsior and american). This table does not list Q. oocarpa and Q. frainetto, as no work has been found with the concentrations of these volatile compounds. Only Vivas [ 21 ] shows the presence of vanillin and eugenol β -Methyl- γ -octalactone in these species as well as Q. alba,Q. petraea, and Q. robur and oxo-3-retro- α -ionol in addition to Q. alba. Regarding cherry, in Table 2the species is not indicated since it was not identified in the studies found. In addition, as these compounds are formed during drying and especially during toasting, only one work in green wood has been found that studied the species Q. pyrenaica. The concentration of the volatile species represented in Table 2shows that the majority of the green and dried wood of Q. pyrenaica is cisβ -Methyl- γ -octalactone, 59 and 68 µ g/g, respectively; in the dry wood of Q. faginea it is furfural with 17.6 µ g/g, and in Q. humbolditti it is eugenol with 2.65 µ g/g. However, the majority in non-Quercus woods after drying is vanillin. As for the wood after toasting, which is usually used in the processes of ageing wines, in almost all species the content of furfural is higher than that of the other five aromas as generally occurs in traditional oaks [ 17 , 51 , 55 , 60 ], with the exception of Q. faginea, Fraxinus american, and Fraxinus excelsior, with vanillin content being the highest. The guaiacol levels in medium-toasted ash woods were much higher than those detected in the other toasted woods, even those normally found in traditional oak, so a more pronounced smoke character can be expected when using toasted ash wood in ageing wines. In some studies, the concentrations of eugenol found in Q. pyrenaica were very high, especially when they were subjected to light toasting, much more so than in those normally found in traditional oaks, so that when using these woods we would have more spicy wines, especially with notes of clove. In general, Table 2shows that woods not belonging to the genus Quercus do not have either β -Methyl- γ -octalactone or cisβ -Methyl- γ -octalactone in their composition. Only the study by Caldeira et al. [ 53 ] found small amounts of these isomers in chestnut (0.23 and 0.34 µ g/g in the isomer trans and cis, respectively), but using 55% ethanol to extract them. The two isomers of β -Methyl- γ -octalactone have a high sensory impact on the wines after wood maturation [ 136 ], giving the wines coconut, toasted, and wood notes; moreover, theses isomers allow French and American oaks to be differentiated [ 59 , 137 , 138 ]. Q. humboldtii also presented very low concentrations of these two isomers. Regarding the species Q. faginea, the concentration of these two isomers in its wood has only been found in the work of Cadahía et al. [ 51 ], in which they also study the traditional oak species, observing that the concentrations in this species are within the usual values found in the traditional species (Q. robur,Q. petraea, and Q. alba). The wood of Q. pyrenaica has been more widely studied, so we find wider ranges of concentrations, depending on the origin, drying,
Beverages 2018,4, 94 18 of 25 and toasting. In general, we could say that some woods have higher concentrations than those found in traditional woods, especially the cis isomer. Many options for woods to be used in cooperage are available and suitable and there may be more. However, with the exception of the species Q. pyrenaica, there have not been many studies carried out on the aforementioned woods and the corresponding treatments in cooperage. Therefore, it is considered of great interest to know more about the aromatic composition of these woods, thus offering more information to coopers and oenologists about the wood they can use for their wines, thus providing that distinctive sought-after seal. Author Contributions: Conceptualization, M.d.A.-S. and I.N.; Funding acquisition, I.N. and M.d.A.-S.; Methodology, I.N.; Supervision, M.d.A.-S.; Visualization, A.M.-G.; Writing—original draft, A.M.-G. and R.S.-G.; Writing—review & editing, A.M.-G., I.N. and M.d.A.-S. Funding: This work was financed by Junta de Castilla y León (VA028U16), MINECO (AGL2014-54602-P), FEDER, and the Interreg España-Portugal Programme (Iberphenol). R.S.G. thanks Iberphenol for his contract. Acknowledgments: The authors wish to thank Ann Holliday for her services in revising the English. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no competing financial interest. References 1. Gautier, J.F. Histoire et ActualitéDu Tonneau. Rev. Française D’oenologie 2000,181, 33–35. 2. Gautier, J.F. Le Tonneau àTravers Les âGes. Rev. Oenologues Tech. Vitivinic. Oenologicques 2003,30, 13–15. 3. Vivas, N.; Saint-Cricq de Gaulejac, N. The useful lifespan of new barrels and risk related to the use of old barrels. Aust. N. Z. Wine Ind. J. 1999,14, 37–45. 4. Singleton, V.L. Le Stockage Des Vins En Barriques: Utilisation et Variables Significatives. J. Sci. Tech. Tonnellerie 2000,6, 1–25. 5. Fernández de Simón, B.; Cadahía, E. Utilización Del Roble Español en el Envejecimiento de Vinos: Comparación con Roble Francés y Americano; Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia: Madrid, Spain, 2004. 6. Chira, K.; Teissedre, P.-L. Chemical and sensory evaluation of wine matured in oak barrel: Effect of oak species involved and toasting process. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2015,240, 533–547. [CrossRef] 7. Cadahía, E.; Muñoz, L.; De Simón, B.F.; García-Vallejo, M.C. Changes in low molecular weight phenolic compounds in Spanish, French, and American oak woods during natural seasoning and toasting. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001,49, 1790–1798. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 8. Cadahía, E.; Varea, S.; Muñoz, L.; Fernández de Simón, B.; García-Vallejo, M.C. Evolution of ellagitannins in Spanish, French, and American oak woods during natural seasoning and toasting. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001 , 49, 3677–3684. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 9. Fernández de Simón, B.; Hernández, T.; Cadahía, E.; Dueñas, M.; Estrella, I. Phenolic compounds in a Spanish red wine aged in barrels made of Spanish, French and American oak wood. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2003 , 216, 150–156. [CrossRef] 10. Fernández De Simón, B.; Cadahía, E.; Jalocha, J. Volatile compounds in a Spanish red wine aged in barrels made of Spanish, French, and American oak wood. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003 ,51, 7671–7678. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 11. Cadahía, E.; Fernández de Simón, B.; Sanz, M.; Poveda, P.; Colio, J. Chemical and chromatic characteristics of Tempranillo, Cabernet Sauvignon and Merlot wines from DO Navarra aged in Spanish and French oak barrels. Food Chem. 2009,115, 639–649. [CrossRef] 12. Guchu, E.; Díaz-Maroto, M.C.; Pérez-Coello, M.S.; González-Viñas, M.A.; Ibáñez, M.D.C. Volatile composition and sensory characteristics of chardonnay wines treated with American and Hungarian oak chips. Food Chem. 2006,99, 350–359. [CrossRef] 13. Díaz-Maroto, M.C.; Guchu, E.; Castro-Vázquez, L.; de Torres, C.; Pérez-Coello, M.S. Aroma-active compounds of American, French, Hungarian and Russian oak woods, Studied by GC–MS and GC–O. Flavour Fragr. J. 2008,23, 93–98. [CrossRef] 14. Mosedale, J.R.; Ford, A. Variation of the flavour and extractives of european oak wood from two French forests. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1996,70, 273–287. [CrossRef]
Beverages 2018,4, 94 19 of 25 15. Prida, A.; Puech, J.-L. Influence of geographical origin and botanical species on the content of extractives in American, French, and East European oak woods. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006 ,54, 8115–8126. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 16. Martínez-Gil, A.M.; Cadahía, E.; Fernández De Simón, B.; Gutiérrez-Gamboa, G.; Nevares, I.; Alamo-Sanza, M. Quercus Humboldtii (Colombian Oak): Characterization of oak heartwood phenolic composition with respect to traditional oak woods in oenology. Ciência Técnica Vitivinícola 2017 ,32, 93–101. [CrossRef] 17. Martínez-Gil, A.; Cadahía, E.; Fernández de Simón, B.; Gutiérrez-Gamboa, G.; Nevares, I.; del Álamo-Sanza, M. Phenolic and volatile compounds in Quercus Humboldtii Bonpl. Wood: Effect of toasting with respect to oaks traditionally used in cooperage. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018. [CrossRef] 18. Singleton, V.L. Some aspects of the wooden container as a factor in wine maturation. Chem. Winemak. Adv. Chem. Ser. 1974,137, 254–277. 19. Taransaud, J. Le Livre de La Tonnellerie; La Roue àLivres Diffusion: París, France, 1976. 20. Cazenave de la Roche, A. La Tonelería En El Contexto Marítimo de La Época Del Renacimiento: Estudio de Un Cargamento de Toneles Hallado En El Pecio de Villefranche s/Mer (1516). In Actas de la XIVa Conferencia Nacional de Arqueología Argentina; Universidad Nacional de Tucumán: Rosario, Argentina, 2004; pp. 1–17. 21. Vivas, N. Manual De Tonelería: Destinado A Usuarios De Toneles; Mundi, Pre: Madrid, Spain, 2005. 22. Feuillat, F.; Keller, R. Variability of Oak Wood (Quercus Robur L., Quercus Petraea Liebl.) Anatomy relating to cask properties. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1997,48, 502–508. 23. Cadahía, E.; Fernández de Simón, B.; Poveda, P.; Sanz, M. Utilización de Quercus Pyrenaica Willd. de Castilla y León En El Envejecimiento de Vinos. Comparación Con Roble Francés y Americano; Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia: Madrid, Spain, 2008. 24. Timbal, J.; Kremer, A. Caractères Botaniques, Morphologiques et Clorologiques. In Le chêne rouge d ´ Amérique; Dremer, J.T., Le Goff, A., Nepveu, G., Eds.; INRA: París, France, 1994; pp. 45–53. 25. Fernández-Golfín, J.I.; Cadahía, E. Características Físicas y Químicas de La Madera de Roble En La Fabricación de Barricas; Gobierno de la Rioja: L. La Rioja, Spain, 1999; pp. 11–66. 26. Philp, J. Cask Quality and Warehouse Conditions. In The Science and Technology of Whiskies; Piggott, J.R., Sharp, R., Duncan, R.E.B., Eds.; Longman Scientific & Technical: Harlow, Essex, UK, 1989; pp. 264–294. 27. Fernández de Simón, B.; Sanz, M.; Cadahía, E.; Poveda, P.; Broto, M. Chemical characterization of oak heartwood from Spanish forests of Quercus Pyrenaica (Wild.). Ellagitannins, Low Molecular Weight Phenolic, and Volatile Compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006,54, 8314–8321. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 28. Fernández de Simón, B.; Cadahía, E.; Conde, E.; García-Vallejo, M.C. Evolution of phenolic compounds of Spanish oak wood during natural seasoning. First Results. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999 ,47, 1687–1694. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 29. Fernández de Simón, B.; Cadahía, E.; Conde, E.; García-Vallejo, M.C. Ellagitannins in woods of Spanish, French and American oaks. Holzforschung 1999,53, 147–150. 30. Fernández de Simón, B.; Cadahía, E.; Conde, E.; García-Vallejo, M.C. Low molecular weight phenolic compounds in Spanish oak woods. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1996,44, 1507–1511. [CrossRef] 31. Alañón, M.E.; Castro-Vázquez, L.; Díaz-Maroto, M.C.; Hermosín-Gutiérrez, I.; Gordon, M.H.; Pérez-Coello, M.S. Antioxidant capacity and phenolic composition of different woods used in cooperage. Food Chem. 2011 , 129, 1584–1590. [CrossRef] 32. Jordão, A.M.; Ricardo-Da-Silva, J.M.; Laureano, O. Ellagitannins from Portuguese Oak Wood (Quercus Pyrenaica Willd.) Used in Cooperage: Influence of geographical origin, coarseness of the grain and toasting level. Holzforschung 2007,61, 155–160. [CrossRef] 33. Castro-Vázquez, L.; Alañón, M.E.; Ricardo-Da-Silva, J.M.; Pérez-Coello, M.S.; Laureano, O. Study of phenolic potential of seasoned and toasted Portuguese wood species (Quercus Pyrenaica and Castanea Sativa). J. Int. des Sci. la Vigne du Vin 2013,47, 311–319. [CrossRef] 34. Canas, S.; Leandro, M.C.; Spranger, M.I.; Belchior, A.P. Influence of botanical species and geographical origin on the content of low molecular weight phenolic compounds of woods used in Portuguese cooperage. Holzforschung 2000,54, 255–261. [CrossRef] 35. Canas, S.; Grazina, N.; Belchior, A.P.; Spranger, M.I.; de Sousa, R.B.; Sousa, R.B.D. Modelisation of heat treatment of Portuguese oak wood (Quercus Pyrenaica L.). Analysis of the behaviour of low molecular weight phenolic compounds. Ciência Técnica Vitivinícola 2000,15, 75–94.
Beverages 2018,4, 94 20 of 25 36. Vivas, N.; Glories, Y.; Bourgeois, G.; Vitry, C. The heartwood ellagitannins of different oaks (Quercus Sp.) and chestnut species (Castanea Sativa Mill.). Quantity analysis of red wines aging in barrels. J. Sci. Tech. Tonnelerie 1996,2, 25–75. 37. Sanz, M.; Cadahía, E.; Esteruelas, E.; Muñoz, Á.M.; Fernández De Simón, B.; Hernández, T.; Estrella, I. Phenolic compounds in chestnut (Castanea Sativa Mill.) heartwood. Effect of toasting at cooperage. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010,58, 9631–9640. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 38. Viriot, C.; Scalbert, A.; Hervédu Penhoat, C.L.M.; Moutounet, M. Ellagitannins in woods of sessile oak and sweet chestnut dimerization and hydrolysis during wood ageing. Phytochemistry 1994 ,36, 1253–1260. [CrossRef] 39. Canas, S.; Leandro, M.C.; Spranger, M.I.; Belchior, A.P. Low molecular weight organic compounds of chestnut wood (Castanea Sativa L.) and corresponding aged brandies. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999 ,47, 5023–5030. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 40. Soares, B.; Garcia, R.; Freitas, A.M.C.; Cabrita, M.J. Phenolic compounds released from oak, cherry, chestnut and robinia chips into a syntethic wine: Influence of toasting level. Ciência Técnica Vitivinic 2012,27, 17–26. 41. Canas, S.; Caldeira, I.; Mateus, A.M.; Belchior, A.P.; Clímaco, M.C.; Bruno-de-Sousa, R. Effect of natural seasoning on the chemical composition of chestnut wood used for barrel making. Ciência Técnica Vitivinic 2006,21, 1–16. 42. Sanz, M.; Fernández de Simón, B.; Esteruelas, E.; Muñoz, A.M.; Cadahía, E.; Hernández, T.; Estrella, I.; Pinto, E. Effect of toasting intensity at cooperage on phenolic compounds in acacia (Robinia Pseudoacacia) heartwood. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011,59, 3135–3145. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 43. Sanz, M.; Fernández de Simón, B.; Cadahía, E.; Esteruelas, E.; Muñoz, Á.M.; Teresa Hernández, M.; Estrella, I. Polyphenolic profile as a useful tool to identify the wood used in wine aging. Anal. Chim. Acta 2012 , 732, 33–45. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 44. Sanz, M.; Cadahía, E.; Esteruelas, E.; Muñoz, M.; Fernández De Simón, B.; Hernández, T.; Estrella, I. Phenolic compounds in cherry (Prunus avium) heartwood with a view to their use in cooperage. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010,58, 4907–4914. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 45. Sanz, M.; De Simón, B.F.; Cadahía, E.; Esteruelas, E.; Muñoz, A.M.; Hernández, T.; Estrella, I.; Pinto, E. LC-DAD/ESI-MS/MS study of phenolic compounds in ash (Fraxinus Excelsior L. and F. Americana L.) heartwood. effect of toasting intensity at cooperage. J. Mass Spectrom. 2012 ,47, 905–918. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 46. Jordão, A.M.; Lozano, V.; Correia, A.C.; Ortega-Heras, M.; González-SanJosé, M.L. Comparative analysis of volatile and phenolic composition of alternative wood chips from cherry, acacia and oak for potential use in enology. BIO Web Conf. 2016,7, 02012. [CrossRef] 47. Canas, S.; Belchior, A.P.; Falcão, A.; Gonçalves, J.A.; Spranger, M.I.; Bruno-De-Sousa, R. Effect of heat treatment on the thermal and chemical mofifications of oak and chestnut wood used in brandy ageing. Ciência Técnica Vitivinic 2007,22, 5–14. 48. Madrera, R.R.; Valles, B.S.; García, Y.D.; Argüelles, P.D.V.; Lobo, A.P. Alternative woods for aging distillates -an insight into their phenolic profiles and antioxidant activities. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2010 ,19, 1129–1134. [CrossRef] 49. Sanz, M.; Fernández de Simón, B.; Esteruelas, E.; Muñoz, Á.M.; Cadahía, E.; Teresa Hernández, M.; Estrella, I.; Martinez, J. Polyphenols in red wine aged in acacia (Robinia Pseudoacacia) and oak (Quercus Petraea) wood barrels. Anal. Chim. Acta 2012,732, 83–90. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 50. Cadahía, E.; De Simón, B.F.; Vallejo, R.; Sanz, M.; Broto, M. Volatile compound evolution in Spanish oak wood (Quercus Petraea and Quercus Pyrenaica) during natural seasoning. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2007 ,58, 163–172. 51. Cadahía, E.; Fernández de Simón, B.; Jalocha, J. Volatile compounds in Spanish, French, and American oak woods after natural seasoning and toasting. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003,51, 5923–5932. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 52. Alañón, M.E.; Pérez-Coello, M.S.; Díaz-Maroto, I.J.; Martín-Alvarez, P.J.; Vila-Lameiro, P.; Díaz-Maroto, M.C. Influence of geographical location, site and silvicultural parameters, on volatile composition of Quercus Pyrenaica Willd. Wood used in wine aging. For. Ecol. Manag. 2011,262, 124–130. [CrossRef] 53. Caldeira, I.; Clímaco, M.C.; Bruno De Sousa, R.; Belchior, A.P. Volatile composition of oak and chestnut woods used in brandy ageing: Modification induced by heat treatment. J. Food Eng. 2006 ,76, 202–211. [CrossRef]
Beverages 2018,4, 94 21 of 25 54. Jordao, A.M.; Ricardo-Da-Silva, J.M.; Laureano, O. Comparison of volatile composition of cooperage oak wood of different origins (Quercus Pyrenaica vs. Quercus Alba and Quercus Petraea). Mitteilungen Klosterneubg. 2005,55, 22–31. 55. De Simon, B.F.; Esteruelas, E.; Muñoz, À.M.; Cadahía, E.; Sanz, M. Volatile compounds in acacia, chestnut, cherry, ash, and oak woods, with a view to their use in cooperage. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009 ,57, 3217–3227. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 56. Flamini, R.; Dalla Vedova, A.; Cancian, D.; Panighel, A.; De Rosso, M. GC/MS-positive ion chemical ionization and MS/MS study of volatile benzene compounds in five different woods used in barrel making. J. Mass Spectrom. 2007,42, 641–646. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 57. Fernández De Simõn, B.; Sanz, M.; Cadahía, E.; Esteruelas, E.; Muñoz, A.M. Nontargeted GC-MS approach for volatile profile of toasting in cherry, chestnut, false acacia, and ash wood. J. Mass Spectrom. 2014 , 49, 353–370. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 58. Fernández de Simón, B.; Cadahía, E.; del Álamo, M.; Nevares, I. Effect of size, seasoning and toasting in the volatile compounds in toasted oak wood and in a red wine treated with them. Anal. Chim. Acta 2010 , 660, 211–220. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 59. Fernández De Simón, B.; Muiño, I.; Cadahía, E. Characterization of volatile constituents in commercial oak wood chips. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010,58, 9587–9596. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 60. Fernández de Simón, B.; Cadahía, E.; Muiño, I.; del Álamo, M.; Nevares, I. Volatile composition of toasted oak chips and staves and of red wine aged with them. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2010,61, 157–165. 61. III-IFE (Inventario Forestal Español) (Ed.) Ministerio de Medio Ambiente; Direccíon General de Conservación de la Naturaleza: Madrid, Spain, 2002. 62. Caudullo, G.; Welk, E.; San-Miguel-Ayanz, J. Chorological Maps for the Main European Woody Species. Data Brief 2017,12, 662–666. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 63. Fernández de Simón, B.; Cadahía, E.; Conde, E.; García-Vallejo, M.C. Ellagitannins in woods of Spanish oaks. J. Sci. Tech. Tonnellerie 1998,4, 91–97. 64. Fernández de Simón, B.; Cadahía, E.; Conde, E.; García-Vallejo, M.C. Low molecular weight phenolic compounds in woods of Spanish, French and American oak. J. Sci. Tech. Tonnelerie 1996. 65. Jordão, A.M.; Ricardo-Da-Silva, J.M.; Laureano, O.; Adams, A.; Demyttenaere, J.; Verhé, R.; De Kimpe, N. Volatile composition analysis by solid-phase microextraction applied to oak wood used in cooperage (Quercus Pyrenaica and Quercus Petraea): Effect of botanical species and toasting process. J. Wood Sci. 2006 ,52, 514–521. [CrossRef] 66. Canas, S. Phenolic composition and related properties of aged wine spirits: Influence of barrel characteristics. A Review. Beverages 2017,3, 55. [CrossRef] 67. Canas, S.; Silva, V.; Belchior, A.P. Wood related chemical markers of aged wine brandies. Ciência Técnica Vitivinícola 2008,23, 45–52. 68. Caldeira, I.; Belchior, A.P.; Clímaco, M.C.; Bruno De Sousa, R. Aroma profile of Portuguese brandies aged in chestnut and oak woods. Anal. Chim. Acta 2002,458, 55–62. [CrossRef] 69. Caldeira, I.; de Sousa, R.B.; Belchior, A.P.; Climaco, M.C. A Sensory and chemical approach to the aroma of wooden agend lourinha wine brandy. Ciencia Tecnica 2008,23, 97–110. 70. Carvalho, E.; Belchior, A.P.; Costa, S.; Caldeira, I.; Tralhao, I. Incidência Da Origem e Queima Da Madeira de Carvalho (“Q. Pyrenaica,Q. Robur,Q. Sessiliflora,Q. Alba/Q. Stellata + Q. Lyrata/Q.Bicolor”) e de Castanho (“C. Sativa”) Em Características Físico-Químicas e Organolépticas de Aguardentes Lourinha Em Envelhecim. Ciência Técnica Vitivinícola 1998,13, 107–119. 71. Tavares, M.; Jordão, A.M.; Ricardo-Da-Silva, J.M. Impact of cherry, acacia and oak chips on red wine phenolic parameters and sensory profile. OENO ONE 2017,51, 329–342. [CrossRef] 72. Sánchez-Gómez, R.; Nevares, I.; Martínez-Gil, A.; del Alamo-Sanza, M. Oxygen consumption by red wines under different micro-oxygenation strategies and Q. Pyrenaica chips. Effects on color and phenolic characteristics. Beverages 2018,4, 69. [CrossRef] 73. Del Álamo, M.; Nevares, I.; Gallego, L.; Fernández de Simón, B.; Cadahía, E. Micro-oxygenation strategy depends on origin and size of oak chips or staves during accelerated red wine aging. Anal. Chim. Acta 2010 , 660, 92–101. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Beverages 2018,4, 94 22 of 25 74. Rodríguez-Bencomo, J.J.; Ortega-Heras, M.; Pérez-Magariño, S.; González-Huerta, C. Volatile compounds of red wines macerated with Spanish, American, and French oak chips. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009 ,57, 6383–6391. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 75. Gonalves, F.J.; Jordao, A.M. Changes in antioxidant activity and the proanthocyanidin fraction of red wine aged in contact with Portuguese (Quercus Pyrenaica Willd.) and American (Quercus Alba L.) oak wood chips. Ital. J. Food Sci. 2009,21, 51–64. 76. De Simón, B.F.; Cadahía, E.; Sanz, M.; Poveda, P.; Perez-Magariño, S.; Ortega-Heras, M.; González-Huerta, C. Volatile compounds and sensorial characterization of wines from four Spanish denominations of origin, aged in Spanish rebollo (Quercus Pyrenaica Willd.) oak wood barrels. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008 ,56, 9046–9055. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 77. Coninck, G.D.E.; Jordão, A.M.; Ricardo-Da-Silva, J.M.; Laureano, O. Evolution of phenolic composition and sensory properties in red wine aged in contact with Portuguese. J. Int. des Sci. de la vigne et du vin 2006 , 40, 25–34. 78. Fernández De Simón, B.; Cadahía, E.; Hernández, T.; Estrella, I. Evolution of oak-related volatile compounds in a Spanish red wine during 2 years bottled, after aging in barrels made of Spanish, French and American oak wood. Anal. Chim. Acta 2006,563, 198–203. [CrossRef] 79. Gallego, L.; Del Alamo, M.; Nevares, I.; Fernández, J.A.; De Simón, B.F.; Cadahía, E. Phenolic Compounds and Sensorial Characterization of Wines Aged with Alternative to Barrel Products Made of Spanish Oak Wood (Quercus Pyrenaica Willd.). Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2012,18, 151–165. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 80. Miranda, I.; Sousa, V.; Ferreira, J.; Pereira, H. Chemical characterization and extractives composition of heartwood and sapwood from Quercus Faginea.PLoS ONE 2017,12, 1–14. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 81. Ministerio de Medioambiente. Plan Forestal Español; Ministerio de Medioambiente: Madrid, Spain, 2002. 82. Reboredo, F.; Pais, J. Evolution of forest cover in Portugal: A review of the 12th–20th centuries. J. For. Res. 2014,25, 249–256. [CrossRef] 83. Mauri, A.; Enescu, C.M.; Houston Durrant, T.; de Rigo, D.; Caudullo, G. Quercus Frainetto in Europe: Distribution, Habitat, Usage and Threats. In European Atlas of Forest Tree Species; San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., de Rigo, D., Caudullo, G., Houston Durrant, T., Mauri, A., Eds.; Publication Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2016; pp. 1–78. 84. Madrigal-Jiménez, T.A. Fenología y Ecofisiología Del Quercus Oocarpa (Fagaceae), Cartago, Costa Rica. Rev. Biol. Trop. 1996,44, 117–123. 85. Andrés, A.M.; Luis Mario, C.C. Conservation and Sustainable Use of Oak Forests in the Conservation Corridor Guantiva-La Rusia—Iguaque, Santander and Boyac, Colombia. Colomb. For. 2010,13, 5–30. 86. Argoti, J.C.; Salido, S.; Linares-Palomino, P.J.; Ramírez, B.; Insuasty, B.; Altarejos, J. Antioxidant activity and free radical-scavenging capacity of a selection of wild-growing colombian plants. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2011 , 91, 2399–2406. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 87. González, R.E.; Baleta, L.C. Quantification and comparison of ageing markers substances of accelerated aging rums and in oak (Quercus Humboldtii Bonpland) barrels. Rev. Venez. Cienc. Tecnol. Aliment. 2010 , 1, 170–183. 88. González, R.E.; Calderón, L.S.; Cabeza, R.A. Quantification of aging markers substances in Quercus Humboldtii through high efficiency liquid chromatography. Temas Agrar. 2008,13, 56–63. [CrossRef] 89. Martínez-Gil, A.M.; del Alamo-Sanza, M.; Gutiérrez-Gamboa, G.; Moreno-Simunovic, Y.; Nevares, I. Volatile composition and sensory characteristics of Carménère wines macerating with Colombian (Quercus Humboldtii) oak chips compared to wines macerated with American (Q. Alba) and European (Q. Petraea) oak chips. Food Chem. 2018,266, 90–100. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 90. Gortzi, O.; Metaxa, X.; Mantanis, G.; Lalas, S. Effect of artificial ageing using different wood chips on the antioxidant activity, resveratrol and catechin concentration, sensory properties and colour of two greek red wines. Food Chem. 2013,141, 2887–2895. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 91. Canas, S.; Caldeira, I.; Belchior, A.P. Extraction/Oxidation kinetics of low molecular weight compounds in wine brandy resulting from different ageing technologies. Food Chem. 2013 ,138, 2460–2467. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 92. De Rosso, M.; Cancian, D.; Panighel, A.; Dalla Vedova, A.; Flamini, R. Chemical compounds released from five different woods used to make barrels for aging wines and spirits: Volatile compounds and polyphenols. Wood Sci. Technol. 2009,43, 375–385. [CrossRef]
Beverages 2018,4, 94 23 of 25 93. Peng, S.; Scalbert, A.; Monties, B. Insoluble ellagitannins in castanea sativa and quercus petraea woods. Phytochemistry 1991,30, 775–778. [CrossRef] 94. Caldeira, I.; Anjos, O.; Belchior, A.P.; Canas, S. Sensory Impact of alternative ageing technology for the production of wine brandies. Ciência Técnica Vitivinícola 2017,32, 12–22. [CrossRef] 95. Caldeira, I.; Santos, R.; Ricardo-Da-Silva, J.M.; Anjos, O.; Mira, H.; Belchior, A.P.; Canas, S. Kinetics of odorant compounds in wine brandies aged in different systems. Food Chem. 2016 ,211, 937–946. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 96. Anjos, O.; Carmona, C.; Caldeira, I.; Canas, S. Variation of extractable compounds and lignin contents in wood fragments used in the aging of wine brandies. BioResources 2013,8, 4484–4496. [CrossRef] 97. Caldeira, I.; Belchior, A.P.; Canas, S. Effect of alternative ageing systems on the wine brandy sensory profile. Ciência Técnica Vitivinícola 2013,28, 9–18. 98. Caldeira, I.; Anjos, O.; Portal, V.; Belchior, A.P.; Canas, S. Sensory and chemical modifications of wine-brandy aged with chestnut and oak wood fragments in comparison to wooden barrels. Anal. Chim. Acta 2010 , 660, 43–52. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 99. Canas, S.; Caldeira, I.; Belchior, A.P. Comparison of alternative systems for the ageing of wine brandy. Oxygenation and wood shape effect. Ciência Técnica Vitivinícola 2009,24, 91–99. 100. Canas, S.; Caldeira, I.; Belchior, A.P.; Spranger, M.I.; Clímaco, M.C.; Bruno-de-Sousa, R. Chestnut Wooden Barrels for the Ageing of Wine Spirits; OIV: París, France, 2018; pp. 1–16. 101. Canas, S.; Belchior, A.P.; Mateus, A.M.; Spranger, M.I.; Bruno-de-Sousa, R. Kinetics of impregnation/evaporation and release of phenolic compounds from wood to brandy in experimental model. Ciência Técnica Vitivinícola 2002,17, 1–14. 102. Belchior, A.P.; Caldeira, I.; Costa, S.; Lopes, C.; Tralhão, G.; Ferrão, A.F.M.; Mateus, A.M.; Carvalho, E. Evolução Das Características Fisico-Químicas e Organolépticas de Aguardentes LourinhãAo Longo de Cinco Anos de Envelhecimento Em Madeiras de Carvalho e de Castanheiro. Ciência Técnica Vitivinícola 2001 , 16, 81–94. 103. Canas, S.; Caldeira, I.; Anjos, O.; Lino, J.; Soares, A.; Pedro Belchior, A. Physicochemical and sensory evaluation of wine brandies aged using oak and chestnut wood simultaneously in wooden barrels and in stainless steel tanks with staves. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016,51, 2537–2545. [CrossRef] 104. Cerezo, A.B.; Tesfaye, W.; Torija, M.J.; Mateo, E.; García-Parrilla, M.C.; Troncoso, A.M. The phenolic composition of red wine vinegar produced in barrels made from different woods. Food Chem. 2008 , 109, 606–615. [CrossRef] 105. Callejón, R.M.; Torija, M.J.; Mas, A.; Morales, M.L.; Troncoso, A.M. Changes of volatile compounds in wine vinegars during their elaboration in barrels made from different woods. Food Chem. 2010 ,120, 561–571. [CrossRef] 106. Arfelli, G.; Sartini, E.; Corzani, C.; Fabiani, A.; Natali, N. Impact of wooden barrel storage on the volatile composition and sensorial profile of red wine. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2007,13, 293–299. [CrossRef] 107. Gambuti, A.; Capuano, R.; Lisanti, M.T.; Strollo, D.; Moio, L. Effect of aging in new oak, one-year-used oak, chestnut barrels and bottle on color, phenolics and gustative profile of three monovarietal red wines. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2010,231, 455–465. [CrossRef] 108. Alañón, M.E.; Schumacher, R.; Castro-Vázquez, L.; Díaz-Maroto, I.J.; Díaz-Maroto, M.C.; Pérez-Coello, M.S. Enological potential of chestnut wood for aging Tempranillo wines part I: Volatile compounds and sensorial properties. Food Res. Int. 2013,51, 325–334. [CrossRef] 109. Alañón, M.E.; Schumacher, R.; Castro-Vázquez, L.; Díaz-Maroto, M.C.; Hermosín-Gutiérrez, I.; Pérez-Coello, M.S. Enological potential of chestnut wood for aging Tempranillo wines part II: Phenolic compounds and chromatic characteristics. Food Res. Int. 2013,51, 536–543. [CrossRef] 110. Fernández De Simón, B.; Sanz, M.; Cadahía, E.; Martínez, J.; Esteruelas, E.; Muñoz, A.M.; De Simón, B.F.; Sanz, M.; Cadahía, E.; Martínez, J.; et al. Polyphenolic compounds as chemical markers of wine ageing in contact with cherry, chestnut, false acacia, ash and oak wood. Food Chem. 2014 ,143, 66–76. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 111. Fernández De Simón, B.; Martínez, J.; Sanz, M.; Cadahía, E.; Esteruelas, E.; Muñoz, A.M. Volatile compounds and sensorial characterisation of red wine aged in cherry, chestnut, false acacia, ash and oak wood barrels. Food Chem. 2014,147, 346–356. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Beverages 2018,4, 94 24 of 25 112. Palomero, F.; Bertani, P.; Fernández De Simón, B.; Cadahía, E.; Benito, S.; Morata, A.; Suárez-Lepe, J.A. Wood impregnation of yeast lees for winemaking. Food Chem. 2015,171, 212–223. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 113. De Rosso, M.; Panighel, A.; Dalla Vedova, A.; Stella, L.; Flamini, R. Changes in chemical composition of a red wine aged in acacia, cherry, chestnut, mulberry, and oak wood barrels. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009 , 57, 1915–1920. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 114. Keil, G.; Spavento, E.; Murace, M.; Millanes, A. The influence of natural seasoning on the concentration of eugenol, vanillin and cis and transβ -methyl- γ -octalactone extracted from French and American oak wood. For. Syst. 2011,20, 21–26. 115. Citron, G. Uso Del Legno in Enologia: Specie Botaniche Utiliz- Zate, Anatomia e Classifi Cazione. L’Informatore Agrar. 2005,59, 69–72. 116. Kozlovic, G.; Jeromel, A.; Maslov, L.; Pollnitz, A.; Orli´c, S. Use of acacia barrique barrels—Influence on the quality of malvazija from Istria wines. Food Chem. 2010,120, 698–702. [CrossRef] 117. Psarra, C.; Gortzi, O.; Makris, D.P. Kinetics of polyphenol extraction from wood chips in wine model solutions: Effect of chip amount and botanical species. J. Inst. Brew. 2015,121, 207–212. [CrossRef] 118. Alañón, M.E.; Marchante, L.; Alarcón, M.; Díaz-Maroto, I.J.; Pérez-Coello, S.; Díaz-Maroto, M.C. Fingerprints of acacia aging treatments by barrels or chips based on volatile profile, sensorial properties, and multivariate analysis. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 119. Delia, L.; Jordao, A.M.; Ricardo-Da-Silva, J.M. Influence of different wood chips species (oak, acacia and cherry) used in a short period of aging on the quality of encruzado white wines. Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg 2017,67, 84–96. 120. Cerezo, A.B.; Espartero, J.L.; Winterhalter, P.; García-Parrilla, M.C.; Troncoso, A.M. (+)-Dihydrorobinetin: A marker of vinegar aging in acacia (Robinia pseudoacacia) wood. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009 ,57, 9551–9554. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 121. Chatonnet, P.; Dubourdie, D.; Boidron, J.; Pons, M. The Origin of ethylphenols in wines. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1992,60, 165–178. [CrossRef] 122. Torija, M.-J.; Mateo, E.; Vegas, C.-A.; Jara, C.; González, Á.; Poblet, M.; Reguant, C.; Guillamon, J.-M.; Mas, A. Effect of wood type and thickness on acetification kinetics in traditional vinegar production. Int. J. Wine Res. 2009,1, 155–160. 123. Elbert, L.; Little, J. USGS Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center: Digital Representations of Tree Species Range Maps from “Atlas of United States Trees”; Elbert, L., Little, J., Eds.; U.S. Department of the Interior/U.S. Geological Survey: Lakewood, CO, USA, 2016. 124. Culleré, L.; Fernández de Simón, B.; Cadahía, E.; Ferreira, V.; Hernández-Orte, P.; Cacho, J. Characterization by gas chromatography-olfactometry of the most odor-active compounds in extracts prepared from acacia, chestnut, cherry, ash and oak woods. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2013,53, 240–248. [CrossRef] 125. Chinnici, F.; Natali, N.; Sonni, F.; Bellachioma, A.; Riponi, C. Comparative changes in color features and pigment composition of red wines aged in oak and cherry wood casks. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011 , 59, 6575–6582. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 126. Chinnici, F.; Natali, N.; Bellachioma, A.; Versari, A.; Riponi, C. Changes in phenolic composition of red wines aged in cherry wood. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2015,60, 977–984. [CrossRef] 127. Prieto, R.O.; González-Oliva, L. Lista Nacional de Plantas Invasoras y Potencialmente Invasoras En La República de Cuba. Bissea Boletín Sobre Conserv. Plantas del Jardín Botánico Nac. Cuba 2015,9, 5–90. 128. Culi¸tă, S.; Adrian, O.; Pavol Jun, E.; Peter, F. New contribution to the study of alien flora in Romania. J. Plant Dev. 2011,18, 121–134. 129. Azizian, D.; Azizian, D. Morphology and distribution of trichomes in some genera (Morus, Ficus, Broussonetia and Maclura) of Moraceae. Iran. J. Bot. 2002,9, 195–202. 130. Nepal, M.; Ferguson, C.J.; Carolyn, J. Phylogenetics of Morus (Moraceae) inferred from ITS and TrnL-TrnF sequence data. Syst. Bot. 2012,37, 442–450. [CrossRef] 131. Koek-Noorman, J.; Topper, S.M.C.; ter Welle, B.J.H. The systematic wood anatomy of the Moraceae (Urticales) V. Genera of the tribe moreae without urticaceous stamens. IAWA J. 1986,7, 175–193. 132. Watanabe, T. Substances in mulberry leaves which attract silkworm larvae (Bombyx mori L.). Nature 1958 , 182, 325–326. [CrossRef] 133. Karami, E.; Pourtahmasi, K.; Shahverdi, M. Wood anatomical structure of Morus alba L. and Morus nigra L., native to Iran. Not. Sci. Biol. 2010,2, 129–132. [CrossRef]
Beverages 2018,4, 94 25 of 25 134. Pasheva, M.; Nashar, M.; Pavlov, D.; Slavova, S.; Ivanov, D.; Ivanova, D. Antioxidant Capacity of Different Woods Traditionally Used for Coloring Hard Alcoholic Beverages in Bulgaria. Sci. Technol. 2013 ,3, 123–127. 135. Chatonnet, P.; Boidron, J.N. Influence Du Traitement Thermique Du Bois de Chine Sur Sa Composition Chimique 1 e Partie: Définition Des Parametres Thermiques de La Chauffe Des F0ts En Tonnellerie. Connaiss. Vigne Vin 1989,23, 1–11. 136. Boidron, J.N.; Chatonnet, P.; Pons, M. Influence Du Bois Sur Certaines Substances Odorantes Des Vins. Connaiss. Vigne Vin 1988,22, 275. [CrossRef] 137. Sefton, M.A.; Francis, I.L.; Pocock, K.F.; Williams, P. The Influence of natural seasoning on the concentration of eugenol, vanillin and cis and transβ -methyl- γ -octalactone extracted from French and American oak wood. Sci. Aliments 1993,13, 629–644. 138. Waterhouse, A.L.; Towey, J.P. Oak lactone isomer ratio distinguishes between wine fermented in american and french oak barrels. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1994,42, 1971–1974. [CrossRef] © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).