scieee AI-readable full text Open interactive document viewer

Influence of oxygen management on color and phenolics of red wines

Carrasco Quiroz, Marioli,Álamo Sanza, María del,Martínez Gil, Ana María,Sánchez Gómez, Rosario,Martínez Martínez, Víctor,Nevares Domínguez, Ignacio Gerardo

Abstract

Producción Científica

Full text

Citation: Carrasco-Quiroz, M.; Alamo-Sanza, M.d.; Martínez-Gil, A.M.; Sánchez-Gómez, R.; Martínez-Martínez, V.; Nevares, I. Influence of Oxygen Management on Color and Phenolics of Red Wines. Molecules 2023,28, 459. https:// doi.org/10.3390/molecules28010459 Academic Editors: Maria Bellumori and Lorenzo Cecchi Received: 17 November 2022 Revised: 28 December 2022 Accepted: 31 December 2022 Published: 3 January 2023 Copyright: © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). molecules Article Influence of Oxygen Management on Color and Phenolics of Red Wines Marioli Carrasco-Quiroz 1, Maria del Alamo-Sanza 1,* , Ana María Martínez-Gil 1, Rosario Sánchez-Gómez 1, Víctor Martínez-Martínez 2,3 and Ignacio Nevares 2,* 1Department of Analytical Chemistry, UVaMOX—Universidad de Valladolid, 34004 Palencia, Spain 2Department of Agroforestry Engineering, UVaMOX—Universidad de Valladolid, 34004 Palencia, Spain 3Faculty of Science and Technology, Isabel I University, 09003 Burgos, Spain *Correspondence: [email protected] (M.d.A.-S.); [email protected] (I.N.) Abstract: Winemaking involves contact at different stages with atmospheric oxygen, the consumption of which determines its final properties. The chemical analysis of red wines subjected to consecutive cycles of air saturation has been extensively researched; however, the capacity to consume different doses of oxygen before bottling is an aspect that has been little studied. In this work, the effect of saturation of different levels of oxygen on the final characteristics of different wines made from Tempranillo and Garnacha grape extracts was studied. For this purpose, the wines were subjected to controlled oxygen saturation levels to simulate their possible oxygenation before bottling. The only difference was the phenolic composition of grape extracts that were reconstituted under the same conditions to avoid the interferences inherent to the fermentation process and the additives added in the winery. The kinetics of oxygen consumption was then evaluated and its effect on the color, antioxidant capacity, and phenols of three different wines was analyzed. This work shows the relationship between the oxidation state of wine and changes in its chemical composition. In addition, it provides insight into the effect of oxygen consumption before bottling on the properties of wines subjected to high and single doses of oxygen. Keywords: oxygen; oxygen consumption kinetics; oxygen saturation; phenols 1. Introduction The oxygen received by a wine during its production and storage plays a fundamental role in its final characteristics. Young wines have a high content of reactive oxygen species that trigger a series of chemical reactions influencing their attributes. High levels of oxygenation can have negative effects on wine, such as oxidation of phenolic and volatile compounds [ 1 ], leading to reduced or oxidized aromas [ 2 – 5 ] and off-flavors related to aldehydes and bacterial spoilage. However, for many years the effect of adding small amounts of oxygen to wine (micro-oxygenation) has been studied, demonstrating its influence on the chemical and sensory characteristics of wine such as increased olfactory intensity, structure, and complexity in the mouth [6]. Improvements in color stability, increase in color intensity [ 2 , 7 – 12 ], and degradation of anthocyanins [ 13 ] presenting a rather unstable chemical reactivity [ 14 ], generate more stable derivative pigments after wine aging due to a series of degradation and oxidation reactions [ 15 ]. In addition, copigmentation phenomena are generated that also influence color changes during wine aging [ 16 – 18 ]. The controlled use of oxygen can increase fruity and spicy flavors and also decrease herbaceous aromas and astringency [ 10 , 19 – 21 ]. Furthermore, oxygen has an important influence on yeasts during wine fermentation. Oxygen additions have been shown to impact non-Saccharomyces yeasts, influencing higher yield and survival rates during the anaerobic stage, and affecting wine flavor and aroma [ 22 , 23 ]. In the same way, excessive exposure to oxygen could cause fermentation Molecules 2023,28, 459. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28010459 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/molecules Molecules 2023,28, 459 2 of 19 stops, causing an alteration in the aromatic quality of the wines and in their chemical components [23]. Other studies show the complexity of the processes caused by the controlled addition of oxygen in wines, much of the reactions depending on the variety, grape, and wine characteristics [ 24 – 29 ]; phenolic profile [ 30 ]; aging conditions in barrels [ 31 – 33 ] and in bottles [ 34 , 35 ]. Different authors have exposed wine to saturation cycles with air, reaching different amounts of dissolved oxygen from 6 mg/L to 7 mg/L in the first saturation [ 36 , 37 ] or between 5 and 8 mg/L with three cycles [ 38 , 39 ] or between 27 and 50 mg/L with four saturation cycles [ 40 ]. Regarding the analysis of oxygen consumption, it has been generally observed that the consumption rate after the first saturation cycle is higher in subsequent cycles [ 41 – 45 ]. Oxidized compounds formed at the first saturation are most probably less likely to consume oxygen from a following saturation [ 36 , 41 , 46 ]. It has been found that after a saturation, wine undergoes a loss of monomeric and total anthocyanins [ 37 , 46 ] as well as the production of new polymeric pigments (10–15%) directly related to oxygen consumption [ 41 ]. This loss of anthocyanins affects the chromatic characteristics of wines due to the progressive loss of pigments reflected in an increase in lightness (L*) [ 47 , 48 ]. When four saturations of a wine are performed, several authors report an increase in hue and loss of color intensity (CI) [20,37,41]. The differences reported in the various studies make it necessary to expand the information on the ability of wines to take up and consume oxygen—as well as the effect on spectral characteristics, anthocyanins, and antioxidant capacity—all under controlled conditions using a single dosage with different oxygen saturation levels in similar wines that differ only in their phenolic content. 2. Results and Discussion 2.1. Kinetics of Oxygen Consumption in Saturated Ws at Different Oxygen Levels The process of saturating samples with different levels of dissolved oxygen is complicated [ 49 ], since each sample must reach the setpoint level while ensuring that it is not oversaturated. The time required to achieve the set O max depended on the type of W and the setpoint oxygen level at saturation, varying between 5 and 20 min. The oxygen levels reached were 125 hPa, 123 hPa, and 126 hPa for W-A, W-B, and W-C, respectively, when subjected to Sat-1, 170 hPa, 166 hPa; and 166 hPa to reach Sat-2 in W-A, W-B, and W-C, respectively; 241 hPa, 255 hPa, and 239 hPa to reach Sat-3 in W-A, W-B, and W-C, respectively; and finally 295 hPa, 276 hPa, and 287 hPa to reach Sat-4 in W-A, W-B, and W-C, respectively. In other words, the samples were taken to four different oxygen levels so that the second level meant an increase of 40% with respect to the first and for the third and fourth, levels of 96% and 130% of oxygen with respect to Sat-1, respectively. These results showed that there were no significant differences in the oxygen level (O max ) reached due to the type of W coming from different red grapes for any of the saturation levels—i.e., the three Ws reach the same oxygen partial pressure when saturated to Sat-1, Sat-2, Sat-3, and Sat-4—although the TPI of W-C was approximately half that of W-A and W-B. However, it is important to note that when working with white, rosé, and red wines not all reach 100% air saturation (pO 2 /0.2095 × P atm ). Thus, previous works have found that only 86%, 82%, and 81% are reached for white, rosé, and red wines, respectively—i.e., the difference between the theoretical oxygen partial pressure and that reached by the samples is significantly lower for white wines (24 hPa), followed by rosé(30 hPa), and red wines (33 hPa) [49]. Figure 1shows the kinetics of consumption in quadruplicate of W-A and W-B of Tempranillo and W-C of Garnacha at each initial saturation level. The analysis of the curves, as described in the previous section, allowed us to establish the different parameters describing each of the kinetics. Table 1presents the results of the multiple comparison ANOVA with Tukey’s test (p< 0.05) applied to the parameters describing the consumption kinetics in the different conditions for the three types of W. On an averaged basis in the case of W-A, it was found that when saturated with high oxygen contents (up to 296 hPa corresponding to Sat-4), the consumption rate was high and after 20 days (472 h) Molecules 2023,28, 459 3 of 19 the dissolved oxygen level was the same as when saturated with Sat-3 up to 245 hPa (Figure 1a). That is, W-A samples with Sat-4 consumed 41 hPa (1.9 mg/L) more than W-A Sat-3 over the same time. At that moment, the values of cyanidin; peonidin; malvidin; antioxidant capacity; TPI; IC and the absorbances at 420, 520, and 620 were slightly higher in Sat-3 (non-significant differences), possibly because in that same time period they had consumed less oxygen. The W samples with Sat-4 ended the consumption kinetics with a lower dissolved oxygen level, 114 hPa (5.3 mg/L), than the samples that were saturated Sat-3, which ended with 121 hPa, (5.7 mg/L). This trend was also observed when the samples were brought to oxygen levels lower or equal to air: the samples saturated with air (Sat-2) and Sat-1 took 15 days (357 h) to reach the same DO level, consuming the first 42 hPa (2 mg/L) more than the saturated Sat-1. At the end of the consumption kinetics, the Sat-2 samples maintained lower levels reaching an Omin of 100 hPa (4.7 mg/L) compared to Sat-1 with an O min of 105 hPa (4.9 mg/L). Chemical analyses performed at this time showed that the delphinidin, cyanidin, petunidin, peonidin, malvidin, TPI contents, and absorbances at different wavelengths of the spectrum between 330 nm and 650 nm were higher in the Sat-2 samples, being lower in antioxidant capacity and luminosity than in the Sat-1 samples. This trend was also found after 19 days (467 h) in the samples with Sat-3 and Sat-4 of W-C, which reached the same DO level (Figure 1c). In this case, the contents of cyanidin, petunidin, peonidin, DPPH, as well as the absorbances at different wavelengths of the spectrum between 330 nm and 650 nm were higher in the samples with Sat-3 oxygen level. This did not occur in the case of the comparative Sat-1 and Sat-2. Molecules 2023, 28, 459 3 of 19 Figure 1 shows the kinetics of consumption in quadruplicate of W-A and W-B of Tempranillo and W-C of Garnacha at each initial saturation level. The analysis of the curves, as described in the previous section, allowed us to establish the different parameters describing each of the kinetics. Table 1 presents the results of the multiple comparison ANOVA with Tukey’s test (p < 0.05) applied to the parameters describing the consumption kinetics in the different conditions for the three types of W. On an averaged basis in the case of W-A, it was found that when saturated with high oxygen contents (up to 296 hPa corresponding to Sat-4), the consumption rate was high and after 20 days (472 h) the dissolved oxygen level was the same as when saturated with Sat-3 up to 245 hPa (Figure 1a). That is, W-A samples with Sat-4 consumed 41 hPa (1.9 mg/L) more than W-A Sat-3 over the same time. At that moment, the values of cyanidin; peonidin; malvidin; antioxidant capacity; TPI; IC and the absorbances at 420, 520, and 620 were slightly higher in Sat- 3 (non-significant differences), possibly because in that same time period they had consumed less oxygen. The W samples with Sat-4 ended the consumption kinetics with a lower dissolved oxygen level, 114 hPa (5.3 mg/L), than the samples that were saturated Sat-3, which ended with 121 hPa, (5.7 mg/L). This trend was also observed when the samples were brought to oxygen levels lower or equal to air: the samples saturated with air (Sat-2) and Sat-1 took 15 days (357 h) to reach the same DO level, consuming the first 42 hPa (2 mg/L) more than the saturated Sat-1. At the end of the consumption kinetics, the Sat-2 samples maintained lower levels reaching an Omin of 100 hPa (4.7 mg/L) compared to Sat-1 with an Omin of 105 hPa (4.9 mg/L). Chemical analyses performed at this time showed that the delphinidin, cyanidin, petunidin, peonidin, malvidin, TPI contents, and absorbances at different wavelengths of the spectrum between 330 nm and 650 nm were higher in the Sat-2 samples, being lower in antioxidant capacity and luminosity than in the Sat-1 samples. This trend was also found after 19 days (467 h) in the samples with Sat- 3 and Sat-4 of W-C, which reached the same DO level (Figure 1c). In this case, the contents of cyanidin, petunidin, peonidin, DPPH, as well as the absorbances at different wavelengths of the spectrum between 330 nm and 650 nm were higher in the samples with Sat- 3 oxygen level. This did not occur in the case of the comparative Sat-1 and Sat-2. (a) (b) (c) Figure 1. Oxygen consumption kinetics (a) W-A (n = 4), (b) W-B (n = 4), and (c) W-C (n = 4) for each saturation level (Sat-1: purple, Sat-2: orange, Sat-3: green, and Sat-4:blue). In the case of W-B, the above-mentioned behavior occurred after 7 days (185 h) of oxygen consumption in the case of the samples with Sat-3 and Sat-4 (Figure 1b), as opposed to the 20 days required in the case of W-A and W-C. At that time the delphinidin, cyanidin, petunidin, peonidin, malvidin, antioxidant capacity (ABTS), TPI, and absorbances at different wavelengths were found to be higher in the W-B samples with Sat-3; while the antioxidant capacity (DPPH), and the color parameters b*, a*, Cab*, and hab* were higher in the samples with Sat-4. These data tell us that the more available oxygen the samples have, the more oxygen they consume, causing the formation of new, more 85 130 175 220 265 310 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Oxygen partial pressure (hPa) Time (h) W-A 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Time (h) W-B 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Time (h) W-C Sat-1 Sat-2 Sat-3 Sat-4 Figure 1. Oxygen consumption kinetics ( a ) W-A (n= 4), ( b ) W-B (n= 4), and ( c ) W-C (n= 4) for each saturation level (Sat-1: purple, Sat-2: orange, Sat-3: green, and Sat-4:blue). In the case of W-B, the above-mentioned behavior occurred after 7 days (185 h) of oxygen consumption in the case of the samples with Sat-3 and Sat-4 (Figure 1b), as opposed to the 20 days required in the case of W-A and W-C. At that time the delphinidin, cyanidin, petunidin, peonidin, malvidin, antioxidant capacity (ABTS), TPI, and absorbances at different wavelengths were found to be higher in the W-B samples with Sat-3; while the antioxidant capacity (DPPH), and the color parameters b*, a*, Cab*, and hab* were higher in the samples with Sat-4. These data tell us that the more available oxygen the samples have, the more oxygen they consume, causing the formation of new, more oxidizable compounds, such as aldehydes, mainly acetaldehyde which plays an important role in oxidation [ 50 ]. This was very evident in W-A, and not related to the initial content in total phenols, which was very similar in W-A and W-B (TPI of 34.8 and 34.5, respectively) and significantly lower than W-C (TPI of 16.3). This information corroborates what has been indicated in other studies [ 51 , 52 ] where both white and red wines were shown to be capable of consuming similar levels of oxygen. However, these works do not agree with what was observed by other researchers [ 53 ] who concluded that red wines could consume more oxygen than whites. Although one might think of the influence of the metals iron (Fe) and copper (Cu), Molecules 2023,28, 459 4 of 19 as they participate in the interaction of polyphenols with oxygen [ 54 , 55 ], in the present work the content of these metals in the three Ws is the same. However, it did relate to changes in the level of phenols (start and end of oxygen consumption) since they presented a greater loss of TPI at the end of oxygen consumption in the case of the W-A samples with Sat-4 compared to the samples maintained in an inert atmosphere (Sat-0, anoxia). Table 1. ( a ) W-A, W-B, and W-C parameters at the four oxygen saturation levels (Sat-1, Sat-2, Sat-3, and Sat-4). ( b ) W-A, W-B, and W-C parameters at the four oxygen saturation levels (Sat-1, Sat-2, Sat-3, and Sat-4). (a) Saturation Level Omax Omin ∆Omax_min Oint O90 ∆O90_10 Amax_min AOmax_min W-A Sat-1 125 ±7.64 a 106 ±7.59 a 18.9 ±5.12 a 115 ±7.17 a 123 ±7.60 a 14.8 ±4.20 a 52,544 ±3208 a 2430 ±763 a Sat-2 170 ±0.00 a 100 ±6.08 a 69.3 ±6.08 ab 135 ±3.04 ab 162 ±0.97 a 54.8 ±4.57 ab 73,727 ±3333 a 8488 ±964 ab Sat-3 241 ±12.9 b 121 ±14.0 a 120 ±12.7 b 181 ±11.9 bc 227 ±11.7 b 94.0 ±9.46 b 108,585 ±7047 b 13,841 ±2922 b Sat-4 296 ±15.7 b 113 ±4.42 a 183 ±13.2 c 205 ±9.50 c 276 ±13.9 b 144 ±9.27 c 129,133 ±4683 b 24,753 ±1237 c W-B Sat-1 123 ±8.92 a 101 ±8.93 a 16.5 ±6.43 a 112 ±6.91 a 120 ±8.34 a 12.8 ±5.16 a 87,881 ±5116 a 2111 ±1171 a Sat-2 166 ±0.00 ab 105 ±5.24 a 61.3 ±5.24 ab 136 ±2.62 ab 160 ±0.50 ab 48.6 ±4.06 ab 93,639 ±4316 ab 8882 ±1211 ab Sat-3 229 ±22.0 bc 111 ±3.45 a 118 ±19.7 bc 170 ±12.3 bc 215 ±17.0 bc 92.1 ±12.5 bc 117,120 ±4988 bc 18,030 ±2315 bc Sat-4 277 ±12.0 c 109 ±4.39 a 169 ±8.08 c 193 ±8.07 c 260 ±11.1 c 134 ±6.40 c 129,846 ±5545 c 22,466 ±1490 c W-C Sat-1 126 ±7.67 a 116 ±8.62 a 10.1 ±1.19 a 121 ±8.14 a 125 ±7.79 a 7.70 ±1.02 a 43,575 ±3335 a 1004 ±319 a Sat-2 166 ±0.00 a 119 ±5.89 a 47.1 ±5.89 b 142 ±2.94 ab 161 ±0.56 a 37.4 ±4.66 b 78,183 ±2677 a 4979 ±1272 ab Sat-3 240 ±12.8 b 135 ±14.8 a 105 ±2.07 c 187 ±13.8 bc 228 ±13.4 b 82.7 ±1.49 c 130,410 ±13,035 b 12,003 ±1541 b Sat-4 296 ±7.81 c 129 ±5.90 a 167 ±5.56 d 213 ±6.34 c 278 ±8.53 b 133 ±5.45 d 161,098 ±8410 b 22,971 ±2900 c (b) Saturation Level A090_10 tOmin tO_90 tR_min Rmax Rmedio Vcons Vcons10% W-A Sat-1 1667 ±411 a 434 ±34.4 a 17.6 ±4.46 b 254 ±97.6 a 0.91 ±0.26 a 254 ±138 a 0.04 ±0.01 a 0.12 ±0.01 a Sat-2 5095 ±703 ab 639 ±7.78 a 4.19 ±0.58 a 19.3 ±6.78 a 19.3 ±0.43 a 19.3 ±9.58 a 0.11 ±0.01 ab 1.81 ±0.47 a Sat-3 6808 ±3511 ab 620 ±232 a 0.16 ±0.00 a 2.39 ±0.50 a 90.2 ±15.6 b 2.39 ±0.71 ab 0.18 ±0.03 b 88.8 ±15.3 b Sat-4 13,449 ±1142 c 906 ±10.1 a 12.3 ±0.48 ab 0.35 ±0.29 a 27.0 ±9.52 a 0.35 ±0.40 b 0.20 ±0.01 b 1.68 ±0.38 a W-B Sat-1 2486 ±2081 a 382 ±103 a 17.4 ±5.54 a 185 ±114 a 0.93 ±0.15 a 185 ±161 a 0.04 ±0.01 a 0.10 ±0.03 a Sat-2 5520 ±1021 ab 727 ±75.4 ab 8.75 ±2.26 a 45.4 ±33.0 a 1.07 ±0.14 a 45.4 ±46.7 ab 0.09 ±0.02 ab 0.76 ±0.21 a Sat-3 10,924 ±1398 ab 806 ±59.8 ab 11.1 ±1.45 a 1.19 ±0.14 a 20.0 ±11.3 a 1.19 ±0.20 bc 0.15 ±0.03 bc 1.04 ±0.28 a Sat-4 13,029 ±1554 b 909 ±58.1 b 0.60 ±0.15 a 0.02 ±0.00 a 33.7 ±7.59 a 0.02 ±0.00 c 0.19 ±0.01 c 31.3 ±10.6 b W-C Sat-1 737 ±306 a 312 ±95.1 a 15.6 ±4.47 b 105 ±37.5 a 0.91 ±0.26 a 105 ±53.1 a 0.03 ±0.01 a 0.08 ±0.03 a Sat-2 3061 ±836 a 520 ±96.0 ab 5.76 ±1.30 ab 112 ±0.58 a 1.21 ±0.40 a 112 ±0.82 a 0.09 ±0.01 ab 0.84 ±0.10 a Sat-3 7253 ±1089 ab 736 ±101 ab 0.31 ±0.16 a 499 ±93.9 b 61.2 ±11.3 b 499 ±133 ab 0.14 ±0.02 b 22.3 ±7.91 c Sat-4 13,731 ±1825 b 939 ±121 b 1.73 ±0.00 a 0.09 ±0.00 a 17.6 ±4.21 a 0.09 ±0.00 b 0.18 ±0.03 b 9.03 ±2.84 b ( a ) O max : maximum/initial oxygen value (hPa); O min : minimum/residual oxygen value (hPa); ∆ O max_min : total oxygen consumed (hPa); O int : oxygen value when half of the total consumption time has elapsed (hPa); O 90 : oxygen representing 90% of the range between the maximum and minimum values, i.e., when the first 10% of total oxygen (hPa) had been consumed; ∆ O 90_10 : variation between 90% and 10% of oxygen (hPa); A max_min : area under the oxygen consumption curve (hPa); AO max_min : area under the oxygen consumption curve between maximum and minimum oxygen (hPa). For the same row, different letters indicate significifferences between the different saturation levels for W-A, W-B, and W-C, according to the Tukey’s test (p< 0.05). ( b ) ∆ O 90_10 : variation between 90% and 10% of oxygen consumed (hPa); t Omin : time in hours that it took to consume all the oxygen (h); t 0_90 : time it took to reach O 90 (h); t R_min : time it took to reach the minimum oxygen consumption rate (h); R max : rate of oxygen consumption (hPa/h); R mean : the area divided by the time it took to consume; V cons : rate of consumption of ∆ O max_min (hPa/h); V cons10% : rate of consumption to consume the first 10% of oxygen consumed (O 90 ) (hPa/h). For the same row, different letters indicate significant differences between the different saturation levels for W-A, W-B, and W-C, according to the Tukey’s test (p< 0.05). Molecules 2023,28, 459 5 of 19 The analysis of the amount of oxygen consumed by the different samples indicates that, on average, all the samples consumed more oxygen as more was provided. Thus, when saturated at Sat-1 (5.8 mg/L), they consumed 12% of the dosed oxygen (0.7 mg/L); while, if saturated with 7.8 mg/L, they consumed 35% (2.76 mg/L), and when given a single dose of 11.5 mg/L, they were observed to consume 5.33 mg/L, 46% of the available oxygen, and at the highest dose of 13.4 mg/L they consumed 60% of that available (8 mg/L). Specifically, W-A consumed 0.89 mg/L, 3.22 mg/L, 5.61 mg/L, and 8.5 mg/L of oxygen after being subjected to Sat-1, Sat-2, Sat-3, and Sat-4, respectively; which meant a consumption of 15%, 41%, 50%, and 62% of all the oxygen available to them at each level. In the case of W-B the oxygen consumption was of the same order: 0.75 mg/L, 2.85 mg/L, 5.51 mg/L, and 7.85 mg/L after being subjected to the different saturation levels; which meant a consumption of 13%, 37%, 46%, and 61% of all the oxygen available at each level. In all the described cases of W-A and W-B—except in the Sat-4 samples—the oxygen consumption was significantly higher than that found for the W-C samples, with a consumption of 0.47 mg/L, 2.20 mg/L, 4.86 mg/L, and 7.80 mg/L of oxygen after being subjected to the different saturation levels, which meant a consumption of 8%, 28%, 44%, and 58% of all the oxygen available at each level (Figure 2). Molecules 2023, 28, 459 4 of 19 oxidizable compounds, such as aldehydes, mainly acetaldehyde which plays an important role in oxidation [50]. This was very evident in W-A, and not related to the initial content in total phenols, which was very similar in W-A and W-B (TPI of 34.8 and 34.5, respectively) and significantly lower than W-C (TPI of 16.3). This information corroborates what has been indicated in other studies [51,52] where both white and red wines were shown to be capable of consuming similar levels of oxygen. However, these works do not agree with what was observed by other researchers [53] who concluded that red wines could consume more oxygen than whites. Although one might think of the influence of the metals iron (Fe) and copper (Cu), as they participate in the interaction of polyphenols with oxygen [54,55], in the present work the content of these metals in the three Ws is the same. However, it did relate to changes in the level of phenols (start and end of oxygen consumption) since they presented a greater loss of TPI at the end of oxygen consumption in the case of the W-A samples with Sat-4 compared to the samples maintained in an inert atmosphere (Sat-0, anoxia). The analysis of the amount of oxygen consumed by the different samples indicates that, on average, all the samples consumed more oxygen as more was provided. Thus, when saturated at Sat-1 (5.8 mg/L), they consumed 12% of the dosed oxygen (0.7 mg/L); while, if saturated with 7.8 mg/L, they consumed 35% (2.76 mg/L), and when given a single dose of 11.5 mg/L, they were observed to consume 5.33 mg/L, 46% of the available oxygen, and at the highest dose of 13.4 mg/L they consumed 60% of that available (8 mg/L). Specifically, W-A consumed 0.89 mg/L, 3.22 mg/L, 5.61 mg/L, and 8.5 mg/L of oxygen after being subjected to Sat-1, Sat-2, Sat-3, and Sat-4, respectively; which meant a consumption of 15%, 41%, 50%, and 62% of all the oxygen available to them at each level. In the case of W-B the oxygen consumption was of the same order: 0.75 mg/L, 2.85 mg/L, 5.51 mg/L, and 7.85 mg/L after being subjected to the different saturation levels; which meant a consumption of 13%, 37%, 46%, and 61% of all the oxygen available at each level. In all the described cases of W-A and W-B—except in the Sat-4 samples—the oxygen consumption was significantly higher than that found for the W-C samples, with a consumption of 0.47 mg/L, 2.20 mg/L, 4.86 mg/L, and 7.80 mg/L of oxygen after being subjected to the different saturation levels, which meant a consumption of 8%, 28%, 44%, and 58% of all the oxygen available at each level (Figure 2). Figure 2. Dissolved oxygen level (mg/L) consumed (c) and remaining (r) (: dosed oxygen;  oxygen consumed; : remaining oxygen) (Sat-1: purple, Sat-2: orange, Sat-3: green, and Sat-4:blue). For each wine, different letters indicate significant differences among different saturation levels (α < 0.05), lower case letters for the oxygen dose, capital letters for oxygen consumed and Greek letters for oxygen remaining level. These results indicate that when the samples were taken to an oxygen level below saturation with air (Sat-1), which could simulate a racking process at 16 °C, they did not consume all the available oxygen, leaving a very similar dissolved oxygen remnant in all the Ws (about 5.12 mg/L). The same occurred when the samples were taken to the Sat-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 W-A W-B W-C Dissolved oxygen (mg/L) Sat 1 Sat 1c Sat 1r Sat 2 Sat 2c Sat 2r Sat 3 Sat 3c Sat 3r Sat 4 Sat 4c Sat 4r a α b b a ab bc c α αα α ααα A a AB B C A AB BC C αα αa A a c b B C D α Figure 2. Dissolved oxygen level (mg/L) consumed (c) and remaining (r) ( Molecules 2023, 28, 459 4 of 19 oxidizable compounds, such as aldehydes, mainly acetaldehyde which plays an important role in oxidation [50]. This was very evident in W-A, and not related to the initial content in total phenols, which was very similar in W-A and W-B (TPI of 34.8 and 34.5, respectively) and significantly lower than W-C (TPI of 16.3). This information corroborates what has been indicated in other studies [51,52] where both white and red wines were shown to be capable of consuming similar levels of oxygen. However, these works do not agree with what was observed by other researchers [53] who concluded that red wines could consume more oxygen than whites. Although one might think of the influence of the metals iron (Fe) and copper (Cu), as they participate in the interaction of polyphenols with oxygen [54,55], in the present work the content of these metals in the three Ws is the same. However, it did relate to changes in the level of phenols (start and end of oxygen consumption) since they presented a greater loss of TPI at the end of oxygen consumption in the case of the W-A samples with Sat-4 compared to the samples maintained in an inert atmosphere (Sat-0, anoxia). The analysis of the amount of oxygen consumed by the different samples indicates that, on average, all the samples consumed more oxygen as more was provided. Thus, when saturated at Sat-1 (5.8 mg/L), they consumed 12% of the dosed oxygen (0.7 mg/L); while, if saturated with 7.8 mg/L, they consumed 35% (2.76 mg/L), and when given a single dose of 11.5 mg/L, they were observed to consume 5.33 mg/L, 46% of the available oxygen, and at the highest dose of 13.4 mg/L they consumed 60% of that available (8 mg/L). Specifically, W-A consumed 0.89 mg/L, 3.22 mg/L, 5.61 mg/L, and 8.5 mg/L of oxygen after being subjected to Sat-1, Sat-2, Sat-3, and Sat-4, respectively; which meant a consumption of 15%, 41%, 50%, and 62% of all the oxygen available to them at each level. In the case of W-B the oxygen consumption was of the same order: 0.75 mg/L, 2.85 mg/L, 5.51 mg/L, and 7.85 mg/L after being subjected to the different saturation levels; which meant a consumption of 13%, 37%, 46%, and 61% of all the oxygen available at each level. In all the described cases of W-A and W-B—except in the Sat-4 samples—the oxygen consumption was significantly higher than that found for the W-C samples, with a consumption of 0.47 mg/L, 2.20 mg/L, 4.86 mg/L, and 7.80 mg/L of oxygen after being subjected to the different saturation levels, which meant a consumption of 8%, 28%, 44%, and 58% of all the oxygen available at each level (Figure 2). Figure 2. Dissolved oxygen level (mg/L) consumed (c) and remaining (r) (: dosed oxygen;  oxygen consumed; : remaining oxygen) (Sat-1: purple, Sat-2: orange, Sat-3: green, and Sat-4:blue). For each wine, different letters indicate significant differences among different saturation levels (α < 0.05), lower case letters for the oxygen dose, capital letters for oxygen consumed and Greek letters for oxygen remaining level. These results indicate that when the samples were taken to an oxygen level below saturation with air (Sat-1), which could simulate a racking process at 16 °C, they did not consume all the available oxygen, leaving a very similar dissolved oxygen remnant in all the Ws (about 5.12 mg/L). The same occurred when the samples were taken to the Sat-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 W-A W-B W-C Dissolved oxygen (mg/L) Sat 1 Sat 1c Sat 1r Sat 2 Sat 2c Sat 2r Sat 3 Sat 3c Sat 3r Sat 4 Sat 4c Sat 4r a α b b a ab bc c α αα α ααα A a AB B C A AB BC C αα αa A a c b B C D α : dosed oxygen; Molecules 2023, 28, 459 4 of 19 oxidizable compounds, such as aldehydes, mainly acetaldehyde which plays an important role in oxidation [50]. This was very evident in W-A, and not related to the initial content in total phenols, which was very similar in W-A and W-B (TPI of 34.8 and 34.5, respectively) and significantly lower than W-C (TPI of 16.3). This information corroborates what has been indicated in other studies [51,52] where both white and red wines were shown to be capable of consuming similar levels of oxygen. However, these works do not agree with what was observed by other researchers [53] who concluded that red wines could consume more oxygen than whites. Although one might think of the influence of the metals iron (Fe) and copper (Cu), as they participate in the interaction of polyphenols with oxygen [54,55], in the present work the content of these metals in the three Ws is the same. However, it did relate to changes in the level of phenols (start and end of oxygen consumption) since they presented a greater loss of TPI at the end of oxygen consumption in the case of the W-A samples with Sat-4 compared to the samples maintained in an inert atmosphere (Sat-0, anoxia). The analysis of the amount of oxygen consumed by the different samples indicates that, on average, all the samples consumed more oxygen as more was provided. Thus, when saturated at Sat-1 (5.8 mg/L), they consumed 12% of the dosed oxygen (0.7 mg/L); while, if saturated with 7.8 mg/L, they consumed 35% (2.76 mg/L), and when given a single dose of 11.5 mg/L, they were observed to consume 5.33 mg/L, 46% of the available oxygen, and at the highest dose of 13.4 mg/L they consumed 60% of that available (8 mg/L). Specifically, W-A consumed 0.89 mg/L, 3.22 mg/L, 5.61 mg/L, and 8.5 mg/L of oxygen after being subjected to Sat-1, Sat-2, Sat-3, and Sat-4, respectively; which meant a consumption of 15%, 41%, 50%, and 62% of all the oxygen available to them at each level. In the case of W-B the oxygen consumption was of the same order: 0.75 mg/L, 2.85 mg/L, 5.51 mg/L, and 7.85 mg/L after being subjected to the different saturation levels; which meant a consumption of 13%, 37%, 46%, and 61% of all the oxygen available at each level. In all the described cases of W-A and W-B—except in the Sat-4 samples—the oxygen consumption was significantly higher than that found for the W-C samples, with a consumption of 0.47 mg/L, 2.20 mg/L, 4.86 mg/L, and 7.80 mg/L of oxygen after being subjected to the different saturation levels, which meant a consumption of 8%, 28%, 44%, and 58% of all the oxygen available at each level (Figure 2). Figure 2. Dissolved oxygen level (mg/L) consumed (c) and remaining (r) (: dosed oxygen;  oxygen consumed; : remaining oxygen) (Sat-1: purple, Sat-2: orange, Sat-3: green, and Sat-4:blue). For each wine, different letters indicate significant differences among different saturation levels (α < 0.05), lower case letters for the oxygen dose, capital letters for oxygen consumed and Greek letters for oxygen remaining level. These results indicate that when the samples were taken to an oxygen level below saturation with air (Sat-1), which could simulate a racking process at 16 °C, they did not consume all the available oxygen, leaving a very similar dissolved oxygen remnant in all the Ws (about 5.12 mg/L). The same occurred when the samples were taken to the Sat-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 W-A W-B W-C Dissolved oxygen (mg/L) Sat 1 Sat 1c Sat 1r Sat 2 Sat 2c Sat 2r Sat 3 Sat 3c Sat 3r Sat 4 Sat 4c Sat 4r a α b b a ab bc c α αα α ααα A a AB B C A AB BC C αα αa A a c b B C D α oxygen consumed; Molecules 2023, 28, 459 4 of 19 oxidizable compounds, such as aldehydes, mainly acetaldehyde which plays an important role in oxidation [50]. This was very evident in W-A, and not related to the initial content in total phenols, which was very similar in W-A and W-B (TPI of 34.8 and 34.5, respectively) and significantly lower than W-C (TPI of 16.3). This information corroborates what has been indicated in other studies [51,52] where both white and red wines were shown to be capable of consuming similar levels of oxygen. However, these works do not agree with what was observed by other researchers [53] who concluded that red wines could consume more oxygen than whites. Although one might think of the influence of the metals iron (Fe) and copper (Cu), as they participate in the interaction of polyphenols with oxygen [54,55], in the present work the content of these metals in the three Ws is the same. However, it did relate to changes in the level of phenols (start and end of oxygen consumption) since they presented a greater loss of TPI at the end of oxygen consumption in the case of the W-A samples with Sat-4 compared to the samples maintained in an inert atmosphere (Sat-0, anoxia). The analysis of the amount of oxygen consumed by the different samples indicates that, on average, all the samples consumed more oxygen as more was provided. Thus, when saturated at Sat-1 (5.8 mg/L), they consumed 12% of the dosed oxygen (0.7 mg/L); while, if saturated with 7.8 mg/L, they consumed 35% (2.76 mg/L), and when given a single dose of 11.5 mg/L, they were observed to consume 5.33 mg/L, 46% of the available oxygen, and at the highest dose of 13.4 mg/L they consumed 60% of that available (8 mg/L). Specifically, W-A consumed 0.89 mg/L, 3.22 mg/L, 5.61 mg/L, and 8.5 mg/L of oxygen after being subjected to Sat-1, Sat-2, Sat-3, and Sat-4, respectively; which meant a consumption of 15%, 41%, 50%, and 62% of all the oxygen available to them at each level. In the case of W-B the oxygen consumption was of the same order: 0.75 mg/L, 2.85 mg/L, 5.51 mg/L, and 7.85 mg/L after being subjected to the different saturation levels; which meant a consumption of 13%, 37%, 46%, and 61% of all the oxygen available at each level. In all the described cases of W-A and W-B—except in the Sat-4 samples—the oxygen consumption was significantly higher than that found for the W-C samples, with a consumption of 0.47 mg/L, 2.20 mg/L, 4.86 mg/L, and 7.80 mg/L of oxygen after being subjected to the different saturation levels, which meant a consumption of 8%, 28%, 44%, and 58% of all the oxygen available at each level (Figure 2). Figure 2. Dissolved oxygen level (mg/L) consumed (c) and remaining (r) (: dosed oxygen;  oxygen consumed; : remaining oxygen) (Sat-1: purple, Sat-2: orange, Sat-3: green, and Sat-4:blue). For each wine, different letters indicate significant differences among different saturation levels (α < 0.05), lower case letters for the oxygen dose, capital letters for oxygen consumed and Greek letters for oxygen remaining level. These results indicate that when the samples were taken to an oxygen level below saturation with air (Sat-1), which could simulate a racking process at 16 °C, they did not consume all the available oxygen, leaving a very similar dissolved oxygen remnant in all the Ws (about 5.12 mg/L). The same occurred when the samples were taken to the Sat-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 W-A W-B W-C Dissolved oxygen (mg/L) Sat 1 Sat 1c Sat 1r Sat 2 Sat 2c Sat 2r Sat 3 Sat 3c Sat 3r Sat 4 Sat 4c Sat 4r a α b b a ab bc c α αα α ααα A a AB B C A AB BC C αα αa A a c b B C D α : remaining oxygen) (Sat-1: purple, Sat-2: orange, Sat-3: green, and Sat- 4:blue). For each wine, different letters indicate significant differences among different saturation levels ( α < 0.05), lower case letters for the oxygen dose, capital letters for oxygen consumed and Greek letters for oxygen remaining level. These results indicate that when the samples were taken to an oxygen level below saturation with air (Sat-1), which could simulate a racking process at 16 ◦ C, they did not consume all the available oxygen, leaving a very similar dissolved oxygen remnant in all the Ws (about 5.12 mg/L). The same occurred when the samples were taken to the Sat-2 level, in which a dissolved oxygen remnant of 5.06 mg/L was left, somewhat higher when taking them to the Sat-3 level (6.12 mg/L) and of the same order as those saturated at Sat-4 (6.12 mg/L). That is, when the samples were subjected to saturation levels with medium, high, and very high oxygen, they consumed significantly higher amounts according to the increase in available oxygen, but in all cases the remaining oxygen not consumed was very similar (Figure 2). Therefore, compounds other than phenolics play an important role in the depletion of available oxygen observed in commercial red wines [49]. Analyzing the rate of oxygen consumption, it was found that it varied according to the type of W and the level of dissolved oxygen reached at saturation (O max ) (Figure 3). The more oxygen the samples had available, the higher the rate of consumption of available oxygen until O min was reached, this being especially relevant in the first few hours (zoom Figure 3). These results confirm what was observed by Picariello et al., 2020 [ 44 ], who described a rapid oxygen consumption over the first day after saturation, corroborating what was described by Ribéreau-Gayon, 1933 [ 56 ], who for the first time showed an initial Molecules 2023,28, 459 6 of 19 rapid consumption attributed to Fe(II) oxidation and later corroborated by Danilewicz, 2013 [57]. Molecules 2023, 28, 459 5 of 19 level, in which a dissolved oxygen remnant of 5.06 mg/L was left, somewhat higher when taking them to the Sat-3 level (6.12 mg/L) and of the same order as those saturated at Sat- 4 (6.12 mg/L). That is, when the samples were subjected to saturation levels with medium, high, and very high oxygen, they consumed significantly higher amounts according to the increase in available oxygen, but in all cases the remaining oxygen not consumed was very similar (Figure 2). Therefore, compounds other than phenolics play an important role in the depletion of available oxygen observed in commercial red wines [49]. Analyzing the rate of oxygen consumption, it was found that it varied according to the type of W and the level of dissolved oxygen reached at saturation (Omax) (Figure 3). The more oxygen the samples had available, the higher the rate of consumption of available oxygen until Omin was reached, this being especially relevant in the first few hours (zoom Figure 3). These results confirm what was observed by Picariello et al., 2020 [44], who described a rapid oxygen consumption over the first day after saturation, corroborating what was described by Ribéreau-Gayon, 1933 [56], who for the first time showed an initial rapid consumption attributed to Fe(II) oxidation and later corroborated by Danilewicz, 2013 [57]. Figure 3. Oxygen consumption rate (Sat-1: purple, Sat-2: orange, Sat-3: green, and Sat-4:blue). Table 1b shows that for all three Ws the initial consumption rate was higher in the samples with higher oxygen levels (Sat-3 and Sat-4). When samples were saturated with oxygen levels equal to or lower than air, their consumption rate was significantly lower (Figure 3), with a maximum oxygen consumption of 2 hPa/h (0.1 mg/L·h) observed in W- A during the first 15 h. When samples were saturated with oxygen levels lower than what was present in air, oxygen was consumed very slowly (below 0.15 hPa/h in the first few hours, zoom Figure 3) and after 15 days the rate of oxygen consumption stabilized at 0.05 hPa/h (0.002 mg/L·h) in all samples analyzed, regardless of their nature. In the case of saturating the samples with the Sat-4 level, in the first 3 h the consumption rate dropped below 0.23 mg/L·h (5 hPa/h), while the samples with Sat-3 level needed twice as long (7 h) to reach the same consumption rate of 5 hPa/h (Figure 3). 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Oxygen consumption rate (hPa/h) time (h) W-A Sat-1 W-A Sat-2 W-A Sat-3 W-A Sat-4 W-B Sat-1 W-B Sat-2 W-B Sat-3 W-B Sat-4 W-C Sat-1 W-C Sat-2 W-C Sat-3 W-C Sat-4 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 5 10 15 20 25 Figure 3. Oxygen consumption rate (Sat-1: purple, Sat-2: orange, Sat-3: green, and Sat-4:blue). Table 1b shows that for all three Ws the initial consumption rate was higher in the samples with higher oxygen levels (Sat-3 and Sat-4). When samples were saturated with oxygen levels equal to or lower than air, their consumption rate was significantly lower (Figure 3), with a maximum oxygen consumption of 2 hPa/h (0.1 mg/L · h) observed in W-A during the first 15 h. When samples were saturated with oxygen levels lower than what was present in air, oxygen was consumed very slowly (below 0.15 hPa/h in the first few hours, zoom Figure 3) and after 15 days the rate of oxygen consumption stabilized at 0.05 hPa/h (0.002 mg/L · h) in all samples analyzed, regardless of their nature. In the case of saturating the samples with the Sat-4 level, in the first 3 h the consumption rate dropped below 0.23 mg/L · h (5 hPa/h), while the samples with Sat-3 level needed twice as long (7 h) to reach the same consumption rate of 5 hPa/h (Figure 3). When samples were saturated with oxygen levels lower than what was present in air, oxygen was consumed very slowly (below 0.15 hPa/h in the first few hours, zoom Figure 3) and after 15 days the rate of oxygen consumption stabilized at 0.05 hPa/h (0.002 mg/L · h) in all samples analyzed, regardless of their nature. In the case of saturating the samples with the Sat-4 level, in the first 3 h the consumption rate dropped below 0.23 mg/L · h (5 hPa/h), while the samples with Sat-3 level needed twice as long (7 h) to reach the same consumption rate of 5 hPa/h (Figure 3). It was observed that, after 15 h, oxygen consumption slowed down in all cases, and as can be seen in Figure 3, all samples maintained an oxygen consumption rate according to the saturation level, with the highest rate for those saturated with Sat-4, followed by Sat-3, Sat-2, and finally Sat-1 until the consumption kinetics ended and Omin was reached. Similar behavior was observed with the parameters related to the area under the consumption curve, with a greater area under the curve, the higher the level of oxygen in saturation, as reflected in the three parameters A max_min , AO max_min , and AO 90_10 , which presented statistically significant differences for all Ws with Sat-1 and Sat-4. However, no statistically significant differences were observed in the minimum residual oxygen level (O min ) attained by the W samples with each of the different saturation levels reached, but yes in the time required for the samples to reach Molecules 2023,28, 459 7 of 19 that level of dissolved oxygen (t O_min ) in W-B and W-C when subjected to Sat-1 and Sat-4 (Table 1b). These results indicated that the samples consumed all the available oxygen quickly, developing more reactions with oxygen by generating highly oxidizable compounds. This may be due to the reactions that occur once oxygen is reduced to hydrogen peroxide [ 58 ] with the Fenton reaction [ 59 ]. This peroxide can react with ferrous or cuprous ions and form hydroxyl radicals capable of oxidizing ethanol to acetaldehyde [ 54 , 60 ], which reacts with numerous compounds, such as anthocyanins generating more stable and complex phenolic compounds [ 61 ]. However, in the case of having low oxygen levels, the oxidation products are less oxidizable and thus the rate of consumption is reduced more rapidly, as seen in the W-C samples with Sat-3 and Sat-4. Since W-C had a lower TPI content, this behavior may be due to the lower content of phenolic compounds which are the primary substrates for oxidation [ 26 , 58 , 62 , 63 ]. These results have been described by Picariello et al., 2017 [ 64 ], showing a direct connection between the anthocyanin/tannin ratio, red wine oxygenation, and the reactions occurring in the wine. The present work was developed under the conditions of an aging room (16 ± 0.2 ◦ C), which influenced the rate of oxygen consumption. Moreover, as described in the first section, although initially the samples subjected to the four saturation levels reached different levels of dissolved oxygen (O max ), it was found that after 24 h consuming oxygen at different rates, all of them reached a rate below 2.5 hPa/h. The consumption rate is affected by the temperature at which the consumption kinetics develops, in this case at 16 ◦ C, so when the kinetics develops at 35 ◦ C, the rate is between 3 and 6 hPa/h after saturation with air [ 65 ]; while at Sat-2, corresponding to a saturation of 7.8 mg/L O 2 (similar saturation to air), the rate is between 1 and 2 hPa/h. Therefore, regardless of the type of sample analyzed, at 16 ◦ C oxygen consumption and thus the evolution caused by high oxygen levels slows down. Grape variety plays a very important role in the oxidability of wines, [ 66 ]. It has been shown that the rate of oxygen consumption depends on wine composition [ 67 ], who found a high correlation (r = 0.959) between antioxidant capacity and total phenol content (between 1018 and 3545 mg/L in reds, and between 262 and 1425 mg/L in whites, expressed as gallic acid). These results have been recently corroborated by Hernández et al., 2021 [ 68 ], with a positive correlation between antioxidant capacity and flavanol composition, monomer content, and shorter proanthocyanidins. In the present work, it is important to remember that the only difference between the Ws is the phenolic content, since the three grape extracts were reconstituted in the same way, which avoided the interferences inherent to the fermentation process and the additives added in the winery. As shown in Table 1, the samples of the Garnacha variety (W-C) consumed oxygen faster (they had a higher consumption rate, R max ) although they consumed less oxygen ( ∆ O max_min ) presenting higher levels of residual oxygen (O min ), possibly due to their lower phenol content. Marrufo- Curtido et al., 2018 [ 69 ] described a higher “explosive stage” of oxygen consumption, the higher the Cu/Fe ratio, absorbance at 520 nm and guaiacylpyranopeonidin-3-O-glucoside content, while acetaldehyde content produced a negative effect on the “explosive” rate. These results were similar to those observed in the present work (Table 1b), where the consumption rate of the first 10% of the total oxygen consumed (V cons10% ), was higher in the samples with a higher amount of available oxygen (Sat-3 and Sat-4). Those authors indicated that oxygen consumption tends to decrease with successive oxygen saturations; however, in the present work when all the oxygen was dosed at once, the wines consumed more oxygen (parameter ∆ O max_min , Table 1a)—in other words with a single dose of oxygen. 2.2. Effect of Oxygen Consumption on Phenol Composition and Color The effect of the different amounts of oxygen consumed on the properties of the wine was studied by evaluating the difference between the characteristics of the samples after consuming the oxygen reached at Sat-1, Sat-2, Sat-3, and Sat-4 versus the characteristics of the same samples stored under anoxic conditions (Sat-0). These differences may be attributable to the amounts of oxygen consumed rather than to changes occurring over time. Molecules 2023,28, 459 8 of 19 Therefore, the oxygen consumed after dosing the four levels described above ( ∆ O max_min ) and the differences occurring in different chemical and color parameters were correlated for each type of W (Table 2). Figure 4presents the results obtained by PCA analysis of these data, the distribution of the samples (a) and of the variables (b) in the plane formed by PC1 and PC2. As can be seen in Figure 4b, PC1 explains 62.46% of the variability of the data and is positively related to the color parameters, L*, a*, b* Cab, and to the antioxidant capacity, ABTS and DPPH (Figure 4b) close to the W-B samples (Figure 4a). On the other hand, 330 nm, 420 nm, 520 nm, anthocyanin content, and minimum oxygen (O min ) are negatively related to PC1 (Figure 4b) close to samples W-C (Figure 4a). PC2 explains 22.65% of the variability of the data and differentiates samples with oxygen contents Sat-1 and Sat-2 (Figure 4a) defined by better maintaining malvidin content (Figure 4b), while samples with oxygen levels above air Sat-3 and Sat-4 (located on the positive axis PC2, Figure 4a) that consume higher amount of oxygen and present higher level of TPI (4b). Table 2. Pearson correlation coefficients obtained between the consumption kinetics parameters and the difference between the chemical parameters obtained for W-A, W-B, and W-C after each saturation situation compared to the samples kept inert (* plevel < 0.05, ** plevel < 0.01, *** plevel < 0.001). Omax Omin ∆Omax_min Rmax W-A W-B W-C W-A W-B W-C W-A W-B W-C W-A W-B W-C Df-3-Gl (Df) −0.947 *** −0.895 ** −0.732 * −0.626 −0.616 −0.659 −0.922 *** −0.900 ** −0.679 −0.695 −0.718 * −0.681 Cy-3-Gl (Cn) 0.382 −0.492 −0.840 ** 0.272 −0.503 −0.538 0.361 −0.471 −0.822 * 0.477 −0.626 −0.581 Pt-3-Gl (Pt) 0.407 −0.829 * −0.787 * 0.469 −0.139 −0.206 0.377 −0.836 ** −0.809 * 0.426 −0.752 * −0.462 Pn-3-Gl (Pn) −0.125 −0.891 ** −0.413 0.129 −0.433 −0.269 −0.085 −0.895 ** −0.397 −0.091 −0.720 * −0.338 Mv-3-Gl (Mv) −0.932 *** −0.800 * −0.962 *** −0.406 −0.291 −0.484 −0.908 ** −0.819 * −0.950 *** −0.553 −0.582 −0.595 % ABTS −0.888 ** −0.552 −0.621 −0.568 −0.399 −0.462 −0.867 ** −0.574 −0.556 −0.754 * −0.323 −0.666 % DPPH −0.883 ** −0.761 * −0.102 −0.539 −0.538 −0.313 −0.853 ** −0.786 * −0.061 −0.729 * −0.536 −0.225 TPI 0.953 *** 0.784 * 0.330 0.498 0.483 0.280 0.932 *** 0.791 * 0.312 0.674 0.549 0.000 Color Intensity (CI) 0.306 −0.570 −0.024 0.015 −0.357 0.364 0.332 −0.586 −0.119 0.305 −0.331 0.705 L* −0.033 0.585 −0.418 0.134 0.350 −0.584 −0.067 0.599 −0.326 −0.095 0.367 −0.872 ** a* 0.035 0.607 −0.861 ** 0.165 0.377 −0.601 0.000 0.622 −0.813 * −0.048 0.397 −0.765 * b* −0.032 0.594 −0.672 0.143 0.368 −0.559 −0.066 0.608 −0.630 −0.086 0.380 −0.420 Cab* 0.005 0.599 −0.869 ** 0.152 0.368 −0.614 −0.030 0.613 −0.820 * −0.067 0.387 −0.753 * 650 nm −0.086 −0.625 0.816 * −0.193 −0.341 0.628 −0.050 −0.638 0.757 * 0.003 −0.434 0.808 * 630 nm 0.113 −0.566 0.718 * −0.121 −0.361 0.630 0.147 −0.578 0.647 0.122 −0.350 0.873 ** 620 nm 0.183 −0.546 0.612 −0.088 −0.335 0.621 0.217 −0.562 0.533 0.169 −0.318 0.900 ** 520 nm 0.174 −0.658 −0.574 −0.024 −0.378 −0.022 0.200 −0.672 −0.640 0.262 −0.424 0.172 420 nm 0.566 −0.262 0.457 0.117 −0.264 0.546 0.588 −0.279 0.373 0.407 −0.021 0.923 *** 330 nm 0.685 0.291 0.092 0.122 −0.041 0.396 0.711 * 0.285 0.012 0.374 0.468 0.854 ** Molecules 2023, 28, 459 8 of 19 higher in the samples with a higher amount of available oxygen (Sat-3 and Sat-4). Those authors indicated that oxygen consumption tends to decrease with successive oxygen saturations; however, in the present work when all the oxygen was dosed at once, the wines consumed more oxygen (parameter ∆Omax_min, Table 1a)—in other words with a single dose of oxygen. 2.2. Effect of Oxygen Consumption on Phenol Composition and Color The effect of the different amounts of oxygen consumed on the properties of the wine was studied by evaluating the difference between the characteristics of the samples after consuming the oxygen reached at Sat-1, Sat-2, Sat-3, and Sat-4 versus the characteristics of the same samples stored under anoxic conditions (Sat-0). These differences may be attributable to the amounts of oxygen consumed rather than to changes occurring over time. Therefore, the oxygen consumed after dosing the four levels described above (∆Omax_min) and the differences occurring in different chemical and color parameters were correlated for each type of W (Table 2). Figure 4 presents the results obtained by PCA analysis of these data, the distribution of the samples (a) and of the variables (b) in the plane formed by PC1 and PC2. As can be seen in Figure 4b, PC1 explains 62.46% of the variability of the data and is positively related to the color parameters, L*, a*, b* Cab, and to the antioxidant capacity, ABTS and DPPH (Figure 4b) close to the W-B samples (Figure 4a). On the other hand, 330 nm, 420 nm, 520 nm, anthocyanin content, and minimum oxygen (Omin) are negatively related to PC1 (Figure 4b) close to samples W-C (Figure 4a). PC2 explains 22.65% of the variability of the data and differentiates samples with oxygen contents Sat-1 and Sat-2 (Figure 4a) defined by better maintaining malvidin content (Figure 4b), while samples with oxygen levels above air Sat-3 and Sat-4 (located on the positive axis PC2, Figure 4a) that consume higher amount of oxygen and present higher level of TPI (4b). (a) (b) Figure 4. Principal component analysis (PCA) for W-A, W-B, and W-C presents distribution of the samples (a) and of the variables (b) (Legend in Table 2). Table 2 shows that as the oxygen consumed (∆Omax_min) increased, there was a significant loss of anthocyanins, especially malvidin (correlation of −0.908, −0.819, and −0.950 with W-A, W-B and W-C, respectively) and delphinidin (correlation of −0.922 and −0.900 with W-A and W-B, respectively) compared to the same samples maintained under anoxic conditions during the same period of time. Samples W-C, having a lower initial content, showed lower losses of these anthocyanins, followed by W-A and W-B. Figure 5a represents the average oxygen content consumed by each W in each saturation situation (Sat 1, 2, 3, or 4) versus the difference in the average delphinidin content after consuming that amount of oxygen and the content in the sample in the absence of oxygen (Sat-0). It is observed that all samples lost more delphinidin when saturated with different levels of oxygen than when kept free of oxygen, and that samples W-A and W-B showed the W-A1 W-A2 W-A3 W-A4 W-B1 W-B2 W-B3 W-B4 W-C1 W-C2 W-C3 W-C4 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 PC1: 62.46% -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 PC1: 22.65% Omax Omin Cn Pt Pn Mv ABTS DPPH TPI CI L* b* 420 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 PC1 : 62.46% -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 PC2 : 22.65% Omax-min Df a* Cab 650 630 620 520 330 Figure 4. Principal component analysis (PCA) for W-A, W-B, and W-C presents distribution of the samples (a) and of the variables (b) (Legend in Table 2). Molecules 2023,28, 459 9 of 19 Table 2shows that as the oxygen consumed ( ∆ O max_min ) increased, there was a significant loss of anthocyanins, especially malvidin (correlation of − 0.908, − 0.819, and − 0.950 with W-A, W-B and W-C, respectively) and delphinidin (correlation of − 0.922 and − 0.900 with W-A and W-B, respectively) compared to the same samples maintained under anoxic conditions during the same period of time. Samples W-C, having a lower initial content, showed lower losses of these anthocyanins, followed by W-A and W-B. Figure 5a represents the average oxygen content consumed by each W in each saturation situation (Sat 1, 2, 3, or 4) versus the difference in the average delphinidin content after consuming that amount of oxygen and the content in the sample in the absence of oxygen (Sat-0). It is observed that all samples lost more delphinidin when saturated with different levels of oxygen than when kept free of oxygen, and that samples W-A and W-B showed the greatest loss as oxygen consumption increased. As for malvidin (Figure 5b), it can be seen that after consuming amounts of oxygen below air (Sat-1 and Sat-2) the samples maintained a higher content of this anthocyanin than in the absence of oxygen, as shown in Figure 4a. However, when the samples were subjected to high doses of oxygen (Sat-3 and Sat-4), they lost more malvidin than if they were in anoxia, this tendency being more marked in W-A. Initially, W-A and W-B had a higher TPI content showing significant correlation with the oxygen consumed—0.932 and 0.791, respectively—indicating the formation of new compounds with oxygen intervention (Figure 5c). These reactions gave rise to compounds with a lower antioxidant capacity (%DPPH), significant in the samples with higher levels of phenolic compounds ( − 0.853 and − 0.786 for W-A and W-B). Thus, these samples presented a higher antioxidant capacity (%ABTS and %DPPH) with oxygen dosages below or equal to air (Sat-1 and Sat-2), compared to samples kept in anoxic conditions. On increasing the oxygen dosage (Sat-3 and Sat-4), the antioxidant capacity decreased (Figure 5d,e), being lower than in the oxygen-free samples. However, when the Ws were subjected to Sat-1 they showed the lowest absorbance losses at 520 nm (0.0354). For the samples with lower phenolic content, W-C, it was found that the highest loss of absorbance (0.014) occurred with high doses of oxygen (Sat-4), but very close to those obtained with Sat-2 and Sat-3, with losses of 0.012 and 0.009. It was found that the W-C samples presented higher absorbance than the oxygen-free samples (Figure 6) in the 600–650 nm range after consuming oxygen, which may be related to the formation of portisins, a type of anthocyanin vinyl flavanol pigment of a blue color [ 15 ]. This result is of great interest, as it tells us that—for the same conditions of Sat-1, Sat-2, Sat-3, and Sat-4—samples W-C maintained or increased the level of violet hues (Figure 5i), while samples W-A and B maintained or lost these hues. As for the color parameters, the results of the color intensity indicated that with the increase in oxygen consumption the samples showed lower CI (Figure 5f) in all cases, especially W-A and W-B. The same tendency was found in the case of measurements at 520 nm (Figure 5g) which reflect the loss of red color, typical of an aging process [ 70 ]. When measured at 420 nm (Figure 5h), which represents brownish tones, it can be observed that with oxygen consumption, samples W-A and W-C showed levels similar to those of samples stored in anoxia. The increase or decrease in absorbance between 330 and 650 nm caused by oxygen consumption for each W at different saturation levels (Sat-1, Sat-2, Sat-3, and Sat-4) with respect to anoxic conditions (Sat-0), is shown in Figure 6. The range of absorbance between 370 and 470 nm, which is related to yellow-orange tones, and the range from 520 to 670 nm related to red-purple colors is interesting. Samples after consuming oxygen showed a higher absorbance than inert samples between 330 and 370 nm, indicating an increase in yellow-orange shades. Absorbances near 310–330 nm are characteristic of acylation with p-coumaric acid [ 71 ] and are also related to compounds such as pyranoanthocyanins [ 72 ], typical of an aged wine. Thus, W-A samples with oxygen saturation at Sat-2, Sat-3, and Sat-4 levels showed the largest increases of about 0.035 in absorbance, while they presented a slight loss of absorbance (close to 0.003) with small amounts of oxygen (Sat-1). In the case of samples W-B and W-C, no trends according to oxygen consumption were observed in this range of absorbance. Between the absorbances at 420 and 440 nm, the smallest Molecules 2023,28, 459 16 of 19 4. Wirth, J.; Caillé, S.; Souquet, J.M.; Samson, A.; Dieval, J.B.; Vidal, S.; Fulcrand, H.; Cheynier, V. Impact of Post-Bottling Oxygen Exposure on the Sensory Characteristics and Phenolic Composition of Grenache RoséWines. Food Chem. 2012 ,132, 1861–1871. [CrossRef] 5. Ugliano, M. Oxygen Contribution to Wine Aroma Evolution during Bottle Aging. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013 ,61, 6125–6136. [CrossRef] 6. Parpinello, G.P.; Plumejeau, F.; Maury, C.; Versari, A. Effect of Micro-Oxygenation on Sensory Characteristics and Consumer Preference of Cabernet Sauvignon Wine. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2012,92, 1238–1244. [CrossRef] 7. Wirth, J.; Morel-Salmi, C.; Souquet, J.M.; Dieval, J.B.; Aagaard, O.; Vidal, S.; Fulcrand, H.; Cheynier, V. The Impact of Oxygen Exposure before and after Bottling on the Polyphenolic Composition of Red Wines. Food Chem. 2010,123, 107–116. [CrossRef] 8. Cano-López, M.; Pardo-Minguez, M.; López-Roca, J.M.; Gómez-Plaza, E. Effect of Microoxygenation on Anthocyanin and Derived Pigment Content and Chromatic Characteristics of Red Wines. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2006,57, 325–331. [CrossRef] 9. Cano-López, M.; Pardo-Mínguez, F.; Schmauch, G.; Saucier, C.; Teissedre, P.-L.; López-Roca, J.M.; Gómez-Plaza, E. Effect of Micro-Oxygenation on Color and Anthocyanin-Related Compounds of Wines with Different Phenolic Contents. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008,56, 5932–5941. [CrossRef] 10. Gómez-Plaza, E.; Cano-López, M. A Review on Micro-Oxygenation of Red Wines: Claims, Benefits and the Underlying Chemistry. Food Chem. 2011,125, 1131–1140. [CrossRef] 11. Sánchez-Gómez, R.; Nevares, I.; Martínez-Gil, A.; del Alamo-Sanza, M. Oxygen Consumption by Red Wines under Different Micro-Oxygenation Strategies and Q. Pyrenaica Chips. Effects on Color and Phenolic Characteristics. Beverages 2018 ,4, 69. [CrossRef] 12. Sánchez-Gómez, R.; Del Alamo-Sanza, M.; Martínez-Martínez, V.; Nevares, I. Study of the Role of Oxygen in the Evolution of Red Wine Colour under Different Ageing Conditions in Barrels and Bottles. Food Chem. 2020,328, 127040. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 13. del Álamo Sanza, M.; Nevares Domínguez, I.; García Merino, S. Influence of Different Aging Systems and Oak Woods on Aged Wine Color and Anthocyanin Composition. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2004,219, 124–132. [CrossRef] 14. Dangles, O.; Fenger, J.-A. The Chemical Reactivity of Anthocyanins and Its Consequences in Food Science and Nutrition. Molecules 2018,23, 1970. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 15. Waterhouse, A.L.; Zhu, J. A Quarter Century of Wine Pigment Discovery. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020,100, 5093–5101. [CrossRef] 16. Boulton, R. The Copigmentation of Anthocyanins and Its Role in the Color of Red Wine: A Critical Review. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2001,52, 67–87. [CrossRef] 17. Zhang, B.; Yang, X.-S.; Li, N.-N.; Zhu, X.; Sheng, W.-J.; He, F.; Duan, C.-Q.; Han, S.-Y. Colorimetric Study of Malvidin-3- O -Glucoside Copigmented by Phenolic Compounds: The Effect of Molar Ratio, Temperature, PH, and Ethanol Content on Color Expression of Red Wine Model Solutions. Food Res. Int. 2017,102, 468–477. [CrossRef] 18. Gordillo, B.; Cejudo-Bastante, M.J.; Rodríguez-Pulido, F.J.; González-Miret, M.L.; Heredia, F.J. Application of the Differential Colorimetry and Polyphenolic Profile to the Evaluation of the Chromatic Quality of Tempranillo Red Wines Elaborated in Warm Climate. Influence of the Presence of Oak Wood Chips during Fermentation. Food Chem. 2013,141, 2184–2190. [CrossRef] 19. del Carmen Llaudy, M.; Canals, R.; González-Manzano, S.; Canals, J.M.; Santos-Buelga, C.; Zamora, F. Influence of Micro- Oxygenation Treatment before Oak Aging on Phenolic Compounds Composition, Astringency, and Color of Red Wine. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006,54, 4246–4252. [CrossRef] 20. Cejudo-Bastante, M.J.; Hermosín-Gutiérrez, I.; Pérez-Coello, M.S. Micro-Oxygenation and Oak Chip Treatments of Red Wines: Effects on Colour-Related Phenolics, Volatile Composition and Sensory Characteristics. Part II: Merlot Wines. Food Chem. 2011 , 124, 738–748. [CrossRef] 21. Cejudo-Bastante, M.J.; Pérez-Coello, M.S.; Hermosín-Gutiérrez, I. Effect of Wine Micro-Oxygenation Treatment and Storage Period on Colour-Related Phenolics, Volatile Composition and Sensory Characteristics. Lebenson. Wiss. Technol. 2011 ,44, 866–874. [CrossRef] 22. Morales, P.; Rojas, V.; Quirós, M.; Gonzalez, R. The Impact of Oxygen on the Final Alcohol Content of Wine Fermented by a Mixed Starter Culture. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015,99, 3993–4003. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 23. Yan, G.; Zhang, B.; Joseph, L.; Waterhouse, A.L. Effects of Initial Oxygenation on Chemical and Aromatic Composition of Wine in Mixed Starters of Hanseniaspora Vineae and Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. Food Microbiol. 2020,90, 103460. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 24. Ferrer-Gallego, R.; Hernández-Hierro, J.M.; Rivas-Gonzalo, J.C.; Escribano-Bailón, M.T. Influence of Climatic Conditions on the Phenolic Composition of Vitis vinifera L. Cv. Graciano. Anal. Chim. Acta 2012,732, 73–77. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 25. Baiano, A.; Terracone, C. Varietal Differences among the Phenolic Profiles and Antioxidant Activities of Seven Table Grape Cultivars Grown in the South of Italy Based on Chemometrics. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011,59, 9815–9826. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 26. Waterhouse, A.L. Wine Phenolics. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2002,957, 21–36. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 27. Danilewicz, J.C. Role of Tartaric and Malic Acids in Wine Oxidation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014,62, 5149–5155. [CrossRef] 28. Kontoudakis, N.; Guo, A.; Scollary, G.R.; Clark, A.C. The Impact of Aging Wine in High and Low Oxygen Conditions on the Fractionation of Cu and Fe in Chardonnay Wine. Food Chem. 2017,229, 319–328. [CrossRef] 29. Robinson, A.L.; Boss, P.K.; Solomon, P.S.; Trengove, R.D.; Heymann, H.; Ebeler, S.E. Origins of Grape and Wine Aroma. Part 1. Chemical Components and Viticultural Impacts. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2014,65, 1–24. [CrossRef] Molecules 2023,28, 459 17 of 19 30. Sikuten, I.; Stambuk, P.; Tomaz, I.; Marchal, C.; Kontic, J.K.; Lacombe, T.; Maletic, E.; Preiner, D. Discrimination of Genetic and Geographical Groups of Grape Varieties (Vitis vinifera L.) Based on Their Polyphenolic Profiles. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2021 ,102, 104062. [CrossRef] 31. Vivas, N. Recherches Sur La QualitéDu Chêne Français de Tonnellerie (Q. Petraea Liebl., Q. Robur L.) et Sur Les Mécanismes d’Oxydoréduction des Vins Rouges Au Cours de Leur Élevage En Barriques; Universitéde Bordeaux II: Bordeaux, France, 1997. 32. del Alamo-Sanza, M.; Nevares, I. Recent Advances in the Evaluation of the Oxygen Transfer Rate in Oak Barrels. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014,62, 8892–8899. [CrossRef] 33. Kelly, M.; Wollan, D. Micro-oxygenation of wine in barrels. Aust. N. Z. Grapegrow. Win. Annu. Tech. Issue 2003,473, 29–32. 34. Kassara, S.; Kennedy, J.A. Relationship between Red Wine Grade and Phenolics. 2. Tannin Composition and Size. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011,59, 8409–8412. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 35. Mercurio, M.D.; Dambergs, R.G.; Cozzolino, D.; Herderich, M.J.; Smith, P.A. Relationship between Red Wine Grades and Phenolics. 1. Tannin and Total Phenolics Concentrations. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010,58, 12313–12319. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 36. Ferreira, V.; Carrascon, V.; Bueno, M.; Ugliano, M.; Fernandez-Zurbano, P. Oxygen Consumption by Red Wines. Part I: Consumption Rates, Relationship with Chemical Composition, and Role of SO 2 .J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015 ,63, 10928–10937. [CrossRef] 37. Carrascon, V.; Fernandez-Zurbano, P.; Bueno, M.; Ferreira, V. Oxygen Consumption by Red Wines. Part II: Differential Effects on Color and Chemical Composition Caused by Oxygen Taken in Different Sulfur Dioxide-Related Oxidation Contexts. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015,63, 10938–10947. [CrossRef] 38. Deshaies, S.; Cazals, G.; Enjalbal, C.; Constantin, T.; Garcia, F.; Mouls, L.; Saucier, C. Red Wine Oxidation: Accelerated Ageing Tests, Possible Reaction Mechanisms and Application to Syrah Red Wines. Antioxidants 2020,9, 663. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 39. Deshaies, S.; Garcia, L.; Veran, F.; Mouls, L.; Saucier, C.; Garcia, F. Red Wine Oxidation Characterization by Accelerated Ageing Tests and Cyclic Voltammetry. Antioxidants 2021,10, 1943. [CrossRef] 40. Marrufo-Curtido, A.; Ferreira, V.; Escudero, A. An Index for Wine Acetaldehyde Reactive Potential (ARP) and Some Derived Remarks about the Accumulation of Acetaldehyde during Wine Oxidation. Foods 2022,11, 476. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 41. Gambuti, A.; Picariello, L.; Rinaldi, A.; Moio, L. Evolution of Sangiovese Wines with Varied Tannin and Anthocyanin Ratios during Oxidative Aging. Front. Chem. 2018,6, 63. [CrossRef] 42. Rinaldi, A.; Picariello, L.; Soares, S.; Brandão, E.; de Freitas, V.; Moio, L.; Gambuti, A. Effect of Oxidation on Color Parameters, Tannins, and Sensory Characteristics of Sangiovese Wines. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2021,247, 2977–2991. [CrossRef] 43. Coppola, F.; Picariello, L.; Forino, M.; Moio, L.; Gambuti, A. Comparison of Three Accelerated Oxidation Tests Applied to Red Wines with Different Chemical Composition. Molecules 2021,26, 815. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 44. Picariello, L.; Slaghenaufi, D.; Ugliano, M. Fermentative and Post-Fermentative Oxygenation of Corvina Red Wine: Influence on Phenolic and Volatile Composition, Colour and Wine Oxidative Response. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020 ,100, 2522–2533. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 45. Jeremic, J.; Vongluanngam, I.; Ricci, A.; Parpinello, G.P.; Versari, A. The Oxygen Consumption Kinetics of Commercial Oenological Tannins in Model Wine Solution and Chianti Red Wine. Molecules 2020,25, 1215. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 46. Carrascón, V.; Vallverdú-Queralt, A.; Meudec, E.; Sommerer, N.; Fernandez-Zurbano, P.; Ferreira, V. The Kinetics of Oxygen and SO 2 Consumption by Red Wines. What Do They Tell about Oxidation Mechanisms and about Changes in Wine Composition? Food Chem. 2018,241, 206–214. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 47. García-Puente Rivas, E.; Alcalde-Eon, C.; Santos-Buelga, C.; Rivas-Gonzalo, J.C.; Escribano-Bailón, M.T. Behaviour and Characterisation of the Colour during Red Wine Making and Maturation. Anal. Chim. Acta 2006,563, 215–222. [CrossRef] 48. Heras-Roger, J.; Pomposo-Medina, M.; Díaz-Romero, C.; Darias-Martín, J. Copigmentation, Colour and Antioxidant Activity of Single-Cultivar Red Wines. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2014,239, 13–19. [CrossRef] 49. Del Alamo-Sanza, M.; Sánchez-Gómez, R.; Martínez-Martínez, V.; Martínez-Gil, A.; Nevares, I. Air Saturation Methodology Proposal for the Analysis of Wine Oxygen Consumption Kinetics. Food Res. Int. 2021,147, 110535. [CrossRef] 50. Culleré, L.; Cacho, J.; Ferreira, V. An Assessment of the Role Played by Some Oxidation-Related Aldehydes in Wine Aroma. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007,55, 876–881. [CrossRef] 51. Boulton, R.B. Both White Wines and Red Wines Can Consume Oxygen at Similar Rates. 2011. Available online: http://www. acenologia.com/enfoques/roger_boulton_enf0612_eng.htm (accessed on 4 August 2021). 52. Nevares, I.; Martínez-Martínez, V.; Martínez-Gil, A.; Martín, R.; Laurie, V.F.; Del Álamo-Sanza, M. On-Line Monitoring of Oxygen as a Method to Qualify the Oxygen Consumption Rate of Wines. Food Chem. 2017,229, 588–596. [CrossRef] 53. Danilewicz, J.C.; Standing, M.J. Reaction Mechanisms of Oxygen and Sulfite in Red Wine. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2018 ,69, 189–195. [CrossRef] 54. Danilewicz, J.C. Review of Reaction Mechanisms of Oxygen and Proposed Intermediate Reduction Products in Wine: Central Role of Iron and Copper. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2003,54, 73–85. [CrossRef] 55. Danilewicz, J.C. Interaction of Sulfur Dioxide, Polyphenols, and Oxygen in a Wine-Model System: Central Role of Iron and Copper. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2007,58, 53–60. [CrossRef] 56. Ribereau-Gayon, J. Contribution àl’étude des Oxydations et Réductions dans les Vins; Universiat de Burdeus: Burdeus, France, 1933. 57. Danilewicz, J.C. Reactions Involving Iron in Mediating Catechol Oxidation in Model Wine. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2013 ,64, 316–324. [CrossRef] Molecules 2023,28, 459 18 of 19 58. Waterhouse, A.L.; Laurie, V.F. Oxidation of Wine Phenolics: A Critical Evaluation and Hypotheses. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2006 ,57, 306–313. [CrossRef] 59. Casellato, U.; Tamburini, S.; Vigato, P.A.; Vidali, M.; Fenton, D.E. Binuclear Oxovanadium(IV) Complexes as Catalyst for the Oxygenation of the Catechols. Inorganica Chim. Acta 1984,84, 101–104. [CrossRef] 60. Elias, R.J.; Waterhouse, A.L. Controlling the Fenton Reaction in Wine. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010,58, 1699–1707. [CrossRef] 61. Peterson, A.L.; Waterhouse, A.L. 1H NMR: A Novel Approach to Determining the Thermodynamic Properties of Acetaldehyde Condensation Reactions with Glycerol, (+)-Catechin, and Glutathione in Model Wine. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016 ,64, 6869–6878. [CrossRef] 62. Singleton, V.L. Oxygen with Phenols and Related Reactions in Musts, Wines, and Model Systems: Observations and Practical Implications. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1987,38, 69–77. 63. Singleton, V.L. Browning and oxidation of must and wines. In Proceedings of the 4th Annual Midwest Regional Grape and Wine Conference; Peterson, D.V., Dharmadhikari, M.R., Holloway, J., Eds.; State Fruit Experiment Station, Southwest Missouri State University: Mountain Grove, MO, USA, 1989; pp. 87–93. 64. Picariello, L.; Gambuti, A.; Petracca, F.; Rinaldi, A.; Moio, L. Enological Tannins Affect Acetaldehyde Evolution, Colour Stability and Tannin Reactivity during Forced Oxidation of Red Wine. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018,53, 228–236. [CrossRef] 65. Carrasco-Quiroz, M.; Martínez-Gil, A.M.; Nevares, I.; Martínez-Martínez, V.; Sánchez-Gómez, R.; Del Alamo-Sanza, M. Development of a New Strategy for Studying the Oxygen Consumption Potential of Wine through the Grape Extract Evaluation. Foods 2022,11, 1961. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 66. Vivas, N.; de Gaulejac, N.; Nonier, M.F. Quelques Aspect Cinétiques de la Consommation de l’oxygène et Conséquences Technologiqes des Oxydations dans les Vins Rouges. Rev. Oenologues Tech. Vitivinic. Oenologiques. 2014,150, 27–31. 67. Landrault, N.; Poucheret, P.; Ravel, P.; Gasc, F.; Cros, G.; Teissedre, P.L. Antioxidant Capacities and Phenolics Levels of French Wines from Different Varieties and Vintages. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001,49, 3341–3348. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 68. Hernández, M.M.; Pesquera-Alegría, C.; Manso-Martínez, C.; Menéndez, C.M. Antioxidant Capacity and Flavanol Composition of Seed Extracts from a Grenache × Tempranillo Population: Effect of Sex and Color. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021 ,161, 113177. [CrossRef] 69. Marrufo-Curtido, A.; Carrascón, V.; Bueno, M.; Ferreira, V.; Escudero, A. A Procedure for the Measurement of Oxygen Consumption Rates (OCRs) in Red Wines and Some Observations about the Influence of Wine Initial Chemical Composition. Food Chem. 2018,248, 37–45. [CrossRef] 70. del Alamo, M.; Bernal, J.L.; Gómez-Cordovés, C. Behavior of Monosaccharides, Phenolic Compounds, and Color of Red Wines Aged in Used Oak Barrels and in the Bottle. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000,48, 4613–4618. [CrossRef] 71. Harborne, J.B. The Flavonoids: Advances in Research since 1980; Harborne, J.B., Ed.; Chapman and Hall: London, UK, 1988; ISBN 9780412287701. 72. He, F.; Liang, N.-N.; Mu, L.; Pan, Q.-H.; Wang, J.; Reeves, M.J.; Duan, C.-Q. Anthocyanins and Their Variation in Red Wines. II. Anthocyanin Derived Pigments and Their Color Evolution. Molecules 2012,17, 1483–1519. [CrossRef] 73. Santos-Buelga, C.; Bravo-Haro, S.; Rivas-Gonzalo, J.C. Interactions between catechin and malvi-din-3-monoglucoside in model solutions. Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch. 1995,201, 269–274. [CrossRef] 74. Mateus, N.; Oliveira, J.; Pissarra, J.; González-Paramás, A.M.; Rivas-Gonzalo, J.C.; Santos-Buelga, C.; Silva, A.M.S.; de Freitas, V. A New Vinylpyranoanthocyanin Pigment Occurring in Aged Red Wine. Food Chem. 2006,97, 689–695. [CrossRef] 75. Mateus, N.; Silva, A.M.S.; Rivas-Gonzalo, J.C.; Santos-Buelga, C.; de Freitas, V. A New Class of Blue Anthocyanin-Derived Pigments Isolated from Red Wines. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003,51, 1919–1923. [CrossRef] 76. Atanasova, V.; Fulcrand, H.; Cheynier, V.; Moutounet, M. Effect of Oxygenation on Polyphenol Changes Occurring in the Course of Wine-Making. Anal. Chim. Acta 2002,458, 15–27. [CrossRef] 77. De Freitas, V.A.P.; Fernandes, A.; Oliveira, J.; Teixeira, N.; Mateus, N. A Review of the Current Knowledge of Red Wine Colour. OENO One 2017,51, 1001–1021. [CrossRef] 78. Zhang, X.-K.; He, F.; Zhang, B.; Reeves, M.J.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, X.; Duan, C.-Q. The Effect of Prefermentative Addition of Gallic Acid and Ellagic Acid on the Red Wine Color, Copigmentation and Phenolic Profiles during Wine Aging. Food Res. Int. 2018 ,106, 568–579. [CrossRef] 79. Quaglieri, C.; Jourdes, M.; Waffo-Teguo, P.; Teissedre, P.-L. Updated Knowledge about Pyranoanthocyanins: Impact of Oxygen on Their Contents, and Contribution in the Winemaking Process to Overall Wine Color. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017 ,67, 139–149. [CrossRef] 80. Schmidtke, L.M.; Clark, A.C.; Scollary, G.R. Micro-Oxygenation of Red Wine: Techniques, Applications, and Outcomes. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2011,51, 115–131. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 81. Alegre, Y.; Arias-Pérez, I.; Hernández-Orte, P.; Ferreira, V. Development of a New Strategy for Studying the Aroma Potential of Winemaking Grapes through the Accelerated Hydrolysis of Phenolic and Aromatic Fractions (PAFs). Food Res. Int. 2020 ,127, 108728. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 82. Näykki, T.; Jalukse, L.; Helm, I.; Leito, I. Dissolved Oxygen Concentration Interlaboratory Comparison: What Can We Learn? Water 2013,5, 420–442. [CrossRef] 83. Glories, Y. La Couleur Des Vins Rouges. 2e Partie: Mesure, Origine et Interprétation. OENO One 1984,18, 253. [CrossRef] 84. Compendium of International Analysis of Methods -OIV Chromatic Characteristics. Available online: http://www.oiv.int/ public/medias/2478/oiv-ma-as2-11.pdf (accessed on 2 October 2022). Molecules 2023,28, 459 19 of 19 85. Ribereau-Gayon, P. The determination of total phenolic compounds in red wines, Le dosage des composés phénoliques totaux dan les vins rouges. Chim. Anal. 1970,52, 627–631. 86. Re, R.; Pellegrini, N.; Proteggente, A.; Pannala, A.; Yang, M.; Rice-Evans, C. Antioxidant Activity Applying an Improved ABTS Radical Cation Decolorization Assay. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1999,26, 1231–1237. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 87. Brand-Williams, W.; Cuvelier, M.E.; Berset, C. Use of a Free Radical Method to Evaluate Antioxidant Activity. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 1995,28, 25–30. [CrossRef] Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.