scieee Science in your language
[In] (orig)

Numerical Estimation of Stresses in Railway Axles Using a Train-Track Interaction Model

Abstract

The fatigue design of railway axles requires that the stresses arising in the axle in real service are accurately quantified. This paper describes a method to compute the dynamic stresses arising in railway axles as the effect of train track interaction, based on the numerical simulation of the dynamic interaction between a flexible wheelset and a flexible track. The wheelset is modelled as a flexible rotating body using an Eulerian approach, whereas track is regarded as an infinite periodic system with the rail modelled as a Timoshenko beam resting on discrete elastic supports, considering the inertia associated with the sleepers. The paper presents an application of the proposed procedure to the calculation of the dynamic stresses caused in the axle by different types of geometric imperfection occurring on the wheel and rail surfaces, considering the cases of a single harmonic rail corrugation, random rail roughness and a wheelflat.

Read accessible full text

Numerical Estimation of Stresses in Railway Axles Using a Train-Track Interaction Model

Author: Martínez Casas, José,Mazzola, Laura,Baeza González, Luis Miguel,Bruni, Stefano
Publisher: Elsevier
Year: 2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.07.006
Source: https://riunet.upv.es/bitstream/10251/78196/2/Manuscript.pdf
Documen downloaded om:
This pape mus be ci ed as:
The inal publica ion is a ailable a
Copy igh
Addi ional In o ma ion
h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1016/j.ij a igue.2012.07.006
h p://hdl.handle.ne /10251/78196
Else ie
Ma ínez Casas, J.; Mazzola, L.; Baeza González, LM.; B uni, S. (2013). Nume ical
Es ima ion o S esses in Railway Axles Using a T ain-T ack In e ac ion Model. In e na ional
Jou nal o Fa igue. 47:18-30. doi:10.1016/j.ij a igue.2012.07.006.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
Nume ical Es ima ion o S esses in Railway Axles Using a T ain-
T ack In e ac ion Model
Au ho s: José Ma ínez-Casas1, Lau a Mazzola2, Luis Baeza1, S e ano B uni2
A ilia ion:
1Cen o de In es igación en Tecnología de Vehículos, Uni e sidad Poli écnica de Valencia, Camino
de Ve a s/n, 46022 Valencia - Spain
2Dipa imen o di Meccanica, Poli ecnico di Milano, Via La Masa 1, 20156 Milano, I aly
E-mail co esponding au ho : s e ano.b [email protected]
Abs ac
The a igue design o ailway axles equi es ha he s esses a ising in he axle in eal se ice a e
accu a ely quan i ied. This pape desc ibes a me hod o compu e he dynamic s esses a ising in
ailway axles as he e ec o ain- ack in e ac ion, based on he nume ical simula ion o he
dynamic in e ac ion be ween a lexible wheelse and a lexible ack. The wheelse is modelled as a
lexible o a ing body using an Eule ian app oach, whe eas ack is ega ded as an in ini e pe iodic
sys em wi h he ail modelled as a Timoshenko beam es ing on disc e e elas ic suppo s,
conside ing he ine ia associa ed wi h he sleepe s.
The pape p esen s an applica ion o he p oposed p ocedu e o he calcula ion o he dynamic
s esses caused in he axle by di e en ypes o geome ic impe ec ion occu ing on he wheel and
ail su aces, conside ing he cases o a single ha monic ail co uga ion, andom ail oughness and
a wheel la .
Keywo ds
Railway ehicles, wheelse design, wheelse axle a igue, dynamic loads, ain- ack in e ac ion, ail
oughness, wheel la
*Manusc ip
Click he e o iew linked Re e ences
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
1. In oduc ion
Railway axles du abili y is a key issue in designing and co ec ly main aining ailway ehicles, o
ensu e ha he highes sa e y s anda ds a e me and, a he same ime, o op imise li e-cycle cos s
om a sys em poin o iew, i.e. conside ing no only he ehicle bu also he in e ac ing
in as uc u e. F om he single poin o iew o a igue esis ance, he axle design should end
owa ds inc easing he size o educe s esses, bu his componen also ep esen s a signi ican
con ibu ion o he wheelse un-sp ung mass, which, on he con a y, shall be minimised o educe
he gene a ion o dynamic o ce a wheel- ail con ac and hence damage in he ack and in he
wheels, especially o high-speed ains.
A p esen , wheelse axles a e designed o in ini e a igue li e, howe e a small numbe o axle
ailu es due o a igue con inues o be epo ed, some imes wi h ca as ophic consequences. One o
he easons which ha e been p oposed o explain hese un o eseen ailu es is ha he loads assumed
by he s anda d o he pu pose o a igue design e i ica ion do no ully e lec he ac ual se ice
loads o he ehicle, which a e la gely depending on he ehicle design pa ame e s (e.g. unsp ung
masses, suspension s i ness and damping, …) and on he ehicle se ice p o ile [1, 2]. The p ecise
knowledge o se ice loads is also pi o al o he de ini ion o app op ia e in e als o he non-
des uc i e inspec ion o ailway axles [3, 4], which a e nowadays pa o s anda d main enance
p ac ice o emo e om se ice c acked axles be o e ailu e.
De ailed in o ma ion on he se ice loads is o en de i ed expe imen ally, using ins umen ed
wheelse s [5 - 7]. This app oach howe e p esen s some d awbacks: i s o all, he physical
measu e is no applicable a he design s age o a new ehicle, se ing-up and unning he es s is
expensi e and demanding due o he ha sh measu ing en i onmen and ex ensi e es campaigns a e
equi ed o co e all se ice condi ions (di e en lines and speeds, ope a ion a a e / ull load, new
/ wo n wheel p o iles, …). Fu he mo e, he expe imen al measu e o he se ice load is no mally
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
no able o ully explain he causes o ex eme loads, which esul in s ess peaks mos ly a ec ing
he a igue esis ance o he axle and c ack p opaga ion.
Fo his eason, in he las yea a emp s ha e been made o de ine p ocedu es based on he use o
mul i-body models o a ailway ehicle o ain se , o p o ide a nume ical es ima e o he se ice
loads [6 – 8]. This app oach can be used o complemen measu emen s, e.g. add essing se ice
condi ions no co e ed by he es s and o p o ide a be e physical unde s anding o he ac o s
in luencing he se ice spec a, including (among o he s) ehicle design pa ame e s, he condi ion
o he wheel and ail su aces and he se ice scena io. To he Au ho s’ knowledge, hese
app oaches ha e howe e un il now been de eloped conside ing he wheelse as a igid body.
Hence, axle s esses can be co ec ly compu ed only in he low- equency ange (app oxima ely 0-
20 Hz), whe eas hei high- equency componen s, mainly esponsible o he occu ence o s ess
peaks, a e excluded om he analysis [8].
This pape aims he e o e a es ablishing a me hod o de ine nume ically he s esses in a ailway
axle, including he high equency componen s, as unc ion o ehicle- ack pa ame e s and o he
ehicle’s unning condi ion, he eby ex ending he scope and de ail o he exis ing nume ical
app oaches o p edic he wheelse se ice loads. To his end, a model o a lexible wheelse
in e ac ing wi h a lexible ack in angen ack is de i ed and used o simula e ypical se ice
scena ios o a high-speed ailway ehicle. The wheelse is modelled as a lexible o a ing body,
using an Eule ian app oach o ake ad an age om axial symme y and modal syn hesis o educe
he size o he p oblem. The ack is modelled as an in ini e pe iodic sys em, wi h he ail modelled
as a Timoshenko beam es ing on disc e e elas ic suppo s, conside ing he ine ia associa ed wi h
he sleepe s. The nume ical simula ion conside s he e ec o geome ic i egula i ies appea ing on
he ail and wheel su aces, allowing o conside he e ec o e.g. ail co uga ion, ail dips, wheel
polygonalisa ion, wheel la s e c.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
T ain- ack in e ac ion models including a de ailed desc ip ion o he wheelse as an elas ically
de o mable body ha e been p oposed by se e al au ho s. Some models, e.g. [9] a e de ined in he
equency domain and de i e he dynamic o ces a wheel- ail con ac by combining he wheelse
and ack equency esponse unc ions wi h he assumed ail co uga ion. This app oach is
inhe en ly linea and does no allow o conside he ails as disc e ely suppo ed. Modelling
app oaches which inco po a e a disc e e-suppo ack model and he e ec o nonlinea i ies in he
ack and in wheel– ail con ac ha e been de eloped in Re s. [10–14]: in his case, he ain- ack
model is de ined in he ime domain and he wheelse and ack models a e de ined using he ini e
elemen me hod, in oducing a educ ion o he deg ees o eedom using mode supe posi ion.
These app oaches ha e been mos ly applied o he s udy o damage phenomena in he ack and a
wheel- ail in e ace, and he e o e ocus on he de ini ion o wheel- ail con ac o ces a he han
axle s esses. The e o e, a simpli ied model o he wheelse axle (some imes based on beam
elemen s) can be used. Fu he mo e, he e ec o wheelse o a ion is neglec ed o conside ed wi h
some app oxima ion, whe eas his e ec may impo an ly a ec he wheelse esonance condi ions,
which in u n can be a cause o ex eme s ess peaks a ising in he axle: he p esen pape aims
he e o e a de eloping a modelling and simula ion app oach speci ically ailo ed on he p edic ion
o axle s esses
The pape desc ibes he wheelse - ack in e ac ion model de eloped and he p ocedu e o compu e
he dynamic s esses in he axle. Resul s o he nume ical p ocedu e a e p esen ed o di e en
exci a ion cases including ail co uga ion ha ing di e en wa eleng h and a wheel la , and
conside ing he e ec o wheelse speed.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
2. THE VEHICLE-TRACK INTERACTION MODEL
The ehicle – ack in e ac ion model, see Figu e 1, is de ined adop ing a sub-s uc u ing echnique
[15, 16], acco ding o which he whole sys em is di ided in o subs uc u es: he ehicle, he ails
and he ail suppo s. Fo each subs uc u e, he equa ions o mo ion a e w i en sepa a ely, and
in e ac ion e ec s be ween ehicle and ack a e ep esen ed by he wheel- ail con ac o ces and by
he o ces gene a ed a he ailpads [15]. The simula ion app oach is de eloped conside ing he
mo ion o he wheelse in angen ack.
Gi en he ange o equencies add essed, he ehicle model is con ined o one wheelse wi h
p ima y suspension, see sec ion 2.1. The ib a ion o he lexible wheelse is exp essed using
Eule ian modal coo dina es, see Sec ion 3, aking ad an age o m he axial symme y o he body.
Fu he mo e he modal app oach is chosen o desc ibe he wheelse mo ion in o de o educe he
compu a ional e o equi ed by he simula ion.
The ack is modelled by means o a cyclic app oach, which p o ides some bene i wi h espec o
classical ack modelling o he ini e one. The sub-s uc u ing echnique is s ill adop ed he e o
simpli y he sys em modelling; a de ailed desc ip ion o he ack is p o ided in sec ion 2.2.
2.1 The Vehicle Model
The dynamic s esses a ising in he wheelse axle a e mos ly ela ed wi h ain- ack in e ac ion
e ec s in he equency ange abo e 20 Hz, which a e exci ed by sho wa eleng h geome ic
impe ec ions in he wheel and ail p o iles and by singula i ies such as ail dips and wheel la s.
In his equency ange he dynamics o he sp ung masses (bogie ame and ca body) a e
e ec i ely isola ed om he mo ion o he un-sp ung masses (wheelse s and axle boxes) on accoun
o he mechanical il e in oduced by he suspensions. The e o e, he ehicle model used in his
pape conside s one single wheelse , modelled as an elas ically lexible body, and he p ima y
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
suspension, ep esen ed using isco-elas ic lumped pa ame e elemen s. The s a ic load associa ed
wi h he g a i a ional o ces ac ing on he bogie and on he ca body masses is ep esen ed by wo
s a ic o ces applied h ough he p ima y suspension on he wo sides o he wheelse .
2.2 The T ack Model
The ack is modelled by means o a cyclic app oach, whe e a ini e sec ion o he ack is de ined,
in oducing cyclic bounda y condi ions a he ends o he model, hence he ack, see Figu e 2, can
be in e p e ed as an in ini e ack, nego ia ed by an in ini e se o iden ical ehicles, uni o mly
dis ibu ed in such a way ha each ehicle is se a a cons an dis ance L apa om he adjacen
ones. Due o he pe iodici y o he s uc u e and o he loading condi ions, he s udy is educed o a
single sec ion ha ing ini e leng h L, whose alue is se la ge enough o a oid in e ac ion be ween
he ehicles.
The model adop ed o he di e en ack componen s is illus a ed in Figu e 3: he ails a e
modelled as Timoshenko beams, including bending de o ma ions in e ical/la e al di ec ions, as
well as o sional de o ma ions. Rail ib a ion is in oduced in e ms o modal supe posi ion o he
uncons ained ail wi h cyclic bounda y condi ions, hence esul ing in o a se o de-coupled 1-d.o. .
equa ions. Mo eo e due o he symme y o he sub-sys em wi h espec o he ack cen eline,
only one ail is modelled in he p esen s udy.
The disc e e ail suppo s a e in oduced in he o m o lumped pa ame e sys ems, see Figu e 3
igh . The ail pads a e modelled as lumped isco-elas ic elemen s gene a ing he in e ac ion o ces
be ween he ails and he sleepe s, ep esen ed as lumped masses. Ballas dynamics is neglec ed
he e, being no ele an o he s ess analysis on he wheelse , bu he equi alen ballas s i ness
and damping a e accoun ed o by means o lumped sp ing and dashpo elemen s.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
2.3 The Model o Wheel-Rail Con ac Fo ces
The ack model is coupled wi h he lexible wheelse ia he wheel- ail con ac o ces, which a e
exp essed as unc ion o he ela i e wheel- ail displacemen and eloci y in he con ac pa ch. In
he nume ical model p esen ed he e, he heo y o He z is adop ed o de ine he no mal con ac
o ce componen and FASTSIM [17] is used o de ine he angen ial con ac o ces as unc ion o
he no mal con ac o ce and o he c eepage componen s.
A each ime s ep, he displacemen and eloci y o he wheel in he con ac poin a e ob ained using
Eq. (1) e alua ed a he con ac poin posi ion.
3. THE FLEXIBLE WHEELSET MODEL
In o de o model he kinema ics o he lexible wheelse , wo con igu a ions (unde o med and
de o med) a e de ined. The unde o med con igu a ion is associa ed wi h he spinning eloci y o he
wheelse (a cons an angula eloci y

). The de o med con igu a ion conside s he lexibili y and
small igid solid displacemen s. The displacemen ield ela es he de o med con igu a ion wi h he
unde o med con igu a ion as i will be shown in Eq. (1).
The coo dina es ha a e implemen ed in he wheelse model do no ollow he ma e ial poin s o he
solid which is he commones p ocedu e in Mechanics, ne e heless hey a e associa ed wi h spa ial
poin s (Eule ian app oach). Le
u
an Eule ian ec o coo dina e in a ixed coo dina e ame. Any
p ope y o he solid
),( u

co esponds o he ma e ial poin o he solid whose unde o med
con igu a ion is in he spa ial poin
u
a ins an
. Following his c i e ion, he displacemen ield is
de ined by means o he ollowing o mula:
),( uwu 
, (1)
whe e
is he inal posi ion o he pa icle, and
w
is he displacemen s associa ed wi h lexibili y
and small igid body displacemen s.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
The coo dina e ame is chosen so ha he spin o a ion is in he second axle. The ollowing
ma ices a e de ined as ollows:












001
000
100
J
;











100
000
001
E
. (2)
The angula eloci y enso e i ies:
JΩ
















00
000
00
~
; and
EΩΩ 2
~~


. (3)
The eloci y due o he igid body spinning is:
 
uuJuΩ ~
~
T
321 ΩΩ 
, (4)
whe e
 
T
13 0
~uu u
. The eloci y o he pa icle is compu ed h ough he ma e ial de i a i e
o
, and ha is
 








ii
i
ii
i
ii
iu
uΩΩ
u
u
w
wuJ
w
w
uwu ~
D
D
D
D
D
D
. (5)
In o de o calcula e he kine ic ene gy o he solid, he squa e o he pa icle eloci y Eq. (5) has o
be ob ained. I has he ollowing o mula:
.
~
2
~
22
~~
D
D
D
D
T
T
2T
T
2TT2
T













































ii
i
ii
i
ii
i
ii
i
u
uΩ
u
uΩΩ
u
u
u
uΩΩ
w
wuJ
w
uJw
ww
wwuEu


(6)
The nex modal app oach is adop ed:
)()(),( quΦuw 
, (7)
being
)(uΦ
he mode shape unc ions ma ix o he ee-bounda y wheelse . The small igid
displacemen s o he solid a e conside ed in his app oach h ough he igid modes o he wheelse .
I mus be poin ed ou ha he mode shape unc ions do no depend on ime since he o a ion o he
solid does no change he mode shapes unc ions in ixed coo dina es, because he axial symme y
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
ampli ude o he dynamic o ce luc ua ion is app oxima ely 81 kN, and is he e o e conside ably
lowe han o he 60 mm wa eleng h (c . Fig. 6), on accoun o he ail showing a g ea e mobili y
in his esonance condi ion. Also in his case, he peak-peak o ce ampli ude is nea ly p opo ional
o he co uga ion ampli ude.
The lowe sub igu e shows he e ical con ac o ce plo ed s. he a elled dis ance o a
co uga ion wa eleng h exci ing he i s o wa d bending mode o he wheelse . In his case, he
peak-peak ampli ude o he con ac o ce o he la ge co uga ion ampli ude is 82.2 kN, again
signi ican ly lowe han o he 60 mm wa eleng h. In his second case howe e he inc ease o he
peak-peak o ce ampli ude wi h he co uga ion ampli ude is signi ican ly less han p opo ional,
and also he wa e o m o he con ac o ce is di e en o he wo co uga ion ampli udes: his shall
be asc ibed o he di e en impo ance o he sleepe -passing e ec in he wo cases, a he han o
he e ec o non-linea i ies.
In Figu e 9, he y-axis no mal s ess in he axle is shown o he same cases as in Fig. 8. Fo he
co uga ion wa eleng h exci ing he pinned-pinned esonance o he ack, no signi ican di e ence
is obse ed wi h espec o he cases epo ed in Figu e 7 o he same speed (300 km/h), and again
an inc ease o he co uga ion ampli ude lea es una ec ed he ampli ude o he axial s ess.
Howe e , when he co uga ion wa eleng h exci ing he wheelse esonance and he la ge
co uga ion ampli ude is conside ed, he s ess ampli ude becomes 33% highe han in Figu e 7
(despi e he con ac o ce being lowe in his case han o he 60 mm wa eleng h) and de ia es
signi ican ly o m he sinusoidal wa e o m. This esul is jus i ied by he e ec o wheelse
lexibili y playing a pa icula ly impo an ole in he case conside ed, on accoun o one mode o
ib a ion being exci ed in esonance.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
A use ul pa ame e o quan i y he ele ance o dynamic e ec s a ec ing he wheel- ail con ac
o ces and he s esses in he axle is he dynamic ac o , de ined as he a io be ween he maximum
dynamic alue o he quan i y conside ed and he co esponding s a ic alue. Fo he con ac o ce,
he dynamic ac o
Q
k
is de ined acco ding o he ollowing equa ion:
s
max,d
QQ
Q
k
(20)
wi h
max,d
Q
he maximum alue o he con ac o ce and
s
Q
he s a ic wheel load. Fo he s ess in
he axle he dynamic ac o

k
is de ined as:
max,s
max,d
k




(21)
wi h
max,d

maximum dynamic s ess in he ma e ial poin conside ed and
max,s

he
co esponding maximum s ess unde he ac ion o o a ing bending p oduced by he s a ic loads
ac ing on he wheelse .
In Figu e 10 he dynamic ac o s
Q
k
and

k
a e epo ed as unc ion o he ehicle speed o he
di e en ypes o ail co uga ion p esen ed abo e, conside ing a co uga ion ampli ude en imes
g ea e han he ISO 3095 limi ; in his case, also he esul s o a co uga ion wa eleng h exci ing
he second o wa d bending mode o he wheelse a e p esen ed. Fo he con ac o ce dynamic
ac o
Q
k
, in he en i e speed ange conside ed, he la ges alues a e ob ained o he co uga ion
wa eleng h exci ing he i s o wa d bending mode o he wheelse , wi h a maximum alue close o
1.8. A local maximum appea s o mos o he co uga ion cases conside ed o speeds in he 125-
135 km/h ange, his is due o a esonance e ec associa ed wi h he sleepe passing equency ha
exci es P2 equency (see P1 and P2 equencies in Re . [15])..
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
As a as he s ess dynamic ac o

k
is conce ned, e y simila ends and alues a e ob ained o
he case wi h no oughness, o oughness wa eleng h exci ing he pinned-pinned equency,
leading o low alues o s ess ampli ica ion (max. alue below 1.2). Only O he wise, in he case o
he o co uga ion wa eleng h exci ing one o he wheelse he bending esonances o he wheelse
he s ess dynamic ac o is signi ican ly highe and can be eaches a maximum alue close up o
abou 1.8 o he case o co uga ion wa eleng h exci ing , wi h he esonance o he i s o wa d
and up o 1.4 app oxima ely o co uga ion wa eleng h exci ing bending mode leading o la ge
dynamic s esses han o he second o wa d bending mode. The ends wi h speed a e close o
mono onically inc easing, and he e ec o he esonance associa ed wi h he sleepe passing is less
e iden han in he end o he
Q
k
dynamic ac o .
These esul s sugges ha he bending s esses in he axle a e highly a ec ed by he wa eleng h o
ail co uga ion, and ha combina ions o ain speed and co uga ion wa eleng h leading o a
esonance o a bending mode may be especially ele an in iew o axle esis ance o a igue.
Pa icula ly signi ican in iew o eal applica ions is he case o ail co uga ion, a o m o i egula
wea o he ail o en appea ing in ailway sys ems and cha ac e ised quasi-ha monic wea pa e ns
de eloping on he ail head in longi udinal di ec ion [18]. Co uga ion wa eleng h can ange om
50 mm o less up o mo e han 1m in he case o hea y haul co uga ion, and ypical wea dep h
alues a e in he ange o some en hs o millime e.
To quan i y he ele ance o a igue o ail co uga ion, we no e ha he design me hods p esc ibed
o ailway axles by he Eu opean S anda ds EN13103 and EN13104 [19, 20] assume a 1.25
dynamic ampli ica ion ac o on he loads gene a ed a he p ima y suspension. Since he calcula ion
o he bending s esses is hen based on s a ic equilib ium, also he bending s esses a e magni ied
by 25% wi h espec o he s a ic case, whe eas he esul s in Figu e 10 sugges ha la ge dynamic
ac o s migh apply when a pa icula combina ion o co uga ion wa eleng h and ain speed
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
exci es one bending mode. Fo ins ance, a sinusoidal ail co uga ion ha ing app oxima ely 350 mm
wa eleng h and 0.15 mm dep h (i.e. en imes he ISO3095 limi o he conside ed wa eleng h)
would p oduce a dynamic s ess ampli ica ion close o 40%. I shall be poin ed ou howe e ha he
equi alen s a ic loads p esc ibed by EN13103/104 also include la e al wheel- ail con ac o ces due
o cu ing, which a e no included in he analysis p esen ed he e.
4.2 Resul s o andom ail co uga ion and o a wheel la
The simple exci a ion cases conside ed in Sub-sec ion 4.1 allow o poin ou he in luence o
di e en dynamic e ec s on ain- ack in e ac ion and on he s esses in he wheelse , bu do no
ep esen ealis ic exci a ion cases. In his Sub-sec ion, wo sou ces o exci a ion ypically occu ing
in se iced ains a e conside ed: andom ail oughness and a wheel la . Random oughness akes
place on he ail head on accoun o di e en causes: geome ic impe ec ions associa ed wi h he
manu ac u ing and ins alla ion o he ail, i egula wea caused by ain passage and, o la ge
wa eleng hs, non-uni o m ack se lemen due o pe manen de o ma ions in he soil and ballas (in
his case, he e m ― ack i egula i ies‖ is used ins ead o co uga ion). S udies ha e shown ha ail
oughness and ack i egula i y ake he o m o s a iona y andom p ocesses cha ac e ised by hei
powe spec al densi y, which can be de ined based on he quali y o ack main enance [2181]. On
he o he hand, wheel la s a e localised de ec s occu ing on he wheel su ace as he esul o ull
slip o he wheel, ypically caused by poo ly adjus ed o aul y b akes [1922].
Figu e 11 shows he e ical con ac o ce plo ed s. he a elled dis ance o he ain speeds o
100 and 300 km/h, conside ing he exci a ion p oduced by andom ail co uga ion (ampli ude
co esponding o he ISO 3095 limi ). The esul s ob ained conside ing a igid and lexible wheelse
model a e compa ed. Impo an dynamic luc ua ions o he con ac o ce a e e idenced, wi h he
maximum dynamic alue co esponding o app oxima ely 1.6 imes he s a ic load. The di e ences
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
be ween he esul s ob ained o he igid and lexible wheelse a e ela i ely small in his case, and
do no a ec signi ican ly he maximum con ac o ce alue.
Figu e 12 p esen s he e ical con ac o ce s. a elled dis ance o a ehicle a ec ed by a
wheel la . The calcula ion has been ca ied ou o 50 and 300 km/h by means o he igid and
enhanced wheelse models. A se e e dynamic e ec is obse ed, consis ing o he comple e loss o
con ac be ween he wheel and he ail, ollowed by an impac leading o a maximum alue o he
con ac o ce which is be ween 3 and 4 imes he s a ic load and inally by a ansien ib a ion. The
di e ences be ween he esul s o he igid and lexible wheelse model a e small in e ms o
du a ion o he con ac loss and o maximum o e loading, bu he ansien ollowing he impac is
a ec ed qui e ema kably by wheelse lexibili y, as demons a ed by he di e en equency
con en s o he con ac o ce signal, see pa icula ly he zoomed iew on he igh side o he igu e.
The y-axis s esses o he andom ail co uga ion and wheel la exci a ion cases a e shown in
Figu e 13. In he andom co uga ion case, he dynamic luc ua ions o he s ess componen a e
ela i ely low and lead o a maximum peak-peak s ess ampli ude a ound 91.2 MPa, co esponding
o a dynamic ampli ica ion wi h espec o he maximum s ess p oduced by he s a ic load

k
o
1.18 app oxima ely. When he wheel la de ec is conside ed, he esul s a e highly a ec ed by he
ehicle speed, wi h la ge dynamic e ec s aking place a low speed (wi h a dynamic ac o

k
o
1.34 app oxima ely) on accoun o he epea ed loss o con ac o he wheel o he ail, and wi h a
educ ion o he dynamic s esses a highe speed.
Finally, in Figu e 14 he dynamic ac o s
Q
k
and

k
a e epo ed o he andom co uga ion and
wheel la as unc ion o he ehicle speed. The con ac o ce dynamic ac o
Q
k
is nea ly
mono onically inc easing up o a maximum alue close o 1.8 o andom co uga ion exci a ion,
whe eas in case o wheel la exci a ion he dynamic ac o is much highe , in he ange o 2.8-4.2,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
wi h la ge alues occu ing a lowe speeds: his is because a low speed he du a ion o he con ac
loss caused by he wheel la is longe and hence he ollowing impac is la ge . The s ess dynamic
ac o

k
o he andom co uga ion exci a ion case is almos mono onically inc easing wi h speed,
wi h a maximum alue close o 1.3. Fo he wheel la exci a ion case, a comple ely di e en end is
obse ed, he s ess dynamic ac o

k
being ini ially dec easing wi h he speed and hen inc easing
abo e 200 km/h. The maximum alue o he s ess dynamic ac o o his exci a ion case is
ob ained a he lowes speed conside ed in he analysis and is sligh ly below 1.5.
As in he case o exci a ion gene a ed by a single-ha monic ail co uga ion, i is in e es ing o
obse e ha in some cases he dynamic ac o

k
exceeds he 1.25 alue assumed in EN13103/104.
Fo wheel la exci a ion, his happens a low speeds (below 75 km/h) which a e ypical e.g. o
eigh applica ion whe eas o andom ail oughness he 1.25 alue is exceeded only a e y high
speeds abo e 300 km/h, which a e only ele an o e y high speed ains. I shall be s essed
howe e ha he esul s shown in Figu e 14 depend on he ampli ude o he de ec s being
conside ed and, in case o mo e se e e i egula i ies, la ge dynamic s esses shall be expec ed.
I is also in e es ing o poin ou ha by using a s a ic calcula ion o de i e he bending s esses,
S anda ds EN13103/104 inhe en ly imply a p opo ionali y be ween he con ac o ces and he
s esses, whe eas he esul s in igu es 10 and 14 show ha he s ess dynamic ac o

k
is
gene ally lowe (some imes much lowe ) han he dynamic ac o o he e ical con ac o ce
Q
k
.
This ci cums ance is due o he ine ia o ces gene a ed in he wheels and o he di e en
magni ica ion o wheelse lexible modes p oduced when esonance condi ions occu and sugges s
ha a me hod based on a s a ic calcula ion could be no ully sui ed o es ima e se ice s esses in
he axle. Dynamic ain- ack in e ac ion models such as he one p oposed in his pape could be
en isaged as a means o de i e a mo e ealis ic es ima e o se ice s esses in he axle, bu his

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
equi es he s udy o be ex ended o conside he e ec o cu ing, which is en isaged as a nex
de elopmen o he wo k desc ibed he e.
.
5. CONCLUSIONS
Dynamic e ec s may be ex emely impo an in de e mining he a igue esis ance o ailway axles,
and need o be p ope ly conside ed in he axle design p ocess. This pape has p esen ed a me hod
o he nume ical es ima ion o he dynamic s esses in ailway axles, based on he simula ion o he
in e ac ion be ween a lexible wheelse and a lexible ack. The me hod is p esen ly limi ed o he
case o angen ack unning o he wheelse , bu he ex ension o he cu ing condi ion is
en isaged as a nex s ep o he esea ch, o conside he addi ional axle loading due o wheel- ail
con ac o ces in a cu e.
Resul s o he nume ical p ocedu es we e p esen ed in he pape , conside ing he dynamic exci a ion
caused by ail co uga ion and by a wheel la o di e en wheelse speed alues. The esul s clea ly
show ha dynamic e ec s may lead o a signi ican dynamic ampli ica ion o he s esses in he
axle, which is in some cases close o 70%. Howe e , he ac ual ele ance o dynamic e ec s
a ec ing axle s esses is s ongly depending upon he ype o exci a ion and he ehicle speed.
When single ha monic co uga ion is conside ed, he dynamic ampli ica ion o axle s esses is
ela i ely low excep in he case when he co uga ion wa eleng h exci es he bending modes o he
wheelse . In he case o andom mul i-ha monic ail co uga ion, he dynamic ampli ica ion ac o s
a e ela i ely low because he exci a ion is sp ead o e a wide ange o equencies, hus educing
he impo ance o esonance e ec s. In all ail co uga ion cases conside ed, ega dless he
wa e o m o he exci a ion, he dynamic s ess ampli ica ion ends o inc ease wi h he ehicle
speed, so ha he mos c i ical case is ob ained o high-speed applica ions.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
Wheel la exci a ion also appea s o be c i ical in iew o he axle a igue li e, because high
dynamic ampli ica ion ac o s up o 45-50% a e ob ained, bu on accoun o he localized na u e and
small size o his de ec in his case he mos se e e dynamic exci a ion occu s a low speeds, a
which he equency o he exci a ion gene a ed by he la exci es he bending esonances o he
axle. Fo he wheel la case, he e o e, he mos c i ical case appea s o be ha o eigh ca s,
which may be o en a elling a low speed.
O e all, he analyses p esen ed in his pape show ha dynamic e ec s a e essen ial o co ec ly
es ima e he wheelse ’s a igue li e. Mo e esea ch and alida ion is needed o ans e he indings
p esen ed he e in o axle design p ac ices. Hope ully howe e he pape has highligh ed an impo an
a ea o u u e esea ch, in iew o u he imp o ing he eliabili y o ailway anspo .
Acknowledgemen s
The au ho s g a e ully acknowledge he suppo o his wo k p o ided by he P ojec TRA2010-
15669 (Minis e io de Ciencia e Inno ación) and TRA2007-67167 (Minis e io de Educación y
Ciencia-FEDER).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
Re e ences
[1] R. A. Smi h, Railway a igue ailu es: an o e iew o a long s anding p oblem,
Ma e ialwissenscha und We ks o echnik 36:11 (2005) 697-705
[2] V. G ubisic, G. Fische , P ocedu e o eliable du abili y alida ion o ain axles,
Ma e ialwissenscha und We ks o echnik 37:12 (2006) 973-982
[3] S. Be e a, M. Ca boni Va iable ampli ude a igue c ack g ow h in a mild s eel o ailway
axles: Expe imen s and p edic i e models, Enginee ing F ac u e Mechanics 78 (2011) 848-
862.
[4] M. Luke, I. Va olomee , K. Lü hepol, A. Esde s, Fa igue c ack g ow h in ailway axles:
Assessmen concep and alida ion es s, Enginee ing F ac u e Mechanics 78 (2011) 714–
730.
[5] V. G ubisic, G. Fische , Bemessung on Radsa zwellen – Ein lussg ssen und Vo gehen bei
de Auslegung. Be ich FB-226, LBF, Da ms ad ; 2005.
[6] S. Al i, F. B aghin, S. B uni, Nume ical and expe imen al e alua ion o ex eme loads o
imp o ed wheelse design, Vehicle Sys em Dynamics, 46 S (2008) 431-444.
[7] A. S. Wa son, K. Timmis, A me hod o es ima ing ailway axle s ess spec a, Enginee ing
F ac u e Mechanics 78 (2011) 836–847.
[8] S. B uni, R. Co adi, L. Mazzola, Wheel ail con ac o ces as inpu o op imal and obus
axle design, 8 h In e na ional Con e ence on Con ac Mechanics and Wea o Rail/Wheel
Sys ems (CM2009), Fi enze, I aly, Sep embe 15-18, 2009.
[9] D.J. Thompson, C.J.C. Jones Thompson A e iew o he modelling o wheel/ ail noise
gene a ion, Jou nal o Sound and Vib a ion, 231 (2000), pp. 519–536.
[10] J.C.O. Nielsen, A. Igeland, Ve ical dynamic in e ac ion be ween ain and ack—in luence
o wheel and ack impe ec ions, Jou nal o Sound and Vib a ion 187 (5) (1995) 825–839.
[11] G. Diana, F. Cheli, S. B uni, A. Collina, Expe imen al and nume ical in es iga ion on
subway sho pi ch co uga ion, Vehicle Sys em Dynamics, 29 S, (1998) 234-245.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
[12] J.C.O. Nielsen, J. Osca sson, Simula ion o dynamic ain_ ack in e ac ion wi h s a e-
dependen ack p ope ies, Jou nal o Sound and Vib a ion 275 (2004) 515–532.
[13] J. Fayos, L. Baeza, J. E. Ta ancón and F. D. Denia, An Eule ian coo dina e-based me hod
o analysing he s uc u al ib a ions o a solid o e olu ion o a ing abou i s main axis,
Jou nal o Sound and Vib a ion 306 (2007) 618–635
[14] L. Baeza, J. Fayos, A. Roda and R. Insa, High equency ailway ehicle- ack dynamics
h ough lexible o a ing wheelse s, Vehicle Sys em Dynamics 46 (2008) 647 – 659
[15] Baeza, L., Huajiang, O., A ailway ack dynamics model based on modal subs uc u ing and
cyclic bouda y condi ion, Jou nl o Sound and V ib a ion 330 (2011) 75-86.
[16] L. Baeza, A. Roda, J.C.O. Nielsen, Railway ehicle/ ack in e ac ion analysis using a modal
subs uc u ing app oach, Jou nal o Sound and Vib a ion 293 (2006) 112–124
[17] J.J. Kalke , A as algo i hm o he simpli ied heo y o olling con ac , Vehicle Sys em
Dynamics 11 (1982) 1–13.
[18] S. L. G assie, J. Kalousek, Rail co uga ion: cha ac e is ics, causes and ea men s, P oc.
Ins n. Mech. Eng s. Pa F – Jou nal o Rail and Rapid T ansi , 207 (1993), 57-68.
[19] EN 13103 Railway applica ions - Wheelse s and bogies – Non-powe ed axles - Design
me hod, CEN, B ussels, Ap il 2001.
[20] EN 13104 Railway applica ions - Wheelse s and bogies - Powe ed axles - Design me hod,
CEN, B ussels, Ap il 2001.
[1821] ORE B 176: Bogies wi h s ee ed o s ee ing wheelse s. Repo No. 1: Speci ica ions and
p elimina y s udies, Vol. 2, Speci ica ion o a bogie wi h imp o ed cu ing cha ac e is ics.
ORE, U ech 1989.
[2219] A. Johansson, J.C.O. Nielsen, Ou -o - ound ailway wheels — wheel- ail con ac o ces and
ack esponse de i ed om ield es s and nume ical simula ions, P oc. Ins n. Mech. Eng s.
Figu e 3: De ail o he ack model. Le : model o some sleepe bays. Righ :sleepe and
ailpad model.
Figu e 3

Figu e 4: Fini e elemen model o he lexible wheelse .
Figu e 4
Figu e 5: S udied sec ion o wheelse and spa ial poin whe e he s esses ha e been
calcula ed.
y
z
z
x
Figu e 5
Figu e 6: Wheel- ail con ac o ce when he ehicle ci cula es on a co uga ed ack
wi h co uga ion wa eleng h 60 mm. Abo e: e ec o speed and o wheelse lexibili y
o co uga ion ampli ude co esponding o he ISO 3095 limi . Below: e ec o
co uga ion ampli ude o speed 300 km/h and lexible wheelse .
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
52
54
56
58
60
62
64
66
68
70
Rail oughness
Dis ance x [m]
Ve ical con ac o ce [kN]
Flexible wheelse V = 100 km/h Flexible wheelse V = 300 km/h Rigid wheelse V = 300 km/h
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
Rail oughness
Dis ance x [m]
Ve ical con ac o ce [kN]
ISO 3095 10 x ISO 3095
Figu e 6
Figu e 7: y-axis no mal s ess in he s udied sec ion o he axle (c . Fig. 5) when he
ehicle ci cula es on a co uga ed ack wi h co uga ion wa eleng h 60 mm. Le : wo
ehicle speeds, co uga ion ampli ude co esponding o he ISO 3095 limi . Righ : wo
co uga ion ampli udes ( he esul s a e undis inguishable).
  











Ro a ed angle [ ad]

y [MPa]
V = 100 km/h V = 300 km/h
  











Ro a ed angle [ ad]

y [MPa]
ISO 3095 10 x ISO 3095
Figu e 7
Figu e 8: Wheel- ail con ac o ce when he ehicle ci cula es on a co uga ed ack
wi h di e en co uga ion wa eleng hs. Two co uga ion ampli udes a e conside ed,
co esponding o he ISO 3095 limi and 10 imes he ISO 3095 limi . Abo e: he
co uga ion wa eleng h exci es he pinned-pinned mode o he ail. Below: he
co uga ion wa eleng h exci es he i s o wa d bending mode o he wheelse .
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
Rail oughness
Dis ance x [m]
Ve ical con ac o ce [kN]
ISO 3095 10 x ISO 3095
0 0.6 1.2 1.8 2.4 3 3.6 4.2 4.8 5.4 6
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
Rail oughness
Dis ance x [m]
Ve ical con ac o ce [kN]
ISO 3095 10 x ISO 3095
Figu e 8

Figu e 9: y-axis no mal s ess in he s udied sec ion o he axle (c . Fig. 5) when he
ehicle ci cula es on a co uga ed ack a 300 km/h speed. Le : he co uga ion
wa eleng h exci es he pinned-pinned mode o he ail. Righ : he co uga ion
wa eleng h exci es he i s o wa d bending mode o he wheelse .
  











Ro a ed angle [ ad]

y [MPa]
ISO 3095 10 x ISO 3095
  







Ro a ed angle [ ad]

y [MPa]
ISO 3095 10 x ISO 3095
Figu e 9
Figu e 10: Dynamic ac o s
Q
k
( e ical con ac o ce, uppe sub igu e) and

k
(y-axis
s ess, lowe sub igu e) o di e en exci a ion cases and ehicle eloci ies. The
oughness ampli ude is en imes highe he ISO 3095 limi .
050 100 150 200 250 300 350
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
Vehicle eloci y [km/h]
Dynamic/s a ic con ac o ce a io
No oughness
Co uga ion exci es pinned-pinned equency
Co uga ion exci es 1s o wa d mode
Co uga ion exci es 2nd o wa d mode
050 100 150 200 250 300 350
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
Vehicle eloci y [km/h]
Dynamic/s a ic s ess a io
No oughness
Co uga ion exci es pinned-pinned equency
Co uga ion exci es 1s o wa d mode
Co uga ion exci es 2nd o wa d mode
Figu e 10
Figu e 11: Wheel- ail con ac o ce when he ehicle ci cula es a 100 and 300 km/h
speeds on a andomly co uga ed ack.
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Rail oughness
Dis ance x [m]
Ve ical con ac o ce [kN]
Flexible wheelse V = 100 km/h Flexible wheelse V = 300 km/h Rigid wheelse V = 300 km/h
Figu e 11
Figu e 12: Wheel- ail con ac o ce when he ehicle ci cula es a 50 (abo e) and 300
km/h (below) speeds on a pe ec ly e en ail in p esence o a 50 mm wheel la .
0 0.5 1 1.5
0
50
100
150
200
250
Dis ance x [m]
Ve ical con ac o ce [kN]
View A
Flexible wheelse V = 50 km/h Rigid wheelse V = 50 km/h
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
0
50
100
150
200
250
Dis ance x [m]
Ve ical con ac o ce [kN]
Zoomed iew A
0 0.5 1 1.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Dis ance x [m]
Ve ical con ac o ce [kN]
View A
Flexible wheelse V = 300 km/h Rigid wheelse V = 300 km/h
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Dis ance x [m]
Ve ical con ac o ce [kN]
Zoomed iew A
Figu e 12