scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Existence and uniqueness of solutions of higher-order antiperiodic dynamic equations

Abstract

We prove existence and uniqueness results in the presence of coupled lower and upper solutions for the general nth problem in time scales with linear dependence on the ith Δ- derivatives for i = 1, 2, . . . ,n, together with antiperiodic boundary value conditions. Here the nonlinear right-hand side of the equation is defined by a function f (t,x) which is rd-continuous in t and continuous in x uniformly in t. To do that, we obtain the expression of the Green’s function of a related linear operator in the space of the antiperiodic functions

Read accessible full text

Existence and uniqueness of solutions of higher-order antiperiodic dynamic equations

Author: Cabada Fernández, Alberto; Rodríguez Vivero, Dolores
Publisher: SpringerOpen
Year: 2004
DOI: 10.1155/S1687183904310022
Source: https://minerva.usc.es/bitstreams/30100767-e912-42e5-93b6-568320b1348e/download
EXISTENCE AND UNIQUENESS OF SOLUTIONS OF
HIGHER-ORDER ANTIPERIODIC DYNAMIC EQUATIONS
ALBERTO CABADA AND DOLORES R. VIVERO
Recei ed 8 Oc obe 2003 and in e ised o m 9 Feb ua y 2004
We p o e exis ence and uniqueness esul s in he p esence o coupled lowe and uppe
solu ions o he gene al n h p oblem in ime scales wi h linea dependence on he i h ∆-
de i a i es o i=1,2,...,n, oge he wi h an ipe iodic bounda y alue condi ions. He e
he nonlinea igh -hand side o he equa ion is de ined by a unc ion ( ,x) which is
d-con inuous in and con inuous in xuni o mly in . To do ha , we ob ain he exp es-
sion o he G een’s unc ion o a ela ed linea ope a o in he space o he an ipe iodic
unc ions.
1. In oduc ion
The heo y o dynamic equa ions has been in oduced by S e an Hilge in his Ph.D. hesis
[12]. This new heo y uni ies diffe ence and diffe en ial equa ions and has expe ienced
an impo an g ow h in he las yea s. Recen ly, many pape s de o ed o he s udy o
his kind o p oblems ha e been p esen ed. In he monog aphs o Bohne and Pe e son
[5,6] he e a e he undamen al ools o wo k wi h his ype o equa ions. Su eys on his
heo y gi en by Aga wal e al. [2]andAga wale al.[1]gi eusanideao heimpo ance
o his new ield.
In his pape , we s udy he exis ence and uniqueness o solu ions o he ollowing n h-
o de dynamic equa ion wi h an ipe iodic bounda y alue condi ions:
(Ln)
u∆n( )+
n−1

j=1
Mju∆j( )=  ,u( ),∀ ∈I=[a,b],
u∆i(a)=−u∆iσ(b),0≤i≤n−1.
(1.1)
He e, n≥1, Mj∈Ra e gi en cons an s o j∈{1,...,n−1},[a,b]=Tκn,wi hT⊂Ran
a bi a y bounded ime scale and :I×R→Rsa is ies he ollowing condi ion:
Copy igh ©2004 Hindawi Publishing Co po a ion
Ad ances in Diffe ence Equa ions 2004:4 (2004) 291–310
2000 Ma hema ics Subjec Classi ica ion: 39A10
URL: h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1155/S1687183904310022
292 Highe -o de an ipe iodic dynamic equa ions
(H ) o allx∈R, (·,x)∈C d(I)and ( ,·)∈C(R)uni o mlya ∈I, ha is, o
all >0, he e exis s δ>0such ha
|x−y|<δ=⇒ 
 ( ,x)− ( ,y)
<,∀ ∈I. (1.2)
Asolu iono p oblem(Ln) will be a unc ion u:T→Rsuch ha u∈Cn
d(I) and sa -
is ies bo h equali ies. He e, we deno e by Cn
d(I) he se o all unc ions u:T→Rsuch
ha he i h de i a i e is con inuous in Tκi,i=0,...,n−1, and he n h de i a i e is d-
con inuous in I.
I is clea ha o any gi en cons an M∈R,p oblem(Ln)canbe ew i enas
u∆n( )+
n−1

j=1
Mju∆j( )+Mu( )=  ,u( )+Mu( ), ∀ ∈I,
u∆i(a)=−u∆iσ(b),0≤i≤n−1.
(1.3)
De ining he linea ope a o Tn[M]:Cn
d(I)→C d(I) o e e yu∈Cn
d(I)as
Tn[M]u( ):=u∆n( )+
n−1

j=1
Mju∆j( )+Mu( ), o e e y ∈I, (1.4)
and he se
Wn:=u∈Cn
d(I):u∆i(a)=−u∆iσ(b),0≤i≤n−1, (1.5)
we can ew i e he dynamic equa ion (Ln)as
Tn[M]u( )=  ,u( )+Mu( ), ∈I,u∈Wn.(1.6)
F om his ac , we deduce ha o ensu e he exis ence and uniqueness o solu ions o
he dynamic equa ion (Ln), we mus de e mine he eal alues M,M1,...,Mn−1 o which
he ope a o Tn[M] is in e ible on he se Wn, ha is, he alues o which G een’s unc-
ion associa ed wi h he ope a o T−1
n[M]inWncan be de ined. In Sec ion 2,wep esen
he exp ession o G een’s unc ion associa ed o he ope a o T−1in Wn,whe eTis a
gene al n h-o de linea ope a o ha is in e ible on ha se . This o mula is analogous
o he one gi en in [9] o n h-o de dynamic equa ions wi h pe iodic bounda y alue
condi ions.
In Sec ion 3,wep o easufficien condi ion o he exis ence and uniqueness o solu-
ions o he dynamic equa ion (Ln). Fo his, we ake as e e ence he esul s ob ained in
[3,4], whe e he exis ence and uniqueness o solu ions o p oblem (Ln)iss udiedin he
pa icula case T={0,1,...,P+n}and so (Ln)isadiffe ence equa ion wi h an ipe iodic
bounda y condi ions. In his case, he classical i e a i e me hods based on he exis ence
o a lowe and an uppe solu ion and on compa ison p inciples o some adequa e linea
A. Cabada and D. R. Vi e o 293
ope a o s, canno be applied and, as a consequence, ex emal solu ions do no exis in a
gi en unc ion’s se . Hence, o s udy he exis ence and uniqueness o solu ions o p ob-
lem (Ln) in an a bi a y bounded ime scale T⊂R, we use he echnique de eloped in
[3,4], based on he concep o coupled lowe and uppe solu ions, simila o he de i-
ni ion gi en in [10] o ope a o s de ined in abs ac spaces and in [11] o an ipe iodic
bounda y i s -o de diffe en ial equa ions. A su ey o hose esul s o diffe ence equa-
ions can be ounded in [8].
Using he esul s p o ed in Sec ions 2and 3,wewillob aininSec ions4and 5 he
exp ession o G een’s unc ion and a sufficien condi ion o he exis ence and uniqueness
o solu ions o he dynamic equa ions o i s - and second-o de , espec i ely; likewise,
we will gi e de ails abou he con inuous case whe e a dynamic equa ion is a diffe en ial
equa ion and he disc e e case, in which ei he a diffe ence equa ion o a q-diffe ence
equa ion a e ea ed.
2. Exp ession o G een’s unc ion
In his sec ion, we ob ain he exp ession o G een’s unc ion associa ed wi h he ope a o
T−1in Wn,whe eTis a gene al linea ope a o o n h-o de ha is in e ible on he
men ioned se .
Fi s , we in oduce he concep o n h-o de eg essi e ope a o , see [5, De ini ion 5.89
and Theo em 5.91].
De ini ion 2.1. Le Mi∈R,0≤i≤n−1 be gi en cons an s, he ope a o T:Cn
d(I)→
C d(I), de ined o e e y u∈Cn
d(I)as
Tu( ):=u∆n( )+
n−1

i=0
Miu∆i( ), o e e y ∈I, (2.1)
is eg essi e on Ii and only i 1 + n
i=1(−µ( ))iMn−i= 0 o all ∈I.
Theo em 2.2. Le Mi∈R,0≤i≤n−1be gi en cons an s such ha he ope a o Tde ined
in (2.1) is eg essi e on I(see De ini ion 2.1). I he ope a o Tis in e ible on Wn, hen
G een’s unc ion associa ed o he ope a o T−1in Wn,G:T×I→Ris gi en by he ollowing
exp ession:
G( ,s)=


u( ,s)+ ( ,s), i a≤σ(s)≤ ≤σn(b),
u( ,s), i a≤ <σ(s)≤σ(b), (2.2)
whe e, o e e y s∈[a,b] ixed, (·,s)is he unique solu ion o he p oblem
(Qs)
Txs( )=0, ∈σ(s),b,
x∆i
sσ(s)=0, i=0,1,...,n−2,
x∆n−1
sσ(s)=1,
(2.3)
and o e e y s∈[a,b] ixed, u(·,s)is gi en as he unique solu ion o he p oblem
294 Highe -o de an ipe iodic dynamic equa ions
(Rs)
Tys( )=0, ∈[a,b],
y∆i
s(a)+y∆i
sσ(b)=−
∆iσ(b),s,i=0,1,...,n−1.(2.4)
P oo . Fi s , we see ha he unc ion Gis well de ined, ha is, o e e y s∈[a,b] ixed,
p oblems (Qs)and(Rs) ha e a unique solu ion.
Since he ope a o Tis eg essi e on I,weha e,see[5, Co olla y 5.90 and Theo em
5.91], ha o e e y s∈[a,b] ixed, he ini ial alue p oblem (Qs) has a unique solu ion.
To e i y ha he pe iodic bounda y p oblem (Rs) is uniquely sol able, we conside
he ollowing bounda y alue p oblem:
(Pλ)
w∆n( )+
n−1

i=0
Miw∆i( )=h( ), ∈I,
w∆i(a)+w∆iσ(b)=λi,i=0,1,...,n−1,
(2.5)
wi h h∈C d(I)andλi∈R,0≤i≤n−1 ixed.
We know ha w∈Cn
d(I)isasolu iono p oblem(Pλ)i andonlyi W( )=
(w( ),w∆( ),...,w∆n−1( ))Tis a solu ion o he ma ix equa ion
W∆( )=AW( )+H( ), ∈I,W(a)+Wσ(b)=λ, (2.6)
whe e H( )=(0,...,0,h( ))T,λ=(λ0,...,λn−1)T,and
A=












010··· 0
001··· 0
.
.
..
.
..
.
.....
.
.
000
··· 1
−M0−M1−M2··· −Mn−1












.(2.7)
Since he ope a o Tis eg essi e on I,weha e,by[5, De ini ions 5.5 and 5.89], ha
he ma ix Ais eg essi e on I ooandso,i ollows om[5, Theo em 5.24] ha he
ini ial alue p oblem
W∆( )=AW( )+H( ), ∈I,W(a)=Wa, (2.8)
has a unique solu ion ha is gi en by he ollowing exp ession:
W( )=eA( ,a)Wa+
aeA ,σ(s)H(s)∆s. (2.9)
A. Cabada and D. R. Vi e o 295
I we deno e he n×niden i y ma ix by In, hen we ob ain, om he bounda y con-
di ions, ha p oblem (2.6) has a unique solu ion i and only i he e exis s a unique
Wa=W(a)∈Rnsuch ha
In+eAσ(b),aWa=λ−σ(b)
aeAσ(b),σ(s)H(s)∆s, (2.10)
o equi alen ly, i and only i he ma ix In+eA(σ(b),a)isin e ible.
Now, since he ope a o Tis in e ible on Wn,weha e ha p oblem(P0)hasaunique
solu ion and hen he e exis s he in e se o such ma ix. As a consequence, p oblem (Rs)
has a unique solu ion.
Now, le z:T→Rbe de ined o e e y ∈Tas
z( )=σ(b)
aG( ,s)h(s)∆s. (2.11)
I is no difficul o p o e, by using [5, Theo em 1.117], ha zis he unique solu ion
o he p oblem (P0). 
Now, we p o e he ollowing p ope ies o G een’s unc ion associa ed o he ope a o
T−1in Wn.
P oposi ion 2.3. Le Mi∈R,0≤i≤n−1be gi en cons an s such ha he ope a o Tde-
ined in (2.1) is eg essi e on I.I G:T×I→Ris G een’s unc ion associa ed o he ope a o
T−1in Wn,de inedin(2.2), hen he ollowing condi ions a e sa is ied.
(1) The e exis s k>0such ha |G( ,s)|≤k o all ( ,s)∈T×I.
(2) I n=1, hen o e e ys∈I, he unc ionG(·,s)is con inuous a ∈Texcep a
=s=σ(s).
(3) I n>1, hen o e e ys∈I, he unc ionG(·,s)is con inuous in T.
(4) I n=1, hen o e e y ∈T, he unc ionG( ,·)is d-con inuous a s∈Iexcep
when s= =σ( ).
(5) I n>1, hen o e e y ∈T, he unc ionG( ,·)is d-con inuous in I.
P oo . As we ha e seen in he p oo o Theo em 2.2, we know ha G een’s unc ion asso-
cia ed o he ope a o T−1in Wnis gi en as he 1 ×n e m o he ma ix unc ion
F( ,s)=




eA ,σ(s)−eA( ,a)In+eAσ(b),a−1eAσ(b),σ(s),σ(s)≤ ,
−eA( ,a)In+eAσ(b),a−1eAσ(b),σ(s), <σ(s), (2.12)
whe e Ais he ma ix gi en in (2.7).
F om [5, De ini ion 5.18 and Theo em 5.23], we know ha he ma ix exponen ial
unc ion is con inuous in bo h a iables and so he unc ion Gis bounded in he compac
se T×I.
Now, since eA( , )=In,i =σ(s)=s, hen he diagonal e ms o F(·,s) a e no con-
inuous a .
I is clea ha in any o he si ua ion, he unc ion F(·,s)iscon inuousa .

296 Highe -o de an ipe iodic dynamic equa ions
On he o he hand, gi en 0∈T, o e e ys0∈Isuch ha s0= 0,i ollows, om
he con inui y o he exponen ial unc ion, ha i s→s0and σ(s)→σ(s0), hen F( 0,s)→
F( 0,s0).
Hence, since G( ,s)(≡F1,n( ,s)) belongs o he diagonal o F( ,s)onlywhenn=1, he
p ope ies (2), (3), (4), and (5) o he s a emen hold. 
3. Exis ence and uniqueness esul s
In his sec ion, we p o e exis ence and uniqueness esul s o he n h-o de nonlinea
dynamic equa ion wi h an ipe iodic bounda y condi ions (Ln).
Suppose ha he unc ion :I×R→Rsa is ies condi ion (H ), he ope a o Tn[M]
is eg essi e on Iand in e ible on Wnand Gis G een’s unc ion associa ed o he ope a o
Tn−1[M]inWn,de inedin(2.2).
We de ine he unc ions G+,G−:T×I→Ras
G+:=max{G,0}≥0, G−:=−min{G,0}≥0, (3.1)
and so,
G=G+−G−on T×I. (3.2)
Conside ing he ope a o s A+
n[M],A−
n[M]:C(T)→C(T)de ined o e e yη∈C(T)
as
A+
n[M]η( ):=σ(b)
aG+( ,s) s,η(s)+Mη(s)∆s, ∈T,
A−
n[M]η( ):=σ(b)
aG−( ,s) s,η(s)+Mη(s)∆s, ∈T,
(3.3)
he solu ions o he dynamic equa ion (Ln) a e he ixed poin s o he ope a o
An[M]:=A+
n[M]−A−
n[M].(3.4)
No e ha i condi ion (H ) holds, hen he ope a o s A+
n[M]andA−
n[M]a ewell
de ined.
To deduce he exis ence and uniqueness o solu ions o he dynamic equa ion (Ln), we
in oduce he concep o coupled lowe and uppe solu ions o such p oblem.
De ini ion 3.1. Gi en M∈Rsuch ha he ope a o Tn[M] is eg essi e on Iand in e ible
on Wn, a pai o unc ions α,β∈Cn
d(I)such ha α≤βin Tis a pai o coupled lowe
and uppe solu ions o he dynamic equa ion (Ln) i he inequali ies
α( )≤A+
n[M]α( )−A−
n[M]β( ), ∀ ∈T,
β( )≥A+
n[M]β( )−A−
n[M]α( ), ∀ ∈T,(3.5)
hold.
A. Cabada and D. R. Vi e o 297
Unde he condi ions o he p e ious de ini ion, i αand βa e a pai o coupled lowe
and uppe solu ions o he dynamic equa ion (Ln), hen de ining he ope a o
B[M]:[α,β]×[α,β]−→ C(T) (3.6)
as
B[M](η,ξ):=A+
n[M]η−A−
n[M]ξ, (3.7)
and conside ing he hypo hesis
(H) o e e y ∈Iand α( )≤u≤ ≤β( ), i is sa is ied ha
( ,u)+Mu≤ ( , )+M , (3.8)
we p o e he ollowing mono onici y p ope y.
Lemma 3.2. Suppose ha M∈Ris a gi en cons an such ha he ope a o Tn[M]is e-
g essi e on Iand in e ible on Wn,αand βa e a pai o coupled lowe and uppe solu-
ions o he dynamic equa ion (Ln)and he unc ion :I×R→Rsa is ies hypo heses (H )
and (H).Then,B[M](η,ξ)∈[α,β] o all η,ξ∈[α,β].Mo eo e ,i α≤η1≤η2≤βand
α≤ξ2≤ξ1≤β, hen
B[M]η1,ξ1≤B[M]η2,ξ2in T.(3.9)
P oo . Le α≤η1≤η2≤βand α≤ξ2≤ξ1≤β. I ollows, om he de ini ions o A+
n[M]
and A−
n[M], ha
A+
n[M]α≤A+
n[M]η1≤A+
n[M]η2≤A+
n[M]βin T,
A−
n[M]α≤A−
n[M]ξ2≤A−
n[M]ξ1≤A−
n[M]βin T.(3.10)
F om he de ini ions o αand β,weob ain ha
α≤A+
n[M]α−A−
n[M]β≤A+
n[M]η1−A−
n[M]ξ1
≤A+
n[M]η2−A−
n[M]ξ2≤A+
n[M]β−A−
n[M]α≤βin T.(3.11)
This comple es he p oo . 
Now, we ob ain a esul which gi es us a egion whe e all he solu ions in [α,β]o he
dynamic equa ion (Ln)lie.
P oposi ion 3.3. Suppose ha M∈Ris a gi en cons an such ha he ope a o Tn[M]is
eg essi e on Iand in e ible on Wn,αand βa e a pai o coupled lowe and uppe solu ions
o he dynamic equa ion (Ln)and he unc ion :I×R→Rsa is ies hypo heses (H )and
(H).
Then, he e exis wo mono one sequences in C(T),{ϕm}m∈N,and{ψm}m∈N,wi hα=
ϕ0≤ϕm≤ψl≤ψ0=βin T,m,l∈Nwhich con e ge uni o mly o he unc ions ϕand ψ
ha sa is y
ϕ=A+
n[M]ϕ−A−
n[M]ψ,ψ=A+
n[M]ψ−A−
n[M]ϕin T.(3.12)
298 Highe -o de an ipe iodic dynamic equa ions
Mo eo e , any solu ion u∈[α,β]o (Ln)belongs o he sec o [ϕ,ψ]. I , in addi ion,
ϕ=ψ, hen ϕis he unique solu ion o (Ln)in [α,β].
P oo . The sequences {ϕm}m∈Nand {ψm}m∈Na e ob ained ecu si ely as ϕ0:=α,ψ0:=β
and o e e y m≥1,
ϕm:=B[M]ϕm−1,ψm−1,ψm:=B[M]ψm−1,ϕm−1.(3.13)
F om Lemma 3.2,weknow ha α=:ϕ0≤ϕ1≤ψ1≤ψ0:=βin T.
By induc ion, we conclude ha he sequence {ϕm}m∈Nis mono one inc easing, he
sequence {ψm}m∈Nis mono one dec easing, and ϕm≤ψlin T o e e y m,l∈N.
As a consequence, o e e y ∈T, he e exis ϕ( ):=limm→∞ ϕm( )andψ( ):=
limm→∞ ψm( ).
F om hypo hesis (H )andP oposi ion 2.3, we know ha bo h sequences a e uni-
o mly equicon inuous on Iand so, Ascoli-A zel`
a’s heo em, (see [7, page 72], [14,page
735]), implies ha such con e gence is uni o m in T.Now,[13, Theo em 1.4.3] shows
ha
ϕ=A+
n[M]ϕ−A−
n[M]ψ,ψ=A+
n[M]ψ−A−
n[M]ϕin T.(3.14)
Le ube a solu ion o he dynamic equa ion (Ln)such ha u∈[α,β]. F om Lemma
3.2,weknow ha
ϕ1:=B[M](α,β)≤B[M](u,u)=u≤B[M](β,α)=:ψ1in T.(3.15)
By ecu ence, we a i e a ϕm≤u≤ψlin T o all m,l∈N. Thus, passing o he limi ,
we ob ain ha ϕ≤u≤ψin T.
Finally, i ϕ=ψ, henweha e ha ϕ=A+
n[M]ϕ−A−
n[M]ϕ=:An[M]ϕ, ha is, ϕ=ψ
is a solu ion o he dynamic equa ion (Ln)in[α,β]. Since all solu ions o (Ln) ha belong
o [α,β] lie in he sec o [ϕ,ψ], we conclude ha ϕis he unique solu ion o (Ln)in
[α,β]. 
Now, le ·be he sup emum no m in C(T).
We p o e he ollowing exis ence esul , ha gi es us a sufficien condi ion o assu e
ha he dynamic equa ion (Ln) has a unique solu ion lying be ween a pai o coupled
lowe and uppe solu ions o (Ln).
Theo em 3.4. Assume ha M∈Ris a gi en cons an such ha he ope a o Tn[M]is
eg essi e on Iand in e ible on Wn,αand βa e a pai o coupled lowe and uppe solu ions
o he dynamic equa ion (Ln)and he unc ion :I×R→Rsa is ies hypo hesis (H ).
I o e e y ∈Iand α( )≤u≤ ≤β( ) he inequali ies
−M( −u)≤ ( , )− ( ,u)≤(K−M)( −u) (3.16)
A. Cabada and D. R. Vi e o 299
a e sa is ied o some K≥0such ha
K·



σ(b)
a
G( ,s)
∆s




<1, (3.17)
hen he dynamic equa ion (Ln)has a unique solu ion in [α,β].
P oo . Since he i s pa o he inequali y (3.16) is hypo hesis (H), we know, by
P oposi ion 3.3, ha he e exis s a pai o unc ions ϕ,ψ∈C(T)such ha o e e y ∈T
we ha e
0≤(ψ−ϕ)( )
=A+
n[M]ψ( )−A−
n[M]ϕ( )−A+
n[M]ϕ( )+A−
n[M]ψ( )
=σ(b)
aG+( ,s) s,ψ(s)− s,ϕ(s)+Mψ(s)−ϕ(s)∆s
+σ(b)
aG−( ,s) s,ψ(s)− s,ϕ(s)+Mψ(s)−ϕ(s)∆s
=σ(b)
a
G( ,s)
 s,ψ(s)− s,ϕ(s)+Mψ(s)−ϕ(s)∆s
≤σ(b)
a
G( ,s)
·K·ψ(s)−ϕ(s)∆s
≤
ψ−ϕ
·K·



σ(b)
a
G( ,s)
∆s




.
(3.18)
Thus, i ollows om he inequali y (3.17) ha ϕ=ψin Tand P oposi ion 3.3 allows
us o conclude ha he dynamic equa ion (Ln) has a unique solu ion in [α,β]. 
Rema k 3.5. One can check, ollowing he p oo s gi en in hese sec ions, ha we can
de elop an analogous heo y o p oblem
(¯
Ln)
−u∆n( )+
n−1

j=1
Mju∆j( )=  ,u( ),∀ ∈I=[a,b],
u∆i(a)=−u∆iσ(b),0≤i≤n−1.
(3.19)
In his case, we mus s udy he ope a o
¯
Tn[M]u≡−u∆n+
n−1

j=1
Mju∆j+Mu (3.20)
in he space Wn.
The unc ions αand βa e gi en as in De ini ion 3.1,wi hGG een’s unc ion ela ed
wi h ope a o ¯
Tn[M]inWn.
306 Highe -o de an ipe iodic dynamic equa ions
One can e i y ha he ope a o
T2[M]u( ):=−u( )+M2u( ), ∈I, (5.12)
is eg essi e on Iand in e ible on W2 o all M= 0. Mo eo e , G een’s unc ion associ-
a ed o he ope a o T−1
2[M]inW2is gi en by he ollowing exp ession.
I M=0, hen
G( ,s)=








1
2T
2− +s,i 0≤s< ≤T,
1
2T
2−s+ ,i 0≤ ≤s≤T.
(5.13)
I M= 0, hen
G( ,s)=












1
2Me−M( −s)
1+e−MT −eM( −s)
1+eMT ,i 0≤s< ≤T,
1
2MeM(T+ −s)
1+eMT −e−M(T+ −s)
1+e−MT ,i 0≤ ≤s≤T.
(5.14)
F om he p e ious exp essions we ob ain ha i M=0, hen




T
0
G( ,s)
ds




≤5T2
4=:K0>0, (5.15)
and i M= 0, hen




T
0
G( ,s)
ds




≤1
2|M|MeMT −1
1+eMT +1−e−MT
1+e−MT =:KM>0.(5.16)
The e o e, om Co olla y 5.1 we ob ain he ollowing esul .
Co olla y 5.2. Assume ha M∈Ris a gi en cons an , αand βa e a pai o coupled
lowe anduppe solu ionso hediffe en ial equa ion (¯
L2),and :I×R→Ris a con inu-
ous unc ion. Assuming condi ion (3.16)(wi hM2ins ead o M) o someK≥0such ha
K<1/KM,wi hK0and KMde ined in (5.15)and(5.16), espec i ely, hen he diffe en ial
equa ion (¯
L2)has a unique solu ion in [α,β].
Diffe ence equa ions. Le h>0, P∈N;P≥2, and T={0,h,...,hP}⊂R.
Gi en u:T→R,i ollows om[5, Theo em 1.16] ha o e e y ∈Tκ2,uis wice
∆-diffe en iable a , mo eo e , we ha e ha
u∆2( )=u( +2h)−2u( +h)+u(h)
h2.(5.17)

A. Cabada and D. R. Vi e o 307
In his case, one can e i y ha o all M∈Rsuch ha |M| = 1/h,1+(1+Mh)P−1= 0,
and 1 + (1 −Mh)P−1= 0, he ope a o
¯
T2[M]u( ):=−u( +2h)+2u( +h)−1−M2h2u(h)
h2, ∈I, (5.18)
is eg essi e on Iand in e ible on W2. Now, he unc ion Gis gi en by he ollowing
exp ession.
I M=0, hen
G( ,s)=








1
2h(P−1)
2− +s+h,i 0≤s+h≤ ≤hP,
1
2h(P−1)
2−s−h+ ,i 0≤ ≤s≤h(P−2).
(5.19)
I M= 0, |M| = 1/h,1+(1+Mh)P−1= 0, and 1 + (1 −Mh)P−1= 0, hen
G( ,s)=










1
2M(1 −Mh)( −s−h)/h
1+(1−Mh)P−1−(1 + Mh)( −s−h)/h
1+(1+Mh)P−1,i 0≤s+h≤ ≤hP,
1
2M(1 + Mh)(Ph+ −s−2h)/h
1+(1+Mh)P−1−(1 −Mh)(Ph+ −s−2h)/h
1+(1−Mh)P−1,i 0≤ ≤s≤h(P−2).
(5.20)
F om hese exp essions, we deduce he ollowing es ima es.
I M=0, hen we ha e ha





h·
h(P−2)

s=0
G( ,s)





≤5h(P−1)2
4=:K0>0.(5.21)
I |M|<1/h,M= 0, hen we a i e a





h·
h(P−2)

s=0
G( ,s)





≤1
2|M|M(1 + Mh)P−1−1
1+(1+Mh)P−1+1−(1 −Mh)P−1
1+(1−Mh)P−1
=:KM>0.
(5.22)
As a consequence, we a i e a he ollowing esul .
Co olla y 5.3. Assume ha M∈Ris a gi en cons an such ha |M|<1/h,αand βa e
a pai o coupled lowe and uppe solu ions o he dynamic equa ion (¯
L2),and he unc ion
:I×R→R e i ies ha o e e y ∈I, ( ,·)∈C(R).I (3.16)(wi hM2ins ead o M)
holds o some K≥0such ha K<1/KM,wi hK0and KMde ined in (5.21)and(5.22),
espec i ely, hen he dynamic equa ion (¯
L2)has a unique solu ion in [α,β].
q-diffe ence equa ions. Gi en q∈R,q>1, and N∈N,N≥2, le T={1,q,...,qN}⊂R.
308 Highe -o de an ipe iodic dynamic equa ions
I u:T→R, henweknow,by[5, Theo em 1.16], ha o e e y ∈Tκ2,uis wice
∆-diffe en iable a and
u∆2( )=uq2 −(q+1)u(q )+qu( )
(q−1)2q 2.(5.23)
I =qiand s=qj, hen one can e i y ha G een’s unc ion is gi en by he ollowing
exp ession.
I M=0, hen
G( ,s)=








1
2qN−1
2−qi+qj+1,i 0≤j+1≤i≤N,
1
2qN−1
2−qj+1 +qi,i 0≤i≤j≤N−2.
(5.24)
I M= 0, |M| = 1/(q−1)qk o each k∈JN−2={0,1,...,N−2},1+
N−2
k=0(1 + M(q−
1)qk)= 0and1+N−2
k=0(1 −M(q−1)qk)= 0, hen
G( ,s)=





























1
2Mi−1
k=j+1 1−M(q−1)qk
1+N−2
k=01−M(q−1)qk−i−1
k=j+1 1+M(q−1)qk
1+N−2
k=01+M(q−1)qk,
i 0 ≤j+1≤i≤N,
1
2Mk∈Ii,j1−M(q−1)qk
1+N−2
k=01−M(q−1)qk−k∈Ii,j1+M(q−1)qk
1+N−2
k=01+M(q−1)qk,
i 0 ≤i≤j≤N−2,
(5.25)
wi h Ii,jde ined in (4.23).
F om he exp ession o G een’s unc ion, we ob ain he ollowing uppe bounds.
I M=0, hen
(q−1) ·max
0≤i≤NN−2

j=0
qj
Gqi,qj
≤maxK0,1,K0,2=:K0>0, (5.26)
wi h
K0,1 :=5qN−1−12
4,
K0,2 :=1
2qN−1qN−1−1+1
2qN−1−12.
(5.27)
I |M|<1/(q−1)qN−2,M= 0, hen
(q−1) ·max
0≤i≤NN−2

j=0
qj
Gqi,qj
≤maxKM,1,KM,2=:KM>0, (5.28)
A. Cabada and D. R. Vi e o 309
whe e
KM,1 :=1
2|M|MN−2
k=01+M(q−1)qk−1
1+N−2
k=01+M(q−1)qk+1−N−2
k=01−M(q−1)qk
1+N−2
k=01−M(q−1)qk,
KM,2 :=1
2|M|MN−1
k=01+M(q−1)qk−1−M(q−1)qN−1
1+N−2
k=01+M(q−1)qk
+1−M(q−1)qN−1−N−1
k=01−M(q−1)qk
1+N−2
k=01−M(q−1)qk.
(5.29)
F om he p e ious exp essions, we ha e he ollowing esul .
Co olla y 5.4. Assume ha M∈Ris such ha |M|<1/(q−1)qN−2,αand βa e a pai o
coupled lowe and uppe solu ions o he dynamic equa ion (¯
L2),and :I×R→R e i ies
ha o e e y ∈I, ( ,·)∈C(R).I (3.16)(wi hM2ins ead o M)is ue o someK≥0
such ha K<1/KM,wi hK0and KMde ined in (5.26)and(5.28), espec i ely, hen he
dynamic equa ion (¯
L2)has a unique solu ion in [α,β].
Acknowledgmen s
The au ho s hank he e e ees o he pape o hei in e es ing commen s and sugges-
ions. This esea ch was pa ially suppo ed by D. G. I. and F.E.D.E.R. p ojec BFM2001-
3884-C02-01, and by Xun a de Galicia and F.E.D.E.R. p ojec PGIDIT020XIC20703PN,
Spain.
Re e ences
[1] R.P.Aga wal,M.Bohne ,D.O’Regan,andA.Pe e son,Dynamic equa ions on ime scales: a
su ey, J. Compu . Appl. Ma h. 141 (2002), no. 1-2, 1–26.
[2] R.P.Aga wal,M.Bohne ,andA.Pe e son,Inequali ies on ime scales: a su ey, Ma h. Inequal.
Appl. 4(2001), no. 4, 535–557.
[3] R. P. Aga wal, A. Cabada, and V. O e o-Espina , Exis ence and uniqueness esul s o n h o de
nonlinea diffe ence equa ions in p esence o lowe and uppe solu ions, A ch. Inequal. Appl.
1(2003), no. 3-4, 421–431.
[4] R. P. Aga wal, A. Cabada, V. O e o-Espina , and S. Don ha, Exis ence and uniqueness o solu ions
o an i-pe iodic diffe ence equa ions, o appea in A ch. Inequal. Appl.
[5] M. Bohne and A. Pe e son, Dynamic Equa ions on Time Scales. An In oduc ion wi h Applica-
ions,Bi kh
¨
ause Bos on, Massachuse s, 2001.
[6] ,Ad ances in Dynamic Equa ions on Time Scales,Bi kh
¨
ause Bos on, Massachuse s,
2003.
[7] H. B ezis, Analyse Fonc ionnelle: Th´
eo ie e Applica ions [Func ional Analysis: Theo y and Appli-
ca ions], Collec ion Ma h´
ema iques Appliqu´
ees pou la Maˆ
ı ise, Masson, Pa is, 1983.
[8] A. Cabada, Theme hodo lowe anduppe solu ions o pe iodicandan i-pe iodicdiffe ence
equa ions, o appea in Elec . T ans. Num. Anal.
[9] ,Ex emal solu ions and G een’s unc ions o highe o de pe iodic bounda y alue p ob-
lems in ime scales, J. Ma h. Anal. Appl. 290 (2004), no. 1, 35–54.
[10] A. Cabada and J. J. Nie o, Fixed poin s and app oxima e solu ions o nonlinea ope a o equa-
ions. Fixed poin heo y wi h applica ions in nonlinea analysis,J.Compu .Appl.Ma h.113
(2000), no. 1-2, 17–25.
310 Highe -o de an ipe iodic dynamic equa ions
[11] D. F anco, J. J. Nie o, and D. O’Regan, An i-pe iodic bounda y alue p oblem o nonlinea i s
o de o dina y diffe en ial equa ions, Ma h. Inequal. Appl. 6(2003), no. 3, 477–485.
[12] S. Hilge , Ein Maßke enkalk¨
ul mi Anwendung au Zen umsmannig al igkei en, Ph.D. hesis,
Uni e si ¨
a W¨
u zbu g, W¨
u zbu g, 1988.
[13] B. Kaymakc¸alan, V. Lakshmikan ham, and S. Si asunda am, Dynamical Sys ems on Measu e
Chains, Kluwe Academic Publishe s, Do d ech , 1996.
[14] J. Mawhin, Analyse. Fondemen s, Techniques, ´
E olu ion [Analysis. Founda ions, Techniques, E o-
lu ion], second ed., Acc`
es Sciences, De Boeck Uni e si y, B ussels, 1997.
Albe o Cabada: Depa amen o de An´
alise Ma em´
a ica, Facul ade de Ma em´
a icas, Uni e sidade
de San iago de Compos ela, 15782 San iago de Compos ela, Galicia, Spain
E-mail add ess:[email p o ec ed]
Dolo es R. Vi e o: Depa amen o de An´
alise Ma em´
a ica, Facul ade de Ma em´
a icas, Uni e sidade
de San iago de Compos ela, 15782 San iago de Compos ela, Galicia, Spain
E-mail add ess:[email p o ec ed]