scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Genetic Characterization of the Fish Piaractus brachypomus by Microsatellites Derived from Transcriptome Sequencing

Abstract

The pirapitinga, Piaractus brachypomus (Characiformes, Serrasalmidae), is a fish from the Amazon basin and is considered to be one of the main native species used in aquaculture production in South America. The objectives of this study were: (1) to perform liver transcriptome sequencing of pirapitinga through NGS and then validate a set of microsatellite markers for this species; and (2) to use polymorphic microsatellites for analysis of genetic variability in farmed stocks. The transcriptome sequencing was carried out through the Roche/454 technology, which resulted in 3,696 non-redundant contigs. Of this total, 2,568 contigs had similarity in the non-redundant (nr) protein database (Genbank) and 2,075 sequences were characterized in the categories of Gene Ontology (GO). After the validation process of 30 microsatellite loci, eight markers showed polymorphism. The analysis of these polymorphic markers in farmed stocks revealed that fish farms from North Brazil had a higher genetic diversity than fish farms from Southeast Brazil. AMOVA demonstrated that the highest proportion of variation was presented within the populations. However, when comparing different groups (1: Wild; 2: North fish farms; 3: Southeast fish farms), a considerable variation between the groups was observed. The FST values showed the occurrence of genetic structure among the broodstocks from different regions of Brazil. The transcriptome sequencing in pirapitinga provided important genetic resources for biological studies in this non-model species, and microsatellite data can be used as the framework for the genetic management of breeding stocks in Brazil, which might provide a basis for a genetic pre-breeding programme

Read accessible full text

Genetic Characterization of the Fish Piaractus brachypomus by Microsatellites Derived from Transcriptome Sequencing

Author: Jorge, Paulo H.; Mastrochirico Filho, Vito Antonio; Hata, Milene E.; Mendes, Natália J.; Ariede, Raquel B.; Freitas, Milena Vieira de; Vera Rodríguez, Manuel; Porto Foresti, Fábio; Hashimoto, Diogo Teruo
Publisher: Frontiers Media
Year: 2018
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00046
Source: https://minerva.usc.es/bitstreams/42ceb526-6bc0-49cd-9825-49c3778124c3/download
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
published: 22 Feb ua y 2018
doi: 10.3389/ gene.2018.00046
F on ie s in Gene ics | www. on ie sin.o g 1Feb ua y 2018 | Volume 9 | A icle 46
Edi ed by:
Rod igo A. To es,
Uni e sidade Fede al de Pe nambuco,
B azil
Re iewed by:
Ped o Manoel Gale i J ,
Fede al Uni e si y o São Ca los, B azil
Ma ia Raquel Mou a Coimb a,
Fede al Ru al Uni e si y o
Pe nambuco, B azil
*Co espondence:
Diogo T. Hashimo o
[email p o ec ed]
Special y sec ion:
This a icle was submi ed o
E olu iona y and Popula ion Gene ics,
a sec ion o he jou nal
F on ie s in Gene ics
Recei ed: 01 Sep embe 2017
Accep ed: 31 Janua y 2018
Published: 22 Feb ua y 2018
Ci a ion:
Jo ge PH, Mas ochi ico-Filho VA,
Ha a ME, Mendes NJ, A iede RB,
F ei as MV, Ve a M, Po o-Fo es i F
and Hashimo o DT (2018) Gene ic
Cha ac e iza ion o he Fish Pia ac us
b achypomus by Mic osa elli es
De i ed om T ansc ip ome
Sequencing. F on . Gene . 9:46.
doi: 10.3389/ gene.2018.00046
Gene ic Cha ac e iza ion o he Fish
Pia ac us b achypomus by
Mic osa elli es De i ed om
T ansc ip ome Sequencing
Paulo H. Jo ge1, Vi o A. Mas ochi ico-Filho1, Milene E. Ha a1, Na ália J. Mendes1,
Raquel B. A iede1, Milena Viei a de F ei as1, Manuel Ve a2, Fábio Po o-Fo es i3and
Diogo T. Hashimo o1*
1Aquacul u e Cen e o Uni e sidade Es adual Paulis a Júlio de Mesqui a Filho, São Paulo S a e Uni e si y, Jabo icabal,
B azil, 2Ve e ina y Facul y, Uni e si y o San iago de Compos ela, Lugo, Spain, 3School o Sciences, São Paulo S a e
Uni e si y, Bau u, B azil
The pi api inga, Pia ac us b achypomus (Cha aci o mes, Se asalmidae), is a ish om
he Amazon basin and is conside ed o be one o he main na i e species used in
aquacul u e p oduc ion in Sou h Ame ica. The objec i es o his s udy we e: (1) o
pe o m li e ansc ip ome sequencing o pi api inga h ough NGS and hen alida e
a se o mic osa elli e ma ke s o his species; and (2) o use polymo phic mic osa elli es
o analysis o gene ic a iabili y in a med s ocks. The ansc ip ome sequencing was
ca ied ou h ough he Roche/454 echnology, which esul ed in 3,696 non- edundan
con igs. O his o al, 2,568 con igs had simila i y in he non- edundan (n ) p o ein
da abase (Genbank) and 2,075 sequences we e cha ac e ized in he ca ego ies o Gene
On ology (GO). A e he alida ion p ocess o 30 mic osa elli e loci, eigh ma ke s showed
polymo phism. The analysis o hese polymo phic ma ke s in a med s ocks e ealed
ha ish a ms om No h B azil had a highe gene ic di e si y han ish a ms om
Sou heas B azil. AMOVA demons a ed ha he highes p opo ion o a ia ion was
p esen ed wi hin he popula ions. Howe e , when compa ing di e en g oups (1: Wild; 2:
No h ish a ms; 3: Sou heas ish a ms), a conside able a ia ion be ween he g oups
was obse ed. The FST alues showed he occu ence o gene ic s uc u e among he
b oods ocks om di e en egions o B azil. The ansc ip ome sequencing in pi api inga
p o ided impo an gene ic esou ces o biological s udies in his non-model species,
and mic osa elli e da a can be used as he amewo k o he gene ic managemen
o b eeding s ocks in B azil, which migh p o ide a basis o a gene ic p e-b eeding
p og amme.
Keywo ds: aquacul u e, gene ic s uc u e, NGS, Pi api inga, Se asalmidae
INTRODUCTION
The pi api inga (Pia ac us b achypomus) is a na i e ish om he Amazon and O inoco Ri e s and
can each up o 20 kg o weigh (Alcân a a e al., 1990). This species is used o ish a ming, is
alued o i s mea and has as g ow h pe o mance (F esneda e al., 2004). In B azil, pi api inga
a ming ep esen s he hi d la ges ish p oduc ion ope a ion (abou 10,000 ons) among he na i e
Jo ge e al. Gene ic Resou ces in Pi api inga
ish species (MPA, 2013a). Fu he mo e, his species has
been widely used o he p oduc ion o in e speci ic hyb ids,
pa icula ly he amba inga ( emale ambaqui Colossoma
mac opomum ×male pi api inga P. b achypomus), and pa inga
( emale pacu Pia ac us mesopo amicus ×male pi api inga P.
b achypomus; IBGE, 2016). The aquacul u e p oduc ion o
pi api inga in B azil is concen a ed mainly in he Midwes and
No h (87%), ollowed by he Sou heas (9%), No heas (3%)
and Sou h (1%) (MPA, 2013b). This species also has economic
impo ance o aquacul u e in o he coun ies in Sou h Ame ica
(Colombia, Pe u, and Venezuela) and in Asia (China, Myanma ,
Thailand, and Vie nam; Flo es Na a, 2007; Honglang, 2007; Lin
e al., 2015).
Howe e , despi e his ep esen a ion o aquacul u e
p oduc ion, ew scien i ic s udies ha e ocused on unde s anding
he biology o pi api inga, especially o gene ic ai s. So, he
gene a ion o gene ic esou ces o his species is undamen al
o ad ancing s udies o b eeding and gene ic managemen , as
occu ed in model species used in aquacul u e, such as salmon,
ca ish, ca p, and ilapia (Lien e al., 2011; Liu e al., 2011; Guyon
e al., 2012; Ji e al., 2012).
Model ish species, such as zeb a ish Danio e io, ha e been
desc ibed wi h mo e han 26,000 genes (Howe e al., 2013).
Howe e , ew genes and hei me abolic pa hways ha e been
cha ac e ized o non-model species wi hou e e ence genomes,
as is he case o pi api inga. In he ield o gene ics and molecula
biology, Nex -Gene a ion Sequencing (NGS) echnologies a e
causing a e olu ion, allowing he sequencing o genome and
ansc ip ome o any o ganism, quickly and a low cos (Seeb
e al., 2011). RNA-seq ( ansc ip ome sequencing) is conside ed
one o he mos used s a egies o NGS echnology o he
ansc ip s analysis (Qian e al., 2014), whe ein all he messenge
RNA (mRNA) o a speci ic issue o se o issues a e used as a
sou ce o sequencing. Mo eo e , RNA-seq is an e ec i e ool o
disco e y o molecula ma ke s, pa icula ly o he p ospec ion
o gene-associa ed mic osa elli es (Teache e al., 2012; Xu e al.,
2013).
Due o he use ulness o e ealing he gene ic a ia ion among
indi iduals (Liu and Co des, 2004), mic osa elli e ma ke s ha e
p o en o be e icien o gene ic cha ac e iza ion o wild
popula ions and b eeding s ocks o a med ish (Koljonen e al.,
2002; Lehoczky e al., 2005), such as o p e en inb eeding
(Ponzoni e al., 2008), o iden i y and p ese e li e gene banks
(Machado-Schia ino e al., 2007), o de ec gene ic s uc u e
(Do P ado e al., 2018), o di ec ma ings du ing he o ma ion
o he popula ion base o b eeding p og ammes (Fe nández
e al., 2014), and o pe o m ma ke assis ed selec ion (MAS) o
economic ai s (Hous on e al., 2010). Howe e , hese ma ke s
a e no a ailable o pi api inga, one o mos impo an species
o he aquacul u e in Sou h Ame ica.
Fo he aquacul u e o pi api inga, analysis o gene ic
a iabili y in a med s ocks s ill needs o be pe o med, which
will allow h ee hypo heses o be es ed: (1) a med s ocks
o pi api inga ha e lowe gene ic di e si y in ela ion o wild
s ocks; (2) a med s ocks o pi api inga in B azil a e gene ically
s uc u ed; and (3) gene-linked mic osa elli es can be associa ed
o economic ai s o pi api inga, such as g ow h and disease
esis ance. These analyses will suppo he c ea ion o a b eeding
p og amme o inc ease he p oduc i i y o pi api inga, by
di ec ed ma ings which lead o he o ma ion o amilies,
a oiding he p oblems o bo lenecks and inb eeding in he base
popula ion (Fe nández e al., 2014), and by he iden i ica ion o
quan i a i e ai loci (QTL), which will assis he selec ion o
supe io geno ypes by MAS (Hous on e al., 2010).
Thus, he objec i e o he p esen s udy was o cha ac e ize
gene ic esou ces o he p ope managemen o his non-model
species in aquacul u e, h ough ansc ip ome cha ac e iza ion
and gene ic a iabili y analysis o s ocks using mic osa elli e
ma ke s.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
E hics S a emen
This s udy was ca ied ou in s ic acco dance wi h he
animal wel a e guidelines o he Na ional Council o Con ol
o Animal Expe imen a ion (B azilian Minis y o Science,
Technology, and Inno a ion). The p esen s udy was pe o med
unde au ho iza ion N◦33435-1, issued h ough ICMBio (Chico
Mendes Ins i u e o he Conse a ion o Biodi e si y, B azilian
Minis y o En i onmen ). No animal was housed o ca ed
o in he labo a o y. Fish we e eu hanized by benzocaine
anes he ic o e dose o collec ion o li e issue o ansc ip ome
sequencing. Fo mic osa elli e alida ion and gene ic a iabili y
analysis, in agmen s we e collec ed om each ish unde
benzocaine anes hesia and all e o s we e made o minimize
su e ing.
Samples o T ansc ip ome Sequencing
To pe o m he ansc ip ome sequencing, samples o li e
issue we e aken om 10 indi idual ish om h ee di e en
B azilian ish a ms and one wild popula ion: Aquacul u e
Cen e o São Paulo S a e Uni e si y, CAUNESP, Jabo icabal, SP
(n=3); P oje o Peixe ish a m, Sales Oli ei a, SP (n=1);
Fazenda São Paulo ish a m, B ejinho de Naza é, TO (n=5);
and Tocan ins Ri e , Lajeado, TO (n=1). Indi iduals om
di e en o igins we e used in o de o achie e he highes gene ic
a iabili y in mic osa elli e disco e y analysis. Li e samples
we e selec ed o ansc ip ome s udies because he li e plays
a c i ical ole in coo dina ing a ious physiological p ocesses,
including diges ion, me abolism, de oxi ica ion, and endoc ine
sys em immune esponse (Ma in e al., 2010).
Samples o Gene ic Va iabili y Analysis
Analyses o mic osa elli e alida ion we e pe o med in 22
indi idual pi api inga collec ed om he Tocan ins Ri e (TO)
om Lajeado Ci y, Tocan ins S a e, B azil. We hen used he
mic osa elli e ma ke s o s udy he gene ic a iabili y in samples
collec ed om ou comme cial ish a ms: TO1 (n=25) and
TO2 (n=26), om Tocan ins S a e (No h B azil); and SP1
(n=36) and SP2 (n=20), om São Paulo S a e (Sou heas
B azil). To main ain he con iden iali y o hese ish a ms, he
names o and in o ma ion on he ish a ms ha e been p ese ed.
F on ie s in Gene ics | www. on ie sin.o g 2Feb ua y 2018 | Volume 9 | A icle 46
Jo ge e al. Gene ic Resou ces in Pi api inga
Analysis o Gene ic Pu i y in Pi api inga
Indi iduals
Acco ding Hashimo o e al. (2014), in e speci ic hyb ids ha e
been de ec ed in b oods ocks o B azilian ish a ms. The
pi api inga can be c ossed wi h ambaqui C. mac opomum o
pacu P. mesopo amicus, esul ing in iable and e ile hyb ids
(Hashimo o e al., 2012, 2014). The e o e, in he p esen s udy,
special a en ion was gi en o analyze pu e pi api inga, and no
in e speci ic hyb ids. The analysis o gene ic pu i y in all animals
he ein s udied was pe o med using he mi ochond ial genes,
Cy och ome C Oxidase subuni I (m -co1) and Cy och ome b
(m -cyb); and he nuclea genes, α-T opomyosin ( pm1) and
Recombina ion Ac i a ing Gene 2 ( ag2), acco ding o he
p o ocols and me hods o Hashimo o e al. (2011). Fish iden i ied
as in e speci ic hyb ids we e excluded om u he analysis in
his s udy.
cDNA Lib a y Cons uc ion and Roche 454
Pla o m Sequencing
Samples o ∼100 mg o li e ixed in RNAla e we e ex ac ed
wi h Rneasy Mini Ki (Qiagen). Each sample was quan i ied
by spec opho ome y using NanoD op ND-1000 equipmen
and he quali y (in eg i y) was checked by 2100 Bioanalyze
equipmen . I succeeded he p epa a ion o an equimola pool o
o al RNA samples ( om 10 indi iduals) o mRNA en ichmen
wi h µMACS mRNA Isola ion Ki (Mil enyi Bio ech).
A non-no malized cDNA lib a y was p epa ed using cDNA
Syn hesis Sys em Ki wi h andom p ime GS Rapid Lib a y
P ep Ki and GS Rapid Lib a y MID Adap o s Ki (Roche).
The High Sensi i i y DNA LabChip Ki (Agilen Technologies)
wi h 2100 Bioanalyze was used o quali y analysis o he
cDNA lib a y. The concen a ion o sample (molecules/µL)
was ob ained by Quan iFluo TM—ST luo ime e (P omega).
Ti a ion o emPCR (emulsion PCR) was pe o med wi h he
GS FLX Ti anium SV em PCR Ki (Lib-L) (Roche), acco ding
o he emPCR Ampli ica ion Me hod Manual—Libl SV, GS
FLX+Se ies, o iden i y he op imal numbe o DNA molecules
pe bead (cpb =copies pe bead). A e emPCR i a ion, he
emPCR was pe o med wi h GS FLX Ti anium LV emPCR
Ki (Lib-L) (Roche), acco ding o he emPCR Ampli ica ion
Me hod Manual—LibL LV, GS FLX+Se ies. The ansc ip ome
sequencing was conduc ed using he Roche/454 echnology (GS
FLX Ti anium Sequencing Ki XL +) om HELIXXA company
(Campinas, SP, B azil), which has been used o ansc ip ome
analysis o non-model ish species (Renau e al., 2010).
Bioin o ma ic Analysis
Fil e ing o he ini ial quali y o he 454 sequences in s o ma
was pe o med using he Roche Newble p og amme. Sequence
analysis was pe o med using he high- h oughpu sequencing
module o CLC Genomics Wo kbench ( e sion 7.5.1; CLC bio,
Aa hus, Denma k). The aw eads we e cleaned by imming
low quali y sequences wi h quali y sco es o <20. Te minal
nucleo ides ( i e nucleo ides a each ex emi y 5′and 3′),
ambiguous nucleo ides, adap e sequences and eads <15 base
pai s (bp) we e disca ded. Fo de no o assembly, con igs <200 bp
we e also disca ded and he de aul local alignmen se ings we e
used o ank po en ial ma ches (misma ch cos o 2, inse ion cos
o 3, dele ion cos o 3). The highes sco ing ma ches ha sha ed
≥50% o hei leng h wi h ≥80% o simila i y we e included in
he alignmen . The assembled ansc ip s we e subjec ed o cd-
hi -es p og amme wi h an iden i y h eshold o 90% o emo e
edundancy (Li and Godzik, 2006; Duan e al., 2012). In o de
o emo e any mi ochond ial and ibosomal con amina ion,
sequences we e compa ed agains pacu mi ochond ial genome
and zeb a ish ibosomal RNA Re Seqs (NCBI da abase) using
CLC Genomic Wo kbench ( e sion 8.0.3; CLC Bio, Aa hus,
Denma k).
Func ional anno a ion o he unique consensus sequences was
pe o med by homology sea ches agains he Na ional Cen e
o Bio echnology In o ma ion (NCBI) non- edundan p o ein
da abase (n ) (cu o E- alue o 1E-3) using BLAST2GO so wa e
(Conesa e al., 2005) o ob ain he pu a i e gene iden i y. All
BLASTx hi s we e il e ed o edundancy in p o ein accessions.
The gene on ology (GO) e ms we e assigned o each unique gene
based on he GO e ms anno a ed o he co esponding homologs
in he NCBI da abase (e- alue cu o 1e-6). The ansc ip s
we e u he anno a ed in In e P o, Enzyme code (EC), and
Kyo o Encyclopedia o Genes and Genomes (KEGG) me abolic
pa hways analysis h ough he Bi-di ec ional Bes Hi s (BBH)
me hod.
Mic osa elli es we e iden i ied in he con igs using
msa commande so wa e (Fai clo h, 2008). P ime s lanking
he mic osa elli e loci we e designed wi h P ime 3plus so wa e
(Rozen and Skale sky, 2000). The six possible eading ames o
he consensus sequence o each unc ionally anno a ed con ig
con aining mic osa elli e we e compa ed agains he NCBI
p o ein da abase using BLASTx (e- alue 1e-10) in o de o
ind Open Reading F ame (ORF) egions. These app oaches
allowed us o loca e mic osa elli es in coding sequences (CDS)
o un ansla ed egions (5′UTR and 3′UTR) h ough g aphical
sequence iewe Table (Milne e al., 2013).
Mic osa elli e Geno yping and Valida ion
DNA was ex ac ed om in agmen s using he Wiza d
Genomic DNA Pu i ica ion Ki (P omega), acco ding o he
manu ac u e ’s p o ocol. Mic osa elli e alida ion was pe o med
in 30 loci, selec ed acco ding o he mo i and unc ional
anno a ion o he con igs. Ampli ica ions we e pe o med by
polyme ase chain eac ion (PCR) in a o al olume o 25 µl
con aining 100 µM o each dNTP (dATP, dTTP, dGTP, and
dCTP), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1X Taq DNA bu e (20 mM T is-HCl,
pH 8.4, and 50 mM KCl), 0.1 µM o each p ime , 0.5 uni s o
Taq Polyme ase (In i ogen) and 10-50 ng o genomic DNA.
The eac ions we e pe o med in a he mocycle (P oFlexTM
PCR Sys em, Li e Technologies) ollowing ini ial dena u ing o
10 min a 95◦C; 35 cycles o 30 s a 95◦C, 30 s a 55–60◦C
(adjus ed o each p ime se ), 20 s a 72◦C; and a inal ex ension
a 72◦C o 20 min.
Mic osa elli es ha showed polymo phism in 6%
polyac ylamide gels we e analyzed in a 3130xl sequence
(Li e Technologies) o ge be e accu acy o allele de e mina ion.
The sequencing s a egy adop ed in his s udy was acco ding
o p o ocols desc ibed by Schuelke (2000), using he CAG ag
p ime (5′-CAGTCGGGCGTCATCA-3′;Shi k e al., 2013)
labeled wi h he luo och omes HEX o FAM. The geno yping
F on ie s in Gene ics | www. on ie sin.o g 3Feb ua y 2018 | Volume 9 | A icle 46
Jo ge e al. Gene ic Resou ces in Pi api inga
PCR was pe o med wi h he ollowing eagen s: 100 µM o
each dNTP, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1X Taq DNA bu e , 0.1 µM o each
p ime (F and R), 0.01 µM o he CAG ag p ime , 0.5 uni s o Taq
Polyme ase (In i ogen), and 10–50 ng o genomic DNA. The
cycling p og amme o ampli ica ion consis ed o : nine cycles a
95◦C o 30 s, 55–60◦C o 30 s (adjus ed o each p ime se ),
72◦C o 20 s; hen, 30 cycles a 95◦C o 30 s, 50◦C o 30 s,
and 72◦C o 20 s. Du ing he i s nine cycles, he annealing
empe a u e o 55–60◦C allows inco po a ion o he p ime s
(F and R) om he mic osa elli e loci. Then, in he ollowing
30 cycles, he empe a u e o 50◦C acili a es he annealing
o he luo escen dye-labeled CAG ag p ime . PCR p oduc s
we e analyzed by capilla y elec opho esis wi h a 3130xl gene ic
analyze , using he DS-30 ma ix, wi h he GeneScan 500 ROX
dye Size S anda d (The mo). The p og amme GeneMappe 3.7
(Applied Biosys ems) was used o de e mine he allele sizes.
Mic osa elli e Di e si y and Popula ion
Analysis
Fo s a is ical analysis, we ini ially used GenAlex analysis 6.1
so wa e (Peakall and Smouse, 2012) o con e he a ays
in o speci ic o ma s o each p og amme. The obse ed (Ho)
and expec ed (He) he e ozygosi y, Ha dy-Weinbe g Equilib ium
(HWE) and Analysis o Molecula Va iance (AMOVA) (Exco ie
e al., 1992) we e calcula ed using he A lequim 3.5 p og amme
(Exco ie and Lische , 2010). The le els o signi icance o he
HWE es we e adjus ed wi h he Bon e oni co ec ion (Rice,
1989). The inb eeding coe icien (FIS) was pe o med using
Genepop 4.0.11 (Rousse , 2008), based on Wei and Cocke ham
(1984) es ima es. The ixa ion index (FST) was calcula ed using
FSTAT 9.3.2 so wa e (Goude , 1995). W igh (1965) h eshold
alues we e adop ed, FST =li le gene ic di e en ia ion (0–
0.05); mode a e gene ic di e en ia ion (0.05–0.25); high le el o
gene ic di e en ia ion (>0.25). The p og amme Ce us .3.0.7
(Ma shall e al., 1998) was applied o e i y he p esence o
null alleles. Linkage disequilib ium (LD) was es ima ed using
A lequin .3.5.2.2. The le els o signi icance we e adjus ed o
mul iple es s using he Bon e oni co ec ion.
A e LD analysis, le el o admix u e among popula ion
samples was in e ed by es ima ing he op imum numbe o
clus e s (K), as sugges ed by E anno e al. (2005), using
he p og amme STRUCTURE e sion 2.3.4 (P i cha d e al.,
2000) wi hou p io in o ma ion abou popula ion. P ima ily,
we de e mined he dis ibu ion o 1K, an ad hoc s a is ic
based on he a e o change in he log p obabili y o da a
be ween successi e K alues. The ange o clus e s (K) was
p ede ined om 1 o 5. The analysis was pe o med in 25
eplica ed uns using 200,000 i e a ions a e a bu n-in pe iod o
50,000 uns. The K alue mos likely o explain he popula ion
s uc u e is he modal alue o his 1K. The ou pu s o
STRUCTURE analysis we e isualized h ough he STRUCTURE
HARVESTER p og amme (Ea l, 2012).
Analysis o popula ion bo lenecks was es ed using
BOTTLENECK (Co nue and Luika , 1996; Pi y e al., 1999), by
using he mu a ion–d i equilib ium assuming he wo-phase
model (TPM) wi h 70% s epwise mu a ion model (SMM)
and 30% in ini e allele model (IAM). De ia ions be ween he
obse ed and expec ed equency dis ibu ions we e es ed using
he Wilcoxon’s signed ank es . BOTTLENECK was un o
10,000 i e a ions.
RESULTS
T ansc ip ome Sequencing
The esul s o li e ansc ip ome sequencing in pi api inga
yielded a o al o 192,373 eads, which we e deposi ed in he
Sho Read A chi e (SRA) o NCBI unde he accession numbe
SRR6303971. The aw eads p esen ed an a e age leng h o 395.5
bp, comp ising a o al o ∼76 Mbp. A e he imming p ocess,
he a e age leng h o he eads was o 362.1 bp, esul ing in a
o al o ∼69 Mbp (192,077 eads; Table 1). As P. b achypomus
is conside ed a non-model o ganism, and he e o e wi hou
e e ence genome, de no o assembly s a egy was pe o med
o ansc ip ome analysis, which yielded 3,696 non- edundan
con igs as a esul o 174,272 o e lapping eads (63,460,229 bp).
The size cha ac e is ics o he con igs a e p esen ed in Table 1.
A o al o 17,805 emaining eads (6,084,530 bp) was conside ed
as single ons, and he e o e hey we e no used o subsequen
analysis.
Non- edundan sequences we e anno a ed by BLASTx
algo i hm agains he NCBI da abases: non- edundan p o ein
(n ), p o ein Re Seq o zeb a ish and ugu. A o al o 2,568
unique p o ein accessions (69.4% o ansc ip s) had signi ican
simila i y in he n da abase. In ela ion o he p o ein Re Seq o
zeb a ish and ugu, we ound simila numbe s o anno a ed genes,
which we e o 2,498 (67.6%) and 2,419 (65.4%), espec i ely.
No sequence showed homology wi h known pi api inga p o ein
sequences deposi ed in NCBI da abase, because he a ailable
sequences da abase is s ill limi ed o mos ly mi ochond ial
sequences.
O he 2,568 con igs wi h co espondence in he n da abase,
2,075 (80.8%) we e anno a ed in he ca ego ies o Gene On ology
(GO). A o al o 1,831 assignmen s o Biological P ocess (88.2%)
we e ound, ollowed by 1,757 o Molecula Func ion (84.6%)
and 1,378 o Cellula Componen (66.4%). In ela ion o he
GO subca ego ies, he mos abundan e ms we e ela ed o:
me abolic p ocess, cellula p ocess, and single-o ganism p ocess
o he Biological P ocess ca ego y; binding, ca aly ic ac i i y, and
TABLE 1 | Da a o de no o assembly om li e ansc ip ome o pi api inga
Pia ac us b achypomus.
Ma ched eads o assembly 174,272
To al nucleo ides o ma ched eads 63,460,229
Numbe o con igs 3,797
To al o con ig nucleo ides 2,999,680
Minimum con ig leng h (bp) 202
Maximum con ig leng h (bp) 7,812
A e age con ig leng h (bp) 790
N75 (bp) 593
N50 (bp) 861
N25 (bp) 1,383
F on ie s in Gene ics | www. on ie sin.o g 4Feb ua y 2018 | Volume 9 | A icle 46
Jo ge e al. Gene ic Resou ces in Pi api inga
anspo e ac i i y o he Molecula Func ion; cell, o ganelle,
and memb ane o he Cellula Componen (Figu e 1). In he
p esen s udy, genes assigned o he immune sys em, g ow h
and ep oduc ion we e ound, and he e o e hese da a will
se e as suppo o u u e s udies on he aquacul u e o
pi api inga.
The ansc ip s cha ac e iza ion in he KEGG da abase
demons a ed ha 1,122 sequences we e iden i ied in 106
me abolic pa hways. Genes in ol ed in he biosyn hesis o
an ibio ics, pu ine me abolism and glycolysis/gluconeogenesis
we e able o be highligh ed (Figu e 2).
Mic osa elli e Di e si y and Popula ion
Analysis
The sea ch o sho sequence epea s (SSR) in he 3,696 con igs
esul ed in he disco e y o 130 mic osa elli e ma ke s dis ibu ed
in 95 con igs. In o al, 75 pai s o p ime s we e designed
adjacen o he mic osa elli e loci, including he ollowing
sequence epea s: 56 di, 13 i, 4 e a, and 2 pen anucleo ide.
Among he dinucleo ide mo i s, he main epea s we e he
ypes AC (48.28%), AG (39.65%), AT (10.35%), and CG
(1.72%). In ela ion o he inucleo ide mo i s, we iden i ied
se en ypes (AGC, AGG, ATC, AAT, ACG, CCG, and AAG).
The e anucleo ide (ATCT, AAAG, AATG, and AAAT) and
pen anucleo ide (ACTAT and ATAGT) sequences we e desc ibed
wi h he p esence o ou and wo ypes o mo i s. In ela ion
o he gene posi ion, 26.76% o he mic osa elli e ma ke s we e
ound in he 3′UTR (un ansla ed egion), 19.71% in he 5′UTR,
and 29.58% in he cds (coding sequence).
In he p ocess o mic osa elli e alida ion, 30 ma ke s
we e e alua ed in 22 samples o pi api inga collec ed om
he wild. O hese ma ke s, eigh mic osa elli e loci showed
polymo phism (GenBank accession numbe s MG595996—
MG596003), e ealed by he p esence o di e en agmen
sizes (Table 2). The numbe o alleles was low, which anged
om 2 (loci C25, C64, C410, and C1832) o 5 (C1376) and
mean o 2.750 ±0.366. The expec ed (He) and obse ed (Ho)
he e ozygosi y in he wild popula ion had an a e age o 0.466
±0.061 and 0.355 ±0.076, espec i ely. Mos o he loci
showed posi i e alues o FIS, excep he locus C64. Th ee
mic osa elli e loci (C13, C25, and C1716) showed signi ican
de ia ion om he Ha dy–Weinbe g Equilib ium (HWE) a e
Bon e oni co ec ion (adjus ed p=0.00625).
The esul s o gene ic a iabili y in a med s ocks e ealed ha
No h ish a ms TO1 and TO2 had highe di e si y han he wild
popula ion, demons a ed by numbe o alleles (mean o 4.500 ±
0.423 and 3.375 ±0.596, espec i ely) and a e age alues o He
(0.589 ±0.033 and 0.488 ±0.044, espec i ely) and Ho(0.520 ±
0.060 and 0.447 ±0.040, espec i ely; Table 3). The Sou heas ish
a ms SP1 and SP2 showed he lowes gene ic a iabili y when
compa ed o o he popula ions, wi h lowe allele numbe (mean
o 2.250 ±0.313 and 3.125 ±0.581, espec i ely), and a e age
o He(0.226 ±0.077 and 0.278 ±0.085, espec i ely; p<0.05)
and Ho(0.259 ±0.103 and 0.251 ±0.079, espec i ely; Table 3).
Mos o he mic osa elli e loci we e cha ac e ized wi h posi i e
alues o FIS, excep o SP1 and SP2. The mean alue o
FIS and null alleles was posi i e in mos popula ions, wi h he
excep ion o SP1 (−0.071 ±0.076 and −0.011 ±0.080). The
majo i y o he ma ke s we e in conco dance o HWE, a e
Bon e oni co ec ion, wi h he excep ion o C25 (TO1, SP1, and
SP2), C64 (SP1 and SP2) and C1376 (SP1) (Table 3). Linkage
disequilib ium was ound be ween he mic osa elli es C410 and
C1005 (p<0.00625). Al hough molecula ma ke s on linkage
disequilib ium we e no applied in gene ic a iabili y s udies,
his in o ma ion can be use ul in u u e analysis o gene ic
mapping.
In bo leneck analyses, e idence o ecen educ ions in
popula ion size (bo leneck) using TPM was no ound, excep
o he wild popula ion o Tocan ins Ri e (p=0.027).
In he e alua ion o he le el o admix u e among s ocks by
STRUCTURE, he model-based clus e ing analyses de ec ed K
=3, allowing he iden i ica ion o 3 main clus e s be ween he
popula ions: G oup 1 (SP1 and SP2), G oup 2 (TO1 and TO2),
and G oup 3 (wild) (Figu e 3).
The global FST was 0.379, which showed high gene ic
di e en ia ion among he popula ions (p<0.05). Pai wise
FST de ec ed a highe gene ic di e en ia ion be ween he wild
popula ion and all a med s ocks, pa icula ly when compa ed
o SP1 (FST =0.538, p<0.05) and SP2 (FST =0.537, p<
0.05). Addi ionally, high gene ic s uc u e was ound be ween
he popula ions om No h and Sou heas B azil, as obse ed
be ween TO2 wi h SP1 (FST =0.463, p<0.05) and TO1 wi h
SP2 (FST =0.380, p<0.05; Table 4). Mo eo e , alues o pai wise
FST a e s ock clus e ing de ec ed a highe gene ic di e en ia ion
when compa ing G oup 1/G oup 2 (FST =0.379, p<0.05),
G oup 1/G oup 3 (FST =0.549, p<0.05), and G oup 2/G oup
3 (FST =0.144, p<0.05).
The esul s o AMOVA showed ha he majo i y o
gene ic a ia ion (29.11%, FCT =0.291, p<0.001) occu ed
be ween g oups (acco ding o STRUCTURE clus e ing), while
he a ia ion among indi iduals wi hin popula ions was only
8.21% (FIS =0.126, p<0.001) and among popula ions wi hin
g oups p esen ed 6.06% o gene ic a ia ion (FSC =0.085,
p<0.001).
DISCUSSION
T ansc ip ome Sequencing
Cu en ly, gene ic esou ces o pi api inga P. b achypomus
a e limi ed only o sequences o he mi ochond ial genome
(Chen e al., 2016). Thus, one o he main esul s o
his s udy was he da a gene a ed h ough ansc ip ome
sequencing, because li le knowledge was a ailable abou
he genes o his species. The e iciency o he Roche/454
sequencing sys em in he unc ional genomics analysis o
pi api inga can be obse ed because o he 3,696 ansc ip s
ha we e gene a ed in his s udy. Acco ding o Seeb e al.
(2011), genome educ ion s a egies o NGS sequencing (e.g.,
ansc ip ome sequencing) a e mo e iable when he objec i e
is o p ospec molecula ma ke s and gene ic in o ma ion o
use in aquacul u e, in a low cos and as way. Roche/454
sequencing echnology is one o he main me hods used in
NGS ansc ip ome o non-model ish (Renau e al., 2010;
F on ie s in Gene ics | www. on ie sin.o g 5Feb ua y 2018 | Volume 9 | A icle 46

Jo ge e al. Gene ic Resou ces in Pi api inga
FIGURE 1 | Resul s o unc ional anno a ion and he assignmen o genes in he GO ca ego ies and subca ego ies.
FIGURE 2 | T ansc ip s cha ac e ized in me abolic pa hways da abase o KEGG enzymes (Kyo o Encyclopedia o Genes and Genomes).
Shin e al., 2012; Calduch-Gine e al., 2013; Mu z e al.,
2013).
The esul s o unc ional anno a ion showed ha he
sequences o pi api inga had a high p opo ion o anno a ed
genes when compa ed o he da abase o zeb a ish and
ugu p o eins. The gene anno a ion allowed iden i ica ion
o genomic egions esponsible o on ogene ic de elopmen
p ocesses, biological egula ion, he immune sys em, and
egions in ol ed in p ocesses o g ow h and ep oduc ion.
Consequen ly, he p esen da a can be used as he basis
o u he biological s udies o o he a eas o aquacul u e
o o u u e b eeding p og ammes. In addi ion, h ough
ansc ip ome sequencing, he disco e y o gene-associa ed
mic osa elli es can be conside ed o be he main esul
which can be applied o pi api inga aquacul u e, as al eady
demons a ed in p e ious s udies o ish (Renau e al., 2010;
Helya e al., 2012; Shin e al., 2012). The use o gene-
associa ed ma ke s becomes e en mo e impo an in he
cons uc ion o gene ic maps (Shin e al., 2012) because, by
compa a i e genomics using ish genome e e ences al eady
sequenced, i is possible o p esume he loca ion o each s udied
locus.
F on ie s in Gene ics | www. on ie sin.o g 6Feb ua y 2018 | Volume 9 | A icle 46
Jo ge e al. Gene ic Resou ces in Pi api inga
TABLE 2 | Cha ac e iza ion o he gene ic di e si y o eigh polymo phic mic osa elli es in he wild popula ion o pi api inga (Pia ac us b achypomus).
Locus Sequence
desc ip ion
Gene
posi ion
Mo i s P ime s 5′−3′TA◦C Size ange Na HoHeP(HWE) FIS F(Null)
C13 dihyd oxy i amin d24-like 3′UTR (AGC)6F: TCTCTTCAAGCCTCCTCTGC
R: ATGCTGCAGCTCCTCCTGT
60◦C 143–149 3 0.545 0.669 0.000 0.188 0.075
C25 cy osolic 5-nucleo idase
3a-like iso o m x 1
3′UTR (AT)11 F: CTTTGTCTGCTTTGGGTCGT
R: CTTAGAAGAATGTGCAAATTGAAA
60◦C 117–120 2 0.000 0.169 0.001 1.000 0.887
C64 sodium-coupled neu al
amino acid anspo e
5′UTR (AAAG)7F: CAAAGCAAACTCAAAAAGGAAAA
R: TGGGAACGTTTAGCATCTCA
55◦C 143–151 2 0.545 0.474 0.650 −0.156 −0.082
C410 apolipop o ein e 3′UTR (AG)8F: CGCACAGGTCTAAAGGCACT
R: CTCCCACACAGTGAAAAGCA
60◦C 125−127 2 0.273 0.359 0.271 0.245 0.125
C1005 apolipop o ein e 3′UTR (AG)7F: AGTTGTTGCACCAAATGCAG
R: CTTGTTCCCTCCCACACAGT
60◦C 137−141 3 0.318 0.369 0.225 0.140 0.090
C1376 u ose-biphospha ase
1-like
5′UTR (AC)10 F: GTGTTACATGGCAGGCGTTT
R: CAAGTGAGACCAAATCCAAGG
60◦C 157–175 5 0.500 0.608 0.185 0.180 0.073
C1716 acuola a p syn hase 16
kda p o eolipid subuni
3′UTR (GT)7F: AACCGAAGAGAGGGGAGTGT
R: GCATTTACAAGGGGACGCAC
60◦C 155–171 3 0.545 0.659 0.000 0.175 0.059
C1832 – – (AC)6F: GGTGCTATGTCGTAGAGGCC
R: AGGAAGGCATGACCAGTGTG
60◦C 159–169 2 0.111 0.529 0.036 0.800 ND
The wild popula ion analyzed co esponds o 22 indi iduals collec ed on he Tocan ins Ri e . TA,annealing empe a u e (◦C); Na, numbe o alleles pe locus; Ho,obse ed he e ozygosi y;
He,expec ed he e ozygosi y; P (HWE), p- alue om Ha dy-Weinbe g equilib ium and FIS, inb eeding coe icien . F(Null), Null alleles; ND, no pe o med.
Mo eo e , some examples ha e demons a ed ha
gene-linked mic osa elli e ma ke s can be co ela ed wi h
in e es ing p oduc i e ai s, especially o g ow h pe o mance.
In he ish Spa us au a a, a dinucleo ide mic osa elli e in he
5′UTR o he g ow h ho mone gene (GH) is linked wi h
as e g ow h a e, especially he alleles 250 and 254, which
can be used o b eeding managemen and gene ic selec ion
o his ai (Almuly e al., 2005). In o he ish species, such as
O eoch omis nilo icus and La es calca i e (Yue e al., 2001; Yue
and O ban, 2002), mic osa elli es ha e also been epo ed o
genes o in e es (p olac in, GH and ig 2) and, he e o e, hey
can be used in ma ke -assis ed selec ion (MAS) p og ammes.
In he p esen s udy, eigh polymo phic mic osa elli e loci we e
alida ed, some o hem loca ed in gene egions ha may be
use ul o p oduc i e cha ac e is ics in aquacul u e. In his case, a
mic osa elli e locus was ound in he gene Te aspanin−3 iso o m
x1 (C1832), which plays a ole in i al in ec ion pa hology
(Ma in e al., 2005; Shoshana and Shoham, 2005). The e is
ano he mic osa elli e in he gene Cy osolic 5 – nucleo idase 3
a-like (NTC5C3) (C25), which con ibu es in he p oduc ion
o ed blood cells and i s mu a ion can cause hemoly ic anemia
and in luence on he immune sys em (Aksoy e al., 2009).
Thus, he mic osa elli es desc ibed in his s udy will be also
impo an in u u e analysis o (QTL) linked o ai s o disease
esis ance, which has ecei ed special a en ion in aquacul u e
species, such as u bo (Scoph halmus maximus), ainbow ou
(Onco hynchus mykiss), salmon (Salmo sala ), Nile ilapia (O.
nilo icus), and cod (Gadus mo hua), in es iga ing he esis ance
o pa hogens (Pa do e al., 2008; Ødegå d e al., 2010, 2011;
Yáñez e al., 2014; E enhuis e al., 2015). Fu he mo e, one
mic osa elli e locus was also de ec ed in he gene apolipop o ein
e(C410), which is associa ed wi h he cen al ne ous sys em
and he senescence p ocess (Wang e al., 2014). These ma ke s
can p o ide use ul in o ma ion o s udies o he biology o
he pi api inga, besides se ing as a amewo k o o he na i e
species.
Popula ion Analysis
The alida ion o eigh mic osa elli es showed a low le el
o gene ic di e si y in hese loci, bo h in wild and a med
s ocks. In he wild, he obse ed he e ozygosi y (Ho) anged
om 0.000 o 0.545 and an a e age o 2.750 alleles pe
locus. These alues con i m he low gene ic a iabili y when
compa ed wi h ela ed species, such as pacu P. mesopo amicus
(Ho ange om 0.068 o 0.911 and a e age o 8.5 alleles pe
locus), and ambaqui C. mac opomum (Ho ange om 0.430
o 0.880 and a e age o 12.8 alleles pe locus; Calcagno o
and DeSalle, 2009; Fazzi-Gomes e al., 2017). In con as
o neu al ma ke s (mic osa elli es in noncoding egions),
gene-associa ed mic osa elli es migh be mo e suscep ible o
selec ion p essu e and, he e o e, hey ha e low alues o gene
di e si y.
Analysis o he gene ic di e si y in pi api inga a med s ocks
showed signi ican di e ences be ween ish a ms in di e en
egions o B azil, wo om he Sou heas (São Paulo S a e:
SP1 and SP2) and wo om he No h (Tocan ins S a e: TO1
and TO2). In gene al, a med s ocks we e expec ed o ha e
low gene ic a iabili y as a esul o gene ic decline, gene ic
F on ie s in Gene ics | www. on ie sin.o g 7Feb ua y 2018 | Volume 9 | A icle 46
Jo ge e al. Gene ic Resou ces in Pi api inga
TABLE 3 | Values o gene ic di e si y o eigh mic osa elli e loci o Pia ac us b achypomus.
S ocks Loci
C13 C25 C64 C410 C1005 C1376 C1716 C1832
Wild N 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 9
Na 3 2 2 2 3 5 3 2
Ho0.545 0.000 0.545 0.273 0.318 0.500 0.545 0.111
He0.669 0.169 0.474 0.359 0.369 0.608 0.659 0.529
P(HWE) 0.000 0.001 0.650 0.271 0.225 0.185 0.000 0.036
FIS 0.188 1.000 −0.156 0.245 0.140 0.180 0.175 0.800
F(Null) 0.075 0.887 −0.082 0.125 0.090 0.073 0.059 ND
TO1 N 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Na 4 5 3 3 4 6 6 5
Ho0.600 0.160 0.560 0.520 0.560 0.440 0.760 0.560
He0.536 0.704 0.495 0.537 0.562 0.609 0.782 0.580
P(HWE) 0.650 0.001 0.365 0.267 0.421 0.010 0.545 0.388
FIS −0.121 0.776 −0.133 0.034 0.004 0.282 0.028 0.035
F(Null) −0.067 0.620 −0.065 −0.015 −0.034 0.164 0.011 −0.001
TO2 N 26 21 26 26 26 26 26 26
Na 3 2 2 2 2 6 5 5
Ho0.500 0.380 0.346 0.384 0.384 0.538 0.461 0.653
He0.528 0.315 0.382 0.506 0.506 0.632 0.515 0.638
P(HWE) 0.840 1.000 0.626 0.256 0.256 0.020 0.030 0.670
FIS 0.055 −0.212 0.096 0.244 0.244 0.151 0.107 −0.253
F(Null) 0.018 −0.103 0.040 0.127 0.127 0.055 0.067 −0.027
SP1 N 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14
Na 2 1 1 3 2 3 3 3
Ho0.143 – – 0.287 0.500 0.857 0.143 0.143
He0.137 – – 0.264 0.494 0.634 0.140 0.203
P(HWE) 1.000 – – 1.000 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.109
FIS −0.040 – – −0.083 −0.011 −0.368 −0.019 0.306
F(Null) −0.028 – – −0.069 −0.023 −0.215 −0.027 0.272
SP2 N 19 19 19 19 19 16 18 19
Na 2 2 1 3 3 5 3 6
Ho0.368 0.000 – 0.157 0.157 0.625 0.222 0.473
He0.308 0.193 – 0.152 0.152 0.790 0.207 0.486
P(HWE) 1.000 0.002 – 1.000 1.000 0.112 1.000 0.387
FIS −0.200 1.000 – −0.038 −0.385 0.214 −0.070 0.027
F(Null) −0.099 0.916 – −0.032 −0.032 0.093 −0.051 0.024
Wild, popula ion om he Tocan ins Ri e ; TO1 and TO2, ish a ms om Tocan ins; SP1 and SP2, ish a ms om São Paulo, Na, numbe o alleles; Ho, obse ed he e ozygosi y; He,
expec ed he e ozygosi y; P (HWE), P- alue om Ha dy-Weinbe g equilib ium; FIS,inb eeding coe icien ; F(Null), Null alleles; ND, no pe o med.
d i , selec ion and inb eeding (Theodo ou and Cou e , 2015).
Howe e , he esul s o his s udy showed highe gene ic
a iabili y in b eeding s ocks om No h ish a ms in ela ion
o he wild s ocks (p<0.05; highe alues o allelic equency
and he e ozygosi y), which was also obse ed in s udies wi h
o he ela ed species (Ba oso e al., 2005; Pana a i-An unes e al.,
2011). The basis o his esul could be conside ed om h ee
di e en pe spec i es: (1) No h ish a ms had o igina ed om
di e en wild s ocks esul ing in high le el o gene ic a iabili y;
(2) p oblems o sample size bias, such as ew mic osa elli e
loci and indi iduals analyzed; (3) e idence o ecen gene ic
bo lenecks in he wild popula ion. Some s udies o ish ha e
epo ed bo lenecks in na u al popula ions, pa icula ly due o
habi a loss and agmen a ion by human dis u bance (B aue
e al., 2016). In he case o pi api inga, he agmen a ion o
he Tocan ins Ri e by hyd oelec ic dams in he 80′s and
90′s (e.g., Tucu uí and Luiz Edua do Magalhães dams, whe e
wild ish we e collec ed o his s udy) could be esponsible o
F on ie s in Gene ics | www. on ie sin.o g 8Feb ua y 2018 | Volume 9 | A icle 46
Jo ge e al. Gene ic Resou ces in Pi api inga
FIGURE 3 | E alua ion o he le el o admix u e among s ocks by
STRUCTURE, showing h ee main clus e s be ween he popula ions: G oup 1
(SP1 and SP2) in g een, G oup 2 (TO1 and TO2) in ed, and G oup 3 (wild) in
yellow.
TABLE 4 | Analysis o pai wise FST based on eigh mic osa elli e loci be ween
popula ions o Pia ac us b achypomus.
SP1 SP2 TO1 TO2 wild
SP1 –
SP2 0.18438 –
TO1 0.39201 0.38080 –
TO2 0.46373 0.42999 0.08345 –
wild 0.53856 0.53782 0.16086 0.17915 –
Wild, popula ion om he Tocan ins Ri e ; TO1 and TO2, ish a ms om Tocan ins; SP1
and SP2, ish a ms om São Paulo. All esul s o FST we e signi ican s a is ically p <0.05.
a popula ion educ ion and subsequen gene ic a ia ion loss
de ec ed by ou mic osa elli e analysis. The e a e conside able
numbe s o hyd opowe dams in he basin, which can a ec
he ep oduc ion, mig a o y ou es, and egg and la ae d i
o ish (Agos inho e al., 2008). Al e a ion o he mig a o y
low consequen ly leads o a dec ease in o in e up ion o
he gene low, educing he popula ion size, which makes he
ish mo e suscep ible o he e ec s o gene ic d i (Ha anaka
and Gale i, 2003), which esul s in gene ic s uc u e o some
ish species (Calcagno o and DeSalle, 2009; Do P ado e al.,
2018).
STRUCTURE and pai wise FST analyses sugges ed a
high gene ic s uc u e be ween he s ocks he ein analyzed,
pa icula ly as esul o he ixa ion o speci ic alleles in some
loci, which esul ed in h ee clus e s (Figu e 3). The e a e
h ee hypo he ical explana ions o hese gene ic pa e ns:
(1) di e en ia ion o wild popula ion in ela ion o a med
s ocks, which could be due o he selec ion o he i es
indi iduals o a ming sys ems o low numbe o ounde s
o he es ablishmen o he a med b oods ocks; (2) lowe
gene ic s uc u e in No h/wild han Sou heas /wild, which
sugges s ha No h ish a ms had equen b oods ock
eno a ion om he wild; (3) ish a ms we e gene ically
clus e ed due o he geog aphic dis ibu ion, i.e., he deg ee
o gene ic simila i y is highe when one ish a m is close
o he o he , indica ing in e change o indi iduals be ween
nea by ish a ms, common o igin o he a med b oods ocks,
o ixa ion/selec ion o speci ic alleles o di e en clima ic
condi ions ha a e ound in B azil (No h and Sou h). Howe e ,
hese gene ic pa e ns should be also e alua ed using neu al
ma ke s (mic osa elli es in noncoding egions) and h ough
echniques o highe genome co e age (SNP, single-nucleo ide
polymo phism).
Th ough AMOVA analysis, he main gene ic a ia ion was
ound o be p esen wi hin popula ions (64.8%). This gene ic
pa e n has also been epo ed in s udies ca ied ou wi h
pacu (Calcagno o and DeSalle, 2009; Ie olino e al., 2010)
and ambaqui (Aguia e al., 2013). Mo eo e , highly signi ican
gene ic a ia ion was associa ed wi h di e ences be ween g oups
(Wild, SP, and TO), which ep esen ed 29.11% o gene ic
a ia ion, in con as o low di e ences among popula ions
wi hin g oups (6.06%).
In gene al, ou s udy o gene ic cha ac e iza ion in pi a ininga
a med s ocks p o ides impo an insigh s which can lead
o be e managemen o his species in aquacul u e. Ou
esul s a e undamen al o beginning a b eeding p og amme,
since he gene ic s uc u e should be aken in o conside a ion
when composing an ini ial base popula ion, whe e ma ings
be ween a med indi iduals om No h and Sou heas B azil
a e shown o esul in highe gene ic a iabili y in he amilies.
Mo eo e , he da a sugges ed le els o gene ic di e si y which
we e highe in a med s ocks han in wild ish, disca ding he
occu ence o inb eeding. In gene al, lack o knowledge on
gene ic a iabili y o s ocks can esul in inb eeding and ixa ion
o dele e ious genes, educed g ow h a es, disease esis ance
p oblems and educed abili y o adap o new en i onmen s
(A kush e al., 2002; Galla do e al., 2004; Nei a e al.,
2006; Hillen e al., 2017). The e o e, besides he iden i ica ion
o QTL o assis in he selec ion o supe io geno ypes by
MAS, s udies o mic osa elli es a e impo an o gene ic
moni o ing, suppo ing pi api inga aquacul u e and inc easing
i s p oduc i i y.
FINAL CONSIDERATIONS
The p ospec ion o gene ic da a o pi api inga is one o
he p io i y issues o aquacul u e, since his species is
o high economic impo ance in na ional and global ish
a ming. The iden i ica ion o gene-associa ed mic osa elli es
by NGS is undamen al o unde s anding he gene ic
s uc u e o wild and a med popula ions, p o iding
suppo o u he managemen p og ammes and gene ic
p e-b eeding p og ammes. Mo eo e , he mic osa elli es
desc ibed he ein a e in e es ing a ge s used o ind QTL
ma ke s, speci ically ela ed o he immune sys em o
pi api inga.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
PJ: Acquisi ion, analysis and in e p e a ion o da a, d a o
he wo k, inal app o al o he e sion; VM-F, RA, and MdF:
D a o he wo k, de elopmen o in ellec ual con en , inal
app o al o he e sion; MH: Analysis and in e p e a ion o da a,
d a o he wo k, inal app o al o he e sion; NM: Analysis
and in e p e a ion o da a, d a o he wo k, inal app o al
o he e sion; MV: Analysis and in e p e a ion o da a, d a
F on ie s in Gene ics | www. on ie sin.o g 9Feb ua y 2018 | Volume 9 | A icle 46