scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

FACTORS HINDERING THE CONDUCT OF AUDITS OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REPORTS: EVIDENCE FROM POLAND

Abstract

This article presents the results of empirical research conducted among audit firms in Poland regarding the factors hindering the provision of non-financial information verification and attestation services. The rapidly developing practice of non-financial reporting among socially responsible entities in Poland does not translate into the number of reports that are subjected to external audits. Despite the unquestionable need to confirm the reliability of non-financial data, services of this type are not provided by the majority of audit firms. The primary aim of the article is to identify the factors hindering the performance of audits of non-financial reports in Poland. The article identifies the entities operating in the Polish audit market in terms of selected features. The authors provided answers to three main research questions: What percentage of audit firms in Poland carry out the verification of non-financial reports? What is the size and the level of employment of audit firms in Poland? What factors hinder, in the auditors’ practice, the performance of audits of non- financial reports? To achieve the objective, a survey research was conducted among audit firms under the supervision of the Polish Agency of Audit Oversight. The theoretical basis of the article included a literature study on the audit of non-financial reports as well as an analysis of regulations governing this subject matter in Poland. This study is the first such review of factors that condition the use of such an important tool as an audit in non-financial reporting. The obtained study results indicate that only 2.3% of audit firms perform audits of CSR reports. The main factor that limits audit firms in the performance of this type of services is the low demand in this regard. Moreover, the audits of non-financial reports are limited by insufficient staff.

Read accessible full text

FACTORS HINDERING THE CONDUCT OF AUDITS OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REPORTS: EVIDENCE FROM POLAND

Author: Bartoszewicz, Anna
Publisher: Technická Univerzita v Liberci
Year: 2022
Source: https://dspace.tul.cz/bitstreams/e6cfae63-c921-456b-92da-dbbe61f688c4/download
24 2022, XXV, 1
Business Adminis a ion and Managemen
10.15240/ ul/001/2022-1-002
FACTORS HINDERING THE CONDUCT
OF AUDITS OF CORPORATE SOCIAL
RESPONSIBILITY REPORTS:
EVIDENCE FROM POLAND
Anna Ba oszewicz1, Anna Ru kowska-Zia ko2
1 Uni e si y o Wa mia and Mazu y in Olsz yn, Facul y o Economic Sciences, Ins i u e o Economics and Finance,
Poland, ORCID: 0000-0002-6872-780X, [email p o ec ed];
2 Uni e si y o Wa mia and Mazu y in Olsz yn, Facul y o Economic Sciences, Ins i u e o Economics and Finance,
Poland, ORCID: 0000-0001-6073-3386, [email p o ec ed].
Abs ac : This a icle p esen s he esul s o empi ical esea ch conduc ed among audi i ms in
Poland ega ding he ac o s hinde ing he p o ision o non- inancial in o ma ion e i ica ion and
a es a ion se ices. The apidly de eloping p ac ice o non- inancial epo ing among socially
esponsible en i ies in Poland does no ansla e in o he numbe o epo s ha a e subjec ed o
ex e nal audi s. Despi e he unques ionable need o con i m he eliabili y o non- inancial da a,
se ices o his ype a e no p o ided by he majo i y o audi i ms. The p ima y aim o he a icle is o
iden i y he ac o s hinde ing he pe o mance o audi s o non- inancial epo s in Poland. The a icle
iden i ies he en i ies ope a ing in he Polish audi ma ke in e ms o selec ed ea u es. The au ho s
p o ided answe s o h ee main esea ch ques ions: Wha pe cen age o audi i ms in Poland ca y
ou he e i ica ion o non- inancial epo s? Wha is he size and he le el o employmen o audi
i ms in Poland? Wha ac o s hinde , in he audi o s’ p ac ice, he pe o mance o audi s o non-
inancial epo s? To achie e he objec i e, a su ey esea ch was conduc ed among audi i ms
unde he supe ision o he Polish Agency o Audi O e sigh . The heo e ical basis o he a icle
included a li e a u e s udy on he audi o non- inancial epo s as well as an analysis o egula ions
go e ning his subjec ma e in Poland. This s udy is he i s such e iew o ac o s ha condi ion
he use o such an impo an ool as an audi in non- inancial epo ing. The ob ained s udy esul s
indica e ha only 2.3% o audi i ms pe o m audi s o CSR epo s. The main ac o ha limi s audi
i ms in he pe o mance o his ype o se ices is he low demand in his ega d. Mo eo e , he
audi s o non- inancial epo s a e limi ed by insu icien s a .
Keywo ds: Audi , non- inancial epo ing, CSR, co po a e social esponsibili y, audi , assu ance,
e i ica ion.
JEL Classi ica ion: M42, Q56.
APA S yle Ci a ion: Ba oszewicz, A., & Ru kowska-Zia ko, A. (2022). Fac o s Hinde ing he
Conduc o Audi s o Co po a e Social Responsibili y Repo s: E idence om Poland. E&M
Economics and Managemen , 25(1), 24–41. h ps://doi.o g/10.15240/ ul/001/2022-1-002
In oduc ion
In ecen yea s, non- inancial epo ing has
become a global p ac ice used by businesses
almos all o e he wo ld. I s dynamic
de elopmen can be also ecen ly obse ed in
Poland, which is e lec ed in he g owing numbe
o co po a e social esponsibili y (CSR) epo s
published olun a ily by en e p ises. Thei
scope includes non- inancial esul s ob ained
wi hin he en i onmen al, social and economic
a ea and in o ms abou he isk associa ed wi h
he ini ia i es unde aken by companies.
EM_1_2022.indd 24 23.3.2022 9:36:21
25
1, XXV, 2022
Business Adminis a ion and Managemen
Al hough he da a con ained in CSR epo s
a e in o ma i e o s akeholde s and a e used in
he decision-making p ocess, he e is a ce ain
conce n ha hey may lack eliabili y (compa e
wi h Dal Maso e al., 2020). I is no ou o he
ques ion ha companies, while p omo ing hei
ac i i ies, will disclose only selec ed, usually
posi i e, aspec s o hei ope a ions. The e o e,
i appea s easonable o subjec he disclosu es
p esen ed in CSR epo s o an audi , which,
in his con ex , means an independen and
objec i e e i ica ion o he non- inancial
in o ma ion con ained in he epo , and hei
a es a ion (con i ma ion) in e ms o eliabili y.
Un il 2018, non- inancial epo ing in
Poland was olun a y o all en i ies. This was
changed by he Polish ansposi ion o Di ec i e
2014/95/EU o he Eu opean Pa liamen and
o he Council o Oc obe 22, 2014, unde
which nea ly 300 Public In e es En i ies in
Poland we e obliged o disclose non- inancial
in o ma ion. Poland implemen ed he p o isions
o Di ec i e 2014/95/EU in he a ea o epo ing
o ex ended non- inancial in o ma ion by means
o : The Ac o Decembe 15, 2016, amending
he Accoun ing Ac (Jou nal o Laws o 2017,
i em 61), and he Ac o May 11, 2017, on
s a u o y audi o s, audi i ms, and public
o e sigh (Jou nal o Laws o 2017, i em 1089).
Th ee o ms o epo ing non- inancial da a a e
pe mi ed. The i s o m is a s a emen in he
a ea conce ned, p esen ed as a sepa a e pa
in he epo . The second op ion is a sepa a e
epo on non- inancial in o ma ion, d awn up
along wi h he ac i i y epo . The hi d o m
pe mi s la i ude in non- inancial epo ing while
p o iding o he possibili y o including hei
own, na ional, Eu opean Union, o in e na ional
p inciples selec ed by he en i y, wi h he
epo ing en i y ha ing o indica e hem. I
should be emphasized ha he issuance o
EU Di ec i e 2014/95/EU, which he Membe
S a es we e equi ed o anspose in o na ional
legisla ion, was a b eak h ough in non- inancial
epo ing in Eu ope. I s con en has indica ed
a clea di ec ion owa ds g ea e business
anspa ency and esponsibili y as ega ds
he social and en i onmen al issues. I should
be no ed ha 22 coun ies d ew he epo ing
amewo k om he Di ec i e, while he o he s
adap ed i o he exis ing guidelines, and
he audi o ’s in ol emen in con i ming non-
inancial da a was adop ed by 19 Membe
S a es, including Poland (Fă caș, 2020).
The epo ing o in o ma ion hese 300
Public In e es En i ies in Poland is o be
con i med by an independen hi d pa y ha
issues a s a emen in his ega d. O he en i ies
decide hemsel es whe he o commission
he a es a ion o non- inancial da a and,
addi ionally, o subjec hem o a ull audi ,
as he e is no manda o y obliga ion o do so.
I should be no ed ha egula ions do no
indica e clea ly who is o con i m non- inancial
in o ma ion. In p ac ice, his ole is assigned
o he s a u o y audi o , since he p ocess o
disclosu e e i ica ion and he me hodological
aspec s o audi ing non- inancial epo s
a e e y simila o a inancial e iew. I can
he e o e be assumed ha a s a u o y audi o
is a compe en pe son in his a ea. A s udy
conduc ed by Wiśniewska (2015) in he a ea o
he e i ica ion o co po a e social esponsibili y
epo ing on a g oup o 32 Polish companies
ound ha he da a con i ma ion se ices in
his ega d we e p o ided in he en i ies unde
s udy by h ee g oups o uni s: Global Repo ing
Ini ia i e (GRI), consul ing and audi i ms and
o he consul ing i ms. In ol ing audi i ms in
he p ocess o e i ica ion may p o e o be an
app op ia e solu ion, as hese en i ies ha e bo h
he ele an expe ience gained in he cou se o
audi ing inancial epo s, access and he abili y
o link non- inancial in o ma ion wi h inancial
da a and ha e app op ia e IT ools o p o iding
se ices o his ype. The a o emen ioned
componen s ende he audi p ocess cohe en
and well- a ge ed, which may b ing measu able
e ec s in he audi o ’s p ac ice.
I is di icul o indica e he ac ual le el o
audi pe o mance in Poland, as he da a in his
ega d a e no ye ully known. The inc eased
epo ing p ac ices in ecen yea s may no be
consis en wi h he e i ica ion and a es a ion
o he da a con ained in hem (compa e
Zysna ska-Dwo czak, 2016). The a ionale
behind his s a emen includes he esul s o
an analysis o sus ainable de elopmen epo s
o he yea s 2001–2010 om 15 coun ies
which indica ed an inc ease in hei numbe ,
which, un o una ely, did no co ela e wi h
he numbe o epo s subjec ed o ex e nal
e i ica ion. Mo eo e , in ce ain coun ies, e.g.,
I aly and Sweden, wi h an inc ease in epo ing,
a dec ease in he ex e nal e i ica ion o epo s
was no ed (Zysna ska-Dwo czak, 2016).
I is also di icul o quo e he esea che s’
obse a ions in his ega d, as he opics hey
EM_1_2022.indd 25 23.3.2022 9:36:21
26 2022, XXV, 1
Business Adminis a ion and Managemen
add ess ocus mainly on non- inancial epo ing
ca ied ou by socially esponsible en i ies, while
he conside a ions mainly conce n he scope
and hema ic con en o he abo e-men ioned
epo s and epo ing s anda disa ion. The a ea
o epo e i ica ion is usually desc ibed by
companies ha commission his ype o se ice
and indica es whe he a epo o a pa icula
company has been o no subjec ed o
e i ica ion. The e a e no analyses o he audi
ma ke o he le el o se ices p o ided by audi
i ms and he ac o s ha egula e his si ua ion.
This indica es a esea ch gap occu ing in his
a ea. The au ho s belie e ha non- inancial
epo ing audi s a e a ely pe o med, wi h
he iden i ica ion o ac o s which con ibu e
o his si ua ion being o impo ance. I is also
becoming easonable o iden i y a hypo he ical
link be ween speci ic cha ac e is ics o audi
i ms and he ba ie s ha p e en he audi ing
o non- inancial epo s. In he cou se o such
conside a ions, he ollowing esea ch ques ion
a ose:
RQ1: Wha pe cen age o audi i ms in
Poland ca y ou audi s o non- inancial epo s?
RQ2: How la ge a e audi i ms in Poland in
e ms o he u no e ob ained and he numbe
o employees?
RQ3: How many yea s o business
expe ience do he i ms p o iding audi se ices
ha e?
RQ4: Wha ac o s (in he opinion o audi
i ms) hinde he pe o mance o audi s o non-
inancial epo s?
The sea ch o answe s o he abo e
ques ions di ec ed he esea ch objec i e
owa ds he “Iden i ica ion o ac o s hinde ing
he pe o mance o audi s o non- inancial
epo s in Poland”. The addi ional objec i es
o he s udy included he “Iden i ica ion o he
pe cen age o audi i ms in Poland, being unde
audi supe ision, which will pe o m an audi o
non- inancial epo s” and he “Cha ac e isa ion
o audi i ms in Poland in e ms o he
employmen and he u no e ob ained”.
The con ex o he conside a ions e e ed
o Polish audi o s’ p ac ices as ega ds he
e i ica ion o CSR epo s. The cu en s udy
con ibu es o he knowledge in he a ea o
non- inancial epo ing in wo ways: i s ly,
i cha ac e ises audi i ms ope a ing in he
Polish ma ke and indica es wha pe cen age
o hese en i ies pe o m he se ices o
audi ing non- inancial epo s. Secondly, he
s udy demons a es he ba ie s ha hinde
he audi o non- inancial epo s, which leads
o he conclusion ha he implemen a ion o
mechanisms elimina ing hese limi a ions will
success ully con ibu e o an inc ease in he
numbe o en i ies p o iding audi se ices in
he a ea o CSR.
1. Li e a u e Re iew
The conduc ed li e a u e e iew sugges s ha
despi e many scien i ic pape s on non- inancial
epo ing in Poland and wo ldwide, esea ch
conce ning e i ica ion o non- inancial
in o ma ion is s ill a an ea ly de elopmen
phase. The impo ance o he p esen ed subjec
ma e and he need o de elop empi ical
esea ch in his a ea we e emphasised in e
alia by E kens e al. (2015) who conduc ed
a de ailed bibliome ic analysis o published
scien i ic a icles on non- inancial in o ma ion.
They ecognise ha , a he u n o he 20 h
and he 21s cen u y, he e was a change
owa ds a g ea e numbe o audi s o non-
inancial in o ma ion. Howe e , an analysis o
he esea ch objec i es applied in all analysed
a icles shows ha mos o hem a e based on
a chi al me hodologies. A signi ican p opo ion
o he a icles a e in he o m o an essay
(25.3% o published a icles), while app ox.
14.4% a e ques ionnai es o expe imen s and
8.4% a e case s udies. Only a small numbe o
he a icles a e analy ical in na u e. The au ho s
sugges he necessi y o esea ch in o, in e
alia, he issues o he eliabili y o non- inancial
in o ma ion disclosu es, di icul ies in audi ing
CSR epo ing and he need o independen
audi s (E kens e al., 2015).
In o eign publica ions, he audi ing o
non- inancial epo s has been conside ed in
ecen yea s, in e alia by Puche a‐Ma ínez
e al. (2018), Dal Maso e al. (2020), Ri iè e-
Gio dano (2007), Kaspina and Samoilo a (2020),
Co an e al. (2009), and Mane i and Tocca ondi
(2012). In u n, in Polish scien i ic publica ions,
he s ic e opic o e i ica ion and a es a ion o
non- inancial in o ma ion was add essed in e
alia by Zyzna ska-Dwo czak (2016), Hummel &
Michalak (2016), Wiśniewska (2015), Wiśniewska
and Chojnacka (2016), Ku e a and Zyzna ska-
Dwo czak (2018) and Ba oszewicz (2018).
Ha ing analysed he conside a ions gi en
by he au ho s as ega ds he e i ica ion and
a es a ion o non- inancial in o ma ion, h ee
main opics can be dis inguished:
EM_1_2022.indd 26 23.3.2022 9:36:21
27
1, XXV, 2022
Business Adminis a ion and Managemen
 s essing he impo ance and necessi y o
pe o ming se ices o his ype in o de o
inc ease he eliabili y o non- inancial da a;
 emphasising me hodological di icul ies in
he pe o mance o non- inancial audi s;
 he e ec o speci ic a iables on he quali y
o hese audi s.
An impo an aspec in epo ing non- inan-
cial in o ma ion is i s sui abili y o s akeholde s.
The in o ma ion con ained in a CSR epo
should be cha ac e ised by use ulness,
comple eness, consis ency, anspa ency and,
p ima ily, eliabili y (Fijałkowska, 2013), which
should be con i med by an independen audi .
Hence, i is o impo ance ha hey a e subjec ed
o an audi . The impo ance o con i ma ion
se ices o inc easing he eliabili y o an en i y’s
pe o mance measu es as pa o he ex ended
ole o s a u o y audi o s was dis inguished in
he ‘Repo o Special Commi ee o Assu ance
Se ices’ (Ame ican Ins i u e o Ce i ied Public
Accoun an s – AICPA, 1997). The con en o he
epo sugges s ha he adi ional ole o audi
in o de o inc ease eliabili y and in oduce an
added alue o he in o ma ion being p esen ed
should apply whe he o no i is inancial o
non- inancial in o ma ion (AICPA, 1997, as ci ed
in Co am e al., 2009, p. 138). As Mane i and
Tocca ondi (2012) claim, in o de o p o ide
epo s on sus ainable de elopmen , an ex e nal
supplie in o ms abou he o ganisa ion’s
pe o mance as ega ds en i onmen al and
social issues. Such an ac i i y inc eases he
quali y o in o ma ion disclosed in co po a e
social esponsibili y epo s (compa e wi h
indica ions by Mane i & Beca i, 2009, as
ci ed in Sie a-Ga cia e al., 2018). Humel and
Michalak (2016) add ha he assessmen o he
epo ing p ocess unc ioning and all audi o ’s
ecommenda ions conce ning he unc ioning o
his p ocess a e as impo an as ensu ing da a
eliabili y. As in he case o audi ing inancial
epo s, as pa o summa ising he wo k on
he e i ica ion o non- inancial epo s, he
audi o submi s a le e o he Managemen
Boa d, which summa ises hei obse a ions
and ecommenda ions conce ning possible
imp o emen s in he epo ing p ocess. Howe e ,
as Lam and Kha e (2010) poin ou , due o he
wide hema ic ange o disclosu es p esen ed
in non- inancial epo s, which esul s om he
na u e o co po a e social esponsibili y and i s
mul i- ace ed cha ac e , he au hen ica ion o
in o ma ion o his ype is a di icul ask.
In addi ion, Hummel and Michalak (2016)
emphasise he posi i e side o he audi o non-
inancial epo s, claiming ha an in es men
in he e i ica ion o non- inancial da a can
make a signi ican con ibu ion o building
a compe i i e ad an age. The companies ha
epo non- inancial da a and subjec hem o
e i ica ion achie e be e esul s and highe
pe o mance in inancial ma ke s, and a e
much less sensi i e o ma ke -wide downwa d
ends, because hanks o he eliable
disclosu e o signi ican da a, all in o ma ion is
al eady discoun ed and e lec ed in he sha e
ma ke . Zysna ska-Dwo czak (2016) poin s
ou , howe e , ha despi e he en i ies being
ocused on ensu ing he highes quali y o
epo s, egula ions do no oblige en i ies o
apply speci ic solu ions including, in pa icula ,
o ex e nal e i ica ion o he da a being
p esen ed. Thus, he en i ies hemsel es decide
whe he o subjec non- inancial in o ma ion
o ex e nal e i ica ion. In u n, Sie a-Ga cia
e al. (2018) no e ha al hough he Di ec i e
does no equi e he e i ica ion o he con en
o a non- inancial epo , in many coun ies his
is done by an independen ex e nal se ice
p o ide o inc ease he eliabili y and diligence
o he in o ma ion being p esen ed. Howe e ,
acco ding o he esea ch conduc ed by
Wiśniewska (2015) in he a ea o e i ica ion
o Co po a e Social Responsibili y epo s in
Polish companies which submi ed epo s
in 2013 and 2014 o he compe i ion ‘Social
Repo s’ in Poland in 2013, ou o 32 epo s
submi ed o he compe i ion, 15 we e subjec
o ex e nal e i ica ion, which accoun ed o
46.9%. In 2014, ou o 31 submi ed epo s,
19 we e subjec o ex e nal e i ica ion,
which accoun ed o 61.3%. The e o e, he
numbe o epo s e i ied by ex e nal expe s
inc eased by 14.4%, which may indica e an
inc ease in companies’ awa eness o he need
o au hen ica e non- inancial da a p esen ed
in epo s. I is wo h s essing ha he s udy
in ol ed companies ha ha e submi ed hei
epo s o he compe i ion, hence i can be
assumed ha hey unde s and he idea o
non- inancial epo ing, and can see he need
o con i m he in o ma ion con ained in CSR
epo s.
I is, howe e , di icul o de e mine whe he
his end o inc easing he e i ica ion o
epo s has been main ained. This s a emen
may be based on he ac ha he p ocess
EM_1_2022.indd 27 23.3.2022 9:36:21
28 2022, XXV, 1
Business Adminis a ion and Managemen
o me hodological audi ing non- inancial
in o ma ion can be a signi ican di icul y,
he e o e audi i ms may no be willing o p o ide
se ices o his ype. As K asodomska (2014)
no es, non- inancial da a con aining issues
o he en i onmen , espec ing human and
wo ke s’ igh s, and he p e en ion o co up ion
and b ibe y a e desc ip i e in o ma ion wi h
a di e en s uc u e, language, s yle and
na a i e me hods, which uses indus y-speci ic
e ms, he e o e i is a challenge o audi o s o
assess hem objec i ely. This p oblem was also
add essed by Kaspina and Samoilo a (2020).
In hei opinion, one o he aspec s hinde ing
he p ac ical pe o mance o a es a ion
assignmen s conce ning non- inancial
in o ma ion is he lack o es ablished c i e ia
o he pe o mance o non- inancial epo ing.
Repo s conce ning sus ainable de elopmen
a e mos o en d awn up in acco dance wi h he
Global Repo ing Ini ia i e’s (GRI) guidelines
o sus ainable de elopmen epo ing. In
such a case, a s a u o y audi o will ollow he
s anda d p ocedu es o he a es a ion se ice.
The si ua ion is di e en in he case o epo s
d awn up by o eign en i ies, in acco dance wi h
o he coun ies’ ules, and he e y c i e ia o
hei implemen a ion. In his case, i is di icul
o selec he ools o es ing. Fu he mo e, i
is di icul o de e mine he e y signi icance o
he in es iga ion. A he same ime, a p oblem
a ises: how o de e mine he app op ia e
app oach o sampling? The selec i e app oach
esul s om he ac ha he audi o ’s esou ces
a e limi ed, and he pe o mance o a ull audi
is almos impossible, he e o e a sample should
be selec ed o audi ing, and he eliabili y o
in o ma ion should be assessed based on he
sample, which, in he case o non- inancial
in o ma ion, may be an uneasy ask.
The posi i e side o he audi s o non-
inancial epo s is indica ed by he esul s o
he s udy conduc ed by Puche a-Ma ínez
e al. (2018). They show ha audi ing i ms
om he so-called ‘big ou ’, and he ees o
an audi pe o med by he i ms unde s udy
encou age CSR epo ing. They belie e ha
la ge audi i ms play an impo an ole in
disclosing in o ma ion on CSR, which may help
mi iga e he in o ma ion asymme y be ween
manage s and s akeholde s. In u n, Dal Maso
e al. (2020) in es iga ed he ela ionship
be ween he con i ming se ices pe o med
by he same audi i m in he a ea o CSR and
inancial epo s. They assessed posi i ely he
e ec o such a si ua ion on he assessmen o
he con inua ion o he company’s ope a ions.
On he o he hand, Ri iè e-Gio dano (2007)
poin s ou ha i ms should conside subjec ing
non- inancial in o ma ion o an audi , as i is
p ac iced in he a ea o inancial in o ma ion
au hen ica ion. He p oposes an audi o social
in o ma ion as a measu e con i ming he
eliabili y o such da a. I should be emphasised
ha an inc easing numbe o adi ional
in es o s (i.e., in es o s who a e no speci ically
guided by he CSR- ela ed in es men s a egy)
a e including CSR esul s o hei decisions
conce ning he selec ion o sha es and
obliga ions (Du and e al., 2019), hence i is
jus i ied o subjec he published in o ma ion o
audi s.
Despi e much e idence ound in he
li e a u e, which indica e he need o e i y
non- inancial epo s and he con i ma ion o
non- inancial in o ma ion by he audi o , as
p e iously men ioned, he au ho s belie e ha
he se ices o his ype a e p ac iced among
ew audi i ms in Poland. In o de o e i y he
p ac ice in his ega d, and o de e mine he
ac o s which hinde he audi s o CSR epo s,
an empi ical s udy was conduc ed.
2. Resea ch Me hodology and Da a
The a icle used he su ey esea ch. The
s udy was conduc ed be ween Oc obe and
No embe 2020 on a popula ion o 1,410 audi
i ms unde he supe ision o he Polish Agency
o Audi O e sigh (PANA). The selec ion o he
indica ed g oup o he s udy was mo i a ed
by he ac ha hese en i ies a e supe ised
by he abo e-men ioned Agency, which is an
independen ins i u ion ocusing i s ac i i ies
on building us in inancial in o ma ion.
PANA exe cises independen supe ision o e
s a u o y audi o s, audi i ms and p o essional
sel -go e ning bodies o s a u o y audi o s and
ensu es ha he audi s o inancial se ices
and a es a ion se ices a e app op ia ely
pe o med by s a u o y audi o s. Such
a measu e con ibu es o an inc ease in in es o
secu i y and economic u no e . The ac i i ies
o he Agency a e supe ised by he Minis e o
Finance, in e alia by means o appoin ing and
dismissing PANA bodies, g an ing i s s a u es
and app o ing a inancial plan and a inancial
epo . The lis o 1,410 i ms is a ailable on he
PANA websi e (as o Oc obe 15, 2020). When
EM_1_2022.indd 28 23.3.2022 9:36:21

29
1, XXV, 2022
Business Adminis a ion and Managemen
he s udy was ini ia ed, he con ac de ails o
pa icula i ms lis ed on he PANA websi e
we e subjec ed o p elimina y e i ica ion. The
epea ed eco ds and he en i ies o which
he e we e sho comings we e dele ed. 1,293
en i ies we e quali ied o he u he s age o
he s udy.
The su ey was add essed o all en i ies
ep esen ing he s udy popula ion. By
assump ion, he s udy was in ended o be
a comple e popula ion s udy. Howe e , no all
esponden s p o ided comp ehensi e answe s
o all ques ions. The issue is desc ibed in de ail
below. The esponden s’ willingness o p o ide
answe s o indi idual ques ions was he only
c i e ion o he inclusion o a pa icula audi
i m in he sample. The e o e, i could no be
assumed ha i was a andom sample, and i
was no ad isable o apply s a is ical es ima ion
me hods. Fo his eason, he s udy employed
he desc ip i e s a is ics me hod, including
in e dependence es ing using C ame ’s V.
This is a measu e o he independence o
a iables, which can be applied o a iables
in all measu emen scales. I can ake alues
om he in e al o [0; 1], whe e ‘0’ indica es
s ochas ic independence, and ‘1’ indica es
a de e minis ic dependence.
The s udy was conduc ed using he CATI
(Compu e Assis ed Telephone In e iew)
echnique, whe e he esponden s we e
ei he con ac pe sons indica ed on he PANA
websi e o pe sons indica ed by hem as
compe en o answe he ques ions conce ned.
The measu emen ool was an in e iew
ques ionnai e comp ised o se en ques ions
on he cha ac e is ics o he i ms unde s udy,
he p o ision (o lack he eo ) o he se ice o
non- inancial epo audi ing in he a ea o CSR
and he ac o s ha hinde he pe o mance
o se ices o his ype. The con ac wi h
a esponden was success ully es ablished o
1,109 audi i ms, wi h some i ms e using o
pa icipa e in he s udy. 774 i ms answe ed
a single ques ion conce ning hei pe o mance
o non- inancial epo e i ica ion, which
enabled he conclusion as o how many o hem
pe o m he se ices o CSR epo e i ica ion.
I was ound ha 18 en i ies we e audi i ms ha
pe o med audi s o non- inancial epo s, while
he o he en i ies (756) we e audi i ms ha
did no p o ide se ices o his ype. Ul ima ely,
235 esponden s p o ided answe s o all he
ques ions asked. 226 o hem a e i ms ha
do no pe o m audi s o non- inancial epo s,
and only nine o hem p o ided se ices in his
ega d. Due o he e y low ep esen a ion o
audi i ms ha p o ide se ices in e i ying non-
inancial epo s and he adop ed objec i es
o he s udy, u he empi ical conside a ions
omi ed he en i ies which p o ide se ices
o his ype. On he o he hand, he answe s
p o ided by 226 esponden s om audi i ms,
ha did no pe o m audi s o non- inancial
in o ma ion, we e subjec ed o a de ailed
analysis. Thei ope a ions a e mainly ocused
on audi ing inancial epo s. The di ec ion o he
adop ed esea ch enabled he cha ac e isa ion
o his g oup o audi en i ies, and iden i ied he
easons o hei ailu e o pe o m audi s o
non- inancial epo s. The su ey checked wha
di icul ies in he p o ision o se ices in he
a ea o CSR audi ing we e mos o en indica ed
by esponden s om hese en i ies. I should
be s essed ha a sample o 774 en i ies was
used only o de e mine he pe cen age o audi
i ms p o iding se ices o CSR epo audi ing.
All o he analyses we e ca ied ou based on
a sample o 226 i ms which pe o med no
e i ica ion o non- inancial in o ma ion.
3. Empi ical Resul s and Discussion
Acco ding o he s udy esul s, ou o 774 audi
i ms, only 18 (2.3%) pe o m audi s o CSR non-
inancial epo s. Mos en i ies do no p o ide
se ices o his ype. Based on a sample o 226
esponden s om audi i ms which pe o med
no audi s o non- inancial in o ma ion, he
ac o s hinde ing, in he audi o s’ p ac ice, he
pe o mance o audi s o non- inancial epo s
we e analysed. Mo eo e , his g oup o en i ies
was examined in e ms o hei expe ience in
he pe o mance o audi s o inancial epo s
and he size.
The esul s o he conduc ed analysis
e ealed he main ea u es o audi i ms in
Poland and enabled hei cha ac e isa ion.
The size o he en i ies was conside ed in
e ms o he annual u no e , he numbe o
all s a employed a he uni , and he numbe
o audi o s wo king in a pa icula en i y. The
company’s expe ience was desc ibed using wo
a iables exp essed in yea s: (1) he leng h o
ope a ion in he ma ke ; and (2) he expe ience
in p o iding inancial epo e i ica ion and
con i ma ion se ices.
Acco ding o he esponden s’ decla a ions,
221 en i ies a e mic o-en e p ises wi h
EM_1_2022.indd 29 23.3.2022 9:36:21
30 2022, XXV, 1
Business Adminis a ion and Managemen
a u no e o less han 2 million EUR. Only i e
audi i ms eco ded an annual u no e o mo e
han 2 million EUR while no exceeding he 10
million EUR u no e ceiling, which classi ies
hem as small-sized en e p ises.
Based on he answe s o he ques ions
conce ning he cha ac e is ics o he en i ies
unde s udy, he ollowing we e de e mined:
how long hese i ms had been ope a ing in
Polish ma ke (Tab. 1), how many yea s o
expe ience hey had in pe o ming audi s o
inancial epo s (Tab. 2) and how many s a
hey employed (Tab. 3), including audi o s
(Tab. 4).
As indica ed by he s udy esul s, he
younges o he i ms unde s udy s a ed
ope a ing in 2020 and he oldes s a ed in 1980.
In 1989, in Poland, he e was a ans o ma ion
o i s cen ally planned economy in o he ee
ma ke economy. I is wo h no ing ha se e al
audi i ms ha ha e been ope a ing o da e we e
es ablished be o e he sys em ans o ma ions.
25% o he en i ies ha e been ope a ing o
less han 10 yea s and only 10% o less han
5 yea s. Nea ly one-qua e o audi i ms ha e
been ope a ing o 25–30 yea s, i.e. hese a e
i ms ha we e es ablished a he beginning o
he ee ma ke ans o ma ions in Poland.
App ox. 24% o i ms ha e less han 10
yea s’ expe ience in audi ing ac i i ies in he
a ea o inancial epo s, and 10% ha e less
han 5 yea s’ expe ience. Mo e han 75% o
en i ies ha e been in ol ed in he e i ica ion
o inancial epo s o 10 yea s o longe . Mo e
Numbe o yea s Numbe o en i ies F equency Cumula i e equency
[0; 5) 27 0.1195 0.1195
[5; 10) 29 0.1283 0.2478
[10; 15) 47 0.2080 0.4558
[15; 20) 35 0.1549 0.6106
[20; 25) 24 0.1062 0.7168
[25; 30) 55 0.2434 0.9602
[30; 35) 5 0.0221 0.9823
[35; 40] 4 0.0177 1
To al 226
Sou ce: own
Numbe o yea s Numbe o en i ies F equency Cumula i e equency
[0; 5) 24 0.1062 0.1062
[5; 10) 30 0.1327 0.2389
[10; 15) 40 0.1770 0.4159
[15; 20) 41 0.1814 0.5973
[20; 25) 23 0.1018 0.6991
[25; 30) 47 0.2080 0.9071
[30; 35] 21 0.0929 1
To al 226
Sou ce: own
Tab. 1: The leng h o business ope a ion, in yea s
Tab. 2: The expe ience in he pe o mance o audi s o inancial epo s
EM_1_2022.indd 30 23.3.2022 9:36:21
31
1, XXV, 2022
Business Adminis a ion and Managemen
han one- hi d o he companies ha p o ide
se ices in his ega d ha e been ope a ing o
10–20 yea s. Ha ing analysed he in o ma ion
p o ided in Tabs. 1 and 2, one can conclude
ha among he audi i ms unde s udy, en i ies
wi h ex ensi e expe ience in he pe o mance
o inancial audi s a e p edominan .
The majo i y (63%) o he i ms a e en i ies
employing ewe han i e s a , while 85% o
he examined i ms employ ewe han 10 s a .
The i ms employing a leas 20 s a accoun o
5% o he popula ion examined.
As he s udy esul s show, mo e han 80%
o en i ies employ ewe han ou audi o s,
while 4% o he i ms unde s udy employ
a leas se en ones. I should he e o e be
concluded ha he i ms p o iding se ices o
audi ing inancial epo s in Poland a e mic o-
and small-sized en e p ises in e ms o he
numbe o employees. The majo i y o hem a e
mic oen e p ises ha employ highly quali ied
s a .
Due o he low pe cen age o i ms p o iding
se ices in he a ea o he e i ica ion o non-
inancial epo s in Poland ( he esul s o he
conduc ed s udy indica e 2.3%), he c ucial
objec i e was o iden i y he mos impo an ac o s
con ibu ing o his si ua ion. The esponden s had
he oppo uni y o choose om i e hypo he ical
di icul ies p o ided in he ques ionnai e.
Mo eo e , hey could indica e o he ba ie s
which, in hei opinion, ha e a conside able e ec
on he pe o mance o non- inancial audi s, and
cons i u e obs acles in his ega d.
Numbe o employees Numbe o en i ies F equency Cumula i e equency
[0; 5) 143 0.6327 0.6327
[5; 10) 49 0.2168 0.8496
[10; 15) 19 0.0841 0.9336
[15; 20) 30.0133 0.9469
[20; 25) 5 0.0221 0.9690
[25; 30) 20.0088 0.9779
[30; 35) 30.0133 0.9912
[35; 40) 1 0.0044 0.9956
[40; 45] 1 0.0044 1
To al 226
Sou ce: own
Numbe o audi o s Numbe o en i ies F equency Cumula i e equency
[0–4) 182 0.8053 0.8053
[4–7) 35 0.1549 0.9602
[7; 10) 4 0.0177 0.9779
[10; 13) 30.0133 0.9912
[13; 15) 1 0.0044 0.9956
[15; 17] 1 0.0044 1
To al 226
Sou ce: own
Tab. 3: Numbe o employees
Tab. 4: Numbe o audi o s
EM_1_2022.indd 31 23.3.2022 9:36:21
32 2022, XXV, 1
Business Adminis a ion and Managemen
The ques ionnai e p oposed he ollowing
ac o s hinde ing he pe o mance o audi s o
non- inancial epo s:
1. ‘Low demand o such se ices’;
2. ‘Lack o audi o s’ p ac ical knowledge as
ega ds he me hodology o pe o ming
audi s o non- inancial epo s’;
3. ‘Di e si y o pe mi ed s anda ds as ega ds
he pe o mance o audi s o non- inancial
epo s’;
4. ‘Di icul ies in he assessmen o non-
inancial da a eliabili y’;
5. ‘Conside able la i ude in d awing up non-
inancial epo s by companies’;
6. ‘O he , which ones?’
A summa y o he esponden s’ answe s o
he ques ion conce ning he di icul ies in he
pe o mance o audi s o non- inancial epo s
is p esen ed in Tab. 5.
As demons a ed by he s udy esul s, he
di icul y in pe o ming audi s o non- inancial
epo s, mos equen ly indica ed by he
esponden s, was oo low demand o se ices
o his ype; i was indica ed by 125 esponden s,
i.e., mo e han hal o all s udy pa icipan s.
Ano he impo an limi a ion is he lack o audi o s’
p ac ical knowledge as ega ds he me hodology
o pe o ming audi s o non- inancial epo s.
This answe was indica ed by 64 en i ies, i.e.
almos one- hi d o he esponden s.
As pa o p o iding answe s o he
ques ion conce ning he ac o s hinde ing he
pe o mance o audi s o non- inancial epo s,
he esponden s had he oppo uni y o indica e
addi ional ba ie s ha had no been included
in he ques ionnai e. The conduc ed s udy
demons a es ha 103 esponden s (46%)
p oposed a di e en ac o . The ac o s we e
g ouped in o he ollowing ou ca ego ies:
1. ‘No assignmen s’ ( ac o 7);
2. ‘No ime o he p o ision o an addi ional
se ice’ ( ac o 8);
3. ‘A high cos o he se ice pe o mance, and
no expe ience in his ega d’ ( ac o 9);
4. ‘Too ew employees’ ( ac o 10).
A gene al summa y o he answe s p o ided
in his ega d is p esen ed in Tab. 6. The g oup
o en i ies which men ioned he ac o o ‘No
assignmen s’ may be he audi i ms which a e
p epa ed, in e ms o s a ing and subs an ially,
o p o ide a se ice o his ype, and ha e i in
hei o e , bu ecei e no assignmen s o i . The
eason o his may be he lack o legal obliga ion
o mos companies in Poland o d aw up non-
inancial epo s, which also ansla es in o hei
subsequen e i ica ion. E en in he case o
olun a y epo ing ca ied ou by some en i ies
in he a ea o CSR, he e is no in e es on he
pa o he managemen in subjec ing a epo
o an audi . Fac o 8, ‘No ime o he p o ision
o an addi ional se ice’, was indica ed by i ms
which, due o he g ea numbe o assignmen s
in he a ea o inancial epo audi ing, show
no in e es in ex ending he o e o include he
e i ica ion o non- inancial epo s. Fo some
o he esponden s ( he g oup indica ing ac o
9), he pe o mance o audi s o non- inancial
epo s is an expensi e se ice which equi es
Fac o Numbe o en i ies Pe cen age
1. ‘Low demand o such se ices’ 125 0.553
2. ‘Lack o audi o s’ p ac ical knowledge as ega ds
he me hodology o pe o ming audi s o non-
inancial epo s’
64 0.283
3. ‘Di e si y o pe mi ed s anda ds as ega ds he
pe o mance o audi s o non- inancial epo s’ 33 0.146
4. ‘Di icul ies in he assessmen o non- inancial da a
eliabili y’ 40 0.177
5. ‘Conside able la i ude in d awing up non- inancial
epo s by companies’ 42 0.186
6. ‘O he , which ones?’ 103 0.456
Sou ce: own
Tab. 5: The numbe and pe cen age o indica ions o a pa icula ac o hinde ing
he pe o mance o audi s o non- inancial epo s
EM_1_2022.indd 32 23.3.2022 9:36:21
39
1, XXV, 2022
Business Adminis a ion and Managemen
while 4% o he i ms unde s udy employ a
leas se en ones. Mo eo e , he i ms p o iding
se ices o audi ing inancial epo s in Poland
a e mic o- and small-sized en e p ises in e ms
o he numbe o employees. The majo i y
o hem a e mic oen e p ises ha employ
highly quali ied s a ( esea ch ques ion 2).
Among he audi i ms unde s udy, en i ies
wi h ex ensi e expe ience in he pe o mance
o inancial audi s a e p edominan . Mo e han
75% o en i ies ha e been in ol ed in he
e i ica ion o inancial epo s o 10 yea s o
longe ( esea ch ques ion 3). In he opinion
o audi i ms, he main ac o s ha hinde he
pe o mance o audi s o non- inancial epo s
a e he low demand o such se ices and he
lack o audi o s’ p ac ical knowledge on he
me hodology o ca ying ou a s udy in he
scope discussed. Mo eo e , addi ional ba ie s
ha hinde he p o ision o audi se ices in he
a ea o non- inancial epo s in Poland a e no
assignmen s, no ime o he p o ision o an
addi ional se ice (in addi ion o hose being
cu en ly p o ided), he high cos o he se ice,
no expe ience in he a ea conce ned, as well
as unde s a ing in an audi i m ( esea ch
ques ion 4).
In summa y, aking in o conside a ion he
exis ing audi ing p ac ice in Poland, he au ho s
belie e ha ce ain measu es need o be aken
o inc ease and s anda dise bo h epo ing and
he p o ision o audi se ices in he CSR a ea.
These include:
(1) a na ional solu ion in he legal a ea,
which would in ol e he in oduc ion o an
obliga o y equi emen o a legal audi o non-
inancial epo s o all i ms ha publish non-
inancial epo s;
(2) solu ions in he me hodological a ea,
which would indica e he need o con i m he
eliabili y o da a based on he pe o mance
o comple e audi s based on uni o m audi
s anda ds and me hodological guidelines in he
a ea conce ned;
(3) he p omo ion o good audi p ac ices by
audi o s’ o ganisa ions in a pa icula coun y,
which would p o ide a e e ence poin o ce ain
solu ions ha may be applied in he a ea o da a
e i ica ion and con i ma ion. Such a measu e
would be a suppo and ecommenda ion o
he audi sec o ;
(4) Eu opean ha monisa ion o s anda ds as
ega ds he p epa a ion o non- inancial epo s,
and in ela ion o he pe o mance o he audi
o he in o ma ion p o ided in CSRs. Such
a measu e would acili a e he pe o mance o
a da a assessmen , and enable he compa ison
o he in o ma ion being e i ied wi h he
in o ma ion p o ided in o he en i ies’ epo s;
(5) uni ica ion o egula ions being
implemen ed a he le el o all Eu opean Union
coun ies as ega ds audi ing o non- inancial
in o ma ion. In his con ex , i should be no ed
ha non- inancial epo ing and an audi o
in o ma ion p o ided in CSR epo no only
conce ns Poland, as i is a global p oblem ha
equi es ce ain solu ions o be de eloped a
he en i e EU le el. Hence, i is impo an o
de elop uni o m s anda ds and egula ions ha
will apply in all coun ies.
The au ho s a e o he opinion ha
unde aking he abo e measu es would bo h
enable a educ ion in he exis ing ba ie s
occu ing on he audi se ice ma ke and
inc ease he numbe o non- inancial epo
audi s being implemen ed. Thus, he main
added alue in he abo e-men ioned measu es
would p ima ily be an inc ease in he quali y o
non- inancial in o ma ion and an assu ance o
s akeholde s abou i s eliabili y. In iew o he
widesp ead p oblem ela ed o he e i ica ion
and assessmen o non- inancial da a occu ing
in many coun ies, subsequen s udies on
he subjec conce ned should be ca ied ou .
The au ho s o he a icle belie e ha u u e
esea ch in he CSR a ea should ocus p ima ily
on he me hodological aspec o non- inancial
epo s. Resea ch in his a ea would p o ide an
oppo uni y o c ea e a ce ain amewo k and
me hodological guidance o audi o s ca ying
ou he audi s conce ned. A u he s ep in he
esea ch should be an expansion o he s udy
popula ion o include ad iso y en i ies which
could also con i m non- inancial in o ma ion.
Conduc ing s udies o a simila na u e in o he
coun ies would allow a compa a i e analysis
o be ca ied ou . Such a esea ch end would
enable a b oade iew o he p oblem unde
s udy and allow u u e egula o y measu es o
be s ee ed on he igh ack.
Acknowledgemen : Suppo ed by he g an
o he Facul y o Economic Sciences a he
Uni e si y o Wa mia and Mazu y in Olsz yn
en i led “An Assessmen o De e minan s
o Non-Financial In o ma ion A es a ion,
P esen ed by Socially Responsible En i ies in
he Ligh o Ques ionnai e S udy Resul s”.
EM_1_2022.indd 39 23.3.2022 9:36:22

40 2022, XXV, 1
Business Adminis a ion and Managemen
Re e ences
Ac No. 61/2017 Coll., on Accoun ing Ac o
Laws (Polish).
Ac No. 1089/2017 Coll., on S a u o y
Audi o s, Audi Fi ms, and Public O e sigh
(Polish).
Ame ican Ins i u e o Ce i ied Public
Accoun an s (AICPA). (1997). The Repo o
he Special Commi ee on Assu ance Se ices.
New Yo k, NY: AICPA.
Ba oszewicz, A. (2018). A es acja danych
nie inansowych p zedsiębio s w społecznie
odpowiedzialnych w świe le s anda yzacji
ISAE 3000 [Assu ance se ice o non- inancial
da a o social esponsibili y en e p ises in he
ligh o ISAE S anda diza ion]. P ace Naukowe
Uniwe sy e u Ekonomicznego we W ocławiu,
522, 305–316. h ps://doi.o g/10.15611/
pn.2018.522.22
Co am, P., Mon oe, G. S., & Woodli , D.
(2009). The Value o Assu ance on Volun a y
Non inancial Disclosu e: An Expe imen al
E alua ion. AUDITING: A Jou nal o P ac ice &
Theo y, 28(1), 137–151. h ps://doi.o g/10.2308/
aud.2009.28.1.137
Dal Maso, L., Lobo, G. J., Mazzi, F., &
Paugam, L. (2020). Implica ions o he Join
P o ision o CSR Assu ance and Financial Audi
o Audi o s’ Assessmen o Going-Conce n
Risk. Con empo a y Accoun ing Resea ch,
37(2), 1248–1289. h ps://doi.o g/10.1111/1911-
3846.12560
Du and, R., Paugam, L., & S olowy, H.
(2019). Do in es o s ac ually alue sus ainabili y
indices? Replica ion, de elopmen , and
new e idence on CSR isibili y. S a egic
Managemen Jou nal, 40(9), 1471–1490.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1002/smj.3035
E kens, M., Paugam, L., & S olo y, H.
(2015). Non- inancial in o ma ion. S a e o
he a and esea ch pe spec i es based on
a bibliome ic s udy. Comp abili é – Con ôle
– Audi , 21(3), 15–92. h ps://doi.o g/10.3917/
cca.213.0015
Eu opean Union. (2014). Di ec i e
2014/95/UE o he Eu opean Pa liamen and
o he Council o 22 Oc obe 2014. B ussels:
Eu opean Union.
Fă caș, T. V. (2020). S udy abou he
Implemen a ion o he Di ec i e 95/2014 in
Romania – Legisla i e Pe spec i e and he
Ac ual Applica ion. Audi Financia , 18(2-
158), 339–351. h ps://doi.o g/10.20869/
AUDITF/2020/158/009
Fijałkowska, J. (2013). Zes awienie ujawnień
w apo ach społecznej odpowiedzialności
i z ównoważonego ozwoju p zedsiębio s w
[Co po a e Social Responsibili y and
Sus ainable De elopmen Repo – Dilemmas
o Disclosu e]. P ace Naukowe Uniwe sy e u
Ekonomicznego we W ocławiu, 311, 85–94.
Hummel, R., & Michalak, T. (2016). Ko zyści
z we y ikacji danych nie inansowych [Bene i s
o e i ying non- inancial da a]. In S. S oka
(Ed.), Rapo owanie nie inansowe Wa ość dla
spółek i inwes o ów [Non- inancial epo ing.
Value o Companies and In es o s] (pp.
57–60). Wa szawa: S owa zyszenie Emi en ów
Giełdowych.
Kaspina, R. G., & Samoilo a, N. O. (2020).
Аудит нефинансовой информации [Audi o
Non- inancial In o ma ion]. Accoun ing. Analysis.
Audi ing, 7(4), 71–80. (In Russ.) h ps://doi.
o g/10.26794/2408-9303-2020-7-4-71-80
K asodomska, J. (2014). In o macje
nie inansowe w sp awozdawczości spółek [Non-
inancial in o ma ion in company epo ing].
K aków: Wydawnic wo UE w K akowie.
K asodomska, J., & Zieniuk, P. (2021).
A es acja in o macji nie inansowych:
pods awy eo e yczne, s anda dy i p ak yki
spółek działających w Eu opie Zachodniej
i Wschodniej [Assu ance on non- inancial
epo ing: heo e ical unde pinning, s anda ds
and p ac ices o companies ope a ing in
Wes e n and Eas e n Eu ope]. Zeszy y
Teo e yczne Rachunkowości, 45(1), 53–74.
h p://doi.o g/10.5604/01.3001.0014.8350
Ku e a, M., & Zyzna ska-Dwo czak, B.
(2018). Na acja w sp awozdawczości – jak
ją we y ikować? [Repo ing na a i e – how o
e i y i ?]. S udia i P ace Kolegium Za ządzania
i Finansów Szkoły Głównej Handlowej w
Wa szawie, 160, 99–111.
Lam, H., & Kha e, A. (2010). HR’s c ucial
ole o success ul CSR. Jou nal o In e na ional
Business E hics, 3(2), 3–15.
Mane i, G., & Beca i, L. (2009).
Assu ance se ices o sus ainabili y epo s:
S anda ds and empi ical e idence. Jou nal o
Business E hics, 87(S1), 289–298. h ps://doi.
o g/10.1007/s10551-008-9809-x
Mane i, G., & Tocca ond, S. (2012). The ole o
s akeholde s in sus ainabili y epo ing assu ance.
Jou nal o Cleane P oduc ion, 107(3), 363–77.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/s10551-011-1044-1
Ma ínez-Fe e o, J., & Ga cía-Sánchez, I.
M. (2018). The le el o sus ainabili y assu ance:
EM_1_2022.indd 40 23.3.2022 9:36:22
41
1, XXV, 2022
Business Adminis a ion and Managemen
he e ec s o b and epu a ion and indus y
specialisa ion o assu ance p o ide s. Jou nal
o Business E hics, 150(4), 971–990. h p://doi.
o g/10.1007/s10551-016-3159-x
Puche a-Ma inez, M. C., Bel-Oms, I., &
Rod igues, L. L. (2018). The engagemen o
audi o s in he epo ing o co po a e social
esponsibili y in o ma ion. Co po a e Social
Responsibili y and En i onmen al Managemen ,
26(1), 46–56. h ps://doi.o g/10.1002/cs .1656
Quick, R., & Inwinkl, P. (2020). Assu ance
on CSR epo s: impac on he c edibili y
pe cep ions o non- inancial in o ma ion by bank
di ec o s. Medi a i Accoun ancy Resea ch,
28(5), 833–862. h ps://doi.o g/10.1108/
MEDAR-10-2019-0597
Ri iè e-Gio dano, G. (2007). Commen
c édibilise le epo ing socié al? [How o gi e
c edibili y o socie al epo ing?]. Comp abili é –
Con ôle – Audi , 13(2), 127–147.
Sie a-Ga cia, L., Ga cia-Benau, M. A., &
Bollas-A aya, H. M. (2018). Empi ical Analysis
o Non-Financial Repo ing by Spanish
Companies. Adminis a i e Sciences, 8(3),
1–17. h ps://doi.o g/10.3390/admsci8030029
Wiśniewska, J. (2015). We y ikacja danych
poza inansowych w apo ach CSR polskich
spółek [Ve i ica ion o Non-Financial Da a in
CSR Repo s o Polish Companies]. P ace
Naukowe Uniwe sy e u Ekonomicznego we
W ocławiu, 396(2), 159–168. h ps://doi.
o g/10.15611/pn.2015.396.17
Wiśniewska, J., & Chojnacka, E. (2016).
We y ikacja danych poza inansowych
p zedsiębio s w odpowiedzialnych społecznie
– wyniki badania ankie owego [Ve i ica ion
o non- inancial da a o socially esponsible
companies – he esul s o he su ey]. S udia
Ekonomiczne, 284, 97–107.
Zyzna ska-Dwo czak, B. (2016). We y ikacja
danych poza inansowych w apo owaniu
osiągnięć jednos ek odpowiedzialnych społecznie
[Ve i ica ion o Non inancial Da a in Co po a e
Responsibili y Repo ing]. Zeszy y Naukowe
Uniwe sy e u Szczecińskiego Finanse, Rynki
Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, 2(80), 525–532.
h ps://doi.o g/10.18276/ u.2016.2.80/2-56
Elec onic and Online Ma e ials
The Polish Agency o Audi O e sigh
websi e. (2020). Gene al in o ma ion abou
he Polish Agency o Audi O e sigh – ision
mission. (In Polish). Re ie ed Oc obe 15,
2020, om h ps://pana.go .pl/in o macje-
ogolne-o-pana-1/misja-wizja/
Dadacz, J. (2017). Rola biegłego ewiden a
w odniesieniu do apo owania nie inansowego.
[The ole o he audi o in ela ion o non- inancial
epo ing]. Minis y o Finance o Poland. Re-
ie ed Augus 27, 2021, om h ps://m -a ch2.
m .go .pl/minis e s wo- inansow/dla-mediow/
wywiady/ekspe ci-m /-/asse _publishe /P3qp/
con en /dy ek o -joanna-dadacz- ola-bieglego-
ewiden a-w-odniesieniu-do- apo owania-
nie inansowego-pa kie -6-g udnia-2017- /pop_
up?_101_INSTANCE_P3qp_ iewMode=p in
EM_1_2022.indd 41 23.3.2022 9:36:23