scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Art therapy is associated with sustained improvement in cognitive function in the elderly with mild neurocognitive disorder: findings from a pilot randomized controlled trial for art therapy and music reminiscence activity versus usual care

Read accessible full text

Art therapy is associated with sustained improvement in cognitive function in the elderly with mild neurocognitive disorder: findings from a pilot randomized controlled trial for art therapy and music reminiscence activity versus usual care

Author: Mahendran, R,Gandhi, M,Moorakonda, R B,Wong, J,Kanchi, M M,Fam, J,Rewtaer, I,Kumar, A P,Feng, L,Kua, E H
Year: 2018
Source: https://trepo.tuni.fi/bitstream/10024/104774/1/Art_therapy_is_associated_2018.pdf
RESEARCH Open Access
A he apy is associa ed wi h sus ained
imp o emen in cogni i e unc ion in he
elde ly wi h mild neu ocogni i e diso de :
indings om a pilo andomized con olled
ial o a he apy and music eminiscence
ac i i y e sus usual ca e
Ra hi Mahend an
1,2,3*
, Mihi Gandhi
4,5,6
, Rajesh Babu Moo akonda
4
, Jona han Wong
1
, Madhu Ma hi Kanchi
8
,
Johnson Fam
1,2
, I is Raw ae
7
, Alan P em Kuma
8,9
, Lei Feng
1,2
and Ee Heok Kua
1,2
Abs ac
Backg ound: Mild cogni i e impai men (MCI) is a phase in cogni i e decline when i is s ill possible o in e ene o
e e se he decline. Cogni i e s imula ion deli e ed h ough psychosocial in e en ions p o ides bo h psychological
in e en ion and social s imula ion o imp o e cogni ion. A pilo open-label pa allel-a ms andomized con olled ial
was unde aken o examine he e ec s o a he apy (AT) and music eminiscence ac i i y (MRA) compa ed o he
con ol, on he p ima y ou come o neu ocogni i e domain assessmen s in elde ly people wi h MCI.
Me hods: Communi y-li ing elde ly people wi h MCI (Pe e sen’s c i e ia), assessed o s udy eligibili y, we e
andomized using a web-based sys em wi h equal alloca ion o wo in e en ion a ms: AT (guided iewing o a
pieces and p oduc ion o isual a s) and MRA (lis ening, and ecalling memo ies ela ed o music) and a con ol a m
(s anda d ca e wi hou any in e en ion). In e en ions we e led by ained he apis s weekly o 3 mon hs, hen
o nigh ly o 6 mon hs. Neu ocogni i e domains (mean o memo y, a en ion, and isuo-spa ial abili ies s anda dized
sco es), psychological wellbeing (subsynd omal dep ession and anxie y) and elome e leng h as a biological ma ke o
cellula ageing, we e assessed by in e en ion-blinded assesso s a baseline, 3 mon hs and 9 mon hs.
Resul s: In o al, 250 people we e sc eened and 68 we e andomized and included in he analysis. In he AT a m,
neu ocogni i e domains imp o ed compa ed o he con ol a m a 3 mon hs (mean di e ence (d) = 0.40; 90% CI 0.126,
0.679) and we e sus ained a 9 mon hs (d = 0.31; 90% CI 0.068, 0.548). The e was some imp o emen in dep ession and
anxie y a 3 and 9 mon hs and in elome e leng h a 9 mon hs, bu his was no signi ican . Simila imp o emen s
we e obse ed in he MRA a m o e he con ol a m, bu hey we e no signi ican . The e we e no in e en ion- ela ed
ad e se e ec s.
(Con inued on nex page)
* Co espondence: [email p o ec ed]
1
Depa men o Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School o Medicine,
Na ional Uni e si y o Singapo e, NUHS Towe Block, Le el 9, 1E Ken Ridge
Road, Singapo e 119228, Singapo e
2
Depa men o Psychological Medicine, Na ional Uni e si y Hospi al, NUHS
Towe Block, Le el 9, 1E Ken Ridge Road, Singapo e, Singapo e
Full lis o au ho in o ma ion is a ailable a he end o he a icle
© The Au ho (s). 2018 Open Access This a icle is dis ibu ed unde he e ms o he C ea i e Commons A ibu ion 4.0
In e na ional License (h p://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/4.0/), which pe mi s un es ic ed use, dis ibu ion, and
ep oduc ion in any medium, p o ided you gi e app op ia e c edi o he o iginal au ho (s) and he sou ce, p o ide a link o
he C ea i e Commons license, and indica e i changes we e made. The C ea i e Commons Public Domain Dedica ion wai e
(h p://c ea i ecommons.o g/publicdomain/ze o/1.0/) applies o he da a made a ailable in his a icle, unless o he wise s a ed.
Mahend an e al. T ials (2018) 19:615
h ps://doi.o g/10.1186/s13063-018-2988-6
(Con inued om p e ious page)
Conclusions: A he apy deli e ed by ained s a as “a as he apy”and “a psycho he apy”may ha e been he
signi ican con ibu o o cogni i e imp o emen s. The indings suppo cogni i e s imula ion o elde ly people wi h
cogni i e decline and signal he need o la ge s udies and u he in es iga ion o ca e ully designed psycho-social
in e en ions o his g oup.
T ial egis a ion: Clinical T ials.go , NCT02854085. Regis e ed on 7 July 2016.
Keywo ds: A he apy, Music eminiscence ac i i y, Elde ly, Mild cogni i e impai men
Backg ound
Psycho-social in e en ions a e inc easingly in es iga ed
as p e en i e s a egies o elde ly people wi h cogni i e
decline. To da e, he e is li le e idence o bene i when
demen ia (o majo neu ocogni i e diso de , Diagnos ic
and s a is ical manual o men al diso de s (DSM)-5) has
se in when e en cogni i e aining and cogni i e s imu-
la ion in e en ions canno signi ican ly imp o e gene al
cogni ion [1,2]. Al hough a en ion has shi ed o
p e-demen ia o mild cogni i e impai men (MCI) (mild
neu ocogni i e diso de , DSM-5), he e is again no e i-
dence ha any in e en ion is e ec i e a his s age and
u he mo e, pha maco he apy is no ecommended o
MCI [3,4]. The elde ly wi h MCI a e un o una ely a
pa icula ly ulne able “a - isk”g oup. Almos hal will
de e io a e o demen ia and a a highe a e han hose
who a e cogni i ely no mal [5,6]. Up o 40% who may
emain a he MCI s age, will con inue o expe ience
cogni i e di icul ies and psychological sequelae [7]. In-
e en ions ha imp o e domains o memo y and ex-
ecu i e unc ion would he e o e be pa icula ly
bene icial i hey could con ibu e o a slowing o he
p og ession o e en a e e sal o cogni i e impai men .
In an ea lie na u alis ic s udy, Raw ae e al.[8] ound
imp o emen s in subsynd omal anxie y and dep ession
amongs communi y-li ing elde ly who pa icipa ed in
psychosocial in e en ions, pa icula ly mind ul awa e-
ness p ac ice, a he apy (AT) and music eminiscence
ac i i y (MRA). Howe e , when he li e a u e on hese
psychosocial in e en ions was explo ed o cogni i e e -
ec s in elde ly people wi h MCI, i was e iden ha eld-
e ly popula ions wi h MCI ha e no been s udied, many
o he s udies on AT and MRA in e en ions we e no
andomized, and in e en ions we e mainly ac i i ies like
a and c a wo k o lis ening o music, a he han he -
apy. Thus, o examine he e ec s o bo h hese in e en-
ions on cogni i e unc ions in elde ly people wi h MCI,
he in e en ions we e ca e ully e iewed, designed and
s uc u ed as he apy, and a pilo andomized con olled
ial (RCT) was unde aken. The p ima y indings o he
e ec s on cogni ion, subsynd omal mood s a es and
elome e leng hs a e p esen ed. The p ima y objec i e
was he compa ison o change in neu opsychological es
sco es a 3 mon hs be ween he in e en ion and con ol
g oups; he seconda y objec i es we e compa isons a
9 mon hs.
Me hods
Pa icipan s and s udy design
An open-label, pa allel RCT wi h h ee a ms ( wo in e -
en ions and one con ol) ec ui ed communi y-li ing
elde ly people who me p e-de ined inclusion c i e ia,
(age 60–85 yea s, bo h gende s, communi y-li ing, ul ill
Pe e sen’s c i e ia o MCI) [9]. The s udy had e hics ap-
p o al om he Na ional Uni e si y o Singapo e Ins i u-
ional Re iew Boa d and w i en in o med consen was
aken om pa icipan s. Subjec s who had been in a
la ge coho s udy a he Uni e si y Depa men ’s e-
sea ch si e in he communi y, (known as he T aining
and Resea ch Academy, TaRA) and who had gi en con-
sen o be app oached o in e en ion s udies we e con-
ac ed and p o ided in o ma ion abou he s udy.
Rec ui men , sc eening and in o med consen and sub-
sequen in e en ions and assessmen s we e done a
TaRA. In e en ions we e adminis e ed weekly in he
i s 3 mon hs, hen o nigh ly o 6 mon hs. Pa ici-
pan s we e andomly alloca ed in o h ee a ms (1:1:1 al-
loca ion) using a web-based andomiza ion sys em,
p o ided by he Singapo e Clinical Resea ch Ins i u e,
and in e en ion assignmen was balanced using he pe -
mu ed block andomiza ion s a i ied by gende . A de-
ailed s udy p o ocol was p e iously published [10].
In e en ions
AT in ol ed wo componen s. A pieces we e selec ed
by cu a o s om he Na ional Galle y and he Na ional
Uni e si y o Singapo e Museum and he ac i i y was
de eloped in consul a ion wi h he s udy eam (psychia-
is s and he apis s), wi h emphasis on ele ance o he
elde ly, in e ms o hemes and e en s om he coun y’s
pas . Guided iewing and cogni i e e alua ion o a
wo ks a he espec i e si es was conduc ed as a g oup
ac i i y by ained s a and in ol ed na a ion o
hough s and inne expe iences. A second componen
in ol ed isual a p oduc ion. The physical c ea ion o
hemed a wo k was ollowed by image app ecia ion ac-
i i ies o gain insigh and discuss eelings, and ook
place a he esea ch cen e . MRA in ol ed lis ening,
Mahend an e al. T ials (2018) 19:615 Page 2 o 10
and ecalling memo ies and expe iences ela ed o he
music. The he apis p epa ed songs and used pho o-
g aphs o ideo clips o accompany he music, o discus-
sion pu poses. The MRA p omo ed sha ed eelings while
he g oup p ocess p o ided alida ion. The de ailed con-
en s o he s uc u ed in e en ions a e a ailable in he
s udy p o ocol [10]. Fu he de ails on he a wo ks used
and sample a wo ks c ea ed by he pa icipan s will be
a ailable on eques . The con ol g oup (CG) did no e-
cei e any in e en ion bu con inued li e as usual.
Ou come measu es
Neu ocogni i e domain assessmen s a baseline and a 3
and 9 mon hs epo ed he e include he Rey audi o y
e bal lea ning es (RAVLT) Lis Lea ning, Delayed Re-
call, Recogni ion T ial (Memo y), Wechsle Adul
In elligence Scale-3 d edi ion (WAIS-III) Block design
(Visuospa ial abili ies), Digi Span Fo wa d (A en ion
and Wo king Memo y), and Colo T ails Tes 2 (Execu-
i e unc ion) [11–13]. Indi idual domain sco es we e
s anda dized (z-sco es) o gene al popula ion no ms ad-
jus ed o age and educa ion le el; highe sco es indica e
be e pe o mance [14].
Psychological wellbeing was assessed a baseline and a
3 and 9 mon hs wi h he (1) Ge ia ic Dep ession Scale
(GDS), which is a 15-i em “yes/no”ques ionnai e wi h
highe o al sco es associa ed wi h highe isk o dep es-
sion [15] and (2) Ge ia ic Anxie y In en o y (GAI),
which is a 20-i em “ag ee/disag ee”ques ionnai e meas-
u ing dimensional anxie y, wi h highe o al sco es asso-
cia ed wi h anxie y symp oms [16].
Sleep quali y was assessed using a 100-poin isual
analog scale (VAS) (0, wo s sleep o 100, bes sleep).
Fo elome e leng h measu emen s, genomic DNA was
ex ac ed om whole blood samples using QIA amp DNA
blood mini ki (ca alog numbe 51104) acco ding o he
manu ac u e ’s p o ocol and s o ed a −80 °C. Telome e
leng h was measu ed by using a non- adioac i e chemilu-
minescen elome e leng h assay ki (Telo TAGGG assay
ki , Sigma Ald ich; ca alog numbe 12209136001) o
isualize he elome ic DNA epea sequence TTAAGGG
om blood samples. Telome e leng h measu emen in-
ol es he diges ion o 1 μgo DNAusingHin I/RsaIen-
zymesa 37°C o 2h,and unon0.8%aga osegel.DNA
smea s we e ans e ed on o he nylon memb ane (Ame -
sham Hybond ™-XL) o e nigh . T ans e ed DNA ag-
men s a e hyb idized o a digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled p obe
o alida e he elome ic epea s de eloped by CDP-S a
which is a digoxigenin subs a e o cap u e he imaging on
x- ay ilm.Telome eleng hwas measu ed by he loca ion
o bands based on molecula weigh s anda d. A e age elo-
me e leng h is measu ed be ween 100 base pai s o 20 k
base pai s. TeloTool, which is MATLAB so wa e, was used
o measu e he elome e leng hs o he samples in his
s udy. Image p ocessing and de ec ion o DNA smea s we e
e alua ed as indica ed in he e e ences [17,18].
S a is ical analysis
The sample size o he s udy was calcula ed o es ima e
he in e en ion e ec (i.e., di e ence be ween he in e -
en ion and con ol g oup o mean change in neu o-
psychological es sco e a 3 mon hs om baseline) wi h
p e-speci ied p ecision. A sample size o 22 pa icipan s
in each g oup will p o ide an es ima e wi h p ecision
+/−0.5 s anda d de ia ion (SD) wi h 90% ce ain y (i.e.,
wid h o 90% con idence in e al (uppe limi –lowe
limi ) equal o 1 SD). The p ecision le el was selec ed
conside ing an in e en ion will be wo h in es iga ing
u he in a con i ma o y ial i a he leas a medium
s anda dized e ec size (0.5 SD) is shown in compa ison
o he con ol g oup.
Mean change om baseline in neu ocogni i e z-sco es
we e es ima ed and compa ed be ween he in e en ions
and he con ol g oups using he linea mixed model
wi h pa icipan -speci ic andom e ec s and indica o
a iables o he wo in e en ions ( e e ence, con ol
g oup), indica o a iables o ime (3-mon h and
9-mon h assessmen s wi h baseline as he e e ence), in-
e ac ions be ween indica o a iables o he in e en-
ions and ime, baseline alue, and gende as ixed
e ec s, along wi h 90% and 95% CIs. No mul iplici y
co ec ions we e applied due o he explo a o y na u e
o he s udy. The same model was used o compa e he
Ge ia ic Dep ession Scale (GDS) o al sco e, Ge ia ic
Anxie y Index (GAI) o al sco e, sleep quali y VAS, and
elome e leng h be ween he in e en ions and he con-
ol g oups. All he analyses we e pe o med in he
in en ion- o- ea popula ion. SAS so wa e e sion 9.4
(SAS Ins i u e, Ca y, NC, USA) was used. A p alue
<0.05 was deemed o be s a is ically signi ican : p alues
should be in e p e ed as hypo hesis gene a ing as he
s udy was no powe ed o hypo hesis es ing.
Resul s
Pa icipan cha ac e is ics and s udy conduc
Be ween 13 June 2016 and 17 Augus 2016, 250 po en-
ial pa icipan s we e sc eened o whom 68 we e e-
c ui ed in o he s udy, andomly assigned o AT (n= 22),
MRA (n= 24), o he CG (n= 22), and included in he
in en ion- o- ea popula ion. The e we e no clinically
ele an di e ences among he h ee g oups a baseline
(Table 1), excep he CG had a la ge pe cen age o pa -
icipan s (41%) who we e cu en ly wo king ( ull ime/
pa - ime/sel -employed) compa ed o he AT (18%) and
(8%) MRA g oups. O e all, he mean age o he pa ici-
pan s was 71.1 yea s, 56 pa icipan s we e emale, and
he a e age du a ion o schooling was 5.4 yea s.
Mahend an e al. T ials (2018) 19:615 Page 3 o 10
Du ing he i s 3 mon hs pos - andomiza ion, h ee
pa icipan s om he AT g oup, one om he MRA
g oup, and ou om he CG g oup discon inued he
s udy (Fig. 1). Mean compliance (a endance a in e en-
ion he apy sessions) wi h AT and MRA was 80% and
82%, espec i ely. By he end o he s udy a 9 mon hs,
he AT g oup, MRA g oup, and CG had 18, 22, and 18
pa icipan s, espec i ely; mean compliance wi h he AT
and MRA in e en ions was 75% and 83%, espec i ely.
Each o he in e en ion sessions ( o AT and MRA)
las ed an hou inclusi e o a 5-min mind ul elaxa ion
exe cise a he s a , o se le he subjec s, and a
15-min b eak). The 40 min o ac i e engagemen was
e ec i e and did no i e he elde ly pa icipan s; hey
emained engaged h oughou he session. No subjec
le any o he sessions be o e i ended. T a elling
ime by coach o he Na ional Galle y o NUS
Museum ook abou 15 min. The he apis s, we e ad-
ised on he pa icipan s’educa ional le el and cogni-
i es a eandwe e hesame h oughou hes udy
pe iod and e e y e o was made o ensu e hey
unde s ood he in e en ion and sessions.
Changes in neu opsychological es sco es
The es ima ed mean change a 3 mon hs om baseline was
s a is ically signi ican ly highe in he AT g oup compa ed
o he CG o Lis Lea ning (di e ence (d) = 0.542; 90%
con idence in e al (CI) 0.105, 0.810; p=0.042) and Digi
Span Fo wa d (d = 0.991; 90% CI 0.251, 1.730; p=0.028)
(Fig. 2). Fu he mo e, Bene icial e ec s we e also obse ed
in he AT g oup o Delayed Recall, Recogni ion T ials,
Block Design, and Colo T ails 2; howe e , hese esul s
we e no s a is ically signi ican (each p>0.05). The mean
o memo y domains (Lis Lea ning, Delayed Recall, Recog-
ni ion T ial) and he mean o all domains (Lis Lea ning,
Delayed Recall, Recogni ion T ial, Digi Span Fo wa d,
Colo T ains 2, Block Design) we e also s a is ically signi i-
can ly highe in he AT g oup compa ed o he CG (d
(memo y domains) = 0.403; 90% CI 0.126, 0.679; p=0.017;
d (all domains) = 0.462; 90% CI 0.202, 0.722; p=0.004).
Table 1 Baseline demog aphic and neu ocogni i e cha ac e is ics
Cha ac e is ics A he apy
(n= 22)
Music eminiscence ac i i ies
(n= 24)
Con ol
(n= 22)
Age (yea s), mean (SD) 71.1 (4.8) 71.6 (5.3) 70.6 (5.8)
Female, n(%) 18 (81.8) 20 (83.3) 18 (81.8)
Li ing wi h pa ne , n(%) 14 (63.6) 15 (62.5) 20 (90.9)
Educa ion yea s, mean (SD) 5.2 (4.1) 5.0 (3.3) 6.1 (3.4)
Wo king, n(%) 4 (18.2) 2 (8.3) 9 (40.9)
Body mass index, mean (SD) 24.9 (3.6) 23.5 (3.8) 22.8 (3.9)
Medical condi ion, n(%)
High blood p essu e 14 (63.6) 18 (75.0) 6 (27.3)
High choles e ol 11 (50.0) 15 (62.5) 7 (31.8)
Diabe es melli us 2 (9.1) 8 (33.3) 5 (22.7)
O he s 2 (9.1) 3 (12.5) 3 (13.6)
Neu ocogni i e domain z-sco e, mean (SD)
RAVLT Lis Lea ning Sum 0.04 (1.35) 0.01 (1.26) −0.01 (1.26)
RAVLT Delayed Recall −0.05 (0.98) −0.01 (1.10) 0.05 (0.87)
RAVLT Recogni ion T ial −0.05 (1.28) 0.26 (1.10) 0.14 (0.91)
Mean o memo y domains (RAVLT subse s) −0.02 (0.97) 0.09 (0.95) 0.06 (0.79)
WAIS-III Block Design −0.74 (1.16) −0.93 (1.04) −0.47 (0.85)
WAIS-III Digi Span (Fo wa d) 1.33 (1.59) 1.79 (1.65) 2.15 (1.77)
Colo T ails 2 −0.55 (1.38) −1.15 (1.46) −0.82 (1.91)
Mean o all domains −0.00 (0.42) −0.01 (0.59) 0.17 (0.56)
Numbe o domains wi h z-sco e < −1.5, mean (SD) 1.41 (0.80) 1.71 (0.81) 1.14 (0.35)
GAI o al sco e, mean (SD) 2.0 (3.9) 2.1 (4.0) 2.8 (4.1)
GAD o al sco e, mean (SD) 2.5 (2.9) 1.8 (2.2) 2.8 (2.9)
Sleep quali y VAS, mean (SD) 67.0 (26.1) 68.4 (19.8) 69.8 (16.5)
See “Me hods”sec ion o ou come de ini ions
RAVLT Rey Audi o y Ve bal Lea ning Tes , WAIS-III Wechsle Adul In elligence Scale-3 d edi ion, GAI Ge ia ic Anxie y In en o y, GAD Ge ia ic Dep ession Scale,
SD s anda d de ia ion
Mahend an e al. T ials (2018) 19:615 Page 4 o 10
Mean numbe o domains wi h z-sco e < −1.5 a 3 mon hs
was lowe in he AT g oup compa ed wi h he CG (d = −
0.314; 90% CI −0.629, 0.000; p= 0.100). The e ec o AT
on memo y domains was also sus ained a 9 mon hs (d =
0.308; 90% CI 0.068, 0.548; p= 0.035). The de ailed esul s
o memo y- ela ed and o he neu opsychological ou comes
a e epo ed in Table 2and Addi ional ile 1:TablesS1and
Table S2, espec i ely.
The es ima ed mean changes we e highe in he MRA
g oup compa ed o he CG o Delayed Recall (d = 0.172),
Assessed o eligibili y (n = 250)
Excluded (n = 182)
-Did no mee inclusion c i e ia (n = 179)
-Did no comple e assessmen (n = 3)
Analyzed (n = 22)
Discon inued in e en ion (n = 3)
-No in e es (n = 1)
-Shi ed ou o he a ea (n = 1)
-S a ed employmen (n = 1)
Alloca ed o A The apy
(n = 22)
Los o ollow-up (n = 4)
-Re used u he pa icipa ion a e
alloca ion (n = 2)
- Unable o a end due o spinal
comp ession (n = 1)
- Unable o a end due o wo k
commi men s (n = 1)
Alloca ed o Con ol G oup
(n = 22)
Analyzed (n = 22)
Analysis
Randomized (n = 68)
En ollmen
Alloca ed o Music Reminiscence
Ac i i y (n = 24)
Discon inued in e en ion (n = 1)
-Pa icipan s opped a ending
a e 1 session due o a medical
issue
Follow-Up
Analyzed (n = 24)
Alloca ion
Fig. 1 Pa icipan s disposi ion (Consolida ed S anda ds o Repo ing T ials (CONSORT) diag am)
Fig. 2 Es ima ed mean change in memo y- ela ed neu opsychological ou comes a 3 mon hs (3M) and 9 mon hs (9M) om baseline: *p< 0.05
o compa ison wi h he con ol g oup. RAVLT, Rey Audi o y Ve bal Lea ning Tes . Ou comes a e p esen ed as s anda dized z-sco e (see he
“Me hods”sec ion). Mean alues we e es ima ed using a linea mixed-e ec s model adjus ed o baseline alues and gende
Mahend an e al. T ials (2018) 19:615 Page 5 o 10

Recogni ion T ial (d = 0.088), Digi Span Fo wa d (d =
0.787), Colo T ails 2 (d = 0.033), and Block Design
(d = 0.130), bu hey we e no s a is ically signi ican
(each p>0.05) (Fig. 2). Simila ly, he means o mem-
o y domains and all domains we e highe in he
MRA g oup compa ed o he CG g oup bu we e no
s a is ically signi ican (d (memo y domains) = 0.037; d
(all domains) = 0.180; each p> 0.05). The e ec in he
MRA g oup a 9 mon hs was simila o ha a 3
mon hs (Table 2; Addi ional ile 1:TablesS1andS2).
Changes in subsynd omal dep ession and anxie y
The e was some decline (less han 2 poin s) in he GDS
and GAI o al sco es a 3 mon hs and 9 mon hs om
baseline in bo h he AT and MRA g oups. Howe e ,
hese educ ions we e no s a is ically signi ican ly di e -
en om he ones obse ed in he CG (d < 1 poin in
bo h he GDS and GAI o al sco es a each imepoin ;
p> 0.05). (Table 3and Addi ional ile 1: Table S3).
Change in sleep quali y
The e was an imp o emen o 7 poin s and 3 poin s in
he sleep quali y VAS in he AT g oup a 3 mon hs and
9 mon hs. Howe e , hese imp o emen s we e no
s a is ically signi ican ly be e han he changes
obse ed in he CG (d < 4 poin s a each imepoin ;
p> 0.05). The MRA g oup also had sleep quali y simi-
la o he CG a pos -baseline assessmen s (Table 3
and Addi ional ile 1Table S3).
Changes in elome e leng hs
The e was an inc ease in he elome e leng h in he AT
g oup a 9 mon hs (mean change = 552; p= 0.003). How-
e e , he change was no s a is ically signi ican ly di e en
om he inc ease obse ed in he CG (d = −22; p>0.05).
The MRA g oup also had an inc ease in he eleme e
leng h a 9 mon hs (mean change = 292; p= 0.076), bu
his was no s a is ically signi ican ly di e en om he
CG (d = −281; p> 0.05) (Table 4and Addi ional ile 1:
Table S4). The e we e no in e en ion- ela ed ad e se
e ec s epo ed in he ial.
Discussion
This s udy p o ides p elimina y e idence ha speci ic
psychosocial in e en ions ha a e ca e ully s uc u ed
and egula ly deli e ed by ained s a can e ec i ely
Table 2 Es ima ed mean change in memo y- ela ed neu opsychological ou comes a 3-mon hs and 9-mon hs
A he apy
(n= 22)
Music eminiscence ac i i ies
(n= 24)
Con ol
(n= 22)
Numbe o pa icipan s assessed a 3 mon hs 19 23 18
Numbe o pa icipan s assessed a 9 mon hs 18 22 18
RAVLT Lis Lea ning Sum z-sco e
Mean change a 3 mon hs om baseline (SE) 1.01 (0.19) 0.36 (0.17) 0.47 (0.19)
Di e ence (in e en ion –con ol) (90% CI) [p] 0.54 (0.105, 0.978) [0.042] −0.11 (−0.529, 0.314) [0.674]
Mean change a 9 mon hs om baseline (SE) 1.07 (0.17) 0.73 (0.15) 0.60 (0.16)
Di e ence (in e en ion –con ol) (90% CI) [p] 0.47 (0.089, 0.854) [0.043] 0.13 (−0.240, 0.493) [0.569]
RAVLT Delayed Recall z-sco e
Mean change a 3 mon hs om baseline (SE) 0.31 (0.14) 0.25 (0.13) 0.08 (0.14)
Di e ence (in e en ion –con ol) (90% CI) [p] 0.24 (−0.088, 0.561) [0.230] 0.17 (−0.142, 0.486) [0.366]
Mean change a 9 mon hs om baseline (SE) 0.41 (0.13) 0.41 (0.12) 0.27 (0.12)
Di e ence (in e en ion –con ol) (90% CI) [p] 0.14 (−0.159, 0.430) [0.448] 0.14 (−0.145, 0.421) [0.419]
RAVLT Recogni ion T ial z-sco e
Mean change a 3 mon hs om baseline (SE) 0.57 (0.22) 0.20 (0.20) 0.11 (0.22)
Di e ence (in e en ion –con ol) (90% CI) [p] 0.46 (−0.045, 0.969) [0.134] 0.09 (−0.402, 0.578) [0.767]
Mean change a 9 mon hs om baseline (SE) 0.50 (0.21) 0.32 (0.19) 0.18 (0.20)
Di e ence (in e en ion –con ol) (90% CI) [p] 0.32 (−0.153, 0.802) [0.262] 0.14 (−0.318, 0.600) [0.612]
Mean z-sco e o RAVLT memo y domains
Mean change a 3 mon hs om baseline (SE) 0.64 (0.12) 0.27 (0.11) 0.23 (0.12)
Di e ence (in e en ion –con ol) (90% CI) [p] 0.40 (0.126, 0.679) [0.017] 0.04 (−0.230, 0.304) [0.819]
Mean change a 9 mon hs om baseline (SE) 0.67 (0.10) 0.48 (0.10) 0.36 (0.10)
Di e ence (in e en ion –con ol) (90% CI) [p] 0.31 (0.068, 0.548) [0.035] 0.13 (−0.102, 0.358) [0.358]
Mean alues we e es ima ed using a linea mixed-e ec s model adjus ed o baseline alues and gende . See “Me hods”sec ion o ou come de ini ions
RAVLT Rey Audi o y Ve bal Lea ning Tes , SE s anda d e o , CI con idence in e als
Mahend an e al. T ials (2018) 19:615 Page 6 o 10
imp o e cogni i e unc ion in speci ic domains in elde ly
people wi h MCI [4]. Compa ed o p e ious s udies on
AT and MRA, his RCT was me hodologically igo ous
and sugges s ha AT has a g ea e bene i han MRA. AT
had mo e signi ican e ec s han MRA wi h imp o e-
men s in memo y, a en ion, isuo-spa ial abili ies and ex-
ecu i e unc ion a 3 mon hs and which was sus ained in
he memo y domain a 9 mon hs. We posi ha bo h he
cogni i e e alua ion o a wo ks and he physical c ea ion
o a pieces, ollowed by discussions ha in ol e di e en
cogni i e p ocesses, con ibu ed o he imp o emen s wi h
AT (Lee R, Wong J, Wong LS, Gandhi M, Raw ae I, Feng
L, Kua EH, Mahend an R: A he apy o he p e en ion
o cogni i e decline, in p epa a ion). AT deli e ed as a
combina ion echnique o “a -as- he apy”and “a -psy-
cho he apy”may ha e been he c i ical p ocess ha led o
he cogni i e imp o emen s.
Resea ch o da e suppo s he impac o a on he
b ain wi h se e al psychological [19,20] and physio-
logical [21] p ocesses in ol ing he in eg a ion o sen-
so y inpu , in e nal decision-making and emo ional
p ocessing, and join a en ion, wi h accompanying
neu oana omical changes in unc ional connec i i y in
he de aul mode ne wo k [22] and ac i a ion in egions
such as he o bi o on al co ex [23].
While s udies sugges ha elome e leng hs espond o
li es yle and mindse ia elome ase ac i i y, (an in acellu-
la enzyme wi h a RNA e e se ansc ip ase componen
ha leng hens elome es) [24], ecen wo k e lec s ha
oxida i e s ess and in lamma ion need o be e e sed o
leng hening o occu [25]. Sho elome e leng h is associ-
a ed wi h impai ed cogni i e pe o mance [26]. The be e
cogni i e sco es associa ed wi h elome e leng hening sug-
ges s ha he psychosocial in e en ions we e e ec i e in
Table 3 Es ima ed mean change in anxie y, dep ession, and sleep quali y ou comes a 3-mon hs and 9-mon hs
A he apy
(n= 22)
Music eminiscence ac i i ies
(n= 24)
Con ol
(n= 22)
Numbe o pa icipan s assessed a 3 mon hs 19 23 18
Numbe o pa icipan s assessed a 9 mon hs 18 22 18
Ge ia ic Anxie y In en o y o al sco e
Mean change a 3 mon hs om baseline (SE) −0.45 (0.72) −0.98 (0.66) −1.25 (0.75)
Di e ence (in e en ion –con ol) (90% CI) [p] 0.80 (−0.92, 2.52) [0.444] 0.27 (−1.39, 1.92) [0.791]
Mean change a 9 mon hs om baseline (SE) −0.17 (0.71) −0.75 (0.65) −0.05 (0.72)
Di e ence (in e en ion –con ol) (90% CI) [p]−0.12 (−1.79, 1.56) [0.909] −0.70 (−2.30, 0.91) [0.474]
Ge ia ic dep ession scale o al sco e
Mean change a 3 mon hs om baseline (SE) −0.76 (0.62) −0.75 (0.57) −1.22 (0.64)
Di e ence (in e en ion –con ol) (90% CI) [p] 0.46 (−1.02, 1.93) [0.610] 0.46 (−0.96, 1.89) [0.590]
Mean change a 9 mon hs om baseline (SE) −1.06 (0.62) −1.15 (0.57) −0.47 (0.63)
Di e ence (in e en ion –con ol) (90% CI) [p]−0.59 (−2.05, 0.88) [0.509] −0.67 (−2.08, 0.74) [0.431]
Sleep quali y isual analog scale
Mean change a 3 mon hs om baseline (SE) 6.94 (4.39) −2.09 (4.09) 3.56 (4.62)
Di e ence (in e en ion –con ol) (90% CI) [p] 3.39 (−7.15, 13.92) [0.595] −5.65 (−15.85, 4.55) [0.361]
Mean change a 9 mon hs om baseline (SE) 3.44 (4.17) 4.51 (3.82) 2.06 (4.29)
Di e ence (in e en ion –con ol) (90% CI) [p] 1.39 (−8.54, 11.32) [0.817] 2.46 (−7.08, 11.99) [0.670]
Mean alues we e es ima ed using a linea mixed-e ec s model adjus ed o baseline alues and gende . See “Me hods”sec ion o ou come de ini ions
SE s anda d e o , CI con idence in e als
Table 4 Es ima ed mean change in elome e leng h a 3 mon hs and 9 mon hs
A he apy
(n= 22)
Music eminiscence ac i i ies
(n= 24)
Con ol
(n= 22)
Numbe o pa icipan s assessed a 3 mon hs 19 23 NA
Numbe o pa icipan s assessed a 9 mon hs 18 22 18
Mean change a 3 mon hs om baseline (SE) 197 (197) −41 (186) NA
Mean change a 9 mon hs om baseline (SE) 552 (177) 292 (163) 573 (182)
Di e ence (in e en ion –con ol) (90% CI) [p]−22 (−444, 400) [0.932] −281 (−686, 124) [0.252]
Mean alues we e es ima ed using a linea mixed-e ec s model adjus ed o baseline alues and gende . See “Me hods”sec ion o ou come de ini ions
NA no applicable ( elome e leng h was no collec ed in he con ol g oup a 3 mon hs pos baseline), SE s anda d e o , CI con idence in e als
Mahend an e al. T ials (2018) 19:615 Page 7 o 10
e e sing cellula -le el in lamma o y mechanisms ha
con ibu e o cogni i e decline [27].
The s udy challenges he iew ha in e en ions a e
ine ec i e in MCI and suppo s he use o “single”psy-
chosocial in e en ions when mul i ace ed in e en ions
a e no eadily a ailable o possible [2]. The equency o
guided in e en ions a weekly in e als, was also su i-
cien ly e ec i e in add essing cogni i e decline, when a
p e ious s udy had sugges ed engagemen in s imula ing
ac i i ies a leas a wice a week o educe he isk o de-
men ia by 50% [28]. Finally, he sho ime ame in which
cogni i e imp o emen s we e no ed in he cogni i e do-
mains, especially memo y and execu i e unc ion is pa -
icula ly signi ican o pa ien s wi h MCI o ea ly
demen ia whe e ea ly in e en ions could inc ease he
chances o delaying o e en e e sing cogni i e decline.
O no e a e he imp o emen s in he CG e en hough
hey we e no o e ed any in e en ion and allowed o con-
inueli easusual.Whilei maybea gued ha suchim-
p o emen s e lec a lack o speci ici y o he in e en ions,
i mus be no ed ha 40% o he CG e u ned o employ-
men du ing he s udy du a ion, which was no disallowed
in he s udy p o ocol, and which could ha e accoun ed o
he imp o emen in cogni ion sco es. Employmen may
ha e p o ided cogni i e s imula ion, and he inc ease in
daily physical ac i i y, likely con ibu ed o he gains seen
in he CG. Bu hese gains we e associa ed wi h a nega i e
e ec as hei mood s a e was a ec ed as e lec ed in he
wo sened subsynd omal anxie y sco es in he CG.
The e a e some limi a ions in his s udy ha need o be
highligh ed. As his was a pilo s udy, he sample size was
small and no powe ed o hypo hesis es ing. The e o e,
he p alues should be in e p e ed wi h cau ion. The ma-
jo i y o s udy pa icipan s we e emale. A simila p epon-
de ance o emale pa icipan s was no ed in ou o he
psychosocial in e en ion s udies; i is because many men
a e s ill employed and unable o commi o pa icipa ion
in s udies. Double blinding, while ideal, is no possible in a
s udy o his na u e. Howe e , we ensu ed ha assesso s
we e blind o he s udy in e en ion a m and pa icipan s
we e also eminded no o discuss hei in e en ion wi h
he assesso s. Al hough we excluded pa icipan s wi h de-
p ession and anxie y, i is s ill possible ha he imp o e-
men s in subsynd omal dep ession and subsynd omal
anxie y could ha e had a small con ounding e ec on
cogni i e unc ioning. We also did no in e iew pa ici-
pan s o assess hei emo ional s a es. Fu he mo e, i
could be a gued ha he design o he AT in e en ion,
wi h he wo componen s, equi es mo e ac i e pa icipa-
ion han he MRA. Finally, we need o conside whe he
socializa ion had an impac on he esponse o he in e -
en ions and i has been sugges ed ha his is possible ia
mechanisms such as join a en ion and heo y o mind
[21,29]. Al hough his was no examined, and may no
ha e made a signi ican con ibu ion o he esul s as pa -
icipan s we e independen and communi y-li ing elde ly
wi h no psychia ic illnesses, hese a eas none heless de-
se e u he inqui y.
The easibili y o his ial was dependen on se e al
ac o s he mos impo an being he in e en ion design
and he p og am deli e y. The AT in e en ion was
mo e han jus a pa icipa i e ac i i y desc ibed in o he
s udies bu in ol ed bo h a iewing and cogni i e
e alua ion, and a c ea ion wi h discussion, analysis,
and sel -e alua ion. The well-de eloped in e en ion
unde wen se e al e iews by he cu a o s, he apis s,
and s udy in es iga o s and may no be eadily deli e ed
excep by ained a he apis s, which would be a limi -
ing ac o especially o la ge sample sizes. Addi ionally,
iden i ying elde ly people wi h MCI equi es bo h clin-
ical e alua ion and de ailed neu opsychological es ing.
The e we e also se e al aspec s o he s udy logis ics ha
mus be no ed. A pieces could no be emo ed om
he Na ional Galle y o NUS Museum and so pa ici-
pan s had o go o hese enues o he a iewing ses-
sions. To ensu e ha he elde ly would a i e sa ely and
on ime, anspo a ion was a anged and s a accom-
panied hem om he communi y Resea ch Cen e
which added o s udy cos s. Buy-in and suppo om
he Na ional Galle y and NUS Museum we e c ucial in
unde aking he s udy [30,31].
Conclusions
While he e a e inhe en issues in he s udy design, i
would be e y di icul o con ol o hese in unde aking
a s udy o his na u e. Al hough hese ac o s may limi
he gene alizabili y o his RCT, his pilo RCT suppo s
he e ec i eness o cogni i e s imula ion p og ams, in pa -
icula a he apy o elde ly peopoe wi h mild cogni i e
impai men and highligh s he need o u he e alua ion
o hese in e en ions and eplica ion on a la ge scale.
Addi ional ile
Addi ional ile 1: Table S1. Es ima ed mean and change om baseline
(95% con idence in e al) in memo y- ela ed neu opsychological
ou comes a 3 mon hs and 9 mon hs. Table S2. Es ima ed mean and
change om he baseline (90% and 95% con idence in e als) in
neu opsychological ou comes (o he han memo y- ela ed) a 3 mon hs
and 9 mon hs. Table S3. Es ima ed mean and mean change om
baseline (95% con idence in e al) in anxie y, dep ession and sleep
quali y ou comes a 3 mon hs and 9 mon hs. Table S4. Es ima ed mean
change in elome e leng h a 3 mon hs and 9 mon hs. (DOCX 26 kb)
Abb e ia ions
AT: A he apy; CG: Con ol g oup; CI: Con idence in e al; GDS: Ge ia ic
Dep ession Scale; GIA: Ge ia ic Anxie y Index; MCI: Mild cogni i e
impai men ; MRA: Music eminiscence ac i i y; p:P alue; RAVLT: Rey
Audi o y Ve bal Lea ning Tes ; RCT: Randomized con olled ial; SD: S anda d
de ia ion; TaRA: T aining and Resea ch Academy; WAIS: Wechsle Adul
In elligence Scale
Mahend an e al. T ials (2018) 19:615 Page 8 o 10
Acknowledgemen s
Na ional Galle y and he Na ional Uni e si y o Singapo e Museum.
Funding
Funding was by Resea ch Dona ions om Kwan Imm Thong Hood Cho
Temple and Lee Kim Tah Holdings P e L d.
A ailabili y o da a and ma e ials
The da ase s suppo ing he conclusions o his a icle a e a ailable on
eques o he co esponding au ho . The da a will be sha ed o u he
esea ch subjec o app o al om he ins i u ion e hics boa d.
Au ho s’con ibu ions
RM is he P incipal In es iga o o he s udy and was in ol ed in designing
he s udy, ca ying i ou , and w i ing he manusc ip . MG was in ol ed in
he s udy design, analysis planning, analyzing da a, and w i ing he
in e p e a ion o he esul s. RBM analyzed he da a. JW e iewed he
li e a u e and ca ied ou he s udy. JF was in ol ed in designing he s udy
and in he neu oimaging. IR was in ol ed in designing he s udy and in
manusc ip e iew. APK was in ol ed in designing he s udy, and wi h MMK,
he elome e wo k. LF was in ol ed in designing he s udy and in da a
e iew. EHK o mula ed he esea ch ques ion, and was in ol ed in
designing he s udy and e iewing he manusc ip . All au ho s ead and
app o ed he inal manusc ip .
E hics app o al and consen o pa icipa e
The s udy p o ocol was e iewed by he E hics Boa d o he Na ional Uni e si y
o Singapo e Ins i u ional Re iew Boa d (NUS-IRB Re Code: B-16-095) and he
app o al was da ed 6 June 2016. W i en in o med consen was ob ained om
e e y pa icipan and con iden iali y was s ic ly main ained. All da a we e
anonymized and main ained acco ding o E hics Boa d guidelines.
Consen o publica ion
No applicable.
Compe ing in e es s
The au ho s decla e ha hey ha e no compe ing in e es s.
Publishe ’sNo e
Sp inge Na u e emains neu al wi h ega d o ju isdic ional claims in
published maps and ins i u ional a ilia ions.
Au ho de ails
1
Depa men o Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School o Medicine,
Na ional Uni e si y o Singapo e, NUHS Towe Block, Le el 9, 1E Ken Ridge
Road, Singapo e 119228, Singapo e.
2
Depa men o Psychological Medicine,
Na ional Uni e si y Hospi al, NUHS Towe Block, Le el 9, 1E Ken Ridge Road,
Singapo e, Singapo e.
3
Academic De elopmen Depa men , Duke-NUS
Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapo e, Singapo e.
4
Depa men o
Bios a is ics, Singapo e Clinical Resea ch Ins i u e, 31 Biopolis Way, Singapo e,
Singapo e.
5
Cen e o Quan i a i e Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8
College Road, Singapo e, Singapo e.
6
Tampe e Cen e o Child Heal h
Resea ch, Uni e si y o Tampe e and Tampe e Uni e si y Hospi al, Tampe e,
Finland.
7
Depa men o Psychia y, Sengkang Gene al Hospi al, 110
Sengkang Eas Way, Singapo e, Singapo e.
8
Cance Science Ins i u e o
Singapo e, Na ional Uni e si y o Singapo e, 14 Medical D i e, Singapo e,
Singapo e.
9
Medical Science Clus e , Yong Loo Lin School o Medicine,
Na ional Uni e si y o Singapo e, Singapo e, Singapo e.
Recei ed: 13 Ap il 2018 Accep ed: 15 Oc obe 2018
Re e ences
1. Ame ican Psychia ic Associa ion. Diagnos ic and s a is ical manual o men al
diso de s, Fi h Edi ion. A ling on: Ame ican Psychia ic Associa ion; 2013.
2. Hun ley JD, Gould RL, Liu K, Smi h M, Howa d RJ. Do cogni i e in e en ions
imp o e gene al cogni ion in demen ia? A me a-analysis and me a-
eg ession. BMJ Open. 2017;7. Published Online Fi s : 30 Aug 2017. h ps://
doi.o g/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-005247co 1.
3. Ma in M, Cla e L, Al gassen AM, Came on MH, Zehnde F. Cogni ion-based
in e en ions o heal hy olde people and people wi h mild cogni i e
impai men (Re iew). Coch ane Da abase Sys Re . 2011;(1):CD006220.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1002/14651858.CD006220.pub2
4. Coope C, Li R, Lyke sos C, Li ings on G. A sys ema ic e iew o ea men s
o mild cogni i e impai men . B J Psychia y. 2013;203(3):255–64.
5. Coope C, Somme land A, Lyke sos CG, Li ings on G. Modi iable p edic o s
o demen ia in mild cogni i e impai men : a sys ema ic e iew and me a-
analysis. Am J Psychia y. 2015;17(4):323–34.
6. Robe s R, Knopman DS. Classi ica ion and epidemiology o MCI. Clin Ge ia
Med. 2013;29(4). h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.cge .2013.07.003.
7. Manly JJ, Tang MX, Schup N, S e n Y, Vonsa el JP, Mayeux R. F equency
and cou se o mild cogni i e impai men in a mul ie hnic communi y. Ann
Neu ol. 2008;63(4):494–506. h ps://doi.o g/10.1002/ana.21326.
8. Raw ae I, Mahend an R, Yu JH, Fam J, Feng L, Kua EH. Psychosocial
in e en ions wi h a , music, Tai Chi and mind ulness o subsynd omal
dep ession and anxie y in olde adul s: a na u alis ic s udy in Singapo e.
Asia Paci ic J Psychia y. 2015;7(3):240–50.
9. Pe e sen RC. Mild cogni i e impai men as a diagnos ic en i y. J In Med.
2004;256(3):183–94.
10. Mahend an R, Raw ae I, Fam J, Wong J, Kuma AP, Gandhi M, Jing KX, Feng
L, Kua EH. A The apy and Music Reminiscence Ac i i y in he P e en ion o
Cogni i e Decline: s udy p o ocol o a andomized con olled ial. BMC
T ials. 2017;18:324. h ps://doi.o g/10.1186/s13063-017-2080-7
11. Ande sson C, Lindau M, Almk is O, Eng eld P, Johansson SE, E iksdo e
Jonhagen M. Iden i ying pa ien s a high and low isk o cogni i e decline
using Rey Audi o y Ve bal Lea ning Tes among middle-aged memo y clinic
ou pa ien s. Demen Ge ia Cogn Diso d. 2006;21:251–9.
12. Yin S, Zhu X, Huang X, Li J. Visuospa ial cha ac e is ics o an ea ly Chinese
popula ion: esul s om he WAIS-R block design es . F on Aging Neu osci.
2015;7(17). h ps://doi.o g/10.3389/ nagi.2015.00017.
13. Tombaugh TN. T ail making Tes A and B: no ma i e da a s a i ied by age
and educa ion. A ch Clin Neu opsychol. 2004;19(2):203–4. h ps://doi.o g/10.
1016/S0887-6177(03)00039-8.
14. Lee CK, Collinson SL, Feng L, Ng TZ. P elimina y no ma i e
neu opsychological da a o an elde ly Chinese popula ion. Clin
Neu opsychol. 2012. h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/13854046.2011.652180.
15. Nyun MSZ, Fones C, Ni i M, Ng TP. C i e ion-based alidi y and eliabili y o
he ge ia ic Dep ession Sc eening Scale (GDS-15) in a la ge alida ion
sample o communi y-li ing Asian olde adul s. Aging Men Heal h. 2009;
13(3):376–82.
16. Pachana NA, By ne GJ, Siddle H, Koloski N, Ha ley E, A nold E. De elopmen
and alida ion o he Ge ia ic Anxie y In en o y. In Psychoge ia ics. 2007;
19(1):103–14.
17. Rane G, Koh WP, Kanchi MM, Wang R, Yuan JM, Wang X. Associa ion
be ween leukocy e elome e leng h and plasma homocys eine in a
Singapo e Chinese popula ion. Reju ena ion Res. 2015;18(3):203–10.
18. Goh ing J, Fulche N, Jacak J, Riha K. TeloTool: a new ool o elome e
leng h measu emen om e minal es ic ion agmen analysis wi h
imp o ed p obe in ensi y co ec ion. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(3):e21.
19. Kon son KL, Megjhani M, B an ley JA, C uz-Ga za JG, Nakagome S, Roble o
D, Whi e M, Ci illico E, Con e as-Vidal JL. You b ain on a : eme gen
co ical dynamics du ing aes he ic expe iences. F on Hum Neu osci. 2015;9:
626. h ps://doi.o g/10.3389/ nhum.2015.00626.
20. Scai e M, B une JS. The capaci y o join isual a en ion in he in an .
Na u e. 1975;253:265–6.
21. Bullo NJ, Rebe R. The a ul mind mee s a his o y: owa d a psycho-
his o ical amewo k o he science o a app ecia ion. Beha B ian Sci.
2013;36:123–37.
22. Bolwe k A, Mack-And ick J, Lang FR, Do le A, Malho ne C. How a
changes you b ain: di e en ial e ec s o isual a p oduc ion and
cogni i e a e alua ion on Func ional b ain connec i i y. PLoS One. 2014;
9(7):e101035. h ps://doi.o g/10.1371/jou nal.pone.0101035.
23. B own S, Gao X, Tisdelle L, Eickho SB, Lio i M. Na u alizing aes he ics: b ain
a eas o aes he ic app aisal ac oss senso y modali ies. Neu oimage2011; 58:
250–258.
24. Epel E. How “ e e sible”is elome ic aging? Cance P e Res. 2012;5(10):1163–8.
25. Kiecol -Glase J, Epel E, Belbu y M, And idge R, Lin J, Glase R, Mala key WB,
Hwang BS, Blackbu n E. Omega-3 a y acids, oxida i e s ess, and leukocy e
elome e leng h: a andomized con olled ial. B ain Beha Immun. 2013;28:
16–24.
26. Hagg S, Zhan Y, Ka lson R, Ge i sen L, Plone A, an de Lee SJ, B oe L,
Deelen J, ( o he ENGAGE Conso ium), e al. Sho elome e leng h is
Mahend an e al. T ials (2018) 19:615 Page 9 o 10