scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

The Level function in rearrangement invariant spaces

Abstract

An exact expression for the down norm is given in terms of the level function on all rearrangement invariant spaces and a useful approximate expression is given for the down norm on all rearrangement invariant spaces whose upper Boyd index is not one.

Read accessible full text

The Level function in rearrangement invariant spaces

Author: Sinnamon, Gord
Publisher: Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
Year: 2001
DOI: 10.5565/PUBLMAT_45101_08
Source: https://ddd.uab.cat/pub/pubmat/02141493v45n1/02141493v45n1p175.pdf
Publ. Ma . 45 (2001), 175–198
THE LEVEL FUNCTION IN REARRANGEMENT
INVARIANT SPACES
Go d Sinnamon
Abs ac
An exac exp ession o he down no m is gi en in e ms o he
le el unc ion on all ea angemen in a ian spaces and a use-
ul app oxima e exp ession is gi en o he down no m on all e-
a angemen in a ian spaces whose uppe Boyd index is no one.
1. In oduc ion
Le λbe a measu e on Rand ake X o be a ea angemen in a i-
an space o λ-measu able unc ions. We define he down no m o a
λ-measu able unc ion o be
 X↓= sup R
| |gdλ:g≥0,gnon-inc easing,gX≤1.(1.1)
Had we aken he sup emum o e all gin he uni ball o X, he associa e
space o he Banach unc ion space X, we would ha e eco e ed he no m
o in Xso i is immedia e ha
 X↓≤ X.
The significance o he down no m is ha he inequali y
R
gdλ ≤ X↓gX
(1.2)
holds o all and all non-nega i e, non-inc easing unc ions g. Since
he down no m o is smalle han he no m o in X his es ima e
uses he mono onici y hypo hesis on g o imp o e he usual es ima e
R
gdλ ≤ XgX.
2000 Ma hema ics Subjec Classifica ion. P ima y: 46E30; Seconda y: 26D15.
Key wo ds. Le el unc ion, ea angemen in a ian , down no m.
Suppo om he Na u al Sciences and Enginee ing Resea ch Council o Canada is
g a e ully acknowledged.
176 G. Sinnamon
To use inequali y (1.2) effec i ely i is necessa y o unde s and he
down no m. In he case ha Xis Lebesgue space his has been done in
wo ways. Halpe in [6] and Lo en z [9] ga e an exac exp ession o he
down no m when λis a non-nega i e weigh unc ion imes Lebesgue
measu e. Gi en a unc ion hey cons uc ed a ela ed unc ion ◦,
called he le el unc ion o , and showed ha he down no m is p e-
cisely he no m o ◦in X.In[13], he le el unc ion cons uc ion was
ex ended o gene al ( egula ) measu es on R, he down no m was shown
o define a Banach space and he dual space was also cons uc ed.
The second app oach o unde s anding he down no m, gi en in [12]
o weigh ed Lebesgue spaces, was o gi e an equi alen no m in a mo e
ac able o m. The no m in Xo a ce ain a e aging ope a o applied
o was shown o be equi alen o he down no m o . The loss o
exac ness is mo e han made up o because he a e aging ope a o is
linea . This app oach was ex ended o O licz spaces wi h weigh s in [8]
whe e he down no m in sequence spaces was also conside ed.
Ou objec is o look a bo h o hese app oaches in he mo e gen-
e al se ing o ea angemen in a ian spaces. As o en happens when
heo ems a e examined in hei na u al gene ali y, he p oo s educe o
hei essen ial ea u es and g ea e unde s anding is gained. We will see
how he a e aging ope a o in ol ed in he esul s o [12] and [8] a ises
na u ally om he le el unc ion cons uc ion and how he fini eness o
λ(R) affec s ha ope a o . We will also see why he le el unc ion ap-
p oach o he down no m emains alid in all ea angemen in a ian
spaces while a es ic ion is equi ed o he o he app oach o be alid.
In [12] he es ic ion was ha he Lebesgue index be g ea e han one
and in [8]a∆
2condi ion was imposed on he N- unc ions defining he
O licz spaces.
Fo defini ions and no a ion in ol ing Banach unc ion spaces and
ea angemen in a ian spaces we e e o [1]. We adop he con en ion
ha 0·∞ =∞/∞=0. I Aand Ba e exp essions in ol ing , we w i e
A≈B o mean ha he e exis s a posi i e cons an C, no depending on
, such ha C−1A≤B≤CA. The ange o in eg a ion o an in eg al
gi en wi h limi s is aken o be he closed in e al so ha
b
a
dλ=[a,b]
dλ bu b
−∞
dλ=(−∞,b]
dλ.
2. The down no m
Le Xbe a ea angemen in a ian space o e he measu e spa-
ce (R,λ). Fo he down no m o be in e es ing some es ic ions on
The Le el Func ion in R.I. Spaces 177
λa e in o de . Since we wan non-nega i e, non-inc easing unc ions o
be λ-measu able we assume ha se s o he o m (−∞,x] and (−∞,x)
a e λ-measu able which means ha all Bo el se s a e λ-measu able. To
ensu e ha he space Xac ually con ains non- i ial non-nega i e, non-
inc easing unc ions we assume ha o each x,λ(−∞,x]<∞.Fo
echnical easons he measu e λin [13] was assumed o be egula and
since we wish o apply hose esul s we make he same assump ion he e.
Finally, in wo king wi h ea angemen in a ian spaces i is usual o as-
sume ha he unde lying measu e space is esonan [1, Defini ion II.2.3
and Theo em II.2.7] so ha , among o he hings, he associa e space will
also be ea angemen in a ian . Fo hese easons we assume hence o h
ha
λis a egula Bo el measu e on R,
λ(−∞,x]<∞ o all x∈R,and
λis nona omic o else comple ely a omic
wi h all a oms ha ing measu e 1.
(2.1)
Wi h hese assump ions on he measu e λwe can show ha X↓, he
collec ion o unc ions sa is ying  X↓<∞, is a no med ec o space:
I is easy o see ha X↓is a ec o space con aining Xand i is clea
om (1.1) ha ·
X↓is non-nega i e, homogeneous, and sa isfies he
iangle inequali y. I emains o show ha only he ze o unc ion has
ze o no m in X↓. Fo each x∈R,λ(−∞,x]<∞so χ(−∞,x]∈Xand
hence, i  X↓= 0 we ha e x
−∞ dλ= 0 o each x. I ollows ha
=0λ-almos e e ywhe e and we ha e shown ha ·
X↓is a no m.
In ac , X↓is a Banach space as we show in Theo em 5.3.
In mos applica ions, he measu e λis weigh ed Lebesgue measu e on
he hal line, dλ(x)=w(x)dx wi h wa non-nega i e, locally in eg able
unc ion on [0,∞). The case ha λis coun ing measu e on he posi i e
in ege s also a ises. The ea angemen in a ian spaces o he la e
measu e include lpand O licz sequence spaces while hose o he o me
measu e a e weigh ed Lebesgue spaces, O licz spaces, Lo en z spaces
and o he s. We has en o poin ou ha while he weigh ed Lebesgue
space Lp
w[0,∞) is no ea angemen in a ian wi h espec o Lebesgue
measu e unless w≡1, i is ea angemen in a ian wi h espec o he
measu e w(x)dx.
We plan o use he le el unc ion o ela e he no m in he space X↓
o he no m on he o iginal space X. The nex p oposi ion in oduces
he le el unc ion as cons uc ed in [13]. Fo con enience we define B
178 G. Sinnamon
o be he collec ion o λ-measu able unc ions on Rwhich a e bounded
and suppo ed in a se o he o m (−∞,M] o some M∈R.
P oposi ion 2.1. Suppose λsa isfies (2.1) and ∈B. Then he e is a
non-nega i e, non-inc easing unc ion ◦∈B, called he le el unc ion
o wi h espec o λ, and ha ing he ollowing p ope ies.
(a) The e exis s a fini e o coun able collec ion o disjoin in e als Ii
o fini e, non-ze o λmeasu e such ha = ◦λ-almos e e ywhe e
on E=R ∪
iIiand o each i,
◦(x)=(1/λIi)Ii
| |dλ
o λ-almos e e y x∈Ii.
(b) I gis non-nega i e and non-inc easing hen
R]
| |gdλ≤R
◦g dλ.
(c) I 1,
2∈Band | 1|≤| 2| hen ◦
1≤ ◦
2.
P oo : The s uc u e o he le el unc ion o is gi en in [13, Theo-
em 4.4, Defini ion 4.6, Co olla y 4.8 and Theo em 4.9]. The e i is
shown ha ◦is non-nega i e and non-inc easing and ha (a) holds. I
is no assumed in [13] ha is suppo ed on (−∞,M] so he possibil-
i y o a le el in e al o infini e λmeasu e is conside ed he e. An easy
a gumen shows ha i is suppo ed on (−∞,M] hen all he le el
in e als Iia e con ained in (−∞,M] and hence a e o fini e λmeasu e.
Clea ly we may disca d hose o ze o λ-measu e.
Pa (b) is gi en in [13, Theo em 4.11] and (c) is p o ed in [13,
Theo em 5.2].
The main esul o his sec ion is gi en in he nex heo em o ∈B
and in Co olla y 2.4 o gene al .
Theo em 2.2. Suppose λsa isfies (2.1),Xis a ea angemen in a i-
an space o e (R,λ), ∈B, and ◦is he le el unc ion o wi h
espec o λ. Then  X↓= ◦X.
P oo : We use he le el in e als o o define he ope a o A .
A h=hχE+
i1
λIiIi
hdλ
χIi.
No e ha A is sel -adjoin , ha is R(A g)hdλ =Rg(A h)dλ o
app op ia e gand h. Also no e ha by [1, Theo em II.4.8] A is a con-
ac ion on any ea angemen in a ian space, in pa icula A hX≤
The Le el Func ion in R.I. Spaces 179
hX o h∈X. I is clea om he defini ion ha A | |= ◦and
since he se s Iia e in e als, A his non-nega i e and non-inc easing
whene e his.
I gis non-nega i e and non-inc easing and gX≤1 hen by P opo-
si ion 2.1(b),
R
| |gdλ≤R
◦gdλ≤ ◦X
so we ha e  X↓≤ ◦X. Now we p o e he e e se inequali y. A
simple limi ing a gumen shows ha
 ◦X= sup R
◦hdλ
whe e he sup emum is aken o e non-nega i e unc ions h∈Bsa -
is ying hX≤1. Fo such an h, since ◦is non-nega i e and non-
inc easing, we ha e
R
◦hdλ≤R
◦h◦dλ =R
(A | |)(Ahh)dλ =R
| |(A (Ahh)) dλ.
Se g=A (Ahh). Since Ahh=h◦is non-nega i e and non-inc easing
we see ha gis non-nega i e and non-inc easing. Mo eo e , gX≤
hX≤1 since bo h A and Aha e con ac ions on X. We conclude
ha
 ◦X≤sup R
| |gdλ:g≥0,gnon-inc easing,gX≤1= X↓.
This comple es he p oo .
To ex end he defini ion o he le el unc ion om ∈B o all λ-mea-
su able unc ions we use P oposi ion 2.1(c).
Defini ion 2.3. I is a λ-measu able unc ion le
n= min(| |,n)χ(−∞,n]and se ◦= limn→∞ ◦
n.
Clea ly n∈B o each nso ◦
nis defined. By P oposi ion 2.1(c),
{ ◦
n}is a non-dec easing sequence so he limi in Defini ion 2.3 always
exis s as a unc ion which akes alues in [0,∞]. Mo eo e , i ∈B
hen n= o sufficien ly la ge nso he new defini ion o ◦ag ees
wi h he o iginal one.
I is immedia e ha , wi h his defini ion o he le el unc ion, P opo-
si ion 2.1(c) emains alid o a bi a y unc ions. An applica ion o
he Mono one Con e gence Theo em shows ha Pa (b) also ex ends.
Pa (a) does no hold o a bi a y unc ions because he igh mos le el
in e al may ha e infini e λmeasu e. To wha ex en he s uc u e o

180 G. Sinnamon
◦ o an a bi a y unc ion can be desc ibed in e ms o le el in e als
is no clea .
The sequence n= min(| |,n)χ(−∞,n]in Defini ion 2.3 is chosen o
con enience, in Sec ion 5 we show ha he defini ion o ◦is independen
o he app oxima ing sequence.
Co olla y 2.4. Suppose λsa isfies (2.1) and Xis a ea angemen in-
a ian space o e (R,λ).I ∈X↓ hen ◦is fini e λ-almos e e y-
whe e, belongs o X, and  X↓= ◦X.
P oo : Since n= min(| |,n)χ(−∞,n]is a non-dec easing sequence, P o-
posi ion 2.1(c) shows ha ◦
nis also. The Fa ou p ope y o he Banach
unc ion space X, Theo em 2.2, and he obse a ion ha n≤| |show
ha
 ◦X= lim
n→∞  ◦
nX= lim
n→∞  nX↓≤ X↓.
Now [1, Lemma I.1.5(i) and Theo em I.1.4] show ha ◦∈Xand is
he e o e fini e λ-almos e e ywhe e.
Fo each non-nega i e, non-inc easing unc ion gwi h gX≤1we
ha e, by he Mono one Con e gence Theo em and P oposi ion 2.1(b),
R
| |gdλ= lim
n→∞ R
ngdλ≤lim
n→∞ R
◦
ngdλ≤lim
n→∞  ◦
nX= ◦X.
Taking he sup emum o e all such gyields  X↓≤ ◦Xand com-
ple es he p oo .
3. An equi alen no m
Exp essing he down no m o a unc ion in e ms o he le el unc-
ion o , al hough exac , has a majo d awback. The map → ◦
is no linea , in ac , i is no e en sublinea . In he Lebesgue space
case i was shown in [12] ha he space X↓has an equi alen no m
which can be exp essed in e ms o a linea a e aging ope a o applied
o . The same a e aging ope a o was shown o wo k in O licz spaces
in [8]. The linea i y o his a e aging ope a o leads o a duali y p inci-
ple which educes weigh ed inequali ies o a gene al ope a o conside ed
o e mono one unc ions o weigh ed inequali ies o a modified ope a o
conside ed o e all unc ions. In his sec ion we show ha he equi a-
len no m and he duali y p inciple emain alid o a wide ange o
ea angemen in a ian spaces. Since he echniques in ol ed a e qui e
diffe en his also p o ides new p oo s o some esul s o [12] and [8].
The Le el Func ion in R.I. Spaces 181
Since λsa isfies (2.1), i s cumula i e dis ibu ion unc ion is fini e
on R. Le Λ(x)=x
−∞ dλ o x∈[−∞,∞] and define he a e aging
ope a o Pby
P (x)=Λ(x)−1x
−∞
dλ+Λ(∞)−1∞
−∞
dλ.
By ou con en ion he second e m is absen , ega dless o , when
Λ(∞)=∞.
Theo em 3.1. Suppose λsa isfies (2.1) and Xis a ea angemen in-
a ian space o e (R,λ). Then  X↓≈P X o all ≥0i and
only i P:X→Xis bounded.
P oo : Suppose fi s ha  X↓≈P X o all ≥0. Then he e
exis s a cons an Csuch ha o any ∈X,
P X≤C X↓≤C X
so P:X→Xis bounded.
Con e sely, suppose ha P:X→Xis bounded and hence con in-
uous. Then he e exis s a cons an Csuch ha P X≤C X o
all ∈X.I ≥0 hen se n= min( ,n)χ(−∞,n]so ha ◦is he
poin wise limi o he inc easing sequence { ◦
n}. By P oposi ion 2.1(b)
wi h g=χ(−∞,x]we ha e x
−∞ ndλ ≤x
−∞ ◦
ndλ o each nand each
x∈R.Thus
P nX≤P( ◦
n)X≤C ◦
nX
and so, using he Mono one Con e gence Theo em and he Fa ou p op-
e y o X, we ha e
P X≤C ◦X=C X↓.
On he o he hand, since ◦
nis non-nega i e and non-inc easing, ◦
n≤
P( ◦
n) and hence
 X↓= ◦X= lim
n→∞  ◦
nX≤lim
n→∞ P( ◦
n)X.
To comple e he p oo i will suffice o p o e he ollowing lemma since
hen we will ha e
 X↓≤3 lim
n→∞ P nX=3P X.
Lemma 3.2. Suppose λsa isfies (2.1) and Xis a ea angemen in-
a ian space o e (R,λ). Then o any non-nega i e ∈Bwe ha e
P( ◦)X≤3P X.
182 G. Sinnamon
P oo : We show ha P( ◦)−P X≤2P X, om which he esul
is immedia e. Fo his a gumen we need a ew de ails om [13, Defini-
ion 4.6] in addi ion o hose p esen ed in P oposi ion 2.1. Wi h Iiand
Eas in P oposi ion 2.1, i we define aiand biby (ai,b
i)⊂Ii⊂[ai,b
i]
hen we ha e he ollowing: The poin x∈Ei and only i
(−∞,x)
◦dλ =(−∞,x)
dλ and (−∞,x]
◦dλ =(−∞,x]
dλ.
The poin xis in e io o one o he in e als Iii and only i
(−∞,x)
◦dλ > (−∞,x)
dλ and (−∞,x]
◦dλ > (−∞,x]
dλ.
The le endpoin , ai∈Iii and only i
(−∞,ai]
◦dλ > (−∞,ai]
dλ.
The igh endpoin , bi∈Iii and only i
(−∞,bi)
◦dλ > (−∞,bi)
dλ.
I ollows ha
P( ◦)(x)−P (x)
=
i
Λ(x)−1x
−∞
◦dλ −x
−∞
dλ
χIi(x)
=
i
Λ(x)−1Ii∩(−∞,x]
◦dλ −Ii∩(−∞,x]
dλ
χIi(x)
≤
i
Λ(x)−1Ii∩(−∞,x]
◦dλχIi(x).
The second equali y abo e is easy o p o e in wo cases depending on
whe he ai∈Iio no .
We use P oposi ion 2.1(a) o con inue he calcula ion.
P( ◦)(x)−P (x)
≤
i
Λ(x)−1Ii∩(−∞,x]
dλ Ii
dλ−1Ii
dλχIi(x)
=
i
λ(−∞,x]−1λ(Ii∩(−∞,x])λ(Ii)−1Ii
dλχIi(x).
The Le el Func ion in R.I. Spaces 183
Now we use he ob ious inequali y
λ(Ii∩(−∞,x])λ(Ii∪(−∞,x]) ≤λ(−∞,x]λ(Ii)
o ge
P( ◦)(x)−P (x)≤
i
λ(Ii∪(−∞,x])−1Ii
dλχIi(x).(3.1)
No e ha o x∈Ii,Ii∪(−∞,x] does no depend on x. I is ei he
(−∞,b
i) o (−∞,b
i] depending on whe he o no biis in Ii. Se Bi=
λ(Ii∪(−∞,x]).
Define I0and I1by
I0={i:2Bi<Λ(∞)}and I1={i:2Bi≥Λ(∞)}.
Fo each i∈I
0choose ci∈Rsuch ha Λ(ci)=2Bi. This is possible i
λis non-a omic because Λ is con inuous in ha case. I is also possible
i λconsis s o equal a oms because he condi ion λ(−∞,x]<∞ensu es
ha he a oms do no clus e . The eason o choosing such a ciis so
ha he se I
i=(−∞,c
i] (Ii∪(−∞,x]) has λ-measu e Bi o each
x∈Ii.
Fo each i∈I
1se I
i=Ii. We claim ha





i
B−1
iIi
dλχIi



X
≤




i
B−1
iIi
dλχI
i



X
.(3.2)
This is a amilia calcula ion in ea angemen in a ian spaces which
ollows om Lemma 3.3 below. Now, i i∈I
0and x∈I
i hen x≤ciso
2Bi=Λ(ci)≥Λ(x). I ollows ha

i∈I0
B−1
iIi
dλχI
i(x)≤2Λ(x)−1
i∈I0Ii
dλχ
I
i(x)≤2Λ(x)−1x
−∞
dλ
since he in e als Iia e disjoin . I i∈I
1 hen I
i=Iiand 2Bi≥Λ(∞)
so, once again using disjoin ness, we ha e

i∈I1
B−1
iIi
dλχ
I
i(x)≤2Λ(∞)−1∞
−∞
dλ.
Combining hese las wo es ima es wi h (3.1) and (3.2) yields he desi ed
inequali y
P( ◦)−P X≤2P X
and comple es he p oo .
190 G. Sinnamon
P oo : Since ¯αX<1, Theo em 4.4 shows ha he e exis s a posi i e
cons an Csuch ha
C−1PϕX≤ϕX↓≤CPϕX
o all ϕ∈X↓.
I a C1exis s sa is ying (4.5) hen o any ∈Yand any non-nega i e,
non-inc easing g∈Xwe ha e
M
(T∗g)dµ =R
(T )gdλ≤T X↓gX
≤CPT XgX≤CC1 YgX.
Taking he sup emum o e all wi h  Y≤1 yields (4.6) wi h C2=
CC1.
Con e sely, i he e exis s a C2sa is ying (4.6) hen o any ∈Y
and any non-nega i e, non-inc easing g∈Xwe ha e
R
(T )gdλ=M
(T∗g)dµ ≤ YT∗gY≤C2 YgX.
Taking he sup emum o e all non-nega i e, non-inc easing g∈Xwi h
gX≤1 we ha e T X↓≤C2 Yand hence
PT X≤CT X↓≤CC2 Y
and so (4.5) holds wi h C1=CC2.
The Boyd indices a e known o many classes o ea angemen in a i-
an spaces. The simples is he class o Lebesgue spaces. Fo 1 ≤p≤
∞le Lp
λdeno e he collec ion o λ-measu able unc ions such ha
 Lp
λ<∞whe e
 Lp
λ≡R
| |pdλ1/p
o p<∞and  L∞
λ≡ess supλ
x∈R
| (x)|.
I is well known ha he uppe Boyd index o Lp
λis 1/p. Theo em 4.4
educes o he ollowing.
P oposi ion 4.6. Suppose λsa isfies (2.1) and 1≤p≤∞. Then
P:Lp
λ→Lp
λi and only i 1<p≤∞i and only i
sup R
gdλ :g≥0,gnon-inc easing,gLp
λ
≤1
≡ Lp
λ↓≈P Lp
λ.

The Le el Func ion in R.I. Spaces 191
No e ha since λmay be coun ing measu e on he se o posi i e
in ege s his includes he case Lp
λ=lp.
I 1 <p<∞and is a non-nega i e weigh defined on (0,∞) hen
we may define λby dλ(x)=χ(0,∞)(x) (x)dx and eplace by / o
ob ain
sup ∞
0
g :g≥0,gnon-inc easing,gLp
≤1
≈∞
0x
0
px
0
−p
(x)dx1/p
+∞
0
∞
0
−1/p
which was p o ed in [12, Theo em 1].
Conside able p og ess has been made on de e mining he Boyd in-
dices o O licz spaces in [3], [4], [5], [10] and o he s bu only a small
po ion o his heo y is equi ed o ou pu poses. We e e o [11] o
he defini ions o a Young’s unc ion Φ, i s complemen a y Young’s unc-
ion Ψ, and he O licz space LΦ
λ. We say a Young’s unc ion sa isfies he
∆2condi ion and w i e Φ ∈∆2p o ided he e exis s a cons an C>1
such ha Φ(2x)≤CΦ(x) o all x>0. We say ha Φ sa isfies he ∆∞
2
condi ion and w i e Φ ∈∆∞
2p o ided he e exis cons an s N>0 and
C>1 such ha Φ(2x)≤CΦ(x) o all x>N.
P oposi ion 4.7. Suppose λsa isfies (2.1),Φis a Young’s unc ion,
and Ψis i s complemen a y Young’s unc ion. Then P:LΦ
λ→LΦ
λi
and only i Ψ∈∆∞
2i and only i
(4.7) sup R
gdλ :g≥0,gnon-inc easing,gLΨ
λ≤1
≡ LΦ
λ↓≈P LΦ
λ.
P oo : The associa e space o LΦ
λis LΨ
λwi h equi alen no ms so all
ha is needed o deduce his esul om Theo em 4.4 is o e i y ha
he uppe Boyd index o LΦ
λis less han one i and only i Ψ ∈∆∞
2.
Since he uppe Boyd index o LΦ
λis one minus he lowe Boyd index
o LΨ
λwe wish o show ha he lowe Boyd index o Ψ is g ea e han
ze o i and only i Ψ ∈∆∞
2. This ollows om [10, Theo em 3.2b and
Theo em 4.2].
When λis weigh ed Lebesgue measu e on he hal line, o λis coun ing
measu e on he posi i e in ege s (4.7) was es ablished in [8, Theo em 2.2
and Theo em 3.2] unde he assump ion ha bo h Φ and Ψ sa is y he
∆2condi ion. Fo sequence spaces Heinig and Ku ne gi e somewha
192 G. Sinnamon
mo e. Thei Theo em 3.2 includes a weigh ed e sion o he down no m
which sugges s he ollowing p oblem.
P oblem 4.8. Suppose λsa isfies (2.1), Xis a ea angemen in a i-
an space o e (R,λ), and is a non-nega i e, λ-measu able unc ion.
Cha ac e ize he no m
 X↓
= sup R
| |gdλ:g≥0,gnon-inc easing,g X≤1.
5. Comple eness and duali y
We ha e seen ha X↓is a no med ec o space. In his sec ion we
show ha X↓is a Banach space o unc ions which is no , in gene al, a
Banach unc ion space. We also cha ac e ize he dual space o X↓.To
begin we show ha he map → ◦p ese es inc easing limi s.
P oposi ion 5.1. Suppose ha λsa isfies (2.1) and ∈B.I 0≤ n↑
| | hen ◦
n↑ ◦.
P oo : Since ∈B, n∈B o all nand hence , n∈L2
λ⊂L2
λ↓ o all
n.By[13, Theo em 5.4] ◦is he unique 2-le el unc ion o and ◦
n
is he unique 2-le el unc ion o n.Now[13, Lemma 5.3] wi h hn= ◦
n
shows ha limn→∞ ◦
nis also a 2-le el unc ion o . We conclude ha
limn→∞ ◦
n= ◦as equi ed.
Theo em 5.2. Suppose ha λsa isfies (2.1) and Xis a ea angemen
in a ian space o e (R,λ).I 0≤ n↑| | hen ◦
n↑ ◦and  nX↓↑
 X↓.
P oo : Fi s no e ha P oposi ion 2.1(c) easily ex ends o a bi a y
unc ions and he e o e n≤| |implies ◦
n≤ ◦and we ha e limn→∞ ◦
n≤
◦.
To p o e he o he inequali y le h=| |, se hn= min(h, n)χ(−∞,n]
and define
mn,k = min( n,h
k).
Since n↑h≥hk o all k, we ha e limn→∞ mn,k =hk o all k. Since
hk∈B, P oposi ion 5.1 shows ha limn→∞ m◦
n,k =h◦
k o all k.Now
by Defini ion 2.3
◦= lim
k→∞ h◦
k= lim
k→∞ lim
n→∞ m◦
n,k ≤lim
k→∞ lim
n→∞ ◦
n= lim
n→∞ ◦
n.
The Le el Func ion in R.I. Spaces 193
Thus we ha e ◦
n↑ ◦. Now we apply Co olla y 2.4 and he Fa ou
p ope y in X o ge
lim
n→∞  nX↓= lim
n→∞  ◦
nX= ◦X= X↓.
This comple es he p oo .
Theo em 5.3. I λsa isfies (2.1) and Xis a ea angemen in a ian
space o e (R,λ) hen X↓is a Banach space.
P oo : We ha e al eady shown ha X↓is a no med linea space, i
emains o p o e comple eness. To do his we show ha e e y ab-
solu ely summable sequence in X↓is summable in X↓. Suppose ha
n∈X↓ o all nand ∞
n=1  nX↓<∞. Then | n|∈X↓and so
SN≡N
n=1 | n|∈X↓ o each N. Le Sbe he poin wise limi o he
non-dec easing sequence SN, ha is, S=∞
n=1 | n|. Since SN↑Sand
lim
N→∞ SNX↓≤
N

n=1
 nX↓≤
∞

n=1
 nX↓<∞
we ha e SX↓<∞by Theo em 5.2 and hence S∈X↓. In pa icula
his implies ha Sis fini e λ-almos e e ywhe e because o any M∈R,
χ(−∞,M]is non-inc easing so
M
−∞
Sdλ≤SX↓χ(−∞,M]X<∞.
(Since λ(−∞,M] is fini e, χ(−∞,M]∈X.) Thus, Sis fini e λ-almos
e e ywhe e on (−∞,M] bu since Mwas a bi a y, Sis fini e λ-almos
e e ywhe e on R.
We ha e shown ha ∞
n=1 | n|con e ges poin wise λ-almos e e y-
whe e and i ollows ha ∞
n=1 ncon e ges poin wise λ-almos e e y-
whe e. Le FN=N
n=1 nand F=∞
n=1 n. Fix K, se IN=
in n≥N|Fn−FK|≤|FN−FK| o N>Kand no e ha IN∈X↓
wi h INX↓≤N
n=K+1  nX↓≤∞
n=K+1  nX↓. The sequence IN
is non-dec easing and con e ges poin wise o |F−FK|. Thus, applying
Theo em 5.2 again,
F−FKX↓= lim
N→∞ INX↓≤
∞

n=K+1
 nX↓
and so F−FKX↓ ends o ze o as K→∞. Tha is, FK→Fin X↓
as K→∞. This comple es he p oo .
194 G. Sinnamon
Al hough X↓is a Banach space, i is no a Banach unc ion space in
gene al as he ollowing example shows: Take λ o be Lebesgue measu e
on he hal line. We show ha condi ion [1, Defini ion I.1.1(P5)] ails
o he space L2
λ↓. To do his we exhibi a se Eo fini e measu e and a
sequence o unc ions { n}in L2
λ↓such ha E n/ nL2
λ↓is unbounded.
Se
E=
∞

n=1
[n−2−n,n]
and no e ha λ(E)=∞
n=1 2−n<∞.I n=2
nχ[n−2−n,n]we compu e
E n= 1 and ◦
n=(1/n)χ[0,n].Thus nL2
λ↓= ◦
nL2
λ=n−1/2and
so E n/ nL2
λ↓is unbounded o la ge n.
Fo he emainde o his sec ion we in es iga e he dual space o X↓.
Defini ion 5.4. Suppose ha gis a λ-measu able unc ion. Define ¯gby
¯g(x) = ess sup ≥x|g( )|, se gX↓=¯gX, and le X↓be he collec ion
o unc ions g o which gX↓<∞.
No e ha ¯gis non-nega i e and non-inc easing and ha , by a s an-
da d measu e heo y a gumen , ¯g≥|g|λ-almos e e ywhe e. The
space X↓is a subspace o Xsince we ha e gX≤gX↓.I is
easy o see ha ·
X↓is a no m.
Al hough he no a ion X↓sugges s he associa e space o X↓ his is
no asse ed he e. In ac , since X↓is no necessa ily a Banach unc ion
space, i is no clea ha i has a well-defined associa e space. The
space X↓does beha e like an associa e space, howe e , as we see in
Theo ems 5.6 and 5.7 below. Theo em 5.8 shows ha he dual space
o X↓o en coincides wi h X↓. To p epa e o hese h ee heo ems we
need ano he esul om [13].
P oposi ion 5.5. Suppose λsa isfies (2.1),α∈(0,1), and ,g a e
λ-measu able unc ions such ha ◦and ¯ga e fini e λ-almos e e y-
whe e. Then he e exis s a non-nega i e λ-measu able unc ion hsuch
ha
R
h|g|dλ ≥α2R
| |¯gdλ and R
hϕ dλ ≤R
| |ϕdλ
o all non-nega i e, non-inc easing, λ-measu able unc ions ϕ.
P oo : This is p o ed in [13, Lemma 6.5] unde he assump ion ha
◦∈Lp
λand ¯g∈Lp
λ o some p∈(1,∞]. Only he weake assump ion
ha ◦and ¯ga e fini e λ-almos e e ywhe e is used in he p oo . I
emains alid in his mo e gene al si ua ion wi hou al e a ion.
The Le el Func ion in R.I. Spaces 195
Theo em 5.6. Suppose λsa isfies (2.1),Xis a ea angemen in a i-
an space o e (R,λ), and ∈X↓. Then
 X↓= sup R
gdλ
:gX↓≤1.(5.1)
P oo : Since ¯gis non-inc easing and ¯g≥|g|λ-almos e e ywhe e we
ha e
(5.2) R
gdλ
≤R
| ||g|dλ ≤R
| |¯gdλ≤R
◦¯gdλ
≤ ◦X¯gX= X↓gX↓.
This p o es ha he le side o (5.1) is no less han he igh side.
To p o e he o he inequali y no e ha i gis non-nega i e and non-
inc easing wi h gX≤1 hen sgn( )gX↓≤1 and R| |gdλ =
R sgn( )gdλ
so by (1.1)
 X↓= sup R
| |gdλ:g≥0,gnon-inc easing,gX≤1
≤sup R
gdλ
:gX↓≤1.
This comple es he p oo .
Theo em 5.7. Suppose λsa isfies (2.1),Xis a ea angemen in a i-
an space o e (R,λ), and g∈X↓. Then
gX↓= sup R
gdλ
: X↓≤1.(5.3)
P oo : The calcula ion in (5.2) shows ha he le hand side o (5.3)
is no less han he igh hand side. To p o e he o he inequali y we
equi e P oposi ion 5.5. Fix g∈X↓. Then ¯g∈Xso ¯gis fini e λ-almos
e e ywhe e. Fix α∈(0,1) and choose a non-nega i e unc ion wi h
 X≤1 such ha
gX↓=¯gX≤1
αR
¯g dλ.
Since  X≤1, ∈X⊂X↓so ◦is fini e λ-almos e e ywhe e by
Co olla y 2.4. The unc ion ho P oposi ion 5.5 sa isfies
hX↓= sup R
hϕ dλ ≤sup R
| |ϕdλ≤ X≤1

196 G. Sinnamon
whe e he sup ema a e aken o e all non-nega i e, non-inc easing unc-
ions ϕwi h ϕX≤1. The e o e
α3gX↓≤α2R
¯gdλ≤R
h|g|dλ ≤sup R
gdλ
: X↓≤1.
Since his holds o all α∈(0,1) we may le α→1 o ob ain he
emaining inequali y in (5.3).
Defini ion 5.8. Suppose ha Ais a Banach space o unc ions. We
say he space Ahas absolu ely con inuous no m p o ided e e y non-
inc easing sequence o unc ions in Awhich con e ges o ze o poin wise,
con e ges o ze o in A.
In iew o [1, P oposi ion I.3.5] his defini ion ag ees wi h [1, Defini-
ion I.3.1] when Ais a Banach Func ion Space.
Theo em 5.9. Suppose λsa isfies (2.1),Xis a ea angemen in a i-
an space o e (R,λ)and bo h Xand X↓ha e absolu ely con inuous
no m. Then he dual space o X↓is X↓. Mo e p ecisely, each unc-
ion g∈X↓gi es ise o a con inuous linea unc ional Lgon X↓gi en
by Lg( )=R gdλ. The no m o Lgis gX↓and e e y con inuous
linea unc ional on X↓is Lg o some g∈X↓.
P oo : By [1, Co olla y I.4.3] X=X∗.I g∈X↓ hen Lgis a clea ly
linea and Theo em 5.7 shows ha Lgis con inuous on X↓, ha ing
no m gX↓. Suppose now ha Lis a con inuous, linea unc ional
on X↓. We wish o show ha L=Lg o some g∈X↓.
Since Xis a subspace o X↓(wi h ·
X↓≤·
X) we may conside
Las a con inuous linea unc ional on X. The hypo hesis ha X∗=X
shows ha he e is a unc ion g∈Xsuch ha L =R gdλ o all
∈X. To comple e he p oo we show ha L =R gdλ o all
∈X↓and ha g∈X↓.
To do he fi s we fix ∈X↓, se n= min(n, max(−n, ))χ(−∞,n],
and conside he sequence {| ng|}. This inc eases poin wise o | g|. The
Mono one Con e gence Theo em yields
R
| g|dλ = lim
n→∞ R
| ng|dλ = lim
n→∞ L(| n|sgn(g))
≤LX→Rlim
n→∞  nX↓≤LX→R X↓<∞.
The Le el Func ion in R.I. Spaces 197
Thus g ∈L1
λ. Now conside { n}as a sequence in X↓. Since {| − n|}
dec eases o ze o poin wise and X↓has absolu ely con inuous no m we
see ha { n}con e ges o in X↓. Since Lis con inuous,
L = lim
n→∞ L( n) = lim
n→∞ R
ngdλ=R
gdλ
whe e he las inequali y ollows om he Domina ed Con e gence The-
o em using ou obse a ion ha g ∈L1
λ.
The second ask is o show ha g∈X↓. Se
gn(x) = min(n, |g(x)|)χ(∞,n]and no e ha gn∈X↓and {gn}inc eases
poin wise o |g|.Thus{¯gn}inc eases poin wise o ¯g. The Fa ou p ope y
o he Banach unc ion space Ximplies ha
lim
n→∞ gnX↓= lim
n→∞ ¯gnX=¯gX=gX↓.
Bu
gnX↓= sup R
¯gndλ
≤sup R
| ||g|dλ
= sup L(| |sgn(g)) ≤LX↓→R.
He e he sup ema a e aken o e all unc ions wi h  X↓≤1. The
conclusion is ha gX↓≤LX↓→Rso ha g∈X↓as equi ed.
Co olla y 5.10. I λsa isfies (2.1),Xis a ea angemen in a ian
space o e (R,λ)and bo h Xand X↓ha e absolu ely con inuous no m
hen X↓is comple e.
P oo : The dual space o any no med linea space is comple e.
See [13, Example 6.9] o an example o show ha X↓need no be
eflexi e e en when bo h Xand X↓ha e absolu ely con inuous no m.
I may be ha i Xhas absolu ely con inuous no m hen so does X↓
bu we ha e no p oo o coun e example. In e y many cases, howe e ,
i is ue. We lea e he ollowing as a (non- i ial) exe cise: Suppose λ
sa isfies (2.1), Λ(x)=x
−∞ dλ, and hM(x) = min(M,1/Λ(x)) o M>0.
I Xhas absolu ely con inuous no m and hM∈X o all M>0 hen
X↓has absolu ely con inuous no m.
198 G. Sinnamon
Re e ences
[1] C. Benne and R. Sha pley,“In e pola ion o ope a o s”, Aca-
demic P ess Inc., Bos on, MA, 1988.
[2] D. W. Boyd, Indices o unc ion spaces and hei ela ionship o
in e pola ion, Canad. J. Ma h. 21 (1969), 1245–1254.
[3] D. W. Boyd, Indices o he O licz spaces, Pacific J. Ma h. 38
(1971), 315–323.
[4] A. Fio enza and M. K bec, Indices o O licz spaces and
some applica ions, Commen . Ma h. Uni . Ca olin. 38(3) (1997),
433–451.
[5] A. Fio enza and M. K bec, A o mula o he Boyd indices in
O licz spaces, Func . App ox. Commen . Ma h. 26 (1998), 173–179.
[6] I. Halpe in, Func ion spaces, Canadian J. Ma h. 5(1953),
273–288.
[7] G. H. Ha dy, J. E. Li lewood and G. P´
olya,“Inequali ies”,
2nd ed., Camb idge Uni e si y P ess, Camb idge, 1952.
[8] H. P. Heinig and A. Ku ne , Ha dy ope a o s o mono one
unc ions and sequences in O licz spaces, J. London Ma h. Soc. (2)
53(2) (1996), 256–270.
[9] G. G. Lo en z,“Be ns ein polynomials”, Ma hema ical Exposi-
ions 8, Uni e si y o To on o P ess, To on o, 1953,
[10] L. Malig anda, Indices and in e pola ion, Disse a iones Ma h.
(Rozp awy Ma .) 234 (1985), 49p.
[11] M. M. Rao and Z. D. Ren,“Theo y o O licz spaces”, Mono-
g aphs and Tex books in Pu e and Applied Ma hema ics 146, Ma -
cel Dekke Inc., New Yo k, 1991.
[12] E. Sawye , Boundedness o classical ope a o s on classical Lo en z
spaces, S udia Ma h. 96(2) (1990), 145–158.
[13] G. Sinnamon, Spaces defined by he le el unc ion and hei duals,
S udia Ma h. 111(1) (1994), 19–52.
Depa men o Ma hema ics
Uni e si y o Wes e n On a io
London, On a io, N6A 5B7
Canada
E-mail add ess:[email p o ec ed]
P ime a e si´o ebuda el 17 de maig de 2000,
da e a e si´o ebuda el 10 de juliol de 2000.