scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)
This version is available at https://doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-9765
Copyright applies. A non-exclusive, non-transferable and limited
right to use is granted. This document is intended solely for
personal, non-commercial use.
Terms of Use
Kastner, H., Einhorn-Stoll, U., & Senge, B. (2012). New Parameters for the Examination of the Pectin
Gelation Process. In Gums and Stabilisers for the Food Industry 16 (pp. 191–197).
https://doi.org/10.1039/9781849734554-00191
H. Kastner, U. Einhorn-Stoll, B. Senge
New Parameters for the Examination of
the Pectin Gelation Process
Submitted manuscript (Preprint)Chapter in book |
NEW PARAMETERS FOR THE EXAMINATION OF THE PECTIN GELATION
PROCESS
H. Kastner, U. Einhorn-Stoll, B. Senge
Department of Food Technology and Food Chemistry, Technische Universitaet Berlin,
Koenigin-Luise-Strasse 22, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
1 INTRODUCTION
Industrial pectins are mainly obtained from by-products of the citrus or apple juice industry
by acidic extraction. They are used as gelling or thickening agents in order to improve the
texture of food products. Pectins are branched polysaccharides with a backbone of
galacturonic acid and neutral sugar side chains, present in the plant cell walls. The
galacturonic acid molecules are partly esterified with methanol. Materials with more than 50
% methoxylated carboxyl groups (degree of methylation DM > 50 %) are named as high-
methoxylated pectins (HMP) and those with less than 50 % are low-methoxylated (LMP).
The typical DM for commercial use is about 60 to 77 % for HMP and about 25 to 40 % for
LMP.1 The DM is crucial for the complex pectin gelation process. HMP form gels in the
presence of at least 55 % soluble solids (mostly about 65 % sugar) and at low pH (< 3.5).2,3
Their gelling mechanism is a combination of hydrophobic interactions between methoxyl
groups, favored by higher temperature, and hydrogen bonds between undissociated carboxyl
groups, dominating at lower temperature.4 The LMP network formation is less dependent on
pH and soluble solids than the HMP gelation, it is promoted by the presence of Ca2+, forming
intermolecular ionic junction zones between smooth regions of neighbored chains (egg-box
model).1,5
Fundamental knowledge of the material and structuring properties of pectins, especially of
their gelling behavior, is of crucial importance for their application in foods as well as for
the configuration of technological processes. The gelation temperature of pectins depends
not only on their botanical source, manufacturing conditions and molecular and material
properties but also on the gel preparation procedure and cooling conditions. There are many
experimental studies of the complex pectin gelation process as transition from sol to gel as
well as of the “gel point”, the temperature at which the material properties change from
liquid to solid. Sometimes, however, it can be difficult to define a clear gel point because the
pectin gelation process is rather complex.
Mechanical properties of final pectin sugar model gels have been investigated for instance
using empirical tests, based on gel breaking, or the °SAG-method.6,7 They are applied in the
pectin industry in order to standardize pectins for commercial use. Nowadays mainly
fundamental rheological measurements are applied for gel examination. They allow the
investigation of the structure formation during the gelling process with determination of
setting time and temperature (gel point) as well as the final gel properties.
In oscillation measurements, widely used for the examination of the pectin structuring
process, the gel point was frequently defined as cross-over of storage modulus and loss
modulus G´´ (tanδ = G´´/G´ = 1). This method was developed initially for chemical
gelation.8 In most food products, however, physical gelation via junction zones occurs and
sometimes no clear gel point can be determined for pectin gels, for instance because of pre-
gelation.9,10,11 Therefore, a modified method examined the point of intersection as a function
of frequency,3,8 where the gel point as tanδ = 1 might be defined only in case it is
independent on the frequency.11 But also this method is not always exact and, therefore,
sometimes the described point is named as “apparent gel point”.3 Other indicators of the gel
formation were described by a strong decrease of tanδ12,13 or using the structure development
rate SDR = dG´/dt during cooling14. Nevertheless, the gel point determination is not
completely clear, yet.
The objective of this study is it, therefore, to investigate the structuring process of
commercial pectin gels using additional new gelling parameters that allow a detailed
examination of influencing factors such as botanical origin, preparation conditions,
molecular and material properties, gel preparation (pectin concentration, pH, soluble solid,
divalent cations) or experimental parameters like cooling rate on the gelling process.
2 MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1 Materials
High or low methylated non-standardized commercial citrus pectins were obtained from
three pectin companies. For data protection reasons an anonymous pectin declaration 2A,
3B, etc. had to be made. Gelling parameters and the DM of the samples are given in Table
3, further molecular characteristics and the relating determination methods are presented in
a parallel paper.15
2.2 Gel preparation
The pectin-sucrose-gel composition and preparation was based on the USA-sag method6,7
(Table 2). In contrast to HMP gel preparation, the LMP gelation requires Ca2+ and a different
pH (Table 1). All experiments were made at least in duplicate for each pectin gel.
2.2.1 HMP sucrose gel preparation: Dry pectin powder was dissolved in demineralised
water. While stirring, the mixture was heated quickly to boiling. The sucrose was added and
the HMP-sucrose mass was reduced to a defined value. Afterwards, the pH of the mass was
reduced degraded by addition of tartaric acid solution.
2.2.2 LMP sucrose gel preparation: Demineralised water, citric acid solution and sodium
citrate solution were mixed in a steel pot and the dry pectin powder was added while stirring.
The mixture was heated quickly to boiling, sucrose was added and the mixture was boiled
again. The calcium chloride dehydrate solution was added and while stirring the LMP-
sucrose mass was reduced to a defined value. The detailed information of the ingredients of
the two gels is given in Table 1.
Table 1 Preparation of gel samples with pectins of different DM
Ingredients
HMP gel
LMP gel
Pectin content
2.75 g
6.00 g
Demineralized water
430.00 g
637.50 g
Sucrose
647.25 g
264.00 g
48.8 % tartaric acid solution
7.00 ml
-
54.3 % citric acid solution
-
7.50 ml
6 % sodium citrate solution
-
15.00 ml
2.205 % calcium chloride dehydrate solution
-
37.50 ml
Reduced to
1015 g
900 g
Total pectin concentration
0.27 %
0.67 %
2.2 Rheological measurements
Oscillation measurements of pectin-sugar model gels were carried out on a Physica MCR
301 (Anton Paar). The applied geometry was a double gap rotational cylinder CC27/P1 with
peltier cylinder temperature system TEZ 150P. After gel preparation, about 15 ml of the
sample was transferred immediately into the pre-heated rheometer (105 °C) and cooled to
20 °C (HMP) or 10 °C (LMP) with a cooling rate of 1 K/min. The sample was coated with
silicone oil and the cylinder was closed with a special lid in order to avoid evaporation. The
dynamic rheological parameters storage modulus and loss modulus G´´ as well as the loss
factor tand = G´´/G´ of the pectin-sugar model systems were recorded during cooling
(temperature sweep) at a frequency of 1 Hz and deformation amplitude of 0.001.
2.3 Ridgelimeter (USA-sag) method
The USA-sag method was implemented by the IFT committee for pectin standardisation.
This method is rather empirical but frequently used for routine or quality tests in the pectin
industry, yet.
The rest of the hot pectin-sugar solution, prepared as described above, was filled into three
special glasses and stored at 25 °C for 24 h before measurement. For an accurate result, the
average gel properties of the three gel cones had to be within the limits shown in Table 2.
A Lab850 pH-meter with a special penetration electrode from Schott Instruments was used
for the determination of the pH in the gels after Ridgelimeter measurements. Moreover, the
soluble solid SS was determined in the gel using a refractometer (Schmidt and Haensch).
Table 2 Conditions for the different pectin gels
Ingredients
HMP gel
LMP gel
pH
2.2 - 2.4
2.8 - 3.2
SS
64.5 - 65.5 %
30 - 32 %
Gel strength
19.5 - 27.0 %sag
2.4 Examination of structure formation
Three characteristic gelling temperatures were calculated: The (apparent) gel point
temperature (GP) as cross-over of G´ and G´´, the initial structuring temperature (IST) and
critical structuring temperature (CST) as shown in Figure 1 from the first derivation of the
storage modulus (dG´/dt = structure formation velocity) using Origin 8.1 software. The IST
is defined as the temperature at which the structure formation velocity was different from 0
for the first time. The CST is the extrapolated temperature for the first strong increase of the
structure formation velocity. In contrast to the GP, these two structuring temperatures could
be detected for any pectin we have ever investigated. Moreover, from the structure formation
velocity curve often different structuring phases could be identified.
The details of the new defined parameters are shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1 Evaluation of the structure formation during cooling of an HMP-gel
(sample 3A). Full line = dG´/dt; dotted line = storage modulus G´; IST =
initial structuring temperature; CST = critical structuring temperature;
end = end level at 20 °C; GP = gel point = tanδ = 1.
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
3.1 Structure formation temperatures
The rheological studies were made using different but constant preparation conditions for
HMP and LMP, respectively, (Table 1) and allowed the comparison of the gelling processes
and gel properties. Sometimes, the rheological measurements gave no clear setting point as
intercept of and G´´, causing uncertainty for identifying the exact gelling temperature.
Especially in these cases, the new structuring parameters IST and CST allowed a better
description and comparison of the structure formation process.
The structure formation velocity curve dG´/dt characterised not only the gelling kinetic but
also different phases in the gelation process by alterations of the structure formation velocity.
040 80
0
20
dG'/dt (Pa/min)
Time (min)
CST
IST
end
GP
0
500
1000
Storage modulus (Pa)
100 80 60 40 20
X
Temperature (°C)
Table 3 Characteristics and gelling properties of the tested pectin samples.
DM = degree of methoxylation, GP = gelling point, IST = initial
structuring temperature, CST = critical structuring temperature, end
= final storage modulus, tan
d
end = final loss factor.
Parameters of the gelation process
Source
Sample
DM
GP
IST
CST
end
tan
d
end
%
°C
°C
°C
Pa
1
1B
59.6
93
81
91
1077
0.078
1C
24.2
51
42
53
91
0.151
2
2A
68.9
86
88
85
815
0.068
2B
55.1
58
62
58
639
0.054
2C
30.1
43
51
37
81
0.200
3
3A
69.8
77
79
76
587
0.061
3B
57.1
57
60
56
877
0.051
3C
63.6
67
70
66
788
0.057
3D
32.8
43
60
31
44
0.166
3E
30.2
58
66
55
128
0.128
3F
27.7
-
79
69
293
0.120
3G
69.0
70
72
69
296
0.090
3H
56.5
54
54
53
348
0.087
3.2 Gelling process
A higher DM, in general, leaded to a faster start of the incipient structuring process at higher
gelation temperatures (Table 3 and Figure 2a). This is well-known and crucial for the pectin
application.
In order to investigate the influence of manufacturing conditions on the gelling process, two
HMP (2A and 3A) and two LMP (2C and 3E), respectively, with similar DM but from
different companies were compared. Differences in the start of the structuring process and
structuring velocity were observed (Figure 2b and 2c, Table 3). As shown in Figure 2b, there
was an earlier increase in dG´/dt of the 2A gel, with structure formation temperatures GP,
IST and CST about 9 K higher than in the 3A gel. The same was found for the two LMP
with a difference > 15 K. This means that the gelling properties of pectins were strongly
dependent on their processing conditions and that the DM is one indicator but not the only
parameter for evaluating the gelling properties.
An increase or decrease of structure formation velocity dG´/dt can indicate different gelling
process phases. It seems that single structuring mechanisms (hydrogen bonds beside
hydrophobic interaction for HMP gelation, egg-box junction zones via calcium bridges and
hydrogen bonds for LMP) occur in typical temperature ranges of the gelling process. It was
found that, even if the IST for two tested HMP or two LMP varied, the typical structuring
phases during cooling can behave comparable. Also using the SDR theory14, two phases of
the gelation process have been already described in past publications. The publication of
further results in this field with other influencing parameters is in preparation.
The relationship between CST and GP of the tested gels is shown in Figure 3. From this
significant correlation can be concluded that the newly defined structuring temperatures CST
and the nearly CST - parallel IST are a complementary way to evaluate the incipient gelling
process, especially for gels without a clear G´-G´´ cross-over. The influence of the
manufacturing conditions on the setting behavior of pectins could be sufficiently examined
by IST and CST.
Figure 3 Correlation of structure formation temperatures GP and CST
for all pectin sucrose gels.
040 80
0
10
20
Fig. 2b
2A
3A
dG'/dt (Pa/min)
Time (min)
100 80 60 40 20
Temperature (°C)
20 30 40 50 60 70
0
10
20
3A
3E
dG'/dt (Pa/min)
Time (min)
80 70 60 50 40 30
Fig. 2a
Temperature (°C)
030 60 90
0
2
4
2C
3E
dG'/dt (Pa/min)
Time (min)
100 80 60 40 20
Temperature (°C)
Fig. 2c
Figure 2 Structure developing velocity
dG´/dt during cooling in dependence on
degree of methoxylation.
a: comparison of a HMP and a LMP from
the same company (shown from 85 to 30
°C); b: comparison of two HMP from
different companies with similar DM
(cooled from 105 to 20 °C); c: comparison
of two LMP from different companies with
similar DM (cooled from 100 to 10 °C).
4 CONCLUSIONS
The analysis of the chemical structure of the examined pectins from different companies
showed the complexity of the polymer properties and their influence on the pectin gel
characteristics, depending on the pectin manufacturing process. The newly defined initial
structuring temperature IST and critical structuring temperature CST were, beside the GP,
suitable parameters in order to describe the incipient gel structuring process for both types
of pectins. Even samples with no clear GP could be evaluated this way. Therefore, IST and
CST have proved to be valuable complementary parameters and can help to understand the
structure formation processes more detailed. They can be used for optimizing the pectin
production process as well as the pectin application in food products.
References
1 A.G.J. Voragen, W. Pilnik, J.-F. Thibault, M.A.V. Axelos and C.M.G. Renard, ‘Pectins‘
in Food Polysaccharides and Their Applications, eds., A.M. Stephen, New York,
Marcel Dekker Inc., 1995, pp. 287-339.
2 B.R. Thakur, R.K. Sing and A.K. Handa, Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 1997, 37, 7.
3 J.A. Lopes da Silva, M.P. Goncalves and M.A. Rao, Int. J. Biological Macromolecules,
1995, 17, 25.
4 D. Oakenfull and A. Scott, J. Food Sci., 1984, 49, 1093.
5 E.R. Morris, D.A. Powell, M.J. Gidley and D.A. Rees, J. Molecular Biology, 1982, 155,
507.
6 IFT Committee, Food Technology, 1959, 8, 496.
7 R.E. Cox and R.H. Higby, Food Industry, 1944, 16, 441.
8 H.H. Winter and F. Chambon, Journal of Rheology, 1986, 30, 367.
9 D. Lootens, F. Capel, D. Durand, T. Nicolai, P. Boulenguer and V. Langendorff, Food
Hydrocolloids, 2003, 17, 237.
10 A. Slavov, C. Garnier, M.-J. Crepeau, S. Durand, J.-F. Thibault and E. Bonnin,
Carbohydrate Polymers, 2009, 7, 876.
11 P. Stang-Holst, A.-L. Kjöniksen, H. Bu, S.-A. Sande and B. Nyström, Polymer Bulletin,
2006, 56, 239.
12 A. Dahme, J. Texture Studies, 1992, 23, 1.
13 S. Neidhart, C. Hannak and K. Gierschner, ‘Sol-gel transitions of high-esterified pectins
and their molecular structure’ in Advances in Pectin and Pectinase Research, eds.,
A.G.J. Voragen, H. Schols and R. Visser, Kluwer, 2003, pp. 431-448.
14 J.-T. Fu and M.A. Rao, Food Hydrocolloids, 2001, 15, 93.
15 U. Einhorn-Stoll, H. Kastner and B. Senge, Gums and stabilisers for the food industry,
2011, 16.