Green Chemistry
PAPER
Cite this: Green Chem., 2020, 22,
6981
Received 13th August 2020,
Accepted 7th September 2020
DOI: 10.1039/d0gc02779k
rsc.li/greenchem
Efficient NO
2
sensing performance of a low-cost
nanostructured sensor derived from molybdenite
concentrate†
Mirabbos Hojamberdiev, *
a
Neeraj Goel,
b
Rahul Kumar,
b
Zukhra C. Kadirova
c
and Mahesh Kumar
b
Accumulation of industrial solid waste necessitates the development of utilization processes and techno-
logies to reduce their negative environmental impact. Herein, molybdenite concentrate from the mining-
metallurgy industry is systematically characterized as a valuable starting material for the fabrication of an
efficient and low-cost nanostructured gas sensor. Few-layer MoS
2
is obtained from molybdenite concen-
trate by liquid nitrogen exfoliation and deposited on different substrates by spin coating and drop casting.
It is found that spin coating is advantageous over drop casting in fabricating a homogeneous and dense
few-layer MoS
2
film. The charge-transfer-based sensing performance of the fabricated few-layer MoS
2
film is investigated upon exposure to NO
2
at different temperatures (50, 100, and 120 °C). At an optimized
temperature of 120 °C, a faster recovery is achieved, and the fabricated device exhibits 28, 38, and 44%
sensitivity to 10, 50, and 100 ppm NO
2
, respectively, making it suitable for practical applications.
Furthermore, the adsorption affinity of NO
2
to the predominant (002) crystallographic plane of MoS
2
is
estimated from the distribution of field density and the calculated differential adsorption energies.
According to the molecular modeling data, NO
2
in the Ar/NO
2
mixture has better interaction (dE
ad
/dN
NO2
= 4.77 kcal mol
−1
) with the few-layer MoS
2
surface than individual NO
2
(dE
ad
/dN
NO2
= 2.57 kcal mol
−1
),
and van der Waals interaction (≈14 kcal mol
−1
) is the main adsorption force compared to the relatively
weaker electrostatic interaction (<1 kcal mol
−1
). This work demonstrates a straightforward approach not
only for the conversion of molybdenite concentrate into an efficient and low-cost nanostructured gas
sensor but also for the reduction of the negative impact of accumulated molybdenum concentrate on
the environment and human health.
1. Introduction
Rapid industrialization and urbanization have led to severe air
pollution that has increasing negative impacts on human
health and the environment alike. The United States
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has even started an
AirNow program that receives, manages and shares the data
related to the real-time global air quality.
1
This program also
forecasts the local air quality and supports actions to reduce
exposure to air pollution. Along with other hazardous air pol-
lutants like sulfur dioxide (SO
2
), carbon dioxide (CO
2
), and
nitrogen monoxide (NO), nitrogen dioxide (NO
2
) is emitted
into the atmosphere as a product of combustion processes
(vehicles, industry, heating, shipping, etc.)
2
and explosives.
3
NO
2
is the main source of tropospheric ozone and PM2.5 and
forms nitrous acid (acid rain) upon reaction with water, which
is harmful to ecosystems. Short- and long-term exposure to
NO
2
can have adverse respiratory and cardiovascular health
effects and even mortality.
4
According to the current World
Health Organization’s guideline, the NO
2
annual mean value
has been set to 40 micrograms per cubic meter in order to
protect public health.
5
It is a prerequisite to constantly
monitor the air quality using highly sensitive and fast gas
sensing systems to comply with laws and regulations.
In recent years, two-dimensional (2D) transition metal
dichalcogenides, such as MoS
2
, MoSe
2
,WS
2
, WSe
2
, SnS
2
,etc.,
have gained enormous interest in sensing applications with
low-power consumption due to their exceptional electrical,
†Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/
d0gc02779k
a
Institut für Chemie, Technische Universität Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135,
Fax: +49 (0) 30 314-79656; Tel: +49 (0)30 314-26178
b
Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur,
Jodhpur-342037, India
c
Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry,
National University of Uzbekistan, University Street 4, 100174 Tashkent, Uzbekistan
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020 Green Chem.,2020,22, 6981–6991 | 6981
Open Access Article. Published on 07 September 2020. Downloaded on 1/7/2021 9:16:44 AM.
This article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence.
View Article Online
View Journal
| View Issue
chemical, and physical properties.
6
Among transition metal
dichalcogenides, MoS
2
has recently emerged as a potential
candidate for NO
2
sensing application due to its atomic-scale
thickness, high surface to volume ratio, tunable band gap, and
high on/offswitching ratio.
A one-dimensional MoS
2
nanowire network (NW) fabricated
by using controlled turbulent vapor flow from the chemical
transport reaction showed about 2-fold enhanced sensitivity
for NO
2
at 60 °C with a low detection limit (4.6 ppb) and
enhanced sensitivity and selectivity towards NO
2
because of a
combination of abundant active edge sites and a large surface
area and tuning of the potential barrier at the intersections of
nanowires during adsorption/desorption.
7
Vertically aligned
MoS
2
fabricated by using the rapid sulfurization method of
CVD process showed about 5-fold enhanced sensitivity to NO
2
compared to horizontally aligned MoS
2
due to the high density
of the exposed edge sites.
8
Hierarchical MoS
2
microsphere
hollow structures synthesized by a hydrothermal method
showed enhanced NO
2
detection owing to the improved active
edge sites.
9
Some researchers have used a UV light source to
improve the sensing performance of a MoS
2
sensor at room
temperature. For instance, a photoactivated mixed in-plane
and edge-enriched p-type MoS
2
flake-based sensor demon-
strated a fast response with a good sensitivity of ∼10.36% for
10 ppm NO
2
without and with complete recovery at room
temperature and under UV light irradiation, respectively.
10
Under photo excitation, MoS
2
exhibited an enhanced sensi-
tivity with ultrafast response time of ∼29 s and excellent recov-
ery to NO
2
(100 ppm) at room temperature due to charge per-
turbation on the surface of the sensing layer during the NO
2
/
MoS
2
interaction under light irradiation.
11
A high-performance
gas sensor prepared using a hybrid of temperature-assisted
sulfur vacancy within the edge-oriented vertically aligned MoS
2
and reduced graphene oxide exhibited a significantly
enhanced response to NO
2
with fast response and complete
recovery due to the controlled electrical/chemical sensitization
level of MoS
2
through controllable vacancy and interface
engineering.
12
However, it is necessary to develop efficient and low-cost
sensing materials based on MoS
2
to find practical applications
in NO
2
sensing. One of the plausible ways to develop efficient
and low-cost sensing materials is to utilize industrial solid
wastes. In this work, we aim to characterize molybdenite con-
centrate from the mining-metallurgy industry and to fabricate
an efficient and low-cost nanostructured sensor by utilizing
molybdenite concentrate. Simple liquid nitrogen exfoliation is
used to exfoliate few-layer MoS
2
and to remove any impurities
from molybdenite concentrate. The gas sensing behavior of
the fabricated sensor by spin coating of few-layer MoS
2
to the
ppm concentration of NO
2
is investigated. Furthermore, the
adsorption affinity of NO
2
to the predominant (002) crystallo-
graphic plane of molybdenite-2H is estimated from the distri-
bution of field density and the calculated differential adsorp-
tion energies. This work demonstrates a straightforward
approach not only for the conversion of molybdenite concen-
trate into an efficient and low-cost nanostructured gas sensor
but also for the reduction of the negative impact of accumu-
lated molybdenum concentrate on the environment and
human health.
2. Experimental
2.1. Preparation
Molybdenite concentrate (MC) is generally formed during the
extraction process of copper and molybdenum from porphyry
copper-molybdenum in Almalyk Mining-Metallurgical
Complex, Uzbekistan and has been used as the starting
material in this study. As shown in Fig. 1, after grinding for
30 min, MC was immersed in liquid nitrogen for 2 h,
13
and
the upper part of the suspension was separated and ground
again for 1 h. Afterward, 45 mg of the exfoliated MC was dis-
persed in 3 mL of isopropyl alcohol under sonication for 2 h.
The samples were prepared by spin coating of the MC-based
suspension on a SiO
2
/Si substrate at 1500 (MC1), 2500 (MC2)
and 3500 (MC3) rpm for 30 s. The MC4 and MC5 samples were
prepared by spin coating of the MC-based suspension on an
n-type silicon substrate at 500 and 1500 rpm for 30 s, respect-
ively. The MC6 sample was prepared by drop casting of 30 µL
of the MC-based suspension on a metallic IDC-patterned
SiO
2
/Si substrate.
The conductivity of the fabricated sensing device is very
important in examining its sensing response. Previously, it has
been reported that few-layer MoS
2
has higher conductivity
than its monolayer and multilayer counterparts.
14
Therefore,
we have used few-layer MoS
2
to fabricate a sensing device that
shows a higher sensing response stability while maintaining a
high surface to volume ratio. The fabricated sensing device
was annealed at 300 °C for 1 h under a N
2
atmosphere to
reduce the unintentional barrier at the metal/semiconductor
interfaces.
15
Au was used to create an Ohmic contact with few-
layer MoS
2
.
16,17
The current–voltage characteristic curve of the
fabricated sensing device at room temperature is shown
Fig. S1 in the ESI,†indicating the Ohmic behavior of the fabri-
cated sensing device.
2.2. Characterization
The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on a MiniflexII
(Rigaku) diffractometer using Cu Kαradiation (λ= 0.15418 nm)
in the 2θscan range from 10 to 80°. The morphology of the
samples was examined using a JSM-7600F field-emission-type
scanning electron microscope (JEOL). The energy-dispersive X-ray
spectroscopy (EDX) element mapping images were obtained
using a spectrometer attached to the SEM. The crystallinity and
nanostructure of the samples were analyzed using a JEM-2100F
HK high-resolution analytical scanning transmission electron
microscope (JEOL). The ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) diffuse
reflectance spectrum of the samples was recorded on a
UV-3600 UV-vis-NIR spectrophotometer (Shimadzu) equipped
with an integrating sphere, and BaSO
4
was used as the refer-
ence. The Brunauer−Emmett−Teller (BET) specific surface
area of the samples was determined from the N
2
adsorption–
Paper Green Chemistry
6982 |Green Chem.,2020,22, 6981–6991 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020
Open Access Article. Published on 07 September 2020. Downloaded on 1/7/2021 9:16:44 AM.
This article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence.
View Article Online
desorption isotherm measured using a BELSORP-mini instru-
ment (BEL Japan, Inc.) at 77 K after degassing the sample at
120 °C for 12 h. The surface chemical states of elements were
analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (JPS-9010MC,
JEOL) using non-monochromated Mg Kαradiation (1253.6 eV).
2.3. Gas-sensing measurement
Based on the characterization results, only the MC6 sample
was selected for gas-sensing measurement. Its gas-sensing be-
havior was examined in a gas-sensing chamber using the
desired concentrations (10, 50 and 100 ppm) of NO
2
after
injecting a mixture of 5% NO
2
(99.99%, HPS Gases Limited)
and 95% Ar (99.99%, HPS Gases Limited). An external heating
filament was used to increase the temperature of the device to
120 °C. The change in the current of the device at 3.0 V bias
voltage was measured using a Keithley 4200-SCS semi-
conductor characterization system (Tektronix).
3. Results and discussion
Fig. 2a shows the XRD pattern of molybdenite concentrate.
The major reflections in the XRD pattern are readily indexed
to the hexagonal molybdenite-2H with the space group P63/
mmc (194) (ICDD PDF# 06-0097), while the minor reflections
Fig. 1 Preparation procedure of a low-cost nanostructured sensor from molybdenite concentrate.
Fig. 2 (a) XRD pattern, (b) side and top views of the crystal structure of molybdenite (2H polytype), (c and d) BSE-SEM images, (e) UV-vis DRS spec-
trum, and (f) N
2
adsorption–desorption isotherm of molybdenite concentrate.
Green Chemistry Paper
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020 Green Chem.,2020,22, 6981–6991 | 6983
Open Access Article. Published on 07 September 2020. Downloaded on 1/7/2021 9:16:44 AM.
This article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence.
View Article Online
can be assigned to the triclinic FeS
2
with the space group P1
(ICDD PDF#71-1680) and an unidentified phase. The three
main reflections observed at 2θ= 14.39, 44.16, and 60.11°
correspond to the (002), (006), and (008) atomic planes of crys-
talline molybdenite-2H, indicating a stacking layer along the c
direction. These atomic planes are stacked in a laminar crystal-
line structure (common 2H polytype), as shown in Fig. 2b.
These individual two-dimensional S–Mo–S crystalline layers
are bonded by the weak van der Waals interactions and are
capable of slipping over each other and generate low-energy
and hydrophobic surfaces (basal planes). The in-plane S–Mo
bonds are strong Mo–S covalent bonds, which create high-
energy and hydrophilic sites known as edges when broken.
18,19
Therefore, molybdenite particles exhibit anisotropic surface
properties and are naturally hydrophobic due to the surface
content of S atoms.
19,20
Fig. 2c and d show the low- and high-
magnification BSE-SEM images of molybdenite concentrate.
Along with other irregular particles, truncated triangular par-
ticles, formed by the face-to-face stacking of the two-dimen-
sional layers of molybdenite-2H, with a lateral size of <40 µm
can be observed. Clearly, the surface of truncated triangular
particles also contains some irregular particles of molybden-
ite-2H.
Fig. 2e shows the UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectrum of
molybdenite concentrate. As shown, molybdenite concentrate
exhibits a strong light absorption in the wavelength range of
200–800 nm. An absorption edge of molybdenite concentrate
is observed at approximately 435 nm, corresponding to an
optical indirect band-gap energy (E
g
) of 2.86 eV. Clearly, the
indirect band-gap energy of molybdenite concentrate is much
lower than the reported value for a bulk MoS
2
crystal (E
g
= 1.29
eV)
21
due to their chemical and structural differences. It is
known that the band-gap energy of MoS
2
can easily be tuned
by changing the number of layers
22
and by applying a mechan-
ical strain,
23
and a direct to indirect band-gap transition is
also observed. Obviously, four characteristic peaks with lower
intensity at about 290–300 nm and 550–685 nm are observed
in the UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectrum of molybdenite con-
centrate. Presumably, the peaks observed at 290–300 nm may
indicate a reduction in the 2H phase of MoS
224,25
or the inter-
band transition between the occupied and unoccupied orbi-
tals,
26
while the peaks noted at 550–685 nm correspond to the
excitonic interband transitions at the Kpoint of the Brillouin
zone.
27
It must be mentioned that the peaks representing the
four excitonic electronic transitions are blue-shifted compared
to those of stable dispersion of MoS
2
nanosheets.
26
As the
specific surface area plays an important role in sensing, the
specific surface area was estimated from the N
2
gas adsorp-
tion–desorption isotherm shown in Fig. 2f. According to the
IUPAC classification,
28
the isotherm of molybdenite concen-
trate is type III, indicating a relatively weak adsorbent–adsor-
bate interactions on the surface of a nonporous or macropor-
ous solid. The estimated specific surface area of molybdenite
concentrate was 2.11 m
2
g
−1
.
Various particles were observed in the BSE-SEM images of
molybdenite concentrate in addition to the molybdenite-2H
particles. To identify these particles, energy-dispersive X-ray
spectroscopy (EDX) analysis was performed. Fig. S2 in the ESI†
shows the BSE-SEM images and the corresponding EDX
spectra of different particles of molybdenite concentrate.
Based on the EDX data shown in Fig. S2a and S2d,†the trun-
cated cubic and plate-like particles can be assigned to FeS
2
and molybdenite-2H, respectively, and no impurities/dopants
are detected, implying the high purity of both components. In
Fig. S2b,†the irregular inhomogeneous particles accumulated
between the truncated cubic crystals of FeS
2
and plate-like par-
ticles of molybdenite-2H contain iron, copper, magnesium,
aluminum, sulfur, and oxygen elements. Interestingly, the
sponge-like quasi-spherical particles contain iron, magnesium,
aluminum, oxygen and a small amount of sulfur (Fig. S2c†).
According to the EDX data, the chemical composition of mol-
ybdenite concentrate (wt%) is 24.54 Mo, 51.41 S, 18.53 O, 3.62
Fe, 0.87 Al, 0.57 Cu, and 0.46 Mg.
The exfoliation in liquid nitrogen and dispersion in isopro-
panol under ultrasonication yielded a few-layer MoS
2
film. As
shown in Fig. S3a in the ESI,†the presence of a strong diffrac-
tion peak at 2θ= 14.3° in the XRD pattern of the exfoliated/de-
posited sample confirms high crystallinity of few-layer MoS
2
.
Furthermore, Raman spectroscopy was used to estimate the
thickness of the MoS
2
film. For a better understanding, the
Raman spectrum of few-layer MoS
2
deposited on the sensing
device is compared with that of bulk MoS
2
. As shown in
Fig. S3b,†the Raman spectrum of few-layer MoS
2
deposited on
the sensing device shows red and blue shifts as compared to
the Raman spectrum of bulk MoS
2
. The two vibrational modes
positioned at 383.30 and 407.28 cm
−1
correspond to the in-
plane (E
12g
) and out-of-plane (A
1g
) phonon modes. The differ-
ence between the two modes is ∼24 cm
−1
which ensures that
the thickness of the deposited MoS
2
film in the sensing device
is about 4 nm.
29,30
Molybdenite-2H collected after liquid nitrogen exfoliation
was analyzed using a high-resolution analytical scanning
transmission electron microscope to gain more insights into
the crystal structure, and the results are shown in Fig. 3. The
bright-field TEM image in Fig. 3a shows a molybdenite-2H par-
ticle with a lateral size of about 7 µm. Clearly, the main part of
the molybdenite-2H particle had a darker color than its edge,
suggesting that the molybdenite-2H particle is composed of
several layers. No clear defects were seen in the lattice image
(Fig. 3b), confirming the high crystallinity of exfoliated molyb-
denite-2H layers. The interplanar spacing in the lattice fringe
image was found to be 0.27 nm, corresponding to the (100)
atomic plane of hexagonal molybdenite-2H, which is in good
agreement with the XRD data. A typical hexagonal lattice struc-
ture of molybdenite-2H was identified by indexing the SAED
pattern shown in Fig. 3c. The well-ordered diffraction spots in
the SAED pattern reveal the single-crystalline nature of the
layered structure of molybdenite-2H. In Fig. 3d–f, the scanning
transmission electron microscope (STEM) image and the
corresponding elemental mapping images indicate the homo-
geneous distribution of Mo and S atoms (Mo : S ratio =
1.01 : 1.97) over the entire layered structure of molybdenite-2H.
Paper Green Chemistry
6984 |Green Chem.,2020,22,6981–6991 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020
Open Access Article. Published on 07 September 2020. Downloaded on 1/7/2021 9:16:44 AM.
This article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence.
View Article Online
The wide-scan XPS spectra of molybdenite concentrate
before and after liquid nitrogen exfoliation are shown in Fig. 4.
As shown in Fig. 4a, the XPS spectrum of molybdenite concen-
trate before exfoliation indicates the presence of Mo, S, O, Fe,
Al, Cu, Mg and adventitious C elements. In contrast, the XPS
spectrum of molybdenite concentrate after liquid nitrogen
exfoliation (Fig. 4b) shows only Mo, S, and adventitious C and
O elements, deducing that enriched molybdenite-2H can be
produced by liquid nitrogen exfoliation. In Fig. 4c, the high-
resolution XPS spectrum of Mo 3d shows the predominant Mo
3d
3/2
and Mo 3d
5/2
peaks at 233.0 eV and 229.9 eV, respectively,
which are ascribed to the Mo
4+
components of the molybden-
ite-2H phase. In Fig. 4d, the high-resolution XPS spectrum of
S 2p are deconvoluted into two characteristic S
2−
components
(S 2p
1/2
and S 2p
3/2
) of the molybdenite-2H phase at 162.1 eV
and 163.31 eV, respectively.
31
Fig. 5 shows the XRD patterns of the molybdenite-2H films
fabricated on SiO
2
/Si (MC1–MC3), n-type silicon (MC4
Fig. 3 TEM (a) and HRTEM (b) images, SAED pattern (c), STEM image (d) and the corresponding EDX elemental mapping images of Mo (e) and S (f)
of exfoliated molybdenite.
Fig. 4 Wide-scan XPS spectra of molybdenite concentrate before (a) and after (b) liquid nitrogen exfoliation and Mo 3d (c), and S 2p (d) XPS spectra
of molybdenite concentrate after liquid nitrogen exfoliation.
Green Chemistry Paper
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020 Green Chem.,2020,22, 6981–6991 | 6985
Open Access Article. Published on 07 September 2020. Downloaded on 1/7/2021 9:16:44 AM.
This article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence.
View Article Online
andMC5) and metallic IDC-patterned SiO
2
/Si (MC6) substrates.
Upon increasing the speed of spin coating from 1500 rpm to
3500 rpm, the intensity of the 002 reflection in the XRD pat-
terns of molybdenite-2H films fabricated on the SiO
2
/Si sub-
strate was increased presumably due to the formation of a
thicker film. A similar trend was observed for molybdenite-2H
films fabricated by spin coating on the n-type silicon substrate.
That is, the intensity of the 002 reflection in the XRD pattern
of the molybdenite-2H film fabricated by spin coating at 1500
rpm was higher than that of the molybdenite-2H film fabri-
cated at 500 rpm. The molybdenite-2H film fabricated by drop
casting on the metallic IDC-patterned SiO
2
/Si substrate showed
a slightly lower intensity of the 002 reflection than the other
samples.
Fig. 6 shows the SEM images of molybdenite-2H films fabri-
cated on the SiO
2
/Si (MC1–MC3), n-type silicon (MC4 and
MC5) and metallic IDC-patterned SiO
2
/Si (MC6) substrates. It
can be seen in Fig. 6a that the exfoliated molybdenite-2H
sheets were deposited on the SiO
2
/Si substrate by spin coating
at 1500 rpm, and the shape of the deposited molybdenite-2H
sheets was visible. However, upon increasing the spin coating
speed from 1500 rpm to 3500 rpm, the deposited molybdenite-
2H films became denser and less rough, and the shape of the
molybdenite-2H sheets was less visible (Fig. 6b and c).
Similarly, the molybdenite-2H film fabricated on the n-type
silicon substrate by spin coating at 500 rpm was the least
dense and rougher, showing clearly the face-to-face deposited
irregular molybdenite-2H sheets (Fig. 6d). In contrast, when
the spin coating speed was raised to 1500 rpm, the molybden-
ite-2H film became denser (Fig. 6e), indicating a close relation-
ship between the fabricated film density and the spin coating
speed. Fig. 6f shows the SEM image of the molybdenite-2H
film fabricated by drop casting on the metallic IDC-patterned
SiO
2
/Si substrate. It is clear that smaller and thinner molyb-
denite-2H sheets were homogeneously deposited, from which
thicker molybdenite-2H sheets protruded. This indicates that
spin coating is advantageous over drop casting in fabricating a
homogeneous and dense molybdenite-2H film. Particularly,
the MC3 sample shows a homogeneously deposited molybden-
ite-2H film. In Fig. S4a–c in the ESI,†the EDX spectrum and
EDX elemental mapping images reveal that Mo and S are
homogeneously distributed in the molybdenite-2H film, and
no impurities are detected, implying high purity of the de-
posited film.
In recent years, MoS
2
has established itself as a promising
gas sensing material for detecting various environmental pol-
lutants. It offers a higher density of states, a higher value of
mobility, and a lower value of interface scattering. Late et al.
32
studied the sensing performance of single- and few-layer MoS
2
upon exposure to NO
2
gas molecules. After comparing the
results from both types of devices, it was observed that few-
layer MoS
2
is more suitable for sensing applications due to its
excellent sensing response. The improvement in the sensing
response of few-layer MoS
2
is due to its different electronic
structures and more stable response over time. Hence, these
appealing attributes of MoS
2
for gas sensing applications
attract much research interest for developing highly sensitive,
selective, and stable gas sensors. However, the incomplete
Fig. 5 XRD patterns of (a) MC1, (b) MC2, (c) MC3, (d) MC4, (e) MC5, and
(f) MC6 samples.
Fig. 6 SEM images of (a) MC1, (b) MC2, (c) MC3, (d) MC4, (e) MC5, and (f) MC6 samples.
Paper Green Chemistry
6986 |Green Chem.,2020,22, 6981–6991 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020
Open Access Article. Published on 07 September 2020. Downloaded on 1/7/2021 9:16:44 AM.
This article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence.
View Article Online
recovery is a major bottleneck restricting the performance of
MoS
2
-based gas sensors at lower temperatures (<100 °C).
33
Therefore, a sufficient external stimulus is the stringent need
for the complete recovery of practical gas sensors.
Among various available alternatives, thermal energy is one
of the most widely used techniques to improve the sensing per-
formance of the developed device. Therefore, we investigated
the sensing performance of the device fabricated using the
MC3 sample against different concentrations of NO
2
at
different temperatures (50, 100, and 120 °C). The relative
dynamic response of the device was calculated as (ΔR/R
0
)×
100% = (R
g
−R
0
)/R
0
× 100%, where R
g
is the resistance of the
MC3 sample in the presence of NO
2
and R
0
is the base resis-
tance of the device. As an oxidizing gas, NO
2
traps electrons
from the surface of the MC3 sample, resulting in the change
of the charge density of the deposited film (Fig. 7a).
33
The vari-
ation in the carrier concentration leads to a large increase in
the resistivity of the device, and hence, a high value of sensi-
tivity was achieved. At 50 °C, 48% and 67% sensitivities were
observed upon exposure to 50 and 100 ppm NO
2
gas mole-
cules, respectively (Fig. 7b). However, the fabricated sensor was
not fully recovered due to insufficient thermal energy. A strong
binding energy between the MoS
2
film and the NO
2
molecules
prevents the complete recovery of the fabricated device at
50 °C.
34
Therefore, to make the fabricated device fully recover-
able, the temperature of the sensor was raised to 100 °C. At
this temperature, 42% and 52% sensitivities were achieved for
50 and 100 ppm NO
2
, respectively. Upon increasing the temp-
erature of the device, the recovery was improved appreciably
(Fig. 7c). Yet, a full recovery of the gas sensor was still not poss-
ible. Thus, the sensing behavior of the fabricated device was
further evaluated at a slightly higher temperature. As expected,
a full recovery of the fabricated sensor was achieved at an opti-
mized temperature of 120 °C (Fig. 8). The fabricated device
exhibited 28, 38, and 44% sensitivities to 10, 50, and 100 ppm
NO
2
, respectively. Clearly, the sensitivity of the device
increased with the increasing concentration of NO
2
.Itwas
noticed that at 120 °C, the sensitivity was slightly lowered as
compared to the sensitivity at 50 and 100 °C. The decrement
in the sensitivity is primarily due to a higher rate of desorption
than adsorption at high temperatures. Besides acceleration of
the desorption process, the reduced interaction between the
MoS
2
surface and gas molecules at high temperature plays a
Fig. 7 (a) Schematic illustration of the sensing behavior of the fabricated device based on the charge-transfer mechanism, and the sensing per-
formance of the MC6 sample against 50 and 100 ppm NO
2
at 50 °C (b) and 100 °C (c).
Fig. 8 Sensing performance of the MC6 sample against NO
2
gas with
different concentrations at 120 °C.
Green Chemistry Paper
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020 Green Chem.,2020,22, 6981–6991 | 6987
Open Access Article. Published on 07 September 2020. Downloaded on 1/7/2021 9:16:44 AM.
This article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence.
View Article Online
crucial role in determining the sensitivity of the device. In
addition, the sensing performance of the as-received molyb-
denite concentrate without removing the impurities was also
evaluated. As shown in Fig. S5,†the sensitivity decreased from
a value of ∼28% to ∼21% in the presence of 10 ppm NO
2
at
120 °C. This decrement in the sensitivity is primarily due to
the higher thickness of MoS
2
in molybdenite concentrate and
lesser availability of favorable adsorption sites for NO
2
. The
performance of the fabricated sensing device using few-layer
MoS
2
was compared with earlier reports. As shown in Table S1
in the ESI,†the sensing performance of the fabricated device
is consistent with the previously reported values, indicating its
good sensing response.
The adsorption of NO
2
onto the predominant (002) surface
of molybdenite-2H was modeled by Forcite and Adsorption
Locator modules in Accelrys Materials Studio using the experi-
mental crystallographic structural data.
35
The adsorption
affinities can be estimated from the distribution of field density
(Fig. 9a) and the calculated differential adsorption energies
(dE
ad
/dN
NO
2
and (dE
ad
/dN
Ar
) which are the energies required for
removing the sorbate of a particular component. According to
the estimated differential adsorption energies, NO
2
can form
comparatively similar substrate–adsorbate configurations at
different surfaces with a slightly preferential adsorption on the
(002) surface (Fig. 9a). As the sensing behavior of the molybden-
ite-2H film was tested using a 5% NO
2
and 95% Ar mixture, the
dE
ad
/dN
i
values were estimated for the adsorption of the NO
2
/Ar
mixture onto different surfaces of molybdenite-2H:
NO
2
:−4.77 kcal mol
−1
for (002) > −3.43 kcal mol
−1
for
(006) > −3.35 kcal mol
−1
for (008)
Ar:−1.82 kcal mol
−1
for (008) > −1.15 kcal mol
−1
for (006) >
−0.18 kcal mol
−1
for (002).
It is clear that NO
2
in the Ar/NO
2
mixture has better inter-
action with the surfaces of molybdenite-2H than individual
NO
2
(dE
ad
/dN
NO
2
= 2.57 kcal mol
−1
).
The layered crystal structure of molybdenite-2H shows
closely packed double layers with S
6
-coordination of Mo atom
(Fig. 9). The adsorption of different adsorbate molecules like
H
2
,
36
DNA,
37
CO,
38
thiophene,
39
and methanol
40
was studied
by molecular modeling on the surface of molybdenite to gain
more insights into the mechanisms of catalytic reaction
36,38–40
and sensing.
37
It has been shown that molybdenite is a prom-
ising candidate for a new generation of gas sensors based on
layered compounds. The chemical interaction mechanism for
NO
2
sensing was proposed as follows:
41
MoS2þNO2ðgasÞ¼MoS2þNO2ðadsÞð1Þ
MoS2þNO2ðadsÞ¼MoS2NO2ðadsÞþhVBþð2Þ
The calculation results of equilibrium adsorption of Ar/
NO
2
(gas) and Ar/NO
2
−
(ads) show negative values (exothermic
process) of total adsorption energies at different temperatures
(Table 1). Although the total adsorption energies and differen-
tial adsorption (desorption) energies dE
ad
/dN
NO
2
are negative,
the differential adsorption energies dEad=dNNO2are positive
at different temperatures. This implies that higher tempera-
tures should lead to the desorption of NO
2
and the shift of the
adsorption–desorption equilibrium to adsorption of
Ar/NO
2
−
(ads) on molybdenite-2H. The energy gain between the
Fig. 9 (a) Field density distribution of a 5% NO
2
and 95% Ar mixture on the predominant (002) surface of molybdenite-2H. Atoms: sulphur, yellow;
and molybdenum, light blue. Isosurface:NO
2
, green; and Ar, red. (b) Close contacts (less than 3.7 Å) of NO
2
/NO
2
−
species on the predominant (002)
surface of molybdenite-2H. Atoms: sulphur, yellow; molybdenum, light blue; nitrogen, dark blue; oxygen, red; and argon, grey.
Paper Green Chemistry
6988 |Green Chem.,2020,22, 6981–6991 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020
Open Access Article. Published on 07 September 2020. Downloaded on 1/7/2021 9:16:44 AM.
This article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence.
View Article Online
adsorption and desorption processes for NO
2
/NO
2
−
species
can be estimated as:
Δ¼dEad=dNðNO2ÞdEad=dNðNO2Þ14 kcal mol1ð3Þ
In general, the dE
ad
/dN
NO
2
and dEad=dNNO2values are
similar at 25 °C and 120 °C. At 120 °C, the total adsorption of
Ar/NO
2
(−38.59 kcal mol
−1
) is greater than that at lower temp-
eratures. However, the dE
ad
/dN
NO
2
value at 120 °C (−4.48 kcal
mol
−1
) is slightly decreased when compared to the dE
ad
/dN
NO
2
value at 25 °C (−4.77 kcal mol
−1
). The highest desorption of
Ar/NO
2
−
is observed at 25 °C (−20.39 kcal mol
−1
), while the de-
sorption of NO
2
−
at 25 °C (10.12 kcal mol
−1
) is similar to that
at 120 °C (10.00 kcal mol
−1
). Thus, NO
2
adsorption is still high
at 120 °C with high NO
2
desorption. Quantitatively, the
optimal adsorption–desorption ratio of NO
2
/NO
2
−
and the
energy gain (−14.99 kcal mol
−1
) are observed at 25 °C although
the largest gain in total adsorption–desorption is at 120 °C
(17.80 kcal mol
−1
).
The calculation results show that the adsorption of Ar and
NO
2
molecules is impossible between the double S–Mo–S
layers connected by weak van der Waals interactions. The
negative and positive charges of the molybdenite-2H surface
should have more influence on the electrostatic interactions
between the molybdenite-2H surface and Ar/NO
2
−
species. As a
result, NO
2
is adsorbed in a vertical position when compared
to NO
2
−
which is adsorbed in a horizontal position corre-
spondingly (Fig. 9b). It is consistent with the previous data
40
that the negatively charged DNA-molecules could not interact
with the positively charged Mo atoms due to the stereochemi-
cal shield of the Mo atoms from the adsorption surface.
Therefore, DNA could be adsorbed more effectively on the
MoS
2
surface via van der Waals interactions than through
electrostatic interactions between the phosphate and Mo
atoms. As shown in Table 1, the interaction forces between
NO
2
−
and MoS
2
were analyzed, and the total interaction energy
was found to be about −14 kcal mol
−1
. The van der Waals
force is similar to the total energy, while the contribution of
electrostatic interaction force is less than −1.0 kcal mol
−1
in
the case of NO
2
−
adsorption. It indicates that the electrostatic
interaction is relatively weak, and the main adsorption force is
van der Waals interaction. This is in good agreement with our
description for the molecular modeling data of close contacts
between NO
2
/NO
2
−
and molybdenite-2H (Fig. 9b). The number
of close contacts of NO
2
is less than the number of close con-
tacts of NO
2
−
, indicating better interaction of NO
2
−
species
with the positively charged surface of molybdenite-2H.
4. Conclusions
In summary, we have characterized molybdenite concentrate
from the mining-metallurgy industry as a valuable starting
material for the fabrication of an efficient and low-cost nano-
structured gas sensor. After liquid nitrogen exfoliation, impuri-
ties were removed and the enriched molybdenite-2H was de-
posited on different substrates by spin coating and drop
casting. It was found that spin coating was advantageous over
drop casting in fabricating a homogeneous and dense molyb-
denite-2H film. The gas sensing behavior of the fabricated
sensor was studied for different concentrations of NO
2
at
different temperatures. It was found that the temperature
strongly influences the key sensing parameters of the device.
The sensing behavior of the fabricated device was explained
based on the charge-transfer mechanism. The molecular mod-
eling results showed that NO
2
in the Ar/NO
2
mixture had
better interaction with the molybdenite-2H surface than indi-
vidual NO
2
, and the main adsorption force was the van der
Waals interaction. The findings of this study reflect a straight-
forward approach for converting molybdenite concentrate into
an efficient and low-cost nanostructured gas sensor.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest to declare.
Acknowledgements
MH would like to thank the Alexander von Humboldt (AvH)
Stiftung for the research award and equipment subsidy grant
(no. 3.4-8151/12 005) and The World Academy of Sciences
(TWAS) for the TWAS-COMSTECH Research Grant (no. 18-455
RG/MSN/AS_C-FR3240305789). The authors wish to thank
Dr. Tetsu Ohsuna of Toyota Central R&D Laboratories Inc. and
Prof. Masashi Hasegawa of Nagoya University for their help
with TEM observations.
Table 1 Energies of adsorption (desorption) of Ar/NO
2
and Ar/NO
2
−
on the (002) surface of molybdenite-2H
Temperature, °C Adsorption energy Rigid adsorption energy Deformation energy dE
ad
/dN(Ar) dE
ad
/dN(NO
2
)
MoS
2
/NO
2
(gas)
−173 °C −36.88 −36.88 0.00 −1.78 −1.74
25 °C −33.63 −33.64 0.01 −1.01 −4.77
120 °C −38.59 −38.59 0.00 −1.82 −4.48
MoS
2+
/NO
2
−
(ads)
−173 °C −22.49 −22.49 0.00 −1.75 10.65
25 °C −20.39 −20.40 0.01 −1.35 10.12
120 °C −20.79 −20.80 0.00 −0.87 10.00
Green Chemistry Paper
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020 Green Chem., 2020, 22, 6981–6991 | 6989
Open Access Article. Published on 07 September 2020. Downloaded on 1/7/2021 9:16:44 AM.
This article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence.
View Article Online
References
1 AirNow Program of the United States Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA). https://www.airnow.gov/.
2 J. Cyrys, et al., Variation of NO
2
and NO
x
concentrations
between and within 36 European study areas: Results
from the ESCAPE study, Atmos. Environ., 2012, 62, 374–
390.
3 I. Zawadzka-Małota, Testing of mining explosives with
regard to the content of carbon oxides and nitrogen oxides
in their detonation products, J. Sustain. Min., 2015, 14,
173–178.
4 T.-M. Chen, W. G. Kuschner, J. Gokhale and S. Shofer,
Outdoor Air Pollution: Nitrogen Dioxide, Sulfur Dioxide,
and Carbon Monoxide Health Effects, Am. J. Med. Sci.,
2007, 333, 249–256.
5 WHO Air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone,
nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide (Global update 2005,
Summary of risk assessment). https://www.who.int.
6 R. Kumar, N. Goel, M. Hojamberdiev and M. Kumar,
Transition metal dichalcogenides-based flexible gas
sensors, Sens. Actuators, A, 2020, 303, 111875.
7 R. Kumar, N. Goel and M. Kumar, High performance NO
2
sensor using MoS
2
nanowires network, Appl. Phys. Lett.,
2018, 112, 053502.
8 S.-Y. Cho, S. J. Kim, Y. Lee, J.-S. Kim, W.-B. Jung, H.-W. Yoo,
J. Kim and H.-T. Jung, Highly Enhanced Gas Adsorption
Properties in Vertically Aligned MoS
2
Layers, ACS Nano,
2015, 9, 9314–9321.
9 Y. Li, Z. Song, Y. Li, S. Chen, S. Li, Y. Li, H. Wang and
Z. Wang, Hierarchical hollow MoS
2
microspheres as
materials for conductometric NO
2
gas sensors, Sens.
Actuators, B, 2019, 282, 259–267.
10 A. V. Agrawal, R. Kumar, S. Venkatesan, A. Zakhidov,
G. Yang, J. Bao, M. Kumar and M. Kumar, Photoactivated
mixed in-plane and edge-enriched p–type MoS
2
flake-based
NO
2
sensor working at room temperature, ACS Sens., 2018,
3, 998–1004.
11 R. Kumar, N. Goel and M. Kumar, UV-activated MoS
2
based
fast and reversible NO
2
sensor at room temperature, ACS
Sens., 2017, 2, 1744–1752.
12 R. Kumar, N. Goel, A. V. Agrawal, R. Raliya, S. Rajamani,
G. Gupta, P. Biswas, M. Kumar and M. Kumar, Boosting
sensing performance of vacancy-containing vertically
aligned MoS
2
using rGO particles, IEEE Sens. J., 2019, 19,
10214–10220.
13 H. Wang, W. Lv, J. Shi, H. Wang, D. Wang, L. Jin, J. Chao,
P. A. van Aken, R. Chen and W. Huang, Efficient Liquid
Nitrogen Exfoliation of MoS
2
Ultrathin Nanosheets in
the Pure 2H Phase, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2020, 8,
84–90.
14 W. Liu, J. Kang, W. Cao, D. Sarkar, Y. Khatami, D. Jena and
K. Banerjee, High-performance few-layer-MoS2 field-effect-
transistor with record low contact-resistance, IEEE
International Electron Devices Meeting, 2013, pp.
19.4.1–19.4.4.
15 W. S. Leong, T. N. Chang and J. T. L. Thong, What does
annealing do to metal–graphene contacts?, Nano Lett.,
2014, 14, 3840–3847.
16 A. T. Neal, H. Liu, J. J. Gu and P. D. Ye, Metal contacts to
MoS
2
: A two-dimensional semiconductor, 70
th
Device
Research Conference (DRC), 2012, pp. 65–66.
17 H. Liu, A. T. Neal and P. D. Ye, Channel length scaling of
MoS
2
MOSFETs, ACS Nano, 2012, 6, 8563–8569.
18 P. F. A. Braga, A. P. Chaves, A. B. Luz and S. C. A. França,
The use of dextrin in purification by flotation of molybden-
ite concentrates, Int. J. Miner. Process., 2014, 127,23–27.
19 D. Yuan, K. Cadien, Q. Liu and H. Zeng, Separation of talc
and molybdenite: challenges and opportunities, Miner.
Eng., 2019, 143, 105923.
20 S. Castro, A. Lopez-Valdivieso and J. S. Laskowski, Review
of the flotation of molybdenite. Part I: Surface properties
and floatability, Int. J. Miner. Process., 2016, 148,48–58.
21 Gmelin Handbook of Inorganic and Organometallic
Chemistry, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 8th edn, 1995, vol. B7.
22 K. F. Mak, C. Lee, J. Hone, J. Shan and T. F. Heinz,
Atomically Thin MoS
2
: A New Direct-Gap Semiconductor,
Phys. Rev. Lett., 2010, 105, 136805.
23 H. J. Conley, B. Wang, J. I. Ziegler, R. F. Haglund Jr.,
S. T. Pantelides and K. I. Bolotin, Bandgap Engineering of
Strained Monolayer and Bilayer MoS
2
,Nano Lett., 2013, 13,
3626–3363.
24 G. Eda, H. Yamaguchi, D. Voiry, T. Fujita, M. Chen and
M. Chhowalla, Photoluminescence from Chemically
Exfoliated MoS
2
,Nano Lett., 2011, 11, 5111–5116.
25 W. Wang, O. O. Kapitanova, P. Ilanchezhiyan, S. Xi,
G. N. Panin, D. Fu and T. W. Kang, Self-assembled MoS
2
/
rGO nanocomposites with tunable UV-IR absorption, RSC
Adv., 2018, 8, 2410–2417.
26 R. Ahmad, R. Srivastava, S. Yadav, D. Singh, G. Gupta,
S. Chand and S. Sapra, Functionalized Molybdenum
Disulfide Nanosheets for 0D–2D Hybrid Nanostructures:
Photoinduced Charge Transfer and Enhanced
Photoresponse, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2017, 8, 1729–1738.
27 Y. Yao, L. Tolentino, Z. Yang, X. Song, W. Zhang, Y. Chen
and C.-p. Wong, High–Concentration Aqueous Dispersions
of MoS
2
,Adv. Funct. Mater., 2013, 23, 3577–3583.
28 M. Thommes, K. Kaneko, A. V. Neimark, J. P. Olivier,
F. Rodriguez-Reinoso, J. Rouquerol and K. S. W. Sing,
Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evalu-
ation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC
technical report), Pure Appl. Chem., 2015, 87, 1051–1069.
29 D.-S. Tsai, K.-K. Liu, D.-H. Lien, M.-L. Tsai, C.-F. Kang,
C.-A. Lin, L.-J. Li and J.-H. He, Few-layer MoS
2
with high
broadband photogain and fast optical switching for use in
harsh environments, ACS Nano, 2013, 7, 3905–3911.
30 C. Lee, H. Yan, L. E. Brus, T. F. Heinz, J. Hone and S. Ryu,
Anomalous lattice vibrations of single-and few-layer MoS
2
,
ACS Nano, 2010, 4, 2695–2700.
31 M. Acerce, D. Voiry and M. Chhowalla, Metallic 1 T phase
MoS
2
nanosheets as supercapacitor electrode materials,
Nat. Nanotechnol., 2015, 10, 313–318.
Paper Green Chemistry
6990 |Green Chem., 2020, 22, 6981–6991 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020
Open Access Article. Published on 07 September 2020. Downloaded on 1/7/2021 9:16:44 AM.
This article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence.
View Article Online
32 D. J. Late, Y.-K. Huang, B. Liu, J. Acharya, S. N. Shirodkar,
J. Luo, A. Yan, D. Charles, U. V. Waghmare, V. P. Dravid
and C. N. R. Rao, Sensing behavior of atomically thin-
layered MoS
2
transistors, ACS Nano, 2013, 7, 4879–4891.
33B.Cho,A.R.Kim,Y.Park,J.Yoon,Y.-J.Lee,S.Lee,
T.J.Yoo,C.G.Kang,B.H.Lee,H.C.Ko,D.-H.Kimand
M. G. Hahm, Bifunctional Sensing Characteristics of
Chemical Vapor Deposition Synthesized Atomic-
Layered MoS
2
,ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2015, 7,2952–
2959.
34 S.-Y. Cho, S. J. Kim, Y. Lee, J.-S. Kim, W.-B. Jung, H.-W. Yoo,
J. Kim and H.-T. Jung, Highly Enhanced Gas Adsorption
Properties in Vertically Aligned MoS
2
Layers, ACS Nano,
2015, 9, 9314–9321.
35 B. Schönfeld, J. J. Huang and S. C. Moss, Anisotropic
mean–square displacements (MSD) in single–crystals of
2H–and 3R–MoS
2
,Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B: Struct. Sci.,
1983, 39, 404–407.
36 M. Sun, A. E. Nelson and J. Adjaye, Adsorption and dis-
sociation of H
2
and H
2
S on MoS
2
and NiMoS catalysts,
Catal. Today, 2005, 105,36–43.
37 F. Liu, Y. Zhang, H. Wang, L. Li, W. Zhao, J.-W. Shen and
L. Liang, Study on the adsorption orientation of DNA on
two-dimensional MoS
2
surface via molecular dynamics
simulation: A vertical orientation phenomenon, Chem.
Phys., 2020, 529, 110546.
38 K. Zhang, Q. Wang, B. Wang, Y. Xu, X. Ma and Z. Li, A DFT
study on CO methanation over the activated basal plane
from a strained two-dimensional nano-MoS
2
,Appl. Surf.
Sci., 2019, 479, 360–367.
39 S. Li, Y. Liu, X. Feng, X. Chen and C. Yang, Insights into
the reaction pathway of thiophene hydrodesulfurization
over corner site of MoS
2
catalyst: A density functional
theory study, Mol. Catal., 2019, 463,45–53.
40 Y. Y. Chen, M. Dong, Z. Qin, X.-D. Wen, W. Fan and
J. Wang, A DFT study on the adsorption and dissociation of
methanol over MoS
2
surface, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2011,
338,44–50.
41 M. Donarelli, S. Prezioso, F. Perrozzi, F. Bisti, M. Nardone,
L. Giancaterini, C. Cantalini and L. Ottaviano, Response to
NO
2
and other gases of resistive chemically exfoliated MoS
2
-
based gas sensors, Sens. Actuators, B, 2015, 207,602–613.
Green Chemistry Paper
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020 Green Chem.,2020,22, 6981–6991 | 6991
Open Access Article. Published on 07 September 2020. Downloaded on 1/7/2021 9:16:44 AM.
This article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence.
View Article Online