Dvasiškos terminologijos klaidos

PRAEITIES AIDAI 1904--1994 A year 90 ago, 1904 m. of May 7 po 40 m. Czarism signed its act ne of defeat and issued a decree on the lifting of the ban on the Lithuanian press. In independent — Lithuania, this day is celebrated as the Day of the Restoration of Printing and Language Book. ir Tų pat 1904 m. left The first Lithuanian daily newspaper “Vilniaus žinios” is published in Vilnius (publisher P. (Wiley). This newspaper, among other things, greatly helped to strengthen and establish the common Lithuanian language. Initially, the church was concerned with the issues of language. This was particularly relevant at that time, because the matters of faith were proclaimed and spoken and written about in an infinitely corrupted language. In commemoration of the ninetyth anniversary of Vilnius Žinios and the recovery of the press, we reprint J. Gerutis’s article “Spiritual terminology errors” from this newspaper. In order for the reader to see how it was written then, nothing has been changed in the article. The author of the article, signed J. Geručiu, was canon Jonas Balvočius (1842.111.2 — 1915.XI.12), a well-educated Žemaites from Viekšniai, a well-known writer, the author of a manuscript Polish-Lithuanian dictionary, who worked almost all his life as a priest in the Aukštaičiai land of the Žemaites bishopric. St. K. Spiritual terminology errors The ancient followers will be strongly affected by erroneous terminology. They are right that teip was used earlier and that people are used to calling teip. Not everything that was then can be now. The butter flourishes in all branches—- so in language—and everyone wants to be closer, better and more just. Everyone thinks for himself and no longer suffers under the influence of the past. Everywhere is a good one. Is it because my father was wearing strings and I had to take off my shoes? My aunt used to eat only barley, so I'm not allowed to bake wheat pizza? 4—880 49 Not at all! Black did it because he couldn't do it ar otherwise, he o aš ir didn't ir want to do it, I can do it. It should be remembered that the errors in spiritual terminology were made unintentionally. ir O we hold them for deliberair te ir desires. Kunigailenkai (there were no own then) who baptized us, did not know the Lithuanian language well could ir not learn them too. After a while, he began to preach to the newly baptized things of faith on the ambulance, even writing prayer ir books. How did gi they do it? The ir advertisement said who paid. Ir came out a mess. The sermon ir books became half Lithuanian, half Polish, or Polish words with Lithuanian endings. The su catechism of ecclesiastical prayer has become some sort of jargon. ir į O when the Lithuanian is extremely patient, indulgent for ir centuries accustomed to slavery, he did not resist the ir destruction of the language. It was disgusting for him to hear how the preacher mixed Lithuanian words with Polish ones; jų reading a prayer book, will make him disgusting. But what ką did the prisoner have to do? He was patient. To tell the truth, if anyone wrote a Polish, German, French prayer book in such ar jargon, ar every Polish, German, French — would spit at him. The unfortunate — Lithuanian has to accept the fact that ją the tape was there before, that he is accustomed to calling it tape. Towards habituation is the argument (proof) fat. ne If a man can get used to mistakes, it's better to get used to mistakes. It is inherent in all to seek the truth and love it when ir found. To the Lithuanian, too. Tą we saw when the new crown appeared ir Supplication of Mogilev; people who hold your two hands, can not rejoice in purity beauty. ir What gi happened here? Ar Did you hear the news? Not at all! The content remained the same, only the word spelling (barbarisms) are no longer there, here is the whole ir secret. Iš to From this example we see that Lithuanians are no longer stubborn enough to be able to understand what is pure and what is strange ir and difficult to understand. | The name of the errors in spiritual terminology is marmaline. Aš I'll just remind you of some. Beer, honey, inside, sky have no manynumbers. Where did the Lord's Prayer appear in heaven? When we say in heaven, it turns out that there is more than one heaven. In Latin there is guotidianum daily. — For what all these days? It is said: whole year's salary, whole month's profit; but it means only a month, those tą years. People say: trouble ir tears are my daily bread. (o ne 50 The word praised with the Vulgate benedicta. Praised hostess for delicious flying, už excellent fabric, o most sacred Blessed is Mary. After all, gi we don't say eight praises, but eight blessings. The disease is a rare, uncommon disease. People say, "The whistle strikes me, the child whistles." So “fruit of ziv” is a very ugly saying. Prefix does not agree po su Pilot. It turns out that first Pilate suffereo d, then jo suffered Jesus Christ. Or, that The pilot was above, the o Savior suffered below. All prayers are finished: in the name of the Lord forever and ever. The translator's name is — unknown. Translated back to Latin į flats: saecula secularium. To /n reinforce the sentence, we put it next to nouns, like this: vargų vargai. We du cannot say: Woe to the poor, woe to the poor. — — — It's an absurdity of apartments. The very real form of flats: par centuries centuries, — centuries - centuries. There is nothing to say about syntax. It is either Latin or Polish, and sometimes Russian. The hymns teip-pat ensure that only the final syllables agree, and the spirit of the language is not in their minds. P. Naujalio hymnbook was intended to give Lithuania excellent hymns with gaidas, but it was unexpectedly lost. The new prayer book “The Voice of the Butterfly”, which appeared in Vilnius this year, has gone a long way, but it has not finished. Towards the holidays it is pure Poland. What does this mean to Lithuanians: gram, grom, gramnyčios? It doesn't mean anything. The Pravads drove out the Atvalyk; pravadai —Deductions. Traicė, although she did not drive out anyone, but for us Lithuanians that word is foreign. There is no noun ending in aicė in Lithuanian. If you ask a Strange Lithuanian, what is the word Traice, he wouldn't say anything. When asked what Treybé is, he would answer that there is a monk who consists of three. The Latvians say to ourselves: tritadiba Sanskrit — trimutra. The Germans say: Dreifaltigkeit, Dreieinigkeit. Everyone does without Polish Traice, only we — Lithuanians — seem to be unable to do without it. That Trinity is purely Lithuanian and that there is no error of faith in that word is shown by “Spring Voices”, in which the doctor of theology, the inspector of the academy, uses it perfectly. Who can know better than the European scholar. Let us have mercy on our wronged language, let us correct it without delay. Now is a convenient time, you need to use it. J. Gerutis 51