Mišrieji dvigarsiai „am“, „an“, „em“, „en“ ir balsiai „ą“, „ę“ K. Širvydo raštuose

IN LITHUANIAN LANGUAGES GRAMATINE SANDARA LIE T "UV O $'T'SR SCIENCE A K A DE M T J. A. MIXED DVIGARSIAI am, an, em, en IR VOCALS 4, ¢ K. IN THE HEART CIRCLE K. CARROTS K. Sirvydo — vieno The exact birthplace of the most important representa- — tive of the ancient Lithuanian literature is unknown. Most of the ji dialectal iš features are assumed, many of which are written in the two-part jo collection of — sermons (,,Punktuose sakymų“) in the first Lithuanian language dictionary ir (,,Dictionarium trium linguarum“). For to understandable, how important it is to clarify each dialectal jo feature of writings especially ir localized ją (to determine its prevalence in the present Lithuanian dialects). Linguists have long observed that both of the aforementioned Many of the a. dialectal characteristics of Lithuanian monuments of the 17th century are typical of the eastern Highlands. Be to, mixed diphthongs um, un, im, in ir vowels u, i instead of am, an, em, en ir Ą, g indicate that the tų author of the monuments came from iš the eastern part of the Highlands, where the so-called pointinians dialect is spoken. Plg. K. "The Word Forms of ir Širvydo Script: vmzinas'" (in Lithuanian). SP 1 78, SD? I 96, 192, III 477, crankshaSP I 269, ft pitch SP I 108, sumtis SD I 190, III 102, 470; vnglis SD I 189, III dungus 468, duntis SP I 7, SD I 183, 205, III 513, nemundagus SD I 96, III 204, kunkliey ‘kanklės’ SP II 57, punéiu SP 1 38, tikius [=thin] SP II 5, wunduo SP I 72, 110, SD I 55, 90, busionéios SP II 36, szaukiūčio [=szaukiuncio] SP I 69, workiuncias SP I 42; pimpe SD I 17; covering SD I 1104), thick SP 1 27, {yngwa SP I 51, nindre SP I 43, II 163; Drusus SD I 20, 170, Gruztas 412, III SP 1 271, SD I 177, III crop 429, SP 1 271, must SP 1 50, busius ‘future’ SP I 75, darus ,,daras’ SD I 97, III 21, 39, vns. gal. gat SD I 22, 60, 93, III vns. 48, in. Cactus SD I 18, missing SP I 39; I define SD I 213, changing SP 1 23, dead SP I 10, buck SP I 53, drying SP I 330, vns. kilm. sweet SP I 9, vns. gal. mail SP I 58, su Galiby SP I 15, kokiamy SP 1 42, raszty® SP I 13. ! Some of the grapheme of Sirvydo scripts have been changed: / instead of s, is written instead of 8 — sz, o instead of several grapheme ž, denoting a consonant, one is written — 2. * illustrative material collected iš K. “Register of Lithuanian words in Konstantinas Širvydas’s Dictionary “Dictionarium trium linguarum”” (LTSR MA Institute of Lithuanian Language and Literature, 1964, typewritten). * On the K. infinitive vowel of the plural of Širvitas writings (-e, rarely -i) see „Morphological structure of Lithuanian ir language and its development“, Vilnius, 1964, p. 145 tt. 139 However, both in,,Punktai sakymų“, and in the dictionary you can find words and forms with am, an, em, en; ą (a), ę (e). The latter cases are often seen not as the facts of the Širvydas dialect, but as the facts of other dialects or of the literary language that began to form at that time. Is this the right approach in all cases? Another question arises: are the mixed diphthongs am, an, em, en and the vowels ą, g equally common in both parts of the “Punktų žodžiai” and in all editions of the dictionary? After all, other Zmonés* have more or less contributed to the preparation of Part II of the “Punkty sakymai” and to the three editions of the dictionary, which appeared after K. Širvydas’s death. A more precise answer to these questions can be given by statistics of all cases in which the aforementioned diphthongs and vowels occur, as well as by comparing individual facts characteristic of K. Širvydas’ writings with the corresponding data of the present Eastern Highland dialects.” The words and forms with am, an, em, en in K. Širvydas’ writings can be divided into two groups: 1) where these diphthongs are consistent in both parts of the “Punktų sakymai” and in all editions of the dictionary, 2) where am, an, em, en occur inconsistently, usually in one part of each of the “Punktų sakymai”, not in all editions of the dictionary. Words and forms with gq, e in sequence do not occur. It. The consecutive am, an, em, en are in several cases. a) em, en have to communicate with their derivatives of those verbs, in the present or past tense of which, or in both of the mentioned tense, these diphthongs break down, i.e. the first syllable becomes part of one syllable, and the second of another. These em, en have the following words and jy forms of K. Širvydo writings: remti SP 11 98, remt SP II 98, iremtu SP 1 343, II 65, pasiremtu SP II 975+), pasirétu [= relying] SP II 97, based on SD III 488, based on SP II 98; iszzemti SP I 277, iszzemt SP I 209, SD III 494, Semkite SP I 214, semtu SP I 209, no yszsemtu SP I 209, ižsemtas SP II 212, neižsemtas SD I 97; aptemti SD III 523, sutems SP 1 331; attremt SP I 158, ižtremt SP II 56, 61, atatremdawo SP II 58, ižtremtas SP II 56, ižtrėtas [=exiled] SP II 69, isztremtas SD III 496, iziréta [=exiled] SP II 138, dgs. ward. ižtremti SP 1 254; ižwems SP 1 382; nugaben? SP II 87, neišgabentu SD III 3; nopgierdentas „neapskelbtas“ SD III 208; giwenti SP I 174, 244, giwent SP I 17, 44, 72—73, 353, II 27, 228, pagiwent SD III 323, pragiwėt [=pragiwent] SD III 359, giwendawo SP I 254, giwens SP I 244, 311, 360, giwensime SP II 241; giwentu SP I 154, 206, 207, II 241, * Plg. K. Pakalka, From the history of the dictionary Dietionarium trium linguarum by K. Širvydas, „Lietuvių kalbotyros klausimai“, vol. 3, Vilnius, 1960, p. 277 etc. ; K. Itakaaxka, IlepBbihA JiKTOBCKHA CJIOBADpb, aBTOped. auce., Bausrbuioc, 1964, p. 4 etc. 5 The most important cases in which am, an, em, en and ą, g occur in K. Širvydas’ writings have been identified by F. Spechtas, who has registered a part of the words and forms with these diphthongs and vowels, cf. Sirwyds Punktay sakimu (Punkty kazan), part I: 1629, part II: 1644, Lithuanian and Polish with a short grammatical introduction edited by Dr. Franz Specht, Göttingen, 1929, p. 14*—16*. In this article, we especially wanted to draw attention to those inconsistencies in K. Širvydas’ writings, for which justification can be found in the very eastern Highland dialects. 140 giwendamas SP I 137, 149, II 17, 47, 49, giwendama SP I 94, giwendami SP I 284, giwentoias SD I 103, III, 239, 271, giwėtoias [=juwentoias] SD III 115, giwentoio SD III vns. 371, J.N. giwentoiu SP I 152, IH 72, giwentoiey SP I 125, II 100, 154, 241, SD III obsolete 60; SD III 479. Mixed diphthongs em, has en ir to type forms, also found in an anonymous catechism based on the eastern Highland dialect: isztremtiėy 1605 m. AK 59; giwent AK 100, 101, Giwendamas" AK 30. The number of such ar words, where em is replaced en by im, in, is very small in K. the writings of Širvydas. This is a synthesis of the present tense form (I — proofreading error instead of f) SD III sinstu 422, SD V 352, timsta SD I 81, 83, III 36, 171, ažutimsta SD Participant 515; III sutimstunt SD Determinative 171; derivatives of verb III: nelymtas SD I 27, 36, 39, 91, III dgs. 77, ward. netyti SP 1 125, netymtiby ‘non-fatal’ SP I 114. In the present-day Eastern Highland dialects, the em are en pronounced differently. All the western edge of these dialects area, approximately to the line Saločiai—Pasvalys—Panevėžys—Ukmergė—- Širvintos, they are kept intact; so here it is pronounced: support, supported, supported, supported, supported; sėmt, sėmsit, sėmkit, sémdam, átvett; tėmt, tėmsta, tems: live, live, live, live, live, live, live, live, live (to live), living, living; sėnt, sėnsta, pasefis, pasenk, sėndamas. Iš pointers so say Residents of Siesikai, Ukmergė, Pabaisko, Gelvonai, Musninkai neighborhoods. In most of the area of the pontiniai dialect (as in the ir whole area of the eastern Dzūkian dialect) the mentionen ed į diphthongs em, translated im, in: simt, simsit (simsta), simkit, simdamas, pasimtas; thyme, thyme, thyme; living, living up, living, living up, living up, living up, living up (Karsakiškis, Vabalninkas, Salamiestis, Kamajai, Kuktiškės, Tauragnai); serious, seriously, seriously, seriously, seriously, seriously. (Freeman?®). "The Points of Sayings" ir ,Dictionarium trium linguarum® mixed diphthongs em, in descriptive en forms, are undoubtedly a feature of be the author’s native ty dialect. Since in those publications there ir is one other form im, su (true, in su in only in later editions of the dictionary), it must be K. assumed that Širvydas's birthplace was near the mentioned em, transformation im, isoglosa. en į in From a geographita cal point of K. view, the isogloss in ir the present time of Širvydas’s life may ir not have coincided. b) an has the conjunction idant, which is almost not used in current Lithuanian dialects, but Širvydas K. “Sayings in points” occur quite a lot of times (I — 141, II — 92). Only in this part of the book II the conjunction du mentioned is su sometimes un: idūt [=idunt] 29, idunt In 47. the dictionary it is su an: idant III 1, 3, idat [=idant] III 3. Slightly less common ,,In points statements“ are jun5 To this group F. Spechtas also assigns ben „at least“ SP I 65, pen [in text: pan] ‘t.p.’ SP II 186 (see min. action, p. 15%). 7 Plg. also ben AK 87(2x). 8 In other eastern Altay dialects, instead of supporting, the verb spirti "to put a pillar" is usually used. In addition, the verb seni has been replaced in many places by the newer derivative seniuoti or the compound eiti senyn. 141 tukas adant (I —24, II —72), of which an has evolved into un (adunt) everywhere; an he has only once (Adant II 29). c) am, an, em, en in proper and common names of non-Lithuanian origin: lampa „lempa“ SD III 92, 148, lampas SP 1228, SD III 304, Lampas SP I 228 4x), lampomis SP I 227; Samsonas SP II 10, 256 x; adamantu „diamantą“ SP I 381; Alexandrios SP II 102; Andriejus SP II 104, Andrietaus SP II 107, Andrieium SP 11 107; Angetu SP I 32, Angetay SP II 1, Angetamus SP II 1; Anglia SP I 345, Anglios SD III 119; eleJantas „elephant“ SD III 409, elefanto SP I 184; ewangelia SP I six) II ex) Ewangelista SP I 126, 133, II 61, 73, Ewagelista [=Evangelista] SP II 234, Ewangelistas SP I 225; inflantay „Livonia“ SD III 90, inftančik „inhabitant of Livonia“ SD III 89, inflancikas SD IV 62; kanclieriia SD 1 51, kancelaria SD III 94, kanclierius SD I 51, III 95, vns. kilm. kanclerious SD III 168, kanclerios SD IV 110, kancleriste SD III 95 (only: vice-kanclerius SD III 308); Chestnut village „Konstantinopolis“ SD III 27; coriander „such a plant, coriander“ SD III 121; matelis [=mantle] „clothed“ SD III 298, mantelu SD III 298; Niderlantay „Netherlands“ SD III 200; paganku „vns. J.N. pagone“ SP I 232; pantaplia „kurpė“ SD I 119, pantaflos SD III 284, pantaflinikas SD 111 284; adwentas SD III 1, Aduento SP I 1, 32, 69, 122; Amen SP II 224; diamant SD I 20, diamento SD I 20; elefanto SD III 409 2x,,410; elementu SP 1 62; fundamentas SD I 40, III 77, fundumentu SD I 40; instrumentas SD III 39, 109, 144, instrumentay SP 1 29, instrumentu SP 1 96 6ax,, instrumentus SP II 163, instrumentays SP I 337; kalendorius SD I 50, kalendorius SD III 92; Klemės [= Klemens] SP II 212; mentelelis „apsiaustėlis“ SD III 298; momentus SP 1 134; referendorius SD III 375; sacrament SD III 15, 397, sacrament SD III 179, 371, SP I 43x), lus); talentas SP I 51, SD III 440, talentu SP I 51, talentus SP I 51, talentays SP I 51; testament SD HI 443, testamento SP 1 74, 156, 197, 224, II 208, SD III 60, 123, 443, Testamėto [=Testament] SP II 131, testūmėto [=testamento] SD III 12, testamentu SP 1 73, SD III 63, 99, 443, testamenti SP 1 216 3x), Testamenti SP IT 209, Testamenty SP II 23, Testaméti [=Testaments] SP II 5, testamenty SD III 526, testamentary person SD III 443. Senesniy borrowed (slavizmy) žemčiūgas and lenciugas (lenciigas) diphthongs em, en are conjugated to im, in (or un): žimčiugay SP I 354, ziméiugu SP I 29, 186, 189 (ax), 354, žimčiugus SP I 85, 291, ziméiugays SP I 186, 366, ziméiugais SP I 217, žimčiugieli SP I 187; lynciugu SP 1 38, {ynciugus SP I 38, tynciugays SP I 39, 127, linc¢iugays SP I 161, tynéiugays SP I 363, II 70, žunčiugays SP 1 374, tynéiuguosna SP I 373. The exception is the form in the grounds of SP II 179. Instead of an turi un is Slavic attuncawoiu SD 111 254. d) Diphthongs of secondary origin am, an (they are also present in the present Eastern Highland dialects), e.g.: vns. caud. for SP 1 10, another SP I 12, the same SP I 1; dgs. caud. for hardening SP I 105, for serving SP I 214; gradually ‘slowly’ SP II 64; for SP 1 112 gx), 120, 195, for SP I 194, for SP II kunan 142 53, 108; vns. it. aran SP I 26, Ežeran SP II 42, kitan SP I 11, SP I 88. 2. Inconsistently in separate ar word forms more frequently ko occurram, an, en, very rarely — ą, g. a) Instead of the mixed diphthongs an, en, the second syllable of — which is a present tense root K. insertion, in Širvydas writings there is usually un, in: apiunku ‘apanku’ SD Iskunku III 264; SD 1 22, III 47; pripruntu SD I 87, 90, 1510x), 152, ground SD III splitting 190, round SP I 16; SP 1 39, 208(2x,, 308, II 44, 73, 100, 106, 209, 210, SD I 90, round kt. ; SP I 12, 28, 81 ir Suštup [<*su$lanpu] SD 1 83, stumpu SD III tumpa 1786.,; [<*no] SP 1 25, 89, 107, 108 ir kt., blunt SP I 102, the heaps SD I 34, 174, III 20, 31 ir kt ; ginda SP I 95, II 7, gindus SP I 80; fits "tenka" SP I 322, does not apply SD I 93, III 217, 398 ir kt However, several to types of forms are ir su diphthongs an, en: understood SD III 52 (greta: suprat’,suprantus® SD III 317, understSD IV 221), ood is found SP I 128, iszrandu SD III 109: gienduncieys SP II 207, patenka SP 11 178. Also mentioned here is the form ir szalu SD I 216, persal SD I 77, SD IV 247, next to frequency: szufu SD I 77, 215, Suszufu SD I 209, Shuta III 155, SP II 63. Currently in the eastern highland dialects of the above-mentioned forms an ir en the fate is unequal: en (gefda, prasmefga) speaks, it seems, all the eastern Highlanders, o an (comprehension, — development) mainly in ty the western edge of the dialect area. Iš pointers šį an mostly healthy have Siesikų, Ukmergės, Pabaisko, Gelvonų, Musninkų neighbourhoods. Almost all the rest of the area of Puntininkai is pronounced suprufita, ruūnda, but the fortification of analogous verbs varies here, e.g.: mų šiumpa ir (Karsakiškis, Kuktiškės, Tauragnai), ažufika (Kamajai, Tauragnai) and šlampa (Vabalninkas, Salamiestis, Skapiškis*), zaafika'* (Karsakiškis, Vabalninkas, Salamiestis, Skapiškis). Thus, when locating K. Širvydas’ birthplace on the basis of current dialect data, of all the above-mentioned forms, we can rely more reliably only on the present tense forms of the verbs (su)prasti, rasti. By comparing them with the corresponding forms of the “Punktų sakymai” and the “Dictionarium trium linguarum”, we can guess that the author of those publications was born on the edge of the zone where the word supruiita, rufida, is pronounced. b) Both in the parts of the “Points of Pronunciation” and in the dictionary en quite often has the word holy and all other derivatives of this root. However, not all words of the root mentioned in K. Širvydas’ writings contain the diphthong en equally: in some cases the word šlumpa is also used. 10 This inconsistency may have been caused by the influence of other forms: the present tense root 4 or i may have been replaced by vowels a and e (or a, e before the insertion of n in some places simply remained) according to such forms as: šlapti, šlapo; Gestures, gestures. In addition, a possible object, not in all dialects and not in all present tense forms of verbs, the insertion of n has occurred at the same time, e.g. nuseika (Karsakiškis, Vabalninkas, Kamajai), nusanka (Salamiestis, Skapiškis, Tauragnai) and izbraka (Kuktiškės). 143 on some pages there jų are more, in some fewer o do not occur at all. — ar This is particularly evident in,,The Points of Sayings"". The en mentioned root has several ir times in the dictionary (inventory 1 15, swintui 1 78, szwentay 111 429), but much more often — in (sszwyntorius III 36, szwyntas I 177, III 297, 333 ir kt ). Forms of su root bulbsthere are few; voice has e only form szwesta all the SD I 39, o others — i (paszwisto SP I 147, paszwistas SP I 156, swiss SP I 277, Szwisk SP 11 71, szwysias SD III 483). c) More word forms with ir inconsistent am, an, em, en; ą, e, There is almost I no "point sayings" (only the tank remained unmentioned in this section) 16 ir Kadag 96 instead of the more common form kadung SP I 147, 287 ir kt.); rarely jų occurs in ir the dictionary: age III corner 422, samditiniay IV 215, III 90, tamsokus 111 360, dantu 111 46, toothpicked 111 104, 111 178, fankas 111 63, non-bitter [=impatient] I 24, knifegirl and a 111 242, half 1 152, entrance 111 473, weight "Thief" III 127, 455. How many more such ir word forms are there In the part of IL "point stateme36, nts": 168, amžinu 178, amžiney 180, 181, 188, amžino 189, eternal 204: amžinoy amžiu vns. ad. iamp 132 (greta: iumpi SP I 30, 62, iump SP I 172 ir kt.); apitamsemis 142, patamsoy 142, tamsibessa 243; tampidamies 179; brangiu 176, 207, brangibes 213; dagaus [= dangaus] 178; patibes 169; attankisiu 179), attankitume 182, atlankit 183; prabangiey 75, prabangi 175, prabangiu 176; vns. gal. randu 141, rando 168; ranku 183; surantitu 219, surantitas 220; Wando 189sx), wandeni 188, 189, wandeniu 189, wadenio [=wandenio] 190; Zandu 74; iz2andasi 141; su ia 143; nessag [<nesang] 248; ne bedrautumite [=not communicate] 168; vzudenktu 18, apsidenktumite apdenktumime 175, apdengiete 182, apdengieme 182, niopkenčia 182; 142: i nendres 99, niendri 166, niandri 166, 199; collected by 172; stripping [=nuzengeci] 34; nuzengeci [=nuzengianci] „descending“ 70, užženge 243; ne prylankt 171, pasilankie 183; stanksti vns. 179; J.N. (?) friend 31, 60, 64 (can be pns. viet. friend in a < friend'*). i! Almost to the half of this book I (up to p. 174) those root words ir forms which are near have only 90, in (six-), o from p. 174 type ir in (40), ir en (76). Various forms of su in ir en pages are arranged as follows (number in plain font indicates the page containing the form su light-, o number in bold Font — page containing the form su saint-); 174, 175, 177%), 178, 17862x), 179, 179, 18062x), 181@x), 183, 189(3x), 190, 192, 194, 195, 198(2x), 199, 200, 203, 203, 205%), 208, 210, 212, 213, 221, 222, 226, 227, 231, 2324x), 233, 239, 242, 251, 251Gx), 252, 256, 268, 275, 278, 28063x), 284(2x), 287, 288, 289, 290), 292, 2995), 300, 301, 301, 302(2x), 305(2x), 307. x), 309, 313, 314), 315, 320, 323, 326, 329, 331, 333, 336, 337, 337(.x), 341, 342, 344(,x), 344, 346, 347.) 352, 354, 354, 364(,x), 365, 367+), 368, 369), 374, 376, "Punkty sayings" In the long part (su in — 108, su en — 73): 1, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11x), 13, 14, 15, 17x), 18, 19, 19, 20, 24¢x), 25, 28x), 29, 30, 32, 33, 34, 34, 35, 36, 38, 39, 40. 42, 47, 53s), 5562x), 58, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, Tax), 78, 81, 81, 83, 84, 84, 85, 87, 89 90, 91, 92, 93(x), 98, 102, Mix), 12x), 113, 11d x), 115%), 116, 117%), 119, 121, 128, 129, 131%), 132, 134(2x), 136, 141, 142, 148(, x), 1493 x), 151(3x), 155, 156, 157, 160, 161, 162(5x), 164, 167, 170(x), 172), 1760: x), 177 x), 178, 179, 18162x), 183, 189ax), 190ux), 191@x), 19762x), 198@x), 199, 200, 201, x), 202: 207, 208, 209 x), 212ax), 211, 213@x), 2l4ex), 215, 216, 219, 220, 223, 228, 229, 229, 231, 239 x), 2412 x), 243, 245, 251, x), 252, 253, 254, 255, 258. 2 Plg. Sirwyds Punktay sakimu (Punkty kazan), p. 16*. 144 Interestingly, the above mentioned forms, as ir well as the su en forms in the root ne sanct-, are equally common throughout the book. In order they are in the following On the tų pages of II the section "Punksakymiai": 18, 34, 36, T0ax, 74, 75, 99, 132, 141ax), 14253x>, 143, 16665, 168), 169, 171, 172, 1750x, 176(2x), 178x» 179459, 180, 181, 18244), 18334), 188245, 189), 190, 199, 204, 207, 213, 219, 220, 243 2x), As can 248. be seen, most of such forms are p. 166—190 (25 pages contain */s of all forms of that type In the section II "Point statements"). — “= K. The mixed diphthongs am, an, em, en ir Overview of vowels g(a), e(e) in particular ir some statistical data allow to draw the following conclusions: secondary I. Be origin diphthongs am, (e.g., vns. an caud. other, p.c. it. kitan), which other eastern Altay dialects ir have, the facts of Širvydas native dialect K. also consider em, verb type semti, gyventi forms. en The comparison of the form of ir the latter, as a round of forms, with the su corresponding forms of the present eastern Highland pointers gives some data for further clarification of the place of Širvydas’ K. rise. ir 2. The am, an, em, en: g(a), e(e), which occur in other cases, to some extent show how Širvydas was influenced by the forming Lithuanian literary language of the time and other factors of the other dialect. K. to ir It is interesting that In the part tų of the I “Punksako ymų”, as well as in ir the edition I of the dictionary, these diphthongs are consistently present only in the proper ir common names of other an languages, the ir diphthong en conjunction in the case of a diphthong is quite often root-terminal. In other po K. editions of the dictionary after Širvydas's death, ir especially In the section of II “point statements” there are more ir word forms that inconsistently contain the ir aforementioned diphthongs. This suggests that the later publishing editors, tų who came ir from other countries, contributed most to the emergence of double ir vowels here. iš Lithuania places. AMETOHTHUECKHE COUETAHHS am, an, em, en Vi TJIACHbIE 4, ¢ B MTUCBbMEHHBIX MAMATHUKAX K. LIMPBUIACA K. MOPKYHAC Pesiome Baxnofi I'm looking for him. 0COGEHHOCTHIO ABYX MHChbMEHHBIX MAMSTHHKOB JHTOBCKOTO S13bIka XVII B. — "Punktay sakimu" wu "Dictionarium trium linguarum" — siBasiorcs nugTOHFHYECKHE CcOYeTaHHsi um, un, im, in nu raacHble U, i, ynorpe6iseMble BMecTO am, an, em, en; ą, g. drag 0cOGEHHOCTh CBH/IETEJIbCTBYeT O TOM, YTO aBTOP YKa3aHHBIX NMaMSTHHKOB K. IllupBunac Guin PebeacTabhTeNeM YES HA3LIBAGMOTO MYHTHHHHKCKOTO JHAJeKTa (6osee TOUHLIX cBenenHit O MecTe poxaenus K. Illupsunaca nora Here). Ojinako B HEKOTOPBIX cayuasix JKĖOTOHTHUeCKHe COYETAHHS Am, an, em, en H rJAacHble ą(a), g(e) serpewaorcs H y K. Illnpsugaca. Oco6oro BHHMAHHs 3acJyXKHBAIOT em, en B (Gopmax raaronos TtHma semti «yepnaTh», live xurb, KOTOpble NpeACTaBHTENASIMH 10. Grammatical structure of Lithuanian language 145 COBPEMEHHOro MyHTHHHHKCKOrO /HaJieKTa NPOH3HOCATCH ABOAKO: Sėmi, pyvėnt (B oKpecTHocTax Cecukaii, Ykmsipre, Ila6aiickac, TanBonai, Mycuuukait) wn simf, gyvint (ma Bceit OCTaJbHON TEPPUTOPHH NYHTHHHHKCKOro auaJsekra- ). ITockoabky K. IllupBunacy i3BectHa H ¢opma timsta (<femsta) «cMmepkaetcsi», TO MOXHO NpeanoJararb, YTo ero pojiHofį roBOP TEPPHTOPHAJLHO TPAHHYHJI C TOBOPOM, B KOTOPOM BMecTo em, en B (GopMmax AaHHbIX rnaroJiOB NPOH3HOCHJHCH im, In. Hurepecno, uto AHdTOHTHUECKHe COUeTAHHS em, en B dopMax AaHHOTO THMA cOXpaHAIOTCA H B aHOHHMHOM KaTexusuce 1605 r., HanHCcaHOM TakiKe Ha BOCTOYHO- -ayKIITaiTCKOM JHAJEKTe. Kpowme Toro, nudronrnyeckue coueranuss am, an, em, en y K. lllupsunaca 3akoHomepHO BCTpeualoTes ellle H B ApyrHX CJayuasix, a HMeHHO: (a) the B colossus identical; 6) am, an, em, en B CJOBax HHOS3BIYHOTO NPOHCXOXKJAeHHS, Hanp. : lamp, talent; B) ceKyHIapHble (BTOPHYHOTO NPOHCXOXKAEHHS) am, an, Hanp. : Rhythm 'npyroMy', HJAJTATHB ex. 4. Rifan. 130 dopm umelor in u 76 —en; B ll-oit vactu: 108 —in, 73 —en). 130 dopm umelor in u 76 —en; B ll-oit vactu: 108 —in, 73 —en). 130 dopm umelor in u 76 —en; B ll-oit vactu: 108 —in, 73 —en). 130 dopm umelor in u 76 —en; B ll-oit vactu: 108 —in, 73 —en). 130 dopm umelor in u 76 —en; B ll-oit vactu: 108 —in, 73 —en). Onnuako npyrne oTrn7eJibHbIe crosa H opmm ¢ am, an, em, en nu g(a), ¢(e) HeCKOJILKO walle BCTPCYAIOTCH TOJIbKO BO Bropoii uacrTH,Punktay sakimu“ u B Tperbem —nsTOM usmanuax,- Dictionarium trium linguarum®. Dro oObsicHAeTCs TeM, UTO MPH MOATOTOBKe YKA3aHHBIX H3JIaHHH K MeuaTH nocje cept K. IllupBunaca npuHHMann yuacTHe H JApPyrHe JHIA —MPEACTABHTENH HHBIX TOBOPOB.