Kalbininkės sugrįžimas

pay, grandson, far, sétus, iš one side, ir s. sl. mogo, logi, rus. dal, sl. s. sym, iš antros (p. 108-110), represent different roots. Because of the different vocalism of the root, it is also impossible to etymologically link lit. glodus ir lat. smooth (p. 109), let. draw ir swipe (p. 114). The relationship between lit. house ir dimstis “Courtyard (room), Good” (p. 109), The truth is unclear"", but the possibility is not ruled out that the house, lat. nams has an independent root ‘nem-. S. sl. Trepetati ir rus. pryskato is also better not to tie liet. su shake ir rus. bryzgats, (p.104—105), but to be regarded as separate roots". Liet. strazdas, lat. strazds ir sl. "'drozd+» the difference between the initial consonants of the word (p.104) must be interpreted by Siebs' law. Lithuanian geisti does not have "-ds-(p. 100), but is composed of the root geir and the communicative formant "-t(e)i", so at the junction of the morphemes there is '-dt-(>"-tt-- >-st-). P. 94 states that finger, s. l. presto turi lit. š, sl. s from "k", and on p. 115 they are assigned to the words that in Lithuanian have the š, derived from ide. '5 por. P. 293 indicates that a stem gen. sing. The ending '-a (wilko, s. sl. vivka) is from ide. '-ūs, p. 210 t. correctly proves that it is the old ablative ending (*-od). P. 178-179 is the Finnish paimen „Hirt“, p. 208 is already correctly referred to as paimen. On p. 179 we find pr. menschon „des Fisches“, on p. 263 correctly „des Fleisches“. Mr. guntwei is not 1. Plur. (p. 69). Instead of lit. taišyti (p. 96), pr. sachis (p. 101), s. indų ugnis (p. 110), lit. taisytis (p. 116), lat. barti (p. 141), lit. sū viena šviesa (p. 226), instr. sing. way (p. 227, exp. 269), gen. dual. Two cows (p. 260. exp. 330) must be respectively tešniai, sackis, dgnis, tausytis, bart, viena šviesa, badū, two cows. si Simas Queen of SPEAKERS BITING Tamara Bu ch. Opuscula Lithuanica. Wydat Wojciech Smoczynski, Warszawa, 1998: Katedra Jezykoznawsta Ogélnego i Baltystyki Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, 381 p. In her recently published memoirs about her sister Tamara Buchieng, the well-known Germanist Ina Meiksinaité quoted an excerpt from her letter to Monsignor Vincent Mincevi€, who lived in Rome: „And what does this life do to me! After all, I always wanted to live in Kaunas, walk along the banks of the Nemunas, I needed pine forests, lakes, silence, why did I have to live in different places, among different people, speak different languages and — at the moment — lose my mother tongue? "Oacmep M. JCPSA III (1987) 391, IV (1987) 99. 252 fifth citizenship' '. These words truly correctly describe the life of a talented Lithuanian language researcher, full of tragedies and difficult trials. She was born (1923 07 03) in the city of Vitebsk. Later, she returned to her parents' homeland, Lithuania. He attended the German High School in Kaunas. Branda received her diploma from the Lithuanian gymnasium on 21 June 1941. The war that began the next morning pushed her to a remote corner of Russia, where she worked as a tractor driver and studied German studies in Gorky. In the first post-war years, she was an aspirant of academician Viktor Zhirmunsky at Leningrad University, then a lecturer at Vilnius University and Chelyabinsk Pedagogical University. Again in Lithuania, she worked for several years at the Institute of Lithuanian Language and Literature- *, which greatly influenced the direction of her further research. 1957–1967: Associate Professor at the University of Warsaw. Lithuanian studies courses are also taught at the Sorbonne and Chicago universities. During difficult periods of her life, especially living in Paris, she experienced the friendly spiritual and material support of the famous semiotician Algirdas Julius Greimas, Monsignor Vincentas Mincevičius and others. Unfavorable circumstances (about which little was known in Lithuania) forced her to constantly change countries and jobs, often living separately from her family, and suffering from a serious illness Tamara Buchienė died on February 7, 1970. Haifa (Israel). She was only forty-seven years old… Every Lithuanian language researcher will probably be delighted to take into his hands Tamara Buchienė’s collection of Lithuanian studies, recently published by the Department of General Linguistics and Baltic Studies of the University of Warsaw and compiled by Wojciech Smoczynski, one of the most prominent Polish Baltists. The book begins with the author’s memories of Tamara Buchienė. In them, the author remembers his teacher with very warm words, describes her pedagogical activities at the University of Warsaw. The circumstances surrounding the preparation and publication of this publication are explained separately (Nota wydawnicza). The book Opuscula Lithuanica contains almost all of Tamara Buchienė’s most important Lithuanian works published in scientific publications in various countries. They are presented in the languages in which they were published for the first time: German (15 works), Polish (13), Lithuanian (3), English (2), Russian (2), French (1). All published works are divided into eight chapters by the author of the book. Seven of them cover the following fields of Lithuanian studies: phonetics, accentology, verb system, the language of Lesser Lithuania according to the grammar of Daniel Klein, the language of Kristijonas Donelaitis, the Seine Lithuanian schnecks, the Seine onomastics. The collected works show that their author was interested in the origin and development of various Lithuanian language phenomena, as well as their use in the current common language or dialects. ! "Not Our Will!" —Naujasis Židinys —Aidai 5—6, 1998, 311. * Tamara Buchienė was recommended to the Director of the Institute, Kostas Korsakas, as a research collaborator (in 1953) by his youth friend and then Director of the House of Books, Antanas Ulpis (1904-1981), “a noble-hearted and distinguished man, who at all times supported those who were persecuted” (I. Meiksinaite’s words). 253 The eighth chapter deals with three articles on Germanistics. But only the first iš jų (Die reflexive Construction of the Verba im Gotischen), can be said to be purely Germanic. iš Other du — To the East Prussian German im XVII-XVIII Jh. ir Remarks on the syntactic influences of German neighbouring in nonGerman dialects (by the way, the co-author of the latter, ir as one of the articles of the phonology — Zuzanna Topolinska) — siejasi ir su Lithuanian Studies: they contain remarks about The Lithuanian script of Lesser Lithuania, some of its linguistic features are similar to the su corresponding phenomena of the German language. In general, the works devoted to the theme of Lesser Lithuania part of the legacy of Tamara Buchienė: about the Lithuanian language of this region according to Danieliaus Klein's grammar articles published 6 in the book (one co-author Jonas Palionis), and the language of the great Boer singer Kristijonas Donelaitis is examined in 7 articles and probably in a large, but unfinished study The phonological system the of ‘Metai’ by Christian Donelaitis (p. 129— 199). This study was written in Polish. In 1974, an English translation (Lithuanian Phonology in Christian Donelaitis) was published in Haifa. Unfortunately, the newly published, non-specialist translated text received criticism from linguists, and it is very pleasing that the newly published English text was carefully reviewed by Professor Axelis Vault. Lithuanian dialectologists, Lithuanian onomastics researchers have the opportunity to once again draw attention to the linguist’s articles about the Lithuanian dialects of the Seine region, interesting place names of this region, which are published and discussed in 6 articles. Among other things, the article about river names of Seinai and Suvalkai region was written together with our famous linguist Petru Jonikas. It should be recalled that Tamara Buchienė, working at the University of Warsaw, became very friendly with the Lithuanians of the Seine region. Sometimes she spent months there. One of the authors of this article, who visited the linguist’s home in Warsaw, Lumumba Street, experienced with what pride she showed her guests tablecloths and bedspreads donated by Lithuanians from the Seine region, and treated them to “Lithuanian” honey. The book ends with the article Jn memory of Tamara Buch, written in English by Jon Palionis in 1971, a list of the linguist’s publications, subject and name indexes, and a list of true words of the Seine and Suvalkian region. By the way, from the list of publications, which consists of 44 positions, it is clear that Tamara Buchienė’s dissertation Bosepamnas KOKHCMpyKUUA 2nazona 6 eepmaHckux ssvikax, defended in Leningrad in 1951, is not included in Opuscula Lithuanica, as is the work Die Akzentuierung des Christian Donelaitis (Wroclaw etc., 1961, 147 p.), published as a separate book, and the study of the first printed grammar of the Lithuanian language (co-author Jonas Palionis), published in the book Pirmoji lietuvių kalbos gramatika. 1653 metai (Vilnius, 1957) and 5 smaller articles from various periodicals, as well as excerpts from Atsiminimai, published in Lithuania (Proskyna 3, 1989, 164—177) and reprinted in Poland (Linguistica Baltica 2, 1993, 301-313). The study printed in the book is not included in the bibliography 254 The phonological system the of ‘Metai’ by Christian Donelaitis. Professor Wojciech Smoczynski, carefully prepared Tamaros Buchienės (Book) Opuscula Lithuanica į has added another very important position to its long list of merits for Lithuanian studies. Together, the works published in this book as if returned the jų author On the occasion of the 75th į anniversary of his birth, the ji ar ne had to leave by his own will. Kazys Morkūnas and Algirdas Sabaliauskas Register zur Zeitschrift fiir Comparative Linguistic research Band 1-100 (1851— 1987). Edited by Ivo Hajnal, Christiane Schaefer, Gerhard Schaufelberger and Sabine Ziegler. Published by Alfred Bammesberger Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht in Göttingen, 1997, 324 p. 1987 m. published by the famous German linguist Adalberto Kuhno 1851 m. Zeitschrift fūr Vergleichende Sprachforschung, a journal of historical comparative linguistics 100th — Anniversa- — ry Volume. This volume of jo editors Alfredo Bammesberger and Günter Neumann was designed so that the 25 articles published reflect the current problems and methodology of the study of Indo-European languages. The reaction was unexpectedly favourable — several reviews and otherwise long discussions appeared, in which the role of this journal in historical comparative Indo-European linguistics was fully assessed. Two reviews have also been published in the Lithuanian linguistic press —V. 1988, No. 6, 34-35) and V. Urbutis’s “Baltistica” (25, 1989, 188-190). Prof. Dr. Bernhard Forssmann of the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg proposed in his review in the journal „Universitas“ (No. 12, 1988, 1329-1330) the establishment of a comprehensive register (Gesamtregister). As Professor Dr. Alfred Bammesberger notes in the editor’s preface, this proposal was gladly accepted by the editors’ publishing house. ir With the financial support of Die deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Dr. Christiane Schaefer (Freie Universität Berlin), Dr. Sabine Ziegler (Universität Würzburg) and Dr. Ivo Hajnal (Universität Zürich) took turns in compiling the register, and Gerhard Schafelberger (Universität Zürich) contributed significantly to the collection of the material. The technical work was carried out at the Department of English Philology and Comparative Linguistics of the University of Eichstätt, headed by Prof. Dr. Alfred Bammesberger. The register volume consists of: table of contents, pp. 5-6, editor’s preface, pp. 7-8, authors’ index, pp. 9-209, subjects’ index, pp. 209-321, and editors’ list, pp. 323-324. The indexes of authors and subjects are, of course, arranged in alphabetical order. List of all au255