Motivation and semantics of the present-day Vilnius county toponym oppositions: the concept of the object’s position in space

254 Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica LXXXIV PAVEL SKORUPA Lie u ių kalbos ins i u as ORCID id: o cid.o g/0000-0003-3903-7006 Fields o esea ch: Toponymy, Cogni i e Onomas ics, Cogni i e Seman ics. DOI: doi.o g/10.35321/all84-12 MOTIVATION AND SEMANTICS OF THE PRESENT-DAY VILNIUS COUNTY TOPONYM OPPOSITIONS: THE CONCEPT OF THE OBJECT’S POSITION IN SPACE Daba inės Vilniaus apsk i ies oponimų opozicijų mo y acija i seman ika: objek o padė ies e d ėje samp a a ANNOTATION The a icle p esen s bo h synch onic and diach onic analysis o he mo i a ion and seman ics o he p esen -day Vilnius Coun y lexical oponym opposi ions based on he concep o posi ion in space, esp. hei ela ionship wi h o he objec s. The ela i e posi ion o objec s in space is cha ac e is ic o me ely any class o oponyms: oikonyms, po amonyms, limnonyms, e c. A he lexical le el, in bo h comple e and incomple e lexical oponym opposi ions, he ‘uppe ’ o ‘lowe ’ posi ion o he objec s is exp essed by he an onymic co ela ion o p onominal adjec i es Li h. aukš àsis ‘ he high; highe ’ – žemàsis ‘ he low; lowe ’, simple adjec i es Li h. áukš as ‘high’ – žẽmas ‘low’, and Li h. kalnnis ‘o he moun ain/hill’ – klõninis ‘o he alley’. KEYWORDS: oponyms, synch onic and diach onic analysis, e ymology, seman ics, mo i a ion, oponym lexical opposi ions. S aipsniai / A icles 255 Mo i a ion and seman ics o he p esen -day Vilnius coun y op- onym opposi ions: he concep o he objec ’s posi ion in space ANOTACIJA S aipsnyje pa eikiama daba inės Vilniaus apsk i ies oponimų, suda ančių leksines an onimines opozicijas, mo y acijos i seman ikos analizė iek sinch oniškai, iek diach oniškai, emian is į a dijamų objek ų padė ies e d ėje požiū iu, . y. jų san ykiu su ki ais objek ais. San ykinė objek ų padė is e d ėje būdinga be ku iai ie o a džių klasei: oikonimams, po amonimams, limnonimams i k . Leksiniame lygmenyje iek pilnose, iek nepilnose oponimų opozicijose objek ų san ykinė padė is iš eiškiama į a džiuo inių būd a džių o mų aukš àsis – žemàsis i pap as ųjų būd a džių o mų áukš as – žẽmas bei kalnnis – klõninis an onimine ko eliacija. ESMINIAI ŽODŽIAI: oponimai, sinch oninė i diach oninė analizė, e imologija, seman ika, mo y acija, oponimų leksinės opozicijos. 0. INTRODUCTION Since he eme gence o oponyms, hei main na u al unc ion has been he indica ion o a place (add ess), i.e., hey we e mean o p o ide in o ma ion abou he objec i sel and i s ela ionship wi h o he objec s. The e o e, he ep esen a i es o many onomas ic schools ha e been paying a en ion o he ple ho a o oponyms based on co ela ions, such as uppe – lowe , close – u he (nea – a ), old – new, big – small, we – d y, e c., as well as a mul i ude o ‘colou ed’ o ‘black-and-whi e’ place names in a ious oponymic classes. The p oblem o an onymy and opposi ion in oponymy has been deal wi h by many onomas icians (c . Supe anskaja 1970; Ko epano a 1973; Kond ashina 1980; Š ěpán 2009; Ahundo a 2011; Tkachenko 2003, 2013, 2014; Hon sa 2014; Bukha o a e al. 2016; Ilchenko, Isachuk 2016; Ga aullin, Fa ykho a 2018; S achowski 2018), who claim ha he an onymic ela ionships be ween place names o di e en classes a e ypical o mos e i o ies. In Li huania, howe e , oponym opposi ions s ill do no ecei e due a en ion. The i s a emp s o look in o he p oblem o opposi ion and an onymy in egional oponymy we e made by Pa el Sko upa (2019). This adds o he ele ance o he cu en esea ch, as he mo i a ion and seman ic s udies o Li huanian egional oponymy, esp. oponymy o he p esen -day Vilnius Coun y, a e s ill incomple e. The abo e-men ioned schola s belie e ha such nomina ion pa e ns a e no only o a g ea impo ance in he designa ion o geog aphical objec s, bu also play a key ole in he o ma ion o he na ional onomas icon, as such o mal and seman ic sequences o oponyms a e o med aking in o conside a ion bo h linguis ic and ex alinguis ic condi ions in he a ea unde in es iga ion. Thus, PAVEL SKORUPA 256 Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica LXXXIV he analysis o s uc u al-seman ic opposi ions in oponymy may a leas o a ce ain ex en help iden i y and explain many mo i a ing ac o s ha had led o he o igins o oponyms and may help o es ablish he p inciples o nomina ion o oponymic uni s in Li huanian lands. Howe e , plen y o logical ques ions a ise be o e plunging in o he emendous a ie y o simple, de i ed, compound, and composi e place names o Vilnius Coun y, e.g., Can oponyms exp ess he an onymic ela ions in gene al? Wha elemen s in he names o geog aphic objec s c ea e he opposi e seman ic meaning? Wha ca ego ies do such oponyms c ea e? Wha linguis ic o ex alinguis ic ac o s de e mined he o igins o such names? e c. The objec o he cu en esea ch is p esen -day Vilnius Coun y oponym opposi ions (bo h se lemen and non-se lemen names) based on he concep o he named objec ’s ela i e posi ion in space. The aim o he p esen pape is o examine mo i a ion and seman ics o cons i uen pa s o oponyms wi h he homogeneous name lexemes and an onymic di e en ia ing ma ke s. Resea ch Ma e ial and Sou ces. The main body o he esea ch comp ises oponym opposi ions based on he concep o he named objec ’s ela i e posi ion in space selec ed om he co pus o 5126 p esen -day Vilnius Coun y oponyms1 collec ed by he au ho in he pe iod om 2018 o 2020. The in es iga ion is based on oponyms and he ac ual da a collec ed om a ious mode n elec onic, p in ed and manusc ip (a chi al) sou ces (see Toponym Sou ces and Re e ences). These ma e ials complemen each o he , help o de i e and subs an ia e sound e ymological (including oponym mo i a ion) e sions, and o m he basis o he esea ch. Toponyms a e in es iga ed bo h synch onically and diach onically. 1. THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK 1.1. Concep o Opposi ion in Toponymy An onymic ela ionships exis in me ely e e y class o oponyms – oikonyms, hyd onyms, mic o oponyms (names o a ines, loodplains, idges, ac s, capes, 1 3900 se lemen (ci y, own, illage, ailway s a ions wi h a se lemen ) names, 718 lake names, 362 i e and s eam names, and 146 pond names. S aipsniai / A icles 257 Mo i a ion and seman ics o he p esen -day Vilnius coun y op- onym opposi ions: he concep o he objec ’s posi ion in space islands, e c.) – and is exp essed by means o bina y opposi ions2, i.e., pai s o ela ed place names ha a e opposi e in meaning. Acco ding o Na aliya Podolskaja (1978: 40), a bina y opposi ion in oponymy is he opposi ion o con as o wo ela ed objec s o dis inguish hem by means o names wi h he same base lexemes and an onymic di e en ia ing ma ke s (elemen s). As obse ed by Ve a Kond ashina (1980: 29), some imes he opposi ion may be o med by mo e han wo membe s, one o se e al o which may ha e no di e en ia ing ma ke , i.e., may ha e a clea base. The iden i ica ion o an onyms o (bina y) opposi ions in oponymy, he e o e, is he iden i ica ion o he dependen uses o oponyms ha make up he simples mic osys em (Tkachenko 2014: 68). This means ha an onymic oponyms ( oponymic an onyms) a e ypically examined in a oponymic con ex and explained by he co ela ion o objec s ha a e limi ed bo h linguis ically and geog aphically, i.e., spa ialy. Mos o en oponyms ha o m he opposi ional (an onymic) ela ionship a e wi hin he bounda ies o a ce ain e i o y, i.e., in close p oximi y o each ano he , e lec ing he ela i i y o he loca ion o he objec s hey designa e and, hus, c ea e a ce ain (mic o)sys em (c . Š ěpán 2009; Tkachenko 2003, 2013, 2014; Ilchenko, Isachuk 2016). The e o e, an onymic pai s in egional oponymy (hyd onymy, oikonymy, e c.) a e pu ely con ex ual and a e limi ed by he hyd onymic, oikonymic, o any o he (mic o)sys em hey c ea e wi hin hei own class3: limnonym × lymnonym, po amonym × po amonym, oikonym × oikonym, o onym × o onym, d imonym × d imonym, e c. As main ained in he onomas ic li e a u e (Kond ashina 1980: 29–35; Š ěpán 2009: 915–919; Tkachenko 2003: 58–60; 2013: 399–404; 2014: 67– 69; Ilchenko, Isachuk 2016: 100–101 and o he s), an onymic ela ionships in oponymy a e c ea ed by bo h composi e (complex) and compound names4, 2 The concep o bina y opposi ions in language was i s p oposed in Fe dinand de Saussu e’s s uc u alism heo y, unde he amewo k o which he bina y opposi ion is a pai o ela ed e ms o concep s ha a e opposi e in hei meaning. Acco ding o de Saussu e (1959: 53 .), (bina y) opposi ion is a means by which language uni s ha e alue o meaning, i.e., each language uni is de ined in ela ion o ano he uni . This is no by any means a con adic o y (i.e., ela ionship o nega ions) bu a he a s uc u al, complemen a y ela ionship. The e o e, he meaning o he linguis ic uni is no absolu e, bu a he ela i e (con ex ual) and may be de i ed om bo h syn agma ic (con ex ual) and pa adigma ic (g oup) ela ionships o he uni . 3 He eina e , he co ela ion o onyms o ming he opposi ion will be ma ked wi h “×”. 4 In Li huanian oponomas ics, he s udies o bo h composi e and compound oponyms we e ca ied ou in wo ks by Rena a Endzely ė (2005), Ne ija Ba ku ė (2008), Dalia Kačinai ė (2008), Ma ija Razmukai ė (1998, 2002, 2003, 2009), Dalia S ide skienė (2006, 2006a, 2007), Aleksand as Vanagas (1970) and o he s. The key ocus o hese s udies is on he oponyms o a ious classes de i a ion models, om he pe spec i e o oponym- o ma ion and o igin. Ce ain PAVEL SKORUPA 258 Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica LXXXIV based on he co ela ion o lexical and/o g amma ical di e en ia ing a ibu es o di e en ia ing ma ke s5, which a e used as p e- o pos -modi ie s o dis inguish be ween wo iden ical name lexemes. In composi e oponyms, he opposi e ela ionship is o med when he common componen o opposi ion membe s ( he iden ical pa o names) is modi ied wi h an au onomous DM, usually he quali ying adjec i es o size, age, ho izon al o e ical posi ion in space, colou , e c. wi h an onymic ela ionships, such as big – small (also, g ea – small), old – new, uppe – lowe (some imes – middle), u he – close , black – whi e, e c. In compound oponyms, he opposi e ela ionship is c ea ed by names ha sha e a common lexeme and a lexeme (usually he i s elemen o a compound name), whose ole is simila o a DM ha c ea es an opposi e (an onymic) ela ion be ween he opposi ion membe s. DMs in bo h composi e and compound oponyms, acco ding o Pa el Š ěpán (2009: 915–917), c ea e an onymic seman ic ela ionships ha all in o ca ego ies, based on he concep s o ex en , posi ion, age, owne , colou , e c. o he designa ed objec . In he majo i y o cases, opposi ions in oponymy a e mo i a ed by a a ie y o ex alinguis ic ac o s, de e mined by he needs o he socie y a a ce ain s age o i s de elopmen , namely o exp ess he ela ionship o new names o exis ing ones wi h he help o linguis ic means (Ilchenko, Isachuk 2016: 101). In addi ion, hey e lec a ious sphe es o human ac i i ies, including, bu no limi ed o, e i o ial and na u al-geog aphic ea u es o human li e, as well as cogni ion (Ilchenko, Isachuk 2016; Ga aullin, Fa ykho a 2018). The e o e, i may be claimed ha such cons uc ions in he b oades sense a e he p oduc o bo h his o ical and cul u al de elopmen o a na ion. Ye geniy Tkachenko (2014: 68) main ains ha no all onomas icians acknowledge he exis ence o an onyms a he le el o p ope names due o he ac ha names wi h e ymologically an onymic lexemes o m a single onomas ic sequence and he objec i e co ela ion o names is mo e impo an han hei concep ual aspec , whe eas in appella i al an onyms his phenomenon is s ic ly concep ual, as he co ela ion o apella i es is es o ed only h ough he co ela ion o concep s. Ne e heless, wo dis inc ca ego ies o oponymic an onyms esp. opposi ions, which a e s uc u ally simila o appella i al an onyms, can be aspec s o an onymy in he class o hyd onyms we e obse ed in Vanagas (1981a). The di e si y o Li huanian place names wi h he p onominal o ms o adjec i es Li h. áukš as, aukš à ‘high’ was discussed in Razmukai ė (2003a). 5 The e ms “di e en ia ing a ibu e” and “di e en ia ing ma ke ” a e used synonymously by he men ioned esea che s o opposi ions in oponymy. The e o e, o he sake o language economy and in o de o a oid he use o mul iple synonymous e ms, he eina e , we will use he e m “di e en ia ing ma ke ” (he eina e , DM). S aipsniai / A icles 259 Mo i a ion and seman ics o he p esen -day Vilnius coun y op- onym opposi ions: he concep o he objec ’s posi ion in space poin ed ou , i.e., lexical and g amma ical oponymic an onyms. Lexical oponymic an onyms a e o med by homogeneous name lexemes ( oo s; he eina e , HNL) in bo h compound and composi e names6. G amma ical oponymic an onyms a e o med by HNLs ma ked wi h di e en a ixes ha a e opposi e in meaning. Bo h lexical and g amma ical oponymic opposi ions, acco ding o hei ypes, can be ei he comple e o incomple e, as poin ed ou in he onomas ic li e a u e (c . Ko epano a 1973: 31; Kond ashina 1980: 30–32; Tkachenko 2013: 400– 404; 2014: 68–69; Ilchenko, Isachuk 2016: 100–102 and o he s). The comple e opposi ion p esen s he comple e an onymic exp ession o he cons i uen pa s in all names o ming he opposi ion, i.e., iden ical name lexemes a e ma ked wi h a ce ain DM (a su ix, p e ix, o any o he composi e elemen ). The incomple e opposi ion p esen s an incomple e an onymic exp ession o he cons i uen pa s in one o he names in opposi ion, i.e., one o he names is clea /unma ked wi h a DM (a su ix, p e ix, au onomous wo d, e c.). 1.2. Resea ch Me hods and Limi a ions Resea ch me hods. Wi h e e ence o he heo ies o Cogni i e Linguis ics and Cogni i e Onomas ics as well as he adi ional onomas ic esea ch models, he linguis ic esea ch and he seman ic classi ica ion o mo i a ing concep s o Vilnius Coun y oponym opposi ions is based on he e ymological, de i a ional, and seman ic analyses o bo h he DMs and HNLs o oponyms. The e ymological analysis is based on wo ks o Kazimie as Būga (1958, 1959, 1961), Jonas Ju kš as (1985), Ma ija Razmukai ė (1998, 2002, 2003, 2009, e c.), Aleksand as Vanagas (1970, 1981, 1981a, 1996), and o he s, as well as a ious lexicog aphic sou ces (Li huanian, Russian, Polish, e c. dic iona ies). The composi ion analysis o oponym opposi ions is based on he s uc u al- g amma ical classi ica ion o wa e names p oposed by Vanagas (1970: 21– 27). In o de o de e mine he mo i a ion o selec ed oponyms, he seman ic classi ica ion o hyd onyms p oposed by Vanagas (1981b: 19–120) is applied. Bo h Vanagas’ classi ica ions a e belie ed o be easily adap ed o he s udy o a ious classes o oponyms (no jus hyd onyms). 6 This also can be obse ed in Li huanian oponymy among bo h compound names, c .: oikonyms Senãd a is × Naujãd a is, and composi e names, c .: limnonyms Ìlma Didžióji × Ìlma Mažóji o oikonyms Seneji Miežiόnys × Naujeji Miežiόnys, e c. In he compound oikonyms he an onymic ela ionship is o med by he seman ics o he lexemes (name oo s) in p e-posi ion Li h. sẽnas ‘old’ and naũjas ‘new’, whe eas in he case o composi e names he an onymy is exp essed by he DM (au onomous wo ds) in p e- o pos -posi ion o he homogeneous name lexemes. PAVEL SKORUPA 260 Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica LXXXIV Acco ding o he known heo ies o Cogni i e Onomas ics (Coa es 2006, 2012, 2015, 2016; Van Langendonck 2007, 2013, 2016, 2017; B endle 2016; Slíz 2017; Sjöblom 2011 and o he s), all onyms ha e meaning. The e o e, oponym (sub)classes a e analyzed acco ding o he concep s ha mo i a ed hei o igin, based on he concep ual me apho model, i.e., ans e o cogni i e ai s (concep s) om one domain o ano he ( om appella i es/p ope names o onyms): sou ce domain (appella i e) → concep ual s uc u e (cogni i e ai ) → a ge domain (onym) (c . Kö ecses 2002; Lako , Johnson 2003; Dob ić 2010). The ans e o seman ic and concep ual s uc u es om one concep ual domain o ano he is o g ea impo ance o he c ea ion o onymic p o o ypes: ans e ing he meaning o an appella i e o an onym, o using a place name o designa e a pe son, he eby indica ing he place whe e he pe son was bo n (Dob ić 2010: 139–141), o ans e ing he pe sonal name o he oikonym, hus, exp essing he concep o possessi i y (i.e., indica ing he ela ionship o belonging), e c. I is no ewo hy ha he analysis o onyms unde he amewo k o concep ual me apho is no e ymological analysis bu a he an a emp o de e mine how he concep ual s uc u e o wo ds has mo i a ed and s ill mo i a es hei c ea ion. In addi ion o he linguis ic analysis, o unde s and he seman ics and mo i a ion o he DMs in lexical oponym opposi ions, he ex alinguis ic (geog aphical, his o ical, socio-cul u al) da a, esp. he named objec ’s ela ion o he neighbou ing objec (hills, alleys, i e s, se lemen s, e c.) and i s posi ion in he e ain (including he posi ion abo e he sea le el – MSL7) was conside ed. Resea ch Limi a ions. The cu en esea ch is limi ed o he analysis o 21 oponyms o ming 10 oponym opposi ions (see Appendix) based on he co ela ion o au onomous wo ds as DMs o oponyms wi h HNL, aking in o conside a ion mo i a ion and seman ics o oponyms’ cons i uen pa s, ocusing on he named objec ’s ela i e ‘uppe ’ – ‘lowe ’ posi ion in space. The selec ion o such oponym opposi ions was limi ed by he ac o o dis ance. Resea che s o opposi ions in egional oponymy (c . Ko epano a, 1973; Š ěpán, 2009; Ahundo a, 2011; Tkachenko, 2003, 2013, 2014; S achowski, 2018 and o he s) obse e ha he oponym opposi ions, he co ela ion o he addi ional ea u es o which is ei he seman ically an onymic o no , a e only possible in 7 MSL – me e s abo e sea le el. In he cu en esea ch, his in o ma ion was ob ained using objec ele a ion measu emen ools on GP and UETK websi es. O cou se, i is unlikely ha a he ime o nomina ion he in o ma ion abou he posi ion o he objec abo e he sea le el was known. People mos p obably simply conside ed he posi ion o he objec in ela ion o o he neighbou ing objec s in he speci ic loca ion, ega ding he elie o he gi en a ea. S aipsniai / A icles 261 Mo i a ion and seman ics o he p esen -day Vilnius coun y op- onym opposi ions: he concep o he objec ’s posi ion in space a ce ain (mic o)sys em, i.e., in a ce ain e i o y, since such names ac ually co ela e wi h each o he . Hence, we belie e he dis ance o up o 20 ± 5 km is he maximum dis ance o conside wo o mo e co ela ing oponyms an opposi ion8. In his esea ch, he dis ance be ween he objec s (oikonym, po amonym, limnonym, e c.) was measu ed using he dis ance measu ing ools (a s aigh line) on GP and UETK web si es (see Toponym Sou ces). All he oponyms ha o m opposi ions a e wi hin he bo de s o Vilnius Coun y. 2. MOTIVATION AND SEMANTICS OF LEXICAL TOPONYM OPPOSITIONS I is obse ed in oponymy s udies ha he di e en ia ing adjec i es indica ing he ‘uppe ’ – ‘lowe ’ oponym’s posi ion in space, esp. in oikonymy, usually indica e ei he 1) he posi ion o he named objec in ela ion o he i e low wi h he meaning ei he ‘loca ed in he lowe pa o he i e ’, i.e., downs eam – close o he mou h o he i e , o ‘loca ed in he uppe pa o he i e ’, i.e., ups eam – close o he sou ce o he i e , o 2) he loca ion o he objec on he hill/moun ain, o a he oo o he hill/moun ain (c . Kond ashina 1980, Tkachenko 2013, Ilchenko, Isachuk 2016). In Li huanian oponymy he posi ion o he objec s in space is mos o en exp essed by: 1) he co ela ion o simple adjec i es Li h. m s áukš as, s aukš à ‘high’ – m s žẽmas, s žemà ‘low’; Li h. m pl kalnniai ‘o he moun ains/hills’ – klóniniai ‘o he alleys’9; 2) he co ela ion o p onominal adjec i es10 Li h. m s aukš àsis, s aukš óji ‘ he high; highe ’ – žemàsis, žemóji ‘ he low; lowe ’; Li h. m 8 This is in line wi h Kamil S achowski’s (2018: 201) obse a ion abou he dis ance one can egula ly a el, esp. on oo , om one loca ion o ano he and back wi hin one day. 9 The simple adjec i es Li h. klõninis and kalnnis a e espec i ely de i ed om he nomencla u e e ms Li h. klónis / klõnis ‘ alley, dip, lowland, a ine’ and kálnas ‘high na u al g ound ele a ion; hill, moun ain’ (LKŽe). 10 In he mode n Li huanian language, p onominal o ms o adjec i es exp ess he ca ego y o de ini eness, and, he e o e, some imes, may be conside ed an equi alen o he English de ini e a icle. These adjec i es ha e a a ie y o pu poses, one o which is he dis inguishing o known objec s in e ms o he spa ial, empo al, physical, and o he quali ies by: a) he compa ison o he highe deg ee o he known quali y, b) any p ope y o one objec opposi e o ano he ( ypically, albei no always, when no mo e han wo objec s a e opposed), and c) some peculia , indi idual ea u e no inhe en in o he objec s o ha kind. The same pu poses o he p onominal adjec i es a e used o dis inguish objec s wi hin he class o p ope names (DLKG 174–177). I has o be no ed ha in almos all cases, he e is a possibili y o use a simple adjec i e o modi y he objec , howe e , he meaning will be comple ely di e en . PAVEL SKORUPA 262 Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica LXXXIV pl aukš eji – žemeji, pl áukš osios - žẽmosios. Such opposi ions a e ypical o he moun ainous a eas neighbou ing wi h lowlands and con ey ce ain in o ma ion abou he elie o a gi en a ea. In he sec ions below, oponyms a e p esen ed in he alphabe ical o de , lis ing bo h linguis ic and ex alinguis ic da a ( oponym class, localiza ion, his o ical o ms o he name), a ailable a he ime o w i ing, ollowed by he analysis (e ymology and mo i a ion) and discussion o he opposi ion. The cu en o ms o analyzed oponyms a e i alicized and, whe e possible, s essed. 2.1. Bezdónys n × Bezdónys × Aukš eji Bezdónys Bezdónys – Bezdónys eld, V D; loca ed 138 MSL, a he hill oo on he igh bank alley o he Bezdonė ( he Ne s ib.), 6 km sou heas o Nemenčnė; GSD1974 728 Bezdonys n, GI1905 58 Rus. ст.[анция] Безданы, д.[еревня] Безданы, REM1872 Rus. Безданы. Bezdónys – Bezdónys eld, V D; 137 MSL, a he hill oo on he le bank alley o he Bezdonė, 1 km om he own; GSD1974 728 Bezdonys , GI1905 58 Rus. с.[еление] Безданы, им.[ение] Безданы, REM1872 Rus. Госп. [одский] д.[вор] Безданы. Aukš eji Bezdónys – Bezdónys eld, V D; 143 MSL, in he hills in Rõkan iškės o es , 6 km eas o Bezdónys; GSD1974 728 Aukš ieji Bezdonys , GI1905 58 Rus. з.[астенок] Безданолѣсье, Безданолѣсъ, REM1872 Rus. з.[астенок] Безданайцы. The oikonym Bezdónys is Li h. su . -onys de i a i e om he Bezdonė11 s eam. This de i a ion model o he abo e oikonyms om he hyd onym 11 The po amonym Bezdonė (LKIVK Bezdonė, Bezdanka; he Vlnia ib.) is mos p obably o Sla . o igin and may be ela ed o Rus. бездонный, - ая ‘bo omless; ( igu a i e) ex emely deep (← Rus. бездна)’ (Slo a .cc, SRYAe), o Pol. bezdenny ‘deep, bo omless’, bezdeń ‘whi lpool: a apidly o a ing mass o wa e in a i e in o which objec s may be d awn’ (PSPR 34), Bel. бездань, бяздонне ‘abyss, deep place’ (Ska nik.by). Acco ding o Ju kš as (1985: 19), he i e name Bezdonė is no au hen ic. The schola belie es ha he au hen ic o m o Bezdónys migh ha e been *Bedugniai, de i ed om he simila hyd onym: in he sou ce o 1516 he po amonym is w i en as Besdenay a, Besdanay a, Besdonay a, he su . o which co esponds o Li h. -ai (ė), hus, he name migh ha e been *Bedugnai ė, de i ed om hyd onym (ei he lake, o swamp) *Bedugnis, -ė and ela ed o Li h. bedùgnė ‘g ea dep h’ (LKŽe) (also, c . LVŽ I 466). Acco ding o Vykin as Vai ke ičius, he s eam was ea lie called he Juodupis: “z Bezdan – Jodupis, 1784 m., TVD 382” (Vai ke ičius 2012: 111). Taking i s beginning in he we lawns be ween Paskyna and Rõkan iškės o es s, he s eam lows in o he swampy Bezdónys ishing pond and h ough Bezdónys o es s, e aining he p ime al alley, which ull o sloughs, di ches, deb is, allen ees, na u al dams. Whe he au hen ic S aipsniai / A icles 269 Mo i a ion and seman ics o he p esen -day Vilnius coun y op- onym opposi ions: he concep o he objec ’s posi ion in space nea he ba n(s) in o he oikonym: s inas, -ai → he place nea he ba n(s) o whe e he ba n(s) a e/we e loca ed → (Aukš eji / Žemeji) S i na. The DMs o bo h oikonyms a e mo i a ed no only by he se lemen s’ e ical posi ion in space, bu also by hei posi ion in ela ion o he i e low16. 2.10. Áukš osios Viẽsos × Žẽmosios Viẽsos Áukš osios Viẽsos – Š in os eld, Š D; 111 MSL, on he le bank ups eam he Ši in à ( he Š en óji ib.) a i s con luence wi h he Viesà, 6,5 km om Ši in os; GSD1974 587 Aukš osios Viesos , GI1905 78 Rus. д.[еревня] Вѣсы- Горные, REM1872 Rus. з.[астенок] Весы. Žẽmosios Viẽsos – Š in os eld, Š D; 108 MSL, downs eam he Ši in à, in he igh bank alley 0,8 km away om Áukš osios Viẽsos; GSD1974 589 Žemosios Viesos , GI1905 78 Rus. з.[астенок] Вѣсы-Дольные, REM1872 Rus. з.[астенок] Новые Весы. The homogeneous names Viẽsos o he wo illages owe hei names o he Viesà – he s eam, on he banks o which bo h se lemen s a e loca ed, and a e he pl in lexion Li h. -os de i a i e om he po amonym17. The e o e, he oikonym may be conside ed a me onymic ansposi ion o he po amonym ( ansonymiza ion) ( he concep o place): Viẽsos ← Vies- + -os ← he se lemen on/upon he Viesà. The DMs Áukš osios and Žẽmosios o bo h oikonyms a e mo i a ed no only by he se lemen s’ e ical posi ion in space, bu also by hei posi ion in ela ion o he i e low. 16 Qui e in e es ing is he change o he DMs om pos -posi ion o HNLs (REM1872 Rus. Свирны Верх.[ние], Свирны Нижнiе: Верхние and Нижнiе ← Rus. верхний ‘uppe ’, нижний ‘lowe ’) o p e-posi ion in bo h oikonyms (Aukš eji S i na, Žemeji S i na). Howe e , he easons o such change a e no clea . 17 The po amonym Viesà is o an obscu e o igin. I s sou ce lies in he icini y o he swampy sho es o lake Viess. Howe e , i is no clea now whe he i is he lake o he mo i a ed each o he ’s names. Vanagas (1981: 378) ela es hese wo hyd onyms o Li h. esulas ‘s ong whi lwind’ (LKŽe), which allegedly is de i ed om InE. *eḭ- ‘ o bend, wis ’ and a ibu es i o he hyd onyms o physiog aphic meaning (Vanagas 1981a: 63). This could be pa ly ue, aking in o conside a ion he winding i e cou se, esp. om he midway and o he poin i d ains i s wa e s in o Ši in à; o conside ing he winding sho eline o he swamps a ound lake Viess. Hence, bo h hyd onyms may be me apho ic in na u e and a e he ansposi ions o he concep o whi ls, bends and wis s winding i e bed and winding sho eline, espec i ely: 1) esulas → a winding i e bed → he Viesà, 2) esulas → a winding sho eline → Viess. PAVEL SKORUPA 270 Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica LXXXIV *** The comple e an onymic co ela ion o he DMs ei he in p e- o pos - posi ion o he HNLs a e obse ed in 7 cases (1 limnonym and 6 oikonym opposi ions). The incomple e co ela ion o DMs in p e-posi ion o he modi ied HNLs is obse ed in 3 opposi ions om he class o oikonyms. The analyzed opposi ions based on he co ela ion o simple and p onominal adjec i es and hei o ms Li h. áukš as, -à (aukš àsis, aukš eji, áukš osios) ‘high’ (‘uppe ’) – žẽmas, -à (žemàsis, žemeji, žẽmosios) ‘low’ (‘lowe ’) and Li h. kalnnis (kalnniai) ‘o he hills’ – Li h. klóninis (klõniniai) ‘o he alley’ make only a small pa – 10 cases ( o med by 21 oponyms), i.e., 0,251% o he 251 opposi ions cu en ly unc ioning wi hin he bo de s o Vilnius Coun y. Bo h he linguis ic and ex alinguis ic analysis o he DMs has shown ha he choice o bo h p onominal and simple quali ying adjec i es in he p ocess o nomina ion was based on he named objec ’s ela i e posi ion (ei he ho izon al, o e ical) in space ( he e ain): 1) The co ela ion o Li h. áukš as ‘high’ – žẽmas ‘low’ is based on he objec ’s ho izon al posi ion in space (in ela ion o he neighbou ing i e ): Aukš eji Ka klnai × Žemeji Ka klnai , Pame ks × Aukš àsis Pame ks , Aukš eji Rusõkais ead × Žemeji Rusõkais ead, Áukš osios Viẽsos × Žẽmosios Viẽsos , Aukš eji S i nas ead × Žemeji S i nas ead; 2) The co ela ion o Li h. áukš as ‘high’ – žẽmas ‘low’ is based on he objec ’s e ical posi ion in space (on he hill/moun ain as opposed o he o he objec ’s posi ion a he oo o he hill/moun ain): Aukš eji Bezdónys × Bezdónys × Bezdónys n, Nẽ a das Áukš asL × Nẽ a das ŽẽmasL, Aukš eji Semeniùkai × Žemeji Semeniùkai ; 3) The co ela ion o Li h. kalnnis ‘o he moun ain/hill’ – klóninis ‘o he alley’ is based on he objec ’s e ical posi ion in space (on he hills as opposed o he o he objec ’s posi ion in he alley o he neighbou ing i e ): Jagėlónys × Klõniniai Jagėlónys , Kalnniai Mijáugonys × Klõniniai Mijáugonys . Conside ing he abo e, i may be concluded ha he co ela ion o simple and p onominal adjec i es in Vilnius Coun y oponymy is a he clea , as hese DMs ca y he ollowing seman ic load: 1) Li h. áukš as, -à (aukš àsis, aukš eji, áukš osios) – ‘loca ed on he hill/moun ain’ ( e ical uppe posi ion), Li h. žẽmas, -à (žemàsis, žemeji, žẽmosios) – ‘loca ed a he oo o he hill/moun ain’ ( e ical lowe posi ion); 2) Li h. áukš as, -à (aukš àsis, aukš eji, áukš osios) – ‘loca ed in he uppe pa o he i e (ups eam)’ (ho izon al posi ion up/back), Li h. žẽmas, -à (žemàsis, žemeji, žẽmosios) – ‘loca ed in he lowe pa o he i e (downs eam)’ (ho izon al posi ion down); 3) Li h. kalnnis (kalnniai) – ‘loca ed S aipsniai / A icles 271 Mo i a ion and seman ics o he p esen -day Vilnius coun y op- onym opposi ions: he concep o he objec ’s posi ion in space on he hill/moun ain’ ( e ical uppe posi ion), Li h. klóninis (klõniniai) – ‘loca ed in he alley’ ( e ical lowe posi ion). The analysis o he HNLs has shown ha hese may all in o wo ca ego ies, based on he a ie y o mo i a ing concep s: 1) name lexemes o clea mo i a ion and seman ics: a) mo i a ed by he oponym ( he concep o place/loca ion) – Bezdónys n, Bezdónys , Aukš eji Bezdónys , Pame ks , Aukš àsis Pame ks , Áukš osios Viẽsos , Žẽmosios Viẽsos ; b) mo i a ed by an h oponym ( he concep o possessi i y, belonging) – Jagėlónys , Klõniniai Jagėlónys , Kalnniai Mijáugonys , Klõniniai Mijáugonys , Aukš eji Semeniùkai , Žemeji Semeniùkai ; c) mo i a ed by appella i e – ( he concep o sou ce/sp ing) Nẽ a das Áukš asL, Nẽ a das ŽẽmasL, (concep o place) Aukš eji S i nas ead, Žemeji S i nas ead; 2) name lexemes o obscu e mo i a ion and seman ics: a) mo i a ed by appella i e o nickname ( he concep o place o people) – Aukš eji Ka klnai , Žemeji Ka klnai ; b) mo i a ed by he an h oponym ( he concep o possessi i y o people) – Aukš eji Rusõkais ead, Žemeji Rusõkais ead. 3. CONCLUSIONS 1. Opposi ions based on he co ela ion o simple and p onominal adjec i es and hei o ms Li h. áukš as, -à (aukš àsis, aukš eji, áukš osios) ‘high’ (‘uppe ’) – žẽmas, -à (žemàsis, žemeji, žẽmosios) ‘low’ (‘lowe ’) and Li h. kalnnis (kalnniai) ‘o he hills’ – Li h. klõninis (klõniniai) ‘o he alley’ make only a small pa – 10 cases ( o med by 21 oponyms), i.e., 0,251% o he 251 opposi ions cu en ly unc ioning wi hin he bo de s o Vilnius Coun y. All he selec ed oponym opposi ions exis in opposi ions a e wi hin 0,08 o 6 km om each o he . 2. The comple e an onymic co ela ion o he DMs ei he in p e- o pos - posi ion o he HNLs a e obse ed in 7 cases (1 limnonym and 6 oikonym opposi ions, o med by 2 and 12 names espec i ely). The incomple e co ela ion o DMs in p e-posi ion o he modi ied HNLs is obse ed in 3 opposi ions om he class o oikonyms, o med by 7 names. 3. To unde s and he seman ics o he DMs, bo h he linguis ic and ex alinguis ic da a was analyzed. The analysis o he DMs (simple and p onominal adjec i es and hei o ms) has shown ha he choice o DMs in he p ocess o nomina ion was de e mined by he named objec ’s ela i e posi ion (ei he ho izon al, o e ical) in space ( he e ain). The mo i a ion o he DMs is a he clea and hey ca y he ollowing seman ic load: 1) Li h. áukš as, -à (aukš àsis, aukš eji, áukš osios) – ‘loca ed on he hill/moun ain’ ( e ical PAVEL SKORUPA 272 Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica LXXXIV uppe posi ion), Li h. žẽmas, -à (žemàsis, žemeji, žẽmosios) – ‘loca ed a he oo o he hill/moun ain’ ( e ical lowe posi ion); 2) Li h. áukš as, -à (aukš àsis, aukš eji, áukš osios) – ‘loca ed in he uppe pa o he i e (ups eam)’ (ho izon al posi ion up/back), Li h. žẽmas, -à (žemàsis, žemeji, žẽmosios) – ‘loca ed in he lowe pa o he i e (downs eam)’ (ho izon al posi ion down); 3) Li h. kalnnis (kalnniai) – ‘loca ed on he hill/moun ain’ ( e ical uppe posi ion), Li h. klóninis (klõniniai) – ‘loca ed in he alley’ ( e ical lowe posi ion). 4. The analysis o he HNLs has shown ha hese may all in o wo ca ego ies, based on he a ie y o mo i a ing concep s: 1) name lexemes o clea mo i a ion and seman ics: a) mo i a ed by he oponym ( he concep o place/loca ion) – 7 homogeneous oikonym lexemes; b) mo i a ed by an h oponym ( he concep o possessi i y, belonging) – 6 homogeneous oikonym lexemes; c) mo i a ed by appella i e – ( he concep o sou ce/ sp ing) 2 homogeneous limnonym lexemes, (concep o place) 2 oikonym lexemes; 2) name lexemes o obscu e mo i a ion and seman ics: a) mo i a ed by appella i e o nickname ( he concep o place o people) – 2 homogeneous oikonym lexemes; b) mo i a ed by he an h oponym ( he concep o possessi i y o people) – 2 homogeneous oikonym lexemes. ABBREVIATIONS Bel. – Bela ussian; c . – compa e; coll. – colloquial; D – dis ic ; DM – di e en ia ing ma ke ; dial. – dialec al; El – Elek ėnai; eld – elde ship; e al. – and o he s; – eminine; Heb. – Heb ew; HNL – homogeneous name lexeme; InE. – Indo-Eu opean; km – kilome e ; L – lake; Li h. – Li huanian; m – masculine; MSL – me e s abo e sea le el; Pol. – Polish; pl – plu al; Rus. – Russian; s – singula ; s ead – s eading/homes ead; Šlčn – Šalčininkai; Š – Ši in os; n – own; T ak – T akai; ib. – ibu a y; Ukm – Ukme gė; V – Vilnius; – illage. TOPONYM SOURCES GI1905 – Goshke ich Iosi I. 1905: Гошкевич Iосиф I. Виленская губернiя. Полный списокъ населенныхъ мѣстъ со статистическими данными о каждомъ поселенiи, Вильна: Губернская Типографiя. A ailable a : h ps:// usneb. u/ ca alog/000199_000009_003727513/. GK – Gam os ka alogas. Lie u os andens elkiniai. A ailable a : h p://eze ai. ilnius21. l /. S aipsniai / A icles 273 Mo i a ion and seman ics o he p esen -day Vilnius coun y op- onym opposi ions: he concep o he objec ’s posi ion in space GP – Geopo al.l – Lie u os e d inės in o macijos po alas. A ailable a : h ps://www. geopo al.l /geopo al/. GSD1974 – Cen inė s a is ikos aldyba p ie Lie u os TSR minis ų a ybos 1974: Lie u os TSR kaimo gy enamosios ie o ės 1959 i 1970 me ais (Visasąjunginių gy en ojų su ašymo duomenys), Vilnius. A ailable a : h ps://knyga.lie u ai.l /w/images/7/79/ Lie u os_gy en ojų_su ašymas_1959_i _1970.pd . IVDB – Lie u ių kalbos ins i u o lie u ių kalbos iš eklių in o macinė sis ema: Is o inių ie o a džių duomenų bazė (The Ins i u e o he Li huanian Language In o ma ional Sys em o he Li huanian Language Resou ces: The His o ical Place Names Da abase). A ailable a : h ps://ekalba.l /is o iniu- ie o a dziu-duomenu-baze. KA1861 – Ko e o An on K. 1861: Корево Антон К. Матерiалы для географiи и статистики Россiи, собранные офицерами генералного штаба. Виленская губернiя, Санктпетербургъ: типографiя Iосафата Оргизко. A ailable a : h ps://www.p lib. u/ i em/426806. KGS1903 – Ковенский Губернский Статистический комитет 1903: Алфавитный списокъ населённыхъ мѣстъ Ковенской губернiи на 1902 год, Ковна: Типографiя Губернского Правленiя. A ailable a : h p://book-olds. u/BookLib a y/17000- Ko enskaya-gub/1902.-Spisok-naselennyih-mes -Ko enskoy-gube nii-na-1902-god. h ml. LKIVA – Lie u ių kalbos ins i u o Va dyno sky iaus p ieška inės Vilniaus k aš o žemės a dyno anke ų a chy as (The A chi e o Vilnius Region Land Names Fo ms o he Resea ch Cen e o Bal ic Languages and Onomas ics a he Ins i u e o he Li huanian Language). LKIVK – Lie u ių kalbos ins i u o Va dyno sky iaus ie o a džių, su ink ų iš gy osios kalbos, ka o eka (The Ca alogue o Li huanian Place Names W i en om he Li ing Language o he Resea ch Cen e o Bal ic Languages and Onomas ics a he Ins i u e o he Li huanian Language). REM1872 – Russian Empi e 1872 Map. MAPIRE – His o ical Maps Online. A ailable a : h ps://mapi e.eu/en/map/ ussia-1872/. UETK – Lie u os upių, eže ų i enkinių kadas as (The Ri e s, Lakes and Ponds Cadas e o he Republic o Li huania). A ailable a : h ps://ue k.am.l . Vilnius Coun y Maps – Map o he Republic o Li huania. A ailable a : h ps://www. geopo al.l . Vilnius Coun y Municipali ies’ web si es: Elek ėnai Municipali y web si e a : h ps://www.elek enai.l / PAVEL SKORUPA 274 Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica LXXXIV Šalčininkai Dis ic Municipali y web si e a : h p://www.salcininkai.l / Ši in os Dis ic Municipali y web si e a : h ps://www.si in os.l /l Š enčionys Dis ic Municipali y web si e a : h p://www.s encionys.l /li /I_p adzia T akai Dis ic Municipali y web si e a : h ps://www. akai.l /; h p://old. akai.l / Ukme gė Dis ic Municipali y web si e a : h ps://www.ukme ge.l / Vilnius Ci y Municipali y web si e a : h ps:// ilnius.l /l / Vilnius Dis ic Municipali y web si e a : h ps://www. sa.l / REFERENCES Ahundo a Gjulshen 2011: Ахундова Гюльшен. Психолингвистические основы функционирования тюркской топонимии (на материале географических названий Азербайджана, Дагестана и других cопредельных регионов). – Tü kologiya 3, 45–51. Ba ku ė Ne ija 2008: Joniškio ajono e i o ijos oponimija: da yba i aidos polinkiai: dak a o dise acija, Šiauliai: Vu au o Didžiojo uni e si e as, Šiaulių uni e si e as. B endle Sil io (ed.) 2016: Cogni i e Onomas ics. A Reade , Hambu g: Baa . Bukha o a Gulnu Kh., Sami o a Luiza Kh., Tagi o a Salima A., Da le kulo a Akhme Kh., Da le baje a Raisa G., Usmano a Minsilu G. 2016: Colo Symbolism in he Bashki Toponymy. – In e na ional Jou nal o En i onmen al and Science Educa ion 11(18), 12281–12288. Būga Kazimie as 1958: Rink iniai aš ai 1, Vilnius: Vals ybinė poli inės i mokslinės li e a ū os leidykla. Būga Kazimie as 1959: Rink iniai aš ai 2, Vilnius: Vals ybinė poli inės i mokslinės li e a ū os leidykla. Būga Kazimie as 1961: Rink iniai aš ai 3, Vilnius: Vals ybinė poli inės i mokslinės li e a ū os leidykla. Coa es Richa d 2006: P ope hood. – Language 82(2), 356–382. A ailable a : h p:// s o.sussex.ac.uk/196/. Coa es Richa d 2012: Eigh Issues in he P agma ic Theo y o P ope hood. – Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica 66, 119–140. Coa es Richa d 2015: A concise heo y o meaning ulness in li e a y naming wi hin he amewo k o The P agma ic Theo y o P ope hood. – Jou nal o Li e a y Onomas ics 4(1), 31–34. A ailable a : h p://digi alcommons.b ockpo .edu/jlo/ ol4/iss1/3. S aipsniai / A icles 275 Mo i a ion and seman ics o he p esen -day Vilnius coun y op- onym opposi ions: he concep o he objec ’s posi ion in space Coa es Richa d 2016: On he heo e ical possibili y o p ope e bs. – Linguis ics 54(2), 411–431. A ailable a : h p://ep in s.uwe.ac.uk/27187. DLKG – Daba inės lie u ių kalbos g ama ika, ed. V. Amb azas, Vilnius: Min is, 1994. Dob ić Nikola 2010: Theo y o Names and Cogni i e Linguis ics – he Case o he Me apho . – Filozo ia i d uš o 21, 135–147. Endzely ė Rena a 2005: Šiau ės idu io Lie u os ie o a džiai: dak a o dise acija, Kaunas: Vy au o Didžiojo uni e si e as. Ga aullin Ra il G., Fa ykho a Lija A. 2018: Гатауллин Равиль Г., Фатыхова Лия А. „Цветные“ топонимы и их особенности. – Вестник Башкирского университета 23(1), 211–219. Hon sa I ina S. 2014: Гонца Ірина С. Структурно-граматичні особливості двочленних ойконімів Черкащини. – Вісник Черкаського університету: Філологічні науки 7, 86–90. A ailable a : h ps://dspace.udpu.edu.ua/xmlui/ handle/6789/3361?show= ull. Ilchenko I ina I., Isachuk Nas asiya V. 2016: Ільченко Ірина І., Ісачук Настасія В. Бiнарнi опозицiï в топонiмiï Надвеликолужжя. – Перспективи розвитку філологічних наук (м. Київ, 13–14 травня 2016 р.), Херсон: Видавничий дім „Гельветика“, 99–102. A ailable a : h p:// isnyk- ilologia.mdu.in.ua/publ/2019/ ilchenko_i ina_i ani na_isachuk_nas asija_ ik o i na/1-1-0-23. Ju kš as Jonas 1985: Vilniaus ie o a džiai, Vilnius: Mokslas. Kačinai ė Dalia 2008: Lie u ių sudu inių o onimų da ybos b uožai. – Bal is ica 2, 275–288. Kond ashina Ve a V. 1980: Кондрашина Вера В. Соотносительный ряд «верхний» – «нижний» в русской топонимии. – Вопросы ономастики 14, 29–35. Ko epano a Anna P. 1973: Корепанова Анна П. Протиставлення як засіб утворення слов’янських ойконімів. – Мовознавство 4, 30–33. Kö ecses Zol an 2002: Me apho : a p ac ical in oduc ion, New Yo k: Ox o d Uni e si y P ess. Lako Geo ge, Johnson Ma k 2003: Me apho s we li e by, Chicago: The Uni e si y o Chicago P ess. LKŽe – Lie u ių kalbos žodynas I–XX (1941–2002), e. a ian as, ed. kolegija G. Nak inienė, J. Paulauskas, R. Pe okienė, V. Vi kauskas, J. Zaba skai ė, y . ed. G. Nak inienė, Vilnius: Lie u ių kalbos ins i u as, 2005 (a naujin a e sija, 2008 i 2018). A ailable a : h p://www.lkz.l /. PAVEL SKORUPA 276 Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica LXXXIV LVŽ I – Lie u os ie o a džių žodynas I (A–B), ed. kolegija L. Balode, V. Blažek, G. Blažienė, V. Ka delis, A. Ragauskai ė, S. Temčinas, J. Udolph, Vilnius: Lie u ių kalbos ins i u as, 2008. PDB – Lie u ių kalbos ins i u o lie u ių kalbos iš eklių in o macinė sis ema: Pa a džių duomenų bazė (The Ins i u e o he Li huanian Language In o ma ional Sys em o he Li huanian Language Resou ces: The Su names Da abase). A ailable a : h ps://ekalba. l /pa a dziu-duomenu-baze. Podolskaja Na aliya V. 1978: Подольская Наталия В. Словарь русской ономастической терминологии, Москва: Наука. PSPR – Rozwadowska Ma yja F. 1974: Pod ęczny słownik polsko- osyjski, Wa szawa: Wiedza powszechna. Razmukai ė Ma ija 1998: Lie u os p iesaginiai oikonimai: dak a o dise acija, Vilnius: Lie u ių kalbos ins i u as, Vy au o Didžiojo uni e si e as. Razmukai ė Ma ija 2002: Lie u os sudė inių oikonimų da ybos b uožai. – Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica 46, 123–130. Razmukai ė Ma ija 2003: Sudė iniai Lie u os oikonimai. – Bal u Filoloģija XII (2), 63–80. Razmukai ė Ma ija 2003a: Būd a džio áukš as, aukš à į a džiuo inės o mos ie o a džiuose. – Kalbos kul ū a 76, 63–66. Razmukai ė Ma ija 2009: Apie kai ku iuos Vaka ų Lie u os p iesaginius oikonimus. – Kalbos kul ū a 82, 34–40. Saussu e Fe dinand de 1959: Cou se in Gene al Linguis ics, Ch. Bally, A. Sechehaye (eds.), W. Baskin ( ans.), New Yo k: The Philosophical Socie y. Sjöblom Paula 2011: A Cogni i e App oach o he Seman ics o P ope Names. – Onoma: Jou nal o he In e na ional Council o Onomas ic Sciences 41, 63–82. Ska nik.by – Мазок Алег, Літ Серж (comp.) 2015: Белорусско-русский словарь (на основе академического словаря под редакцией Я. Коласа, К. Крапивы и П. Глебки 1953: Руска-беларускі Слоўник, I–III, Мiнск: Інстытут Мовазнаўства АН БССР), e- e sion. A ailable a : h ps://www.ska nik.by/. Sko upa Pa el 2019: Seman ic opposi ions in Vilnius coun y oponyms. – Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica 81, 139–159. Slíz Ma iann 2017: Pe sonal Names in Medie al Hunga y, Hambu g: Baa . Slo a .cc – Большой современный толковый словарь русского языка, e- e sion, 2010– 2020. A ailable a : h ps://slo a .cc/ us/ olk.h ml. S aipsniai / A icles 277 Mo i a ion and seman ics o he p esen -day Vilnius coun y op- onym opposi ions: he concep o he objec ’s posi ion in space SSP2 – K asiński Adam S. 1885: Słownik synonimów polskich 2, K aków: Wyd. Akademii Umieję ności; w d uk. “Czasu” F. Kluczyckiego. SRY – Ožego Se gej I. 1984: Ожегов Сергей И. Словарь русского языка, Москва: „Русский Язык“. SRYAe – Ye genye a Anas asiya (ed.) 1999: Евгеньева Анастасия П. Cловарь русского языка: В 4-х т., Москва: Полиграфресурсы. A ailable a : h p:// eb-web. u/ eb/mas/ mas-abc/de aul .asp. S achowski Kamil 2018: O opozycjach kolo ys ycznych w ojkonimii Polski. – Ac a onomas ica LIX, 197–214. Supe anskaja Aleksand a V. 1970: Суперанская Александра В. Терминологичны ли цветовые названия рек? – Местные географические термины, 120—127, Москва: Мысль. S ide skienė Dalia 2006: Ma ijampolės apsk i ies sudu iniai o onimai. – Li uanis ica 4(68), 47–59. S ide skienė Dalia 2006a: Ma ijampolės apsk i ies d imonimų da ybos i kilmės polinkiai. – Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica / Lie u ių kalbo y os klausimai 54, 49–62. S ide skienė Dalia 2007: Ma ijampolės apsk i ies gy enamųjų ie ų a dai. – Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica / Lie u ių kalbo y os klausimai 57, 99–122. Tkachenko Ye geniy N. 2003: Ткаченко, Евгений Н. Взаимодействие гидронимов и ойконимов (в бассейне реки Казенный Торец). – Філологічні студії, 58–62. Tkachenko Ye geniy N. 2013: Ткаченко, Євген M. Бурлук – Бурлучок: формально незмінні та граматично переоформлені імена (у басейні річки Великий Бурлук). – Філологічні студії. Науковий вісник Криворізького державного педагогічного університету 9, 399–406. A ailable a : h p://nbu .go .ua/UJRN/ PhS _2013_9_59. Tkachenko Ye geniy N. 2014: Ткаченко, Евгений Н. Явление бинарной оппозиции в региональной топонимии (на примере географических названий Слобожанщины). – Вестник Воронежского государственного университета 3, 67–70. Š ěpán Pa el 2009: Opposi ions in Toponymy. – Names in Mul i-Lingual, Mul i- Cul u al and Mul i-E hnic Con ac , P oceedings o he 23 d In e na ional Cong ess o Onomas ic Sciences. Augus 17–22, 2008, Yo k Uni e si y, To on o, Canada, 915–920. A ailable a : h ps://yo kspace.lib a y.yo ku.ca/xmlui/handle/10315/4034. Vai ke ičius Vykin as 2012: Ne is. 2007 me ų ekspedicija, an a knyga, Vilnius: Min is. PAVEL SKORUPA 278 Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica LXXXIV Vanagas Aleksand as 1970: Lie u os TSR hid onimų da yba, Vilnius: Min is. Vanagas Aleksand as 1981: Lie u ių hid onimų e imologinis žodynas, Vilnius: Min is. Vanagas Aleksand as 1981a: Lie u ių hid onimų seman ika. – Lie u ių kalbo y os klausimai 21, 4–153. Vanagas Aleksand as 1996: Lie u os mies ų a dai, Vilnius: Mokslo i enciklopedijų leidykla. Van Langendonck Willy 2007: Theo y and Typology o P ope Names, Be lin: de G uy e . Van Langendonck Willy 2013: A Seman ic-P agma ic Theo y o P ope Names. – Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica 69, 99–129. Van Langendonck Willy, Van de Velde Ma k 2016: Names and g amma . – The Ox o d Handbook o Names and Naming, C. Hough (ed.), Ox o d: Ox o d Uni e si y P ess. DOI 10.1093/ox o dhb/9780199656431.013.21. Van Langendonck Willy 2017: A Dicho omy in he Diach onic S uc u e o Family Names. – P oceedings o iconn 4, O. Felecan (ed.), Cluj-Napoca: Edi u a Mega, Edi u a A gonau , 45–50. DOI 10.30816/ICONN4/2017. Zinke ičius Zigmas 2008: Lie u ių asmen a džiai, Vilnius: Lie u ių kalbos ins i u as. Zinke ičius Zigmas 2012: Vilnijos lenkakalbių pa a dės, Vilnius: Mokslo i enciklopedijų leidybos cen as.