scieee Open visual document viewer

Gender differences in the auditing stereotype and their influence on the intention to enter the profession

Amondarain Arteche, Josune,Aldazabal Etxeberria, Miren Edurne,Espinosa Pike, Marcela

Abstract

This work was funded by Instituto de Censores Jurados de Cuentas de España (ICJCE), Spain

Full text

Jou nal o Beha io al and Expe imen al Finance 37 (2023) 100784 Con en s lis s a ailable a ScienceDi ec Jou nal o Beha io al and Expe imen al Finance jou nal homepage: www.else ie .com/loca e/jbe Full leng h a icle Gende di e ences in he audi ing s e eo ype and hei in luence on he in en ion o en e he p o ession Josune Amonda aina,∗, M. Edu ne Aldazabalb, Ma cela Espinosa-Pikea aUni e sidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU), Facul ad de Economía y Emp esa, A da. Lehendaka i Agi e 83, 48015 Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain bUni e sidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU), Facul ad de Economía y Emp esa (Sección Gipuzkoa), Plaza Oña i s/n, 20009 Donos ia, Gipuzkoa, Spain a icle in o A icle his o y: Recei ed 6 June 2022 Recei ed in e ised o m 27 Decembe 2022 Accep ed 28 Decembe 2022 A ailable online 2 Janua y 2023 Keywo ds: Audi ing Gende P o ession S e eo ype Business s uden s abs ac This s udy analyses gende di e ences in he audi ing p o ession s e eo ype and how hese di e ences impac he in en ion o wo k in audi ing. The esul s o he s udy ca ied ou among Spanish business s uden s e eal he exis ence o ele an gende di e ences in he pe cep ion o he audi ing p o ession and how ac o s, such as he pe cep ion o audi ing as a demanding ca ee o he in e es in audi ing wo k, a ec men and women di e en ly in hei in en ion o en e he p o ession. These esul s con ibu e o he audi ing s e eo ype as well as gende li e a u e as e y ew p e ious s udies ha e del ed in o he exis ence o gende di e ences in he audi ing s e eo ype li e a u e. This s udy has ele an implica ions o audi i ms. They may apply di e en s a egies o women and men alen a ac ion and e en ion in hei o ganisa ions, which will educe p esen and u u e olun a y o a ion, and may inc ease he bene i s ha di e si y gene a es in audi i ms. ©2022 The Au ho (s). Published by Else ie B.V. This is an open access a icle unde he CC BY-NC-ND license (h p://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). 1. In oduc ion Today, a ac ing alen ed p o essionals means inco po a ing di e si y (ACCA,2020) and in pa icula , gende di e si y. The as majo i y o s udies conduc ed in ecen yea s e eal he bene i s o ha ing an inc easing numbe o women in manage- men and decision-making posi ions in companies. These bene i s e e o inc eased p o i abili y and inancial esul s (ACCA,2020; Dhi ,2015;G an Tho on,2019;ILO,2019;Pos and By on, 2015), inc eased inno a ion and c ea i i y (Cox and Blake,1991; Fogelbe g E iksson,2014;Øs e gaa d e al.,2011;Pauli e al., 2020), imp o ed employee ela ions leading o inc eased job sa is ac ion and o ganisa ional commi men (Ghani e al.,2018; La ie a-Rubín de Celis e al.,2015) and e en imp o ed co po a e social esponsibili y (Ben-Ama e al.,2017;By on and Pos ,2016; Fe nandez-Feijoo e al.,2014;Fo migoni e al.,2020). A he local go e nmen le el, a g ea e p esence o emale poli icians educes he isk o deb de aul (Gómez-Mi anda e al.,2022). In he audi ing con ex , he inc easing numbe o women in op posi ions may ha e ele an bene i s in imp o ing se ice quali y (Came an e al.,2018;Ha dies e al.,2016). Women audi- o s show a highe le el o independence (Be na di and A nold, 1997;By nes e al.,1999), mo e p o essional due diligence (Huse ∗Co esponding au ho . E-mail add esses: [email p o ec ed] (J. Amonda ain), [email p o ec ed] (M.E. Aldazabal), [email p o ec ed] (M. Espinosa-Pike). and Solbe g,2006;Jonne gå d e al.,2010;Sweeney e al.,2010), highe p o essional scep icism (Gold e al.,2009), and lowe in- en ions o engage in audi quali y educ ion beha iou s (I o- nen e al.,2013;Khalil and Nehme,2021;Nehme e al.,2021; Neide meye e al.,2003;Sweeney e al.,2010). The li e a u e also sugges s highe audi ing ees when he pa ne is a woman mainly due o emales’ less isk ole ance and less o e con idence, which implies a highe in es men in planning and de eloping he audi se ice (Aguila Ag eda e al.,2019;Ha dies e al.,2015; I onen and Peni,2012). The accoun ing p o ession is awa e o hese bene i s and is y- ing o change he adi ional masculinised iew owa ds a mo e di e se and inclusi e one (Bujaki e al.,2018;Edgley e al.,2016; Pica d e al.,2014). The li e a u e sugges s ha he a ac i eness o he accoun ing p o ession o women has inc eased in ecen yea s (AICPA,2019;ICAC,2018). Many public accoun ing i ms and co po a e o ganisa ions ha e es ablished p og ams and ini ia i es p ima ily designed o a ac , p omo e, and e ain emale accoun ing p o essionals (B oadben and Ki kham,2008;Cohen e al.,2020;Gold e al., 2009;Ko nbe ge e al.,2010). Women ha e achie ed signi ican success in he e y masculine p o ession. Indeed, emale audi o s in audi i ms ep esen nea ly 50% o all employees (AICPA,2019; ICAC,2018;ICJCE,2017). Howe e , males ou numbe women in audi i ms and signi ican ly in leading posi ions (AICPA,2020; B oadben and Ki kham,2008;Damb in and Lambe ,2012; Edgley e al.,2016;FRC,2019;Vidwans and Cohen,2020). Some s udies show ha emale audi ing p o essionals ep esen less h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.jbe .2022.100784 2214-6350/©2022 The Au ho (s). Published by Else ie B.V. This is an open access a icle unde he CC BY-NC-ND license (h p://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by- nc-nd/4.0/). J. Amonda ain, M.E. Aldazabal and M. Espinosa-Pike Jou nal o Beha io al and Expe imen al Finance 37 (2023) 100784 han 25% o all pa ne s in audi i ms (AICPA,2020). In Spain, emale audi o s ep esen 18% o indi idual audi o s and 19.5% o pa ne s in audi i ms (ICAC,2021). This si ua ion may be explained no only by he adi ional disc imina ion agains women in audi i ms (Bi bol-Saba and Damb in,2019;Ca negie and Napie ,2010;Dal on e al.,2014; Damb in and Lambe ,2008;Haynes,2017;Koko ,2015) bu also by he idea ha women a e no as in e es ed as men in emaining in he accoun ing p o ession (Nou i and Pa ke ,2020). Indeed, he li e a u e e eals ha women end o lea e he audi p o ession o a highe ex en han men (Dal on e al.,2014;Nou i,2017). The a ac i eness o a p o ession has been s udied h ough he s e eo ype li e a u e. Accoun ing s e eo ypes ha e been widely s udied (A que o and Fe nández-Pol illo,2019;Daous ,2020; Dimnik and Fel on,2006;Du oche e al.,2016;E ans and F ase , 2012;F iedman and Lyne,2001;Jeacle,2008;Pica d e al.,2014; Richa dson e al.,2015;Saemann and C ooke ,1999); howe e , ew ha e ocused on he possibili y o gende di e ences in his s e eo ype (Caglio e al.,2019;Ge sson e al.,2017;Heia e al., 2007;Hun e al.,2009). Fu he , his s udy ocuses on he image o audi o s. In he Spanish con ex , audi o s di e om o he accoun ing p o ession- als as he only pa o he p o ession legally egula ed is audi ing. This implies ha he image o audi o s may di e om o he accoun ing p o essionals. This si ua ion is di e en om o he Eu opean coun ies whe e he accoun ing p o ession as a whole is no only p o essionally bu also legally egula ed. P e ious s udies ha e con i med he in luence o s e eo ypes on he in en ion o join a p o ession (Albu e al.,2011;Lips, 1992;King and Robe ,1968;Saemann and C ooke ,1999;Sang e al.,2009). The e o e, he e is a need o unde s and he gende di e ences in he pe cep ion o he p o ession and hei in luence on indi iduals’ decision o become a p o essional accoun an , which is he main aim o his s udy. This s udy add esses he call made by esea che s (Caglio e al.,2019;Ha dies e al.,2015;Haynes,2017;Khli and Achek, 2017) o conside gende di e ences in accoun ing esea ch. The li e a u e calls o new empi ical s udies ha in es iga e oday’s pe cep ions o he accoun ing p o ession and, in pa icula , em- pi ical esea ch on gende di e ences ega ding he pe cep ions o he images o accoun an s and hei consequences in e ms o he in e es in en e ing he p o ession. Ou esul s e eal a signi ican gende di e ence in he s e eo- ype o he audi ing p o ession, no only conce ning a be e pe cep ion o he p o essionals’ image bu also wi h ega d o emales conside ing audi ing as a mo e in e es ing and mo e p es igious p o ession han males. The s udy p o ides e idence o he in luence o gende on he decision o en e he ield o audi ing. This esea ch has impo an implica ions o he audi ing p o- ession. Unde s anding emale pe cep ions may help he audi ing p o ession and audi i ms de elop s a egies o make audi ing a com o able and a ac i e ca ee o women. In his sense, his may educe he high o a ion ha exis s nowadays, mainly among women, and inc ease he bene i s ha di e si y gene a es in any o ganisa ion’s unc ioning and wo k ou comes. Finally, his pape con ibu es o he gende and job li e a u e as he esul s sugges ha he di icul y o a ca ee , long wo king hou s, a ca ee di icul o achie e, and a s ess ul job, will no p e en women om choosing a p o ession. Howe e , in he case o men he esul s e eal ha hese ac o s a ec nega i ely o hei in en ion o en e ing he p o ession. The es o he documen is s uc u ed as ollows: The sec- ond sec ion de elops he hypo heses. The hi d desc ibes he esea ch me hodology applied, and in he ou h sec ion he esul s ob ained. The las sec ion p esen s he conclusions and ecommenda ions o u u e esea ch. 2. Li e a u e e iew and hypo heses de elopmen 2.1. Gende di e ences in unde g adua e s uden s’ pe cep ion o he audi ing p o ession How people pe cei e a pa icula g oup is e e ed as an s e eo ype. I shows a gene alised belie abou a pa icula g oup o people ha sha e ce ain cha ac e is ics o quali ies (Do idio, 2010). I is he ypical pic u e abou a pa icula social g oup (Lippmann,1922). S e eo ypes simpli y people’s pe sonali ies’ complexi y by gene alising g oups and g oup membe s’ a ibu es and beha iou s conside ed ypical (Hil on and on Hippel,1996). Some p e ious s udies ha e shown ha people ha e an s e eo- yped pe cep ion o accoun an s. The adi ional s e eo ype pe - cei e accoun an s as bo ing and conse a i e (Dimnik and Fel on, 2006;F iedman and Lyne,2001;Hun e al.,2004;Pica d e al., 2014;Richa dson e al.,2015) bu also as us ed and e hical (Bougen,1994;Caglio e al.,2019;Ca negie and Napie ,2010; Daous ,2020;Jeacle,2008;Nga and Wai Mun,2013). Some ecen s udies sugges ha he image o accoun ing p o essionals is changing owa ds a mul idisciplina y p o essional being seen no jus as igo ous and e hical bu also as an e ec i e manage , leade , and decision-make (Daous ,2020;Pica d e al.,2014). Mos o he p e ious s udies on accoun ing s e eo ypes ha e no del ed in o gende di e ences in he pe cep ion o he ac- coun ing/audi ing p o ession. Howe e , a pa o hem ha e done i , and mos ha e ound ha women show a mo e posi i e iew o he p o ession han males (By ne and Willis,2005;Caglio e al., 2019;Caglio and Came an,2017;Hun e al.,2009;Ma io and Ma io ,2003). These esul s could be explained by he social ole heo y (Eagly,1987). Resea ch on gende s e eo ypes has con i med he exis ence o socially cons uc ed ules ega ding di e ences in male and emale beha iou . These gende oles may in o m us di e en ly abou how men and women pe cei e o he s (Winquis e al.,1998). The pe cep ion o o he s is no only caused by he a ge , bu also by he cha ac e is ics o he pe cei e , which a e a leas as impo an as he cha ac e is ics o he a ge (Winquis e al.,1998;Xie e al.,2019). The li e a u e e eals ha he ex en o which pe cei e s and a ge cha ac e is ics con ibu e o he p ocess o imp ession o ma ion a ies sys ema ically ac oss gende and acial bounda ies (Winquis e al.,1998;Wood e al., 2010;Xie e al.,2019). Based on social ole heo y, li e a u e sugges s ha social oles and gende ole expec ancies lead o gende di e ences in pe cep ions and, in pa icula , ha due o emales’ communal ole, women will pe cei e o he s mo e a ou able (Winquis e al.,1998). This leads us o conside ha he e could be gende di e ences in he pe cep ion o he audi ing p o ession. Conside ing his social ole heo y and p e ious s udies on accoun ing s e eo ypes, we s a e he ollowing hypo hesis: H1: The e a e gende di e ences in he audi ing p o ession s e eo- ype. 2.2. Gende di e ences in he in en ion o en e he audi ing p o es- sion S e eo ypes li e a u e a i ms ha one g oup’s pe cep ion may de e mine he in e es in belonging o ha pa icula g oup. In his way, public a i ude owa ds he a ac i eness o a p o es- sion is in luenced by s e eo ypes (Albu e al.,2011;Fe nández e al.,2006;Powell e al.,2012;Saemann and C ooke ,1999;Sang e al.,2009). Gende is pa icula ly a ec ed by occupa ional seg ega ion, which means ha he wo k a ea o ield is gende speci ic (Adisa e al.,2021) and p oduces an unequal dis ibu ion o males and emales among di e en occupa ions. 2 J. Amonda ain, M.E. Aldazabal and M. Espinosa-Pike Jou nal o Beha io al and Expe imen al Finance 37 (2023) 100784 Accoun ing as a p o ession has adi ionally been iewed as a male-domina ed p o ession (Del Baldo e al.,2019;Haynes,2017; Jackling and Cale o,2006;Ki kham,1992;Whi e and Whi e, 2006), whe e women ha e been disc imina ed agains (Bi bol- Saba and Damb in,2019;Ca negie and Napie ,2010;Damb in and Lambe ,2008;G ey,1998;Haynes,2017;Lupu,2012). These iews may in luence iden i y and discou age women om en e - ing he p o ession (Haines e al.,2016;Piosik e al.,2019). Acco ding o he social ole heo y (Eagly,1987), gende iden- i ies and di e ences a e acqui ed by men and women as a esul o socialisa ion, de i ed om he disc epan dis ibu ion o men and women in social oles, bo h a home and wo k (Eagly,1987,1997;Koenig and Eagly,2014). Gende s e eo ypes desc ibe socially p e ailing belie s abou he cha ac e is ics and a ibu es associa ed wi h each sex (Be nd and Helle ,1986; Heilman,2012). These s e eo ypes a ec people’s expec a ions p io o en y in o he wo k o ce (Che yan e al.,2013;Sang e al., 2009). The accoun ing and audi ing p o essions a e mo e linked o masculine alues, inhibi ing eminine quali ies (B oadben ,1998). When a p o ession is ypically masculine, women may pe cei e a ‘lack o i ’ be ween hei a ibu es and hose equi ed o succeed in he occupa ion and i s o ganisa ional posi ions (Heilman,1983, 2012;S eele,1997). This may explain ha women sel -alloca e o occupa ions wi h which hey iden i y (Ake lo and K an on, 2010). Howe e , some s udies e eal ha he gende o he s uden does no a ec he in en ion o become an accoun an (Jackling and Cale o,2006;Sugaha a e al.,2009). Indeed, mo e emales ypically choose male occupa ions han males ypically choose women’s occupa ions (Simpson,2005;Twenge,1997,2001). Ex- pec ed beha iou s a e changing o a less no ma i e model, and women a e shi ing o beha ing acco ding o indi idual choices a he han cul u al no ms (Haines e al.,2016;Khilji and Pum oy, 2019). This easoning leads us o p opose he ollowing hypo hesis: H2: The e a e no gende di e ences in he in en ion o become an audi o . P e ious esea ch sugges s ha males end o s e eo ype mo e in hei judgmen s abou occupa ions han emales (Cla ke,1990; Jessell and Beyme ,1992). Lips (1992) s udied he scien is s e eo- ype and i s in luence on women and men’s academic and o- ca ional choices. The pe cep ion o he sociabili y o scien is s in luences bo h g oups in he pu sui o he scien is ca ee . Howe e , he s e eo ype had a lowe in luence on women’s in en ion o pu sue he ca ee han in he case o men, indica ing ha he in luence o he p o ession’s s e eo ype on academic and oca ional choices seems o be lowe in he case o women. In he pa icula case o he accoun ing p o ession, Caglio e al. (2019) and Hun e al. (2009) ound simila esul s and concluded ha he nega i e ep esen a ion o he accoun an s e eo ype has a lowe in luence on women’s han men’s in en ion o en e he accoun ing p o ession. Taking in o accoun hese lines o esea ch, we s a e he ol- lowing hypo hesis: H3: The e a e gende di e ences in he in luence o he audi ing s e eo ype on he in en ion o become an audi o . 3. Resea ch me hodology 3.1. Da a collec ion The s udy sample comp ises unde g adua e s uden s in he hi d and ou h yea s o hei deg ee, om 21 Spanish Economic and Business Highe Ins i u ions. The da a we e collec ed h ough a su ey o Business Adminis a ion, Finance and Accoun ing, Double deg ee in Business Adminis a ion and Law, Economics, Finance and Insu ance, Comme ce, Double deg ee in Business Adminis a ion and Compu e Enginee ing, Managemen o SMEs and Ma ke ing unde g adua e s uden s. They we e chosen as he sample o his s udy because hey may ha e some knowledge abou he accoun ing p o ession and hey a e possible p ospec s o he p o ession. In Spain, he deg ees ela ed o economics and business a e he mos common ones o en e he p o ession. Indeed, he deg ee ha has lead adi ionally o he accoun ing p o ession is he Business adminis a ion one (A que o-Mon año e al.,2009). App oxima ely 760 ques ionnai es we e dis ibu ed, and we ob ained 656 alid esponses. 3.2. ope a ionalisa ion o he a iables A li e a u e e iew conduc ed o ind a iables o measu e audi o s e eo ypes e ealed h ee app oaches o e lec a ious aspec s o he audi ing p o ession: The independen a iables consis on h ee app oaches o he audi ing s e eo ype e ealed by p e ious li e a u e: audi ing p o ession o ca ee , audi o s’ wo k, and he audi o s hemsel es (Bekoe e al.,2018;Caglio e al.,2019;Espinosa-Pike e al.,2021; Ge sson e al.,2017;Jackling e al.,2012;Ma io and Ma io , 2003;Mcdowall and Jackling,2010;Richa dson e al.,2015). Audi ing ca ee . I e e s o he pe cep ion o audi ing as a p o essional ca ee . The ins umen includes 7 i ems ela ed o he oppo uni ies ha he audi ing ca ee o e s o p o essional de elopmen and o he s ela ed o he di icul y o succeeding in he ca ee . These we e selec ed based on ins umen s p e i- ously used in he academic li e a u e on accoun ing and audi ing (Ge sson e al.,2017;Ma io and Ma io ,2003;Mcdowall and Jackling,2010). Audi ing wo k. This scale included 10 i ems ela ed o he kind o wo k audi o s ca y ou , which was de i ed om p e ious s udies (Bekoe e al.,2018;Jackling e al.,2012;Ma io and Ma io ,2003;Mcdowall and Jackling,2010). Audi o s’ image. This a iable conce ns audi o image as in- elligen , bo ing, in e es ing, us y, and so on. This 16 i ems scale was d awn om p e ious s udies o accoun an s e eo ypes (Caglio and Came an,2017;Nga and Wai Mun,2013). The inal ques ionnai e con ained 33 ques ions ela ed o he audi ing ca ee , audi ing wo k, and audi o image. Pa icipan s had o indica e hei ag eemen wi h di e en ques ions using a Like scale anging om 1 o 5, whe e 1 indica ed ‘comple ely disag ee’, and 5 indica ed ‘comple ely ag ee’. The o iginal language o he i ems included in he ques ion- nai e was English. The i ems om he ques ionnai e we e ans- la ed in o Spanish by he au ho s and hey we e es ed among people om he popula ion o in e es o ensu e ha he e was no mis ansla ions o be adjus ed. A e his p ocess, he ques- ionnai e was dis ibu ed among he sample. 3.3. Responden s’ cha ac e is ics In o al, 656 esponses we e examined in his s udy. The gene al cha ac e is ics o he esponden s a e lis ed in Table 1. Responden s’ a e age age was 23 yea s, and 61% o he sample was emale. As can be seen in Table 1, s uden s we e en olled in di e en deg ees ela ed o business and economics. In pa icula , 69% o he s uden s we e en olled in Business Adminis a ion, 18% in Finance and Accoun ing, 9% in Double deg ee in Business Adminis a ion and Law, and 4% in o he deg ees. In his las ca ego y (O he s), we ha e included s uden s en olled in Finance and Insu ance, Comme ce, Economics, Double deg ee in Business Adminis a ion and Compu e Enginee ing, SME Managemen , and Ma ke ing. 3 J. Amonda ain, M.E. Aldazabal and M. Espinosa-Pike Jou nal o Beha io al and Expe imen al Finance 37 (2023) 100784 Table 1 Cha ac e is ics o pa icipan s. Gende N % Male 257 39% Female 399 61% Age N % Mean: 23.17 <21 yea s 28 4% 21–24 yea s 507 77% 25–30 yea s 99 15% >31 yea s 22 4% Deg ee N % Business Adminis a ion 454 69.2% Finance and Accoun ing 120 18,3 Double deg ee Business Adminis a ion and Law 58 8,8 O he s 24 3.7% To al 656 100% 3.4. Resea ch design Using he p incipal componen analysis echnique, we educed he 33 i ems ha cap u e he image o audi ing and i s p o- essionals in o 8 ac o s. Then, in o de o de ec di e ences be ween male and emale s uden s in he pe cep ion o he audi ca ee , audi p o essionals and he wo k hey do, we ca ied ou a compa ison be ween he means o he 8 ac o s o bo h g oups. Be o e ca ying ou he - es , we pe o med he Le enne es o iden i y he p esence o homoscedas ici y. In his way we we e able o e i y whe he hypo hesis 1 is ul illed. Nex , we pe o med a Chi-squa e es o de ec whe he he e a e di e ences be ween male and emale s uden s in he in en- ion o en e he p o ession and hus alida e ou hypo hesis 2. Finally, o es ou hi d hypo hesis and o examine whe he male and emale s uden s we e in luenced di e en ly by hei pe cep ions o he p o ession and audi p o essionals in hei decision o en e he p o ession, we cons uc ed successi e bi- na y logis ic eg ession models. The dependen a iable was he in en ion o en e he p o ession, a dummy a iable wi h yes o no answe s. The ini ial independen a iables we e gende and he 8 ac o s ob ained p e iously. Nex , we buil he same model spli ing he sample in o men and women, in o de o iden i y di e ences in hei beha iou . Finally, we cons uc ed a model inco po a ing he in e ac ions be ween he a iables and gende o iden i y whe he he obse ed di e ences we e signi ican . In o de o ca y ou he bina y logis ic eg ession, we selec ed hose s uden s who answe ed a i ma i ely o nega i ely o he ques ion abou hei in en ion o en e audi ing. We disca ded hose who did no answe o hose who exp essed doub s abou he answe , which ep esen ed 33.4% o he o al sample. O he emaining s uden s, only hose who answe ed he 33 i ems used o cons uc he ac o s in he p incipal componen analysis we e inally included. Those who did no answe any i em we e excluded om he inal sample. The selec ed cases included in he logis ic eg ession analysis we e 192: 77 males and 115 emales. 4. Resul s 4.1. Explo a o y ac o analysis As a p elimina y s ep, o s udy he ela ionship be ween he pe cep ion o he audi p o ession and he in en ion o en e he p o ession, we conduc ed an explo a o y ac o analysis in o de o educe he numbe o a iables ha collec in o ma ion abou he s e eo ype in o a smalle numbe o unde lying ac o s. The e was a high co ela ion among a iables o each g oup o i ems; he ela ionship among a iables was s ong. The co ela ion ma- ix de e minan was close o ze o, Ba le ’s es o Sphe ici y p- alue<0.001, and he Kaise –Meye –Olkin (KMO) measu e o sampling adequacy was highe han 0.7. These sample adequacy es s indica e ha he da a a e adequa e o he ac o ed analysis. The esul s o a p incipal componen ac o analysis using he Va imax o a ion a e shown in Table 2. All ac o s comp ised a leas h ee i ems, and all o hem we e loaded abo e 0.5 o each ac o . C onbach’s alpha o all componen s exceeds he alue o 0.6. Acco ding o Loewen hal and Lewis (2001), C onbach’s alpha coe icien s o app oxima ely 0.60 a e conside ed accep able o scales con aining ewe han 10 i ems. Wi h espec o he audi ing ca ee , he esul s o a p inci- pal componen ac o analysis e ealed wo ac o s (P o essional de elopmen and Demanding ca ee ) ha explain nea ly 63% o he a iance wi h eigen alues g ea e han one. P o essional de elopmen comp ises ou i ems e lec ing oppo uni ies o p o essional de elopmen du ing an audi ing ca ee . Demanding ca ee included h ee i ems ela ed o he di icul y and s ess o he ca ee . Wi h espec o audi ing wo k, he ac o solu ion o he p in- cipal componen ac o analysis e ealed ha h ee ac o s had eigen alues g ea e han one. These h ee ac o s accoun ed o 65% o he a iance. The i s ac o , igo ous/ esponsibili y in- cludes h ee i ems p esen ing audi ing wo k as igo ous and esponsibili y-d i en. The second ac o , soli a y, e ol es a ound he pe cep ion o audi o s’ wo k as in ol ing s ic compliance o ules and being soli a y. The hi d ac o , in e es ing, includes ou i ems e e ing o audi ing as an in e es ing ac i i y ha con ibu es o socie y. Finally, conce ning he audi o ’s image, he ac o analysis esul s e ealed ha h ee ac o s had eigen alues g ea e han 1. These h ee ac o s accoun ed o nea ly 58% o he a iance. The i s ac o , compe en , includes se en i ems e lec ing audi o s’ compe ence and skills. Fac o 2, e hical, includes six i ems ha e e o audi o s as e hical, us wo hy, and complian wi h he law. The hi d ac o , nega i e image, e ol es a ound some audi o s’ nega i e pe cep ions, such as bo ing people o easily in luenced. 4.2. Gende di e ences in audi ing s e eo ype and in en ion o en e he p o ession Once he ac o s desc ibing he audi o s e eo ype was con- s uc ed, he di e ences be ween men and women a e p e- sen ed in Table 3. Le enne’s es was ca ied ou o de ec non- homoscedas ici y and o adjus he - es . The esul s ob ained wi h he - es e ealed ha he e we e gende di e ences in he ac o s ela ed o audi o s e eo ype. Wi h espec o he audi ing ca ee , he esul s e ealed gende signi ican di e ences. In pa icula , women showed a signi ican posi i e di e ence in he pe cep ion o audi ing as a ca ee ha o e s p o essional de elopmen . Women had be e pe cep ion o he oppo uni ies o p o essional de elopmen , o he possibili y o achie ing an excellen long- e m sala y and a good p o es- sional aining, and highe pe cep ion o audi ing as a p es igious p o ession han men. The esul s also e ealed gende di e ences wi h espec o audi wo k. In pa icula , women showed a signi ican posi i e di e ence in he pe cep ion o audi ing as an in e es ing wo k. Women had be e pe cep ion o he a ie y o asks ha he audi ing wo k implies, and hei con ibu ion o socie y han men. Finally, wi h espec o audi o ’s image, he e we e also signi - ican gende di e ences. In his sense, women showed a signi - ican posi i e di e ence in he pe cep ion o audi o ’s image as 4 J. Amonda ain, M.E. Aldazabal and M. Espinosa-Pike Jou nal o Beha io al and Expe imen al Finance 37 (2023) 100784 Table 2 PCA Ro a ed componen ma ix. Ro a ion me hod: Va imax. Fac o Audi ing ca ee 1 2 P o essional de elopmen Audi ing ca ee o e s good p o essional aining 0.789 0.270 Audi ing is a p es igious p o ession 0.774 0.159 Audi ing ca ee o e s g ea oppo uni ies o p o essional de elopmen 0.757 0.020 The audi ing ca ee o e s he possibili y o achie ing a good long- e m sala y 0.699 0.371 Demanding ca ee Audi ing is a e y s ess ul job 0.015 0.836 In he audi ing ca ee , many hou s a e wo ked 0.238 0.778 The audi ing ca ee is di icul o achie e 0.392 0.576 % o a iance explained 35.62% 26.74% C onbach’s Alpha 0.73 0.63 Audi ing wo k 1 2 3 Rigo ous/Responsibili y Audi ing implies g ea esponsibili y 0.830 −0.091 0.194 Audi ing is a e y p ecise ac i i y ha wo ks he in o ma ion in dep h 0.808 −0.014 0.251 Audi ing in ol es e y s uc u ed wo k, ollowing e y de ined p ocesses 0.804 0.113 0.156 Soli a y Audi o s a e numbe -c unche s; hey seldom wo k wi h people −0.031 0.845 0.001 Audi o s wo k alone mo e han hey wo k wi h people 0.058 0.836 −0.163 Audi ing in ol es a lo o ixed ules; i does no in ol e concep ual skills o judgmen −0.005 0.818 0.11 In e es ing Audi ing in ol es a a ie y o asks 0.069 −0.027 0.769 Audi ing is in e es ing 0.135 0.050 0.736 Audi ing equi es wo king as a eam 0.284 −0.170 0.652 Audi ing con ibu es signi ican ly o socie y 0.390 0.095 0.637 % o a iance explained 22.48% 21.46% 21.28% C onbach’s Alpha 0.78 0.79 0.70 Audi o s image 1 2 3 Compe en Audi o s ha e p es ige 0.729 0.182 0.000 Audi o s a e ambi ious 0.698 −0.011 0.124 Audi o s ha e leade ship abili y 0.689 0.215 0.145 Audi o s a e achie e s 0.668 0.271 0.239 Audi o s a e in elligen 0.664 0.196 −0.105 Audi o s a e expe s 0.663 0.251 −0.216 Audi o s a e ha d wo ke s 0.652 0.313 −0.177 E hical Audi o s beha e e hically 0.213 0.807 −0.073 Audi o s comply wi h he law 0.255 0.754 −0.143 Audi o s a e hones 0.182 0.753 0.001 Audi o s a e us wo hy 0.311 0.728 −0.142 Audi o s a e inco up ible 0.024 0.704 0.199 Audi o s a e awa e o hei du y 0.416 0.604 −0.151 Nega i e Image Audi o s do no ha e social skills −0.046 0.163 0.781 Audi o s a e easily in luenced 0.145 −0.138 0.736 Audi o s a e bo ing people −0.058 −0.064 0.707 % o a iance explained 22.96% 22.38% 12.02% C onbach’s Alpha 0.81 0.84 0.66 compe en . Women pe cei ed audi o s as ha de wo ke s, mo e expe and in elligen , mo e ambi ious and p es igious, and wi h highe leade ship abili y han did males. Fu he , women had a signi ican ly lowe pe cep ion o a nega i e image o audi o s as bo ing o lacking in social skills han did males. The esul s suppo he con i ma ion o hypo hesis 1, which s a es ha he e a e gende di e ences in he audi ing p o ession s e eo ype. Conce ning he in en ion o en e he audi ing p o ession, he esul s shown in Table 4 e eal ha nea ly 35% o he pa icipan s did no in end o wo k as audi o s, while almos 31% in ended o do so. Fu he , he esul s show ha he e a e no gende di e ences in his in en ion. This leads us o accep hypo hesis 2. 4.3. Logis ic eg ession This sec ion es s he hi d hypo hesis de eloped in his s udy using logis ic eg ession. The dependen a iable is he in en ion o en e he audi ing p o ession, aking wo alues: yes o no. The independen a iables a e he eigh ac o s ob ained om he p incipal componen analysis: p o essional de elopmen , de- manding ca ee , igo ous wo k, soli a y wo k, in e es ing wo k, compe en , e hical and nega i e image, and gende . The esul s a e p esen ed in Table 5. The esul s showed ha he pe cep ion o audi ing in luences he in en ion o en e he p o ession. Indeed, h ee ac o s con- i m his in luence. In pa icula , he a iable ha has he g ea es in luence on he in en ion o wo k in audi ing is he pe cep ion o 5 J. Amonda ain, M.E. Aldazabal and M. Espinosa-Pike Jou nal o Beha io al and Expe imen al Finance 37 (2023) 100784 Table 3 Desc ip i e s a is ics and independence es . Table 4 In en ion o wo k in audi ing. F equencies and Chi Squa e es . Table 5 Bina y logis ic eg ession models. Va iables in he equa ion N= 192 Male N=77 Female N= 115 Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I. o EXP(B) Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I. o EXP(B) Sig. Exp(B) 95% C.I. o EXP(B) Lowe Uppe Lowe Uppe Lowe Uppe In en ion o en e ing he audi ing p o ession (Yes) Gende (Female) .569 0.798 .366 1.737 P o essional De elopmen .594 1.189 .630 2.243 .374 1.669 .539 5.167 .757 1.148 .479 2.752 Demanding ca ee **/**/ .028 0.600 .381 .946 .035 0.416 .184 .941 .413 0.789 .448 1.391 Rigo ous/Responsibili y demanding .429 1.240 .728 2.114 .415 0.637 .215 1.884 .075 1.843 .940 3.611 Soli a y .296 1.283 .804 2.048 .879 0.943 .445 1.998 .158 1.574 .839 2.953 In e es ing***/**/*** <.001 4.455 2.434 8.153 .029 3.383 1.129 10.134 <.001 5.594 2.420 12.935 Compe en .361 1.301 .740 2.287 .436 1.465 .561 3.825 .797 1.111 .497 2.486 E hical .095 1.482 .934 2.352 .109 1.860 .871 3.969 .498 1.244 .661 2.342 Nega i e Image***// .030 0.601 .379 .952 .144 0.562 .260 1.218 .057 0.551 .298 1.019 Cons an .532 1.175 .576 2.730 .400 1.329 .659 1.128 Cox & Snell R238.2% 39.7% 42.1% Nagelke ke R251.1% 53.0% 56.7% Hosme and Lemeshow Tes Sig. = 0.507 Sig. = 0.428 Sig. =0.854 Classi ica ion% 79.6% 77.6% 80.9% The e e ence ca ego y is: NO in en ion. Signi icance ** p<0.05 *** p<0.01. audi ing as in e es ing wo k. In his sense, he p obabili y o being willing o wo k in audi ing mul iplies 4.4 imes when audi ing is conside ed in e es ing. On he con a y, he in en ion o wo k in audi ing dec eases by nea ly 40% when audi ing is seen as a di icul ca ee and when he image o he audi o s is a nega i e one. Gende was no a signi ican a iable in his decision. How- e e , as he esul s o he s uden ’s - es e ealed signi ican gende di e ences in he pe cep ion o he audi ing ca ee , audi - ing wo k, and audi o ’s image, we may guess ha he ac o s ha in luence he decision may be di e en o males and emales. In an a emp o iden i y hese di e ences, we pe o med a sep- a a e logis ic eg ession o males and emales. The esul s a e p esen ed in Table 5. The esul s e ealed ha he signi ican ac o s o he in en- ion o wo k in audi ing a e no he same o males and emales. 6 J. Amonda ain, M.E. Aldazabal and M. Espinosa-Pike Jou nal o Beha io al and Expe imen al Finance 37 (2023) 100784 Table 6 Bina y logis ic eg ession model wi h he in e ac ion o gende and in e es ing wo k, and gende and demanding ca ee *. Va iables in he equa ion Sig. Exp(B) In en ion o en e ing he audi ing p o ession (Yes) Gende (Female) .528 P o essional De elopmen .661 Demanding ca ee .004 Rigo ous/Responsibili y demanding .319 Soli a y .303 In e es ing .001 Compe en .422 E hical .146 Nega i e Image .025 Female and Demanding ca ee ** .030 2.645 Female and in e es ing wo k .978 1.016 Cons an .223 Cox & Snell R239.9% Nagelke ke R253.5% Hosme and Lemeshow Tes Sig. = 0.217 Classi ica ion% 79.6% The e e ence ca ego y is NO in en ion. Signi icance: ** p<0.05. Demanding ca ee and in e es ing ac o s a e signi ican o males’ in en ion o wo k in audi ing while only he in e es ing ac o a ec s emales’ in en ion. Fu he , o emales, he in luence o he pe cep ion o audi ing wo k as in e es ing on he in en ion o en e he audi ing p o ession is highe han o males. To iden i y an in e ac ion e ec , we de eloped a bina y logis ic eg ession wi h wo mo e independen a iables, he in e ac ion be ween gende and in e es ing wo k and he in e ac ion be ween gende and demanding ca ee . The esul s a e p esen ed in Table 6. The esul s in Table 6 show he signi ican ele ance o he in e ac ion be ween gende and he pe cep ion o he audi ing ca ee as a demanding one. In pa icula , he esul s show ha he pe cep ion o audi ing as a demanding ca ee is only signi ican o males in hei in en ion o wo k in audi ing and no o e- males. Howe e , he in e ac ion be ween gende and in e es ing wo k does no signi ican ly ela e o he in en ion o wo k in audi ing. These esul s con i m ou hypo hesis 3, which s a es ha he e a e gende di e ences in he in luence o he audi ing s e eo ype on he in en ion o become an audi o . 5. Discussion o he esul s and conclusions This s udy analyses he cu en pe cep ion o he audi ing p o ession s e eo ype on he pa o hose who ha e o decide hei ca ee in hei nea u u e and he possible exis ence o gende di e ences in his pe cep ion. Fu he , his pape del es in o how hese di e ences in luence he indi iduals’ in en ion o en e ing he p o ession. The esul s ob ained in his s udy sugges ha a nega i e iew o he p o ession can be o e come. Unde g adua e business s uden s ha e a posi i e iew o he audi ing p o ession. S u- den s conside audi ing a g ea esponsibili y ha in ol es e y s uc u ed and p ecise wo k ca ied ou by expe , in elligen , and us wo hy people. Fu he , hey iew audi ing as o e ing he possibili y o achie ing a good long- e m sala y and as a p es igious ca ee wi h good oppo uni ies o p o essional de- elopmen . Ou esul s also e eal he pe cep ion o audi ing as a demanding and s ess ul ca ee equi ing long hou s o wo k. The esul s ob ained e eal he exis ence o gende di e ences in he pe cep ion o he audi ing p o ession. The di e ences ex- is in he pe cep ion o he audi ing ca ee , audi ing wo k, and audi o s’ image. Al hough bo h gende s show a good pe cep ion o he p o ession, hese esul s con i m p e ious esea ch whe e emales show a be e pe cep ion han males (By ne and Willis, 2005;Hun e al.,2009;Ma io and Ma io ,2003;Mcdowall and Jackling,2010). Howe e , con a y o wha could be expec ed, his be e pe cep ion does no imply a highe willingness o en e he p o ession among emales. The esul s e eal ha he ac o s ha in luence his in en ion di e be ween males and emales. Bo h gende s a e highly in luenced by hei in en ion o wo k in he audi ing ield due o hei in e es in he wo k, which is a ele an esul ha could be aken in o accoun in he a ac ion and e en ion policies. P e ious s udies (ACCA and IFAC,2021; A que o-Mon año e al.,2009;Bebbing on e al.,1997;By ne e al.,2012;Nelson e al.,2008) conclude ha he ocus o he a ac ion o he accoun ing p o ession has been placed on he possibili ies o p o essional de elopmen , sala y, a ailabili y o jobs, he p es ige o he p o ession, and ele ance o he aining ecei ed in he audi ing con ex . Howe e , ou s udy e eals ha unde g adua e business s uden s place a highe ele ance on ques ions such as he a ie y o asks in he audi ing wo k, he in e es in he wo k i sel , wo king as a eam, and he p o ession’s con ibu ion o socie y. Ou esul s con i m p e ious li e a u e abou he nega i e in- luence o pe cei ing audi ing p o essionals as bo ing and lacking social skills on he in en ion o wo k in he audi ing p o ession (A que o and Fe nández-Pol illo,2019;He manson e al.,1995; Saemann and C ooke ,1999). The hi d ac o ha nega i ely in luences he p o ession’s a - ac i eness is he pe cep ion o audi ing as a demanding ca ee . Howe e , his in luence is no he same o bo h gende s. The esul s e ealed a lack o in luence in he case o emales. I could ha e been expec ed in he audi ing con ex and, in gene al, in he business con ex , ha he di icul y o a ca ee , which implies long wo king hou s, a ca ee di icul o achie e, and a s ess ul job, will p e en women om en e ing he p o ession mainly because o he di icul y o achie e a wo k-li e balance in such jobs. Howe e , ou esul s do no suppo his hypo hesis. On he con a y, his di icul y p e en s male s uden s om wo king in audi ing, bu no emale s uden s. This is a ele an esul no p e iously s udied. These esul s ha e ele an implica ions o he audi ing p o- ession and he policies ha could be implemen ed o a ac and e ain he bes alen . I is key o de eloping success ul s a egies o alen a ac ion and e en ion in audi i ms o know he ac o s ha in luence he willingness o en e he p o ession and how hese ac o s a ec di e en ly o women and men’s in en- ion. The ele ance o he in e es in he audi ing wo k s esses 7 J. Amonda ain, M.E. Aldazabal and M. Espinosa-Pike Jou nal o Beha io al and Expe imen al Finance 37 (2023) 100784 he necessi y o ocus a en ion on he p ospec s o lea ning abou he a ie y o asks pe o med in he audi ing con ex , eamwo k, and he p o ession’s con ibu ion o socie y, which a e ele an ac o s o bo h gende s. This is mo e impo an han e e o educe he isk o a sho age o p o essionals in he nea u u e (Geo ge and Wallio,2017;Ge sson e al.,2017;Hall and Smi h, 2009;Hil ebei el and Leauby,2001;Johnson and Pike,2018; Nou i and Pa ke ,2020;Smi h e al.,2020). Fu he , he esul s sugges ha he ele ance o s ess and long hou s and he di icul y o he audi ing ca ee on male in en- ion o en e he p o ession, bu no emale, has o be conside ed in he s a egies o alen managemen in audi ing i ms and he p o ession in gene al. I seems ha he p ejudices owa ds a lowe emale commi men o he audi ing p o ession o he audi ing i m due o his di icul y a e no suppo ed. This does no p e en women om wo king in audi ing, bu i does p e en men. This sugges s ha he s a egies may need o be di e en o bo h gende s. Fu u e esea ch could del e in o gende di e ences on he ac o s ha a ec he a ac i eness o he p o ession o con i m o suppo ou esul s. These s udies could be done in o he cul u al con ex s and wi h di e en samples comp ising unde - g adua e s uden s om ma hema ics o compu e s deg ees, as hese s uden s can also be p ospec i e audi ing p o essionals. Fu u e esea ch could s udy gende di e ences in how young audi o s deal wi h he di icul y o hei ca ee , he long hou s, o he s ess in he audi ing con ex . This s udy has se e al limi a ions. Unde g adua e business s uden s a e jus pa o he po en ial p ospec s o he accoun ing p o ession. The e o e, he esul s migh be biased by he pe cep- ion o his sample. Fu he , as s e eo ypes seem o be in luenced by cul u e, ou esul s may no be gene alised o o he cul u al con ex s. The ques ionnai e me hodology employed in he s udy implies ha he da a o bo h he p edic o and dependen a i- ables we e ga he ed om he same sou ce. This condi ion is belie ed o cause po en ial p oblems o common me hod bias, which can in luence he esea ch esul s. We use p ocedu es as sepa a ing he measu emen s o he a iables and employing di e en scale ancho s o educe he e ec s o me hod bias. Compliance wi h e hical s anda ds Resea ch In ol ing Human Pa icipan s All p ocedu es we e in acco dance wi h he e hical s anda ds o he ins i u ional and na ional esea ch commi ees and wi h he 1964 Decla a ion o Helsinki and i s la e amendmen s. CRediT au ho ship con ibu ion s a emen Josune Amonda ain: Concep ualiza ion, Me hodology, Fo - mal analysis, W i ing. M. Edu ne Aldazabal: Concep ualiza ion, In es iga ion, Visualiza ion. Ma cela Espinosa-Pike: Supe - ision, Visualiza ion, W i ing – e iew & edi ing, P ojec adminis a ion. Decla a ion o compe ing in e es The au ho s decla e ha hey ha e no known compe ing inan- cial in e es s o pe sonal ela ionships ha could ha e appea ed o in luence he wo k epo ed in his pape . Funding This wo k was unded by Ins i u o de Censo es Ju ados de Cuen as de España (ICJCE), Spain. Re e ences ACCA, 2020. Fu u e eady: accoun ancy ca ee s in he 2020s. Re ie ed om h ps://www.accaglobal.com/gb/en/p o essional-insigh s/p o-accoun an s- he- u u e/ u u e_ eady_2020s.h ml. (Augus , 2020). ACCA, IFAC, 2021. G ound-b eake s: Gen Z and he u u e o accoun ancy. Re ie ed om h ps://www.accaglobal.com/con en /dam/ACCA_ Global/p o essional-insigh s/g oundb eake s-gen-z/PI-GEN%20Z- GROUNDBREAKERS.pd . (June, 2021). Adisa, T.A., Gbadamosi, G., Adekoya, O.D., 2021. Gende apa heid: The challenges o b eaking in o man’s wo ld. Gend. Wo k O gan. 28 (6), 2216–2234. Aguila Ag eda, J.M., Se ano. J, Be nabé-Pé ez, M., 2019. Análisis de la p ima de iesgo en las muje es audi o as: el caso español. Small Bus. In . Re . (SBIR) 3 (2), 17–33. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.26784/sbi . 3i2.193. AICPA, 2019. 2019 T ends in he supply o accoun ing g adua es and he demand o public accoun ing ec ui s. Re ie ed om h ps: //www.aicpa.o g/con en /dam/aicpa/in e es a eas/accoun ingeduca ion/ newsandpublica ions/downloadabledocumen s/2019- ends- epo .pd . (June, 2021). AICPA, 2020. 2019 CPA i m gende su ey. Re ie ed om h ps://www.google. com/sea ch?clien = i e ox-b-d&q=2019+CPA+Fi m+Gende +Su ey. (Sep em- be , 2022). Ake lo , G.A., K an on, R.E., 2010. Iden i y Economics: How Ou Iden i ies Shape Ou Wo k, Wages, and Wellbeing. P ince on Uni e si y P ess. Albu, N., Albu, C.N., Gî binä, M.M., Sandu, M.I., 2011. A amewo k o he analysis o he s e eo ypes in accoun ing. In . Sch. Sci. Res. Inno . 5 (5), 732–736. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.5281/zenodo.1071224. A que o, J.L., Fe nández-Pol illo, C., 2019. Accoun ing s e eo ypes. business and accoun ing s uden ’s mo i a ions and pe cep ions o accoun ing. Re . Con abilidad Span. Accoun . Re . 22 (1), 88–99. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.6018/ c- sa .22.1.354341. A que o-Mon año, J.L., Donoso-Anes, J.A., Jiménez-Ca doso, S.M., González González, J.M., 2009. Análisis explo a o io del pe il demandado pa a Adminis ación y Di ección de Emp esas: Implicaciones pa a el á ea con able: Explo a o y analysis o he demanded p o essional p o ile on business adminis a ion deg ee: Implica ions o he accoun ing a ea. Re . Con abilidad Span. Accoun . Re . 12 (2), 181–214. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1016/S1138-4891(09)70006-8. Bebbing on, J., Thomson, I., Wall, D., 1997. Accoun ing s uden s and cons uc ed gende : An explo a ion o gende in he con ex o accoun ing deg ee choices a wo sco ish uni e si ies. J. Accoun . Educ. 15 (2), 241–267. h p://dx.doi. o g/10.1016/S0748-5751(97)00004-3. Bekoe, R.A., Owusu, G.M.Y., O o i, C.G., Essel-Ande son, A., Welbeck, E.E., 2018. A i udes owa ds accoun ing and in en ion o majo in accoun ing: A logis ic eg ession analysis. J. Accoun . Eme g. Econ. 8 (4), 459–475. h p://dx.doi.o g/ 10.1108/JAEE-01-2018-0006. Ben-Ama , W., Chang, M., McIlkenny, P., 2017. Boa d gende di e si y and co po a e esponse o sus ainabili y ini ia i es: e idence om he ca bon disclosu e p ojec . J. Bus. E hics 142 (2), 369–383. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1007/ s10551-015-2759-1. Be na di, R.A., A nold, S ., D.F., 1997. An examina ion o mo al de elopmen wi hin public accoun ing by gende , s a le el, and i m. Con emp. Accoun . Res. 14 (4), 653–668. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1111/J.1911-3846.1997.TB00545.X. Be nd , T.J., Helle , K.A., 1986. Gende s e eo ypes and social in e ences: a de elopmen al s udy. J. Pe sonal. Soc. Psychol. 50 (5), 889–898. h p://dx. doi.o g/10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.889. Bi bol-Saba, N., Damb in, C., 2019. ‘‘I ’s no o en we ge a isi om a beau i ul woman!’’ The body in clien -audi o in e ac ions and he masculini y o accoun ancy. C i . Pe spec . Accoun . 64, h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1016/j.cpa.2018. 12.002, UNSP 102068. Bougen, P.D., 1994. Joking apa : The se ious side o he accoun an s e eo- ype. Accoun . O gan. Soc. 19 (3), 319–335. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1016/0361- 3682(94)90039-6. B oadben , J., 1998. The gende ed na u e o ‘‘accoun ing logic’’: poin e s o an accoun ing ha encompasses mul iple alues. C i . Pe spec . Accoun . 9 (3), 267–297. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1016/0361-3682(94)90039-6. B oadben , J., Ki kham, L., 2008. Glass ceilings, glass cli s o new wo lds? Re isi ing gende and accoun ing. Accoun . Audi ing Accoun . J. 21 (4), 465–473. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1108/09513570810872888. Bujaki, M., Du oche , S., B oua d, F., Neilson, L., Pype , R., 2018. P o ec , p o i , p o ess, p omo e: Es ablishing legi imacy h ough logics o di e si y in Canadian accoun ing i m ec ui men documen s. Can. J. Adm. Sci. 35 (1), 162–178. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1002/cjas.1392. By ne, M., Willis, P., 2005. I ish seconda y s uden s’ pe cep ions o he wo k o an accoun an and he accoun ing p o ession. Accoun . Educ. 14 (4), 367–381. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1080/06939280500346003. By ne, M., Willis, P., Bu ke, J., 2012. In luences on school lea e s’ ca ee decisions – implica ions o he accoun ing p o ession. In . J. Manag. Educ. 10 (2), 101–111. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1016/j.ijme.2012.03.005. By nes, J.P., Mille , D.C., Scha e , W.D., 1999. Gende di e ences in isk aking: a me a-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 125 (3), 367. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1037/0033- 2909.125.3.367. 8 J. Amonda ain, M.E. Aldazabal and M. Espinosa-Pike Jou nal o Beha io al and Expe imen al Finance 37 (2023) 100784 By on, K., Pos , C., 2016. Women on boa ds o di ec o s and co po a e social pe o mance: A me a-analysis. Co p. Go . In . Re . 24 (4), 428–442. h p: //dx.doi.o g/10.1111/co g.12165. Caglio, A., Came an, M., 2017. Is i shame ul o be an accoun an ? GenMe pe cep ion(s) o accoun an s’ e hics. Abacus J. Accoun . Financ. Bus. S ud. 53 (1), 1–27. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1111/abac.12098. Caglio, A., Came an, M., Klobas, J., 2019. Wha is an accoun an ? An in es iga ion o images. Eu . Accoun . Re . 28 (5), 849–871. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1080/ 09638180.2018.1550000. Came an, M., Di illo, A., Pe inicchio, A., 2018. Audi eam a ibu es ma e : How di e si y a ec s audi quali y. Eu . Accoun . Re . 27 (4), 595–621. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1080/09638180.2017.1307131. Ca negie, G.D., Napie , C.J., 2010. T adi ional accoun an s and business p o es- sionals: po aying he accoun ing p o ession a e En on. Accoun . O gan. Soc. 35 (3), 360–376. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1016/j.aos.2009.09.002. Che yan, S., Plau , V.C., Hand on, C., Hudson, L., 2013. The s e eo ypical compu e scien is : Gende ed media ep esen a ions as a ba ie o inclusion o women. Sex Roles 69 (1–2), 58–71. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1007/s11199-013- 0296-x. Cla ke, V.A., 1990. Sex di e ences in compu ing pa icipa ion: Conce ns, ex en , easons and s a egies. Aus . J. Educ. 34 (1), 52–66. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1177/ 000494419003400104. Cohen, J.R., Dal on, D.W., Holde -Webb, L.L., McMillan, J.J., 2020. An analysis o glass ceiling pe cep ions in he accoun ing p o ession. J. Bus. E hics 164 (1), 17–38. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1007/s10551-018-4054-4. Cox, T.H., Blake, S., 1991. Managing cul u al di e si y: implica ions o o gani- za ional compe i i eness. Acad. Manag. Pe spec . 5 (3), 45–56. h p://dx.doi. o g/10.5465/ame.1991.4274465. Dal on, D.W., Cohen, J.R., Ha p, N.L., McMillan, J.J., 2014. An eceden s and consequences o pe cei ed gende disc imina ion in he audi p o ession. Audi ing J. P ac . Theo y 33 (3), 1–32. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.2308/ajp -50737. Damb in, C., Lambe , C., 2008. Mo he ing o audi ing? The case o wo big ou in F ance. Accoun . Audi ing Accoun . J. 21 (4), 474–506. h p://dx.doi.o g/ 10.1108/09513570810872897. Damb in, C., Lambe , C., 2012. Who is she and who a e we? A e lexi e jou ney in esea ch in o he a i y o women in he highes anks o accoun ancy. C i . Pe spec . Accoun . 23 (1), 1–16. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1016/j.cpa.2011.06. 006. Daous , L., 2020. Playing he big ou ec ui men game: The ension be ween illusio and e lexi i y. C i . Pe spec . Accoun . 66, h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1016/ j.cpa.2019.04.002. Del Baldo, M., Ti on-Tudo , A., Fa agalla, W.A., 2019. Women’s ole in he accoun ing p o ession: A compa a i e s udy be ween I aly and Romania. Adm. Sci. 9 (1), 2. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.3390/admsci9010002. Dhi , A.A., 2015. Challenging Boa d oom Homogenei y: Co po a e Law, Go e nance, and Di e si y. Camb idge Uni e si y P ess. Dimnik, T., Fel on, S., 2006. Accoun an s e eo ypes in mo ies dis ibu ed in No h Ame ica in he wen ie h cen u y. Accoun . O gan. Soc. 31 (2), 129–155. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1016/j.aos.2004.10.001. Do idio, J.F., 2010. The SAGE Handbook o P ejudice, S e eo yping and Disc imina ion. Sage Publica ions, h p://dx.doi.o g/10.4135/9781446200919. Du oche , S., Bujaki, M., B oua d, F., 2016. A ac ing millennials: Legi imacy managemen and bo om-up socializa ion p ocesses wi hin accoun ing i ms. C i . Pe spec . Accoun . 39, 1–24. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1016/j.cpa.2016.02.002. Eagly, A.H., 1987. Sex Di e ences in Social Beha io : A Social-Role In e p e- a ion. Law ence E lbaum Associa es, Hillsdale, h p://dx.doi.o g/10.4324/ 9780203781906. Eagly, A.H., 1997. Sex di e ences in social beha io : Compa ing social ole heo y and e olu iona y psychology. Am. Psychol. 52 (12), 1380–1383. h p: //dx.doi.o g/10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1380.b. Edgley, C., Sha ma, N., Ande son-Gough, F., 2016. Di e si y and p o essionalism in he big ou i ms: Expec a ion, celeb a ion and weapon in he ba le o alen . C i . Pe spec . Accoun . 35, 13–34. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1016/j.cpa. 2015.05.005. Espinosa-Pike, M., Aldazabal, E., Ba ainkua, I., 2021. Unde g adua e business s uden s’ pe cep ion o audi ing: impac o p oximi y and knowledge on audi o s’ s e eo ype. Manag. Audi ing J. 36 (5), 699–723. h p://dx.doi.o g/ 10.1108/MAJ-07-2020-2739. E ans, L., F ase , I., 2012. The accoun an ’s social backg ound and s e eo ype in popula cul u e: he no els o Alexande Cla k Smi h. Accoun . Audi ing Accoun . J. 25 (6), 964–1000. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1108/09513571211250215. Fe nández, M.L., Cas o, Y.R., O e o, M.C., Fol z, M.L., Lo enzo, M.G., 2006. Sexism, oca ional goals, and mo i a ion as p edic o s o men’s and women’s ca ee choice. Sex Roles 55 (3–4), 267–272. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1007/s11199-006- 9079-y. Fe nandez-Feijoo, B., Rome o, S., Ruiz-Blanco, S., 2014. Women on boa ds: Do hey a ec sus ainabili y epo ing? Co p. Soc. Responsib. En i on. Mgm . 21, 351–364. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1002/cs .1329. Fogelbe g E iksson, A., 2014. A gende pe spec i e as igge and acili a o o inno a ion. In . J. Gend. En . 6 (2), 163–180. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1108/IJGE- 09-2012-0045. Fo migoni, H., Segu a, L., Gallego-Ál a ez, I., Ga cia-Sanchez, I.-M., 2020. Boa d o di ec o s cha ac e is ics and disclosu e p ac ices o co po a e social e- sponsibili y: a compa a i e s udy be ween B azilian and Spanish companies. Soc. Responsib. J. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1108/SRJ-01-2019-0043. F.R.C. (Financial Repo ing Council), 2019. Key ac s and ends in he accoun ancy p o ession 2019. London: Re ie ed om: h ps: //www. c.o g.uk/documen -lib a y/p o essional-o e sigh /2019/key- ac s- and- ends-in- he-accoun ancy-p o ession. (Feb ua y, 2020). F iedman, A., Lyne, S., 2001. The beancoun e s e eo ype: owa ds a gene al model o s e eo ype gene a ion. C i . Pe spec . Accoun . 12 (4), 423–451. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1006/cpac.2000.0451. Geo ge, J., Wallio, S., 2017. O ganiza ional jus ice and millennial u no e in public accoun ing. Empl. Rela . 39 (1), 112–126. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1108/ ER-11-2015-0208. Ge sson, N., Syl ande , J., B obe g, P., F ibe g, J., 2017. Explo ing audi assis an s’ decision o lea e he audi p o ession. Manag. Audi ing J. 32 (9), 879–898. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1108/MAJ-05-2016-1381. Ghani, F.A., De ani, N.E.S., Aznam, N., Mohamad, N., Zaka ia, S.A.A., Toolib, S.N., 2018. An empi ical in es iga ion o he ela ionship be ween ans o ma- ional, ansac ional emale leade ship s yles and employee engagemen . Glob. Bus. Manag. Res. 10 (3), 724. Gold, A., Hun on, J.E., Gomaa, M.I., 2009. The impac o clien and audi o gende on audi o s’ judgmen s ( e ac ed). Accoun . Ho iz. 23 (1), 1–18. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.2308/acch.2009.23.1.1. Gómez-Mi anda, M.E., Na a o-Gale a, A., Buendía-Ca illo, D., La a-Rubio, J., 2022. An empi ical analysis o women’s in luence on managemen o inan- cial isk in local go e nmen s. Re . Con abilidad Span. Accoun . Re . 25 (2), 271–281. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.6018/ csa .447901. G an Tho on, 2019. Women in business: Beyond policy o p og ess. Re ie ed om: h ps://www.g an ho n on.co.uk/globalasse s/1.-membe - i ms/global/insigh s/women-in-business/g an - ho n on-women-in- business-2018- epo .pd . (Accessed 22 Sep embe 2020). G ey, C., 1998. On being a p o essional in a ‘‘Big Six’’ i m. Accoun . O gan. Soc. 23 (5/6), 569–587. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1016/s0361-3682(97). Haines, E.L., Deaux, K., Lo a o, N., 2016. The imes hey a e a-changing... o a e hey no ? A compa ison o gende s e eo ypes, 1983–2014. Psychol. Women Q. 40 (3), 353–363. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1177/0361684316634081. Hall, M., Smi h, D., 2009. Men o ing and u no e in en ions in public accoun ing i ms: a esea ch no e. Accoun . O gan. Soc. 34 (6/7), 695–704. h p://dx.doi. o g/10.1016/j.aos.2008.11.003. Ha dies, K., B eesch, D., B anson, J., 2015. The emale audi ee p emium. Audi ing J. P ac . Theo y 34 (4), 171–195. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.2308/ajp -51079. Ha dies, K., B eesch, D., B anson, J., 2016. Do ( e) male audi o s impai audi quali y? E idence om going-conce n opinions. Eu . Accoun . Re . 25 (1), 7–34. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1080/09638180.2014.921445. Haynes, K., 2017. Accoun ing as gende ing and gende ed: A e iew o 25 yea s o c i ical accoun ing esea ch on gende . C i . Pe spec . Accoun . 43, 110–124. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1016/j.cpa.2016.06.004. Heia , A., B own, D., Johnson, D.M., 2007. An empi ical analysis o unde lying ac o s a ec ing he choice o accoun ing majo . J. Coll. Teach. Lea n. (TLC) 4 (8), h p://dx.doi.o g/10.19030/ lc. 4i8.1558. Heilman, M.E., 1983. Sex bias in wo k se ings: The lack o i model. Res. O gan. Beha . 5, 269–298. Heilman, M.E., 2012. Gende s e eo ypes and wo kplace bias. Res. O gan. Beha . 32, 113–135. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1016/j. iob.2012.11.003. He manson, D.R., He manson, R.H., I ance ich, S.H., 1995. A e Ame ica’s op business s uden s s ee ing clea o accoun ing? Ohio CPA J. 54 (2), 26. Hil ebei el, K.M., Leauby, B.A., 2001. Mig a o y pa e ns o en y-le el accoun an s. Ohio CPA J. 71 (4), 54–56. Hil on, J.L., on Hippel, W., 1996. S e eo ypes. Annu. Re . Psychol. 47 (1), 237–271. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1146/annu e .psych.47.1.237. Hun , S.C., Falgiani, A.A., In ie i, R.C., 2004. The na u e and o igins o s uden s’ pe cep ions o accoun an s. J. Educ. Bus. 79 (3), 142–148. h p://dx.doi.o g/ 10.3200/JOEB.79.3.142-148. Hun , S.C., In ie i, R.C., Falgiani, A.A., Papini, M.T., 2009. The e ec o gende and knowledge on s uden s imp essions o accoun an s in he pos -en on e a. J. Bus. Econ. Res. (JBER) 7 (5), h p://dx.doi.o g/10.19030/ lc. 4i8.1558. Huse, M., Solbe g, A.G., 2006. Gende - ela ed boa d oom dynamics: How Scandina ian women make and can make con ibu ions on co po a e boa ds. Women Manag. Re . 21 (2), 113–130. h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1108/ 09649420610650693. ICAC Ins i u o de Con abilidad y Audi o ía de Cuen as, 2018. Anua io del Regis o O icial de Audi o es de Cuen as. Re ie ed om: h ps://www.icac.gob.es/ si es/de aul / iles/2020-11/ANUARIO%20ROAC%202018_0.pd . (Ma ch, 2020). ICAC Ins i u o de Con abilidad y Audi o ía de Cuen as, 2021. Si uación de la audi o ía en España 2020. Mad id: Re ie ed om: h ps: //www.icac.gob.es/si es/de aul / iles/2021-10/Si uaci%C3%B3nAudi o %C3% ADa2020_127BOICAC_VFINAL 1.pd . (No embe , 2021). ICJCE Ins i u o de Censo es Ju ados de Cuen as de España, 2017. Fo og a ía del sec o de la audi o ía, La audi o ía de cuen as en España, adiog a ía del sec o y es imación de su impac o económico. Mad id: Re ie ed om h ps://www.icjce.es/adjun os/ o og a ia-sec o -2016.pd . (June, 2020). 9