Amorphous FeCoCrSiB Ribbons with Tailored Anisotropy for the Development of Magnetic Elements for High Frequency Applications
Abstract
The research funding from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (Ural Federal University Program of Development within the Priority-2030 Program) is gratefully acknowledged. Further funding from University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU Research Groups Funding (GMMM) is similarly gratefully acknowledged.
Full text
Citation: Kurlyandskaya, G.V.; Lezama, L.; Pasynkova, A.A.; Volchkov, S.O.; Lukshina, V.A.; Larrañaga, A.; Dmitrieva, N.V.; Timofeeva, A.V.; Orue, I. Amorphous FeCoCrSiB Ribbons with Tailored Anisotropy for the Development of Magnetic Elements for High Frequency Applications. Materials 2022,15, 4160. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/ma15124160 Academic Editors: Matteo Tonezzer and Davide Barreca Received: 5 May 2022 Accepted: 10 June 2022 Published: 12 June 2022 Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Copyright: © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). materials Article Amorphous FeCoCrSiB Ribbons with Tailored Anisotropy for the Development of Magnetic Elements for High Frequency Applications Galina V. Kurlyandskaya 1,2,*, Luis Lezama 3,4 , Anna A. Pasynkova 2,5 , Stanislav O. Volchkov 2, Vera A. Lukshina 6, Aitor Larrañaga 4, Natalia V. Dmitrieva 6, Anastasia V. Timofeeva 2,5 and Iñaki Orue 4 1Department of Electricity and Electronics, Basque Country University (UPV/EHU), 48940 Leioa, Spain 2Institute of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Ural Federal University, 620002 Ekaterinburg, Russia; [email protected] (A.A.P.); stanislav[email protected] (S.O.V.); [email protected] (A.V.T.) 3Department ofInorganic Chemistry, Basque Country University (UPV/EHU), 48940 Leioa, Spain; [email protected] 4Los Servicios Generales de Investigación (SGIKER), Basque Country University UPV/EHU, 48940 Leioa, Spain; aitor[email protected] (A.L.); [email protected] (I.O.) 5 Laboratory of Advanced Magnetic Materials, Institute of Metal Physics UD RAS, 620108 Ekaterinburg, Russia 6Micromagnetism Laboratory Institute of Metal Physics UD RAS, 620108 Ekaterinburg, Russia; [email protected] (V.A.L.); [email protected] (N.V.D.) *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) in the frequency range of 0.5 to 12.5 GHz has been investigated as a function of external magnetic field for rapidly quenched Fe 3 Co 67 Cr 3 Si 15 B 12 amorphous ribbons with different features of the effective magnetic anisotropy. Three states of the ribbons were considered: as-quenched without any treatment; after relaxation annealing without stress at the temperature of 350 ◦ C during 1 h; and after annealing under specific stress of 230 MPa at the temperature of 350 ◦ C during 1 h. For FMR measurements, we adapted a technique previously proposed and tested for the case of microwires. Here, amorphous ribbons were studied using the sample holder based on a commercial SMA connector. On the basis of the measurements of the reflection coefficient S 11, the total impedance including its real and imaginary components was determined to be in the frequency range of 0.5 to 12.5 GHz. In order to confirm the validity of the proposed technique, FMR was also measured by the certified cavity perturbation technique using a commercial Bruker spectrometer operating at X-band frequency of 9.39 GHz. As part of the characterization of the ribbons used for microwave measurements, comparative analysis was performed of X-ray diffraction, optical microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, inductive magnetic hysteresis loops, vibrating sample magnetometry, magneto-optical Kerr effect (including magnetic domains) and magnetoimpedance data for of all samples. Keywords: amorphous ribbons; magnetic anisotropy; magnetization process; magnetoimpedance; ferromagnetic resonance; magnetic field sensors; microwave absorption 1. Introduction Rapidly quenched amorphous and nanocrystalline ribbons were the subject of intensive research in the last three decades [ 1 – 3 ]. Special interest in this kind of material can be explained by their extensive use in production techniques. It is reasonably stable and applicable in a wide variety of compositions, and low contamination can be ensured. In addition, the ribbon’s properties can be modified by the post preparation treatments according the particular application [ 3 – 5 ]. Among others, Co-based amorphous ribbons with close-to-zero magnetostriction were extensively studied with the focus on their applications to wound core in the field of transformers, working at frequency levels of hundreds Hz and magnetic sensors focused on the detection of small magnetic fields [6–8]. Materials 2022,15, 4160. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15124160 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/materials
Materials 2022,15, 4160 2 of 20 One of the most sensitive effects for small magnetic field sensor applications is magnetoimpedance (MI). The MI phenomenon consists of the change in the total impedance of a ferromagnetic conducting sample under application of an external magnetic field (H) and flow of a high frequency alternating current [ 4 , 9 , 10 ]. Makhotkin et al. reported the first ribbon-based alternating current magnetic sensor prototype in [ 11 ]. They introduced ribbon-based prototypes suitable for magnetic biosensing both in label-free and magnetic label detection regimes [ 12 , 13 ]. In the latter, the corrosion stability was very important and compositions with chromium or molybdenum [ 14 – 16 ] were considered to take account of the need for low or high corrosion. For the CoFeCrSiB composition, the best results were obtained after stress annealing, and a sensitivity with respect to the applied field of the order of 200%/Oe was achieved [ 17 ]. This was made possible by thorough previous studies on the annealing conditions: the temperature (T), annealing time (t) and specific load ( σ ) were carefully adjusted [ 18 ]. However, past research focused on the understanding of the dependence of magnetic properties, effective magnetic anisotropy and MI for rather high values of the induced magnetic anisotropy constant (K u ) above 2000 erg/cm 3 . For the temperature of the stress annealing of 350 ◦ C, there is only one study of MI with low specific load value under the following conditions: t = 1 h and σ = 210 MPa. This resulted in formation of transverse magnetic anisotropy with very low anisotropy distribution and high MI sensitivity of the order of 200%/Oe for the frequency of a flowing current (f) of about 10 MHz and samples of 10 cm in length [ 17 ]. However, other conditions were not investigated, and the transition from the longitudinal to the transverse anisotropy was not really understood. As-quenched Co-based ribbons are characterized bythe longitudinal magnetic anisotropy with the in-plane magnetic anisotropy axis along the long side of the ribbon. Relaxation annealing at temperatures below the crystallization temperature of the particular alloy results in the reduction of the level of the as-quenched stresses but does not change the type of the magnetic anisotropy, which continues to be longitudinal. Stress annealing with a negative magnetic anisotropy constant results in formation of the transverse uniaxial magnetic anisotropy, with the induced anisotropy axis oriented along the width of the ribbon and, again, the reduction of the level of the as-quenched stresses [ 19 , 20 ]. Such a transition (from the longitudinal to transverse effective anisotropy) can be studied in terms of the MI effect. Although the concept of using MI as an “instrument” was proposed during the first years of MI studies, the number of systematic MI works for the precise evaluation of anisotropy features is still limited. The MI phenomenon has been understood in the context of classical electrodynamics and is well explained on the basis of the dependence of skin penetration depth ( δ ) on the dynamic magnetic permeability ( µ ) of a ferromagnetic conductor. That is, high frequency impedance depends on the skin penetration depth, which in turn depends on the magnetic permeability and applied magnetic field: Z = Z( δ (f, µ (H)) [ 1 – 4 ]. There have also been special studies related to the connection between MI and another well-known high frequency phenomenon—ferromagnetic resonance (FMR). FMR is the resonant absorption of microwave radiation in magnetic material [ 21 , 22 ]. Yelon et al. proposed the point of view that calculations of magnetoimpedance and of ferromagnetic resonance response are rigorously equivalent in the case of a plate or ribbon [ 23 ]. Experimental analysis included an evaluation of the changes in the attenuation coefficient of a coaxial line, having a NiFeMo wire as the central conductor for the frequency range of 100 to 6000 MHz. However, the number of studies of both MI and FMR remain very limited. Among other reasons, broadband measurement techniques were not widely available. They have become more accessible and applied to very different types of soft magnetic materials only in the last one and half decade [ 24 – 27 ]. For example, El Kammouni et al. studied FMR of amorphous microwires using a network analyzer (Agilent E8362B) in the frequency range of up to 12GHz at a constant incident power of − 10dBm using a commercial SMA connector where the inner pin had been removed in order to avoid radiation effects [ 28 ]. The same technique was employed by Kurlyandskaya et al. for the case of CuBe/FeCoNi electroplated wires in
Materials 2022,15, 4160 3 of 20 the frequency range of up to 14 GHz [ 29 ]. In the latter, both FMR and MI measurements were presented. In this present work, we proposed to design and test the broadband measurement technique based on the employment of coaxial waveguide, and a sample holder based on a commercial SMA connector. The reflection coefficient S 11 measurements allowed accurate definition of the total impedance variation in the frequency range of 0.5 to 12.5 GHz. Special attention was paid on the selection and detailed characterization of the model samples prepared that were based on a single batch Fe 3 Co 67 Cr 3 Si 15 B 12 amorphous ribbon. The amorphous structure was studied, and the static and dynamic magnetic properties of the ribbons with different features of effective magnetic anisotropy near the state of transition from longitudinal to a transverse magnetic anisotropy were comparatively analyzed using different techniques prior to the microwave tests. 2. Materials and Methods Amorphous ribbons with nominal composition of Fe 3 Co 67 Cr 3 Si 15 B 12 were prepared by rapid quenching onto a Cu drum. The length of one batch was as much as several meters with very close parameters of the width and thickness over the whole batch. According to the literature [ 3 , 15 ], the ribbons of such composition have very small negative saturation magnetostriction constant ( λS ~10 −7 ) and therefore they can be used for stress annealing and formation of the transverse magnetic anisotropy suitable for MI applications [13,19,30–32] . Apart from the as-quenched samples in the initial state (AP), the samples that were considered were obtained by the relaxation annealing (AN) at 350 ◦ C during 1 h without load and stress annealing (SA) during 1 h and specific load of 230 MPa. Selected composition differs from the widely studied Fe 4 Co 69 Si 15 B 12 [ 33 ] material by the presence of chromium making it very stable in special environmental conditions including chemically active biofluids [ 6 ]. Fe 3 Co 67 Cr 3 Si 15 B 12 ribbons have a saturation magnetization M s = 365 G, and a Curie temperature of 160 ◦ C which is quite low in comparison with their crystallization temperature of 570 ◦ C. This means that selected heat treatments at 350 ◦ C were performed at the temperature being approximately 0.6 of the crystallization temperature. For the majority of rapidly quenched amorphous alloys, such heat treatments do not change the amorphous structure of the material [ 1 , 34 , 35 ]. For example, Dmitrieva et al. [ 33 ] had studied the Fe 5 Co 72 Si 15 B 8 alloy in the initial state, after relaxation or stress annealing. According to magnetic measurements and TEM data analysis, all materials were amorphous but the change of the structure was observed after annealing at 430 ◦ C. The Fe 5 Co 72 Si 15 B 8 alloy has a much lower crystallization temperature of 418 ◦ C in comparison with that of Fe 3 Co 67 Cr 3 Si 15 B 12 , and a corresponding ratio of 1.02 between the temperature of the heat treatment and crystallization temperature. The temperature and time of the annealing were selected on the basis of previous studies [ 3 , 17 , 18 ]. However, the specific load was modified, namely increased up to σ= 230 MPa in comparison with data in [ 18 ]. The following arguments were used for the selected conditions. Dmitrieva et al. had shown linear dependence of Ku( σ ) for the specific load range 400–1400 MPa. The only specific load in the interval 0–400 MPa was 210 MPa reported by Kurlyandskaya et al. [ 17 ]. However, this was following the linear dependence of Ku( σ ) with a somewhat lower regression. We therefore decided to slightly increase the specific load in the present study up to σ = 230 MPa in keeping with the joint data analysis reported in [ 17 , 18 ]. Heat treatments (both AN and SA) were done in the self-made vertical furnace with a thermocouple temperature control using a calibrated system. The widths and surface features of the ribbons from both sides (the free and weal sides) were studied by optical microscopy (Nicon L-UEPI microscope, Boston Industries, Inc., MA). The geometrical parameters of the samples were defined as follows: width—d, thickness—h and length—l (Figure 1).
Materials 2022,15, 4160 4 of 20 Materials 2022, 15, 4160 4 of 20 (a) (b) Figure 1. (a) Schematic description of amorphous ribbon sample with dimensions l × d × h: H is the external magnetic field applied during magnetic and GMI measurements, however for FMR measurements in the resonance cavity both in-plane and out-of-plane orientations of the external magnetic field were used; EMA 1 corresponds to the easy magnetization axis of the sample in initial state; EMA 2 corresponds to the easy magnetization axis of the sample after relaxation annealing; and EMA 3 corresponds to the easy magnetization axis of the sample after TMO. (b) The scheme of the broadband microwave measurements using ZVA VNA for the coaxial position of a sample; H is an external magnetic field. The amorphous state of the samples in all conditions was checked by X-ray diffraction technique. These studies were performed by operating the DISCOVER D8 diffractometer (Bruker, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands) at 40 kV and 40 mA, using Cu-Kα radiation (wavelength of 1.5418 Å), a graphite monochromator and a scintillation detector. Ribbons were cut into pieces of about 1 cm and placed onto zero signal Si plate. In addition, the ribbons of all types were studied by transmission electron microscopy using JEM 200CX electron microscope (JEOL, Freising, Germany). The samples for TEM analysis were prepared by electropolishing with H 3 PO 4 + CrO 3 fresh electrolyte. Both the bright field image for revelation of the microstructural features and the microdiffraction patterns were collected. All magnetic and microwave measurements were made at room temperature. Magnetic measurements of the hysteresis loops M(H) were carried out by both a conventional inductive system and a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM, Lake Shore 7404, Westerville, OH, USA) in the up to ±1.8 kOe field range. The inductive hysteresis loops were measured by applying a uniform external magnetic field in the plane of the ribbons of 45 mm length, i.e., the same length as the ones used for MI measurements (Figure 1). However, as FMR studies in both systems employed were made for short samples of 5 mm length, apart from the inductive hysteresis loops, VSM data were also collected and analyzed for samples of 5 mm length. In the VSM case, both in-plane and out-of-plane (Figure 1a) were carried out. In addition, magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE) was employed for magnetic measurements and observation of magnetic domains. The hysteresis loops were also measured by Kerr microscopy (Evico, Dresden, Germany) by plotting the average image intensity as a function of magnetic field. The magnetoimpedance measurements were performed using a “microstrip” line with 50 Ohm characteristic impedance. The electrical contacts were made by a conductive silver paint for proper installation of the ribbon into microwave holder. The external magnetic field of up to H max ± 110 Oe was created by a pair of Helmholtz coils. The total impedance (Z) was calculated from the reflection coefficient S 11 , after proper calibration and mathematical subtraction of the microwave fixture contributions. S 11 (H) values were measured by 4294A (Agilent/Keysight Technologies, Santa Rosa, CA, USA), using an output power of 0 dB. This means that the amplitude of the excitation current across the sample was about 10 mA. An external magnetic field was applied in-plane of the ribbon along the ribbon axis (long side of the ribbon) and in the same direction as the flowing current. The configuration of the longitudinal MI employed was the same configuration as for FMR: the radio frequency field created by the alternating current was perpendicular to l h I ac H, EMA 1 ,EMA 2 EMA 3 in plane out of plane Figure 1. ( a ) Schematic description of amorphous ribbon sample with dimensions l × d × h: H is the external magnetic field applied during magnetic and GMI measurements, however for FMR measurements in the resonance cavity both in-plane and out-of-plane orientations of the external magnetic field were used; EMA 1 corresponds to the easy magnetization axis of the sample in initial state; EMA 2 corresponds to the easy magnetization axis of the sample after relaxation annealing; and EMA 3 corresponds to the easy magnetization axis of the sample after TMO. ( b ) The scheme of the broadband microwave measurements using ZVA VNA for the coaxial position of a sample; H is an external magnetic field. The amorphous state of the samples in all conditions was checked by X-ray diffraction technique. These studies were performed by operating the DISCOVER D8 diffractometer (Bruker, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands) at 40 kV and 40 mA, using Cu-K α radiation (wavelength of 1.5418 Å), a graphite monochromator and a scintillation detector. Ribbons were cut into pieces of about 1 cm and placed onto zero signal Si plate. In addition, the ribbons of all types were studied by transmission electron microscopy using JEM 200CX electron microscope (JEOL, Freising, Germany). The samples for TEM analysis were prepared by electropolishing with H 3 PO 4 + CrO 3 fresh electrolyte. Both the bright field image for revelation of the microstructural features and the microdiffraction patterns were collected. All magnetic and microwave measurements were made at room temperature. Magnetic measurements of the hysteresis loops M(H) were carried out by both a conventional inductive system and a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM, Lake Shore 7404, Westerville, OH, USA) in the up to ± 1.8 kOe field range. The inductive hysteresis loops were measured by applying a uniform external magnetic field in the plane of the ribbons of 45 mm length, i.e., the same length as the ones used for MI measurements (Figure 1). However, as FMR studies in both systems employed were made for short samples of 5 mm length, apart from the inductive hysteresis loops, VSM data were also collected and analyzed for samples of 5 mm length. In the VSM case, both in-plane and out-of-plane (Figure 1a) were carried out. In addition, magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE) was employed for magnetic measurements and observation of magnetic domains. The hysteresis loops were also measured by Kerr microscopy (Evico, Dresden, Germany) by plotting the average image intensity as a function of magnetic field. The magnetoimpedance measurements were performed using a “microstrip” line with 50 Ohm characteristic impedance. The electrical contacts were made by a conductive silver paint for proper installation of the ribbon into microwave holder. The external magnetic field of up to H max ± 110 Oe was created by a pair of Helmholtz coils. The total impedance (Z) was calculated from the reflection coefficient S 11 , after proper calibration and mathematical subtraction of the microwave fixture contributions. S 11 (H) values were measured by 4294A (Agilent/Keysight Technologies, Santa Rosa, CA, USA), using an output power of 0 dB. This means that the amplitude of the excitation current across the sample was about 10 mA. An external magnetic field was applied in-plane of the ribbon along the ribbon axis (long side of the ribbon) and in the same direction as the flowing current. The configuration of the longitudinal MI employed was the same configuration as for FMR: the radio frequency field created by the alternating current was perpendicular
Materials 2022,15, 4160 5 of 20 to the direction of the applied field. For the convenience of comparison of experimental results with the data reported by other researchers, the following MI ratio was used: ∆Z/Z = 100% ·(Z(H) −Z(Hmax))/Z(Hmax)). (1) In addition, the sensitivity with respect to the constant applied field was defined as follows: ∆(∆Z/Z)(H)= (∆Z/Z (H1) −∆Z/Z (H2))/|H1−H2|, (2) where H 1 is the smallest and H 2 is the biggest values of the applied field for the interval of linear dependence of ∆Z/Z (H), i.e., the interval for which the sensitivity was calculated. Ferromagnetic resonance measurements at microwave frequency f = 9.39 GHz were carried out on an ELEXSYS 500 Bruker spectrometer (Bruker, Tampa, FL, USA) operating by standard cavity perturbation technique protocol [ 22 ]. Both in-plane and out-of-plane configurations of the application of the external magnetic field were used. The maximum field value intensity was as high as 4.0 kOe (sufficient for magnetic saturation of the ribbons). In previous works [ 24 , 36 ], we proposed a way to measure the microwave properties of microwires that are electroplated and rapidly quenched wires in the coaxial line. The test fixtures, based on the SMA-holder for 1–15 GHz range, were designed and tested (for the cylindrical configuration). All test fixtures have individual characteristics such as terminal layout, dielectric constant of insulator, ground plate and so on. However, each one can be matched to the coaxial line with 50-Ohm characteristic impedance according to the established calibration process by using open, short and load reference terminations connected to the test port. Each of the terminations is measured, and the obtained impedance values of these reference terminations are analyzed in the form of vector impedance coordinates and a Smith chart. Compensation procedures allow the elimination of errors corresponding to test fixture contributions and to electrical length. The latter compensation eliminates measurement errors due to phase shift in the coaxial section [36]. Here we describe the possibility of adapting a previously designed system for precise measurements of the samples in the shape of prisms (amorphous ribbons) in a coaxial waveguide. The microwave properties of the ferromagnetic conducting ribbons were measured by the system based on a ZVA-67 vector network analyzer (VNA) (Rohde & Schwarz, Munich, Germany) using the one port method (Figure 1b). The electromagnet connected to the power supply TDK-Lambda GEN100-50 was capable of creating an external magnetic field with an intensity of up to 13 kOe. However, as amorphous ribbons are soft ferromagnets, the maximum value of the external magnetic field (sufficient for the ribbons’ magnetic saturation) was as high as 4.0 kOe. The power output of the signal of the ZVA analyzer was set at a level of 0.1 mW, based on the maximum signal-to-noise ratio criterion. In addition, at this level of power, the amplitude values of the intensity of an alternating magnetic field are significantly smaller than the value of the intensity of a field generated by a permanent magnet. Since no difference was observed between the positive and negative branches of measurements, the graphs discussed here present the values obtained in the positive field interval of 0.0–4.0 kOe only. The measured samples were placed onto a holder made of a commercial connector SMA S-2454 (Mouser Electronics, Inc., Mansfield, TX, USA) connected to a coaxial cable (Pasternack PE3C0752) via a BN533795 adapter. The length of the samples of the microwires was chosen based on results of modeling. Since a ZVA-67 vector analyzer measures the amplitude and phase of the reflected signal as well, the value of the parameter S 11 can be compensated for the length k of the adapter with the holder. Full one-port calibration was used to compensate the coaxial cable [ 24 , 36 ]. Although the range of the measurements using SMA in combination with VNA is 0.1 to 15 GHz, after careful modeling of the complete coaxial waveguide parameters with specific geometry used by High-Frequency Structure Simulator software, the appropriate frequency range was considered to be 0.5–12.5 GHz. The reflection coefficient S 11 values were measured as a function of the external magnetic field and frequency. These data can be used to estimate such parameters as microwave
Materials 2022,15, 4160 6 of 20 absorption of ferromagnetic samples. The next step was to determine the impedance of the sample Z with both real and imaginary parts. This required the compensation of the parameter S11 for the distance k: S‘ 11 =S11 ×ei2βk(3) where S‘ 11 is the value of the parameter of the scattering matrix in the plane of the sample; S11 is the value of the parameter of the scattering matrix in the calibration plane; β = 2 π / λ is the wavenumber; λ is the wavelength; and k is the electrical distance of the coaxial transmission line. The sample impedance can therefore be determined as follows: Z=Z0×1+S‘ 11 1−S‘ 11 (4) where Z 0 = 50 Ohm is the impedance of the coaxial line. The change in the reactive part of the impedance ∆ X(f, H) = X(f, H) − X(f, 0) and loss resistance ∆ R(f, H) = R(f, H) − R(f, 0) under application of an external constant magnetic field were also taken into account for the analysis of the observed resonance phenomena. 3. Results and Discussion Table 1summarizes the data on the states and types of treatments applied to the samples, and collects selected magnetic parameters. In a first step, the structure and geometrical parameters were defined. Figure 2a,b show the general view of the surface of the ribbons from both sides. The surface features were not changed during the heat treatments and the samples did not show any measurable elongation for the conditions under consideration. One can see that they have quite uniform surface features and welldefined width which was measured in the optical microscope after calibration. The width of the ribbons was 0.80 ±0.02 mm and their thickness was 0.24 ±0.01 µm. The XRD analysis summary is given in Figure 2b. All types of the ribbons presented a clear amorphous structure and very broad diffraction peaks, 2 θ ( ◦ ) in a range of around 43–46 ◦ (Figure 2c), confirming the absence of long range ordering and crystalline phases in all cases under consideration. Such a result was highly expected for the ribbons of this composition [ 17 ] as the selected specific load value was very small. In addition, it was noted that mechanical properties of the samples were not visibly changed. The absence of significant changes (such as crystallization) in the amorphous structure was also confirmed by the analysis of TEM data. Figure 3shows electron diffraction patterns and electron micrographs ( × 20,000) for different samples of the amorphous Fe 3 Co 67 Cr 3 Si 15 B 12 alloy in all states under consideration: AP, AN and SA. According to electron diffraction data, the samples of Fe 3 Co 67 Cr 3 Si 15 B 12 alloy in all states are amorphous as they have no precipitates of crystalline phases. According to the existing literature, structural inhomogeneities can be formed in an amorphous alloy upon annealing at high temperatures following the rule that the higher the temperature, the higher the content of formed inhomogeneities. The inhomogeneities can have different chemical composition, size and features of a short-range order. It was previously shown that the prepared amorphous ribbons have less uniform structure in comparison with ribbons after stress annealing at a temperature of about 300 ◦ C. The non-stoichiometry in the local composition and the tendency for atomic chemical ordering can result in the formation of clusters that are not considered as the first stage of crystallization but rather can increase the stability of the amorphous material [33].
Materials 2022,15, 4160 7 of 20 Table 1. Description of the types and states of rapidly quenched Fe 3 Co 67 Cr 3 Si 15 B 12 ribbons and conditions of their thermal treatments. Selected parameters, obtained for long samples of 45 mm: K u —effective magnetic anisotropy constant, H c —coercivity, H a —magnetic anisotropy field and Ms—saturation magnetization. Sample Description Ku, erg/cm3Hc, Oe Ha, Oe Ms, Gs AP As-prepared 0 0.1 0.1 300 AN Annealed at 350 ◦C without stress during 1 h 0 0.1 0.1 300 SA Stress annealing at 350 ◦C without stress during 1 h for specific stress of 230 MPa 500 0.2 3.3 300 Materials 2022, 15, 4160 7 of 20 (a) (b) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 AP AN SA Intensity (arb. un.) 2 (o) 0300 600 900 0.000 0.005 N Short Long (c) (d) Figure 2. General view of the surface of amorphous ribbons obtained by optical microscopy: free side (a) and weal side (b) of the Fe3Co67Cr3Si15B12 amorphous ribbon. (c) XRD spectra for all types of the samples. (d) Demagnetizing factors calculated for selected values of magnetic susceptibility χ and two different lengths of the samples: l = 5 mm for “short” and l = 45 mm for “long” samples. According to electron diffraction data, the samples of Fe3Co67Cr3Si15B12 alloy in all states are amorphous as they have no precipitates of crystalline phases. According to the existing literature, structural inhomogeneities can be formed in an amorphous alloy upon annealing at high temperatures following the rule that the higher the temperature, the higher the content of formed inhomogeneities. The inhomogeneities can have different chemical composition, size and features of a short-range order. It was previously shown that the prepared amorphous ribbons have less uniform structure in comparison with ribbons after stress annealing at a temperature of about 300 °C. The non-stoichiometry in the local composition and the tendency for atomic chemical ordering can result in the formation of clusters that are not considered as the first stage of crystallization but rather can increase the stability of the amorphous material [33]. Model considerations were given to the role of the micro-inhomogeneities contributing to the structural changes under uniaxial tensile stresses. Clusters may become anisotropic in shape and after cooling down due to difference in the thermal expansion coefficients of the amorphous matrix and clusters. Moreover, the magnetoelastic anisotropy at the interface between the matrix and the clusters may orient the magnetization in the transverse direction, i.e., along the short side of the ribbon [35]. However, the objectives of the present work do not include such a fundamental question as the nature of the induced magnetic anisotropy in the amorphous rapidly-quenched ferromagnets. Here, we use different structural and magnetic techniques for advanced characterization of the samples, which are prepared for rigorous testing of the microwave absorption technique proposed for broadband ferromagnetic resonance measurements. 0.5 mm 0.5 mm Figure 2. General view of the surface of amorphous ribbons obtained by optical microscopy: free side ( a ) and weal side ( b ) of the Fe 3 Co 67 Cr 3 Si 15 B 12 amorphous ribbon. ( c ) XRD spectra for all types of the samples. ( d ) Demagnetizing factors calculated for selected values of magnetic susceptibility χ and two different lengths of the samples: l = 5 mm for “short” and l = 45 mm for “long” samples. Model considerations were given to the role of the micro-inhomogeneities contributing to the structural changes under uniaxial tensile stresses. Clusters may become anisotropic in shape and after cooling down due to difference in the thermal expansion coefficients of the amorphous matrix and clusters. Moreover, the magnetoelastic anisotropy at the interface between the matrix and the clusters may orient the magnetization in the transverse direction, i.e., along the short side of the ribbon [ 35 ]. However, the objectives of the present work do not include such a fundamental question as the nature of the induced magnetic anisotropy in the amorphous rapidly-quenched ferromagnets. Here, we use different structural and magnetic techniques for advanced characterization of the samples, which are prepared for rigorous testing of the microwave absorption technique proposed for broadband ferromagnetic resonance measurements.
Materials 2022,15, 4160 8 of 20 Materials 2022, 15, 4160 8 of 20 Figure 3. Microdiffraction patterns (a,c,d) and electron micrographs (b,d,e) for Fe 3 Co 67 Cr 3 Si 15 B 12 rapidly-quenched ribbons in following states: AP (a,b); AN (c,d); and SA (e,f) (see also Table 1). We now discuss static magnetic properties of the samples of different lengths. The size of the functional elements of rapidly-quenched ribbons can vary significantly from tens of cm for wound transformers to a few mm for sensitive element of the magnetic field sensors. The samples of 45 mm length (denominated as “long” samples) were prepared for magnetoimpedance testing. Their static magnetic hysteresis loops were measured using an inductive technique. Both VSM and FMR techniques required preparation of the “short” samples of 5 mm length. The length difference caused a change in the demagnetizing factor, affecting the value of the effective magnetic anisotropy on the ribbons of each particular geometric length. In order to take into account the difference in the geometry of the ribbons, we calculated the demagnetizing factors of the prisms with the corresponding geometrical parameters for selected values of magnetic susceptibility from 0 to 999. It is well known that demagnetizing factors (N) for the objects of such shapes can be calculated only approximately [37]. However, Chen et al. proposed a useful technique for calculations of demagnetizing factors of rectangular [38] prisms, which was employed for N value calculations for the “short” and “long” ribbons under consideration (Figure 2d). One can see that calculated demagnetizing factors are significantly higher in the case of the “short” ribbons for all considered magnetic susceptibility values. Figure 4a,b show the results of the measurements of inductive hysteresis loops along the long side of the ribbons. One can clearly see that AP and AN ribbons have longitudinal Figure 3. Microdiffraction patterns ( a , c , d ) and electron micrographs ( b , d , e ) for Fe 3 Co 67 Cr 3 Si 15 B 12 rapidly-quenched ribbons in following states: AP (a,b); AN (c,d); and SA (e,f) (see also Table 1). We now discuss static magnetic properties of the samples of different lengths. The size of the functional elements of rapidly-quenched ribbons can vary significantly from tens of cm for wound transformers to a few mm for sensitive element of the magnetic field sensors. The samples of 45 mm length (denominated as “long” samples) were prepared for magnetoimpedance testing. Their static magnetic hysteresis loops were measured using an inductive technique. Both VSM and FMR techniques required preparation of the “short” samples of 5 mm length. The length difference caused a change in the demagnetizing factor, affecting the value of the effective magnetic anisotropy on the ribbons of each particular geometric length. In order to take into account the difference in the geometry of the ribbons, we calculated the demagnetizing factors of the prisms with the corresponding geometrical parameters for selected values of magnetic susceptibility from 0 to 999. It is well known that demagnetizing factors (N) for the objects of such shapes can be calculated only approximately [ 37 ]. However, Chen et al. proposed a useful technique for calculations of demagnetizing factors of rectangular [ 38 ] prisms, which was employed for N value calculations for the “short” and “long” ribbons under consideration (Figure 2d). One can see that calculated demagnetizing factors are significantly higher in the case of the “short” ribbons for all considered magnetic susceptibility values. Figure 4a,b show the results of the measurements of inductive hysteresis loops along the long side of the ribbons. One can clearly see that AP and AN ribbons have longitudinal
Materials 2022,15, 4160 9 of 20 magnetic anisotropy with very similar shaped M(H) loops and very small difference in the field range of 0.1 to 0.3 Oe; andthe sample after relaxation annealing shows a slightly faster approach to magnetic saturation. Both EMA 1 and EMA 2 are parallel to each other and to the long side of the ribbon. Materials 2022, 15, 4160 9 of 20 magnetic anisotropy with very similar shaped M(H) loops and very small difference in the field range of 0.1 to 0.3 Oe; andthe sample after relaxation annealing shows a slightly faster approach to magnetic saturation. Both EMA1 and EMA2 are parallel to each other and to the long side of the ribbon. -5 0 5 -200 0 200 M (G) H (Oe) Inductive, in plane AP AN SA -1 0 1 -200 0 200 M (G) H (Oe) Inductive, in plane AP AN SA (a) (b) -300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 -200 0 200 M (G) H (Oe) In plane, VSM AP AN SA -5 0 5 -200 0 200 M (G) H (Oe) In plane, VSM AP AN SA (c) (d) -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 -200 0 200 M (G) H (kOe) Out of plane, VSM AP AN SA -4 -2 0 2 4 -200 0 200 M (G) H (kOe) Out of plane, VSM AP AN SA (e) (f) Figure 4. Magnetic hysteresis loops of amorphous Fe3Co67Cr3Si15B12 ribbons in different states, with AP, AN and SA measured by: inductive technique (a,b); by VSM in the plane of the sample (c,d); and out-of-plane of the sample (e,f). For inductive measurements, sample length was l = 45 mm and for VSM samples, the length was l = 5 mm. Figure 4. Magnetic hysteresis loops of amorphous Fe 3 Co 67 Cr 3 Si 15 B 12 ribbons in different states, with AP, AN and SA measured by: inductive technique ( a , b ); by VSM in the plane of the sample ( c , d ); and out-of-plane of the sample ( e , f ). For inductive measurements, sample length was l = 45 mm and for VSM samples, the length was l = 5 mm.
Materials 2022,15, 4160 16 of 20 perturbation measurement, which appears to be very close to the broadband measurements for corresponding the frequency. Materials 2022, 15, 4160 16 of 20 Figure 9a shows experimental f2(Hres) dependences for all ribbon types and corresponding fits of Equation (6) using experimental parameters obtained from magnetic measurements. Both experimental curves of all types and the fitted curves show quite similar evolution, indicating the high quality of the proposed method for evaluation of broadband properties. Here we draw attention to the fact that, according to HFSS simulation, the appropriate measurements range was 0.5 to 12.5 GHz. Although Figure 8a represents the f2 range up to about 14 GHz (f2 200 GHz2), the data above 12.5 GHz become less precise. The dashed rectangular frame indicates this range of deviations. In addition, the excellent match for cavity perturbation technique data is also shown by indicating the position for the cavity perturbation measurement, which appears to be very close to the broadband measurements for corresponding the frequency. 0 1 2 3 0 50 100 150 200 Experimental Kittel fit AP AP AN AN SA SA f2 (GHz2) Hres (kOe) - cavity perturbation f = 9.39 GHz 01000 2000 3000 0 1AP, f = 9.39 GHz Cavity Coaxial line P (Arb. un.) H (Oe) = 0o (a) (b) 01000 2000 3000 0 1 P (Arb. un.) H (Oe) AN, f = 9.39 GHz Cavity Coaxial line = 0o 01000 2000 3000 0 1SA, f = 9.39 GHz Cavity Coaxial line P (Arb.un.) H (Oe) = 0o (c) (d) Figure 9. Microwave absorption measurements using a complete coaxial waveguide for Fe3Co67Cr3Si15B12 amorphous ribbons in different states AP, AN and SA. Experimental results and Kittel´s fit. (a) Dashed rectangle indicates the frequency range where the measurements are still possible but less precise as the approximation to the 50 Ohm matching waveguide characteristic impedance (Z0) deviates. (b–d) Direct comparison of the FMR resonance lines obtained for the frequency f = 9.39 GHz both by the cavity perturbation technique and using the coaxial waveguide for all ribbon types . Red and black dashed lines indicate the width of the FMR resonances. Figure 9. Microwave absorption measurements using a complete coaxial waveguide for Fe 3 Co 67 Cr 3 Si 15 B 12 amorphous ribbons in different states AP, AN and SA. Experimental results and Kittel ´ s fit. ( a ) Dashed rectangle indicates the frequency range where the measurements are still possible but less precise as the approximation to the 50 Ohm matching waveguide characteristic impedance (Z 0 ) deviates. ( b – d ) Direct comparison of the FMR resonance lines obtained for the frequency f = 9.39 GHz both by the cavity perturbation technique and using the coaxial waveguide for all ribbon types. Red and black dashed lines indicate the width of the FMR resonances. Figure 9b–d show experimental P(H) dependences for all types of Fe 3 Co 67 Cr 3 Si 15 B 12 amorphous ribbons measured by both the standard cavity perturbation technique and the coaxial waveguide. As the original measurements (done by the commercial spectrometer) were made in dP/dH mode, in order to perform such a comparison, the initial signals dP/dH were mathematically integrated with respect to the external magnetic applied field and the maximum of the absorption power intensity was normalized to one unit. For proper comparison, the reflection coefficient S 11 measured by the ZVA VNA analyzer for the calibration plane was recalculated in accordance with the method proposed in [ 29 , 36 ], and the changes in the real and imaginary parts of the impedance ( ∆ R and ∆ X) were obtained. For comparison between the two different microwave techniques, the ∆ R
Materials 2022,15, 4160 17 of 20 part was employed. Figure 9b–d show the broadband measurements data for all ribbon types. We used the normalized value of the ∆ R variation for the field dependence for the purposes of direct comparison with the cavity perturbation results. One can see very good agreement between the FMR (H res ) measured by the two microwave techniques. Not only are the positions of the maximum values of the microwave absorption quite similar, but this also applies to the width of the FMR lines. In rigorous evaluation terms, we note that the width of the resonance line is better defined for the cavity perturbation case. In the case of the coaxial waveguide, the main problem is the correct determination of the base line. Even so, Figure 9convincingly confirms the results of the measurements at f = 9.39 GHz. Strictly speaking, the comparison for Kittel ´ s conditions was made for one resonance frequency only and this is a disadvantage. However, very good agreement between the experimental results and fit of the Equation (7) is obtained, and the proposed measuring technique seems to be well adapted to the high frequency broadband characterization of the amorphous ribbons. ItisnecessarytoemphasizethatdependingontheselectedlengthsoftheFe 3 Co 67 Cr 3 Si 15 B 12 amorphous ribbons, the obtained materials can be used for high frequency applications in different frequency ranges. The independence of the FMR responses of short ribbons on the anisotropy features under consideration is also very interesting. It indicates the flexibility of the material and its potential for avoiding very strict protocols of additional heat treatments, saving time and energy in the case of some particular applications. One of the tendencies of the development of present-day microdevices and microsystems is an extension of the operating frequency range. This feature requires further development of the characterization techniques for different kinds of magnetically soft ferromagnets [ 5 , 31 , 36 , 48 ]. Here we proposed a simple way to measure the broadband FMR characteristics for amorphous ribbons. However, it can also be used for nanocrystalline materials and foils of rectangular shape. 4. Conclusions Produced from one batch of the material, rapidly quenched Fe 3 Co 67 Cr 3 Si 15 B 12 amorphous ribbons were prepared and designed in order to obtain model materials with different features of effective magnetic anisotropy for microwave tests. The following states were considered: (AP)—as-quenched without any treatment; (AN)—after relaxation annealing without stress at the temperature of 350 ◦ C during 1 h; and (SA)—after annealing under specific stress of 200 MPa at the temperature of 350 ◦ C during 1 h. In accordance with XRD and TEM studies, all materials were in amorphous state. Magnetic measurements of the long ribbons (45 mm) using inductive technique and MOKE revealed some differences in the effective magnetic anisotropy features, namely: AP and AN samples had well defined longitudinal effective magnetic anisotropy. Stress annealed ribbons had well-defined transverse effective anisotropy with low dispersion of the local magnetic anisotropy axes. SA ribbons showed excellent magnetoimpedance properties with very high sensitivity above 130%/Oe for a frequency of about 20 MHz, which is very convenient for sensor applications. At the same time, VSM measurements of the short ribbons (5 mm) showed similarity of their magnetic characteristics due to strong contribution of the shape anisotropy. Following this thorough characterization, the designed materials were used for microwave absorption measurements. For FMR tests of the short (5 mm) samples, we proposed, designed and tested a broadband measurement technique based on the employment of coaxial waveguide and sample holder established from a commercial SMA connector. Measurements of the reflection coefficient S 11 allowed the accurate determination of the total impedance variation in the frequency range of 0.5 to 12.5 GHz. The validity of the proposed technique was also confirmed by the measurements using the traditional cavity perturbation technique (spectrometer operating at X-band frequency of 9.39 GHz).
Materials 2022,15, 4160 18 of 20 Author Contributions: Conceptualization, G.V.K. and L.L.; methodology, G.V.K., L.L., V.A.L. and S.O.V.; software, S.O.V.; validation, A.A.P., A.L., N.V.D. and I.O.; formal analysis, A.L., A.V.T., N.V.D. and A.A.P.; investigation, G.V.K., L.L., I.O., V.A.L. and S.O.V.; resources, G.V.K.; data curation, A.L., A.V.T. and N.V.D.; writing—original draft preparation, G.V.K. and S.O.V.; writing—review and editing, G.V.K., V.A.L. and A.A.P.; visualization, G.V.K., L.L., A.L., A.A.P., S.O.V. and A.V.T.; supervision, G.V.K. and A.A.P.; funding acquisition, G.V.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding: The research funding from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (Ural Federal University Program of Development within the Priority-2030 Program) is gratefully acknowledged. Further funding from University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU Research Groups Funding (GMMM) is similarly gratefully acknowledged. Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable. Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable. Data Availability Statement: Data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Acknowledgments: We would like to thank V.O. Vaskovskiy and M. Vazquez for special support. Selected measurements were made at the SGIKER facilities of UPV/EHU. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. References 1. McHenry, M.E.; Willard, M.A.; Laughlin, D.E. Amorphous and nanocrystalline materials for applications as soft magnets. Prog. Mater. Sci. 1999,44, 291–433. [CrossRef] 2. Serikov, V.V.; Kleinerman, N.M.; Volkova, E.G.; Lukshina, V.A.; Potapov, A.P.; Svalov, A.V. Structure and magnetic properties of nanocrystalline FeCuNbSiB alloys after a thermomechanical treatment. Phys. Met. Metallogr. 2006,102, 268–273. [CrossRef] 3. Kurlyandskaya, G.V.; Dmitrieva, N.V.; Potapov, A.P.; Lukshina, V.A.; Voronova, L.M.; Gervas’eva, I.V.; Bebenin, N.G. Stressanneal-induced magnetic anisotropy in an amorphous alloy Fe3Co67Cr3Si15B12.Phys. Met. Metallogr. 1997,83, 487–490. 4. Beach, R.; Berkowitz, A. Sensitive field-and frequency-dependent impedance spectra of amorphous FeCoSiB wire and ribbon. J. Appl. Phys. 1994,10, 6209–6213. [CrossRef] 5. Eggers, T.; Leary, A.; McHenry, M.; Marcin, J.; Skorvanek, I.; Srikanth, H.; Phan, M.H. Correlation between domain structure, surface anisotropy and high frequency magneto-impedance in Joule annealed CoFe-based melt-spun ribbons. J. Alloys Compd. 2016,682, 799–804. [CrossRef] 6. Kurlyandskaya, G.; Miyar, V.F.; Saad, A.; Asua, E.; Rodriguez, J. Giant magnetoimpedance: A label-free option for surface effect monitoring. J. Appl. Phys. 2007,101, 054505. [CrossRef] 7. Phan, M.-H.; Kim, Y.-S.; Chien, N.X.; Yu, S.-C.; Yu, S.-C.; Lee, H.; Chau, N. Giant magnetoimpedance effect in Co70Fe5Si15B10 and Co70Fe5Si15Nb2.2Cu0.8B7 ribbons. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2003,42, 5571–5574. [CrossRef] 8. Semirov, A.V.; Bukreev, D.A.; Moiseev, A.A.; Derevyanko, M.S.; Kudryavtsev, V.O. Relationship between the temperature changes of the magnetostriction constant and the impedance of amorphous elastically deformed soft magnetic cobalt-based ribbons. Russ. Phys. J. 2013,55, 977–982. [CrossRef] 9. Panina, L.V.; Mohri, K. Magneto-impedance effect in amorphous wires. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1994,65, 1189. [CrossRef] 10. Rao, K.V.F.; Humphrey, F.B.; Costa-Kramer, J.L. Very large magneto-impedance in amorphous soft ferromagnetic wires. J. Appl. Phys. 1994,76, 6204–6208. [CrossRef] 11. Makhotkin, V.E.; Shurukhin, B.P.; Lopatin, V.A.; Marchukov, P.Y.; Levin, Y.K. Magnetic field sensors based on amorphous ribbons. Sens. Act. A 1991,27, 759–762. [CrossRef] 12. Safronov, A.P.; Mikhnevich, E.A.; Lotfollahi, Z.; Blyakhman, F.A.; Sklyar, T.F.; Larrañaga Varga, A.; Medvedev, A.I.; Fernández Armas, S.; Kurlyandskaya, G.V. Polyacrylamide ferrogels with magnetite or strontium hexaferrite: Next step in the development of soft biomimetic matter for biosensor applications. Sensors 2018,18, 257. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 13. Beato-López, J.J.; Garikoitz Urdániz-Villanueva, J.; Pérez-Landazábal, J.I.; Gómez-Polo, C. Giant stress impedance magnetoelastic sensors employing soft magnetic amorphous ribbons. Materials 2020,13, 2175. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 14. Volchkov, S.O.; Pasynkova, A.A.; Derevyanko, M.S.; Bukreev, D.A.; Kozlov, N.V.; Svalov, A.V.; Semirov, A.V. Magnetoimpedance of CoFeCrSiB ribbon-based sensitive element with FeNi covering: Experiment and modeling. Sensors 2021,21, 6728. [CrossRef] 15. Kurlyandskaya, G.V.; Barandiaran, J.M.; Vazquez, M.; Garcia, D.; Dmitrieva, N.V. Influence of geometrical parameters on the giant magnetoimpedance response in amorphous ribbons. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2000,215, 740–742. [CrossRef] 16. Kraus, L. Nonlinear magnetoimpedance in fieldand stress-annealed amorphous ribbons. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2010 ,46, 428–431. [CrossRef] 17. Kurlyandskaya, G.V.; Garcia-Arribas, A.; Barandiaran, J.M.; Kisker, E. Giant magnetoimpedance strip and coil sensors. Sens. Actuator. A Phys. 2001,91, 116–119. [CrossRef]
Materials 2022,15, 4160 19 of 20 18. Dmitrieva, N.V.; Kurlyandskaya, G.V.; Lukshina, V.A.; Potapov, A.P. The recovery kinetics of the magnetic anisotropy induced by stress annealing of the amorphous Co-based alloy with low Curie temperature J.Magn. Magn. Mater. 1999 ,196, 320–321. [CrossRef] 19. Gazda, P.; Nowicki, M.; Szewczyk, R. Comparison of stress-impedance effect in amorphous ribbons with positive and negative magnetostriction. Materials 2019,12, 275. [CrossRef] 20. Vázquez, M.; Hernando, A. A soft magnetic wire for sensor applications. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 1996,29, 939–949. [CrossRef] 21. Kittel, C. Introduction to Solid State Physics; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1996. 22. Bhagat, S.M. Metals Handbook, 9th ed.; American Society for Metals: Metals Park, OH, USA, 1986; Volume 10. 23. Yelon, A.; Menard, D.; Britel, M.; Ciureanu, P. Calculations of giant magnetoimpedance and of ferromagnetic resonance response are rigorously equivalent. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1996,69, 3084–3086. [CrossRef] 24. Kurlyandskaya, G.V.; Shcherbinin, S.V.; Volchkov, S.O.; Bhagat, S.M.; Calle, E.; Pérez, R.; Vazquez, M. Soft magnetic materials for sensor applications in the high frequency range. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2018,459, 154–158. [CrossRef] 25. Pozar, D.M. Microwave Engineering, 4th ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2011. 26. Bilzer, C.; Devolder, T.; Crozat, P.; Chappert, C.; Cardoso, S.; Freitas, P.P. Vector network analyzer ferromagnetic resonance of thin films on coplanar waveguides: Comparison of different evaluation methods. J. Appl. Phys. 2007,101, 074505. [CrossRef] 27. Gupta, S.; Kumar, D.; Jin, T.L.; Nongjai, R.; Asokan, K.; Ghosh, A.; Aparnadevi, M.; Suri, P.; Piramanayagam, S.N. Broadband strip-line ferromagnetic resonance spectroscopy of soft magnetic CoFeTaZr patterned thin films. AIP Adv. 2018 ,8, 056125. [CrossRef] 28. El Kammouni, R.; Infante, G.; Torrejón, J.; Britel, M.R.; Brigui, J.; Vázquez, M. Microwave behavior in CoFe-based singleand two-phase magnetic microwires. Phys. Stat. Sol. A 2011,208, 520–525. [CrossRef] 29. Kurlyandskaya, G.V.; El Kammouni, R.; Volchkov, S.O.; Shcherbinin, S.V.; Larrañaga, A. Magnetoimpedance sensitive elements based on CuBe/FeCoNi electroplated wires in single and double wire configurations. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2017 ,53, 2000415. [CrossRef] 30. Bukreev, D.A.; Moiseev, A.A.; Derevyanko, M.S.; Semirov, A.V. High-frequency electric properties of amorphous soft magnetic cobalt-based alloys in the region of transition to the paramagnetic state. Russ. Phys. J. 2015,58, 141–145. [CrossRef] 31. Yang, Z.; Lei, C.; Zhou, Y.; Sun, X.C. Study on the giant magnetoimpedance effect in micro-patterned Co-based amorphous ribbons with single strip structure and tortuous shape. Microsyst. Technol. 2015,21, 1995–2001. [CrossRef] 32. Kurlyandskaya, G.V.; Sánchez, M.L.; Hernando, B.; Prida, V.M.; Gorria, P.; Tejedor, M. Giant-magnetoimpedance-based sensitive element as a model for biosensors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003,82, 3053–3055. [CrossRef] 33. Dmitrieva, N.V.; Lukshina, V.A.; Noskova, N.I.; Potapov, A.P. Magnetic anisotropy induced by stress annealing, its thermal stability, and structure of the Fe5Co72Si15B8alloy. Phys. Met. Metallogr. 2007,104, 53–58. [CrossRef] 34. Handrich, K.; Kobe, S. Amorphe Ferround Ferrimagnetika (Amorphous Ferroand Ferrimagnets); Akademie-Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 1980. 35. Potapov, A.P.; Dmitrieva, N.V.; Glazer, A. Magnetic properties and time–Temperature stability of the Fe 60 Co 20 Si 5 B 15 amorphous alloy annealed at the onset temperature of crystallization. Phys. Met. Metallogr. 1995,79, 142–146. 36. Shcherbinin, S.V.; Volchkov, S.O.; Lepalovskii, V.N.; Chlenova, A.A.; Kurlyandskaya, G.V. System based on a ZVA-67 vector network analyzer for measuring high-frequency parameters of magnetic film structures. Russ. J. Nondestruct. Test 2017 , 53, 204–212. [CrossRef] 37. Osborn, J.A. Demagnetizing factors of general ellipsoid. Phys. Rev. 1945,67, 351–357. [CrossRef] 38. Chen, D.-X.; Pardo, E.; Sanchez, A. Demagnetizing factors for rectangular prisms. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2005 ,41, 2077–2088. [CrossRef] 39. Svalov, A.; Lokamani, L.; Schäfer, R.; Vas’kovskiy, V.; Kurlyandskaya, G. Magnetization processes and magnetic domain structure in weakly coupled GdCo/Si/Co trilayers. J. Alloys Compd. 2014,615, S366–S370. [CrossRef] 40. Závˇeta, K.; Nielsen, O.V.; Jurek, K. A domain study of magnetization processes in a stress-annealed metallic glass ribbon for fluxgate sensors. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1992,117, 61–68. [CrossRef] 41. Hubert, A.; Schäfer, R. Magnetic Domains: The Analysis of Magnetic Microstructures; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1998. 42. Kurlyandskaya, G.V.; Vazquez, M.; Muñoz, J.L.; Garcia, D.; McCord, J. Effect of induced magnetic anisotropy and domain structure features on magnetoimpedance in stress annealed Co-rich amorphous ribbons. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1999 ,196, 259–261. [CrossRef] 43. Patil, S.I.; Tan, D.; Lofland, S.E.; Bhagat, S.M.; Takeuchi, I.; Famodu, O.; Read, J.C.; Chang, K.S.; Craciunescu, C.; Wuttig, M. Ferromagnetic resonance in Ni-Mn-Ga films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002,81, 1279–12881. [CrossRef] 44. Belyaev, B.A.; Izotov, A.V. Ferromagnetic resonance study of the effect of elastic stresses on the anisotropy of magnetic films. Phys. Solid State 2007,49, 1731–1739. [CrossRef] 45. Machado, F.; Martins, C.; Rezende, S. Giant magnetoimpedance in the ferromagnetic alloy Co 75-x Fe x Si 15 B 10 .Phys. Rev. B 1995 , 51, 3926. [CrossRef]
Materials 2022,15, 4160 20 of 20 46. Parsons, R.; Ono, K.; Li, Z.; Kishimoto, H.T.; Shoji, T.; Kato, A.; Hill, M.R.; Suzuki, K. Prediction of density in amorphous and nanocrystalline soft magnetic alloys: A data mining approach. J. Alloys Compd. 2021,859, 157845. [CrossRef] 47. Arfken, G. Conformal Mapping. Mathematical Methods for Physicists, 3rd ed.; Academic Press: Orlando, FL, USA, 1985; pp. 392–394. 48. Komogortsev, S.V.; Vazhenina, I.G.; Kleshnina, S.A.; Iskhakov, R.S.; Lepalovskij, V.N.; Pasynkova, A.A.; Svalov, A.V. Advanced characterization of FeNi-based films for the development of magnetic field sensors with tailored functional parameters. Sensors 2022,22, 3324. [CrossRef] [PubMed]