Green hemostatic sponge-like scaffold composed of soy protein and chitin for the treatment of epistaxis

Green hemostatic sponge-like scaffold composed of soy protein and chitin for the treatment of epistaxis Jon Jimenez-Martin a , 1 , Kevin Las Heras a , c , 1 , Alaitz Etxabide d , Jone Uranga d , Koro de la Caba d , e , Pedro Guerrero d , e , f , Manoli Igartua a , b , c , Edorta Santos-Vizcaino a , b , c , ** , 2 , Rosa Maria Hernandez a , b , c , * , 2 a NanoBioCel Research Group, Laboratory of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Paseo de La Universidad 7, 01006 Vitoria Gasteiz, Spain b Biomedical Research Networking Centre in Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain c Bioaraba, NanoBioCel Research Group, Vitoria Gasteiz, Spain d BIOMAT Research Group, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Escuela de Ingeniería de Gipuzkoa, Plaza de Europa 1, 20018 Donostia-San Sebasti an, Spain e BCMaterials, Basque Center for Materials, Applications and Nanostructures, UPV/EHU Science Park, 48940, Leioa, Spain f Proteinmat Materials SL, Avenida de Tolosa 72, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain ARTICLE INFO Keywords: Epistaxis Nasal pack Hemostasis Sustainability ABSTRACT Epistaxis is one of the most common otorhinolaryngology emergencies worldwide. Although there are currently several treatments available, they present several disadvantages. This, in addition to the increasing social need of being environmentally respectful, led us to investigate whether a sponge-like scaffold (SP–CH) produced from natural by-products of the food industry —soy protein and β-chitin —can be employed as a nasal pack for the treatment of epistaxis. To evaluate the potential of our material as a nasal pack, it was compared with two of the most commonly used nasal packs in the clinic: a basic gauze and the gold standard Merocel®. Our SP-CH presented great physicochemical and mechanical properties, lost weight in aqueous medium, and could even partially degrade when incubated in blood. It was shown to be both biocompatible and hemocompatible in vitro, clearing up any doubt about its safety. It showed increased blood clotting capacity in vitro, as well as increased capacity to bind both red blood cells and platelets, compared to the standard gauze and Merocel®. Finally, a rattail amputation model revealed that our SP-CH could even reduce bleeding time in vivo. This work, carried out from a circular economy approach, demonstrates that a green strategy can be followed to manufacture nasal packs using valorized by-products of the food industry, with equal or even better hemostatic properties than the gold standard in the clinic. 1. Introduction Nasal hemorrhage, also known as epistaxis or nosebleed, is one of the most common otorhinolaryngology emergencies worldwide. It is estimated that 60% of the world's population will experience an epistaxis episode at least once in their lifetime, although only about 6%–10% of them would seek medical attention [1]. Despite being usually simple to treat, severe nosebleed might cause serious risks for the patient, especially for those over 70 years, for whom the incidence of these episodes is higher [2]. In addition to this, nasal injury is common after nasal surgery, for which treatment must be started quickly. Several methods are available to treat epistaxis, among which electrocautery, vasoconstrictors, surgical procedures and nasal packing arise as the most popular [3]. Nasal packing, which involves the insertion of a kind of tampon in the nasal cavity, is of special interest for the treatment of epistaxis, offering * Corresponding author. NanoBioCel Research Group, Laboratory of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Paseo de la Universidad 7, 01006 Vitoria Gasteiz, Spain. ** Corresponding author. NanoBioCel Research Group, Laboratory of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Paseo de la Universidad 7, 01006 Vitoria Gasteiz, Spain. E-mail addresses: edorta.sant[email protected] (E. Santos-Vizcaino), [email protected] (R.M. Hernandez). 1 These authors contributed equally to this work. 2 RM Hernandez and E. Santos-Vizcaino equally share credit for senior authorship. Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Materials Today Bio journal homepage: www.journals.elsevier.com/materials-today-bio https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100273 Received 1 February 2022; Received in revised form 25 April 2022; Accepted 26 April 2022 Available online 30 April 2022 2590-0064/©2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Materials Today Bio 15 (2022) 100273 elevated rates of success [4]. Nevertheless, the choice of the most adequate nasal pack is vital for the outcome of the treatment. The ideal nasal pack should promote hemostasis while being comfortable for the patient, as well as hindering mucosal damage [5]. Therefore, alternatives to currently commercialized nasal packs are needed, since they are commonly nonabsorbable —causing patient's discomfort during removal —and act just by physical pressure tamponade, without any intrinsic hemostatic effect. Additionally, sustainability is attracting more and more attention in all research areas —including health-related areas —with the aim of reducing the environmental load associated to processes and products. In this sense, environmental analysis is a useful tool to measure emissions throughout the product life. Its principal benefit is that it identifies the environmental impacts within the value chain, which could be redesigned to reduce the environmental burden. Most environmental assessments are studies in which emissions and resource use are classified into categories that can potentially harm the environment, such as global warming potential [6]. Numerous works have been carried out related to the processing of petrochemical-derived materials, but only a few related to those derived from biopolymers [7–10]. In this context, natural polymers are arising as promising compounds for the development of hemostatic materials, being possible to manufacture them as scaffolds that mimic the extracellular matrix (ECM), which permits their reabsorption by the body [11]. These biopolymers are synthesized by living organisms such as plants, animals or microorganisms, and they generally offer good biocompatibility and biodegradability [12]. They might also possess different mechanisms to promote hemostasis. Following this path, residual or unused biomass is an excellent source of proteins and polysaccharides. In this regard, soy protein (SP) is extracted from soybeans when soy oil is produced. In this process, soy flour is obtained as by-product, which is purified to obtain soy protein powder. Out of every 3 kg of soybean, 1 kg of soy protein is obtained [13]. In this study, soy protein was reinforced with chitin (CH), which provides higher stability and better mechanical properties. Chitin can be obtained from marine waste, such as shrimp and crab shells, following three processes [14]: deproteination in an alkaline medium to separate protein and polysaccharide, demineralization to eliminate inorganic matter using an acidic medium, and decoloration for pigment elimination. Interestingly, using squid pens as a source of chitin requires neither demineralization nor decoloration steps; thus, the extraction time, the employment of acid and basic solvents, and the voluminous wastewater discharge can be avoided, and the production costs, as well as the environmental load, can be considerably reduced. In this regard, we recently developed and characterized a brand new sponge-like scaffold (SP–CH) based on a green strategy [15], using valorized by-products of the food industry. SPI is an abundant biopolymer that shows biocompatibility and low immunogenicity, as well as several peptides with interesting biological functions, such as the RGD-like sequence (Arg-Gly-Asp) containing peptides, providing great cell-adhesive properties [16]. For its part, CH —namely poly (β-(1–4)-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine) —also shows low toxicity due to its natural origin [17], and is biodegradable. These two biopolymers have been selected due to their broad valorization potential, since they are non-toxic, biocompatible, biodegradable, renewable, abundant and available at relatively low-cost, characteristics that provide them with a great value for the development of novel biosystems for health-related applications. Although freeze-dried sponge-like structures with chitosan, crosslinked with glutaraldehyde, have shown blood-absorbing capacity suitable for haemostasis [18], in this work, chitin was used as reinforcement in order to provide soy protein with higher stability and better mechanical properties, avoiding the use of glutaraldehyde. Furthermore, since a brand new sponge-like scaffold (SP–CH) using valorized by-products of the food industry has been recently developed and characterized in a previous work [15], the aim here was to analyze its potential as a nasal pack for the treatment of epistaxis. The initial characterization of our SP-CH revealed its great physicochemical properties, with increased swelling capacity and partial degradability. Besides, the microstructure of the developed scaffolds could promote appropriate cell adhesion and proliferation, while remaining totally biocompatible. Even if several biopolymeric sponges has already been developed for the treatment of hemorrhagic wounds [19–21], hardly any of them seems to be directed towards the treatment of epistaxis [22,23], and none of them employs valorized products for its manufacturing. Considering the excellent biomedical properties of the components of our SP-CH, we aimed to analyze its potential as a nasal pack for the treatment of epistaxis, comparing it with materials widely used as nasal packs during nosebleeds: a basic gauze and Merocel®(MRC), the nasal pack used worldwide as gold standard. We expect our material to present more adequate mechanical properties to be used as a nasal pack, in addition to a greater hemostatic capacity, compared to the aforementioned widely used products. To this end, we first compared their porosity, pore size, degradation, swelling profile and mechanical properties. Additionally, we performed in vitro cytotoxicity studies to confirm the safety of our SP-CH. Then, we investigated their hemostatic potential, including blood clotting capacity and the adhesion of erythrocytes and platelets to the materials. Finally, we evaluated the hemostatic efficacy of each material in vivo. On the other hand, in addition to the physicochemical and biological aspects, the environmental assessment was considered in this work as a key tool to evaluate the impacts of the scaffolds and the processes followed for their manufacture. One of the aims of using these materials was the valorization of side streams and biobased waste into high value-added products, promoting resource efficiency, in line with the circular economy strategy, by creating new value chains. At the same time, the dependency on fossil-based polymers and GHG emissions are reduced in order to meet sustainable development goals. Therefore, this work was focused on researching unexploited opportunities to maximize the valorization potential of biological resources. 2. Materials and methods 2.1. Materials Soy protein (SP), PROFAM 974, was supplied by ADM Protein Specialties Division (The Netherlands). The amino acid analysis as well as XPS and FTIR studies were performed in a previous work [15]. Chitin (CH) was extracted from fresh squid pens (Loligo sp.), which were treated with NaOH (1 M) at room temperature under continuous stirring for 24 h; afterwards, the solid fraction (CH) was washed with distilled water until neutral pH. Finally, CH was freeze-dried and milled to obtain the powder. Soy protein and chitin batches were those used and characterized in a previous work [14]. Glycerol, with a purity 99.5%, was supplied by Panreac (Barcelona, Spain). This polyol was employed as a plasticizer in order to disrupt intramolecular interactions among protein chains and facilitate intermolecular interactions between soy protein and chitin. The properties of our SP-CH was compared with a standard gauze (Medicomp®55 cm, Hartmann bv, Nijmegen, The Netherlands) and with Merocel®(Medtronic Xomed, Jacksonville, Fla.). This commercial nasal pack, which is composed of hydroxylated polyvinyl acetate, and presented as a compressed and dehydrated sponge, is the primary nonabsorbable nasal pack in several emergency departments around the world [24–27]. 2.2. Preparation of the sponge-like scaffold (SP–CH) In order to prepare the SP-CH, 5 g of SPI were initially mixed with 30 wt % CH (based on the SPI dry basis), followed by the addition of 125 mL of distilled water to the mixture. Next, NaOH (1 M) was employed to adjust the pH to 10, and the solution was heated at 80 C for 30 min under magnetic stirring. Subsequently, 30 wt % glycerol (based on the J. Jimenez-Martin et al. Materials Today Bio 15 (2022) 100273 2 SPI dry basis) was added to the blend. So as to achieve a homogeneous blend, it was maintained at 80 C for other 30 min. The solution was then poured into moulds and maintained for 48 h in a freezer at 22 C. Finally, it was freeze-dried for 72 h in order to complete the preparation of the SP-CH, which was eventually cut into discs using a hollow punch. 2.3. Environmental assessment Environmental assessment was carried out according to ISO 14040 guidelines and recommendations: goal definition, inventory, impact assessment, and interpretation. The main goal of the study was to assess the environmental impact of the extraction of materials, the manufacturing of scaffolds and biodegradation as the end of life. The software used for this analysis was SimaPro 9.2.0.1 (PR e Consultants, The Netherlands). The materials used in the laboratory, the energy consumption during the extraction process, and the transportation of materials and residues were the resources and processes considered to develop the inventory phase. The environmental burden related to the production of the scaffolds was determined considering the energy (electricity) and materials (NaOH, glycerol, water) used in the extraction and manufacturing processes. Also transportation of materials, distilled water production and its transportation to the waste treatment plant after use were considered. Data were obtained from Ecoinvent v3 database, which provides data regarding energy production, transport and production of chemicals. The functional unit selected was 1 g. Based on the inventory data, environmental impacts were assessed according to the Hierarchist version of ReCiPe 2016, midpoint (H) v1.05. The impact categories under study were global warming, water consumption, land use, human carcinogenic toxicity, ozone formation (human health), terrestrial ecotoxicity, freshwater ecotoxicity, marine ecotoxicity, human non-carcinogenic toxicity, fine particulate matter formation, terrestrial acidification, freshwater eutrophication, marine eutrophication, mineral resource scarcity, fossil resource scarcity, ozone formation (terrestrial ecosystems), stratospheric ozone depletion, and ionizing radiation. 2.4. Blood obtention Blood was acquired from healthy volunteers according to the protocols approved by the Ethics Committee for Researching Involving Biological Agents &GMOs (Procedure number: M30/2021/257) and the Ethics Committee for Research Involving Human Beings of the University of the Basque Country (Procedure number: M10/2021/256). 2.5. Pore size and porosity A Hitachi S-4800 field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) (Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) was employed to obtain the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs, using a beam accelerated voltage of 5 kV. All the tested materials were cut into discs of 8 mm diameter, mounted on a metal stub with adhesive tape and coated with gold under vacuum (JFC-1100) under an argon atmosphere before testing. Image J software was used to measure pore diameters from SEM micrographs, in order to determine pore sizes. Between 75 and 250 randomly selected pores were measured for each material (n ¼3 samples per group), and the average pore size for each material was calculated. To evaluate the porosity of the samples (15–20 mg, n ¼3 samples per group), a liquid displacement method was performed using 98% ethanol as the liquid medium, since it can diffuse through the samples without causing swelling or shrinkage [28]. V1 was defined as the initial volume of ethanol where the samples were submerged. Degassification was carried out for 5 min using a vacuum pump, so that the samples could be impregnated with the ethanol. V2 was defined as the total volume — ethanol plus soaked sample —after degasification. Last, ethanol-impregnated samples were removed and V3 was defined as the remaining volume of ethanol. The porosity ( ε ) of each sample was calculated using the equation below: ε ð%Þ¼V1V3 V2V3x100 2.6. Swelling capacity and liquid retention ratio under pressure (LRRP) Swelling capacity of the materials (15–20 mg, n ¼4 samples per group) was calculated immersing preweighed samples (W 0 ) of each material in 5 mL of PBS. The samples were weighed again (W t ) after 5 s, 15 s, 30 s, 1 min, 5 min and 15 min, to obtain the swelling curves of each material. Swelling at each time point was calculated using the following equation: Swellingð%Þ¼Wt W0 W0x100 Liquid retention ratio under pressure (LRRP) was calculated in order to evaluate the ability of each material to retain the preabsorbed liquid when a certain pressure is applied. Samples of each material (20–25 mg, n¼6 samples per group) were immersed in PBS to absorb as much liquid as possible, and then they were weighed (W 0 ). Next, known weights — 10 g, 15 g, 30 g and 40 g —were serially placed upon the wet material, carefully collecting the released liquid and weighting the sample again. This procedure was repeated for each weight (W X ). Then, LRRP was obtained using the following equation: LRRPð%Þ¼Wx W0x100 2.7. Weight loss in aqueous medium Weight loss in aqueous medium was studied by immersing preweighed (W0) samples (20–25 mg, n ¼4 samples per group) of each material in 2 mL PBS, and culturing them at 37 C for different periods of time —2, 5, 9 and 14 days —. After removing the samples from PBS, they were first lyophilized and then weighed (Wf), in order to calculate the remaining weight (%). Weight loss in aqueous medium was expressed as the remaining weight of the incubated and lyophilized samples with respect to their initial weight, according to the following equation: Remaining weightð%Þ¼Wf W0x100 2.8. Mechanical characterization The mechanical properties of the dry materials were tested by compression test and cyclic compression test (35–45 mg, n ¼5 samples per group). An Instron 5969 mechanical tester —equipped with a 50 N load cell —was used at a compressive rate of 0.5 mm s 1 up to 70% strain. As MRC is commercialized in lyophilized form, it was expanded before the test, by wetting and completely drying it off. Several parameters were calculated in order to compare the mechanical properties of the materials: The maximum stress of each cycle relative to the maximum stress of the first cycle was calculated as follows: Relative stressð%Þ¼Stressðcycle xÞ Stressðcycle 1Þx100 Young's modulus was calculated for all the strains of the first cycle of each biomaterial, using the following equation for each point of the stress-strain curve: Young0s modulusðkPaÞ¼ StressðkPaÞ ½Strainð%Þ=100 Damping coefficient was calculated by means of the stress-strain curves of the materials, both for cycle 1 and for cycle 10. The J. Jimenez-Martin et al. Materials Today Bio 15 (2022) 100273 3 following equation was used: Damping coefficient ¼D U where Dis the dissipated energy (area between the loading and unloading curves) and Uis the total input energy (area under the loading curve). All the areas under the curve where calculated using the software GraphPad Prism 8.0.1. Besides, an expansion force test was performed, hydrating samples of dry materials (35–45 mg, n ¼5 samples per group) and recording the upwards stress displayed by the expansion of the material during water absorption. 2.9. Cytotoxicity studies Cytotoxicity of the materials was assessed according to the ISO 10993-5:2009 guidelines for biological evaluation of medical devices. Both direct —direct contact with cells —and indirect —cells exposed to a conditioned medium of each material —cytotoxicity assays were performed. In both cases viability of L-929 fibroblasts (ATCC® 30–2003™) was measured through CCK-8 reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, Spain). After incubating the cells with CCK-8 solution in medium (1:11) for 4 h, the absorbance was read with a plate reader (Infinite®200 PRO series, Tecan Trading AG, M€ annedorf, Switzerland) at 450 nm, using 650 nm as the reference wavelength. Cells that were not exposed to the materials —100% viability —were used as a control group. In the direct cytotoxicity assay, 35,000 cells were seeded per well in a 24-well plate, using 500 μ L/well of EMEM complete medium. Next, the cells were incubated for 24 h at 37 C. After removing the medium, 1 mL of fresh medium was added and each material (10–15 mg, n ¼4 samples per group) was hydrated and placed in a transwell to bring it into direct contact with the bottom of the well. The materials were removed after 48 h of incubation, replacing the medium with 300 μ L/well of CCK-8 reagent. In the case of the indirect cytotoxicity assay, L-929 fibroblasts were exposed to conditioned medium of each material (n ¼5 samples per group), obtained incubating 100 mg of each material with 500 μ Lof EMEM at 37 C for 24 h. Firstly, a 96-well plate was used to seed 5000 cells/well in 100 μ L/well of medium, and the plates were incubated for 24 h at 37 C. After, the medium was replaced with 100 μ L/well of the corresponding conditioned medium, and the plate was straightaway incubated at 37 C for 24 h. Eventually, the conditioned medium was removed, and 110 μ L/well of CCK-8 reagent was added. 2.10. Blood swelling and degradation in blood Maximum blood swelling capacity was tested by immersing preweighed (W0) samples (15–20 mg, n ¼5 samples per group) of the materials in 500 μ L of blood. After 2 min, to allow complete blood absorption, samples were weighed again (Wf). The maximum swelling capacity (%) was calculated using the following equation: Swellingð%Þ¼Wf W0x100 To evaluate the degradation of the materials in blood, preweighed (W0) samples (15–25 mg, n ¼4 samples per group) of each material were placed in 24-well plates, using one plate for each time-point tested —2, 4 and 7 days —. Blood was added to each sample in an amount of a 120% of its maximum blood swelling capacity, and the plates where incubated at 37 C. At each time-point, samples were washed out with PBS, lyophilized and weighed (Wf). Degradation in blood was expressed as the remaining weight of the incubated and lyophilized samples with respect to their initial weight, according to the following equation: Remaining weightð%Þ¼Wf W0x100 2.11. Whole blood clotting in vitro Hemoglobin content of the samples was quantified using a Hemoglobin Assay Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), by measuring absorbance of the samples (Is) with a plate reader (Infinite®200 PRO series, Tecan Trading AG, M€ annedorf, Switzerland) at 400 nm. For the whole blood clotting test, citrated whole blood —9:1 whole blood to 3.8% sodium citrate —was obtained from a healthy human donor. First, 0.2 mL of the citrated whole blood was added to preheated (30 min at 37 C) samples of the materials disposed in a 24 well plate (25–35 mg, n ¼5 samples per group). After this, 20 μ L of CaCl 2 (0.2 M) were added to start coagulation. The plate with the materials was incubated under 30 rpm agitation for 10 min at 37 C. Afterwards, 2 mL of deionized water were added in each well to hemolyze the red blood cells (RBCs) that were not within the clot formed in the material. The deionized water containing the non-adhered and hemolyzed RBCs was collected and its hemoglobin content was quantified. 5 μ L of CaCl 2 (0.2 M) and 50 μ L of citrated whole blood were added to 750 μ L of deionized water, and the absorbance of this solution was used as the reference value (Ir). The absorbance of an empty well was also measured (Io). Blood Clotting Index (BCI) of each sample was calculated using the following equation: BCI ð%Þ¼ðIs IoÞ ðIr IoÞx100 with the purpose of visually evaluating the clotting capacity of each material, 150 mg of each material were disposed in Eppendorf tubes, subsequently adding 500 μ L of citrated whole blood and 500 μ L of CaCl 2 (10 mM). After incubating the Eppendorf tubes for 1 min at 37 C, they were turned upside down and gently shaken to observe the formed clots. 2.12. Hemolysis assay in vitro For the assessment of hemocompatibility in vitro, citrated whole blood —9:1 whole blood to 3.8% sodium citrate —from a healthy donor was obtained and diluted 1:5 in normal saline. Samples of each material (10–15 mg, n ¼6 samples per group) were disposed in a 24-well plate. Diluted whole blood was added to each sample in an amount of the 80% of each material's swelling capacity. The plate was incubated for 1 h at 37 C. Samples were moved to conical centrifuge tubes and centrifuged for 10 min at 3000 rpm. The supernatant of each sample was collected and its hemoglobin content was quantified as described in section 2.8. 150 μ L of whole blood was added to deionized water and to normal saline, in order to use these solutions as positive (Ir) and negative (Io) controls, respectively. Hemolysis rate was calculated using the following equation: Hemolysisð%Þ¼ðIs IoÞ ðIr IoÞx100 2.13. Red blood cell adhesion in vitro To evaluate RBC adhesion to the material, citrated whole blood —9:1 whole blood to 3.8% sodium citrate —was collected from a healthy donor. Samples of each material were cut (15–20 mg, n ¼6 samples per group) and each sample was placed in a Petri dish. Citrated whole blood was added to each sample in an amount of the 80% of each material's swelling capacity, and they were incubated for 5 min at 37 C. Next, 5–10 mL of deionized water were gently added by the edge of the dish until the water touched the sample and blood started to flow. More deionized water was added until a total volume of 50 mL for each sample. Each material was carefully moved to a clean Petri dish, and the liquid in J. Jimenez-Martin et al. Materials Today Bio 15 (2022) 100273 4 each old Petri dish, —containing the RBCs that could not adhere to the sample —, was collected. The hemoglobin content of this solution was quantified as described in section 2.8. This measurement accounts for hemoglobin outside the material, that is, the RBCs that could not adhere to the material. Afterwards, hemoglobin within the materials was measured, which accounts for the amount of RBCs adhered to each sample. 10 mL of deionized water were added straightly on the material —so that the previously adhered RBCs would be released —and the hemoglobin content in the resultant solution was quantified as described in section 2.8. For both the hemoglobin outside and within the material, a positive control was prepared by mixing 200 μ L of blood and 50 mL of deionized water. Hemoglobin concentration (mg dL 1 ) of each sample was calculated using the following equation provided by the Hemoglobin Assay Kit, and results of each sample were normalized against the blood volume added to the control group: ½Hemoglobin¼ðIs IoÞ ðIr IoÞx100 mg dL xdf where Is is the absorbance of the tested solution; Io is the absorbance of the blank (water); Ir is the absorbance of the calibrator provided in the Hemoglobin Assay Kit; 100 mg/dL is the concentration of the diluted calibrator; df is the dilution factor, which was calculated for each sample depending on the volume of blood and deionized water added. Citrated whole blood was also added to samples of each material (n ¼ 3 samples per group) and the adhesion of RBCs was visually evaluated using SEM micrographs, obtained as described in section 2.2. 2.14. Platelet adhesion in vitro Adhesion of platelets to the materials was studied through a Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) Assay Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), which allows to quantify platelet adhesion by measuring the LDH released by platelets when they are lysed, according to a reported method [29]. Briefly, citrated whole blood —9:1 whole blood to 3.8% sodium citrate —was obtained from a healthy donor. After centrifuging it at 480 g for 10 min at 4C with 4 a/d, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was obtained. The serum above the buffy coat was collected from the centrifuged blood samples and kept in citrated tubes. Samples of each material (15–20 mg, n ¼5 samples per group) were disposed in a 24-well plate and PRP was added to each sample in an amount of the 80% of each material's swelling capacity, and they were incubated for 30 min at 37 C. Normal saline was gently added to each well until the samples were immersed, so that the non-adhered platelets could be removed from the material, and all samples were moved to a new 24-well plate. 1 mL of Triton X-100 1%-PBS was added straightly on the material, in order to lyse the platelets that had adhered to the material. After incubation for 1 h at 37 C, each solution of Triton and lysed platelets was collected and LDH content was measured according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) of the LDH Kit. To prepare the negative (Io) and positive (Ir) controls, 200 μ L of PRP were added to 1 mL of PBS and Triton X-100 1%, respectively. Absorbances of the lysed platelets of each samples (Is) were measured with a plate reader (Infinite®200 PRO series, Tecan Trading AG, M€ annedorf, Switzerland) at 400 nm, and normalized against the PRP volume added to the controls. LDH release (%) relative to the positive control was calculated using the following equation: LDH releaseð%Þ¼ðIs IoÞ ðIr IoÞx100 PRP was also added to samples of each material (n ¼3 samples per group) and the platelet adhesion was visually evaluated using SEM micrographs, obtained as described in section 2.4. 2.15. IN VIVO hemostatic efficacy To evaluate the hemostatic efficacy in vivo, a rat-tail amputation model was used. This experiment was conducted following the protocols approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee for Animal Experimentation of the University of the Basque Country (Procedure number: M20/ 2021/362). Wistar rats —with weights between 250 and 300 g (Janvier Labs, Le Genest-Saint-Isle, France) —were anesthetized with isoflurane (Isoflo®, Esteve, Spain), and 2.5 cm from the end of their tail was cut using a scalpel. The tail was immediately placed in air for 10 s to guarantee normal blood loss, after which the wound was brought into direct contact with the corresponding preweighed material (250–300 mg, n ¼6 rats per group), holding it with a preweighed gauze (900–950 mg). The wound was uncovered every minute to check if bleeding persisted. For this reason, bleeding time (min) was assessed by assigning a score to each period at which bleeding ceased, as follows: 0–3 min: 1; 3–6 min: 2; 6–9 min: 3; >9 min: 4. Therefore, a lower bleeding time score represents a faster hemostatic effect. The blood-impregnated samples were weighed again to calculate total blood loss (g). 2.16. Statistical analysis Mean standard deviation was used to express the results. In the case of normally distributed data, results were analyzed through a one-way ANOVA test. Bonferroni or Tamhane post-hoc analysis was applied based on the Levene test for the homogeneity of variances. In reverse, non-normally distributed data was analyzed by Mann–Whitney's nonparametric analysis. Sample size of each experiment is indicated in the corresponding materials and methods section. p <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Moreover, all the statistical computations were performed using SPSS 25.0 (SPSS®, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). 3. Results and discussion 3.1. Environmental assessment The increasing environmental concern has led to assess the suitability of biodegradable polymers extracted from natural and renewable resources. Therefore, biopolymers derived from residual biomass have become an attractive alternative due to their abundance, cost and biodegradability. In this context, CH and soy protein were used in this work. On the one hand, CH can be obtained from shrimp, crabs or squid pens, among others. It should be noted that the CH content varies significantly depending on the source employed for its extraction. When CH is obtained from crustacean shells, CH content is around 20% after a demineralization process; however, the CH content from squid pens can reach 50%, with a mineral content lower than 3% [30]. On the other hand, soy protein, a by-product from soy oil production, can be purified to obtain SPI. In this process, soy flour is obtained as by-product, which is purified to obtain soy protein powder after centrifugation, acidification and neutralization processes. Although the properties of some products based on natural materials differ between batches, in the case of the extraction of chitin from Loligo sp., the traceability of this process has been confirmed. We follow a standardized process that allows us to obtain sponges without differences between batches, showing the same degree of acetylation and crystallinity [14]. To determine the environmental load associated with CH and soybean residue valorization, the environmental loads associated with those processes were considered. All the abovementioned processes were considered to obtain the global environmental results of scaffolds production reported in Table 1. The results showed that terrestrial ecotoxicity, global warming and ionizing radiation caused low environmental load in the production of scaffolds, while the other categories contributed minimally to the overall environmental burden. We should note that the environmental burden of terrestrial ecotoxicity is related to soybean production and the generation of energy needed to obtain CH. J. Jimenez-Martin et al. Materials Today Bio 15 (2022) 100273 5 It is worth noting that the use of squid pens as a source of CH provided environmental benefits. Due to the low amount of inorganic compounds and the lack of pigments in squid pens, demineralization and decolorization processes could be eliminated from the CH extraction process and, thus, the use of chemicals and energy consumption associated with those processes were reduced significantly [14]. In addition, the elimination of those processes entailed economic benefits, since the extraction process implied the employment of smaller amounts of resources (materials, energy, and time) and, at the same time, a higher yield of CH was obtained, compared to that of CH extracted from crustacean shells. The relative contributions in each impact category for the most relevant processes involved in the complete life cycle of the scaffolds are shown in Fig. 1. The environmental results obtained are shown in percentage proportions, where it can be seen that the most relevant contributing factor was electricity consumption in extraction and manufacturing processes. We must remember that the environmental impact calculated in this work was based on the results obtained in the laboratory and gave us an idea of which processes should be optimized to be able to reduce the environmental burden, which could be more easily reduced at an industrial scale. In addition, Fig. 1 shows the environmental results broken down into percentages for each impact category. In this way, the contribution of each stage on the final product could be assessed. In this case, the contributions of the different processes and activities involved throughout the life cycle were calculated as a function of the overall results. As shown in Fig. 1, the stages of obtaining CH required energy and this represented more than 80% of the total impact, becoming the factor with the greatest potential for improvement in decision making when scaling-up. In particular, the energy consumed in the scaffold production, specifically the consumption of electricity, played a critical role in the environmental impact, regardless of the impact category considered. Since the scaffolds were produced at laboratory scale, scaling up the processes would lead to reducing the aforementioned environmental impacts. 3.2. Physicochemical characterization 3.2.1. Pore size and porosity Pore structure of biomaterials that aim to be used as wound healing agents —either to treat hemorrhages or other types of wounds —is of great importance. Differences in the structure of the three materials employed during this study can be appreciated in the macroscopic images (Fig. 2A). Even though, differences in the microestructure are of greater importance. The excellent physicochemical properties of our material were already demonstrated in our previous work [15], but we aimed to compare some of these properties between the three materials. In this vein, the gauze was the material with the highest pore size —479 252 μ m—, while MRC and SP-CH showed a very similar pore size distribution, 144 63 and 141 124 μ m, respectively (Fig. 2B). MRC and SP-CH showed no significant difference in mean pore size (p >0.05), while both of them showed significant differences with respect to gauze (p <0.001). Pore size can be closely related to the hemostatic capacity of a material [31]. Ideally, a balance should be sought between large pore sizes that allow RBC and platelet internalization and small pores that provide optimal surface area, required for appropriate cell adhesion [32]. Porosity is required to be high to allow diffusion of nutrients and oxygen [33]. Besides, high porosity is related to elevated surface area, which is of interest for the absorption of wound fluids, either exudates or even blood [34]. As a larger surface area of the material is also related to higher exposition to cells, it can influence cell adhesion and viability as well [35]. In this context, MRC and SP-CH showed similar porosity (Figs. 2C), 92.97 4.39% and 86.95 1.58%, respectively. Meanwhile, the gauze showed significantly higher porosity than SP-CH, 96.68  0.12%. The difficulties associated with a high porosity might be overcome by the weight loss or partial degradation of the nasal pack, which would facilitate the painless removal of the pack. In this sense, it is clear that the SP-CH offer advantages in the removal of the pack compared to MRC and the gauze, even if the three of them present high porosities. On the other hand, SEM micrographs (Fig. 2D) clearly evince that internal Table 1 Impact category values measured in the production of the scaffolds. Impact Category Unit Total Global warming kg CO 2 eq 1.7517401 Stratospheric ozone depletion kg CFC11 eq 8.11E-07 Ionizing radiation kBq Co-60 eq 0.99109783 Ozone formation, human health kg NO x eq 0.00560783 Fine particulate matter formation kg PM 2.5 eq 0.00403105 Ozone formation, terrestrial ecosystems kg NO x eq 0.005638093 Terrestrial acidification kg SO 2 eq 0.010339224 Freshwater eutrophication kg P eq 0.00067464 Marine eutrophication kg N eq 6.30E-05 Terrestrial ecotoxicity kg 1,4-DCB 1.4278474 Freshwater ecotoxicity kg 1,4-DCB 0.023579723 Marine ecotoxicity kg 1,4-DCB 0.033241366 Human carcinogenic toxicity kg 1,4-DCB 0.061105474 Human non-carcinogenic toxicity kg 1,4-DCB 1.3274998 Land use m 2 a crop eq 0.16276505 Mineral resource scarcity kg Cu eq 0.001540514 Fossil resource scarcity kg oil eq 0.48253294 Water consumption m 3 0.012084432 Fig. 1. Relative contributions in each impact category for the most relevant processes involved in the entire life cycle of scaffolds. Disaggregating environmental results are displayed in percentage ratios for the most relevant contributing factors. J. Jimenez-Martin et al. Materials Today Bio 15 (2022) 100273 6 Fig. 2. Physicochemical characterization. (A) Macroscopic images of the materials: Gauze, MRC, and SP-CH. (B) Pore size distribution of the materials. (C) Porosity (%) of each material. Error bars, mean SD. *p <0.05; ***p <0.001 vs gauze. N.S., nonsignificant (p >0.05). (D) SEM micrographs of dry materials. (E) Swelling profiles. Error bars, mean SD. N.S., nonsignificant (p >0.05). (F) Liquid retention ratio under different pressures. Error bars, mean SD. &&&p<0.001 gauze vs MRC. #p <0.05; ##p <0.01; ###p <0.001 MRC vs SP-CH. ***p <0.001 gauze vs SP-CH. (G) Weight loss in aqueous medium. Error bars, mean SD. N.S., nonsignificant (p >0.05). J. Jimenez-Martin et al. Materials Today Bio 15 (2022) 100273 7 structures of the three materials differ. The gauze shows thousands of intertwined fibers forming a mesh, but the space between the fibers does not present well defined pores, which are required for good liquid retention. For their part, MRC and SP-CH show an internal microstructure of well-defined interconnected pores, which in the case of MRC are more circular and in the case of SP-CH present a more amorphous structure. Together with a similar pore size and porosity, this makes MRC and SP-CH very similar regarding to their internal microarchitecture, which completely differs from that of the gauze. 3.2.2. Swelling capacity and liquid retention ration under pressure (LRRP) The capacity of biomaterials to absorb fluids is important as it will determine their abilities to absorb the blood present in hemorrhages. We tested the water swelling profiles of the three materials by measuring swelling at different time points (Fig. 2E). The three materials showed similar water uptake capacity, with the maximum swelling capacity ranging between 1334 34% (MRC) and 1442 267% (SP–CH) of its initial weight after 15 min. During that period of time, the gauze absorbed 1412 182% of its initial weight. Even if the maximum absorption capacity was similar for the three materials, the swelling profile turned out to be quite different. While SP-CH and gauze achieved a 1383 168% and 1324 302% of their initial weight within only 5 s, respectively, MRC could only swell a 178 21% of its initial weight during the same time. This shows that even if all of them displayed similar maximum absorption capacity, MRC showed delayed swelling, only equaling SP-CH and gauze after 60 s. The water absorption property appears to be especially important in the treatment of epistaxis as the principal way in which nasal packs arrest bleeding is by exerting pressure on the damaged blood vessels of the nasal mucosa to promote hemostasis. After being inserted in the nostril, the nasal pack absorbs wound fluids and expands, maintaining pressure on the wound site. This pressure should be high enough to control the bleeding, but not as high to damage the nasal cavity. Complications associated with excessive pressure include movement of the pack from its initial position [36], obstructed breathing and reduced sense of smell [1], and even necrosis of mucosa and cartilage [25]. Nevertheless, when the pack puts pressure on the nostril's walls, the nostril's walls also put pressure on the pack, thus desorbing part of the Fig. 3. Mechanical characterization. (A) Scheme of the procedure carried out for the cyclic compression test. (B–D) Cyclic compression stress-strain curves of gauze (B), MRC (C) and SP-CH (D). (E) Relative stress (%) of the materials for 10 cyclic compressions. Error bars, mean SD. &&p<0.01 gauze vs MRC. **p <0.01 by gauze vs SP-CH. (F) Young's modulus of the materials at different strains. (G) Damping coefficients of the material for cycles 1 and 10. Error bars, mean SD. &&&p< 0.001 gauze vs MRC. ***p <0.001 SP-CH vs the other groups. $$$p <0.001 cycle 1 vs cycle 10 of the same group. (H) Scheme of the procedure carried out for the expansion force test. (I) Relative expansion strength curves of the materials. * indicates the moment at which water was added to each material. (J) Relative expansion force of the materials. Error bars, mean SD. ***p <0.001 SP-CH vs the other groups. N.S., nonsignificant (p >0.05). J. Jimenez-Martin et al. Materials Today Bio 15 (2022) 100273 8 previously absorbed fluids. For this reason, we evaluated the capacity of the materials to retain the absorbed liquid under pressure. In this experiment (Fig. 2F) both MRC and SP-CH showed significantly greater (p <0.001) water retention capacity compared to gauze, independently of the pressure applied. Besides, MRC displayed significantly better retention at low pressures compared to SP-CH, although both materials turned out to similar (p >0.05) retaining values for pre-absorbed water when the maximum weight —40 g —was applied, with MRC maintaining 49.58 4.37% and SP-CH 45.83 4.54% of their maximum swelling capacity, while gauze maintained just 34.44 2.35%. Therefore, even if the three materials showed similar water swelling capacity, gauze is not able to effectively retain the absorbed water when a pressure is applied, and thus loses its ability to exert pressure to the bleeding site, likely due to its internal microstructure, as commented before. Probably one of the major drawbacks of the pressure exerted by the nasal packs is the discomfort caused to the patient, both with the pack in situ and during its removal, with the latter even causing rebleeding, mucosal abrasions, demucosalization and detachment of scars [37]. As pressure is needed to promote hemostasis, these disadvantages always go together with effective nasal packs, as long as they are nonabsorbable. 3.2.3. Weight loss in aqueous medium Weight loss in aqueous medium is a property of increasing popularity among biomaterials for nasal packings, as it reduces both patient discomfort and rebleeding upon removal, among other advantages [38]. In this vein, both gauze and MRC showed no weight loss during the 14 days of experiment (Fig. 2G), while SP-CH lost 25.96 3.22% of its initial weight after 48 h. After that measurement, SP-CH showed no more weight loss on the following days (p >0.05). These results clearly show that both gauze and MRC are totally non-absorbable nasal packs, while SP-CH can lose about a 25% of its initial weight after 48 h, due to the glycerol content (30 wt %) of the SP-CH dissolving in water. This may probably be enough to relieve patient's discomfort and damage associated with pack removal, and to avoid rebleeding episodes, which would suppose a great advantage both for the patient and the clinician [39]. Besides, it is worth mentioning that in our previous work about the SP-CH [15], we demonstrated that it can be enzymatically degraded within 2 h, using collagenase P. Moreover, in this previous work we performed cell-mediated degradation studies in an implanted SP-CH, observing complete degradation in vivo. However, since this enzymatic degradation does not represent an epistaxis scenario, we believe that in this case weight loss in aqueous medium and blood mediated degradation are more meaningful. 3.3. Mechanical characterization For appropriate handling and clinical use nasal packs must present good mechanical properties and resistance to deformation, thus alleviating patient's concerns about discomfort during the treatment and providing mechanical stability [40]. We carried out a cyclic compression stress-strain test with 10 cycles (Fig. 3A) to characterize the mechanical properties of the materials (Fig. 3B–D). These curves show an initial plateau region, followed by a hyperelastic region at higher strains, which is more noteworthy for the gauze and SP-CH than for MRC. For the three materials the relationship between stress and strain is nonlinear, exhibiting nonlinear viscoelasticity, similarly to many body tissues and extracellular matrix components [41]. This viscoelasticity could be confirmed by the loading and unloading curves of each cycle taking different paths, which occur due to energy dissipation during deformation of the material [42], producing an hysteresis loop between loading and unloading curves. The area under the loading curve represents the total input energy of the cycle and the area under the unloading curve represents the elastic strain energy, while the area between the two curves accounts for the dissipated energy during the compression cycle [43]. In addition to this, gauze showed the highest stress at a strain of 70%, both for cycle 1 and for cycle 10, while MRC showed the lowest, meaning that gauze was the most difficult material to deform up to a strain of 70%, and MRC the easiest one, which could be due to the internal microstructure of each one. SP-CH required an intermediate stress to be deformed up to a 70% of strain. Nevertheless, the cyclic compression test revealed that the stress needed to deform the materials decreased substantially cycle after cycle (Fig. 3E), losing their maximum ability to resist deformation. This phenomenon, which is defined as cyclic softening [44], is probably a consequence of irreversible deformations of the internal microarchitecture caused by the compression [45]. Results of the relative maximum stress (%) (Fig. 3E) show that the gauze could only maintain an 80.2 2.0% of its maximum stress after 10 cycles, compared to the maximum stress of cycle 1. This is significantly lower (p <0.01) than MRC and SP-CH, that displayed a relative stress of 87.3 5.2% and 88.6 1.6% after 10 cycles, respectively. Young's modulus defines the ability of a material to withstand changes in length when subjected to compressive loads, and it is useful to measure the stiffness of a material [46]: the higher the Young's modulus, the higher the stiffness of the material. Since the three materials present a nonlinear behavior, Young modulus is not constant but changes depending on the position in the stress-strain curve, and is defined by the slope of the tangent to the curve [47]. Thus, we calculated the Young's modulus for all the strains of the first cycle of each biomaterial (Fig. 3F). Initially, the three samples presented a high Young's modulus, which rapidly decreased when strain started to increase. As strained became higher, the Young modulus of gauze and SP-CH started to increase again at strains coinciding with the ones in which the hyperelastic region of each material began —around 25% of strain for the gauze and 50% of strain for SP-CH —. This could indicate that at 25% of strain, all the cotton layers forming the gauze are very compact, and consequently the stiffness of the sample strongly increases. Meanwhile, the internal microstructure of the SP-CH would not get completely compact until a strain of 50%. MRC showed no meaningful increase of its Young's modulus at higher strains, indicating that its stiffness remained low throughout all the compression process. Summing up, while gauze becomes rigid at low strains, both MRC and SP-CH remain flexible until a strain of 50% is achieved. As commented before, the cyclic loading and unloading produced dissipation of energy within the material, which is usually a result of the viscoelastic behavior of the material or general damage to the structure [48]. Since viscoelastic nature of the three materials could be previously confirmed by the profile of the stress-strain curves and the presence of the hysteresis loop, energy dissipation can be attributed to that viscoelastic behavior. The area of this hysteresis loop —that is, the area between the loading and unloading curves —is directly linked to the damping capacity of the material [49], which is defined by the damping coefficient —or mechanical loss coefficient —, that measures to which extent a material can dissipate vibrational energy [50]. This property depends on factors such as the type of material, internal forces, sizes of geometry and the surface of the material [51], and seems to be of greater importance in biological materials for their protection via damping the impact waves [52]. Damping capacity is commonly high in materials such as foams, elastomers and polymers [50], and therefore they are widely used as damping materials [53]. Since a nasal pack is inevitably subjected to mechanical compression when inserted in the nostril, we evaluated the damping coefficient of the three materials for cycle 1 and 10, calculating it as the ratio of the energy dissipation —area of the hysteresis loop —and the total input energy —area under de loading curve —for the given cycle [51]. For the first cycle, SP-CH presented a damping coefficient of 0.72 0.02, which was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than the ones obtained for gauze and MRC, 0.59 0.05 and 0.29 0.01, respectively. Comparing the first cycle's coefficient to the cycle 10's, all the materials significantly (p <0.001) lost damping capacity, probably due to irreversible alterations in their internal microstructure caused by the cyclic compression. Even though, SP-CH presented a damping coefficient of 0.57 0.03 in cycle 10, which is still significantly J. Jimenez-Martin et al. Materials Today Bio 15 (2022) 100273 9 phosphatidylserine-exposing membrane surface, which is essential for the formation of thrombin [78]. In turn, thrombin activates platelets — through hydrolyzation of G-proteincoupled protease-activated receptors (PAR) 1 and 4 [81]—and promotes clot stabilization by converting of fibrinogen to fibrin [82]. We hypothesize that this platelet-thrombin interaction, that boosts the formation of the hemostatic plug, can be influenced somehow by the SP-CH. This is because SPI is a source of phylloquinone —vitamin K1 — [83], which certainly is involved in blood coagulation. Vitamin K serves as a cofactor for the endoplasmic enzyme g-glutamate carboxylase (GGCX), which plays a vital role in the carboxylation of certain protein-bound glutamate residues into g-carboxyglutamate (Gla) [84]. Seven blood coagulation factors —including prothrombin, fVII, fIX, and fX [85]—require this K vitamin-dependent glutamate residue carboxylation in order to bind Ca þ2 . Therefore, this carboxylation is essential for the formation of ion bridges between the blood-clotting enzymes and phospholipids on platelets’membranes [86], promoting the activation of these coagulation factors. In addition, it has also been mentioned that the SPI present in the SPCH has RGD-motif containing peptides [16], which could explain its ability to bind platelets. This is because the RGD sequence is also present in the α -chains of fibrinogen [87], and it is one of the two motifs that bind to the α IIbβ3 integrin receptor of platelets to boost their aggregation [88]. The interaction of these RGD sequences with platelet integrin α IIbβ3 has been recently described using optical trap-based methods, and the importance of this motif in the hemostatic process has been highlighted [89]. In fact, RGD sequences are recently being used to target platelets with different objectives [90]. Thus, we hypothesize that the increased platelet adhesion capacity of our SP-CH is due to the interaction between the RGD-motifs of the SPI and the α IIbβ3 integrin receptor of the platelets. 3.8. IN VIVO hemostatic efficacy A rat-tail amputation model (Fig. 8A) was used to evaluate the in vivo hemostatic properties of the three materials. Photographs of the appearance of the materials (Fig. 8B) were taken during the experiment. The gauze obtained a mean bleeding time score of 2.8 0.8 (Fig. 8C), which was similar to MRC's, 2.5 1.0. Meanwhile, SP-CH obtained a significantly lower (p >0.05) bleeding time score, 1.8 0.4, meaning that it could promote hemostasis in vivo faster than both gauze and MRC. Regarding to blood loss (Fig. 8D), no significant differences were found between groups. The gauze presented a mean blood loss of 1.1 1.0 g, MRC 1.2 0.8 g and SP-CH 0.6 0.3 g. However, it is noteworthy that both gauze and MRC showed an increased deviation among replicates, while blood loss in the SP-CH group remained consistent in all the tested samples, guaranteeing a homogeneous hemostatic efficacy. We consider that a lack of a suitable epistaxis animal model supposes a limitation in our study. Indeed, even if in vivo epistaxis models exist [91, 92] they either involve large size animals or fail to faithfully reproduce a real case of epistaxis, since an external hemorrhage is induced and the treatment is not introduced in the nasal cavity. Therefore, for the initial evaluation of the general hemostatic properties of our SP-CH, we aimed to choose a model with an adequate relationship between relevance and reduced invasiveness. In this vein, the rat-tail amputation model has been the animal model of choice for many important studies involving the evaluation of hemostatic properties of biomaterials [93–96], and hence it seems to be an appropriate model for this objective. Undoubtedly, a bigger sample size would have allowed detecting bigger differences between the assayed groups. We understand that the experiment might be underpowered, but it is still totally valid, and viable from an ethical point of view, respecting the principles of the 3R. In this context, the bleeding time results support those obtained in the in vitro experiments, where SP-CH showed superior hemostatic properties compared to the gauze and MRC. 4. Conclusions In this study we demonstrated that by-products of the food industry are a valuable and sustainable source of biomaterials that can be employed to manufacture safe and effective nasal packs with great hemostatic properties. The developed SP-CH presents a greatly interconnected porous microstructure, great water and blood swelling capacity and appropriate retention of the absorbed fluids. Besides, mechanical properties of the biomaterial demonstrated to be adequate for its use as a nasal pack. The biomaterial presented excellent biocompatibility and hemocompatibility in vitro. Interestingly, it was able to lose weight in aqueous medium and to degrade partially within a few days when incubated in blood, which is becoming more and more important characteristic for nasal packs. Moreover, the hemostatic properties of our SPCH outperformed those of the two nasal packs used in the clinical routine worldwide: a standard gauze and the commercial synthetic pack Merocel®. Our biomaterial was found to effectively promote blood coagulation in vitro, showing outstanding RBC and platelet binding properties compared to the gauze and MRC, likely due to the intrinsic hemostatic properties of its natural components. Although further research of its hemostatic effect in vivo is needed, SP-CH significantly shortened bleeding time in a rat-tail amputation model. Additionally, the study of the environmental loads associated with the extraction of materials and the manufacturing of scaffolds showed low environmental impacts in all the categories analyzed. All in all, our SP-CH, produced from a renewable and sustainable source of biomaterials (by-products of the food industry), showed superior mechanical and hemostatic properties compared to Merocel®and a standard gauze. Thus, we have demonstrated that a green and ecofriendly strategy can be followed to develop a biomaterial that outperforms the gold standard in the treatment of epistaxis. This leads us to believe that our SP-CH may be an appropriate nasal pack candidate for the treatment of epistaxis. CRediT authorship contribution statement Jon Jimenez-Martin: Methodology, Investigation, Writing –original draft. Kevin Las Heras: Methodology, Investigation, Writing –original draft. Alaitz Etxabide: Investigation. Jone Uranga: Investigation. Koro de la Caba: Resources, Funding acquisition, Writing –review &editing. Pedro Guerrero: Investigation, Writing –review &editing. Manoli Igartua: Resources, Funding acquisition, Writing –review &editing. Edorta Santos-Vizcaino: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing –review &editing. Rosa Maria Hernandez: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing –review &editing, Project administration. Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Acknowledgments Authors thank Eusko Jaurlaritza (Grupos Consolidados, No ref: IT907-16) and MCI/AEI/FEDER, UE (RTI2018-097100-B-C22). References [1] R. Beck, M. Sorge, A. Schneider, A. Dietz, Current approaches to epistaxis treatment in primary and secondary care, Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 112 (2018) 12–22, https:// doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2018.0012. [2] D. Passali, V. Damiani, F.M. Passali, M.A. Tosca, G. Motta, G. Ciprandi, E.S. Group, An International Survey on the pragmatic management of epistaxis, Acta BioMedica Atenei Parm. 91 (2020) 5–10, https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i1S.9241. J. Jimenez-Martin et al. Materials Today Bio 15 (2022) 100273 16 [3] W.M. Alshehri, M. Wafaa, M.W. Ahmed, A. Albathi, B. Alqahtani, Merocel surgicel wrap technique to manage diffuse epistaxis in patients with comorbidities, Int. J. Otolaryngol. 2020 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8272914. [4] Y. Abbas, M. Abdelkader, M. Adams, A. Addison, R. Advani, H. Zhang, Nasal packs for epistaxis : predictors of success, Clin. Otolaryngol. 45 (2020) 659–666, https:// doi.org/10.1111/coa.13555. [5] M. Bresnihan, B. Mehigan, A. Curran, An evaluation of Merocel and Series 5000 nasal packs in patients following nasal surgery : a prospective randomised trial, Clin. Otolaryngol. 32 (2007) 352–355. [6] M. Curran, L. de Baan, A. De Schryver, R. Van Zelm, S. Hellweg, T. Koellner, G. Sonnemann, M. Huijbregts, Toward meaningful end points of biodiversity, Environ. Sci. Technol. 45 (2011) 70–79. [7] E. Benetto, C. Jury, G. Kneip, I. V azquez-Rowe, V. Huck, F. Minette, Life cycle assessment of heat production from grape marc pellets, J. Clean. Prod. 87 (2015) 149–158, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.028. [8] Z. Günkaya, M. Banar, An environmental comparison of biocomposite film based on orange peel-derived pectin jelly-corn starch and LDPE film: LCA and biodegradability, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 21 (2016) 465–475, https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11367-016-1042-8. [9] I. Leceta, P. Guerrero, S. Cabezudo, K. De La Caba, Environmental assessment of chitosan-based films, J. Clean. Prod. 41 (2013) 312–318, https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jclepro.2012.09.049. [10] I. Mu~ noz, C. Rodríguez, D. Gillet, B.M. Moerschbacher, Life cycle assessment of chitosan production in India and Europe, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 23 (2018) 1151–1160, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1290-2. [11] R. Valentine, P.J. Wormald, R. Sindwani, Advances in absorbable biomaterials and nasal packing, Otolaryngol. Clin. 42 (2009) 813–828, https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.otc.2009.07.009. [12] P. Agrawal, S. Soni, G. Mittal, A. Bhatnagar, Role of polymeric biomaterials as wound healing agents, Int. J. Low. Extrem. Wounds 13 (2014) 180–190, https:// doi.org/10.1177/1534734614544523. [13] I. Leceta, A. Etxabide, S. Cabezudo, K. De Caba, P. Guerrero, Bio-based films prepared with by-products and wastes: environmental assessment, J. Clean. Prod. 64 (2014) 218–227, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.054. [14] T. Garrido, A. Etxabide, K. de la Caba, P. Guerrero, Versatile soy protein films and hydrogels by the incorporation of β-chitin from squid pens (Loligo sp.), Green Chem. 19 (2017) 5923–5931, https://doi.org/10.1039/C7GC02982A. [15] K. Las Heras, E. Santos-Vizcaino, T. Garrido, F.B. Gutierrez, J.J. Aguirre, K. de la Caba, R.M. Hernandez, Soy protein and chitin sponge-like scaffolds: from natural by-products to cell delivery systems for biomedical applications, Green Chem. 22 (2020) 3445–3460, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0gc00089b. [16] C. Chatterjee, S. Gleddie, C.W. Xiao, Soybean bioactive peptides and their functional properties, Nutrients 10 (2018), https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10091211. [17] M. Rinaudo, Chitin and chitosan : properties and applications, Prog. Polym. Sci. 31 (2006) 603–632, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2006.06.001. [18] P.C.K. Sankar, G. Rajmohan, M.J. Rosemary, Physico-chemical characterisation and biological evaluation of freeze dried chitosan sponge for wound care, Mater. Lett. 208 (2017) 130–132, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2017.05.010. [19] X. Yang, W. Liu, G. Xi, M. Wang, B. Liang, Y. Shi, Y. Feng, X. Ren, C. Shi, Fabricating antimicrobial peptide-immobilized starch sponges for hemorrhage control and antibacterial treatment, Carbohydr. Polym. 222 (2019), 115012, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115012. [20] H. Cheng, D. Xiao, Y. Tang, B. Wang, X. Feng, M. Lu, G.J. Vancso, X. Sui, Sponges with janus character from nanocellulose : preparation and applications in the treatment of hemorrhagic wounds, Adv. Healthc. Mater. 9 (2020), 1901796, https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201901796. [21] C. Liu, X. Liu, C. Liu, N. Wang, H. Chen, W. Yao, G. Sun, Q. Song, W. Qiao, A highly efficient, in situ wet-adhesive dextran derivative sponge for rapid hemostasis, Biomaterials 205 (2019) 23–37, https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.biomaterials.2019.03.016. [22] R. Hajosch, M. Suckfuell, S. Oesser, M. Ahlers, K. Flechsenhar, A novel gelatin sponge for accelerated hemostasis, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 94 (2010) 372–379, https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31663. [23] Z. Lin, X. Zhang, R. Zeng, Preparation and properties of polyvinyl acetal sponge modified by chitosan, Front. Chem. China 3 (2008) 172–177, https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11458-008-0033-0. [24] S.C. Bagheri, B. Bell, H.A. Khan, Current Therapy in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Elsevier Health Sciences., 2011. [25] T.L. Viehweg, J.B. Roberson, J.W. Hudson, Epistaxis : diagnosis and treatment, J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 64 (2006) 511–518, https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.joms.2005.11.031. [26] T. de Aramburu Mera, M. Labella  Alvarez,  A. Castellano, M. del Robledo, Alergia, in: Man. CL INICO URGENCIAS Del Hosp, Univ. Virgen Del Rocío., 2020, pp. 1–13. [27] G.D.E. Traslados, I. Grupo, P.D.E. Urgencias, P.D.E. Salud, Protocolos de derivaci on interhospitalaria urgente de pacientes en la provincia de almería, 2012. [28] G. Yang, Z. Xiao, H. Long, K. Ma, J. Zhang, X. Ren, J. Zhang, Assessment of the characteristics and biocompatibility of gelatin sponge scaffolds prepared by various crosslinking methods, Sci. Rep. 8 (2018) 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598018-20006-y. [29] H.K. No, N. Young Park, S. Ho Lee, S.P. Meyers, Antibacterial activity of chitosans and chitosan oligomers with different molecular weights, Int. J. Food Microbiol. 74 (2002) 65–72, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(01)00717-6. [30] E.S. Abdou, K.S.A. Nagy, M.Z. Elsabee, Extraction and characterization of chitin and chitosan from local sources, Bioresour. Technol. 99 (2008) 1359–1367, https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.051. [31] C. Zheng, Q. Zeng, S. Pimpi, W. Wu, K. Han, K. Dong, T. Lu, Research status and development potential of composite hemostatic materials, J. Mater. Chem. B. 8 (2020) 5395–5410, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0tb00906g. [32] C.M. Murphy, F.J. O'Brien, Understanding the effect of mean pore size on cell activity in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds, Cell Adhes. Migrat. 4 (2010) 377–381, https://doi.org/10.4161/cam.4.3.11747. [33] N. Annabi, J.W. Nichol, X. Zhong, C. Ji, S. Koshy, A. Khademhosseini, F. Dehghani, Controlling the porosity and microarchitecture of hydrogels for tissue engineering, Tissue Eng. B Rev. 16 (2010) 371–383, https://doi.org/10.1089/ ten.teb.2009.0639. [34] Z.M. Huang, Y.Z. Zhang, M. Kotaki, S. Ramakrishna, A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites, Compos. Sci. Technol. 63 (2003) 2223–2253, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(03) 00178-7. [35] F.J. O'Brien, B.A. Harley, I.V. Yannas, L.J. Gibson, The effect of pore size on cell adhesion in collagen-GAG scaffolds, Biomaterials 26 (2005) 433–441, https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.052. [36] F. Javier García Callejo, N. Mu~ noz Fern andez, M. Teresa Achiques Martínez, S.F. Moya-Angeler, M.J. Montoro Elena, J. Marco Algarra, Nasal packing in posterior epistaxis. Comparison of two methods, Acta Otorrinolaringol. (English Ed.) 61 (2010) 196–201, https://doi.org/10.1016/s2173-5735(10)70034-x. [37] D.E. Tunkel, S. Anne, S.C. Payne, S.L. Ishman, R.M. Rosenfeld, P.J. Abramson, J.D. Alikhaani, M.M. Benoit, R.S. Bercovitz, M.D. Brown, B. Chernobilsky, D.A. Feldstein, J.M. Hackell, E.H. Holbrook, S.M. Holdsworth, K.W. Lin, M.M. Lind, D.M. Poetker, C.A. Riley, J.S. Schneider, Clinical practice guideline : nosebleed (epistaxis), Otolaryngol. Neck Surg. 162 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0194599819890327.S1–S38. [38] M. Berlucchi, P. Castelnuovo, A. Vincenzi, B. Morra, E. Pasquini, Endoscopic outcomes of resorbable nasal packing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a multicenter prospective randomized controlled study, Eur. Arch. Oto-RhinoLaryngol. 266 (2009) 839–845, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-008-0841-3. [39] P.J. Wormald, R.N. Boustred, T. Le, L. Hawke, R. Sacks, A prospective single-blind randomized controlled study of use of hyaluronic acid nasal packs in patients after endoscopic sinus surgery, Am. J. Rhinol. 20 (2006) 7–10, https://doi.org/10.1177/ 194589240602000102. [40] X. Song, C. Zhu, D. Fan, Y. Mi, X. Li, R.Z. Fu, Z. Duan, Y. Wang, R.R. Feng, A novel human-like collagen hydrogel scaffold with porous structure and sponge-like properties, Polymers 9 (2017) 1–16, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9120638. [41] O. Chaudhuri, J. Cooper-White, P.A. Janmey, D.J. Mooney, V.B. Shenoy, Effects of extracellular matrix viscoelasticity on cellular behaviour, Nature 584 (2020) 535–546, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2612-2. [42] Z. Wang, M.J. Golob, N.C. Chesler, Viscoelastic properties of cardiovascular tissues, Viscoelastic Viscoplastic Mater 2 (2016) 64, https://doi.org/10.5772/64169. [43] D. Yang, J. Hu, X. Ding, Analysis of energy dissipation characteristics in granite under high confining pressure cyclic load, Alex. Eng. J. 59 (2020) 3587–3597, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.06.004. [44] M. Jürgens, J. Olbricht, B. Fedelich, B. Skrotzki, Low cycle fatigue and relaxation performance of ferritic–martensitic grade P92 steel, Metals (Basel) 9 (2019) 99, https://doi.org/10.3390/met9010099. [45] L. Zhu, J. Qiu, E. Sakai, A high modulus hydrogel obtained from hydrogen bond reconstruction and its application in vibration damper, RSC Adv. 7 (2017) 43755–43763, https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra08272j. [46] L. Wang, P.H.P. D'Alpino, L.G. Lopes, J.C. Pereira, Mechanical properties of dental restorative materials: relative contribution of laboratory tests, J. Appl. Oral Sci. 11 (2003) 162–167, https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-77572003000300002. [47] M. Capurro, F. Barberis, Evaluating the mechanical properties of biomaterials, in: Biomater. Bone Regen. Nov. Tech. Appl., Woodhead Publishing, 2014, pp. 270–323, https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857098104.2.270. [48] Z. Yousaf, M. Smith, P. Potluri, W. Parnell, Compression properties of polymeric syntactic foam composites under cyclic loading, Compos. B Eng. 186 (2020), 107764, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107764. [49] G. Pilz, P. Guttmann, F. Oesterreicher, G. Pinter, Experimental method for creep characterization of polymeric foam materials in media immersion, Mech. TimeDependent Mater. 24 (2020) 421–433, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11043-02009457-x. [50] M.F. Ahsby, H. Sherecliff, D. Cebon, Shake, rattle and roll: cyclic loading, damage and failure, in: H. Shercliff (Ed.), Mater. Eng. Sci. Process. Des., first ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, 2007, pp. 186–187. [51] F. Orban, Damping of materials and members in structures, in: J. Phys. Conf. Ser., IOP Publishing, 2011, p. 12022, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/268/1/ 012022. [52] M. Qwamizadeh, P. Liu, Z. Zhang, K. Zhou, Y.W. Zhang, Hierarchical structure enhances and tunes the damping behavior of load-bearing biological materials, J. Appl. Mech. 83 (2016), 051009, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032861. [53] P. Zhang, M.A. Heyne, A.C. To, Biomimetic staggered composites with highly enhanced energy dissipation: modeling, 3D printing, and testing, J. Mech. Phys. Solid. 83 (2015) 285–300, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2015.06.015. [54] T.L. Landsman, T. Touchet, S.M. Hasan, C. Smith, B. Russell, J. Rivera, D.J. Maitland, E. Cosgriff-Hernandez, A shape memory foam composite with enhanced fluid uptake and bactericidal properties as a hemostatic agent, Acta Biomater. 47 (2017) 91–99, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.10.008. [55] L. Novotny, M. Crha, P. Rauser, A. Hep, J. Misik, A. Necas, D. Vondrys, Novel biodegradable polydioxanone stents in a rabbit airway model, J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 143 (2012) 437–444, https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jtcvs.2011.08.002. J. Jimenez-Martin et al. Materials Today Bio 15 (2022) 100273 17 [56] J.H. Franklin, E.D. Wright, Randomized, controlled, study of absorbable nasal packing on outcomes of surgical treatment of rhinosinusitis with polyposis, Am. J. Rhinol. 21 (2007) 214–217, https://doi.org/10.2500/ajr.2007.21.3011. [57] J. Selvarajah, M.F. Mh Busra, A. Bin Saim, R. Bt Hj Idrus, Y. Lokanathan, Development and physicochemical analysis of genipin-crosslinked gelatine sponge as a potential resorbable nasal pack, J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 31 (2020) 1722–1740, https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2020.1774841. [58] M. Weber, H. Steinle, S. Golombek, L. Hann, C. Schlensak, H.P. Wendel, M. AvciAdali, Blood-contacting biomaterials: in vitro evaluation of the hemocompatibility, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 6 (2018) 99, https://doi.org/10.3389/ fbioe.2018.00099. [59] J. Zhu, H. Han, F. Li, X. Wang, J. Yu, X. Qin, D. Wu, Peptide-functionalized amino acid-derived pseudoprotein-based hydrogel with hemorrhage control and antibacterial activity for wound healing, Chem. Mater. 31 (2019) 4436–4450, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b00850. [60] X. Chen, C. Cui, Y. Liu, C. Fan, M. Xiao, D. Zhang, Z. Xu, Y. Li, J. Yang, W. Liu, A robust poly(: N-Acryloyl-2-glycine)-based sponge for rapid hemostasis, Biomater. Sci. 8 (2020) 3760–3771, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0bm00770f. [61] S.S. Biranje, P.V. Madiwale, K.C. Patankar, R. Chhabra, P. Bangde, P. Dandekar, R.V. Adivarekar, Cytotoxicity and hemostatic activity of chitosan/carrageenan composite wound healing dressing for traumatic hemorrhage, Carbohydr. Polym. 239 (2020), 116106, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116106. [62] P. Wong, A basis of echinocytosis and stomatocytosis in the disc–sphere transformations of the erythrocyte, J. Theor. Biol. 196 (1999) 343–361, https:// doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1998.0845. [63] K.D. Tachev, K.D. Danov, P.A. Kralchevsky, On the mechanism of stomatocyte–echinocyte transformations of red blood cells: experiment and theoretical model, Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 34 (2004) 123–140, https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2003.12.011. [64] M.C. Wesseling, L. Wagner-Britz, H. Huppert, B. Hanf, L. Hertz, D.B. Nguyen, I. Bernhardt, Phosphatidylserine exposure in human red blood cells depending on cell age, Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 38 (2016) 1376–1390, https://doi.org/10.1159/ 000443081. [65] J. Shin, K. Lim, J. Noh, O. Bae, S. Chung, M. Lee, J. Chung, Lead-induced procoagulant activation of erythrocytes through phosphatidylserine exposure may lead to thrombotic diseases, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 20 (2007) 38–43, https://doi.org/ 10.1021/tx060114þ. [66] J.L.N. Wolfs, P. Comfurius, E.M. Bevers, R.F.A. Zwaal, Influence of erythrocyte shape on the rate of Ca2þ-induced scrambling of phosphatidylserine, Mol. Membr. Biol. 20 (2003) 83–91, https://doi.org/10.1080/0968768031000064444. [67] Y.A. Sheremet, A.N. Popovicheva, G.Y. Levin, Lysophosphatidic acid and human erythrocyte aggregation, Cell Tissue Biol. 8 (2014) 237–243, https://doi.org/ 10.1134/S1990519X14030110. [68] D.B. Nguyen, T.B.T. Ly, M.C. Wesseling, M. Hittinger, A. Torge, A. Devitt, Y. Perrie, I. Bernhardt, Characterization of microvesicles released from human red blood cells, Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 38 (2016) 1085–1099, https://doi.org/10.1159/ 000443059. [69] J. Tissot, G. Canellini, O. Rubin, A. Angelillo-scherrer, J. Delobel, M. Prudent, N. Lion, Blood microvesicles: from proteomics to physiology, Transl. Proteomics 1 (2013) 38–52, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trprot.2013.04.004. [70] J.K.F. Leal, M.J.W. Adjobo-hermans, G.J.C.G.M. Bosman, Red blood cell homeostasis: mechanisms and effects of microvesicle generation in health and disease, Front. Physiol. 9 (2018) 703, https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00703. [71] S. Chung, O. Bae, K. Lim, J. Noh, M. Lee, Y.S. Jung, C.J. H, Lysophosphatidic acid induces thrombogenic activity through phosphatidylserine exposure and procoagulant microvesicle generation in human erythrocytes, Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 27 (2007) 414–421, https://doi.org/10.1161/ 01.ATV.0000252898.48084.6a. [72] B.B. Mendes, M. Gomez-florit, A.C. Araújo, J. Prada, P.S. Babo, R.M.A. Domingues, R.L. Reis, M.E. Gomes, Intrinsically bioactive cryogels based on platelet lysate nanocomposites for hemostasis applications, Biomacromolecules 21 (2020) 3678–3692, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.0c00787. [73] W. Huang, S. Cheng, X. Wang, Y. Zhang, L. Chen, L. Zhang, Noncompressible hemostasis and bone regeneration induced by an absorbable bioadhesive selfhealing hydrogel, Adv. Funct. Mater. 31 (2021), 2009189, https://doi.org/ 10.1002/adfm.202009189. [74] J.W. Weisel, R.I. Litvinov, Red blood cells: the forgotten player in hemostasis and thrombosis, J. Thromb. Haemostasis 17 (2019) 271–282, https://doi.org/10.1111/ jth.14360. [75] G. Barshtein, R. Ben-Ami, S. Yedgar, Role of red blood cell flow behavior in hemodynamics and hemostasis, Expert Rev. Cardiovasc Ther. 5 (2007) 743–752, https://doi.org/10.1586/14779072.5.4.743. [76] A.H. Gillespie, A. Doctor, Red blood cell contribution to hemostasis, Front. Pediatr. 9 (2021) 178, https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.629824. [77] J.W.M. Heemskerk, E.M. Bevers, T. Lindhout, Platelet activation and blood coagulation, Thromb. Haemostasis 88 (2002) 186–193, https://doi.org/10.1055/s0037-1613209. [78] H.H. Versteeg, J.W.M. Heemskerk, M. Levi, P.H. Reitsma, New fundamentals in hemostasis, Physiol. Rev. 93 (2013) 327–358, https://doi.org/10.1152/ physrev.00016.2011. [79] K. Broos, H.B. Feys, S.F. De Meyer, K. Vanhoorelbeke, H. Deckmyn, Platelets at work in primary hemostasis, Blood Rev. 25 (2011) 155–167, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.blre.2011.03.002. [80] Z. Li, M.K. Delaney, K.A. O'Brien, X. Du, Signaling during platelet adhesion and activation, Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 30 (2010) 2341–2349, https://doi.org/ 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.207522. [81] S. Nylander, C. Mattsson, Thrombin-induced platelet activation and its inhibition by anticoagulants with different modes of action, Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis 14 (2003) 159–167, https://doi.org/10.1097/00001721-200302000-00007. [82] M. Koupenova, L. Clancy, H.A. Corkrey, J.E. Freedman, Circulating platelets as mediators of immunity, inflammation, and thrombosis, Circ. Res. 122 (2018) 337–351, https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.310795. [83] D.W. Stafford, The vitamin K cycle, J. Thromb. Haemostasis 3 (2005) 1873–1878. [84] C. Vermeer, Vitamin K: the effect on health beyond coagulation–an overview, Food Nutr. Res. 56 (2012), https://doi.org/10.3402/fnr.v56i0.5329. [85] G. Ferland, The discovery of vitamin K and its clinical applications, Ann. Nutr. Metab. 61 (2012) 213–218, https://doi.org/10.1159/000343108. [86] D. Bartusik, D. Aebisher, B. Tomanek, The synthesis and application of vitamins in nanoemulsion delivery systems, in: Emulsions, Academic Press, 2016, pp. 519–555, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804306-6/00015-5. [87] G. Soslau, R. Class, D.A. Morgan, C. Foster, S.T. Lord, P. Marchese, Z.M. Ruggeri, Unique pathway of thrombin-induced platelet aggregation mediated by glycoprotein ib, J. Biol. Chem. 276 (2001) 21173–21183, https://doi.org/10.1074/ jbc.M008249200. [88] J. S anchez-Cort es, M. Mrksich, The platelet integrin α IIbβ3 binds to the RGD and AGD motifs in fibrinogen, Chem. Biol. 16 (2009) 990–1000, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.chembiol.2009.08.012. [89] O. Kononova, R.I. Litvinov, D.S. Blokhin, V.V. Klochkov, J.W. Weisel, J.S. Bennett, V. Barsegov, Mechanistic basis for the binding of RGDand AGDV-peptides to the platelet integrin α IIbβ3, Biochemistry 56 (2017) 1932–1942, https://doi.org/ 10.1021/acs.biochem.6b01113. [90] M. Alipour, M. Baneshi, S. Hosseinkhani, R. Mahmoudi, A. Jabari Arabzadeh, M. Akrami, J. Mehrzad, H. Bardania, Recent progress in biomedical applications of RGD-based ligand: from precise cancer theranostics to biomaterial engineering: a systematic review, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 108 (2020) 839–850, https://doi.org/ 10.1002/jbm.a.36862. [91] I. Iynen, O. Sogut, R. Kose, The efficacy of Ankaferd Blood Stopper in heparininduced hemostatic abnormality in a rat epistaxis model, Otolaryngol. Neck Surg. 145 (2011) 840–844, https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599811415594. [92] V. Yurttas, M. Sereflican, E.H. Terzi, G. Ozyalvaçlı, H. Kazaz, Comparison of microporous polysaccharide hemospheres and Ankaferd Blood Stopper in a rabbit epistaxis model, Eur. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. 273 (2015) 933–938, https:// doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3692-8. [93] X. Sun, Z. Tang, M. Pan, Z. Wang, H. Yang, H. Liu, Chitosan/kaolin composite porous microspheres with high hemostatic efficacy, Carbohydr. Polym. 177 (2017) 135–143, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.08.131. [94] C. Feng, J. Li, G.S. Wu, Y.Z. Mu, M. Kong, C.Q. Jiang, X.J. Cheng, Y. Liu, X.G. Chen, Chitosan-coated diatom silica as hemostatic agent for hemorrhage control, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8 (2016) 34234–34243, https://doi.org/10.1021/ acsami.6b12317. [95] X. Cheng, Z. Shao, C. Li, L. Yu, M.A. Raja, C. Liu, Isolation, characterization and evaluation of collagen from jellyfish Rhopilema esculentum Kishinouye for use in hemostatic applications, PLoS One 12 (2017), e0169731, https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0169731. [96] G. Li, K. Quan, C. Xu, B. Deng, X. Wang, Synergy in thrombin-graphene sponge for improved hemostatic efficacy and facile utilization, Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 161 (2018) 27–34, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.10.021. J. Jimenez-Martin et al. Materials Today Bio 15 (2022) 100273 18