Contributions of Women in Recent Research on Biopolymer Science

  Citation: Veettil, U.T.; Olza, S.; Brugerolle de Fraissinette, N.; Bascans, E.; Castejón, N.; Adrien, A.; Fernández-Marín, R.; Nardin, C.; Fernandes, S.C.M. Contributions of Women in Recent Research on Biopolymer Science. Polymers 2022, 14, 1420. https://doi.org/10.3390/ polym14071420 Academic Editor: Cornelia Vasile Received: 31 January 2022 Accepted: 28 March 2022 Published: 30 March 2022 Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Copyright: © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). polymers Review Contributions of Women in Recent Research on Biopolymer Science Unnimaya Thalakkale Veettil 1,2 , Sheila Olza 1,2,3, Nelly Brugerolle de Fraissinette 1,2 , Elodie Bascans 1,2,4 , Natalia Castejón1,2,† , Amandine Adrien 1,2, Rut Fernández-Marín5, Corinne Nardin 1 and Susana C. M. Fernandes 1,2,* 1E2S UPPA, CNRS, IPREM, Universite de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour, 64000 Pau, France; [email protected] (U.T.V.); [email protected] (S.O.); nelly.br[email protected] (N.B.d.F.); [email protected] (E.B.); [email protected] (N.C.); [email protected] (A.A.); corinne.nar[email protected] (C.N.) 2 E2S UPPA, Marine Materials Research Group, Universite de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour, 64600 Anglet, France 3Department of Cellular Biology and Histology, Faculty of Medicine Nursery, University of the Basque Country, B Sarriena, s/n, 48940 Leioa, Spain 4 CNRS, INRAE, INSA, Toulouse Biotechnology Institute (TBI), Universitéde Toulouse, 31400 Toulouse, France 5Environmental and Chemical Engineering Department, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Plaza Europa 1, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain; [email protected] *Correspondence: [email protected] † Present address: Department for Food Chemistry and Toxicology, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria. Abstract: Nowadays, biopolymers are playing a fundamental role in our society because of the environmental issues and concerns associated with synthetic polymers. The aim of this Special Issue entitled ‘Women in Polymer Science and Technology: Biopolymers’ is highlighting the work designed and developed by women on biopolymer science and technology. In this context, this short review aims to provide an introduction to this Special Issue by highlighting some recent contributions of women around the world on the particular topic of biopolymer science and technology during the last 20 years. In the first place, it highlights a selection of important works performed on a number of well-studied natural polymers, namely, agar, chitin, chitosan, cellulose, and collagen. Secondly, it gives an insight into the discovery of new polysaccharides and enzymes that have a role in their synthesis and in their degradation. These contributions will be paving the way for the next generation of female and male scientists on this topic. Keywords: natural polymers; agar; chitin; chitosan; cellulose; collagen; marine polysaccharides; marine CAZymes 1. Introduction Natural polymers, also known as biopolymers, are naturally occurring materials, formed during the life cycles of living organisms. They can be derived from plants (e.g., cellulose), algae (e.g., agar), animals (e.g., chitin and collagen), bacteria (e.g., bacterial cellulose), and fungi (e.g., chitosan) (Figure 1). Biopolymers present unique properties and advantages, namely, high biocompatibility, lack of toxicity, biodegradability, stability, available functional groups, and often are low cost. These properties make natural polymers interesting sustainable alternatives to replace synthetic polymers in materials development. Thus, in the last decades, there has been a prompt development and breakthrough in biopolymer science and technology to better understand their fundamental and applied biological, physicochemical, morphological, and mechanical properties [ 1 – 7 ]. Moreover, the challenging prospection for novel natural polymers has led to fundamental discoveries; in particular, within the rich fount of marine polysaccharides, and their related enzymes (carbohydrate-active enzymes or CAZymes) that represent marine microscopic life [ 8 – 10 ]. Polymers 2022,14, 1420. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14071420 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/polymers Polymers 2022,14, 1420 2 of 20 Figure 1. Chemical structure of (A) agarose, (B) cellulose, (C) chitin, (D) chitosan, and (E) collagen. Henri Braconnot or Anselme Payen are names that are very well known in the biopolymer field for their outstanding discovery of chitin and cellulose. Maybe the names Angelina Fanny Hesse and Wanda Kirkbride Farr are not as widely recognized as others are in the field, however, the outstanding idea of Hesse to use agar as culture media for growing microorganisms in 1882 revolutionized microbiology [ 11 ]. In 1940, Farr discovered the mechanism of cellulose formation in the plant cell walls, answering a question that had puzzled scientists for a long time [ 12 ]. Since the discovery of these polymers, a number of great works have highlighted their importance and greatly implemented the work of the pioneers of biopolymer science. During the last 20 years, many research teams have dedicated their time to biopolymer sciences and have led to several advances, discoveries, and innovations (Figure 2), building upon the general knowledge of natural polymers [ 13 ]. In this paper, we wanted to showcase some of these recent devoted efforts by highlighting the work of women investigators worldwide (both well-recognized leaders and rising stars) in the biopolymer community. The aim of this paper is not to list all the numerous accomplishments of women in the biopolymer science as it would be an impossible task. Herein, we rather want to highlight some examples of scientific advances of some wellknown natural polymers that have been made possible by the dedication of researchers in women-led teams. Polymers 2022,14, 1420 3 of 20 Figure 2. Applications of biopolymers. Reprinted from ref. [14]. 2. Advances in Biopolymer Research: Examples from Well-Known Biopolymers 2.1. Agar The use of agar as a gelling agent is very ancient, and in particular, in several Southeast Asian cuisines. It is said that it was discovered in the 17th century in Japan by an innkeeper named Mino Tar ¯ ozaemon who noticed the jellification of a seaweed soup after a night at cold temperatures. It was only in 1859 that the chemist Anselme Payen subjected agar, extracted from the red seaweed Gelidium corneum, to chemical analysis [ 15 ]. One of the major breakthroughs concerning the use of agar was its utilization as a solid medium for the culture of microorganisms. Although agar was first described for use in microbiology in 1882 by the German microbiologist Walther Hesse, an assistant working in Robert Koch’s laboratory [ 16 ], it was Fanny Hesse’s idea, Walther Hesse’s wife, to use agar as an alternative to gelatin. Since then, the knowledge on agar, its extraction processes, and its properties have widely extended. Agar is a collective term used to describe a mixture of gelling polysaccharides made up of Dand L-galactose. It has a linear sugar skeleton consisting of alternating units of 1-4 linked 3-6-anhydroα -L-galactose and 1-3-linked β -D-galactopyranose [ 17 ]. Agar can be fractionated principally into two components, agarose and agaropectin. Agarose is the gelling fraction, and it is a neutral linear molecule with low levels of sulphation, while agaropectin is the non-gelling fraction characterized as a heterogeneous mixture of smaller molecules including substituted galactose residues and methylated or sulphated sugar units. The relative proportions of agarose and agaropectin are known to vary between species, locality, and environmental conditions. Thus, the selection of raw material can be used to source specific agar functionality [ 18 ]. Agar is mainly found in the cell-matrix of red seaweeds of the order Gelidiales (Gelidium and Pterocladia) and Gracilariales (Gracilaria and Hydropuntia), which have become the major worldwide sources [ 19 ]. The properties of agar make it suitable for applications in diverse fields with high-added value. For instance, the most common applications include food, feed, cosmetics, pharmaceutical, and biotechnology (mainly microbiology as growth media for culturing bacteria), but potentially emerging applications may also include biomedical, agriculture, biomaterials, and bioplastics. The industrial production of agar is performed by traditional hot water extraction during several hours under conventional heating [ 20 ]. However, this conventional method involves a large volume of water and high-energy requirements; thus, novel strategies Polymers 2022,14, 1420 4 of 20 using eco-friendly techniques are needed. In this sense, Amparo López-Rubio and her group have made an important contribution, not only for the successful extraction of agar from the red algae Gelidium sesquipedale but also for the use of eco-friendly methods following the principles of ‘Green Chemistry’. For instance, Martinez-Sanz et al. reported the production of agar-based extracts by applying ultrasoundand microwave-assisted methods, highlighting the potential of these alternative methods to produce more sustainable agar-based extracts for food-related applications [ 21 , 22 ]. Additionally, a further step in the sustainable use of natural sources by eco-friendly approaches was performed by Sagrario Beltrán’s and Rodrigo Melgosa’s group from the University of Burgos, Spain. They have been working on the valorization of the solid residue generated after agar extraction from the red algae G. sesquipedale [23]. In recent years, the use of agar-based biomaterials in emerging areas, such as tissue engineering or ‘smart materials’, has gained great interest. In this sense, the group of Gonçalves and colleagues has made a significant contribution. For instance, Sousa et al. studied the structural and physicochemical properties of agar extracted from Gracilaria vermiculophylla under microwave heating [ 24 – 26 ]. In a further study, the same research group investigated the formation of agar gels in aqueous media focusing on the different molecular assemblies to understand how these associations can be modified to meet the specific needs of a given application [ 27 ]. After a deep characterization of agar and agar gels, they successfully reported the first study of the production of agar-based nanofibers by electrospinning, opening new opportunities for the fabrication of agar-based biomaterials in the form of nanofibers [28]. Another important application for agar-based materials is the production of films for food packaging. Koro De la Caba and her team (University of Basque Country, Spain) have been actively working on the production of food packaging from marine by-products. For instance, they reported the preparation of agar-based films from G. sesquipedale using a thermo-molding method to produce renewable and biodegradable films [ 29 – 31 ]. Following a similar approach, the group of Gonçalves and colleagues developed different strategies to improve the mechanical strength and water resistance of agar films [ 32 , 33 ] and proposed alternative plasticizers for the production of thermo-compressed agar films [ 34 ]. Moreover, the group of Amparo López-Rubio from the Spanish National Research Council presently works on the production of agar-based hydrogels and bioactive aerogels as matrices for the controlled release of bioactive compounds in food systems [ 35 , 36 ]. An original idea from the same group was to use agarose to encapsulate probiotic bacteria and improve their viability during storage, which is a promising approach for the preparation of probiotic functional foods [37]. 2.2. Chitin and Chitosan Chitin has a scientific research story of over 200 years. It began in 1811 with the French chemist Henri Braconnot, with chitin isolation and characterization from some fungal species. It was not until 1859 that Rougeut discovered that chitin could be manipulated through chemical and temperature treatments, with heated potassium hydroxide, resulting in a soluble substance. This compound was named “chitosan” in the late 19th century by the German scientist and physiologist Felix Hoppe-Seyler [ 38 ]. Since then, researchers efforts have led to the discovery of various sources of chitin, its structural characterization [ 38 , 39 ], and more recently the isolation of nanochitin [ 40 ]. In the last two decades, research has focused on improving the properties of chitinand chitosan-based materials, either through their combination or with other materials or obtaining derivatives by functionalization [ 41 ]. Extraction techniques have also been improved, which have evolved from classical chemical extraction of chitin to green chemistry strategies. Chitin is a semi-crystalline, high-molecular-weight linear polysaccharide made up of β -(1,4)-linked N-acetyl-2-amido-2-deoxy-D-glucose units [ 42 ]. There are two principal types of crystalline isoforms, α - and β -chitin. Those two isoforms differ on their chain alignment, which determines the final physicochemical properties of the chitin. α -chitin has a compact Polymers 2022,14, 1420 5 of 20 and highly crystalline structure that results from antiparallel chain arrangement that favors strong hydrogen bonds, whereas the less abundant β -isoform is more reactive and has a high affinity for solvents due to its parallel chain arrangement that provides weaker hydrogen bonds [ 43 ]. This biopolymer is present in the cell wall of fungi and is the main compound in the exoskeleton of crustaceans and arthropods and is also present in mollusks, thus making it the second most abundant polysaccharide on earth after cellulose. The major source of chitin is the marine crustacean shells waste from the fisheries industry, such as shrimp, lobster, and crab shells [44]. Rinaudo and colleagues made significant advances on the extraction and characterization of chitin from different marine sources such as α -chitin from shrimp waste and crab shells and β -chitin from cuttlefish bones [ 43 , 45 – 47 ]. They made also a great contribution to the optimization of the deproteination and demineralization processes from shrimp shells. They found that an enzymatic deproteination by crude microbial proteases led to an 88 ±5% decrease of the protein content, which is similar to the alkali deproteination [48–50]. Although chitin presents interesting properties for applications in the biomedical field, such as good biocompatibility, biodegradability, low immunogenicity, and antimicrobial and wound healing activities, its natural insolubility limits its use [ 51 ]. Therefore, chitosan, the most important derivative of chitin resulting from its deacetylation [ 44 ], has gained great interest [ 52 ] because of its higher solubility, the fact that it is positively charged in acidic conditions, presents the unique biological properties of chitin, and has excellent film-forming properties [ 42 , 53 , 54 ]. Chitosan and its derivatives have great potential in cosmetics, pharmaceutical, and biomedical applications such as delivery systems or bioactive materials for tissue engineering [ 55 , 56 ]. The group of Lina Zhang has developed a large variety of chitin and chitosan-based biomaterials with promising biomedical applications [ 57 , 58 ], particularly hydrogels. Hydrogels that could serve as 3D cell culture platforms [ 59 ], cell encapsulation and drug delivery systems [ 60 ], and tissue engineering scaffolds [ 61 ] were developed by combining the advantageous bioactive properties of chitin and chitosan with other materials. The new techniques developed by this group led to the conception of electroneutral and on-demand dissolvable self-healing hydrogel systems [ 62 , 63 ]. Another important contribution of Zhang et al. was the creation of chitin microspheres based on a chitin solution in a NaOH/urea aqueous system and the use of chitosan microspheres as a sacrificial template [ 64 , 65 ]. This technology has been successfully used in the biomedical field for blood purification therapy [ 66 ] and in tissue engineering [ 67 ]. Another example of chitosan valorization comes from Eleonora Marsich and colleagues, specialized in carbohydrate polymers. The team focused on the use of lactose-modified chitosan, commercially known as CTL, to mimic biological matrices [68–71]. In recent years, the use of nanochitin has also gained attention because of its interesting properties at the nano scale, such as high surface area and aspect ratio, mechanical properties, and high antibacterial and anti-inflammatory activities, among others [ 72 ]. For instance, the team of Yimin Fan from the Nanjing Forestry University, China, developed new methods to isolate individualized water-dispersed chitin nanofibers and nanocrystals from both α - and β -chitin [ 73 , 74 ]. One of the most promising methodologies was based on the 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl radical-mediated oxidation (TEMPO) of chitin followed by mechanical disintegration in water [ 75 ]. In a further study, Fan et al. developed a simple pretreatment strategy that improved the oxidation efficiency of TEMPO-mediated isolation and reduced the consumption of the oxidants, resulting in a novel green methodology [ 76 ]. Nanochitin can also be employed as nanofiller to obtain reinforced composites of superior mechanical and biological properties [ 77 ]. For this purpose, Coltelli and colleagues worked on the use of chitin nanofibrils from fishery biomass to develop bioand eco-compatible nanocomposites. The incorporation of chitin nanofibrils as a reinforcing agent in extruded composites based on biodegradable polylactic acid (PLA) improved the mechanical properties and provided indirect antimicrobial activity, resulting in potential bioplastics for food packaging and for skin tissue regeneration [ 78 ]. Recently, the same Polymers 2022,14, 1420 6 of 20 effect was performed with cellulose-based bioplastics for food packaging [ 79 ]. Another biomedical application of chitin nanofibrils in combination with electronegative nanolignin in microcapsule-like complexes was used to entrap and later deliver both hydrophobic and lipophilic molecules [72]. These are just a few examples of women researchers working on chitin and chitosan. Fortunately, many other women around the world are doing excellent work on this topic and innovating, as is the case of Insiya Jafferjee, who is the co-founder and CEO at Shellworks (https://www.theshellworks.com, accessed on 2 November 2021), a London-based start-up that is developing a method to transform chitin into a novel bioplastic. 2.3. Cellulose 2.3.1. Cellulose and Nanocellulose We have been widely using cellulose as a source of energy and as a material for thousands of years. Nonetheless, its first isolation from plant matter and chemical structure identification was undertaken by the French chemist Anselme Payen in 1838. Since then, multitudinous scientific and technological studies have been made by several scientists around the world on its extraction from different sources, establishment of its chemical and physical structure and morphology, development of different materials from pulp and paper, composites and packaging, to medical materials and high-tech applications, chemoenzymatic modification, cellulose derivatives, new instrumentation, and more recently, isolation of nanocrystals and nanofibers [ 80 – 83 ]. Herein, we will highlight some works developed by female scientists on (nano)cellulose-based materials from plants and bacteria (Figure 3a–c). Cellulose is a polysaccharide that is the main constituent of plant cell walls (Figure 3a–c) and the most abundant naturally occurring biopolymer in the biosphere. This linear homopolysaccharide is composed of repeating β -D-glucopyranose molecules that are covalently linked through acetal functions between the equatorial -OH group of the C4 and of the C1 carbon atom [ 84 ]. Cellulose is insoluble in water and in most common solvents due to its strong interand intramolecular H-bonding between its individual chain units. Despite its poor solubility, it is used for a wide variety of applications in papermaking, coating, packaging, construction materials, composites, food additives, and in the biomedical fields [ 80 ]. Owing to their properties, namely, biocompatibility, biodegradability, nontoxicity and recyclability, and excellent mechanical properties, cellulose and its derivatives such as carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), cellulose acetate (CA), methyl cellulose (MC), hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC), and (hydroxypropyl) methyl cellulose (HPMC) have gained a lot of attention [81,82]. In nature, it presents a semicrystalline fibrillar structure of cellulose chains assembled together to form microfibrils, nanofibers, and fibers involved strongly with hemicellulose, lignin, and residual inorganic elements. Using chemical and physical treatments and/or enzymatic-assisted extraction, it is possible to extract cellulose fibers for use in the many application sectors mentioned before [ 85 ]. The work developed by Elvira Fortunato and her research group at the New University of Lisbon, Portugal, is an example of one important application of cellulose fibers. They have been working on the development of paperbased transistors as an alternative to silicon-based components. These paper transistors could be used in different applications in daily life such as ‘smart’ packaging, biosensors, animated billboards, and networked shipping labels (Patent: EP2235741, EP2059810) [ 86 , 87 ]. Moreover, these materials are produced at room temperature and are biodegradable, which reduces the negative impact on the environment. Using top-down approaches, from cellulose fibers, it is possible to isolate nanocellulose, i.e., less than 100 nm in one dimension: cellulose nanofibers (CNF) and cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) [ 81 , 82 , 88 ]. These nanocellulose forms, aside from the cellulose fiber properties, also exhibit high surface area and aspect ratio, making these cellulose nanoforms very interesting for the development of nanomaterials. Polymers 2022,14, 1420 7 of 20 Among the numerous women working on this topic, Kristiina Oksman (Luleå University of Technology, Sweden), Aji Mathew (Stockholm University, Sweden), and Arantxa Eceiza (University of Basque Country, Spain) have achieved significant progresses on nanocellulose. These include: (i) the isolation of nanocellulose (nanofibers, nanocrystals, or whiskers) from different origins and sources such as microcrystalline cellulose from Norway spruce, kenaf fibers, beech pulp, and unbleached rice straw among others by using different isolation approaches, namely, chemical hydrolysis or physical or mechanical isolation methods such as refining, high-pressure homogenization and ultrafine grinder and their characterization [ 88 – 91 ]; (ii) the processing of functional materials such as nanocomposites with interesting mechanical properties [ 92 – 94 ], hydrogels, aerogels [ 95 ], and membranes for several applications [ 96 , 97 ]; and (iii) the cellulose-based material development for biomedical applications; for example, as scaffolds [83,98,99]. Particular attention has been focused on cellulose-based nanocomposites presenting interesting mechanical properties prepared using different approaches. For instance, nanocomposites made from cellulose nanofiber with starch powder were investigated by Oksman team. These composites were made using a twin-screw extrusion process. They found that the mechanical properties, as well as the moisture sensitivity of the thermoplastic starch, were improved by preparing the nanocomposites with the cellulose nanofibers [ 100 , 101 ]. Furthermore, polylactic acid-cellulose whisker nanocomposites were synthesized by compounding extrusion. The cellulose whiskers were developed from microcrystalline cellulose and the whiskers were aggregated by strong H-bonds [ 93 ]. These whiskers were able to improve the storage modulus of polylactic acid in the plastic region. Much more work on cellulose-based materials has been and will be carried out by both female and male scientists working together or individually [102–105]. 2.3.2. Bacterial Cellulose On the other hand, bacterial cellulose (BC, Figure 3a), also known as microbial cellulose, is a naturally occurring 3D network-based material produced as an exopolysaccharide by some aerobic bacteria, such as those from the genus Komagataeibacter. This 3D network is composed of nanoand microfibrils which are 70–80 nm wide and 3–4 nm thick, being 100 times thinner than typical vegetal cellulose fibers [106]. The difference between plant-based cellulose and BC is purity, physicochemical and mechanical properties, and structure. BC is of high purity (free of hemicelluloses and lignin that are usually associated with plant cellulose), crystallinity, and degree of polymerization. Moreover, BC possesses extremely higher water-binding capacity, tensile strength, and surface area, as compared to the widespread plant-based counterparts [107–109]. The genus Komagataeibacter is Gram-negative aerobic and non-photosynthetic bacteria capable of converting glucose, glycerol, and other organic substrates into cellulose within a period of a few days in the presence of oxygen. BC can be produced using different bacterial culture media including static, agitated, and bioreactors. Generally, BC production involves expensive culture media. Thus, the use of agroforestry industrial residues could overcome this limitation by serving carbon substrates for the BC production as demonstrated by Carmen S R Freire and collaborators at the University of Aveiro, Portugal [ 110 ], or by Arantxa Eceiza and collaborators using pineapple agroindustrial residues [ 111 ]. Another study reported on the possibility of using residues from the olive oil production industry as a carbon source for the production of BC by Gluconacetobacter sacchari [ 112 ]. Furthermore, the by-products of cider, when the apple pomace is mixed with sugar cane, was found to be a potential carbon source for Gluconacetobacter medellinensis [113]. When combined with other materials such as alginate, silk fibroin, chitosan, xylans, and starch to form biocomposites, the mechanical and biological properties of bacterial cellulose-based functional materials can be enhanced [ 7 , 114 – 117 ]. Cellulose-based functional materials are gaining increasing interest in several industrial fields such as biomedicine, cosmetics, and bioelectronics [109,118]. Polymers 2022,14, 1420 8 of 20 Carmen S R Freire and collaborators have greatly contributed to the research related to BC-based materials, namely, nanocomposites, membranes, films, etc., by using different approaches such as physical and chemical modification, and polymerization. These materials prepared using mainly BC produced by Acetobacter xylinum showed several encouraging properties such as a high mechanical strength and controlled drug loading, making it a promising biopolymer for the production of biomaterials such as optically transparent nanocomposites for different kinds of applications [ 7 , 114 – 117 , 119 – 123 ]. As mentioned above, they chemically modified the structure of BC to improve its properties. For example, Tome et al. studied BC membranes with tailored surfaces as well as barrier properties for gases using controlled heterogeneous esterification with hexanoyl chloride [ 124 ]. Moreover, Fernandes et al. were bio-inspired by the antimicrobial properties of chitosan, and chemically grafted aminoalkyl groups on the BC surface, with the ensuing nanofibrillar network revealing interesting antimicrobial activity and good mechanical properties [116]. Figueiredo et al. from CICECO Laboratory at the University of Aveiro, Portugal, prepared BC-poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) nanocomposite films by in situ radical polymerization of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate, using poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate as crosslinker. The films thus formed were diaphanous compared to BC and showed improved mechanical performances as well as thermal stability when compared to poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate). As this nanocomposite has proven non-toxicity to human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells, it could be used for dry dressing applications [ 123 ]. BC-polycaprolactone nanocomposite films were successfully synthesized by incorporating variable amounts of polycaprolactone powder into a BC culture medium. The nanocomposites thus formed could be used for food packaging applications [125]. Figure 3. ( a ) Extrusion of a network of bacterial cellulose nanofibrils with associated (nano)fibril crosssectional morphology. ( b ) Mechanical disintegration of plant matter to produce NFC with associated cross-sectional morphology that corresponds to a bundle of individual cellulose microfibrils. Cellulose microfibrils are present in the cell wall of wood, along with hemicelluloses, protein, and lignin. ( c ) Biomechanical hotspots occur at junctions between two or more microfibrils, or upon close cellulose–cellulose contact, mediated by matrix polysaccharides, such as coiled xyloglucan. Reprinted from ref. [126]. Polymers 2022,14, 1420 9 of 20 2.4. Collagen From the first use of degraded collagen as a glue more than a hundred years ago to today’s cell therapy, twenty-eight collagen types have been identified and characterized at molecular level [ 127 ]. Structural characterization of collagen started in the 1930s and was greatly implemented by researchers such as Ramachandran, the Nobel laureate Crick, Pauling, Rich, and Yonath, and others including Brodsky and Berman [ 128 ]. In 1985, Mieczysław Skrodzki, Antoni Michniewicz, and Henryk Kujawa were the first to develop a method to isolate collagen directly from fish skins. In the last 40 years, the research on collagen has greatly increased and has led to today’s collagen therapeutic applications. Collagen is the most abundant fibrous protein found in the connective tissues of a wide range of vertebrates and invertebrate species. It is responsible for providing stability as well as strength to the tissues and thereby gives them their structure [ 129 ]. Collagen is a heteropolymer composed of three polypeptide chains in a triple-helical structure. Two of the three chains are identical chains and the remaining one differs in its chemical composition [ 130 ]. Collagen has widespread applications in numerous fields, such as pharmaceutical, medical, biomedical, food industry, cosmetics, etc. Majorly, collagen has been used for the cosmetic industry, primarily to increase skin hydration and prevent aging of skin [131]. Collagen has been extracted from various sources, mainly bovine, porcine, and murine animals. Nonetheless, marine organisms are now considered as an interesting alternative source for collagen as they are safer and easier to extract in comparison to terrestrial sources [ 132 ]. The traditional extraction method to obtain collagen from terrestrial animal sources is a multi-step process involving the removal of proteins and pigments, a demineralization with HCl or acetic acid, as well as a final digestion using acid or an enzyme [ 130 ]. In the eighties, Sylvie Ricard-Blum and her team started working on the biochemical and physicochemical characterization of collagen extracted from fetal calf cartilage. The minor disulfide-bonded collagen was isolated using pepsin treatment [ 133 ]. Claire Lethias’s research group from the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) has been actively working on the isolation of marine collagen from jellyfish such as Aurelia aurita, Cotylorhiza tuberculata,Pelagia noctiluca, and Rhizostoma pulmo from the Mediterranean sea coast. The best collagen yield was obtained from Rhizostoma pulmo, and this material was found to have applications in the biomedical field, such as for cell adhesion, proliferation, etc. [134–138]. Recently, Sionkowska et al. studied the influence of UV light on the rheological properties of collagen extracted from the skin of the silver carp fish. They found that all the acetic acid collagen solutions they prepared were showing a shear-thinning flow behavior after UV irradiation. They concluded that, depending on the duration of the UV treatment, the collagen could be subjected to photo-degradation or crosslinking. These results were interesting as physically crosslinked collagen can be used for applications in the biomedical, cosmetic, as well as in the food industries [131,139,140]. Table 1summarizes the origin, extraction methods, and applications of the described biopolymers. Table 1. Biopolymers’ origin, extraction methods, and applications. Biopolymers Origin and Extraction Methods References Agar From red seaweeds of the order Gelidiales and Gracilariales Extraction methods: - hot water extraction for several hours [20] - ultrasound assisted methods [21,22] - microwave-assisted methods [24–26] Polymers 2022,14, 1420 16 of 20 42. Muxika, A.; Etxabide, A.; Uranga, J.; Guerrero, P.; De la Caba, K. Chitosan as a Bioactive Polymer: Processing, Properties and Applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017,105, 1358–1368. [CrossRef] 43. Hajji, S.; Younes, I.; Ghorbel-Bellaaj, O.; Hajji, R.; Rinaudo, M.; Nasri, M.; Jellouli, K. Structural Differences between Chitin and Chitosan Extracted from Three Different Marine Sources. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014,65, 298–306. [CrossRef] 44. Claverie, M.; McReynolds, C.; Petitpas, A.; Thomas, M.; Fernandes, S.C.M. Marine-Derived Polymeric Materials and Biomimetics: An Overview. Polymers 2020,12, 1002. [CrossRef] 45. Tolaimate, A.; Rhazi, M.; Alagui, A.; Desbrieres, J.; Rinaudo, M. Valorization of Waste Products from Fishing Industry by Production of Chitin and Chitosan. Phys. Chem. News 2008,42, 120–127. 46. Hajji, S.; Younes, I.; Rinaudo, M.; Jellouli, K.; Nasri, M. Characterization and In Vitro Evaluation of Cytotoxicity, Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activities of Chitosans Extracted from Three Different Marine Sources. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2015 ,177, 18–35. [CrossRef] 47. Rinaudo, M. Chitin and Chitosan: Properties and Applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2006,31, 603–632. [CrossRef] 48. Younes, I.; Ghorbel-Bellaaj, O.; Nasri, R.; Chaabouni, M.; Rinaudo, M.; Nasri, M. Chitin and Chitosan Preparation from Shrimp Shells Using Optimized Enzymatic Deproteinization. Process Biochem. 2012,47, 2032–2039. [CrossRef] 49. Younes, I.; Hajji, S.; Frachet, V.; Rinaudo, M.; Jellouli, K.; Nasri, M. Chitin Extraction from Shrimp Shell Using Enzymatic Treatment. Antitumor, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities of Chitosan. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014 ,69, 489–498. [CrossRef] 50. Younes, I.; Hajji, S.; Rinaudo, M.; Chaabouni, M.; Jellouli, K.; Nasri, M. Optimization of Proteins and Minerals Removal from Shrimp Shells to Produce Highly Acetylated Chitin. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016,84, 246–253. [CrossRef] 51. Ifuku, S.; Saimoto, H. Chitin Nanofibers: Preparations, Modifications, and Applications. Nanoscale 2012 ,4, 3308–3318. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 52. Pradhan, S.; Brooks, A.K.; Yadavalli, V.K. Nature-Derived Materials for the Fabrication of Functional Biodevices. Mater. Today Bio 2020,7, 100065. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 53. Fernandes, S.C.M.; Freire, C.S.R.; Silvestre, A.J.D.; Neto, C.P.; Gandini, A.; Desbriéres, J.; Blanc, S.; Ferreira, R.A.S.; Carlos, L.D. A Study of the Distribution of Chitosan onto and within a Paper Sheet Using a Fluorescent Chitosan Derivative. Carbohydr. Polym. 2009,78, 760–766. [CrossRef] 54. Fernandes, S.C.M.; Freire, C.S.R.; Silvestre, A.J.D.; Desbrières, J.; Gandini, A.; Neto, C.P. Production of Coated Papers with Improved Properties by Using a Water-Soluble Chitosan Derivative. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010,49, 6432–6438. [CrossRef] 55. Zubillaga, V.; Salaberria, A.M.; Palomares, T.; Alonso-Varona, A.; Kootala, S.; Labidi, J.; Fernandes, S.C.M. Chitin Nanoforms Provide Mechanical and Topological Cues to Support Growth of Human Adipose Stem Cells in Chitosan Matrices. Biomacromolecules 2018,19, 3000–3012. [CrossRef] 56. Zubillaga, V.; Alonso-Varona, A.; Fernandes, S.C.M.; Salaberria, A.M.; Palomares, T. Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Chondrospheroids Cultured in Hypoxia and a 3D Porous Chitosan/Chitin Nanocrystal Scaffold as a Platform for Cartilage Tissue Engineering. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020,21, 1004. [CrossRef] 57. Zhu, K.; Duan, J.; Guo, J.; Wu, S.; Lu, A.; Zhang, L. High-Strength Films Consisted of Oriented Chitosan Nanofibers for Guiding Cell Growth. Biomacromolecules 2017,18, 3904–3912. [CrossRef] 58. Gao, H.; Zhong, Z.; Xia, H.; Hu, Q.; Ye, Q.; Wang, Y.; Chen, L.; Du, Y.; Shi, X.; Zhang, L. Construction of Cellulose Nanofibers/Quaternized Chitin/Organic Rectorite Composites and Their Application as Wound Dressing Materials. Biomater. Sci. 2019,7, 2571–2581. [CrossRef] 59. Liu, H.; Liu, J.; Qi, C.; Fang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhuo, R.; Jiang, X. Thermosensitive Injectable In-Situ Forming Carboxymethyl Chitin Hydrogel for Three-Dimensional Cell Culture. Acta Biomater. 2016,35, 228–237. [CrossRef] 60. Yang, X.; Yang, H.; Jiang, X.; Yang, B.; Zhu, K.; Lai, N.C.-H.; Huang, C.; Chang, C.; Bian, L.; Zhang, L. Injectable Chitin Hydrogels with Self-Healing Property and Biodegradability as Stem Cell Carriers. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021,256, 117574. [CrossRef] 61. Wu, S.; Duan, B.; Lu, A.; Wang, Y.; Ye, Q.; Zhang, L. Biocompatible Chitin/Carbon Nanotubes Composite Hydrogels as Neuronal Growth Substrates. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017,174, 830–840. [CrossRef] 62. Huang, W.; Wang, Y.; Huang, Z.; Wang, X.; Chen, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, L. On-Demand Dissolvable Self-Healing Hydrogel Based on Carboxymethyl Chitosan and Cellulose Nanocrystal for Deep Partial Thickness Burn Wound Healing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018,10, 41076–41088. [CrossRef] 63. Liang, X.; Wang, X.; Xu, Q.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xia, H.; Lu, A.; Zhang, L. Rubbery Chitosan/Carrageenan Hydrogels Constructed through an Electroneutrality System and Their Potential Application as Cartilage Scaffolds. Biomacromolecules 2018,19, 340–352. [CrossRef] 64. Pei, X.; Deng, Y.; Li, Y.; Huang, Y.; Yuan, K.; Lee, J.-F.; Chan, T.-S.; Zhou, J.; Lei, A.; Zhang, L. Size-Controllable Ultrafine Palladium Nanoparticles Immobilized on Calcined Chitin Microspheres as Efficient and Recyclable Catalysts for Hydrogenation. Nanoscale 2018,10, 14719–14725. [CrossRef] 65. Pei, X.; Li, Y.; Deng, Y.; Lu, L.; Li, W.; Shi, R.; Lei, A.; Zhang, L. Chitin Microsphere Supported Pd Nanoparticles as an Efficient and Recoverable Catalyst for CO Oxidation and Heck Coupling Reaction. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021,251, 117020. [CrossRef] 66. Wu, S.; Duan, B.; Zeng, X.; Lu, A.; Xu, X.; Wang, Y.; Ye, Q.; Zhang, L. Construction of Blood Compatible Lysine-Immobilized Chitin/Carbon Nanotube Microspheres and Potential Applications for Blood Purified Therapy. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017 ,5, 2952–2963. [CrossRef] 67. Su, X.; Tan, M.; Duan, B.; Cai, J.; Jiang, W.; Zhang, L. Hierarchical Microspheres with Macropores Fabricated from Chitin as 3D Cell Culture. J. Mater. Chem. B 2019,7, 5190–5198. [CrossRef] Polymers 2022,14, 1420 17 of 20 68. Sacco, P.; Furlani, F.; Cok, M.; Travan, A.; Borgogna, M.; Marsich, E.; Paoletti, S.; Donati, I. Boric Acid Induced Transient Cross-Links in Lactose-Modified Chitosan (Chitlac). Biomacromolecules 2017,18, 4206–4213. [CrossRef] 69. Vecchies, F.; Sacco, P.; Decleva, E.; Menegazzi, R.; Porrelli, D.; Donati, I.; Turco, G.; Paoletti, S.; Marsich, E. Complex Coacervates between a Lactose-Modified Chitosan and Hyaluronic Acid as Radical-Scavenging Drug Carriers. Biomacromolecules 2018 ,19, 3936–3944. [CrossRef] 70. Furlani, F.; Sacco, P.; Scognamiglio, F.; Asaro, F.; Travan, A.; Borgogna, M.; Marsich, E.; Cok, M.; Paoletti, S.; Donati, I. Nucleation, Reorganization and Disassembly of an Active Network from Lactose-Modified Chitosan Mimicking Biological Matrices. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019,208, 451–456. [CrossRef] 71. Pizzolitto, C.; Cok, M.; Asaro, F.; Scognamiglio, F.; Marsich, E.; Lopez, F.; Donati, I.; Sacco, P. On the Mechanism of Genipin Binding to Primary Amines in Lactose-Modified Chitosan at Neutral PH. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020,21, 6831. [CrossRef] 72. Danti, S.; Trombi, L.; Fusco, A.; Azimi, B.; Lazzeri, A.; Morganti, P.; Coltelli, M.-B.; Donnarumma, G. Chitin Nanofibrils and Nanolignin as Functional Agents in Skin Regeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019,20, 2669. [CrossRef] 73. Fan, Y.; Saito, T.; Isogai, A. Preparation of Chitin Nanofibers from Squid Pen β -Chitin by Simple Mechanical Treatment under Acid Conditions. Biomacromolecules 2008,9, 1919–1923. [CrossRef] 74. Jiang, J.; Ye, W.; Yu, J.; Fan, Y.; Ono, Y.; Saito, T.; Isogai, A. Chitin Nanocrystals Prepared by Oxidation of α -Chitin Using the O2/Laccase/TEMPO System. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018,189, 178–183. [CrossRef] 75. Fan, Y.; Saito, T.; Isogai, A. Chitin Nanocrystals Prepared by TEMPO-Mediated Oxidation of α -Chitin. Biomacromolecules 2008 ,9, 192–198. [CrossRef] 76. Ye, W.; Liu, L.; Wang, Z.; Yu, J.; Fan, Y. Investigation of Pretreatment Methods for Improving TEMPO-Mediated Oxidation and Nanofibrillation Efficiency of α-Chitin. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019,7, 19463–19473. [CrossRef] 77. Kiroshka, V.V.; Petrova, V.A.; Chernyakov, D.D.; Bozhkova, Y.O.; Kiroshka, K.V.; Baklagina, Y.G.; Romanov, D.P.; Kremnev, R.V.; Skorik, Y.A. Influence of Chitosan-Chitin Nanofiber Composites on Cytoskeleton Structure and the Proliferation of Rat Bone Marrow Stromal Cells. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2017,28, 21. [CrossRef] 78. Coltelli, M.-B.; Gigante, V.; Panariello, L.; Aliotta, L.; Morganti, P.; Danti, S.; Cinelli, P.; Lazzeri, A. Chitin Nanofibrils in Renewable Materials for Packaging and Personal Care Applications. Adv. Mater. Lett. 2019,10, 425–430. [CrossRef] 79. Panariello, L.; Coltelli, M.-B.; Buchignani, M.; Lazzeri, A. Chitosan and Nano-Structured Chitin for Biobased Anti-Microbial Treatments onto Cellulose Based Materials. Eur. Polym. J. 2019,113, 328–339. [CrossRef] 80. Eichhorn, S.J.; Dufresne, A.; Aranguren, M.; Marcovich, N.E.; Capadona, J.R.; Rowan, S.J.; Weder, C.; Thielemans, W.; Roman, M.; Renneckar, S.; et al. Review: Current International Research into Cellulose Nanofibres and Nanocomposites. J. Mater. Sci. 2010 , 45, 1–33. [CrossRef] 81. Freire, C.S.R.; Fernandes, S.C.M.; Silvestre, A.J.D.; Pascoal Neto, C. Novel Cellulose-Based Composites Based on Nanofibrillated Plant and Bacterial Cellulose: Recent Advances at the University of Aveiro—A Review. Holzforschung 2013 ,67, 603–612. [CrossRef] 82. Shojaeiarani, J.; Bajwa, D.S.; Chanda, S. Cellulose Nanocrystal Based Composites: A Review. Compos. Part C Open Access 2021 ,5, 100164. [CrossRef] 83. Abdelhamid, H.N.; Mathew, A.P. A Review on Cellulose-Based Materials for Biomedicine. Preprints 2022. [CrossRef] 84. Kim, J.; Yun, S.; Ounaies, Z. Discovery of Cellulose as a Smart Material. Macromolecules 2006,39, 4202–4206. [CrossRef] 85. Henriksson, M.; Henriksson, G.; Berglund, L.A.; Lindström, T. An Environmentally Friendly Method for Enzyme-Assisted Preparation of Microfibrillated Cellulose (MFC) Nanofibers. Eur. Polym. J. 2007,43, 3434–3441. [CrossRef] 86. Cunha, I.; Martins, J.; Bahubalindruni, P.G.; Carvalho, J.T.; Rodrigues, J.; Rubin, S.; Fortunato, E.; Martins, R.; Pereira, L. Handwritten and Sustainable Electronic Logic Circuits with Fully Printed Paper Transistors (Adv. Mater. Technol. 12/2021). Adv. Mater. Technol. 2021,6, 2170071. [CrossRef] 87. Cunha, I.; Martins, J.; Bahubalindruni, P.G.; Carvalho, J.T.; Rodrigues, J.; Rubin, S.; Fortunato, E.; Martins, R.; Pereira, L. Handwritten and Sustainable Electronic Logic Circuits with Fully Printed Paper Transistors. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2021,6, 2100633. [CrossRef] 88. Mondragon, G.; Fernandes, S.; Retegi, A.; Peña, C.; Algar, I.; Eceiza, A.; Arbelaiz, A. A Common Strategy to Extracting Cellulose Nanoentities from Different Plants. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014,55, 140–148. [CrossRef] 89. Bondeson, D.; Mathew, A.; Oksman, K. Optimization of the Isolation of Nanocrystals from Microcrystalline Cellulose by Acid Hydrolysis. Cellulose 2006,13, 171–180. [CrossRef] 90. Nissilä, T.; Wei, J.; Geng, S.; Teleman, A.; Oksman, K. Ice-Templated Cellulose Nanofiber Filaments as a Reinforcement Material in Epoxy Composites. Nanomaterials 2021,11, 490. [CrossRef] 91. Muraleedharan, M.N.; Karnaouri, A.; Piatkova, M.; Ruiz-Caldas, M.-X.; Matsakas, L.; Liu, B.; Rova, U.; Christakopoulos, P.; Mathew, A.P. Isolation and Modification of Nano-Scale Cellulose from Organosolv-Treated Birch through the Synergistic Activity of LPMO and Endoglucanases. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021,183, 101–109. [CrossRef] 92. Mathew, A.P.; Oksman, K.; Sain, M. Mechanical Properties of Biodegradable Composites from Poly Lactic Acid (PLA) and Microcrystalline Cellulose (MCC). J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2005,97, 2014–2025. [CrossRef] 93. Oksman, K.; Mathew, A.P.; Bondeson, D.; Kvien, I. Manufacturing Process of Cellulose Whiskers/Polylactic Acid Nanocomposites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2006,66, 2776–2784. [CrossRef] 94. Jonoobi, M.; Harun, J.; Mathew, A.P.; Oksman, K. Mechanical Properties of Cellulose Nanofiber (CNF) Reinforced Polylactic Acid (PLA) Prepared by Twin Screw Extrusion. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2010,70, 1742–1747. [CrossRef] Polymers 2022,14, 1420 18 of 20 95. Berglund, L.; Nissilä, T.; Sivaraman, D.; Komulainen, S.; Telkki, V.-V.; Oksman, K. Seaweed-Derived Alginate–Cellulose Nanofiber Aerogel for Insulation Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021,13, 34899–34909. [CrossRef] 96. Fijoł, N.; Aguilar-Sánchez, A.; Mathew, A.P. 3D-Printable Biopolymer-Based Materials for Water Treatment: A Review. Chem. Eng. J. 2022,430, 132964. [CrossRef] 97. Abdelhamid, H.N.; Mathew, A.P. In-Situ Growth of Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks into a Cellulosic Filter Paper for the Reduction of 4-Nitrophenol. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021,274, 118657. [CrossRef] 98. Sultan, S.; Mathew, A.P. 3D Printed Porous Cellulose Nanocomposite Hydrogel Scaffolds. J. Vis. Exp. 2019 ,146, e59401. [CrossRef] 99. Oprea, M.; Panaitescu, D.M. Nanocellulose Hybrids with Metal Oxides Nanoparticles for Biomedical Applications. Molecules 2020,25, 4045. [CrossRef] 100. Hietala, M.; Mathew, A.P.; Oksman, K. Bionanocomposites of Thermoplastic Starch and Cellulose Nanofibers Manufactured Using Twin-Screw Extrusion. Eur. Polym. J. 2013,49, 950–956. [CrossRef] 101. Oksman, K.; Aitomäki, Y.; Mathew, A.P.; Siqueira, G.; Zhou, Q.; Butylina, S.; Tanpichai, S.; Zhou, X.; Hooshmand, S. Review of the Recent Developments in Cellulose Nanocomposite Processing. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2016,83, 2–18. [CrossRef] 102. Abdelhamid, H.N.; Mathew, A.P. Cellulose–Metal Organic Frameworks (CelloMOFs) Hybrid Materials and Their Multifaceted Applications: A Review. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2022,451, 214263. [CrossRef] 103. Vadillo, J.; Larraza, I.; Calvo-Correas, T.; Gabilondo, N.; Derail, C.; Eceiza, A. Role of in Situ Added Cellulose Nanocrystals as Rheological Modulator of Novel Waterborne Polyurethane Urea for 3D-Printing Technology. Cellulose 2021,28, 4729–4744. [CrossRef] 104. Thomas, P.; Duolikun, T.; Rumjit, N.P.; Moosavi, S.; Lai, C.W.; Bin Johan, M.R.; Fen, L.B. Comprehensive Review on Nanocellulose: Recent Developments, Challenges and Future Prospects. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2020,110, 103884. [CrossRef] 105. Zinge, C.; Kandasubramanian, B. Nanocellulose Based Biodegradable Polymers. Eur. Polym. J. 2020,133, 109758. [CrossRef] 106. Tomita, Y.; Kondo, T. Influential Factors to Enhance the Moving Rate of Acetobacter Xylinum Due to Its Nanofiber Secretion on Oriented Templates. Carbohydr. Polym. 2009,77, 754–759. [CrossRef] 107. George, J.; Ramana, K.V.; Sabapathy, S.N.; Jagannath, J.H.; Bawa, A.S. Characterization of Chemically Treated Bacterial (Acetobacter xylinum) Biopolymer: Some Thermo-Mechanical Properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2005,37, 189–194. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 108. Esa, F.; Tasirin, S.M.; Rahman, N.A. Overview of Bacterial Cellulose Production and Application. Agric. Agric. Sci. Procedia 2014 , 2, 113–119. [CrossRef] 109. Wang, J.; Tavakoli, J.; Tang, Y. Bacterial Cellulose Production, Properties and Applications with Different Culture Methods—A Review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019,219, 63–76. [CrossRef] 110. Carreira, P.; Mendes, J.A.S.; Trovatti, E.; Serafim, L.S.; Freire, C.S.R.; Silvestre, A.J.D.; Neto, C.P. Utilization of Residues from Agro-Forest Industries in the Production of High Value Bacterial Cellulose. Bioresour. Technol. 2011,102, 7354–7360. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 111. Algar, I.; Fernandes, S.C.M.; Mondragon, G.; Castro, C.; Garcia-Astrain, C.; Gabilondo, N.; Retegi, A.; Eceiza, A. Pineapple Agroindustrial Residues for the Production of High Value Bacterial Cellulose with Different Morphologies. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015,132, 41237. [CrossRef] 112. Gomes, F.P.; Silva, N.H.C.S.; Trovatti, E.; Serafim, L.S.; Duarte, M.F.; Silvestre, A.J.D.; Neto, C.P.; Freire, C.S.R. Production of Bacterial Cellulose by Gluconacetobacter sacchari Using Dry Olive Mill Residue. Biomass Bioenergy 2013,55, 205–211. [CrossRef] 113. Urbina, L.; Hernández-Arriaga, A.M.; Eceiza, A.; Gabilondo, N.; Corcuera, M.A.; Prieto, M.A.; Retegi, A. By-Products of the Cider Production: An Alternative Source of Nutrients to Produce Bacterial Cellulose. Cellulose 2017,24, 2071–2082. [CrossRef] 114. Fernandes, S.C.M.; Oliveira, L.; Freire, C.S.R.; Silvestre, A.J.D.; Neto, C.P.; Gandini, A.; Desbriéres, J. Novel Transparent Nanocomposite Films Based on Chitosan and Bacterial Cellulose. Green Chem. 2009,11, 2023. [CrossRef] 115. Trovatti, E.; Fernandes, S.C.M.; Rubatat, L.; Freire, C.S.R.; Silvestre, A.J.D.; Neto, C.P. Sustainable Nanocomposite Films Based on Bacterial Cellulose and Pullulan. Cellulose 2012,19, 729–737. [CrossRef] 116. Fernandes, S.C.M.; Sadocco, P.; Alonso-Varona, A.; Palomares, T.; Eceiza, A.; Silvestre, A.J.D.; Mondragon, I.; Freire, C.S.R. Bioinspired Antimicrobial and Biocompatible Bacterial Cellulose Membranes Obtained by Surface Functionalization with Aminoalkyl Groups. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013,5, 3290–3297. [CrossRef] 117. Vilela, C.; Silva, A.C.Q.; Domingues, E.M.; Gonçalves, G.; Martins, M.A.; Figueiredo, F.M.L.; Santos, S.A.O.; Freire, C.S.R. Conductive Polysaccharides-Based Proton-Exchange Membranes for Fuel Cell Applications: The Case of Bacterial Cellulose and Fucoidan. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020,230, 115604. [CrossRef] 118. Almeida, T.; Silvestre, A.J.D.; Vilela, C.; Freire, C.S.R. Bacterial Nanocellulose toward Green Cosmetics: Recent Progresses and Challenges. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021,22, 2836. [CrossRef] 119. Frazão, C.J.R.; Silva, N.H.C.; Freire, C.S.R.; Silvestre, A.J.D.; Xavier, A.M.R.B.; Tavares, A.P.M. Bacterial Cellulose as Carrier for Immobilization of Laccase: Optimization and Characterization. Eng. Life Sci. 2014,14, 500–508. [CrossRef] 120. Silva, N.H.C.S.; Rodrigues, A.F.; Almeida, I.F.; Costa, P.C.; Rosado, C.; Neto, C.P.; Silvestre, A.J.D.; Freire, C.S.R. Bacterial Cellulose Membranes as Transdermal Delivery Systems for Diclofenac: In Vitro Dissolution and Permeation Studies. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014,106, 264–269. [CrossRef] 121. Trovatti, E.; Freire, C.S.R.; Pinto, P.C.; Almeida, I.F.; Costa, P.; Silvestre, A.J.D.; Neto, C.P.; Rosado, C. Bacterial Cellulose Membranes Applied in Topical and Transdermal Delivery of Lidocaine Hydrochloride and Ibuprofen: In Vitro Diffusion Studies. Int. J. Pharm. 2012,435, 83–87. [CrossRef] 122. Trovatti, E.; Oliveira, L.; Freire, C.S.R.; Silvestre, A.J.D.; Pascoal Neto, C.; Cruz Pinto, J.J.C.; Gandini, A. Novel Bacterial Cellulose–Acrylic Resin Nanocomposites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2010,70, 1148–1153. [CrossRef] Polymers 2022,14, 1420 19 of 20 123. Figueiredo, A.G.P.R.; Figueiredo, A.R.P.; Alonso-Varona, A.; Fernandes, S.C.M.; Palomares, T.; Rubio-Azpeitia, E.; BarrosTimmons, A.; Silvestre, A.J.D.; Pascoal Neto, C.; Freire, C.S.R. Biocompatible Bacterial Cellulose-Poly(2-Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate) Nanocomposite Films. BioMed Res. Int. 2013,2013, 698141. [CrossRef] 124. Tomé, L.C.; Brandão, L.; Mendes, A.M.; Silvestre, A.J.D.; Neto, C.P.; Gandini, A.; Freire, C.S.R.; Marrucho, I.M. Preparation and Characterization of Bacterial Cellulose Membranes with Tailored Surface and Barrier Properties. Cellulose 2010 ,17, 1203–1211. [CrossRef] 125. Figueiredo, A.R.P.; Silvestre, A.J.D.; Neto, C.P.; Freire, C.S.R. In Situ Synthesis of Bacterial Cellulose/Polycaprolactone Blends for Hot Pressing Nanocomposite Films Production. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015,132, 400–408. [CrossRef] 126. Kontturi, K.S.; Lee, K.-Y.; Jones, M.P.; Sampson, W.W.; Bismarck, A.; Kontturi, E. Influence of Biological Origin on the Tensile Properties of Cellulose Nanopapers. Cellulose 2021,28, 6619–6628. [CrossRef] 127. Ricard-Blum, S. The Collagen Family. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2011,3, a004978. [CrossRef] 128. Deshmukh, S.N.; Dive, A.M.; Moharil, R.; Munde, P. Enigmatic Insight into Collagen. J. Oral Maxillofac. Pathol. 2016 ,20, 276–283. [CrossRef] 129. Avila Rodríguez, M.I.; Rodríguez Barroso, L.G.; Sánchez, M.L. Collagen: A Review on Its Sources and Potential Cosmetic Applications. J. Cosmet. Derm. 2018,17, 20–26. [CrossRef] 130. Silvipriya, K.; Kumar, K.; Bhat, A.; Kumar, B.; John, A.; Lakshmanan, P. Collagen: Animal Sources and Biomedical Application. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2015,5, 123–127. [CrossRef] 131. Sionkowska, A.; Adamiak, K.; Musiał, K.; Gadomska, M. Collagen Based Materials in Cosmetic Applications: A Review. Materials 2020,13, 4217. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 132. Coppola, D.; Oliviero, M.; Vitale, G.A.; Lauritano, C.; D’Ambra, I.; Iannace, S.; De Pascale, D. Marine Collagen from Alternative and Sustainable Sources: Extraction, Processing and Applications. Mar. Drugs 2020,18, 214. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 133. Ricard-Blum, S.; Tiollier, J.; Garrone, R.; Herbage, D. Further Biochemical and Physicochemical Characterization of Minor DisulfideBonded (Type IX) Collagen, Extracted from Foetal Calf Cartilage. J. Cell. Biochem. 1985,27, 347–358. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 134. Dubost, A.; Micol, D.; Meunier, B.; Lethias, C.; Listrat, A. Relationships between Structural Characteristics of Bovine Intramuscular Connective Tissue Assessed by Image Analysis and Collagen and Proteoglycan Content. Meat Sci. 2013 ,93, 378–386. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 135. Exposito, J.-Y.; Valcourt, U.; Cluzel, C.; Lethias, C. ChemInform Abstract: The Fibrillar Collagen Family. ChemInform 2011 ,42, 407–426. [CrossRef] 136. Margaron, Y.; Bostan, L.; Exposito, J.-Y.; Malbouyres, M.; Trunfio-Sfarghiu, A.-M.; Berthier, Y.; Lethias, C. Tenascin-X Increases the Stiffness of Collagen Gels without Affecting Fibrillogenesis. Biophys. Chem. 2010,147, 87–91. [CrossRef] 137. Lethias, C.; Carisey, A.; Comte, J.; Cluzel, C.; Exposito, J.-Y. A Model of Tenascin-X Integration within the Collagenous Network. FEBS Lett. 2006,580, 6281–6285. [CrossRef] 138. Aouacheria, A.; Cluzel, C.; Lethias, C.; Gouy, M.; Garrone, R.; Exposito, J.-Y. Invertebrate Data Predict an Early Emergence of Vertebrate Fibrillar Collagen Clades and an Anti-Incest Model. J. Biol. Chem. 2004,279, 47711–47719. [CrossRef] 139. Sionkowska, A.; Lewandowska, K.; Adamiak, K. The Influence of UV Light on Rheological Properties of Collagen Extracted from Silver Carp Skin. Materials 2020,13, 4453. [CrossRef] 140. Sionkowska, A.; Kami´nska, A. Thermal Helix-Coil Transition in UV Irradiated Collagen from Rat Tail Tendon. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 1999,24, 337–340. [CrossRef] 141. Katz, L.; Baltz, R.H. Natural Product Discovery: Past, Present, and Future. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016,43, 155–176. [CrossRef] 142. Colliec-Jouault, S.; Zanchetta, P.; Helley, D.; Ratiskol, J.; Sinquin, C.; Fischer, A.M.; Guezennec, J. Les polysaccharides microbiens d’origine marine et leur potentiel en thérapeutique humaine. Pathol. Biol. 2004,52, 127–130. (In French) [CrossRef] 143. Raposo, M.; De Morais, R.; Bernardo de Morais, A. Bioactivity and Applications of Sulphated Polysaccharides from Marine Microalgae. Mar. Drugs 2013,11, 233–252. [CrossRef] 144. Laurienzo, P. Marine Polysaccharides in Pharmaceutical Applications: An Overview. Mar. Drugs 2010,8, 2435–2465. [CrossRef] 145. Delbarre-Ladrat, C.; Salas, M.L.; Sinquin, C.; Zykwinska, A.; Colliec-Jouault, S. Bioprospecting for Exopolysaccharides from Deep-Sea Hydrothermal Vent Bacteria: Relationship between Bacterial Diversity and Chemical Diversity. Microorganisms 2017 ,5, 63. [CrossRef] 146. Zykwinska, A.; Marchand, L.; Bonnetot, S.; Sinquin, C.; Colliec-Jouault, S.; Delbarre-Ladrat, C. Deep-Sea Hydrothermal Vent Bacteria as a Source of Glycosaminoglycan-Mimetic Exopolysaccharides. Molecules 2019,24, 1703. [CrossRef] 147. Colliec Jouault, S.; Chevolot, L.; Helley, D.; Ratiskol, J.; Bros, A.; Sinquin, C.; Roger, O.; Fischer, A.-M. Characterization, Chemical Modifications and in Vitro Anticoagulant Properties of an Exopolysaccharide Produced by Alteromonas Infernus. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Gen. Subj. 2001,1528, 141–151. [CrossRef] 148. Le Costaouëc, T.; Cérantola, S.; Ropartz, D.; Ratiskol, J.; Sinquin, C.; Colliec-Jouault, S.; Boisset, C. Structural Data on a Bacterial Exopolysaccharide Produced by a Deep-Sea Alteromonas Macleodii Strain. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012,90, 49–59. [CrossRef] 149. Colliec-Jouault, S.; Zykwinska, A. Marine Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) and GAG-Mimetics: Applications in Medicine and Tissue Engineering. In Extracellular Sugar-Based Biopolymers Matrices; Cohen, E., Merzendorfer, H., Eds.; Biologically-Inspired Systems; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; Volume 12, pp. 625–648. ISBN 978-3-030-12918-7. 150. Senni, K.; Gueniche, F.; Changotade, S.; Septier, D.; Sinquin, C.; Ratiskol, J.; Lutomski, D.; Godeau, G.; Guezennec, J.; ColliecJouault, S. Unusual Glycosaminoglycans from a Deep Sea Hydrothermal Bacterium Improve Fibrillar Collagen Structuring and Fibroblast Activities in Engineered Connective Tissues. Mar. Drugs 2013,11, 1351–1369. [CrossRef] 151. Delbarre-Ladrat, C.; Sinquin, C.; Lebellenger, L.; Zykwinska, A.; Colliec-Jouault, S. Exopolysaccharides Produced by Marine Bacteria and Their Applications as Glycosaminoglycan-like Molecules. Front. Chem. 2014,2, 85. [CrossRef] Polymers 2022,14, 1420 20 of 20 152. Amjres, H.; Béjar, V.; Quesada, E.; Carranza, D.; Abrini, J.; Sinquin, C.; Ratiskol, J.; Colliec-Jouault, S.; Llamas, I. Characterization of Haloglycan, an Exopolysaccharide Produced by Halomonas Stenophila HK30. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015,72, 117–124. [CrossRef] 153. Mota, R.; Vidal, R.; Pandeirada, C.; Flores, C.; Adessi, A.; De Philippis, R.; Nunes, C.; Coimbra, M.A.; Tamagnini, P. Cyanoflan: A Cyanobacterial Sulfated Carbohydrate Polymer with Emulsifying Properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020,229, 115525. [CrossRef] 154. Costa, R.; Costa, L.; Rodrigues, I.; Meireles, C.; Soares, R.; Tamagnini, P.; Mota, R. Biocompatibility of the Biopolymer Cyanoflan for Applications in Skin Wound Healing. Mar. Drugs 2021,19, 147. [CrossRef] 155. Nichols, C.M.; Bowman, J.P.; Guezennec, J. Olleya marilimosa gen. nov., sp. nov., an Exopolysaccharide-Producing Marine Bacterium from the Family Flavobacteriaceae, Isolated from the Southern Ocean. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2005,55, 1557–1561. [CrossRef] 156. Nichols, C.M.; Lardière, S.G.; Bowman, J.P.; Nichols, P.D.; Gibson, J.A.E.; Guézennec, J. Chemical Characterization of Exopolysaccharides from Antarctic Marine Bacteria. Microb. Ecol. 2005,49, 578–589. [CrossRef] 157. Mancuso Nichols, C.A.; Nairn, K.M.; Glattauer, V.; Blackburn, S.I.; Ramshaw, J.A.M.; Graham, L.D. Screening Microalgal Cultures in Search of Microbial Exopolysaccharides with Potential as Adhesives. J. Adhes. 2009,85, 97–125. [CrossRef] 158. Salmeán, A.A.; Guillouzo, A.; Duffieux, D.; Jam, M.; Matard-Mann, M.; Larocque, R.; Pedersen, H.L.; Michel, G.; Czjzek, M.; Willats, W.G.T.; et al. Double Blind Microarray-Based Polysaccharide Profiling Enables Parallel Identification of Uncharacterized Polysaccharides and Carbohydrate-Binding Proteins with Unknown Specificities. Sci. Rep. 2018,8, 2500. [CrossRef] 159. Chernysheva, N.; Bystritskaya, E.; Stenkova, A.; Golovkin, I.; Nedashkovskaya, O.; Isaeva, M. Comparative Genomics and CAZyme Genome Repertoires of Marine Zobellia Amurskyensis KMM 3526T and Zobellia Laminariae KMM 3676T. Mar. Drugs 2019,17, 661. [CrossRef] 160. Vidal-Melgosa, S.; Pedersen, H.L.; Schückel, J.; Arnal, G.; Dumon, C.; Amby, D.B.; Monrad, R.N.; Westereng, B.; Willats, W.G.T. A New Versatile Microarray-Based Method for High Throughput Screening of Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes. J. Biol. Chem. 2015 , 290, 9020–9036. [CrossRef] 161. De Jesus Raposo, M.; De Morais, A.; De Morais, R. Emergent Sources of Prebiotics: Seaweeds and Microalgae. Mar. Drugs 2016 , 14, 27. [CrossRef] 162. Jia, S.; Lu, Z.; Gao, Z.; An, J.; Wu, X.; Li, X.; Dai, X.; Zheng, Q.; Sun, Y. Chitosan Oligosaccharides Alleviate Cognitive Deficits in an Amyloid-B1–42-Induced Rat Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016 ,83, 416–425. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 163. Song, J.Y.; Alnaeeli, M.; Park, J.K. Efficient Digestion of Chitosan Using Chitosanase Immobilized on Silica-Gel for the Production of Multisize Chitooligosaccharides. Process Biochem. 2014,49, 2107–2113. [CrossRef] 164. Matard-Mann, M.; Bernard, T.; Leroux, C.; Barbeyron, T.; Larocque, R.; Préchoux, A.; Jeudy, A.; Jam, M.; Nyvall Collén, P.; Michel, G.; et al. Structural Insights into Marine Carbohydrate Degradation by Family GH16 κ -Carrageenases. J. Biol. Chem. 2017 ,292, 19919–19934. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 165. Naretto, A.; Fanuel, M.; Ropartz, D.; Rogniaux, H.; Larocque, R.; Czjzek, M.; Tellier, C.; Michel, G. The Agar-Specific Hydrolase ZgAgaC from the Marine Bacterium Zobellia Galactanivorans Defines a New GH16 Protein Subfamily. J. Biol. Chem. 2019 ,294, 6923–6939. [CrossRef] [PubMed]