scieee AI-readable full text Open interactive document viewer

Tool Wear Effect on Surface Integrity in AISI 1045 Steel Dry Turning

Magalhães, Laurence C.,Carlesso, Gabriel Catarino,López de Lacalle Marcaide, Luis Norberto,Souza, Marcelo T.,de Oliveira Palheta, Fabiana,Binder, Cristiano

Abstract

Thanks are also addressed to MICINN PDC2021-121792-I00. Special thanks to the basic collaboration scheme between the Brazilian groups and the Basque university group IT 573-22.

Full text

  Citation: Magalhães, L.C.; Carlesso, G.C.; López de Lacalle, L.N.; Souza, M.T.; de Oliveira Palheta, F.; Binder, C. Tool Wear Effect on Surface Integrity in AISI 1045 Steel Dry Turning. Materials 2022,15, 2031. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15062031 Academic Editor: Krzysztof ˙ Zak Received: 8 February 2022 Accepted: 2 March 2022 Published: 9 March 2022 Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Copyright: © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). materials Article Tool Wear Effect on Surface Integrity in AISI 1045 Steel Dry Turning Laurence Colares Magalhães 1,* , Gabriel Catarino Carlesso 1, Luis Norberto López de Lacalle 2,* , Marcelo Tramontin Souza 3, Fabiana de Oliveira Palheta 4and Cristiano Binder 4 1Department of Industrial Technology, Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES), Vitória 29075-910, Brazil; [email protected] 2Department of Mechanical Engineering, CFAA—University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Zamudio Technologic Park, 48170 Bilbao, Spain 3 Department of Exact and Technological Sciences, Santa Cruz State University (UESC), Ilhéus 45662-900, Brazil; [email protected] 4Department of Mechanical Engineering, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis 88040-900, Brazil; [email protected] (F.d.O.P.); [email protected] (C.B.) *Correspondence: [email protected] (L.C.M.); [email protected] (L.N.L.d.L.); Tel.: +55-27-99764-8009 (L.C.M.) Abstract: In the present work, the surface integrity and flank wear of uncoated cermet inserts in dry turning of AISI 1045 steel were evaluated. Three-dimensional techniques were used to assess the surface roughness. Previously, finite element analysis was carried out to predict the cutting forces and heat distribution in the chip formation region. Cutting speed and feed were the parameters varied in the experiments. Feed is decisive in the final quality of the turned surface and cutting speed had little influence on this aspect. The surface was significantly damaged with the progression of the insert flank wear. Considering an average flank wear VB B of 0.1 mm, a tool life of 35 min was achieved using a cutting speed of 175 m/min, and of 23 min for a cutting speed of 275 m/min. Abrasive wear was predominant during the experiments. No microstructure defects were observed, as well as crack propagation or accentuated deformations near the machined surface region. Therefore, the dry turning of 1045 steel with cermet inserts route has proven extremely viable from the standpoints of tool life, surface integrity, chip formation, and sustainability. Keywords: dry turning; surface integrity; tool wear 1. Introduction Machining industries are interested in high material removal rates and high product quality by using the greatest cutting speed and feed rates to achieve better productivity. It becomes extremely tough to attain these properties as the high cutting temperature produced in the cutting zone causes premature failure of the cutting tools, which results in poor dimensional accuracy. It also weakens the surface integrity of the product by inducing tensile residual stresses and surface and sub-surface microcracks in addition to rapid oxidation and corrosion [ 1 ]. Residual stresses are always a serious concern regarding the fatigue life of components. The main functions of cooling lubricants are to reduce heat generation by reducing friction and to eliminate the exertion of unacceptable influences on the structure of the subsurface layer of the workpiece by absorbing and removing heat from the cutting area. In cutting operations, cooling lubricants also have an important transport function for the chips which have to be removed. Thus, efficient lubrication systems enable highperformance operations in practice [2]. In dry machining operations, there is no coolant. This means that there will be more friction and adhesion between the tool and workpiece. Tools and workpieces are subjected Materials 2022,15, 2031. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15062031 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/materials Materials 2022,15, 2031 2 of 16 to greater thermal loads. This may result in higher levels of tool wear, e.g., in increased crater formation when steel materials are machined using uncoated carbides. However, the dry cutting may also show positive effects such as a reduction in thermal shock and thus in the formation of comb cracks when parts are machined in interrupted mode with carbides or cermets. Higher machining temperatures influence chip formation. This may result in both ribbon chips and snarl chips [2]. The usage of cooling lubricants imposes environmental problems due to their chemical breakdown at high temperatures and it contaminates water and soil during mass disposal. It also imposes a high cost for the setup of a coolant system, as it has to be stored, pumped, filtered, and recycled when it is used. It also has adverse effects on the parts of the machine tool and workpiece causing corrosion, which leads to its failure. Besides, attention to health precautions cannot be neglected [1,2]. Recent advances in cutting tools materials have successfully enabled the use of dry cutting or MQL (minimum quantity of lubrication), notably in steels and alloys. In some cases, the surface quality is the same or better when dry cutting is used. Moreover, depending on the selected cutting parameters, tool wear in dry cutting is not that different when MQL is used [3]. Considering tool materials for dry cutting, cermets stand out due to their high hot hardness, low reactivity with steels and other metals, and especially low thermal conductivity compared with cemented carbide [ 4 ]. So, Klocke [ 5 ] compares the properties of the principal constituents of a typical cemented carbide (WC-6CO) with cermet (titanium carbide, TiC—based) inserts. Tungsten carbide (WC) has an average microhardness of 1580 HV (HV30) and thermal conductivity of 80 W/(m.K), while for TiC, these values are 3100 HV (HV0.05) and 33 W/(m.K), respectively. Furthermore, some features (such as wear resistance, edge strength, and sharpness, ability to cut at high speeds employing moderate feeds and depths of cut, and high quality of the machined surface) are responsible for the superior cutting performance of cermets [ 6 ]. The properties, performance, and cost, comparable with cemented carbides, make cermet tools a competing alternative to semi-finish and finish machining of steels and cast irons [7]. Some works have investigated the turning of alloy steels under different cooling conditions employing different cutting materials. REIS et al. [ 8 ] investigated the cutting performance and wear behavior of single-coated cermet and multilayer-coated carbide tools with distinct chip breaker geometries when dry turning AISI 4340 steel. With regard to tool wear, the coated cermet tool showed the lowest values for maximum flank wear (VB Bmax ) compared with the cemented carbide tool. Crater wear was also lower on the cermet insert. Adhesive and abrasive wear mechanisms were observed, respectively, in the rake and flank faces of both tools. Maruda et al. [9] evaluated the cooling effect under minimum quantity cooling lubrication and dry cutting on structural changes and microhardness of the ferritic–pearlitic AISI 1045 steel after turning. The tests showed that cooling of the cutting zone under minimum quantity cooling lubrication (MQL) condition decreased the depth of the hardened layer compared with dry cutting by approximately 40% for both pearlite and ferrite phase structures. The microhardness of the perlite phase on the top surface was 430 (HV 0.05) on dry condition and 340 HV on MQL condition. As a result of cooling being applied to the cutting zone using the MQL method, the average diameter of ferrite grains has been decreased in the entire surface area compared with dry cutting. Sarjana et al. [ 10 ] evaluated uncoated cermet tools made of titanium carbonitride (TiCN) as core particles, (Ti, Nb, and W) (C, N) for the second hard phase, and a W-rich Co binder and a PVD-coated (TiCN/TiN) tool to the turning of high-strength low-alloy steel AISI 4340 (hardened to 50 HRC). The results of the study show that both cermet tools can be recommended to support the work of coated cemented carbide, in particular, to finish the turning of the hardened steel. The optimum cutting condition at cutting speed of 120 m/min, feed of 0.1 mm/rev, and depth of cut of 0.2 mm give the best result in terms of productivity. The uncoated tool showed better results in terms of productivity and the Materials 2022,15, 2031 3 of 16 PVD-coated tool showed better results in terms of surface quality. Flank wear was the dominant wear and failure mode of both cermet cutting tools when assigned to finish hard turning. Besides, chipping was also observed, and this wear mode started after a certain limit of flank wear progression (after VB B ~ 125 µ m for uncoated and after VB B ~ 100 µ m for PVD-coated). Yang et al. [ 11 ] studied the flank wear mechanism of (Ti,W)C–Mo2C–Co cermets during dry turning of a high carbon alloy steel hardened to 62 HRC. Considering the average flank wear of VB B = 0.3 mm, the tool life was about 33 min to a cutting speed of 180 m/min. Tool life decreased around 40% when the cutting speed was raised to 280 m/min and 75% when the cutting speed was raised to 450 m/min. At lower cutting speeds, only abrasive wear was noticed and adhesion was observed at higher cutting speeds. Tool life decreased 75% when the depth of cut was raised from 0.22 to 0.5 mm, and 22% when the feed was raised from 0.08 to 0.24 mm/rev. Depth of cut was the most significant parameter influencing diffusive wearing. Four wear mechanisms, including abrasive wearing, adhesive wearing, diffusive wearing, and oxidative wearing, aggravate the flank wear of (Ti, W) C-based cermet inserts differently when varying cutting speed, feed rate, or depth of cut. Das et al. [ 12 ] compared the performance of uncoated carbide with coated cermet inserts in dry turning of AISI 4340 steel (hardened at 48 HRC). The authors analyzed the part surface temperature, cutting forces, and flank wear. Cutting forces and tool wear were lower with the use of cermets. Grzesik [ 13 ] studied the influence of tool wear on surface roughness in the hard turning of AISI 5140 steel with mixed ceramic wiper inserts. The author draws attention to the notch wear on the secondary flank as an aggravating factor in the roughness of the turned surface. Sampaio et al. [ 3 ] analyzed the wear process of PCBN (polycrystalline cubic boron nitride) cutting tools in the hard turning of hardened SAE 1045 steel using MQL and compared it with dry machining. In terms of surface roughness, dry cutting presents better performance. In dry conditions, for a cutting speed of 150 m/min with a depth of cut set at 0.2 mm, the tool flank shows severe damage with chipping of the tool edge because the crater wears extended up to the flank region. Adhesion, abrasion, and plastic deformation could be observed as wear modes in the dry condition. In general, the MQL condition can reduce the crater and flank wear and white layer thickness. Abbas et al. [ 14 ] compared the effectiveness of using dry, flood, and MQL methods when turning the AISI 1045 steel. Better surface roughness and power consumption performance were achieved at MQL conditions. However, the lowest machining costs were noticed in dry-cutting conditions. Magalhães et al. [ 15 ] evaluated the wear of coated cermet inserts in turning 1020 steel applying coolant. The results showed that for a cutting speed of 290 m/min and considering the average flank wear of VB B = 0.3 mm, the tool life is 113 min, which demonstrates the feasibility and success of this tool material for general industrial processes. The same author investigated the influence of the feed and tool geometry on the surface roughness in the high-speed turning of 4340 steels. It was found that the feed is a capital factor in this sense and the corner radius of the insert has little influence in this aspect. Arithmetical mean height values of Ra = 0.35 µ m were obtained when the best parameters were selected, i.e., smaller feeds and larger corner radii [ 16 ]. Zhang and Wu [ 17 ] studied the chip control in the dry turning of hardened AISI 1045 steel (52~58 HRC). Negative CBN inserts were used in the experiments. The studies were carried out from two perspectives: conventional and high-speed cutting. The results showed that continuous ribbon chips can be produced at a low cutting speed of 110 m/min, and the chip thickness is relatively uniform. Chips demonstrate saw-tooth morphology at a cutting speed of 276 m/min. When high cutting speeds were used (414 and 552 m/min), serrated chipping took place. These chips were easily broken into short chips of 1~3 cm lengths. The surface roughness obtained at high speeds ranged from 0.63 µ m to 1.6 µ m, proving that hard turning is feasible to be Materials 2022,15, 2031 4 of 16 implemented in industrial applications since it can reach the same level as that achieved by the grinding process in terms of surface roughness. Kumar et al. [ 18 ] investigated the performance of TiAlCrN-coated tungsten carbide tools during AISI 1045 steel dry turning. The application of the TiAlCrN coating caused a significant reduction in the coefficient of friction, which resulted in a reduction in tool stresses. Besides, the coating acts as a thermal barrier for the substrate, it makes the removal of the hot chip faster, thus reducing the time of contact with the workpiece. Finally, various authors have proposed alternative cooling methods in machining, with CO 2 cryogenics being the most promising one because of its low cost and maximum cooling action. Amigo et al. [ 19 ] obtained good results in hard turning. Other authors such as Suárez et al. [ 20 ] proposed the use of high pressure with emulsions coolants instead of conventional pressure values. Even with the good results of those works, dry turning will also protect the health and safety of the workers. In this work, the dry turning of AISI 1045 steel was studied. Uncoated cermet inserts were used. Feed and cutting speed were varied and surface integrity and tool wear were evaluated. Finite element analysis was performed to understand chip formation, heat generated in the cutting zone, and cutting forces. Within this context, it is expected to contribute to a more sustainable machining process, verifying if the combination of the use of modern cermets in dry turning in the processing of medium carbon steels can be a viable route from the point of view of surface quality, tool life, and microstructure. 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Experimental Procedure External cylindrical dry turning was performed on AISI 1045 Steel (wt%—0.48 C, 0.73 Mn, 0.25 Si, 0.016 P, 0.05 S, 0.02 Al, 0.02 Cr, and 0.01 Ni—manufacturer datasheet) round bars with 30 mm diameter and 55 mm length in a Boxford ® CNC lathe model 160 VMCi (Halifax, UK) (0.5 KW power and 3200 maximum rpm). The 1045 steel was machined in its state of supply and presented a hardness of 248 HB; its mechanical properties are shown in Table 1. A three-jaw air chuck was used to clamp the parts. The positive (6 ◦ rake angle) uncoated cermet inserts grade T1200A geometry DNMG090202N-SC and SDACR062B tool holder supplied by Sumitomo Tools (Osaka, Japan) were used on experiments (Figure 1). According to the manufacturer, the inserts present a tough composite phase of coarse grains, a W-rich tough hard phase, and a fine TiCN grain phase in the binder phase. Materials 2022, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 17 Figure 1. Part and tool fixture scheme during performed tests. Two values of cutting speed (Vc): 175 m/min and 275 m/min, and four values of feed (f): 0.025 mm/rev, 0.05 mm/rev, 0.075 mm/rev, and 0.01 mm/rev were varied during the tests. Depth of cut (doc) was kept constant at 0.2 mm (100% of tool corner radius), as shown in Table 2. Before each test, an initial preparation pass with a dedicated tool was performed to uniform the surface. Each test was repeated twice and a new cutting edge was used for each test. Divergence was lower than 5% in each condition. Table 2. Test cutting parameters. Vc (m/min) f (mm/rev) Doc (mm) 175 0.025 0.2 0.05 0.075 0.1 275 0.025 0.05 0.075 0.1 2.2. Finite Elements Analysis (FEA) Finite element analysis was performed to predict cutting forces, heat flow in the cutting zone, and chip formation. AdvantEdge V7.1 software (2015, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was used to simulate the orthogonal cut for the two cutting speeds (175 m/min and 275 m/min) and the lower and higher feed levels (0.025 mm/rev and 0.1 mm/rev). The friction coefficient was established according to tool geometry and the material software default of the general ceramic tool. AdvantEdge simplifies the friction coefficient as defined by Coulomb friction in the following Equation (1):  =  ×  (1 ) where Fn is the normal force exerted between the surfaces, μ is the coefficient of friction, and Ff is the resulting force due to friction. AISI 1045 steel data were customer-defined with Table 1 data and equivalent chemical composition. The workpiece meshing was defined as a maximum and minimum element size of 0.1 mm and 0.02 mm, respectively. The mesh refinement and coarsening factor were kept as defaults, 2 and 6, respectively. The maximum number of nodes was adjusted to 2400. Thirty output frames were adopted. Tecplot 360 R2 software (2020, Bellevue, WA, USA) was used for data analysis and treatment. A Carl Zeiss Discovery V12 stereomicroscope (Oberkochen, German) equipped Figure 1. Part and tool fixture scheme during performed tests. Materials 2022,15, 2031 5 of 16 Table 1. Material properties. Properties Values Tensile strength (MPa) 793 Yield strength (MPa) 718 Hardness (HB) 248 Two values of cutting speed (Vc): 175 m/min and 275 m/min, and four values of feed (f): 0.025 mm/rev, 0.05 mm/rev, 0.075 mm/rev, and 0.01 mm/rev were varied during the tests. Depth of cut (doc) was kept constant at 0.2 mm (100% of tool corner radius), as shown in Table 2. Before each test, an initial preparation pass with a dedicated tool was performed to uniform the surface. Each test was repeated twice and a new cutting edge was used for each test. Divergence was lower than 5% in each condition. Table 2. Test cutting parameters. Vc (m/min) f (mm/rev) Doc (mm) 175 0.025 0.2 0.05 0.075 0.1 275 0.025 0.05 0.075 0.1 2.2. Finite Elements Analysis (FEA) Finite element analysis was performed to predict cutting forces, heat flow in the cutting zone, and chip formation. AdvantEdge V7.1 software (2015, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was used to simulate the orthogonal cut for the two cutting speeds (175 m/min and 275 m/min) and the lower and higher feed levels (0.025 mm/rev and 0.1 mm/rev). The friction coefficient was established according to tool geometry and the material software default of the general ceramic tool. AdvantEdge simplifies the friction coefficient as defined by Coulomb friction in the following Equation (1): F f =µ×Fn (1) where Fn is the normal force exerted between the surfaces, µ is the coefficient of friction, and Ff is the resulting force due to friction. AISI 1045 steel data were customer-defined with Table 1data and equivalent chemical composition. The workpiece meshing was defined as a maximum and minimum element size of 0.1 mm and 0.02 mm, respectively. The mesh refinement and coarsening factor were kept as defaults, 2 and 6, respectively. The maximum number of nodes was adjusted to 2400. Thirty output frames were adopted. Tecplot 360 R2 software (2020, Bellevue, WA, USA) was used for data analysis and treatment. A Carl Zeiss Discovery V12 stereomicroscope (Oberkochen, German) equipped with AxioCam 305 (Oberkochen, German) and AxioVision V4.7 software (2008, Jena, Germany) was used to measure chip thickness and compare these results with FEA analysis. 2.3. Surface Roughness At first, the topography of surfaces machined with new inserts was evaluated using white light interferometry. With this technique, better visualization and evaluation of the surface integrity is possible. It was employed with the New View 7300 interferometer from Zygo (Middlefield, CT, USA) and Leica (Wetzlar, HE, German). A scan rate of 100 µ m/s and a magnification of 20 × were used. The accuracy of the former equipment is less than 0.75%, the lateral resolution from 0.36 to 9.5 nm, and the vertical resolution 0.1 nm. Materials 2022,15, 2031 6 of 16 In the second stage, the surface roughness was evaluated at intervals of 150 mm of machined length together with the tool wear evaluation, so a roughness × flank wear curve could be plotted. At this stage, a Taylor Hobson Surtronic 25 roughness meter (Leicester, England) was employed. A cut-off of 0.25 mm according to ISO 4288 [ 21 ] was established. The results are an average of three measurements performed on each sample. The results were compared with theoretical roughness (h) following Equation (2), where Re is the insert corner radius. For the Ra parameter, this may be written as h/4 [22]. h= f2 8Re (2) 2.4. Tool Life and Tool Wear The tool life tests were performed using an end-of-life criterion based on an average width of the flank wear land VB B = 0.1 mm based on the ISO 3685 [ 23 ] standard. An average of three measurements were taken. Tool wear was measured at intervals of 150 mm of machined length. The flank wear was measured using a Carl Zeiss Discovery V12 stereomicroscope equipped with AxioCam 305 (Oberkochen, BW, Germany) and AxioVision V4.7 software (2008, Jena, Germany) to acquire and process digital images. 2.5. Microstructure and Microhardness Evaluation To evaluate the surface integrity under the machined surface, microhardness tests on each microconstituent of the material (pearlite—dark phase and ferrite—white phase), were performed. Samples were cut and embedded in Bakelite and then sanded and polished with alumina suspensions with granulation of 1 µ m. The metallographic sections were etched using a 2% nitric acid solution in ethanol (Nital) during 10 s. A Vickers indenter with a load of 25 g during 12 s was used in the test for all the measurements which were performed beneath the machined surface in depths of 25 µ m, 125 µ m, 225 µ m, 325 µ m, and 425 µ m, as shown in Figure 2details. Three measurements were performed at nearby points. A Shimadzu HMV-G 20ST hardness tester (Kyoto, Japan) was used to perform microhardness evaluation. The Nikon Eclipse MA200 microscope (Kyoto, Japan) was used to analyze material microstructure after the machining process. Materials 2022, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 17 Figure 2. Microhardness indentations on the pearlite phase in a sample machined at Vc = 275 m/min and f = 0.1 mm/rev. 3. Results 3.1. FEA Analysis Results The FEA analysis results show that the temperature in the tool part contact zone can exceed 860 °C for the highest cutting speed and feed settings used in the experiments, while 17% lower temperature values are found for the lowest cutting speed and feed settings used. The chips are predominantly in the form of twisted ribbons of the continuous type, for all test configurations (Figures 3 and 4). Figure 3. Heat distribution and chip thickness in Finite Elements Analysis (FEA) for f = 0.025 mm/rev. Vc = 175 m/min (top) and Vc = 275 m/min (below). Figure 2. Microhardness indentations on the pearlite phase in a sample machined at Vc = 275 m/min and f = 0.1 mm/rev. 3. Results 3.1. FEA Analysis Results The FEA analysis results show that the temperature in the tool part contact zone can exceed 860 ◦ C for the highest cutting speed and feed settings used in the experiments, while Materials 2022,15, 2031 7 of 16 17% lower temperature values are found for the lowest cutting speed and feed settings used. The chips are predominantly in the form of twisted ribbons of the continuous type, for all test configurations (Figures 3and 4). Materials 2022, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 17 Figure 2. Microhardness indentations on the pearlite phase in a sample machined at Vc = 275 m/min and f = 0.1 mm/rev. 3. Results 3.1. FEA Analysis Results The FEA analysis results show that the temperature in the tool part contact zone can exceed 860 °C for the highest cutting speed and feed settings used in the experiments, while 17% lower temperature values are found for the lowest cutting speed and feed settings used. The chips are predominantly in the form of twisted ribbons of the continuous type, for all test configurations (Figures 3 and 4). Figure 3. Heat distribution and chip thickness in Finite Elements Analysis (FEA) for f = 0.025 mm/rev. Vc = 175 m/min (top) and Vc = 275 m/min (below). Figure 3. Heat distribution and chip thickness in Finite Elements Analysis (FEA) for f= 0.025 mm/rev. Vc = 175 m/min (top) and Vc = 275 m/min (below). Materials 2022, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 17 Figure 4. Heat distribution and chip thickness in FEA analysis for f = 0.1 mm/rev. Vc = 175 m/min (top) and Vc = 275 m/min (below). It is possible to verify a good agreement between the chip thickness values estimated by FEA and measured through microscopy by analyzing Table 3 and Figure 5. The smaller the feed, the smaller the chip shear angle. As expected, the cutting force values increase with increasing feed, however, the cutting forces estimated by the FEA analysis did not exceed 120 N in any setting of parameters used (Figure 6). The good concordance of the chips obtained with those estimated by FEA analysis, in terms of shape and thickness, shows that this technique has good reliability for the results presented and discussed. Table 3. Comparison between FEA analysis and optical measurement chip thickness. Feed, f (mm/rev) Cutting Speed, Vc (m/min) Chip Thickness (mm) FEA Analysis (σ) Optical Measurement (σ) 0.025 175 0.043 (0.003) 0.045 (0.002) 275 0.035 (0.001) 0.028 (0.002) 0.1 175 0.15 (0.02) 0.12 (0.03) 275 0.17 (0.01) 0.18 (0.01) Figure 4. Heat distribution and chip thickness in FEA analysis for f= 0.1 mm/rev. Vc = 175 m/min (top) and Vc = 275 m/min (below). Materials 2022,15, 2031 8 of 16 It is possible to verify a good agreement between the chip thickness values estimated by FEA and measured through microscopy by analyzing Table 3and Figure 5. The smaller the feed, the smaller the chip shear angle. As expected, the cutting force values increase with increasing feed, however, the cutting forces estimated by the FEA analysis did not exceed 120 N in any setting of parameters used (Figure 6). The good concordance of the chips obtained with those estimated by FEA analysis, in terms of shape and thickness, shows that this technique has good reliability for the results presented and discussed. Table 3. Comparison between FEA analysis and optical measurement chip thickness. Feed, f (mm/rev) Cutting Speed, Vc (m/min) Chip Thickness (mm) FEA Analysis (σ) Optical Measurement (σ) 0.025 175 0.043 (0.003) 0.045 (0.002) 275 0.035 (0.001) 0.028 (0.002) 0.1 175 0.15 (0.02) 0.12 (0.03) 275 0.17 (0.01) 0.18 (0.01) Materials 2022, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 17 Figure 5. Chip thickness under optical microscope measurements for Vc = 175 m/min and f = 0.1 mm/rev. Figure 6. Cutting forces predicted by FEA analysis (filtered of numerical noise) for f = 0.1 mm/min and Vc = 275 m/min. 3.2. Surface Roughness and Tool Wear The topography of the machined surface, as a function of feed, using a new cutting edge, is shown in Figures 7 and 8 for cutting speeds of 175 m/min and 275 m/min, respectively, and the results are summarized in the graph shown in Figure 9. It is easy to see the effect of increased feed on machined surface degradation. For a feed of 0.025 mm/rev, an arithmetical mean height value (Sa) of 0.23 μm is reached, denoting a superfinishing surface state. This value reaches the 0.94 μm Sa mark, for a feed of 0.1 mm/rev. Considering the maximum height Sz parameter, the values are Sz = 8.13 μm and Sz = 8.8 μm, respectively, when the cutting speed is 175 m/min. The Sa parameter expands the profile (line roughness) three-dimensionally. It represents the arithmetic mean of the absolute ordinate Z (x,y) within the evaluation area. This is one of the most widely used parameters providing stable results since it is not significantly influenced by scratches, contamination, and measurement noise. The Sz parameter expands the profile (line roughness) parameter Rz three-dimensionally. The maximum height Sz is equivalent to the sum of maximum peak height Sp and maximum valley depth [24]. By increasing the cutting speed to 275 m/min, an arithmetical mean height value Sa = 0.26 μm is achieved, also denoting a superfinishing surface state. This value reaches the Sa = 0.96 μm mark, for a feed of 0.1 mm/rev. Considering the maximum height Sz parameter, the values are Sz = 6.4 μm and Sz = 12.2 μm, respectively. It is thus possible to establish that the cutting speed has little influence on the final roughness, however, if the Sz parameter is mandatory, it is better to use the combination of high cutting speed (275 m/min) and low feed (0.025 mm/rev). Nonetheless, it is worth considering that although frequently used, this parameter is significantly influenced by scratches, contamination, and measurement noise due to its utilization of peak values [24]. Figure 5. Chip thickness under optical microscope measurements for Vc = 175 m/min and f= 0.1 mm/rev. Materials 2022, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 17 Figure 5. Chip thickness under optical microscope measurements for Vc = 175 m/min and f = 0.1 mm/rev. Figure 6. Cutting forces predicted by FEA analysis (filtered of numerical noise) for f = 0.1 mm/min and Vc = 275 m/min. 3.2. Surface Roughness and Tool Wear The topography of the machined surface, as a function of feed, using a new cutting edge, is shown in Figures 7 and 8 for cutting speeds of 175 m/min and 275 m/min, respectively, and the results are summarized in the graph shown in Figure 9. It is easy to see the effect of increased feed on machined surface degradation. For a feed of 0.025 mm/rev, an arithmetical mean height value (Sa) of 0.23 μm is reached, denoting a superfinishing surface state. This value reaches the 0.94 μm Sa mark, for a feed of 0.1 mm/rev. Considering the maximum height Sz parameter, the values are Sz = 8.13 μm and Sz = 8.8 μm, respectively, when the cutting speed is 175 m/min. The Sa parameter expands the profile (line roughness) three-dimensionally. It represents the arithmetic mean of the absolute ordinate Z (x,y) within the evaluation area. This is one of the most widely used parameters providing stable results since it is not significantly influenced by scratches, contamination, and measurement noise. The Sz parameter expands the profile (line roughness) parameter Rz three-dimensionally. The maximum height Sz is equivalent to the sum of maximum peak height Sp and maximum valley depth [24]. By increasing the cutting speed to 275 m/min, an arithmetical mean height value Sa = 0.26 μm is achieved, also denoting a superfinishing surface state. This value reaches the Sa = 0.96 μm mark, for a feed of 0.1 mm/rev. Considering the maximum height Sz parameter, the values are Sz = 6.4 μm and Sz = 12.2 μm, respectively. It is thus possible to establish that the cutting speed has little influence on the final roughness, however, if the Sz parameter is mandatory, it is better to use the combination of high cutting speed (275 m/min) and low feed (0.025 mm/rev). Nonetheless, it is worth considering that although frequently used, this parameter is significantly influenced by scratches, contamination, and measurement noise due to its utilization of peak values [24]. Figure 6. Cutting forces predicted by FEA analysis (filtered of numerical noise) for f= 0.1 mm/min and Vc = 275 m/min. Materials 2022,15, 2031 9 of 16 3.2. Surface Roughness and Tool Wear The topography of the machined surface, as a function of feed, using a new cutting edge, is shown in Figures 7and 8for cutting speeds of 175 m/min and 275 m/min, respectively, and the results are summarized in the graph shown in Figure 9. It is easy to see the effect of increased feed on machined surface degradation. For a feed of 0.025 mm/rev, an arithmetical mean height value (Sa) of 0.23 µ m is reached, denoting a superfinishing surface state. This value reaches the 0.94 µ mSa mark, for a feed of 0.1 mm/rev. Considering the maximum height Sz parameter, the values are Sz = 8.13 µ m and Sz = 8.8 µ m, respectively, when the cutting speed is 175 m/min. The Sa parameter expands the profile (line roughness) three-dimensionally. It represents the arithmetic mean of the absolute ordinate Z (x,y) within the evaluation area. This is one of the most widely used parameters providing stable results since it is not significantly influenced by scratches, contamination, and measurement noise. The Sz parameter expands the profile (line roughness) parameter Rz three-dimensionally. The maximum height Sz is equivalent to the sum of maximum peak height Sp and maximum valley depth [24]. Materials 2022, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 of 17 Figure 7. 3D surface roughness for Vc = 175 m/min with different feeds. (a) 0.025 mm/rev, (b) 0.05 mm/rev, (c) 0.075 mm/rev, (d) 0.1 mm/rev. Figure 8. 3D surface roughness for Vc = 275 m/min with different feeds. (a) 0.025 mm/rev, (b) 0.05 mm/rev, (c) 0.075 mm/rev, (d) 0.1 mm/rev. Figure 7. 3D surface roughness for Vc = 175 m/min with different feeds. ( a ) 0.025 mm/rev, (b) 0.05 mm/rev, (c) 0.075 mm/rev, (d) 0.1 mm/rev. By increasing the cutting speed to 275 m/min, an arithmetical mean height value Sa = 0.26 µm is achieved, also denoting a superfinishing surface state. This value reaches the Sa = 0.96 µm mark, for a feed of 0.1 mm/rev. Considering the maximum height Sz parameter, the values are Sz = 6.4 µ m and Sz = 12.2 µ m, respectively. It is thus possible to establish that the cutting speed has little influence on the final roughness, however, if the Sz parameter is mandatory, it is better to use the combination of high cutting speed (275 m/min) and low feed (0.025 mm/rev). Nonetheless, it is worth considering that although frequently used, this parameter is significantly influenced by scratches, contamination, and measurement noise due to its utilization of peak values [24]. Materials 2022,15, 2031 16 of 16 18. Kumar, C.S.; Zeman, P.; Polcar, T. A 2D finite element approach for predicting the machining performance of nanolayered TiAlCrN coating on WC-Co cutting tool during dry turning of AISI 1045 steel. Ceram. Int. 2020,46, 25073–25088. [CrossRef] 19. Amigo, F.J.; Urbikain, G.; Pereira, O.; Fernández-Lucio, P.; Fernández-Valdivielso, A.; de Lacalle, L.L. Combination of high feed turning with cryogenic cooling on Haynes 263 and Inconel 718 superalloys. J. Manuf. Process. 2020,58, 208–222. [CrossRef] 20. Suárez, L.; López de Lacalle, R.; Polvoroza, F.; Veiga, A.; Wretland, A. Effects of high-pressure cooling on the wear patterns on turning inserts used on alloy IN718. Mater. Manuf. Process 2017,32, 678–686. [CrossRef] 21. ISO. ISO 4288: Geometrical Product Specification (GPS)—Surface Texture: Profile Method—Rules and Procedures for the Assessment of Surface Texture; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1996. 22. Shaw, M.C. Metal Cutting Principles, 2nd ed.Oxford University Press: London, UK, 2004. 23. ISO. ISO 3685—Tool Life Testing Wit Single Point Turning Tools; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1993 . 24. Brown, C.A. Roughness Measurement Guidebook: Introduction to Surface Roughness Measurement; Olympus Corporation: Tokyo, Japan, 2017; pp. 1–45. 25. Davim, J. Surface Integrity in Machining; Springer: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2010. 26. Pereira, O.; Rodríguez, A.; Calleja-Ochoa, A.; Celaya, A.; de Lacalle, L.N.L.; Fernández-Valdivielso, A.; González, H. Simulation of Cryo-cooling to Improve Super Alloys Cutting Tools. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. Technol. 2022,9, 73–82. [CrossRef]