scieee Open visual document viewer

Fatty Acid Hydroxytyrosyl Esters of Olive Oils Are Bioaccessible According to Simulated In Vitro Gastrointestinal Digestion: Unraveling the Role of Digestive Enzymes on Their Stability

Alemán-Jiménez, Carolina,Domínguez-Perles, Raul,Gallego Gómez, Juana Inés,Simonelli Muñoz, Agustín Javier,Moine, Sperance,Durand, Thierry,Crauste, Céline,Ferreres, Federico,Gil-Izquierdo, Ángel,Medina, Sonia

Abstract

Recently, new bioactive compounds were identified in olive oil, lipophenols, which are composed of a fatty acid (FA) and a phenolic core, such as HT (HT-FA). However, their bioaccessibility remains unknown. Thus, the present study uncovers the impact of the separate phases of gastrointestinal digestion on the release and stability of HT-FAs from oily matrices under in vitro simulated conditions. Accordingly, it was found that the bioaccessibility of HT derivatives is largely dependent on the type of FA that esterifies HT, as well as the food matrix. Also, the generation of HT-FAs during intestinal digestion was observed, with pancreatin being the enzyme responsible, to a higher extent, for the de novo formation of lipophenolic derivatives. These findings prompt us to identify new applications to oily matrices and their byproducts as potential functional ingredients for the promotion of health, where the possible formation of new lipophenols during digestion should be taken into consideration.

Full text

Fa y Acid Hyd oxy y osyl Es e s o Oli e Oils A e Bioaccessible Acco ding o Simula ed In Vi o Gas oin es inal Diges ion: Un a eling he Role o Diges i e Enzymes on Thei S abili y Ca olina Alemán-Jiménez, # Raul Domínguez-Pe les, # Juana I. Gallego-Gómez, Agus ín Simonelli-Munoz, Espé ance Moine, Thie y Du and, Céline C aus e, Fede ico Fe e es, Angel Gil-Izquie do,* and Sonia Medina* Ci e This: J. Ag ic. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 14165−14175 Read Online ACCESS Me ics & Mo e A icle Recommenda ions ABSTRACT: Recen ly, new bioac i e compounds we e iden ified in oli e oil, lipophenols, which a e composed o a a y acid (FA) and a phenolic co e, such as HT (HT-FA). Howe e , hei bioaccessibili y emains unknown. Thus, he p esen s udy unco e s he impac o he sepa a e phases o gas oin es inal diges ion on he elease and s abili y o HT-FAs om oily ma ices unde in i o simula ed condi ions. Acco dingly, i was ound ha he bioaccessibili y o HT de i a i es is la gely dependen on he ype o FA ha es e ifies HT, as well as he ood ma ix. Also, he gene a ion o HT-FAs du ing in es inal diges ion was obse ed, wi h panc ea in being he enzyme esponsible, o a highe ex en , o he de no o o ma ion o lipophenolic de i a i es. These findings p omp us o iden i y new applica ions o oily ma ices and hei byp oduc s as po en ial unc ional ing edien s o he p omo ion o heal h, whe e he possible o ma ion o new lipophenols du ing diges ion should be aken in o conside a ion. KEYWORDS: oli e oil, hyd oxy y osol, lipophenols, in i o gas oin es inal diges ion, bioaccessibili y, lipases ■INTRODUCTION Oli e d upes and de i ed p oduc s a e conside ed pa o he Medi e anean die and co-con ibu e o he heal hy cha ac e - is ics o his die , especially because o hei con en o mono- and polyunsa u a ed a y acids (FAs) and (poly)phenols such as hyd oxy y osol (HT). 1,2 Mo eo e , oleic acid is he mos abundan FA in oli e oil, and HT is i s p incipal phenolic compound. 3 Also, he p esence o lipophenol s uc u es, composed o an FA and a phenolic co e, has been epo ed in edible oils. These molecules esul om he es e ifica ion o HT wi h a y acids (e.g.,α-linolenic, linoleic, and oleic acids (HT-ALA, HT-LA, and HT-OA, co espondingly)). 4,5 To da e, ex a i gin and i gin oli e oils (EVOO and VOO, espec i ely) a e he oily ma ices wi h he highes concen a ion o hese compounds. 5 Lipophenols offe unc ional ad an ages ela i e o hei molecula cons i uen s (HT and FAs). Specifically, hese compounds a e cha ac e ized by a highe lipophilici y, cell memb ane affini y, and imp o ed an ioxidan ac i i ies. 6−8 Howe e , despi e he sugges ion o lipophenol’s biological powe , 9,10 he ac ual unc ions emain almos unexplo ed. Ne e heless, ega ding hei an ioxidan p ope y, i may p og essi ely be augmen ed along wi h he ex ension o he FA chain leng h up o a c i ical poin , when addi ional ex ension could lowe he adical sca enging powe . Because o his phenomenon, he so-called cu offeffec , sho - o medium- chain lipophilic es e s o phenolic compounds (C8−C12) a e mo e effec i e an ioxidan s ela i e o long-chain es e s. 11 In con as , o he s udies ha e associa ed equal o highe ac i i y wi h long-chain es e s (C18−C20). 12,13 Aside om hese conside a ions, he bioaccessibili y o lipophenols emains o be assessed. In his ega d, acco ding o p e ious s udies, in ense hyd olysis o HT ace a e a e panc ea in and bile sal diges ion has been epo ed, 14 while y osol acyl es e s a e hyd olyzed by panc ea ic lipase o p oduce ee y osol, showing a ce ain sus ained- elease beha io . 15,16 These esul s sugges ha he ime ame o e ie ing biological ac i i ies om phenolic compounds could be ex ended due o lipophenol’s bioac i i y, hus allowing us o ob ain addi ional heal h benefi s. 15 These au ho s epo ed ha he s abili y o y osol es e s unde he physicochemical condi ions associa ed wi h he in i o simula ion o gas o- in es inal (GI) diges ion was co ela ed bo h wi h he chain leng h and wi h he numbe o unsa u a ions. 16 None heless, he effec o he diges i e p ocess on he elease o HT-FAs and hei s abili y emains unde explo ed. Also, he expe - imen al app oach implemen ed hus a , based on he analysis o au hen ic s anda ds ins ead o ood ma ices, is negligible because i igno es he effec o he ma ix h oughou he diges ion. 14 To o e come his limi a ion, a simula ed GI Recei ed: Augus 30, 2021 Re ised: No embe 11, 2021 Accep ed: No embe 12, 2021 Published: No embe 19, 2021 A iclepubs.acs.o g/JAFC © 2021 Ame ican Chemical Socie y 14165 h ps://doi.o g/10.1021/acs.ja c.1c05373 J. Ag ic. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 14165−14175 Downloaded ia UNIV DE ALMERIA on Decembe 1, 2021 a 19:13:42 (UTC). See h ps://pubs.acs.o g/sha ingguidelines o op ions on how o legi ima ely sha e published a icles. diges ion by in i o models could be a aluable, ime-sa ing ool, as i equi es ewe esou ces o ob aining p elimina y bu ex emely impo an in o ma ion o he e alua ion o he s uc u al and chemical changes unde GI condi ions. 17 Acco ding o his backg ound in o ma ion and p e ious findings, he p esen wo k aims o gain u he insigh in he esul s o he GI diges ion on HT-ALA, HT-LA, and HT-OA ound in EVOO and VOO o iden i y he lipophenols eleased om he ood ma ix ha emain s able du ing GI diges ion and ha a e a ailable o abso p ion. Also, he e alua ion o he effec o pepsin, panc ea in, and panc ea ic lipase allowed us o disco e he influence o he diges i e enzymes on he s abili y o lipophenols. The majo ou comes e ie ed con ibu ed o se ing up he bioaccessibili y o HT-FAs in he small in es ine compa ed wi h unes e ified HT and o unde s anding he enzyma ic mechanisms esponsible o hem, p o iding he heo e ical basis o he ans o ma ion o lipophenols du ing he diges i e p ocess. ■MATERIALS AND METHODS Chemicals and Reagen s. The au hen ic s anda ds o high-pu i y HT-FAs (HT-ALA, HT-LA, and HT-OA) we e syn hesized and ully cha ac e ized by nuclea magne ic esonance (NMR)-based analysis by he Ins i u des Biomolecules Max Mousse on (IBMM) (Mon pellie , F ance) acco ding o p e iously published p ocedu es. 4 Ace one and bu yla ed hyd oxyanisole (BHA) we e pu chased om Sigma-Ald ich (S . Louis, MO, USA), and all LC−MS-g ade sol en s (deionized wa e , me hanol, and ace oni ile) we e om J.T. Bake (Phillipsbu g, NJ, USA). A ce ified e e ence o FA s anda ds om Sigma-Ald ich was used o hei iden ifica ion and quan ifica ion. Hyd oxy y osol, wi h he ollowing specifica ions: pu i y 99.6%, mois u e 3.7%, and pH 4.26 (1 M aqueous solu ion), was p o ided by Sep ox BIOTECH S.L. (Mu cia, Spain). All lipophenols we e dissol ed in dime hyl sul oxide (DMSO) om Sigma Ald ich (S . Louis, MO, USA) o ob ain a s ock solu ion (a he mM ange o concen a ion), and hen successi e dilu ions we e p epa ed in me hanol/deionized Milli-Q wa e (50:50, / ). All s ock solu ions o lipophenols we e s o ed a −20 °C in he da k. Po cine pepsin (P6887), panc ea in om po cine panc eas (P7545, 8 ×USP), and lipase om po cine panc eas (L3126) we e ob ained om Sigma- Ald ich Co. (S . Louis, MO, USA). All o he eagen s we e o analy ical g ade. Fa y Acid Composi ion Analysis o Edible Oils. Fa y acids o EVOO, VOO, and flaxseed oil (FO) we e ex ac ed acco ding o he me hodology employed p e iously 5 and published by he FAO (FAOLEX No. LEX-FAOC141241, h p://www. ao.o g/ aolex/ esul s/de ails/es/c/%20LEX-FAOC141241/) o he analysis o ege able oils. B iefly, samples (1 g) we e weighed and d ied a 70 ±10 °C o 6 h. The a y acid con en was ob ained by he Soxhle ex ac ion wi h die hyl e he and hep ane and by es e ifica ion wi h me hanolic NaOH (1 M). Fa y acids we e de e mined by gas ch oma og aphy coupled o a flame ioniza ion de ec o (GC-FID) (6890 GC Agilen Technologies, Wald onn, Ge many). The absolu e concen a ion (g/100 g w) o a y acids in he ege able oils (n=3) was calcula ed acco ding o he o mula indi idual a y acid (g/100 g w) = indi idual a y acid (% o a )/100 × o al a (g/100 g w), which was used acco ding o FAO/INFOODS guidelines o con e ing uni s, denomina o s, and exp ession (2012). 18 Vege able Oil Samples and P epa a ion o Analy ical Ex ac s o Hyd oxy y osol Fa y Acid Es e s. Ex a i gin oli e oil (Picual mono a ie al; Olimend os S.L. (Mu cia, Spain)), VOO (Picual mono a ie al; Sal ado Gallego El Jo a S.L. (Albace e, Spain)), and FO (Labo a o ios Almond S.L. (Mu cia, Spain)) we e chosen due o hei dissimila concen a ion o HT es e ified wi h ALA, LA, and OA, wi h FO used as he nega i e con ol sample due o i s lack o HT-FA es e con en . 5 All oil samples we e kep in da k glass bo les, closed wi h sc ew caps, and s o ed a 4 °C o a oid oil oxida ion o he g ea es possible ex en . The HT-FAs we e ex ac ed om ege able oils acco ding o he me hodology desc ibed p e iously. 5 In Vi o Simula ed Gas oin es inal Diges ion. To ep oduce he sepa a e diges ion phases (gas ic, in es inal, and GI), he edible oils (EVOO, VOO, and FO) we e p ocessed based on he ha monized in i o diges ion p o ocol desc ibed in he li e a u e, 19,20 using he simula ed gas ic and in es inal fluids (SGF and SIF, espec i ely) s ock elec oly e solu ion, de eloped acco ding o he in o ma ion p o ided in Table 1. A e diges ion, he samples we e cen i uged a 1600g o 5 min a 4°C o sepa a e he bioaccessible ac ion (BF) and he uppe oily phase o esidual ac ion (RF); he concen a ion o HT and HT-FAs in each ac ion was analyzed. Blanks (nega i e con ols) wi hou enzymes we e p ocessed and analyzed in pa allel unde equal condi ions. All samples we e p o ec ed om ligh o e he en i e p ocess. Bo h BF and RF ac ions we e ozen immedia ely a −80 °C and lyophilized. Fo he HT and HT-FA ex ac ion, he lyophilized samples we e hen dissol ed in 3 mL o an ace one/BHA (99.995:0.005, /w) solu ion, o exed o 1 min, sonica ed o 30 min a 40 kHz, and cen i uged a 8750g o 5 min a 4 °C acco ding o he p ocedu e desc ibed. 5 The samples we e d ied using a SpeedVac concen a o , and he d y ex ac s we e econs i u ed wi h 500 μL o MeOH, sonica ed o 10 min, cen i uged a 8750g o 5 min, and fil e ed h ough a 0.45 μmfil e (Millipo e, Bu ling on, MA, USA). UHPLC-ESI-QqQ-MS/MS Analysis. The sepa a ion and iden i- fica ion o HT and HT-FAs we e pe o med using a UHPLC coupled wi h a iple quad upole MS/MS (Agilen Technologies, Waldb onn, Ge many) acco ding o he me hodology epo ed in he li e a u e. 5 The e en ion imes eco ded o unes e ified HT, HT-ALA, HT-LA, and HT-OA we e 0.6, 3.8, 4.0, and 4.4 min, espec i ely. The analyses we e pe o med by mul iple eac ion moni o ing (MRM) in he nega i e mode, and he quan ifica ion and confi ma ion MRM ansi ions we e as ollows: m/z 153 > 123 a bi a y mass uni s (amu) and m/z 153 > 95 amu, espec i ely, o HT; m/z 413 > 277 amu and m/z 413 > 260 amu, co espondingly, o HT-ALA; m/z 415 > 279 amu and m/z 415 > 262 amu, espec i ely, o HT-LA; and m/z 417 > 281 amu and m/z 417 > 264 amu, co espondingly, o HT- OA. Da a acquisi ion and p ocessing we e done using he MassHun e so wa e e sion B.08.00 (Agilen Technologies, Waldb onn, Ge many). Bo h HT and es e s o HT we e quan ified using e e ence s anda ds, and he concen a ions we e exp essed as nanog ams pe g am o esh weigh (ng/g w). S a is ical Analyses. All he analy ical ex ac ions o he oily ma ices conside ed in he p esen wo k, as well as he p oduc s o he gas ic, in es inal, and GI diges ions, we e analyzed in iplica e (n= 3), and he da a we e exp essed as he mean ±SD. S a is ical analyses we e pe o med a 5% o he significance le el using he SPSS 27.0 Table 1. P epa a ion o Simula ed Gas ic Fluid (SGF) and Simula ed In es inal Fluid (SIF) cons i uen a (mmol/L) simula ed fluids KCl KH2PO4NaHCO3NaCl MgCl2(H2O)6(NH4)2CO3 simula ed gas ic fluid (SGF; pH 3) 6.90 0.90 25.00 47.20 0.10 0.50 simula ed in es inal fluid (SIF; pH 8) 6.80 0.80 85.00 38.40 0.13 a KCl, po assium chlo ide; KH2PO4, po assium phospha e monobasic; NaHCO3, sodium bica bona e; NaCl, sodium chlo ide; MgCl2(H2O)6, magnesium chlo ide hexahyd a e; and (NH4)2CO3, ammonium ca bona e. Jou nal o Ag icul u al and Food Chemis y pubs.acs.o g/JAFC A icle h ps://doi.o g/10.1021/acs.ja c.1c05373 J. Ag ic. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 14165−14175 14166 Figu e 1. Concen a ion (ng/g w) o HT and i s lipophenolic de i a i es in ex a i gin oli e oil (EVOO) and i s bioaccessible and esidual ac ions (A) and bioaccessibili y esul ing om he indi idual gas ic and in es inal diges ions (B). N.d., no de ec ed. Ba s wi h a diffe en lowe case le e indica e s a is ically significan diffe ences among ma ices a p< 0.05 acco ding o he analysis o a iance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s mul iple ange es . Figu e 2. Concen a ion (ng/g w) o HT and i s lipophenolic de i a i es in i gin oli e oil (VOO) and i s bioaccessible and esidual ac ions (A) and bioaccessibili y esul ing om he indi idual gas ic and in es inal diges ions (B). N.d., no de ec ed. Ba s wi h a diffe en lowe case le e among ma ices indica e s a is ically significan diffe ences among ma ices a p< 0.05 acco ding o he analysis o a iance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s mul iple ange es . Jou nal o Ag icul u al and Food Chemis y pubs.acs.o g/JAFC A icle h ps://doi.o g/10.1021/acs.ja c.1c05373 J. Ag ic. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 14165−14175 14167 so wa e package (LEAD Technologies, Inc., Cha lo e, NC, USA). Da a we e subjec ed o a one-way analysis o a iance (ANOVA). The no mal dis ibu ion o he esiduals and he homogenei y o a iance we e es ed wi h he Kolmogo o −Smi no and Le ene es s, espec i ely. When s a is ical diffe ences we e iden ified, he a iables we e compa ed using pos hoc analysis wi h Tukey’s mul iple ange es . ■RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Quan i a i e P ofile o Hyd oxy y osol-Fa y Acids in Ex a Vi gin Oli e Oil and Vi gin Oli e Oil. To unde s and he bioaccessibili y o HT-FAs, fi s , he quan i a i e p ofile o unes e ified and es e ified HT in EVOO and VOO edible oils was se up. As expec ed, he e en ion ime o HT-FAs displayed a e e se co ela ion wi h he deg ee o unsa u a ion o i s lipid pa . Thus, HT-ALA, HT-LA, and HT-OA we e elu ed a 3.8, 4.0, and 4.4 min, espec i ely, which a e consis en wi h p e ious expe imen al esul s 5 and o he lipophenolic de i a i es such as y osol es e s. 16 A e his ask, i was obse ed ha he amoun o unes e ified and es e ified HT o bo h oli e oils was simila (Figu es 1 and 2) bu diffe en om ha co esponding o FO, which exhibi ed an absence o HT FAs (da a no shown). In his way, he unes e ified HT was p esen as 874.74 and 934.09 ng/g w in EVOO and VOO, espec i ely. These concen a ions we e in line wi h hose a ailable in he Phenol- Explo e da abase (h p://phenol-explo e .eu/) on he HT con en o EVOO (0.01−3.47 mg/100 g w) and VOO (<0.01−7.43 mg/100 g w). Rega ding he HT-FAs, alues o 2.80, 1.54, and 20.00 ng/g we e eco ded o HT-ALA, HT- LA, and HT-OA, espec i ely, in EVOO and 4.56, 2.59, and 11.90 ng/g in VOO (Figu es 1 and 2, co espondingly), which a e in ag eemen wi h p e ious epo s on ma ching ood ma ices and analy es, 5 al hough impo an ac o s such as a ie y, geog aphical o igin, ipening s age, and p oduc ion and ex ac ion p ocesses may play an impo an ole in lipophenol con en . 21 Fa y Acid Composi ion o he Edible Oils Assessed. As e e ed o be o e, i is wo h no ing ha he bioaccessibili y o specific bioac i e compounds may be enhanced by he con en o FAs in he ood ma ix h ough dispe sing ood componen s in he diges i e ac o by p omo ing he sec e ion o panc ea ic juice. 22 In his scena io, as one o he objec i es o he cu en s udy was o desc ibe he bioaccessibili y o he o HT-FAs, he quan i a i e p ofile o a y acids o he edible oils unde conside a ion (EVOO, VOO, and FO) was c ea ed, gi en i s cen al impo ance o he o ma ion o he a ge bioac i e compounds, he HT-FAs. As expec ed and acco ding o p e ious desc ip ions in he li e a u e, he FA composi ion o he ege able oils conside ed in he p esen wo k (EVOO, VOO, and FO) in ol ed sa u a ed, monounsa u a ed, and polyunsa u a ed a y acids (SFAs, MUFAs, and PUFAs, co espondingly). 23 Specifically, he oily ma ices s udied con ained a o al o 13 indi idual FAs (Table 2). The SFAs de ec ed we e palmi ic (C16:0) and s ea ic (C18:0) acids, which showed s a is ically significan diffe ences be ween samples (p< 0.05), wi h EVOO being he plan oil wi h he highes con en o palmi ic acid (12.07 g/100 g w) in compa ison wi h VOO and FO (10.97 and 5.77 g/100 g w, espec i ely). On he o he hand, FO p o ided he g ea es concen a ion o s ea ic acid (4.40 g/100 g w) ha su passed by 41.7%, on a e age, he con en s eco ded in EVOO and VOO, which emained in simila bu lowe le els. Mo eo e , significan diffe ences we e eco ded ega ding he con en o palmi oleic and oleic acids (C16:1 n7 and C18:1 n9, espec i ely) be ween he di e se edible oils analyzed (p< 0.05), wi h oleic acid unde lined as ha ing he mos abundan MUFA in all ege able oils conside ed (in he ange o 19.97−80.10 g/100 g w). The highes concen a ion o oleic acid was ound in VOO (80.10 g/100 g w) ollowed by EVOO (3.2% lowe ) and FO (75.1% lowe ) (Table 2). Finally, when analyzing he con en o PUFAs, linoleic (C18:2 n-6) and α-linolenic (C18:3 n-3) acids we e ound a he highes concen a ions in FO (15.27 and 53.53 g/100 g w, espec i ely), whe eas EVOO and VOO displayed alues in a simila lowe le el (4.27 and 0.62 g/100 g w, on a e age, espec i ely) (Table 2). The composi ion esul s ega ding SFAs, MUFAs, and PUFAs a e in acco dance wi h in o ma ion p e iously epo ed in he ame o s udies compa ing he FA composi ion o se e al ypes o edible oils. 5,24 In his ega d, he FA p ofile, oge he join ly wi h he p esence o HT in he ma ices e e ed o in he s udy o HT lipophenolic de i a i es, would p o ide a e y help ul choice o assessing he effec o GI diges ion on he lipophenolic p ofile o ege able oils, which is essen ial o disco e ing he biological in e es o hese compounds. Bioaccessibili y o Fa y Acid Es e s o Hyd oxy y - osol om Ex a Vi gin Oli e Oil and Vi gin Oli e Oil. Fo his fi s desc ip ion o he GI bioaccessibili y o he HT lipophenols, an op imized and s anda dized s a ic me hod was applied o he in i o simula ion o GI diges ion, which allows mimicking he physicochemical condi ions in he GI ac , in i o, as closely as possible. 19,20 The lipophenols o HT, HT- ALA, HT-LA, and HT-OA we e analyzed in he h ee ege able oils u ilized in he p esen s udy. FO was selec ed Table 2. Concen a ion o Fa y Acids (g/100 g w) in he Ex a Vi gin Oli e Oil (EVOO), Vi gin Oli e Oil (VO), and Flaxseed Oil (FO) Analyzed in he P esen Wo k edible oils a y acids a EVOO VOO FO LSD (p< 0.05) C14:0 0.03a b 0.03a 0.03a <0.01 C16:0 12.07a 10.97b 5.77c 0.17 C16:1 n7 0.93a 0.83a 0.10b 0.09 C17:0 0.10a 0.10a 0.10a <0.01 C17:1 n8 0.10a 0.10a 0.10a <0.01 C18:0 2.50c 2.63b 4.40a 0.06 C18:1 n9 77.53b 80.10a 19.97c 0.17 C18:2 n6 4.43b 4.10c 15.27a 0.09 C18:3 n3 0.63b 0.60b 53.53a 0.09 C20:0 0.37a 0.60a 0.33a 0.09 C20:1 0.30a 0.30a 0.10b <0.01 C22:0 0.10a 0.10a 0.10a <0.01 C24:0 0.47a 0.10b 0.10b 0.06 a C14:0: my is ic acid; C16:0: palmi ic acid; C16:1 n7: palmi oleic acid; C17:0: hep adecanoic acid; C17:1 n8: hep adecenoic acid; C18:0: s ea ic acid; C18:1 n9: oleic acid; C18:2 n6: linoleic acid; C18:3 n3: alpha-linolenic acid; C20:0: a achidic acid; C20:1: eicosenoic acid; C22:0: behenic acid; and C24:0: lignoce ic acid. b Means (n= 3) wi hin a ow wi h diffe en lowe case le e s a e significan ly diffe en a p< 0.05 acco ding o he analysis o a iance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s mul iple ange es . Jou nal o Ag icul u al and Food Chemis y pubs.acs.o g/JAFC A icle h ps://doi.o g/10.1021/acs.ja c.1c05373 J. Ag ic. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 14165−14175 14168 as a nega i e con ol as i does no con ain ei he HT o i s lipophenolic de i a i es acco ding o ou p e ious wo k. 5 These molecules we e also assessed in he diges a es ob ained a e in i o gas ic, in es inal, and GI diges ion o he ege able oils men ioned abo e. In his ega d, bo h he uppe oily o esidual phase (RF) and he lowe micella o bioaccessible ac ion (BF) esul ing om diges ion we e collec ed and analyzed o e ie e accu a e in o ma ion on he heo e ical and po en ial bioa ailable ac ions o hese new lipophilic phenolic compounds, and also in e con e sions be ween unes e ified HT and i s es e s de i a i es, which would condi ion u u e in i o esea ch aimed a add essing he ac ual bioa ailabili y o HT ( ee and es e ified). The in i o GI diges ion pe o med on EVOO (Figu e 1A) and VOO (Figu e 2A) e ealed ha ALA-, LA-, and OA-based lipophenols o es e ified HT we e p esen in he BF. The concen a ions o HT-FAs co esponding o EVOO we e 3.68, 4.04, and 239.41 ng/g w, while o he VOO samples, hese we e 8.22, 1.80, and 92.00 ng/g w o HT-ALA, HT-LA, and HT-OA, espec i ely, e idencing ha he es e ified o ms o HT we e bioaccessible. Howe e , he a e o bioaccessibili y depended on bo h he specific FA-based es e ifica ion and he composi ional ea u es o he ood ma ix, as al eady epo ed o ee HT pha macokine ics and bioa ailabili y, in i o, a e inges ion o diffe en oily ma ices. 25 These esul s a e in good ag eemen wi h p e ious epo s on he bioaccessibili y o o he es e s o HT, namely, phospha idyl-hyd oxy y osol (PHT, phospholipid de i a i es o HT wi h phospha idylcholine). 17 In hei wo k, Ma in e al. desc ibed ha he po ion o HT wi hin he BF, ega ding he es e ified o m (PHT), was significan ly highe ela i e o unes e ified HT. 17 In addi ion, al hough a lowe concen- a ions han in BF, bo h unes e ified HT and es e ified HT we e de ec ed in RF (Figu es 1A and 2A). Jus as wi h PHT, he amphiphilic p ope ies o HT es e ified wi h FAs could cause i s dispe sion in he aqueous media, which in u n indi ec ly enabled he dispe sion o he ehicula ed HT. 17 When analyzing he bioaccessibili y a e o HT and i s lipophenol de i a i es, i was ound ha he unes e ified o m p esen ed a bioaccessibili y o 70.9 and 15.4% o EVOO and VOO, espec i ely. These esul s a e in line wi h p e ious desc ip ions conce ning an impo an loss o HT in he duodenal compa men (∼50%, on a e age) e ie ed om alpe ujo (oli e-mill was e) diges ions. 26 These au ho s desc ibed ha when diges ing only he a ge bioac i e compounds in analy ical sol en s (wi hou he p esence o addi ional ood cons i uen s, such as s a ch, casein, and fibe ), he bioaccessibili y o HT was enhanced by ∼20%. This effec could be due o he p esence o he e e ed mac omolecules, which can bind polyphenols and e ain hem wi hin he ood ma ix. Hence, se e al au ho s ha e emphasized he signifi- cance and complexi y o phenolic compound in e ac ions wi hin he ood ma ices associa ed o hei bioaccessibil- i y. 26,27 In ela ion o he concen a ions o lipophenols in EVOO, he concen a ion o HT-FAs in BF inc eased 1.3-, 3.0-, and 11.9- old o HT-ALA, HT-LA, and HT-OA, espec i ely (Figu e 1A). This ac may be due o he in e ac ions be ween ee HT and FAs, whe e HT could ac as a nucleophilic compound able o ap ALA, LA, and OA p esen in he oily ma ix o o m he co esponding es e s ia enzyma ic o chemical means unde GI condi ions, 28 he e o e exe ing ″nega i e″effec s on ee HT bioaccessibili y bu amelio a ing he concen a ion o he es e ified o ms o HT in he diges a e. A simila beha io was obse ed o VOO as a esul o he GI diges ion, which esul ed in a 1.8- and 7.7- old ise in concen a ion o HT-ALA and HT-OA, espec i ely, in he BF when compa ed o hose ound in VOO, wi h he excep ion o HT-LA, whose bioaccessibili y dec eased up o ∼70%, on a e age (Figu e 2A). In addi ion, i should also be s essed ha he mos abundan HT-FA in he RF was HT-OA, which inc eased 2.0- and 5.6- old in compa ison wi h he amoun s ound in EVOO and VOO, espec i ely (Figu es 1A and 2and Table 2). This diffe en ial occu ence o HT-FAs om EVOO and VOO a e GI diges ion could be owed o he in e ac ions o hese compounds wi h he ood ma ix componen s such as amino acids and p o eins, in spi e o hei low con en (0.07− 2.4 mg/kg). The p esence o hese componen s depends on he ipening s age o oli e cul i a , among o he ac o s, 29,30 and may gene a e a y acid-binding p o ein eac ions 31,32 ha can hampe he bioaccessibili y o hese compounds. Con en ionally, he RF has no been conside ed o he e alua ion o he bioaccessibili y o phenolic compounds a e he diges ions. Howe e , his ac ion is o high ele ance because o i s high concen a ion o polyphenols ha a e no abso bed in he small in es ine, which can be me abolized by he gu mic obio a, 33 gi ing ise o addi ional bioac i e de i a i es ha could also con ibu e o he heal hy a ibu es o oods. Thus, bo h ac ions (BF and RF) esul ing om GI diges ion may be esponsible o he posi i e heal h effec s a ibu ed o plan -based oods, including edible oils. 34 In his ma e , he capaci y o he in es inal mic obio a o modi y he quan i a i e phy ochemical p ofile o he diges ion p oduc s and he eby he bioa ailabili y/abso p ion capaci y o bioac i e compounds p esen in oli e and oli e oils ha ha e no been abso bed in he small in es ine is ema kable, and as a esul , he subs a e o hese me abolic eac ions (nonabso bed phenolics) should no be dis ega ded. In ac , he gu mic obio a plays a p ominen ole in he bio ans o ma ion o bo h es e ified and aglycone o ms o phenolic compounds, bu he me abolism o lipophenols by he gu mic obio a is s ill unclea . To da e, he e is only one s udy ha e alua ed he ecal mic obial me abolism o lipophenols u ilizing an in i o e men a ion model as well as he in i o abso p ion and plasma pha macokine ics o y osol es e s in a s, whe e s anda ds o y osol and y osol es e s we e adminis a ed in he d inking wa e . 35 The au ho s concluded ha y osol es e de i a i es ac ed longe in i o han na i e y osol by obse ing a second abso p ion peak in pha macokine ic p ofiles, possibly due o mic obio a deg ada ion, wi h he es e ified molecules exhibi ing an imp o ed bioa ailabili y as compa ed o ha o ee y osol. The incuba ion o y osol es e s in he e men a ion solu ion libe a ed ee y osol in a ime- dependen manne , indica ing he occu ence o hyd olysis. 35 Howe e , his finding should be es ed wi h a s ed wi h na u al sou ces o hese lipophenols, no wi h s anda ds, and in he na u al concen a ions in which hey a e ound. Con ibu ion o he Gas ic and In es inal Diges ion Phases o he Bioaccessibili y o HT-FAs. To unde s and he impac o he diges ion p ocess on he bioaccessibili y o HT-FAs, he gas ic diges a es om EVOO and VOO we e also analyzed (Figu es 1B and 2), which p o ided aluable in o ma ion on he elease o he a ge lipophenols on each diges ion s age. Upon his analysis, i was obse ed ha unes e ified HT and i s lipophenol de i a i es we e p esen a Jou nal o Ag icul u al and Food Chemis y pubs.acs.o g/JAFC A icle h ps://doi.o g/10.1021/acs.ja c.1c05373 J. Ag ic. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 14165−14175 14169 high concen a ions in he RF ob ained om he gas ic diges ion o bo h EVOO and VOO. When e alua ing he impac o gas ic diges ion on he EVOO lipophenols, low concen a ions o HT and HT-FAs we e obse ed in he BF o all indi idual analy es (no de ec ed, no de ec ed, and 1.77 and 0.33 ng/g o HT-ALA, HT-LA, HT-OA, and HT) (Figu e 1B). Simila esul s we e ob ained ega ding VOO (no de ec ed and 0.13, 0.82, and 0.52 ng/g o HT-ALA, HT-LA, HT-OA, and HT) (Figu e 2B). The low concen a ions eco ded could be due o he labili y o lipophenols agains he physicochemical condi ions and he enzyma ic ac i i y p ope o he gas ic diges ion, which would be associa ed wi h a low elease o s abili y o he a ge analy es. This would be consis en wi h p e ious epo s on he bioaccessibili y o HT in oli e lea es, 36 u he suppo ing he influence o he ood ma ix, he gas ic enzymes, o acidic condi ions p e iously desc ibed. 37 None heless, he de elop- men o in es inal diges ion on he chyme p o ided a high concen a ion o ee HT in he BF. This could be due o he hyd olysis o oleu opein and i s aglycone du ing in es inal diges ion ha depends on he lipase ac i i y, hus leading o he appea ance o HT, as p e iously s a ed by Rocche i e al. 38 In e es ingly, as a esul o in es inal diges ion, he concen- a ion o HT-FAs significan ly inc eased in he BF o e he en i e GI p ocess, en a i ely due o he pu a i e enzyma ic ac i i y o panc ea ic lipase ha may ca alyze bo h he hyd olysis o syn hesis o es e s. 39 As a as we know, o da e, mos esea ch on he bioaccessibili y o lipophenols has been pe o med on solu ions o au hen ic s anda ds exposed o he GI physicochemical condi ions. The e o e, despi e he e e ed a ibu es o he syn hesis o lipophenols as a esul o he diges i e enzyma ic ac i i y, addi ional wo ks ha e e idenced ha HT de i a i es, such as hyd oxy y osol ace a e, unde go in ense hyd olysis du ing in es inal diges ion mainly due o he enzyma ic ac i i y o panc ea in. 14 Simila ly, i has been epo ed ha y osol acyl es e s a e hyd olyzed by panc ea ic lipase o p oduce ee y osol. 15,16 Mo eo e , he s abili y o es e a ol es e s wi h cap ylic acid du ing diges ion is nega i ely co ela ed wi h he deg ee o subs i u ion o he FA moie y, gi en ha a e 120 min o incuba ion a 37 °C, ∼54 and ∼11% o monoes e s and dies e s a e hyd olyzed, espec i ely, while no hyd olysis o he ies e s has been no iced. 40 Howe e , hese esul s ha e been associa ed wi h an ″a ificially″ob ained (only wi h chemically o enzyma ically syn hesized s anda ds) highe bioaccessibili y ela i e o he effec s ha occu du ing he GI diges ion o oods because hese models do no allow moni o ing he ex ac i e capaci y o he p ocess, he in e con e sion be ween molecules, o he de no o syn hesis o he a ge analy es ( om he complex pool o molecules p esen in he ood ma ix). This gap in knowledge has been o e whelmed by a s udy on he bioaccessibili y o HT wi h alpe ujo (solid byp oduc o oli e oil ex ac ion). This s udy desc ibed a lowe bioacces- sibili y o HT when applying GI diges ion on a ege able ma ix due o he p esence o fibe s and suga s ha could in e ac wi h HT and he diges i e enzymes, modula ing he bioaccessibili y a e. 26 Acco dingly, he assessmen o he bioaccessibili y o HT o HT-FAs needs o include a ood ma ix o ob ain obus and nonspecula i e conclusions. The ele ance o he in es inal diges ion phase o he p esence o HT lipophenols in he p oduc o he GI diges ion p omp ed us o explo e he effec o he in es inal diges ion conside ed indi idually on he in ac ood ma ix, a oiding he unce ainly de imen al effec ha could be occu ing du ing he gas ic s age (Table 3). Thus, when he in es inal diges ion was pe o med on bo h EVOO and VOO (wi hou he p e ious gas ic phase), he concen a ion o HT lipophenols obse ed in he BF was highe ela i e o ha ob ained ollowing he physiological wo kflow (Table 3). The con en o HT-ALA, HT-LA, and HT-OA in BF o he in es inally diges ed EVOO was ∼64-, ∼8-, and ∼15- old highe , espec i ely, in compa ison wi h he BF ob ained a e a comple e GI diges ion (gas ic plus in es inal diges ions). This end was simila o VOO, whe e he con en o lipophenols in he BF inc eased ∼4-, ∼3-, and ∼13- old o HT-ALA, HT-LA, and HT-OA, espec i ely, ela i e o BF ob ained om he sequen ial gas ic and in es inal diges ions (Table 3). On he con a y, he highes concen a ion o unes e ified HT was ound in he BF om in es inal diges ions de eloped on gas ic diges a es o EVOO (619.88 ng/g w) in compa ison wi h he di ec in es inal diges ion o he in ac ood ma ix (55.0% lowe , p< 0.001) (Table 3), while ega ding VOO, no s a is ically significan diffe ences we e ound, ein o cing he Table 3. Concen a ion (ng/g w) o he Bioaccessible and Residual F ac ions (BF and RF, Respec i ely) o HT and I s Lipophenolic De i a i es as a Resul o he Only In es inal Diges ion on he Diffe en Subs a es (Ex a Vi gin Oli e Oil, Vi gin Oli e Oil, and Thei Gas ic Diges a es) concen a ion (ng/g w) subs a e o he in es inal diges ion gas ic diges a e oli e oil oil ma ix analy e a oli e oil BF RF BF RF EVOO a HT 874.47 ±41.88a b 619.88 ±144.42b 64.46 ±12.70d 279.05 ±63.95c 542.00 ±34.15b HT-ALA 2.80 ±0.95b 3.68 ±2.30b 0.61 ±0.06b 235.96 ±23.77a 0.64 ±0.02b HT-LA 1.54 ±0.49bc 4.04 ±1.97b N.d. 34.19 ±1.61a N.d. HT-OA 20.00 ±8.11c 237.64 ±76.94b 12.68 ±2.72c 3599.94 ±107.20a 102.35 ±0.41bc VOO HT 934.09 ±29.53a 143.76 ±25.08bc 39.58 ±1.27c 207.75 ±131.67b 251.66 ±3.38b HT-ALA 4.56 ±1.52b 8.22 ±1.79b 5.12 ±1.25b 32.44 ±5.17a 4.59 ±0.54b HT-LA 2.59 ±0.46b 1.98 ±0.44b N.d. 5.87 ±1.51a N.d. HT-OA 11.90 ±4.90b 91.18 ±2.97b 63.90 ±4.21b 1205.44 ±160.57a 85.81 ±7.79b a HT, hyd oxy y osol; HT-ALA, hyd oxy y osol es e ified wi h α-linolenic acid; HT-LA, hyd oxy y osol es e ified wi h linoleic acid; and HT-OA, hyd oxy y osol es e ified wi h oleic acid. b Da a a e shown as means ±SD (n= 3). Da a wi hin a single ow ollowed by he same lowe case le e a e no significan ly diffe en a p< 0.001 acco ding o he analysis o a iance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s mul iple ange es . N.d., no de ec ed. Jou nal o Ag icul u al and Food Chemis y pubs.acs.o g/JAFC A icle h ps://doi.o g/10.1021/acs.ja c.1c05373 J. Ag ic. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 14165−14175 14170 ele ance o he ood ma ix composi ion o he final bioaccessibili y esul s. The dis inc beha io in he diges i e hallma k o HT and i s lipophenol de i a i es could be due o he spa ing solubili y o HT in oli e oil and i s consequen loca ion in he aqueous phase (>99%), while, boos ed by he amphiphilic na u e, HT-FAs a e dis ibu ed be ween bo h he oily and aqueous phases. 41 The eby, as expec ed, HT-OA was he mos abundan lipophenol in he ood ma ix and he GI diges a es (Table 3). This lipophenol should be o med h ough he enzyma ic es e ifica ion o HT wi h OA, which is he mos abundan FA in he oily ma ices conside ed in he p esen wo k (EVOO and VOO) (Table 2). Based on he findings om he o ma ion o HT-FAs unde in es inal diges i e condi ions, he use o p o ec o s o HT agains he gas ic condi ions migh be o in e es o ake ad an age o he bioac i i ies o HT-FAs om biological o echnological poin s o iew. Rela i e Influence o he In es inal Enzymes on he Gene a ion o Hyd oxy y osol Lipophenols. Gi en he ele ance o he in es inal s age o he bioaccessibili y o HT and i s lipophenolic de i a i es, he sepa a e and join effec s o in es inal enzymes (panc ea in and panc ea ic lipase) on hese compounds we e u he in es iga ed o gain u he unde - s anding o hei ole on he elease o HT-FAs in o he in es inal lumen and hei s abili y. Wi h his objec i e, EVOO was diges ed using SIF con aining indi idual and combined in es inal enzymes a 37 °C o 120 min. The incuba ion o EVOOin heSIFwi hou anydiges i eenzymewas conside ed as a nega i e con ol. This app oach allowed e ie ing c i ical in o ma ion on hei ela i e influence on he bioaccessibili y o HT-FAs. Lipases ( iacylglyce ol acyl hyd olases, EC 3.1.1.3.) a e bioca alys s wi h a high selec i i y and s abili y ha ca alyze hyd olysis, es e ifica ion, anses e ifica ion, and alcoholysis eac ions. 42 To da e, lipases ha e been applied o he p oduc ion o FA de i a i es by he ag o- ood and nu aceu ical indus ies because o hei po en ial uses as fla o ing es e s, a y acid es e s o an ioxidan s, and s uc u ed lipids wi h high egio- and s e eo-selec i i ies. 43 Up o now, he biosyn hesis o HT-FAs has been done using comme cial enzymes on pu e s anda d compounds. 39 These eac ions ha e been epo ed as being closely dependen on he acyl chain leng h and he deg ee o unsa u a ion o FAs ha affec he con e sion yield o he es e ifica ion p ocess due o diffe ences in hei spa ial configu a ion. 44,45 In he cu en wo k, he gene a ion o HT es e s wi h an equi alen ca bon alkyl chain (C18) bu wi h diffe en deg ees o unsa u a ion, C18:1, C18:2, and C18:3 co esponding o HT es e ified wi h OA, LA, and ALA, espec i ely, was moni o ed, o he fi s ime, a e he in es inal diges ion o EVOO wi h indi idual and combined in es inal enzymes (panc ea in and panc ea ic lipase). The con e sion yield o HT-FAs was mo e p onounced when he eac ion was ca alyzed only by panc ea in han when panc ea ic lipase was Figu e 3. Rep esen a i e UHPLC-ESI-QqQ-MS/MS-ex ac ed ion ch oma og ams co esponding o he bioaccessible lipophenols o hyd oxy y osol (HT-ALA, hyd oxy y osol-α-linolenic acid; HT-LA, hyd oxy y osol-linoleic acid; and HT-OA, hyd oxy y osol-oleic acid) in diges a es ob ained a e applying diffe en enzyme combina ions on ex a i gin oli e oil du ing simula ed in i o in es inal diges ion using he quan ifica ion MRM ansi ions. CPS, cha ges pe second. Table 4. Concen a ion (ng/g w) o Hyd oxy y osol Es e ified wi h Fa y Acids a e In es inal Diges ion o Ex a Vi gin Oli e Oil wi h Diffe en Combina ions o Diges i e Enzymes analy e a con ol (no enzyme) panc ea in panc ea ic lipase panc ea in + panc ea ic lipase HT-ALA 4.58 ±1.44b b 228.85 ±14.87a 193.94 ±27.88a 173.40 ±4.55 a HT-LA 0.68 ±0.17c 25.77 ±2.25a 21.33 ±7.50ab 14.54 ±0.42b HT-OA 31.83 ±2.02c 4853.34 ±69.57a 2235.37 ±244.55b 2876.17 ±315.30b a HT-ALA: hyd oxy y osol es e ified wi h α-linolenic acid; HT-LA: hyd oxy y osol es e ified wi h linoleic acid; and HT-OA: hyd oxy y osol es e ified wi h oleic acid. b Mean ±s anda d de ia ion (n= 3) ollowed by he same lowe case le e a e no s a is ically significan a p< 0.05 acco ding o he analysis o a iance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s mul iple ange es . Jou nal o Ag icul u al and Food Chemis y pubs.acs.o g/JAFC A icle h ps://doi.o g/10.1021/acs.ja c.1c05373 J. Ag ic. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 14165−14175 14171 p esen (alone o in combina ion wi h panc ea in) (Figu e 3). HT-OA was he lipophenol wi h he highes concen a ion in he in es inal diges a e, independen ly o he enzymes o hei combina ion applied (4853.34, 2235.37, and 2876.17 ng/g wi h panc ea in, panc ea ic lipase, and combina ions o he wo enzymes, espec i ely), and showed no s a is ical diffe ences be ween panc ea ic lipase and he combina ion o bo h enzymes (p> 0.05) (Table 4). Rega ding HT-LA and HT- ALA, he final concen a ions achie ed in he in es inal diges a e, as well as he diffe ences be ween enzyma ic condi ions, a ied o a lesse ex en ela i e o HT-OA (Figu e 3and Table 4). This may be due o he deg ee o unsa u a ion o he FAs in ol ed in he es e ifica ion o HT, which may affec hei con o ma ion and he eby he eac ion ime, as s a ed by p e ious esea ch. 44 The gene a ion o HT-FAs has al eady been desc ibed in oily ood ma ices a e o i ying ood ma ices wi h HT, 5 as well as in oli e oil byp oduc s du ing p ocessing and s o age, while his was no de ec able in in ac oli es. 46 A hypo hesis suppo ing hese findings sugges s ha HT es e s could be o med independen ly as a esul o he es e ase ac i i y om lipase-posi i e yeas s, which a e p esen in plan -based oods. Howe e , he molecula mechanisms esponsible o he de no o o ma iono lipophenols,aswellas heop imal condi ions needed o he success ul de elopmen o such eac ions, emain unclea . Likewise, ecen ly, he o ma ion o y osol es e s, pa icula ly wi h OA, has been desc ibed, iden i ying c ushing and kneading p ocesses when enzymes a e ac i a ed and he eac ions igge ed. 47 Wi hin his ame, he p esen s udy con ibu es o he unde s anding o he gene a ion o lipophilic hyd oxy y osyl es e s du ing GI diges ion in oily ma ices, wi h a discussion o some possible scena ios being necessa y. The diffe en efficiency ega ding he o ma ion o he sepa a e lipophenols (HT-ALA, HT-LA, and HT-OA) may be associa ed wi h he deg ee o unsa u a ion, which in u n modifies he FA spa ial configu a ion and he lipase selec i i y. Mo eo e , he concen a ion o he p ecu so s in he ood ma ix (bo h unes e ified HT and FAs) seems o be c i ical o he syn hesis o HT-FAs du ing diges ion as well since he con en o ee OA in EVOO and VOO was, on a e age, ∼99 and ∼95% in compa ison wi h he ALA and LA concen a ion, espec i ely (Table 2). This is in ag eemen wi h ecen esea ch, which u ilized nanopa icles wi h immobilized lipase om The momyces lanuginosus and employed oli e lea aqueous ex ac o he syn hesis o bioac i e hyd oxy y osyl FA es e s. The s udy epo ed ha he con e sion yields (%) o OA (C18:1), LA (C18:2), and my is ic acid (C14:0) we e 55.0, 50.4, and 64.3%, espec i ely, es ablishing ha he numbe o double bonds had a di ec co ela ion wi h he molecula s uc u e o he FA, which, as a esul , would affec he ad ance o he acyla ion eac ions. 45 On he con a y, addi ional s udies wo king wi h he pu e s anda d o long-chain unsa u a ed FAs indica ed ha he e was no ela ionship be ween chain leng h and con e sion, as he highes con e sion was ob ained wi h eicosapen aenoic acid (EPA) (68.0%) ela i e o OA (46.0%). The a ia ion in hese findings may be caused by he selec i i y o lipase o he FAs, wi h he deg ee o unsa u a ion being a mo e ele an ac o a he han FA chain leng h. 39 In addi ion, lipase pe o ms he e ogeneous eac ions, and i s ca aly ic ac i i y is maximum when he enzyme is adso bed a an oil− wa e in e ace. Gene ally, long-chain es e s a e mainly dispe sed in he oil d ople , while sho -chain es e s a e ound mos ly in he wa e d ople . 48 Fo lipophenols, a cu off effec ha in ol es a oo-sho o a oo-long hyd ophobic chain does no ensu e a p ope in e acial loca ion, which in u n does no esul o an op imal lipase ac i i y, 49 and he cu off effec is simply a na u al consequence o he diffe en ial solubili y o an ioxidan s in he aqueous, in e acial, and oil egions o an emulsion. 50 Fu he mo e, o he phenolic acyl es e s, such as y osol-FAs, ha e shown a sus ained- elease beha io o ee y osol molecules du ing he ime-consuming diges ion p ocess 16 ha could imp o e he bioac i i y scope o polyphenols because o ex ended ac ions. In his sense, he cu en wo k b ings new knowledge and s a egies o he design o slow- elease o mula ions o HT-FAs ha could enhance he phenolic loading cycle ime by p olonging he e minal hal - li e and he eby leng hening hei bioac i i y. This is pa icula ly impo an , as se e al biological p ope ies ha e been ecen ly sugges ed o hese compounds, namely, an idiabe ic, p oli e a i e, and an ioxidan capaci ies. 47,51 In addi ion, i has been demons a ed ha he es e ifica ion o phenolic compounds did no comp omise he bioac i i y o he na i e molecule bu ins ead may enhance i s bioa ailabili y and expand i s applica ion domains. 52 As concluding ema ks, he p esen s udy p o ides new e idence on he bioaccessibili y o lipophenolic de i a i es o HT om di e se oli e oils (EVOO and VOO), showing ha hey a e bioaccessible a e pe o ming a simula ion o GI diges ion unde in i o condi ions, depending la gely on he ype o FA es e i ying HT as well as he ood ma ix. Mo e impo an ly, he gene a ion o HT-FAs du ing in es inal diges ion was epo ed in he p esen wo k, as well as he iden ifica ion o he enzymes esponsible o mos o he syn hesis iden ified (panc ea in). These findings a e o c i ical ele ance om a clinical and echnological poin o iew because o he po en ial biological effec s ha could be expec ed om de no o syn hesized lipophenols, which could ha e a c i ical impac on bo h he hal -li e o plan -based oods and he biological benefi s al eady desc ibed on hose oods and oods uffs con aining he componen s o lipophenols (e.g., HT and FAs). Indeed, he majo ou comes e ie ed sugges ha he use o oily ma ices and hei byp oduc s as po en ial unc ional ing edien s, oods, supplemen s, o cosme ics, o heal h p omo ion and disease isk educ ion, should ake in o conside a ion he o ma ion o new lipophenols du ing diges ion and, consequen ly, he ans o ma ion o he final bioac i e scope and he effec s wi hin he ame o specific pa hophysiological p ocesses. Ul ima ely, u he assays con- ce ning he bioa ailabili y o HT-FAs a e s ill needed, wi h a high impo ance placed on alida ing whe he lipophenol molecules would mig a e ac oss he epi helial ba ie , hei me aboliza ion ci cula ing eac ion, he anspo e s o hese compounds, and he me abolic e en s ha affec hei final shel -li e in he o ganism and bioac i i y in he sepa a e issues and cell ypes. ■AUTHOR INFORMATION Co esponding Au ho s A  ngel Gil-Izquie do −Depa men o Food Science and Technology, Resea ch G oup on Quali y, Sa e y and Bioac i i y o Plan Foods, CEBAS-CSIC, Uni e si y Campus o Espina do, Mu cia 30100, Spain; o cid.o g/0000- 0001-7646-0386; Phone: +34968396200; Email: [email p o ec ed] Jou nal o Ag icul u al and Food Chemis y pubs.acs.o g/JAFC A icle h ps://doi.o g/10.1021/acs.ja c.1c05373 J. Ag ic. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 14165−14175 14172 Sonia Medina −Depa men o Food Science and Technology, Resea ch G oup on Quali y, Sa e y and Bioac i i y o Plan Foods, CEBAS-CSIC, Uni e si y Campus o Espina do, Mu cia 30100, Spain; o cid.o g/0000-0002-7231-6480; Phone: +34968396200; Email: [email p o ec ed] Au ho s Ca olina Alemán-Jiménez −Depa amen o de En e me ía, Uni e sidad Ca ólica de Mu cia, Mu cia 30107, Spain Raul Domínguez-Pe les −Depa men o Food Science and Technology, Resea ch G oup on Quali y, Sa e y and Bioac i i y o Plan Foods, CEBAS-CSIC, Uni e si y Campus o Espina do, Mu cia 30100, Spain; o cid.o g/0000- 0001-6232-712X Juana I. Gallego-Gómez −Depa amen o de En e me ía, Uni e sidad Ca ólica de Mu cia, Mu cia 30107, Spain Agus ín Simonelli-Munoz −Depa amen o de En e me ía, Fisio e apia y Medicina. Uni e sidad de Alme ía, Alme ía 04120, Spain Espé ance Moine −Ins i u des Biomolécules Max Mousse on (IBMM), UMR 5247, CNRS, Uni e si y o Mon pellie , Mon pellie 34093, F ance Thie y Du and −Ins i u des Biomolécules Max Mousse on (IBMM), UMR 5247, CNRS, Uni e si y o Mon pellie , Mon pellie 34093, F ance Céline C aus e −Ins i u des Biomolécules Max Mousse on (IBMM), UMR 5247, CNRS, Uni e si y o Mon pellie , Mon pellie 34093, F ance; o cid.o g/0000-0002-5714- 8749 Fede ico Fe e es −Depa men o Food Technology and Nu i ion, Molecula Recogni ion and Encapsula ion (REM) G oup, Uni e sidad Ca ólica de Mu cia, UCAM, Mu cia 30107, Spain Comple e con ac in o ma ion is a ailable a : h ps://pubs.acs.o g/10.1021/acs.ja c.1c05373 Au ho Con ibu ions # C.A.-J. and R.D.-P. wo au ho s con ibu ed equally o he p esen wo k. Funding This wo k was pa ially unded by he ″FundacionSe neca de la Region de Mu cia″G upo de Excelencia 19900/GERM/15. S.M. was suppo ed by a Pos doc o al Con ac (Saa ed a- Faja do 21078/SF/19) om he Agency o Science and Technology o he Region de Mu cia−″FundacionSe neca″ (Spain). No es The au ho s decla e no compe ing financial in e es . ■ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The au ho s hank he company Olimend os S.L. (Mu cia, Spain) o he supply o ex a i gin oli e oils. ■ABBREVIATIONS BF, bioaccessible ac ion; BHA, bu yla ed hyd oxyanisole; DMSO, dime hyl sul oxide; EVOO, ex a i gin oli e oil; FAs, a y acids; FO, flaxseed oil; HT, hyd oxy y osol; HT-ALA, hyd oxy y osol es e ified wi h α-linolenic acid; HT-FA, hyd oxy y osol es e ified wi h a y acid; HT-LA, hyd oxy y - osol es e ified wi h linoleic acid; HT-OA, hyd oxy y osol es e ified wi h oleic acid; MRM, mul iple eac ion moni o ing; MUFAs, monounsa u a ed a y acids; NMR, nuclea magne ic esonance; PUFAs, polyunsa u a ed a y acids; RF, esidual ac ion; SFAs, sa u a ed a y acids; SGF, simula ed gas ic fluid; SIF, simula ed in es inal fluid; VOO, i gin oli e oil ■REFERENCES (1) Wah bu g, U.; K a z, M.; Cullen, P. Medi e anean Die , Oli e Oil and Heal h. Eu . J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2002,104, 698−705. (2) Vilaplana-Pé ez, C.; Auón, D.; Ga cía-Flo es, L. A.; Gil- Izquie do, A. Hyd oxy y osol and Po en ial Uses in Ca dio ascula Diseases, Cance , and AIDS. F on . Nu . 2014,1, 18. (3) Wani, T. A.; Masoodi, F. A.; Gani, A.; Baba, W. N.; Rahmanian, N.; Akh e , R.; Wani, I. A.; Ahmad, M. Oli e Oil and I s P incipal Bioac i e Compound: Hyd oxy y osol −A Re iew o he Recen Li e a u e. T ends Food Sci. Technol. 2018,77,77−90. (4) Lee, Y. Y.; C aus e, C.; Wang, H.; Leung, H. H.; Ve cau e en, J.; Galano, J. M.; Oge , C.; Du and, T.; Wan, J. M.; Lee, J. C. Ex a Vi gin Oli e Oil Reduced Polyunsa u a ed Fa y Acid and Choles e ol Oxida ion in Roden Li e : Is This Accoun ed o Hyd oxy y osol- Fa y Acid Conjuga ion? Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2016,29, 1689−1698. (5) Medina, S.; Domínguez-Pe les, R.; Auón, D.; Moine, E.; Du and, T.; C aus e, C.; Fe e es, F.; Gil-Izquie do, A. Ta ge ed Lipidomics P o iling Re eals he Gene a ion o Hyd oxy y osol-Fa y Acids in Hyd oxy y osol-Fo i ied Oily Ma ices: New Analy ical Me hodology and Cy o oxici y E alua ion. J. Ag ic. Food Chem. 2020,68, 7789− 7799. (6) Liu, S.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, N.; Fan, D.; Wang, M.; Zhao, Y. An ioxida i e P ope ies and Chemical Changes o Que ce in in Fish Oil: Que ce in Reac s wi h F ee Fa y Acids o Fo m I s Es e De i a i es. J. Ag ic. Food Chem. 2021,69, 1057−1067. (7) Moine, E.; B abe , P.; Guillou, L.; Du and, T.; Ve cau e en, J.; C aus e, C. New Lipophenol An ioxidan s Reduce Oxida i e Damage in Re ina Pigmen Epi helial Cells. An ioxidan s 2018,7, 197. (8) Zhou, D. Y.; Sun, Y. X.; Shahidi, F. P epa a ion and An ioxidan Ac i i y o Ty osol and Hyd oxy y osol Es e s. J. Func . Foods 2017, 37,66−73. (9) C aus e, C.; Rosell, M.; Du and, T.; Ve cau e en, J. Omega-3 Polyunsa u a ed Lipophenols, How and Why? Biochimie 2016,120, 62−74. (10) Moine, E.; Boukhalla , M.; Cia, D.; Jacquemo , N.; Guillou, L.; Du and, T.; Ve cau e en, J.; B abe , P.; C aus e, C. New Lipophenols P e en Ca bonyl and Oxida i e S esses In ol ed in Macula Degene a ion. F ee Radical Biol. Med. 2021,162, 367−382. (11) Lague e, M.; López Gi aldo, L. J.; Lecom e, J.; Figue oa- Espinoza, M. C.; Ba éa, B.; Weiss, J.; Decke , E. A.; Villeneu e, P. Chain Leng h A ec s An ioxidan P ope ies o Chlo ogena e Es e s in Emulsion: The Cu o Theo y behind he Pola Pa adox. J. Ag ic. Food Chem. 2009,57, 11335−11342. (12) T ujillo, M.; Ma eos, R.; Collan es de Te an, L.; Espa e o, J. L.; Ce , R.; Jo e , M.; Alcudia, F.; Bau is a, J.; Ce , A.; Pa ado, J. Lipophilic Hyd oxy y osyl Es e s. An ioxidan Ac i i y in Lipid Ma ices and Biological Sys ems. J. Ag ic. Food Chem. 2006,54, 3779−3785. (13) Wa nakulasu iya, S. N.; Rupasinghe, H. P. V. Long Chain Fa y Acid Acyla ed De i a i es o Que ce in-3-O-Glucoside as An iox- idan s o P e en Lipid Oxida ion. Biomolecules 2014,4, 980−993. (14) Pe ei a-Ca o, G.; Sa iá, B.; Mad ona, A.; Espa e o, J. L.; Escude os, M. E.; B a o, L.; Ma eos, R. Diges i e S abili y o Hyd oxy y osol, Hyd oxy y osyl Ace a e and Alkyl Hyd oxy y osyl E he s. In . J. Food Sci. Nu . 2012,63, 703−707. (15) Yin, F.; Hu, X.; Zhou, D.; Ma, X.; Tian, X.; Huo, X.; Raka iya ham, K.; Shahidi, F.; Zhu, B. Hyd olysis and T anspo Cha ac e is ics o Ty osol Acyl Es e s in Ra In es ine. J. Ag ic. Food Chem. 2018,66, 12521−12526. (16) Yin, F.; Hu, X.; Zhou, D.; Ma, X.; Tian, X.; Huo, X.; Raka iya ham, K.; Shahidi, F.; Zhu, B. E alua ion o he S abili y o Ty osol Es e s du ing in Vi o Gas oin es inal Diges ion. Food Func . 2018,9, 3610−3616. Jou nal o Ag icul u al and Food Chemis y pubs.acs.o g/JAFC A icle h ps://doi.o g/10.1021/acs.ja c.1c05373 J. Ag ic. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 14165−14175 14173