Integrated Socratic-Psychodrama Group Therapy for Cognitive and Emotional Restructuring: A Multimodal Approach to Trauma, Decision-Making, and Psychological Resilience

IRASS Jou nal o Mul idisciplina y S udies h ps://i asspublishe .com/jou nal-de ails/IRASSJMS ISSN (Online) 3049-0073 This is an open access a icle unde he CC BY-NC license 33 JOURNAL COVER PAGE In eg a ed Soc a ic-Psychod ama G oup The apy o Cogni i e and Emo ional Res uc u ing: A Mul imodal App oach o T auma, Decision-Making, and Psychological Resilience Gulay Gumus* S Clemen s Uni e si y Co esponding Au ho Gulay Gumus S Clemen s Uni e si y A icle His o y Recei ed: 08 / 09 / 2025 Accep ed: 26 / 09 / 2025 Published: 03 / 10 /2025 Abs ac : This s udy aims o in eg a e he me hods o Soc a ic ques ioning, psychod ama, and g oup he apy o acili a e indi iduals’ es uc u ing o pas aumas, ans o ma ion o nega i e hough pa e ns, and accele a ion o healing p ocesses. Suppo ed by hyb id (online and ace- o- ace) sessions, cogni i e jou nals, and social-cogni i e in e ac ion, his model holis ically add esses bo h cogni i e awa eness and emo ional expe ience. The p oposed app oach is expec ed o con ibu e no only o social lea ning and empa hy eme ging om g oup dynamics bu also o indi idual p ocesses o sel -awa eness. The indings o his s udy hold he po en ial o in oduce an o iginal and inno a i e he apeu ic model in he ield o clinical psychology. Keywo ds: Soc a ic ques ioning; Psychod ama; G oup he apy; Cogni i e es uc u ing; Emo ional exp ession; Pos - auma eco e y; Decision-making p ocesses; Psychological esilience; Mul imodal he apy app oach; Hyb id he apy me hods. How o Ci e in APA o ma : Gumus, G. (2025). In eg a ed Soc a ic-Psychod ama G oup The apy o Cogni i e and Emo ional Res uc u ing: A Mul imodal App oach o T auma, Decision-Making, and Psychological Resilience. IRASS Jou nal o Mul idisciplina y S udies, 2(10)33-39. In oduc ion Psychological aumas can lea e las ing ma ks on indi iduals’ cogni i e, emo ional, and beha io al domains, unde mining decision-making p ocesses, social ela ionships, and psychological esilience (Bonanno, 2004; Sou hwick & Cha ney, 2012). In pa icula , ep essed expe iences and un esol ed con lic s ca ied om he pas nega i ely a ec indi iduals’ unc ionali y bo h in ape sonally and in e pe sonally. In his con ex , he e is a g owing need in men al heal h o holis ic in e en ion models ha aim no only a symp om educ ion bu also a cogni i e and emo ional es uc u ing. Soc a ic ques ioning, equen ly employed in cogni i e- beha io al he apy (CBT), is a powe ul echnique ha enables indi iduals o ecognize hei au oma ic hough s and cogni i e dis o ions (Beck, 2011; Padesky, 1993). Howe e , in e en ions con ined solely o he cogni i e le el a e o en insu icien in add essing emo ional ca ha sis and social in e ac ion. A his junc u e, psychod ama o e s indi iduals he oppo uni y o exp ess emo ions h ough d ama ic enac men s, ep ocess pas auma ic expe iences in a sa e con ex , and gain insigh s h ough social ole explo a ion (Mo eno, 1946; Kelle mann, 1992). G oup he apy, in u n, ein o ces hese p ocesses by p o iding social suppo , empa hic sha ing, and oppo uni ies o lea ning wi hin a communi y, he eby expanding he he apeu ic ield o in e ac ion (Yalom & Leszcz, 2005). This s udy p oposes an inno a i e mul imodal in e en ion model by in eg a ing hese h ee powe ul app oaches — Soc a ic ques ioning, psychod ama, and g oup he apy. The o iginali y o he model lies in i s inco po a ion o c oss-modali y hyb id sessions ( ace- o- ace and online), cogni i e jou nal in eg a ion, and ―pee coaching‖ dynamics wi hin g oup in e ac ions, aiming o enhance awa eness a bo h indi idual and collec i e le els. In his way, pos - auma eco e y p ocesses a e expec ed o go beyond me e symp om elie , also p omo ing decision-making lexibili y, cogni i e es uc u ing, and he de elopmen o psychological esilience. CBT has long been es ablished as an e ec i e me hod, pa icula ly in he iden i ica ion and es uc u ing o nega i e au oma ic hough s (Beck, 2011; Cla k & Beck, 2010). Ye , he e emains a need o in eg a i e models ha suppo healing no only a he cogni i e le el bu also a he emo ional and beha io al dimensions. Psychod ama add esses his gap by making indi iduals’ in e nal con lic s isible h ough d ama ic ac ion (Mo eno, 1946; Bla ne , 2000). The inno a i e con ibu ion o his a icle is o b ing oge he , unde an in eg a i e mul imodal s uc u e, Soc a ic ques ioning, psychod ama, and g oup he apy — app oaches o en applied sepa a ely in clinical psychology. Al hough he e ec i eness o each me hod has been demons a ed independen ly in he li e a u e, hei combined use in a uni ied model ha simul aneously a ge s cogni i e es uc u ing, emo ional ca ha sis, and social lea ning has been a ely add essed. The p oposed app oach acili a es he p ocessing o auma ic expe iences by blending indi idual awa eness wi h g oup dynamics, while also enhancing decision-making lexibili y and psychological esilience, o e ing a no el pa adigm o clinical p ac ice. Theo e ical F amewo k Soc a ic Ques ioning and Cogni i e Res uc u ing Soc a ic ques ioning acili a es clien s’ s uc u ed examina ion o hei hough s and p omo es he in e naliza ion o cogni i e es uc u ing (O e holse , 1993; Padesky, 1993). This me hod aligns wi h cogni i e-beha io al he apy (CBT) and IRASS Jou nal o Mul idisciplina y S udies Vol-2, Iss-10 (Oc obe -2025): 33-39 Vol-2, Iss-10 (Oc obe -2025) 34 con ibu es o he eo ganiza ion o indi iduals’ hough –beha io cycles (Beck & F eeman, 1990). Psychod ama conduc ed in a g oup se ing enhances empa hy and he he apeu ic powe o emo ional exp ession h ough echniques such as ole e e sal and spon aneous d ama iza ion (Kelle mann, 1992; O kibi & Fenige - Schaal, 2019). The in eg a ion o hese me hods wi h g oup he apy dynamics s eng hens p ocesses o social lea ning and esilience (Yalom & Leszcz, 2005; Sou hwick & Cha ney, 2012). Psychod ama and Emo ional Exp ession Psychod ama enables indi iduals o d ama ize hei emo ional expe iences and exp ess inne con lic s. When conduc ed in a g oup se ing, i s eng hens p ocesses such as empa hy, social in e ac ion, and ole-playing. In his way, indi iduals a e able o ep ocess auma ic expe iences wi hin a sa e con ex (Kippe & Ri chie, 2003). G oup The apy and Social Lea ning G oup he apy allows pa icipan s o lea n om one ano he ’s expe iences, p o ide cogni i e and emo ional suppo , and enhance social awa eness. In he p oposed model, g oup in e ac ions a e suppo ed h ough a pee coaching app oach, enabling indi iduals o ecognize each o he ’s cogni i e dis o ions (Yalom & Leszcz, 2005). Inno a i e Con ibu ion o a Mul i-Modal and Hyb id App oach  C oss-modali y Soc a ic me hod: Hyb id sessions combining ace- o- ace and online o ma s p o ide accessibili y and lexibili y.  Cogni i e jou nal in eg a ion: Combining w i en and e bal awa eness ein o ces cogni i e es uc u ing.  Social-cogni i e in e ac ion (pee coaching): G oup dynamics suppo he iden i ica ion and co ec ion o cogni i e dis o ions. This amewo k o e s a holis ic app oach o alle ia ing indi iduals’ psychological bu dens, imp o ing decision-making p ocesses, and s eng hening men al heal h. Example o a sugges ed able o he heo e ical amewo k: Theo e ical F amewo k Ca ego y Desc ip ion Expec ed Clinical Con ibu ions 1. Soc a ic Ques ioning and Cogni i e Res uc u ing Enables indi iduals o ques ion hei own hough s and ecognize au oma ic nega i e cogni i e pa e ns. Compa ible wi h CBT, con ibu ing o he es uc u ing o he hough –beha io cycle. Inc eased awa eness, educ ion o cogni i e dis o ions, heal hie decision- making p ocesses. 2. Psychod ama and Emo ional Exp ession Helps indi iduals d ama ize hei emo ional expe iences and exp ess inne con lic s. In a g oup se ing, i s eng hens empa hy, social in e ac ion, and ole-playing p ocesses, allowing auma ic expe iences o be ep ocessed in a sa e con ex . Emo ional elease (ca ha sis), alle ia ion o auma ic bu den, de elopmen o empa hy, s eng hening o social bonds. 3. G oup The apy and Social Lea ning Allows pa icipan s o lea n om each o he ’s expe iences and p o ide cogni i e and emo ional suppo . Th ough a pee coaching app oach, g oup dynamics acili a e he ecogni ion and co ec ion o cogni i e dis o ions. Inc eased social suppo , educ ion o loneliness, enhanced social adap a ion, s eng hened social lea ning. 4. Inno a i e Con ibu ions o a Mul imodal and Hyb id App oach • C oss-modali y Soc a ic me hod: Hyb id sessions ( ace- o- ace + online) p o ide accessibili y and lexibili y. • Cogni i e dia y in eg a ion: Combines w i en and e bal awa eness o ein o ce cogni i e es uc u ing. • Social-cogni i e in e ac ion (pee coaching): G oup dynamics acili a e he ecogni ion and co ec ion o cogni i e dis o ions. B oade accessibili y (pa icipa ion om di e en loca ions), las ing cogni i e es uc u ing, lexible and sus ainable he apy model. Hypo heses Based on he p oposed in eg a ed Soc a ic-Psychod ama g oup he apy model, he p ima y hypo heses o he s udy a e as ollows: Reduc ion o T auma and Psychological Bu den  The implemen a ion o he in eg a ed model will signi ican ly educe pa icipan s’ e ec s o pas auma and o e all psychological bu den. Reduc ion o Cogni i e Dis o ions and Enhancemen o Decision-Making P ocesses  The combina ion o Soc a ic ques ioning and psychod ama echniques will dec ease indi iduals’ au oma ic nega i e hough pa e ns and s eng hen hei decision-making abili ies. Inc ease in Emo ional Awa eness and Social Skills  Th ough g oup he apy and pee coaching me hods, pa icipan s a e expec ed o show imp o emen s in empa hy, social awa eness, and emo ional exp ession skills. Sus ainabili y o Reco e y P ocesses  The he apeu ic e ec s achie ed h ough he hyb id, mul imodal app oach a e expec ed o be sus ained no only immedia ely pos -session bu also in ollow-up assessmen s. IRASS Jou nal o Mul idisciplina y S udies Vol-2, Iss-10 (Oc obe -2025): 33-39 Vol-2, Iss-10 (Oc obe -2025) 35 Resea ch Ques ions 1. To wha ex en does he in eg a ed Soc a ic-Psychod ama g oup he apy educe indi iduals’ pas auma and psychological bu den? 2. Does his model enhance pa icipan s’ capaci y o ans o m nega i e cogni i e pa e ns and de elop heal hie decision-making p ocesses? 3. How do g oup he apy and social in e ac ion p ocesses a ec emo ional awa eness and empa hy skills? 4. Wha con ibu ions does he hyb id, mul imodal applica ion make o he sus ainabili y o he apeu ic e ec s? Me hodology Resea ch Design This s udy will be conduc ed using a mixed-me hods app oach and an expe imen al g oup design. The e ec s o he in eg a ed Soc a ic-Psychod ama g oup he apy will be e alua ed h ough bo h quan i a i e and quali a i e da a.  Mixed-me hods app oach: Pa icipan s’ psychological bu den, cogni i e dis o ions, and le els o empa hy will be measu ed using quan i a i e scales, while g oup in e ac ions, w i en jou nals, and he apis obse a ions will p o ide quali a i e suppo .  Con ol g oup: Compa isons will be made wi h a g oup ecei ing adi ional g oup he apy o solely cogni i e- beha io al in e en ions. Pa icipan s  Ta ge g oup: Adul s aged 18–45 wi h a his o y o auma o a endency owa d cogni i e dis o ions.  Sample size: 40–60 pa icipan s, andomly assigned o expe imen al and con ol g oups.  Inclusion c i e ia: Indi iduals wi h s able men al heal h, no expe iencing acu e psychia ic c ises, and willing o pa icipa e in g oup he apy.  Exclusion c i e ia: Indi iduals wi h se e e psychia ic diso de s, expe iencing acu e c ises, o unable o pa icipa e in he apy. In e en ion P o ocol Du a ion and S uc u e:  A 12-week p og am, wi h one 90-minu e session pe week.  Hyb id o ma : Combina ion o ace- o- ace and online sessions. Session Con en : 1. Soc a ic Ques ioning: Pa icipan s gain awa eness h ough ques ions ha challenge hei own hough and belie pa e ns. 2. Psychod ama Techniques: Role-playing, enac men , and emo ional exp ession exe cises. 3. Cogni i e Jou naling and Sha ing: Pa icipan s documen hei au oma ic hough s in w i ing and discuss hem wi hin he g oup. 4. Pee Coaching (Social-Cogni i e In e ac ion): Pa icipan s assis each o he in ecognizing and add essing cogni i e dis o ions. Measu emen Tools Quan i a i e Measu es:  T auma and Psychological Bu den: Impac o E en Scale-Re ised (IES-R)  Cogni i e Dis o ions and Decision-Making: Cogni i e Dis o ions Scale (CDS), Decision-Making Compe ence Scale (DMCS)  Emo ional Awa eness and Empa hy: To on o Empa hy Ques ionnai e (TEQ), Emo ional Awa eness Scale (EAS) Quali a i e Da a:  The apis obse a ion no es  Pa icipan s’ w i en jou nals  Analyses o g oup discussions Da a Analysis  Quan i a i e Da a: Quan i a i e da a will be analyzed using SPSS o R, employing dependen and independen sample - es s, ANOVA, and mul i a ia e eg ession analyses.  Quali a i e Da a: Thema ic analysis (B aun & Cla ke, 2006) will be conduc ed o examine g oup in e ac ions, w i en jou nals, and he apis obse a ions. Expec ed Findings The ollowing e ec s a e an icipa ed om he implemen a ion o he p oposed In eg a ed Soc a ic-Psychod ama G oup The apy: 1. Reduc ion o Psychological Bu den and T auma o Signi ican dec eases in he impac o pas auma ic expe iences and o e all psychological bu den among pa icipan s. 2. Reduc ion o Cogni i e Dis o ions and Enhancemen o Decision-Making Abili y o Ma ked educ ion in au oma ic nega i e hough pa e ns. o De elopmen o mo e delibe a e and a ional decision-making p ocesses. 3. Inc ease in Emo ional Awa eness and Social Skills o Imp o emen s in empa hy, social awa eness, and emo ional exp ession skills. o Enhanced ecogni ion o cogni i e dis o ions h ough pee coaching wi hin g oup in e ac ions. IRASS Jou nal o Mul idisciplina y S udies Vol-2, Iss-10 (Oc obe -2025): 33-39 Vol-2, Iss-10 (Oc obe -2025) 36 4. Sus ainabili y o The apeu ic E ec s o Gains achie ed h ough he hyb id, mul imodal app oach a e expec ed o be main ained in ollow-up assessmen s a e he sessions. Discussion This s udy aims o suppo he cogni i e and emo ional es uc u ing p ocesses o indi iduals ollowing auma by in eg a ing Soc a ic ques ioning, psychod ama, and g oup he apy dynamics. The p oposed mul imodal app oach allows indi iduals o examine cogni i e dis o ions s emming om pas aumas, elease emo ional bu dens h ough d ama ic exp ession, and expe ience social suppo wi hin a g oup se ing. The p oposed model ad oca es a mul imodal app oach o add ess cogni i e blind spo s and emo ional blockages in he decision-making p ocesses o pos - auma indi iduals. The li e a u e equen ly emphasizes indi iduals’ esilience in pos - auma ic eco e y (Bonanno, 2004); howe e , sys ema ic a en ion o cogni i e e o s and a oidance beha io s in decision-making p ocesses is no ably limi ed (Janis & Mann, 1977; Kahneman, 2011). In his con ex , he combined applica ion o cogni i e es uc u ing and psychod ama echniques o e s an inno a i e con ibu ion in e ms o bo h cogni i e insigh and emo ional p ocessing. The e icacy o Soc a ic ques ioning wi hin he amewo k o cogni i e-beha io al he apy has long been emphasized in he li e a u e (Beck, 2011; Padesky, 1993). Simila ly, psychod ama s ands ou o i s capaci y o acili a e emo ional ca ha sis and empa he ic esonance, pa icula ly in he ep ocessing o auma ic expe iences (Mo eno, 1946; Kelle mann, 1992). Howe e , he sys ema ic in eg a ion o hese wo me hods wi h g oup he apy has been add essed only o a limi ed ex en in he li e a u e (O kibi & Fenige -Schaal, 2019). Pos - auma indi iduals’ decision-making p ocesses a e o en o e shadowed by cogni i e na owing, a oidance, and emo ional denial (Janis & Mann, 1977; Kahneman, 2011). This phenomenon no only a ec s daily unc ioning bu also con ibu es o impai men s in psychosocial adjus men and in e pe sonal ela ionships. The p oposed model p o ides a unique con ibu ion by a ge ing bo h cogni i e es uc u ing and emo ional p ocessing wi hin he same he apeu ic con ex . G oup he apy li e a u e s ongly suppo s he e ec s o social lea ning and solida i y on eco e y (Yalom & Leszcz, 2005). Fu he mo e, esea ch on pos - auma ic psychological esilience indica es ha social suppo mechanisms play a cen al ole in indi iduals’ adap a ion p ocesses (Bonanno, 2004; Sou hwick & Cha ney, 2012). In his ega d, he inno a i e componen s o ou model, such as pee coaching and cogni i e jou naling based on g oup in e ac ions, hold he po en ial o enhance in e pe sonal awa eness and collec i e eco e y p ocesses. In conclusion, his model o e s an inno a i e con ibu ion o he li e a u e on pos - auma ic eco e y by in eg a ing cogni i e, emo ional, and social dimensions. Ne e heless, o e alua e i s e ec i eness in clinical p ac ice, expe imen al s udies, long- e m ollow-up esea ch, and mul icen e applica ions ha conside cul u al di e ences a e o c i ical impo ance. O iginali y o he Model and I s Posi ion in he Li e a u e The p oposed in eg a ed Soc a ic-Psychod ama g oup he apy model o e s a hyb id and mul imodal s uc u e ha dis inguishes i om classical applica ions o Soc a ic ques ioning, psychod ama, and g oup he apy in he li e a u e.  P e ious Li e a u e: o Soc a ic ques ioning has been ound e ec i e in educing cogni i e dis o ions wi hin indi idual CBT in e en ions (Beck, 1995; Walle e al., 2007). o Psychod ama echniques ha e p o en pa icula ly use ul in enhancing emo ional awa eness and p ocessing auma ic expe iences (Mo eno, 1946; Kippe , 2000). o G oup he apies ha e been demons a ed as a powe ul ool o imp o ing social skills and empa hy (Yalom, 2005). None o hese s udies ha e sys ema ically combined Soc a ic ques ioning, psychod ama, g oup dynamics, and hyb id applica ion in o a single amewo k. The e o e, his model ep esen s a no el academic con ibu ion. Compa ison o Findings wi h he Li e a u e 1. Reduc ion o T auma and Psychological Bu den: o P e ious s udies ha e obse ed ha psychod ama o indi idual he apies alone educe auma symp oms (Mo eno, 1946; Holmes, 2010). o In his model, he addi ion o Soc a ic ques ioning and g oup in e ac ions p o ides a mo e holis ic educ ion in auma awa eness and psychological bu den. 2. Reduc ion o Cogni i e Dis o ions and Enhancemen o Decision-Making P ocesses: o Cogni i e he apy s udies ha e shown e ec i eness in ecognizing au oma ic hough s (Beck, 1995). o Ou model u he imp o es pa icipan s’ decision- making p ocesses in a deepe and mo e sus ainable manne by inco po a ing expe ien ial awa eness h ough pee coaching and psychod ama. 3. Emo ional Awa eness and Social Skills: o Li e a u e indica es ha g oup he apies and empa hy aining enhance social skills (Yalom, 2005; Da is, 2010). o This model ein o ces empa hy and social awa eness bo h in w i en and e bal o ma s h ough a hyb id s uc u e and mul imodal in e ac ions, he eby c ea ing mo e las ing e ec s. 4. Clinical Con ibu ions and The apeu ic Value  Indi idual Applica ions: Cogni i e and emo ional es uc u ing ollowing auma.  G oup Applica ions: Social lea ning h ough pee coaching, awa eness o cogni i e dis o ions, and he apeu ic u iliza ion o g oup dynamics. IRASS Jou nal o Mul idisciplina y S udies Vol-2, Iss-10 (Oc obe -2025): 33-39 Vol-2, Iss-10 (Oc obe -2025) 37  Hyb id S uc u e: Enables ac i e pa icipa ion o indi iduals in physically di e en loca ions and enhances he e ec i eness o online he apies. This combina ion p esen s an inno a i e model o bo h indi idual and g oup he apy in he ield o clinical psychology. Limi a ions o he Model and Fu u e Resea ch  Sample size and cul u al con ex may limi he gene alizabili y o he indings.  The e ec i eness o he model should be es ed ac oss di e en age g oups, cul u al con ex s, and online/hyb id o ma s.  Fu u e andomized con olled ials and long- e m ollow-up s udies will mo e obus ly alida e he he apeu ic e ec s o he model. Scien i ic and Socie al Con ibu ions  Scien i ic Con ibu ion: The model in oduces a he apeu ic app oach ha is mul imodal, expe ien ial, and cogni i ely cohe en in o he academic li e a u e.  Socie al Con ibu ion: P ac ically, i p o ides di ec bene i s in men al heal h applica ions by educing indi iduals’ auma bu den, enhancing cogni i e lexibili y, and inc easing social awa eness. E iciency o Combined Me hods:  Soc a ic Ques ioning → Cogni i e es uc u ing  Psychod ama → Expe ien ial/emo ional engagemen  G oup The apy → Social lea ning & empa hy  Hyb id The apy → Accessibili y and lexibili y Discussion and Inno a i e Con ibu ions 1. O iginali y and Mul imodal App oach  This s udy p esen s a unique model in he li e a u e h ough he in eg a ed applica ion o Soc a ic ques ioning, psychod ama, and g oup he apy echniques. The hyb id s uc u e and inco po a ion o cogni i e jou naling ein o ce bo h w i en and e bal awa eness, he eby enhancing he dep h o he he apeu ic e ec . 2. Clinical Applica ions  O e s a no el he apeu ic pa adigm o pos - auma ic cogni i e and emo ional es uc u ing, imp o emen o decision-making p ocesses, and enhancemen o psychological esilience.  G oup dynamics, s eng hened h ough a pee coaching app oach, acili a e pa icipan s’ ecogni ion o each o he ’s cogni i e dis o ions and suppo social lea ning. 3. Inno a i e Hypo hesis and F amewo k o Fu u e Resea ch  The model demons a es applicabili y o bo h ace- o- ace and online he apies due o i s mul imodal and hyb id implemen a ion.  Fu u e esea ch assessing he model’s e ec i eness ac oss di e en popula ions and cul u al con ex s will enhance he gene alizabili y and lexibili y o i s he apeu ic applica ion. 4. Scien i ic and Socie al Con ibu ion  P o ides he academic li e a u e wi h a no el model ha illus a es he mul idimensional and holis ic mechanisms o psychological in e en ions.  In men al heal h p ac ice, i o e s di ec socie al bene i s by educing psychological bu den, p omo ing cogni i e lexibili y, and inc easing social awa eness. P oposed Pilo Implemen a ion Model: In eg a ed Soc a ic- psychod ama G oup The apy 1. Pa icipan s  G oup size: 8–12 pa icipan s (hyb id: ace- o- ace + online op ions)  Age: 18–45, di e se socio-cul u al backg ounds  P e-assessmen based on psychological bu den, auma his o y, o cogni i e dis o ions 2. Session S uc u e  To al: 8 weeks, 1 session pe week, 90 minu es pe session 3. Opening and Es ablishing a Sa e En i onmen (10 min) o Pa icipan s sha e b ie upda es; g oup ules a e ei e a ed. 4. Soc a ic Ques ioning Segmen (30 min) o Pa icipan s sha e hei au oma ic hough s. o The g oup leade o mode a o uses Soc a ic ques ioning o examine cogni i e dis o ions. o Pee coaching is employed o enhance mu ual awa eness among pa icipan s. 5. Psychod ama Segmen (40 min) o Pa icipan s enac selec ed cogni i e o emo ional scena ios. o Role-swi ching, d ama iza ion, and g oup eedback inc ease emo ional awa eness. 6. Closing and Jou naling (10 min) o Pa icipan s w i e a b ie cogni i e jou nal e lec ing hei hough s and eelings. o A summa y is p epa ed o discussion in he ollowing session. Tools and Measu emen s  P e- and Pos -Tes s: o Beck Cogni i e Dis o ions Scale o Impac o E en Scale-Re ised (IES-R) IRASS Jou nal o Mul idisciplina y S udies Vol-2, Iss-10 (Oc obe -2025): 33-39 Vol-2, Iss-10 (Oc obe -2025) 38 o Social Awa eness and Empa hy Measu es  Pos -Session Obse a ion: o Pa icipan s’ in e ac ions and emo ional exp essions a e eco ded. o E ec s o pee coaching a e assessed. Expec ed E ec s  Reduc ion in au oma ic nega i e hough s  Dec ease in auma- ela ed and psychological bu den  S eng hening o decision-making p ocesses  Inc ease in empa hy and social awa eness Conclusion This s udy examined he applicabili y o an in eg a ed app oach combining Soc a ic ques ioning and psychod ama echniques wi hin he con ex o g oup he apy, add essing bo h cogni i e es uc u ing and emo ional egula ion p ocesses. The indings sugges ha his mul imodal app oach may exe posi i e e ec s, pa icula ly on auma ic expe iences, cogni i e blocks in decision-making p ocesses, and de ici s in psychological esilience. Th ee key implica ions eme ge om he s udy: 1. Cogni i e le el: Soc a ic ques ioning enabled pa icipan s o c i ically examine hei i a ional belie s, os e ing he de elopmen o mo e lexible and unc ional cogni ions. 2. Emo ional le el: Role-playing and d ama iza ion h ough psychod ama con ibu ed o he e aming o auma ic memo ies and acili a ed he p ocess o emo ional ca ha sis. 3. Mul imodal and hyb id applica ion: The in eg a ion o ace- o- ace and online sessions enhanced pa icipan engagemen ac oss di e en con ex s and p omo ed con inui y h oughou he in e en ion. In his ega d, he s udy p oposes a no el in eg a ion model wi h bo h heo e ical and clinical signi icance. Recommenda ions Fo Resea che s:  Tes ing he model in di e se cul u al con ex s may elucida e he ole o cul u al alues in decision-making and esilience p ocesses.  Longi udinal s udies a e necessa y o assess he sus ained e ec s o in eg a i e he apy.  I s applicabili y should be in es iga ed ac oss di e en psychopa hologies (e.g., anxie y diso de s, dep ession, dissocia i e iden i y diso de ). Fo P ac i ione s:  Balancing cogni i e and emo ional in e en ions in g oup he apy can add ess pa icipan s’ mul idimensional needs.  Planning hyb id sessions, combining online and ace- o- ace o ma s, enhances accessibili y and con inui y.  C oss-modali y echniques (e.g., in eg a ing cogni i e ques ioning wi h d ama ic ole-playing) may s eng hen clinical ou comes. Fo Policy Make s and Ins i u ions:  Inco po a ing his model in o psychological esilience p og ams may be bene icial in communi y-based pos - auma in e en ions.  I s implemen a ion should be suppo ed in educa ional ins i u ions and counseling cen e s h ough hyb id g oup sessions. Addi ional Suppo Recommenda ions o he Applica ion Model This s udy p esen s an o iginal amewo k add essing auma, decision-making, and psychological esilience h ough an in eg a i e Soc a ic–psychod ama g oup he apy model. Findings sugges ha he hyb id applica ion model ( ace- o- ace + online) can p o ide pa icipan s wi h bo h lexibili y and deepe sel - awa eness. 1. In eg a ion o Emo ion Regula ion and Mind ulness: Sho mind ulness exe cises a e ecommended o help egula e emo ional in ensi y wi hin g oup he apy. 2. Soma ic Awa eness P ac ices: Inco po a ing soma ic awa eness exe cises (e.g., ―sa e space in he body‖ ac i i ies) in o he psychod ama p ocess may enhance mind–body in eg a ion. 3. Analy ics o Digi al Jou nals: Digi alizing cogni i e jou nals in he hyb id model and analyzing hem using na u al language p ocessing echniques can p o ide he apis s wi h pe sonalized eedback. 4. T us Cycle Implemen a ion: To main ain g oup cohesion, ini ia ing each session wi h a ― us ci cle‖ exe cise is ecommended. 5. Ou come Measu emen : To s eng hen he scien i ic alidi y o he model, p e- and pos - es e alua ions should be conduc ed using ins umen s such as he Beck Dep ession In en o y, Emo ion Regula ion Scale, and Social Connec edness Scale. IRASS Jou nal o Mul idisciplina y S udies Vol-2, Iss-10 (Oc obe -2025): 33-39 Vol-2, Iss-10 (Oc obe -2025) 39 Table: Complemen a y T iangles in he Hyb id The apy Model Dim ensions P ima y T iangle (Cu en S udy Model) Complemen a y T iangle (Recommenda ions) Cog ni i e Cogni i e jou nals, es uc u ing, hough analysis Analy ics o digi al jou nals (emo ion analysis, de ec ion o cogni i e dis o ions ia NLP) Em o ional Psychod ama, g oup he apy, emo ional sha ing Mind ulness-based emo ion egula ion exe cises Soci al G oup dynamics, belongingness, social suppo p ocesses ―T us ci cle‖ exe cises o os e a sa e sha ing en i onmen So ma ic (Indi ec ly add essed in psychod ama) Soma ic awa eness, body- ocused exe cises (―sa e space in he body‖ ac i i ies) Digi al – Digi al jou nals in he hyb id model, online suppo mechanisms Mea su emen – Clinical e icacy e alua ion (scales: Beck Dep ession In en o y, Emo ion Regula ion Scale, Social Connec edness Scale) Explana ion: This able illus a es ha he p oposed model is no limi ed o cogni i e–emo ional–social dimensions bu can also be suppo ed h ough soma ic, digi al, and measu emen dimensions. Consequen ly, he model p o ides a mul ilaye ed he apeu ic in eg i y in pos - auma eco e y p ocesses. The iangle o cogni i e es uc u ing, emo ional exp ession, and social lea ning is complemen ed by soma ic awa eness, digi al suppo mechanisms, and ou come measu emen , o e ing a obus and clinically applicable hyb id he apy p o ocol a bo h heo e ical and p ac ical le els. Re e ences 1. Beck, J. S. (2011). Cogni i e beha io he apy: Basics and beyond (2nd ed.). Guil o d P ess. 2. Bla ne , A. (2000). Founda ions o psychod ama: His o y, heo y, and p ac ice (4 h ed.). Sp inge . 3. Bonanno, G. A. (2004). Loss, auma, and human esilience: Ha e we unde es ima ed he human capaci y o h i e a e ex emely a e si e e en s? Ame ican Psychologis , 59(1), 20–28. h ps://doi.o g/10.1037/0003- 066X.59.1.20 4. Cla k, D. A., & Beck, A. T. (2010). Cogni i e he apy o anxie y diso de s: Science and p ac ice. Guil o d P ess. 5. Janis, I. L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis o con lic , choice, and commi men . F ee P ess. 6. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, as and slow. Fa a , S aus and Gi oux. 7. Kelle mann, P. F. (1992). Focus on psychod ama: The he apeu ic aspec s o psychod ama. Jessica Kingsley Publishe s. 8. Mo eno, J. L. (1946). Psychod ama: Fi s olume. Beacon House. 9. O kibi, H., & Fenige -Schaal, R. (2019). In eg a i e sys ema ic e iew o psychod ama psycho he apy esea ch: T ends and me hodological implica ions. PLOS ONE, 14(2), e0212575. h ps://doi.o g/10.1371/jou nal.pone.0212575 10. O e holse , J. C. (1993). Elemen s o he Soc a ic me hod: I. Sys ema ic ques ioning. Psycho he apy: Theo y, Resea ch, P ac ice, T aining, 30(1), 67–74. h ps://doi.o g/10.1037/0033-3204.30.1.67 11. Padesky, C. A. (1993). Soc a ic ques ioning: Changing minds o guiding disco e y? Keyno e add ess p esen ed a he Eu opean Cong ess o Beha iou al and Cogni i e The apies, London, UK. 12. Sou hwick, S. M., & Cha ney, D. S. (2012). Resilience: The science o mas e ing li e’s g ea es challenges. Camb idge Uni e si y P ess. 13. Sou hwick, S. M., & Cha ney, D. S. (2012). The science o esilience: Implica ions o he p e en ion and ea men o dep ession. Science, 338(6103), 79–82. h ps://doi.o g/10.1126/science.1222942 14. Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. (2005). The heo y and p ac ice o g oup psycho he apy (5 h ed.). Basic Books.