scieee Open visual document viewer

Students' insights on the objective structured practical examination as an assessment tool for undergraduates

Ismail, Faiza; Habib, Safia; Singh, Yogendra; Ahmed, Istiaque; Moin, Shagufta

Abstract

Background & Objective: The Objective Structured Practical Examination (OSPE) is mandatory for undergraduate and postgraduate medical examinations. This is an important component of formative and summative examinations proposed by the National Medical Council, India. OSPE helps evaluate the practical skills of the students in real-time settings. This approach is an innovative method for evaluating and delivering medical education. Moreover, it helps to bring objectivity to the evaluation process. Most studies identify the OSPE as a tailored technique for assessing performance in a realistic educational setting. However, understanding students' perspectives is now a critical need. OSPE relies on a predetermined checklist, which effectively reduces examiner bias. To fully utilize its potential, it is necessary to bridge the current knowledge gap regarding students' perspectives toward the conduct of OSPE. The study aims to gain insights into students' viewpoints, which could help refine and enhance OSPE, making it a more effective assessment tool. Materials & Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to identify the characteristics of the respondents. A structured restricted Google questionnaire was given to collect feedback from MBBS phase I students in the 2023 batch at Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, on various components of the OSPE. Out of 150 students, 132 provided responses. Data analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel Professional Plus 2016 and R Version 4.3.3. The data obtained was analyzed using descriptive statistics, and the frequency distribution was presented in pie charts and percentages. A chi-square test was done, and data was considered significant at p-value ≤ 0.001. Results: Out of the 132 students, approximately 31.1% were aware of OSPE beforehand. More than 80% reported that the instructions provided before the OSPE were clear and easy to understand. Around 96% felt that the time allocated for each station was sufficient. Additionally, 76% noted that the instructors' attitudes were more positive during the OSPE than traditional exams. Furthermore, 77.7% believed introducing OSPE would eliminate bias in assessment, and 89.4% felt that OSPE encouraged them to focus more on the practical examination. Conclusion: Students found OSPE a straightforward, bias-free, and aptitude-based mode of examination. OSPE appears to be a fine tool for assessment. It enhances students' laboratory competence and provides objective scores for the evaluation, making it an extremely viable assessment method.

Full text

Copy igh © 2025 Zanjan Uni e si y o Medical Sciences. Published by Zanjan Uni e si y o Medical Sciences. This wo k is licensed unde a C ea i e Commons A ibu ion-NonComme cial 4.0 In e na ional license (h ps://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by- nc/4.0/). Noncomme cial uses o he wo k a e pe mi ed, p o ided he o iginal wo k is p ope ly ci ed. S uden s' insigh s on he objec i e s uc u ed p ac ical examina ion as an assessmen ool o unde g adua es Faiza Ismail1, Sa ia Habib1, Yogend a Singh1, Is iaque Ahmed1, Shagu a Moin1 1Depa men o Biochemis y, J.N. Medical College, Facul y o Medicine, Aliga h Muslim Uni e si y, Aliga h, India. . A icle in o Abs ac In oduc ion Assessmen is a c ucial pa o e alua ing he knowledge and skill o a lea ne [1]. The e ha e been con inuous a emp s in medical educa ion o make assessmen s mo e objec i e and eliable. Con en ional me hods su e om a ious sho comings, like examine bias, lack o p ope communica ion skills and a i ude among s uden s, ailu e o iden i y and acknowledge hei sho comings, and absence o a sys ema ic and objec i e e alua ion o all he compe encies [2]. P ac ical examina ions a e i al in assessing non-clinical subjec s, making hem essen ial o cul i a ing and de eloping compe en physicians [3]. Keeping his poin in iew, medical colleges in he Uni ed Kingdom, he Uni ed S a es o Ame ica, and Canada adop ed he Objec i e S uc u ed P ac ical Examina ion (OSPE) as a s anda d assessmen me hod [4]. A s udy by Ha den and his colleagues iden i ied ha OSPE has he es o ime and has o e come he p oblems o con en ional p ac ical- ela ed examina ions [5]. One s udy epo ed ha OSPE was well-accep ed and ecei ed widesp ead app ecia ion Ismail e al. J Med Edu De . 2025; 18(2): 144-152 Jou nal o Medical Educa ion De elopmen Backg ound & Objec i e: The Objec i e S uc u ed P ac ical Examina ion (OSPE) is manda o y o unde g adua e and pos g adua e medical examina ions. This is an impo an componen o o ma i e and summa i e examina ions p oposed by he Na ional Medical Council, India. OSPE helps e alua e he p ac ical skills o he s uden s in eal- ime se ings. This app oach is an inno a i e me hod o e alua ing and deli e ing medical educa ion. Mo eo e , i helps o b ing objec i i y o he e alua ion p ocess. Mos s udies iden i y he OSPE as a ailo ed echnique o assessing pe o mance in a ealis ic educa ional se ing. Howe e , unde s anding s uden s' pe spec i es is now a c i ical need. OSPE elies on a p ede e mined checklis , which e ec i ely educes examine bias. To ully u ilize i s po en ial, i is necessa y o b idge he cu en knowledge gap ega ding s uden s' pe spec i es owa d he conduc o OSPE. The s udy aims o gain insigh s in o s uden s' iewpoin s, which could help e ine and enhance OSPE, making i a mo e e ec i e assessmen ool. Ma e ials & Me hods: A c oss-sec ional s udy was conduc ed o iden i y he cha ac e is ics o he esponden s. A s uc u ed es ic ed Google ques ionnai e was gi en o collec eedback om MBBS phase I s uden s in he 2023 ba ch a Jawaha lal Neh u Medical College, Aliga h Muslim Uni e si y, Aliga h, U a P adesh, on a ious componen s o he OSPE. Ou o 150 s uden s, 132 p o ided esponses. Da a analysis was pe o med using Mic oso Excel P o essional Plus 2016 and R Ve sion 4.3.3. The da a ob ained was analyzed using desc ip i e s a is ics, and he equency dis ibu ion was p esen ed in pie cha s and pe cen ages. A chi-squa e es was done, and da a was conside ed signi ican a p- alue ≤ 0.001. Resul s: Ou o he 132 s uden s, app oxima ely 31.1% we e awa e o OSPE be o ehand. Mo e han 80% epo ed ha he ins uc ions p o ided be o e he OSPE we e clea and easy o unde s and. A ound 96% el ha he ime alloca ed o each s a ion was su icien . Addi ionally, 76% no ed ha he ins uc o s' a i udes we e mo e posi i e du ing he OSPE han adi ional exams. Fu he mo e, 77.7% belie ed in oducing OSPE would elimina e bias in assessmen , and 89.4% el ha OSPE encou aged hem o ocus mo e on he p ac ical examina ion. Conclusion: S uden s ound OSPE a s aigh o wa d, bias- ee, and ap i ude-based mode o examina ion. OSPE appea s o be a ine ool o assessmen . I enhances s uden s' labo a o y compe ence and p o ides objec i e sco es o he e alua ion, making i an ex emely iable assessmen me hod. Keywo ds: objec i e s uc u ed p ac ical examina ion, assessmen ool, biochemis y, Google o ms *Co esponding au ho : Faiza Ismail, Depa men o Biochemis y, J.N. Medical College, Facul y o Medicine, Aliga h Muslim Uni e si y, Aliga h, India. Email: [email protected] B ie epo A icle his o y: Recei ed 28 Sep. 2024 Accep ed 23 Ap . 2025 Published 13 Jul. 2025 How o ci e his a icle: Ismail F, Habib S, Singh Y, Ahmed I, Moin Sh. S uden s' insigh s on he objec i e s uc u ed p ac ical examina ion as an assessmen ool o unde g adua es . J Med Edu De . 2025; 18(2): 144-152. [ DOI: 10.61882/edcj.18.2.144 ] [ Downloaded om edujou nal.zums.ac.i on 2025-10-03 ] 1 / 9 Ismail e al.: S uden s' insigh s on he objec i e s uc u ed p ac ical examina ion as an assessmen ool Jou nal o Medical Educa ion De elopmen ¦ Volume 18 ¦ Issue 2 ¦ 2025 145lopmen ¦ Volume 17 ¦ Issue 54¦ 2024 om s uden s who suppo ed i s implemen a ion. The same s udy also quo ed he ad an ages ha OSPE o e s o o ma i e (day- o-day) assessmen o s uden s o imp o e hei clinical compe ence and o de i e an objec i e sco e o in e nal assessmen [6]. Howley epo ed ha acul y eedback on OSPE iden i ied i as a be e ool o imp o ing s uden s' pe o mance and eaching me hodologies [7]. In 1975, Ha den e al. highligh ed he p omising ole o he OSCE in assessing basic clinical skills and es ablished i s eliabili y [2]. Mos o he s udies ied o e alua e OSPE as an assessmen ool o p ac ical examina ions and ied o compa e i wi h he adi ional me hods. Howe e , o ou knowledge, a ew s udies ocus on s uden s' pe spec i es ega ding OSPE [8]. Examina ions should be ai , comp ehensi e, and objec i e, as dic a ed by he discipline [9], and mus assess s uden s' knowledge, skills, and a i udes. The e o e, he assessmen me hods employed o e alua e s uden s' pe o mance in he Biochemis y labo a o y should connec o he cou se objec i es. In India, Compe ency-Based Medical Educa ion (CBME) was adop ed in Augus 2019, ini ially implemen ed o he Bachelo o Medicine and Bachelo o Su ge y (MBBS) ba ch admi ed in Phase I ( he i s yea o 2019) (h ps://www.nmc.o g.in/in o ma ion-desk/ o - colleges/ug-cu iculum/#).OSPE s a ions can assess a ious skills, including labo a o y p ocedu es, iden i ica ion, mic oscopic skills, and diagnos ic and applied medical aspec s [10]. This is an o ganized app oach o he s uden s o ecognize and iden i y hei de iciencies and e ine and en ich hei clinical abili ies [11]. Since OSPE is a new me hod o assessing p ac ical compe encies, engaging wi h s uden s and unde s anding hei expe iences and insigh s ega ding he en i e p ocess is essen ial. This app oach will help c ea e a ai , eliable, and e ec i e assessmen amewo k. By u ilizing s uden eedback, medical ins i u ions can imp o e how hei assessmen me hods align wi h he compe encies and enhance he s uden 's lea ning jou ney. In ligh o he indings and exis ing li e a u e, he au ho s aimed o analyze OSPE as a me hod o assessing p ac ical skills in biochemis y among i s -yea MBBS s uden s a Jawaha lal Neh u Medical College (JNMC), AMU. The s udy also sough o e alua e he e icacy o OSPE as a pedagogical ool. Hence, he p ima y goal o his esea ch was o gain and access s uden s' iews on OSPE as an e alua ion ool a an unde g adua e le el. Ma e ial & Me hods Design and se ing(s) The s udy included MBBS phase I s uden s admi ed o he 2023 ba ch a Jawaha lal Neh u Medical College, Aliga h Muslim Uni e si y, Aliga h, U a P adesh. These s uden s unde wen aining in bo h p ac ical and heo e ical opics, including all aspec s ou lined in he CBME cu iculum. Fu he , be o e implemen ing his e alua ion me hod, all acul y membe s in ol ed in i s design we e ho oughly b ie ed and sensi ized. S uden s we e also gi en an o ien a ion abou he p ocess in ad ance. They o a ed h ough se en s a ions, which included h ee skill-based s a ions, wo iden i ica ion (knowledge-based) s a ions, and wo diagnos ic s a ions (assessing knowledge, skills, and a i udes). The ime allo ed o each s a ion was 2 minu es (Figu e 1). All se en s a ions we e de eloped a e an in ensi e ocus g oup discussion among he acul y membe s in ol ed in OSPE, keeping in mind he alignmen o he ques ions, p ocedu es, o in e p e a ions a a ious s a ions wi h he compe encies s udied by he s uden s o da e. The whole OSPE ca ied 14 ma ks, wo o each s a ion. The e o e, i was decided by he Boa d o S udies o he depa men o o m 7 s a ions o wo ma ks each and assign a ime o 2 minu es. This is acco ding o he Na ional Medical Council guidelines. O ien a ion o s uden s and examine s is done be o e he s a o OSPE o amilia ize hem wi h he OPSE pe o mance and e alua ion p ocess. Se e al s eps a e in ol ed in designing and se ing OSPE s a ions. S uden s we e u he ins uc ed o o a e clockwise o ensu e hey a ended all s a ions. S ic measu es we e implemen ed o p e en communica ion among s uden s, ensu ing no in e ac ion be ween hose who had comple ed he OSPE and hose awai ing hei u n. Each OSPE s a ion included s uc u ed and objec i e ques ions, wi h acul y membe s obse ing and e alua ing s uden s a e e y s a ion using a p o ided checklis . The assessmen o p ocedu e s a ions was based on his checklis , while s uc u ed ques ions and co esponding key answe s we e c ea ed o each s a ion. The e ec i eness was assessed h ough se en sho assignmen s designed by he subjec expe . Each assignmen was amed acco ding o Bloom's axonomy. This ensu ed ha assessmen co e ed highe cogni i e skills o deepe lea ning and skills ans e o a wide spec um o applied biochemis y [12]. [ DOI: 10.61882/edcj.18.2.144 ] [ Downloaded om edujou nal.zums.ac.i on 2025-10-03 ] 2 / 9 Ismail e al.: S uden s' insigh s on he objec i e s uc u ed p ac ical examina ion as an assessmen ool 146 Jou nal o Medical Educa ion De elopmen ¦ Volume 18 ¦ Issue 2 ¦ 2025 Figu e 1. Depic s se -up o se en s a ions designed o OSPE O ien a ion o s uden s and examine s is done be o e he s a o OSPE o amilia ize hem wi h he OPSE pe o mance and e alua ion p ocess. Se e al s eps a e in ol ed in designing and se ing OSPE s a ions. S uden s we e u he ins uc ed o o a e clockwise o ensu e hey a ended all s a ions. S ic measu es we e implemen ed o p e en communica ion among s uden s, ensu ing no in e ac ion be ween hose who had comple ed he OSPE and hose awai ing hei u n. Each OSPE s a ion included s uc u ed and objec i e ques ions, wi h acul y membe s obse ing and e alua ing s uden s a e e y s a ion using a p o ided checklis . The assessmen o p ocedu e s a ions was based on his checklis , while s uc u ed ques ions and co esponding key answe s we e c ea ed o each s a ion. The e ec i eness was assessed h ough se en sho assignmen s designed by he subjec expe . Each assignmen was amed acco ding o Bloom's axonomy. This ensu ed ha assessmen co e ed highe cogni i e skills o deepe lea ning and skills ans e o a wide spec um o applied biochemis y [12]. The p ocedu al s a ions assessed p ac ical labo a o y skills, such as he quali a i e es ima ion o analy es ( o example, Hay's sul u es o bile sal s). In con as , he esponse s a ions ocused on highe cogni i e skills, e alua ing he applica ion o knowledge in clinical scena ios. These included asks such as in e p e ing lab epo s based on case scena ios o iden i ying and applying labo a o y ins umen s, all aligned wi h he cu iculum's lea ning objec i es. Pa icipan s and sampling One hund ed i y s uden s we e assessed o e h ee days, wi h a maximum o 50 s uden s e alua ed each day. Phase I MBBS s uden s o JNMC, AMU, who we e willing o pa icipa e om he admi ed ba ch o 2023, we e included in he s udy. S uden s om o he acul ies, di e en p o essional yea s, o he cou ses, and hose who op ed no o pa icipa e we e excluded. The sample size was calcula ed using a 95% con idence le el, a 5% signi icance le el, and a 3.5% ma gin o e o , ollowing he o mula p o ided below [13]. 𝑛 = 𝛸2 ×𝑁×𝑃×(1−𝑃) (𝑀𝐸2 ×(𝑁−1))÷(𝛸2 ×𝑃 ×(1 −𝑃)) Whe e: Χ2 = 3.842 a 1 deg ee o eedom and 5 % signi icance le el. N = 150 (Popula ion size) P = 0.5 (Popula ion p opo ion) [13] 1-P = 0.5 n = Sample size ME = 0.035 (Desi ed ma gin o e o ) The calcula ed sample size was 125, and he o al numbe o pa icipan s was 132 Tools/Ins umen s Google ques ionnai e links we e sen o 150 s uden s immedia ely a e hei hi d in e nal assessmen , well [ DOI: 10.61882/edcj.18.2.144 ] [ Downloaded om edujou nal.zums.ac.i on 2025-10-03 ] 3 / 9 Ismail e al.: S uden s' insigh s on he objec i e s uc u ed p ac ical examina ion as an assessmen ool Jou nal o Medical Educa ion De elopmen ¦ Volume 18 ¦ Issue 2 ¦ 2025 147lopmen ¦ Volume 17 ¦ Issue 54¦ 2024 be o e hei p o essional examina ions. (To assess he s uden 's pe cep ion o he o e all conduc o OPSE, ques ions 1-7 we e asked in he ques ionnai e wi h h ee al e na i es- Yes/No/Somewha . Fu he , o gi e an idea abou he speci ic s ance o pa icipan s on OSPE as an assessmen ool, s a emen s 8-11 we e gi en. S uden s we e ins uc ed o gi e hei opinion by ma king any one o he h ee op ions- Ag ee, Disag ee, o Neu al. Ques ion 12 was a closed-ended mul iple choice, wi h ou op ions based on he o e all e ec i eness o OSPE in judging he di e en skills o a lea ne ). The ques ionnai e was alida ed by in ol ing subjec expe s o check he ele ance and accu acy o he included ques ions and conduc ing a pilo s udy on 30 s uden s. The ques ionnai e's eliabili y coe icien was de e mined by calcula ing C onbach's alpha [14]. Da a collec ion me hods A Google ques ionnai e was adminis e ed o collec eedback om s uden s on a ious componen s o he OSPE. The ques ionnai e comp ised close-ended ques ions co e ing cogni i e, psychomo o , and highe - o de hinking domains and s uden s' o e all pe cep ion o OSPE as an assessmen ool. OSPE is designed using NMC guidelines o he unde g adua e cu iculum (h ps://www.nmc.o g.in/in o ma ion-desk/ o - colleges/ug- cu iculum/#) a e being adop ed h ough he Boa d o S udies o he Depa men o Biochemis y, Jawaha lal Neh u Medical College, Aliga h, U a P adesh, India. Pa icipan anonymi y was ensu ed o p omo e hones eedback. To u he mi iga e he esponse bias, he language o he ques ions in he ques ionnai e was kep neu al o a oid leading answe s. A ange o op ions like Ag ee, Disag ee, and Neu al was gi en o ensu e a balanced esponse. Op ions like he 'Neu al' o 'NO' op ion, whe e e easible, we e gi en o he pa icipan s o know hei ue pe spec i e. O he 150 s uden s, 132 p o ided esponses. Da a analysis Da a managemen was conduc ed using Mic oso Excel P o essional Plus 2016. S a is ical calcula ions we e pe o med using R Ve sion 4.3.3. The chi-squa e es was done, and p ≤ 0.001 was conside ed signi ican . Resul s The C onbach's alpha o he adminis e ed ques ions was 0.859, indica ing good in e nal consis ency o he ques ionnai e. S uden s p o ided cons uc i e eedback and exp essed a high accep ance o he assessmen p ocess, as demons a ed by he da a in Table 1. The s a is ical analysis o he pa icipan s' esponses is shown in Table 2. Table 1. Summa y analysis o he adminis e ed ques ionnai e. C i e ia abou OSPE o be analyzed Yes No Somewha - 1 Do you ha e any p io exposu e o, knowledge o , o unde s anding o OSPE? 31.1% 42.4% 26.5% - 2 Did you ind he ins uc ions o each s a ion clea and unde s andable? 85.7% 4.5% 9.8% - 3 We e he ques ions ele an o he syllabus? 97.7% 0% 2.3% - 4 Did you eel you had adequa e ime o comple e each s a ion? 96.2% 0% 3.8% - 5 Did you ind OSPE mo e s ess ul han adi ional assessmen me hods? 27.3% 59.8% 12.9% - 6 Should OSPE be used as a me hod o assessmen in Biochemis y in u u e exams? 81.1% 7.6% 11.4% - 7 Do you ind OSPE mo e e ec i e and knowledge-d i en han adi ional assessmen me hods? 84.8% 3.8% 11.4% - C i e ia abou OSPE o be analysed Ag ee Disag ee Neu al - 8 OSPE is a mo e e ec i e ool o assessing a ious domains o lea ning. 86.4% 2.3% 11.4% - 9 Teache s' a i udes du ing OSPE we e be e han du ing adi ional assessmen me hods. 75.8% 1.5% 22.7% - 10 OSPE elimina e bias in assessmen . 77.7% 5.4% 16.9% - 11 OSPE encou ages lea ne s o ocus mo e on p ac ical examina ions. 89.4% 8.3% - C i e ia abou OSPE o be analysed Psychomo o -mo o skills Cogni i e skills Highe - o de hinking All 12 Wha domain does OSPE p ima ily assess in lea ne s? 4.5% 5.3% 3% 87.1% Abb e ia ions: OSPE, objec i e s uc u ed p ac ical examina ion. [ DOI: 10.61882/edcj.18.2.144 ] [ Downloaded om edujou nal.zums.ac.i on 2025-10-03 ] 4 / 9 Ismail e al.: S uden s' insigh s on he objec i e s uc u ed p ac ical examina ion as an assessmen ool 148 Jou nal o Medical Educa ion De elopmen ¦ Volume 18 ¦ Issue 2 ¦ 2025 Table 2. S a is ical analysis o he esponses o he pa icipan s o he adminis e ed ques ionnai e. No C i e ia abou OSPE o be analyzed Chi-squa e alue p- alue 1 Do you ha e any p io exposu e o, knowledge o , o unde s anding o OSPE? 4.0166 0.134 2 Did you ind he ins uc ions o each s a ion clea and unde s andable? 123.633 < 0.001 3 We e he ques ions ele an o he syllabus? 186.5174 < 0.001 4 Did you eel you had adequa e ime o comple e each s a ion? 178.0664 < 0.001 5 Did you ind OSPE mo e s ess ul han adi ional assessmen me hods? 34.6322 < 0.001 6 Should OSPE be used as a me hod o assessmen in Biochemis y in u u e exams? 102.6452 < 0.001 7 Do you ind OSPE mo e e ec i e and knowledge-d i en han adi ional assessmen me hods? 120.0632 < 0.001 8 OSPE is a be e ool o assess di e en domains o knowledge. 127.679 < 0.001 9 OSPE is a mo e e ec i e ool o assessing a ious domains o lea ning. 87.8954 < 0.001 10 Teache s' a i udes du ing OSPE we e be e han du ing adi ional assessmen me hods. 90.5618 < 0.001 11 OSPE elimina e bias in assessmen . 141.9962 < 0.001 12 Wha domain does OSPE p ima ily assess in lea ne s? 206.156 < 0.001 No e: The able shows he Chi-squa e alues, he co esponding p- alues. C onbach’s alpha o he ques ionnai e = 0.859. Abb e ia ions: p, p obabili y- alue; OSPE, objec i e s uc u ed p ac ical examina ion. O 132 s uden s assessed in ba ches o 50 o e h ee days, 31.1% had p io knowledge o OSPE. Mo e han 80% epo ed ha he ins uc ions p o ided be o e s a ing he OSPE p o ocol we e clea and easy o unde s and. Addi ionally, app oxima ely 96% belie ed ha he ime allo ed o each s a ion was su icien o comple e hei asks. O e 80% o he s uden s el ha OSPE was mo e e ec i e han adi ional assessmen me hods. Rega ding he ins uc o s' a i udes, abou 76% conside ed hem o be mo e posi i e. Howe e , 27.3% ound OSPE s ess ul compa ed o he simple spo ing exe cises hey aced in Biochemis y p ac ical examina ions du ing hei in e nal mock p epa a o y es s. Fac o s con ibu ing o his anxie y may include he lack o adequa e mock exams be o e he ac ual assessmen , insu icien p io knowledge o OSPE, con inuous obse a ion by examine s du ing he examina ion, and being e alua ed agains checklis s. Ne e heless, mos s uden s exp essed con idence ha hey would pe o m s ess- ee du ing hei p o essional examina ions. The analysis o he 27.3% o s uden s who expe ienced s ess will be included as an aspec o his s udy in u u e ex ensions [15]. Figu es 2 and 3 show de ailed analyses o he OSPE eedback conduc ed unde di e en headings in pie cha s and ba g aphs. Figu e 2. Pie-cha s depic ing he s uden 's pe cep ion abou he o e all conduc o OPSE [ DOI: 10.61882/edcj.18.2.144 ] [ Downloaded om edujou nal.zums.ac.i on 2025-10-03 ] 5 / 9 Ismail e al.: S uden s' insigh s on he objec i e s uc u ed p ac ical examina ion as an assessmen ool Jou nal o Medical Educa ion De elopmen ¦ Volume 18 ¦ Issue 2 ¦ 2025 149lopmen ¦ Volume 17 ¦ Issue 54¦ 2024 Figu e 3. Ba g aphs depic ing he iewpoin s o pa icipan s on OSPE as an assessmen ool Discussion OSPE has gained wo ldwide ecogni ion as an imp o ed me hod o eaching, lea ning, and assessmen [16]. The highligh s o i s bene i s include a ocus on p ac ical skills, a s uc u ed and objec i e way o assessmen , cons uc i e eedback, alignmen wi h he compe encies, and encou agemen o s uden s o ac i e lea ning [17]. Se e al s udies u he poin ed ou ha OSPE p o ides objec i e, uni o m, and ocused assessmen , he eby p o iding an unbiased e alua ion o he s uden s [18]. This ag ees wi h he indings epo ed by Ma d & Gha ou i, who men ion ha OSPE inc eases he sa is ac ion o medical s uden s. Abou 86% o s uden s belie ed ha OSPE es s all he skill domains o he assessmen [19]. Rajkuma e al. ound ha OSPE is a signi ican ly be e assessmen ool o e alua ing p ac ical skills in all p eclinical subjec s [20]. Ramachand a e al., in hei s udy, emphasized he accep ance o OSPE in he medical cu iculum by bo h s uden s and acul y [21]. A s udy conduc ed a King Saud Uni e si y, Saudi A abia, by Alsai e al. obse ed ha mock OSPE sessions conduc ed be o e he p o essional examina ions educed he s ess o MBBS s uden s and imp o ed hei pe o mance [22]. Rega ding bias elimina ion, 77.7% ag eed ha in oducing OSPE is expec ed o educe bias, while 16.9% emained neu al. 89.4% ag eed ha OSPE imp o es and encou ages he lea ne o pay mo e a en ion owa ds p ac ical examina ions. These indings align wi h P asad e al.'s indings, who indica ed ha " he OSPE o ma was pe cei ed mo e a ou ably by s uden s and esul ed in a highe a e age sco e" [15]. OSPE could be used o examine some cha ac e is ics o pos g adua e s uden s, such as pe o mance du ing p ocedu es, ecogni ion o molecula echniques and bioma ke s, in e p e a ion o esul s, and diagnos ics. In addi ion o he a ious posi i e aspec s men ioned, implemen ing OSPE p esen s signi ican challenges ha mus be acknowledged. The OSPE o ma is o en c i icized o equi ing esou ces and ime in i s a angemen and conduc , especially he need o la ge manpowe , p epa a ion o p e-de ined checklis s, la ge spaces/halls, skill labs, simula o s, and well- ained s a [23]. Ye ano he aspec is he exhaus ion and d aining o he examine s by he end o he o a ion, esul ing in bias o un ai e alua ion [24]. Elabo a ing he indings o ou s udy, excep o he i s c i e ion, "Do you ha e any p io exposu e/knowledge/unde s anding o OSPE?" all c i e ia om 1-7 gi en o assess he s uden 's pe cep ion o he o e all conduc o OPSE showed signi ican di e ences in esponse pa e ns. The p- alue o he i s ques ion is g ea e han 0.001, indica ing no s a is ically signi ican di e ence in he dis ibu ion o esponses. This indica es ha s uden s' esponses ("Yes", "No", "Somewha ") ega ding his ques ion we e e enly dis ibu ed o exhibi ed no clea pa e n. The esul s suppo he e ec i eness and accep abili y o OSPE as [ DOI: 10.61882/edcj.18.2.144 ] [ Downloaded om edujou nal.zums.ac.i on 2025-10-03 ] 6 / 9 Ismail e al.: S uden s' insigh s on he objec i e s uc u ed p ac ical examina ion as an assessmen ool 150 Jou nal o Medical Educa ion De elopmen ¦ Volume 18 ¦ Issue 2 ¦ 2025 an assessmen ool, wi h posi i e eedback ega ding i s ele ance, adequacy o ime, cla i y, and e ec i eness. Fu he , he esul s o all ou c i e ia om 8-11 showed highly signi ican di e ences in esponses, emphasizing a s ong posi i e iewpoin o OSPE as an assessmen ool. S uden s ecognize i s e ec i eness in assessing knowledge, elimina ing bias, de eloping posi i e eache in e ac ions, and encou aging s uden s o ocus on p ac ical skills. This again unde lines OSPE's sui abili y and accep abili y as a mode n assessmen me hod. An excep ionally small p- alue was ob ained o he las c i e ion, demons a ing a e y s ong and clea pa e n in he da a. I shows ha he esponses we e no e enly dis ibu ed; ins ead, he e was a signi ican p e e ence o one op ion. S uden s ag eed on a speci ic op ion comple ely, which is he e ec i eness o OSPE in assessing he di e se skills o he lea ne . This esul u he alida es he obus ness o he obse a ions, highligh ing a de ini i e and consis en ag eemen among he pa icipan s. The s udy ies o e alua e OSPE om s uden s' insigh s, bu a ew limi a ions o his s udy need o be add essed. Fi s ly, he lack o a p ope la ge a ea ixed and iden i ied o each s a ion will e amp he way OSPE is conduc ed. Secondly, s uden s om di e en ins i u ions should be included. Fu u e esea ch shall be done ac oss mul iple ins i u ions, mainly in di e en a eas wi h a ying esou ces, o make he indings gene alizable. Las ly, he sample size needs o be inc eased o imp o e he powe o he s udy. A la ge sample size wi h di e se pa icipan s om a ying educa ional and socio-economic backg ounds will gi e a b oade pe spec i e. Conclusion S uden s p o ided posi i e eedback, indica ing ha his e alua ion enhances hei lea ning. OSPE was pe cei ed as an e ec i e ool o bo h eaching and assessmen . The e o e, i seems o be a s uden - iendly, e ec i e, and less biased me hod o labo a o y-based examina ions. O e all, s uden s' pe cep ions end o a o OSPE. Fu u e esea ch should concen a e on ways o enhance he p ocess o s anda dizing OPSE; his will pa e he way o consis en e alua ion c i e ia. E hical conside a ions The s udy, i led "Objec i e s uc u ed p ac ical examina ion: A be e assessmen ool o unde s and he magni ude o pe cep ion owa ds unde g adua e biochemis y p ac ical examina ion o e adi ional me hods," was app o ed by he O ice o he Ins i u ional E hics Commi ee, Jawaha lal Neh u Medical College, Aliga h, U a P adesh, unde P oposal Re e ence Numbe (IECJNMC/1655). Ve bal consen was ob ained olun a ily om each s uden who was willing o pa icipa e in his esea ch. A i icial in elligence u iliza ion o a icle w i ing G amma ly was u ilized o e ine he English language used in he documen . Acknowledgmen s In as uc u e acili ies p o ided by he Depa men o Biochemis y, Jawaha lal Neh u Medical College, unde he DST (FIST & PURSE) p og am a e g a e ully acknowledged. The au ho s acknowledge P o esso Najmul Islam, Chai pe son, Depa men o Biochemis y, o his able guidance. We would like o hank all he s uden s who pa icipa ed in his s udy. Con lic o in e es s a emen The au ho s decla e ha hey ha e no disce nible compe ing inancial in e es s o pe sonal connec ions ha could be in e p e ed as in luencing he conclusions made in his wo k. Au ho con ibu ions S udy Idea o Design, Da a Collec ion, Da a Analysis, and In e p e a ion: FI, SH, YS, IA and SM. Manusc ip P epa a ion, Re iew, and Edi ing: FI, SH. Final App o al: FI, SH, YS, IA and SM. Suppo ing esou ces This esea ch did no ecei e a speci ic g an om any unding agency in he public, comme cial, o no - o - p o i sec o s. Da a a ailabili y s a emen Da a will be made a ailable a a easonable eques . Re e ences 1. Abbasi M, Shi azi M, To kmandi H, Homayoon S, Abdi M. Impac o eaching, lea ning, and assessmen o medical law on cogni i e, a ec i e and psychomo o skills o medical s uden s: a sys ema ic e iew. BMC Medical Educa ion. 2023;23(1):703. [h ps://doi.o g/10.1186/s12909-023-04695-2] 2. Ha den RM, S e enson M, Downie WW, Wilson GM. Assessmen o clinical compe ence using objec i e [ DOI: 10.61882/edcj.18.2.144 ] [ Downloaded om edujou nal.zums.ac.i on 2025-10-03 ] 7 / 9 Ismail e al.: S uden s' insigh s on he objec i e s uc u ed p ac ical examina ion as an assessmen ool Jou nal o Medical Educa ion De elopmen ¦ Volume 18 ¦ Issue 2 ¦ 2025 151lopmen ¦ Volume 17 ¦ Issue 54¦ 2024 s uc u ed examina ion. B i ish Medical Jou nal. 1975;1(5955):447-51. [h ps://doi.o g/10.1136/bmj.1.5955.447] 3. Lakum NR, Ma u AM, Algo a CG, Makwana HH. Objec i e s uc u ed p ac ical examina ion (OSPE) as a ool o he o ma i e assessmen o p ac ical skills in he subjec o physiology: a compa a i e c oss-sec ional analysis. Cu eus. 2023;15(9): e46104. [h ps://doi.o g/10.7759/cu eus.46104] 4. Ab aham RR, Upadhya S, To ke S, Ramna ayan K. S uden pe spec i es o assessmen by TEMM model in physiology. Ad ances in Physiology Educa ion. 2005;29(2):94-7. [h ps://doi.o g/10.1152/ad an.00051.2004] 5. Ha den RM, Gleeson FA. Assessmen o clinical compe ence using an objec i e s uc u ed clinical examina ion (OSCE). Medical Educa ion. 1979;13(1):39-54. [h ps://doi.o g/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1979. b00918.x] 6. Kundu D, Das HN, Sen G, Os a M, Mandal T, Gau am D. Objec i e s uc u ed p ac ical examina ion in biochemis y: an expe ience in medical college, Kolka a. Jou nal o Na u al Science, Biology, and Medicine. 2013;4(1):103. [h ps://doi.o g/10.4103/0976-9668.107268] 7. Howley LD. Pe o mance assessmen in medical educa ion: whe e we’ e been and whe e we’ e going. E alua ion & he Heal h P o essions. 2004;27(3):285- 303. [h ps://doi.o g/10.1177/0163278704267044] 8. Nundy S, Kaka A, Bhu a ZA, Nundy S, Kaka A, Bhu a ZA. De eloping lea ning objec i es and e alua ion: mul iple choice ques ions/objec i e s uc u ed p ac ical examina ions. How o P ac ice Academic Medicine and Publish om De eloping Coun ies? A P ac ical Guide. 2022:393-404. [h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/978-981-16-5248-6_41] 9. C o H, Gilligan C, Rasiah R, Le e -Jones T, Schneide J. Cu en ends and oppo uni ies o compe ency assessmen in pha macy educa ion–a li e a u e e iew. Pha macy. 2019;7(2): 67. [h ps://doi.o g/10.3390/pha macy7020067] 10. Faldessai N, Dha wadka A, Mohan y S. Objec i e- s uc u ed p ac ical examina ion: a ool o gauge pe cep ion and pe o mance o s uden s in biochemis y. Asian Jou nal o Mul idisciplina y S udies. 2014;2(8):32-38. 11. Naya U, Malik SL, Bijlani RL. Objec i e s uc u ed p ac ical examina ion: a new concep in assessmen o labo a o y exe cises in p eclinical sciences. Medical Educa ion. 1986;20(3):204-209. [h ps://doi.o g/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1986. b01169.x] 12. Adams NE. Bloom's axonomy o cogni i e lea ning objec i es. Jou nal o he Medical Lib a y Associa ion. 2015;103(3):152-153. [h ps://doi.o g/10.3163/1536- 5050.103.3.010] 13. K ejcie RV and Mo gan DW. De e mining sample size o esea ch ac i i ies. Educa ional and Psychological Measu emen . 1970;30:607-610. [h ps://doi.o g/10.1177/001316447003000308] 14. C onbach LJ. Coe icien alpha and he in e nal s uc u e o es s. Psychome ika. 1951;16(3):297-334. [h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/BF02310555] 15. P asad HK, P asad HK, Saji ha K, Bha S, She y KJ. Compa ison o Objec i e S uc u ed P ac ical Examina ion (OSPE) e sus con en ional pa hology p ac ical examina ion me hods among he second-yea medical s uden s—a c oss-sec ional s udy. Medical Science Educa o . 2020;30:1131-1135. [h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/s40670-020-01025-9] 16. B azeau C, Boyd L, C osson J. Changing an exis ing OSCE o a eaching ool: he making o a eaching OSCE. Academic Medicine. 2002;77(9):932. [h ps://doi.o g/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005649] 17. Pasi R, Babu TA, Kalidoss VK. De elopmen and alida ion o s uc u ed aining module o heal hca e wo ke s in ol ed in managing pedia ic pa ien s du ing COVID-19 pandemic using “Objec i e S uc u ed Clinical Examina ion” (OSCE). Jou nal o Educa ion and Heal h P omo ion. 2023;12(1):15. [h ps://doi.o g/10.4103/jehp.jehp_578_22] 18. Cha les J, Janagond A, Thilaga a hy R, Ramesh V. E alua ion by OSPE (Objec i e S uc u ed P ac ical Examina ion)–a good ool o assessmen o medical unde g adua es–a s udy epo om Velammal medical college, Madu ai, Tamil Nadu, India. IOSR Jou nal o Resea ch & Me hod in Educa ion. 2016;6:1-6. [h ps://doi.o g/10.9790/7388-0603020106]. 19. Ma d SA, Gha ou i S. Objec i e s uc u ed p ac ical examina ion in expe imen al physiology inc eased sa is ac ion o medical s uden s. Ad ances in Medical Educa ion and P ac ice. 2020;651-659. [h ps://doi.o g/10.2147/AMEP.S264120] 20. Rajkuma KR, P akash KG, Saniya K, Sailesh KS, Vegi P. OSPE in ana omy, physiology and biochemis y p ac ical examina ions: pe cep ion o MBBS s uden s. Indian Jou nal o Clinical Ana omy and Physiology. 2016;3(4):482-4. [h ps://doi.o g/10.5958/2394- 2126.2016.00111.0] 21. Ramachand a SC, Vishwana h P, Ojha VA, P ashan A. Objec i e s uc u ed p ac ical examina ion [ DOI: 10.61882/edcj.18.2.144 ] [ Downloaded om edujou nal.zums.ac.i on 2025-10-03 ] 8 / 9 Ismail e al.: S uden s' insigh s on he objec i e s uc u ed p ac ical examina ion as an assessmen ool 152 Jou nal o Medical Educa ion De elopmen ¦ Volume 18 ¦ Issue 2 ¦ 2025 (OSPE) imp o es s uden pe o mance: a quasi- expe imen al s udy. Jou nal o Medical Educa ion & Resea ch. 2021;23(3):149-54. [h ps://jou nal.jkscience.o g/index.php/JKScience/a icle/ iew/77] 22. Alsai F, Alkuwaiz L, Alhumud M, e al. E alua ion o he expe ience o pee -led mock objec i e s uc u ed p ac ical examina ion o i s -and second-yea medical s uden s. Ad ances in Medical Educa ion and P ac ice. 2022;13:987. [h ps://doi.o g/10.2147/AMEP.S359669] 23. Alkha eeb N, Salih AM, Shabila N, Al- Dabbagh A. Objec i e s uc u ed clinical examina ion: challenges and oppo uni ies om s uden s' pe spec i e. PLoS One. 2022;17(9):e0274055. [h ps://doi.o g/10.1371/jou nal.pone.0274055] 24. Fu medge DS, Smi h LJ, S u ock A. De eloping doc o s: wha a e he a i udes and pe cep ions o yea 1 and 2 medical s uden s owa ds a new in eg a ed o ma i e objec i e s uc u ed clinical examina ion? BMC Medical Educa ion. 2016;16:1-9. [h ps://doi.o g/ 10.1186/s12909-016-0542-3] [ DOI: 10.61882/edcj.18.2.144 ] [ Downloaded om edujou nal.zums.ac.i on 2025-10-03 ] Powe ed by TCPDF (www. cpd .o g) 9 / 9