Ruppeliana Young (Insecta: Hemiptera: Cicadellidae): three new species, redescriptions, and key to males
Abstract
Alasmar, Luísa, Cavichioli, Rodney Ramiro (2025): Ruppeliana Young (Insecta: Hemiptera: Cicadellidae): three new species, redescriptions, and key to males. European Journal of Taxonomy 1022: 51-84, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2025.1022.3081, URL: https://europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu/index.php/ejt/article/download/3081/13739
Full text
51 European Journal of Taxonomy 1022: 51–84 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2025.1022.3081 europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu ISSN 2118-9773 2025 · Alasmar L. & Cavichioli R.R. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) Received: 20 February 2025 • Accepted: 4 July 2025 • Published: 1 October 2025 Topic editor: Tony Robillard • Section editor: Christopher Dietrich • Desk editor: Pepe Fernández Research article urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A6490362-39CA-4236-B6A0-2DF89953E41F Ruppeliana Young (Insecta: Hemiptera: Cicadellidae): three new species, redescriptions, and key to males Luísa ALASMAR1,* & Rodney Ramiro CAVICHIOLI 2 1,2 Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Caixa Postal 19020, 81531-980, Curitiba, PR, Brazil. * Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 Email: [email protected] Abstract. The Neotropical genus Ruppeliana Young, 1977 comprises 13 species. The following three are redescribed and illustrated herein: R. coronata (Signoret, 1853), R. fulva (Taschenberg, 1884), and R. nigripes (Signoret, 1853). Additionally, three new species are described and illustrated: R. delicata sp. nov., R. robusta sp. nov., and R. tridentata sp. nov., from the states of Paraná, Santa Catarina, and Rio de Janeiro, respectively. A revised diagnosis, a key to males, a distribution map, and a neotype designation for R. grossii Cavichioli et al., 2017 are also proposed. Keywords. Taxonomy, sharpshooter, Cicadellini, Neotropical Region. Alasmar L. & Cavichioli R.R. 2025. Ruppeliana Young (Insecta: Hemiptera: Cicadellidae): three new species, redescriptions, and key to males. European Journal of Taxonomy 1022: 51–84. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2025.1022.3081 Introduction Ruppeliana was established by Young (1977) to accommodate Tettigonia signiceps Stål, 1862, along with the following species: Tettigonia coronata Signoret, 1853; T. coronulifera Stål, 1862; T. episcopalis Signoret, 1853; T. fulva Taschenberg, 1884; T. glaucomaculata Germar, 1821; T. nigripes Signoret, 1853; and T. taschenbergi Berg, 1899. Additionally, Young described a new species, R. tatia. Recent studies have described six new species: R. caelimaculata and R. flavivirescens (Carvalho et al. 2014), as well as R. barbarensis, R. grossii, R. longiphallus, and R. serrana (Cavichioli et al. 2017). Furthermore, R. coronulifera and R. taschenbergi were synonymized with R. signiceps (Stål, 1862) (Carvalho et al. 2014). At the present moment, Ruppeliana comprises 13 species. Although the original genus description included records from southern Brazil and northern Argentina, the Argentinian record could not be confirmedinsubsequentstudies(Cavichioliet al. 2017). Ruppeliana was placed near Pawiloma Young, 1977 due to similarities in both male and female genitalia (Young 1977). However, they differ in the former having elongated basal processes of the aedeagus (Carvalho et al. 2014). Representatives of Ruppeliana are colorful and robust, measuring approximately
European Journal of Taxonomy 1022: 51–84 (2025) 52 10 millimeters, but they are not commonly found in collections (Cavichioli et al. 2017). This rarity likely explains why Young (1977) did not propose a dichotomous key for the genus. The original descriptions of R. coronata, R. episcopalis, R. fulva, R. glaucomaculata, R. nigripes, and R. signiceps are brief and primarily focused on external morphology. Most of these species were later redescribed and illustrated by Young (1977), except for R. nigripes and R. coronata, for which the author suggested a possible synonymy. The illustrations of R. coronata were based on a non-type series male, while for R. nigripes, Young (1977) provided only a lateral view of the pygofer and a ventral view of the aedeagus. Due to the absence of detailed morphological descriptions and illustrations in previous studies, we redescribed and illustrated the species R. coronata, R. nigripes, and R. fulva, describing the color variation for the latter. Additionally, we describe three new species: R. delicata sp. nov., R. tridentata sp. nov., and R. robusta sp. nov. We also provide a key to the males of the genus, an occurrence map and a neotype designation for R. grossii. Material and methods The terminology adopted here follows Young (1977) for the main terms, Hamilton (1981) and Mejdalani (1993, 1998) for facial areas of the head, and Nielson (1965) for female genitalia. The terms “gonoplac” and“sculptedareasoffirstovipositorvalvule”followMejdalani(1998).Thetechniquesforgenitalia preparationfollowCavichioli&Takiya(2012),withmodificationsasinDomahovski(2024).The dissected parts were stored in microvials with glycerin, as suggested by Young & Beirne (1958). Digital images of habitus were obtained with a Leica MZ12.5 stereo microscope with a SCMOS 05000KPB digital camera attached and were stacked using CombineZP software. First and second valvulae and gonoplacs were separated and mounted on a temporary slide covered with a cover slip, then photographed using the former mentioned digital camera, attached to a Nikon optical microscope at40×and100×magnification. The specimens examined are deposited in the Coleção Entomológica Padre Jesus Santiago Moure, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil (DZUP), and in Museu Nacional do Rio de Janeiro (MNRJ). The occurrence map was generated using Simple Mappr (available online at https://www.simplemappr.net/), with data obtained from the literature (Young 1977; McKamey 2007; Froza et al. 2024; and original descriptions), from the online source Taxonomic Catalogue of Brazilian Fauna (Takiya et al. 2024), and from specimen labels deposited at DZUP.
ALASMAR L. & CAVICHIOLI R.R., New species of Ruppeliana (Hemiptera) 53 Results Taxonomy Class Insecta Linnaeus, 1758 Order Hemiptera Linnaeus, 1758 Suborder Auchenorrhyncha Duméril, 1806 Family Cicadellidae Latreille, 1825 Subfamily Cicadellinae Latreille, 1825 Tribe Cicadellini Latreille, 1825 Genus Ruppeliana Young, 1977 Type species Tettigonia signiceps Stål, 1862. Diagnosis (1) Head moderately produced, with anterior margin broadly rounded; (2) interocular width greater thanpronotum;(3)clypeus,inlateralview,inflatedmedially;(4)pronotumwithoutsculpting;(5)male pygofer strongly produced posteriorly; (6) subgenital plate triangular and attaining to pygofer apical third,frequentlywitharowofmicrosetaealongdorsalmargin;(7)connectivebearingamediankeel; (8) aedeagus curved ventrally with a sheath-like atrium, with at least a pair of basidorsal processes; (9) paraphysis absent; (10) second valvulae of female bearing irregular shaped teeth in basal curvature. Included species (Distribution based on Young 1977; McKamey 2007; Carvalho et al. 2014; Cavichioli et al. 2017, Taxonomic Catalogue of Brazilian Fauna and material deposited at DZUP). 1 R. barbarensis Cavichioli, Carvalho & Mejdalani, 2017. Distribution: Brazil (Minas Gerais State). 2. R. caelimaculata Carvalho, Cavichioli, Rodrigues & Gonçalves, 2014. Distribution: Brazil (Espírito Santo State). 3. R. coronata (Signoret, 1853). Distribution: Brazil. 4. R. delicata sp. nov. Distribution: Brazil (Paraná State). 5. R. episcopalis (Signoret, 1853). Distribution: Brazil (Rio de Janeiro State). 6. R. flavivirescens Carvalho, Cavichioli, Rodrigues & Gonçalves, 2014. Distribution: Brazil (Minas Gerais State). 7. R. fulva (Taschenberg, 1884). Distribution: Brazil (Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Paraná, and Santa Catarina states). 8. R. glaucomaculata (Germar, 1821). Distribution: Brazil (Bahia and Minas Gerais states). 9. R. grossii Cavichioli, Carvalho & Mejdalani, 2017. Distribution: Brazil (Rio de Janeiro State). 10. R. longiphallus Cavichioli, Carvalho & Mejdalani, 2017. Distribution: Brazil (Rio de Janeiro State). 11. R. nigripes (Signoret, 1853). Distribution: Brazil (Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro, and São Paulo states). 12. R. robusta sp. nov. Distribution: Brazil (Paraná and Santa Catarina states). 13. R. serrana Cavichioli, Carvalho & Mejdalani, 2017. Distribution: Brazil (Rio de Janeiro State). 14. R. signiceps (Stål, 1862). Distribution: Brazil (Bahia [new record], Espírito Santo, Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro, and Paraná states). 15. R. tatia Young, 1977. Distribution: Brazil (Rio de Janeiro State). 16. R. tridentata sp. nov. Distribution: Brazil (Rio de Janeiro State).
European Journal of Taxonomy 1022: 51–84 (2025) 54 Ruppeliana coronata (Signoret, 1853) Figs 1–2 Tettigonia coronata Signoret, 1853: 348. Ruppeliana coronata – Young 1977: 751. — Cavichioli et al. 2017: 438 (in key). Diagnosis Large sharpshooters, about 10 mm length (Fig. 1A–B). Overall body coloration yellow, with a horseshoe shaped macula in frons (Fig. 1A–C). Forewings reddish, with yellowish or whitish longitudinal straps (Fig. 1A–B). Male pygofer in dorsal view with apices directed inwards (Fig. 15A). Subgenital plate in lateral view attaining pygofer’s apex (Fig. 1D). Style very long with microsetae in outer margin and apex rounded (Fig. 1F). Aedeagal atrium with a pair of long and slender basidorsal processes and a pair of acute short processes preapically (Fig. 1G–H). Material examined BRAZIL – Minas Gerais State • 2♂♂;Itamonte;elev.2100–1700m;21–23Nov.2008;R.Carvalho, O.EvangelistaandD.Takiyaleg,;DZUP•1♀;Extrema,MorrodoLopo;22.881°S,46.308°W; elev. 1520 m; 9 Dec. 2012; P. Grossi leg.; DZUP. – Paraná State • 1♂;PortoMendes;Oct.1998; S.B. Pessoa leg.; DZUP. – Rio de Janeiro State • 2♀♀;Itatiaia,Parque,NacionaldoItatiaia; 22.452500°S, 44.610681°W; elev. 788 m; 12–14 Jan. 2023; A.P. Pinto, A.C. Domahovski, J. Ehlert andL.P.Aguiarleg.;sweep;DZUP•1♂;1♀;samedataasforpreceding;22.431°S, 44.625°W; elev.1200m;30Oct.2011;R.R.Cavichiolileg.;DZUP•1♂;samedataasforpreceding;elev.2000m; Jan.1957;U.Barthleg.;DZUP•1♀;samedataasforpreceding,TrilhaHotelSimon;22.436°S, 44.609°W;elev.1100m;28Oct.2011;R.R.Cavichiolileg.;DZUP•1♂;EngenheiroPassos,BR-485, Km11,HotelFazendaPalmital;22°25′26″S,44°44′21″W;elev.960m;26Apr.2007;J.A.Rafael and F.F. Xavier leg.; light; DZUP. – São Paulo State •2♀♀;SerraCantareira,HortoFlorestal;8Aug. 1946; F. Lane leg.; DZUP • 1♀;samedataasforpreceding;S.Lopesleg.;DZUP•1♀;samedataas forpreceding;Apr.1934;R.Spitzleg;DZUP•1♂;samedataasforpreceding;Mar.1935;L.Travassos leg.;DZUP•1♂;samedataasforpreceding;16Oct.1946;F.Laneleg.;DZUP•1♂,1♀;Camposdo Jordão; Nov. 1957; K. Lenko leg.; DZUP. Description MeasureMents (mm). Total length. Males: 10.6–13.4 (n = 9), females: 10.8–13.5 (n = 10). Head (Fig. 1A). In dorsal view, moderately produced anteriorly, anterior margin rounded, median lengthofcrownapproximately⅓ofinterocularwidthand⅓oftransocularwidth.Frons(Fig.1C), in frontal view, texture slightly granular, muscular impressions indistinct, epistomal suture complete. Clypeus (Fig. 1C), in frontal view, slightly pubescent apically. Pronotum (Fig. 1A), in dorsal view, with lateral margins slightly convergent anteriorly, posterior two-thirds of disk slightly transversely striated medially. Mesonotum (Fig. 1A) texture slightly granulated. Forewings (Fig. 1A–B) veins and membrane distinct, including inner apical cell and posterior third of remaining apical cells; bases of anteapical cells approximately aligned with claval apex. Remaining characteristics of external morphology as described for the genus by Young (1977: 747). Coloration. Crown (Fig. 1A–B) yellow. Frons (Fig. 1C) yellow, with a brown horseshoe-shaped macula. Clypeus (Fig. 1C) yellow, with a longitudinal brown stripe medially, enlarging in apex. Lorum and gena (Fig. 1C) yellow. Pronotum (Fig. 1A) yellow, with a browned stripe medially and posterior margin brown. Mesonotum, meso and metasternum (Fig. 1B–C) yellow. Forewing (Fig. 1A–B) red, with
ALASMAR L. & CAVICHIOLI R.R., New species of Ruppeliana (Hemiptera) 55 longitudinal yellow or whitish longitudinal stripes, membrane darkened. Legs (Fig. 1B–C) yellow with distal portions darkened. Abdomen (Fig. 2A–B) yellow, with lateral margins blackened. Fig. 1. Ruppeliana coronata (Signoret, 1853), ♂(Brazil,Itatiaia,Parque,NacionaldoItatiaia;30Oct. 2011; R.R. Cavichioli leg; DZUP). A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Habitus, lateral view. C. Head, frontal view. D. Pygofer, valve and subgenital plate, lateral view. E. Valve and subgenital plates, ventral view. F. Connective and style, ventral view. G. Aedeagus, lateral view. H. Aedeagus, ventral view. Scale bars in mm.
European Journal of Taxonomy 1022: 51–84 (2025) 56 Male genitalia. Pygofer (Fig. 1D), in lateral view, strongly produced posteriorly, dorsal, and ventral margins narrowed after basal third, posterior margin broadly rounded, macrosetae distributed along the Fig. 2. Ruppeliana coronata (Signoret, 1853), ♀(Brazil,Itatiaia,Parque,NacionaldoItatiaia;12–14Jan. 2023; A.P. Pinto, A.C. Domahovski, J. Ehlert and L.P. Aguiar leg; DZUP). A. Distal portion of abdomen, ventral view. B. Distal portion of abdomen, lateral view. C. Sternite VII, ventral view. D. First valvifer andfirstvalvula,lateralview.E.Apicalportionoffirstvalvula.F. Second valvula, lateral view. G. Basal portion of second valvula. H. Apical portion of second valvula. I. Second valvifer and gonoplac, lateral view. J. Apical portion of gonoplac. Scale bars in mm.
ALASMAR L. & CAVICHIOLI R.R., New species of Ruppeliana (Hemiptera) 57 posterior thirds of disc; in dorsal view, apex directed inwards. Valve (Fig. 1E), in ventral view, narrow, lateral margins acute apically, ventral margin slightly rounded. Subgenital plate (Fig. 1D–E), in ventral view, triangular, broadened at base, narrowing gradually towards apex, inner margin rectilinear, outer margin with a uniseriate row of macrosetae; in lateral view, slightly surpassing pygofer apex, dorsal margin with multiseriate row of long microsetae. Style (Fig. 1F), in dorsal view, very elongate, extending posteriorly much beyond apex of connective, apical portion curved outwards, outer margin bearing microsetae, apex rounded. Connective (Fig. 1F), in dorsal view, V-shaped, arms, and stalk short, with a median keel. Aedeagus (Fig. 1G–H), in lateral view, shaft broadened apically, dorsal margin slightly curved, apex truncated; in dorsal view, apex opened medially as the gonopore exit. Aedeagal atrium well developed, forming a sheath-like structure with apical portion curved anteriorly, reaching shaft’s apex, with two pairs of acute processes, one elongate basidorsal, with an acute and curved ventrally apex, trespassing much far as shaft’s apex; second short and acute, located preapically; in ventral view, preapical short processes subparallel, and basidorsal processes apical portions convergent. FeMale genitalia. Pygofer (Fig. 2B), in lateral view moderately produced posteriorly, posterior margin triangular, macrosetae along ventral and posterior margins. Abdominal sternite VII (Fig. 2A–C) wider than long, posterior margin slightly emarginated medially; posterolateral corners slightly directed outwards. Valvifer I (Fig. 2D), in lateral view, rounded. Valvula I (Fig. 2D–E), in lateral view, blade narrowed apically, apex acute; dorsal sculptured area strigate, extending from basal portion to apex, ventral sculpted area strigate, restricted to apical portions. Valvula II (Fig. 2F–H), in lateral view, slightly expanded beyond basal curvature, narrowing gradually towards apex; without preapical prominence; apex rounded; dorsal margin with 40 continuous teeth, irregular shaped after basal curvature, robust and subtriangular at basal and median portions and small and trapezoid in apical portion, all bearing denticles. Gonoplac (Fig. 2I–J), in lateral view, with basal half narrow, bearing denticuli in ventral margin, apical half expanded; apex rounded, with apical surface bearing denticuli and few macrosetae in ventroposterior margin. Remarks Ruppeliana coronata and R. nigripes were suggested by Young (1977) to be possible synonyms. However, they can be distinguished by several morphological characteristics. The forewing coloration is reddish at R. coronata and brown in R. nigripes. In dorsal view, the pygofer apices are directed inwards in R. coronata (Fig. 15A), whereas they are subparallel in R. nigripes (Fig. 15B). Additionally, the subgenital plate reaches or surpasses pygofer apex in R. coronata, while in R. nigripes, it does not extend beyond pygofer apical portion. Ruppeliana fulva (Taschenberg, 1884) Figs 3–5 Tettigonia fulva Taschenberg, 1884: 442. Ruppeliana fulva – Young 1977: 751. — Cavichioli et al. 2017: 438 (in key). Diagnosis Sharpshooters with about 8 mm (Figs 3A–B, 4A–D). Overall coloration yellow or green (Figs 3A–B, 4). Pronotum and forewings varying from pale (Fig. 4C–D) to dark green (Fig. 4A–B), mottled with small spots, which can be yellow (Fig. 4C–D), green (Fig. 4A–B) or dark green, always contrasting with forewings. Pygofer narrowed in apical portion, with posterior margin rounded (Fig. 3D). Subgenital plate attaining to pygofers apex (Fig. 3D). Style short, with apex acute (Fig. 3F). Aedeagal shaft curved ventrally, with apex rounded, basidorsal process long and subparallel (Fig. 3G). Aedeagal atrium forming a sheath-like structure, which is connected by membrane to aedeagal basis (Fig. 3G).
European Journal of Taxonomy 1022: 51–84 (2025) 58 Material examined BRAZIL – Minas Gerais State • 2♀♀;Itamonte;10–14Oct.1998;D.M.Takiyaleg.;DZUP•1♀; Itamonte; elev. 2100–1700 m; 21–23 Nov. 2008; R. Carvalho, O. Evangelista and D. Takiya leg.; DZUP•1♀;ParqueNacionaldoCaparaó;20.40956°S, 41.84904°W; elev. 1517 m; 3–7 Mar. 2017; M.SavarisandA.L.Norrbomleg.;DZUP•1♂;Extrema,MorrodoLopo;22.881°S, 46.308°W; elev. 1520 m; 9 Dec. 2012; P. Grossi leg.; DZUP. – Paraná State • 1♂;BR277,Km54,TorreTelepar; 5–11Dec.1984;DZUP•1♀;SãoJosédosPinhais;Feb.1982;Cavichiolileg;DZUP•1♀;samedata asforpreceding;18Jan.1982;DZUP•1♀;samedataasforpreceding;25°36′05″S,49°36′05″W; elev.880m;21Sep.2011;A.C.Domahovskileg.;DZUP•1♀;samedataasforpreceding;25°36′18″S, 49°11′37″W;6Jun.2015;A.C.Domahovskileg.;sweep;DZUP•6♂♂;samedataasforpreceding; 18Nov.2015;DZUP•1♂;samedataasforpreceding;17–31Dec.2016;DZUP•1♂;samedataas forpreceding;19Mar.2016;DZUP•2♂♂;samedataasforpreceding;13Aug.2016;DZUP•1♀; samedataasforpreceding;1–31Mar.2018;Malaisetrap;DZUP•2♂♂;samedataasforpreceding; 1–31Oct.2019;DZUP•1♂;samedataasforpreceding;1–28Feb.2019;DZUP•1♀;samedataas forpreceding;19Oct.2020;sweep;DZUP•1♂;samedataasforpreceding;1–31Mar.2021;Malaise trap;DZUP•1♂;Piraquara,MananciaisdaSerra;25°29′S,48°59′W;elev.980m;11–12Dec.2010; P.C.Grossileg;DZUP•1♂;samedataasforpreceding;elev.1100m;Jul.2011;DZUP•1♂,1♀;same data as for preceding; 25.4966°S, 48.9839°W; elev. 1010 m; 1–16 Feb. 2019; G. Melo and A. Martins leg.;Malaisetrap;DZUP•1♀;samedataasforpreceding;29–30Nov.2019;A.C.Domahovskiand R.R.Cavichiolileg.;sweep;DZUP•4♀♀;samedataasforpreceding;25°29′47″S,48°58′54″W; elev.1021m;27–28Feb.2022;A.CDomahovskileg.;sweep;DZUP•1♀;Piraquara,ParqueEstadual do Marumbi; 25°29′13″S,48°58′30″W;24Jan.2012;Grossi,CavichioliandSilvaleg.;lighttrap; DZUP•1♂;Colombo;Nov.2012;M.SavarisandS.Lampertleg.;DZUP•1♀;samedataasfor preceding;1–31Sep.2014;Malaisetrap;DZUP•1♂;Curitiba;Sep.1983;CostaandElileg.;DZUP •1♀;TijucasdoSul,Br376km;25.835°S, 49.048°W; elev. 655–879 m; 7 Oct. 2011; M.L. Monné andR.R.Cavichiolileg.;DZUP•1♂;samedataasforpreceding,AssociaçãodosProfessoresUFPR; elev. 878 m; 25°50′14″S,49°02′57″W;A.PaladiniandR.R.Cavichiolileg;lighttrap;DZUP.– Santa Catarina State • 1♂;RioVermelho,SãoBentodoSul;16Mar.1974;elev.850m;Rankleg.;DZUP.– São Paulo State •2♀♀;SãoJosédoBarreiro,SerraBocaina;elev.1600m;Nov.1976;F.M.Oliveira leg.;DZUP•1♂;CamposdoJordão;Nov.1957;K.Lenkoleg;DZUP. Description MeasureMents (mm). Total length. Males: 8.1–8.5 (n = 24), females: 8.9–9.4 (n = 21). H ead (Fig. 3A). In dorsal view, moderately produced anteriorly, anterior margin from rounded to slightly subtriangular, median length of crown 1/5 of interocular width and approximately 1/4 of transocular width. Frons (Fig. 3C), in frontal view, texture slightly granular, muscular impressions distinct, epistomal suture obsolete medially. Clypeus (Fig. 3C), in frontal view, slightly pubescent apically. Pronotum (Fig. 3A), in dorsal view, with lateral margins convergent, posterior two-thirds of disk slightly transversely striated medially. Mesonotum (Fig. 3A) slightly granulated before transverse sulcus and slightly transversely striate posteriorly. Forewings (Fig. 3A–B) with veins indistinct, membrane distinct, including inner apical cell and posterior third of remaining apical cells; bases of anteapical cells approximately aligned with claval apex. Remaining characteristics of external morphology as described for the genus by Young (1977: 747). Coloration. Crown and frons (Figs 3A–C, 4A–D) from pale to dark yellow, with various small blackened spots. Frons (Fig. 3C) with lateral and posterior margins smoky brown, clypeus yellow, with a longitudinal smoky brown stripe medially, and paler areas laterally. Lorum and gena (Fig. 3C) yellow. Pronotum (Figs 3A, 4A–C) anterior third blackened, with yellowed maculae, posterior two-thirds green with yellowed smoky rounded maculae. Mesonotum (Figs 3A, 4A–C) yellow, with browned maculae.
ALASMAR L. & CAVICHIOLI R.R., New species of Ruppeliana (Hemiptera) 59 Meso and metasternum (Figs 3B, 4B–D) yellow. Forewing (Figs 3A–B, 4) from pale to dark green, mottled with small rounded yellowish or greenish maculae. Legs (Fig. 3C) yellow with orangish areas. Abdomen (Figs 4B, 5A–B) yellow, with reddish parts. Fig. 3. Ruppeliana fulva (Taschenberg, 1884), ♂ (Brazil, São José dos Pinhais, 18 Nov. 2015; A.C. Domahovski leg.; DZUP). A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Habitus, lateral view. C. Head, frontal view. D. Pygofer, valve and subgenital plate, lateral view. E. Valve and subgenital plates, ventral view. F. Connective and style, ventral view. G. Aedeagus, lateral view. H. Aedeagus, ventral view. Scale bars in mm.
European Journal of Taxonomy 1022: 51–84 (2025) 66 Etymology The epithet ‘delicata’ is derived from the Latin and means ‘charming’, ‘elegant’, and ‘delicate’, referring to the remarkable pattern and coloration of its representatives. Type material Holotype BRAZIL – Santa Catarina State •♂;Urubici,ParqueNacionalSãoJoaquim;elev.1600m;17–18Mar. 2012; Grossi, Parizotto and Leivas leg.; DZUP. Paratypes BRAZIL – Santa Catarina State •1♂,8♀♀;samedataasforholotype;DZUP. Description MeasureMents (mm). Total length. Maleholotype:9.6.Paratype(♂):9.9(n=1);(♀)9.9–11.2(n=8). Head (Fig. 8A). In dorsal view, moderately produced anteriorly, anterior margin broadly rounded, medianlengthofcrownapproximately⅓ofinterocularwidthandapproximately½oftransocularwidth. Frons (Fig. 8C), in frontal view, texture slightly granular, muscular impressions indistinct, epistomal suture obsolete medially. Clypeus (Fig. 8C), in frontal view, posterior half slightly pubescent. Pronotum (Fig. 8A), in dorsal view, with lateral margins slightly convergent apically; posterior two-thirds of disk slightly transversely striated medially. Mesonotum (Fig. 8A) slightly granulated before transverse sulcus and slightly transversely striate behind. Forewings (Fig. 8A–B) with veins indistinct, membrane distinct, including inner apical cell; bases of anteapical cells approximately aligned with claval apex. Remaining characteristics of external morphology as described for the genus by Young (1977: 747). Coloration. Crown and face (Fig. 8A–B) black, with various rounded yellowed macula. Clypeus (Fig. 8C) black, with a pair of yellowed oval maculae on lateral margins. Lorum and gena (Fig. 8C) yellow, with smoky browned areas. Pronotum (Fig. 8A) anterior third blackened, with rounded yellowed maculae, posterior two-thirds black with smoky yellowed areas and yellow maculae. Mesonotum (Fig. 8A) anterior half black, with two pairs of yellow maculae, one laterally and the other medially; yellow posteriorly to transversal sulcus. Meso and metasternum (Fig. 8B) black. Forewing (Fig. 8A–B) browned, mottled with rounded yellow maculae, with a transversal yellow band from basal to anteapical portion. Legs (Fig. 8B–C) yellow, coxae lateral portions browned, tibia lateral portions reddened. Abdomen (Fig. 9A–B) blackened. Male genitalia. Pygofer (Fig. 8D), in lateral view, strongly produced posteriorly, dorsal margin conspicuouslyconcavepreapically,apicalportionslightlyexpanded,posteriormarginsubquadrangular; macrosetae distributed along the posterior two-thirds of disc. Valve (Fig. 8F), in ventral view, with a longitudinal median thickening, anterior margin with a reentrance medially. Subgenital plate (Fig. 8D), in ventral view, triangular, narrowing gradually towards apex, inner margin rectilinear, outer margin with a uniseriate row of macrosetae; in lateral view, reaching pygofer posterior third, dorsal margin with multiseriate rows of microsetae. Style (Fig. 8E), in dorsal view, elongate, extending posteriorly beyond apex of connective, outer margin apical portion bearing microsetae, slightly directed outwards, apex truncated. Connective (Fig. 8E), in dorsal view, V-shaped, arms and stalk short, with a median keel. Aedeagus (Fig. 8G–H), in lateral view, shaft conspicuously curved ventrally, with rounded apex; aedeagal atrium well developed, forming a sheath-like structure directed anteroventrally, attaining shaft’s apex, with a pair of elongate basidorsal processes, with acute apex, directed posteriorly and trespassing shaft’s apex; in ventral view, anterior margin narrowly projected anteriorly, posterior margin of atrium with a strong reentrance medially, forming two distinct rounded lobes laterally; basidorsal processes apical portions subparallel.
ALASMAR L. & CAVICHIOLI R.R., New species of Ruppeliana (Hemiptera) 67 FeMale genitalia. Pygofer (Fig. 9B), in lateral view strongly produced posteriorly, posterior margin triangular, macrosetae along ventral and posterior margins. Abdominal sternite VII (Fig. 9A–C) as long as wide, posterior margin emarginated medially, forming a pair of rounded lobes laterally, posterolateral corners slightly directed outwards. Valvifer I (Fig. 9D), in lateral view, rounded. Valvula I (Fig. 9D–E), in lateral view, blade narrowed apically, base with a lobated projection directed anteriorly, apex narrowly rounded, dorsal sculptured area strigate, extending from basal portion to apex and almost reaching Fig. 8. Ruppeliana delicata sp. nov., holotype, ♂(Brazil,Urubici,ParqueNacionalSãoJoaquim;17–18 Mar. 2012; Grossi, Parizotto and Leivas leg.; DZUP). A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Habitus, lateral view. C. Head, frontal view. D. Pygofer, valve and subgenital plate, lateral view. E. Valve and subgenital plates, ventral view. F. Connective and style, ventral view. G. Aedeagus, lateral view. H. Aedeagus, ventral view. Scale bars in mm.
European Journal of Taxonomy 1022: 51–84 (2025) 68 halfwidth of blade, ventral sculpted area strigate, extending from basal to apical portions. Valvula II (Fig. 9F–H), in lateral view, slightly expanded beyond basal curvature, narrowing gradually towards apex; without preapical prominence; apex rounded; dorsal margin with 55 continuous teeth, irregular shaped after basal curvature, robust and triangular at basal and median portions and small and trapezoid Fig. 9. Ruppeliana delicata sp. nov., paratype, ♀(Brazil,Urubici,ParqueNacionalSãoJoaquim;17– 18 Mar. 2012; Grossi, Parizotto and Leivas leg.; DZUP). A. Distal portion of abdomen, ventral view. B. Distal portion of abdomen, lateral view. C. Sternite VII, ventral view. D. Firstvalviferandfirst valvula, lateral view. E.Apicalportionoffirstvalvula.F. Second valvula, lateral view. G. Basal portion of second valvula. H. Apical portion of second valvula. I. Second valvifer and gonoplac, lateral view. J. Apical portion of gonoplac. Scale bars in mm.
ALASMAR L. & CAVICHIOLI R.R., New species of Ruppeliana (Hemiptera) 69 or irregular shaped in apical portion, all bearing denticles. Gonoplac (Fig. 9I–J), in lateral view, with basal half narrow, bearing denticuli in ventral margin, apical half expanded; apex rounded, with apical surface bearing denticuli and few macrosetae in ventroposterior margin. Remarks Ruppeliana delicata sp. nov. and R. longiphallus share two distinct forewing marking patterns: longitudinal stripes and spots. However, R. delicata can be readily distinguished from R. longiphallus and all other species of Ruppelianabyitsuniquewingpattern,whichfeaturesasinglepairoflateral longitudinal stripes, with the remaining forewing surface mottled with spots. In contrast, R. longiphallus has four pairs of rounded basal spots on the forewings, each followed by a longitudinal stripe. Ruppeliana robusta sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:73E45847-9A37-4153-8E8D-E241CF404762 Figs 10–11 Diagnosis Large sharpshooters, about 10 mm (Fig. 10A–B). Crown and frons black, mottled with yellow spots. Forewing green, with veins and apex brownish. Pygofer (Fig. 10D), in lateral view, strongly produced posteriorly, dorsal margin concave preapically, posterior margin rounded. Subgenital plate in lateral view, reaching pygofer posterior third (Fig. 10D). Aedeagus shaft curved ventrally, with apex rounded (Fig. 10G). Aedeagal atrium with a basidorsal elongate process, with apex acute; in ventral view, dorsoapical portion of sheath-like structure forming subtriangular lobes laterally (Fig. 10H). Etymology The species epithet ‘robusta’ comes from the Latin and means ‘robust’, referring to the overall large aspect of this species. Type material Holotype BRAZIL – Paraná State •♂;Guaratuba,PontaldoParaná;elev.1400m;16Feb.2009;P.C.Grossiand D.R. Parizotto leg.; DZUP. Paratypes BRAZIL – Paraná State •1♂;samedataasforholotype;DZUP•2♀♀;samedataasforholotype;16 Apr.2011;DZUP•1♂;TijucasdoSul,MorrodoAraçatuba;elev. 1200–1600 m; 25–27 Feb. 2011; P.C. Grossileg.;DZUP•1♂;samedataasforholotype;elev. 1600–1652 m; 31 Jan. 2012; Grossi and Santos leg.;DZUP•2♀♀;PontaldoItararé,MorrodosPerdidos;25°53′27″S,48°57′27″W;elev. 1423 m; 3 Feb. 2010; P.C. Grossi leg.; DZUP. Description MeasureMents (mm). Total length. Maleholotype:9.8.Paratypes(♂):9.4–10.2(n=3);(♀)10.9–11.6 (n = 4). Head (Fig.10A).Indorsalview,moderatelyproducedanteriorly;anteriormarginsubquadrangular; medianlengthofcrown⅓ofinterocularwidthand½oftransocularwidth.Frons(Fig.10C),infrontal view, texture slightly granular, muscular impressions indistinct; epistomal suture obsolete medially. Clypeus (Fig. 10C), in frontal view, without pubescence. Pronotum (Fig. 10A), in dorsal view, with lateral margins parallel, posterior two-thirds of disk slightly transversely striated medially. Mesonotum (Fig. 10A), in dorsal view, slightly granulated before transverse sulcus and slightly transversely striated
European Journal of Taxonomy 1022: 51–84 (2025) 70 posteriorly. Forewings (Fig. 10A–B) with veins and membrane distinct, including apical cells posterior third; bases of anteapical cells approximately aligned with claval apex. Remaining characteristics of external morphology as described for the genus by Young (1977: 747). C oloration . Crown and frons (Fig. 10A–C) black, mottled with yellowed spots. Clypeus (Fig. 10C) black, with yellowed maculae on lateral margins. Lorum and gena yellow (Fig. 10C). Pronotum (Fig. 10A) anterior third blackened, with various yellowed maculae, posterior two-thirds yellow; Fig. 10. Ruppeliana robusta sp. nov., holotype, ♂ (Brazil, Guaratuba, Pontal do Paraná; 1400 m; 16 Feb. 2009; P.C. Grossi and D.R. Parizotto leg.; DZUP). A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Habitus, lateral view. C. Head, frontal view. D. Pygofer, valve and subgenital plate, lateral view. E. Valve and subgenital plates, ventral view. F. Connective and style, ventral view. G. Aedeagus, lateral view. H. Aedeagus, ventral view. Scale bars in mm.
ALASMAR L. & CAVICHIOLI R.R., New species of Ruppeliana (Hemiptera) 71 posterior margin outlined in black. Mesonotum (Fig. 10A) anterior half black, with a pair of triangular maculae laterally and a yellow spot medially; yellowish posteriorly to transversal sulcus. Meso and metasternum (Fig. 10B–C) yellow. Forewing (Fig. 10A–B) green, with veins and apex browned. Legs Fig. 11. Ruppeliana robusta sp. nov., paratype, ♀ (Brazil, Guaratuba, Pontal do Paraná; 1400 m; 16 Apr. 2011; P.C. Grossi and D.R. Parizotto leg.; DZUP). A. Distal portion of abdomen, ventral view. B. Distal portion of abdomen, lateral view. C. Sternite VII, ventral view. D. Firstvalviferandfirstvalvula,lateral view. E.Apicalportionoffirstvalvula.F. Second valvula, lateral view. G. Basal portion of second valvula. H. Apical portion of second valvula. I. Second valvifer and gonoplac, lateral view. J. Apical portion of gonoplac. Scale bars in mm.
European Journal of Taxonomy 1022: 51–84 (2025) 72 (Fig. 10B) brown with coxae outer margins yellow. Abdomen (Fig. 11A–B) blackened, with terminalia outlined in yellow. Male genitalia. Pygofer (Fig. 10D), in lateral view, strongly produced posteriorly, dorsal margin concave preapically, posterior margin rounded; macrosetae distributed along the posterior two-thirds of disc. Valve (Fig. 10F), in ventral view, with a longitudinal median thickening, anterior margin with a reentrance medially. Subgenital plate (Fig. 10D), in ventral view, triangular, narrowing gradually towards apex, inner margin rectilinear, outer margin with a uniseriate row of macrosetae; in lateral view, reaching pygofer posterior third, dorsal margin with multiseriate rows of microsetae. Style (Fig. 10E), in dorsal view, elongate, extending posteriorly beyond apex of connective, apical portion slightly directed outwards and bearing microsetae, apex truncated. Connective (Fig. 10E), in dorsal view, V-shaped, arms and stalk short, with a median keel. Aedeagus (Fig. 10G–H), in lateral view, shaft conspicuously curved ventrally, apex rounded; aedeagal atrium well developed, forming a sheath-like structure directed anteroventrally, attaining shaft’s apex, with a pair of elongate basidorsal processes, directed posteroventrally, with apex acute and surpassing shaft’s apex; in ventral view, anterior margin narrowly projected anteriorly, posterior margin of atrium with a strong reentrance medially, forming two distinct subtriangular lobes laterally; basidorsal processes apexes slightly divergent. FeMale genitalia. Pygofer (Fig. 11B), in lateral view strongly produced posteriorly, posterior margin triangular, macrosetae along ventral and posterior margins. Abdominal sternite VII (Fig. 11B–C) as long as wide; posterior margin emarginated medially, forming a pair of rounded lobes laterally; posterolateral corners subparallel. Valvifer I (Fig. 11D), in lateral view, rounded. Valvula I (Fig. 11D–E), in lateral view, blade narrowed apically; base with a lobated projection directed anteriorly, apex narrowly rounded; dorsal sculptured area strigate, extending from basal portion to apex and almost reaching halfwidth of blade, ventral sculpted area strigate, extending from basal to apical portions. Valvula II (Fig. 11F–H), in lateral view, slightly expanded beyond basal curvature, narrowing gradually towards apex; without preapical prominence; apex rounded; dorsal margin with 40 continuous teeth, robust and triangular at basal and median portions followed by small and trapezoid in apical portion, both bearing denticles. Gonoplac (Fig. 11I–J), in lateral view, with basal half narrow, apical half expanded; apex rounded, with apical surface bearing denticuli and macrosetae along ventroposterior margin. Remarks Ruppeliana robusta sp. nov. can be distinguished from all other species of Ruppeliana by its forewings, which lack stripes or spots but feature distinct veins and a brownish apex. To date, R. robusta is the only speciesinthegenuswithasubquadrangularposteriormarginofthehead. Ruppeliana tridentata sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:B62D15F1-D71F-4318-ABEE-779D33538E41 Figs 12–13 Diagnosis Large sharpshooters, about 10 mm length (Fig. 12A–B). Crown yellow, with black marks (Fig. 12A). Frons yellow, with three longitudinal stripes, two laterally, one medially, connecting each other posteriorly (Fig. 12C). Forewings mottled with pale spots (Fig. 12A). Male pygofer strongly produced posteriorly, with a slight reentrance preapically in dorsal margin, subgenital plate not surpassing apical third (Fig. 12D). Connective U-shaped, style with apex obtuse (Fig 12F). Aedeagus shaft with apex truncated (Fig. 12G). Aedeagal atrium with an elongate basidorsal process, with apex acute and a pair of lobate processes dorsoapically at the sheath-like portion (Fig. 12H).
ALASMAR L. & CAVICHIOLI R.R., New species of Ruppeliana (Hemiptera) 73 Etymology The species epithet ‘tridentata’ is derived from the Latin, where the word ‘trident’ means ‘three teeth’. This refers to the trident-shaped maculae present on the specimen’s frons. Type material Holotype BRAZIL – Rio de Janeiro State •♂;ParqueNacionalSerradosÓrgãos(PARNASO);Jun.2007; Laboratório de Ecologia de Insetos, UFRJ leg.; MNRJ. Paratypes BRAZIL – Rio de Janeiro State •1♀;samedataasforholotype;MNJR;1♂,1♀;samedataasfor holotype; DZUP. Description MeasureMents (mm). Total length. Maleholotype:9.5.Paratypes(♂):8.9(n=1);(♀)9.7–9.9(n=2). Head (Fig. 12A). In dorsal view, moderately produced anteriorly, anterior margin rounded, median lengthofcrownapproximately⅓ofinterocularwidthandapproximately⅓oftransocularwidth.Frons (Fig. 12C), in lateral view, with a slight anteapical process, in frontal view, texture slightly granular, muscular impressions indistinct, epistomal suture complete. Clypeus (Fig. 12C) without pubescence. Pronotum (Fig. 12A), in dorsal view, with lateral margins parallel, posterior two-thirds of disk slightly transversely striated medially. Mesonotum (Fig. 12A) slightly granulated before transverse sulcus and slightly transversely striated posteriorly. Forewings (Fig. 12A–B) with veins indistinct; membrane distinct, including inner apical cell and posterior third of remaining apical cells, bases of anteapical cells approximately aligned with claval apex. Remaining characteristics of external morphology as described for the genus by Young (1977: 747). Coloration. Crown (Fig. 12A) yellow, with blackened marks. Frons (Fig. 12C) yellow, with a longitudinal trident-shaped maculae: two bands laterally and one medially, connected posteriorly. Clypeus (Fig. 12C) black, anterolateral margins yellow. Lorum and gena (Fig. 12C) yellow and black, respectively. Pronotum (Fig. 12A) anterior third yellow, with black maculae, posterior two-thirds browned, with yellowed areas laterally, posterior margin black. Mesonotum (Fig. 12A) yellow, with two inverted triangular black maculae laterally. Meso and metasternum (Fig. 12B) black. Forewing (Fig. 12A–B) browned, mottled with paler spots, costal margin smoky yellow basally. Legs (Fig. 12B–C) yellow, tibia anterior portion browned. Abdomen (Fig. 13A–B) blackened with lateral portions paler. M ale genitalia . Pygofer (Fig. 12D), in lateral view, strongly produced posteriorly, dorsal margin with a slight reentrance preapically, posterior margin rounded, macrosetae distributed from basal to ventroapical portions. Valve (Fig. 12E), in ventral view, narrow, lateral margins acute anteriorly, ventral margin slightly concave. Subgenital plate (Fig. 12D), in ventral view, triangular, narrowing gradually towards apex, inner margin rectilinear, outer margin with a multiseriate row of macrosetae; in lateral view, broadened, not reaching pygofer apical portion. Style (Fig. 12F), in dorsal view, elongate, extending posteriorly beyond apex of connective, outer margin with a slight median lobe, apical portion slightly curved outwards and outer margin bearing microsetae, apex obtuse. Connective (Fig. 12F), in dorsal view, U-shaped, arms short, with a median keel. Aedeagus (Fig. 12G–H), in lateral view, shaft slightly curved ventrally, with apex truncated; aedeagal atrium well developed, forming a sheath-like structure, directed anteroventrally, not trespassing shaft’s posterior half; with a pair of elongate narrowed basidorsal processes, with acute apex, directed posteriorly and trespassing much far as shaft’s apex, and a pair of lobate processes dorsoapically; in ventral view, anterior margin of atrium slightly concave, with a pair of lobated processes laterally, posterior margin projected medially; basidorsal processes apical portions slightly convergent or subparallel.
European Journal of Taxonomy 1022: 51–84 (2025) 74 F eMale genitalia . Pygofer (Fig. 13B), in lateral view strongly produced posteriorly, posterior margin triangular, macrosetae along ventral margin. Abdominal sternite VII (Fig. 13B–C) as long as wide; posterior margin with a slight tip medially, posterolateral corners convergent. Valvifer I (Fig. 13D), in lateral view, rounded. Valvula I (Fig. 13D–E), in lateral view, blade narrowed apically, apex narrowly rounded; dorsal sculptured area strigate, extending from basal portion to apex, reaching halfwidth of blade, ventral sculpted area strigate, restricted to apical portions. Valvula II (Fig. 13F–I), in lateral view, slightly expanded beyond basal curvature, narrowing gradually towards apex, without preapical Fig. 12. Ruppeliana tridentata sp. nov., holotype, ♂(Brazil,ParqueNacionalSerradosÓrgãos (PARNASO); Jun. 2007; Laboratório de Ecologia de Insetos, UFRJ leg.; MNRJ). A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Habitus, lateral view. C. Head, frontal view. D. Pygofer, valve and subgenital plate, lateral view. E. Valve and subgenital plates, ventral view. F. Connective and style, ventral view. G. Aedeagus, lateral view. H. Aedeagus, ventral view. Scale bars in mm.
ALASMAR L. & CAVICHIOLI R.R., New species of Ruppeliana (Hemiptera) 75 prominence, apex rounded; dorsal margin with 45 continuous teeth, irregular shaped in basal curvature, robust and subtriangular at basal and median portions, small and rounded in apical portion, all bearing denticles. Gonoplac (Fig. 13I–J), in lateral view, with basal half narrow, apical half expanded; apex rounded, with apical surface bearing denticuli and macrosetae along ventroposterior margin. Fig. 13. Ruppeliana tridentata sp.nov.,paratype,♀(Brazil,ParqueNacionalSerradosÓrgãos (PARNASO); Jun. 2007; Laboratório de Ecologia de Insetos, UFRJ leg.; MNRJ). A. Distal portion of abdomen, ventral view. B. Distal portion of abdomen, lateral view. C. Sternite VII, ventral view. D. First valviferandfirstvalvula,lateralview.E.Apicalportionoffirstvalvula.F. Second valvula, lateral view. G. Basal portion of second valvula. H. Apical portion of second valvula. I. Second valvifer and gonoplac, lateral view. J. Apical portion of gonoplac. Scale bars in mm.
European Journal of Taxonomy 1022: 51–84 (2025) 82 Acknowledgments We are thankful to the anonymous reviewers who kindly made improvements to a preliminary version of this manuscript. LAisPhDstudentfellowfromConselhoNacionaldeDesenvolvimentoCientíficoe Tecnológico(CNPq,141245/2023-2009). References Carvalho R.A., Cavichioli R.R., Rodrigues L.G.N. & Gonçalves A.C. 2014. Two new Brazilian species of the Neotropical sharpshooter genus Ruppeliana (Insecta: Hemiptera: Cicadellidae). Zoologia 31: 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-46702014000100009 Cavichioli R.R. & Takiya D.M. 2012. Description of a new species of Wolfniana and new records of Rotigonalia (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Cicadellinae) from the state of Amazonas, Brazil. Zoologia 29: 85–88. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-46702012000100011. Cavichioli R.R., Carvalho R.A. & Mejdalani G. 2017. The Neotropical sharpshooter genus Ruppeliana Young (Insecta: Hemiptera: Cicadellidae): four new species, key to males, and new synonyms. Zootaxa 4329 (5): 436–448. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4329.5.2 CôrteI.,PeclyN.H.,QuintasV.,FerreiraA.L.D.,CavichioliR.R.&MejdalaniG.2021.Two new species of the sharpshooter genus Paratubana (Hemiptera:Cicadellidae:Cicadellini)fromalpinefieldsofRio de Janeiro state, southeastern Brazil. Zootaxa 5005 (3): 339–348. https://doi.org/10.11646/ZOOTAXA.5005.3.8 Domahovski A.C. 2024. A new species of Culumana DeLong & Freytag (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Gyponini) from Peru, with two new combinations. Zootaxa 5523 (5): 593–600. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5523.5.9 Domahovski A.C., Alasmar L. & Cavichioli R.R. 2023. The genus Sofiella gen. nov. (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae, Cicadellini) with description of two new species from Brazil. Zootaxa 5318 (4): 571–579. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5318.4.10 Felix M., Mejdalani G., Domahovski A.C. & Cavichioli R.R. 2022. Eight new Brazilian species of Fonsecaiulus (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Cicadellini), new records of species, and key to males of the genus. Zootaxa 5195 (2): 101–124. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5195.2.1 Froza J.A. & Mejdalani G. 2022 A new species of the sharpshooter genus Hanshumba (Insecta: Hemiptera:Cicadellidae:Cicadellini)fromtheMantiqueiramountainrange,southeasternBrazil, associated with olive orchards. Zoologia 39: e22026. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-4689.v39.e22026 FrozaJ.A.,QuintasV.&MejdalaniG.2021.A new species of Erythrogonia Melichar, 1926 (Insecta: Hemiptera:Cicadellidae:Cicadellini)fromtheMantiqueiramountainrange,southeasternBrazil,associated with olive orchards. Zootaxa 4996 (2): 374–382. https://doi.org/10.11646/ZOOTAXA.4996.2.11 Froza J.A., Moura P.H., Silva L.F., Mejdalani G. & Lopes J.R. 2024. Species composition and prevalence of sharpshooters and spittlebugs potential vectors of Xylella fastidiosa in olive orchards of southeastern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 68 (3): e20240017. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9665-RBENT-2024-0017 Hamilton K.G.A. 1981. Morphology and evolution of the rhynchotan head (Insecta: Hemiptera, Homoptera). Canadian Entomologist 113: 953–974. https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent113953-11 ICZN (International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature) 1999. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Fourth edition. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London. Available from https://www.iczn.org/the-code/the-code-online/ [accessed 15 Nov. 2024].
ALASMAR L. & CAVICHIOLI R.R., New species of Ruppeliana (Hemiptera) 83 McKamey S.H. 2007. Taxonomic catalogue of the leafhoppers (Membracoidea). Part 1. Cicadellinae. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute 78: 1–394. Mejdalani G. 1993. Morfologia da cabeça de Versigonalia ruficauda (Walker, 1851), com notas sobre a terminologia (Homoptera, Cicadellidae, Cicadellinae). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 37: 279–288. Mejdalani G. 1998. Morfologia externa dos Cicadellinae (Homoptera, Cicadellidae): comparação entre Versigonalia ruficauda (Walker) (Cicadellini) e Tretogonia cribrata Melichar (Proconiini), com notas sobre outras espécies e análise da terminologia. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 15: 451–544. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81751998000200015 MejdalaniG.,QuintasV.,PeclyN.H.,FrozaJ.A.,CarvalhoS.R.&SilvaA.P.2023.A new species of Cavichiana from southeastern Brazil, with a key to the species of the genus and notes on the distribution of C. bromelicola (Insecta: Hemiptera: Cicadellidae). Zoologia 40: e23017. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-4689.v40.e23017 MejdalaniG.,SilvaA.P.,FrozaJ.A.,CarvalhoS.R.,PeclyN.H.&QuintasV.C.2024.A new species of the sharpshooter genus BalachafromanalpinefieldinsoutheasternBrazil(Insecta:Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Cicadellini). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 68 (2): e20240008. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9665-RBENT-2024-0008 Nielson M.W. 1965. A revision of the genus Cuerna (Homoptera, Cicadellidae). Technical Bulletin of the United States Department of Agriculture 1318: 1–48. PeclyN.H.,QuintasV.,DomahovskiA.C.,CavichioliR.R.&MejdalaniG.2024.Anewgenusand species of Cicadellini (Insecta: Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Cicadellinae) from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. European Journal of Taxonomy 921: 64–75. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2024.921.2415 Signoret V. 1853. RevueiconographiquedesTettigonides.Annales de la Société Entomologique de France 3e Série 1: 323–374. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/8311185 Takiya D.M., Cavichioli R.R., Mejdalani G., Felix M., Gonçalves C.C.,Camisão B.M., Barbosa J.F., Prando J.S., Pecly N.H., Praciano D.L., Domahovski A.C. & Sauceda J. 2024. Cicadellidae. In: Catálogo Taxonômico da Fauna do Brasil. Available from http://fauna.jbrj.gov.br/fauna/faunadobrasil/17076 [accessed 15 Nov. 2024]. Taschenberg E. 1884. Zur Kenntniss der Cicadellinen-Gattung Tettigonia Geoffr. Zeitschrift für Naturwissenschaften 57: 431–455. Available from https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/34973599 [accessed 15 Nov. 2024]. Young D.A. 1977. Taxonomic study of the Cicadellinae (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). Part 2: New World Cicadellini and the genus Cicadella. Technical Bulletin of the North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station 239: 1–1135. Available from https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/61448230 [accessed 15 Nov. 2024]. Young D.A. & Beirne B.P. 1958. A taxonomic revision of the leafhopper genus Flexamia and a new related genus (Homoptera, Cicadellidae). Technical Bulletin of the United States Department of Agriculture 1173: 1–53. Printed versions of all papers are deposited in the libraries of four of the institutes that are members of the EJTconsortium:MuséumnationaldʼHistoirenaturelle,Paris,France;MeiseBotanicGarden,Belgium; Royal Museum for Central Africa, Tervuren, Belgium; Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium. The other members of the consortium are: Natural History Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark; Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Museo Nacional de
European Journal of Taxonomy 1022: 51–84 (2025) 84 Ciencias Naturales-CSIC, Madrid, Spain; Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Bonn – Hamburg, Germany; National Museum of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic; The Steinhardt Museum of Natural History, Tel Aviv, Israël. Supplementary file Supp. file 1. Altitude of collected specimens of Ruppeliana Young, 1977. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2025.1022.3081.13737