scieee AI-readable full text Open interactive document viewer

Understanding the influence of seismic mantle structures at the core-mantle boundary on intense magnetic flux regions

Fröhlich, Yvonne; Thiygarajan, Harini; Tölle, Lena Sophie; Ritter, Joachim R. R.; Thomas, Christine

Abstract

Abstract Within the Priority Program 2404 “Reconstructing the Deep Dynamics of Planet Earth over Geologic Time” (DeepDyn) we investigate possible seismic signatures at magnetic high-latitude flux lobes (HLFL). The focus is on four target regions on the northern hemisphere: Siberia, Canada, North Atlantic and Indonesia. While Siberia and Canada show the HLFL, the North Atlantic should be the location of a third postulated flux lobe, but this area shows no high-flux signal in the magnetic field. The region beneath Indonesia and the Indian Ocean is characterized by an area of high magnetic flux that changes direction and moves westwards over time. Our aim is to understand whether mineralogy and seismic structure (i.e., thermal constraints) could be responsible for the different magnetic signatures at the core mantle boundary (CMB). This is done by combining two approaches: seismic anisotropy and seismic reflections near the CMB. To study anisotropy, we measure shear wave splitting of SKS, SKKS, and PKS phases as well as of S and ScS phases. Thereby, we determine the splitting parameters, the fast polarization direction φ and the delay time δt as well as the splitting intensity SI. Especially, we search for phase pair discrepancies, e.g., between SKS and SKKS phases, as they are a clear indication for a lowermost mantle contribution to the anisotropy. Based on our shear wave splitting measurements, we will derive structural and mineralogical anisotropy models using the MATLAB Seismic Anisotropy Toolbox (Walker and Wookey 2012). To test these models, we simulate synthetic seismograms using AxiSEM3D (Leng et al. 2016, 2019). Besides comparing synthetic and observed seismograms, we plan to measure the shear wave splitting of the synthetic phases and compare splitting parameters and splitting intensity to the observed values. The second approach uses seismic reflections (P and S waves) from the D" discontinuity, located 300 km above the CMB, and measures their arrival time, slowness, polarity and waveform, using array analysis. We aim to cover the regions with a number of crossing paths, for verification and also for determining whether anisotropy is present (Pisconti et al., 2022). Especially the polarity of the reflected waves, when taken together with the splitting analysis, can help to find the mineralogy that leads to the observed structures near the CMB, which in turn will help to understand the influence of the mantle on core dynamics. See also Proceedings of the 84th Annual Meeting of the German Geophysical Society Conference start: DeepDyn at the DGG annual conference DeepDyn - DFG Priority Programm 2404 Funding Funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) – 521545943under Germany’s Priority Programme "Reconstructing the deep dynamics of planet Earth over geologic time (DeepDyn)" SPP 2404 – 500707704. --- Typos in the references on the poster Walker and Wookey 2010 -> Walker and Wookey 2012 Kennett 1999 -> Kennett and Engdahl 1991

Full text

KIT –The Research University in the Helmholtz Association Understanding the influence of seismic mantle structures at the CMB on intense magnetic flux regions Yvonne Fröhlich1, Harini Thiyagarajan2, Lena Tölle2, Joachim R. R. Ritter1, Christine Thomas2 1Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Geophysical Institute, Karlsruhe, Germany 2University of Münster, Institute of Geophysics, Münster, Germany References & Acknowledgements DeepDyn - DFG Priority Program 2404 Target regions: LMM below Siberia very stable magnetic field Canada more mobile magnetic field North Atlantic unclear, expected due to symmetry Indonesia mobile, westward movement Aims: Understanding of Seismic structure and anisotropy Deformation Mineralogy from seismic observations and deformation Thermal conductivity from petro-physical modeling Search for shear wave splitting SKS, SKKS (XKS) phases S, ScS phases → splitting parameters, splitting intensity Search for phase pair discrepancies → LMM mantle contribution Search for D" reflections PdP, SdS phases PdS, SdP phases → travel time, amplitude, polarity Calculation of reflection coefficients → velocity contrast across the D" reflector Consideration of different scenarios in the LMM minerals structures Wave propagation backazimuth-dependent shear wave splitting for XKS reflection coefficients for P, S We study the lowermost mantle (LMM) with seismological methods as contribution to the DFG Priority Program 2404 “Reconstructing the Deep Dynamics of Planet Earth over Geologic Time – DeepDyn”. For this we explore anisotropy and reflectors at the core-mantle boundary (CMB). Specific study areas are the geomagnetic high-latitude flux loops (HLFL) where dense bundles of magnetic field lines are proposed. In the first funding period we concentrate on the northern hemisphere at spots in the LMM below Canada, the North Atlantic and Siberia as well as Indonesia. •YF is supported by DFG grant RI1133/14-1 (SPP 2404 DeepDyn). •HT is supported by DFG grand TH1530/25-1 (SPP 2404 DeepDyn). Seismic Models Cluster analysis (Lekic et al., 2012) 5 models low S wave velocities Votemap analysis (Shephard et al., 2017) 7 models high S wave velocities Shear wave splitting database (Wüstefeld et al., 2009) Library of elastic tensors for LMM seismic anisotropy (Creasy et al., 2020) MATLAB Seismic Anisotropy Toolbox (MSAT) (Walker and Wookey, 2010) Seismic Anisotropy Inclusion of Existing Models and Databases Modeling AxiSEM2D AxiSEM3D •Amit et al., 2011. •Jackson et al., 2000. Deep mantle anisotropy database (Wolf et al., 2023) SKS-SKKS LLSVP S-ScS Kendall et al., 2014; modified. Ray paths after iasp91 Earth model (Kennet 1999). Calculation with tauP (Crotwell et al., 1999). Seismology: Combination of two approaches •Geographic maps were generated with PyGMT and GMT. •The gufm1 model was generated with pymagglobal. Seismic Reflections