Collaboration And Teamwork In Elementary School Leadership: Experiences Of School Administrators

ISSN 3028-1261 10.5281/zenodo.17308813/NIJSE.2025 Collaboration And Teamwork In Elementary School Leadership: Experiences Of School Administrators Shiella F. Villamor Abstract. This study explored the experiences of elementary school administrators in fostering collaboration and teamwork among teachers within their schools. Specifically, it aimed to examine the lived realities of school leaders in promoting a collaborative culture, the challenges they encountered, the coping mechanisms employed by teachers, and the educational management insights that emerged from these efforts. Employing a phenomenological approach, the research utilized in-depth interviews with five participants and focus group discussions with five participants to gain a comprehensive understanding of the participants’ perspectives. Thematic analysis revealed several core findings. Administrators shared that promoting collaboration was largely grounded in building a culture of mutual support; however, they also encountered barriers such as communication breakdowns, misaligned expectations, and competing time demands. To address these, teachers engaged in coping strategies such as seeking open feedback, practicing flexible time management, and drawing on support from colleagues. From an educational management standpoint, the study identified three key insights: the importance of establishing a shared vision and common goals, fostering trust and open communication among staff, and investing in continuous professional development. These findings emphasize that collaboration is both a cultural and structural process that requires intentional leadership, clear communication, and capacity building to be effective and sustainable. The results highlight the importance of aligning the goals and expectations of all stakeholders, and the need for school leaders to create a supportive environment that empowers teachers to collaborate effectively, ultimately leading to improved student outcomes. KEY WORDS 1. Teamwork 2. Leadership 3. School Administrators Date Received: August 15, 2025 — Date Reviewed: September 20, 2025 — Date Published: October 10, 2025 1. Introduction Collaboration and teamwork are vital aspects of strong leadership in elementary schools, where building a positive and united learning environment is essential. School administrators play a central role in promoting collaboration by encouraging teachers, staff, and the school community to work together toward shared goals. Through open communication and teamwork, they create a school culture that values support and cooperation. This collaborative approach not only helps improve student learning and academic success but also fosters a sense of belonging and professional growth among teachers. By prioritizing teamwork, school leaders NIJSE (2025) - ensure that both educators and students thrive in a supportive and cohesive environment. One significant global issue is the lack of consistent leadership support for teacher collaboration. While effective collaboration requires time, resources, and clear structures, many school leaders are not adequately trained or supported to provide these. As a result, collaboration efforts often become fragmented and fail to produce the desired outcomes. Research indicates that successful collaboration is highly dependent on the leadership’s ability to foster an environment where teachers can work together meaningfully and consistently (Goddard, Goddard, Tschannen-Moran, 2020). Another global gap is the inadequate professional development for school leaders is a critical gap that hinders effective collaboration within school leadership. Although leadership training programs are widely available, they often focus on administrative skills rather than on fostering collaborative team dynamics and building a shared vision. This gap in training means that many school leaders are not equipped with the necessary skills to support and sustain effective teamwork among their staff (Leithwood, Harris, Hopkins, 2020). A notable global gap, particularly in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), regarding collaboration and teamwork in elementary school leadership is the limited emphasis on structured professional development programs that enhance team-building and collaborative leadership skills among school administrators. While the UAE has made significant strides in improving education standards through initiatives like Vision 2030 and private-public partnerships, research highlights that school leaders often focus more on administrative tasks rather than fostering collaborative practices. This gap underscores the need for a stronger focus on cultivating teamwork among educators and staff to promote a holistic, inclusive, and student-centered approach to education. (Kim, 2021) One of the critical issues in the Philippines concerning collaboration and teamwork in elementary school leadership is the lack of sufficient professional development for school leaders. While the Department of Education (DepEd) provides some training programs, these often focus on administrative and managerial skills rather than on building effective collaborative leadership capacities. This gap in professional development leaves many school administrators unprepared to foster a collaborative environment that promotes teamwork and shared decision-making among teachers (Gonzales, 2022). Additionally, geographical and resource constraints exacerbate this issue. Many school leaders in remote or rural areas have limited access to professional development opportunities. This disparity results in inconsistent leadership quality across different regions, further complicating the implementation of effective collaborative practices. A study by Bartolome (2019) highlighted the need for more localized and accessible training programs that cater to the unique challenges faced by school leaders in these areas. Cultural factors also pose significant challenges to the effective implementation of collaboration and teamwork in elementary school leadership in the Philippines. The hierarchical nature of many Filipino organizations, including schools, often results in a top-down leadership approach. This cultural tendency can make it difficult for school leaders to promote collaborative practices that require shared leadership and distributed decision-making among teachers and staff (Torres Alieto, 2019). In the District of Binugao, Division of Davao City, there is a noticeable lack of focus on fostering collaboration and teamwork among school administrators, teachers, and staff. While efforts have been made to improve academic performance, the absence of structured initiatives to promote teamwork and shared leadership has limited the potential for creating a more cohesive and supportive school environment. Thus, this study aims to explore the experiences of 2ISSN 3028-1261 10.5281/zenodo.17308813/NIJSE.2025 NIJSE (2025) - school administrators in fostering collaboration and teamwork in elementary schools within the district. 1.1. Purpose of the Study—The purpose of this study is to explore the experiences of school administrators in fostering collaboration and teamwork within elementary school leadership. By examining the strategies, challenges, and successes they encounter in building cohesive and effective leadership teams, the study aims to gain a deeper understanding of how collaborative practices contribute to improved decision-making, school culture, and overall student outcomes. Insights from this research will provide valuable guidance for school leaders and policymakers seeking to strengthen leadership practices and create supportive environments that enhance the collective efficacy of school communities. 1.2. Research Questions—The main purpose of this study was to discover the school administrators’ perception on the role of collaboration and teamwork in enhancing school elementary leadership with diversity management and their inclusion leadership methods is important because it offers important insights into the opportunities and challenges of creating inclusive learning environments. Specifically, this research aims to answer the following: (1) What are the experiences of the teachers in promoting collaboration and teamwork? (2) H ow do they cope with the challenges they encountered in promoting collaboration and teamwork? (3) W hat educational insights can be drawn from the experiences of the school administrators? Department of Education Officials – This study provides valuable data on the effectiveness of current leadership practices in elementary schools. By examining the experiences of school administrators, the research can highlight best practices and identify gaps in policies that support collaborative leadership. School Administrators – By exploring the challenges and successes of their peers in fostering collaboration and teamwork, administrators can gain insights into effective strategies that can be implemented in their own schools. The study can provide a framework for understanding how to navigate common obstacles, such as resistance to collaboration or conflicts within the leadership team. Teachers – Deeper understanding of collaborative leadership practices can lead to improved professional relationships and a more cohesive school culture. Teachers who feel included in the decision-making process and supported by a collaborative leadership team are more likely to be motivated, engaged, and committed to their work. Students – Indirectly benefit from the study as well, as improved collaboration and teamwork among school leaders and teachers contribute to a more effective and supportive learning environment. When school administrators and teachers work together cohesively, it leads to better alignment of teaching strategies, more consistent implementation of educational programs, and a stronger focus on student-centered learning. Future Researchers – This study lays the groundwork for further exploration into collaborative leadership in educational settings. It provides a foundation for investigating the long-term impacts of collaborative practices on school performance, the professional development of educators, and student outcomes. Future research can build on this study by examining the specific factors that facilitate or hinder effective collaboration in different educational contexts, exploring the role of cultural and contextual influences, and developing new frameworks for fostering teamwork in schools. 3ISSN 3028-1261 10.5281/zenodo.17308813/NIJSE.2025 NIJSE (2025) - Finally, to fellow researchers who wanted to conduct a similar or comparative study. This section defines the key terms used in the study to ensure clarity and consistency in their interpretation. The definitions reflect how these terms are applied within the context of elementary school leadership. Collaboration – Refers to the process where school administrators, teachers, and staff work together toward shared goals, exchanging ideas and resources to improve the overall learning environment. Teamwork – Describes the collective effort of individuals within the school community to achieve common objectives, characterized by mutual support, communication, and cooperation. School Administration – Pertains to the leadership and management roles carried out by school heads and administrators, focusing on planning, organizing, and fostering collaboration to create a positive and effective school environment. 1.3. Review of Significant Literature — 1.3.1. Collaboration and Teamwork in School Leadership—Collaboration and teamwork are vital components of effective leadership in elementary education. Research shows that collaborative leadership enhances school climate, fosters shared decision-making, and improves student outcomes (Leithwood Jantzi, 2020; Hargreaves Fullan, 2022). Leaders who promote collective engagement create environments conducive to innovation and reflective practice (Schleicher, 2020; DeWitt, 2019). Leadership, next to classroom instruction, has the greatest impact on student achievement, underscoring its importance in school improvement (Leithwood et al., 2020; Wallace, 2022). Collaborative leadership integrates shared vision, governance, and resource allocation (Hallinger Heck, 2020). It encourages transparency, participation, and communication built on trust (Fullan, 2021; Kotter, 2022; Scharmer, 2019). A supportive culture grounded in honesty and mutual respect drives team cohesion, while open communication facilitates idea exchange (Poff Parks, 2020). Studies confirm that collaborative leadership indirectly improves student learning by strengthening school capacity and collective efficacy (Heck Hallinger, 2020). 1.3.2. Teamwork Dynamics Among School Administrators—Effective teamwork relies on communication, trust, and shared vision (Spillane, 2020; Bryk Schneider, 2022). Collaborative leadership aligns school goals and enhances cohesion, outperforming purely transformational or instructional models (Marks Printy, 2023). However, leadership must adapt to each school’s context—strategies effective in one setting may not translate directly to another (Jacob, 2020). Team-based collaboration integrates curriculum, professional learning, and open communication (Bridges, 2019). It unites administrators, teachers, and staff through shared commitment and participatory decision-making (Maine, 2020). Effective teamwork combines diverse skills and perspectives, enabling flexible, highquality outcomes and efficient decision-making (Jerome, 2021; Mole, 2020). Trust, cooperation, and individual development underpin successful teams (Lewin, 2021; Hall Oldroyd, 2019). 1.3.3. Challenges and Coping Strategies in Promoting Collaboration—School administrators face numerous challenges in promoting collaboration, including resistance to change, limited resources, time constraints, and staff conflict (Fajinmi Oloyede, 2025; Urbani et al., 2024). Financial and training limitations, especially in rural contexts, exacerbate workload and stress (Torrino Naparan, 2023). Effective leaders manage these through open communication, stakeholder engagement, and structured feedback systems. Emotional regulation and resilience are critical for sustaining collaborative efforts (Friedman, 2025). Leaders with high emotional intel4ISSN 3028-1261 10.5281/zenodo.17308813/NIJSE.2025 NIJSE (2025) - ligence navigate interpersonal conflicts and promote positive relationships (Kalkan et al., 2020). Adaptive and transformational leadership approaches enhance team motivation and organizational resilience (Zadok Benoliel, 2024). Cultural diversity also affects teamwork; inclusive leadership practices—active listening, equity, and cultural awareness—transform diversity into a source of strength (Da Fonte BartonArwood, 2017). Time management remains a major barrier, but flexible scheduling and asynchronous communication can maintain collaboration continuity (Smith et al., 2020). Structured collaboration supported by data and clear goals yields stronger outcomes (Ronfeldt et al., 2015). Teacher burnout and new staff integration pose additional challenges. Supportive environments, wellness programs, and mentorship initiatives improve retention and collaboration (Skaalvik Skaalvik, 2021; Ingersoll Strong, 2011). The rise of digital platforms has enabled sustained teamwork but introduced new issues of access and fatigue; strategic tech integration and training mitigate these barriers (Barrera Ursabia, 2021). Reflective leadership—grounded in self-assessment and continuous learning—fosters adaptive and collaborative school cultures (Urbani et al., 2024). 1.3.4. Leadership Approaches that Strengthen Collaboration—Distributed and adaptive leadership models empower teachers, promoting shared responsibility and innovation (Awyan, 2023; Daharee Kerdtip, 2022). Collaborative structures such as professional learning communities and team teaching improve instructional practice and strengthen relationships (Ingram, 2020; Urbani et al., 2024). Effective leaders facilitate relational trust and professional dialogue, fostering innovation and co-reflection (Pesonen et al., 2023). Professional development also plays a crucial role. Team-based training and mentorship programs enhance collaboration skills and encourage reflective practice (Smith et al., 2020; Sjølie et al., 2021). Administrators must embed collaboration into the school’s professional growth mechanisms to ensure sustainability. Contextual and policy factors influence collaborative success. In the Philippines, curriculum leadership and teacher-led innovation thrive under supportive administrators (Ainin, Tampus, Eliseo, 2025). However, high accountability pressures can constrain genuine collaboration (Bush, 2019). Balancing compliance demands with participatory leadership ensures that teamwork remains central to school improvement. 1.4. Synthesis—Collaboration and teamwork play a critical role in shaping the effectiveness of elementary school leadership. School administrators recognize that fostering a collaborative environment among teachers, staff, and stakeholders leads to shared decisionmaking, improved communication, and a collective sense of purpose. In elementary schools, where the foundational learning of students begins, leadership must go beyond mere administrative duties. It requires cultivating relationships, building trust, and encouraging a culture where every voice is valued. Administrators who embrace teamwork often find themselves leading schools that are more responsive to student needs and staff concerns. Many school leaders report that collaboration enhances instructional practices and professional development. By working together in professional learning communities or gradelevel teams, teachers are better equipped to plan lessons, share strategies, and address student learning gaps. Administrators facilitate these interactions by providing time, support, and resources for collaborative planning. These efforts not only strengthen instructional coherence but also promote a positive school culture where teachers feel supported and empowered. Teamwork among educators also fosters innovation as teachers learn from one another and test new approaches in the classroom. However, challenges to collaboration and teamwork 5ISSN 3028-1261 10.5281/zenodo.17308813/NIJSE.2025 NIJSE (2025) - still exist in many school settings. School administrators often face time constraints, lack of resources, and varying levels of teacher commitment or resistance to change. Some may struggle with balancing leadership responsibilities with the need to engage consistently in collaborative practices. Conflicts may also arise due to differences in teaching philosophies or interpersonal dynamics. Despite these challenges, effective school leaders find ways to mediate, communicate, and model teamwork by being approachable, transparent, and consistent in their actions. Experiences of school administrators highlight the importance of shared leadership in fostering a collaborative culture. Many emphasize the role of distributed leadership, where responsibilities are shared among teacher leaders, coordinators, and other staff members. This not only eases the administrative burden but also promotes ownership and accountability among team members. When everyone feels that their contribution matters, motivation increases, and the school community becomes more cohesive. Administrators note that when collaboration is embedded in the school’s vision and daily operations, it leads to better outcomes for both staff and students. In conclusion, the experiences of elementary school administrators reveal that collaboration and teamwork are essential to effective school leadership. These practices strengthen professional relationships, enhance instructional quality, and promote a unified school mission. While obstacles persist, committed leadership and strategic efforts can nurture a culture where collaboration thrives. The insights and experiences of school administrators offer valuable lessons for educational leaders aiming to build inclusive, participatory, and high-performing school environments. Through sustained teamwork, schools become more resilient, adaptive, and student-centered. 1.5. Theoretical Lens—The study is anchored to Bruce Tuckman in 1965 Tuckman’s Stages of Group Development: This model describes the stages a group goes through as it develops: forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. It is relevant to school leadership teams as it provides a framework for understanding the dynamics of team development and the role of school administrators in guiding their teams through these stages to achieve effective collaboration. Tuckman’s Stages of Group Development is a model that outlines the progression a team undergoes as it matures. It consists of five stages: forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. These stages provide a framework for understanding how a group evolves over time, and they are particularly relevant for school leadership teams. School administrators can use this model to guide their teams through these stages, promoting effective collaboration and teamwork among educators and staff. The forming stage is the initial phase where team members come together and begin to understand their roles and the team’s purpose. In a school setting, this may involve administrators, teachers, and staff members meeting to discuss the vision, goals, and expectations for the school year. At this point, team members are usually polite and reserved as they get to know one another. The role of school administrators during this stage is to provide clear direction, establish ground rules, and create an environment that encourages open communication and trust. The storming stage follows, where conflicts and disagreements often arise as team members start to assert their opinions and question leadership and the team’s processes. In schools, this could manifest as disagreements over instructional strategies, resource allocation, or policies. Administrators must navigate these conflicts carefully by promoting open dialogue and helping team members focus on shared goals. This stage is crucial for the development of the team, as it lays the groundwork for a deeper understanding and respect among members, which is essential for 6ISSN 3028-1261 10.5281/zenodo.17308813/NIJSE.2025 NIJSE (2025) - moving forward. Next is the norming stage, where the team begins to establish a sense of cohesion and unity. Members start to resolve their differences, establish norms, and agree on roles and responsibilities. In this phase, school administrators can foster a collaborative culture by encouraging teamwork and recognizing the contributions of individual members. This is also an opportune time for professional development and team-building activities, which can further strengthen the bonds between team members and enhance their collective efficacy. The performing stage is where the team reaches its highest level of productivity and efficiency. The team now functions smoothly, with members working collaboratively towards shared objectives. In the context of school leadership, this is when the team effectively implements strategies, makes data-driven decisions, and addresses student needs in a coordinated manner. Administrators at this stage should focus on sustaining high performance by providing ongoing support, celebrating successes, and addressing any emerging challenges proactively. The final stage, adjourning, involves the disbandment of the team, either temporarily or permanently, as the team’s objectives have been achieved, or its members move on to new roles. For school leadership teams, this could occur at the end of the school year or after a specific project has been completed. Administrators should facilitate a positive conclusion by acknowledging the team’s accomplishments and reflecting on lessons learned. This stage is also an opportunity to plan for future collaborations and ensure that the relationships built during the previous stages are maintained. Overall, Tuckman’s Stages of Group Development provides a valuable framework for school administrators to understand the dynamics of team development. By recognizing and addressing the unique challenges and opportunities presented at each stage, school leaders can effectively guide their teams toward achieving their goals and fostering a collaborative and supportive school environment. Another relevant theory that would anchor this study is the Transformational theory, primarily associated with leadership, was significantly developed by James MacGregor Burns in his seminal work ”Leadership” published in 1978. Burns distinguished between two types of leadership: transactional and transformational. While transactional leadership focuses on exchanges and rewards to motivate followers, transformational leadership seeks to elevate the motivations and moralities of both leaders and followers. This theory emphasizes the profound impact leaders can have on their followers by fostering an environment of inspiration, trust, and mutual respect, ultimately leading to significant change and improvement within organizations. At the core of transformational leadership are four key components articulated by Bernard Bass, who expanded on Burns’ work. These components idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, and individualized consideration serve as the foundation for effective transformational leadership. Idealized influence refers to leaders acting as role models, garnering trust and admiration from their followers. Inspirational motivation involves articulating a compelling vision that energizes and motivates team members. Intellectual stimulation encourages creativity and problem-solving, challenging followers to think critically and embrace innovation. Finally, individualized consideration highlights the importance of recognizing each follower’s unique strengths and providing tailored support and mentorship. The impact of transformational leadership extends beyond individual followers; it can create a positive organizational culture and drive substantial change. When leaders adopt a transformational approach, they cultivate an environment where employees feel valued, engaged, and empowered. This increased morale often translates into higher levels of performance and productivity, as team members are motivated to go above and 7ISSN 3028-1261 10.5281/zenodo.17308813/NIJSE.2025 NIJSE (2025) - beyond their basic job requirements. Additionally, organizations led by transformational leaders tend to be more adaptable, as these leaders encourage innovation and flexibility, enabling teams to navigate challenges and seize new opportunities effectively. Transformational theory has wide-ranging applications across various fields, including education, healthcare, and corporate environments. In educational settings, for example, transformational leaders can inspire both teachers and students to strive for excellence and embrace lifelong learning. In the corporate world, companies that foster transformational leadership often experience enhanced employee engagement, reduced turnover, and improved overall performance. As organizations continue to face complex challenges in an ever-changing landscape, the principles of transformational theory remain relevant, offering valuable insights for leaders seeking to inspire and mobilize their teams toward shared goals and meaningful change. Figure 1 illustrates three key aspects of the topic ”Collaboration and Teamwork in Elementary School Leadership: Experiences of School Administrators.” The first circle emphasizes how school administrators perceive the role of collaboration and teamwork in enhancing leadership. This element reflects their beliefs, attitudes, and understanding of how collaborative practices can influence school dynamics, improve decisionmaking, and foster a supportive environment for both staff and students. It is crucial for administrators to recognize the value of teamwork, as it sets the foundation for promoting a culture of shared responsibility and collective growth in schools. The second circle highlights the challenges faced by school administrators in promoting collaboration and teamwork within the leadership team. This component focuses on the practical difficulties that arise in the implementation of collaborative strategies. Such challenges might include resistance to change, conflicting priorities among staff, lack of trust, or inadequate communication. The intersection of these two circles, combined with the third element, presents the insights that can be drawn from the experiences of school administrators. This central area signifies the practical knowledge and lessons learned from navigating the complexities of teamwork in an educational setting. It reflects how administrators can leverage their experiences to refine their approaches, mentor other leaders, and contribute to the broader discourse on effective school leadership. 2. Methodology Presented in this chapter were the description of the research design, philosophical assumptions, research participants and sampling, ethical considerations, research instrument, data collection, and data analysis. Focus groups, in-depth interviews, and participant observation were the three most popular types of qualitative research. Every technique was best suited for acquiring a certain kind of data. It was appropriate to get information on normally occurring behaviors in their typical settings through participant observation. When gathering information about people’s backgrounds, viewpoints, and experiences, in-depth interviews (IDI) were the best method, especially when discussing delicate subjects. Focus groups were useful for gathering information on a group’s cultural norms and for producing high-level summaries of topics that were important to the represented cultural groups or subgroups. Patton (2019) defined phenomenology as an inquiry that asked the question, ”What is the structure and essence of the experience of this phenomenon for these people?” The goal of this research worked well with this definition in trying to understand the challenges of the floating teachers. Giorgi (2019) cautioned researchers to be prepared for an 8ISSN 3028-1261 10.5281/zenodo.17308813/NIJSE.2025 NIJSE (2025) - Fig. 1. The Conceptual Framework of the Study investigation that was greater in both depth and breadth than the offered description implied. He suggested information be viewed as only the tip of the iceberg. 2.1. Philosophical Assumptions—The philosophical assumption served as a framework for gathering, examining, and interpreting facts related to a particular area of research. It provided the context for the decisions and conclusions that followed. Typical philosophical presumptions came in several forms, which were further explained below. A good research project included choosing the paradigm and the topic, challenge, or area of interest. The choice of the paradigm and the topic, problem, or area of interest were the first steps in any good research project. According to Stanage (2019), the word ”paradigm” had Greek (paradeigma) and Latin (paradigm) roots, denoting a pattern, model, or example. A paradigm was a person’s thought patterns; it was a leading example among examples, an exemplar, or a model to be followed to guide design decisions. Put another way, accepting a viewpoint was what constituted a paradigm (Stanage 2019). This view was supported by Denzin and Lincoln (2019), who defined a research paradigm as a “basic set of beliefs that guide action,” dealing with first principles, ‘ultimates’ or the researcher’s worldview or philosophy. In developing research methodologies, there were three types of philosophical assumptions used. Epistemological assumptions dealt with subjective evidence that was collected from field studies. Axiological assumptions took into account the biases of the researcher and actively reported them. It was used to establish whether the environment being studied was a product of the behavior that was encountered or if the behavior was a product of the environment (Pring, 2019). Ontological assumptions referred to the nature of the reality of the subject that was being researched. The latter assumption was best suited to my study, as a qualitative researcher, I believed that these realities were perceived by different individuals. I also believed that these realities were heavily shaped by their experiences. Using phenomenology as a methodology, this proposed study focused on the teachers’ opinions, feelings, experiences, and inner thoughts 9ISSN 3028-1261 10.5281/zenodo.17308813/NIJSE.2025 NIJSE (2025) - lytical framework was never ‘final’ until the last transcript had been coded. Indexing involves identifying portions or sections of data that relate to a specific theme. This procedure is conducted using all textual data collected, such as transcripts of interviews. Ritchie and Spencer (2019) suggest using a numerical system to index references and annotating them in the margin beside the text for ease. Qualitative data analysis tools are ideal for this task. Charting involves summarizing the data by category from each transcript. Good charting requires an ability to strike a balance between reducing the data on the one hand and retaining the original meanings and ‘feel’ of the interviewees’ words on the other. The chart should include references to interesting or illustrative quotations. The final stage, mapping, and interpretation, includes an analysis of the important qualities depicted in the charts. This analysis should be able to provide a schematic diagram of the event/phenomenon, assisting the researcher in interpreting the data set. I must be cognizant of the objectives of qualitative analysis and define concepts, map the range and nature of phenomena, create typologies, find associations, provide explanations, and develop strategies (Ritchie Spencer, 2019). These concepts, technologies, and associations mirror the participant. Therefore, any strategies or recommendations the researcher offers reflect the participants’ real views, beliefs, and values. Shown in figure 2 were steps in the process of the analytical framework of the study, which involves familiarization, coding, developing a thematic framework, indexing, charting, mapping, and interpretation. 2.12. Trustworthiness of the Study —Concepts of validity and reliability were relatively foreign to the field of qualitative research. Instead of focusing on reliability and validity, qualitative researchers substituted data trustworthiness. Trustworthiness consisted of the following components: credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability (Harts, 2019). Credibility – Credibility contributed to a belief in the trustworthiness of data by observing the attributes of prolonged engagement. To address the issue of credibility, I interviewed as many research participants as possible, or up to the point of saturation. Transferability – Transferability was concerned with the extent to which the findings of one study could be applied to other situations. In positivist work, the concern often lay in demonstrating that the results of the work at hand could be applied to a wider population. Since the findings of a qualitative project were specific to a small number of particular environments and individuals, it was impossible to demonstrate that the findings and conclusions applied to other situations and populations. Therefore, to ensure transferability, I acknowledged that it was my responsibility as a researcher to ensure that sufficient contextual transformation about the fieldwork sites was provided to enable the reader to make such a transfer. Confirmability – Confirmability associated objectivity in science with the use of instruments that were not dependent on human skill and perception. It was, Figure 2. Analytical Framework of the Study however, difficult to ensure real objectivity since, as even tests and questionnaires were designed by humans, the intrusion of the researcher’s biases was inevitable. In this case, steps were taken to help ensure, as far as possible, that the work’s findings were the result of the experiences and ideas of the participants, rather than the characteristics and preferences of the researcher. 16 ISSN 3028-1261 10.5281/zenodo.17308813/NIJSE.2025 NIJSE (2025) - Fig. 2. Analytical Framework of the Study 17 ISSN 3028-1261 10.5281/zenodo.17308813/NIJSE.2025 NIJSE (2025) - 3. Results and Discussion This chapter presents the detailed analysis and interpretation of the data gathered from the participants who shared their lived experiences regarding collaboration and teamwork in elementary school leadership. The data were collected through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions, allowing the school administrators to express their insights, perspectives, and actual practices related to collaborative leadership. Through thematic analysis, common patterns and significant narratives were identified, categorized, and interpreted to address the research questions of the study. This chapter is structured around the emerging themes that highlight the realities, challenges, and strategies experienced by the participants in promoting teamwork within their respective school communities. Each theme is supported by direct participant responses, translated from the participants mother-tongue into English, ensuring both authenticity and clarity. These narratives are further examined and connected to relevant literature to provide a comprehensive understanding of how collaboration and teamwork influence leadership effectiveness in elementary school settings. 3.1. The Experiences of the Teachers in Promoting Collaboration and Teamwork —This section explores the lived experiences of elementary school administrators in fostering collaboration and teamwork among teachers and staff. Their narratives reflect how leadership practices, school culture, and professional relationships influence the ways in which teamwork is built, sustained, and strengthened. Through their stories, the study uncovers both the successes and struggles that school leaders face in cultivating an environment where collaboration thrives. The data gathered revealed recurring themes that illustrate the depth and variety of their experiences—ranging from the creation of supportive professional communities to the intentional alignment of roles and responsibilities. These themes also highlight how leadership styles, trust-building, and shared goals contribute to collaborative efforts that ultimately support teaching and learning. The following themes emerged from the analysis of participants’ responses, each offering insight into how school administrators experience and promote teamwork in their respective contexts. 3.1.1. Building a Culture of Mutual Support—A key experience shared by the school administrators in promoting collaboration and teamwork was their intentional effort to build a culture of mutual support among teachers. They emphasized that fostering an environment where teachers feel valued, heard, and supported creates a foundation for open communication and trust. This supportive culture helps teachers feel more comfortable sharing ideas, asking for help, and working together toward common goals. The participants described how their leadership practices aimed to encourage this culture by being approachable, respecting teacher input, and actively promoting cooperation. These experiences highlight the crucial role of school leaders in shaping a positive and inclusive environment that nurtures teamwork and collective responsibility among staff. The statement from Participant 7 underscores the importance of proactive and empathetic leadership in fostering collaboration. By expressing intentional efforts to make teachers feel supported and not alone, the school leader cultivates a sense of psychological safety and belonging. This aligns with the principle that effective teamwork is rooted in trust and emotional connection, where leaders serve as facilitators rather than distant figures of authority. When administrators initiate support without waiting to be approached, it sends a powerful message of sol18 ISSN 3028-1261 10.5281/zenodo.17308813/NIJSE.2025 NIJSE (2025) - idarity and shared responsibility. Such behavior reflects servant leadership, where the needs of the team are prioritized to empower individuals, thereby laying the groundwork for authentic collaboration. Participant 8 highlights democratic leadership as a crucial element in promoting cooperation and teamwork within the school context. By stating that decision-making should not rest solely with the principal, the administrator reinforces the importance of participative governance. Creating an environment where teachers’ voices are heard fosters mutual respect, which in turn encourages a stronger sense of ownership and engagement in school initiatives. This inclusive approach reduces hierarchical barriers and cultivates a collegial atmosphere. When educators perceive that their contributions are valued and their opinions considered, they are more likely to collaborate actively, support collective decisions, and invest in shared goals. The perspective of Participant 9 emphasizes the connection between administrative support and teachers’ willingness to collaborate. The assurance of support from school leaders helps mitigate fears of judgment or failure, thus promoting an open culture where sharing ideas is normalized and encouraged. When teachers feel backed by the administration, their confidence increases, which directly impacts their participation in collaborative processes. This reflects the findings in educational leadership literature that psychological safety and trust are precursors to innovative thinking and teamwork. Supportive leadership thus acts as a catalyst for open communication, professional risk-taking, and collaborative engagement among educators. These responses vividly illustrate the pivotal role that school leaders play in both modeling and cultivating a positive culture of teamwork within educational settings. Rather than imposing collaboration through rigid rules or mandates, effective leaders foster an environment where teamwork naturally evolves from a foundation of trust and open, transparent communication. This nurturing approach helps create a climate where teachers feel psychologically safe and valued, which, in turn, encourages genuine cooperation and collective problemsolving. When leaders actively cultivate such an atmosphere of support, it not only strengthens professional relationships but also promotes the active and enthusiastic participation of teachers in various school initiatives and decisionmaking processes. This dynamic interplay between leadership and culture thus becomes a powerful catalyst for sustained collaboration and shared commitment to the school’s mission. Extensive research by scholars in educational leadership further supports the importance of positive school culture as a fundamental driver of effective collaboration. Hargreaves and Fullan (2022) articulate that collaborative cultures within schools thrive when leaders make relational trust and emotional safety their top priorities. They argue that when educators feel secure and supported emotionally, they are more likely to engage openly, take risks, and innovate collaboratively. Similarly, DuFour and Mattos (2019) highlight that collective responsibility among teachers, coupled with supportive and empathetic leadership, cultivates a strong sense of belonging and shared purpose. This sense of belonging is critical, as it transforms isolated efforts into cohesive teamwork that benefits the entire school community. The participants’ narratives in this study resonate deeply with these scholarly insights, providing concrete examples of how school administrators actively shape an inclusive and encouraging environment. In such settings, teachers are not only motivated but willingly commit to collaborative efforts, recognizing that their contributions are valued and that together they can achieve greater educational outcomes. 3.1.2. Navigating Communication Barriers and Misalignment—Participant 1 highlights a common challenge faced by school administrators: maintaining effective communication 19 ISSN 3028-1261 10.5281/zenodo.17308813/NIJSE.2025 NIJSE (2025) - amidst heavy workloads. The statement emphasizes that the multitude of tasks can hinder the flow of communication, leading some teachers to become less receptive to suggestions. This situation often results in misunderstandings and a breakdown in collaborative efforts. The struggle to balance administrative demands with open dialogue reflects findings in educational leadership literature that time constraints and competing priorities are significant barriers to communication (Grissom, Egalite, Lindsay, 2021). When teachers are overwhelmed, they may become disengaged or resistant, making it difficult for school leaders to foster cohesive teamwork. Addressing this issue requires intentional communication strategies and consistent dialogue to maintain alignment and collective focus. Participant 2’s insight draws attention to the problem of role ambiguity and inconsistent interpretation of responsibilities within teams. Even when roles are established, discrepancies in how these roles and expectations are understood can lead to confusion and hinder collaboration. This challenge reflects the need for clear, structured communication in team settings, especially in diverse school environments where teachers may interpret instructions differently based on prior experience or assumptions. Research supports the importance of role clarity in enhancing group performance and minimizing conflict (Katzenbach Smith, 2020). School administrators must therefore ensure that communication is not only delivered but also comprehended in a consistent manner by all members of the teaching team. The perspective of Participant 3 centers on the difficulties of maintaining alignment with the school’s vision, especially when staff members are occupied with various responsibilities. The lack of a shared understanding of the school’s goals often leads to internal conflict and fragmentation of efforts. This scenario underscores the importance of visionary leadership and continuous reinforcement of collective objectives. When teachers do not clearly grasp or connect with the school’s vision, their participation in collaborative initiatives may be misaligned or inconsistent. Research by Leithwood et al. (2020) highlights the role of clear, sustained communication of vision as essential to building unified, goal-driven teams. School leaders must therefore embed the vision into daily practices and discussions to ensure consistent direction and buy-in. gaps sometimes led to misunderstandings and hindered smooth cooperation within the school. The leaders emphasized the difficulty in ensuring that all staff members are on the same page, especially in busy school environments where time constraints and varying priorities complicate consistent communication. These challenges highlight the ongoing struggle administrators encounter in aligning diverse perspectives and fostering true collaborative efforts despite logistical and interpersonal barriers. The participant responses clearly indicate that communication challenges remain a significant obstacle in promoting collaboration among school staff. Issues such as unclear roles, differing expectations, and resistance to feedback create confusion and sometimes conflict, which weaken teamwork efforts. These challenges are often exacerbated by the busy schedules and heavy workloads that teachers and administrators face, making consistent and effective communication difficult to maintain. The lived experiences of the administrators reveal the complex dynamics of aligning diverse perspectives while trying to sustain a shared vision for the school. Recent research supports these findings, emphasizing that clear communication and alignment of goals are essential to effective teamwork but are often difficult to achieve in practice. For example, Leithwood et al. (2020) highlight that miscommunication and unclear expectations undermine relational trust, which is critical for collaborative cultures in schools. Similarly, Zhao and Ok (2021) found that communication barriers and lack of shared 20 ISSN 3028-1261 10.5281/zenodo.17308813/NIJSE.2025 NIJSE (2025) - understanding among educators lead to fragmentation in school leadership efforts. These studies align with the participants’ narratives, underscoring that overcoming communication gaps is a continuous and necessary challenge for school administrators to foster genuine collaboration. 3.1.3. Managing Conflicting Priorities and Time Constraints—A recurring challenge experienced by school administrators in promoting collaboration and teamwork is managing the competing priorities and limited time available to teachers. Participants reported that heavy workloads, administrative tasks, and multiple responsibilities often leave little room for collaborative planning and shared decision-making. This scarcity of time creates stress and sometimes frustration, which negatively affects teachers’ willingness and capacity to engage in teamwork. The administrators noted that balancing instructional duties with collaboration demands requires careful scheduling and flexibility, but even then, finding consistent opportunities for meaningful teamwork remains difficult. These experiences highlight how external pressures and time limitations pose ongoing barriers to fostering effective collaboration within elementary schools. Participant 3 expresses a critical and commonly felt concern among school administrators and teachers alike: the overwhelming volume of tasks that crowd out opportunities for collaboration. The participant highlights how collaboration and teamwork, though valued, often become a low priority due to pressing workloads. This aligns with research findings that show how task saturation among educators reduces the time and mental space necessary for meaningful collaboration (Hargreaves Fullan, 2020). When collaborative practices are constantly deprioritized, they lose their strategic role in improving instruction and sustaining school culture. School leaders must therefore explore systemic ways to embed collaboration into daily routines, rather than treating it as an optional or supplementary activity. Echoing the sentiment of Participant 3, Participant 5 further emphasizes how deadlines and workload pressures frequently result in canceled team meetings, disrupting the consistency and flow of collaborative efforts. The cancellation of collaborative sessions can signal to teachers that teamwork is expendable, thereby weakening their commitment to collective engagement. Research by DuFour and Marzano (2011) stresses the importance of protected time for collaboration, such as scheduled professional learning communities (PLCs), to ensure sustained professional dialogue and instructional coherence. When such structures are not institutionalized, school teams struggle to maintain alignment and lose momentum in joint initiatives. Effective leadership involves carving out non-negotiable time for collaboration despite operational demands. Participant 6 identifies time management as a core struggle, particularly given the simultaneous demands of teaching multiple classes and completing administrative reports. This illustrates the multifaceted nature of educators’ responsibilities, where instructional duties, documentation, and compliance-related tasks compete for attention. Time management challenges not only affect individual productivity but also hinder collective processes like planning, problem-solving, and reflective dialogue. According to Sahlberg (2019), excessive administrative workload can stifle creativity and reduce collaboration, particularly when teachers feel isolated or rushed. School administrators must advocate for manageable workloads, distribute leadership tasks effectively, and streamline reporting processes to free up time for team-based learning and collaboration. The participants responses reveal that conflicting priorities and limited time significantly hinder effective collaboration among teachers. The recurring theme is that heavy workloads and numerous deadlines force teachers to prioritize individual tasks over teamwork, 21 ISSN 3028-1261 10.5281/zenodo.17308813/NIJSE.2025 NIJSE (2025) - Fig. 3. The experiences of the teachers in promoting collaboration and teamwork causing collaboration efforts to be sidelined or canceled. These insights highlight the practical realities administrators face, where the demands of classroom instruction and administrative responsibilities leave little space for consistent, meaningful teamwork. Recent studies confirm that time scarcity is a critical barrier to school collaboration. For instance, Kim and Kim (2021) emphasize that teacher workload and competing demands limit opportunities for collaborative planning, which can negatively affect school climate and student outcomes. Similarly, Roberts and Weller (2020) argue that time constraints disrupt the continuity of professional learning communities and teamwork, reducing the effectiveness of collaborative initiatives. These findings align with the participants’ experiences, underscoring the need for intentional time management strategies and systemic support to facilitate collaboration despite these challenges. Figure 3. The figure outlines the experiences of teachers in fostering collaboration and teamwork, presenting both positive outcomes and challenges. On the positive side, teachers successfully build a culture of mutual support, where colleagues work together to share ideas, resources, and strategies, creating a more cohesive and effective educational environment. However, they also encounter significant challenges, such as navigating communication barriers and misalignment among team members, which can hinder progress and create friction. Additionally, teachers often struggle with managing conflicting priorities and time constraints, as balancing collaborative efforts with individual responsibilities requires careful coordination and flexibility. These experiences highlight the complexities of teamwork in educational settings, emphasizing the need for clear communication, shared goals, and efficient time management to overcome obstacles and sustain productive collaboration. 3.2. Teachers cope with the challenges they encountered in promoting collaboration 22 ISSN 3028-1261 10.5281/zenodo.17308813/NIJSE.2025 NIJSE (2025) - and teamwork—Promoting collaboration and teamwork in elementary schools often presents various challenges that can affect teachers’ motivation and effectiveness. Understanding how teachers cope with these difficulties is essential for school administrators and policymakers to provide appropriate support and create strategies that enhance cooperative efforts. The experiences of teachers in managing obstacles related to communication, time constraints, and conflicting priorities reveal important coping mechanisms that enable them to sustain collaboration despite these barriers. This section explores the different ways teachers navigate and address the challenges they face in fostering teamwork. By examining their coping strategies, this study aims to shed light on practical approaches and resilience factors that contribute to maintaining a collaborative culture within the school community. Insights gained from these experiences can inform leadership practices that support teacher well-being and collective efficacy in the pursuit of shared educational goals. 3.2.1. Seeking Open Communication and Feedback —One common coping strategy teachers use to overcome challenges in promoting collaboration is actively seeking open communication and feedback among colleagues. Participants shared that maintaining honest and respectful dialogue helps address misunderstandings, align goals, and build trust within the team. By encouraging open channels for sharing ideas and concerns, teachers create a supportive environment that fosters cooperation even when difficulties arise. Open communication serves as a vital tool to bridge gaps caused by misalignment or resistance, allowing teachers to clarify expectations and work collaboratively toward shared objectives. This strategy not only helps in resolving conflicts but also strengthens professional relationships and collective commitment to teamwork. Participant 8 emphasizes the value of open and constructive dialogue as a mechanism for resolving team problems and maintaining workflow efficiency. The participant’s focus on “talking properly” suggests an intentional effort to communicate respectfully and clearly, which research identifies as critical to conflict resolution (Jehn Mannix, 2019). When conflicts are addressed through effective communication, teams are able to realign their goals and processes, preventing misunderstandings from escalating. This proactive approach not only repairs working relationships but also reinforces trust and collaboration, essential components of high-performing school teams. The statement from Participant 9 highlights the role of continuous feedback in promoting improvement and teamwork cohesion. Encouraging feedback creates a culture of openness and professional growth, where members feel safe to share constructive criticism and suggestions. Research shows that feedback loops facilitate reflective practice and team learning, which are vital for sustained collaboration (Hattie Timperley, 2021). By normalizing feedback exchanges, school leaders foster transparency and collective responsibility, enabling teams to identify areas for development and celebrate successes collaboratively. Participant 10 underscores the importance of clear and open communication in preventing conflicts and clarifying expectations within teams. The participant’s experience aligns with leadership studies that link transparent communication with improved team functioning and reduced misunderstandings (Clampitt, 2016). Clear articulation of roles, goals, and expectations ensures that all members are aligned, which minimizes friction and fosters a cooperative atmosphere. This highlights the critical role of school administrators as facilitators of communication channels that promote clarity, mutual respect, and shared understanding among educators. The participant responses highlight that open communication and feedback are key coping mechanisms teachers use to manage challenges in collaboration and teamwork. By fostering a 23 ISSN 3028-1261 10.5281/zenodo.17308813/NIJSE.2025 NIJSE (2025) - culture where dialogue is encouraged and feedback is welcomed, teachers are able to address misunderstandings early and realign their goals effectively. This proactive approach helps reduce tensions and build trust, which is essential for sustaining cooperative efforts despite obstacles. The emphasis on respectful and honest conversations also reinforces mutual support and collective problem-solving among team members. Recent studies reinforce the importance of open communication as a vital strategy in overcoming teamwork challenges. For instance, Nguyen and Nguyen (2022) found that schools promoting transparent communication had higher levels of teacher engagement and collaboration. Similarly, Kim et al. (2021) argue that structured feedback processes enhance professional relationships and reduce conflicts, thereby strengthening team cohesion. These findings align closely with the participants’ experiences, underscoring that communication is not only a tool for information exchange but also a foundational element in building resilient and effective teams within schools. 3.2.2. Utilizing Flexible Scheduling and Time Management Strategies —Teachers often face the significant challenge of balancing limited time with numerous competing priorities, which can easily hinder opportunities for effective collaboration. To cope with these demands, many educators have adopted flexible scheduling and strategic time management techniques as essential tools for sustaining teamwork. Participants in the study described how they intentionally adjust meeting times to fit the varying availability of their colleagues, often opting for early mornings, lunch breaks, or late afternoons when traditional schedules may not align. They also make deliberate use of their planning periods or free blocks during the school day to focus on joint projects, lesson planning, or problemsolving discussions. In some cases, teachers extend their collaboration beyond regular school hours—whether before or after school, or even during weekends, to ensure that important conversations and cooperative work continue uninterrupted despite their already busy workloads. This flexibility in scheduling reflects not only a practical response to time constraints but also a commitment to the collaborative process itself. By consciously managing their time and remaining open to alternative arrangements, teachers demonstrate a willingness to prioritize teamwork alongside their individual responsibilities. This adaptability allows them to maximize every available moment for shared efforts, ensuring that collaborative initiatives do not fall by the wayside due to time pressures. Furthermore, this approach helps mitigate the stress that can arise from juggling multiple demands simultaneously, as it encourages more intentional and focused use of time rather than reactive or fragmented work. Participant 4 highlights the proactive efforts of teachers to create opportunities for collaboration despite a busy school schedule. By utilizing free periods or after-class time for meetings, educators demonstrate a commitment to prioritizing teamwork even when formal time may not be allocated. This reflects findings from studies that show successful collaboration often depends on the willingness of team members to creatively manage their schedules (Vangrieken et al., 2017). Such flexible time management supports the continuity of collaborative practices, ensuring that teamwork is sustained alongside instructional responsibilities. The statement from Participant 5 illustrates a high level of dedication, as teachers not only adjust their regular schedules but sometimes collaborate during weekends to complete tasks. This underscores the importance of flexibility and sacrifice in maintaining effective teamwork in demanding educational environments. While this commitment facilitates the accomplishment of collective goals, research also cautions against potential risks of burnout when educators consistently extend work beyond regular hours (Bakker Demerouti, 2018). There24 ISSN 3028-1261 10.5281/zenodo.17308813/NIJSE.2025 NIJSE (2025) - fore, school leaders must balance encouraging collaboration with ensuring teacher well-being to sustain long-term productivity. Participant 6 emphasizes prioritizing time management to protect both individual work and collaborative efforts. Effective time management strategies help reduce conflicts between administrative duties and teamwork, allowing educators to perform their roles efficiently without compromising collaboration. This aligns with research by Little (2019), which advocates for intentional scheduling and delegation to optimize time use in schools. School administrators play a key role in fostering a culture that values time management by providing structures and supports that enable teachers to balance responsibilities and collaborate effectively. Teachers’ responses indicate that flexible scheduling and deliberate time management are crucial coping strategies to address the challenges posed by limited time and competing priorities. By adjusting meeting times to fit into free periods, after-class hours, or even weekends, teachers demonstrate adaptability and commitment to maintaining collaboration despite busy workloads. This approach reflects a proactive mindset, where teachers take ownership of their schedules to preserve opportunities for teamwork without sacrificing their primary instructional duties. Recent literature supports these findings, highlighting that effective time management and flexible planning significantly enhance collaboration among educators. For example, Lee and Brown (2021) found that schools encouraging flexible scheduling saw increased teacher participation in collaborative activities. Similarly, Santos and Reyes (2022) emphasized that adaptive time management fosters a sustainable collaborative culture, mitigating burnout and promoting teacher wellbeing. These studies align with the participants’ experiences, illustrating that flexibility and intentional time use are key to overcoming timerelated barriers in school teamwork. 3.3. Leveraging Support Networks and Peer Encouragement —To cope with the difficulties in promoting collaboration and teamwork, teachers often rely on support networks and encouragement from peers. Participants shared that having colleagues who motivate each other, share resources, and offer emotional support helps them navigate challenges and stay committed to teamwork. These social connections provide a sense of belonging and collective resilience that strengthens collaborative efforts. By leaning on these support systems, teachers create an environment where challenges are met with shared problem-solving and encouragement. This peer support not only sustains motivation but also fosters a positive atmosphere conducive to ongoing collaboration. Participant 10 highlights the critical role of peer motivation and mutual support in overcoming fatigue and maintaining collaborative efforts. The statement reflects the social-emotional dimension of teamwork, where encouragement from colleagues acts as a buffer against burnout and stress (Bakker et al., 2020). This kind of peer support nurtures resilience, helping educators persevere through demanding periods. Studies show that motivation from team members not only strengthens individual morale but also enhances group cohesion, which is essential for sustained collaboration in challenging school environments. Participant 11 emphasizes the use of digital communication tools, such as group chats, as platforms for idea sharing and mutual encouragement. This reflects how technology can bridge physical and temporal barriers, enabling continuous support among team members outside formal meetings. Research indicates that virtual collaboration tools foster immediacy and connectedness, which are vital for maintaining engagement and positive team dynamics (Tucker Zhang, 2021). The ability to quickly exchange ideas and provide encouragement contributes to a supportive culture that sustains collaboration during stressful 25 ISSN 3028-1261 10.5281/zenodo.17308813/NIJSE.2025 NIJSE (2025) - tion and communication norms (storming and norming), and fostering shared accountability and autonomy (performing). By aligning leadership practices with the stages of group development, administrators can intentionally nurture stronger and more resilient school teams. Moreover, school systems and policy-makers should emphasize leadership training programs that integrate both developmental and transformational frameworks. School administrators need preparation not only in managerial tasks but also in people-centered leadership that cultivates collaboration, trust, and innovation. In doing so, education systems can ensure that schools are led by leaders who are capable of transforming school culture and driving collective success. Finally, these findings open new directions for research and practice. Future studies might explore how Tuckman’s model and transformational leadership can be integrated into leadership coaching, performance management, or school-wide reform efforts. As collaboration becomes increasingly critical in navigating educational challenges, aligning leadership with developmental and transformational principles will be essential for cultivating thriving and adaptive school communities. 4.3. Future Directions—Based on the findings of this study, it is important that all key stakeholders utilize the insights gained to enhance the professional journey of novice teachers and create more collaborative, supportive educational environments. Students – For novice students, this study emphasizes the importance of self-awareness, openness to feedback, and engagement in reflective practices. Students are encouraged to become active participants in their learning communities, seek peer support, and remain adaptable in refining their study habits. By embracing the process of continuous learning and collaboration, novice students can strengthen their academic confidence and contribute meaningfully to their personal growth and school goals. Teachers – For novice teachers, this study emphasizes the importance of self-awareness, openness to feedback, and engagement in reflective practice. Teachers are encouraged to become active participants in professional learning communities, seek peer mentoring, and remain adaptable in refining their teaching methods. By embracing the process of continuous learning and collaboration, novice teachers can strengthen their pedagogical confidence and contribute meaningfully to school goals. School Principals and School Heads – As the frontline leaders in schools, principals and school heads have a unique opportunity to shape a culture that supports professional collaboration. This study highlights the importance of principals adopting transformational leadership strategies to inspire, mentor, and empower novice teachers. Encouraging open communication, fostering trust, and promoting teamwork among staff members can significantly enhance teachers’ confidence and collective performance. Furthermore, principals should regularly assess the developmental stages of their teams and provide interventions tailored to the needs of each stage, in line with Tuckman’s framework. The Department of Education – The study’s results provide valuable information about the real-life challenges and coping strategies of novice teachers, especially in fostering collaboration and aligning with school goals. These insights can support the Department of Education in strengthening teacher induction programs and enhancing policies that promote professional development grounded in experiential, constructivist, and transformational approaches. By institutionalizing school-based mentoring systems and providing resources that encourage collaboration and reflective practice, the department can play a pivotal role in improving teacher retention and instructional quality. Other Stakeholders – Parents, local government units, and education-oriented organiza32 ISSN 3028-1261 10.5281/zenodo.17308813/NIJSE.2025 NIJSE (2025) - tions also have a role in creating a school culture that embraces collaboration and shared responsibility. Their involvement—through community partnerships, donations, or volunteer support—can help address gaps in resources and build a more inclusive and enabling environment for novice teachers. Engaging external stakeholders in school activities also promotes stronger school-community relations, enhancing student outcomes and school effectiveness. Future Researchers – The findings invite further exploration of various dimensions of novice teachers’ experiences. Future research could examine how specific leadership styles affect collaboration and retention, or how team development strategies can be integrated into teacher preparation programs. Investigating the long-term impact of mentorship, collaborative learning structures, and school culture on novice teachers’ career trajectories can further enrich the literature. It is also recommended that similar studies be conducted across diverse school contexts to develop a more comprehensive understanding of novice teacher development. 5. References Ainin, J., Tampus, M. G., & Eliseo, J. M. (2025). Teacher leadership and collaboration in leading curriculum innovation: A case study on effective practices. International Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities,6(1), 96–114. https://doi.org/10.47505/IJRSS. 2025.6110 Akba s¸ , E. M., Can, ¨ O. Z. L. ¨ U., ¨ Unver, E., ¨ Oz c¸ i c¸ ek, F., Demirta s¸ , L., Ya s¸ ar, H., & ¨ Ozt ¨ urk, P. (Eds.). (2020). Dahili aciller. Akademisyen Kitabevi. Andersen, T. (2019). Diversity and educational policy: Challenges and opportunities. Policy and Practice in Education,8(4), 102–119. Awyan, M. (2023). Distributed leadership of school heads, participation in decision making and teamwork skills of the teachers: A causal model on organizational commitment in public schools. European Journal of Education Studies,10(1), 123–145. https://doi.org/10. 46827/ejes.v10i1.5852 Aziz, A. (2019). Fostering leadership in elementary schools: A comprehensive approach (Vol. 15). Barrera, J. D., & Ursabia, R. T. (2021). Challenges and coping strategies of school administrators and elementary teachers during pandemic. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research,3(6), 12. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.03. 06.12 Bartolome, M. (2019). Challenges in implementing professional learning communities in rural schools in the philippines. International Journal of Educational Development in Asia, 2(1), 67–78. Becker, J. (2020). Quantitative data analysis for beginners. Wiley. Black, R. (2020). The role of leadership in promoting inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education,22(3), 89–104. Bolden, R. (2011). Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews,13(3), 251–269. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Qualitative research in psychology: An introduction. Psychology Press. Bridges, W. (2019). Managing transitions in school leadership: Strategies for success. Leadership in Education,27(2), 12–25. 33 ISSN 3028-1261 10.5281/zenodo.17308813/NIJSE.2025 NIJSE (2025) - Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2022). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. Journal of Educational Change,18(1), 30–45. Bush, T. (2020). Leadership and management development in education: An international perspective. International Journal of Leadership in Education,23(2), 123–137. Chounta, I. - A. (2022). Collaborative learning and patterns of practice [arXiv:2203.15834]. arXiv Preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.15834 Corcoran, L., Saikia, P., Ugalde-Loo, C. E., & Abeysekera, M. (2025). An effective methodology to quantify cooling demand in the uk housing stock. Applied Energy,380, 125002. Creswell, J. W. (2019). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th). SAGE Publications. Da Fonte, M. A., & Barton-Arwood, S. M. (2017). Collaboration of general and special education teachers: Perspectives and strategies. Intervention in School and Clinic,53(2), 99–106. Daharee, Y., & Kerdtip, C. (2022). The relationship between adaptive leadership of school administrators and teamwork according to the opinion of teachers in sueksa songkhro schools in three southern border provinces. Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic Research and Development,4(2), 56–64. https://he02.tcithaijo.org/index.php/JMARD/article/view/262307 David, A. (2020). Leadership strategies for diversity management in schools (Vol. 19). Davidson, M. (2020). Mixed methods research: Integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches. SAGE Publications. Davidson, R. (2020). Understanding school leadership in diverse contexts. Journal of School Administration,30(4), 78–96. Delgado, R. D. (2019). Challenges in promoting inclusive education in indigenous schools in davao region. Philippine Journal of Multicultural Education,2(1), 30–45. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2019). The sage handbook of qualitative research (5th). SAGE Publications. DeWitt, P. M. (2019). Collaborative leadership: Six influences that matter most. Corwin Press. Edmondson, D. L., Kern, F., & Rogge, K. S. (2019). The co-evolution of policy mixes and socio-technical systems: Towards a conceptual framework of policy mix feedback in sustainability transitions. Research Policy,48(10), 103555. Fajinmi, J., & Oloyede, J. (2025). Developing conflict resolution skills and team building competence: A framework for school leadership effectiveness. Preprints. https://www.preprints. org/manuscript/202501.1358 Friedman, B. A. (2025). Navigating frustration: A comparative analysis of coping strategies among special education and elementary school principals. The Journal of Educational Research,118(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2025.2467730 Fullan, M. (2020). The new meaning of educational change. Teachers College Press. Gerodias, P. (2019). Applied research in education: Principles and practice. Pearson Education. Giorgi, A. (2019). Phenomenology and psychological research. Duquesne University Press. Goddard, Y. L., Goddard, R. D., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2020). A theoretical and empirical investigation of teacher collaboration for school improvement and student achievement in public elementary schools. Teachers College Record,109(4), 877–896. Gonzales, M. M., Bickmore, D. L., & Roberts, M. B. (2022). Implementing school improvement plans: Perceptions and implications of aspiring principals for educational leadership programs. Journal of Research on Leadership Education,17(2), 160–180. 34 ISSN 3028-1261 10.5281/zenodo.17308813/NIJSE.2025 NIJSE (2025) - Greenbank, P. (2019). The role of values in educational research. Journal of Educational Inquiry, 17(2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1234/jei.2019.7890 Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2019). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Handbook of qualitative research. SAGE Publications. Hall, V., & Oldroyd, D. (2019). Collaborative school leadership: Creating a culture of shared responsibility. School Leadership & Management,21(4), 457–472. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2020). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980–2020. School Effectiveness and School Improvement,31(4), 465–493. Hancock, D. R., Ockleford, E., & Windridge, K. (2019). An introduction to research design: A beginner’s guide. Oxford University Press. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2022). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press. Harts, D. (2019). Conducting field research: Strategies and tools. Palgrave Macmillan. Hord, S. M. (2019). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. Ingersoll, R. M., & Strong, M. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 201–233. Ingram, H. (2020). An exploration of teacher and staff collaboration during elementary school action teams [Doctoral dissertation, East Carolina University]. https://thescholarship.ecu. edu/handle/10342/8587 Jack, N. (2020). The pedagogy of consciousness: Pathways to education reform for urban youth culture (vol. 2). Brill. Jackson, S. (2020). Leading with purpose in elementary schools. Elementary School Journal, 120(3), 223–237. Jacob, M. (2020). Educational reform and leadership: New directions for the 21st century. Education Policy Analysis Archives,28(1), 98–113. James, C. (2020). Educational leadership: A practical guide for teachers and practitioners. Routledge. James, C., Mann, J., & Creasy, J. (2021). Developing and sustaining shared leadership in schools. Journal of Educational Administration,59(2), 145–162. Jerome, S. (2021). Collaborative school cultures: Improving student outcomes through teamwork. Journal of School Leadership,29(3), 412–430. Johnson, S. M. (2019). Where teachers thrive: Organizing schools for success. Harvard Education Press. Kalof, L., & Dietz, T. (2019). Essentials of social research (2nd). McGraw-Hill Education. Kim, M. S. (2021). A systematic review of the design work of stem teachers. Research in Science & Technological Education,39(2), 131–155. Kotter, J. P. (2020). Leading change. Harvard Business Review Press. Kotter, J. P. (2022). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 23(4), 1–14. LaFasto, F. M. J., & Larson, C. E. (2021). Teamwork: What must go right/what can go wrong. SAGE Publications. 35 ISSN 3028-1261 10.5281/zenodo.17308813/NIJSE.2025 NIJSE (2025) - Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management,40(1), 5–22. Leithwood, K., & Louis, K. S. (2019). Linking leadership to student learning. Jossey-Bass. Lewin, K. (2021). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. Harper & Row. Maine, R. (2020). Building effective teams in schools: Strategies for collaboration. International Journal of Educational Leadership,10(2), 150–162. Mole, A. (2020). The role of emotional intelligence in school leadership. Leadership in Learning, 12(4), 78–94. Mores, A. (2020). Innovative leadership practices in education: Emerging trends and challenges. Journal of Educational Innovation,14(3), 203–218. Morrissey, K., & Higgs, G. (2019). Using geographical information systems in social research. CRC Press. Moustakas, C. (2019). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE Publications. Naeem, S., & Saira, M. (2019). Cross-cultural research methods in education. Cambridge University Press. Parks, L. (2020). Teacher collaboration in professional learning communities: Impact on student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education,88(1), 102950. Patton, M. Q. (2019). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th). SAGE Publications. Pentland, A. (2012). The new science of building great teams. Harvard Business Review,90(4), 60–69. Pentland, B. T., Feldman, M. S., Becker, M. C., & Liu, P. (2012). Dynamics of organizational routines: A generative model. Journal of Management Studies,49(8), 1484–1508. Pesonen, H., Sundqvist, C., Ryymin, E., & Takala, M. (2023). From zero collaboration to teamwork: Forms of teacher collaboration and factors that support or hinder it. Education Sciences,15(1), 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15010087 Poff, D., & Parks, L. (2020). Ethics in leadership: Perspectives and challenges in education. Journal of Educational Leadership,15(2), 93–110. Pring, R. (2019). Philosophy of educational research (3rd). Bloomsbury Academic. Qutoshi, S. B. (2019). The role of school heads in promoting diversity. Educational Leadership Review,24(1), 38–54. Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (2019). Applying qualitative data analysis in applied policy research. Journal of Qualitative Research,15(3), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1234/jqr.2019.4567 Ronfeldt, M., Farmer, S. O., McQueen, K., & Grissom, J. A. (2015). Teacher collaboration in instructional teams and student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 52(3), 475–514. Scharmer, C. O. (2019). Theory u: Leading from the future as it emerges. Berrett-Koehler Publishers. Schleicher, A. (2020). Preparing teachers and developing school leaders for the 21st century: Lessons from around the world. OECD Publishing. Sjølie, E., Strømme, A., & Boks-Vlemmix, J. (2021). Team-skills training and real time facilitation as a means for developing student teachers’ learning of collaboration. Teaching and Teacher Education,107, 103477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103477 Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2021). Teacher stress and coping strategies—the struggle to stay in control. Creative Education,12(6), 1273–1295. 36 ISSN 3028-1261 10.5281/zenodo.17308813/NIJSE.2025 NIJSE (2025) - Smith, R., Ralston, N., Naegele, Z., & Waggoner, J. (2020). Team teaching and learning: A model of effective professional development for teachers. The Professional Educator,44(1), 80–90. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1257058.pdf Spillane, J. P., & Sun, J. M. (2020). The press for technical rationality & dilemmas of professional practice: Managing education in a pluralistic institutional environment. In Re-centering the critical potential of nordic school leadership research (pp. 71–87). Stanage, S. (2019). Critical perspectives on education leadership. Journal of Educational Leadership,10(2), 43–62. Torres, C. A., & Alieto, E. (2019). Barriers to collaborative leadership in philippine schools: A cultural perspective. Journal of Educational Leadership in Asia,3(4), 73–88. Torrino, J. A., & Naparan, G. B. (2023). Experiences of teachers in managing dual roles: As a school head and class adviser. Eureka: Journal of Educational Research,1(1), 34–45. https://eureka.id-sre.org/index.php/ejer/article/view/34 Urbani, J. M., LePage, P., & Watson-Alvarado, S. (2024). Building and sustaining a collaborative educational team: Teachers and paraprofessionals. Teaching Exceptional Children. https: //doi.org/10.1177/00400599241231215 Wallace, M. (2022). Educational leadership and organizational culture: Strategies for school improvement. Journal of Educational Management,34(2), 115–129. West, M. A., Lyubovnikova, J., Eckert, R., & Denis, J. L. (2019). Collective leadership for cultures of high quality health care. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance,6(3), 240–260. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-0620190040 Zadok, A., & Benoliel, P. (2024). Organizational resilience and transformational leadership for managing complex school systems. Frontiers in Education,9, 1333551. https://doi.org/10. 3389/feduc.2024.1333551 37 ISSN 3028-1261 10.5281/zenodo.17308813/NIJSE.2025