1 Equal-Life – Deliverable 8.2 Project title: Early Environmental quality and life-course mental health effects Project Number: 874724 Project Acronym: Equal-Life Work package 8 - Deliverable D8.2 Dialogue minutes HISTORY OF CHANGES Version Publication date Change 1.0 20.12.2023 2.0 31.12.2023 final Ref. Ares(2023)8897306 - 29/12/2023
H2020 program Grant agreement numbers 874724 (Equal-Life) Project start date: Jan 1st 2020 Duration: 60 months Project Coordinator: Irene van Kamp (RIVM) WP (number and title) Equal-Life WP8 Stakeholder involvement and intervention development Deliverable Number Equal-Life D8.2 Deliverable Title Dialogue minutes Due date 31. 10. 2022 Actual date 31. 12. 2023 Dissemination Level Public Lead beneficiary INCHES Responsible author(s) and beneficiary acronym: Peter van den Hazel –INCHES, Miriam Weber – City of Utrecht, Sonja Jeram –NIJZ, Sammie Jansen – RIVM, Roos Teeuwen - TU Delft, Achilleas Psyllidis – TU Delft, Gordana Ristovska – IJZERM, Sarah Benz – ZEUS, Julia Kuhlmann – ZEUS, Anna Sandionigi – Quantia, Marco Balduini – Quantia, Dirk Schreckenberg – ZEUS, Maddie White – UB, Lena GudiMindermann – UB, Jenny Ahrens – UB Work package/task: WP8 / Task 8.1 Document status: Final Confidentiality: public Key words: Stakeholder, Co-design, forum, science-policy interface E-mail / phone responsible authors Peter van den Hazel
[email protected] Miriam Weber
[email protected] Co-authors Sonja Jeram [email protected] Sammie Jansen [email protected] Roos Teeuwen [email protected] Achilleas Psyllidis [email protected] Gordana Ristovska [email protected] Sarah Benz [email protected]
3 Julia Kuhlmann kuhlman[email protected] Anna Sandionigi
[email protected] Marco Balduini
[email protected] Dirk Schreckenberg
[email protected] Maddie White
[email protected] Lena Gudi-Mindermann
[email protected]
4 Contents Summary............................................................................................................................................6 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................7 WorldCafésession..........................................................................................................................9 2.1TwoonlineworldcafésessionsJanuaryandFebruary2021..................................................9 2.2Worldcafé18May2021.............................................................................................................10 2.3Worldcafé17June2021–Dutchstakeholders..........................................................................10 StakeholderforumLjubljana.........................................................................................................10 Co‐designworkshopSkopje..........................................................................................................11 StakeholderforumMilano............................................................................................................11 6.Co‐designworkshopComo............................................................................................................12 7.StakeholderforumHelsinki...........................................................................................................12 8.Partners/Equal‐Lifecontactinformation.....................................................................................14 9.Annexes.........................................................................................................................................15 Annex1TwoonlineworldcafésessionsJanuaryandFebruary2021..................................................15 Annex2Worldcafé18May2021........................................................................................................23 Annex3WorldcafésessionwithDutchStakeholders17June2021...................................................25 Annex4MentimeterquestionsandanswersstakeholderforuminLjubljana.....................................28 Annex5StakeholderforumLjubljana..................................................................................................35 Theme1:Scaleonwhichresultsshouldfocus..................................................................................35 Theme2:Includingtheimpactofenvironmentalfactorsonmentalhealthfactorsinallpolicy making...............................................................................................................................................35 Theme3:Settingupeffectiveyouthparticipation...........................................................................36 Mentalhealthplans...........................................................................................................................36 Annex6Someexamplesofusedpersonas..........................................................................................38 Annex7Co‐designworkshopinSkopje................................................................................................40 4.1Theme1:Co‐designtools......................................................................................................40 4.2Theme2:WorkingonapplicationoftoolsbasedonEqual‐liferesults................................41 4.3Theme3:Workingtowardstranslationofscientificresults.................................................41 4.4Theme4:Interventions‘bridgingthegap’asatooltoimprovehealthforall.....................43 4.5Theme5:Spectrumofprevention........................................................................................45 4.6Theme6:Whatarethenextsteps?......................................................................................46 Annex8StakeholderforumMilano......................................................................................................47 5.1Equal‐Lifehandbookandtoolbox.........................................................................................47
5 5.2WorldcafédiscussionsonEqual‐Lifepresentations.............................................................48 5.3Usingalogicmodelasatooltoencouragethinkingaboutsocialinequalitiesinurban planninginterventions......................................................................................................................56 5.4Evaluatingchildren’saccesstopublicoutdoorplayspace...................................................56 5.5Policyrecommendationperspectives...................................................................................57 5.6Spectrumofinterventions,screeningmethods,toolboxandhandbookinpractice............58 5.7Whatarethenextsteps?......................................................................................................58 Annex9Co‐designworkshopComo......................................................................................................60 Annex10StakeholderforuminHelsinki...............................................................................................66 Annex11Co‐designprocesspresentation...........................................................................................74 Annex12Workingonapplicationoftools...........................................................................................77 Annex13MentimeterresultsstakeholderforumHelsinkiSeptember2023.......................................79 Annex14researchquestionsusedinComoco‐designworkshop........................................................83
6 Summary TheEqual‐Lifeprojectaimstoinvestigatethecombinedeffectsofvariousexposuresonchildrenand adolescentmentalhealthacrossdifferentdevelopmentalstages.Importanttothisprojectisthe collaborationwithstakeholders. Thetask“Connectingsciencetopolicy”relatedtoD8.2hastheobjectivetoestablishabi‐directional dialoguebetweentheEqual‐Lifeprojectand(inter)nationalpolicymakersto1)translateproject resultsintoeffectivechildrenhealthpoliciesand2)injectknowledgeaboutbestpracticesandhealth policiesintotheproject. Thisdeliverableisareportofmeetingswithstakeholdersrepresentingthedialogueswiththose stakeholders.Therewereninedifferentmeetings.Eachmeetingwasstructuredaccordingtodifferent themes.Theworldcafésessionsweretargetedtocollectinformationfromthestakeholderstocreate ascience‐policyinterface.ThestakeholderforainLjubljana,MilanoandinHelsinkiwerestructured accordingtodifferentinteractivesessions.Differentworkingmethodswereused.Arangeofpotential outcomeswereaddressed. Theoutcomesoftheworldcafésessions,theco‐designworkshopsandstakeholderforasignifyamajor steptowarddevelopingasetofpolicyimplementations,atoolboxandguidebook.Theseoutcomes notonlyaddressthecomplexitiesofexposomedatabutalsoensuresitspracticalapplicabilityin diversesettings.Thecollaborativeandinclusivenatureofthiseffortreflectsacommitmentto advancingourunderstandingoftheexposome'simpactonchildmentalhealthandcognitive development.Thefindingsprovideafoundationforinformedpolicydecisions,promotingthe integrationofthistoolboxintorelevantresearch,healthcare,andeducationalinitiatives. Thecollectedinformationfromstakeholderscontributestogetintoaninteractivemodewith stakeholders.TheyareinterestedinpracticalimplicationsofEqual‐Liferesults.Itshouldassistthe stakeholderstounderstandtheconnectionsbetweenthemultipleresultsdisplayedandwhatthey meanforoptionsofinterventions.Forthescientificcommunity,nearnesstodecision‐makersis important.Scientistsshouldmakeuseofcommunicationexpertswereapplicableinorderto communicatetheirdataresultsandrecommendations.
7 Introduction Thetask“Connectingsciencetopolicy”relatedtoD8.2hastheobjectivetoestablishabi‐directional dialoguebetweentheEqual‐Lifeprojectand(inter)nationalpolicymakersto1)translateprojectresults intoeffectivechildrenhealthpoliciesand2)injectknowledgeaboutbestpracticesandhealthpolicies intotheproject.Thistaskensuresthatthegeneratedknowledge(onexposome,mechanisms,and healtheffects)isdevelopedinlinewiththeneedsofthebroadersociety,andthatknowledgeofthe involved(publicandprivate)stakeholderswillhelptointerprettheresults.Thisscience‐policy interactiongivesabetterunderstandingofthesocietalimpactandrelevanceoftheEqual‐Liferesearch bothforthescientistswithintheprojectasforthestakeholders.Wehaveidentifiedkeystakeholder (policymakers,regulatorsandresearchnetworks),andsetuptwoformalco‐designworkshopand threestakeholderforaandestablishedregularinteractionbetweenscientistsandstakeholders. Thisdeliverableisinaformatofareport.Itisarepresentationofallactivitiesinninedifferent meetings.Eachmeetingwasstructuredaccordingtodifferentthemes.Thestakeholderforain Ljubljana,MilanoandinHelsinkiwerestructuredaccordingtodifferentinteractivesessions. Worldcafésessionsin2021and2022 StakeholderforuminLjubljana,March7‐8,2022 Co‐designworkshopinSkopje,September14‐15,2022 StakeholderforuminMilan,November16‐17,2022 Co‐designworkshopinComo,June29‐30,2023 StakeholderforuminHelsinkiSeptember7‐8,2023 ThisreportreflectsonlytheminutesofthemeetingsThereisanoverlapwithD8.4.Thisreportshows moreonthepresentationsandlessontheconclusionsoftheinteractionwiththestakeholders.This sinceintheprojectproposaltherewasnotmadeacleardistinctionbetweenthemeetingsthatwere meanttobeonlytocommunicatewithstakeholdersortobemeantforinteraction.Onlytheworld cafésessionsduringthefirstprojectcouldberecognizedasapurelydialogueprocess. TheDeliverable8.2willbeupdatedagainin2024afterupcomingmeetingswithstakeholders. Worldcafésession TheWorldCafémethodologyisasimple,effective,andflexibleformatforconductingagroupdialogue. Eachelementofthemethodhasaspecificpurposeandcorrespondstooneormoreofthedesign principles.Themethodmakesuseofaninformalcafesettingforparticipantstoexploreanissueby discussingitinsmalltablegroups.Discussionisheldinmultipleroundsof20‐30minutes,withthecafe ambianceintendedtoallowformorerelaxedandopenconversationstotakeplace.Itisamethodto quicklycollectalotofinformationasallparticipantshavetheopportunitytospeak. Co‐designworkshop Co‐designistheactofcreatinginteractionwithstakeholders(policymakers,end‐users)specifically withinadesigndevelopmentprocesstoensurethattheresultsmeettheirneedsandareusable.Its aimistocreatesomethingnotonlyforpeople,butalsowiththem.Stakeholderscanbecomecreators ofaproductbeingactivelyinvolvedinthecreationprocess.Co‐designisoftenatransdisciplinary
8 process.Theresultcanbeareportoraproduct(handbook,guideline).InEqual‐Lifetheco‐designisa tooltoenablestakeholderstouseEqual‐Liferesultsforpolicymakingoreventodraftinterventions. Weconductedoneco‐designworkshopinSkopje(seechapter3). Stakeholderforum StakeholderForummeansaplatformopentorepresentativesofinstitutions,national,regionaland localauthorities,organisedinterestsandindividualentitiesfromdifferentdomains,highereducation, research,associations,civilsocietyandclusterorganisations,aswellasotherinterestedpartiesfrom acrossaselectedknowledgeorpolicyfocus. Thesetupoftheworkprocessofco‐designworkshopsorstakeholderforumissimilar.Theforumaims moreatsendinginformationbetweentheparticipants.Theco‐designworkshopaimsatproducing contentrelatedtotheproductsthatareseenasresultoftheproject. Theprocessoftheco‐designworkshopandstakeholderforumusesastructuredapproach.This approachfacilitatesacodesignworkshop/forumaimedatcollaborativelydeveloping1)inputfor policyrecommendations;2)atoolorguidebookwithsupportfromdiversestakeholders.Theprocess emphasizesopencommunication,activeparticipation,anditerativefeedbacktoensureawell‐ roundedandinclusivefinalproduct.Thefollowingstepscanbeidentifiedandhavebeenusedatthe differentworkshopsandfora. 1.DefiningObjectivesandScope:Theworkshopbeginswithacleararticulationofitspurposeand goals.Thefocusisondefiningthescopeofthetoolorguidebook,establishingboundariestoguide thecollaborativeprocess. 2.IdentifyingStakeholders:Stakeholders,includingend‐users,subjectmatterexperts,anddecision‐ makers,areidentifiedandinvitedtoparticipate.Thegoalistoensureadiverserepresentationthat capturesabroadrangeofperspectives. 3.Pre‐workshopPreparation:Participantsreceiverelevantinformationbeforetheworkshop,along withmaterialsorresourcestoreview.Acommunicationplatformisestablishedtofacilitateongoing collaborationamongstakeholders. 4.WorkshopAgenda:Adetailedagendaoutlinestheworkshopactivities,incorporating introductions,icebreakers,andspecificdesignsessions.Timeisallocatedforbrainstorming, prototyping,andfeedbacksessions. 5.FacilitationTechniques:Facilitationtechniquesareemployedtoencourageopencommunication, activeparticipation,andequalcontribution.Thefacilitatorfostersacollaborativeandinclusive environmentwhereallvoicesareheard. 6.Brainstorming:Structuredbrainstormingsessionsareconductedtogenerateideas.Techniques suchasmindmappingoraffinitydiagramsareemployed,andparticipantsareencouragedtoshare theirperspectivesandinsights. 7.Prototyping:Thedesignisbrokendownintosmallercomponents,andparticipantsworkon creatingprototypesordraftsofthetoolorguidebook.Collaborativetoolsorphysicalmaterialsare usedtovisualizeideas. 8.IterativeFeedback:Regularfeedbacksessionsarefacilitated,allowingstakeholderstoreviewand provideinputonprototypes.Constructivecriticismisencouraged,andconcernsareaddressedto refinethedesign.
9 9.Decision‐Making:Facilitateddecision‐makingsessionshelpprioritizefeatures,content,ordesign elements.Techniqueslikedotvotingorconsensusbuildingareusedtoreachagreementsamong stakeholders. 10.Documentation:Outcomes,decisions,andchangesmadeduringtheworkshoparethoroughly documented.Aroadmaporactionplanwillcreateforthenextstepsinthedevelopmentprocess. 11.Follow‐upandImplementation:Stakeholdersarekeptinformedabouttheworkshopoutcomes. Agreed‐upondesignchangesareimplemented,andstakeholdersarecontinuouslyinvolvedinthe developmentprocess. 12.Communication:Ongoingcommunicationismaintainedwithstakeholdersthroughoutthe developmentprocess.Regularupdatesandinvolvementinfutureiterationsensuresustained collaboration. Byfollowingthesesteps,thecodesignprocessbecameadynamicandinclusivejourney,harnessing thecollectivecreativityandexpertiseofstakeholderstodevelopavaluableandwell‐receivedsteps towardspolicyimplications,atoolorguidebook. Thefollowingsectionsdescribethedifferentsessionsthatwereorganisedwithstakeholders. WorldCafésession 2.1 TwoonlineworldcafésessionsJanuaryandFebruary2021 Method:AnonlineWorld‐Caféwashostedtocreateascience‐policyinterfaceforSouth‐Eastern Europeanstakeholderswithrelevantbackgroundstoenvironmentalresearchand/orchildren’s (mental)health.Viaqualitativecontentanalysismethods,thedataretrievedfromthe7participating stakeholderswasthematicallyanalysedandcoded. Results:Thestakeholdersincreasinglyshared,bothbeneficialandharmful,internalexposures(e.g. metabolism,microbiome,melatoninsystem,parentsage),physicalexposures(e.g.outdoorgreen‐, blue‐andedible‐spaceandplaygrounds;urbanversusruralliving;qualityofindoorandoutdoorspace includingairpollutionandnoise;lifestylefactorssuchasphysicalactivity,dietandschoolperformance medicationintake)andsocialexposures(e.g.avarietyofsocialcontactsandtheircharacteristics includingpeersandparents;theageofparentsatbirthinRomania;screentimeandlivingasedentary lifestyle;family/work‐life(im‐)balance;bicyclinglifestyle;competitivenessandawarenessaround mentalhealthinSouth‐EasternEurope;socioeconomiccircumstancesandaccesstoservices; institutionalisationinBulgaria;COVIDmeasuresandotherlegislationsandprioritiesofthe government).Mentalhealthoutcomesweredescribedthroughemotionalstatusandmediating factorswithcautionfordiagnosingchildren.Ageperiodsdiscussedwereprenatal,earlyageand adolescence. Conclusion:SoutheasternEuropeanstakeholderinvolvementcanbefacilitatedwithinascience‐policy interface,isappreciatedandcontributestospecificcountry‐basedtopics.Withinthewiderangeof internalandexternalexposuressharedbythestakeholders,socialexposuresappeartobethemain fieldofconcern.Whiletalkingaboutexposures,clusteringofmultipleexposuresoftendevelops naturally.Tobenefitchildren’smentalhealthandcognitivedevelopmentapleaforcountryspecific legislationsfollowingresearchoutcomeswasmade,preferablywithafocusonpreventiveand
16 Table 3. Harmful exposures and featuring segments identified by the stakeholders Internal Physical Social Physical activity Physical activity Outdoor space (balance safety/danger, school, learning, creativity, cleanliness) - Green space - Blue space - Edible space - Playgrounds Rural living Sound Indoor space Social contacts (unconditional love, support, feeling heard, involvement) - Parents (education, age) - Peers (sports) - Teachers - Family Screen time (learning, peer contact, gamification, social media) Economic status Government and policies Access to services - School - (Mental) health care - Child care - Violence protection - Mediation Outdoor space (peer contact) Lifestyle (family/work-life balance, bicycling) Awareness around mental health Table 4. Beneficial exposures and featuring segments identified by the stakeholders
17 Internalexposome:Thestakeholdersmentionedthe metabolismasapossibleimportantinternalexposomecomponent affectingchildren’smentalhealthandcognitivedevelopment. Itwassuggestedthatthehighmetabolicdemandofthebraininearly agescouldbeaffectedbyairpollutionandthattheeffectscouldbe measuredintheamountofoxidativestressorthroughOMICS. Furthereffectsonthemetabolismweresuggestedtobecausedby children’sdietandtheamountofphysicalactivitytheyhavebutalso inparticularbythesedentarylifestyleasaconsequenceofan increaseintheamountoftimespendbehindelectronicscreens,also knownasscreentime,inthecurrentdigitalage.Asidefromtheupcomingsedentarylifestylethe screentimealsoaffectstheamountofbluelightchildrenareexposedtoduringdaytimeandduring nighttime,especiallywhenlookedatteenagers,whichmayaffecttheirmelatoninsystemandsleep andthereforeagainalsotheirmetabolism. Anotherinternalexposomecomponentthestakeholdersmentionedwasthemicrobiome. Theriseintheanti‐vaccinemovementduringthelastdecadesisnoticed,alackofexposureandan increaseinparentsandchildrenwithfoodintolerances.Thesephenomenaareallrelatedtothe microbiomeandcouldhavepossibleeffectsonchildren’sdevelopment. Physicalexposome:Thestakeholdersreportedtheoutdoorspace,andallitcomprises,asa beneficialbutsometimesalsoharmfulpartofthephysicalandsocialexposome.Itwassaidtherehas beenalotofresearchonthebeneficialeffectsofoutdoorspaceonchildren’smentalhealthandthe importanceofcreatingoutdoorplacesnotonlyclosetochildren’slivingenvironmentsand neighbourhoodsbutalsonearkindergartensandschools.Theoutdoorplacesweresaidtohave calmingeffects,helpchildrenstayconnectedwiththerealworldandtoencouragepeercontact. Thereweremultiplerequirementsbroughtupbythestakeholderstomeettheconditionsofthe outdoorspacetobestimulatingforthementalhealthandcognitivedevelopmentsuchasstimulating tolearnwhichcanbedonethroughplay,butalsobyinvolvingchildreninpreservingtheoutdoor space;encouragingdiscoverythroughallsenses;stimulatingcreativityandimagination;cleanliness andmaintenance;tobeabletobealoneortosharethespaceandtherightbalancebetweendanger andsafety,allpotentiallybenefittingchildren’smotorskills,curiosityandworld‐image. Concerningsafety,itwassaidtobenecessarytodistinguishbetweenthesafetyofplayandthe Internalizing Externalizing Other Mediating factors Cognitive development Emotional symptoms Anxiety Trauma Depression Suicide Concentratio n problems Agitation Aggression ADHD Anti-social behaviour Health issues Eating disorders Well-being (securenes s, calmness, happiness) Resilience Stress Sleep Attachment Self-image World-image Social skills Communication skills Verbal skills (vocabulary) Motor skills Fine motor skills Digital skills School performance Intelligence Curiosity Table 5. Mental health and Cognitive development outcomes identified by the stakeholders Age categories Prenatal Early age Teenagers Table 6. Age Categories identified by the stakeholders
18 safetyoftheaccessibilitybutalsotheimportanceofnottoomuchsafetytokeepachallengewhich stimulatesdevelopment.i Thestakeholdersdefinedmultiplecomponentsthatthebeneficialoutdoorspacecouldcompriseof: Greenspacewhichcanrangefromparkstoactivelyplantingtrees;butalsospecificallyincludeedible space,greenspacethatisbeinggrowntoeat,nearchildren’slivingenvironmentsandschool environment.Bluespacecomprisingoflakes,riversandthepossibilitytoswimandplaygroundsto stimulatethecognitivedevelopmentofchildren. Thestakeholdersmentionedtheoutdoorspacebecomingaharmfulexposurewhenitistoo dangerousor(peer)conflictinducingwhichcanmakechildrenfeellesswelcomeandsafe.Thisfor examplehappenswhenthereisnotenoughspace,whenspaceispoorlymaintainedorcomprisingof toxins;toxinsinthebluespaceinparticular,becausebluespacesareoftennotdesignedwith childreninmind.Harmfuloutdoorspaceswerereportedtobeseeninareasaccommodatingmore immigrantsandhavinghigherpovertyrates. Stakeholdersspecificallypointedoutsoundtobebothapossibleharmfulandbeneficial exposurewithintheoutdoorspaceandtheindoorspacebygivingadifferentfeelingtoinsideand outsideenvironments.Harmfulsoundisreferredtoasnoiseandisbeingseenasdisturbing, especiallyforsmallchildrenwhoarenotabletosayanythingaboutthenoise.Contrarily,sound couldalsobebeneficial,givingexamplesofnaturesoundsormusic.Noisewassaidtoaffectschool performance,topotentiallycauseconcentration,agitationandsometimesevenaggression problems.Accordingtothestakeholders,theWHOalreadyhasparticularlygoodguidelinesfornoise butduetoalackoflegislationtheyarenotbeingimplemented. Almosteverystakeholdermentionedthewidespreadproblemofairpollutionaffecting everyonefromthemomentofconceptiononwardsandpointingouttheneedofresearchofthe possibleeffectsairpollutionhasonthementalhealthandcognitivedevelopmentofchildren. SuggestingusingwearabledevicestomeasurethevolatilecompoundssuchasNOandO3peopleare reallyexposedtoandasmentionedbefore,couldhaveaneffectontheoxidativestressandOMICSin children. Thestakeholdersputforwardanextradimensiontothetopicofairpollutionandthebehaviourof peopleasareactiontoit.Adifferencehasbeennoticedincognitivedevelopmentbetweenchildren whowereraisedinurbanareascomparedtoruralareas.Statingthatchildrenofthegeneration broughtupafterthesecondworldwarweresometimesseparated.Thosewhowereraisedinurban areaswithhighereducationalopportunitiesandbetterschoolingstillperformedlessemotionally andintermsofschoolperformance,communicationskillsandverbalskillscomparedtotheir siblingsraisedinruralareaswithfewerfacilitiesbutalsolessairpollution.Evolvingthroughtime people,oftenofahighereconomicclass,arenowchoosingtomoveoutsideofthemetropolitan citiestogreenerlesspollutedareasturningthingsupsidedownespeciallyduringwintertimewhen thereappearstobeariseinburningofsolidmatterssuchasbiomass,wood,coalandtrashfor heatingpurposesduringthecoldmonthsinruralareaswithevenmoreairpollutionasa consequenceopposedtowhatismeasuredinthecity.Asidefromburningsolidmattersthe stakeholdersalsopointedoutanincreaseincaruse.Parentsareusingtheircarsmoretocrossbigger distancesbutalsobecausetheywanttoprotecttheirchildrenfrombeingoutsideinthepollutedair whilegoingtoschool.Asaresult,childrenaregettingoutofthecar,withrunningengines,when theyreachschoolsteppingintoanextrapollutedcarparkwithmorecars.Alifestylechangetowards bicyclingissuggestedtobeencouragedaspartofsolvingthecaruseproblembutevenasbeinga potentiallybeneficialexposureforchildrenonitsown. Thestakeholdersalsomentionedphysicalactivityingeneralasaprovenbeneficialexposureto
19 children’smentalhealthandcognitivedevelopmentbyimprovingemotionalsymptomsandmotor skills.TheWHOhasalreadydefinedtheamountoftimeneededforphysicalactivityinschoolperage categoryandtheimportanceofavarietyofdifferentactivities. Stakeholdersmentionedplasticasapotentialharmfulphysicalexposure,pointingoutthe dangersofmicro‐plastics,phthalateandbisphenolthatcouldpotentiallyharmchildrenevenbefore theyareborn.Theysawtheuseandwasteofplasticbottles,(food)packagingandcontainersasa problem.Itwasalsosaidthateventhoughcountriesappeartobemoreincontroloftheproblem, dangerisalwaysclosewithnewproductscomingontothemarketeveryday. Otherpotentiallyharmfulelementsofthephysicalexposomementionedbythestakeholders were:Cigarettesmokeandsmokingbyparents,oftenveryyoungwomen,whichisstatedtobea widespreadproblemintheBalkanareaandHungary.Thiscauses(prenatal)oxygendeprivationand exposeschildrentoharmfulvolatilecompoundsinthesmoke;Pesticidesonfood,evenhaving prenataleffects;Foodadditivesandtheshortcomingincorrectlabellingoffoodinsomeofthe countriesmakingitimpossibletoaddresstheissueinascientificway;Chemicalssuchaslead, uranium,orescomingfromoldmininglocationsandthestorageofoldpesticideswhichwereused duringtheoldsocialistregimeandstillneedtobetakencareofsafely. Socialexposome:Allthestakeholdersdistinguishedsocialcontactsaspotentiallyharmfulor beneficialexposures.Whenabuse,sexualexploitationorviolenceoccurinsocialcontactsthe developmentofmentalhealthandcognitivedevelopmentproblemsispronetohappen.Onthe otherhand,stakeholdersmentionedunconditionallove,support,feelingheard,involvementinsocial contactsandparticipationinpubliclifeaspotentiallybeneficialtochildren’smentalhealthand cognitivedevelopment.“Withintheinteractionwithotherpeopleandgroupdynamicschildrenare abletolearnsocialbehaviour.”ThestakeholdersrepeatedlypointedoutthatCOVIDmeasuresputin placebythegovernmentareaffectingallthetypesofsocialcontactbyminimizingthepotentially beneficialeffectsandenlargingthenegative. Theattachmenttoandtherelationshipwithparentsinthefirstplace,butalsowithfamily,weresaid tobeproventobeofsignificantimportanceforchildren’smentalhealthandcognitivedevelopmentii andaparentandfamilystrengtheningapproachtobethebaseofallchildsupport.Parentsstruggling withaddiction,busyparentsandafamilythathasafamily/work‐lifeimbalancecouldharm children’smentalhealthandcognitivedevelopment,whilehavingasupportivefamilywitha family/work‐lifebalancecouldbenefitthechildren.Stakeholderssuggestedthatthesentimentthat life’svalueiscreatedthroughworkneedstochange,promotingareductioninthenumberofhours spentonwork,whichwouldmakeitpossibletospendmorequalitytimewithfamily.iiiStakeholders alsosaidthattheeducationofparentscouldhaveaneffectonchildren’scognitivedevelopment. Thestakeholdersspecificallypointedouttheageoftheparentsanditseffectonchildren.Where Romaniahasaveryhighrateofyoungmotherswhohavetheirfirstchildunder18italsohasahigh rateofmotherswhoarehavingtheirfirstchildaftertheageof35yearswiththehelpofinvitro fertilisation.Thisresultsinau‐shapedbirthgraphic.Theageoftheparentscouldhavegenomic effectsbutmoreimportantly,itaffectstheemotionalandculturalenvironmentchildrenarebrought upin.Havingoldparentswasdescribedasgrowingupwitha‘grandparents‐feeling’,providinga moreemotionallysafeandstableenvironmentwithlessstress,morebondingandbetter communicationmakingchildrenmoreresilientandgivingthemanadvantageincognitive developmentbystimulatingtheircommunicationskills.Whereasveryyoungmothersweresaidto oftencomefromruralareas,unprivilegedfamiliesandgypsycommunitieswithlessfinancialmeans, givingchildrenalessstableenvironmentandthereforepotentiallyharmingtheirdevelopment.
20 Thestakeholdersmentionedschool,educationalsystemsandthesocialcontactchildren havewiththeirteachersasbothpotentiallyharmfulandbeneficialexposures.Thecommon educationalsystemthatrevolvesaroundpoints,gradesandcompetitionweresaidtopressure childrenandcausestress.Accordingtothestakeholder’scompetitionhasbecomeoneofthehighest valuesinsociety.TheystatecompetitivenesstobeespeciallyhighamongstSouth‐EasternEuropeans, provokingacompetitivelifestylewhichinturncausesariseinoverdiagnosingandtheuseofschool performancemedicationasapotentiallyharmfulexposureonitsown.Stricteducationalsystems where,forexample,achildisnotallowedtousethetoiletwhentheyneedto,weresaidtobe harmfultotheirmentalhealth.Onlineeducationcouldnegativelyaffecttheirschoolperformance andsocialskillsbyalackofteacherandpeercontact,especiallytheyoungestchildren. Stakeholderspointedoutthatchildrenneedsupportfromtheirteachers,lessstressandmore freedomtoflourish. Thestakeholdersmentionedpeercontacttobeofimportanceforcognitivedevelopmentandmental health,withspecialmentioningofpeercontactthroughsportsimprovingtheirsocialskills.In contrast,itwassaidthatlackofpeercontactcouldevenhaveanegativeeffectwhichwillbefurther elaboratedinthenextsection.Conflictbetweenchildrenwasalsosaidtobepotentiallyrelatedto thedevelopmentofmentalhealthproblems. Almosteverystakeholderpointedouttheexposuretoscreensasharmful,buttheyalsosaw potentiallybeneficialeffectsscreentimecanhave.Screentimeincludedtheusageofinternet, televisionandsocialmedia. Aspreviouslymentioned,thestakeholderstouchedonscreentimeinternallyaffectingthemelatonin systemthroughbluelightexposureandaffectingthemetabolismasaconsequenceofthesedentary lifestyle.Thestakeholdersreferredtoscreensasbeingaddictiveandstimulatingasedentarylifestyle atagrowingrate.Thesedentarylifestyletogetherwiththeindoorlifestyleisevenfurtherstimulated byCOVIDmeasuresthatareimposedbygovernments.Itwasalsosaidthatthereisariseinscreen timebecauseofbusyparentsandparentswhousescreenstocontroltheirchildren,reporting18‐ month‐oldchildrenbeingabletousescreens. Anotherconcernstakeholderspointedoutwerechildrenhavinglessreal‐lifepeercontactbecauseof screentime,livinganindoorlifestyleandCOVIDmeasures.Thismakeschildrenlessableto communicatetheirfeelingsandemotionsinreallifeandaffectstheirattachment,socialskills, communicationskills,verbalskillsandvocabulary,self‐imageandworld‐image.Butinopposite screentimecouldalsohelpchildrentolearn,improvefinemotorskillsanddigitalskills,andto connectandtohavefunwithotherchildrenandparents.“Inthepastchildrenwouldhavepenpals butnowtheycaneasilyhavecontactwithchildrenallovertheworld.” Thestakeholdersalsopointedoutthatchildrencouldbecomeexposedtostereotypesonthescreens affectingtheirbehaviour.Theysuggestweshouldbelookingintothecontentthatthechildrenare watching,likingandsharingononlineplatformssuchas“TikTok”. Thestakeholdersspecificallymentionedtelevisionanditscontentbeingveryloud,colourful,overthe top,fast‐movinginan‘unnatural’wayandverydistractive,whichcouldallpossiblyaffectchildren’s mentalhealth. Thestakeholdersalsosaidthatwecouldbeusinggamificationandscreentimetopositivelyaffect children’sbehaviourbyencouragingchildrentogooutsideandlearnabouttheirenvironmentand eventopossiblybenefittheirenvironment.Pointingouttheimportanceofpeerreviewandagainthe competitivenessasastrongculturalcharacteristicinthesouth‐easternpartofEurope.Theuseof children’ssocialmediaandinfluencerswerebroughtuptoresearchthechildren.Furthermore, influencerscouldalsobeusedtopositivelyaffectthementalhealthofchildrenbecauseofthe enormousimpacttheyhaveonthem. Stakeholderssawscreentimeaffectingtheresilienceofchildren.Thisispotentiallycausedbythe
21 feasibilityoffastswitchingbetweenexposuresinthedigitalworldassoonassomethingisnotto theirliking,lackofpeerreviewandnothavingtodealwiththeemotionsandactionsofotherpeers. ItwasalsosaidthereisariseinADHDdiagnosesseenalongsidetheriseofscreenusagewhichcould becorrelated.ThestakeholdersadditionallypointedoutthattherecouldbeabiasconcerningADHD inoverdiagnosingduetothepossibilitytoreceivefundsafterbeingdiagnosedwithADHDandthe likelihoodofADHDbeingcausedbysomeprenatalexposures. Thestakeholdersindicatedthattheinternetcanalsobeusedtolearnanddevelopdigitalskillswhich wassaidtobeofimportanceinthemodernworld.However,thestakeholderswerealsoworriedthat screentimewillonlymakebrightchildrenclevereratthecostoftherest. Thestakeholderssawgovernmentandpoliciesasanessentialpartoftheexposome research.First,bypotentiallyaffectingchildren’scognitivedevelopmentandmentalhealthin positiveornegativewaysthroughrulesandlegislationssuchastheCOVIDmeasuresandgiving accesstoservices.Butsecondtothatbyaffectingwhatisdonewithalltheknowledgegained throughexposomeresearchoranyotherexposureresearch.Thestakeholdersobservedthatwhen therearenolegislationsandmandatoryeffectivepolicychanges,thegovernmentswillnotputthe obtainedknowledgeintouseevenwhentheevidenceisstrongandbackedupbytheWorldHealth OrganizationAsaresult,theykeeptheapproachtocuringinsteadofpreventingnegativehealth impactswiththesupportofpublichealth.Itwassuggestedthatguidelines,adjustedtodifferent countries,couldhelp.Theyalsoproposedthedirectinvolvementofmunicipalitiesbecausethey sometimesstillhavegoodwilltomakeachangeevenwhenitisnotmandatory. Thestakeholdersalsomentionedtheeconomicstatusofthechild’ssocialenvironmentandthe accesstoservicestobeofimpactonchildren’smentalhealthandcognitivedevelopment.Thiscan bethroughtheavailabilityofappropriatechildcare,(mental)healthcareandpsychosocialsupport, disabilitycare,schoolandeducationortheoptiontoreceivemediationorviolenceprotectionbut evensomethingsmallashavingthepossibilitytoreadabook,gooutsideandhavethepossibilityto beinaplacewheretheycanrelax,canhaveaneffect. GovernmentsinBulgariaweresaidtohavebeenviolatingchildren’srightsbyinstitutionalising childrenin‘orphanages’evenwhentheyhadparents.Theseinstituteswereportrayedasfree childcare,buttheydidnotprovideproperserviceorcare.ThisrenderedBulgariawiththehighest rateofabandonedchildreninthepastandcausesmentalhealthandcognitivedevelopmental problems. InBulgariatherehasalsobeenaproblemofincorrectdiagnosingofchildrenwithanti‐social behaviourincaseofmisdemeanourssuchasstealing,runningawayfromschoolorhome.Inthisway thechildisheldresponsibleinsteadoflookingproperlyintothecircumstanceswhicharecausingthis behaviour,whichofteninvolvelackoffamilysupportandpoverty.Theseso‐called‘statuscrime’ convictionscausechildrentobesentawayintocorrectionalinstitutesor‘socialpedagogicschools’ wheretheyoftenlearncriminalbehaviourfrompeersinsteadofbeingsupportedandreformedby theinstitutes.Throughtheyearschangeshavebeenmadeandthenumberofinstituteshasgone downbutthephilosophybehindthesystemappearsnottohavechangedandtheproblemisbeing divertedintootherforms. Thestakeholdersmentionedtheimportanceofraisingawarenessaroundmentalhealthand environmentaldangersbutontheotherhandalsoemphasizedthatoverinformingonenvironmental dangerscanbecomeapotentiallyharmfulexposureonitsownbyincreasingstress.Thestakeholders pointedoutthattherestillisabigstigmaaroundmentalhealthinSouth‐EasternEuropeand reformationofmentalhealthcareisneeded.Inthismentalhealthenvironment,thereismainlyfocus ontreatingthediseaseandthereislittletonoplaceforprevention.Thestakeholdersalsoindicated thatweshouldbelookingmoreintowhatinterventionsandmethodseffectivelybenefitthechildren insteadoflookingatthediagnosetheyreceived. Mentalhealth:Thestakeholdersdescribedthementalillnessoutcomesastheemotional statusofachildorthewayachildisemotionallyperforming.Otherinternalizingoutcomesthe
22 stakeholdersreferredtowereanxietyandtraumawhichwassaidtobeapresent‐dayproblemoften causedbyviolenceandabuseandwithnopropersupportcouldleadtodepressionorevensuicide. Asidefromthepreviousmentionedconcentration,agitation,aggressionandADHDoutcomesno otherexternalizingsymptomswerebroughtupbythestakeholders. Furthermore,thestakeholderstoucheduponthewell‐beingofchildrenincludinghappiness, calmnessandsecureness,eatingdisordersandthepossibilityofmentalhealthissuesappearingas otherhealthissues. Agecategories:Multiplestakeholdersemphasizedthattheywouldliketoseemoreresearch ontheenvironmentalexposuresduringtheearlyage,orfirst1000days,andonteenagersand referredtotheprenatalageinthepreviousspecifiedsituations.
23 Annex2Worldcafé18May2021 Participants:Dimitri(D),Licia(Li),Ana(A),Laura(L). Threequestionswereaddressedinthissession. 1) Theinternal,externalandsocialexposuresyouconsideraspotentiallyharmfulto children’smentalhealthandcognitivedevelopment. D:traumaticeventsinthefamilyenvironment;theparentsaresometimesalsovictimsofthe situation.It’shardtoprotectchildreninsuchsituations[e.g.whenthere’snoclearabusebythe parents],andtheseproblemsstartinearlylife. Li:worksonaresearchprojectaboutkids/teenagersthattakecareofparents,thesecaring responsibilitiesareariskfactorforfuturementalhealthproblems,butitcanalsohaveapositive effect.Thesechildrenshouldbesupportedtomitigatetherisksandhelpthemenhancethepossible positiveeffectsoftheircaregiving. A:inchildrenwithchronicdiabetes,traumaticeventssuchasalotofstressisariskfactor.Thefamily environmentcaninfluencetheirmentalhealthinbothpositiveandnegativeways.These parents/familiesandchildrenshouldbeempoweredtodealwiththesituation. D:caringforfamilymemberscanalsobepartoftheeducationandidentityofchildren,itcanalso helpthemcopewiththeirmentalhealthproblemsortraumas.Mentalhealthisincreasinglylinkedto physicaldiseasesviaepigeneticmechanisms.He’sperforming[orhasperformed?]ameta‐analysis onbiomarkersindepression;thesebiologicalindicatorsaren’tlookedintomuchwhensignaling mentalhealthproblemsbutcanindicateearlysignsofmentalhealthproblems,earlierthan psychologists/healthprofessionalscandetectssigns. L:manyfactorsareinterrelated,forexamplebiomarkersofstresscanbelinkedtoSESfactors,and there’smultiplecausesforthisrelation.There’strendtocollectmoredata,butthatcanleadto problemsdistinguishingthetreesfromtheforest,it’sgoodtohaveaclearfocusinresearchandnot justcollecthugeamountsofdata. D:agreeswiththistrendforbigdata;butit’sdifficulttocombinedifferent[treatment?]approaches inoneanalysis,forexampleinFranceit’shardtogetfundingforstudyingcombinedapproaches whenthecomponentshavealreadybeenstudiedseparately.Toovercomethesefundingdifficulties anetworkmeta‐analysiscanbeanoption,thisusespooledinformationfromdifferentapproaches. Qualitativeanalysesarealsoincreasinglyperformed. 2) Theinternal,externalandsocialexposuresthatyouconsideraspotentiallybeneficial tochildren’smentalhealthandcognitivedevelopment. A:contactwithpeersandotherfamiliesthatdealwithsimilarissuesandsituationscanhavea positiveeffectonmentalhealthindiabeteschildrenandtheirfamilies.It’seasiertoconnecttopeers thantohealthprofessionalsandthiswaypromotesempowerment.HerorganizationinPortugalis organizingsummercampsthatareremarkablysuccessful:childrenfeellesslonely,andtheylearn frompeershowtodeal/copewiththeirdisease.Theyalsoorganizemeetings/coursesforfamiliesto shareexperiencesandlearnsfromeachother.
24 Li:forchildcaregiversitcanbegoodtobuildrelationswithothersignificantothers,notthesick parentsorfamilymembersinvolvedinthecaregiving,butforexampleteacherscanplayasignificant role,thiscanhelpcopingwiththesituationandpreventmentalhealthissues. L:controllabilityisalsoakeyfactor;tohavesomedegreeofcontrol,feelingsofhelplessnessandlack ofcontrolcannegativelyinfluencementalhealth.Childrenshouldgooutsideandexperiencethat theiractionsdosomethingintheworld. Li:givingchildrenandtheirfamilyinformationaboutthediseaseandsituationcanincreasetheir senseofcontrol. D:ineducationmorepsychologicalandscientificinsights/theoriesshouldbeappliedtoimprovethe schoolenvironment,childrenshouldlearnhowtousetoolsandgainskillsinsteadofsittingstillall day,thiswaytheycanlearnhowtobeincontrolandtoberesponsible L:there’sbeenstudiesthatshowthatgreenspacecanbebeneficialforthemicrobiome;USA researchmeasuredpeople’sgeolocations,andfoundthatmorediverseenvironmentswasrelatedto bettermoods A:physicalactivitycanhavebiological(physical),behavioralandmentalhealthbenefits.Routineand aschedulearealsoparticularlyimportantindealingwitha[chronicdiabetes]disease. 3) Thementalhealthproblemsandcognitivedevelopmentaldisordersinchildrenthat youobservebeingaffectedbyallexposuresandthechildrenaffectedbythese exposures. Compilationofanswers: ‐ Anxiety,depression,behavioralissues,riskonaddictionlaterinlife ‐ Microinflammatorystatus. ‐ There’sathinlinebetweenwhatisconsideredtobeadiseaseandwhat’snot– there’sagreyarea. ‐ L.mentionedresearchdomaincriteriainitiativeasanalternativetotheDSMcriteria –itconsidersbiomarkersofpsychopathologywhereastheDSMisbasedon psychologicalquestionnaires. ‐ Botharedebatableandhaveprosandcons.
25 Annex3WorldcafésessionwithDutchStakeholders17June2021 Therewerethreeparticipantsattheonlinesession.TheywerefromtheNetherlands. Threethemeswereaddressedinthissession. Theme1‐Theinternal,externalandsocialexposuresyouconsideraspotentiallyharmfultochildren’s mentalhealthandcognitivedevelopment. Theme2–Theinternal,externalandsocialexposuresthatyouconsideraspotentiallybeneficialto children’smentalhealthandcognitivedevelopment. Theme3–Thementalhealthproblemsandcognitivedevelopmentaldisordersinchildrenthatyou observebeingaffectedbyallexposuresandthechildrenaffectedbytheseexposures. Participants:EvelieneD.(ED),Karin(KB),EmilyM.(EM) Theme1‐Theinternal,externalandsocialexposuresyouconsideraspotentiallyharmfultochildren’s mentalhealthandcognitivedevelopment. ED–roleofparents,productionoffood(packagingmaterials),breastfeedingcanbeaprotective factoragainstobesity,butmuchhasbeenresearchedaboutnutrition.Butthebreedinggroundin whichproductsareproducedisalsointeresting. Stressorsincertaingroups–lowSES,poverty,reducedskills Airqualitycanalsoplayarole. KB–highlyeducatedparentsalsohavestress. EM–lowSEShasoftenbeenlikethisformanygenerations,acrossgenerationsisinteresting.Agingis astressfactor,apartfromSESetc.Sodon'tjustkeepaneyeonlowSESgroups,everyparentcan haveabackpackthataffectsthedevelopmentofthechild. KB–forfood,alsoviewpackagingmaterial. EM–lackofexerciseaffectsbraindevelopment–andthatinfluencesfuturegenerations. Moderator:whatismeasuredinyourfieldintermsof(bio)markers? ED:toolittle KB–welookatthemanifestationsofthat,anxietydisorder,panicetc.[lookingattheeffectside] EM–iftherearebehaviouralproblems,welookbackatwhatwent'wrong'inearlylife,butwhat non‐medicalfactorsandsignallinginstrumentsarenowslowlybeingdone. RD–thefamilysituationisalreadybeinglookedat(context) ED–anditalsolooksatchildcareandthecontextthere. KB–gooddevelopment:midwivescanalreadyidentifywhethermother/familyarevulnerable(broad definition),thenyouthnursecanvisitthefamilytoseewhatmakesthefamilyvulnerableandhelpis thenoffered. Peter:EQLwantstosetupinterventions–couldwecontinuetotalkabouthowthatcouldbefitted intoprenatalscreeninginthecomingyears?
32 Session: Bringing all countries in Europe at a higher level of science and policy making
33
34
35 Annex5StakeholderforumLjubljana Theme1:Scaleonwhichresultsshouldfocus Thefirstdiscussionswereaboutonwhatscale(neighbourhood,city,country,etc.)theresultsofthe Equal‐Liferesearchshouldfocus,andwhetherafocusshouldbeplacedondeprivedneighbourhoods. Theoverallconclusionwasthatineachcountrythedecision‐makingpowerandfinancesareona differentscale,andthatdataareoftenonlyrelevantiftheysaysomethingaboutthatscale.Anexample fromSloveniawasthatabenchmarkhadbeendevelopedinwhichregionsarecomparedwitheach other.However,theseregionsarenotdecisiveentitiesanddonotmanagetheirownfinances,thus theresultsofthisbenchmarkwerenotusedforanything.Itwassuggestedtodeterminescalesthat aretranslatabletoeachcountry(e.g.pieceofstreetsegment,urbanblock,neighbourhood,district, city,region,etc.)andtofocus/classifyresultsonthesescales. Someadditionalobservationsfromparticipants: Multi‐levelmodel;interventionsonalllevelsshouldfeedintoeachother. Evaluationsofeffectivenessaremissing;whatdointerventionsachieve? Socialdimensionandcognitivedimensionareveryimportant;verydifferentformentalhealth (vs.physical) Itiseasierforpeopletoreflectonphysicalratherthanmentalhealth. Exposomeresearchiscomplex&multidimensional;interventionsonvariouslevelsare necessary. Exampleofintervention:https://young.scot/ Practicalaspects:needofstakeholdersthatresearchdeliverspracticaloutputs;aretheresearchers awareofstakeholderneeds?Howtoinvolvestakeholdersinthenext(research)steps?Matching Equal‐Lifeworkwithstakeholders(needs).Eveniftheyareawareoftheirneeds,theymaynotbeable tohelp.Forexample,dataneededarenotavailableatthelevelthatwouldallowanalysis.Forexample, dataonhealth/wellbeingareonlyavailableformunicipalitiesinSlovenia.Thosedonotallowstudies atneighbourhoodlevelforexample.MaybeEnvironmentalAtlascanbepromotedassourceofatleast someinformationontheenvironment.Thisisavailableatleastforsomeexamplesforthelocallevel. ForexamplenoisemapsareavailableatneighbourhoodlevelbutonlyforareasdefinedinDirective 2002/49/EC.http://gis.arso.gov.si/atlasokolja/profile.aspx?id=Atlas_Okolja_AXL@Arso Theme2:Includingtheimpactofenvironmentalfactorsonmentalhealthfactorsinall policymaking ThisconversationstartedwiththequestionofwhetherEnvironmentalImpactAssessmentsare necessaryforeffectivepolicymaking. Theenvironmentwasbroadlydefinedtoalsoincludee.g.socialmedia,climatechange,fearofwar, availabilityofspacetoplay,etc.Itwasmentionedthatthemostrelevantaspecthereisthe'experience
36 oftheenvironment',insteadoftheobjectivedesignoftheenvironment.Groupscontinuedtodiscuss whatittakestoincludementalhealthandcognitivedevelopmentasafactorinallpolicyfields. Impedingfactorsthatwerementionedincludedifficultiesofworkingtogetherinaninterdisciplinary way,uncertainty/unwillingnesstolookbeyondyourownpolicyfield,notspeakingthesamelanguage, and'lackofmentalhealthliteracy'.Itwasalsomentionedthattoofewevaluationsarecarriedouton theeffectivenessofinitiatives,makingitdifficulttoconvincepolicyofficers/politiciansthattheirpolicy areahassomethingtodowithmentalhealth.Thecomplexityoftheconceptofmentalhealth(and interventionsrelatedtoit)wasmentionedasapossiblefactortoconnectpolicyfields:thetopicisso complexandversatilethateveryone'sinputisusefulandnecessary.Clientandcitizen participation/citizens'initiatives(speakingfromtheexperienceofthecitizeninwhichallsectorscome togethernaturally)werealsomentionedasaconnectingfactorbetweenfields. Theme3:Settingupeffectiveyouthparticipation Inthelastround,wediscussedhowabottom‐upapproach,withtheparticipationofyoungpeopleand childreninresearchandpolicymakingcanbestbesetup.Theplayfulparadigmandthe15‐minutecity werementionedasgoodexamples.Itwasdiscussedthatitisdifficulttoreacharepresentativegroup ofyoungpeople.Finlandworkswithayouthportal,inwhichyoungpeopleareaskedquestionsabout policyplans.Alinktothesequestionsissharedinseveralwaysviasocialmedia,withextraeffortbeing putintoengaginggroupsofyoungpeoplewhoareoutofthepicture–forexampleviaDiscord discussionplatformsandTikTok.Theimportanceoftrainingchildrenandyoungpeopleinpolicy participation(forexampleatschool),givingthemtheconfidencethattheirinputcounts,andimproving theinvolvementoflessprivilegedchildren/youngpeoplewasalsodiscussed.Asagoodexample,it wasmentionedhowchildreninCanadaareencouragedfromprimaryschooltospeakpubliclyandto bepoliticallyengaged. Finally,aparticipantfromScotlandtalkedabouthowlegislatingthechildren'srighttoinvolvementin policymakingopeneddoorstodevelopingapproachestobeeffectiveinyouthparticipation. Supplement:AnothergoodexampleistheBundesjugendvertretung(FederalYouthCouncil,BVJ)in Austriawhichisthe“legallyanchoredrepresentationoftheinterestsofallchildrenandyoungpeople inAustria”(https://bjv.at/english‐information/). Mentalhealthplans Wecollectedmentalhealthplans(withafocusonchildren)togetagriponsomeoftheissuesthat stakeholdersarefacingintheirwork. Mentalhealthpolicyplansmentionedduringtheforum: InSlovenia,NorthMacedonia,butnotspecificforchildren.SeeforSloveniae.g.: https://www.nijz.si/sl/publikacije/mira‐za‐dusevno‐zdravje‐nacionalni‐program‐dusevnega‐ zdravja Croatia:nationalplanforchildren,howevernotaddressingthesettings,physical environment.Addressinghealthandeducation.Mentalhealthliteracyandhealthyliving programmeswithfocusandfinancialresourcesforgreenareas.
37 Dutchprogramme‘Kansrijkestart’.https://www.kansrijkestartnl.nl/ Developmentalprogrammeandsupportforteachersetc.needed(inAustria) Scandinaviafirstthousand‐dayprojectreports:https://norden.diva‐ portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1571297/FULLTEXT01.pdf; https://www.norden.org/en/publication/first‐1000‐days‐nordic‐countries‐situation‐analysis; https://norden.diva‐portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1640984&dswid=‐296 Theseplanshavebeenusedintheworkshopsandstakeholdersforaasexamplesofinspirationand ofidentificationofproblemsinthedomainofchildmentalhealthandcognitivedevelopment.
38 Annex6Someexamplesofusedpersonas
39
40 Annex7Co‐designworkshopinSkopje Theworkshopwasstructuredaccordingtodifferentthemes.Eachthemewasintroducedbyoneofthe Equal‐Lifepartners. Weuseddescriptionsofpersonasofdifferentkindofstakeholdersintheworkshop.Thepurposeof personasistocreatereliableandrealisticrepresentationsofakeyaudience.Theserepresentations shouldbebasedonqualitativeandsomequantitativeuserresearch.Wewantedtogetsomeinsight ofwhatkindofstakeholdersarerelevantforcooperationwithresearcherswithintheEqual‐Life project.Notallpossiblestakeholderswerepresent.Theknowledgeofwhichstakeholderswerenot presentisalsorelevantinformation.Wemustconsiderhowtoreachouttothosemissingstakeholders. Someexamplesofthedifferentpersonasthathavebeendevelopedbytheparticipantsareaddedin theannex6. Afterawelcomeandageneralintroduction,wediscussedthedifferentpersonasandstakeholder representationoftheparticipants.Thiswasfollowedbysessionsaccordingtodifferentthemes. 4.1Theme1:Co‐designtools ThissessionwasintroducedbyPvdH(INCHES).Thesessionaddressedquestionsonhowtowork towardsimplementationofresultsofEqual‐Lifeintohealthandenvironmentalpoliciesconsidering childrenandyouth.Whichco‐designtoolsareavailable?Whatcanwelearnfromdifferentexamples? Whichtoolscouldbenefityourwork? Theworkingmethodwasaworldcafésetupwith4groupsand4questions(4x15minutes).This roundtablediscussedthefollowingquestions: Doyouhaveexperienceandlessonslearnedregardingco‐designorotherparticipatory approaches?Doyouuseco‐designinyourwork?Doyouuseco‐designinyourwork,inyour organisation? Doyoucollaboratewithotherprofessionals,withscientists,withcitizens? Doyouneedtoshiftpolicies,projectsand/orbudgetstochildren’smentalhealthandcognitive development? Doyouhavetipsregardingimplementingnewtools,new(scientific)evidenceinyour organisation,yourwork? Themainconsiderationsweregroupedaccordingtothetopics:1)co‐designprocess;2)awareness raising;3)co‐designtools;and4)cooperation.Theparticipantsgaveabroadrangeofsuggestions. Co‐designingprocess:Learningfromandlisteningtostakeholdersneedinvestment,fromthestart, withoutpresumptions.Non‐linearprocess,sometimesyouneedtogobacktoprevioussteps.Listen topeoplethatarenotenthusiastic.Havepeopleinthecentreofthisprocess,forexampleas‘idea generators’.Considerrewardingstakeholders.Stresstheadvantagesofco‐design,withoutmentioning theconceptofco‐designingexplicitly.Andoutputs/resultsofsuchprocessesarenotsetatthe beginningofthe(co‐design)process.
41 Awarenessraising:weneedgoodstoriesandgood‘storytellers’tobringthetopictothepublicandto politicians.Positivestories,tailoredtoregionsandcountries(culturespecific).Shifttoprevention approach(policiesandfunding).Morelong‐termandstructuralprojects(programmes)areneeded. Thereisstillastigmainvariouscountries.Citizens(voters)canpleadforashifttopreventionwiththe politicians. Tools:importanttoknowthetargetgroup,tailor‐madeproducts.Bestpractices.Issuesaremoneyand staffing.VariousexamplessuchasLifelines,ondatacollection.Visualandinteractive.Specifythe (governmental)levelthatisaddressed.Communication,films,storytelling,etc..Toolsforpresenting data.Donotwastealotoftimefornoreason. Cooperation:Adistinctionneedstobemadebetweenpoliticiansandadministrationwithin governments.Considerwhoisincharge,whichinfluencestheresultsofthecollaboration.Theonesin chargedefinetheagenda,theexpectedoutcomesetcetera.Differentchannelsforcollaboration,see participationladder.However,eventheone‐waycommunication(loweststep)isdifficult.Peopleusing TikTokdonotwanttoreadscientificinformation.Twitter,withscientificinformation,isnotusedby ‘thepeople’.Thusconsiderthesocialmediasourceforcommunication.Collectinformationfrom differentexperts/perspectivesandcombinethatinthecommunication.Makesuccessvisible,which mightbedifferentfordifferentstakeholders.Andidentify‘whataresuccessesforthesedifferent stakeholdergroupsfromthebeginning. 4.2Theme2:WorkingonapplicationoftoolsbasedonEqual‐liferesults Thissessiontheparticipantsdiscussedquestionssuchas:Whattoolssuitthedifferentstakeholders? Howflexibleshouldwebeinapplyingdifferenttools?Howaboutvisualization? Feedbackwasgivenondataandonstructureofthetoolbox/demonstrator.Thelattermust befurtherdeveloped.Inspreading/disseminatingthetoolweneedtoconsiderlanguage. Nextstepistoselectthe‘datathemes’andthendetailthe(levelandtypeof)data(needs). Datavisualisation:tipwasgiventolookattheexampleoftheDutch“Kansenkaart.nl”(see https://kansenkaart.nl/klasouderslaaginkomen#6.47/52.29/5.285) DatainthetoolboxwillbebothfromEqual‐Lifeandfromotherexistingsources.Thedifferent WPswilldeliveralgorithmsandfunctions,andprobablynotdata.Wedonotexpect anonymiseddata.Butaggregationofdatawouldbefeasible. Seepresentationinannex11. 4.3Theme3:Workingtowardstranslationofscientificresults Duringthissession,theparticipantsdiscussedquestionssuchas:Howeasytounderstandneedthe resultsbe?Dowehavedisconnectionsbetweenscientistsandpolicymakers?Whatarebarriers?We usedapresentationandgroupdiscussion.Thepresentationwasfocusedontippingpointsofsocial behaviourandadoptionofchangeinbehaviourbypeople.Seepresentationinannex12. Summaryoffeedbackgiven.
48 asdeliverables,researchquestions,andfeaturesconsideredintheanalysis.Stronginterestwasalso expressedinexplanationsandtrainingonanalysismethodsandsoftwaredevelopedduringthe project,withconsequentinterestindedicatedtrainingsessions. 5.2WorldcafédiscussionsonEqual‐Lifepresentations Presenter:MK,UniversityofKaiserslautern,CognitiveandDevelopmentalPsychology(online) Titlepresentation:Effectsofenvironmentalexposuresonmentalhealth,well‐being,andcognitionin childrenatthetransitionfromkindergartentoprimaryschool:Conceptofalongitudinalfieldstudy Worldcaféquestions: Westudytherelationshipbetweengreenspace,noise,airpollution,socialfactors,andthe cognitivedevelopmentofchildrenintheperiodbetweenpreschoolandprimaryschool. Fromaninterventionperspectivewhatassociationstoanalysewouldbeofmostinterestfor you Worldcafédiscussion: Thepresentationwasregardedasverygood,partlyabithardtounderstand(particularlythedifferent outcomemeasurementsandhowtheyarerelatedtoeachother).Butthestudypresentedwas regardedasquiteillustrativeaboutwhatEqual‐Lifeisdealingwithandisbettertounderstandthan thecohortdata. Topics/discussionpointsmentionedwere: Identifyqualityaspectsofgreenspacethatareimportanttochildren'sdevelopmentandhow theyrelatetothepreferencesoftheirparents. Greenspacesinresidentialareasaremostimportantforsmallchildren. Studytherelationbetweengreenspaces&qualityoftimespentinthosespaces. Atthatpoint,thegroupdiscussedwhatdefinesthebeneficialqualityofgreenspaces(orotherplaces) inrelationtothementalhealthofchildren.ItwasmentionedthattheWP5definitionof"timespent" and"frequencyspent"isprobablyagoodindicatorforanenvironmentbeneficial/attractivefor children‐betterthandefining"highquality"intermsofthephysicalfeatures(vegetation,water…). "Greenspaceneedsmaintenance"wasmentionedhere. ThemoderatorsmentionedthatthePreschoolstudyisalsointerestedinsocialexposure/factors.The groupdiscussion,therefore,shiftedtowardstheroleofgreenspacefordifferent(socio‐economic) targetgroups. Topicsmentionedherebygroup1andthefollowinggroupswere: IsthereadifferenceintheeffectofgreenspacebetweendifferentSESgroups? Ideaforanintervention:addgreenspacetoschools.SchoolyarditselfisanequalizerofSES differences. Thisprovidesequityofaccesstogreenspaceforpupils. Moregeneralideasforinterventionfollowed:
49 Interventionshouldprovideequityinarchitecture&urbandesign. Bringnatureinsidethe(artificial)citytowardcreativity. Also,animalsbringnaturebacktothecity,notthestandardelementsmorecreative. Considerthedidacticaspectsofgreenenvironment. Designinganinterventionthatislocatedinagreenspace(freeschoollunchinaparkduring summer–Helsinki)=>provideshealth‐beneficialeffectsofgreenspaceandequitytodifferent socio‐economicgroups. Besidesgreenspace,somegroups’memberssuggestedconsideringotherexposuresinthepreschool study,namely: Includedigitalexposome. Impactofelectromagneticradiationonpreschoolchildren. Alsoincludenoise. Presenter:CG,CentreforCognitiveScienceTUKaiserslauternGermany(online) Titlepresentation:CausalpathmodellinginEqual‐Life.Whathasbeenandwhatwillbedone? Worldcaféquestion: Howshould(complex)empiricalandstatisticalresultsbecommunicatedtothetargetaudience,and howtopresenttheseresults,toavoidmisconceptions? Worldcafédiscussion: Stakeholdersdiscussedthattheanswerdependsonwhothetargetaudienceisandthatthereare diverselevelsofinformationthatcanbediscussed.Thestakeholdersexpressedinterestininformation onwhattheresultsrepresentandhowtolinkittointerventionsandpractice.Itisimportanttoinform onthecontextoftheresults–whatquestionswereasked,whatdataandmethodswereused,what datawasmissing,andhowwastheconclusionreached.Itisalsoimportantforthestakeholdersto knowhowtheycanchangetheoutcomesintherealworld.Regardingtheformofpresentingresults, severalformswerementioned:short(written)summaries,interactivesessionswithstakeholders, cartoonsoranimations,andinteractiveonlinematerials.Theresultsmustbeintroducedproperly, communicatedinauser‐friendlyandsimpleway,andtherelevancetothetargetaudienceshouldbe clear. Presenter:AP,TUDelft,theNetherlands Titlepresentation:Newmethodologicalapproachestomeasuringthephysicalenvironment Worldcaféquestions: Whatmetrics/indicatorsareyouusinginyourdailypractice(ifatall)toassessaneighbourhood’s walkability/accessibility/encouragementofactivetravelbehaviour,etc.?Whatislacking? Doyouuseanyavailabletools/designguidelinesfromglobalorganizationssuchasWHO,UNHabitat, etc.?Whichones?Whatislacking? Whenitcomestoimprovingchildren’smentalhealthandwell‐being,whichenvironmentalaspectsdo youconsiderthemostimportantandwhy?Onwhatevidencedoyouprioritizethem? Doyouseeanypotentialintheworkwepresentedforyourdailypractice?Whatwouldyouneedto makethishappen?
50 Worldcafédiscussion: Allparticipantsagreedthatthepresentationwasverygood.Alreadyknowingaboutthiskindof researchisan“eye‐opener”.Membersofthisgroupdiscussionwereimpressedwithalldatagathered andwereinterestedinhowtheycanreachdataatasimilarlevelfortheircases.Theywouldbe interestedinreadingreportsandpublicationstoreadmoreaboutitontheEqual‐Lifewebsite. Regardingthetopic“greenareas”theysuggestedtoaddalsolocationsofschools/kindergartens,and playgrounds.Apartfromthefactthatgreenareasarediscusseditisalsoimportantwhatsuchareas offer,whatareactivitiessupportedinsuchplaces(recreation,useofdigitalapps…).Itwassuggested thatalistofaspectsthatspatialplannersshouldconsiderbeforedecidingonnewinterventions. Plannersneedactiveengagementofseveralstakeholdersincludingresidentsandfeedbackfromusers. Itisimportanttomonitorandevaluatetheuseofthegreenareaandmakeimprovementswithtime. Itisimportanttoknowwhatkindofgreenareasweneedinthecity(safety,activities…).Accessibility isimportant,needtoavoidbarriersorcrossthem(railways…).Itshouldbeadynamicprocess.Tools formunicipalitiesareneededtoconsiderthelistofaspectsthattheyshouldconsider. Presenter:JA&LG,UniversityofBremen,Germany Titlepresentation:SocialExposome‐Concept,applicationfields,andimplications Worldcaféquestions: Doesourresearchinspireanypracticalimplicationsinyourwork? Doyouseeanyoptionstointegrateourresearchinyourwork? Doyouseeanygaps,whichshouldbeaddressedinourresearch? Worldcafédiscussion: Doyouseeanygaps,whichshouldbeaddressedinourresearch? OneimportantaspectwithinSocialExposomeshouldbedigitalizationandsocialmedia:Social realityishighlydigitalized,andtheincreasingglobaldigitalizationshouldbeconsideredwhen werefertothesocialenvironment,becauseofthehighinterrelatednessbetweentherealand thevirtual/digitalworlds. o Socialrealityistypicallyperceivedthrough‘digitalfilters’(i.e.useofsmartphones,iPads, socialmedia,etc.) o Theomnipresenceofdigitaldevicesdistractsfromtherealworldandinfluencesour relationships:distraction,lossoffocus(e.g.parentsandlittlechildrenparental investment) o Interactioneffectsbetweentheuseofdigitaladviceandsocioeconomic/educational backgrounddigitalliteracyisneeded. WhentalkingabouttheSocialExposomewealsoneedtoconsidercommunityandsocial interactionsattheneighbourhood/districtlevel. o Qualityofneighbourhoodsdiffersalotwithincitiesanddependshighlyonmovementor employmentpatterns. o Whatcanbeobservedisthatsegregationiswantedbytheprivileged residents/communities:
51 ImportantHowtobreakthroughthisaversionandincreasetolerance/opennessto achieveregenerationwithoutlosingbenefits? o Youngfamiliestypicallyareaconstantinneighbourhoodsmaybeincreaseexchange platformsforchildrentoreachacceptancebetweendiversepopulationsinsight& exchangeoflivingpatterns. o Lookforoptionstoincreasecommunityinvolvement(participatoryapproach) Whentalkingaboutsocialinteractionsweneedtodefinethemeaningofsocialinteractions: qualityandquantityofinteractions. o Inpracticeinteractionsoutsidespecificsettings(e.g.school)definetheatmospherefor meaning,becausehereinteractionslosetheirfunctionas“socialroles”(e.g.teacher,pupil) butcangrowinto‘true’relationships.Thus,to‘improve’interactions,weneedtocreate exchangeoptionsoutsidesettings.Thisunderstandingmayalsohelptoimprove neighbourhoods/relationswithinneighbourhoods. Formentalhealthsocialinteractionsareofhighrelevance,asweneedtoconsiderboth, perceptionofinteractionsandbehaviourwithininteractions. o Toimprovecommunities/neighbourhoodsweneedmoneyand,thus,weneedtoconvince policyanddecision‐makers,weneedtobeoutcome‐related.Butawarenessisalsohighly importantwhichalsocanbeoutcomerelated. Doyouseeanyoptionstointegrateourresearchintoyourwork? Qualityofdata:Concreteoperationalizationoptionsneedtobedefinedtocollectgood&clean datatodrawvalidconclusions. Reductionofcomplexitytomakeitfeasibleinthefield–concreteguidelineswouldhelp. o E.g.LogicModelforEquityAssessment:nameconcreteevaluationcriteriathataretobe followedinthedevelopmentofinterventions. Presenter:MD,TUEindhoven,theNetherlands Titlepresentation:Definingrelevantsettingsbytime‐activity‐soundexposuremapping. Worldcaféquestions: Couldyouseethistypeofstudybeingdoneinyourmunicipalityoranotherscaleyouare dealingwithinyourdailywork(neighbourhood/city/province/country)? Doyouseeanybenefittoapplyourresearchinyourdailywork? Knowingthetypesofdatawecollected,whatresearchquestionscometomind?(Inother words,canyougiveanyadditions/suggestionstoourwork?) Worldcafédiscussions: Stakeholdersfoundtheideaofusingbehaviouralpatternsfordatacollectionaninterestingapproach. Theopinionsweredividedonwhethertheyseethisstudybeingrepeatedintheirownfieldofwork, duetocostsorprivacy.Theinformationthatthestakeholdersthoughtoftobebeneficialfortheirwork were:SES–noise,qualityoflife–noise,mentalhealth–noise,andthesocialdifferences.Itwas suggestedbythestakeholderstoexploretherelationshipbetweendurationandnoise,withthe questionbeing:arelocationswithahighernoiseexposurevisitedforashortertime?Othersuggestions weretoconnectmoredatatotheexistingdatasettoinvestigatethemediationofotherexposures
52 suchasgreenspaceandairqualityandtoincorporatesubjectivesoundexperienceinthefuture. Finally,thestakeholderswouldliketoseesuggestionsforinterventions,guidelinesforwhenasetting is“good”or“bad”andhowtoinformparentsandteachersbetterabouttheeffectsofnoise. Presenter:DK,JožefStefanInstitute,DepartmentofEnvironmentalSciences,Ljubljana,Slovenia Titlepresentation:Children's(mental)healthandparticipatoryresearch:diversityoflevelsofinclusion Worldcaféquestions: Howtotranslatefindingsresultingfromvariousparticipatory/CSactivitiesininterventions? Whichtools(andtheirfeatures)aretobeusedforeffectiveengagementofchildren‐alsoto fostermotivationandconsequentlysustainabilityofactivities? Isthereroomforintegrationofapproachedpresentedintoschoolcurriculum? Howtoassessimpactofactivities/interventionconsideringspecificsofparticipants(children) involved? Howtofostertheupscalingoftheresultsandtheiruptakebypolicyanddecisionmakers? Worldcafédiscussion: Inthebeginningofthediscussion,someoneaskedforanexplanationonwhatisintervention.The meaningofthewordisnotsufficientlyclear.Discussionwentindirectionthatresultsfromtheresearch areveryoftennotimplementedinpolicies.Decisionmakerslistenattheresultscomingfromresearch, buttheydonotconsidertheseresultsindecisionmaking.Weagreethatenvironmentalsensorsforair pollutionandnoiseexposurecangiveveryvaluabledataandtheyshouldbesharedwithlocal authorities.Peoplearescepticalofimplementingsolutionsonchildren’sscience. Onthetopic‐Whichtools(andtheirfeatures)aretobeusedforeffectiveengagementofchildren‐ alsotofostermotivationandconsequentlysustainabilityofactivities,theparticipantsgavevery interestingproposals.Thesetoolscouldbegames,toolsasamusementforchildren,toolsthatmake childrenresponsibletouse,butstill,theyarenotobligatoryforchildren.Itisalsoimportanttoinvolve teachersandchildren,teacherscouldmakeratingfortheirdevelopmentespeciallyindevelopmentof emotionalskills.Someofthesetoolscouldbeincludedineducationprocessandbecomepartof educationcurriculum,especiallyforenvironmentalpollutionandhumanhealth. Weshouldthinktoincludechildrenintheprocessofdevelopmentoftools—co‐creationandco‐design withchildren. Someonegaveideafordevelopmentofapplicationfordailydiary,sowecangetpicturefortime activitypatterns. Howtofostertheupscalingoftheresultsandtheiruptakebypolicyanddecisionmakers? Forthisquestion,allparticipantswereveryscepticalthatresultswillbeimplementedinthepolicies. Presenter:KB,senioradvisorchild&adolescentpublichealth,theNetherlands Titlepresentation:MentalHealthintheDutchPublicHealthsector Worldcaféquestions: Areyoumissingitemsinthewishlist? o Well‐beingasabasicconditionatschool o Moretargetgroup‐orientedinterventions o Moreaccessibleinterventions;morepreventiveinterventions
53 o Attentiontosocialandphysicalfactorsinrelationtomentalhealth o Dataabout:‐youngadults;‐migrants;‐lowsocio‐economicstatus o Morequalitativedatainthefieldofmentalhealth. Aretherealreadyqualitativedataaboutmentalhealththatyouwouldsuggest? Whichqualitativedataaremostrelevant? Aretherealreadynationalresearchagenda’sMentalHealthonchildren’smentalhealth? CanEqual‐Lifebeofanysupport? Worldcafédiscussion: Consideringthetime,nodiscussionwasheldonKarin’spresentation. Presenter:ES,CityofHelsinki,Finland Titlepresentation:Implementingevidence‐basedpsychosocialinterventions:anexamplefrom Helsinki,Finland Worldcaféquestions: Whatkindofnationalguidanceisofferedinyourfieldofwork? Howwouldyouapplyyourexperiencesinourwork? Worldcafédiscussion: First,timewastakentoanswerquestionsabouttheIPC‐Aintervention.Forexample,questionsabout theFinnishhealthcaresysteminwhichbasichealthcaretochildrenisprovidedthroughtheschool system,andthattheIPC‐Aisanindividualinterventionthatcanbeprovidedbyanyonewhohas completedthetraining.AnimportantquestionforEmmaishowtogetmanagersintheschooland healthcaresystemtoadopttheIPC‐Aintervention.Theinterventionisalreadyinthenational guidelines;however,thisnationalguidanceisnotenforced.BarriersinFinlandarethatmanagersdo notfeelthatimplementinghealthcareinterventionsispartoftheirjobdescription,asthelawismore focusedonpreventionthaninterventions. Afewexperiencesfromothercountrieswiththisissuewereshared:oneparticipantproposedto informparentsabouttheimportanceofthisinterventionsothattheywillaskschoolstoimplementit. AGermanparticipantproposedtostartscreeningformentalhealthproblemstoshowthemagnitude oftheproblemandcreatemoresupportforimplementingIPC‐Aorotherinterventions.Another Germanparticipantsuggestedthatitmighthelptoconvinceinsurersthattheinterventioniscost‐ efficient,theymightthenlobbyfortheinterventioninschoolsandhealthcaresettings.Aparticipant fromItalyproposedthatitmighthelptoinformuniversitystudentsabouttheimportanceofthis interventionandtheimportancetoworkinterdisciplinary,sothattheymightchangetheeducational andhealthcaresystemsofthefutureandwillseethevalueoftheseinterventionswhentheyenter professionallife.InSloveniatheyencountersimilardifficultiesinimplementinginterventions,their barriersaremainlyalackofresources,people,andmotivation,andwhohastheresponsibilityforthe implementationofinterventionsisnotclear. Presenter:MW,NCJ,theNetherlands Titlepresentation:Yourbrainincontrol?!Universalpreventiontowardsmentalhealthinadolescents Worldcaféquestions:
54 IsthereawayinwhichEqual‐Lifecanhelpmeasuringthechangesweaimforwiththisinterventionat school? weexpecttoseemoreinteractionbetweenstudents,outsideclassesandlunchbreaks. weexpecttoseemoreinteractionbetweenstudentsandteachers,outsidescheduledclasses, withoutself‐reportedresearch. Inthesequelofthefirstquestion:WherecanEqual‐lifehelptogetinsightsofchangeofbehaviourby lookingfromanotherangletothesituation?Inmostresearchongroupsandstudenttherearelotsof ethicaldiscussions.There’sanon‐ethicalpartinEqual‐Lifethatcanbehelpful. Worldcafédiscussion: The‘Yourbrainincontrol’programislookingfor(new)waystoevaluatetheeffectsoftheintervention. Aswithotheruniversalpreventionprogramsprovidingevidenceonasingle,specificinterventionis challenging.Amethodcouldbetousesocialmediaand–inthiscase–YouTubevideosandposted commentstotrack,analyseandclassify‘thesentiments’(suggestionof/supportbyQUANTIA). Anotherquestionfromtheprogramiswhetherthisinterventionhelpsinimprovingandenhancingthe socialenvironmentofschools.Willschoolsbea‘bettersetting’,asresearchedbyEqual‐Life,dueto thisintervention?CanEqual‐Lifeprovideindicationsorcausalrelationsonsocialenvironments,school settings,andchildren’smentalhealththatwouldsupportthis? Presenter:LG,CorkCity,Ireland Titlepresentation:Let’splayCork Worldcaféquestions: Barrierstoamoreplayfulcityincludededicatedfull‐timeresourcing,annualmulti‐stakeholder budgetingandpublicliability/insurancecosts.BenefitsofapplyinganyresultfromEqual‐Life inyourdailywork:researchfindingsthatproperlyclarifytheimportanceofearlypreventative interventions.Appliedresearchprojectsthattestthesefindingswouldbeagreatbenefit. InmypresentationIwillfocuson2Corkexamples‐Let’sPlayCork(PlayfulParadigm)andLet’s GrowTogether(InfantandChildhoodPartnership).It’importanttonote:Buyinforamore playfulcityisalwayseasy–butthereisaneedformoreappliedresearchandcommittedpilot projectstogrowconfidenceintheabilitytodeliverlarger/morepermanentplayfulcity projects. Worldcafédiscussion: Themainchallengesaremaintenanceoftheplaygroundsandlong‐termfunding.Collaboration betweendifferentsectorsanddepartments,andpeoplewithdifferentexpertisearenecessary forfurtherdevelopment.Thatisagoodreasonforeachcitytohaveahealthycitycoordinator whowillcoordinateallofthem.Someonementionedthatchildrenneeddigitalequipmentfor playingintheplaygrounds,thiscouldbeaveryinnovativeidea. Especiallyimportantistoconsiderequityprinciplestoavoidenlargingthegapamongdifferent populationgroups.Lorcanthinkstheyconsideredsocialinequalitieswhentheyplanned playgrounds. Afestivalofintegratedinvolvementofchildren,parents,andotheradultsisaninteresting eventandimportantforemotionalconnection.ThiseventwasorganizedinEstonia,theyare notsofrequentlyorganized,buttheycanbeagoodexampleofinterpersonalconnection.
55 EvaluationofthisinterventioninCorkcitywasnotperformed,butLorcanthinksthatpeople aremostlysatisfied.Therewasaproposalforevaluationoftheinterventionwithwalking interviews,likewalkingthroughthecityandaskingpeoplewhattheythinkandwhatwillthey changeoraddsomethingelse. Someonementionedasagoodexample“playfulbenchesinNewZeeland”;benchesinthe greenareas,withdifferentpossibilitiesforplayingandstimulationofchildren’sdevelopment. Presenter:ISE,UrbanPlanningInstituteoftheRepublicofSlovenia Titlepresentation:Greenspacesforhealthierchildrenandyouth:recommendationsfrom“GoingOut forHealth”programmeinSlovenia Worldcaféquestions: What“additional”argumentationtosupportgreenspaceplanninganddesigninpracticecan yougive? Howcanthequalityofoutdoorlivingenvironmentaffectandimprovethemental(and physical)healthofchildrenandyouth. Whatkindofindicatorscanbeusedtomeasurethat? Worldcafédiscussion: Questionsthatcameupinthediscussionwerewhatthedefinitionsareof‘nature’and‘green space’,andthatdefinitionsprobablydifferindifferentsettings.Weshouldinvolvecitizensin defininggreenspacesandwhatqualitiestheyappreciateinthem. Stakeholdersalsowantmoreinsightsintohowpeoplereacttodifferenttypesofgreenspaces: whatdopeoplelikeandhowisitbeneficialtothem? Itisimportanttohavegreenspacesclosetohomesandschoolsandontherouteschildren taketoschool,thereisnotenoughdataonthisyet. Introducedigitaltoolsforplayingreenspaces. Presenter:UB,SocialProtectionInstituteoftheRepublicofSlovenia Titlepresentation:Isitallaboutlocation?SpatialInequalitiesinthecityofLjubljana Worldcaféquestions Whatisthepolicyrelevanceandapplicabilityofhighlighteddata? Arepolicymakersandpoliticaldecision‐makersinterestedintheresults? Worldcafédiscussion: Onequestionwasiftherearemoreinequalitiesbetweentheareas,e.g.:Aretheremore facilitiesingeneralintheaffluentareas?Isthisquantifiableforfutureanalysis? Itwassuggestedtolinkthenoiseexposuredata(e.g.,frompubliclyavailablenoisemaps)to thedataonkindergartensubsidiesandseeiftherearedifferencesinnoiseexposure dependingontheprosperitystatus. Weagreedthatitisaninnovativeapproachtoestimatetheprosperityofaneighbourhood anditcouldbeconsideredtouseinEqual‐Lifeaswell.
56 KeynotepresentationSD(online) Thefirst1000daysintheNordicCountries Thefirstmonthsandyearsofchildren’slivesareparamountfortheirfuturewell‐being.Brain developmentisatitspeakandfoundationsarelaidforneuralpathwaysandbrainregionsthatdictate futurelearning,language,emotionregulation,andbehaviour.Thislaysthefoundationforgoodmental healththroughoutthelifespan. Thefirst1000daysintheNordicCountriesisathree‐yearNordicco‐operationprojectlaunchedin 2019.IthasbeenworkingonanextensivesituationanalysisoftheNordiccountries,reviewingthe evidence‐baseforinterventionsandassessmenttools,anddevelopmentofpolicyrecommendations. Thisresultedinthreeextensivereportsonthesethreepillars. Formoreinformationsee:www.first1000days.is/about‐the‐project 5.3Usingalogicmodelasatooltoencouragethinkingaboutsocialinequalitiesin urbanplanninginterventions ForthisworkshopsessionranbyJennyAhrens(UB),thegoalwastoevaluatetheapplicabilityofthe LogicModelforEquityAssessmentusinganexemplaryinterventiononbicycleinfrastructurebasedon theworkshopparticipants’expertise.Todothis,fivegroupswereformed,andeachgroupfocussed onthethreemainpartsofanintervention:Planning–Implementation–Evaluation. Duringthediscussion,thefollowingthreequestionswereourguidingquestions: Whattoolssimilartothelogicmodelareyoucurrentlyusingatwork(e.g.,guidingquestions, frameworks,othermodels)? Canyouseethelogicmodelbeingusedinyourwork? Whatcouldbeaddedorchangedtomakethelogicmodelamoreusefultool? Asforthedifferentthreephases,itwasnotedthatanimpactassessmentwouldbevaluablewithin theplanningphaseandthatevaluationneedstobeimplementedwithinallphases. ThemaintakeawayfromthediscussionwithstakeholdersandmembersofEqual‐Lifewasthatitneeds tobemadenoticeablyclearthatthisLogicModelforEquityAssessmentisnotanotherprocess‐model butisaboutassessingtheequityaspectsinthethreemainphasesofanintervention.Ideastoimprove thiswastoemphasizethiseveninthevisualmodelbyusing“triggerwords”. 5.4Evaluatingchildren’saccesstopublicoutdoorplayspace InthesessiononEvaluatingChildren’sAccesstoPublicOutdoorPlaySpace,RTandAP(TUDelft) collectedknowledgefromtheEqual‐Lifestakeholdersinaninteractiveworkshopsession.TUDelftaims tomeasurechildren’saccesstoplayspacesincities,tobeusedfortheenrichmentoftheEqual‐Life cohortandschoolstudydatasets.Thegoalofthissessionwasthreefold:tocollaborativelyidentifythe factorsthatlimitorpromotechildren’saccesstoplayspace;toconnectthesefactorstoelementsin
57 theurbanenvironment;andtoassessthelatestwork‐in‐progressapproachofTUDelftinmeasuring children’saccesstoplayspace. First,RTintroducedthetopictothestakeholdersandprovidedthemwithabriefoverviewofthe theorythattheworkshopwasbuiltupon.Then,stakeholderswereaskedtocontributewith suggestionsoffactorsthatlimitorthatpromotechildren’saccesstoplayspaceaskeywords,followed byabriefplenarydiscussionofthemostprevalentlimiting(i.e.,lackofsafetyorsecurity,traffic,and lackofplacessuitingageormultiplegenerationsofusers)andpromotingfactors(i.e.,safety,other children,informalplacestoplay,andequipmentforchildrenwithreducedabilities). Second,bothstakeholdersandEqual‐Lifeparticipantssplitinto6groups,eachattheirowntable,to discusschildren’saccessibilityinaspecificurbancase:3tablesfocusedonLjubljana,Slovenia,and3 tablesonMilan,Italy.ParticipantsfamiliarwitheitherMilanorLjubljanawerepresentedwiththe correspondingcity,whileotherswerespreadovertablestoensurevarietyinexpertiseand geographicalbackground.Ateachtable,anEqual‐Lifemoderatorguidedtheprocess.Participants discussedphotosandmapsofthecityathandandpinpointedwhatcouldlimitorpromotechildrento accessplayspaces. Third,participantswerepresentedwithamapoverlayontopofthemapofthesecondround,made byTUDelfttomodelchildren’saccesstoplayspace.Specifically,theseoverlaysshowedplacesthey identifiedthatmayattractchildren’splay(i.e.,playgroundsandsmallparks),orthatmaybeabarrier tochildrenwhowanttoaccessaspacetoplayinthecity(i.e.,transportandnaturalinfrastructures). Participantsdiscussedtowhatextenttheyagreedwiththebarriersandplacespresentedonthemaps, aswellaswhatshouldbeomittedoraddedtobetterreflectpractice. Throughoutthesecondandthirdrounds,participantscontributedtheirknowledgebymeansof annotations,drawings,andstickynotes.Participantsalsoelaboratedonexperiencesfromtheirown lifeortown,whichwerecapturedinaudiorecordings.TUDelftwillusethesetounderstandthe potentialandlimitationsofusingsuchdatatomodelchildren’saccesstoplayspaceintheEqual‐Life project. Preliminarytake‐awaymessagesfromtheparticipantstoRTandAPinclude:Thesizeandshapeof parks,timeofday,movementtrajectories,andsurroundinglanduseandactivitiesmatterwhen assessingchildren’saccesstoplayspace;Goodqualityinfrastructureisimportant;Andknowledge fromlocalexpertsorchildreniscrucialtogetacompleteunderstandingofchildren’saccesstopublic outdoorplayspaceintheurbanenvironmentathand. 5.5Policyrecommendationperspectives PvdHintroducedthesessionwithashortpresentationontheecologicaldoughnutmodelandthe DPSIRmodel.ThedoughnutmodelbyKateRaworth(2012)isavisualframeworkforsustainable development,combiningtheconceptofplanetaryboundarieswiththecomplementaryconceptof socialboundaries.TheDPSIRmodel(drivers,pressures,state,impact,andresponsemodelof intervention)isacausalframeworkfordescribingtheinteractionsbetweensocietyandthe environment.
64 SessiononDataandharmonizationpresentedbyJennySelander(KI) Apresentationwasgivenonmappingofexistingcontentinthecohortsandharmonization(protocol) andcodebook. ThereareAnalysisteamson:diagnosisteam(mentalhealth),internalizing/externalizing(mental health),cognition,well‐being,andonbiomarkers.Selectionoflifephasewhereoutcomesare(most) relevant. Analysisplan: - Whichresidential(maternal)physicalandsocialexposuresduringpregnancyareassociated withADHDdiagnosis? - Whichresidentialphysicalandsocialexposuresatage0‐3yearsareassociatedwithanADHD diagnosis? - WhatistheassociationbetweenprenatalphysicalandsocialexposomeandanADHD diagnosis?Towhatextentisthisassociationmediatedbypretermbirth/SGA/LBW? - Whatistheassociationbetweenphysicalandsocialexposomeatage0‐3yearsandanAHDH diagnosis?Towhatextentisthisassociationmediatedbystress/sleep(measuredatage0‐3 year)? - Whichresidential(maternal)physicalandsocialexposuresduringpregnancyareassociated withautismdiagnosis? - Whichresidentialphysicalandsocialexposuresatage0‐3yearsoldareassociatedwithan autismdiagnosis? - Whatistheassociationbetweenprenatalphysicalandsocialexposomeandanautism diagnosis? - Whatistheassociationbetweenphysicalandsocialexposomeatage0‐3yearsandan autismdiagnosis?Towhatextentisthisassociationmediatedbystress/sleep(measuredat age0‐3years)? Stakeholders’roleparticularlyrelevantandvaluableininterpretingtheanalysisoutcomes.Move awayfromstatisticsintointerpretation(RIVM‐IrenevanKamp). Addingdata:inEHENcontext–oritsfollow‐up(proposalfornewEUproject:I‐EHEN). InteractivesessiononPrioritisingdata(categories) Wewantedtoknowwhichcategoriesofdataareimportantintheviewofstakeholders.Different categoriesofdatawerementioned.Prioritisedcategoriesarementalhealth,fluidintelligence,socio‐ demographicfactors,psychosocialstress,relationshipsandsocialsupport,educationalmobility, healthcharacteristics,learningandteachingconditions,livingconditions. Althoughallhave(some)importance. Reflectionsonthis‘exercise’: - Weshouldhavedonethisatthestartoftheresearchproject. - Combiningresearchandpractitioners’arguments–interdisciplinaryapproach - Combinetheseprioritieswiththeresearchquestionspriorities. SessiononConceptualmodellingwithsemantictechnologies(Quantia,MB)
65 WithinEqual‐Lifeasemanticknowledgesearchtoolwillbedeveloped:atooltohelpyoufindinga specificdocument.Whatisanontology?Amodelof(someaspectof)theworld.Introducesvocabulary relevanttothedomain.Specifiesmeaning(semantics)ofterms.Formalisedusingsuitablelogic.Shared amongmultipleorganisations. Creatingclasses.Creatingsubclasses.Creatingaclassinstance.Forexample:artistisaclass.Painter andsculptoraresubclassesoftheartistclass.AndLeonardoisapainter(hence,alsoan artist).Leonardoisnotaclass.Andthencreatingadditionalclassinstances:forexample,DaVinci,age, birthdate.Creatingclassinstancesthroughclassproperties,forexample:Leonardopaintsthe Monalisa(painting),MichelangelopaintstheSistineChapel(painting),MichelangelosculptstheDavid (sculpture).AndthenanAItoolcanknowthatLeonardocreatestheMonalisaorthatMichelangelo createstheSistineChapelandtheDavid. Stakeholderhelpneededtoimprove/reflectonthetool. Feedbackstakeholders:searchtheevidenceandbestpractice,taketheoryandimplementthat.Not interestedinwhatisatthebackofthat(website,tooletc).Techniqueversuscontent. Searchengineoptimisation.ConceptualmodelofEqual‐Lifeistheontologyforthetoolprototype.To bevalidatedbystakeholders(e.g.instakeholderforuminHelsinki).HaveapractitionerandITexpert workingsidebyside. Organisingtheinputforthemachinelearningisamajorstep.IvK:note,therearemoreconceptual modelsinEqual‐Life,thusneedtousethedefinitiondocuments/goalayerdeeper.Suggestion: prepareanexampletofurtherdiscuss/pre‐testwithstakeholders.Startingpointfortheontology couldbetheconceptualmodelofWP1. Finalconclusion: ADemonstratorversionofthetoolbox/handbookwaspreparedandreviewedwithstakeholdersatthe WP8co‐creationmeetinginComo.Additionally,anEditorialBoardwasformedtoorganizeand incorporateresultsandfindingsfromtheEqual‐Lifeprojectintothetoolboxandhandbook.Thisboard, adoptingatop‐downapproach,comprisesmemberswithdiverseexpertiseinareassuchastoolsand training,knowledgemanagement,handbookandtoolboxdevelopment,stakeholderexpertise,and communicationandcoordination.Theirgoalistomaketheproject'soutcomeseasilyunderstandable andrelevanttothepublic.
66 Annex10StakeholderforuminHelsinki Thursday7thSeptember ThemeetingstartedwithaconciseexplanationofEqual‐Liferesearch,theconceptualframeworkand theprogramofthe2‐dayworkshopsorganizedbyWP8(stakeholderinvolvement)andWP9(toolbox andtraining). Theconceptualframework:thetotalityofinternal,socialandphysicalexposures,overalifetime,to betterunderstandthecausesofandprocessesrelatedtomentalhealthandcognitivefunctioning,with potentialmediatingpathways,providingapossibilityforinterventionsalongthelifecourse. Expectedresults:earlylifeexposuretourbanplanningrelatedfactors(noise,air),socialfactors (parentalstress,socialeconomic),biomarkersrelatedtoenvironmentalandsocialexposures. Presentation:Overviewofpreliminaryresults/updates(DS,Zeus) AimofWP1(onmechanisms)istoformulatetheoriesandmechanisms,forhowexposomelinksto mentalhealthandcognitivedevelopmentofchildrenandadolescentsandtounderstandhowstress/ restoration,self‐regulation/copingandsleepmayaffecttheserelationships. Researchquestionsarestudiedin‐depthinsleepandpre‐schoolstudiesandinthecohortstudies (data),enrichedwithnewdata.Examplesofdataavailableinthecohortsand/orareillustrated. Reflectionsfromstakeholders:coping,digitalenvironmentanddaylightare(yet)missinginresearch. Outcomesinfluencetheexposome;thatarrow/linkis‘missing’intheconceptualframework.Thiscan bemodelledthough(inWP7). Presentation:Measuringaccesstopublicspaces(TUD) Thisworkshopconsistedoftwoparts. Part1:Inthefirstpart,weexaminewhichfactorsinfluencepedestrianaccesstopublicspaces andforwhom.Usinganinteractivecardgame,wewillprioritizevariedfactorsthataffectpedestrian accessibilityanddiscusshowwecanpracticallymeasurethem. Part2:Inthissecondpartwefocusonhowtoassesschildren’saccesstogreenspaceinthecity asaplacetoplay,socialize,beactive,andsoon,ultimatelycontributingtohealthyurban environments.Usinginteractivetools,wewillcollaboratetocreateidealmetricsforchildren’saccess togreenspaceanddiscussseveralmetricsthathavebeenimplementedbyTUDsofar. Relatedtopart1:SDGs,target7:by2030provideuniversalaccesstosafe,inclusiveandaccessible, greenandpublicspacesinparticularforwomenandchildren,olderpersonsandpersonswith disabilities.Howtoidentify,assess,establish/maintaintheseareas?Groupworkonwhatfactorsand forwhom?Andonmeasuringgreenspace. Identifyingandprioritizingurbanfactors:overlapinfactors,importanceofproximity,shadow,safety, lightandamenities.Mostimportantfactorsaretraffic,safety,followedbyenvironmentalfactors, green,shade.Attractivenessandaccessibilityarekey.Otherfactorsmentionedareseasonofthe year,availabilityoftime,education/practice/norms.
67 Mostimportantfactorsoftenarehardtomeasure,whereasthoselessimportantareeasierto measure.Forexample:whatis‘safety’,howtomeasurethis? Reprioritizingspecificallyforparticularpopulationgroups: - forelderlynewfactorswereidentifiedsuchasfreepublictransport,ice‐freeroutes. - forchildrenaswellnewfactorswereidentifiedsuchaspeers,distancefromhome, sidewalks/bikelanes. - forwomennotmanychangesoccurred - forpersonswithdisabilities:accessibilityismostimportantforthisgroup,aswellas safetransport. Relatedtopart2: Measuringgreenspaceforprimaryschoolagedchildren.Whatinformationwouldyouneed?For example,geographicalsizeanddetail,atneighbourhoodleveland/ornationallevel? Suggestions:addingwearablesinordertocollectdatafromchildren’smovements,addingchildren’s voiceandperceptionongoodenvironments.Anotherpresentationwasoncyclingtowork,addingdata onprivateandpublicland,affordability,subsidizedtravelinformation,bicyclestorageandseasonal maps.Andanotheridea:“Let’splayandmovemoreoutside”,aschildrenarenotgettingoutside anymore.Avarietyofpublicplacesandincreasedattractiveness,voiceofparentsandofchildren.And planandmeasurewiththechildren. TUDelftproposals: - children’sindependentaccesstogreenspace.Itisgoodforchildrentogooutdoors independently;cantheyreacha(green)spacetoplaywithoutcrossingbarriers? - daytodaygreenspaces.Childrengotoschooleveryday,butwhichstreetsdothey passandhowvegetatedarethose? - crowd‐sourcedperceivedgreenspaces.Aredataongreenspaces,suchas OpenStreetMapandsatelliteimages,complete?Ordotheymissgreenspaces? Improvementsuggestions:(social)safetyofplayareas,attractivenessofstreets,addchildren’svoice, useofblackspaceandwhythesearenotused(yet). Presentationonenrichingtheenvironmentalexposome:roadtrafficflowpredictionandnoise modelling(ULEIC) Roadtrafficnoisere‐modellingandincludingincohortstudies(whereneeded).Europeanstandard modellingmethod(CNOSSOS‐EU)isusedtocalculatenoiseexposuresatfacadesofdwellings(and indirectlyofindividuals)frommainroads.Inepidemiologicalstudiesweneedexposuredatafor smaller/minorroads,forindividualdwellings,andthusthisapproachaccordingtotheEnvironmental NoiseDirective(END)isnotideal.Equal‐Lifeistryingtofillinthesegapsbyusingstatisticalmethods withaselectednumberofvariables(theso‐calledgeneralizedlinearmixedeffectsregressionmodel). Suchasroadtype,averagedailytrafficcount,population,numberofterminal/dead‐endroads, nearestmajorroadjunction,gradientoftheroad,connectivitytootherroadtypes,numberofpeople thatcandrivewithin5minutestoaparticularlocation/drivetime.Roadtrafficflowpredictionshave beentestedinUK,Barcelona;nowusedfor3Dnoisemodelling.
68 Questions:Whatistheinfluenceofelectricvehicles?Whataboutlownoiseemissionzones?Dominant sourceandbackgroundnoisedifferperroadtype,thusataresidentialroadyouwillhearrollingnoise whereasatamajorroadthatwillbeenginenoise. Nodataontrees(canopies)isincludedinthemodelling.Mostchallengingisthetemporalaspect (andthusdata)ofroadtraffic. Socialexposome(NIJZ) Startingpointbeforethepresentationwasthedescriptionoftwomaintoolsforthetoolbox/handbook plannedfromWP4: 1)Forthetargetgroupofresearchers:ConceptualFrameworkoftheSocialExposomeandits implicationsforresearch.Abriefintroductionwasgiven,theconceptualframeworkisalready published(Gudi‐Mindermannetal.(2023).Integratingthesocialenvironmentwithanequity perspectiveintotheexposomeparadigm:AnewconceptualframeworkoftheSocialExposome. EnvironmentalResearch.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.116485). 2)Forthetargetgroupofpolicymakers/urbanplanners/otherstakeholders:LogicModelforEquity ImpactAssessmentanditsimplicationsforinterventionplanningandevaluation.Afterabrief introductionaCaseStudyonNoiseLegislationinSloveniawaspresented. Explanationofthesocialexposomeconceptualframework,theintegrationofphysicalandsocial exposomesandthehealthoutcomesandhealthinequalities.Tobetestedincohortstudiesandresults expectedin/aftersummer2024.Forthetargetgroupofpolicymakers,urbanplanners,publichealth authoritiesandothersisthelogicmodelforequityimpactassessment.Thisisatooltohelpembedan equityperspectiveintheplanning,implementationandevaluationprocessofuniversalinterventions toimprovethebuiltenvironment.Publicationforeseen. Suggestion:includea‘#when?’questionaswell,inadditiontoHow,Who,WhatandWhere. CasestudiesconductedinEqual‐Lifewere(i)reductionofenvironmentalnoiseexposuresinSlovenia, (ii)improvementofbicycleinfrastructureandincreaseofcyclingbehaviourinMacedonia,(iii)mobility hubsand(iv)playareasinUtrecht,theNetherlands.Theenvironmentalnoisecasestudyisfurther explained,seethehandout/ICBENconferencepaperaswell. Discussiononconceptualframework(INCHES) Theaimofthisdiscussionwastogetapictureof:(i)what'type'ofinformationcanthedifferent stakeholdersapplyintheirwork?(ii)whichdataorresults(exposures,mediators)arerelevanttothe workofstakeholders?(iii)dostakeholdersrecognizetheirowndilemmasandquestionsthattheyhave inthefirstresultsanddeviatethisfromwhatstakeholdersexpected,intheirwork?(e.g.whatarethe maincausesandperhapsmediatorsformentalhealthinchildren,accordingtotheEqual‐Life researchersandaccordingtothestakeholders?). Aninteractivegamewasplayedtogetanideawhichkindofexposureswereprioritizedbythe stakeholders:physicalexposures,mediatorsorsocialexposures.Inaddition,stickynoteswere produced.Someoutcomeswere: Socialexposureswerehighlyratedasbeingimportant. Children’svoicesneedtobeandcanbeheard.
69 Whereismostimpacttobeexpected?Inthedecision‐makingsystems,therechangecanbe achieved. Friday8thSeptember Casestudy:Citycollaborationtrack,Improvingyoungpeople’ssenseofsafetyinthecity(MeriVirta) BloombergandHarvardCityLeadershipInitiativesupport,inHelsinki.Publicvaluestatement:enabling asafeandwelcomingenvironmentforchildrenthroughoutthedayisgoodforeachindividualandthe community.Tacklingtheissuebybreakingitdownintosubcausesandidentifyingcomplexitiesbyan interdisciplinaryteam.E.g.lackofsafefreetimeactivitiesfortheyoung,behaviouralissuesamongthe youngatschoolandinthestreets.Growingnumberofconfrontationsbetweengroups,lackofsupport andsenseofbelongingforfamilies. Threeentrypointshavebeenselected: - Servicesaredesignedfor‘average’users o Hobbyplatform. o Co‐createserviceswithchildren. o Newarea‐basedleadershipmodel. o etc. - Lackofsafefreetimeactivitiesforyoung o Familieshaveknowledgeaboutfreetimepossibilitiesforchildren. o Proactiveleisureservicesfindyoungpeoplewithouthobbies. o etc. - Publicspaces(inclschools)areexperiencedasunsafe o Interveningandsolvingeverycaseofbullyingandharassment. o Publicspaceimprovementsandnewschoolbuildingareprioritized. o Placemakinginterventionswithchildren. o etc. Lessonsareintegratedintoregularworkpractices. ProblemDrivenInteractiveAdaptation(PDIA)process(Harvard)steps:Initialproblemanalysis;Identify actionsteps;Takeaction;Check‐in;Sustainauthorityandlegitimacy;Adaptanditerate. Keyresultsandtakeaways: - Wemanagedtocompletenumeroussimultaneousjoinedinterventionsintheareain matterofmonths.Initialresultsindicatethatantisocialbehaviourhasdecreasedin thearea. - Startwiththeproblemandtherootcauses.Stoppingatthecommonproblemwas worththetime–thisenhancedpeople’sownershipandfromanearlystagethey startedseeingtheirroleinthesolutionstoo. - Makesureyouhavetherightpeopleatthetable.Havingthemandatetobringabout concretechangeandinterventionswascrucial. - Interventionswerebasedonwideparticipationofstakeholdersandasolid knowledgebase.
70 Qualitativedatacollection(anduse)needstobeimproved.Qualitativedatawillbecombinedwith theexisting(quantitative)datainthemunicipality.Thenadecisiononform(at)ofdatacollectionwill betaken. Whathappensnext? - Resultsarecompiledandpresentedtothecityleadership.Decisionsareyettobe madeaboutscaling. - Allcitydivisionsarecommittedtostrengtheningarea‐basedwork,utilizingthetools andprocesstrialedinthearea. - Goodworkcontinuesintheareaandsimilarworkwillbeexpandedtothe surroundingneighborhoods. - Keychallengetoaddress:thecoregroupof8peopleputalotoftimeintothisand receivedcoachingthroughouttheprocess–howdoweutilizethemethodsin existingcooperationstructures? Casestudy:infantmentalhealth(TL‐HealthyCitiesCork) Corkcity:Let’sgrowtogether!Variousinterconnectedstrategies:infantmentalhealthandwell‐ being;speechlanguagecommunicationandliteracy. Earlyenvironmentalquality:presentationpreliminaryresults(KI) Acombinationofbirthcohortdataanddatafromschoolstudies. FAIRcohort:ADHDmostimportantvariables(duringpregnancy)arebirthyear,income,smoking, populationdensity,roadintersectioncloseness,educationoffather,roaddistance,etc.ForAutismthe mostimportantvariablesareincome,greenurbanareas,build‐uparea,roadnoise,greenurbanarea, foreigncitizenship,etc.OtherresultsareavailablefromtheALPINE,PIAMAandWALNUTScohorts. Question:howtocommunicatetheresults? - Communicatetheresultspercohortorallpooledcohorts? - Visualizetheimportanceofthevariables.Oratoptenpresentation. - Infographic - Moreinformationisneeded,forexampleoncausality,howtointerprettherelation betweenthevariableandtheoutcome. - Involvestakeholdersinreviewingpapers!Inordertogivemeaningtoresearch outcomes. Toolboxandhandbook(Quantia) ThestakeholderforuminHelsinkiproducedbeneficialfeedbackfortherevisedprototypeofthe toolbox/handbook. InvolvementofstakeholdersinbroadercommunicationofEqual‐Liferesultsis crucial–andoffered! DiscusseditemsfortheToolboxmodulesarestakeholders,visualization,semanticknowledge exploration,connectionandsharingmodules.InmoredetailtheStakeholdermoduleshouldbean explorativewebsitewithclickableelements.Feedbackhasbeentestedinpreviousstakeholder workshops.Theupdatedwebsiteispresentedinthisworkshopforcomments.
71 Toolsarebroadlydefined,andabroadselectionwillbepresented,butnothostedonthewebsitebut throughlinkagestothe‘owners’ofthespecifictools.Thewebsitewillbeopenforeveryoneandwill haveanexplorativepart. Usestorytelling(workshops)fortheresearchersinordertocollectstories,contentforthewebsite. Suggestions: - Insteadofawebsiteorinadditiontothewebsiteconsiderdevelopinganapp. - LinktootherwebsitesanddashboardssuchasUNICEF. PresentationbyLAonPersonallisteningandITdevicesandtheirrelationtolifestyleofadolescentsin theSlovakRiskBehaviouralSurvey ThestudyisbasedonabilateralUS‐Slovakprojecttoevaluatetheimpactofselectedbehavioral, psychological,andsocioeconomicfactorsonadolescenthealthintheBratislavaagglomeration.Special attentionispaidtotheuseofselectedITdevices(TV,PC‐personalcomputers,personalmusicplayers ‐PMPs).Thedatafrom525students(185boys)attending8secondaryschoolsinBratislava,aged15‐ 20yearsarepresented. Themostimportanthealthriskbehaviorsinthestudents’samplewere identified,90.9%ofstudentslistentoPMPonaveragefor405minutesandusemobilephonesfor384 minutesperweek,significantlymoregirls.About50%ofstudentslistentoPMPsmorethan200 minutesaweek.ThosestudentshaveaworselifestylethanthoselisteningtoPMPslessthan200 minutesaweek.AhighpercentageofPCusagehasbeenobserved,especiallyduringtheweekend (72.1%morethanthreehoursperday),andlessinterestinwatchingTV.StudentsusethePCmore thantheirparentsandwatchlessTV,butwhenwatchingit,theycopythebehaviorofbothparents. Thestudypresentsachallengefortheanalysisandforfuturepreventionaswellasintervention activitiestoprotectandpromotethehealthofchildrenandyouth. PlaceStandardToolforChildrenandYoungPeople(JH,cityofGlasgow) ThePlaceStandardtool(PSt)waslaunchedin2015andinresponsetoon‐goingfeedbacka versionforchildrenandyoungpeoplewasco‐producedandpublishedin2022. Thistool providesapracticalsolutiontohelpyoungercommunitiesidentifyinacollaborativeand inclusivemannerwhatworkswellwithintheirplace,whatneedsimprovingandthesolutions toaddressthese.Thetoolismadeupof14placedimensionswhichalignwiththeUNSDGs andthisrelationshipcoupledwiththesuccessfulapplicationofthetoolacrossEuropehasled toaninvitationfromWHOtoPublicHealthScotland(PHS)tohostanewCollaboratingCentre forPlacefrom2024onwards. ThelessonslearnedfromtheEqualLifeProjectwouldbe invaluablecontributiontotheCollaboratingCentre’sprogramme. Equal‐Lifeoutcomesandhealthequity(INCHES) Interactivesessionwithmentimeteronquestionsrelatedtodatacollectionandvulnerability.See resultsinannex13. Question1:Therearedatacollectionplans.Howcanweconnectdataonphysicalexposuresto knowledgeaboutwhatworksforchildren’smentalhealth? Multiplechoiceanswers
72 ‐ DataCollectionandIntegrationofdata ‐ InterdisciplinaryCollaboration ‐ LongitudinalStudies ‐ CausalPathwaysandMechanisms ‐ CommunityEngagement ‐ Other Result:Therearedatacollectionplans.Howcanweconnectdataonphysicalexposurestoknowledge aboutwhatworksforchildren’smentalhealth?Highestrankfor‘interdisciplinarycollaboration’ followedby‘datacollectionandintegrationofdata’.Suggestion:mapdataownersanddatasources inordertomakesenseofcombinationsofdataandtomakeastoryonthedata. RelatedtoVulnerability Thefollowingtwoquestionswerebasedonsomehomeworkonatextofvulnerabilities(fromWP1). Question2:Whichdimensionofvulnerabilitydoyouthinkwillcausemostimpactonchildren’s mentalhealth?(oneanswerpossible) ‐ Differentialexposure ‐ Differentialsusceptibility ‐ Differentiationincapacity ‐ Other Result:Whichdimensionofvulnerabilitydoyouthinkwillcausemostimpactonchildren’smental health?Highestrankedansweris‘differentialsusceptibility’.Alternativeanswercategories: environmentalexposuresandpreventiveinterventions. Note:theusedtermsarequitedifficulttounderstand. Question3:Whichdimensionofvulnerabilityprovidesthebestopportunityforpolicyaction? (oneanswerpossible) ‐ Differentialexposure ‐ Differentialsusceptibility ‐ Differentiationincapacity ‐ Other Result:Highestrankingansweris‘differentialexposures’. ThefinalquestionwasrelatedtoTransdisciplinaryinteraction. Improvingtransdisciplinarycooperationinpolicydevelopmentrequiresathoughtfulandstrategic approachtobreakingdownsilos,fosteringcollaboration,andintegratingdiverseperspectives. Transdisciplinarycooperationinvolvesworkingacrossmultipledisciplinesandstakeholderstoaddress complexissuesandcreatewell‐roundedpolicies. Question4 Whichapproachwillenhancetransdisciplinaryinteractioninyourviewmost? Multiplechoiceanswers(moreanswerspossible),
73 ‐ SharedVisionandGoals ‐ DiverseStakeholderEngagement ‐ EffectiveCommunication ‐ InterdisciplinaryTraining ‐ IntegratedResearchandDataSharing ‐ Other Result:Highestrankingansweris‘effectivecommunication’,followedby‘diversestakeholder engagement’and‘interdisciplinarytraining’. Wrap‐upandconclusions(INCHESandCoU) Actionsandnextsteps: - Stakeholderreviewinanalysesandreporting - Broadeningparticipation/stakeholderengagementfromvariousdisciplines - Policyrecommendations - Storytelling - Socialmediaplan/disseminationplan - Training - Nextmeetingtobescheduled:earlyJune2024,possiblelocationsCork,Ghentor Leipzig Inconclusion:ThecollaborativeeffortswithinWorkPackage8(WP8togetherwithWP9)haveyielded substantialprogressinshapinganddevelopingideasforpolicydevelopment,thetoolboxand guidebook.Eachtaskwasexecutedinasynergisticmanner,resultinginaprototypeofthesemantic explorationandknowledgetoolsthatwaspresentedtostakeholdersinHelsinki.This,alongsideactive participationinstakeholderworkshopsandjointendeavorswithWP9,bolsteredstakeholder engagementandenrichedprojectresources.
80 Which dimension of vulnerability do you think will cause most impact on children’s mental health?
81 Which dimension of vulnerability provides the best opportunity for policy action?
82 Which approach will enhance transdisciplinary interaction in your view most?
Annex14researchquestionsusedinComoco‐designworkshop Researchquestions Session3.Topic:Researchquestions Theaimofthissessionisfocusontheuseofourresearchresultstotheworldofpolicymaking. Therefore,wewouldliketoaskyoutodosomehomeworkbeforethemeetinginComo. Wehavearangeofresearchquestions. Table1showsanoverviewofexternalexposomequestionsinassociationwithcognitiveandmentalhealthoutcomes.Theseareoverarchingresearch questions. Table2showstheoutlineforalistofquestionsfocusingonacombinationofselectedexposures(externalandinternal).Thesequestionsarealsoanticipatedas overarchingresearchquestions.Inthislistofquestions,thereare7corequestionswhicharethenrepeatedforthe9differentoutcomesthatareofinterestin Equal‐Life.Thesetargetedquestionsaimtoconsiderboththecumulativeeffectsandthelife‐courseperspectiveinanalysingtheeffectsofdifferent combinationsofexposuresonmentalhealthandcognitiveoutcomes.Thetargetedanalysiswillalsoincludemediators,modifiersandre‐reversedcausality(bi‐ directional)analyses.
84 InadditiontothemainresearchquestionsinEqual‐Life,inTable3,wehavegatheredquestionsthatarespecifictostudyingtheassociationsbetweendiverse typesofexposomes(e.g.,socialexposome,physicalexposome). Ashomeworkwewouldliketoaskyoutochooseforeachtablethethreequestionsthatyouconsiderthemostrelevant. Youmayhavespecificcriteriathatsupportyourdecision.Pleasetakenoteofyourargumentstoselectyourpreferencequestions. Youmightconsiderargumentsbasedonfeasibilitytomakeinterventions,onthebiggesthealthimpact,oncost‐benefitreasons,onsupportingcurrent projects,oranyotherreason.Youalsohaveargumentswhysomeresearchquestionsarenotgood,notfeasibleormaybenotjustorethical. Doyouconsiderresearchquestionsassucharevaluableforstakeholderslikepolicymakersoronlytheresults? CanyoubringyourfilledinformstoComo. However,wepreferitifyoucouldsendusyourfilledinformstwodaysbeforesowecanprintthemout. InthesessionrelatedtotheEqual‐Lifequestionswewilldiscussyourfeedbackontheresearchquestions.
85
86
87
88
89
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105