Supplementary materials of "Smart Cities: A Systematic Review of Emerging Technologies"

PRISMA 2020 for Abstracts Checklist Section and Topic Item # Checklist item Reporte d (Yes/No) TITLE Title 1 Identify the report as a systematic review. Yes BACKGROUND Objectives 2 Provide an explicit statement of the main objective(s) or question(s) the review addresses. Yes METHODS Eligibility criteria 3 Specify the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the review. Yes Information sources 4 Specify the information sources (e.g. databases, registers) used to identify studies and the date when each was last searched. Yes Risk of bias 5 Specify the methods used to assess risk of bias in the included studies. No Synthesis of results 6 Specify the methods used to present and synthesise results. Yes RESULTS Included studies 7 Give the total number of included studies and participants and summarise relevant characteristics of studies. Yes Synthesis of results 8 Present results for main outcomes, preferably indicating the number of included studies and participants for each. If meta-analysis was done, report the summary estimate and confidence/credible interval. If comparing groups, indicate the direction of the effect (i.e. which group is favoured). Yes DISCUSSION Limitations of evidence 9 Provide a brief summary of the limitations of the evidence included in the review (e.g. study risk of bias, inconsistency and imprecision). No Interpretation 10 Provide a general interpretation of the results and important implications. Yes OTHER Funding 11 Specify the primary source of funding for the review. No Registration 12 Provide the register name and registration number. No From: Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71. This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/