scieee AI-readable full text Open interactive document viewer

Online Sensor Selection for Object Detection via Bayesian Risk Minimization

Arash Chaichi Mellatshahi; Tim Willems; Marwan Yusuf; David Van Hamme; Jan Aelterman

Abstract

In today's world, object detection systems increasingly rely on multiple sensors, but processing data from all of them is computationally, energy, and bandwidth intensive. Situations such as battery-saving mode, limited network bandwidth, processor cooling requirements, or handling other tasks simultaneously make it difficult to use all sensors at once. This motivates the need for methods that dynamically select sensors, achieving high detection performance while conserving resources. We propose a decision-theoretic approach for object detection that selects the optimal sensor based on incoming evidence, rather than using all sensors simultaneously. Using Bayesian principles, the system chooses the sensor that minimizes the expected risk of using that sensor, combining the cost of computation and detection errors given the evidence. This dynamic selection balances high detection performance with limited resource usage, producing an output expected to have minimal risk. To demonstrate our sensor selection method, we applied it to choosing between analyzing a low-resolution (LR) or high-resolution (HR) image for car detection. In this setup, the system uses the output of the car detector on the low-resolution image as evidence to decide whether the corresponding high-resolution image should be analyzed for a given region. Our approach, which selects online between high- and low-resolution sensors, increased recall from 0.66 to 0.71 at 0.75 precision compared to using only the medium-resolution sensor on the KITTI dataset. It also reduced processed pixels by 34% and outperformed the medium-resolution pipeline in both computation and detection performance. Overall, our method outperforms low-, medium-, and high-resolution pipelines in terms of total risk.

Full text

…. Online Sensor Selection for Object Detection via Bayesian Risk Minimization IPI: IMAGE PROCESSING AND INTERPRETATION Arash Chaichi Mellatshahi, Tim Willems, Marwan Yusuf , David Van Hamme, Jan Aelterman Contact: Arash.chaichimellat[email protected] Results On the KITTI dataset, our approach improved recall from 0.66 to 0.71 at 0.75 precision, reduced processed pixels by 34% compared to using only the medium-resolution. Overall, our method outperforms low-, medium-, and high-resolution pipelines in terms of total risk. The proposed Sensor Selection Framework Car Detection Quality and Compute Cost on KITTI dataset Recall at 75% precision compared to compute cost (proportional to analyzed pixels). The challenge Object detection systems increasingly rely on multiple sensors, but processing data from all of them is energyand bandwidth-intensive. Edge processing devices may be battery powered, have limited network bandwidth or be thermally limited, and therefore require careful workload management to provide the best accuracy-computational cost tradeoff. Car detection results and compute cost (processed pixels) on a KITTI frame: Medium Resolution vs. Our Method. Case study setup Our Method: Sensor Selection between Lowand High-Resolution Medium-Resolution (fixed) 0,41 MP 0,26 MP Number of Pixels Processed Detected by both/ medium-resolution Detected only by Our method Our Solution: Bayesian Sensor Selection Framework We propose a decisiontheoretic approach for object detection that selects the optimal sensor based on incoming evidence, rather than using all sensors simultaneously. Using Bayesian principles, the system chooses from an initial observation (e.g., a low-resolution first stage detector) whether to activate additional sensors and their processing algorithms. The method minimizes total expected risk, which is defined as a combination of the computation cost and the probability of making a detection error. This dynamic selection balances high detection performance with limited resource usage. Conclusion Our dynamic sensor selection achieves a better accuracy–complexity trade-off than fixed-complexity pipelines and outperforms the medium-resolution sensor pipeline in both computation and detection performance. Ongoing Work Online sensor selection for RGB cameras and Time-of-Flight (ToF) sensors. Next Steps •Extend the framework to new applications and sensor types. •We welcome collaboration to advance this direction. Car Detection Quality and Compute Cost on KITTI Dataset: Total cost = performance risk (false positives & negatives) + computation cost (processed pixels). Experiments: We demonstrate our sensor selection method in a cascaded setting, where the system first analyzes the lowresolution (LR) image and then decides whether to additionally process the high-resolution (HR) image for car detection. In this setup, the decision to analyze the HR image for a given region is guided by the evidence provided by the car detector’s output on the LR image. Medium Resolution Sensor selection