scieee AI-readable full text Open interactive document viewer

Ignoring the Decoy: Tackling Forensic Distractions in Image Forgery Localization using Masked Convolutions

Xander Staelens; Peter Lambert; Glenn Van Wallendael; Hannes Mareen

Abstract

Manipulating images has become easier than ever thanks to the growing sophistication and accessibility of image editing tools. While these tools can be used for good, they have the potential to be exploited for malicious purposes, such as fabricating fake news, spreading misinformation, impersonating individuals, and facilitating fraud. The field of multimedia forensics aims to combat this problem by developing robust image forgery localization (IFL) methods, which detect and localize manipulations in images. However, in this research, we demonstrate that recent IFL methods are compromised by forensic distractions. These distractions are benign visual elements, such as captions, logos, and visible watermarks, that occur in real-world scenarios. We investigate the impact of distractions on state-of-the-art IFL models, which was never formally done before. We reveal that some models (like TruFor) are highly sensitive to forensic distractions, making them lose focus on the real forgeries, leading to large performance drops. To address this issue, we propose a novel masked-convolution approach for TruFor. We replace all convolution operations with a masked counterpart, enabling the method to ignore user-specified distraction regions during inference. Evaluation shows that the proposed masked-convolution approach significantly improves TruFor's robustness against distractions, allowing it to regain focus on the real manipulations and nearly restoring original performance. This demonstrates its potential as a distraction-aware technique to enhance the real-world applicability of IFL models.

Full text

Logos & captions can distract fake image detectors, … Fake! Forensic distraction Context: Fake media can be used for various malicious purposes: disinformation, false evidence, fraud, … Fake image detectors (like TruFor) can detect manipulations. without the distraction Original TruFor Detected Ignoring the Decoy: Tackling Forensic Distractions in Image Forgery Localization using Masked Convolutions Method: masked convolutions All convolution layers are replaced with a masked convolution version. Masked convolutions ignore potential distractions marked by the user in an input mask. By removing the influence of distractions, the model can regain focus on the real manipulations. Schematic overview of the masked convolution Problem: Existing detection methods can be sensitive to forensic distractions. They become distracted, lose focus on the real manipulations, and detection fails. Logos, captions, … Xander Staelens, Peter Lambert, Glenn Van Wallendael & Hannes Mareen IDLab, Ghent University - imec, e-mail: [email protected] with the distraction Original TruFor Performance drops 55% Masked-Convolution TruFor Our method lowers the performance drop to only 7% Detected again! Detection fails improves 87% Distraction detected instead Conclusion: … our masked-convolution approach can refocus detectors.