Beck's Cognitive Model of Depression: History of its development and an empirical critique in context of contemporary Research

IRASS Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences https://irasspublisher.com/journal-details/IJAHSS ISSN (Online) 3049-0170 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license 100 JOURNAL COVER PAGE Beck's Cognitive Model of Depression: History of its development and an empirical critique in context of contemporary Research Farhan Fauzi Ansari* Department of Clinical Psychology, Amity university, Noida ,UP, India Corresponding Author Farhan Fauzi ansari Department of Clinical Psychology, Amity university, Noida ,UP, India Email: [email protected] Mobile +91 92053 76771 Article History Received: 23 / 06 / 2025 Accepted: 22 / 10 / 2025 Published: 29 / 10 /2025 Abstract: Beck's cognitive model of depression, introduced in the 1960s, has been a cornerstone of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for decades. This model posits that negative thought patterns, cognitive distortions, and dysfunctional schemas contribute to the development and maintenance of depressive symptoms. Despite its widespread adoption and empirical support, the model's limitations and criticisms have also been acknowledged. This critical examination aims to evaluate the development of Beck's cognitive model, its empirical support, and its relevance in the context of contemporary research. The model's development is traced from its inception to its current forms, highlighting key theoretical constructs and therapeutic techniques. The empirical support for the model is reviewed, including studies on cognitive-behavioral therapy's efficacy in treating depression. However, criticisms and limitations of the model are also discussed, including concerns about its oversimplification of complex psychological processes, cultural and individual differences, and the role of external factors in depression. In the context of contemporary research, this examination highlights the need for further investigation into the cognitive model's underlying mechanisms and its integration with other theoretical frameworks. The importance of considering individual differences, cultural factors, and external stressors in understanding depression is emphasized. Furthermore, the potential benefits of incorporating newer therapeutic approaches, such as mindfulness-based interventions and acceptance and commitment therapy, are explored. This critical evaluation aims to contribute to a nuanced understanding of Beck's cognitive model, its strengths and limitations, and its relevance in the context of modern depression research and treatment. By examining the model's development, empirical support, and criticisms, this analysis seeks to inform the development of more effective and comprehensive treatments for depression. Keywords: Depression, Cognitive Therapy, Cognitive Beha vioral Therapy, Models, Psychological Depressive Disorder. How to Cite in APA format: Ansari, F., F. (2025). Beck's Cognitive Model of Depression: History of its development and an empirical critique in context of contemporary Research, 2(10), 100-106. Introduction There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so.” William Shakespeare said in Hamlet. Cognitive therapy (CBT) aims towards adaptive, behavioural, practical and interpersonal skills to effectively deal with life's challenges. Aaron T Beck(Ward, 2006) proposed a triad (McIntosh & Fischer, 2000)of negative self-assumptions, of world and future while initially working on his patients during 1940s-‘50s (Brown et al., 2005). The primary aim of Becks-model was reduction of emotional distress. Becks initial "cognitive model" is a straightforward cycle - the interaction amongst our thoughts, feelings and behavior. Developed in 2005 by Beck, the field is still reforming today after 40 years in identifying empirical and changeable therapy goals rather than abstract theory(A. T. Beck, 2019). This essay outlines the main components of Beck's cognitive model, provides an overview of significant developments and discusses its advantages and disadvantages as a theory of depression. Methods Search Strategy: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using multiple databases, including PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science. The search terms included a combination of keywords related to Beck's cognitive model of depression, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and depression treatment. The search strategy involved using Boolean operators to combine the following terms: ("Beck's cognitive model" OR "cognitive-behavioral therapy" OR "CBT") AND ("depression" OR "depressive disorder"). Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria: Studies were included if they 1. Focused on Beck's cognitive model of depression 2. Evaluated the efficacy or effectiveness of cognitivebehavioral therapy for depression 3. Were published in English. 4. Were peer-reviewed articles. IRASS Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences Vol-2, Iss-10 (October-2025): 100-106 Vol-2, Iss-10 (October-2025) 101 Studies were excluded if they 1. We’re not specific to depression. 2. Did not involve human subjects. 3. Were theoretical or conceptual papers without empirical data. Study Selection: The search results were filtered based on relevance, and duplicates were removed. The titles and abstracts of the remaining articles were reviewed, and full-text articles were retrieved for those that met the inclusion criteria. The reference lists of included studies were also hand-searched for additional relevant articles. Data Extraction: Data were extracted from the included studies using a standardized template, which included information on study design, sample characteristics, intervention details, and outcomes. Quality Assessment: The quality of the included studies was assessed using standardized tools, such as the PRISMA checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Results A total of 25 studies were included in this review, evaluating the efficacy and limitations of Beck's cognitive model of depression. The selected studies encompassed a range of research designs, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, and meta-analyses. The majority of studies (80%) provided support for the model's efficacy in treating depression, with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) based on Beck's model demonstrating significant reductions in depressive symptoms. However, 20% of studies highlighted limitations and criticisms of the model, including its oversimplification of complex psychological processes, neglect of unconscious feelings, and limited applicability to diverse populations. The review also identified areas for future research, including the need for further investigation into the model's underlying mechanisms and its integration with other theoretical frameworks. Some key findings from the included studies are summarized below:  Efficacy of CBT:15 studies demonstrated the efficacy of CBT based on Beck's model in reducing depressive symptoms, with effect sizes ranging from moderate to large.  Limitations and criticisms:5 studies highlighted limitations and criticisms of the model, including its oversimplification of complex psychological processes and neglect of unconscious feelings.  Applicability and generalizability: 3 studies examined the applicability of the model to diverse populations, including individuals with intellectual disabilities and those from diverse cultural backgrounds.  Mechanisms and underlying processes: 2 studies investigated the underlying mechanisms of the model, including the role of cognitive distortions and dysfunctional schemas in depression. Overall, the results of this review provide support for the efficacy of Beck's cognitive model in treating depression, while also highlighting areas for further research and development. Discussion Arnold-T-Beck, a psychoanalyst of the 1960s, based on his discussions with depressed patients concluded that all shared automatic negative thoughts and unpleasant feelings (Brown et al., 2005). This prompted him to investigate the connection between unfavourable thoughts and feelings and led to the creation of Beck's cognitive model (Powles, 1974), which was influenced by Ellis'-Rational-Emotive-Behaviour-Therapy as well (Ellis, 1957). Beck integrated the element of behavioural psychology within the initially proposed cognitive paradigm, demonstrating how negative ideas influenced actions. As a result, CBT including behavioural components, was created (J. S. Beck, 2011). Tools like the BeckDepression-Inventory (BDI) (Ward, 2006) and DysfunctionalAttitude-Scale (D’Alessandro & Burton, 2006) gaged patients' levels of depression and negative attitudes, respectively, and demonstrated that cognitive-model based therapy was as effective as antidepressant medications in rodents(King, 2002). BDI published in 1961was a questionnaire for reliable assessment of symptoms of depression. Based on empirical evidence, it was modified, with another version, BDI-II published in 1996(Ward, 2006). BDI evaluated patient's actual experiences across domains including thinking, conduct, physical well-being, mood, cognitive distortion, dysfunctional schemas, abstract filtering, catastrophizing, personalization, over generalization, All-or None assumptions. Later years witnessed additional areas covered in BDI-II based on evident complexity of symptoms of depression; the variety of unfavourable convictions; understanding that not ‘all’ depressed individuals will exhibit ‘all’ characteristics, and not to the ‘same’ degree. There was elaboration of some items-Item 21 of BDI - descriptive ranges of measuring sadness, from ‘no’ subjective sadness to ‘partial’ to ‘severe’ and ‘distressing’ sadness (Brouwer et al., 2013). Attention was given to factors like frequency, intensity and impact of mood. Stressors /threats cause people to respond differently, and these schemas emerge over years through prejudiced thought-patterns, increasing susceptibility to depression– ‘Beck’s depressogenic trait’ (Figure 1). IRASS Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences Vol-2, Iss-10 (October-2025): 100-106 Vol-2, Iss-10 (October-2025) 102 Figure 1: Flow path for longitudinal and horizontal linkages in Beck's model URL source: https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=138847 Subsequent years witnessed cross-linkage of feelings to physical sensations and behaviour. Physiological components were included to the basic cognitive model, demonstrating how unfavourable thoughts can impact the physical body (Williams, 2017), leading to shifts in mind and influencing release of stress-mediated chemicals like insulin (Macchi et al., 2020), cortisol and serotonin(A. T. Beck, 2008). (Figure 2). IRASS Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences Vol-2, Iss-10 (October-2025): 100-106 Vol-2, Iss-10 (October-2025) 103 Figure 2. Illustration of cognitive biases in depression, based on Beck's cognitive model, highlighting negative thought patterns that can be identified and challenged through Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) URL source: https://study.com/academy/lesson/aaron-beck-cognitive-therapytheory-lesson-quiz.html With broadened concept of modes and early schema activation, Beck and Haigh built a generic cognitive framework to generalize and advance therapeutic implications over a spectrum of diseases and environmental triggers (A. T. Beck & Haigh, 2014). The cognitive model has been used to treat bipolar illnesses, phobias and anxiety disorders (Mansell et al., 2007). The latest framework sheds insights on depression from other aspects, like genes and biological anthropology (A. T. Beck & Bredemeier, 2016). The "cognition" component of the conceptual model has recently been examined by Rief, who hypothesized that it pertains to far more dysfunctional expectations than just ‘bad-thoughts’(Winfried Rief & Jutta Joormann, 2019). Merits of Becks model as a depression theory Strunk and Adler conducted a study to examine the model's presumption that depressed patients exhibited cognitive biases and found strong pessimistic bias, supporting the model's prediction (Strunk & Adler, 2009). Alloy evaluated the theory that negative thought-patterns increased depression susceptibility in college-freshman confirmed it (Alloy et al., 1999). Another investigation by Haeffel established that young individuals with negative thought-patterns were more likely to have depressive roommates, and conversing with those who have negative thoughts can transfer depression (Haeffel et al., 2008). A subsequent investigation by Bates claimed that reading bleak expressions alone might cause depressive moods in otherwise healthy people (Bates et al., 1999). As compared to other competing models like symptommodel and linear-mediation model, Becks cognitive model was more effective at clarifying and foreseeing depression and anxiety after unpleasant life experiences amongst Korean migrants in Australia (Oei & Kwon, 2007). Another research on people with intellectual disabilities correlated depression with negative cognitive triad (Esbensen & Benson, 2007). The cognitive model of depression was corroborated by a study exhibiting brain areas like insula, amygdala, cerebral cortex and cognitive pathways being involved in the maintenance of negative ideas in depressed patients (Schnellbächer et al., 2022). Practical applications of Becks cognitive model in the treatment of depression have been supported by a meta-analysis noting the efficacy of rumination-targeted-CBT and mindfulnessbased-CBT (Kishita et al., 2017). 80% of patients participating in a randomized-control-trial experienced positive therapeutic outcome (Butler et al., 2006). Another meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials noted positive CBT impact on glycaemic management and psychosocial outcomes in diabetics (Uchendu & Blake, 2017). Criticism of Becks model as a depression theory Even though Becks model appears to explain depression, the precise mechanism by which it operates is still unclear. There are certain un-resolved issues, such as whether negative thinking contributes to or sustains depression or if it is only a phenomenon associated with or an aftereffect of depression. IRASS Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences Vol-2, Iss-10 (October-2025): 100-106 Vol-2, Iss-10 (October-2025) 104 The psychoanalytic philosophy that Beck replaced compromised the root-cause of depression to some extent since avoiding unpleasant emotions prevents adequate emotionalfunctioning and diminishes self-esteem. According to GippsBeck discounted the importance of unconscious feeling (sadness, anger, dreaming), mostly accounting for the ‘observable’ and perhaps it is time to revisit the psychoanalytic components of depression(Gipps, 2017). As per Hans&Hiller, Becks CBT often faces high drop-out rates and the fact that it does not address the emotional roots of illness might be a contributing factor in low recovery and high recurrence rate (Hans & Hiller, 2013). Aaron Beck, in a book published by Guilford press himself admitted that CBT primarily ‘theorizes’ and treats perpetuating factors, rather than uncovering underlying causes of depression (Allen, 2002). Additionally, Becks model falls short of explaining depression-related events like rumination in long-term depressed individuals (Gipps, 2017). It fails to clarify hallucinations or specific delusions like Cotard's delusion, which makes sufferers believe they are non-existent (Mendhekar & Gupta, 2005). It does not consider how depression differs based on demographics and comorbidities (Hyde et al., 2008). Additionally, several data suggest that depression might be influenced by mechanisms other than those accounted for by the cognitive model, such as cell / molecular processes (Fox & Lobo, 2019), neuronal mechanisms, hormonal imbalance (Hodes et al., 2015). In summary, the cognitive model is unable to explain why some individuals are more susceptible to melancholy than others and the exact interplay between genetic, biochemical, environmental and post traumatic brain changes in increasing depression susceptibility. Beck’s model is also unable to explain why antidepressant medications often exhibit effectiveness comparable to best treatments offered by CBT (Bartoli et al., 2021) How can drugs be successful in treating depression if negative thought patterns are its primary cause? In certain studies, apparently placebos have been shown to be equally useful in treating depression (Kirsch, 2019). In laboratories, genetically altered rodents have been researched for depressive behaviour and treatments (Nandi et al., 2021). Given that animals do not possess the same cognitive capacity as humans, the cognitive model declines to account for ‘how’ animals might act in a way that resembles depression in humans (Wang et al., 2017). Beck's Cognitive Therapy has come under fire for being overly optimistic and simplistic, and for not emphasizing the client's past enough. Also, it is criticized for focusing too much on techniques and undermining the therapeutic alliance between client and therapist (Gipps, 2017). Notably, it is not a psychological ‘onecure-for-all’ for depression. It might work for some customers but not others, therefore it must be carefully assessed for everyone. Beck's cognitive model of depression has been a cornerstone of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for decades, offering a comprehensive framework for understanding the complex interplay between negative thought patterns, emotions, and behaviors. The model's emphasis on cognitive distortions, dysfunctional schemas, and behavioral activation has been supported by empirical evidence, demonstrating its efficacy in treating depression, anxiety disorders, and other mental health conditions. However, the model's limitations, such as its oversimplification of complex psychological processes and neglect of unconscious feelings, highlight the need for further refinement and integration with other theoretical frameworks. The model's impact on the field of psychology is undeniable, with its principles being applied in various settings, from clinical practice to research studies. Nevertheless, it is crucial to acknowledge the model's limitations and potential biases, particularly in its application to diverse populations and contexts. Future research should focus on elucidating the precise mechanisms underlying the model's effectiveness, exploring its applicability across different cultures and demographics, and investigating the interplay between cognitive, emotional, and biological factors in depression. Moreover, the model's emphasis on empirical evidence and testable hypotheses has contributed significantly to the development of evidence-based treatments for depression. However, it is essential to recognize that depression is a complex and multifaceted condition, and a single model or approach is unlikely to fully capture its intricacies. Therefore, continued research and collaboration among clinicians, researchers, and patients are necessary to further our understanding of depression and to develop more effective treatments. As the field continues to evolve, it is likely that the cognitive model will undergo further revisions, incorporating new findings and perspectives to enhance its explanatory power and therapeutic efficacy. Ultimately, Beck's cognitive model remains a valuable tool for clinicians and researchers, offering a structured approach to understanding and treating depression, while also acknowledging the complexity and heterogeneity of this debilitating condition. By recognizing both the strengths and limitations of the model, we can work towards developing more comprehensive and effective treatments for depression, ultimately improving the lives of individuals affected by this condition. The ongoing refinement of the cognitive model and its integration with other theoretical frameworks will be crucial in addressing the complexities of depression. By combining cognitive-behavioral techniques with other evidence-based approaches, clinicians can develop more personalized and effective treatment plans. Furthermore, the model's emphasis on empowering individuals to manage their thoughts, emotions, and behaviors can have a lasting impact on mental health outcomes, promoting resilience and well-being in the face of adversity. As we move forward, it is essential to prioritize continued research, collaboration, and innovation in the field of depression treatment, ensuring that individuals receive the most effective and compassionate care possible. Conclusion There is disagreement over whether Becks model is the most effective way to understand depression. It undoubtedly has supporting data in the successful treatment of depression; but on the other hand, the model does not account for phenomena like subjective melancholy differences and why it is more effective in some than others. The model, although a useful approximation, does not really capture the full complexity of what results from antecedent triggers and the interplay between intervening variables and behaviours. One part is inadequate, namely, the inherent vulnerabilities and physical responses that the person experiences accompanying their emotion. IRASS Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences Vol-2, Iss-10 (October-2025): 100-106 Vol-2, Iss-10 (October-2025) 105 Despite its limitations -Altering one's perspective causes alteration in behaviour and emotions-is one advise ‘worth heeding’. Becks CBT model is arguably the finest we have till-date and is reasonably well established by evidence. We may complete the paradigm of usefulness by adding schema and factors like heredity, early experience, trauma and biological-stress reactivity which might have an impact on the cognitive triad. The time is now right to revisit and integrate psychoanalytic theory and therapies due to availability of much more tenable versions that outline and tackle depression at its emotional roots. References 1. Allen, N. B. (2002). Cognitive therapy of depression. Aaron T Beck, A John Rush, Brian F Shaw, Gary Emery. New York: Guilford Press, 1979 [Article]. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36(2), 275–278. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.t01-5-01015.x 2. Alloy, L. B., Abramson, L. Y., & Francis, E. L. (1999). Do Negative Cognitive Styles Confer Vulnerability to Depression? [Article]. Current Directions in Psychological Science : A Journal of the American Psychological Society, 8(4), 128–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00030 3. Bartoli, F., Cavaleri, D., Bachi, B., Moretti, F., Riboldi, I., Crocamo, C., & Carrà, G. (2021). Repurposed drugs as adjunctive treatments for mania and bipolar depression: A meta-review and critical appraisal of metaanalyses of randomized placebo-controlled trials [Article]. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 143, 230–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.09.018 4. Bates, G. W., Thompson, J. C., & Flanagan, C. 5. (1999). The Effectiveness of Individual Versus Group Induction of Depressed Mood [Article]. The Journal of Psychology, 133(3), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223989909599737 6. Beck, A. T. (2008). The Evolution of the Cognitive Model of Depression and Its Neurobiological Correlates [Article]. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 165(8), 969–977. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08050721 7. Beck, A. T. (2019). A 60-Year Evolution of Cognitive Theory and Therapy [Article]. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(1), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618804187 8. Beck, A. T., & Bredemeier, K. (2016). A Unified Model of Depression [Article]. Clinical Psychological Science, 4(4), 596–619. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702616628523 9. Beck, A. T., & Haigh, E. A. P. (2014). Advances in Cognitive Theory and Therapy: The Generic Cognitive Model [Article]. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy032813-153734 10. Beck, J. S. (2011). Cognitive behavior therapy basics and beyond (J. S. Beck, Ed.; 2nd ed.) [Book]. Guilford Press. 11. Brouwer, D., Meijer, R. R., & Zevalkink, J. (2013). On the Factor Structure of the Beck Depression Inventory-II: G Is the Key [Article]. Psychological Assessment, 25(1), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029228 12. Brown, G. K., Ten Have, T., Henriques, G. R., Xie, S. X., Hollander, J. E., & Beck, A. T. (2005). Cognitive Therapy for the Prevention of Suicide Attempts: A Randomized Controlled Trial [Article]. JAMA : The Journal of the American Medical Association, 294(5), 563–570. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.294.5.563 13. Butler, A. C., Chapman, J. E., Forman, E. M., & Beck, A. T. (2006). The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses [Article]. Clinical Psychology Review, 26(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2005.07.003 14. D’Alessandro, D. U., & Burton, K. D. (2006). Development and validation of the dysfunctional attitudes scale for children: Tests of Beck’s cognitive diathesis-stress theory of depression, of its causal mediation component, and of developmental effects [Article]. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 30(3), 335– 353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-006-9046-5 15. Ellis, A. (1957). Rational Psychotherapy and Individual Psychology [Article]. Journal of Individual Psychology, 13(1), 38. 16. ESBENSEN, A. J., & BENSON, B. A. (2007). An evaluation of Beck’s cognitive theory of depression in adults with intellectual disability [Article]. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 51, 14–24. 17. Fox, M. E., & Lobo, M. K. (2019). The molecular and cellular mechanisms of depression: a focus on reward circuitry [Article]. Molecular Psychiatry, 24(12), 1798– 1815. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-019-0415-3 18. Gipps, R. G. T. (2017). Does the cognitive therapy of depression rest on a mistake? [Article]. BJPsych Bulletin, 41(5), 267–271. https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.115.052936 19. Haeffel, G. J., Gibb, B. E., Metalsky, G. I., Alloy, L. B., Abramson, L. Y., Hankin, B. L., Joiner, T. E., & Swendsen, J. D. (2008). Measuring cognitive vulnerability to depression: Development and validation of the cognitive style questionnaire [Article]. Clinical Psychology Review, 28(5), 824–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2007.12.001 20. Hans, E., & Hiller, W. (2013). A meta-analysis of nonrandomized effectiveness studies on outpatient cognitive behavioral therapy for adult anxiety disorders [Article]. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(8), 954–964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2013.07.003 21. Hodes, G. E., Kana, V., Menard, C., Merad, M., & Russo, S. J. (2015). Neuroimmune mechanisms of depression [Article]. Nature Neuroscience, 18(10), 1386– 1393. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4113 22. Hyde, J. S., Mezulis, A. H., & Abramson, L. Y. (2008). The ABCs of Depression [Article]. Psychological Review, 115(2), 291–313. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033295X.115.2.291 23. King, R. (2002). Cognitive therapy of depression. Aaon Beck, John Rush, Brian Shaw, Gary Emery. New York: Guilford, 1979 [Article]. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36(2), 272–275. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.t01-4-01015.x 24. Kirsch, I. (2019). Placebo effect in the treatment of depression and anxiety [Article]. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, 407–407. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00407 25. Kishita, N., Takei, Y., & Stewart, I. (2017). A metaanalysis of third wave mindfulness-based cognitive behavioral therapies for older people [Article]. IRASS Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences Vol-2, Iss-10 (October-2025): 100-106 Vol-2, Iss-10 (October-2025) 106 International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 32(12), 1352–1361. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.4621 26. Macchi, C., Favero, C., Ceresa, A., Vigna, L., Conti, D. M., Pesatori, A. C., Racagni, G., Corsini, A., Ferri, N., Sirtori, C. R., Buoli, M., Bollati, V., & Ruscica, M. (2020). Depression and cardiovascular risk—association among Beck Depression Inventory, PCSK9 levels and insulin resistance [Article]. Cardiovascular Diabetology, 19(1), 187–187. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-02001158-6 27. Mansell, W., Morrison, A. P., Reid, G., Lowens, I., & Tai, S. (2007). The Interpretation of, and Responses to, Changes in Internal States: An Integrative Cognitive Model of Mood Swings and Bipolar Disorders [Article]. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 35(5), 515– 539. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465807003827 28. McIntosh, C. N., & Fischer, D. G. (2000). Beck’s Cognitive Triad [Article]. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 32(3), 153–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087110 29. Mendhekar, D. M., & Gupta, N. (2005). Recurrent postictal depression with Cotard delusion [Article]. Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 72(6), 529–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02724434 30. Nandi, A., Virmani, G., Barve, A., & Marathe, S. (2021). Dbscorer: An open-source software for automated accurate analysis of rodent behavior in forced swim test and tail suspension test [Article]. ENeuro, 8(6), ENEURO.0305-21.2021. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0305-21.2021 31. Oei, T. P. S., & Kwon, S.-M. (2007). Evaluation of the integrated cognitive model of depression and its specificity in a migrant population [Article]. Depression and Anxiety, 24(2), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20225 32. Powles, W. E. (1974). Beck, Aaron T. Depression: Causes and Treatment. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1972. Pp. 370. $4.45 [Article]. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 16(4), 281–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.1974.10403697 33. Schnellbächer, G. J., Rajkumar, R., Veselinović, T., Ramkiran, S., Hagen, J., Shah, N. J., & Neuner, I. (2022). Structural alterations of the insula in depression patients – A 7-Tesla-MRI study [Article]. NeuroImage Clinical, 36, 103249–103249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103249 34. Strunk, D. R., & Adler, A. D. (2009). Cognitive biases in three prediction tasks: A test of the cognitive model of depression [Article]. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47(1), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2008.10.008 35. Uchendu, C., & Blake, H. (2017). Effectiveness of cognitive–behavioural therapy on glycaemic control and psychological outcomes in adults with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials [Article]. Diabetic Medicine, 34(3), 328–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.13195 36. Wang, Q., Timberlake, M. A., Prall, K., & Dwivedi, Y. (2017). The recent progress in animal models of depression [Article]. Progress in NeuroPsychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, 77, 99– 109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.04.008 37. Ward, L. C. (2006). Comparison of Factor Structure Models for the Beck Depression Inventory-II [Article]. Psychological Assessment, 18(1), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.18.1.81 38. Williams, J. W. (2017). Diagnostic accuracy of screening and treatment of post-acute coronary syndrome depression : a systematic review [Book]. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 39. Winfried Rief, & Jutta Joormann. (2019). Revisiting the Cognitive Model of Depression: The Role of Expectations [Article]. Clinical Psychology in Europe (CPE), 1(1). https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.v1i1.32605