Effectiveness of Mobile Application-Based Cognitive Training in Autism Spectrum Disorder

Effectiveness of Mobile Application-Based Cognitive Training in Autism Spectrum Disorder Author: Benyakorn Calub, Alexander Riley Affiliation: MIND Institute, University of California Abstract Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by challenges in social communication, restricted interests, and repetitive behaviors. Cognitive deficits are a core aspect of ASD, often affecting attention, working memory, and executive functioning, which impede learning and adaptive behaviors. Mobile application-based cognitive training has emerged as a promising intervention for enhancing cognitive skills in children and adolescents with ASD. This study investigates the effectiveness of mobile cognitive training applications in improving cognitive performance and daily functioning in individuals with ASD. A sequential explanatory mixed-methods design was employed, combining quantitative preand post-intervention assessments with qualitative interviews of caregivers and clinicians. Quantitative outcomes measured working memory, attention, and executive function through standardized cognitive tasks, while qualitative data explored user engagement, perceived benefits, and challenges in implementing app-based interventions. Results indicated significant improvements in working memory and attention scores post-intervention, with participants demonstrating higher engagement and motivation during training sessions. Thematic analysis revealed that structured, gamified content and adaptive difficulty levels were key contributors to positive outcomes, while technical challenges and lack of caregiver training posed barriers. Overall, findings suggest that mobile cognitive training applications are effective tools for supporting cognitive development in children with ASD and can complement traditional therapeutic approaches. Recommendations emphasize the importance of evidence-based app selection, caregiver involvement, and personalized training plans to maximize benefits. 1. Introduction Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder with increasing prevalence globally, currently affecting approximately 1 in 36 children in the United States and significant numbers worldwide. Individuals with ASD exhibit diverse cognitive profiles, including difficulties in attention, working memory, planning, and flexible thinking, which can limit educational achievement, adaptive functioning, and social integration. Traditional interventions such as applied behavior analysis, speech therapy, and occupational 2 Teaching of Psychology 0(0) therapy have demonstrated efficacy in addressing core symptoms, yet access and consistency remain challenging due to resource constraints, geographical limitations, and the intensive nature of interventions. Recent technological advancements have opened new avenues for intervention, with mobile applicationbased cognitive training emerging as a scalable and engaging approach. These applications utilize gamification, adaptive difficulty, and interactive interfaces to target specific cognitive domains, providing immediate feedback and personalized progression. Mobile applications offer advantages such as portability, consistent practice opportunities, and potential cost-effectiveness, making them particularly attractive for home-based or school-based interventions. Despite their growing popularity, empirical evidence regarding the effectiveness of mobile cognitive training for individuals with ASD remains limited and heterogeneous. Key questions remain regarding which cognitive domains are most amenable to improvement, the extent of generalization to real-world functioning, and the factors influencing user engagement and adherence. Additionally, prior studies have often focused on short-term outcomes or employed small sample sizes, limiting generalizability. Research Questions i. What cognitive domains (e.g., attention, working memory, executive function) show measurable improvement following mobile application-based cognitive training in individuals with ASD? ii. How do factors such as app design, engagement strategies, and caregiver support influence training outcomes? iii. What recommendations can be made to optimize the effectiveness of mobile cognitive training applications for ASD? The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of mobile cognitive training applications in improving cognitive functioning in children and adolescents with ASD and to identify factors that maximize intervention effectiveness. Findings will provide valuable insights for clinicians, educators, app developers, and caregivers seeking evidence-based technological interventions. 2. Literature Review Theoretical Foundations of Cognitive Training in ASD Cognitive training interventions for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) are grounded in several complementary theoretical frameworks that inform both the design of training tasks and the mechanisms underlying cognitive improvements. Understanding these foundations is crucial to interpreting how mobile applications can be leveraged effectively for neurodevelopmental enhancement. Neuroplasticity Theory: Neuroplasticity refers to the brain’s ability to reorganize its neural circuits in response to experiences and targeted cognitive activities. This capacity for structural and functional adaptation is especially pronounced during childhood, making early intervention critical for children with ASD. Structured cognitive training programs, including mobile applications, aim to harness neuroplasticity by presenting repetitive, progressively challenging tasks that stimulate attentional networks, working memory circuits, and executive function pathways. Research demonstrates that even short-term, focused cognitive exercises can induce measurable changes in brain connectivity and performance in targeted domains. For instance, studies using functional MRI have shown increased activation in prefrontal and parietal regions following working memory training, suggesting that repeated practice can strengthen neural circuits implicated in executive processes. The application of neuroplasticity principles in mobile interventions emphasizes adaptive difficulty, ensuring that tasks Rutter et al. 3 remain challenging yet achievable, thereby promoting incremental cognitive gains without inducing frustration. Executive Function Models: Executive dysfunction is recognized as a core deficit in ASD, affecting higher-order processes such as planning, cognitive flexibility, inhibitory control, and working memory. These deficits contribute to difficulties in daily functioning, social communication, and adaptive behavior. Cognitive training interventions designed to improve executive function often employ scaffolded tasks that incrementally increase complexity, requiring children to plan strategies, shift between rules, and inhibit impulsive responses. Gamified and adaptive interventions are particularly effective because they maintain motivation while simultaneously targeting executive processes. For example, task-switching exercises within a mobile application may improve cognitive flexibility, while sequencing and memory challenges bolster working memory capacity. By aligning training activities with theoretical models of executive function, interventions can be systematically designed to target specific deficits while tracking progress over time. Behavioral Learning Principles: Many mobile cognitive training applications integrate principles from behavioral psychology to encourage repeated practice and sustained engagement. Reinforcement learning, immediate feedback, and motivational systems such as points, badges, or levels are employed to incentivize participation. Applied behavior analysis (ABA) principles, including shaping and task decomposition, are frequently embedded within app design to enhance learning outcomes. Immediate feedback, for example, allows children to correct errors in real-time, reinforcing correct responses and promoting skill acquisition. Furthermore, reinforcement schedules can be customized to maintain motivation across sessions, supporting adherence to longer-term interventions. The incorporation of behavioral learning principles ensures that the intervention is not only cognitively demanding but also intrinsically motivating, which is critical for populations like children with ASD who may have variable attention spans and reward sensitivities. Global Perspectives on Mobile Cognitive Training I. Gamified Cognitive Training: Across international contexts, gamification has emerged as a central strategy for increasing engagement in cognitive training interventions for ASD. Gamified elements, including points, levels, avatars, and rewards, transform training tasks into interactive experiences rather than rote exercises. Studies consistently indicate that gamification enhances motivation, increases session adherence, and reduces dropout rates. For example, European research has demonstrated that children with ASD engage longer and perform better in app-based training when adaptive difficulty is integrated, allowing tasks to dynamically adjust to the child’s performance. By maintaining an optimal challenge level, gamification mitigates frustration and prevents disengagement, promoting a sense of competence and mastery. II. Mobile Platforms: Mobile applications offer distinct advantages over traditional desktop or consolebased interventions. Portability, ease of access, and flexible scheduling make smartphones and tablets ideal platforms for home-based cognitive training. Studies in North America have documented improvements in working memory and attention among children who engaged with mobile cognitive training apps for 15–30 minutes per day over several weeks. The accessibility of mobile platforms also facilitates continuous practice outside clinical or school settings, increasing intervention dosage and supporting skill consolidation. Moreover, mobile apps often allow for real-time data collection and performance tracking, enabling caregivers and therapists to monitor progress and adjust interventions as needed. III. Cross-Cultural Implementation: Despite the promising outcomes, cross-cultural application of mobile cognitive training interventions presents unique challenges. Language barriers, cultural relevance 4 Teaching of Psychology 0(0) of content, and variability in caregiver engagement can affect usability and effectiveness. For instance, an application developed in North America may use culturally specific scenarios or language that is unfamiliar to children in other regions, potentially reducing comprehension and engagement. Successful interventions often incorporate localized content, culturally sensitive narratives, and parent training modules to ensure relevance and usability. Research from Asia and Latin America emphasizes the need for context-specific adaptation, highlighting that interventions cannot be universally applied without considering sociocultural factors and caregiver support structures. Mobile Cognitive Training in ASD: Current Evidence Empirical research examining mobile cognitive training for ASD is still emerging, but existing studies provide encouraging evidence of its efficacy across multiple cognitive domains. Attention and Working Memory: Attention and working memory are foundational cognitive skills often impaired in children with ASD. Mobile cognitive training interventions that employ repetitive, structured tasks have been associated with significant improvements in these domains. Gains are typically observed after 4–8 weeks of consistent use, with tasks progressively challenging attentional control, sequence retention, and dual-task management. For example, studies using apps that require children to remember sequences of stimuli or respond to specific cues have shown measurable increases in task accuracy and response speed, suggesting that mobile interventions can enhance cognitive capacity in ways that generalize beyond the app environment. Executive Functioning: Executive function improvements are also documented, particularly in interventions that incorporate multi-domain training tasks targeting planning, cognitive flexibility, and problem-solving. Apps that simulate real-life scenarios or involve problem-solving challenges encourage children to plan strategies, anticipate consequences, and adapt to changing rules. Evidence indicates that such interventions can lead to observable improvements not only in task performance but also in classroom and home functioning, suggesting potential for transfer of skills. However, the magnitude of improvement varies depending on task complexity, intervention duration, and the level of caregiver support provided. Engagement and Motivation: Engagement is a critical predictor of intervention success. Gamified elements, progress tracking, and immediate feedback have consistently been identified as key factors influencing adherence. Children with ASD are more likely to complete sessions and show cognitive improvements when tasks are interactive and enjoyable. Conversely, low engagement often results from overly complex interfaces, monotonous tasks, or lack of parental facilitation, highlighting the importance of both user-centered design and environmental support. Qualitative studies reveal that caregivers play a pivotal role in sustaining engagement by guiding sessions, offering encouragement, and integrating app-based tasks into daily routines. Limitations of Current Evidence: Despite promising outcomes, existing research has notable limitations. Many studies have small sample sizes, limiting statistical power and generalizability. Intervention durations are typically short, ranging from a few weeks to a few months, and few studies include longterm follow-up assessments to determine the sustainability of cognitive gains. Additionally, most studies focus primarily on performance within the app, with limited examination of whether improvements generalize to broader functional abilities, such as academic performance, social communication, or adaptive behavior. These limitations underscore the need for larger, rigorously designed studies that integrate both quantitative and qualitative methods to assess efficacy and real-world applicability. Addressing these gaps is crucial for developing evidence-based, scalable, and culturally adaptable interventions. The current study seeks to bridge these gaps by employing a mixed-methods design, Rutter et al. 5 combining quantitative assessment of cognitive outcomes with qualitative exploration of user experiences and caregiver insights. This approach not only measures the efficacy of mobile cognitive training but also contextualizes findings within real-world usage, offering a more holistic understanding of intervention potential and practical considerations. Summary The literature indicates that mobile cognitive training interventions for ASD are theoretically grounded, empirically promising, and increasingly accessible. Neuroplasticity, executive function models, and behavioral learning principles provide the foundation for task design and adaptive training. Gamification and mobile platforms enhance engagement and adherence, while cross-cultural considerations highlight the importance of localized content and caregiver involvement. Empirical evidence shows improvements in attention, working memory, and executive function, although long-term sustainability and functional generalization remain underexplored. The current study addresses these limitations by integrating quantitative and qualitative methods to evaluate cognitive gains, user engagement, and practical implementation factors, providing a comprehensive understanding of mobile cognitive training in children with ASD. 3. Conceptual Framework The conceptual framework of this study hypothesizes that mobile application-based cognitive training (independent variable) influences cognitive outcomes (dependent variables) in children with ASD. Key dimensions include: a. Training Intensity: Frequency and duration of sessions. b. Gamification & Engagement: Use of rewards, progress tracking, and interactive features. c. Caregiver Support: Involvement in monitoring and guiding training sessions. d. Adaptive Difficulty: Personalized progression based on user performance. Dependent Variables: i. Attention: Measured through standardized attention tasks. ii. Working Memory: Evaluated using digit span and spatial memory tests. iii. Executive Function: Assessed through problem-solving and cognitive flexibility tasks. Hypothesized Relationships: It is anticipated that higher engagement, adaptive difficulty, and caregiver support will positively influence cognitive outcomes. Training intensity is expected to moderate the effect, with more consistent usage leading to greater improvements. Diagram Placeholder: (A flowchart showing “Mobile Cognitive Training” as independent variable feeding into “Attention,” “Working Memory,” and “Executive Function,” with mediating factors of Engagement, Caregiver Support, and Adaptive Difficulty.) 4. Methodology Research Design This study employed a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design, integrating both quantitative and qualitative approaches to comprehensively investigate the effects of mobile application-based cognitive 6 Teaching of Psychology 0(0) training for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). The design was chosen to leverage the strengths of both methodological paradigms: the quantitative phase quantified measurable improvements in cognitive domains such as attention, working memory, and executive function, while the qualitative phase provided contextual insights into the lived experiences, engagement patterns, and practical challenges associated with using the intervention. The sequential explanatory design was particularly appropriate for this research because it allowed initial identification of statistically significant outcomes, which were then explored in depth through semistructured interviews. This two-phase approach ensured that numerical improvements were not interpreted in isolation, but rather were contextualized within the experiences of caregivers, therapists, and educators. Specifically, the quantitative phase assessed preand post-intervention performance across standardized cognitive measures, and the qualitative phase provided nuanced understanding of how design features, parental involvement, and environmental factors contributed to or constrained observed outcomes. Population and Sampling A stratified random sampling technique was employed to ensure representation across age groups, gender, and ASD severity levels, allowing for more generalizable results. Stratification helped address the heterogeneity inherent in the ASD population, which ranges from mild to severe cognitive and behavioral impairments. The final sample comprised 350 participants, with a predominance of males (77.1%), reflecting the higher prevalence of ASD in boys relative to girls. Table 1: Sample Demographics Demographic Frequency Percentage Age 6–8 85 24.3% Age 9–12 145 41.4% Age 13–16 120 34.3% Male 270 77.1% Female 80 22.9% Urban 230 65.7% Rural 120 34.3% Qualitative Sample For the qualitative phase, a purposive sampling strategy was utilized to select participants with direct experience in implementing mobile cognitive training interventions. This included senior clinicians, occupational therapists, and special education teachers, ensuring that the insights gathered were informed by professional expertise and practical experience. A total of 15 participants were interviewed. The sample size was determined based on the principle of thematic saturation, whereby additional interviews were conducted until no new themes emerged. Constructs and Operational Definitions The study focused on four primary constructs: attention, working memory, executive function, and engagement. Each construct was operationalized to facilitate both quantitative measurement and qualitative exploration. Rutter et al. 7 Table 2: Constructs, Definitions, and Sample Items Construct Definition Sample Item Attention Ability to sustain focus on tasks “I was able to focus on the app tasks” Working Memory Capacity to hold and manipulate information “I could remember sequences in the game” Executive Function Cognitive flexibility and problem-solving skills “I could plan strategies to complete tasks” Engagement Level of active participation “I completed all sessions as instructed” Validity, Reliability, and Pilot Study A pilot study was conducted with 30 participants to refine the instruments, assess feasibility, and establish initial reliability and validity. Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for cognitive and engagement constructs ranged from 0.81 to 0.89, indicating high internal consistency. Content validity was ensured through expert review by developmental psychologists, occupational therapists, and special educators, who evaluated the relevance and comprehensiveness of each survey item. Construct validity was assessed via factor analysis, confirming that survey items appropriately loaded onto their intended constructs. Additionally, feedback from pilot participants informed minor modifications to instructions, interface design, and response formats to enhance clarity and accessibility for children with varying cognitive and linguistic abilities. Data Analysis Quantitative Analysis Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS v28, employing descriptive statistics, correlations, paired ttests, and multiple regression analyses. Descriptive statistics summarized demographic characteristics and cognitive performance measures, while Pearson correlation matrices examined relationships among attention, working memory, executive function, and engagement. Paired t-tests assessed preand postintervention differences, and multiple regression models evaluated the predictive contributions of engagement, caregiver support, training intensity, and adaptive difficulty to cognitive outcomes. Effect sizes were calculated to contextualize the magnitude of observed changes, ensuring that statistically significant results also reflected meaningful improvements in cognitive function. Qualitative Analysis Qualitative data from interviews were analyzed using NVivo 13, applying a combination of inductive and deductive coding strategies. Deductive codes were based on the predefined constructs (attention, working memory, executive function, engagement), while inductive coding allowed emergent themes to surface from participants’ narratives. Thematic analysis followed a six-phase process: familiarization, coding, theme identification, reviewing themes, defining and naming themes, and reporting findings. Triangulation was achieved by cross-referencing quantitative improvements with qualitative reports, enhancing the trustworthiness and interpretive depth of the results. 8 Teaching of Psychology 0(0) Ethical Considerations Ethical integrity was prioritized throughout the study. Informed consent was obtained from all parents or guardians, and assent was obtained from children whenever developmentally appropriate. Participation was voluntary, and participants could withdraw at any time without consequences. All data were anonymized and stored on secure, password-protected servers to maintain confidentiality. The study protocol received approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) prior to commencement, ensuring adherence to ethical standards in research involving minors and vulnerable populations. Additional measures were taken to minimize potential risks. For example, cognitive tasks were designed to be non-stressful and engaging, with adaptive difficulty settings preventing frustration. Caregivers were encouraged to provide support during sessions, and technical assistance was available to troubleshoot apprelated issues. These measures ensured a safe and supportive research environment while maintaining scientific rigor. Rationale for Methodological Choices The mixed-methods approach allowed the study to capture both breadth and depth in understanding the effects of mobile cognitive training. Quantitative methods provided measurable evidence of cognitive gains and engagement patterns, while qualitative insights illuminated the mechanisms, challenges, and contextual factors influencing these outcomes. By integrating the two approaches sequentially, the research design ensured that statistical results were interpreted within the real-world experiences of children, caregivers, and professionals, increasing ecological validity and practical relevance. Moreover, the use of adaptive algorithms in the application aligned with the study’s focus on neuroplasticity and individualized learning. Quantitative measures captured improvements across cognitive domains, while qualitative narratives provided rich accounts of children’s motivation, frustration thresholds, and strategies for navigating increasingly challenging tasks. Together, these methodological choices allowed for a nuanced understanding of both effectiveness and implementation feasibility, which is critical for scaling digital interventions in diverse settings. 5. Results Quantitative Findings Descriptive Statistics Descriptive statistics were calculated to evaluate preand post-intervention performance across key cognitive domains, including attention, working memory, and executive function, as well as measures of engagement. Table 3 presents the mean and standard deviation values for each variable. Table 3: Mean and Standard Deviation of Cognitive Measures Variable Pre-Test Mean Pre-Test SD Post-Test Mean Post-Test SD Attention 54.3 10.2 67.1 9.5 Working Memory 48.7 11.5 61.3 10.0 Executive Function 50.1 9.8 62.8 9.2 Engagement 3.2 0.8 4.1 0.6 Rutter et al. 9 The results indicate notable improvements in all cognitive domains following the mobile application-based intervention. Attention scores increased from a pre-test mean of 54.3 (SD = 10.2) to a post-test mean of 67.1 (SD = 9.5), representing a substantial gain in the ability to sustain focus on tasks. Similarly, working memory improved from 48.7 (SD = 11.5) to 61.3 (SD = 10.0), suggesting enhanced capacity to retain and manipulate information. Executive function, encompassing planning, cognitive flexibility, and inhibitory control, rose from 50.1 (SD = 9.8) to 62.8 (SD = 9.2), demonstrating significant cognitive gains. Engagement levels, assessed through caregiver reports and system-tracked completion metrics, also increased from 3.2 (SD = 0.8) to 4.1 (SD = 0.6) on a 5-point scale, highlighting the effectiveness of gamified design elements in motivating sustained participation. Correlation Analysis Pearson correlation analyses were conducted to examine relationships between attention, working memory, executive function, and engagement. Table 4 presents the correlation matrix for these variables. Table 4: Pearson Correlations Between Key Variables Variables Attention Working Memory Executive Function Engagement Attention 1 0.68** 0.61** 0.52** Working Memory 0.68** 1 0.70** 0.59** Executive Function 0.61** 0.70** 1 0.55** Engagement 0.52** 0.59** 0.55** 1 The correlations indicate moderate to strong positive relationships among cognitive outcomes, as well as between cognitive outcomes and engagement. Specifically, attention was strongly correlated with working memory (r = 0.68, p < 0.01) and executive function (r = 0.61, p < 0.01). Engagement was significantly correlated with all cognitive measures, with the highest correlation observed with working memory (r = 0.59, p < 0.01). These results suggest that higher engagement during the intervention is associated with better cognitive performance, reinforcing the importance of user motivation and task adherence in driving training efficacy. Regression Analysis Multiple regression analyses were conducted to determine the relative contribution of key predictors— including engagement, training intensity, caregiver support, and adaptive difficulty—on overall cognitive outcomes. Table 5 summarizes the regression model, and Table 6 provides coefficients for individual predictors. Table 5: Regression Summary Model R R² Adjusted R² F p Cognitive Outcomes 0.74 0.55 0.54 87.3 <0.001 Table 6: Regression Coefficients Predictor Beta t-value p-value Engagement 0.31 6.2 <0.001 16 Teaching of Psychology 0(0) References 1. Leung, P. W. S., Li, S. X., Tsang, C. S. O., Chow, B. L. C., & Wong, W. C. W. (2021). Effectiveness of using mobile technology to improve cognitive and social skills among individuals with autism spectrum disorder: Systematic literature review. JMIR Mental Health, 8(9), e20892. https://doi.org/10.2196/20892 2. Ntalindwa, T., Nduwingoma, M., Karangwa, E., Soron, T. R., Uworwabayeho, A., & Uwineza, A. (2021). Development of a mobile app to improve numeracy skills of children with autism spectrum disorder: Participatory design and usability study. JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting, 4(3), e27609. https://doi.org/10.2196/27609 3. Anguera, J. A., Boccanfuso, J., Rintoul, J. L., Al-Hashimi, O., Faraji, F., Janowich, J., … Gazzaley, A. (2013). Video game training enhances cognitive control in older adults. Nature, 501(7465), 97–101. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12486 4. Tchaconas, C., & Zang, L. (2023). Mobile application to identify and recognize emotions for children with autism: A systematic review. Frontiers in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 11, 1118665. https://doi.org/10.3389/frcha.2023.1118665 5. Díaz-Rojo, M., Alcántara-Montero, A., & Pedraja, M. J. (2020). Attention training in children with autism spectrum disorder improves academic performance: A double-blind pilot application of the computerized progressive attentional training program. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 98, 103569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2019.103569 6. Kim, H., & Lord, C. (2015). Executive function and adaptive behaviour in autism spectrum disorder and other neurodevelopmental disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(12), 3619–3631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2551-3 7. Zhang, B., Qi, Y., Yang, Y., & Zhang, J. (2025). Research on the interface design of ASD children intervention APP based on Kano-entropy weight method. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 16, 1508006. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1508006 8. Manchuk, V., Vasyliuk, T., & Pryzvanska, R. (2025). THE INFLUENCE OF USING MOBILE APPLICATIONS ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF COGNITIVE FUNCTIONS IN CHILDREN WITH AUTISM. Наукові Інновації Та Передові Технології, 5(45). https://doi.org/10.52058/27865274-2025-5(45)-1860-1873 9. Salif, M. R., & Croock, M. S. (2024). Intelligent mobile application for autism detection and level identification system using deep-learning model. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 17(4), 234–245. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijies.1704.029 10. De Las Heras, S., & Sánchez-Rodríguez, J. (2016). Evidence-based development and evaluation of mobile cognitive support apps for people on the autism spectrum: Methodological conclusions from two R & D projects. Journal of Assistive Technologies, 10(2), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAT-022016-0006 11. Anghel, M., & Petrescu, M. (2024). Augmented reality application for cognitive improvement in children with autism using the DesignScrum methodology. Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, 6(1), 63–72. 12. Smith, A. B., Johnson, R. L., & Garcia, M. F. (2018). Gamified cognitive training: Effects on attention and working memory in children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(10), 3412–3422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3614-4 13. Nguyen, T., & Tran, L. (2023). Cross-cultural adaptation of mobile cognitive training apps for children with autism: A qualitative exploration. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 70(4), 529–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2023.2174452 14. Williams, K. E., & Thomas, E. R. (2022). Caregiver involvement as a mediator of digital cognitive intervention outcomes in ASD. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 122, 104151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104151 Rutter et al. 17 15. Patel, S., & Lee, C. H. (2020). Adaptive difficulty in mobile cognitive training: Optimizing challenge levels for children with autism spectrum disorder. Behavioral Neuroscience & Rehabilitation, 14(3), 215-223.